Date post: | 17-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | brian-robert-rojas-lerena |
View: | 56 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Collective Impact9-25-2014
Why should you use collective impact?
• It brings
▫ Change
▫ Solutions
▫ Results
to the problems we have today that we cannot
solve on our own.
The Road Map ProjectCase Study: 2010-2020
2010 and will end
Road Map Region: Washington
• 7 Districts
▫ South Seattle
▫ Tukwila
▫ Renton
▫ Highline
▫ Kent
▫ Federal Way
▫ Auburn
• Total Students =120,890
(2013)
2013 Results Report
College Completion
On Time Graduation rate = 72% (2010) 2013 Results Report
College Completion
“67% of the jobs in Washington State will require a college degree or a career credential” by 2018.
- Georgetown University Center on Education
2013 Results Report
College Completion
“1 out of 4 King County residents has a bachelor’s degree”
2013 Results Report
Educational Gap
• Students of color
▫ 67% (~81,000)
• Low-income Students
▫ Poverty
Low-income = 59% of Students (~71,400)
• English language learners
▫ 17% of students (~19,400)
▫ 167 languages
2013 Results Report
6th Grade Reading
2020 Target = 80%2013 Technical Report
7th Grade Math
2020 Target = 80%2013 Technical Report
2013 Technical Report
1. Double number of college degrees and career credentials
2. Close achievement gaps of low-income students and students of color, as well as increase overall achievement
The Road Map Project: Project Sponsors
2020 Goal:
2013 Results Report
The Road Map Project: Project Sponsors
• Framework was established in 2011
▫ Road Map Indicators were chosen in 2012
On-Tract and Contributing indicators
2011/2012 Results Report
• Monitor educational Progress
• District, income, ELL, race, & gender• 2020 Target goals
• Factors affecting education results• 2020 Targets not included
The Road Map Project: Road Map Indicators
2013 Results Report
Example: On-Tract Indicators
Proficiency
3rd Grade Reading
▫ 66% (2010) 69% (2013)
2020 Target: 87%
4th Grade Math
▫ 50% (2010) 62% (2013)
2010 Target: 76%
5th Grade Science
▫ 45% (2010) 58% (2013)
2020 Target: 79%
2013 Results Report
The Road Map Project:System Building Strategies and Actions
3 Action Plans
Birth to 3rd Grade High School to College Completion
English Language Learner
Strategy for building systems to connect all the providers and organizations that work with children and families.
Strategy to prevent summer learning loss for low-income students.
Strategy to engage parents and provide tools and resources to support their children’s learning.
A framework and set of strategies.
A framework and set of strategies.
A framework and set of strategies.
Use of an implementation tool kit as a guide and resource.
To identify key systems-level strategies for ELL students.
To support the successful integration of ELL students in the school system.
http://www.roadmapproject.org/collective-action/action-plans/
Encourage and support low-income and minority students to take advanced courses who are believed to be ready for it (Renton
District)
- 5 week Pilot program to reduce summer learning loss (South Seattle)
- 87 struggling students were selected from k-5
Provide credit recovery courses (alternative education program) and help students
transition to high school to improve extended graduation rate. (Renton
District)
Increase the number of teachers that can be better prepared to teach ELL Students
through a teaching program (Kent District)
Improve kindergarten readiness and strengthen primary grade teaching
(Auburn District)
QRIS- Improve childcare quality (Early Achievers
System)- Rates childcare providers - Helps improve quality by providing training
and support-Expand Washington’s Quality Rating and
Improvement System
Wakids-State-funded Assessment tool to test
kindergarten readiness to help kindergarten teachers understand what their students need to work on.
- Test in 6 areas.
The Road Map Project: Aligned Organizational Strategies
Teaching Strategies Gold- A newer assessment tool used in pre-
kindergarten programs just like Wakids- Tests in 7 areas
- Use learning model to improve math scores from k-8 and make educational gap smaller. (Highline District)
- Online learning tools, ST Math
Automatically enroll students in advance courses that they currently do well in
(Federal Way)
Create iGrad program to help students, who dropped out of high school, to earn a high diploma, college credential or career skills
(Kent School)
Increase College Bound Scholarship sign-up and FASFA application filling by talking to parents and students at events, meetings,
and conferences (Tukwila District)
- Work with community colleges to decrease student retention rate and increase post-secondary degree completion
- Green River:Parent/student math advisory nights Development of senior level math courses
- Seattle: Offer free COMPASS Test Prep workshopsOffer the 13th Year Promise Scholarship
- Highline:Offers support and programming to help ELL students transition into credit earningand college level courses
- Providing career-path bridge classes, advising, and academic support
- Renton:- Skill development, help reduce skill
gaps while they learn a new occupation or trade
2011/2012 Results Report
Early Achievers
System
Parents Forum
Full-DayKindergarten
Support of The Community
• Early Achievers System (QRIS)
Child Care Program- 11% sign up in 2012- 36% sign up by 2013
• Parent Participation Cradle
to College and Career ParentForum in 2013
More than 30 parentorganizations
More than 1,000 people- Workshops- Resource Fair
• Full-day Kindergarten
Part-time Full-day- 77% by 2013
The Road Map Project: Powerful Community Voice
2013 Results Report
Additional Groups
Road Map Project:
Steering Committee Work Groups Backbone Organization
Organizations
“Project Sponsors” Community Center for Education Results
(CCER)
Birth to 3rd Grade
English LanguageLearner
Opportunity Youth
Youth DevelopmentFor Education
Advocates Caucus
Community Network
Data AdvisorsGroup
Education ResultsNetwork
High School toCollege
WorkgroupsA group made up of either members from different organizations or the same. -groups are created to address the prior goals
Collaborators
Candace GratamaThe BERC Group
(Project Sponsors)
Rich StolzOneAmerica
(Advocates Caucus)
Deleena Patton Seattle University Youth
Initiative (Data Advisors Group)
Jason Greenberg Motamedi Education Northwest
(English Language Learners)
Jenee Myers Twitchell UW Dream Project(High School to
College Completion)
Jessica Norouzi Year up
(Opportunity Youth Work Group)
Trise Moore Federal ways
public schools (Birth to 3rd grade
work group)
Alexandra DavisHighline Community College
(Community Network)
http://www.roadmapproject.org/collective-action/project-hub/
Collaborators
David Bley Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation (Project Sponsors)
Anthony Shoecraft CCER
(Advocates Caucus)
Israel David Mendoza Mendoza Consulting
(Opportunity Youth Work Group)
http://www.roadmapproject.org/collective-action/project-hub/
Conclusion
• Goal:
▫ Double number of college degrees and career credentials
▫ Close achievement gaps of low-income students and students of color, as well as increase overall achievement
• Number of Organizations/Participators: 78
• Number of individuals: more than 185
• The Road Map Project: 10 year project (2010-2020)
▫ From kindergarten to college
Collective Impact
Non-Profit
Business
Government
Goal:Solve a specific
social issue
Collective Impact
Organization Planning
Self-Desire
Collective Impact
Results
Community Region
Environment
5 Conditions/Components:
Shared MeasurementSystem
Mutually ReinforcedActivities
ContinuousCommunication
BackboneOrganization
Common Agenda
Collective Impact
Common Agenda
• An Agenda that serves as the platform for the project
▫ The Steering Committee makes the common agenda
Common Agenda
• An Agenda that serves as the platform for the project
▫ The Steering Committee makes the common agenda
• Includes 2 steps:
▫ Step 1: Drawing Boundaries
A shared common goal
Common Agenda
• An Agenda that serves as the platform for the project
▫ The Steering Committee makes the common agenda
• Includes:
▫ Step 1: Drawing Boundaries
A shared common goal
A common understanding of the problem
Common Agenda
• Includes:
▫ Step 1: Drawing Boundaries
A shared common goal
A common understanding of the problem
▫ Step 2: Developing a Strategic Action Plan
A collective agreement on smaller goals
5 Conditions/Components:
Shared MeasurementSystem
Mutually ReinforcedActivities
ContinuousCommunication
BackboneOrganization
Common Agenda
Collective Impact
A Shared Measurement System
• An evaluation system to analyze progress
▫ Establishing measures or techniques to monitor progress that is used by everyone
Indicators
A Shared Measurement System
• An evaluation system to analyze progress
▫ Establishing measures or techniques to monitor progress that is used by everyone
Indicators
▫ Involves creating reports, tables, or graphs to represent data or information on progress
5 Conditions/Components:
Shared MeasurementSystem
Mutually ReinforcedActivities
ContinuousCommunication
BackboneOrganization
Common Agenda
Collective Impact
Mutually Reinforcing Activities
• Each participant or organization in the project needs to be involved in different “activities”
(types of work)
▫ Work groups
Mutually Reinforcing Activities
• Each participant or organization in the project needs to be involved in different “activities”
(types of work)
▫ Work groups
Each group having their own mutualset of strategies or mutual action plans that was agreed by everyone in the group.
Mutually Reinforcing Activities
• Each participant or organization in the project needs to be involved in different “activities”
(types of work)
▫ Work groups
Every action is reinforced by these mutual strategies or actions.
Steering CommitteeAction Plans
Work Groups
Mutually Reinforcing Activities
• Each participant or organization in the project needs to be involved in different “activities”
(types of work)
▫ Work groups
Every action is reinforced by these mutual strategies or actions.
Action Plans
Mutually Reinforcing Activities
• Each participant or organization in the project needs to be involved in different “activities”
(types of work)
▫ Work groups Every action that is taken is directed towards reaching the goals in the common agenda.
Common Agenda
5 Conditions/Components:
Shared MeasurementSystem
Mutually ReinforcedActivities
ContinuousCommunication
BackboneOrganization
Common Agenda
Collective Impact
Continuous Communication
• Communication between partners to:
▫ Discuss concerns or issues
▫ Discuss and handle data results from indicators
Continuous Communication
• Communication between partners to:
▫ Discuss concerns or issues
▫ Discuss and handle data results from indicators
▫ Discuss the progress of the project among partners
▫ Make any necessary changes to the common agenda or strategies to reach the goal
• Communication between partners to:▫ Discuss concerns or issues▫ Discuss and handle data results from indicators▫ Discuss the progress of the project among partners▫ Make any necessary changes to the common agenda or
strategies to reach the goal
• Build Trust▫ Working together▫ Can led to Sharing ideas and resources▫ Doesn’t happen after a few meetings
Continuous Communication
Continuous Communication:
Road Map Project• Communication between
▫ Leaders in Education▫ Outside Partners▫ Members of the Community
• Multiple ways to communicate▫ Education Results Network Meetings
Meet quarterly
▫ Reports: http://www.roadmapproject.org/data-center/reports/
5 Conditions/Components:
Shared MeasurementSystem
Mutually ReinforcedActivities
ContinuousCommunication
BackboneOrganization
Common Agenda
Collective Impact
Additional Groups
Collective Impact Structure:
Steering Committee Work Groups Backbone Organization
Organizations
Backbone Organization(s)• Provide planning, organization, and support
▫ Communication Support between partners Discuss concerns or issues Bring partners together for meetings and events Provide information that a partner or organization might need
▫ Guidance or “Strategic Direction” Ways or areas for improvement Keeps partners moving towards their goals
▫ Coordinates community outreach Raising awareness
▫ Organizes Funding and brings new funding in▫ Manages data collection and analysis
Analytical or data support
Backbone Organization(s)• Provide planning, organization, and support
▫ Communication Support between partners Discuss concerns or issues Bring partners together for meetings and events Provide information that a partner or organization might need
▫ Guidance or “Strategic Direction” Ways or areas for improvement Keeps partners moving towards their goals
▫ Coordinates community outreach Raising awareness
▫ Organizes Funding and brings new funding in▫ Manages data collection and analysis
Analytical or data support
Backbone Organization(s)• Provide planning, organization, and support
▫ Communication Support between partners Discuss concerns or issues Bring partners together for meetings and events Provide information that a partner or organization might need
▫ Guidance or “Strategic Direction” Ways or areas for improvement Keeps partners moving towards their goals
▫ Coordinates community outreach Raising awareness
▫ Organizes Funding and brings new funding in▫ Manages data collection and analysis
Analytical or data support
Backbone Organization(s)• Provide planning, organization, and support
▫ Communication Support between partners Discuss concerns or issues Bring partners together for meetings and events Provide information that a partner or organization might need
▫ Guidance or “Strategic Direction” Ways or areas for improvement Keeps partners moving towards their goals
▫ Coordinates community outreach Raising awareness
▫ Organizes Funding and brings new funding in▫ Manages data collection and analysis
Analytical or data support
• Provide planning, organization, and support
▫ Manages data collection and analysis Analytical or data support
Data Advisors Group
These roles can be divided among the organizations, groups, or individuals
Backbone Organization(s)
Type 4
Type 3
Type 2
Type 1
Collective Impact Tools
• Two Assessment tools
1. Wholonomy Consulting
▫ Five types of Readiness
Type 5
Ready for collective impact
Questions
Collective Impact Tools
• Two Assessment tools
1. Wholonomy Consulting
▫ Five types of Readiness
2. FSG Collective Impact Forum: Three questions
▫ Is collective impact right for you?
▫ Do you have the pre-conditions?
▫ Do you have the right people and collective impact structure?
Results Score Card 3.0
http://resultsscorecard.com/
Thank You