Date post: | 30-Oct-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ajay-malik |
View: | 21 times |
Download: | 10 times |
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 14
The Judiciary
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 403
1. The intense struggle over the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the
Supreme Court could have occurred only in the United States
because only here
a. do judges play so large a role in making public policy.
b. is there a judicial nomination process.
c. is there such intense division between political parties.
d. can one party control the executive and the other the legislative
branch.
e. the nomination power is a shared power.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 404
2. Which of the following statements about British courts is true?
a. Judicial review is tightly regulated but fiercely protected.
b. Courts are frequently called on by Parliament to settle
procedural issues.
c. No court may strike down a law that Parliament passes.
d. The British federalist system guarantees a minor role for the
judiciary.
e. Common law ensures judges will be active participants in the
policy making process.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 404
3. The chief judicial weapon in the government's system of checks and
balances is known as
a. judicial activism.
b. judicial interpretivism.
c. judicial review.
d. judicial standing.
e. judicial bypass.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 404
4. The Supreme Court's chief weapon in the system of checks and
balances is the
a. advisory opinion it exercises.
b. place it occupies in public opinion.
c. judicial review it exercises.
d. original jurisdiction it enjoys.
e. power to hand down per curiam opinions.
464 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 404
5. Strict-constructionist judges differ from activist judges in that they
are more likely to
a. support policies that address social and economic problems.
b. apply rules that are clearly stated in the U.S. Constitution.
c. believe in the application of judicial review to criminal matters.
d. look for and apply the general principles underlying the U.S.
Constitution.
e. entangle themselves in matters traditionally left to Congress
and the Executive.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 404
6. A judicial activist is a judge who holds
a. that courts should make as well as interpret law.
b. a liberal ideology.
c. that courts should make but not interpret law.
d. a conservative ideology.
e. that courts merely apply the law and enforce norms.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 404
7. Which of the following is most likely to be true of an activist judge?
a. He or she is conservative politically.
b. He or she is bound by the wording of the U.S. Constitution.
c. He or she is liberal politically.
d. He or she is an interpretivist.
e. He or she is feels contrained by precedent.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 405
8. The Founders expected that judicial review would be relatively
passive because
a. judges would merely find and apply the existing law.
b. judges would be constrained by the legislature.
c. cases would involve only direct disputes between individuals.
d. judges would be empowered to award money damages only.
e. judges would generally be unanimous in their decision making.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 405
9. Marbury v. Madison had both legal and political significance. Which
of the following rulings was of political significance?
a. Congress may not add to the original jurisdiction of the
Supreme Court.
b. The Supreme Court may declare void any laws repugnant to
the U.S. Constitution.
c. Persons seeking writs of mandamus must go to a lower court.
d. The Supreme Court will try to avoid direct confrontations with
other branches of government.
e. Congress can expand or contract the appellate jurisdiction of
the Court.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 465
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 405
10. Between 1789 and the Civil War, the Supreme Court was primarily
occupied with the issues of
a. states' rights and slavery.
b. trade relations and states' rights.
c. national supremacy and trade relations.
d. slavery and national supremacy.
e. commerce and civil liberties.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 405
11. Rulings by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison and
McCulloch v. Maryland established all of the following principles
except
a. the Supreme Court could rule an act of Congress
unconstitutional.
b. the federal government has the power to regulate commerce
among the states.
c. the federal government is permitted to pass any laws necessary
and proper to the attainment of constitutional ends.
d. federal law is supreme over state law.
e. Congress cannot expand the original jurisdiction of the Court.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 405
12. In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held that
a. states could tax a federal bank.
b. state militia were subservient to the federal armed services.
c. the federal government could pass any laws necessary and
proper to the attainment of constitutional ends.
d. the federal government had the power to regulate commerce
that occurred among states.
e. the judicial branch has the power to determine the legitimate
governing power in the states.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 405
13. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton described the judiciary as
a. "the sword of the community"
b. "least dangerous" to political rights
c. "command[ing] the purse"
d. "encouraging factions"
e. “beyond reproach.”
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 405
14. What is the major issue confronting the Supreme Court in America
today?
a. the relationship between government and the economy
b. nationbuilding
c. personal liberty, social equality, and the potential conflict
between the two
d. establishing the supremacy of federal government
e. the constitutionality of the federal income tax
466 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 406
15. The principle that the Supreme Court used in overturning Fulton's
monopoly on a New York steamboat operation was that
a. a monopoly is a restraint on trade.
b. patents cannot be issued on recent technology.
c. state law cannot prevail over federal law.
d. interstate commerce cannot be regulated.
e. the indirect effects of commerce are beyond the scope of
government regulation.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 406
16. The reaction of early presidents to Supreme Court rulings such as
Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland can best be
described as
a. highly negative.
b. relatively mild but negative.
c. relatively mild but positive.
d. highly positive.
e. accepting, and later supportive.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 407
17. The Dred Scott case involved
a. the right of the national government to charter a bank.
b. the doctrine of separate but equal.
c. admission of new states to the union.
d. a slave owner’s property rights to an escaped slave.
e. the suspension of habeas corpus.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 408
18. From the Civil War to the 1930s, the Supreme Court was primarily
occupied with
a. the civil rights of former slaves.
b. economic regulation by government.
c. the rights of the criminally accused.
d. the balance of powers between states and the federal
government.
e. First Amendment freedoms.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 408
19. During the period from the end of the Civil War to the beginning of
the New Deal, the dominant issue that the Supreme Court faced was
a. government regulation of the economy.
b. states' rights versus federal supremacy.
c. slavery.
d. government regulation of interstate commerce.
e. freedom of press.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 467
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 409
20. Until the 1930s, the Supreme Court interpreted the Fourteenth and
Fifteenth Amendments to
a. view civil rights very narrowly.
b. view civil rights very broadly.
c. expand the notion of interstate commerce.
d. contract the notion of interstate commerce.
e. distinguish precedents in a manner that favored minorities.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 409
21. In the period following the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment
was consistently interpreted by the Supreme Court to protect
a. interstate commerce.
b. state regulations.
c. states' rights.
d. the government's right to tax.
e. A and D.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 408
22. A crucial decision involving the protection of private property
interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment's reference to "person" to
mean
a. whites only.
b. adults.
c. labor unions.
d. business firms.
e. males.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 409
23. Between 1887 and 1910, the Supreme Court upheld state regulation
of business opportunity approximately ________ of the time?
a. 10 percent
b. 30 percent
c. 50 percent
d. 60 percent
e. 80 percent
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 409
24. The period in Supreme Court history from 1936 to the present has
been marked by a concern for
a. the regulation of commerce.
b. states' rights.
c. personal liberties.
d. private property.
e. corporate fraud.
468 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 409
25. After 1936, the Supreme Court stopped imposing regulations on the
power of the government to regulate the economy. In its previous
rulings in this area, the Court found itself
a. favoring the cause of labor against business.
b. making judgments it was not competent to make.
c. allowing state legislatures too much control over the national
economy.
d. limiting the protection of private property to enable business to
expand.
e. considerably divided but just about always supportive of
federal interests.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 409
26. The Supreme Court tradition of deferring to the legislature on matters
of economic regulation was established during the period from
a. the very founding.
b. 1789 to 1861.
c. 1861 to 1892.
d. 1892 to 1936.
e. 1936 to the present.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 410
27. Court-packing refers to the practice of
a. taking away the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction.
b. appointing only justices who agree with the president's political
philosophy.
c. appointing only justices who agree with Congress's political
philosophy.
d. appointing only justices who can be categorized as strict
constructionists.
e. ignoring decisions in which a majority of justices cannot agree
on a single opinion.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 410
28. Franklin Roosevelt's court-packing plan would have allowed him to
name a new justice
a. for every sitting justice older than age seventy.
b. once a year, irrespective of retirements.
c. every time the court struck down one of his laws.
d. to replace any sitting justice older than age seventy.
e. each time a justice removed himself/herself from a case.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 410
29. The Supreme Court's acceptance of New Deal principles probably
avoided
a. a conflict between the president and Congress.
b. the election of a Republican president in 1936.
c. an assault on the Supreme Court by the other branches.
d. the early demise of the New Deal.
e. the creation of an even higher appellate court.
Type: Factual
Ans: B 30. There are 94 ___________ in the federal judiciary.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 469
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Page: 411
a. constitutional courts
b. district courts
c. courts of appeal
d. legislative courts
e. supreme courts
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 411
31. There are 12 ___________ in the federal judiciary.
a. constitutional courts
b. district courts
c. courts of appeal
d. legislative courts
e. supreme courts
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 411
32. ___________ are established in the federal judiciary for some
special purpose and are staffed by people who have fixed terms of
office and can have their salaries reduced.
a. Constitutional courts
b. District courts
c. Courts of appeal
d. Legislative courts
e. Supreme courts
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 411
33. The Court of Military Appeals is an example of a
a. constitutional court.
b. district court.
c. court of appeal.
d. legislative court.
e. supreme court.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 411
34. Which courts are mandated by the U.S. Constitution?
a. the Supreme Court only
b. the Supreme and appellate courts
c. the Supreme, appellate, and district courts
d. both constitutional and legislative courts
e. legislative courts
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 411
35. What does the U.S. Constitution have to say about the size of the
Supreme Court?
a. It specifically sets the number of justices at six, later amended
to nine.
b. It specifically sets the number of justices at nine.
c. It suggests but does not mandate a Court of nine justices.
d. It does not indicate how large the Court should be.
e. It specifically places the matter in the hands of the House of
Representatives.
470 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 411
36. Which of the following courts exercises the judicial powers found in
Article III of the Constitution?
a. legislative courts
b. courts of appeals
c. district courts
d. constitutional courts
e. intermediate appellate courts
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 411
37. One basic difference between a constitutional court and a legislative
court is that
a. constitutional court judges handle cases that need not be
decided by the Supreme Court.
b. constitutional court judges cannot be fired.
c. legislative court judges handle cases that need not be decided
by the Supreme Court.
d. legislative court judges cannot be fired.
e. legislative court judges are not confirmed by the Senate.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 411
38. In the matter of federal judicial appointments, presidents invariably
nominate individuals who
a. have previous judicial experience.
b. have state judicial experience.
c. have experience in corporate law.
d. are from a large state.
e. are members of their own party.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 411
39. Democratic judges appear to reach more liberal decisions than
Republican ones on cases involving
a. discrimination and criminal prosecution.
b. freedom of the press and discrimination.
c. business regulations and freedom of the press.
d. criminal prosecution and business regulation.
e. “speech plus” cases and war powers.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 412
40. Why do the records of their Supreme Court appointees occasionally
disappoint presidents?
a. Some justices are not as qualified as they seem.
b. Judicial behavior can be difficult to predict.
c. Most presidents get only a few chances to make Supreme
Court appointments.
d. Presidents often have unrealistic expectations.
e. Presidents rarely seek anything like real “advice” from the
Senate.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 471
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 412
41. The behavior of Justices Holmes, Burger, and Blackman suggests
that
a. presidents can sometimes be mistaken in their prediction about
the actions of their judicial appointees.
b. the Supreme Court follows the election returns.
c. the president clearly controls the Supreme Court through his
appointments.
d. dissenters on the Supreme Court have more influence than the
majority.
e. Presidents are rarely concerned about “court-packing” today.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 412
42. Senatorial courtesy is an especially important consideration in
nominations to
a. legislative courts.
b. courts of appeals.
c. district courts.
d. constitutional courts.
e. intermediate appellate courts.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 412
43. Which of the following statements about the selection of federal
judges is correct?
a. The principle of senatorial courtesy applies to the selection of
judges in the legislative courts.
b. Presidents generally appoint judges whose political views
reflect their own.
c. Nominees for district court judge often face tough confirmation
battles in the Senate.
d. The application of political litmus tests to Supreme Court
nominees was established with the nomination of David
Souter.
e. Supreme Court nominations have only recently become
controversial.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 412
44. It has been suggested that senators actually appoint district judges,
and presidents confirm them, through the practice of
a. senatorial courtesy.
b. advice and consent.
c. legislative vetoes.
d. requiring a two-thirds majority for confirmation.
e. requiring a three-fourths majority for confirmation.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 412
45. Senator Pettifogger has refused to return his blue slip. In so doing, he
is
a. approving the president's nominee for the Supreme Court.
b. approving the president's choice for chief justice.
c. rejecting the president's nominee for the Supreme Court.
d. rejecting the president's nominee for a district judgeship.
e. suggesting an associate justice for the position of chief justice.
Type: Factual 46. The text suggests that the notion that the party membership of federal
472 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: D
Page: 411
judges makes a difference in how they vote is supported by
a. numerous interviews with federal judges.
b. the impressions of disappointed presidents.
c. statements made by the American Bar Association.
d. a review of over 80 studies on the topic.
e. law school text books.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 413
(Figure 14.1)
47. The president who appointed the largest percentage of minorities to
the federal courts was
a. Richard Nixon.
b. Jimmy Carter.
c. Ronald Reagan.
d. George Bush.
e. Dwight Eisenhower.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 413
(Figure 14.1)
48. The president who appointed the largest percentage of Hispanics to
the appeals courts was
a. Gerald Ford.
b. Jimmy Carter.
c. Ronald Reagan.
d. George Bush.
e. Dwight Eisenhower.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 413
(Figure 14.1)
49. The president second to Jimmy Carter in appointing the largest
percentage of women to the federal courts was
a. Richard Nixon.
b. Gerald Ford.
c. Ronald Reagan.
d. George Bush.
e. Dwight Eisenhower.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 413
50. Typically, those who complain about the litmus testing of judicial
candidates are
a. in power.
b. out of power.
c. liberal.
d. conservative.
e. centrists.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 473
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 413
51. Senate conservatives, for example, might make their approval of a
Supreme Court nominee contingent on that individual's personal
views about the death penalty. Such concern for a nominee's ideology
is known as
a. judicial standing.
b. a political litmus test.
c. senatorial courtesy.
d. an amicus curiae standard.
e. an exculpatory remand standard.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 413
52. The text suggests that the litmus test
a. is a great American tradition.
b. is increasingly irrelevant.
c. has grown in importance.
d. has rarely been a factor in Supreme Court nominations.
e. is less important when government is divided.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 414
53. The litmus test is perhaps of greatest importance in nominations to
a. constitutional courts.
b. district courts.
c. courts of appeal.
d. legislative courts.
e. the Supreme Court.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 414
54. In this century, the number of Supreme Court nominees rejected by
the Senate in this century is
a. zero.
b. fewer than ten.
c. between ten and twenty.
d. more than twenty.
e. more than thirty.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 414
55. The dual-court system of the United States refers to
a. trial and appellate courts.
b. criminal and civil courts.
c. statutory and common law courts.
d. federal and state courts.
e. legislative and constitutional courts.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 414
56. A diversity case is one involving
a. the jurisdiction of more than one appellate court.
b. the jurisdiction of more than one district court.
c. citizens of different states.
d. a writ of certiorari.
e. a writ of mandamus.
474 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 414
57. Citizen X is suing his neighbor Y for ramming his $7,000 car. This
case could be heard in
a. a federal court.
b. either a federal or state court.
c. a state court.
d. an appellate court.
e. an intermediate appellate court.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 416
58. California is suing Arizona over the use of the Colorado River. The
case will be heard by
a. a federal court.
b. the Supreme Court of California.
c. the Supreme Court of Arizona.
d. the U.S. Supreme Court.
e. the Court of International Trade.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 416
59. The majority of cases heard by federal courts begin in
a. district courts.
b. state courts.
c. municipal courts.
d. appellate courts.
e. circuit courts.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 416
60. What is the relationship between an appeal and a certiorari?
a. Judges must hear all appeals but only some certiorari.
b. A case granted certiorari may be heard in either state or federal
court.
c. Appeals are paid for by plaintiffs, certiorari by defendants.
d. Only some appeals are granted certiorari.
e. Appeals are directed to appellate courts whereas a writ of
certiorari is sought from a trial court.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 416
61. The highest state court in Iowa has ruled that the federal Endangered
Species Act is illegal because it runs counter to the state constitution.
The case could be brought to the U.S. Supreme Court by means of
a. certiorari.
b. a diversity ruling.
c. original jurisdiction.
d. writ of habeas corpus.
e. none of these; it could not be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 416
62. A case on appeal reaches the Supreme Court via a writ of
a. certiorari.
b. appeal.
c. mandamus.
d. injunction.
e. habeas corpus.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 475
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 416
63. A writ of certiorari is issued by
a. the Supreme Court.
b. a lower court, usually a district court.
c. the defendant in a federal case.
d. the plaintiff in a federal case.
e. the Attorney General.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 416
64. Certiorari is a Latin word meaning, roughly
a. “beyond all uncertainties.”
b. “certified.”
c. “to be heard.”
d. “rule of four.”
e. “made more certain.”
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 417
65. If it wanted to make its caseload significantly more manageable, the
Supreme Court could probably do so most easily by
a. requiring fewer votes for certiorari.
b. requiring more votes for certiorari.
c. eliminating its appeals docket.
d. broadening its appeals docket.
e. eliminating its original jurisdiction.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 416
66. Which of the following significantly increases the odds that the
Supreme Court will review a case?
a. two or more federal courts of appeals have decided the same
issue in different ways.
b. the highest court in a state has held a federal law in violation of
the Constitution.
c. the highest court in a state has held a state law in violation of
the Constitution.
d. the highest court in a state has upheld a state law against a
claim that it is violation of the Constitution.
e. All of these.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 416
67. In a typical year, the Supreme Court may consider over ______
petitions asking it to review decisions of lower or state courts.
a. 1,000
b. 2,000
c. 5,000
d. 7,000
e. 30,000
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 417
68. In a typical year, the Supreme Court rarely gives full review to more
than about ________ of the petitions which request review of the
decisions of lower or state courts.
a. 10
b. 100
c. 1,000
d. 3,000
476 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
e. 10,000
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 417
69. One unintended consequence of the Supreme Court’s heavy caseload
is an increase in the influence wielded by
a. the Chief Justice.
b. Associate Justices.
c. the Attorney General.
d. the Deputy Attorney General.
e. law clerks.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 417
70. Which of the following observations about the Supreme Court’s law
clerks is incorrect?
a. They play a big role in deciding which cases are granted cert.
b. They usually come to the job with several years of experience
as practicing lawyers.
c. They are hired by the Justices.
d. Some of the opinions written by the Justices are drafted by the
clerks.
e. None of these.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 417
71. Which of the following observations about the Supreme Court’s law
clerks is incorrect?
a. They play a big role in deciding which cases are granted cert.
b. They are recent law school graduates.
c. They are confirmed by the Senate.
d. Some of the opinions written by the Justices are drafted by the
clerks.
e. None of these.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 417
72. Clarence Gideon managed to have his case heard before the Supreme
Court by
a. filing a mandatory appeal.
b. claiming diversity of citizenship.
c. seeking expert legal assistance.
d. filing as a pauper.
e. appealing to the Court in a personal letter.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 417
73. An organization that has been influential in getting First Amendment
cases appealed to the Supreme Court is the
a. NRA.
b. National Taxpayers' Union.
c. AFL-CIO.
d. ACLU.
e. NWO.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 477
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 418
74. Indigent A, Middle-Class B, and Rich C are contemplating taking a
case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Which one is most likely to be
discouraged by the costs involved?
a. Indigent A
b. Middle-Class B
c. Rich C
d. A and B.
e. All three would be affected equally.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 418
75. Two common ways for a plaintiff to lower the costs of an appeal are
by filing and being heard as a pauper (in forma pauperis) and by
a. finding an interest group to support the case.
b. filing a writ of certiorari.
c. asking the courts to rule in absentia.
d. suing under the principle of sovereign immunity.
e. applying for a writ of mandamus.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 418
76. Two common ways for a plaintiff to lower the costs of an appeal are
by filing and being heard as a pauper (in forma pauperis) and by
a. filing a Section 1983 suit.
b. asking the courts to rule in absentia.
c. filing a writ of certiorari.
d. suing under the principle of sovereign immunity.
e. filing for a writ of mandamus.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 418
77. Fee shifting is not practiced in European courts because
a. it is formally prohibited by law.
b. it is customarily seen as unethical.
c. it would be impractical to administer.
d. parties there need not pay their own way.
e. statutory law is much more complex than common law.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 418
78. Fee shifting refers to the practice of
a. dividing attorneys' fees among all participants in a class-action
suit.
b. reducing fees if the votes of appellate court judges are divided.
c. getting the government to pay the fees of all parties.
d. having attorneys adjust their fees according to their experience
and the damages awarded.
e. getting the loser to pay court costs.
478 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 418
79. When a citizen sues and wins a suit against a government official for
withholding a benefit to which a citizen is entitled, such a suit is
called a
a. First Amendment suit.
b. civil rights suit.
c. common law suit.
d. Section 1983 suit.
e. civil liberties suit.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 418
80. Taxpayer X believes that the federal Endangered Species Act is
unconstitutional. What will he have to show before his case can be
heard on its merits?
a. that he has exhausted all other means to settle his grievance
b. that more than $10,000 is involved
c. that he has suffered personal harm as a result of enforcement of
the act
d. that Congress will not change the law
e. that the legislative branch is incapable of addressing the issue
in a competent manner.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 418
81. The rules regarding standing to bring a case to federal court involve
all of the following except
a. the existence of a controversy between adversaries.
b. the probability of reaching a satisfactory solution.
c. evidence that actual harm has occurred.
d. a stake in the outcome beyond that of being a taxpayer.
e. A and C.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 418
82. Under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, a citizen cannot
a. sue the government without its consent.
b. bring two suits against one individual for the same crime.
c. bring the same suit to courts in two different states.
d. appeal a case that has already been ruled on by the Supreme
Court.
e. appeal a case that was decided more than one year earlier.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 418
83. The president's helicopter lands in your rose garden and causes
thousands of dollars' worth of damage to your prize roses. Can you
sue the government for damages?
a. Yes, without qualification.
b. Yes, but only if the government gives its consent under the
sovereign immunity doctrine.
c. No, because the government can be sued only when personal
injury is involved.
d. No, because the sovereign immunity doctrine protects the
government from lawsuits.
e. No, unless a neutral magistrate determines the act was
intentional.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 479
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 419
84. Having taxpayer status does not entitle one to sue the government for
actions of which one disapproves. Effort to ease this rule would be
most likely to be opposed by
a. taxpayers.
b. government bureaucrats.
c. large interest groups.
d. the mass media.
e. print journalists.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 419
85. Class-action suits are more advantageous than single-party suits in
that they allow
a. extremely controversial issues to be adjudicated.
b. the government to protect itself from frivolous suits.
c. lawyers to practice without receiving fees.
d. large groups of people to receive relief.
e. lawyers to collect a smaller percentage of potential verdicts.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 419
86. Brown v. Board of Education is an example of a
a. taxpayer suit.
b. class-action suit.
c. Section 1983 suit.
d. reapportionment suit.
e. client participatory suit.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 419
87. The major reasons class-action suits became more common in recent
years was that
a. they became financially attractive to lawyers.
b. laws changed to deregulate such suits.
c. the requirements for bringing such suits to court were easy to
satisfy.
d. attorneys' fees could be shared among all plaintiffs.
e. bar associations have insisted that lawyers participate in them.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 420
88. Among the current members of the U.S. Supreme Court there is (are)
________ women.
a. no
b. 2
c. 3
d. 4
e. 5
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 420
89. The most common background or professional experience among
members of the current Supreme Court is experience as
a. attorney general
b. state judge
c. prosecutor
d. defense attorney
e. federal judge
480 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 420
90. Almost all of the justices on the current Supreme Court came to the
court with previous experience as a
a. judge
b. prosecutor
c. defense attorney
d. attorney general
e. corporate lawyer
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 420
91. Republican presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush appointed
_____ of the current members of the Supreme Court.
a. 9
b. 7
c. 5
d. 3
e. 2
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 420
92. The current Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court is
a. John Paul Stevens.
b. David Souter.
c. Anthony Kennedy.
d. Clarence Thomas.
e. William Rehnquist.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 420
93. The youngest justice on the U.S. Supreme Court is
a. John Paul Stevens.
b. David Souter.
c. Anthony Kennedy.
d. Clarence Thomas.
e. William Rehnquist.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 420
94. Beginning in 1974, the Supreme Court reacted to the implications of
class-action suits by greatly
a. expanding settlement awards.
b. reducing settlement awards.
c. tightening the rules governing class-action suits.
d. easing the rules governing class-action suits.
e. expanding the scope of such suits in the field of commercial
activity.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 420
95. The text argues that getting into court depends most strongly on
having
a. a just cause and standing.
b. standing and resources.
c. resources and an opponent.
d. an opponent and a just cause.
e. a litigious action and connections in the judiciary.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 481
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 420
96. In most cases presented to the Supreme Court, the bulk of the
argumentation presented by either side will be found in the
a. brief.
b. certiorari petition.
c. oral argument.
d. per curiam decision.
e. complaint.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 421
97. A key government official involved in the determination of whether a
case should be appealed to the Supreme Court is the
a. plaintiff's lawyer.
b. president.
c. U.S. attorney general.
d. U.S. solicitor general.
e. Deputy Attorney General.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 421
98. The function of the U.S. solicitor general is to
a. approve every case the federal government presents to the
Supreme Court.
b. enforce the decisions of the Supreme Court.
c. serve as the principal legal adviser, or counsel, to members of
the Supreme Court.
d. maintain order in the Supreme Court's courtroom.
e. direct participants in oral argument before the court.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 421
99. Amicus curiae briefs amount to a form of
a. judicial red tape.
b. judicial standing.
c. judicial lobbying.
d. dissenting opinion.
e. concurring opinion.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 421
100. An interest group such as the ACLU or the NAACP is most likely to
attempt to influence the Supreme Court by
a. appealing a decision directly to the president.
b. consulting in the nomination process of a new Supreme Court
justice.
c. writing an amicus curiae brief.
d. raising a political question with the solicitor general.
e. lobbying the American Bar Association.
482 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: E
Page: 421
101. Sources of influence on Supreme Court justices include all of the
following except
a. the ACLU.
b. amicus curiae.
c. law reviews.
d. NAACP.
e. legal aid societies.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 421
102. A chief justice is able to exercise his influence most effectively by
a. setting the agenda.
b. guiding the voting.
c. guiding the debate.
d. enforcing the decision.
e. directing oral argument.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 422
103. What happens if a vote by the Supreme Court ends in a tie?
a. The chief justice breaks the tie.
b. A majority of both houses of Congress decides the case.
c. The lower court decision is left standing.
d. A vote cannot end in a tie because all nine justices must
participate in every vote.
e. The U.S. Attorney General casts the deciding vote.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 422
104. Among the types of written opinions issued by the Supreme Court
are all of the following except
a. majority.
b. per curiam.
c. concurring.
d. dissenting.
e. mandatory.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 422
105. The strongest type of Supreme Court opinion is a(n)
a. unanimous opinion.
b. majority opinion.
c. concurring opinion.
d. dissenting opinion.
e. plurality opinion.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 422
106. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for example, votes on the side of a
majority of Supreme Court justices on a particular case even though
her reasoning differs from the others. She may choose to express her
reasons in a(n)
a. dissenting opinion.
b. concurring opinion.
c. opinion of the Court.
d. per curiam opinion.
e. plurality opinion.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 483
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 422
107. Typically, about ________ percent of U.S. Supreme Court opinions
are unanimous.
a. one-half
b. three-fourths
c. one-third
d. one-tenth
e. two-fifths
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 423
108. The number of federal laws that have actually been overturned by the
Supreme Court is
a. fewer than 20.
b. approximately 50.
c. between 75 and 100.
d. well in excess of 100.
e. over 3,000.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 423
109. Supreme Court rather than congressional interpretation of acts of
Congress can result from
a. constitutional interpretation.
b. interpretation of federal laws.
c. reversals of past precedents.
d. the imposition of strict constructionism.
e. conservative principles of the justices.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 423
110. One measure of the policy-making role of the Supreme Court is the
frequency with which it
a. supports the president.
b. supports Congress.
c. departs from stare decisis.
d. challenges interest groups.
e. upholds precedent.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 423
111. An important reason federal courts follow precedent is that
a. lower court judges have less expertise than members of the
Supreme Court.
b. the Fourteenth Amendment requires following precedent to
avoid conflict with state courts.
c. the practice of stare decisis makes judicial decision making
chaotic.
d. appellate courts are less likely to agree among themselves if
the standards of decision making are too rigid.
e. equal justice requires similar cases to be decided the same way.
484 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 424
112. The power of federal courts to make policy derives from all of the
following except
a. their interpretation of existing laws.
b. their extension of the reach of existing laws.
c. their designing of imposed remedies.
d. their enactment of new laws.
e. their use of previous decisions.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 424
113. Each of the following is a measure of the power of the federal courts
except
a. the reluctance of these courts to deal with political questions.
b. the number of state laws they declare unconstitutional.
c. the number of federal laws they declare unconstitutional.
d. the number of prior cases they overturn.
e. the kinds of remedies they impose to correct situations.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 424
114. Each of the following is a measure of the power of the federal courts
except
a. the willingness of these courts to rule on political questions.
b. the number of state laws they declare unconstitutional.
c. the number of federal laws they declare unconstitutional.
d. the number of legislators they appoint to the courts.
e. the kinds of remedies they impose to correct situations.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 424
115. The willingness of the Supreme Court to deal with congressional
redistricting is an example of judicial
a. power.
b. fairness.
c. partisanship.
d. reaction.
e. objectivity.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: D
Page: 424
116. When a federal judge orders the reorganization of a state prison
system in a case brought by a single convict, the judge is issuing a
a. partisan decision.
b. stare decisis.
c. writ of certiorari.
d. policy-making remedy.
e. concurring opinion.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: E
Page: 424
117. Justices who believe the Supreme Court should change the direction
of legislative policy are advocating
a. social Darwinism.
b. natural law.
c. strict constructionism.
d. judicial restraint.
e. judicial activism.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 485
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 424
118. The argument that courts are the last resort for the powerless is most
likely to be used by those favoring
a. judicial activism.
b. strict constructionism.
c. interpretivism.
d. conservative causes.
e. natural jurisprudence.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 424
119. A frequent criticism of judicial activism is that judges
a. have little expertise in managing policy areas.
b. are helping the wrong people.
c. do not exercise it enough.
d. should do more research before becoming involved with
policy.
e. are rarely informed about constitutional issues relevant in most
state legislatures.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 424
120. Common criticisms of judicial activism include all of the following
except
a. judicial activism works only when laws are devoid of
ambiguous language.
b. judges are not elected and are therefore immune to popular
control.
c. judicial activism often fails to account for the costs of
implementing activist rulings.
d. judges usually have no expertise in designing and managing
complex institutions.
e. B and D.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 424
121. The argument that justices usually lack expertise in many aspects of
society today is most likely to be used by those favoring
a. judicial activism.
b. strict constructionism.
c. liberal causes.
d. conservative causes.
e. legal realists.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 426
122. The text's position is that the enormous increase in court cases and
the degree of judicial activism by federal courts are most directly
related to an increase in
a. lawyers.
b. contending interests.
c. congressional power.
d. the size of the court system.
e. the frivolous lawsuits encouraged by state bar associations.
486 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 426
123. Cases that come before the courts usually originate from
a. ambitious lawyers.
b. contending interests.
c. conflicting laws.
d. free speech violations.
e. incompetent trial court judges.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 426
124. Between 1961 and 1990, the largest percentage increase in court
cases occurred in the area of
a. libel.
b. prisoner petitions.
c. Social Security.
d. economic regulation.
e. civil rights.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 426
125. The fastest growing portion of the federal courts' civil work load
involves
a. economic regulation.
b. environmental protection.
c. states' rights.
d. civil rights.
e. libel.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 426
126. An increase in cases is not the sole reason for the sweeping remedies
imposed by courts. A second factor contributing to this trend is
a. the rise in the number of courts in the United States.
b. the increasingly liberal ideology of federal court judges.
c. laws that contain vague language.
d. public distrust of Congress.
e. low vote turnout.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 426
127. Federal courts are offered opportunities for designing remedies in
part because of Congress's role in
a. issuing mandates to the courts that encourage judicial activism.
b. nominating federal judges.
c. confirming judges without the advice of bar associations.
d. stripping agencies of their regulatory powers.
e. writing laws that require interpretation or litigation.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 427
128. A study of appellate court reviews of decisions made by regulatory
agencies found that the agencies' position was supported by the
courts
a. in almost every case.
b. approximately two-thirds as often as it was reversed.
c. approximately as often as it was reversed.
d. in a distinct minority of the cases.
e. rarely, if ever.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 487
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 427
129. The ways in which the Supreme Court has interpreted ambiguities in
the law can best be explained by
a. the justice’s commitment to fairness and objectivity.
b. pressure-group activity.
c. changing the views of the legislators.
d. changes in legal education.
e. the personal political beliefs of judges.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 427
130. The fact that prayer continues in some public schools, even though
the Supreme Court has declared it unconstitutional, is an example of
a. the slowness of the appeals process.
b. ambiguity in the Court's decisions.
c. lack of effective enforcement by the Court.
d. the power of state government to countermand judicial rulings.
e. the complexity of the rules relating to federal and state courts.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 427
131. One restraint under which the federal courts operate is that
a. public opinion and election politics can undermine their efforts.
b. their decisions can sometimes be ignored.
c. the president can always fire a federal judge.
d. Congress can always impeach a federal judge for backing an
unpopular position.
e. Congress can reduce the salary of federal judges.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 427
132. The 1952 steel mill seizure case is an example of the
a. limits of judicial power.
b. U.S. commitment to the electoral process.
c. ability of the Supreme Court to check the president.
d. conflicting roles of the judicial and legislative branches of
government.
e. the lack of consistency in the legislative process.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 427
133. Congress can check the power of the federal judiciary in all of the
following ways except
a. by confirming or not confirming nominees.
b. by changing the number of judges.
c. by initiating amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
d. by interpreting laws themselves.
e. B and C.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 427
134. Which of the following statements about impeachment proceedings
against federal judges is true?
a. They are effective restraints on the judiciary.
b. They are quite frequent.
c. They are usually brought by judicial activists.
d. They are ineffective restraints on the judiciary.
e. They have never actually resulted in the removal of a judge.
488 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 428
135. The most practicable course of action for a senator who does not like
a constitutional decision by the Supreme Court is to
a. accept it nevertheless.
b. seek a constitutional amendment.
c. introduce a law to overturn it.
d. solicit the president's support.
e. seek a reduction in the size of the Court.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 428
136. The Fourteenth Amendment overturned
a. Dred Scott v. Sandford.
b. Marbury v. Madison.
c. McCulloch v. Maryland.
d. Brown v. Board of Education.
e. Buck v. Bell.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 428
137. One practicable way that Congress can get around an unfavorable
Supreme Court ruling on a law is to
a. remove the judges who voted against the law.
b. overturn the Supreme Court ruling.
c. repass the law in slightly altered form.
d. strip the Supreme Court of its enforcement authority.
e. contract the original jurisdiction of the Court.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 428
138. Which of the following statements about the Dred Scott decision is
correct?
a. It exceeded the formal authority of the Supreme Court.
b. It infuriated public opinion and harmed the Supreme Court.
c. It resulted from an inaccurate determination of fact.
d. It was widely applauded throughout the nation.
e. It was the primary cause of the War Between the States.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 428
139. Congress has the power to decide the jurisdiction of lower federal
courts. This means that
a. Congress can determine the number of judges that sit on each
court.
b. Congress can decide which judges will hear which cases in
before these courts.
c. Congress can veto decisions of lower courts, unlike those of
the Supreme Court.
d. lower courts cannot declare an act of Congress
unconstitutional.
e. Congress can decide what types of cases these courts hear.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 489
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 428
140. One effective tool that Congress has at its disposal for controlling the
federal courts is the power to
a. impeach judges who back policies opposed by Congress.
b. overturn Supreme Court rulings with which it disagrees.
c. withdraw jurisdiction from the courts.
d. strip federal courts of their enforcement authority.
e. temporarily remove judges who are inordinately partisan in
their rulings.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 428
141. In the 1868 habeas corpus case involving a Mississippi newspaper
editor named McCardle, Congress sought to thwart the Supreme
Court by
a. threatening to impeach the justices.
b. withdrawing part of the Court's appellate jurisdiction.
c. changing the original jurisdiction of the Court.
d. changing the size of the Court.
e. removing the Court from its building.
Type: Factual
Ans: D
Page: 428
142. The Supreme Court is protected to a considerable extent from frontal
attacks by president and Congress through
a. the logic of its decisions.
b. the logic of its opinions.
c. its own bureaucracy.
d. its prestige in the nation.
e. its carefully researched opinions.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: A
Page: 428
143. Withdrawing some of the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
would probably shift policy making to
a. lower federal courts and state courts.
b. Congress.
c. the president.
d. state prosecutors.
e. state governors.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 429
144. Congress's removal of Supreme Court jurisdiction in an area where it
was at odds with the Court might backfire because
a. another court might reinstate the earlier decision.
b. public opinion is always on the side of the courts.
c. Congress has no way to enforce such a decision.
d. a presidential veto would doubtlessly intervene.
e. state bar associations would protest.
490 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: A
Page: 429
145. If Congress passed a law to withdraw some questions from the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the latter would likely
a. declare that law unconstitutional.
b. retaliate against Congress in other areas.
c. reconsider the case that offended Congress.
d. seek impeachment of key congressional leaders.
e. remove itself from such cases before Congress could act.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: E
Page: 429
146. When Supreme Court justices read law review articles commenting
on their opinions, they are acknowledging
a. public opinion.
b. the respect given to their own opinions.
c. a judicial mandate.
d. errors in public opinion.
e. elite opinion.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 429
147. Historically, the Supreme Court has been especially activist when
a. Congress was in transition from control by one party to control
by the other.
b. the political system was undergoing considerable change.
c. the president was weak and indecisive.
d. Congress was weak and the president was strong.
e. the state’s were without power.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: C
Page: 429
148. Periods of partisan realignment often have the effect on the courts of
a. expanding them.
b. contracting them.
c. energizing them.
d. intimidating them.
e. diluting them.
Type: Factual
Ans: B
Page: 430
149. Public confidence in the Supreme Court since 1976 has
a. remained unchanged.
b. seesawed dramatically.
c. increased steadily.
d. decreased steadily.
e. decreased steadily except in election years.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 430
150. Public confidence in the Supreme Court at any given time is most
closely related to
a. the appointment of a new justice to the Court.
b. decisions that reflect either a clearly liberal or a clearly
conservative outlook.
c. the popularity of government as a whole.
d. the performance of the economy, especially with regard to
inflation.
e. the perception of division on the Court.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 491
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Type: Factual
Ans: C
Page: 430
151. Attempts by Presidents Nixon, Reagan, and Bush to produce a less
activist court have been
a. totally unsuccessful.
b. mostly unsuccessful.
c. somewhat successful.
d. very successful.
e. difficult, if not impossible, to assess.
Type: Conceptual
Ans: B
Page: 430
152. If the size and scope of government were reduced, we could expect
a. more judicial activism.
b. less judicial activism.
c. less judicial restraint.
d. a smaller Court.
e. a larger Court.
Type: Factual
Ans: E
Page: 430
153. One cause of today's increased judicial activism is the fact that
a. more judges are willing to stretch the U.S. Constitution to
achieve certain ends.
b. political parties are stronger today than they were fifty years
ago.
c. interest groups employ more lawyers today.
d. a majority of the Senate will simply not confirm anyone who is
not an activist.
e. more judges believe they should be activists.
TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS
Ans: False
Page: 403
154. Clarence Thomas was confirmed by the closest vote in the history of
Supreme Court nominations.
Ans: False
Page: 403
155. Judges play little or no role in the policy making process in the
United States.
Ans: False
Page: 404
156. Great Britain has a strong tradition of judicial review.
Ans: False
Page: 404
157. In reality, judicial review runs counter to the tradition of checks and
balances in this country.
Ans: False
Page: 404
158. A strict constructionist would apply a moral or economic philosophy
to constitutional principles when deciding a case.
Ans: True
Page: 405
159. A judge can be both an activist and a conservative.
492 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: True
Page: 405
160. A judge can be both a strict constructionist and a liberal.
Ans: True
Page: 405
161. Fifty years ago, judicial activists tended to be conservative.
Ans: False
Page: 405
162. Today, judicial activists tend to be conservative.
Ans: True
Page: 405
163. The Founders did not expect the judiciary to be as strong as the other
branches of government.
Ans: True
Page: 405
164. The Founders would be surprised that the judiciary has played such a
strong role in public policy formation.
Ans: True
Page: 405
165. The Founders expected judicial review to deal with narrowly defined
matters and not broad policy.
Ans: True
Page: 405
166. Marbury v. Madison helped establish the powers of the early
Supreme Court.
Ans: True
Page: 405
167. It was a matter of doubt for several generations after 1789 whether
federal law or state law would prevail under the U.S. Constitution.
Ans: True
Page: 405
168. Early Supreme Court cases established that national law was in all
instances supreme law.
Ans: False
Page: 406
169. An early decision by the Supreme Court established the power of
states to regulate commerce that occurs among them.
Ans: False
Page: 407
170. In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal
government, and not the states, has the right to regulate commerce.
Ans: True
Page: 407
171. A direct cause of the Civil War was the Supreme Court ruling in
Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 493
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: False
Page: 407
172. The dominant concern of the Supreme Court in the period following
the Civil War was personal liberties.
Ans: True
Page: 407
173. The dominant issue in the federal courts in the period following the
Civil War was whether the economy could be regulated by state and
federal governments.
Ans: False
Page: 408
174. In the period between the Civil War and the New Deal, the Supreme
Court almost never allowed restrictions on business.
Ans: False
Page: 409
175. Franklin Roosevelt's court-packing plan was unsuccessful because it
was not enacted into law.
Ans: True
Page: 409
176. Franklin Roosevelt's court-packing plan achieved its ultimate goal of
making the Supreme Court more responsive to his policies.
Ans: True
Page: 409
177. During the period from 1936 to the present, the Supreme Court
established the tradition of the courts' deferring to the legislature on
economic issues.
Ans: True
Page: 410
178. If Franklin Roosevelt’s court-packing plan had been activated, the
Supreme Court may have had as many as fifteen members.
Ans: False
Page: 411
179. The Supreme Court and the U.S. Courts of Appeals are the only
federal courts that the Constitution requires.
Ans: False
Page: 411
180. The Constitution specifies the number of justices on the Supreme
Court should be between six and nine.
Ans: True
Page: 411
181. There are 94 U.S. District Courts in the federal court system.
Ans: True
Page: 411
182. The history of the Supreme Court seems to support the view that the
federal government can pass almost any law authorized by the U.S.
Constitution.
Ans: True
Page: 411
183. Some recent Supreme Court cases suggest that the Court has not
abandoned the idea that states have some constitutional power to
resist federal authority.
Ans: False
Page: 411
184. Federal judges serve for life on constitutional and legislative courts
alike.
494 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: True
Page: 411
185. One characteristic of constitutional courts as opposed to legislative
courts is that judges cannot be fired.
Ans: True
Page: 411
186. Party background has some effect on how judges behave.
Ans: True
Page: 412
187. Oliver Wendell Holmes and Warren Burger are examples of Supreme
Court justices whose decisions surprised the presidents who
appointed them.
Ans: False
Page: 412
188. Warren Burger is an example of a justice whose decisions met the
expectations of the president who nominated him.
Ans: False
Page: 412
189. Senatorial courtesy refers to the selection of Supreme Court justices.
Ans: True
Page: 412
190. The tradition of senatorial courtesy gives heavy weight to the
preferences of the senators from the state where a federal district
judge is to serve.
Ans: True
Page: 412
191. Senators wield great influence over the appointment of lower federal
judges.
Ans: False
Page: 414
192. Supreme Court nominees have been rejected as often as they have
been confirmed in the twentieth century.
Ans: True
Page: 414
193. A political litmus test has its greatest impact on nominees to the
Supreme Court.
Ans: False
Page: 413
194. Republican judges tend to be more liberal than Democratic ones.
Ans: True
Page: 413
195. Democrats want judges who support abortion and are favorable to
affirmative action.
Ans: True
Page: 413
196. The use of the litmus test as a mechanism to select federal judges
became much more important during the period of divided
government of the 1990s.
Ans: True
Page: 413
197. Presidents Nixon and Ford made no female and no minority appeals
court appointments.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 495
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
(Figure 14.1)
Ans: False
Page: 413
(Figure 14.1)
198. President Bush made no minority district court appointments.
Ans: False
Page: 414
199. By a dual-court system, we mean one that has both constitutional and
legislative courts.
Ans: False
Page: 414
200. The U.S. Constitution does not specifically spell out the jurisdiction
of the federal courts.
Ans: True
Page: 414
201. Some cases can be tried in either federal or state courts.
Ans: False
Page: 414
202. The litmus test issue is of minimal importance in selecting Supreme
Court justices.
Ans: True
Page: 414
203. Almost thirty presidential nominations to the Supreme Court have
failed.
Ans: False
Page: 414
204. Nominations to U.S. District Courts are much more likely to fail than
nominations to the Supreme Court.
Ans: False
Page: 416
205. Most cases heard by federal courts begin in appellate courts.
Ans: False
Page: 416
206. Those who lose cases before federal regulatory commissions can
always appeal to the Supreme Court.
Ans: False
Page: 416
207. Only on cases of automatic appeal is the Supreme Court most likely
to make decisions that broadly affect policy.
Ans: False
Page: 416
208. Approval of a petition for certiorari requires a majority of the
justices.
Ans: False
Page: 416
209. Only two justices are required to approve a petition for certiorari.
496 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: True
Page: 416
210. Relatively few cases that are appealed are granted certiorari.
Ans: False
Page: 417
211. The Gideon case opened the door for a flood of Supreme Court cases
whose costs were paid by interest groups.
Ans: False
Page: 417
212. The Supreme Court reviews only 10 to 12 percent of appeals court
cases.
Ans: True
Page: 417
213. One consequence of the Supreme Court’s heavy workload is the
increase in influence wielded by law clerks.
Ans: False
Page: 416
214. An application for certiorari costs $3,000.
Ans: False
Page: 418
215. Fee shifting is prohibited by federal law.
Ans: True
Page: 418
216. When a corporation is found guilty of violating antitrust laws, it must
pay the legal fees of the winner. This is called fee shifting.
Ans: False
Page: 418
217. Standing is automatically accorded to any party who wishes to bring
a case in federal court.
Ans: True
Page: 418
218. Standing is a legal concept that determines who is entitled to bring a
case.
Ans: True
Page: 418
219. Personal harm must be demonstrated before standing is granted.
Ans: True
Page: 419
220. The Brown desegregation suit in 1954 benefited a broad category of
people not formally involved in the case.
Ans: False
Page: 419
221. Both the NAACP and Linda Brown benefited financially from the
Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education.
Ans: False
Page: 420
222. After 1974, the rules pertaining to class-action suits were loosened to
allow more cases to be brought to court.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 497
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: False
Page: 420
223. It is usually difficult to bring a class-action suit in most state courts.
Ans: True
Page: 420
224. Most of the justices currently on the Supreme Court came to the
Court with previous judicial experience.
Ans: True
Page: 420
225. Most of the justices currently on the Supreme Court came to the
Court with previous judicial experience in the federal court system.
Ans: True
Page: 420
226. Seven of the nine justices on the current Supreme Court were
appointed by presidents who were Republican.
Ans: False
Page: 421
227. Only rarely is the federal government named as a party to a case
before the Supreme Court.
Ans: True
Page: 421
228. The federal government is party to about one-half of the cases heard
by the Supreme Court.
Ans: True
Page: 421
229. Amicus curiae means "friend of the court" and is a brief typically
filed by an interested party who is not part of the suit.
Ans: False
Page: 422
230. A per curiam opinion is the same as an opinion of the Supreme
Court.
Ans: True
Page: 422
231. Per curiam decisions are brief and unsigned.
Ans: False
Page: 422
232. The majority view in a Supreme Court decision is reflected in the
concurring opinion.
Ans: True
Page: 423
233. On average, the Supreme Court declares federal laws unconstitutional
less than two times a year.
Ans: False
Page: 423
234. Most of the federal laws declared unconstitutional by the Supreme
Court since 1937 have had broad national significance.
Ans: False
Page: 423
235. Stare decisis is a principle used in the overturning of earlier court
decisions.
Ans: True
Page: 423
236. Stare decisis is an informal rule that a current case should be decided
in accordance with earlier decisions on similar cases.
498 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: True
Page: 423
237. One obvious complication with the “principle of precedent” is that
what constitutes a “similar” case is not always clear.
Ans: True
Page: 423
238. The Court is more likely to overturn its own precedents than it is to
exercise judicial review on federal laws.
Ans: True
Page: 424
239. Political questions that once would not have been heard by the
Supreme Court have become more likely to be heard lately.
Ans: False
Page: 424
240. The political question doctrine is an important barrier to judicial
power today.
Ans: True
Page: 424
241. An important measure of judicial power is the kind of remedy or
remedies it imposes to correct wrongs.
Ans: True
Page: 424
242. Perhaps the strongest argument for judicial activism is that the courts
are needed to correct injustices when other branches of government
refuse to do so.
Ans: False
Page: 424
243. One argument in favor of judicial activism is the insulation of
justices from many real-world concerns.
Ans: False
Page: 424
244. Probably the major reason why courts have become so activist is the
large number of lawyers in this country.
Ans: True
Page: 426
245. Contending interests, and not an abundance of lawyers, is probably
the major reason why courts have become so activist.
Ans: False
Page: 426
246. Sweeping judicial remedies become more likely as the number of
Supreme Court cases increases.
Ans: True
Page: 426
247. Hearing more cases by itself does not necessarily lead the federal
courts to sweeping judicial remedies.
Ans: True
Page: 426
248. Laws and the U.S. Constitution are filled with vague language, which
calls for frequent interpretation by the courts.
Ans: True
Page: 426
249. According to the text, the personal opinions and attitudes of judges
“powerfully affect” their decisions.
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 499
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: False
Page: 427
250. The federal government is increasingly on the offensive in court
cases.
Ans: True
Page: 427
251. Supreme Court decisions can sometimes be ignored without fear of
prosecution.
Ans: False
Page: 427
252. One of the strongest checks on the federal courts is the impeachment
of justices.
Ans: True
Page: 427
253. Impeachment is too rarely used on federal judges to have much of an
effect on their behavior.
Ans: False
Page: 427
254. The Supreme Court would be helpless in the face of a congressional
limitation on its powers.
Ans: True
Page: 428
255. The Supreme Court could declare unconstitutional any legislation
that sought to forbid remedies that the Court might desire.
Ans: False
Page: 427
256. Only the president has the right to change the number of judges
sitting on the Supreme Court.
Ans: True
Page: 429
257. Courts outside the United States declare laws unconstitutional in
different ways.
Ans: False
Page: 428
258. Once a law has been ruled unconstitutional, Congress is powerless to
do anything about it.
Ans: True
Page: 428
259. Congress can change the jurisdiction of federal courts.
Ans: False
Page: 429
260. The federal courts have generally been most active during times of
relative tranquility in the country.
Ans: False
Page: 429
261. One argument for judicial activism is that public opinion favors it.
Ans: True
Page: 430
262. In general, the major features of court activism and liberalism during
the Warren years have remained intact.
500 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Ans: True
Page: 430
263. Judicial activism is widely accepted by many judges, liberal and
conservative alike.
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS 264. Sketch the history of the development of the federal judiciary, paying attention to the dominant issues
handled by federal courts in three eras: from the founding to the Civil War; from the Civil War to the New
Deal; from the New Deal to the present.
Answer
a. Founding to Civil War: establishment of national supremacy over the states; slavery
b. Civil War to New Deal: possibility and scope of government regulation of the economy; Fourteenth
and Fifteenth Amendments
c. New Deal to present: economic regulation and political liberties
Page: 405-411
265. Explain the differences between a constitutional court and a legislative court.
Answer
a. Constitutional court: judicial powers found in Article III; judges serve during good behavior and their
salaries cannot be reduced
b. Legislative court: created by Congress for a special purpose; judges serve fixed terms and can be
removed; judges' salaries can be reduced
Page: 411
266. Explain the legal basis for the federal courts' jurisdiction over cases. Explain the different kinds of cases that
can be heard by federal courts.
Answer
a. Legal basis: Article III, Eleventh Amendment
b. Types of cases: federal questions; diversity of citizenship cases triable in federal or state courts
Page: 414-417
267. How has the Supreme Court affected access to the judiciary? Why has it done so?
Answer
a. Easier access: free attorney available in a criminal case for an indigent defendant; fee shifting; class-
action suits
b. Access more difficult: standing (case or controversy, personal injury; taxpayer suits; individual
notification)
c. Why: growth in backlog of cases; ideology of activism
Page: 417-420
268. Discuss the concept of standing in terms of bringing a case to court.
Answer
a. Must be an actual controversy
b. Must be personally harmed by a law or practice
c. Being a taxpayer ordinarily not enough to challenge a government action
Chapter 14: The Judiciary 501
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Page: 418-419
269. Why is following precedent important?
Answer
a. To prevent judicial decisions from being unpredictable
b. Equal justice requires treating similar cases similarly
Page: 423
270. Discuss the arguments for and against the Supreme Court's broad policy-making authority. Is this what the
Founders intended?
Answer
a. Forms of policy making: selection of cases that will raise the opportunity for policy making,
willingness to decide a case more broadly than needed to resolve the specific dispute, ordering
remedies that affect more than the immediate litigants
b. Pro: other branches are allowing injustice to continue; Court is less susceptible to special interest
groups
c. Con: policy in a representative democracy is assumed to be made by elected officials; judges lack
expertise in day-to-day administration of remedies
d. Founders: no; Court was assumed to be the "least dangerous branch"
Page: 423-424
271. How is judicial activism both supported and criticized?
Answer
a. Supported: courts should correct injustices when other branches refuse to do so; courts defend those
without influence
b. Criticized: judges do not have expertise; implementation requires balancing conflicting needs; judges
are not elected
Page: 424-426
272. Discuss the ways in which Congress can seek to check the power of the federal courts, and comment on
whether you think that these checks are desirable or undesirable.
Answer
a. Confirmation and impeachment proceedings
b. Altering number of judges
c. Amending legislation or the U.S. Constitution
d. Altering courts' jurisdiction
Page: 427-430
ESSAY QUESTIONS 273. While the Supreme Court is the most powerful authority in the judiciary, it hears relatively few cases.
Discuss the limitations (legal, political, and self-imposed) on the ability of cases to reach the Supreme
Court, explaining the purpose behind each restriction.
Answer
a. Restrictions imposed by federalism: the U.S. Constitution defines the types of cases over which
federal courts have jurisdiction, with the rest handled by state courts
502 Chapter 14: The Judiciary
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
b. Restrictions imposed by separation of powers: political question doctrine, sovereign immunity, and
congressional control over appellate jurisdiction
c. Restrictions imposed by case load: most cases are rejected, standing and class-action requirements
have been narrowed, a vote of four justices is needed to hear certiorari appeals
d. Restrictions imposed by public opinion: the Supreme Court will, at times, avoid cases to evade a
negative public backlash
e. Restrictions imposed by judicial tradition: courts are reluctant to take cases that may require a
departure from precedent; judges accepting strict constructionism are less likely to assert judicial
power
Page: 420-426
274. It has been argued that the United States has become a "government by judiciary." Is this assessment
accurate? Discuss the power of courts to make policy and whether the checks imposed against federal
judges are sufficient to restrain arbitrary decision making on their part.
Answer
a. Judges have great latitude in making policy. First, laws are frequently vague, enabling discretion in
interpretation.
b. Second, attitudes of judges affect decision making because similar cases are decided differently by
different judges.
c. Constitutional policy clearly varies with public opinion. Periods of judicial activism correspond with
changes in the political system.
d. Numerous checks exist against arbitrary judicial behavior. Congress can impose several restrictions
upon federal courts: alter jurisdiction, propose constitutional amendments, alter the number of judges,
and use of the power of impeachment.
e. Public opinion has, at times, curbed judicial activism.
f. The case load of the Supreme Court severely restricts the number of cases it hears. Fewer than 1
percent of cases heard in courts of appeal reach the Supreme Court.
g. The Supreme Court itself has curtailed federal judicial power in the areas of class-action suits and
standing requirements.
h. Courts do not have the power of enforcement.
Page: Ch. 14