Case Study Jakarta IndonesiaUsing InaSAFE for Decision Making During Emergency and Beyond
Iwan Gunawan, Ph.D.Sr. Disaster Risk Management Specialist
The World Bank
Symposium on Strengthening Disaster Management Information System, 14 March 2015
Collaborators
Outline
• Elements of DRM Information System
• Disaster Context - Jakarta
• Operationalizing InaSAFE
• Linking back to policy
Elements of DM Information System
• Concrete problem to solve use case
• Operational setup
• Community of Practice
Geographical Context: Jakarta
Jakarta bay
Volcanoes, 2000-3000 meter
Bogor
Bekasi TanggerangJakarta
Depok
5 m/year
2 m/year
30 km
Disaster Context: Jakarta manage flood risks from 3 directions
Seawall collapse-Nov 2007Midstream flooding-Feb 2007
Upstream flooding-Feb 2007
Operationalizing InaSAFEDevelopment and “Maintenance”
Develop Simple Tool
Continued Improvement
Build a crowd of talent
Used by Locals for Contingency Planning
Launched at 4th AMCDRR 2012
Operationalizing InaSAFEPopulating Data & Producing “Answer”
Mapping of neighborhood boundaries by officials
“Explosion” of data during participatory exercise
Data used for operational purpose until today
Operationalizing InaSAFETaking the Innovation to the Next Level
Jakarta Smart Disaster Software Competition (Hackaton) - 2014
Mapping of Neighborhood Block (RT) and Inundation areas
Wireless Sensor Network for flood detection(Under testing by BPPT)
AutomatedFlood Damage &Loss Calculation(Under Development)
Linking Back Policythrough dialogue among officials and stakeholders
Jun 2012
Head of Mapping Agency (BIG)Deputy Chief of NDMO (BNPB)
Officials of Jakarta Provincial DMO (BPBD)
• Participatory One Map• Flood Impact estimation for
planning
Takeaway message
• Use of Open source tool and Crowd sourcing of geospatial information for DRM is a concrete example that investing in resilience is everybody’s business
Consideration for WCDRR Outcome
• Countries should invest in open data for resilience as the basis for building risk awareness and mitigation
