Chapter 16 Terrestrial Ecology · considers cumulative impacts of existing and proposed projects in...

REPORT

Millport Coastal Flood Protection

Scheme: Environmental Statement

Chapter 16 Terrestrial Ecology

Client: North Ayrshire Council

Reference: PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0016

Status: Final/P01.01

Date: 31 January 2020

P r o j e c t r e l a t e d

31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0016

i

HASKONINGDHV UK LTD.

74/2 Commercial Quay

Commercial Street

Leith

Edinburgh

EH6 6LX

Industry & Buildings

VAT registration number: 792428892

+44 131 5550506

[email protected]

royalhaskoningdhv.com

T

E

W

Document title: Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme: Environmental Statement

Document short title:

Reference: PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0016

Status: P01.01/Final


Project name: Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme

Project number: PB4749

Author(s): Jen McMillan

Drafted by: Jen McMillan

Checked by: Gordon Campbell

Date / initials: 12/11/2019

Approved by: Frank Fortune

Date / initials: 10/12/2019

Classification

Project related

Disclaimer

No part of these specifications/printed matter may be reproduced and/or published by print, photocopy, microfilm or by

any other means, without the prior written permission of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.; nor may they be used, without such

permission, for any purposes other than that for which they were produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no

responsibility or liability for these specifications/printed matter to any party other than the persons by whom it was

commissioned and as concluded under that Appointment. The integrated QHSE management system of

HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. has been certified in accordance with ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018.



ii

Table of Contents

16 Terrestrial Ecology 1

16.1 Introduction 1

16.2 Legislation, Policy and Guidance 1

16.3 Consultation 8

16.4 Methodology 8

16.5 Existing Environment 15

16.6 Impact Assessment 22

16.7 Interactions 38

16.8 References 44

Table of Tables

Table 16-1 Summary of key legislation and policy relevant to this proposed scheme 2

Table 16-2 Relevant local planning policies 5

Table 16-3 Consultation responses 8

Table 16-4 Study areas 10

Table 16-5 Definitions of importance levels for terrestrial ecology 11

Table 16-6 Definitions of magnitude levels for terrestrial ecology 12

Table 16-7 Impact significance matrix 14

Table 16-8 Impact significance definitions 14

Table 16-9 Non Statutory Designated Sites 16

Table 16-10 Embedded mitigation measures for terrestrial ecology 24

Table 16-11 Embedded mitigation through Best Practice and Policy 24

Table 16-12 Potential Cumulative Impacts 34

Table 16-13 Summary of projects considered for the CIA in relation to terrestrial ecology 35

Table 16-14 Inter-topic relationships 38

Table 16-15 Potential interactions between impacts on terrestrial ecology 39

Table 16-16 Potential Impacts Identified for Terrestrial and Coastal Ecology 42

Table of Figures

Figure 16-1 Project Infrastructure and Study Boundaries

Figure 16-2 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey

Figure 16-3 Designated Sites



iii

Figure 16-4 Otter and Polecat records

Figure 16-5 Bat records

Figure 16-6 Reptile records

Figure 16-7 Invasive non- native species records

Appendices

Appendix 16.1: Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey (EP1HS)





i

Acronyms

Acronym Acronym description

AJPU Ayrshire Joint Planning Unit

BCT Bat Conservation Trust

BSBI Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland

CARS Conservation Area Regeneration Scheme

CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan

CIA Cumulative Impact Assessment

CIEEM Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management

CIRIA Construction Industry Research and Information Association

DMRB Design Manual for Roads and Bridges

EAP Ecological Action Plan

EcIA Ecological Impact assessment

ECoW Ecological Clerk of Works

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EP1HS Extended Phase 1 Habitat survey

EPS European Protected Species

ES Environmental Statement

EU European Union

ICZM Integrated Coastal Zone Management

ILP Institute of Lighting Engineers



ii

JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee

LBAP Local Biodiversity Action Plan

LDP Local Development Plan

LNCS Local Nature Conservation Sites

MAGIC Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside

NALBAP North Ayrshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan

NBN National Biodiversity Network

NPF National Planning Framework

NPMS National Plant Monitoring Scheme

NPPG National Planning Policy guidelines

OS Ordnance Survey

PANS Planning Advice Notes

PEA Preliminary Ecological Appraisal

SAC Special Area of Conservation

SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment

SNH Scottish Natural Heritage

SPA Special Protection Area

SPP Scottish Planning Policy

SSSI Special Site of Scientific Interest

SWSEIC South West Scotland Environmental Information Centre

SWT Scottish Wildlife Trust



iii

TPO Tree Preservation Order

UK United Kingdom

UKBAP United Kingdom Biodiversity Action Plan



iv

Glossary

Glossary Term Glossary Text

Bats Study Area 5km from Terrestrial Ecology Study Area

Desk Study Area 2km from Terrestrial Ecology Study Area

Ecological Impact

Assessment (EcIA)

EIA specifically for ecological receptors (i.e. habitats and species) which may be

affected, following guidance published by the Chartered Institute of Ecology and

Environmental Management (CIEEM) Guidelines for Ecological Impact

Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine

(2018) as amended

Environmental

Impact Assessment

(EIA)

A statutory process by which certain planned projects must be assessed before a

formal decision to proceed can be made. It involves the collection and

consideration of environmental information, which fulfils the assessment

requirements of the EIA Directive and EIA Regulations, including the publication

of an Environmental Statement.

Environmental

Statement (ES)

A document reporting the findings of the EIA and produced in accordance with the

EIA Directive as transposed into UK law by the EIA Regulations.

Holt Resting place for otter

Millport Coastal

Flood Protection

Scheme

The scheme consists of offshore rock armour structures which will be built in the

vicinity of the rock islets within Millport Bay. Onshore works will include flood

walls, improvement works to existing coast protection structures, and works to

raise the level of existing grass areas. Works on the foreshore include shore-

connected rock armour breakwaters and rock armour revetments.

Terrestrial Ecology

Study Area 250m from the footprint of the proposed scheme



1

16 Terrestrial Ecology

16.1 Introduction

1. This chapter of the Environmental Statement (ES) considers the potential impacts of the proposed

Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme (the ‘proposed scheme’) on terrestrial ecology. Potential

impacts on birds are discussed in full in Chapter 11 Offshore and Coastal Ornithology. Impacts on

the intertidal ecology are discussed in full in Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology.

2. This chapter provides an overview of the existing baseline environment in respect to terrestrial

ecology within a study area (see Section 16.4.1.4) around the proposed scheme’s infrastructure

(Figure 16-1a and 16-1b). This chapter then provides the findings from an Ecological Impact

Assessment (EcIA) that has been undertaken of the potential impacts of construction, operation and

decommissioning of the proposed scheme based on this baseline environment. This EcIA also

considers cumulative impacts of existing and proposed projects in respect to terrestrial ecology.

3. The potential effects on terrestrial ecology are assessed conservatively using realistic worst-case

scenarios for the proposed scheme.

4. All figures referred to in this chapter are provided in Volume II of this ES.

5. Other chapters which this chapter interacts with are identified in Section 16.6.8.

6. The assessment of potential effects has been made with specific reference to Scotland’s National

Planning Framework and Planning Policy. These are discussed further in Chapter 2 Policy and

Legislation and outlined below in Section 16.2. These are the principal decision-making documents

for flood protection schemes.

7. This Chapter has been prepared by Royal HaskoningDHV, using information obtained from a suite of

ecological field surveys that have been undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV ecologists. The

assessment follows guidance published by the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental

Management (CIEEM) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland:

Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine (2018) as amended.

8. Additional information to support the assessment of impacts on terrestrial ecology is provided

separately in the following appendices:

• Appendix 16.1: Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey (EP1HS) (Volume III of this ES).

16.2 Legislation, Policy and Guidance

16.2.1 Legislation

9. There are a number of pieces of legislation applicable to terrestrial ecology, with the following key

pieces of International, UK and Scottish legislation being relevant to this chapter. Further on the

following legislation is provided in Chapter 2 Policy and Legislation.

10. Table 16-1 below provides a brief summary of the key legislation and policy relevant to the scheme.



2

Table 16-1 Summary of key legislation and policy relevant to this proposed scheme

Legislation Relevance

Habitats Directive - Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the

Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and

Flora

This Directive provides protection for specific habitats listed

in Annex I and species listed in Annex II of the Directive.

The Directive sets out decision making procedures for the

protection of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and

Special Protection Areas (SPA), implemented in Scotland

through the

Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (as

amended), and in England and Wales through The

Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.

Birds Directive - Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the

Conservation of Wild Birds

This Directive provides a framework for the conservation

and management of wild birds in Europe (also see

Chapter 11 Offshore and Coastal Ornithology). The

most relevant provisions of the Directive are the

identification and classification of SPAs for rare or

vulnerable species listed in Annex I of the Directive and for

all regularly occurring migratory species (required by

Article 4). It also establishes a general scheme of

protection for all wild birds (required by Article 5). The

Directive requires national Governments to establish SPAs

and to have in place mechanisms to protect and manage

them. The SPA protection procedures originally set out in

Article 4 of the Birds Directive have been replaced by the

Article 6 provisions of the Habitats Directive.

Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) (includes

amendments made via the Wildlife and Natural

Environment (Scotland) Act 2011)

Codifies the EU Directive 2009/147/EC (the Birds

Directive) into UK law.

This Act makes it an offence (with exception to species

listed in Schedule 2 and with additional penalties for

species listed in Schedule 1) to intentionally: kill, injure, or

take any wild bird; take, damage or destroy the nest of any

wild bird while that nest is in use or being built; and take or

destroy an egg of any wild bird.

The Act makes it an offence to intentionally kill, injure or

take any animal listed in Schedule 5 of the act and protects

occupied and unoccupied places used for shelter or

protection.

The Act makes it an offence (subject to exceptions) to

intentionally pick, uproot or destroy any wild plant listed in

Schedule 8 of the Act.

The Act makes it a criminal offence to plant or otherwise

cause to grow any non-native, invasive species listed

under Schedule 9 of the Act.

The Act makes provision for the notification and

confirmation of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).

Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004

The Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 places

duties on public bodies in relation to the conservation of

biodiversity, increases protection for Sites of Special



3


Scientific Interest (SSSI) from that set out in the Wildlife

and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), amends

legislation on Nature Conservation Orders, provides for

Land Management Orders for SSSIs and associated land,

strengthens wildlife enforcement legislation (to include

‘reckless’ acts).

Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (as

amended)

Codifies the EU Directive 92/43/EEC (The Habitats

Directive) into UK law.

The Regulations transpose the Council Directive 92 / 43 /

EEC the ‘Habitats Directive’ in to national law (in respect of

Scotland) and requires the state to designate SACs.

The Regulations make it an offence (subject to exceptions)

to deliberately capture, kill, disturb, or trade in the animals

listed in Schedule 2, or pick, collect, cut, uproot, destroy, or

trade in the plants listed in Schedule 4.

The Regulations require competent authorities to consider

or review planning permission, applied for or granted,

affecting a European site, and, subject to certain

exceptions, restrict or revoke permission where the

integrity of the site would be adversely affected.

The Regulations details the protection given to European

protected species of animals and plants. This section also

describes the licensing system, which is used to permit

certain activities that would otherwise be illegal.

Marine (Scotland) Act 2010

Scotland has devolved power under Marine and Coastal

Access Act 2009 for marine planning, licencing, designated

MPAs and seal protection.

16.2.2 Policies and Plans

11. The policies and plans outlined below have also been reviewed for their relevance to terrestrial

ecology when undertaking the EcIA for the proposed scheme.

16.2.2.1 National Plans

National Planning Framework:

12. Scotland’s third National Planning Framework (NPF) (Scottish Government, 2014a) includes the

following ambitions relevant to terrestrial ecology at Millport and these have been considered when

undertaking the EcIA for the proposed scheme:

• Para 4.10 The 2020 Challenge for Scotland’s Biodiversity aims to promote and enhance

Scotland’s nature, and to better connect people with the natural world. Maintaining our natural

capacity to provide services makes economic sense – to help achieve this, biodiversity in

Scotland needs to be viewed at a landscape scale;

13. And:

14. The coast and islands will capitalise on their world-class environment.



4

• Para 4.29 The environment of our coastal areas, on land and at sea, is an outstanding,

internationally important resource. These natural assets support quality of life and underpin

important economic sectors like tourism, outdoor recreation and food and drink.

• Para 4.30 The marine environment, and its natural resources, are central to this. National and

Regional Marine Plans will provide policies to achieve sustainable development, protection and,

where appropriate, enhancement of the marine area. Onshore, land management practices,

including crofting in the north and west and on the islands, help to sustain unique cultural and

natural environments.

• Para 4.31 As climate change impacts on Scotland’s coastline, there will be a need to address the

long-term resilience of some island and coastal communities.

Natural Environment White Paper 2011

15. The paper was the first White Paper produced by the government in 20 years. The paper contains

plans to reconnect nature, connect people and nature for better quality of life and capture and improve

the value of nature.

A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment 2018

16. The plan sets out 10 goals and a range of high-level policies aimed at helping “the natural world

regain and retain good health”. The key policies within the plan relevant for this chapter are:

• Embedding an ‘environmental net gain’ principle for development, including housing and

infrastructure;

• Focusing on woodland to maximise its many benefits; and

• Protecting and recovering nature (including improving biosecurity to protect and conserve nature).

Scottish Planning Policy

17. Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) (Scottish Government, 2014b) contains the following Policy Principles

with regards to Valuing the Natural Environment and these have been taken into consideration when

undertaking the EcIA for the proposed scheme:

18. The planning system should:

• Facilitate positive change while maintaining and enhancing distinctive landscape character;

• Conserve and enhance protected sites and species, taking account of the need to maintain healthy

ecosystems and work with the natural processes which provide important services to communities;

• Promote protection and improvement of the water environment, including rivers, lochs, estuaries,

wetlands, coastal waters and groundwater, in a sustainable and co-ordinated way;

• Seek to protect soils from damage such as erosion or compaction;

• Protect and enhance ancient semi-natural woodland as an important and irreplaceable resource,

together with other native or long-established woods, hedgerows and individual trees with high

nature conservation or landscape value;

• Seek benefits for biodiversity from new development where possible, including the restoration of

degraded habitats and the avoidance of further fragmentation or isolation of habitats; and

• Support opportunities for enjoying and learning about the natural environment.

19. The presence (or potential presence) of a legally protected species is an important consideration in

decisions on planning applications. If there is evidence to suggest that a protected species is present

on site or may be affected by a proposed development, steps must be taken to establish their

presence. The level of protection afforded by legislation must be factored into the planning and design

of the development and any impacts must be fully considered prior to the determination of the

application. Certain activities – for example those involving European Protected Species as specified



5

in the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 and wild birds, protected animals and

plants under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 – may only be undertaken under licence. Following

the introduction of the Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011, Scottish Natural

Heritage is now responsible for the majority of wildlife licensing in Scotland.

Planning Advice Notes (PANS)

20. Planning Advice Note (PAN) 1/2013: Environmental Impact Assessment explains the role of individual

planning authorities and that of the Consultation Bodies in EIA, as well as providing guidance on the

ways in which EIA can be integrated into the overall development management process.

21. PAN 60: Planning for Natural Heritage provides advice on how development and the planning system

can contribute to the conservation, enhancement, enjoyment and understanding of Scotland's natural

environment and encourages developers and planning authorities to be positive and creative in

addressing natural heritage issues. It complements the National Planning Policy Guideline on Natural

Heritage (NPPG 14), with examples of good planning practice in relation to natural heritage drawn

from across Scotland highlighted in a number of case studies.

16.2.2.2 Local Plans

22. The proposed scheme falls within the North Ayrshire Council local authority boundaries. North

Ayrshire adopted its new Local Development Plan 2 in November 2019 (North Ayrshire Council,

2019).

23. For the purpose of the new Local Plan, Millport and the footprint of the proposed scheme is

categorised to be within ‘Developed Coast’. A number of policies which primarily relate to the

management of water resources, and which are inter-linked with terrestrial ecology are discussed in

Chapter 7 Marine Water and Sediment Quality.

24. The Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan ‘Growing A Sustainable Ayrshire’ (North Ayrshire Council, East

Ayrshire Council and South Ayrshire Council, 2007) establishes a framework that brings together the

aspirations of communities with those of business and industry, and the area’s many supporting

agencies and organisations, to provide a strategic land use context to the year 2025. The Plan classes

Great Cumbrae as a ‘potential area’ for a woodland strategy. For woodland management and

expansion.

25. Table 16-2 provides details of the local planning policy documents and the relevant policies in respect

to terrestrial ecology. These policy document have been considered when undertaking the EcIA for

the proposed scheme.

Table 16-2 Relevant local planning policies

Document Policy /

Guidance Policy / Guidance purpose

North Ayrshire

Council Local

Development

Plan, November

2019 (North

Ayrshire Council,

2019)

Policy 16:

Protection of

our Designated

Sites

To support development which would not have an unacceptable adverse

effect on our valuable natural environment as defined by the following

legislative and planning designations

Policy 18:

Forestry,

Woodland,

Where the loss of trees, hedgerows or woodlands of merit is unavoidable

and compensatory planting is required, replacement trees should be of a



6

Document Policy /

Guidance Policy / Guidance purpose

Trees and

Hedgerows

similar scale and massing to the loss or if smaller there should be

additional tree planting committed to ensure a net gain is achieved.

Policy 22:

Water

Environment

Quality

Protecting and enhancing the ecological status and riparian habitat,

natural heritage, landscape values and physical characteristics of water

bodies (including biodiversity and geodiversity);

North Ayrshire

Council

Environmental

Policy, 2012

(North Ayrshire

Council, 2012a)

Challenge 3: To

protect and

enhance the

natural

environment

Protecting and preventing loss of wildlife habitats, flora and fauna;

Supporting the creation of new habitats and habitat networks in both the

rural and urban environment through local biodiversity action planning;

Conserving and enhancing the quality and character of the landscape;

Promoting the value of ecosystem services, including green engineering

technology; and

Encouraging sustainable public access to and enjoyment of the outdoors.

North Ayrshire

Council Tree and

Woodland

Management

Policy (North

Ayrshire Council,

2012b)

-

To set out how the Council will effectively manage trees and woodlands

for which it is responsible ensuring that they positively contribute to the

area and achievement of the corporate priorities of the Council whilst

meeting legal obligations

Ayrshire Joint

Structure Plan

(2014)

ENV 7 Natural

Heritage

Designations

The three Ayrshire Councils shall:

Recognise international and national natural heritage designations and the

statutory protection afforded by them;

Support the identification of additional local natural reserves and continue

to work with other stakeholders to implement the Ayrshire Local

Biodiversity Action Plan

Local plans shall include policies based on the Scottish Executive Model

Policies for the protection for all sites of recognised international and

national natural heritage importance.

ENV 9 Water

Framework

Directive

The three Ayrshire councils shall work with other agencies to introduce the

Water Framework Directive into Planning Policy.

ENV 10

Integrated

Coastal Zone

Management

North and South Ayrshire Councils shall bring forward proposals for a

coastal zone management plan for the Ayrshire coastline.

16.2.2.3 Biodiversity Action Plan

26. At the Rio summit in 1992 world leaders pledged to fight against wildlife’s extinction and strive to

protect the variety of living nature on earth and the Convention on Biological Diversity was signed.

27. The UK generated the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UKBAP) in response to this agreement. Local

Biodiversity Action Plans (LBAP) were adopted at the county level to generate action on the ground

and help meet UK targets.



7

28. Ayrshire is comprised of the three unitary authorities of East, North and South Ayrshire, including a

range of islands (Arran, Great Cumbrae, Little Cumbrae and Ailsa Craig, etc.). It is a cohesive bio-

geographical unit from an environmental perspective as it is bounded by the sea and by watersheds.

The delivery of the Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) within Ayrshire was historically a joint project

with the neighbouring authorities of South and East Ayrshire and led by the Ayrshire Joint Planning

Unit (AJPU).

29. With the closure of the AJPU in the summer of 2013, a revised approach was required to address

North Ayrshire Council’s statutory biodiversity duty and address the Scottish Government’s 2020

Challenge for Scotland’s Biodiversity for the conservation and enhancement of biodiversity in

Scotland. As such, the following revisions were made:

• Ayrshire LBAP 2012-2017 Revision;

• North Ayrshire LBAP 2015-2018 Revision; and

• North Ayrshire LBAP 2019-2031

16.2.3 Guidance

30. The impact assessment has been based upon the following guidance and standards:

• Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) (2018) as amended

Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater,

Coastal and Marine (Version 1.1);

• CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Report Writing (2nd Edition, December 2017).

• A Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessment (Version 5) (Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH),

2018);

• British Standard 42020:2013 –Biodiversity. Code of Practice for planning and development

(British Standard, 2013);

• CIRIA Guidance note C741 Environmental Good Practice on Site Guide (4th edition) (CIRIA,

2015);

• Scottish Biodiversity List (Biodiversity Scotland, undated);

• Scottish Natural Heritage website: Protected Species https://www.nature.scot/professional-

advice/safeguarding-protected-areas-and-species/protected-species Accessed 29.01.20 (SNH,

2019a);

• Scottish Natural Heritage website: Otters: licences for surveys and research (2019)

https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/safeguarding-protected-areas-and-

species/licensing/species-licensing-z-guide/otters-and-licensing/otters-licences-surveys-and)

(SNH, 2019b);

• Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat survey –A technique for environmental audit (JNCC, 2010);

• GB Non-native Species Secretariat (2015) Species Information;

• British Standard 5837: 2012 – Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction;

• Bat Conservation Trust (BCT) and Institute of Lighting Engineers (ILP) (2018) Bats and Artificial

Lighting in the UK;

• Dean et al. (2016) The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series);

• Edgar et al. (2010) Reptile Habitat Management Handbook;

• English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines;

• Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) (2003) Herpetofauna Worker’s Manual;

• Strachan and Moorhouse (2011) Water Vole Conservation Handbook, 3rd Edition; and

• SNH survey guidance and standing advice on individual protected species.



8

16.3 Consultation

31. To inform the ES, North Ayrshire Council has undertaken a thorough pre-application consultation

process, which has included the following key stages:

o Screening and Scoping Reports submitted to Marine Scotland and North Ayrshire Council (Royal

HaskoningDHV 2017); and

o Scoping Opinion received from Marine Scotland and North Ayrshire Council.

32. Full details of the proposed scheme’s consultation process to date is presented within Chapter 3 EIA

Methodology and Consultation.

33. A summary of the consultation carried out at key stages throughout the proposed scheme, of

particular relevance to terrestrial and coastal ecology, is presented in Table 16-3. Although invited to

respond to the proposed scheme’s Scoping Report, no responses were received from Marine

Conservation Society, RSPB Scotland, National Trust Scotland or World Wildlife Fund (Scotland).

Table 16-3 Consultation responses

Consultee Date/

Document

Comment Response / Where

addressed in the ES

Scottish

Natural

Heritage

Scoping Report:

05/05/17

The report correctly identifies the key areas

of concern to this organisation and these

issues have been adequately described.

The proposed measures for baseline

surveys and completing the assessment of

the potential impacts on the natural heritage

should lead to a fair assessment of the

project.

Baseline is described in

Section 16.5 and Impact

Assessment is described

in Section 16.6.

16.4 Methodology

34. This section describes the methodology used to obtain baseline data, characterise the terrestrial

ecology of the area and undertake the EcIA. The primary study area is the Terrestrial Ecology Study

Area (which extends 250m from the footprint of the proposed scheme) however due to the buffer

caused by the buildings of the town, the majority of impacts are considered to occur in the coastal

area. Species or data-specific deviations from this are discussed in Section 16.4.1 and Section

16.4.1.2, and summarised in Section 16.4.1.4. Baseline data was obtained through a number of

sources, namely:

• Desk study;

• An Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey (EP1HS); and

• An Otter Presence / Absence Survey.

35. An Intertidal Survey was also undertaken and is reported in Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal

Ecology.

16.4.1 Baseline Data

16.4.1.1 Data Sources – Desk Study

36. Biological records were obtained from the South West Scotland Environmental Information Centre

(SWSEIC) in November 2017 and is provided in Annex C of Appendix 16.1. The data search returned



9

all records of statutory and non-statutory designated sites for nature conservation within 2km of the

Terrestrial Ecology Study Area boundary. The data search also searched for records of protected and

notable species within 2km of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area boundary (5km for bat species). The

data search was repeated in December 2019 to capture any recent records within the EcIA and has

been incorporated into this assessment. The updated search is in digital format and is available on

request.

37. The Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) website (www.magic.gov.uk)

and the Scottish Natural Heritage website (www.nature.scot) were reviewed for information on

statutory and non-statutory designated sites and notable habitats (e.g. ancient woodlands) of nature

conservation importance within 2km of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area. The National Biodiversity

Network (NBN) Atlas was also reviewed for recorded of protected or notable species and habitats

within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area.

38. A search for water bodies within 250m of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area was made using

Ordnance Survey (OS) maps. A search area of 250m was chosen having taken into account the

habitats around the survey area. Although great crested newts can use suitable terrestrial habitat up

to 500m from a breeding pond (Great Crested Newt Conservation Handbook, Froglife, 2001),

research suggests that newts are likely to travel no more than 250m from ponds where suitable

habitats for foraging and hibernation exist1.

16.4.1.2 Data Sources – Site Specific Surveys and Reports

39. An EP1HS and an Otter Presence/Absence Survey was conducted (Appendix 16.1, Royal

HaskoningDHV 2018a). These surveys were completed in conjunction with an Intertidal Survey

(Appendix 8.2 Royal HaskoningDHV, 2018b) which focussed on the intertidal habitats offshore and

adjacent to the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area in the EP1HS (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2018a).

Intertidal ecology is reported in Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology.

40. The EP1HS and Otter Presence/Absence Survey covered the terrestrial habitats within the footprint

of the proposed scheme plus an additional 250m buffer, as presented in Figure 16-2. It was designed

to cover all terrestrial areas which may be impacted by the proposed scheme and extends from the

old Lido in the west through Newtown Bay and Kames Bay and out towards Farland Point in the east.

Habitats on the far side of houses and streets with no connectivity to the footprint of the proposed

scheme were not surveyed and it is assumed the buildings will provide screening for noise/air quality

related impacts. The EP1HS comprised three components, which collectively enabled a Preliminary

Ecological Appraisal (PEA) of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area to be undertaken. These

components included:

• A desktop review that summarised information on existing protected species records and nature

conservation designations in the area;

• An assessment of the habitats recorded within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area obtained from

the ecological walkover survey; and

• An assessment of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area for its likelihood of supporting protected

species or species of conservation concern.

41. Further details on the EP1HS are set out in Appendix 16.1.

1 Cresswell & Whitworth, 2004, An assessment of the efficiency of capture techniques and the value of different habitats for great crested newt Triturus cristatus, ENRR Number 576



10

42. The Otter Presence/Absence Survey involved looking for evidence to confirm the presence/absence

of otters within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area and the presence/absence of holts and/or resting

places that may be impacted by the scheme. Further details on the survey are set out in Appendix

16.1.

43. Additional ad hoc otter data was gathered during bird surveys (Atlantic Ecology, 2019) during

observations of Millport Bay and included access to the Eileans. This additional data has been

included within this assessment. Details of the bird surveys can be found in Appendix 11.1.

16.4.1.3 Assumptions and Limitations

44. The EP1HS focussed on the footprint of the proposed scheme as access was not possible to the

wider Terrestrial Ecology Study Area. Areas not directly accessed have been assessed using desk

review and aerial imagery. Access was also not possible to the Eileans during the EP1HS or otter

presence/absence survey, however information gathered from access during the bird surveys has

also informed this assessment.

16.4.1.4 Summary of Study Areas

45. A summary of the study areas outlined in Section 16.4.1 and Section 16.4.1.2 is presented below in

Table 16-4.

Table 16-4 Study areas

Study Area Distance from scheme boundary Data type obtained

Terrestrial Ecology Study Area:

EP1HS, otter, reptiles, amphibians,

badger, red squirrel, pine martin,

invasive non-native species

250m Desk study and field survey

Desk Study Area: All habitats and

species, including nature

conservation designated sites

2km from Terrestrial Ecology Study

Area Desk study

Bats Study Area 5km from Terrestrial Ecology Study

Area Desk study

16.4.2 Impact Assessment Methodology

16.4.2.1 EcIA Methodology

46. General methods for EIA are discussed in Chapter 3 EIA Methodology and Consultation. The EcIA

methodology proposed in relation to terrestrial ecology is based on the Guidelines for Ecological

Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal and Marine (CIEEM,

2018). These guidelines aim to predict the residual impacts on important ecological features affected,

either directly or indirectly by a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been

implemented.

47. The approach to determining the significance of an impact follows a systematic process for all

impacts. This involves identifying, qualifying and, where possible, quantifying the sensitivity,

importance and magnitude of all ecological receptors which have been scoped into this assessment.



11

Using this information, a significance of each potential impact has been determined. Each of these

steps is set out in the remainder of this section.

48. The EcIA has used professional judgement to ensure the assessed significance level is appropriate

for each individual receptor, taking account of local importance for biodiversity to avoid a subjective

assessment wherever possible as per the CIEEM guidelines. As a result, the assessed significance

level may not always be directly attributed to the guidance matrix detailed below.

Importance

49. The first stage of an EcIA is determining the ‘importance’ of ecological features or ‘receptors’. CIEEM

identifies the important ecological features as those key sites, habitats and species which have been

identified by European, national and local governments and specialist organisations as a key focus

for biodiversity conservation in the UK. These include:

• Statutory and non-statutory designated sites for nature conservation;

• Species occurring on national biodiversity lists;

• UK Habitats of Principal Importance;

• SNH Priority habitats and species; and

• Red listed, rare or legally protected species.

50. Importance is also qualified by the geographic context of an ecological receptor, i.e. a species which

may be not recognised on a national biodiversity list may be locally in decline, and therefore its local

importance is greater than its national importance.

51. For this EcIA, the guidelines outlined in Table 16-5 will be followed to provide the relative importance

of different ecological features.

Table 16-5 Definitions of importance levels for terrestrial ecology

Importance Definition

High

An internationally designated site or candidate site or an area which the statutory nature

conservation organisation has determined meets the published selection criteria for such

designation, irrespective of whether or not it has yet been notified;

A nationally designated site or a discrete area, including ancient woodlands, which the statutory

nature conservation organisation has determined meets the published selection criteria for

national designation (e.g. SSSI selection guidelines) irrespective of whether or not it has yet

been notified;

A viable area of a habitat type listed in Annex I of the Habitats Directive, or smaller areas of

such habitat which are essential to maintain the viability of a larger whole;

A viable area of a UK Habitat of Principal Importance or smaller areas of such habitat which are

essential to maintain the viability of a larger whole;

A European protected species listed in Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994

(as amended); or

A regularly occurring, nationally significant population / number of any internationally important

species.

Medium

Local Authority designated sites and other sites which the designating authority has determined

meet the published ecological selection criteria for designation, including Local Nature Reserves

selected on defined ecological criteria and Wildlife Trust sites;

Viable areas of habitat identified in a Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP);

Semi-natural woodland greater than 0.5 hectares (ha) which is considered to be in ‘good

condition’;



12

Importance Definition

Any regularly occurring population of a nationally important species which is threatened or rare

in the region; or

A regularly occurring, locally significant number of a species identified as important on a

regional basis.

Low

Semi-natural woodland greater than 0.25ha which is considered to be in ‘good condition’ or

greater than 0.5ha in unfavourable condition;

Network of inter-connected hedgerows including some species-rich hedgerows;

Individual Important hedgerows or other ancient-countryside linear features;

Viable areas of habitat identified in a sub-county (District / Borough) BAP;

Any regularly occurring population of a nationally important species which is not threatened or

rare in the region or county;

Sites / features that are scarce within the District / Borough or which appreciably enrich the

District / Borough habitat resource; or

Other features identified as wildlife corridors or migration routes.

Negligible Features of importance to the immediate area only e.g. within the site.

52. In addition to the features listed in Table 16-5, ecological features which play a key functional role in

the landscape or are locally rare have been considered. The importance of such features has been

determined by professional judgement.

53. CIEEM places the emphasis on using professional judgement when considering importance of

ecological receptors, based on available guidance, information and expert advice (CIEEM, 2018).

Different aspects of ecological importance should be taken into account, including designations,

biodiversity importance, potential importance, secondary or supporting importance, social

importance, economic importance, legal protection and multi-functional features.

Magnitude

54. The magnitude of the impact is assessed according to:

• The extent of the area subject to a predicted impact;

• The duration the impact is expected to last prior to recovery or replacement of the resource or

feature;

• Whether the impact is reversible, with recovery through natural or spontaneous regeneration, or

through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

within a reasonable timescale or there is no intention to reverse the impact; and

• The timing and frequency of the impact, i.e. conflicting with critical seasons or increasing impact

through repetition.

55. Table 16-6 summarises the definitions of magnitude that have been used for the terrestrial ecology

receptors.

Table 16-6 Definitions of magnitude levels for terrestrial ecology

Magnitude Definition

High

Major impacts on the feature / population, which would have a sufficient effect to alter the nature

of the feature in the short to long term and affect its long-term viability. For example, more than

20% habitat loss or damage.



13

Magnitude Definition

Medium Impacts that are detectable in short and long-term, but which should not alter the long-term

viability of the feature / population. For example, between 10 - 20% habitat loss or damage.

Low Minor impacts, either of sufficiently small-scale or of short duration to cause no long-term harm to

the feature / population. For example, less than 10% habitat loss or damage.

Negligible /

No Impact

A potential impact that is not expected to affect the feature / population in any way, therefore no

effects are predicted.

Duration

56. The definitions of duration used within this EcIA are dependent on the individual ecological receptor,

and how sensitive it is to effects over different timescales. However, in general terms the following

definitions have been used:

• Short term: effects which at most occur over a part of, or over a part of a key period of, a species’

active season or a habitat’s growing season, i.e. typically effects which occur over a matter of days

or weeks;

• Medium term: effects which occur over the full duration of a species’ active season or a habitat’s

growing season, i.e. typically effects which occur over a matter of months or one year; and

• Long term: effects which occur over the multiple active or growing seasons, i.e. typically effects

which occur over more than one year.

57. Where deviations from these definitions are used within Section 16.6, this is explained within the text.

Impact Significance

58. Following the identification of receptor importance and magnitude of the effect, it is possible to

determine the significance of the impact.

59. Ecologically significant impacts are defined as:

60. ‘…impacts on structure and function of defined sites, habitats or ecosystems and the conservation

status of habitats and species (including extent, abundance and distribution)’ (CIEEM, 2018).

61. Impacts are unlikely to be significant where features of low importance are subject to small scale or

short-term effects. If an impact is found not to be significant at the level at which the resource or

feature has been valued for its importance, it may be significant at a more local level.

62. CIEEM recommend that the following factors are taken into account when determining significance

for selected ecological receptors:

• Designated/defined sites and Ecosystems

o Designated sites: is the proposed scheme and associated activities likely to undermine the

site’s conservation objectives, or positively or negatively affect the conservation status of

species or habitats for which the site is designated, or may it have positive or negative

effects on the condition of the site or its interest/qualifying features?

Ecosystems: is the proposed scheme likely to result in a change in ecosystem structure

and function?

• Habitats and Species



14

o Habitats: conservation status is determined by the sum of the influences acting on the

habitat that may affect its extent, structure and functions as well as its distribution and its

typical species within a given geographical area.

o Species: conservation status is determined by the sum of influences acting on the species

concerned that may affect its abundance and distribution within a given geographical area

(CIEEM, 2018).

63. Following the identification of receptor importance and magnitude of effect, the significance of the

impact has been considered using the matrix presented in Table 16-7 below and knowledge of the

ecological features affected.

64. The assessment of potential impacts has been undertaken assuming implementation of embedded

mitigation and commitments for the proposed scheme (Section 16.6.2). Residual impacts include

any additional mitigation measures required. An assessment of residual impacts is then made, after

assuming implementation of additional mitigation measures where required, i.e. the significance of

the effects that are predicted to remain after the implementation of all committed mitigation measures.

Table 16-7 Impact significance matrix

Negative Magnitude Beneficial Magnitude

High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

Sensitiv

ity

High Major Major Moderate Minor Minor Moderate Major Major

Medium Major Moderate Minor Minor Minor Minor Moderate Major

Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

Negligible Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Minor

65. The impact significance categories are defined as shown in Table 16-8.

Table 16-8 Impact significance definitions

Impact

Significance Definition

Major

Very large or large change in receptor condition, both adverse or beneficial, which are likely to be

important considerations at a regional or district level because they contribute to achieving

national, regional or local objectives, or, could result in exceedance of statutory objectives and / or

breaches of legislation.

Moderate Intermediate change in receptor condition, which are likely to be important considerations at a

local level.

Minor Small change in receptor condition, which may be raised as local issues but are unlikely to be

important in the decision making process.

Negligible No discernible change in receptor condition.

No Change No impact, therefore no change in receptor condition.

66. Note that for the purposes of the EcIA, major and moderate impacts are deemed to be significant. In

addition, whilst minor impacts are not significant in their own right, it is important to distinguish these

from other non-significant impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or

through interactions.



15

67. Embedded mitigation has been referred to and included in the initial assessment of impact. If the

impact does not require mitigation (or none is possible) the residual impact remains the same.

However, if mitigation is required, an assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact is provided.

Cumulative Impact Assessment

68. For an introduction to the methodology used for the Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA), please

refer to Chapter 3 EIA Methodology and Consultation. This chapter includes those cumulative

impacts that are specific to terrestrial ecology.

69. The key consideration used is whether there is spatial or temporal overlap of effects from different

projects on the same receptors. Therefore, for habitats and non-mobile species, unless there is a

spatial overlap there is no pathway for cumulative impact between spatially separated projects. There

is however a potential for a cumulative impact upon the overall habitat resource at a regional or

national level. Where potential regional or national level impacts are identified and considered to be

relevant they are highlighted in the CIA.

70. For mobile species there is only a pathway for cumulative impact if there is spatial overlap of potential

receptor ranges in addition to temporal overlap with the activity or its resultant impact i.e. where

developments follow on from one another before the species has recovered from displacement or

other impact. In addition, whilst it is assumed that any consented development would be subject to

mitigation and management measures which would reduce impacts to non-significant unless there

were exceptional circumstances, it is accepted that such projects may contribute to a wider cumulative

impact.

71. Finally, in cases where this proposed scheme has negligible or no impact on a receptor (through for

example avoidance of impact through routeing or construction methodology) it is considered that

there is no pathway for a cumulative impact.

Habitats Regulations Appraisal

72. As detailed in Section 16.5 and on Figure 16-3, due to the distances to any Nature 2000 sites and

the lack of connectivity of terrestrial species, there are no impacts anticipated upon Nature 2000 sites

or their qualifying features, and as such a Habitats Regulations Appraisal for terrestrial ecology is not

required.

16.5 Existing Environment

73. This section describes the existing environment and baseline characterisation of the Terrestrial

Ecology Study Area and wider Desk Study Areas, including nature conservation designated sites,

and legally protected or notable species or habitats.

16.5.1 Statutory and Non Statutory Nature Conservation Designated Sites

74. There are no internationally designated sites on Great Cumbrae or within 2km of the proposed

scheme.

75. There is one Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within the footprint of the proposed scheme,

and two SSSIs within a 2km buffer. There are no National Nature Reserves or Local Nature Reserves

on Great Cumbrae or within 2km of the proposed scheme.

76. The statutory designated sites are considered to be of high ecological importance and are discussed

below and shown on Figure 16-3.



16

Kames Bay Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)

77. Kames Bay SSSI is located within the footprint of the proposed scheme and is designated for its

biological (marine and intertidal) coastline habitat, namely its sandflats. It has been studied for over

one hundred years and is the classic Scottish site for the study of intertidal marine biology, having

contributed more to the understanding of marine biology than any other stretch of beach in Scotland

(SNH, 1985). This site is therefore considered further in Chapter 8 Benthic Ecology and is not

assessed in this chapter.

Ballochmartin Bay SSSI

78. Ballochmartin Bay SSSI is located approximately 1.7km north east from the proposed scheme on

Great Cumbrae, and is also designated for its intertidal sandflat habitat. It contains a number of

habitat types and is the most varied section of coastline in Great Cumbrae, and the fauna and flora

of the intertidal areas have been intensively surveyed and studied (SNH, 2000). The beach is backed

by herb-rich grassland and the roadside verges support slow worm Anguis fragilis. The site is also

an important feeding area for waders (considered in Chapter 11 Offshore and Coastal

Ornithology), common seal Phoca vitulina and grey seal Halichoerus grypus (considered in Chapter

10 Marine Mammals and Basking Shark). Marine ecology features are considered further in

Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology.

Southannan Sands SSSI

79. Southannan Sands SSSI is located approximately 2km south east of the scheme, on the Scottish

mainland coastline, south of Largs. Southannan Sands comprises three discrete areas which

together support one of the best examples of intertidal sandflats habitat, alongside associated flora

and fauna including dwarf eelgrass Zostera noltei. This site is considered further in Chapter 8

Benthic and Intertidal Ecology and is not assessed in this chapter.

Non Statutory Designated Sites

80. There are ten non-statutory sites on Great Cumbrae, seven of which fall within a 2km buffer of the

scheme, but none are within the footprint of the scheme (Table 16-9). These sites are designated as

Scottish Wildlife Trust (SWT) Wildlife Sites, and/or as ancient, semi natural or nearly native woodlands

and are shown on Figure 16-3. The SWT sites are considered to be of medium ecological

importance, whilst ancient woodland is considered to be of high importance ecologically.

Table 16-9 Non Statutory Designated Sites

Site Name Designation type Grid

reference

Distance from

proposed

scheme

Barbay Hill SWT Wildlife Site NS171569 1.4 km

Bell Bay to Whitebay SWT Wildlife Site NS166586 2.4 km

Farland Point SWT Wildlife Site NS172542 0.3 km

Fintray Bay to Portachur Point SWT Wildlife Site NS151555 0.4 km

Ninian Brae Wood SWT Wildlife Site / Ancient Woodland NS174552 0.04 km

Ballochmartin Ancient and Semi-natural Woodland NS175584 1.7 km

Ballochmartin Bay, Great

Cumbrae SWT Wildlife Site NS179570 1.7 km



17

Site Name Designation type Grid

reference

Distance from

proposed

scheme

Horse Hill Wood Ancient and Semi natural Woodland NS181577 2.4 km

Great Brae Ancient and Semi-natural Woodland NS155544 0.2 km

Ballihewan Wood Ancient and Semi-natural Woodland NS175584 3.2 km

16.5.2 Habitats and Species

Protected habitats 81. There are no terrestrial habitats from the Scottish Biodiversity List (Scottish Government, 2007) or

NALBAP 2019-31 list within the footprint of the proposed scheme.

82. Inland of the small town, the ground gently rises in altitude and the land opens out to fields with arable

field margins, hedgerows, small watercourses and lowland mixed deciduous woodlands. These

habitats are listed on the Scottish Biodiversity List and within NALBAP 2019-31. These habitats are

of greater ecological importance to the terrestrial habitats on the sea front, and extend into the

Terrestrial Ecology Study Area however are set back from the coastline, behind rows of houses,

gardens and other buildings within the town. As such there is not considered to be ecological

connectivity between these habitats and the proposed scheme.

83. Marine ecology features are considered further in Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology.

Built-up areas - Millport

84. Millport is a coastal town with properties extending down to the waterfront. The built-up areas within

the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area consist of: residential housing, public pathways and roads. Built

up areas have limited potential to support protected species and are considered to be of negligible

ecological importance.

Amenity grassland - Millport

85. There are several areas of amenity grassland, with ornamental flower pots and scattered planted New

Zealand cabbage trees Cordyline australis within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area, alongside a

football field and recreational park to the west of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area. These areas

are characterised with short sward, regularly mown grass species. Daisy Bellis perennis and broad

leave dock Rumex obtusifolius were recorded here. Amenity grassland is quick to recover and

considered to be of negligible importance ecologically. The cabbage trees are non-native to Scotland,

however are not considered to be invasive and are of negligible ecological importance, despite being

well established and contributing to the local character of the town.

86. NBN Atlas records silverweed Potentilla anserina, scurvygrass Cochlearia spp, orache Atriplex spp.

and curled dock Rumex crispus at Crocodile Rock (Figure 16-2) during the 2016 National Plant

Monitoring Scheme (NPMS). Mountain scurvygrass Cochlearia micacea and Scottish scurvygrass

Cochlearia officinalis subsp.scotia are both listed on the Scottish Biodiversity List although not

specifically recorded within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area.

Semi-improved grassland and scrub - Millport

87. There are areas of poor semi-improved grassland, with patches of scrub vegetation, to the east and

west of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area. Key species noted include the following:



18

• Clover Trifoleum spp;

• Broad leaf dock;

• Dog rose Rosa canina;

• Spear thistle Cirsium vulgare;

• Bramble Rubus fruticosus;

• Ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata;

• Oxeye daisy Leucanthemum vulgare; and

• Ragwort Jacobaea vulgaris.

88. To the west of the proposed scheme, along West Bay Road on the western headland, an area of

scrub land and deciduous trees are present. These habitats are likely to support greater biodiversity

than the amenity grassland and are considered to be of low to medium ecological importance locally.

Direct impacts to these habitats are not anticipated.

Scrub habitat - The Eileans

89. The Eileans, two small, low-lying islands located in Millport Bay, were not accessed during the EP1HS

but have been historically surveyed by a number of organisations, with results reported on the online

resource, NBN Atlas. A number of species were recorded, including gorse Ulex europaeus, yarrow

Achillea millefolium, common chickweed Stellaria media, thrift Armeria maritima, rowan Sorbus

aucuparia, meadow buttercup Ranunclus acris, common nettle Urtica dioica, curled dock and

scurvygrass on the northern Eilean island in 2016 during the National Plant Monitoring Scheme

(NPMS) (NBN Atlas, undated).

90. Sea plantain Plantago maritima, broad buckley fern Dryopteris dilatate, thrift, silverweed, ragged robin

Silene flos-cuculi, bell heather Erica cinerea, yellow iris pseudacrus, soft rush Juncus effuses,

bracken Pteridium aquilinum, sea milk-wort Glaux maritima, procumbent pearlwort Sagina

procumbens and elder Sambucus nigra were recorded by the Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland

(BSBI) in 1985 on the southern island (NBN Atlas, undated). Giant Hogweed Heracleum

mantegazzianum was recorded in 2002 by BSBI at grid reference NS1654 on the southern Eilean

island.

91. The Eileans contain a good level of species diversity compared to the rest of the Terrestrial Ecology

Study Area, and are considered to be of medium importance locally.

92. No survey data is available for the Leug or Spoig rock outcrops, although these islands are mostly

intertidal in nature, with limited opportunity for terrestrial plants to establish.

Flora

93. No legally protected terrestrial flora species were noted within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area

during the 2017 survey, however it should be noted that the survey was conducted outside the

flowering plant season and as such, the absence of any observations of legally protected or notable

flora species during the survey is not an indication that none are present. The records for flora

returned by the SWSEIC mainly relate to the SWT Wildlife Sites and Ancient Woodlands, outwith the

footprint of the proposed scheme, for which there is not anticipated to be any ecological connectivity.

There are no Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) on Great Cumbrae (North Ayrshire Council, undated).

94. Pioneer saltmarsh was recorded during the intertidal survey (Appendix 8.2) as the western extreme

of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area near to the lido. The saltmarsh habitat is fully assessed in

Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology.



19

Nesting birds

95. No active nests were observed during the ecological walkover survey; however the survey was

conducted outside of the nesting bird season (March to August). All scrub and semi-improved

grassland present within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area were assessed as having suitable habitat

to support ground-nesting birds. Impacts to birds are considered in Chapter 11 Offshore and

Coastal Ornithology.

Otter

96. The European otter is a semi-aquatic mammal, which is common around the freshwater and coastal

areas of Scotland. UK Populations are internationally important, especially since their widespread

decline across much of their western European range (JNCC, 2004). Populations in coastal areas

utilise shallow, inshore marine areas for feeding and require fresh water for bathing and terrestrial

areas for resting and breeding holts (JNCC, 2004). Where otters live in coastal area (particularly in

Scotland) they tend to have a largely diurnal habitat, live in group territories, and have comparatively

small home ranges, typically below 5km (Kruuk, 1995).

97. Otters are EPS, and protected under the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (as

amended). They are subject to the provisions of Regulation 43 of those Regulations. Otters are also

protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and are listed as an SNH Priority

Species. Otters are also listed on the LBAP. As such, otter are considered to be of high importance.

98. Millport is a busy tourist town, there is potential for otters to traverse the Millport coastline as they

move between the headlands and records of the species have been made in the area. NBN Atlas

(NBN Atlas, undated) shows 11 records of otter on Great Cumbrae, three of which are within Millport

Bay (Figure 16-4). SWSEIC identify 21 records of otter within the Desk Study Area (Figure 16-4).

99. The Terrestrial Ecology Study Area comprised a variety of shore habitats, including shingle, boulder,

rocky outcrops and sand, alongside areas of scrub and grassland. Freshwater inputs (i.e. pipes or

streams) were observed towards the eastern and western extremities of the Terrestrial Ecology Study

Area.

100. During the dedicated otter survey undertaken on the coastland of Great Cumbrae, no evidence of

otter (such as; spraints, feeding remains, pathways, couches or holts) was noted throughout the

Terrestrial Ecology Study Area, and no otter were observed.

101. During the bird surveys (Atlantic Ecology, 2019) access was also gained on The Eileans. On the

basis of the field evidence and direct sightings it seemed likely that at least one otter was resident on

The Eileans through the survey period. It was also deemed likely that this individual had been resident

for at least several months previously.

102. Several large latrines of otter spraints representing several months of accumulation were found in a

restricted area in the north-east corner of South Eilean on the 30 April 2018 survey visit (Figure 16-

4). These were located along a grassy rock-ledge that forms a ramp from the sea and a pathway

leading for about 15m to a runnel into dense bushy undergrowth. It is considered likely that this runnel

leads to an otter holt in the undergrowth (the undergrowth was too dense to investigate further).

103. Individual otter spraints of varying ages were also found at a number of widely spread locations on

both North Eilean and South Eilean. A fresh spraint was also found on South Island on the 2 July

visit. Two fresh spraints were also found on the Great Cumbrae mainland on the 17 May 2018 visit

on rocky shore at Port Loy, the part of the coast closest to South Eilean.



20

104. On the 17 May 2018 visit an adult otter was watched at close range foraging in the middle of the day

close to the southern shore of North Eilean. Later the same afternoon what was presumably the same

individual was seen foraging on and around The Spoig, the rocky skerry approximately 200m south-

west of South Eilean.

105. The only otter seen between August 2018 and March 2019, was an actively foraging animal seen on

South Eilean on the 24 January 2019 survey. It should be noted that no visits were made to The

Eileans to search for otter signs after 2 July 2018. Details of these otters recorded are provided in

Appendix 11.1.

Bats

106. Scattered trees observed in the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area, however there were no

cracks/crevices and no linear habitats for commuting and/or foraging bats was observed during the

2017 survey. No suitable buildings were recorded. Nevertheless, bats records from NBN Atlas and

SWSEIC are present within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area and Bat Study Area (Figure 16-5) and

the coastline may provide suitable foraging habitat for these populations. Bats are EPS, and

protected under the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (as amended). Bats also

have protection under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). Some

species of bats are UK BAP priority species listed on the NALBAP. Bats are considered to be of high

ecological importance and the coastal habitat is considered to be of medium importance for foraging

bats. The species of bat recorded within the Bat Study Area are:

• Natterer’s bat Myotis nattereri;

• Lesser noctule Nyctalus leisleri;

• Common pipistrelle Pipistrellus;

• Soprano pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus; and

• Brown long eared bat Plecotus auritus.

Reptiles and Amphibians

107. No sightings of common reptile or amphibian species were observed during the 2017 survey, however

it should be noted that the survey was conducted towards the end of the reptile active season (March

to October). A historic record for slow worm Anguis fragilis was provided for Millport by the SWSEIC

in 1833 but the lack of further records suggests habitat is limited for this species in the footprint of the

proposed scheme in the current day and there is not anticipated to be connectivity to the population

of slow worm at Ballochmartin Bay SSSI due to distance. Suitable habitats for reptiles are present

within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area (i.e. areas of scrub and grassland, Figure 16-2), however

these areas are limited and fragmented and no potential refugia was observed during the survey.

SWSEIC data includes records of common lizard Zootoca vivipara and slow worm at Fairland point

in 2017 and 2019, just outside the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area (Figure 16-6). Palmate newt

Lissotriton helveticus was recorded within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area but the records appear

to be associated with private gardens and there is not suitable habitat within the footprint of the

proposed scheme or an obvious line of connectivity for this species. Reptiles and amphibians have

protection under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), and all native

reptiles are UK BAP priority species and listed as Scottish Priority Species. Reptiles are considered

to be of medium importance.



21

Other protected species

108. No suitable habitat was observed during the survey for the following protected species, and as such

the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area is considered sub-optimal, therefore these species are concluded

as being absent and not considered further within this assessment:

• Polecat – no signs of polecat were observed within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area and no

habitat is present within the footprint of the proposed scheme. Two records were provided by

SWSEIC – one for the west coast of Great Cumbrae in 2017 and one for Farland Point in 2019

(Figure 16-4) but are likely to be associated with more rural habitat and agricultural fields and

unlikely to use the footprint of the proposed scheme as habitat.

• Water vole – no rivers or ditch systems with suitable berm for burrowing are present.

• Great crested newt – no suitable freshwater waterbodies were identified within the Terrestrial

Ecology Study Area, or within a 250m buffer of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area and as such no

breeding aquatic habitat is present. Furthermore, the terrestrial habitats within the Terrestrial

Ecology Study Area is largely fragmented and considered sub-optimal for foraging/commuting great

crested newt.

• White-clawed crayfish – no suitable freshwater waterbodies were identified within the Terrestrial

Ecology Study Area.

• Badger – no field signs for badger were observed within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area,

furthermore no suitable habitat for badger is present within the footprint of the proposed scheme or

within the areas immediately adjacent.

• Pine martin – no field signs or suitable habitat for pine martin were observed within the footprint of

the proposed scheme and no records are provided by SWSEIC or NBN Atlas within the Terrestrial

Ecology Study Area.

• Red squirrel – no field signs or suitable habitat for pine martin were observed within the footprint of

the proposed scheme and no records are provided by SWSEIC or NBN Atlas within the Terrestrial

Ecology Study Area.

• Insects – a number of records of insects were provided by SWSEIC within the Desk Study Area

however given the non-urban habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is mown amenity

grassland, limited habitat potential for insects is anticipated in the areas which will be directly

impacted during construction activities.

Invasive non-native species

109. No invasive non-native species were noted during the 2017 survey. Invasive non-native species are

listed under Schedule 9 Part I of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). Giant Hogweed

Heracleum mantegazzianum was recorded in 2002 by BSBI at grid reference NS1654 on the southern

Eilean island (NBN Atlas, undated) on the boundary of the proposed scheme. The biological records

obtained from the SWSEIC show that Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica was recorded in 1999 at

Farland Point NS172542 (Appendix 16.1) 650 m from the proposed scheme. Japanese Rose Rosa

rugosa, Monbretia Crososmia pottsii x aurea and rhododendron Rhododendron ponticum have also

been recorded within the Desk Study Area (Figure 16-7). Canadian waterweed Elodea canadensis

was recorded in house ponds but these ponds are not expected to be impacted by construction of the

proposed scheme. Invasive non-native species and the ecological risk they pose is considered to be

of medium importance.



22

16.5.3 Anticipated Trends in Baseline Conditions

110. It is important to recognise that the baseline environment is not static, but instead will exhibit

considerable variability due to cycles or trends of natural change. These can include natural

succession and the longer term effects of sea-level rise associated with global climate change.

111. As the majority of the habitat at Millport is associated with amenity grassland, it is assumed

management of the land will continue and therefore unlikely the general habitat type will change to

any great extent. The Eileans will continue to be influenced by exposure salt spray, and the species

here are also expected to continue to be similar to those currently established, although the area

colonised by terrestrial plants may decrease over time with expected sea-level rise. Pioneer

saltmarsh habitat is anticipated to mature and is discussed in Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal

Ecology. Otter and nesting birds will continue to use the coastline as suitable habitat will continue

to be available, however ongoing human disturbance on the coastal and marine environment is likely

to continue to the same level or greater. Other protected species are not anticipated to move in to

the area due to limited suitable habitat. Given non-native invasive species are already recorded within

the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area and in the vicinity, there is strong likelihood the presence of these

plants will spread over time, unless actively managed.

16.5.4 Biodiversity

112. Following the publication of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)

Regulations 2017, an EcIA must consider the potential impact not upon ‘flora and fauna’ but instead

upon ‘biodiversity, with particular attention to species and habitats protected under the Habitats

Directive and Birds Directive’. This EcIA has considered potential impacts upon biodiversity through

considering the potential impacts on those sites, habitats and species protected through EU and UK

law or through local policy, as representing the elements of UK biodiversity most at risk of loss,

isolation or degradation.

16.6 Impact Assessment

113. This section discusses the impact assessment for terrestrial ecology during construction, operation

and decommissioning of the proposed scheme. Cumulative impacts and inter-relationships are also

considered.

16.6.1 Overview of Potential Impacts

114. The outcome of the desk study and ecological surveys is that the area provides suitable habitat for

reptiles and otters, with a number of otter sightings made within the vicinity of the proposed works.

As such, there is potential for direct (habitat loss, injury or death) or indirect impacts (from increased

noise and human activity, lighting, reduced air quality or pollution events during construction and

maintenance activities) of otter and reptiles. These impacts are scoped in to the assessment.

Breeding bird habitat is also present and birds are assessed in Chapter 11 Offshore and Coastal

Ornithology.

115. The construction of the proposed scheme will give rise to temporary and permanent habitat loss of

terrestrial vegetation.

116. Non-native invasive species are already recorded in the vicinity of the proposed scheme and there is

potential for these plants to be spread during activities on site, or for further invasive non-native seeds



23

to be brought to Millport through contaminated vehicles, machinery or equipment. This impact is

scoped in to the assessment.

117. There is one statutory designated site within the footprint of the scheme, and two statutory designated

sites within a 2km buffer. Ten non-statutory designated sites are present on Great Cumbrae. With

the exception of otter, which may commute the coastlines of Millport and the Eileans, there is no

significant connective or corridor habitat for terrestrial species between the designated sites and the

footprint of the proposed scheme to allow an observable pathway of potential impact.

118. Kames Bay SSSI is located within the footprint of the proposed scheme and is designated for its

biological (marine) habitat. As such, the impact is considered within Chapter 8 Benthic and

Intertidal Ecology and not repeated here.

119. No other statutory or non-statutory sites are within the direct footprint of the areas of proposed works,

and are not considered to be functionally connected. Therefore, there will be no impact to statutory

or non-statutory designated sites designated for terrestrial ecology and impacts to designated sites

are scoped out of further assessment.

120. Terrestrial habitats in the footprint of the landside elements of the proposed scheme are limited to

areas of mown amenity grassland and non-native trees, of limited ecological importance and

providing limited habitat potential for other protected species. Consequently, there is not anticipated

to be direct (habitat loss, species injury or death) or indirect (from increased noise and human activity,

lighting, reduced air quality or pollution events during construction and maintenance activities)

impacts on other terrestrial species (excluding otters and reptiles discussed below and breeding birds

discussed in Chapter 11 Offshore and Coastal Ornithology). Therefore all other impacts have been

scoped out of further assessment.

121. Impacts from the development could arise from the following activities:

• Vegetation removal;

• Excavation of foundation footprints;

• Construction of the breakwaters;

• Construction of sea walls;

• Temporary working areas;

• Construction access;

• Storage of arisings;

• Storage of other materials;

• Creation of site compounds; and

• Disturbance caused by noise, dust or artificial lighting.

122. At worst case, these potential impacts are anticipated to be greatest during the construction phase of

the proposed scheme, with very limited disturbance anticipated during the operational phase.

123. This work has the potential to give rise to impacts on habitats through:

• Direct permanent or temporary loss or fragmentation of habitat features;

• Temporary disturbance of habitats or species (such as light, dust, noise or pollution events);

• Spread of non-native invasive species; and

• Mortality or disturbance to individuals of certain species.



24

124. Impact risk is considered below in Section 16.6.4 with respect to habitats and protected species, with

recommendations for mitigation or further pre-construction survey where appropriate and

proportionate to do so.

16.6.2 Embedded Mitigation

125. Embedding mitigation into the proposed scheme during design development is a type of primary

mitigation and is an inherent aspect of the EcIA process. A full account of embedded mitigation

measures is contained in Chapter 5 Project Description.

16.6.2.1 Scheme design

126. Where embedded mitigation measures have been developed into the design of the proposed scheme

with specific regard to terrestrial ecology, these are described in Table 16-10.

Table 16-10 Embedded mitigation measures for terrestrial ecology

Parameter Mitigation measures embedded into the scheme design

Footprint Construction footprint and working area minimised as far as practical, to minimise

impacts to the habitats on The Eileans and Millport

Reinstatement Habitat reinstatement following the construction phase to the same condition.

Best practice including

timing of works

Avoidance of harm to nesting birds and protected species though adopting specific

working practices, including the timing of the work to avoid sensitive periods

Disturbance

Within Millport Bay, project vessels will restrict their maximum speed to <10 knots, thus

giving birds and other wildlife time to take evasive behaviour and generally reduce the

potential for disturbance to occur.

Disturbance

Within Millport Bay, project vessels will restrict their activity to within a 200m buffer

around construction sites, thus spatially limiting the potential for vessel based

disturbance to affect otters and other wildlife.

Disturbance

Signage on Millport beach/promenade that describes the high value of The Eileans for

wildlife (breeding and wintering birds, seals and otter), the issue of disturbance and

discourages landings, esp. in nesting season.

Consultation Ongoing consultation with local community and other relevant stakeholders

16.6.2.2 Standard Best Practice

127. Additional mitigation measures are also included to follow best practice and policy requirements.

These best practice documents will be adhered to during construction of the proposed scheme. These

documents are described in Table 16-11.

Table 16-11 Embedded mitigation through Best Practice and Policy

Parameter Mitigation measures through Best Practice and Policy

Pollution prevention

Guidance for Pollution Prevention GPP 5: Works and maintenance in or near water

(Netregs, undated)



25

Parameter Mitigation measures through Best Practice and Policy


GPP5: Works and maintenance in or near water (Northern Ireland Environment

Agency (NIEA), Department for Agriculture the Environment and Rural Affairs

(DAERA, SEPA and Natural Resources Wales (NRW), 2018);

GPP21: Pollution incident response planning (NIEA, SEPA and NRW, 2017); and,

GPP22: Dealing with spills (NIEA, DAERA, SEPA and NRW, 2018a).


The following Pollution Prevention Guidance (PPG) will be used as industry best

practice in the absence of any formal guidance, or updated equivalent (Netregs,

undated):

PPG 6: Working at construction and demolition sites;

PPG 1 Understanding your environmental responsibilities – good environmental

practices;

PPG 14: Marinas and crafts

Construction good

practice CIRIA Coastal and marine environmental site guide (2nd edition) (C744)

Construction good

practice CIRIA Guidance note C741 Environmental Good Practice on Site Guide (4th Edition)

Pollution prevention SEPA Pollution Prevention Guidelines

Invasive non-native

species

SEPA guidance: Biosecurity and management of invasive non-native species for

construction sites and controlled activities

Invasive non-native

species

Biosecurity measures compliant with Scotland’s Environmental and Rural Services

biosecurity protocol. In particular aimed at preventing introduction of non-native

invasive plant and animal species to The Eileans.

16.6.3 Ecological Action Plan

128. All mitigation measures proposed in relation to the impacts identified for each receptor below will be

incorporated and detailed in an overarching Ecological Action Plan (EAP). Where mitigation or

management plans are mentioned in the mitigation sections below, these will be incorporated into the

EAP also.

129. The EAP will form part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and will cover

the ecological requirements of the pre-, during and post-construction stages of the proposed scheme.

The EAP will be a live document and will be updated throughout each of these phases. The EAP will

take into account any planning obligations and conditions attached to the proposed scheme should

consent be granted. The EAP will be submitted to and agreed with the North Ayrshire Council, SNH

and other stakeholders, where appropriate, based upon the final design of the proposed scheme. The

EAP will include the principal requirements of mitigation, including:

• Pre-construction ecological surveys;

• Habitats or species directly affected by the proposed scheme;

• Method statements (where necessary);

• Tool box talks;

• Licensing requirements (where necessary);

• Habitat re-instatement plan;

• Overall strategy for delivery of the mitigation proposed in this EcIA; including



26

o Programme for delivery of mitigation; and

o Responsibilities attributed to the relevant parties to deliver the plan.

130. An Ecological Clerk of Works (ECoW) will audit the implementation of the EAP. This would be both a

desk-based and site-based role. It should be noted that the mitigation measures presented below are

based on the individual receptor, therefore in some cases there may be a conflict between the

requirements of one receptor over another (or indeed with other priorities, e.g. tourism and

recreation). The ECoW will have suitable expertise to develop and find pragmatic solutions to any

potential conflicts in consultation with the relevant consultees.

16.6.4 Potential Impacts During Construction

131. This section discusses the potential impacts which may occur to terrestrial ecology receptors during

activities associated with the construction of the proposed scheme. Impacts to nesting and

overwintering birds are considered in Chapter 11 Offshore and Coastal Ornithology. Impacts to

marine mammals are considered in Chapter 10 Marine Mammals and Basking Shark. Impacts to

other intertidal and marine habitats and species are considered in Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal

Ecology.

16.6.4.1 Construction Impact 1: Temporary or Permanent Habitat Loss

132. The majority of the footprint of the proposed scheme consists of existing hard standing, road network

and pavement. Temporary habitat disturbance (and potentially limited permanent habitat loss) will

occur on low importance amenity grassland to enable the improvements to existing sea walls,

construction of flood walls, increased ground levels and improvements to other defence structures,

of which 17,784m2 is located within the footprint of the proposed scheme. Impacts to amenity

grassland will be focused around eastern end of the footprint of the proposed scheme, bordering

Kames Bay and Newtown Bay. Species recorded here are ruderal in nature, including field daisy and

broad leave dock, with low species diversity. The grasslands will be reinstated and are anticipated

to be quick to recover, re-establishing the current level of biodiversity within a growing season or two.

133. As detailed in the embedded mitigation, North Ayrshire Council already commit to maintaining a strict

footprint of works throughout the construction period, and habitat reinstatement upon the completion

of the works. The working methodology will also follow construction industry good practice guidance,

as detailed in Table 16-11, such as having spill kits on site at all times, checking equipment regularly

to ensure leakages do not occur, and limiting refuelling of construction plant to designated

impermeable areas.

134. Impacts to the amenity grassland is considered to constitute an impact of high magnitude, temporary

in nature and reversible upon re-establishment of habitat reinstatement. As the amenity grassland is

considered to be of negligible ecological importance, this constitutes an impact of minor adverse.

135. There will be no removal of the trees during construction activities, however there is potential for

damage to be made to existing trees or their underground root systems during construction activities.

This is considered to be an impact of medium magnitude upon the trees, which are considered to be

of negligible ecological importance due to being non-native species. Overall, a minor adverse impact

is anticipated upon the trees during construction activities.



27

136. This assessment is based on the results of survey visits by an ecologist and desk study and is made

with medium confidence. Impacts to saltmarsh are discussed in Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal

Ecology.

137. The Eileans are floristically diverse and relatively undisturbed with limited opportunity for direct

anthropogenic impact. There is potential for disturbance of the habitats upon the islands during

construction of the offshore breakwaters. The breakwaters will be constructed by barge and as such,

should not require the access onto the islands in the bay, however it is possible that some access

may be required by construction workers to secure the breakwaters, which may cause trampling upon

the vegetation. 280m2 of terrestrial habitat on the southern Eilean island and The Spoig is located

within the footprint of the offshore breakwater, and 1965m2 of terrestrial habitat is located within the

working footprint of the proposed scheme across the two islands (Figure 16-1). Impacts to the

habitats on the Eileans would be short term, temporary and reversible, with replanting of any disturbed

habitats and recovery from the seedbank is likely to occur quickly. Overall, this is assessed to be of

low magnitude, constituting a minor adverse impact on habitats of medium ecological importance

locally.

Mitigation

138. The roots of retained trees along the edge of the working width would be protected from soil

compaction by the enforcement of Root Protection Areas that would be fenced off from the

construction (the extent of which would be calculated using guidance from BS5837: 2012).

139. Access onto the small islands in Millport Bay will be restricted as far as practically possible. Where

access is required, there will be demarcation of narrow acceptable working areas, and checks of

these areas by the ECoW.

140. Good topsoil management practices will be followed. Topsoil will be stripped, stored and capped to

minimise water erosion within the easement whilst works are conducted. The practices to be followed

will be detailed in the EMP), the details and content of which will be agreed with stakeholders.

141. Existing tracks, roadways and hardstanding will be utilised for access and storage where possible.

Where temporary accesses are needed, topsoil and surface water management measures will be

employed as defined in the EMP.

142. Geotextile, or other suitable material, will be used to allow the safe storage and movement of vehicles

within the area, maintain required drainage, and prevent soil erosion and increased surface runoff.

Residual Impact

143. Following implementation of the mitigation measures proposed, protecting trees and managing the

disturbance to the amenity grassland, the impact of temporary and permanent habitat loss will be

negligible.

16.6.4.2 Construction Impact 2: Habitat Loss, Disturbance or Killing of Otter

144. The Terrestrial Ecology Study Area comprised mostly of a shingle and boulder shore, with sandy

beaches in places. To the eastern and western edges of the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area, scrub

and improved grassland was recorded, with freshwater inputs.

145. Suitable habitat for otter was recorded throughout the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area and the species

is highly mobile with a potential home range of up to 5km, and may commute the Millport coastline to



28

reach the quieter headlands or other nearby coastlines in the Clyde catchment. Evidence gained

during site visits to the Eileans during the bird surveys (Atlantic Ecology, 2019) suggest a resident

otter is present, with a number of sightings made of an otter foraging around the islands in Millport

Bay.


footprint of works throughout the construction period, and habitat reinstatement upon the completion

of the works. Toolbox Talks will also be provided to all construction staff regarding otters, their

protection and the agreed mitigation. The working methodology will also follow construction industry

good practice guidance, as detailed in Table 16-11, such as having spill kits on site at all times,

checking equipment regularly to ensure leakages do not occur, and limiting refuelling of construction

plant to designated impermeable areas.

147. There are no Special Areas of Conservation designated for otter which have direct connectivity with

the Clyde, and no impacts are anticipated upon site integrity of designated sites for which otter is an

interest feature. Any otters in the vicinity of the proposed scheme are unlikely to be associated with

a designated population. However, as an EPS, otters are considered to be of high importance.

148. Construction of the onshore infrastructure, including seawall construction, will bring additional volume

of traffic to the area for a temporary period (weeks). Whilst the nature of the site would tend to result

in slow moving vehicles, there remains some potential for otters to be hit by construction vehicles. In

addition, there is potential for animals to be injured through falling into open excavations and

becoming trapped. However, vehicles will be travelling slowly. The potential for this impact to occur

is considered to be of low magnitude, and unlikely to affect the long-term status of the otter population.

The potential impact is anticipated to be of moderate adverse significance.

149. Construction materials are also anticipated to be brought to site via barge. There is a potential for

otters foraging or commuting in the water to be hit by construction vessels or disturbed by underwater

noise. Information provided by Marine Traffic (2020) identifies moderate levels of commercial and

recreational vessels off the coastline at Millport. There are also several important navigation routes

within the study area, particularly the Hunterston and the Firth of Clyde channels, which are major

shipping routes. (see Figure 13-1 and Figure 13-2). A review of the Marine Scotland MAPS NMPI

shows that the area around Millport is relatively high for vessel numbers, with between 20 and 50

vessels within Millport Bay every week, up to 150 vessels each week travelling east past Great

Cumbrae Island, and more than 150 a week passing east of the island (Marine Scotland, 2019). This

gives an indication that any marine mammals and basking shark in the area will be well used to high

vessel presence. The vessels used in construction activities are generally slow moving with noise

emitted at a low frequency. This risk of collision is anticipated to be low magnitude, due to otter’s

habitualisation to the existing local levels of vessel movements in the bay and wider areas, and the

low speeds that any construction vessels would be travelling in the vicinity of the coastline. Studies

into the noise levels associated with rock placement have shown that they are not often discernible

over and above the noise of the associated vessel, and otters are considered to be of low sensitivity

to underwater noise. Overall, the potential impacts associated with vessels is anticipated to be of

moderate adverse significance.

150. There is potential for otters within Millport Bay to be disturbed by loud or sudden noise during

construction activities. This may cause disturbance of resting otters, interruption of foraging

behaviour or fright. These impacts would be of greater magnitude in the immediate vicinity of the

islands in the bay and associated with the construction of the breakwaters. Results of the site visits

indicate regular use of the Eileans, and there is potentially a resting site upon the Eileans where



29

access was unavailable to surveyors. As this site has not been accessed, details of it are unknown

and there is potential it could be a natal holt, of particular sensitivity to noise disturbance. Otters may

breed at any time of the year. The maximum duration of the dredging works is estimated to be

completed over two weeks with the works be intermittent in nature, and will require limited access

onto the Eileans to connect the breakwaters to the islands. Vessel noise will be generated by the

barges and construction vessels, however there is an existing level of vessel activity in the bay

already, to which the local otter population will be habituated. Impacts are considered to be of medium

magnitude and intermittent in the short term, but will cease upon completion of the works. Due to the

potential importance of the Eileans to the local otter population, a precautionary impact of major

adverse significance is predicted on noise disturbance and disturbance of potential resting sites on

the Eileans during this period.

151. On Great Cumbrae, potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Chapter 18

Noise and Vibration, including embedded mitigation measures to minimise effects from construction

phase road traffic and best practice and policy measures to minimise effects of construction noise.

Measures to reduce the impacts of noise and vibration will be included in the CEMP, and with the

implementation of the measures, any impacts will be negligible in significance, temporary, short term

and local and there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to otters along the Millport coastline

from works on Great Cumbrae.

152. Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme

(Chapter 7 Marine Water and Sediment Quality). The potential impact of a pollution event to fish

(otter prey) has been assessed in Chapter 14 Fish and Shellfish as being of no adverse significance

following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency Plan and Vessel

Management Plan, and implementation of the EAP. Should a pollution event occur it is likely to be

localised, short-term, temporary, and potentially reversible. This impact could have a secondary

effect on otter’s food resource, however the abundance of food resource in the seas surrounding

Great Cumbrae and the short term/localised nature of any spill event, an impact of negligible

magnitude is anticipated. Given the unlikeliness of the impact occurring, an impact of minor adverse

significance is predicted on prey resource.

153. Chapter 21 Air Quality discusses potential impacts from dust and particulate matter from earthworks,

construction activities and trackout. With implementation of the mitigation outlined in Chapter 21 Air

Quality, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to otter from air-borne sources during

construction.

154. Otter is considered to be of high ecological importance with potentially resident individual(s) on the

Eileans. Impacts associated with this species are most likely to be regarding disturbance of

individuals which may be commuting along the coastline during construction activities. The

magnitude of impact to otter is anticipated to be low in the medium term during construction activities,

up to medium magnitude particularly around the construction of the offshore breakwaters and islands

in the bay, and temporary and reversible in nature. Overall a potential major adverse impact is

anticipated to otter. This impact is informed by desk study, consultation and field survey, and is made

with medium confidence.

Mitigation

155. The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal

roam in the vicinity of the proposed scheme during construction:



30

• All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with SNH prior to construction;

• Given otters are very mobile species, a pre-construction survey 8 weeks before construction

commences should be undertaken, to re-assess otter activity. Prior to the commencement of

operations an otter survey should be undertaken, within the proposed footprint of construction plus

a 250m buffer zone, to determine current use at the time of construction (otters may increase their

use of the site in the interim period between the current survey and the commencement of

construction). The surveys should be undertaken in appropriate weather condition and following

guidance in the ‘New Rivers and Wildlife Handbook’ (Holmes et al, 1994), Chanin (2003) and

Strachan & Jefferies (1996), and SNH Standing Advise for Planning Consultations, Otter (SNH,

undated).

156. Should an active resting site be found, an European Protected Species (EPS) Licence is likely to be

required to undertake work on this site. Consultation will be undertaken with SNH to discuss the

mitigation required under this licence. This will include the following:

o Construction vehicles and equipment should not be active on, or stored by, the coastline

for longer than is essential;

o Works undertaken adjacent to the islands in Millport Bay will be done in as short a time

frame as practical. Equipment should not be stored on the islands in the bay;

o The risks can be further reduced by following best practice and guidance including SNH

Standing Advise for Planning consultations (otter), SNH, undated), as well as guidance

produced by Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB Volume 10 section 4);

o If any otter fatalities occur during construction, carcases should be retained and SNH should

be notified, if non-fatal injuries occur as a result of construction then SNH should be notified

immediately;

o Where artificial light is required, lights should be directed away from the coastal area and

watercourses to allow otters to migrate through the area undisturbed. Any lighting required

at these areas will be low-intensity;

o An Ecological Clerk of Works (ECoW) will be present during the works. Work should stop

should an otter holt or resting place be found within 250m (SNH 2007), and SNH consulted,

as a licence may be necessary before works can continue;

o A temporary ramp will be placed in trenches over 0.5 m deep in order to allow a potentially

trapped animal to exit the trench;

o Any open pipes will be capped to prevent animals gaining access;

o All excavations and pipe systems will be checked at the start of each working day;

o Site construction fencing will not interfere with the passage of animals through coastal

corridors; and

o Existing vegetation will be retained wherever possible.

Residual Impact

157. Following the implementation of mitigation, which minimises the magnitude of impact to otters through

management of construction works and potential licence application if required, the residual impact

to otters is anticipated to be temporary minor adverse during the period of construction.

16.6.4.3 Construction Impact 3: Habitat Loss, Disturbance or Killing of Reptiles

158. No common reptile species were observed during the survey, however the 2017 survey was

conducted towards the end of the reptile active season (typically March to October but is weather and

temperature dependent). A very historic record was provided by SWSEIC for slow worm at Millport,

although this record is nearly 200 years old. Suitable habitats for reptiles exist within the Terrestrial

Ecology Study Area (i.e. areas of scrub and grassland), however these areas are limited and



31

fragmented and outwith the footprint of the proposed scheme. A strong slow worm population is

known to exist at Ballochmartin Bay, 1.7 km from the proposed scheme, where habitat is greater in

extent and with more extensive ecological connectivity than the habitat at Millport. No potential

refugia was observed during the survey. These areas of scrub and grassland (to the east and west

of the area of the proposed scheme), are outside the working footprint and as such should not require

any specific mitigations. Tool box talks are included within the embedded mitigation, which will be

delivered by the ECoW and will illustrate key habitat, any risk areas on site for reptile, what the

penalties are for killing or injuring reptiles, and the procedure to follow should any reptiles be found

on site during construction.

159. Reptiles are considered to have medium ecological importance. Due to the limited potential for reptiles

to present within the working footprint, the magnitude of impact is considered to be low, and of short

to medium term, temporary and reversible in nature. Overall, a minor adverse impact in anticipated.

Mitigation

160. If construction takes place within the reptile active period (March – October inclusive) and long grass

is present within the footprint of the proposed scheme at the time of construction, habitat manipulation

will be undertaken of the working area to ensure it is unfavourable to reptiles during the works. This

will include a vegetation strim down to 150mm of all vegetation in areas of vehicle tracking or

construction works at least 48 hours prior to construction and all cut vegetation removed outside the

footprint of the proposed scheme, to give any reptiles present time to leave the area. After this time

the vegetation can be strimmed to a closer cut if required. A check of the area of potential reptile

hibernacula will also be undertaken, and any features observed will be removed by hand. Pre-

construction vegetation clearance and hibernacula dismantling will be supervised by a suitably

qualified ecologist.

Residual Impact

161. Following the implementation of these best practice mitigation measures to reduce the magnitude of

effect, the impact to reptiles is anticipated to be negligible.

16.6.4.4 Construction Impact 4: Disturbance of Foraging Bats

162. Potential impacts to foraging and commuting bats could result from night-time working or night-time

lighting of the construction site. Night-time lighting will disrupt bat foraging and commuting routes

which may to cross the proposed scheme. This has the potential to disturb the species by impairing

their ability to survive. This would occur if bats have to avoid lit areas and thus travel further to reach

the same areas for roosting or foraging; or else have to forage in poorer quality areas. The coastal

habitat is considered to be of medium importance for foraging bats. The coastal habitat at Millport are

already subject to existing lighting associated with the town. The potential impact to foraging and

commuting bats is considered to be negative, temporary and of short duration. The magnitude of the

impact is assessed to be low due to the exposure, limited habitat potential and low activity of bat

species. A minor adverse impact is predicted.

Mitigation

163. To minimise impacts to foraging bats, night-time lighting of construction sites should be avoided where

possible. If night-time working is necessary, then lighting will be designed in accordance with Bats

and artificial Lighting in the UK (BCT, ILE, 2018); and Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Obtrusive

Light ILE (2011).



32

Residual Impact

164. Following mitigation the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the impacts to foraging bats are

considered to be negligible.

16.6.4.5 Construction Impact 4: Spread of Non-Native Invasive Species

165. Marine non-native species are discussed in Chapter 8 Benthic Ecology. Although no terrestrial non-

native invasive species have been recorded within the boundary of the proposed scheme, Japanese

knotweed has been recorded at Farland Point, 650 m from the proposed scheme Area, and giant

hogweed has been recorded on the southern Eilean island on the boundary of the proposed scheme.

These records are both historic and there is potential for both species (or indeed other non-native

invasive species) to have become established in other locations on the island in the meantime. In

addition, the construction works will involve bringing in plant and equipment to the Eileans, including

plant which will be used in other areas of the country where there is potential presence of invasive

species. There is therefore a risk of releasing non-native species into the Terrestrial Ecology Study

Area during the construction phase.


footprint of works throughout the construction period. The working methodology will also follow

construction industry good practice guidance, as detailed in Table 16-11, and a Toolbox Talk detailing

invasive non-native species, the risks involved, and the agreed mitigation will be provided to all

construction workers.

167. The risk of introducing non-native species over the long term is anticipated to have an effect of

medium magnitude on a medium importance receptor, and results in an impact of at worst moderate

adverse significance. This assessment is based upon survey and desk study, and is considered to

be made with medium confidence.

Mitigation

168. Mitigation measures to minimise risks will include the following:

• A pre-construction survey will be undertaken to ascertain up-to-date locations of any non-native

invasive species within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area;

• If stands of invasive non-native species are identified within the footprint of the proposed scheme

during this survey, an Invasive Species Management Plan will be drawn up and included in the

EMP. This Plan will include the following:

o Fencing off a 10m buffer around all areas of non-native invasive species to avoid cross-

spread.

Residual Impact

169. Following mitigation, the magnitude of the potential impact of risk if spread of non-native invasive

species is reduced through management measures to minor adverse significance.

16.6.5 Potential Impacts During Operation and Maintenance

170. Once construction has been completed and restoration of habitats has occurred, the footprint of the

operational scheme will be minimal on terrestrial habitats and their species. Operation of the

proposed scheme is not anticipated to cause temporary or permanent habitat loss or contribute to the

spread of invasive non-native species within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area.



33

16.6.5.1 Operation Impact 1: Habitat Loss, Disturbance or Killing of Otter

171. Maintenance works will be low level and will be the responsibility of North Ayrshire Council.

Maintenance will be undertaken as required to check the integrity of the flood walls, sea walls and

breakwater, and conduct any remedial works required. Maintenance of surface water drainage will

require regular inspection and work as required. Maintenance activities may cause disturbance to

otters, through human presence or noise, however, given the existing background level of activities

in Millport Bay, maintenance works associated with the proposed scheme are anticipated to be of

negligible magnitude, constituting an impact of minor adverse significance.

172. The presence of the offshore breakwater is likely to create artificial habitat for otters to rest or feed on

whilst foraging in the bay of limited minor beneficial significance.

Mitigation

173. None required.

Residual Impact

174. No additional mitigation is proposed beyond best practice identified in Section 16.6.2. As such the

impact to otter during operation and maintenance activities remains at worst minor adverse in

significance.

16.6.5.2 Operation Impact 2: Spread of Invasive Non-Native Species

175. As discussed above, maintenance works will be low level, however may give rise to opportunities for

spread of invasive non-native species through contaminated machinery or other equipment.


footprint of works throughout the construction period. The working methodology will also follow

construction industry good practice guidance, as detailed in Table 16-11, and a Toolbox Talk detailing

invasive non-native species, the risks involved, and the agreed mitigation will be provided to all

construction workers.

177. The risk of spread is considered to be low magnitude during operation on a receptor of medium

importance, and as such, an impact of minor adverse significance is anticipated.

Mitigation

178. Should maintenance works be required, mitigation measures to minimise risks will include the

following:

• A pre-works survey will be undertaken to ascertain up-to-date locations of any non-native invasive

species within the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area;

• If stands of invasive non-native species are identified within the footprint of the proposed scheme

during this survey, an Invasive Species Management Plan will be drawn up and included in an EMP.

This Plan will include the following:

• Fencing off a 10m buffer around all areas of non-native invasive species to avoid cross-spread.

Residual Impact

179. Following mitigation, the magnitude of the potential impact of risk if spread of non-native invasive

species is reduced through management measures to negligible significance.



34

16.6.6 Potential Impacts During Decommissioning

180. The structures forming the proposed scheme will be designed to have a life of at least 50 years. As

the purpose of the proposed scheme is for flood protection, it is unlikely that it will be decommissioned

in entirety; it is more likely that the scheme will be repaired, or sections replaced or improved if needed

in the future. To ease the process of decommissioning should it be required, the project design will

aim to avoid excavation or drilling into the bedrock for the toe of the rock structures. Decommissioning

of the flood walls are anticipated to require a similar process to that discussed above for the

construction phase. Prior to any decommissioning activities taking place, consultation will take place

will all relevant statutory stakeholders and any potential impacts will be assessed using best practice

and guidance relevant at that time.

16.6.7 Cumulative Impacts

181. This section describes the CIA for terrestrial ecology, taking into consideration other plans, projects

and activities. This has been undertaken as a two-stage process, with the first stage comprising

assessing all the impacts from the previous sections for the potential to act cumulatively with other

projects. This summary assessment is set out in Table 16-12 below.

Table 16-12 Potential Cumulative Impacts

Impact

Potential

for

Cumulative

Impact

Data

confidence Rationale

Construction

Impact 1: Temporary or permanent

habitat loss No Medium

Loss of habitat due to other projects may

increase the cumulative loss of habitat in

the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area

Impact 2: Habitat loss, disturbance or

killing of reptiles No Medium

The proposed scheme does not impact on

any significant areas of reptile habitat in

the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area


killing of otter Yes Medium

Impact to species due to other projects

may increase the cumulative impacts to

otter in the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area

Impact 4: Disturbance of foraging

bats Yes Medium



bats in the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area

Impact 5: Spread of non-native

invasive species Yes Medium

Other projects may exacerbate the risk of

introducing invasive non-native species

within in the Terrestrial Ecology Study

Area

Operation


killing of otter No Medium



otter in the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area

during operation



35

Impact

Potential

for

Cumulative

Impact

Data

confidence Rationale

Impact 2: Spread of non-native

invasive species Yes Medium

Other projects may exacerbate the risk of

introducing invasive non-native species

within in the Terrestrial Ecology Study

Area

Decommissioning

As a flood prevention scheme, the proposed scheme is anticipated to be maintained rather than removed, and

therefore decommissioning activities are currently unknown. This will be assessed at the time of any

decommissioning activities required.

182. The second stage of the CIA is an assessment of whether there is spatial or temporal overlap between

the extent of potential effects of the proposed scheme, and the extent of potential effects of other

projects scoped into the CIA on the same receptors. To identify whether this may happen, the

potential nature and extent of effects arising from all projects scoped into the CIA have been identified,

and any overlaps between these and the effects identified above have been noted. Where there is an

overlap, an assessment of the cumulative magnitude of effect is provided, and the result cumulative

impact identified.

183. Marine impacts are covered within Chapter 8 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology and ornithological

impacts are considered in Chapter 11 Offshore and Coastal Ornithology. In addition, due to the

small-scale nature of the proposed scheme and its island location in respect of terrestrial ecology

receptors, those projects at a greater distance than 10km away have also been scoped out.

184. Table 16-13 summarises those projects which have been scoped into the CIA due to their temporal

or spatial overlap with the potential effects arising from the proposed scheme. The remainder of the

section details the nature of cumulative impacts against all those receptors scoped in for cumulative

assessment.

Table 16-13 Summary of projects considered for the CIA in relation to terrestrial ecology

Project Status

Distance from

the proposed

scheme (km)

Project data

status Included in CIA Rationale

Hunterston

PARC

No EIA or

planning

permission

required for

works, however

EIA screening

opinion and

licence being

sought for

associated

dredging

2km Low Yes

Potential for

cumulative

impacts with

otter population

Great Cumbrae

Solar farm

Permission

granted 1.5 km Medium Yes

Potential for

cumulative



36

Project Status

Distance from

the proposed

scheme (km)

Project data

status Included in CIA Rationale

impacts with

otter population

Mill Burn,

Millport Flood

Scheme

Option

Appraisal

Within proposed

scheme Area Low Yes

Potential for

cumulative

impacts with

otter population

185. As identified in Table 16-13, three other proposed projects have the potential to impact cumulatively

with the proposed scheme upon the local otter population and spread of invasive non-native species.

These potential impacts are discussed below and are based on the proposed scheme commencing

construction in Autumn 2021.

16.6.7.1 Cumulative impacts during construction

Cumulative Impact 1: Habitat loss, disturbance or killing of otter

Hunterston PARC

186. The majority of the works associated with the proposed Hunterston PARC (Peel Ports Group, 2019)

are terrestrial, however dredging activities will be required and a Marine Licence will be sought for

these works. There is potential for otters at Millport to travel to the mainland and the vicinity of the

PARC, however coastal otters generally have much smaller home ranges than their riverine

counterparts, because of the abundance of fish and crustacean prey in inshore waters (SNH, 2019).

Assessments for the master plan will be subject to site specific surveys and assessments, and liaison

with stakeholders including SNH. EIAs will be undertaken as required. A timeframe for

commencement of construction is currently unknown.

Great Cumbrae Solar Farm

187. The Environmental Report for the Great Cumbrae Solar Farm (Rambol Environ, 2016) states that no

evidence of protected and/or notable species were recorded during the survey (conducted August

2015). No specific mention of otter is made. Habitats recorded at the site are stated to include basin

mire, marginal vegetation, flush, marshy grassland and open water.

188. The Ecological Appraisal (Starling Learning, 2015) provided with the Environmental Report states no

evidence of protected and/or notable species was recorded during the survey. However, it is possible

the site may attract otter during the spring to hunt for amphibians. The Appraisal recommends that,

if the development is likely to affect the pond in any way e.g. run-off into the pond, suitable surface

water management measures such as attenuation ponds and silt nets will be required to minimise

impacts to protected species. No further mention is made of otter in the appraisal, the Planning

Statement, responses from SNH, SWT or the Decision Notice.

189. An otter sighting record is present on NBN Atlas (Figure 16-4) in the vicinity of the Great Cumbrae

Solar Farm. There is potential for otters utilising Millport Bay to travel up to the habitats in the vicinity

of the solar farm to forage for amphibians, and therefore there is potential for connectivity between

the projects and therefore potential cumulative impacts during construction should the construction

periods overlap. Works are required to start on the solar farm before 29th March 2020 but as none of



37

the pre-start conditions have been discharged there is no indication of the realistic programme for this

project, should it be built.

Mill Burn, Millport Flood Scheme Option Appraisal

190. Two options are currently being considered within the Mill Burn, Millport Flood Scheme Option

Appraisal, both of which involve works to the Mill Burn which feed into Newtown Bay (North Ayrshire

Council, pers comm. As a freshwater source, there is potential for the burn to provide habitat and

resource for otters in the vicinity to clean and wash salt from their fur, drink, forage or rest. The

programme for Option 1 is for completion within 2020, whilst for Option 2, works are anticipated to

occur end of 2020 and complete summer 2021. The two proposed schemes would therefore only

overlap in time should Option 2 of the Mill Burn, Millport Flood Scheme be progressed and there is a

delay in the construction work programme.

Summary

191. Considering the three other proposed projects, there remains potential for spatial or temporal overlap

of the otter population in Millport Bay and their potential home range. The mitigation outlined for the

proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an acceptable level and all impacts will be

short term, temporary and reversible upon otter and otter habitat. The total area disturbed even if this

occurs over all 3 projects is very small compared to a home range. Should any of the other

developments have potential to cause an adverse impact upon otter, it is assumed they will be subject

to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential affects. Based on the current status of the

other proposed projects, constructions works for the Mill Burn are not anticipated to occur at the same

time as those for the proposed scheme, reducing temporal overlap between projects. There is

potential the PARC project may commence construction at a similar time, however it is unlikely otters

will be travelling between the two sites due to there being ample food resource in the coastal waters

around both areas. As such, the proposed scheme is not anticipated to cause impacts worse than

minor adverse when considered cumulatively with the other projects. No additional mitigation is

therefore proposed.

Cumulative Impact 2: Spread on non-native invasive species

192. The construction of the proposed projects listed in Table 16-13 will involve bringing in plant and

equipment to the study area, including plant which will be used in other areas of the country, there is

a risk of releasing non-native species to the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area. The risk of introducing

non-native species over the long term is anticipated to have an effect of medium magnitude. It is

assumed that the other proposed projects will be subject to similar best working practices as the

proposed scheme so as to minimise risk, and therefore potential cumulative impacts are anticipated

to be of minor adverse significance, i.e. the same as the impact anticipated to arise due to the

proposed scheme occurring in isolation.

16.6.7.2 Cumulative impacts during Operation and Maintenance

Cumulative Impact 3: Habitat loss, disturbance or killing of otter

193. Operation and Maintenance works will be low level for the proposed scheme, the Mill Burn and the

solar farm and may cause disturbance to otters, through human presence or noise, however, given

the existing background level of activities in Millport Bay, these are anticipated to be of negligible

magnitude, constituting an impact of minor adverse significance. A greater level of disturbance is

likely to occur during operation of the PARC Project, however this project will be subject to its own

conditions in relation to this species and the proposed scheme is not anticipated to increase the

potential impacts which may occur from PARC activities.



38

194. No additional mitigation is considered necessary for the proposed scheme, and therefore potential

cumulative impacts are anticipated to be of minor adverse significance, i.e. the same as the impact

anticipated to arise due to the proposed scheme occurring in isolation.

Cumulative Impact 4: Spread on non-native invasive species

195. The construction of the proposed projects listed in Table 16-13 will involve bringing in plant and

equipment to the study area, including plant which will be used in other areas of the country, there is

a risk of releasing non-native species to the Terrestrial Ecology Study Area. The risk of introducing

non-native species over the long term is anticipated to have an effect of medium magnitude. It is

assumed that the other proposed projects will be subject to similar best working practices as the

proposed scheme so as to minimise risk, and therefore potential cumulative impacts are anticipated

to be of negligible significance, i.e. the same as the impact anticipated to arise due to the proposed

scheme occurring in isolation.

16.6.8 Inter-relationships

196. Table 16-14 lists out the inter relationships between other chapters within the ES.

Table 16-14 Inter-topic relationships

Topic Related

Chapter

Where

addressed

in this

chapter

Rationale

Benthic and intertidal

ecology 8

Section

16.6.4

Both chapters consider the potential effects of the proposed

scheme on habitats at the coastal fringe.

Offshore and coastal

ornithology 11

Section

16.6.4

Both chapters consider the potential effects on habitats

which may support birds.

Water resources and

flood risk 17

Section

16.6.4

The Terrestrial Ecology chapter takes account of the

assessments made in Chapter 17, Water Resources and

Flood Risk which consider potential impacts to groundwater

to assess any associated impacts to designated sites and

habitats.

Noise and vibration 18 Section

16.6.4


assessments made in Chapter 21, Noise and Vibration for

considering potential impacts of noise and vibration to

designated sites and species.

Air quality 20 Section

16.6.4


assessments made in Chapter 22, Air Quality for

considering potential impacts of air quality to designated

sites, habitats and species.

Seascape, landscape and

visual impact assessment 21 Both chapters consider any potential replanting schemes.

16.7 Interactions

197. The impacts identified and assessed in this chapter have the potential to interact with each other,

which could give rise to synergistic impacts as a result of that interaction. The worst case impacts

assessed within this chapter take these interactions into account and for the impact assessments are



39

considered conservative and robust. For clarity, the areas of interaction between impacts are

presented in Table 16-15 along with an indication as to whether the interaction may give rise to

synergistic impacts.

Table 16-15 Potential interactions between impacts on terrestrial ecology

Potential interaction between impacts

Construction

Impact 1:

Temporary

or

permanent

habitat

loss

Impact 2:

Habitat

loss,

disturbance

or killing of

otter

Impact 3:

Habitat

loss,

disturbance

or killing of

reptiles

Impact 4:

Disturbance

of foraging

bats

Impact 5: Spread on non-native invasive

species

Impact 1:

Temporary

or

permanent

habitat loss

Yes Yes Yes No

Impact 2:

Habitat

loss,

disturbance

or killing of

otter

Yes No No No

Impact 3:

Habitat

loss,

disturbance

or killing of

reptiles

Yes No No No

Impact 4:

Disturbance

of foraging

bats

Yes No No No

Impact 5:

Spread on

non-native

invasive

species

No No No No

Operation

Impact 1: Habitat loss,

disturbance or killing of otter Impact 2: Spread on non-native invasive species

Impact 1:

Habitat

loss,

disturbance

No



40

or killing of

otter

Impact 2:

Spread on

non-native

invasive

species

No

Decommissioning

As a flood prevention scheme, the proposed scheme is anticipated to be maintained rather than removed, and

therefore decommissioning activities are currently unknown. This will be assessed at the time of any

decommissioning activities required.

16.7.1 Summary

198. The main potential impacts of the proposed scheme on terrestrial ecological receptors have been

identified within this chapter.

199. No potential impacts to statutory and non-statutory sites designated for the terrestrial ecology they

support have been identified. The assessment of impacts on statutory and non-statutory sites

designated for the intertidal and marine ecology they support are considered in Chapter 8 Benthic

and Intertidal Ecology.

200. No trees will be removed during construction of the proposed scheme. The majority of works will be

constructed upon amenity of grassland of negligible ecological importance, which will be re-instated

upon completion of the construction works with limited permanent habitat loss. More floristically

diverse grassland habitat is present on the Eileans in Millport Bay, and access will be restricted here

as far as practically possible.

201. Precautionary methods (habitat manipulation) will be used to ensure no impacts to reptiles.

202. Otters are known to be present in Millport Bay and there is potential for a resting site in the vicinity of

the proposed scheme. A pre-construction survey will be undertaken and an EPS licence will be

applied for, in consultation with SNH, should there be deemed potential to disturb a resting site.

Access to the Eileans in the bay will be minimised.

203. The proposed scheme may cause disturbance to bats foraging along the coast. This will be mitigated

through implementation of a sensitive lighting regime.

204. There is potential for the spread of terrestrial invasive non-native species during the construction of

the proposed scheme. A pre-construction survey will be undertaken and an Invasive Species

Management Plan will be prepared prior to construction works. Any known stands will be fenced off

to avoid the spread of seeds or plant material and best practice working methods will be followed.

205. During operation and maintenance of the proposed scheme, there is some limited potential for

disturbance to otters through noise or human presence, which is unlikely to represent a significant

adverse impact upon the local otter population. The offshore breakwaters will, by default, create

artificial habitat for otters which, if utilised, may have limited beneficial impacts. There may be

opportunity for spread of non-native invasive species through operation and maintenance regimes

which will be controlled through best practice measures.



41

206. Following the adoption of the recommended best practice guidance and mitigation measures set out

in Table 16-16, the residual impacts to ecological receptors from construction of the proposed scheme

will be no greater than minor adverse in the short to medium term. All mitigation measures will be

detailed in an overarching EAP, which will form part of the EMP.

207. Cumulative impacts with other proposed schemes have been considered and no significant adverse

cumulative impacts have been predicted.

208. A summary of the potential impacts and proposed mitigation is presented in Table 16-16.



42

Table 16-16 Potential Impacts Identified for Terrestrial and Coastal Ecology

Potential

Impact Receptor Importance Magnitude Significance

Summary of Mitigation

Measures

Residual

Impact

Construction

Impact 1:

Temporary or

permanent

habitat loss

Amenity grassland Negligible High Minor adverse

Topsoil management, surface

water management, use of existing

hardstanding where possible,

geotextiles.

Negligible

Trees Negligible Medium Minor adverse Tree RPAs will be defined and

works will be avoided within these. Negligible

Eileans grasslands Low Medium Minor adverse Reduced access onto islands in

the bay. Negligible

Impact 2:

Habitat loss,

disturbance or

killing of reptiles

Reptiles Medium Low Minor adverse Precautionary methods (habitat

manipulation). Negligible

Impact 3:

Habitat loss,

disturbance or

killing of otter

Otter High Up to Medium Up to Major adverse

Pre-construction survey.

Agreement with SNH, Potential

EPS licence.

Minimising works on the islands in

the bay, Best practice guidance,

sensitive lighting regime, ECoW,

and ramps in trenches.

Minor adverse

Impact 4:

Disturbance of

foraging bats

Bats Medium Low Minor adverse Sensitive lighting regime Negligible



43

Potential

Impact Receptor Importance Magnitude Significance

Summary of Mitigation

Measures

Residual

Impact

Impact 5:

Spread on non-

native invasive

species

Non-native invasive

species Medium Medium Moderate adverse

Pre-construction survey;

Invasive Species Management

Plan (if required); and

Fencing off of identified stands.

Minor adverse

Operation

Impact 1:

Habitat loss,

disturbance or

killing of otter

Otter Medium Negligible Minor adverse None Minor adverse

Impact 2:

Spread on non-

native invasive

species

Non-native invasive

species Medium Low Minor adverse

Pre-construction survey;

Invasive Species Management

Plan (if required); and

Fencing off of identified stands.

Negligible

Decommissioning

As a flood prevention scheme, the proposed scheme is anticipated to be maintained rather than removed, and therefore decommissioning activities are currently

unknown. This will be assessed at the time of any decommissioning activities required.



44

16.8 References

Atlantic Ecology (2019) Millport Bay Bird Survey 2018-19 Technical Report prepared by Atlantic

Ecology on behalf of Royal HaskoningDHV Limited and North Ayrshire Council.

Bat Conservation Trust (BCT) and Institute of Lighting Engineers (ILP) (2018) Bats and Artificial

Lighting in the UK

British Standard, (2013): British Standard 42020:2013 –Biodiversity. Code of Practice for planning and

development

Chanin P (2003). Ecology of the European Otter. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series No.

10. English Nature, Peterborough

Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) (2018) as amended

Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal

and Marine. Available at: https://cieem.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ECIA-Guidelines-Sept-2019.pdf

Accessed 29.01.20

CIEEM (2017) Guidelines on Ecological Report Writing. Chartered Institute of Ecology and

Environmental Management, Winchester.

Construction Industry Research and Information Association (2015) Guidance note C741 Environmental

Good Practice on Site Guide (4th edition)

Construction Industry Research and Information Association (2015) Coastal and marine environmental

site guide (2nd edition) (C744)

Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

Society, London

Edgar et al. (2010) Reptile Habitat Management Handbook

English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

GB Non-native Species Secretariat (2015) Species Information. Available at:

http://www.nonnativespecies.org/home/index.cfm Accessed 29.01.20

Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat survey –A technique for environmental audit (JNCC, 2010);

Holmes, N, Ward, D, Jose, P (1994). The New Rivers and Wildlife Handbook. Published by Royal

Society for the Protection of Birds. ISBN 10: 0903138700 ⁄ ISBN 13: 9780903138703

ILE (2011) Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Obtrusive Light. Available at:

https://www.theilp.org.uk/documents/obtrusive-light/ Accessed 29.01.20

Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2004) Otter Lutra lutra. Available at:

https://sac.jncc.gov.uk/species/S1355/ Accessed 29.01.20

Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2010) Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat survey –A technique for

environmental audit (revised 2016)

Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) (2003) Herpetofauna Worker’s Manual;



45

Kruuk H. 1995.Wild otters. Predation and populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–290.

Marine Scotland (2019) Marine Scotland MAPS NMPI Available at::

https://marinescotland.atkinsgeospatial.com/nmpi/ Accessed 29.01.20

Marine Traffic (2020) Available at:

https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ports/4631/United_Kingdom_port:CUMBRAE%20SLIP

Accessed 29.01.20

Natural Environment White Paper (2011).

NBN Atlas, (undated, a). Available at:

https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?q=*:*&fq=species_group:Plants&lat=55.7505&lon=-

4.9256&radius=0.05 Accessed 29.01.20

NBN Atlas, (Undated, b), Available at:

https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?taxa=&q=*%3A*&fq=species_group%3APlants&wkt=&

lat=55.749&lon=-4.9253&radius=0.05&dir=&offset=140&max=20 Accessed 29.01.20

Netregs (undated) Guidance for Pollution Prevention, Available at:

http://www.netregs.org.uk/environmental-topics/pollution-prevention-guidelines-ppgs-and-replacement-

series/guidance-for-pollution-prevention-gpps-full-list/ Accessed 29.01.20

NIEA, SEPA and NRW (2017) GPP 21: Pollution Incident Response Plans. July 2017

NIEA, DAERA, SEPA and NRW (2018) Guidance for Pollution Prevention: Works and maintenance in

or near water: GPP5. Version 1.2. February 2018

NIEA, DAERA, SEPA and NRW (2018a) Guidance for Pollution Prevention. Dealing with spills: GPP 22.

Version 1. October 2018

North Ayrshire Council (2015) North Ayrshire LBAP 2015-2018 Revision Available at URL:

https://www.north-ayrshire.gov.uk/Documents/CorporateServices/Finance/draft-lbap.pdf

North Ayrshire Council (undated) Nature Conservation Sites. Available at: https://www.north-

ayrshire.gov.uk/Documents/CorporateServices/LegalProtective/LocalDevelopmentPlan/nature-

conservation-sites.pdf Accessed 29.01.20

North Ayrshire Council, (undated) Tree Preservation Orders. Available at: https://www.north-

ayrshire.gov.uk/planning-and-building-standards/conservation-natural-environment/tree-preservation-

orders.aspx Accessed 29.01.20

North Ayrshire Council, (2012a.) Environmental Policy. Available at: https://www.north-

ayrshire.gov.uk/Documents/CorporateServices/LegalProtective/Planning/NACEnvironmentalPolicy.pdf

Accessed 29.01.20

North Ayrshire Council, 2012b. Tree and Woodland Management Policy. Available at:

https://www.north-ayrshire.gov.uk/Documents/CorporateServices/LegalProtective/Planning/tree-

woodlands-policy.pdf Accessed 29.01.20

North Ayrshire Council, 2019 Local Development Plan 2. Available at: https://www.north-

ayrshire.gov.uk/planning-and-building-standards/ldp/ldp2.aspx Accessed 29.01.20



46

North Ayrshire Council, East Ayrshire Council, South Ayrshire Council 2007. Ayrshire Joint Structure

Plan. Available at: https://www.south-

ayrshire.gov.uk/documents/ayrshire%20joint%20structure%20plan%202007.pdf Accessed 29.01.20

Peel Ports Group (2019) Hunterston PARC Available at: https://www.peelports.com/news/2019/peel-

ports-sets-out-future-for-hunterston-parc Accessed 29.01.20

Rambol Environ (2016) Great Cumbrae Solar Farm environmental report. Available at:

https://www.eplanning.north-

ayrshire.gov.uk/OnlinePlanning/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=O2L9BCLE03P00

Accessed 29.01.20

Royal HaskoningDHV (2017), Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme Environmental Scoping Report

Royal HaskoningDHV (2018a), Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme: Phase 1 Habitat Survey

Report.

Royal HaskoningDHV (2018b), Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme: Intertidal Survey.

Scottish Biodiversity List (Biodiversity Scotland, undated);

Scottish Environment Protection Agency (undated): Biosecurity and management of invasive non-native

species for construction sites and controlled activities.

Scottish Government (2014) Ayrshire LBAP 2014-2017. Available at:

https://www2.gov.scot/seag/seagDocs/SEA-00998/16001.pdf Accessed 29.01.20

Scottish Government, (1999). National Planning Policy Guidance (NPPG) 14 Natural Heritage

Scottish Government, (2007). Scottish Biodiversity List. Available at:

https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20160402063428/http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Environ

ment/Wildlife-Habitats/16118/Biodiversitylist/SBL Accessed 29.01.20

Scottish Government, (2008). Planning Advice Note (PAN) 60 (Planning for Natural Heritage)

Scottish Government, (2013). Planning Advice Note 1/2013: Environmental Impact Assessment.

Scottish Government, (2014a) Scotland’s third National Planning Framework. Available at:

https://www.gov.scot/publications/national-planning-framework-3/ Accessed 29.01.20

Scottish Government, (2014b) Scotland’s Planning Policy. Available at:

https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-planning-policy/ Accessed: 29.01.20

Scottish Natural Heritage (1985) Available at: https://apps.snh.gov.uk/sitelink-

api/v1/sites/825/documents/1 Accessed 29.01.20

Scottish Natural Heritage (2002): A Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessment

Scottish Natural Heritage (2019a): Protected Species https://www.nature.scot/professional-

advice/safeguarding-protected-areas-and-species/protected-species Accessed 29.01.20

Scottish Natural Heritage (2019b): Otters: licences for surveys and research. Available at:

https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/safeguarding-protected-areas-and-

species/licensing/species-licensing-z-guide/otters-and-licensing/otters-licences-surveys-and

Accessed 29.01.20



47

SNH (1985) Kames Bay SSSI Citation Available at: https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/825 Accessed

29.01.20

SNH (2000) Ballochmartin Bay SSSI Citation available at URL: https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/132

Accessed 29.01.20

SNH (2005) A Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessment (Version 5) Available at:

https://www.nature.scot/handbook-environmental-impact-assessment-guidance-competent-authorities-

consultees-and-others Accessed 29.01.20

SNH (2019) information on otter. Available at: https://www.nature.scot/plants-animals-and-

fungi/mammals/land-mammals/otter Accessed 29.01.20

SNH (undated) Standing Advise for Planning Consultations : Otter . Available at:

https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/2019-10/Species%20Planning%20Advice%20-%20otter.pdf

Accessed 29.01.20

Starling Learning (2015) Preliminary ecological appraisal, Ballochmartin Farm, Cumbrae. Available at:

https://www.eplanning.north-

ayrshire.gov.uk/OnlinePlanning/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=O2L9BCLE03P00

Accessed 29.01.20

Strachan, R. & Jefferies, D.J. (1996). Otter survey of England 1991-1994. The Vincent Wildlife Trust,

London.

Strachan, R., Moorhouse, T., and Gelling, M., (2011). Water Vole Conservation Handbook, Third

Edition.

A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment 2018

The Highways Agency, The Scottish Executive Development Department, The National Assembly for

Wales and The Department for Regional Development (2001) Design Manual for Roads and Bridges

(DMRB Volume 10 section 4). Available at:

http://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/ha/standards/dmrb/vol10/index.htm Accessed 29.01.19

Title:

Project:Millport Flood

Protection Scheme- EIA Report

Client:

North Ayrshire Council

±

Drawn: Scale:Checked:Date:Revision:

Drawing No:

Size:

British National Grid

Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

See Figure 16.1b

210000

210000

215000

215000

220000

220000

6500

00

6500

00

6550

00

6550

00

6600

00

6600

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±

Marlborough HouseMarlborough Crescent

Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 4EE+44 (0)191 211 1300

www.royalhaskoningdhv.com

16.1a

0 3 Kilometres

Legend

1:50,0000 TC A3AS07/11/2019

Project infrastructure and study boundaries

Redline BoundaryTerrestrial Ecology Study AreaDesk Study AreaBat Study Area

Contains OS data © Crown Copyright and database right 2019

Title:



Client:


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

Crocodile RockLido

216000

216000

217000

217000

6540

00

6540

00

6550

00

6550

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.1b

0 200 400 Metres

Legend

1:8,0000 TC A3AS

Project infrastructure and study boundaries

Redline BoundaryTerrestrial Ecology Study AreaPotential Site CompoundPotential Materials StorageFlood WallsRock BreakwaterRock RevetmentModifications to existing coast protection structuresModifications to existing promenade and grass areasOffshore Breakwater

© HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.Contains OS data © Crown Copyright and database right 2019© Crown copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey 100023393.Use of this data is subject to terms and conditions.

1:8,0001 TC A3AS04/02/202019/11/2019

Title:



Client:


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

215500

215500

216000

216000

216500

216500

6545

00

6545

00

6550

00

6550

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.2a

0 200 400 Metres

Legend

1:4,0000 TC A3AS

Extended Phase 1 Habitat Area

Redline BoundaryTerrestrial Ecology Study Area

H Target Notes! Scattered Broadleaved Tree

Phase 1 Survey

A AA A Amenity Grassland

! !

! !! !

! ! Hard StandingI II I Improved Grassland

Scrub

© HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.© 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES(2019) Distribution Airbus DSContains OS data © Crown Copyright and database right 2019

19/11/2019

Title:



Client:


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

216500

216500

217000

217000

217500

217500

6545

00

6545

00

6550

00

6550

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.2b

0 200 400 Metres

Legend

1:4,0000 TC A3AS

Extended Phase 1 Habitat Area

Redline BoundaryTerrestrial Ecology Study Area

H Target Notes! Scattered Broadleaved Tree

Phase 1 Survey

A AA A Amenity Grassland

! !

! !! !

! ! Hard StandingI II I Improved Grassland

Scrub

27/11/2019

© HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.© 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES(2019) Distribution Airbus DSContains OS data © Crown Copyright and database right 2019

Title:

Project:Client:


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

BallihewanWood

Horse Hill Wood

BallochmartinBay SWT/ Ancient Wood

Great BraeWood

StandingstonePlantation

Bell Bay toWhitebay SWT

Barbay HillSWT

Fintray Bay toPortachor Point SWT

FarlandPoint SWT

Ninian BraeWood SWT/Ancient Woodland

SouthannanSands SSSI

BallochmartinBay SSSI

Kames BaySSSI

216000

216000

220000

220000

6520

00

6520

00

6560

00

6560

00

© HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. Contains OS data © Crown Copyright and database right 2019

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.3

Statutory and non Statutory Nature ConservationDesignated Sites

0 3 Kilometres

Redline BoundarySite of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)Ancient and Semi-natural WoodlandWildlife Site (SWT)

Legend

Millport FloodProtection Scheme

- EIA Report

1:30,0000 TC A3AS18/11/2019

Title:



Client:


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

XYXY

XYXY

XY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

XY

XY

XY

XYXY

XY

XY

XY

XY

XY

XYXYXY

XY XYXY

216000

216000

217000

217000

6540

00

6540

00

6550

00

6550

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.4

0 500 Metres

Legend

1:8,0000 TC A317/12/2019

Protected or Noteworthy Species and Habitats- Otter and Polecat

Redline BoundaryTerrestrial Ecology Study AreaDesk Study Area

XY European Otter

XY Polecat

!( Latrines!( Otter!( Spraints

© HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.© Crown copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey 100023393.Use of this data is subject to terms and conditions.Contains OS data © Crown Copyright and database right 2019

1 NBN Atlas2 Atlantic Ecology, 2019

1

XY

XY

XYXY

XY

XY XY XY XYXY

XY

XY

XY

XY

XYXY

XY

XYXY

XY

XYXYXY

XY

XY

XY

XYXYXY

XY XY

XYXY

XY 22

2

1

JMcM

Title:



Client:

kjkjkjkjkj

kj

kjkj kjkjkj

kjkj

kjkjkj

kjkj

kj

kj

kj

kjkjkjkjkjkj

kj

kjkjkj

kjkjkjkjkj

kjkjkjkjkjkjkj

kj

kjkjkjkjkjkj kj

kjkjkj

kj

kj

kjkjkj

kj


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

kjkjkj

kj

kjkj

kjkj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kjkjkjkjkjkj

kj

kjkjkj

kj

kj

216000

216000

217000

2170006540

00

6540

00

6550

00

6550

00

6560

00

6560

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.5

0 500 Metres

Legend

1:8,0000 TC A3JMcM

Protected or Noteworthy Species and Habitats- Bats

Redline BoundaryTerrestrial Ecology Study AreaDesk Study AreaBat Study Area

Bat Recordskj Brown Long-eared Batkj Common Pipistrellekj Lesser Noctulekj Long-eared Bat specieskj Myotis Bat specieskj Natterer's Batkj Pipistrellekj Pipistrelle Bat specieskj Soprano Pipistrellekj Unidentified Bat


(NBN Atlas)

kjkj

kjkjkj

kj

kjkj kjkjkj

kj

kj

kjkj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kjkj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kjkj

kj

kjkj

kjkjkj

kjkj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kjkjkj

kj

kjkj

kj

kj

kjkj

kj

kj

17/12/2019

Title:



Client:


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

")

")

")

")

")")

")

")

")

")

216000

216000

217000

217000

6540

00

6540

00

6550

00

6550

00

6560

00

6560

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.6

0 500 Metres

Legend

1:8,0000 TC A3JMcM

Protected or Noteworthy Species and Habitats- Reptiles


Reptiles") Common Lizard") Palmate Newt") Slow-worm


(NBN Atlas)

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")")

")

")

")

")

")

")

17/12/2019

Title:



Client:


±


Drawing No:

Size:


Figure:

Co-ordinate system:

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂̂__̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

216000

216000

217000

217000

6540

00

6540

00

6550

00

6550

00

6560

00

6560

00

ROYAL HASKONINGDHV

±




16.7

0 500 Metres

Legend

1:8,0000 TC A3

Protected or Noteworthy Species and Habitats- Invasive Species


Invasive Species_̂ Giant Hogweed

_̂ Canadian Waterweed

_̂ Japanese Rose

_̂ Montbretia

_̂ Flowering plant

_̂ Japanese Knotweed


_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂̂__̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂̂_

_̂̂__̂_̂

_̂

_̂_̂̂_

_̂̂__̂

_̂

JMcM17/12/2019

(NBN Atlas)

REPORT

Millport Coastal Flood Protection

Scheme: Environmental Statement

Appendix 16.1 Millport FPS Phase 1 Habitat Survey

Report


Reference: PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-00016.1

Status: Final/F01


ECOLOGICAL REPORT

Millport FPS Phase 1 Habitat Survey

Report


Reference: I&BPB4749R001F0.1

Revision: 0.1/Final

Date: Thursday, 01 March 2018

O p e n

Thursday, 01 March 2018

I&BPB4749R001F0.1 i

HASKONINGDHV UK LTD.

2 Abbey Gardens

Great College Street

London

SW1P 3NL

Industry & Buildings

VAT registration number: 792428892

+44 207 2222115

[email protected]

royalhaskoningdhv.com

T

E

W

Document title: Millport FPS Phase 1 Habitat Survey Report

Document short title:

Reference: I&BPB4749R001F0.1

Revision: 0.1/Final

Date: Thursday, 01 March 2018

Project name: Millport FPS

Project number: PB4749

Author(s): Charlotte Clements

Drafted by: Charlotte Clements

Checked by: Claire Smith

Date / initials: 08/02/18 CS

Approved by: Kerrie Craig

Date / initials: 27/03/2018 KC

Classification

Open

Disclaimer

No part of these specifications/printed matter may be reproduced and/or published by print, photocopy, microfilm or by

any other means, without the prior written permission of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.; nor may they be used, without such

permission, for any purposes other than that for which they were produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no

responsibility or liability for these specifications/printed matter to any party other than the persons by whom it was

commissioned and as concluded under that Appointment. The integrated QHSE management system of

HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. has been certified in accordance with ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 and OHSAS

18001:2007.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 ii

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 1

1.1 Site Description 1

1.2 Scope of Works 1

1.3 Purpose of this Report 2

2 Legislation and Policy 2

3 Methodology 3

3.1 Survey Area 3

3.2 Desk Study 3

3.3 Field Survey 3

3.3.1 Survey methodology 3

3.3.2 Otter 4

3.3.3 Surveyors 4

3.3.4 Weather conditions 4

3.3.5 Survey limitations 4

4 Results 5

4.1 Desk Study 5

4.1.1 Statutory and non-statutory designated sites 5

4.1.2 UK Habitats of Principal Importance 5

4.1.3 Legally protected and notable species 5

4.2 Field Survey 6

4.2.1 Habitats 6

4.2.2 Protected species 7

4.2.3 Otter 8

4.2.4 Invasive non-native species 8

5 Recommendations 8

5.1 Statutory and non-statutory sites 8

5.2 Habitats 8

5.3 Protected Species 8

5.3.1 Nesting and over-wintering birds 8

5.3.2 Reptiles 9

5.3.2.1 Other notable protected species 9

5.4 Otter 9

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 iii

6 Summary 10

7 References 11

Table of Tables

Table 2.1 Summary of key legislation and policy relevant to this project 2

Table 4.1 Non statutory designated sites within 2km of the scheme 5

Table 4.2 Protected species records within 2km of the scheme (5km for bat species) 6

Table 6.1 Summary of findings 10

Appendices

Appendix A – Figures

Appendix B – Target Notes

Appendix C – Biological Records

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 1

1 Introduction

Royal HaskoningDHV was commissioned by North Ayrshire Council to undertake a coastal flood risk

assessment and provide a subsequent appraisal of management options for Millport (herein referred to as

‘the scheme’). As part of this work an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and an Otter Presence/Absence

Survey was required to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The findings of these ecological

surveys are provided in this document, which were carried out concurrently on 10th October 2017.

The scheme includes works on land, works on the foreshore and one of three options for works within the

coastal waters at Millport Bay. The onshore works include the establishment of new flood defence walls,

works to existing coastal defences and the installation of rock revetment and a rock breakwater.

There are three options currently being considered for offshore flood protection works:

• Option 1: a rock armour breakwater extension to Millport Pier; and

• Option 2 and 3: offshore rock armour structures in the vicinity of the rock islets within the bay

(two alternative alignments of offshore breakwaters are being considered).

1.1 Site Description

The Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Otter Presence/Absence Survey covered the terrestrial habitats

within the scheme area plus an additional 250m buffer, as presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3, Appendix

A – Figures. This was designed to cover all terrestrial areas which may be impacted by the proposed

scheme. The survey area extends from the old Lido in the west through Newton bay and Kames bay and

out towards Farland Point in the east. The surveys focussed on the area immediately adjacent to the

foreshore, taking into consideration the natural barrier of the housing, pavements and roads directly behind

the coastline.

1.2 Scope of Works

This report includes the results of an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Otter Presence/Absence

Survey, which were undertaken by a Royal HaskoningDHV ecologist on 10th October 2017.

The Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey comprises three components, which collectively enable a preliminary

ecological assessment of the survey area to be undertaken. These components include:

• a desktop review that summarises information on existing protected species records and nature

conservation designations in the area;

• an assessment of the habitats recorded within the survey area obtained from the ecological

walkover survey; and

• an assessment of the survey area for its likelihood of supporting protected species or species

of conservation concern.

The Otter Presence/Absence Survey involved looking for evidence to confirm the presence/absence of

otters within the survey area and the presence/absence of any holts and/or resting places that may be

impacted by the scheme.

This report has been prepared in line with the guidelines set out in the Chartered Institute of Ecology and

Environmental Management’s (CIEEM) Guidelines for Ecological Report Writing (2nd Edition, December

2017).

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 2

These surveys were completed in conjunction with an Intertidal Survey (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2017), which

focussed on the intertidal habitats offshore and adjacent to the area surveyed as the Extended Phase 1

Habitat Survey.

1.3 Purpose of this Report

The purpose of this report is to present the findings of the 2017 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Otter

Presence/Absence Survey, providing an overall understanding of the existing ecological value of the survey

area.

This report also clearly identifies the potential for the survey area to support legally protected species

(including otters) alongside the requirement for any species specific ‘Phase 2’ surveys, and hence the

potential hazards, restrictions and obligations which may be required to ensure compliance with wildlife

legislation.

2 Legislation and Policy

This section summarises the relevant information of the legal protection afforded to habitats and species

mentioned in this report and identified during the Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Otter Presence/Absence

Survey. However, it should be noted that this is for information only and is not intended to be comprehensive

or to replace specialised legal advice.

Table 2.1 below provides a brief summary of the key legislation and policy relevant to the scheme.

Table 2.1 Summary of key legislation and policy relevant to this project


Wildlife and Countryside Act

1981 (as amended)

Codifies the EU Directive 2009/147/EC (the Birds Directive) into UK law; provides

legal protection for European designated sites (Special Protection Areas (SPA),

Ramsar sites) and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI); outlines legal

offences in relation to wild birds, animals, and invasive species; provides lists of

species which are protected under the Act.

The Conservation of Habitats

and Species Regulations 2017

(as amended)

Codifies the EU Directive 92/43/EEC (The Habitats Directive) into UK law;

provides legal protection for European designated sites (Special Areas of

Conservation (SAC)).

Natural Environment and Rural

Communities Act 2006

Details a list of UK habitats and species of ‘principle importance’ which require

protection within the UK.

Policy Relevance

UK Post-2010 Biodiversity

Framework

Supersedes the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP), which fulfilled legal

obligation under the Convention on Biological Diversity to identify and produce

action plans for produce priority habitats and species.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 3

3 Methodology

3.1 Survey Area

The Phase 1 Habiat survey covered the terrestrial habitats within the scheme area plus an additional 250m

buffer, as presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3, Appendix A. It was designed to cover all terrestrial areas

which may be impacted by the proposed scheme and extends from the old Lido in the west through Newton

bay and Kames bay and out towards Farland Point in the east.

3.2 Desk Study

Biological records were obtained from the South West Scotland Environmental Information Centre

(SWSEIC) in November 2017. The data search returned all records of statutory and non-statutory

designated sites for nature conservation within 2km of the survey area boundary. The data search also

searched for records of protected and notable species within 2km of the survey area boundary (5km for bat

species).

The Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) website (www.magic.gov.uk) and

the Scottish Natural Heritage website (www.nature.scot) were reviewed for information on statutory sites

and notable habitats (e.g. ancient woodlands) of nature conservation value within 2km of the survey area.

A search for water bodies within 250m of the survey area was made using Ordnance Survey (OS) maps. A

search area of 250m was chosen having taken into account the habitats around the survey area. Although

great crested newts can use suitable terrestrial habitat up to 500m from a breeding pond (Great Crested

Newt Conservation Handbook, Froglife, 2001), research suggests that newts are likely to travel no more

than 250m from ponds where suitable habitats for foraging and hibernation exist1.

3.3 Field Survey

3.3.1 Survey methodology

An ecological walkover survey of the survey area and its immediate surrounds was undertaken on 10th

October 2017.

This survey broadly followed the ‘Extended Phase 1’ methodology as set out in Guidelines for Baseline

Ecological Assessment (Institute of Environmental Assessment, 1995). This method of survey provides

information on the habitats in the survey area and assesses the potential for legally protected species to

occur on or adjacent to the survey area.

The main habitats within the survey area are shown on Figure 2 and Figure 3, Appendix A.

Preliminary investigations were undertaken in respect of the presence of the following legally protected

species within the survey area:

• searching for suitable habitats for breeding populations of great crested newts within the

immediate area and up to 250m from the survey area. Also searching for suitable terrestrial

habitat within the immediate area surrounding the survey area;

• searching for signs of badger activity including setts, tracks, snuffle holes and latrines within the

immediate area surrounding the survey area and up to 30m from its boundary;

1 Cresswell & Whitworth, 2004, An assessment of the efficiency of capture techniques and the value of different habitats for great crested newt Triturus cristatus, ENRR Number 576

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 4

• searching for suitable habitat for water voles, otters and white clawed crayfish in water bodies

within or immediately adjacent to the survey area;

• searching for signs of potential roosting sites for bats, particularly within trees within the survey

area;

• searching for suitable habitats for reptiles within the survey area;

• searching for signs of bird nests and identifying any suitable nesting habitats within the survey

area;

• searching for suitable habitat for any other protected species such as dormice; and

• the presence of invasive species within and up to 10m from the survey area boundary. The list

of invasive plant species included on Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as

amended) is extensive and these plants are found in a range of different habitats. The

ecological constraints survey checked, in particular, for the presence of Japanese knotweed,

giant knotweed, hybrid knotweed, giant hogweed, Himalayan balsam, rhododendron and

cotoneaster

3.3.2 Otter

The Otter Presence/Absence Survey was undertaken in accordance with the Scottish Natural Heritage

(SNH) guidance (Scottish Wildlife Series: Otters and Development, online) and was designed to confirm the

presence/absence of otters and to ascertain the presence/absence of any holts and/or resting places that

may be impacted by the scheme.

A search was made for any other signs of otter, including:

• paw-prints;

• spraint (otter faeces);

• anal jelly (jelly-like secretion);

• pathways;

• couches/lie-ups (above ground resting place); and

• holts (below-ground resting places).

3.3.3 Surveyors

The Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Otter Presence/Absence Survey was conducted by Charlotte

Clements (lead Phase 1 and Otter surveyor), and David Tarrant (lead Intertidal surveyor) both Royal

HaskoningDHV ecologists. Charlotte has 3 years’ experience of Extended Phase 1 Habitat Surveying and

2 years’ experience of undertaking Otter Presence/Absence Surveys.

3.3.4 Weather conditions

Weather conditions were fair to good for the duration of the survey, with some light and heavy rain during

the early afternoon. Wind conditions were slight throughout the morning with increasing wind speed during

the afternoon. The conditions did not inhibit the surveyor in any way.

3.3.5 Survey limitations

The survey was conducted during October 2017, which is outside of the optimal survey period for identifying

ground flora species and hence habitat communities. Despite this, sufficient evidence was found during the

survey to successfully identify habitat communities.

Whilst the utmost effort was made to cover each habitat and pick up all field signs present during the field

survey, on occasion due to human error some field signs can be missed or overlooked.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 5

However, despite this, the data presented in this report is considered to provide an accurate description of

the habitats within the survey area.

4 Results

4.1 Desk Study

4.1.1 Statutory and non-statutory designated sites

There is one statutory designated site within the footprint of the scheme, and two statutory designated sites

within a 2km buffer. The statutory and non-statutory designated sites are shown on Figure 1, Appendix A.

Kames Bay Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)

Kames Bay SSSI is located within the footprint of the scheme and is designated for it’s biological (marine)

habitat.

Ballochmartin Bay SSSI

Ballochmartin Bay SSSI is located approximately 1.7km north east from the scheme, and is also designated

for its biological habitats. Of note is that it supports slow worm (Anguis fragilis) within grassland areas and

roadside verges.

Southannan Sands SSSI

Southannan Sands SSSI is located approximately 2km south east of the scheme, on the Scottish coastline

south of Largs. Southannan Sands comprises three discrete areas which together support one of the best

examples of intertidal sandflats habitat, alongside associated flora and fauna.

In addition, there are four non-statutory sites within a 2km buffer of the scheme, but none are within the

footprint of the scheme.

Table 4.1 Non statutory designated sites within 2km of the scheme

Wildlife Site Name Grid Reference Distance from proposed scheme (km)

Barbay Hill NS171569 1.8

Bell Bay to Whitebay NS166586 2.4

Farland Point NS172542 0.9

Fintray Bay to Portachur Point NS151555 0.4

Ninian Brae Wood NS174552 0.4

4.1.2 UK Habitats of Principal Importance

There are no UK Habitats of Principal Importance, as set out in S41 of the Natural Environment and Rural

Communities (NERC) Act 2006, or habitats from the Scottish Biodiversity List within the survey area, or

within the 2km buffer.

4.1.3 Legally protected and notable species

The following species have been recorded within 500m of the survey area, a full list of records of species

within the wider 2km search buffer is included in Appendix C – Biological Records.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 6

Table 4.2 Protected species records within 2km of the scheme (5km for bat species)

Species

Distance from

scheme

(metres)

Main legal protection and conservation status

Tree sparrow (Passer montanus) 0m

Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006

Dumfries and Galloway Local Biodiversity Action Plan Priority

Species

UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) priority bird species

Birds of Conservation Concern 4 (BoCC4) Red list

Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) 0m



Species

UK BAP priority bird species

BoCC4 Red list

Grasshopper warbler (Locustella

naevia) 0m



BoCC4 Red list

Curlew (Numenius arquata) 0m



Species


BoCC4 Red list

Reed bunting (Emberiza schoeniclus) 0m


Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (As amended) Schedule 1


Species


BoCC4 Yellow list

House sparrow (Passer domesticus) 150m



Species


West European hedgehog (Erinaceus

europaeus) 350m Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006

Dunnock (Prunella modularis) 500m Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006

BoCC4 Yellow list

4.2 Field Survey

4.2.1 Habitats

The terrestrial habitat inshore of the coastal area compromises predominately of built up areas (i.e. areas

of hard-standing, housing, public pathways and roads). There are also areas of amenity grassland with

ornamental flower pots and scattered trees, alongside smaller areas of semi-improved grassland and scrub.

Built-up area

The built-up areas within the survey area consist of: residential housing, public pathways and roads.

Amenity grassland

There are several areas of amenity grassland, with ornamental flowers and scattered broadleaved trees

within the survey area, alongside a football field and recreational park to the west of the survey area. These

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 7

areas are characterised with short sward, regularly mown grass species and the scattered broadleaved

trees are all palm trees (Arecaceae).

Semi-improved grassland and scrub

There are areas of semi-improved grassland, with patches of scrub vegetation, to the east and west of the

survey area. Key species noted include the following:

• Clover (Trifoleum spp);

• Broad leaf dock (Rumex obtusifolius);

• Dog rose (Rosa canina);

• Spear thistle (Cirsium vulgare);

• Bramble (Rubus fruticosus);

• Ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata);

• Oxeye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and

• Ragwort (Jacobaea vulgaris).

4.2.2 Protected species

Flora

No legally protected flora species were noted within the survey area during the 2017 survey, however it

should be noted that the survey was conducted outside the flowering plant season and as such, the absence

of any observations of legally protected or notable flora species during the survey is not an indication that

none are present.

Nesting birds

No active nests were observed during the ecological walkover survey; however the survey was conducted

outside of the nesting bird season (March to August). All scrub and semi-improved grassland present within

the survey area were assessed as having suitable habitat to support ground-nesting birds.

Other protected species

No suitable habitat was observed during the survey for the following species, and as such the survey area

is considered sub-optimal, therefore these species are concluded as being absent and not considered

further within this report:

• Water vole – no rivers or ditch systems with suitable berm for burrowing are present.

• Bats – scattered trees observed in the survey area, however there were no cracks/crevices and

no linear habitats for commuting and/or foraging bats was observed during the 2017 survey.

• Dormice – dormice prefer successional woody vegetation, scrub and hedgerows. These

habitats were not recorded during the survey.

• Great crested newt (GCN) – no freshwater waterbodies were identified within the survey area,

or within a 250m buffer of the survey area and as such no breeding aquatic habitat is present.

Furthermore, the terrestrial habitats within the survey area is largely fragmented and considered

sub-optimal for foraging/commuting GCN.

• White-clawed crayfish – no suitable freshwater waterbodies were identified within the survey

area.

• Badger – no field signs for badger were observed within the survey area, furthermore no

suitable habitat for badger is present within the survey area or within the areas immediately

adjacent.

• Reptiles – no sightings of common reptile species were observed during the 2017 survey,

however it should be noted that the survey was conducted towards the end of the reptile active

season (March to October). Suitable habitats for reptiles are present within the survey area

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 8

(i.e. areas of scrub and grassland), however these areas are limited and fragmented and no

potential refugia was observed during the survey.

4.2.3 Otter

The survey area comprised a variety of shore habitats, including shingle, boulder, rocky outcrops and sand,

alongside areas of scrub and grassland. Freshwater inputs (i.e. pipes or streams) were observed towards

the eastern and western extremities of the survey area.

No evidence of otter (such as; spraints, feeding remains, pathways, couches or holts) was noted throughout

the survey area, and no otter were observed.

4.2.4 Invasive non-native species

No invasive non-native species were noted during the 2017 survey.

5 Recommendations

5.1 Statutory and non-statutory sites

There is one statutory designated site within the footprint of the scheme, and two statutory designated sites

within a 2km buffer.

Kames Bay Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) is located within the footprint of the scheme and is

designated for it’s biological (marine) habitat.

Given the proximity of the Kames Bay SSSI to the proposed scheme, the proposed works will be in

accordance with CIRIA best practice guidelines for coastal and marine site working alongside SEPA

Pollution Prevention Guidelines

No other statutory or non-statutory sites are within the direct footprint of the areas of proposed works, and

are not considered to be functionally connected; therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures

are made for the purposes of this report.

5.2 Habitats

No UK Principal habitats are located either immediately adjacent to, or are considered to be functionally

connected to the areas of proposed works. However, due to the proximity of the Kames Bay SSSI, and as

a precautionary approach, CIRIA best practice guidelines for coastal and marine site working and SEPA

Pollution Prevention Guidelines will be adhered to during construction to ensure there is no pollutant release

to this sensitive habitat.

5.3 Protected Species

5.3.1 Nesting and over-wintering birds

The areas of scrub and improved grassland within the survey area provide optimal nesting habitat for

common breeding birds. If vegetation clearance is required and is to be undertaken during the active season

(March – August inclusive, although weather dependant), a pre-construction nesting bird check should be

undertaken by a suitably qualified ecologist no more than 24-48 hours prior to vegetation clearance. If a

nest is found, a 10m buffer must be set up and no works are to take place within this buffer until the young

have fledged.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 9

5.3.2 Reptiles

No common reptile species were observed during the survey, however the 2017 survey was conducted

towards the end of the reptile active season (typically March to October but is weather and temperature

dependent). Suitable habitats for reptiles exist within the survey area (i.e. areas of scrub and grassland),

however these areas are limited and fragmented. No potential refugia was observed during the survey.

These areas of scrub and grassland (to the east and west of the area of the scheme), are outside the

working footprint and as such should not require any specific mitigations. However, the following

precautions are included in order to minimise any potential adverse impact to reptiles:

• Provision of a tool box talk to site operatives prior to works adjacent to the areas highlighted on

Figure 2 and Figure 3, Appendix A (scrub and semi-improved grassland) illustrating any risk

areas on site for reptile, what the penalties are for killing or injuring reptiles, and the procedure

to follow should any reptiles be found on site during construction;

• Habitat manipulation of the working area to ensure it is unfavourable to reptiles during the works.

This will include a vegetation strim down to 150mm of all vegetation in areas of vehicle tracking

or construction works at least 48 hours prior to construction and all cut vegetation removed

outside the proposed works area, to give any reptiles present time to leave the area. After this

time the vegetation can be strimmed to a closer cut if required. Pre-construction vegetation

clearance will be supervised by a suitably qualified ecologist.

5.3.2.1 Other notable protected species

No suitable habitat for water vole, bat, badger, dormice, GCN or white-clawed crayfish were observed during

the ecological walkover survey; therefore no further surveys and/or recommendations are made with regard

to these species.

5.4 Otter

The survey area comprised mostly of a shingle and boulder shore, with sandy beaches in places. To the

eastern and western edges of the survey area, scrub and improved grassland was recorded, with freshwater

inputs.

No evidence of otter presence was recorded during the survey, and no otter were recorded. Furthermore,

no records of otters, up to 2km from the survey area, was returned during the desk study exercise. However,

suitable habitat for otter was recorded throughout the survey area. Should any evidence of otters be

discovered during construction, the following mitigation measures will be adhered to:

• A temporary ramp to be placed in trenches over 0.5 m deep in order to allow a potentially

trapped animal to exit the trench;

• Any open pipes should be capped to prevent animals gaining access;

• All excavations and pipe systems should be checked at the start of each working day;

• Site construction fencing should not interfere with the passage of animals through river

corridors;

• Lighting to be directed away from watercourses and any lighting on bridges or within 30m of

burns to be low-intensity lighting; and

• Existing vegetation along the watercourses should be retained wherever possible.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 10

6 Summary

Table 6.1 summaries the findings of the 2017 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Otter

Presence/absence Survey detailed in Section 4, and the recommendation set out in Section 5.

Table 6.1 Summary of findings

Ecological feature Ecological constraint or opportunity Recommendations

Kames Bay SSSI The Kames Bay SSSI is located directly

adjacent to the area of proposed works to

the west of the survey area.

It is designated for its biological (marine)

habitat

Works to be undertaken in accordance with CIRIA

best practice guidelines for coastal and marine site

working, alongside SEPA Pollution Prevention

Guidelines.

Nesting and over-

wintering birds

Scrub, trees and grassland within the survey

provide suitable habitat for common nesting

birds.

Vegetation clearance should be undertaken outside

the bird nesting season (March to August inclusive).

If vegetation clearance is undertaken within the

nesting season, a pre-construction check is

required.

Reptiles Suitable habitat, such as areas of scrub and

grassland, is present within the survey area.

However these areas are limited and

fragmented and no potential refugia was

observed during the survey.

• Provision of a Toolbox talk; and

• Habitat manipulation.

Otter

No evidence of otter was recorded within

the survey area, furthermore no records of

otters utilising the survey area (plus a 2km

buffer) were shown during the desk study.

Recommendations are made in the event of

any evidence of otter be discovered during

construction

• Temporary ramp in excavations over 0.5m

deep;

• Open pipes to be capped;

• Excavations and piping to be checked daily;

• Construction fencing placed so not interfere with

the passage of animals to/from the shoreline;

• Lighting to be directed away from the shoreline

and of a low intensity; and

• Existing vegetation to be retained where

possible.

Other protected or

notable species

No constraints with respect to any other legally protected or notable species have been identified.

This includes water vole, badger, GCN, rare flora, dormice and white-clawed crayfish

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 11

7 References

Bat Conservation Trust, 2016. Collins, J.(ed.) (2016) Bat Surveys for Professional Ecologists: Good

Practice Guidelines (3rd edn). The Bat Conservation Trust, London

CIEEM (2017) Guidelines on Ecological Report Writing. Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental

Management, Winchester.

Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal Society,

London

Institute of Environmental Assessment, 1995. Guidelines for Baseline Ecological Assessment.

Langton, T.E.S., Beckett, C.L., and Foster, J.P. (2001), Great Crested Newt Conservation

Handbook, Froglife, Halesworth.

Oldham R.S., Keeble J., Swan M.J.S. & Jeffcote M., 2000. Evaluating the suitability of habitat for the

Great Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus). Herpetological Journal 10(4), 143-155.

Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) Protected Species Advice for Developers

Strachan, R., Moorhouse, T., and Gelling, M., 2011. Water Vole Conservation Handbook, Third Edition.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 12

Appendix A – Figures

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 13

Appendix B – Target Notes

Target note number Details

Ep1hs0011 Area of scrub between shore and amenity grassland.

Species including: bramble, nettle, ragwort, meadow daisy, thistle,

Ep1hs001 Strip of improved grassland adjacent to roadside, with benches, mown. Small strip of

longer sward.

Species including: clover, broad leaf dock, thistle, dog rose, bramble, field buttercup,

ribwort plantain, ragwort, fescue spp, field daisy

Ep1hs003 Pipe, freshwater outlet

Ep1hs004 Ornamental flower garden

Ep1hs005 Small patches of grasses.

Species including: field daisy, broad leaf dock at top of upper shore, adjacent to sea

wall

Ep1hs006 Freshwater pipe/outlet

Ep1hs007 Freshwater outlet

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 14

Appendix C – Biological Records

Biological records obtained from the South West Scotland Environmental Information Centre (SWSEIC) of

species recorded within a 2km buffer of the proposed works (5km for bat species) are shown in the table

below.

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 15

Scientific Name Common Name Date Location Name Grid Reference

Distance from centroid (m)

Cladonia chlorophaea lichen 14/04/1975 Great Cumbrae: Lion Rock NS1754 1015

Cladonia chlorophaea lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 2050

Cladonia chlorophaea lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Sherriffs Port - wood nearby NS153554 1427

Cladonia chlorophaea lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 1015

Cladonia chlorophaea lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Standing Stone wood NS176565 1811

Cladonia chlorophaea lichen 15/06/2003 Great Cumbrae: Sherriffs Port - wood nearby NS153554 1427

Cladonia caespiticia lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 1015

Cladonia cervicornis subsp. cervicornis lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

Cladonia ciliata var. ciliata lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

Cladonia ciliata var. tenuis lichen 15/06/2003 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 1015

Cladonia coniocraea lichen 15/06/2003 Great Cumbrae: Sherriffs Port - wood nearby NS153554 1427

Cladonia diversa lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

Cladonia fimbriata lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 2050

Cladonia fimbriata lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Standing Stone wood NS176565 1811

Cladonia fimbriata lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 1015

Cladonia floerkeana lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

Cladonia furcata lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Sherriffs Port - wood nearby NS153554 1015

Cladonia furcata lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

Cladonia furcata lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 1427

Cladonia furcata lichen 15/06/2003 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 1015

Cladonia macilenta lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

Cladonia macilenta lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Standing Stone wood NS176565 1811

Cladonia portentosa Reindeer Moss June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 1015

Cladonia portentosa Reindeer Moss June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 2050

Cladonia portentosa Reindeer Moss 15/06/2003 Great Cumbrae: Millport Marine Station NS1754 1015

Cladonia ramulosa lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 16



Cladonia squamosa lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 1811

Cladonia squamosa lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Standing Stone wood NS176565 2050

Cladonia uncialis subsp. biuncialis lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Glaid Stone NS168570 2050

Hypotrachyna taylorensis lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Standing Stone wood NS176565 1811

Micarea alabastrites lichen June 2002 Great Cumbrae: Millport NS1555 1657

Ramalina fraxinea lichen 15/06/2003 Great Cumbrae: Sherriffs Port - wood nearby NS153554 1427

Nephroma laevigatum lichen 14/04/1975 Great Cumbrae: Lion Rock NS1754 1015

Varicellaria hemisphaerica lichen 15/06/2003 Great Cumbrae: Sherriffs Port - wood nearby NS153554 1427

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 10/06/2005 Cumbrae between the 'Wishing Well' and Keppel pier

NS182555 1637

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 22/05/2009 Survey 359 a NS179545 1325

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 24/07/2015 Keppel Pier, Isle of Cumbrae NS177545 1139

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 25/07/2015 Butter lump/Davy's rock, Isle of Cumbrae NS183556 1766

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 25/07/2015 Butter lump/Davy's rock, Isle of Cumbrae NS183556 1766

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 24/07/2015 Keppel Pier, Isle of Cumbrae NS177545 1139

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 24/07/2015 Keppel Slip, Isle of Cumbrae NS176543 1149

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 25/07/2015 Lion Rock, Isle of Cumbrae NS181548 1452

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 13/03/2016 Marine Parade dive survey NS175542 1132

Sargassum muticum Wireweed 13/03/2016 Farland Point dive survey NS171543 791

Asparagopsis armata Harpoon Weed 22/05/2009 Survey 359 a NS179545 1325

Sphagnum Bog Moss 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS171567 1801



Sphagnum Bog Moss 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Sphagnum Bog Moss 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Sphagnum Bog Moss 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 17



Sphagnum magellanicum Magellanic Bog-moss 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Bryum archangelicum Archangelic Thread-moss

1983 Great Cumbrae NS1855 1345

Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17505652 1778



Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17335515 702




Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15295436 1490

Crocosmia pottsii x aurea = C. x crocosmiiflora

Montbretia 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17475596 1293


Montbretia 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17415433 979








Montbretia 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783


Montbretia 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649



NS14995462 1699

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 18





NS15475639 1862

Hyacinthoides non-scripta Bluebell 1980 ns15Y NS1856 1702

Hyacinthoides non-scripta Bluebell 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17605641 1734






Hyacinthoides non-scripta Bluebell 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17485606 1378






Hyacinthoides non-scripta Bluebell 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15475611 1655

Hyacinthoides non-scripta Bluebell 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Baldellia ranunculoides Lesser Water-plantain 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851

Baldellia ranunculoides Lesser Water-plantain 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851

Potamogeton alpinus Red Pondweed 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851

Potamogeton gramineus Various-leaved Pondweed

07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851

Eriophorum angustifolium Common Cottongrass 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS167567 1746

Eriophorum angustifolium Common Cottongrass 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Eriophorum angustifolium Common Cottongrass 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17015680 1879

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 19







Trichophorum caespitosum Deergrass 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17155700 2104

Trichophorum caespitosum Deergrass 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15475639 1862



NS151555 1649


NS15355590 1612


Carex echinata Star Sedge 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS167567 1746

Carex echinata Star Sedge 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851

Carex echinata Star Sedge 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Carex echinata Star Sedge 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS16965695 2018


Carex echinata Star Sedge 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15655657 1903


Nardus stricta Mat-grass 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Nardus stricta Mat-grass 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17245423 931

Nardus stricta Mat-grass 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS16875698 2036




O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 20



Ranunculus flammula Lesser Spearwort 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851




Ranunculus flammula Lesser Spearwort 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS16875698 2036

Ranunculus flammula Lesser Spearwort 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Ranunculus flammula Lesser Spearwort 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS14995462 1699




Potentilla erecta Tormentil 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17335515 702

Potentilla erecta Tormentil 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17225415 983







Potentilla erecta Tormentil 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17035703 2108

Potentilla erecta Tormentil 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS14995462 1699


NS15295436 1490


NS151555 1649


O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 21





NS15355590 1612



NS15475639 1862



NS15655657 1903

Potentilla palustris Marsh Cinquefoil 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS167567 1746

Potentilla palustris Marsh Cinquefoil 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931



Potentilla palustris Marsh Cinquefoil 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS14995462 1699

Potentilla palustris Marsh Cinquefoil 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17015680 1879

Potentilla palustris Marsh Cinquefoil 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Potentilla palustris Marsh Cinquefoil 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15015490 1647

Veronica scutellata Marsh Speedwell 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS167566 1646

Pedicularis palustris Marsh Lousewort 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS167567 1746

Pedicularis palustris Marsh Lousewort 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Pedicularis palustris Marsh Lousewort 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS16965695 2018

Pedicularis palustris Marsh Lousewort 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Pedicularis palustris Marsh Lousewort 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15475639 1862



O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 22



Myrica gale Bog-myrtle 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15355590 1612

Myrica gale Bog-myrtle 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Rhododendron ponticum flowering plant 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Rhododendron ponticum flowering plant 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17475661 1844

Rhododendron ponticum flowering plant 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Rhododendron ponticum flowering plant 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17225415 983

Calluna vulgaris Heather 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17425549 933

Calluna vulgaris Heather 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17125446 678




Calluna vulgaris Heather 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

Calluna vulgaris Heather 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15655657 1903

Calluna vulgaris Heather 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS16875698 2036


NS15355590 1612




NS151555 1649


NS14995462 1699


NS15475639 1862


Erica cinerea Bell Heather 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 23



Erica cinerea Bell Heather 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Erica cinerea Bell Heather 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17425549 933

Erica cinerea Bell Heather 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17245423 931

Erica cinerea Bell Heather 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Erica cinerea Bell Heather 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS14995462 1699

Erica cinerea Bell Heather 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17155700 2104

Erica tetralix Cross-leaved Heath 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17245423 931



Erica tetralix Cross-leaved Heath 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995



Andromeda polifolia Bog-rosemary 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Andromeda polifolia Bog-rosemary 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS16965695 2018

Fallopia japonica Japanese Knotweed 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17275413 1028



Drosera rotundifolia Round-leaved Sundew 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17015680 1879




Oxalis acetosella Wood-sorrel 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17475661 1844




O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 24





Oxalis acetosella Wood-sorrel 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783






Oxalis acetosella Wood-sorrel 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15655657 1903

Oxalis acetosella Wood-sorrel 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995


NS151555 1649


NS15475611 1655

Oxalis acetosella Wood-sorrel 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17155700 2104

Campanula rotundifolia Harebell 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17455544 930



Campanula rotundifolia Harebell 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15655657 1903

Campanula rotundifolia Harebell 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Menyanthes trifoliata Bogbean 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS167567 1746

Menyanthes trifoliata Bogbean 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851

Menyanthes trifoliata Bogbean 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17015680 1879

Solidago virgaurea Goldenrod 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

Solidago virgaurea Goldenrod 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17425549 933

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 25



Senecio aquaticus Marsh Ragwort 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17275413 1028

Senecio aquaticus Marsh Ragwort 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Succisa pratensis Devil's-bit Scabious 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17475661 1844

Succisa pratensis Devil's-bit Scabious 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Succisa pratensis Devil's-bit Scabious 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17415433 979


Succisa pratensis Devil's-bit Scabious 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783




Succisa pratensis Devil's-bit Scabious 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17425549 933

Succisa pratensis Devil's-bit Scabious 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Succisa pratensis Devil's-bit Scabious 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15475639 1862


NS14995462 1699


NS151555 1649



NS15025424 1785


NS15355590 1612


Hydrocotyle vulgaris Marsh Pennywort 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS167567 1746



Hydrocotyle vulgaris Marsh Pennywort 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17225415 983

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 26





Hydrocotyle vulgaris Marsh Pennywort 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15475639 1862


NS151555 1649


NS15355590 1612


NS15475611 1655

Hydrocotyle vulgaris Marsh Pennywort 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS17035703 2108





Sanicula europaea Sanicle 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS17555648 1768

Sanicula europaea Sanicle 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Oenanthe lachenalii Parsley Water-dropwort

10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Oenanthe lachenalii Parsley Water-dropwort


Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort 07/07/1996 Site name unavailable NS168568 1851

Carum verticillatum Whorled Caraway 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Carum verticillatum Whorled Caraway 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS17125446 678

Carum verticillatum Whorled Caraway 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Carum verticillatum Whorled Caraway 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Carum verticillatum Whorled Caraway 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS15655657 1903

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 27






Arthurdendyus triangulatus New Zealand Flatworm 01/01/1993 Site name unavailable NS1656 1234

Arthurdendyus triangulatus New Zealand Flatworm 20/03/2000 Site name unavailable NS1755 347

Crepidula fornicata American Slipper Limpet

22/05/2009 Survey 359 b NS179545 1325

Nucella lapillus Dog Whelk November 1986

Millport NS176545 1048

Nucella lapillus Dog Whelk 16/07/2005 Keppel Pier, Millport NS177545 1139

Nucella lapillus Dog Whelk 16/07/2005 Lion Rock NS180550 1345

Nucella lapillus Dog Whelk April 2012 Ballochmartin Bay, Isle of Cumbrae NS182567 2330

Nucella lapillus Dog Whelk 13/03/2016 Littoral Survey NS174541 1133

Nucella lapillus Dog Whelk 13/03/2016 Clashfarland Point dive survey NS186562 2308

Atrina fragilis Fan Mussel Unknown Skelmorlie Bank (nr. Largs) NS183559 1896

Arctica islandica Icelandic Cyprine Unknown Cyprina islandica record NS150534 2272

Arctica islandica Icelandic Cyprine 1962 Cyprina islandica record NS178544 1272

Arctica islandica Icelandic Cyprine 06/03/1995 Tan Buoy NS147535 2438

Arctica islandica Icelandic Cyprine 13/03/2016 Trawl Survey NS182544 1641

Achaeus cranchii Cranch's Spider Crab 04/08/2010 LL04#1 Video NS183554 1703

Palinurus elephas Spiny Lobster Unknown Palinurus elephas records NS161538 1282

Palinurus elephas Spiny Lobster Unknown Palinurus elephas record NS178544 1272

Stictonectes lepidus insect - beetle (Coleoptera)

1909 Millport, Cumbrae NS1655 658

Chaetarthria seminulum insect - beetle (Coleoptera)

11/06/1986 Millport Marine Station, Cumbrae NS173544 850

Cercyon littoralis insect - beetle (Coleoptera)

15/06/1986 Farland Point, Cumbrae NS172542 931

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 28



Nephrotoma scurra insect - true fly (Diptera)

07/08/1900 Irvine NS1655 658

Tipula truncorum insect - true fly (Diptera)

07/08/1900 Hawkhead (15 Armadale St.) NS1655 658

Dactylolabis sexmaculata insect - true fly (Diptera)

07/08/1900 Fiddler's Gill SSSI NS1655 658

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 01/03/1977 Lion Rock Millport NS180548 1353

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 12/08/1978 Keppell Port NS178545 1231

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 12/08/1978 Keppell Pier NS178545 1231

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 20/10/1979 Keppel Pier NS179545 1325

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 1981 Near Keppel pier NS179545 1325

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin June 1981 Millport Bay NS164538 1183



Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 07/08/2004 Sewage Pipe Bay, Farland Point, Great Cumbrae

NS171543 791

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 06/08/2004 Keppel Pier, Great Cumbrae NS177545 1139

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 07/08/2004 The Wishing Well / The Butter Lump, Great Cumbrae

NS183555 1732

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 08/08/2004 Farland Point (W Side), Great Cumbrae NS172543 851

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 07/08/2004 Sewage Pipe Bay, Farland Point, Great Cumbrae

NS171543 791

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 16/07/2005 Lion Rock NS180550 1345

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 16/07/2005 Keppel Pier, Millport NS177545 1139

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 08/08/2005 Point south of Fintray Bay NS155565 1930

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 07/08/2005 Farland Point, NS171543 791



O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 29



Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 21/01/2006 Farland Reef, Milport Bay NS171543 791

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 22/09/2007 Hawk Craig Bay Wall, Little Cumbrae NS153528 2546

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 04/08/2010 LL03#3 Video NS179545 1325

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 04/08/2010 LL03#1 Video NS179545 1325

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 26/07/2015 Port Loy (South), Isle of Cumbrae NS167542 756

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 26/07/2015 Port Loy North, Isle of Cumbrae NS170544 653

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 26/07/2015 Port Loy (South), Isle of Cumbrae NS167542 756

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 24/07/2015 Keppel Slip, Isle of Cumbrae NS176543 1149

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 24/07/2015 Keppel Slip, Isle of Cumbrae NS176543 1149

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 25/07/2015 Butter lump/Davy's rock, Isle of Cumbrae NS183556 1766

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 24/07/2015 Keppel Pier, Isle of Cumbrae NS177545 1139

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 24/07/2015 Keppel Pier, Isle of Cumbrae NS177545 1139

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 25/07/2015 Lion Rock, Isle of Cumbrae NS181548 1452

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 25/07/2015 Lion Rock, Isle of Cumbrae NS181548 1452

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 25/07/2015 Butter lump/Davy's rock, Isle of Cumbrae NS183556 1766

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 13/03/2016 Marine Parade dive survey NS175542 1132

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 13/03/2016 Trawl Survey NS182544 1641

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 13/03/2016 Clashfarland Point dive survey NS186562 2308

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 13/03/2016 Littoral Survey NS174541 1133

Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 13/03/2016 Farland Point dive survey NS172543 851



Echinus esculentus Edible Sea Urchin 14/03/2016 Clashfarland Point dive survey NS186562 2308

Paracentrotus lividus Rock urchin 22/05/2009 Survey 359 a NS179545 1325

Paracentrotus lividus Rock urchin 22/05/2009 Survey 359 b NS179545 1325

Styela clava Leathery Sea Squirt 13/03/2016 Farland Point dive survey NS172543 851

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 30



Cetorhinus maximus Basking Shark 29/09/2015 Millport NS1654 1159

Gadus morhua Atlantic Cod 21/01/2006 Farland Reef, Milport Bay NS171543 791

Gadus morhua Atlantic Cod 26/07/2015 Port Loy (South), Isle of Cumbrae NS167542 756

Gadus morhua Atlantic Cod 26/07/2015 Port Loy North, Isle of Cumbrae NS170544 653

Gadus morhua Atlantic Cod 13/03/2016 Trawl Survey NS182544 1641

Merlangius merlangus Whiting 12/08/1978 Keppell Port NS178545 1231

Pomatoschistus microps Common Goby 22/09/2007 Hawk Craig Bay Wall, Little Cumbrae NS153528 2546

Pomatoschistus minutus Sand goby 16/07/2005 Keppel Pier, Millport NS177545 1139

Pomatoschistus minutus Sand goby 07/08/2005 Farland Point, NS171543 791

Pleuronectes platessa Plaice 07/08/2005 Farland Point, NS171543 791

Pleuronectes platessa Plaice 13/03/2016 Trawl Survey NS182544 1641

Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 1833 Millport NS1655 658

Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 1957 Millport-Cumbrae NS1655 658

Anguis fragilis Slow-worm 1833 Millport,Cumbrae NS1655 658

Cygnus olor Mute Swan 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Mergus serrator Red-breasted Merganser

04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Somateria mollissima Eider 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Anser anser Greylag Goose 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Phasianus colchicus Pheasant 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Fulmarus glacialis Fulmar 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Fulmarus glacialis Fulmar 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 31



Fulmarus glacialis Fulmar 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Morus bassanus Gannet 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Phalacrocorax carbo Cormorant 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Phalacrocorax carbo Cormorant 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk 2009 Site name unavailable NS168552 284

Buteo buteo Buzzard 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Buteo buteo Buzzard 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Haematopus ostralegus Oystercatcher 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Haematopus ostralegus Oystercatcher 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Charadrius hiaticula Ringed Plover 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Vanellus vanellus Lapwing 2003 Site name unavailable NS15T

Vanellus vanellus Lapwing 2004 Site name unavailable NS15M

Vanellus vanellus Lapwing 2004 Site name unavailable NS15L








Gallinago gallinago Snipe 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Gallinago gallinago Snipe 2003 Site name unavailable NS15T

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 32



Gallinago gallinago Snipe 2004 Site name unavailable NS15T

Gallinago gallinago Snipe 2006 Site name unavailable NS15M

Numenius arquata Curlew 2003 Site name unavailable NS15L

Numenius arquata Curlew 2003 Site name unavailable NS15T



Numenius arquata Curlew 2004 Site name unavailable NS15M

Numenius arquata Curlew 2004 Site name unavailable NS15S

Numenius arquata Curlew 2004 Site name unavailable NS15R


Numenius arquata Curlew 2005 Site name unavailable NS15R





Tringa totanus Redshank 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Tringa totanus Redshank 2004 Site name unavailable NS15L

Tringa totanus Redshank 2005 Site name unavailable NS15L

Larus argentatus Herring Gull 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Larus argentatus Herring Gull 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Larus marinus Great Black-backed Gull


Columba livia Rock Dove 2009 Site name unavailable NS168552 284

Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 33



Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Locustella naevia Grasshopper Warbler 2003 Site name unavailable NS15T


Locustella naevia Grasshopper Warbler 2006 Site name unavailable NS15M

Locustella naevia Grasshopper Warbler 2006 Site name unavailable NS15S


Alauda arvensis Skylark 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Hirundo rustica Swallow 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

Hirundo rustica Swallow 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Anthus pratensis Meadow Pipit 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Anthus petrosus Rock Pipit 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Anthus petrosus Rock Pipit 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Motacilla alba subsp. yarrellii Pied Wagtail 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Troglodytes troglodytes Wren 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Troglodytes troglodytes Wren 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

Troglodytes troglodytes Wren 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Prunella modularis Dunnock 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Prunella modularis Dunnock 2009 Site name unavailable NS169554 508

Erithacus rubecula Robin 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Erithacus rubecula Robin 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Erithacus rubecula Robin 2009 Site name unavailable NS168552 284



O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 34



Oenanthe oenanthe Wheatear 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Turdus merula Blackbird 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Turdus merula Blackbird 2008 Isle of Cumbrae Buteshire NS157546 1020







Turdus merula Blackbird 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989




Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2009 Site name unavailable NS169554 508

Parus major Great Tit 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

Parus major Great Tit 04/09/1999 Fintray Bay to Portachur Point, Great Cumbrae

NS151555 1649

Parus major Great Tit 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Parus major Great Tit 2009 Site name unavailable NS169554 508

Periparus ater Coal Tit 2009 Site name unavailable NS169554 508

Periparus ater Coal Tit 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Certhia familiaris Treecreeper 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

Corvus monedula Jackdaw 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Corvus frugilegus Rook 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Corvus corone Carrion Crow 05/06/1999 Craigenour Wood, Great Cumbrae NS175565 1761

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 35



Corvus corone Carrion Crow 09/09/1999 Barbay Hill, Great Cumbrae NS171569 1995

Sturnus vulgaris Starling 10/08/1999 Farland Point, Great Cumbrae NS172542 931

Sturnus vulgaris Starling 2008 Isle of Cumbrae, Buteshire NS157546 1020

Passer domesticus House Sparrow 2008 Isle of Cumbrae Buteshire NS157546 1020




Passer domesticus House Sparrow 2009 Site name unavailable NS169554 508

Passer domesticus House Sparrow 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Passer montanus Tree Sparrow 2004 Site name unavailable NS15S



Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2009 Site name unavailable NS157547 989

Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2004 Site name unavailable NS15T

Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2004 Site name unavailable NS15M

Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2004 Site name unavailable NS15S







Erinaceus europaeus West European Hedgehog

1966 Great Cumbrae,Ballock Bay,above NS1856 1702

Erinaceus europaeus West European Hedgehog

1968 Great Cumbrae NS1755 347

Halichoerus grypus Grey Seal 26/07/2015 Port Loy (South), Isle of Cumbrae NS167542 756

O p e n


I&BPB4749R001F0.1 36



Halichoerus grypus Grey Seal 26/07/2015 Port Loy North, Isle of Cumbrae NS170544 653

Phoca vitulina Common Seal 13/03/2016 Littoral Survey NS174541 1133

Lepus europaeus Brown Hare 20/08/1999 Ninian Brae Wood, Great Cumbrae NS174552 783

Date post:	23-Sep-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times