+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to...

Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to...

Date post: 06-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
1 COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge Development of Infrared Tracers Isabelle Theobald GD-OTS Canada
Transcript
Page 1: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

1

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

Development of Infrared Tracers

Isabelle Theobald

GD-OTS Canada

Page 2: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

2

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

2

Outline

Objectives

Features and Benefits

Development Steps

Formulation Selection

Tracer Composition Process

Tracer Assembly Process

Ballistic Performances

Conclusions

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 3: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

3

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

3

Objectives

The objectives are the following:– Develop a complete family of small caliber infrared (IR)

cartridges (main objective) using the ‘’Lean Design for Six Sigma’’ methodology. The selected calibers are 5.56, 7.62, and 12.7 mm.

– Develop tracer and igniter compositions that are invisible to the naked eye and visible with night vision goggles.

• Different tracer compositions for each caliber because the trace distance requirement is not the same; the burning rate should be different.

– Define design and process parameters of the IR tracers for each caliber.

– Develop IR cartridges meeting NATO standards.

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 4: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

4

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

4

Features and Benefits

Use the same projectile, jacket, core and propelling system (primer and propellant) as the conventional tracer cartridges.

Only igniter and tracer compositions are modified.

Same match and ballistic as conventional cartridges because only pyrotechnic compositions change.

Reduce small arms firing signature with IR tracers. Increase safety by reducing the risk of detection by enemy

force.

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 5: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

5

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

5

Development Steps Development of tracer compositions (5.56 mm and 7.62 mm):

– Preliminary development is completed. • Gun firing performed in both calibers using different formulations.

Formulation was selected and needs to be optimized for each caliber.

– Advanced development is on-going:• Small scale test developed to analyze IR tracers.

• DOE (Design of Experiment) to optimize tracer formulations and key assembly parameters, and then verify tolerances.

• Demonstration in an operational environment and at extreme temperatures (-54°C, +52°C).

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 6: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

6

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

6

Development Steps Development of tracer compositions (12.7mm):

• A new tracer composition has to be developed which has not yet however begun but will be completed once development for the other calibers is completed.

Development of igniter compositions is completed for all 3 calibers.

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 7: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

7

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

7

Formulations Selection

Ingredient selection based up on purity, hygroscopicity, and grain size.

Igniter composition:– Ignition temperature, heat of combustion, and ability to ignite

the tracer composition.

Tracer composition:– Oxidizer:

• Easiness of ignition and increase intensity in IR region.

– Fuel:• Easiness of ignition and increase intensity in IR region.

– Binder:• Low melting point, humidity barrier, covering ability, and easiness

of flow.

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 8: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

8

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

8

Tracer Composition Process

Investigation performed to determine:– Mixing time of every steps

– Drying time

– Final granulation

– Humidity content

Characterization of tracer composition:– Grain size distribution

– Calorimetric heat

– Ease of flow

– Friction sensitivity

– Light intensity in visible and IR spectrum

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 9: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

9

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

9

Tracer Assembly Process

Parameters studied:– Tracer composition weight

– Igniter composition weight

– Consolidation pressure

– Number of increments

– Pressure gradient

– Punch shape

– Air gap between closing disc and composition

All of these parameters vary from caliber 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm and 12.7 mm.

Some parameters had less influence while others will need to be optimized.

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 10: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

10

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

10

Ballistic Performances Performance evaluation during preliminary development

– Ignition at -54°C, +21°C and at +52°C

– Trace distance

– Day and night visibility (naked eye vs night vision goggles)

– Light intensity at desired wavelength

– Pulse, projection and other visible defects

Gun firing performances:– First test

• Standard 90° observation angle

– Optimization • Various observation angles (90°, 45°, 12° and 0°)

• Modified assembly parameters in 7.62 mm

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 11: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

11

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

11

Ballistic Performances in 5.56 mm First test using conventional 90°observation angle:

– Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m.

– Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR).

– Only 20% of the tracers were visible in IR at 600m.

– Tracers projected ashes.

Optimization using modified observation angles:– Invisible to naked eye except some projections at 550m (37%).

– Visibility and intensity increase in IR when • distance from the shooter increases (140m vs 300m)

• observation angle is reduced from 90° to 45° to 12° and even behind the shooter.

Therefore for IR tracers, the best observation point is at 300m with a 12° observation angle.

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 12: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

12

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

12

Ballistic Performances in 7.62 mm First test using conventional 90°observation angle:

– Tracers were invisible to naked eye at 13m.

– Tracers were invisible at 13m and ignited at 140m (in IR).

– 32% were slightly visible in the visible band during the trajectory.

– 94% of the tracers met the trace distance requirement of 775m.

– Tracers projected ashes.

Optimization using modified observation angles and assembly parameters:– Invisible to naked eye except projections at 550m (94%).

– Same observations as in 5.56 mm for visibility and intensity in IR.

Therefore for IR tracers, the best observation point is at 300m with a 12° observation angle.

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 13: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

13

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

13

Ballistic Performances in 12.7 mm

Feasibility tests results are:– Some ignition problems

– Visible to the naked eyes (igniter and tracer)

– Excellent trace quality in IR

– Acceptable trace distance

– Projections were observed

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 14: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

14

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

14

Conclusions

12.7 mm to be developed

Optimization required for 5,56 and 7,62 mm

5.56 mm, 7.62 mm and 12.7 mm infrared tracer cartridges with the following features : – Same components as traditional tracer cartridges except igniter

and tracer compositions

– Same ballistic as visible tracer

– Detection by enemy is reduced

– Good performance in infrared

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX

Page 15: Development of Infrared Tracers · – Tracers were invisible to naked eye from gun mouth up to 600m. – Tracers were invisible at gun muzzle and ignited at 140m (in IR). – Only

15

COMPETITIVENESS… A Daily Challenge

15

Contact Information

Isabelle Theobald, M. Sc. Chemist

General Dynamics – Ordnance and Tactical Systems – Canada

Phone: 1-450-581-3080 ext. 8346

Email: [email protected]

TEMPLATE ANGLAIS_2011.POTX


Recommended