+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane talk De Boer

Date post: 03-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Cochrane 2005 Aromatase Inhibitors: Aromatase Inhibitors: Review of adjuvant trials Review of adjuvant trials and toxicity and toxicity Treatment induced bone loss Treatment induced bone loss Dr Richard de Boer Dr Richard de Boer Medical Oncologist Royal Melbourne/Western Hospitals
Transcript
Page 1: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Aromatase Inhibitors: Aromatase Inhibitors: Review of adjuvant trials Review of adjuvant trials

and toxicityand toxicity

Treatment induced bone lossTreatment induced bone loss

Dr Richard de BoerDr Richard de BoerMedical Oncologist

Royal Melbourne/Western Hospitals

Page 2: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

OverviewOverview

Aromatase Inhibitors in Early Breast Cancer– Initial adjuvant therapy

– Switching from tamoxifen to AI

– “Extended Adjuvant” therapy

– Cancer treatment induced bone loss (CTIBL)

Page 3: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

OvarianSteroidogenesis

Granulosa

CorpusLuteum

Oestrogen Stimulation of Target Tissues inOestrogen Stimulation of Target Tissues inPre- and Postmenopausal WomenPre- and Postmenopausal Women

POSTmenopausal Women

Target Tissueseg,

BREASTBREAST TUMOR

ESTRONE

AROMATASE

AdiposeTissue

Breast

BreastTumor

PREmenopausalPREmenopausal Women Women

Adrenal Gland

ANDROSTENEDIONE

OESTRADIOLOESTRADIOL

AROMATASE

TamoxifenTamoxifenTamoxifen

GnRH GnRH agonistsagonists

AI'sAI's

Page 4: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Trials of AI's in Adjuvant TherapyTrials of AI's in Adjuvant Therapy

PLACEBO

EXEMESTANE

LETROZOLE

ANASTROZOLE

TAMOXIFENATAC

ARNO

MA. 17

BIG 1.98

ICCG Study 96

NSABP B-33

TEAM EXE

Page 5: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

BIG 1.98: Adjuvant Letrozole TrialBIG 1.98: Adjuvant Letrozole TrialTrial DesignTrial Design

Tamoxifen

LetrozoleTamoxifen Letrozole

Letrozole Tamoxifen

RANDOMISE

0 2 5YEARS

A

B

C

D

2-Arm Option3/98 to 3/00

1835 pts

4-Arm Option9/99-5/036193 pts

Page 6: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005Years from Randomisation0 2 3 4 51

0

10

5

15

20P

ropo

rtion

Fai

lure

(%)

L

T

BIG 1.98: Cumulative IncidenceBIG 1.98: Cumulative IncidenceBreast Cancer RelapseBreast Cancer Relapse

13.6%

10.2%8.1%

6.2%

5-year diff (L-T) = -3.4% (S.E. 1.2)P=0.0002

Page 7: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005* Patients ≥1 fracture occurring before recurrence, including patients no longer on treatment

PrePre--specified adverse events (%)specified adverse events (%)

T

40.910.213.20.84.5

29.47.7

5.1

AI

35.75.43.50.22.8

35.611.0

1.3

Hot flushesVaginal bleedingVaginal dischargeEndometrial cancerVenous thromboembolic

Joint symptomsFractures

Hysterectomy

p-value

<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.020.0004

<0.0001<0.0001

<0.0001

Page 8: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

A Randomised Trial of Exemestane after 2 to 3 A Randomised Trial of Exemestane after 2 to 3 Years of Tamoxifen in PM Women : Years of Tamoxifen in PM Women :

IntergroupIntergroup Exemestane StudyExemestane Study

ER+

Post-menopausal

2-3 yrs Tamoxifen

RANDOMISED

2-3 yrs Tamoxifen

2-3 yrs Exemestane

Yr after randomization

Yr after start Tamoxifen

Coombes RC et al. NEJM 2004:350;1081–92.

Page 9: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

IES Results: DiseaseIES Results: Disease--free Survivalfree Survival

Coombes RC et al. NEJM 2004:350;1081–92.

No. of Events/No. at Risk

Exemestane 0/2362 52/2168 60/1696 44/757 20/201

Tamoxifen 0/2380 78/2173 90/1682 76/730 18/185

Tamoxifen group

Exemestane group

0 1 2 3 4

75

50

25

100

Patie

nts

surv

ivin

g fr

ee o

f dis

ease

(%)

Years after randomisation

HR for recurrence or death:

0.68 (95% CI, 0.56–0.82) p<0.001,

Absolute DFS benefit - 4.7% (95% CI 2.6-6.8)

Page 10: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005Saphner et al. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2738.

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Rec

urre

nce

haza

rd ra

te

Years

ER– (n=1305)

ER+ (n=2257)

LongLong--Term Risk of Breast Cancer Term Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence Remains High in ER+ PatientsRecurrence Remains High in ER+ Patients

Page 11: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

MA.17: MA.17: A Phase III Randomised, DoubleA Phase III Randomised, Double--Blind Study of Blind Study of Adjuvant Letrozole vs Placebo in PM Women Completing 5 Adjuvant Letrozole vs Placebo in PM Women Completing 5

Years of TamoxifenYears of Tamoxifen

* n=2575 (efficacy); 2154 (safety) in the letrozole arm.† n=2582 (efficacy); 2145 (safety) in the placebo arm.

Primary end point: DFSSecondary end points: OS/safety/QOL

Randomisation(Disease-free)

Tamoxifen

Placebo qd†

Letrozole 2.5 mg qd*

5 years early adjuvant 5 years extended adjuvant

Goss PE et al. NEJM 2003;349(19):1793–802.

Page 12: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Page 13: Cochrane talk De Boer

Overall SurvivalOverall Survival

Node-Positive Node-Negative

LetrozoleLetrozole Placebo

1171

1189

1144

1157

875

877

508

500

255

243

81

75

3

3

1292

1276

1265

1250

972

964

572

571

275

283

93

93

3

5

No. at risk(Letrozole) No. at risk(Placebo)

Months from randomization Months from randomization0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

% S

urvi

ving

% S

urvi

ving

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

P P = 0.04= 0.04 P P = 0.24= 0.24

Page 14: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Cancer TreatmentCancer Treatment--Induced Bone Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL)Loss (CTIBL)

in Breast Cancerin Breast Cancer

Page 15: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Stromal cellStromalStromal cellcellMature osteoclastMature Mature osteoclastosteoclastMature osteoclastMature Mature osteoclastosteoclast

Oestrogen + Oestrogen -

PGE2IL-1TNF-α

RANKL

RANKL

Pre-B cellOsteoclastprogenitor

Oestrogen Depletion Oestrogen Depletion Accelerates Accelerates OsteoclastogenesisOsteoclastogenesis

Page 16: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

BIG 1.98: Bone FracturesBIG 1.98: Bone Fractures

1.44, p=0.0006Odds ratio, p-value (L:T)

1.5

(ATAC 1.5)

2.2

(ATAC 2.2)

Bone fracture rate (fracture/100 patient-years)

162 (4.1%)228 (5.8%)Patients w/ bone fracture

167247Bone fractures

39843965Patients

TamoxifenLetrozole

Page 17: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

BisphosphonatesBisphosphonates• 1st synthesised in Germany 1856• Bind to the bone matrix; Inhibit osteoclasts directly

Page 18: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Zoledronic acidZoledronic acid increases BMD in increases BMD in postmenopausal women with reduced BMDpostmenopausal women with reduced BMD

Reid IR et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:653-661

Lumbar spine Femoral neck

12

Cha

nge

in B

MD

, %

0 3 6 9-1

7

3

5

1

Time, months

Zoledronic acid 4 mg

Placebo

0Time, months

3 6 9 12

Zoledronic acid 4 mg

Placebo

-1.5

0

1.5

3.0

Page 19: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

ZoZometameta--FFemaraemara AAdjuvant djuvant SSynergy ynergy TTrialrial

in in Patients with Breast CancerPatients with Breast Cancer

The The ZOZO--FAST studyFAST study

Page 20: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

• primary endpoint: lumbar BMD 12 m• secondary: hip BMD, fracture, bone

markers; DFS

Adjuvant BC• ER+ or PgR+• Postmenopausal

or recently postmenopausal

• T score > -2 SD Femara

RANDOMI SE

Femara + Immediate Zometa

Zometa: 4 mg IV q 6 mosFemara: 2.5 mg/day500mg of Ca and a multi-vit(400-800 IU of vitamin D)

Delayed Zometa:• BMD Tscore <-2 SD• Or clinical fracture• Or asymptomatic

fracture at 36 mos

Stratification

ZOZO--FAST ProgramFAST Program

Page 21: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

ZZ--FAST Trial (USA)FAST Trial (USA)

• Early results at SABCS Dec 2004– 6 month % change in BMD of Hip and LS

UpfrontZometa

DelayedZometa

Hip +1.02% -1.40%

Lumbar Spine +1.55% -1.78%

Page 22: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

CTIBL: ConclusionsCTIBL: Conclusions

• Treatment induced bone loss is a frequent and relevant problem in breast cancer pts.

• BMD loss during adjuvant treatment with AI's is approx. 3-5% per yr, and without specific treatment, the fracture rate is approx. 2% per year

• Bone loss can be identified early, and during treatment with AI's, yearly BMD measurements are recommended.

• Bisphosphonates can prevent bone loss and increase BMD.

Page 23: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

AI in EBC: ConclusionsAI in EBC: Conclusions

BUT– Increased arthralgias, osteoporosis, #s, ?lipid effects

• Robust evidence that aromatase inhibitors are effective as adjuvant or part of adjuvant treatment for PM hormone receptor +ve women

• Significant aromatase inhibitor advantages across all adjuvant studies compared with tamoxifen– Improvement in DFS– Reduction in contralateral breast cancer– Reduction in endometrial cancer and VTE

Page 24: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Questions NOT Answered by Current AI Questions NOT Answered by Current AI Adjuvant TrialsAdjuvant Trials

• Optimal duration of AI treatment

• Optimal sequencing of endocrine therapy

• Which AI is the most effective and/or has least side effects?

• Best management of side effects

Page 25: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Backup slidesBackup slides

Page 26: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

ATACATAC• Recruitment July 1996 – March 2000• Median follow up 68 months (data cut 31st March 2004)• 8% of patients remain on trial therapy

Arimidex + Tamoxifen(n=3,125)

Tamoxifen (n=3,116)

Surgery+/- RT

+/- Chemo (20%)Anastrozole (n=3,125)

5 years

• 84% HR positive• 61% Node negative

Discontinued following initial analysis as no efficacy or

tolerability benefit compared with tamoxifen arm

Page 27: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

ATAC: DiseaseATAC: Disease--free survivalfree survival(HR+ patients)(HR+ patients)

DFS includes all deaths as a first event

At risk:A 2618 2540 2448 2355 2268 2014 830T 2598 2516 2398 2304 2189 1932 774

Follow-up time (years)

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Absolute difference:1.6% 2.6% 2.5% 3.3%

Pat

ient

s (%

)

Anastrozole (A)Tamoxifen (T)

HR

0.83

0.87

HR+

95% CI

(0.73–0.94)

(0.78-0.97)

p-value

0.005

0.01ITT

A

424

575

T

497

651

Page 28: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 20051919

BIG 1.98: Adverse Events, Any GradeBIG 1.98: Adverse Events, Any Grade

38.0

6.6

3.5

43.5

20.3

6.4

5.7

4.1

1.01.0

3.8

4.0

6.1

12.3

19.1

16.2

1.5

3.3

13.9

33.5

0 25 50

Night Sweats

Hot flushesHyperchol*

JointMuscle

Vaginal bleedingBone fracture

CardiacThromboembolic

CVA/TIA

Percent of Patients

Letrozole

Tamoxifen

*Grade 1: 35.1% L, 17.3% T; Grade 2+: 8.4% L, 1.8% T

Page 29: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

BIG 1.98: Treatment FailuresBIG 1.98: Treatment Failures

0.017

0.155

0.077

0.288

0.005

0.842

0.092

0.034

0.003

9.6%8.1%Systemic Failures**

4.8%4.1%Deaths

10.7%8.8%First Failure Sites (DFS events)

0.9%1.4%Death without cancer event

2.0%1.7%Second (non breast) malignancy

5.8%4.4%Distant

0.3%0.3%Regional*

0.7%0.4%Contralateral Breast (invasive)

0.9%0.5%Local

Letrozole Tamoxifen P

* Regional includes axilla or internal mammary** SDFS ignores local and contralateral events

Thürlimann et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6S. Abstract 511

Page 30: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

Bone mineral density in the proximal tibia

% change in B

MD

weeks

Sham

5

0

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

-5

-10

-15

-20

Let + Zom4.0 µg/kg

Let 1 mg/kg/d

OVX

Let + Zom 20 µg/kg

Gasser et al, San Antonio, 2002

Zoledronic acidZoledronic acid effectively inhibits effectively inhibits letrozoleletrozole--induced bone loss in ratsinduced bone loss in rats

Page 31: Cochrane talk De Boer

Cochrane 2005

– Very rare adverse event (< 1 / 10,000 patients)

– No causal relationship between bisphosphonate use and osteonecrosis has been established

Osteonecrosis reported 4x more often in cancer patients than in the normal population

Multifactorial causes for osteonecrosis (trauma, infection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, long-term glucocorticoid therapy)

OsteonecrosisOsteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer of the Jaw in Cancer Patients on Bisphosphonate TherapyPatients on Bisphosphonate Therapy


Recommended