Date post: | 15-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lilian-philipson |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Visuals: If you can see this slide please raise your hand in the GoToWebinar control panel
Audio Options:• VoIP: You may choose to connect your audio using your computer’s speakers. A headset is
recommended.• Phone: You may choose to call in using your telephone
• Enter the unique audio pin you see in the audio tab of your GoToWebinar control panel
Tech Support: Use Question/Chat box in your GoTo Webinar control panel or email [email protected].
Twitter: For those of you who like to tweet your thoughts as you learn – we invite you to use the hashtag - #tamarackconnect.
Questions? Please use the question/chat box.
Technical Considerations
Kirby EdmondsDCI Senior Fellow and Program
CoordinatorTFC Associates
Our Guest Presenters
Tom KlausPrincipal, Tom Klaus &
Associates
Russ GaskinManaging Director, CoCreative
Consulting
About the R2F Framework Integrated model for facilitating long-term community change
Operationalized and tested in a “nested” backbone configuration: funder > statewide “primary backbone” > 19 local community “backbone coalitions”
Framework identifies internal and external processes in play that facilitate long-term community change
Internal processes (“roots”): Related to establishing a high performing local coalition backbones
External processes (“fruit): Successfully facilitated by a high performing coaltion to bring about policy, practice, social attitude and behavioral changes in community that “stick” for a long time
First wave of annual evaluation to be conducted in early 2015
R2F Tools
Self-Assessment (Currently available free upon request) Currently used by community coalitions to assess their progress in both coalition
development and community engagement progress
R2F Tailored Implementation Instruction and Training (January, 2015) R2F framework presented as a “min specs” approach to community transition Tailored instruction focused on helping sites develop strategies and tactics for use in
their unique communities and situations
R2F Tools
Online Evaluation Survey (available by Spring 2015 in conjunction with R2F training and instruction)
Online survey completed by individual members of the coalition backbones – individual people, not organizations
Eight scales – related to the major processes in the R2F framework Scales have been shown to have strong reliability in pilot tests Individual measures within scales have similarly been shown to have strong face validity
For more information about the R2F framework or any of these tools, contact:
Tom Klaus, Ph.D.
Phone: 240-319-8525
Problem Identification ToolChangeable
Going Well Going Poorly
FIRm
Or FIxEd
Assets
Needs Maintenance
Constraints/Disasters
Problems
Sorting the Problems
• Fast Way-Dots or show of hands• More deliberative:
Use criteria such as: Importance Urgency Cost Difficulty
Advantages
• Simple self-assessment• Flexible in terms of nature of issues
(simple to complex)• Flexible in terms of time required
(1-3 hours or 1-2 days)• Engaging• Turns attention to what can be changed• Establishes priorities for improvement
Key Initiator Examples
Community Capital to move $1 billion in new capital to U.S. CDFI’s (3X success) Market differentiation at no cost
Solar Circle to bring U.S. cost of solar to 50% of supply by 2050 (on track for 2025)
Policy, industry coordination, research, new ventures
Better Paper to transition U.S. magazine industry to recycled paper (150+ titles) Best practices, myth-busting, research, testing
Impacting Poverty to move 5 million Americans out of poverty
The Southern Initiative to revitalize South Auckland, New Zealand
Non-GMO Supply Working Group return non-GMO corn and soy to market dominance
Clean Electronics Production to eliminate toxic exposures in electronics manufacturing
Utility of the Future create the US’s first vertically-integrated 100% renewable energy utility.
+1-202-525-6070 | [email protected]
Key Initiator Situations
• The problem is chronic and previous attempts to solve it have failed
• Stakeholders have divergent worldviews and frames for defining the problem
• The system is complex and no one person has a view on the whole problem
• The system is fragmented and there is a distinct lack of communication and coordination among the parts
• The system is paradoxically dynamic yet stuck and while the influence of various actors shifts over time, there is no meaningful movement
• There is some level of anticipation among SOME stakeholders that new, more integrated solutions could emerge
+1-202-525-6070 | [email protected]
Key Initiator Qualities
Characteristic Polarity
Held in high regard by their peers Humility & Confidence
High expertise in their part of the system/value chain Expertise & Ignorance
Proven collaboration abilities Self-interest & Common good
Willingness to really understand the issues/system, and courage to act quickly on that understanding
Analytical & Action-oriented
Able to represent their institution’s involvement Individual interests & Institutional interests
90% of participants are 100% committed to the goal; 10% are skeptics but open to evidence-based learning
Commitment & Skepticism
+1-202-525-6070 | [email protected]
Key Initiator Principles
(Based on the work of Susan Davis)
“A deal is a good deal when it is good for all concerned”
Each member does what s/he loves to do, does uniquely well, and does as little else as possible
Build trust, build collective intelligence, and build momentum
Analyze fast, prototype early, and learn with our hands
Everything is a hypothesis, even our goal
Differentiate before we integrate
Leverage tensions
+1-202-525-6070 | [email protected]