of 84
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
1/84
ERTH2404
Lecture 11: Earthquakes
Dr. Jason Mah
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
2/84
Review
Peaceful versus Explosive eruptions Defined by viscosity, volatiles, volume Mafic and felsic Peaceful: icelandic, hawaiiian, strombolian Explosive: vulcanian, plinian, caldera
Hazards Primary: pyroclastic flow (nue ardente) & fall, gas Secondary: lahar
2
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
3/84
Reading assignment
Please read Kehews book to complement thematerial presented in this lecture:
Chap. 8 p. 272-315;
3
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
4/84
Lecture contents
Plate tectonics & the relation to earthquakes Earthquakes at spreading centers Earthquakes at transform faults Earthquakes at convergent zones
Intraplate earthquakes Seismic waves and their characteristics Locating the epicenter of an earthquake Estimating the size of an earthquake
4
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
5/84
Fundamentals definitions Earthquakes : movement of the Earth along
breaks in crust Faults : breaks in crust Displacement : motion on faults Seismic waves : energy propagation, motion
generated when fault releases energy Wavelength Amplitude Frequency
5
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
6/84
Plate tectonics and earthquakes
6Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.
4th Edition. Fig. 2.12. Shown with permission.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
7/84
Plate tectonics and earthquakes Earthquakes do not occur randomly Relation between tectonic environment,
deformation forces and earthquake size
No significant earthquake activity associatedwith hot spots
7
Environment Deformationforce
Earthquakesize
Spreading centers Tension SmallTransform faults Shear Large
Convergent zones Compression Gigantic
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
8/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
Frequent Shallow
Small
8
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
9/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
Formation of new oceanic lithosphere1. Centering: moving lithosphere centers about a
"static" hot region in the mantle
9
Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.4th Edition. Fig. 2.24. Shown with permission.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
10/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
Formation of new oceanic lithosphere2. Doming: increase in heat causes the Earths
lithosphere to buldge up into a dome
10
Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.4th Edition. Fig. 2.24. Shown with permission.
Tension
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
11/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
Formation of new oceanic lithosphere3. Rifting: Area is pulled-apart by tensional forces.
Rocks fracture. The central area sags. Volcanismis common.
11Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.
4th Edition. Fig. 2.24. Shown with permission.
Tension
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
12/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
Formation of new oceanic lithosphere4. Spreading: New ocean floor is formed in pulled-
apart area.
12
Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.
4th
Edition. Fig. 2.24. Shown with permission.
Tension
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
13/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
East African rift system "Rifting" stage Rifting started 25 Ma ago
Three zones of tension meet at theAfar triple junction Red Sea Gulf of Aden East African rift system
Frequent, shallow earthquakes Current seismic activity in Africa:
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/current/africa.html
13
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
14/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
East African rift system
14 R e
f . :
A b b o t t
, P . L . 2
0 0 4
. N a t u r a
l D i s a s t e r s .
4 t h
E d i t i o n
. F i g
. 2 . 2 6 .
S h o w n w i t
h p e r m i s s i o n
.
Afar triple junction
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
15/84
1. Earthquakes at spreading centers
15 S o u r c e :
U S G S
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
16/84
2. Earthquakes along transform faults
Sporadic Deep
Potentially large
16
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
17/84
2. Earthquakes along transform faults
San Andreas fault Transform fault accommodating horizontal
movements between the Pacific and NorthAmerican plates
Complex system of sub-parallel faults Shear stress dominant
17
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
18/84
2. Earthquakes along transform faults
San Andreasfault
18 R e
f . :
A b b o t t
, P . L . 2
0 0 4
.
N a t u r a
l D i s a s t e r s
.
4 t h
E d i t i o n
. F i g
. 4 . 2 .
S h o w n w i t
h p e r m i s s i o n
.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
19/84
2. Earthquakes along transform faults
San Andreas fault, 1989 Loma Prieta
19
Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.4th Edition. Fig. 4.16. Shown with permission.
Source: California Geological Survey
Shear stress
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
20/84
2. Earthquakes along transform faults
San Andreas fault Animation: possible future movement along the
San Andreas fault
http://visearth.ucsd.edu/VisE_Int/aralsea/bigone.html
20
http://visearth.ucsd.edu/VisE_Int/aralsea/bigone.htmlhttp://visearth.ucsd.edu/VisE_Int/aralsea/bigone.htmlhttp://visearth.ucsd.edu/VisE_Int/aralsea/bigone.htmlhttp://visearth.ucsd.edu/VisE_Int/aralsea/bigone.html7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
21/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Sporadic Shallow to deep
Potentially gigantic
21
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
22/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Subduction zones
Plates under different stress regimes atdifferent depthsShallow earthquakes:
Compression: plates pushing against each other Tension: subducting plate bending downwards Shear: plates rubbing against each other
22
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
23/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Subduction zones
23
Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.
4th Edition. Fig. 2.13. Shown with permission.
Tension
CompressionShear
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
24/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Subduction zones have 3 stress regimes! Therefore they may contain the most energy
Megathrust fault: largest boundary betweenthe subducting and overriding plate
The worlds largest earthquakes aremegathrust earthquakes
24
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
25/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Shallow, intermediate, and deep earthquakesobserved
Intermediate and deep earthquakes aregenerated when high mantle T causes coldrocks in the subducting plate to yield
25
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
26/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Juan de Fuca plate subducting at a rate of afew cms per year
Cascadia megathrust Contact between Juan de Fuca and North
American plate
26
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
27/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Juan de Fuca plate
27
Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.
4th
Edition. Fig. 4.9. Shown with permission.Source: Earthquakes Canada
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
28/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones 1700 Cascadia earthquake Magnitude 9
Largest in Canadian history Recall that Loma Prieta was only M6.9
3-5 minutes of ground shaking People could not stand and felt sick
Tsunami across the Pacific
Japanese record dates event to 26 January 1700 21:00 Completely destroyed the winter village of the Pachena
Bay people of Vancouver Island with no survivors
28
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
29/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Oral record: first nation people of coastal BC:
In the period not long before European contact, astrong earthquake occurred at night. It wasfollowed by a large tsunami that destroyed thevillage of Pachena Bay
Canoes came down in the trees
29
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
30/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Oral record from: Quileute first nation, Washington State
Story describing an epic battle along the coastbetween the Thunderbird and the Whale
During the struggle there is a "shaking, jumpingup and trembling of the earth beneath, and arolling up of the great waters"
30
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
31/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Japan, Thoku March 11, 2011 Megathrust earthquake M9 Pacific plate thrusts under North American Plate
31
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
32/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones Japan, Thoku
32
USGS
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
33/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones Japan, Thoku
Tsunami Animation
33
NOAA
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
34/84
3. Earthquakes at convergent zones
Stats for Japan, Thoku (National PoliceAgency and other news agencies)
15 878 deaths 129 225 buildings collapsed 254 204 buildings half collapsed Nuclear power plant meltdown Tsunami wave 10m to 40.5m in height
Half way up Dunton tower Reached 10k inland
34
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
35/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes Earthquakes occurring far from any plate
boundary Often associated with zones of lithospheric
weakness Failed rifts Impact craters Hot spot track
Re-activated as earthquake zones by latertectonic forces
35
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
36/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
36Source: M. Lamontagne, NRCan
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
37/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
St. Lawrence River rift Major rift (500-600 Ma) Presently buried under younger rocks Rift coincides with several Eastern Canada
intraplate earthquakes
Rift : extensional plate tectonics Crust and lithosphere are pulled apart
37
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
38/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
38
Rifted margin
Source: J. Adams, Earthquakes Canada
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
39/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada Charlevoix impact crater (357 15 Ma)
Semi-circular area on the north shore of the St.Lawrence river
Differs from regional topography Shatter cones discovered during regional mapping Heavily eroded
All crater-filling products removed Associated with earthquake activity
Impact "scars" act as zones of weakness in the Earthscrust
39
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
40/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
Charlevoix impact crater (357 15 Ma) 54 km dia
40 S o u r c e :
M . L
a m o n t a g n e
. S h o w n w i t
h p e r m i s s i o n
.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
41/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
Charlevoix: events from Jan 78 Sept 99
41 R e
f . :
N R C a n
. S h o w n w i t
h p e r m i s s i o n .
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
42/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
Monteregian Hills, QC 10 mountains aligned E-W over 200 km Intrusive bodies
Less resistant host rock eroded away Formed by a Cretaceous hot spot (150 Ma)
Overlying plate moving west Oldest mountain at Oka
Cause of present-day seismic activity?
42
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
43/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
Monteregian Hills, QC
43
Ref.: Grice, J. 1989
Direction of plate motion
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
44/84
4. Intraplate earthquakes: Canada
Monteregian Hills, QC
44Source: J. Adams, Earthquakes Canada
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
45/84
Summary of Earthquake Environment
Environment Force regime Earthquake size Depth Example
SpreadingCenter
Tension SmallLow magnitude
Shallow< 70 km
East Africa,Afar triple junction
Transformfault Shear LargeTypically < M8 Deep300 km to 700km
San Andreas,CA
Convergentzones
Compression(tension &shear aresecondary)
GiganticPotentially > M8
Shallow to Deep< 70 km to700km
Cascadia,Japan, Thoku
45
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
46/84
Seismic waves Earthquakes are caused by sudden
movements along faults
1. Stress from deformational forces build upuntil rocks fail Stress must build up over several years before
enough energy is stored to cause rupture2. Rocks fracture and shift3. Energy is released as seismic waves
46
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
47/84
Fault rupture
Rupture is initiated at the hypocenter Point of weakness along the fault Point of origin of an earthquake in the subsurface
Epicenter : the hypocenter projected to theEarths surface
directly above hypocenter Fault propagate along the fault surface in a
few seconds
47
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
48/84
Fault rupture
48
R e
f . :
A b b o t t , P . L . 2 0 0 4
. N a t u r a l D i s a s t e r s
.
4 t h
E d i t i o n . F i g . 3
. 1 2
. S h o w n w i t h p e r m i s s i o n
.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
49/84
Seismic waves
Two types: Body waves: propagate through the whole body of
the Earth Large earthquakes generate body waves recorded
all over the world Surface waves: propagate only near the Earths
surface
49
Body waves0.5 - 20 HzFast
Surface waves0.005 - 0.1 HzSlow
Seismicwaves
Rayleigh waves
Love waves
Primary (P) waves
Secondary (S) waves
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
50/84
Seismic waves
Seismic waves: waves caused by the release of energy in the Earth
How are seismic waves recorded? Seismometer : sensor that detects Earths motions Seismograph : an instrument that records these
motions Seismogram : output from seismography
paper record or digital file of an earthquakes motion
50
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
51/84
Seismic waves
51
Animation: Seismographs
USGS
Dragon SeismoscopeZhang Heng (78-139AD)
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
52/84
Seismic waves Modern seismograph
station Quiet environment
Good contact with bedrock Three seismometersdetect the threecomponents of groundmotion
East WestNorth SouthUp Down
52
P h o t o :
G . A
t k i n s o n
, C a r
l e t o n U .
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
53/84
Seismic waves1. Body waves : propagate through the whole body of
the Earth Large earthquakes generate body waves recorded
all over the world
2. Surface waves : propagate only near the Earthssurface
Tend to have stronger vibrations, higher wave amplitudeand cause the most damage
53
Body waves
0.5 - 20 HzFast
Surface waves0.005 - 0.1 HzSlow
Seismicwaves
Rayleigh waves
Love waves
Primary (P) waves
Secondary (S) waves
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
54/84
Seismic waves: Body waves
Primary (P) waves : Compressional energy Small amplitude Travel fastest, recorded first Propagate in solids, liquids, gases Typical velocities
1500 m/s water 2500 m/s sediments 5000 m/s hard rock
54
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
55/84
Seismic waves: Body waves
Secondary (S) waves : Shear energy
More destructive than P waves because they shake
buildings sideways Larger amplitude than P waves Travel 1.7 times slower than P waves
Propagate in solids only
55
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
56/84
Seismic waves: Body waves
56
R e f
. : A
b b o t t
, P . L . 2
0 0 4
. N a t u r a
l D i s a s t e r s
.
4 t h
E d i t i o n
. F i g
. 3 . 1 8 . S
h o w n w i t
h p e r m i s s i o
n .
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
57/84
Seismic waves: Surface waves
Love waves : Cause horizontal shifting Slower than P and S-waves but faster than Raleigh
57
USGS
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
58/84
Seismic waves: Surface waves
Rayleigh waves : Longitudinal and transverse motions Slowest velocity
58
USGS
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
59/84
Seismic waves
Animation: Seismic wave motion
59
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
60/84
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
61/84
Epicenter Location
Question How do we determine the location of the
epicenter?
61
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
62/84
Epicenter Location: Fundamental Principle
P waves travel faster than S waves Further away from the epicenter, the greater
the difference betweenthe P and S arrival times
Arrival time : time at which a particular seismicwave is recorded by a seismometer
A minimum of 3 seismograph stations isrequired to locate the epicenter
62
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
63/84
Epicenter Location: Step 1
Determining the distance between theepicenter and one seismograph station
Step 1.1 Identify the P arrival time Step 1.2 Identify the S arrival time Step 1.3 Compute the difference between
the P and S arrival times
Step 1.4 Read the corresponding distance onthe travel time vs distance curves
63
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
64/84
Epicenter Location: Step 1
Difference between P and S arrival times is3 minutes 45 seconds
64
Ref.: Abbott, P.L. 2004. Natural Disasters.4th Edition. Fig. 3.22. Shown with permission.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
65/84
Epicenter Location: Step 1
Travel time vs distance curves
65
The corresponding epicentral distance is 2250 km R e
f . :
A b b o t t , P . L . 2 0 0 4
. N a t u r a l D i s a s t e r s
.
4 t h
E d i t i o n . F i g . 3
. 2 1
. S h o w n w i t
h p e r m i s s i o n
.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
66/84
Epicenter Location: Step 1
The epicenter could be located anywhere at adistance of 2250 km from the seismographstation
66
2250 km
Station 1Map view
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
67/84
Epicenter Location: Repeat for 3 stations
Determining the direction from where theseismic energy came
Repeat step 1 for a minimum of two additional
seismograph stations Select stations covering evenly the area of interest
Example: Station 2: epicentral distance = 1750 km Station 3: epicentral distance = 1500 km
67
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
68/84
Epicenter Location: 2 nd Station
68
2250 km
1750 km
Station 1
Station 2
?
?
Map view
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
69/84
Epicenter Location: 3 rd Station
69
2250 km
1750 km
1500 km
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
Map view
Additional stations canbe used to improvethe accuracy
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
70/84
Estimating the Magnitude
Earthquakes are related to the energy releaseby a fault
Larger faults (length, width) can have larger
earthquakes Bigger the earthquake
Greater the ground shaking Greater the amplitude recorded on seismograms
70
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
71/84
Estimating the Magnitude
How should the "size" of an earthquake beestimated?
Suggestions: Cost of damage? Lives lost? Length of rupture of the earthquake fault? Amount of ground shaking?
71
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
72/84
Estimating the Magnitude
Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale Developed by Mercalli, 1902 Based on extent of damage
Problems with the Mercalli Intensity Scale Depends on distance from epicenter Depends on surface materials Building design It is subjective!
72
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
73/84
Richter Magnitude scale
Magnitude : total amount of energy releasedduring fault rupture
Developed by Frank Richter, 1935 M = log10Amplitude + constant
Constant is a wave attenuation factor
73
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
74/84
Richter Magnitude scale
Logarithmic scale Increasing the magnitude by 1 is an increase in
amplitude by a factor of 10
Magnitude 2 stamping your foot on the floor
Magnitude 2.5 smallest earthquake felt by people
Magnitude 3 amplitude of 1 mm measured100 km from the epicenter
74
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
75/84
Richter Magnitude scale
Logarithmic scale
75
Magnitude 4
Magnitude 5
Magnitude 6 100mm
10mm
1mm
10 times larger
10 times larger
S o u r c e :
M . L
a m o n t a g n e
, N R C a n
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
76/84
Richter Magnitude: Measurement
Based on measurements made onseismograms
Calculations summarized visually in anomograph
Difference between P and S arrival times Plot on the left column
Maximum amplitude of seismic waves Plot on the right column Read magnitude in the central column
76
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
77/84
Richter Magnitude scale: Station 1
77 R e f
. : A
b b o t t
, P . L . 2
0 0 4
. N a t u r a
l D i s a s t e r s
.
4 t h
E d i t i o n
. F i g
. 3 . 2
4 . S h o w n w i t
h p e r m i s s i o n
.
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
78/84
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
79/84
Richter Magnitude scale
M=7 : "Major" earthquake, causes seriousdamage up to ~100 km
San Francisco, Loma Prieta M6.9
79USGS
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
80/84
Richter Magnitude scale
M=8 : "Great" earthquake, great destruction,loss of life over several 100 km 1906 San Francisco >3000 deaths 225 000 homeless 28 000 buildings $400M in 1906 dollars $9 857M in 2011 dollars
80
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
81/84
Richter Magnitude scale
1906 San Francisco, M8
81
USGS
Financial district, http://www.sfmuseum.org
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
82/84
Richter Magnitude scale
M=9 : Rare great earthquake, major damageover a large region over 1000 km
Chile 1960 M9.5, Alaska 1964 M9.2, Sumatra 2004
M9.1, Japan 2011 M9
82
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
83/84
Richter Magnitude scale
Chile 1960 M9.5 1 655 killed 3 000 injured 2M homeless $550M in Chile $75M in Hawaii 138 killed, $50M in Japan 32 killed in Philippines
83
7/28/2019 ERTH2404 L10 Earthquakes Upload
84/84
References
Animations http://www.iris.edu/hq/programs/education_
and_outreach/animations#CC
Current world seismicity//neic.usgs.gov/neis/current/