+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Comparing The Application Of Plunger Lift Technologies in ... · PDF fileComparing The...

Comparing The Application Of Plunger Lift Technologies in ... · PDF fileComparing The...

Date post: 27-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: vukhue
View: 222 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
28
Comparing The Application Of Plunger Lift Technologies in A Given North American Mature Field To Understand Which System Results in Higher Production Rates Relative to Cost and Well Conditions GORDON GATES RETIRED FROM BP NOW CONSULTING
Transcript

Comparing The Application Of Plunger Lift

Technologies in A Given North American Mature

Field To Understand Which System Results in

Higher Production Rates Relative to Cost and Well

ConditionsGORDON GATES

RETIRED FROM BP NOW CONSULTING

Will Plungers work in my field and why should I use

them in lieu of other Artificial Lift Methods

Disclaimer!!!

When I say always what I really mean in usually.

When I hear “plungers will not work in my field because my wells are different or we are on the other side of the mountain” I………

There can/will be exceptions to success. (there are so many variables that we are not aware of like sand, casing leaks, hole in tubing, EOT location, etc.)

It has been my experience that you need to listen to the local operator to understand what they have seen and try to understand how you can make your plunger work there. Application varies from field to field. (GLR, perm, etc.)

These are my opinions based on my experience and I am human with my own biases

How do I evaluate wells to see if plungers

will be successful?

Typically a well by well with engineer, operator, and artificial lift

specialist

Decline curve analysis:

Determine gas to liquid ratio

Line pressure

Tubing size

End of tubing

Does it have a packer, tapered string?

Well history like sand, paraffin, scale, corrosion

Decline Curve

Decline CurveLoading Detection

Another decline curve. Do you have

these examples?

Does the Gas to Liquid Ratio meet the minimum requirements?

Minimum GLR = 400 scf per bbl per 1000' of lift depth

Example

Well Data

200 MCF/Day

10 Barrels/Day

7000’ Depth

Well GLR = 200,000 SCF/10 BBLS/7

= 2857 SCF/bbl

Well GLR is above 400 SCF/BBL/1000’

Should be adequate for running plunger

How do plungers stack up against

other Artificial Lift Methods? Of course a flowing well above critical is best

Velocity Strings (right size tubing) still a flowing well

Intermittent – never as efficient as plunger IF you can get consistent arrivals

Soap has a daily cost, will not achieve bottom hole pressure compared to a plunger, Soap is easy to apply and vendors will keep them pumping

Beam Lift – Much more capital needed. Down time due to rod repair and gas locking an issue. I sometimes go from Beam Lift to plungers and really lower cost. Much More (a lot of Beam Lift, Why)

Gas Lift - usually best choice when LGR is >150 bbls/MMCF, much more capital needed. Much More

ESPs – Gas separation an issue. GLR should be less than 800 SCF/bbl.

PCP – Ok in shallow wells less than 4000’ ?? Still need power and capitol.

When should I install plungers on

my well?

Better late than never if you can make it work? This is the bulk of

installations so far.

When the well reaches about 120% of critical you should start testing

if the continuous run plunger will help.

Critical rate is the point where you start to have more liquid falling

back than is being removed from the tubing.

In some fields with 250 PSI line pressure continuous run plungers are

dropped at 1.6 MMCFD

Turner et al

Unloading Rates for

Various Tubing Sizes

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Surface Pressure, PSIA

Min

Un

load

ing

Ra

te

, m

cfd

2.375

2.063

1.90

1.66

What type of plunger systems will

be most effective?

So when a wells is drilled and it starts to reach around 120 % of

critical you drop a continuous run plunger.

As you optimize that plunger and your off time increases from a few

seconds to 30 minutes or enough time for a conventional plunger to

reach bottom you should move to what some describe as a

conventional plunger which means it will not fall against flow and

the well must be shut in for the plunger to reach bottom.

As the well depletes and more offtime is needed to build energy

make sure you have a more efficient plunger which will fall slower

due to the efficiency of the plunger

Life cycle of a well (High GLR)

There are many different

types of plungers.

What type of plunger should I

choose?

If you have sand issues try to manage them, do not give up. Use

brushes, bars, and some on the bars with holes that allow the gas to

move through the plunger to clean the sand.

If you have paraffin clean out, bars, or sometimes even pads if you

run often and never let them miss arrivals.

Scale, salt, tight spots, etc. – clean outs or bars

Strong wells – continuous run plungers (two piece)

Weak wells – highly efficient

Low GLR or weak wells - Staged plungers but not many are used

due to maintenance or understanding

Combining plungers with other

methods of Artificial Lift

Most used – Plungers and Soap. I have seen questionable results.

Gas assisted plunger lift – not that common but it is a tool in the right

application. It certainly reduces injection gas volume.

Chamber lift – Works in theory but limited application.

Venting – used quite often but becomes a crutch for poor wells or

optimization.

What portion of my wells will be

successful if plunger lift is installed?

The most important factor is GLR. (Not really it is second to operator

application and skills)

My goal is to get plungers on all of the wells that will work as soon as

possible to get flatter declines and less deferred gas.

One reason we often see a well that plungers do not work on is the

engineer opened up a water zone trying to get a little more gas.

Typically shutting off that water is usually not successful.

So if I had to pull a number out of the sky on a field that most wells

run plungers I would say 75%.

My goal is as close to 100% as possible

How do I optimize my wells?

Monitor cycle logs looking for arrivals every time within the window

of arrival targets

Use the Min on/Min off concept to tune in the well. Which means

optimize the after flow to get the optimum liquid slug size with shut in

time as short as possible.

Assess operators and provide training when needed with coaching.

Monitor short and long term daily gas rates using decline analysis to

catch wells that are falling fast or had a sudden change caused by

something like sand or hole in tubing.

Min On/Min OffBill Hern came up with this illustration

Min Off

Strong Well

Min On

Depleted Well or low GLR

This is one of the reasons optimization is

important

What type of automation control

should I use to monitor and

optimize my plunger wells? Ten years ago there were not many options for control, but many

today that are quite reasonable.

Some of the controllers that are now available that I prefer is one

that optimizes slug size based on arrival time automatically (very

common choice)

All types of options like high line hold, back up time, missed arrival

adjustments

One that provides historical logs and communication (group text

work well)

What type of maintenance is

needed?

Keep a history of plunger installation date, type, problems, wear

when checked, problems, etc.

Start out with no history of three months on conventional plungers

and adjust as you get some history. (Some inspect plungers at 1

month and some as long as never) Typical inspection time maybe 8

months

Also inspect lubricator especially if you are having fast runs.

What type of operator skills are

needed?

Understand and apply decline analysis

Understand and apply Min on/Min Off

Understand wellbore

Basic Automation skills

Understand how wells load and deliquification training.

Understand Critical Rate

Communication skills

How long will plungers be

effective?

If you can make them work they will work a lot longer than most

people think. You just keep adding more shut time to build energy

as the well depletes.

I have run plungers into 1000 PSI as well as near zero PSI systems. I

have run plungers with as low as 40 psi casing pressure.

One method in lieu of pumps is to continue to add compression.

We still do not have that magic pump yet that works in a gas

system that is low cost.

What does plunger success look

like?

A plunger arrives every time

Arrival times are consistent

You have a flat decline

You achieve the lowest casing pressure possible

Increased production is dependent on IPR and liquid.

This is the challenge of the near future, but it

can be managed with plungers

Arkoma West- Well Profile Representation(15% Of Total Horizontals)

6500

7000

7500

8000

8500

9000

9500

10000

10500

11000

7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000

Measured Depth (Ft.)

TVD

(Ft.)

Surdahl 1-11H

Schmitt 1-1H

Sundown 2-20H

Sundown Ranch 2-17H

Louise 1-1H

Loftis 1-2H

Linda 1-32H

Walkup 3-27H

Waccaw 1-15H

Burleson 2-1H

LLN 1-26H

Powell 2-5H

Steinsick 2-14H

Gleese 1-28H

Horizontal Wells – Are they mature

yet? The drilling Machine

The present day inventory of loaded and shut in horizontal wells that

are much more difficult to operate than vertical wells. ( You have

that horizontal lateral that contains many, many barrels of fluid that

when you go vertical the well is dead before the liquid reaches surface)

Tubing completions complicate the issues

Questions now and later?

I like to talk about Plungers

I am biased to plungers if I can make them work

I believe plungers are the most effective and economical tool for

deliquification

Thank You

Gordon Gates - Consultant

[email protected]

409 504 2584


Recommended