Date post: | 28-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | masterubaid |
View: | 118 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Cellular Design
Concept & Fundamentals
Design Objectives Large Coverage Area
Tall antenna/ high power High Capacity
Frequency reuse
Old Systems: A single antenna had a capacity of only 12 users in an area of 1000 sq. mi.!
Design Goals: High capacity/large coverage area at optimal radio spectrum efficiency
Cellular Solution In the 1970s, Bell Labs developed a
solution (AMPS): Instead of using one large powerful transmitter, lets use many small less powerful transmitters
Advantages: Very high capacity Limited spectrum usage Mobile sets can be manufactured with same
sets of frequencies
The Cellular Concept Divide coverage area into smaller
regions(cells of radius 2-50km) with one base station at the center
Divide spectrum into groups of non-contiguous RF channels
Allocate one frequency group to each BS; nearby cells use a different group
If demand increases, increase no. of cells
Some Design Parameters Cell size Cell location RF channel allocation
Why Hexagonal Cells? Radio coverage of a BS is modeled
as a hexagon because: It permits easy analysis It resembles a circle (no overlaps &
gaps) It requires the fewest cells to cover an
area (compared to other shapes) It approximates a circular radiation
pattern for an omni-directional antenna
Frequency Reuse or Planning Def’n: The process of allocating channel
groups to each BS in the system
Given a set of S duplex channels, divide them into N cells with k channels/cell, I.e.
S=kN These N cells form a cluster (of size N)
Typical cluster size is N=4,7, or 12
Frequency Reuse Illustration
AC
D
BG
FE
AC
D
BG
FE
AC
D
BG
FE
Cluster Size Tradeoff If a cluster is replicated M times,
capacity is:C=MkN=MS
If the cluster size (N) is reduced (while cell size remains constant), more clusters will be required; hence, capacity will increase; but interference will also increase
We want to minimize N such that a certain SIR ratio can be maintained
Frequency Reuse Factor The Frequency Reuse factor of a
cellular system is defined as:
1/Nbecause each cell uses only 1/N th of the available channels
Channel Assignment Fixed Assignment
Predetermined fixed set of channels are assigned to each cell
If all channels are busy, calls are blocked
Borrowing Strategy Borrows a channel
from neighboring cells
MSC supervises the process
Dynamic Assignment MSC assigns a
channel to the BS as per some algorithm
Advantages: Increases capacity Increases channel
utilization Disadvantages:
Increased computational load
Handoff Def’n: The transfer of a call from one BS
to another while a MU moves in the area
It involves: Identification of a new BS New voice and control channel assignment
It must be performed: successfully, infrequently and
imperceptibly to the user
Handoff Threshold Def’n: Optimal signal level at which to initiate
a handoff Handoff Threshold (Pht)is usually set at a value
slightly higher than the minimum usable power level(Pmin) received at the BS
The margin, = Pht –Pmin, is a system parameter, which has to be set carefully
If is too high, unnecessary handoffs occur If is too low, the call will be lost because
there will be insufficient time to complete handoff
Handoff deception Fading can result in the signal level
dropping below Pht
Running average signal level (over a time period) must be used to counter this deception
Speed of MU alters running average Speed can be computed at BS from
signal statistics
Dwell Time Def’n: The time over which a call may
be maintained within a cell without handoff
Dwell time is determined by: Propagation Interference Distance Time-varying effects (speed?)
Dwell time statistics are needed to design handoff algorithms
1G Handoff Strategy RSSI( Received Signal Strength Indicator)
of all MUs is measured by the BS A locator receiver (in each BS) is used to
measure RSSI of MUs in neighboring cells Based on this information, the MSC
decides if handoff is necessary or not Typical Handoff time is about 10 sec,
requiring to be about 6-12 dB
2G Handoff Strategy MAHO (Mobile Assisted Handoff) used Each MU measures the received power
from surrounding BS and continually reports the results to BS
Handoff is initiated when Power received from neighboring BS is higher for a certain period of time
MAHO is much faster (about 1-2 sec); suited for micro-cellular environments
Soft Handoff Def’n: The ability to select
between RSSI from various BS In IS-95, CDMA spread spectrum
systems, MU’s share the same channel in each cell. Hence, handoff does not require new channel assignment
MSC decides which version of the signal to send to the PSTN
Prioritizing Handoffs Many Handoff techniques prioritize
Handoff over call initiation by using: Guard Channels
Some channels are reserved for handoff. Capacity decreases With dynamic channel assignment,
spectrum utilization efficiency increases Queuing
Handoff requests are put in a queue
Practical Handoff Issues MU Speed
Vehicles need more handoffs than pedestrians Umbrella cells solve this problem
New Cell sites Zoning laws & barriers restricts new cell’s to be
formed Cell Dragging
MU travels to next cell yet its RSSI is still good Handoff Thresholds must to be adjusted
carefully
Interference Major limiting factor Sources are:
Another mobile in the same cell A call in progress in a neighboring cell Other BS operating in the same freq. band other systems which inadvertently leak
energy into the cellular frequency band Voice channel cross talk Control channel missed/blocked calls
Co-Channel Interference Interference from cells using the same
frequency group in a cluster Cannot simply increase SNR to combat
it Co-channel cells have to be physically
separated to provide isolation It is a function of cell radius (R) and
distance to the center of the nearest cell (D)
Co-Channel Reuse Ratio The Co-channel Reuse Ratio, Q, is
defined as:
Increasing Q increases the spatial separation between co-channel cells; however, it also increase N thereby decreasing capacity
Tradeoff must be made between Q and N
NR
DQ 3
Signal-to-Interference Ratio If the transmit power of each BS is equal,
then the Signal-to-Interference Ratio (SIR) is:
where S is the desired signal power, Ii , is the interference power caused by the ith co-channel, i0 is the number of co-channel interfering cells and n is the propagation exponent
00
11
/
1i
i
ni
i
i
i RDI
SSIR
SIR Approximation If we consider only the first layer of
interfering cells, then the SIR will be:
Note that SIR N! For AMPS, Given SIR=18dB, then N=7
00
3/
i
N
i
RDSIR
nn
Adjacent Channel Interference Interference from signals adjacent in
frequency It is caused by:
Imperfect receiver filters Near-far effect
High & low power transmitted in contiguous channels
It can be minimized by careful filtering, use of guard bands and channel assignment
Power Control Power level transmitted by MU’s are
constantly controlled by BS’s PC ensures that each MU transmits at
the smallest power level necessary This process reduces SIR, increases
capacity and increases battery life It is especially important in CDMA where
all users in the cell share one channel
AMPS Channel Allocation 832(666+166) channels allocated by
FCC The forward channel (870.030MHz) and
reverse channel (825.030MHz) is numbered Channel 1
FCC licensed out the channels to two competitors and divided the channels into Block A & Block B
Out of the 416 channels, 395 are voice channels and 21 are control
AMPS (example 2.3) The 395 channels are divided into 21
groups of about 19 channels each For N=7, each cell uses 3 groups or
about 57 channels (channels are at least 7 channels away from each other)
For example, one group will contain channels 1,8,15,22,29,…309,670,1017 (see table 2.2)
Trunking Theory It allows a large number of users to
share the limited number of channels in a cell according to statistics
How many channels do I need to accommodate x numbers of users?
Tradeoff b/w number of channels, C, and Outage percentage
Grade of Service GOS is a measure of congestion in
system, I.e. it is the ability of a user to access a trunked system during its busiest hour
It is a benchmark Design Issue: Given a GOS, estimate a
maximum capacity level for a set of channels in the wireless network
In AMPS, GOS is 2% blocking
Traffic Intensity It is a measure of channel utilization
time, or the average channel occupancy One Erlang represents the amount of
Traffic Intensity carried by a channel that is completely occupied
The Traffic Intensity per user is:Au=µH
where µ is the average number of call requests per unit time and H is the average call duration
Total Offered Traffic Intensity If the system has U users, then the
total offered traffic Intensity is:A=UAu
If the total Traffic is distributed evenly amongst C Channels, then the total Traffic Intensity per channel is:
A=Uau/C
Blocked Calls Cleared This trunked system offers no queuing for
call requests User is given access to a channel on
demand and blocked if no channel is available
Assumptions are: Poisson call arrivals/exponential channel
occupation Infinite number of users/finite number of
channels
Erlang B Formula Blocked Calls Cleared truncked system
aka M/M/m queue and leads to the Erlang B formula
It determines blocking probability and is a measure of the GOS
It provides a conservative estimate of GOS because in actual life there are finite number of users
See Fig. 2.6 page 49 of text
Capacity At any given time, capacity of a
system is limited to the number of channels, C.
Using Trunking/Queuing theory, Capacity can be increased
Capacity increases with C and with GOS (outage percentage)
Blocked Calls Delayed This trunked system provides a
queue to hold calls which are blocked
Call requests are delayed until a channel is available
GOS is the Probability that a call is blocked after waiting t sec in a queue
Erlang C Formula It is the probability that a call is
initially denied access? I.e. Pr[delay>0].
It is a function of the Traffic Intensity, A, and the number of channels, C.
See Fig. 2.7 on page 50.
GOS of BCD Trunked system GOS is given by:
Pr[delay >t]=Pr[delay>0]Pr[delay >t |delay >0]
=Pr[delay>0]exp(-(C-A)t/H) The average delay, D, for all calls is:
D=Pr[delay>0]H/(C-A) The average delay for those calls that
are queued is:Dq=H/(C-A)
Trunking Efficiency It is a measure of the number of users
which can be offered a particular GOS using fixed number of channels
10 channel trunked system has higher Trunking efficiency than two 5 channel trunked systems because it can support 60% more traffic [See table 2.4 on pg. 47]
Be careful when you allocate channels!
Capacity Improvements Increase in Demand warrants
Capacity enhancements Three practical techniques are:
Cell splitting Sectoring Coverage zone
Cell Splitting It is the process of subdividing a
congested cell into smaller cells Capacity increased because freq. re-use
increased. I.e. no. of channels increased Channel allocation scheme remains intact Antenna Power and height are
subsequently reduced If microcells have half the radius, and with
n=4, trasmit power must be reduced by 1/16 or 12 dB for the same SIR
Cell Splitting 2 In practice, not all cells are split at
the same time. I.e. different cell sizes exist simultaneously
In such cases, channels in the old cell must be broken into two channel groups
Antenna downtilting is used to limit the coverage of microcells
Sectoring Replace single omni-directional
antenna with several directional antenna, thereby sectoring the cell
Reduces the co-channel interference
Normally, three 120o sectors or six 60o sectors are formed
Channels are also broken into sectored groups
Sectoring 2 For a 7-cell reuse, interference is reduced
from 6 to 2, resulting in a SIR of 24dB (up from 17 dB)
Antenna downtilting improves SIR further Sectoring reduces interference by a factor
of 12/7 or 1.7; this allows us to decrease N Drawback is increased no. of Antennas
and a decrease in trunking efficiency Handoff’s increase from one sector to
another
Microcell Zone Divide the cell into zones and connect
them to the same BS and MSC Antennas are placed at outer edges of
the cell and channels are assigned to the BS
Handoff not required between zones; BS merely switches the channel to a different zone
Each channel is active in only one zone; hence interference is reduced
Microcell Zone 2 Especially useful along highways Co-channel interference is reduced Capacity is increased yet trunking
efficiency is not degraded Capacity is increased by a factor of
7/3 or 2.33 over a conventional 7-cell omni system
ComparisonCell Splitting
Sectoring Microcell Zone
No. of BS Increase Same Same
Co-Channel Interference
Same Decrease Decrease
Trunking Efficiency
Same Decrease Same
Handoffs Same Increase Same