+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Carcinome deprimitif inconnu: Le point pour 2020 · AFTER AN ADEQUATE DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION •...

Carcinome deprimitif inconnu: Le point pour 2020 · AFTER AN ADEQUATE DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION •...

Date post: 30-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Carcinomes de primitif inconnu: le point pour 2020 Giulia Baciarello, MD Medical Oncologist Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
Transcript

Carcinomes de primitif inconnu:le point pour 2020

Giulia Baciarello, MDMedical Oncologist

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif

Disclosures

• Advisory boards and symposia:

– Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, Astellas-Pharma, Roche

• Travel accomodations, expenses:

– Amgen, Astellas-Pharma, Astra Zeneca, Ipsen, Janssen Oncology,

Sanofi,

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP):Definition

• Histologically confirmed metastases where no primary site can be confirmed AFTER AN ADEQUATE DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION

• Even after a full diagnostic workup,diagnostic remains unknown in 20-50% of cases

• As carcinomas and adenocarcinomas comprise the majority of cases, CUP is often used to mean carcinoma of unknown primary

07/03/2020 3Fizazi K. Ann Oncol 2015

GEFCAPI 04 Phase III design

CUP R

Control arm: Empiric chemotherapy

Cisplatin 100 mg/m² d1Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m², day 1 and 8, q3w x 6 cycles

Molecular Test

PersonalizedTreatment

=Standard treatment of the suspected primary

PS=0-2No previous systemic RxExcluded: subsets with favourable prognosis

Fizazi K, ESMO 2019

GEFCAPI-04: Patients

TotalControl arm

Gemcitabine/Cisplatin

Treatment of the primary suspected

by molecularanalysis

Intent-to-Treat population 243 120 123

Modified-ITT

(central review available)

223 110 113

Cancers unlikely sensitive to cis-gem and with Biotheranostics moleculartest available

60 23 37

Median age: 62 y (53-68), 60% male/40% female

Fizazi K, ESMO 2019

GEFCAPI-04: Suspected primarycancers(CancerTYPE ID)

Control arm Experimental arm

Fizazi K, ESMO 2019

Primary endpoint: PFS (centralreview)

Arm1: A - Gemcitabin/Cisplatin2: B - Treatment of the primary suspected by molecularanalysis

Logrank p=0.7102

120 51 18 9 8 5 4 3 3

123 51 25 17 9 6 5 4 4

120 51 18 9 8 5 4 3 3

123 51 25 17 9 6 5 4 4

0 10 20 30 40 50

Months

0.4

0.2

0.6

0.8

1.0

PFS

Prob

abili

ty

0.012

2: B - Treatment of the primary suspected by molecularanalysis

Arm 1: A - Gemcitabin/Cisplatin

Logrank p=0.7102

Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimates With Number of Subjects at Risk

Median follow-up:43.4 months [29.4-52.8] control arm47.9 months [28.6-51.8] experimental arm

Central review not available: 20 pts (8.2%)

Control arm Experimentalarm Estimate IC95% Estimate IC95%

Median PFS(months) 5.29 [4.30;6.24] 4.6 [3.68;6.01]12 months PFS(%) 15.25 [9.47;22.32] 20.66 [13.98;28.26]24 months PFS(%) 7.92 [3.86;13.87] 9.02 [4.64;15.18]36 months PFS(%) 5.66 [2.29;11.27] 5.84 [2.41;11.48]

HR: 0.95 (0.72-1.25)

Fizazi K, ESMO 2019

Overall Survival

Arm1: A - Gemcitabin/Cisplatin2: B - Treatment of the primary suspected by molecularanalysis

Logrank p=0.7152

120 75 48 29 20 10 8 6 4 2

123 85 50 26 19 14 10 7 6 2

Surv

ival

Prob

abili

ty

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.012

Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimates With Number of Subjects at Risk

Logrank p=0.7152

HR: 0.92 (0.69-1.23)

120 75 48 29 20 10 8 6 4 2

123 85 50 26 19 14 10 7 6 2

0 10 20 30 40 50

Months

Arm 1: A - Gemcitabin/Cisplatin2: B - Treatment of the primary suspected by molecularanalysis

Control arm Experimental armEstimate IC95% Estimate IC95%

Median OS (mo) 9.99 [7.06;11.96] 10.68 [7.33;11.93]12 months OS (%) 40.68 [31.79;49.36] 41.32 [32.51;49.91]24 months OS (%) 20.4 [13.46;28.36] 18.97 [12.34;26.70]36 months OS (%) 11.2 [5.87;18.45] 11.41 [6.16;18.44]

Fizazi K, ESMO 2019

Overall Survival for patients withpre-analysis selected cancers unlikely to

respond to GC

23 14 7 4 2 1 0

37 23 14 8 7 6 5

0 10 20 30 40

Months

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Surv

iva

l P

rob

ab

ilit

y

12

2: B - Treatment of the primary suspected by molecular analysis1: A - Gemcitabin/Cisplatin

Arm

Logrank p=0.3347

Kaplan-Meier Survival EstimatesWith Number of Subjects at Risk

23 14 7 4 2 1 0

37 23 14 8 7 6 5

0 10 20 30 40

Months

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Surv

iva

l P

rob

ab

ilit

y

12

2: B - Treatment of the primary suspected by molecular analysis1: A - Gemcitabin/Cisplatin

Arm

Logrank p=0.3347

Kaplan-Meier Survival EstimatesWith Number of Subjects at Risk

Control arm Experimental armEstima

te IC95%Estima

te IC95%Median OS(mo)

10.87 [3.45;11.73]

9.1 [5.65;14.62]

12 months OS (%)

30.43 [13.54;49.28]

38.89 [23.29;54.22]

24 months OS (%)

10.43 [1.88;27.65]

24.31 [11.72;39.33]

HR:0.74 (0.36-1.51)

Outcomes for selected suspected cancers

Kidney cancer MelanomaColo-rectal cancer

ExperimentalControl

Fizazi K, ESMO 2019

• These tests can find similarities but NOT differences between cancers of similar origin

• We still do not have real effective drugs for some types of cancers

• Tailored treatment may be associated with better outcomes in suspected cancers poorly sensitive to standard chemotherapy

Comprehensive genomic profiling of carcinoma of unknown primary site

07/03/2020 12Ross et al., Jama Oncol, 2015

Enroll in clinical trials!

[email protected]


Recommended