+ All Categories

ch6

Date post: 25-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: rajeev-yadav
View: 290 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
41
© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. © 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. All rights reserved. 1 Human Human Resource Resource Management Management ELEVENTH EDITION ELEVENTH EDITION G A R Y D E S S L E G A R Y D E S S L E R R B I J U V A R K K E B I J U V A R K K E Y Y Employee Testing and Selection Employee Testing and Selection Chapter Chapter 6 Part 2 | Recruitment and Part 2 | Recruitment and Placement Placement
Transcript
Page 1: ch6

© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd.© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd.All rights reserved.All rights reserved.

1

Human Resource Human Resource ManagementManagement

ELEVENTH EDITIONELEVENTH EDITION

G A R Y D E S S L E RG A R Y D E S S L E R

B I J U V A R K K E YB I J U V A R K K E Y

Employee Testing and SelectionEmployee Testing and Selection

Chapter 6Chapter 6

Part 2 | Recruitment and PlacementPart 2 | Recruitment and Placement

Page 2: ch6

6–2© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

1.1. Explain what is meant by reliability and validity.Explain what is meant by reliability and validity.

2.2. Explain how you would go about validating a test.Explain how you would go about validating a test.

3.3. Cite and illustrate our testing guidelines. Cite and illustrate our testing guidelines.

4.4. Give examples of some of the ethical and legal Give examples of some of the ethical and legal considerations in testing.considerations in testing.

5.5. List eight tests you could use for employee selection, List eight tests you could use for employee selection, and how you would use them.and how you would use them.

6.6. Explain the key points to remember in conducting Explain the key points to remember in conducting background investigations.background investigations.

Page 3: ch6

6–3© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Why Careful Selection is ImportantWhy Careful Selection is Important

Organizational Performance

Legal Obligations and

Liability

The Importance of Selecting the Right

Employees

Costs of Recruiting and

Hiring

Page 4: ch6

6–4© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Avoiding Negligent Hiring ClaimsAvoiding Negligent Hiring Claims

• Carefully scrutinize information on employment Carefully scrutinize information on employment applications.applications.

• Get written authorization for reference checks, and Get written authorization for reference checks, and check references.check references.

• Save all records and information about the applicant.Save all records and information about the applicant.

• Reject applicants for false statements or conviction Reject applicants for false statements or conviction records for offenses related to the job.records for offenses related to the job.

• Balance the applicant’s privacy rights with others’ “need Balance the applicant’s privacy rights with others’ “need to know.”to know.”

• Take immediate disciplinary action if problems arise.Take immediate disciplinary action if problems arise.

Page 5: ch6

6–5© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Basic Testing ConceptsBasic Testing Concepts

• ReliabilityReliability Consistency of scores obtained by the same person Consistency of scores obtained by the same person

when retested with identical or equivalent tests.when retested with identical or equivalent tests. Are test results stable over time?Are test results stable over time?

• ValidityValidity Indicates whether a test is measuring what it is Indicates whether a test is measuring what it is

supposed to be measuring.supposed to be measuring. Does the test actually measure what it is intended to Does the test actually measure what it is intended to

measure?measure?

Page 6: ch6

6–6© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–1 Sample Picture Card from Thematic Apperception Test

Source: Reprinted by permission of the publishers from Henry A. Murray, THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST, Plate 12F, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1943.

Page 7: ch6

6–7© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Page 8: ch6

6–8© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Types of ValidityTypes of Validity

Criterion Validity

Content Validity

Test Validity

Face Validity

Page 9: ch6

6–9© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

How to Validate a TestHow to Validate a Test

1

Relate Your Test Scores and Criteria: scores versus actual performance

Choose the Tests: test battery or single test

Steps in Test Validation

Analyze the Job: predictors and criteria

Administer the Tests: concurrent or predictive validation

2

3

4

Cross-Validate and Revalidate: repeat Steps 3 and 4 with a different sample

5

Page 10: ch6

6–10© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–2 Examples of Web Sites Offering Information on Tests or Testing Programs

• www.hr-guide.com/data/G371.htmProvides general information and sources for all types of employment tests.

• www.ets.org/testcollProvides information on over 20,000 tests.

• http://ericae.net/ Provides technical information about all types of

employment and nonemployment tests.• www.mafoi.com/aspx/common/assessments.aspx One of the Indian agencies that provide testing

services for employers according to international standards.

Page 11: ch6

6–11© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–3 Expectancy Chart

Note: This expectancy chart shows the relation between scores made on the Minnesota Paper Form Board and rated success of junior draftspersons.

Example: Those who score between 37 and 44 have a 55% chance of being rated above average and those scoring between 57 and 64 have a 97% chance.

Page 12: ch6

6–12© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

TABLE 6–1 Testing Program Guidelines

1. Use tests as supplements.

2. Validate the tests.

3. Monitor your testing/selection program.

4. Keep accurate records.

5. Use a certified psychologist.

6. Manage test conditions.

7. Revalidate periodically.

Page 13: ch6

6–13© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Test Takers’ Individual Rights and Test Takers’ Individual Rights and Test SecurityTest Security

• Under the APA’s standard for educational and Under the APA’s standard for educational and psychological tests, test takers have the right:psychological tests, test takers have the right: To privacy and information.To privacy and information.

To the confidentiality of test results.To the confidentiality of test results.

To informed consent regarding use of these results.To informed consent regarding use of these results.

To expect that only people qualified to interpret the To expect that only people qualified to interpret the scores will have access to them.scores will have access to them.

To expect the test is fair to all.To expect the test is fair to all.

Page 14: ch6

6–14© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Legal Privacy IssuesLegal Privacy Issues

• DefamationDefamation Libeling or slandering of employees or former Libeling or slandering of employees or former

employees by an employer.employees by an employer.

• Avoiding Employee Defamation SuitsAvoiding Employee Defamation Suits

1.1. Train supervisors regarding the importance of Train supervisors regarding the importance of employee confidentiality.employee confidentiality.

2.2. Adopt a “need to know” policy.Adopt a “need to know” policy.

3.3. Disclose procedures impacting confidentially of Disclose procedures impacting confidentially of information to employees.information to employees.

Page 15: ch6

6–15© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–4 Sample Test

Source: Courtesy of NYT Permissions.

Page 16: ch6

6–16© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Using Tests at WorkUsing Tests at Work

• Major Types of TestsMajor Types of Tests

Basic skills testsBasic skills tests

Job skills testsJob skills tests

Psychological testsPsychological tests

• Why Use Testing?Why Use Testing?

Increased work demands = more testingIncreased work demands = more testing

Screen out bad or dishonest employeesScreen out bad or dishonest employees

Reduce turnover by personality profilingReduce turnover by personality profiling

Page 17: ch6

6–17© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Computerized and Online TestingComputerized and Online Testing

• Online testsOnline tests Telephone prescreeningTelephone prescreening Offline computer testsOffline computer tests Virtual “inbox” testsVirtual “inbox” tests Online problem-solving testsOnline problem-solving tests

• Types of TestsTypes of Tests Specialized work sample testsSpecialized work sample tests Numerical ability testsNumerical ability tests Reading comprehension testsReading comprehension tests Clerical comparing and checking testsClerical comparing and checking tests

Page 18: ch6

6–18© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Types of TestsTypes of Tests

Cognitive (Mental) Abilities

AchievementMotor and Physical Abilities

Personality and

Interests

What Tests Measure

Page 19: ch6

6–19© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–5 Type of Question Applicant Might Expect on a Test of Mechanical Comprehension

Page 20: ch6

6–20© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–6 Sample Personality Test Items

Source: Elaine Pulakos, Selection Assessment Methods, SHRM Foundation, 2005, p. 9.

Reprinted bypermission of Societyfor Human ResourceManagement via CopyrightClearance Center.

Page 21: ch6

6–21© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

The “Big Five”The “Big Five”

Extraversion

Emotional Stability/Neuroticism

AgreeablenessOpenness to Experience

Conscientiousness

Page 22: ch6

6–22© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–7 Example of a Work Sampling Question

Page 23: ch6

6–23© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Work Samples and SimulationsWork Samples and Simulations

Work Samples

Miniature Job Training

and Evaluation

Management Assessment

Centers

Video-Based Situational

Testing

Measuring Work Performance Directly

Page 24: ch6

6–24© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

TABLE 6–2 Evaluation of Assessment Methods on Four Key Criteria

Source: Elaine Pulakos, Selection Assessment Methods, SHRM Foundation, 2005, p. 17. Reprinted by permission of Society for Human Resource Management via Copyright Clearance Center.

Assessment Method Validity Adverse Impact

Costs (Develop/Administer)

Applicant Reactions

Cognitive ability tests High High (against minorities) Low/low Somewhat favorable

Job knowledge test High High (against minorities) Low/low More favorable

Personality tests Low to moderate

Low Low/low Less favorable

Biographical data inventories

Moderate Low to high for different types High/low Less favorable

Integrity tests Moderate to high

Low Low/low Less favorable

Structured interviews High Low High/high More favorable

Physical fitness tests Moderate to high

High (against females and older workers)

High/high More favorable

Situational judgment tests Moderate Moderate (against minorities) High/low More favorable

Work samples High Low High/high More favorable

Assessment centers Moderate to high

Low to moderate, depending on exercise

High/high More favorable

Physical ability tests Moderate to high

High (against females and older workers)

High/high More favorable

Note: There was limited research evidence available on applicant reactions to situational judgment tests and physical ability tests. However, because these tests tend to appear very relevant to the job, it is likely that applicant reactions to them would be favorable.

Page 25: ch6

6–25© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background Investigations and Background Investigations and Reference ChecksReference Checks

• Investigations and ChecksInvestigations and Checks Reference checksReference checks Background employment checksBackground employment checks Criminal recordsCriminal records Driving recordsDriving records Credit checksCredit checks

• Why?Why? To verify factual information provided by applicants.To verify factual information provided by applicants. To uncover damaging information.To uncover damaging information.

Page 26: ch6

6–26© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–8Reference Checking Form

Source: Society for Human Resource Management, © 2004. Reproduced with permission of Society for Human Resource Management in the Format Textbook via Copyright Clearance Center.

Page 27: ch6

6–27© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background Investigations and Background Investigations and Reference Checks (cont’d)Reference Checks (cont’d)

Former Employers

Current Supervisors

Written References

Social Networking Sites

Commercial Credit Rating Companies

Sources of Information

Page 28: ch6

6–28© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Limitations on Background Investigations Limitations on Background Investigations and Reference Checksand Reference Checks

Background Investigations

and Reference Checks

Supervisor Reluctance

Employer Guidelines

Legal Issues: Privacy

Legal Issues:

Defamation

Page 29: ch6

6–29© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Making Background Checks More UsefulMaking Background Checks More Useful

1.1. Include on the application form a statement for Include on the application form a statement for applicants to sign explicitly authorizing a applicants to sign explicitly authorizing a background check.background check.

2.2. Use telephone references if possible.Use telephone references if possible.

3.3. Be persistent in obtaining information.Be persistent in obtaining information.

4.4. Use references provided by the candidate as Use references provided by the candidate as a source for other references.a source for other references.

5.5. Ask open-ended questions to elicit more Ask open-ended questions to elicit more information from references.information from references.

Page 30: ch6

6–30© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Using Preemployment Information ServicesUsing Preemployment Information Services

1

Notice of adverse action to applicant/employee

Employer certification to reporting agency

Acquisition and Use of Background Information

Disclosure to and authorization by applicant/employee

Providing copies of reports to applicant/employee

2

3

4

Page 31: ch6

6–31© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

TABLE 6–3 Collecting Background Information

Suggestions for collecting background information include the following:

1. Check all applicable state laws.

2. Review the impact of federal equal employment laws.

3. Remember the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.

4. Do not obtain information that you’re not going to use.

5. Remember that using arrest information will be highly suspect.

6. Avoid blanket policies (such as “we hire no one with a record of workers’ compensation claims”).

7. Use information that is specific and job related.

8. Keep information confidential and up to date.

9. Never authorize an unreasonable investigation.

10. Make sure you always get at least two forms of identification from the applicant.

11. Always require applicants to fill out a job application.

12. Compare the application to the résumé (people tend to be more imaginative on their résumés than on their application forms, where they must certify the information).

13. Particularly for executive candidates, include background checks of such things as involvement in lawsuits, and of articles about the candidate in local or national newspapers.

14. Separate the tasks of (1) hiring and (2) doing the background check (a recruiter or supervisor anxious to hire someone may cut corners when investigating the candidate’s background).

Source: Adapted from Jeffrey M. Hahn, “Pre-Employment Services: Employers Beware?” Employee Relations Law Journal 17, no. 1 (Summer 1991), pp. 45–69; and Shari Caudron, “Who Are You Really Hiring?”, Workforce, 81, no. 12 (November 2002), pp. 28–32.

Page 32: ch6

6–32© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Polygraph and Honesty TestingThe Polygraph and Honesty Testing

• Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 Generally prohibits polygraph examinations by all Generally prohibits polygraph examinations by all

private employers unless:private employers unless: The employer has suffered an economic loss or injury.The employer has suffered an economic loss or injury. The employee in question had access to the property.The employee in question had access to the property. There is a reasonable prior suspicion.There is a reasonable prior suspicion. The employee is told the details of the investigation, as well The employee is told the details of the investigation, as well

as questions to be asked on the polygraph test itself.as questions to be asked on the polygraph test itself.

Exceptions:Exceptions: Private security employeesPrivate security employees Employees with access to drugsEmployees with access to drugs National defense and security (FBI, DOE, and DOJ)National defense and security (FBI, DOE, and DOJ)

Page 33: ch6

6–33© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Honesty Testing Programs: Honesty Testing Programs: What Employers Can DoWhat Employers Can Do

• Antitheft Screening Procedure:Antitheft Screening Procedure: Ask blunt questions.Ask blunt questions. Listen, rather than talk.Listen, rather than talk. Do a credit check.Do a credit check. Check all employment and personal references.Check all employment and personal references. Use paper-and-pencil honesty tests and Use paper-and-pencil honesty tests and

psychological tests.psychological tests. Test for drugs.Test for drugs. Establish a search-and-seizure policy and conduct Establish a search-and-seizure policy and conduct

searches.searches.

Page 34: ch6

6–34© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–9 Handwriting Exhibit Used by Graphologist

Source: Kathryn Sackhein, Handwriting Analysis and the Employee Selection Process (New York: Quorum Books, 1990), p. 45. Reproduced with permission of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

Page 35: ch6

6–35© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Physical ExaminationPhysical Examination

• Reasons for preemployment medical Reasons for preemployment medical examinations:examinations: To verify that the applicant meets the physical To verify that the applicant meets the physical

requirements of the position.requirements of the position.

To discover any medical limitations to be taken into To discover any medical limitations to be taken into account in placing the applicant.account in placing the applicant.

To establish a record and baseline of the applicant’s To establish a record and baseline of the applicant’s health for future insurance or compensation claims.health for future insurance or compensation claims.

To reduce absenteeism and accidents.To reduce absenteeism and accidents.

To detect communicable diseases that may be To detect communicable diseases that may be unknown to the applicant.unknown to the applicant.

Page 36: ch6

6–36© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Substance Abuse ScreeningSubstance Abuse Screening

• Types of ScreeningTypes of Screening Before formal hiringBefore formal hiring After a work accidentAfter a work accident Presence of obvious behavioral symptomsPresence of obvious behavioral symptoms Random or periodic basisRandom or periodic basis Transfer or promotion to new positionTransfer or promotion to new position

• Types of TestsTypes of Tests UrinalysisUrinalysis Hair follicle testingHair follicle testing

Page 37: ch6

6–37© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Substance Abuse Screening (cont’d)Substance Abuse Screening (cont’d)

Safety: Impairment vs.

Presence

RecreationalUse vs.

Addiction

Americans with Disabilities Act

Drug Free Workplace Act

of 1988

Intrusiveness of Procedures

Accuracy of Tests

Ethical and Legal

Issues

Page 38: ch6

6–38© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–10 Procedure in Complying with Immigration Law

1. Hire only citizens and aliens lawfully authorized to work in the United States.

2. Advise all new job applicants of your policy.

3. Require all new employees to complete and sign the verification form (the “I-9 form”) designated by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to certify that they are eligible for employment.

4. Examine documentation presented by new employees, record information about the documents on the verification form, and sign the form.

5. Retain the form for three years or for one year past the employment of the individual, whichever is longer.

6. If requested, present the form for inspection by INS or Department of Labor officers. No reporting is required.

Page 39: ch6

6–39© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Improving Productivity Through HRIS: Comprehensive Improving Productivity Through HRIS: Comprehensive Automated Applicant Tracking and Screening SystemsAutomated Applicant Tracking and Screening Systems

“Knock out” applicants who do not meet job requirements

Can match “hidden talents” of applicants to

available openings

Benefits of Applicant Tracking Systems

Allow employers to extensively test

and screen applicants online

Page 40: ch6

6–40© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 6–11 Checklist: What to Look for in an Applicant Tracking System (ATS)

The employer thinking of adopting an ATS should seek one that meets several minimum functionality requirements. Among other things, the ATS should be:

• Easy to use.

• Capable of being integrated into the company’s existing HRIS platform, so that, for instance, data on a newly hired candidate can flow seamlessly into the HRIS payroll system.

• Able to capture, track, and report applicant EEO data.

• Able to provide employee selection performance metrics reports, including “time to fill,” “cost to hire,” and “applicant source statistics.”

• Able to facilitate scheduling and tracking of candidate interviews, email communications, and completed forms, including job offers.

• Able to provide automated screening and ranking of candidates based upon job skill profiles.

• Able to provide an internal job posting service that supports applications from current employees and employee referral programs.

• Able to cross-post jobs to commercial job boards such as www.monster.com.

• Able to integrate the ATS job board with your company’s own Web site, for instance, by linking it to your site’s “careers” section.

• Able to provide for requisition creation and signoff approvals.

Page 41: ch6

6–41© 2009 Dorling Kindersley (I) Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

K E Y T E R M S

negligent hiringnegligent hiring

reliabilityreliability

test validitytest validity

criterion validitycriterion validity

content validitycontent validity

expectancy chartexpectancy chart

interest inventoryinterest inventory

work sampleswork samples

work sampling techniquework sampling technique

management assessment centermanagement assessment center

situational testsituational test

video-based simulationvideo-based simulation

miniature job training and evaluationminiature job training and evaluation


Recommended