Date post: | 12-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | anthony-douranakis |
View: | 347 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Options
Real Options
• Managers have options to adapt and revise decisions.
• Flexibility is valuable.
• Value of flexibility should be accounted for.
Real Options and Financial Options
• Option Definition – the right (but not the obligation) , to buy/sell an underlying asset at a price (the exercise price) that maybe different than the market price.
Real Options Vs. Financial OptionsNot traded on an exchange.
The underlying asset is something other than a security
Options on stocks, stock indices, foreign exchange, gold, silver, wheat,
etc.
Real Options
• Identification– Are there real options imbedded in this project?– What type of options?
• Valuation– How do we value options?– How do we value different types of options?– Can’t we just use NPV?
Identifying Real Options
• Value• Almost always exist• Art:– Identify options that are “significant”– Ignore options that are not
• Identifying real options takes practice, and some times “vision”.
Identifying Real Options
• 4 types1. Growth 2. Abandon 3. Investment Timing4. Switch
• Key elements– Information will arrive in the future– Decisions can be made after the information
Options vs. DCF
• DCF method:– “expected scenario” of cash flows– Discount the expected cash flows
• DCF is fine – as long as – – Expected cash flows are estimated properly– Discount rates are estimated properly
• Complex options make it difficult to estimate
Start with “Static” DCF Analysis
• Begin by valuing project with no options– Pretend the investment decision must be taken
immediately. • This benchmark constitutes a lower bound for
the project’s value. – NPV < 0 – Does not mean:
•
– NPV > 0 – Does not mean:• •
Growth Option (1)
• A company is considering a project that has an initial cost of $500,000.
• The project is expected to produce cash flows of $100,000 at the end of each of the next 5 years, and has a WACC of 12%.
• Should they take the project?
Growth Option (1)
• There is a 10% chance the project will lead to subsequent opportunities that have an NPV of $3,000,000 at t = 5, and a 90% chance of an NPV of -$1,000,000 at t = 5.
NPV with the Growth Option
• At WACC = 12%,– –
• Project NPV–
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
-$500,000
10% prob.
90% prob.1 2 3 4 5 Years0
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000-$1,000,000
$3,000,000
Growth Option (2)
• Suppose GRE Inc is considering a $3M investment. There is a 50% probability of success in which case they will earn 1.5M for 3 years. And, there is a 50% probability of poor results in which case they will earn only $1.1 for 3 years. It is considered to be a relatively risky investment with a WACC of 12%. What is the NPV of this project?
Growth Option (2)
• However, if the plan is successful at the end of the first year, then GRE Inc could invest another $1M at the end of the first year. This additional investment is expected to yield an additional cash flow of $5 the following year. What is the value of the growth option?
Part I - Project without the Growth OptionOutcome Prob. 0 1 2 3 NPVGood 50% -3 1.5 1.5 1.5 $0.603Bad 50% -3 1.1 1.1 1.1 ($0.358)
Expected NPV $0.122
Part II - Project with the Growth OptionInitial Investmet -3 1.5 1.5 1.5Growth Option -1 5Good 50% -3 1.5 0.5 6.5 $3.364Bad 50% -3 1.1 1.1 1.1 ($0.358)
Expected NPV $1.503
• The value of the option:$
Abandonment Option
• A project has an initial, up-front cost of $200,000. The project is expected to produce cash flows of $80,000 for the next three years.
• At a 10% WACC, should we take the project?– The NPV is -1051.84. – No, don’t take the project.
Abandonment Option
• The project’s cash flows depend critically upon customer acceptance of the product.
• There is a 60% probability that the product will be wildly successful and produce CFs of $150,000, and a 40% chance it will produce annual CFs of $25,000.
Abandonment Decision Tree
• If the customer uses the productNPV = $173,027.80.
• If the customer does not use the product, NPV is -$262,171.30.
• Overall,
-$200,00060% prob.
40% prob.1 2 3 Years0
150,000 150,000 150,000
-25,000 -25,000 -25,000
Issues with Abandonment Options
• The company does not have the option to delay the project.
• The company may abandon the project after a year, if the customer has not adopted the product.
• If the project is abandoned, there will be no operating costs incurred nor cash inflows received after the first year.
NPV with Abandonment Option
• If the customer uses the product, NPV is still $173,027.80.
• If the customer does not use the product and it can be abandoned after Year 1, NPV is $222,727.27.
• Overall,
-$200,00060% prob.
40% prob.1 2 3 Years0
150,000 150,000 150,000
-25,000
Should an abandonment option affect a project’s WACC?
Investment Timing Option
• A company is considering a project that has an up-front cost of $100,000. The project is expected to produce cash flows of $33,500 at the end of each of the next four years. The project has a WACC = 10%.
• Should they take the project now? • However, if the company waits a year they
will find out more information.
Investment Timing Option
• If they wait a year:– There is a 50% chance the market will be strong and the
expected cash flows will be $43,500 a year for four years.
– There is a 50% chance the market will be weak and the expected cash flows will be $23,500 a year for four years.
– The project’s initial cost will remain $100,000, but it will be incurred at t = 1 only if it makes sense at that time to proceed with the project.
• Should the company go ahead with the project today or wait for more information?
Investment Timing Decision Tree
• At WACC = 10%, the NPV at t = 1 is:$37,889, if CF’s are $43,500 per year, or -$25,508, if CF’s are $23,500 per year, in which case the firm would not proceed with the project.
50% prob.
50% prob.0 1 2 3 4 5 Years
-$100,000 43,500 43,500 43,500 43,500
-$100,000 23,500 23,500 23,500 23,500
Should we wait or proceed?
Factors to Consider In Decision of When to Invest
• Delaying the project means that cash flows come later rather than sooner.
• It might make sense to proceed today if there are important advantages to being the first competitor to enter a market.
• Waiting may allow you to take advantage of changing conditions.