+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars studies Report to nMPP V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni

Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars studies Report to nMPP V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni

Date post: 23-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: sibyl
View: 38 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars studies Report to nMPP V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni. C.Maglioni, MSC-IC. Mechanical calculations of BB deflections. Observations in 11L6 (J.-Ph.T. & C.). Modelling of bus bars c onstraints. FP. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
15
Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars studies Report to nMPP V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni 7th April 2009
Transcript
Page 1: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

Connection Cryostats:status of bus bars studies

Report to nMPP

V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni

7th April 2009

Page 2: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

MECHANICAL CALCULATIONSOF BB DEFLECTIONS

C.Maglioni, MSC-IC

Page 3: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

Observations in 11L6 (J.-Ph.T. & C.)

Page 4: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7FP

Modelling of bus bars constraints

Page 5: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

Electro-magnetic forces

Comsol Multi-physics• In-plane mechanical model • Proportional to I2

• Inv. proportional to distance

Page 6: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni
Page 7: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni
Page 8: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

J.-Ph.Tock, 9th March ‘09

Page 9: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Fixed Point

Sliding Support

FP

0(1’000)

2’070(860)

LE.L5 (Long)

1440(1’000)

850(1’000)

1’060(1’000)

??(1’000)

??(1’000)

550(1’000)

??(1’000)

??(1’000)

??(1’000)

??(850)

M3

state on 06 April 2009, modified by Pawel Borowiec

09Apr2008

Sector cold

Powered 22 times on RB (<10.3kA), 14 times on RQs (<10.9 kA)

Page 10: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni
Page 11: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Fixed Point

Sliding Support

FP

970(1’000)

??(389)

LE.L6 (Short)1’010

(1’000)1520

(1’000)440

(1’000)1’000

(1’000)1’000

(1’000)860

(1’000)110

(1’000)1’870

(1’000)920

(1’000)450

(379)

M1

state on 06 April 2009, modified by Pawel Borowiec

31Mar200913Feb2009640

(500)

bent

bu

s-ba

r

400(500)

130??

(100)

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7FP

?? (1’000)

??(389)

??(1’000)

??(1’000)

??(1’000)

990(1’000)

1’000(1’000)

??(1’000)

1’200(1’000)

1’010(1’000)

920(1’000)

480(379)

M231Mar2009??

(500)500

(500)110

(100)

To be measured again

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7FP

1280(1’000)

??(389)

1’260(1’000)

680(1’000)

640(1’000)

1’000(1’000)

780(1’000)

1’040(1’000)

80(1’000)

2’160(1’000)

480(1’000)

890(379)

M3640

(500)

160??

(100)

31Mar200913Feb2009

Sector warmPowered 105 times on RB (<11.2kA), 76 times on RQs (<11.3kA)

Page 12: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni
Page 13: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni
Page 14: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

Quad. BB max. deflection as a function of Support spacing and current

Page 15: Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars  studies Report to nMPP V.Parma,  P.Borowiek,  C.Maglioni

Summary of mechanical calculation• With nominal spacing:

– M1, M2 (quad BB): elesticity marginal @ 5TeV; some plastic def. at ultimate; deflections well within tube diameter

– M3 (dip. BB): within elastic domain up to ultimate; deflections well within tube diameter

• Maximum acceptable supports spacing (tube contact) for quad BB (limiting as compared to dip. BB):– @ 5 TeV: up to ~1.55 m– @ nominal: up to ~1.33 m– @ ultimate: up to ~1.3 m


Recommended