International Conference“Climate protection potential of energy efficiency”
Brussels, 09 November 2011
Susanne Berger, Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
Energy Saving Partnership Berlin
Best Practice Examples and Future Developments
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Foundation� in 1992 as Public-Private Partnership
Shareholders� Federal State of Berlin� Vattenfall Europe� GASAG� KfW Banking Group
Disposes of2.5 m € of capital stock
Annual Turnover9.3 m €526 k € Company earnings (EBIT)
Know-how55 members of staff
Energy Services� Contracting� Consulting� International Know-How Transfer
Based in Französische Straße 2310117 BerlinPhone: (030) 29 33 30 - 0e-mail: [email protected]: www.berliner-e-agentur.de
BEA – Facts and Figures
© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Building owner
ESCO
SupplyElectricity, gas, district heat …)
Building(s)
payment
Saving guarantee
payment coordinationof measures
Building operation Saving service
Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) Principle
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3 Pool 4,Pankow
Pool 5,Hellersdorf
Pool 6,Spandau
Pool 8,HU
Pool 9,Friedrichshain
Liegenschaften 35 45 34 56 36 24 4 30
Baseline-Kostenin €/a
3.948.526 € 5.476.100 € 2.699.279 € 2.074.988 € 1.478.027 € 671.165 € 956.178 € 1.090.529 €
Baseline-Verbrauchin MWh/a
74.810 100.990 52.540 49.512 27.476 17.121 18.031 21.952
Energiesparpartner ARGE ESPBewag / Landis &
Staefa GmbH
SFW GmbH, ESB Energiesparen &
Betreiben
ARGE ESP Landis & Staefa GmbH /
Bewag
Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH
HEW Contract GmbH
Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH
ARGE ESP HUB(Kieback&Peter/edl)
MVV Energie AG(ARGE mit WFM
wurde 2002 aufgelöst)
VertragsbeginnBeginn HauptleistungsphaseDauer der Hauptleistungspflicht
01.04.199601.04.199612,75 Jahre
01.04.199601.04.1996
12,75 Jahre
01.05.199801.10.1998
12 Jahre
12.04.199901.03.2000
14 Jahre
01.07.200001.01.2001
14 Jahre
01.04.200001.02.2001
14 Jahre
01.05.200401.11.2004
8 Jahre
31.01.200101.10.2001
10 Jahre
Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht 12,75 12,75 12,00 14,00 14,00 14,00 8,00 10,00Erstinvestitionin €
3.118.880 € 3.530.414 € 1.561.997 € 1.771.339 € 2.291.866 € 598.241 € 1.029.000 € 939.243 €
Garantieeinsparungin %
ca. 20% * ca. 25% * 15,70% 24,20% 23,58% 22,00% 23,43% 19,67%
Garantieeinsparungin €
789.705 € 1.369.025 € 423.787 € 502.147 € 348.519 € 147.656 € 224.000 € 214.507 €
CO2-Einsparungin t/a
8.300 5.400 3.000 2.500 1.100 1.000 1.643 925
Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in %
7,54% 9,28% 7,28% 7,10% 6,72% 4,00% 1,52% 3,46%
Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in €/a
297.719 € 508.102 € 196.637 147.325 € 99.328 € 26.873 € 14.560 37.753 €
Zusätzliche Beteiligung des AGin %
ab 20 % Einsparung: 70ab 25 % Einsparung: 60ab 30 % Einsparung: 50
ab 30 % Einsparung: 50
10 80 50 50 80 90
Bedienung / Instandhaltung von Altanlagen durch AN
ja ja ja ja ja ja nein nein
Energy Saving Partnerships =Energy Performance Contracting for public buildings in Berlin
1995 founded - climate protection targets of the State of Berlin
coordination by: BEA + Senat of Berlin, Division Climate protection
Political back-up by severall political parties and parlamentary groupsin the Berlin City Parliament
Energy Saving Partnership Berlin – a Model of Success
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3 Pool 4,Pankow
Pool 5,Hellersdorf
Pool 6,Spandau
Pool 8,HU
Pool 9,Friedrichshain
Liegenschaften 35 45 34 56 36 24 4 30
Baseline-Kostenin €/a
3.948.526 € 5.476.100 € 2.699.279 € 2.074.988 € 1.478.027 € 671.165 € 956.178 € 1.090.529 €
Baseline-Verbrauchin MWh/a
74.810 100.990 52.540 49.512 27.476 17.121 18.031 21.952
Energiesparpartner ARGE ESPBewag / Landis &
Staefa GmbH
SFW GmbH, ESB Energiesparen &
Betreiben
ARGE ESP Landis & Staefa GmbH /
Bewag
Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH
HEW Contract GmbH
Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH
ARGE ESP HUB(Kieback&Peter/edl)
MVV Energie AG(ARGE mit WFM
wurde 2002 aufgelöst)
VertragsbeginnBeginn HauptleistungsphaseDauer der Hauptleistungspflicht
01.04.199601.04.199612,75 Jahre
01.04.199601.04.1996
12,75 Jahre
01.05.199801.10.1998
12 Jahre
12.04.199901.03.2000
14 Jahre
01.07.200001.01.2001
14 Jahre
01.04.200001.02.2001
14 Jahre
01.05.200401.11.2004
8 Jahre
31.01.200101.10.2001
10 Jahre
Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht 12,75 12,75 12,00 14,00 14,00 14,00 8,00 10,00Erstinvestitionin €
3.118.880 € 3.530.414 € 1.561.997 € 1.771.339 € 2.291.866 € 598.241 € 1.029.000 € 939.243 €
Garantieeinsparungin %
ca. 20% * ca. 25% * 15,70% 24,20% 23,58% 22,00% 23,43% 19,67%
Garantieeinsparungin €
789.705 € 1.369.025 € 423.787 € 502.147 € 348.519 € 147.656 € 224.000 € 214.507 €
CO2-Einsparungin t/a
8.300 5.400 3.000 2.500 1.100 1.000 1.643 925
Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in %
7,54% 9,28% 7,28% 7,10% 6,72% 4,00% 1,52% 3,46%
Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in €/a
297.719 € 508.102 € 196.637 147.325 € 99.328 € 26.873 € 14.560 37.753 €
Zusätzliche Beteiligung des AGin %
ab 20 % Einsparung: 70ab 25 % Einsparung: 60ab 30 % Einsparung: 50
ab 30 % Einsparung: 50
10 80 50 50 80 90
Bedienung / Instandhaltung von Altanlagen durch AN
ja ja ja ja ja ja nein nein
Number of contracts / pools: 26, about 1,400 buildings
Guaranteed Savings (all contracts): ca. 11,7 Mio. €/aShare of Berlin (Savings on public budgets): ca. 2.7 Mio. €/a
CO2-Reduction around 69,600 t/a
Investments (all pools): ca. 51,6 Mio. €
Energy Saving Partnership – a Model of Success
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Client(State, hospital, etc.)
Berliner Energieagentur
Project Manager
Energy Saving PartnerESCO
Assignment
Consultancy
Technical-economic requirements, Negotiations
Energy Saving Guarantee Contract
BEA – Role in Energy Performance Contracting (EPC)
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Energy Saving Partnership (ESP) – A Model of Success
A pool of buildings includes e.g.:
Schools and Kindergarten
Universities, Opera
Swimming Pools
Offices and Administration
Implemented Measures:
Refurbishment ofheating, ilumination,automatic control, etc.
Energy Management
User Motivation
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
� Pool: 69 buildings (schools, kindergarten, gyms)
� Baseline: 1.84 Mio. €/a
� Guaranteed savings: 29,4 % = 541,679 €/a
� Invest: ca. 2.8 Mio. €
� CO2-reduction : 3,973 t/a
� Duration of contract: 14 years
� Measures: new boilers in 11 buildings, switch from coal/heat oil to gas, building automation, modernisation of lighting
� 100,000 € for Renewable energy technologies, e.g. solar thermal systems
ESP Best Practice: Pool 19 District Steglitz-Zehlendorf
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
ESP Best Practice: Berliner Bäder-Betriebe (Swimming Pools)
� Pool: 11 buildings/swimming pools
� Baseline: 4.9 Mio. €/a ( incl. water costs )
� Guaranteed savings: 33,5 % = 1.6 Mio. €/a
� Invest: 7.9 Mio. €
� CO2-reduction : 4,938 t/a
� Duration of contract: 10 years
� Measures: water saving technology, optimizing filte r flushes, separating water circulations, modernisation of hot water generation
renovation of air conditioning and lighting
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Best Practice – Berliner Immobilienmanagement GmbH (Pool 24)
Re-tender after expiration of first ESP contracts ( Pools 1 + 2)
� Pool: 18 office buildings (ca. 300,000 m² GFA)
� Baseline 2007: 2.066 Mio. €/a
� Guaranteed savings: 21 % = 433,757 €/a
� Investment: ca. 2.4 Mio. €
� CO2-reduction: 2,208 t/a
� Duration: 10 years
� Measures (selected): boiler replacement, CHP-unit, optimizing of ventilation systems, renewal of CBCS,
special feature: obligation of maintenance of all old systems
Contracting model - Project example
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
� Guaranteed energy savings achieved in most contract s, high savings up to 35 % feasible
� 26 contracts operated by 17 different ESCOs, around 100 subcontractors (regional SMEs) involved in implemen tation and maintenance
� Good quality in saving measures because of expertis e of ESCOs, rising experience and improvement of cost effective ness
� Additional improvement of maintenance situation by central coordination through ESCO
� No legal proceedings or need to use the bank guaran tees so far, successful re-tendering of EPC projects leads to lon g-term savings
ESP – Experiences and Results in Berlin
� Success thanks to reliable legal framework, standar dized procedures and contracts together with professional process ma nagement
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Future Challenges
� Ambitious climate and energy efficiency targets- Higher EPC savings necessary through comprehensive
measures - Connection to certification / trade systems and monetization
of savings for EPC investments
� Need for decentralization and energy storage- Focus on load management measures and electricity savings - New M&V methods, stronger connection to smart metering
� Technology development- Focus on renewable energy technologies and CHP- EPC as (financing) instrument to create smart buildings (demand
side management)
Challenges to future EPC projects
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
� EPC plus- Integration of (comprehensive) building refurbishment measures- Shared financing instruments - First EPC with (small) share of construction measures
� EPC light- Operation and energy management of buildings with saving
guarantee - First pilot project, 12 public buildings district of Pankow, Berlin
� Green EPC - Focus on renewable energy technologies- Specific tender objectives and link to subsidy programs- Primary energy consumption as guaranteed element
Perspectives of further EPC models
Advanced EPC
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
• Model contracts and tender documents (A, D, F, FIN, GR, I, N, S)• Results: 17 new EPC projects kick-started
• Model contracts and tender documents (LV, LT, PL, CZ, SLO, SK, BG, H)• Results: > 10 contracts signed since 2003
Standards set by BEA realised in several other countries
• Improving EPC and energy efficiency standards (2009-11) (B, SE, NO, CZ, SK, SI, RO, A, F)• European Energy Service Award
Clearcontract – Clearinghouse for Energy Contracting in CEE
Clearcontract – European Energy Service Initiative
• Slovenia, Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, Mexico, Estonia• Ongoing: Chile, Brazil, India, Romania, Serbia, Monaco
EPC Transferred – International Experiences
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Conclusions
� EPC is a high potential instrument for future energy challenges
� Successful EPC projects consist in a balance of standard and flexible elements for the customer
� Experienced project facilitators are needed for successful project implementation
� Availability of tools and model contracts in each European country is crucial
� European policy makers need to establish suitable standards and framework for EPC
09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH
ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments
Thank you for your attentionFor more information:
www.berliner-e-agentur.dewww.european-energy-service-initiative.net