FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE MAHARASHTRA … · farad continuation sheet in the maharashtra...

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 960 OF 2017 (Shri Pralhad D. Lahane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN. DATE : 19.06.2019. ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri A.M. Nagarkar, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents. 2. Learned Presenting Officer has filed short

affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

Same is taken on record and copy thereof has been

served on the other side.

3. S.O. to 18.07.2019.

VICE CHAIRMAN KPB ORAL ORDER 19.06.2019.


BENCH AT AURANGABAD

M.A. No. 89/2019 in O.A. St. No. 43/2019 (Shri Gunaji D. Rathod V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri A.M. Nagarkar, learned Advocate

holding for Shri K.B. Dantal, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents. 2. Learned Presenting Officer seeks time for filing

affidavit in reply on behalf of respondents in M.A. Time

granted.

3. S.O. to 26.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 761 OF 2018 (Shri Shivaji D. Dadge V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri S.P. Dhoble, learned Advocate holding

for Shri A.V. Patil (Indrale), learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents. 2. At the request of learned Advocate for the

applicant, issue fresh notice to respondent No. 5,

returnable on 22.07.2019.

3. Tribunal may take the case for final disposal at

once and separate notice for final disposal shall not be

issued.

4. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on

respondent/s intimation/notice of date of hearing duly

authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper

book of the case. Respondents are put to notice that

the case would be taken up for final disposal at the

stage of admission hearing.

5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11

of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

(Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as

limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.

//3// O.A. No. 761/2018

6. The service may be done by hand delivery, speed

post, courier and acknowledgment be obtained

and produced along with affidavit of compliance in

the Registry before due date. Applicant is directed to

file affidavit of compliance and notice.

7. If notice is not collected within 7 days or proof of

service is not produced before 3 days of the next date,

case shall automatically stand dismissed without

further reference to the Tribunal.

8. S.O. to 22.07.2019.

9. Steno copy and hamdast allowed for the use of

both the sides.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 932 OF 2017 (Shri Walmik Limbaji Kande V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Smt. Vidya Taksal, learned Advocate

holding for Shri A.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,

learned Presenting Officer for respondents. 2. Pleadings are complete. Hence, the present O.A.

is admitted and it be kept for final hearing on

29.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 877 OF 2018 (Shri Sachin V. Tonde V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri V.G. Pingle, learned Advocate holding

for Shri K.B. Jadhav, learned Advocate for the

applicant, Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting Officer

for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Shri I.S. Thorat, learned

Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks time for

filing rejoinder affidavit. Time granted as a last chance.

3. S.O. to 18.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

M.A. No. 92/2019 in O.A. St. No. 189/2019 (Shri Nivrutti K. Lote V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri V.B. Wagh, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting


affidavit in reply on behalf of respondents in M.A. Time

granted.

3. S.O. to 22.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 855 OF 2018 (Shri Baban D. Jatale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri R.D. Khadap, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.S. Thombre, learned Advocate for

the applicant, Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting

Officer for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Shri S.B.

Mene, learned Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 4. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks time for

rejoinder affidavit. Time granted.

3. S.O. to 16.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2018 (Shri Chandrasen K. Bahure V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





the applicant and Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for respondents. 2. Pleadings are complete. Hence, the present O.A.

is admitted and it be kept for final hearing on

22.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 405 OF 2019 (Shri Shishupal S. Raut V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri V.G. Salgare, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent). Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents, present. 2. As none present for the applicant, S.O. to

08.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 407 OF 2019 (Smt. Sadhana U. Borse @ Sadhana S. Pachpol V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Smt. Amruta Paranjape-Menezes, learned

Advocate for the applicant (Absent). Shri M.S.

Mahajan, learned Chief Presenting Officer for

respondents, present.

2. As none present for the applicant, S.O. to

08.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 389 OF 2019 (Shri Shankar M. Jadhav V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri J.M. Murkute, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar,

learned Presenting Officer for respondents. 2. Issue notices to respondents, returnable on

29.07.2019.

3. Tribunal may take the case for final disposal at

once and separate notice for final disposal shall not be

issued.

4. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on

respondent/s intimation/notice of date of hearing duly

authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper

book of the case. Respondents are put to notice that

the case would be taken up for final disposal at the

stage of admission hearing.

5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11

of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

(Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as

limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.

6. The service may be done by hand delivery, speed

post, courier and acknowledgment be obtained

//3// O.A. No. 389/2019

and produced along with affidavit of compliance in

the Registry before due date. Applicant is directed to

file affidavit of compliance and notice.

7. If notice is not collected within 7 days or proof of

service is not produced before 3 days of the next date,

case shall automatically stand dismissed without

further reference to the Tribunal.

8. S.O. to 29.07.2019.

9. Steno copy and hamdast allowed for the use of

both the sides.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2019 (Shri Sandeep G. Salve V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri H.V. Tungar, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned

Presenting Officer for respondents. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks time to

produce on record necessary documents. Time

granted.

3. S.O. to 01.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 484 OF 2019 (Shri Dhanu V. Rathod V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri B.R. Jaybhay, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent). Shri N.U. Yadav, learned

Presenting Officer for respondents, present.


11.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2019 (Shri Namdeo B. Pable V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri P.B. Rakhunde, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent). Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande,

learned Presenting Officer for respondents, present.


04.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

M.A. No. 247/2019 in O.A. St. No. 02/2019 (Shri Tukaram K. Kalaskar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri O.B. Boinwad, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent). Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief

Presenting Officer for respondents, present.


05.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 510 OF 2017 (Shri Santosh S. Vetal V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri I.G. Durrani, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents. 2. Learned Presenting Officer seeks time to file

affidavit in reply to the amended O.A. Time granted as

a last chance.

3. S.O. to 29.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 438 OF 2018 (Smt. Kavita N. Gitte V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri S.G. Jadhavar, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent). Shri N.U. Yadav, learned

Presenting Officer for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, present.

Shri R.J. Nirmal, learned Advocate for respondent

No. 5, absent. 2. On last date i.e. on 05.04.2019 none present for

the applicant. It seems that the applicant is not

interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the matter

is fixed for passing dismissal order on 11.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 886 OF 2018 (Shri Baliram D. Waghmare V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri G.N. Kulkarni (Mardikar), learned Advocate

for the applicant (Absent). Shri D.R. Patil, learned

Presenting Officer for respondents, present. 2. Learned Presenting Officer has filed separate

affidavit in replies on behalf of respondent Nos. 1

and 3 respectively. Same are taken on record. He has

submitted that presently the affidavit in reply of

respondent No. 2 is not necessary.

3. S.O. to 12.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 883 OF 2018 (Shri Sawairam D. Rathod sV/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri G.N. Kulkarni (Mardikar), learned Advocate

for the applicant (Absent). Smt. Deepali S.

Deshpande, learned Presenting Officer for

respondents, present. 2. Learned Presenting Officer has filed separate

affidavit in replies on behalf of respondent No. 1. Same

is taken on record. She has submitted that presently

the affidavit in reply of respondent No. 2 is not

necessary.

3. S.O. to 12.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 912 OF 2018 (Smt. Rabiyabee B. Khajamiyan V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Smt. Dr. Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar, learned

Advocate for the applicant (Absent). Heard Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents. 2. Learned Presenting Officer has placed on record

a copy of the communication dated 18.06.2019 and

seeks time for filing affidavit in reply on behalf of

respondents.

3. On perusal of the record it reveals that already

last chance was given to the respondents for filing

affidavit in reply. But they have failed to file affidavit in

reply in time. There is no just ground to grant further

time. However, in the interest of justice short time is

granted to the respondents for filing affidavit in reply

subject to payment of costs of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five

Thousand Only). The amount of costs shall be

deposited in the registry of this Tribunal.

4. S.O. to 12.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 913 OF 2018 (Smt. Mariyambee L. Sayed V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Smt. Dr. Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar, learned

Advocate for the applicant (Absent). Heard Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for respondents. 2. Learned Presenting Officer has placed on record

a copy of the communication dated 18.06.2019 and

seeks time for filing affidavit in reply on behalf of

respondents.

3. On perusal of the record it reveals that already

last chance was given to the respondents for filing

affidavit in reply. But they have failed to file affidavit in

reply in time. There is no just ground to grant further

time. However, in the interest of justice short time is

granted to the respondents for filing affidavit in reply

subject to payment of costs of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five

Thousand Only). The amount of costs shall be

deposited in the registry of this Tribunal.

4. S.O. to 12.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 70 OF 2019 (Smt. Mangal S. Ghodke V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri Y.H. Jadhav, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents. 2. Learned Presenting Officer has submitted that

during the course of the day affidavit in reply would be

filed.

3. S.O. to 17.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2019 (Shri Durgadas S. Purohit V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri J.B. Choudhary, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Leave Note). Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned

Presenting Officer for respondents, present. 2. Learned Presenting Officer seeks time for filing

affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and

4 to 6. Time granted.

3. S.O. to 18.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2019 (Shri Tejrao B. Gadekar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri S.B. Jadhav, learned Advocate for the

applicant, Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief

Presenting Officer for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and

Shri S.U. Choudhari, learned Advocate holding for

Smt. Vaishali S. Choudhari, learned Advocate for

respondent Nos. 3 and 4. 2. Learned Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4

has filed affidavit in reply. Same is taken on record

and copy thereof has been served on the other side.

3. Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks time to

take instructions from the applicant as to whether he

has received the amount of subsistence allowances as

contended by the respondents in their affidavit in reply

and also to make submissions regarding

maintainability of the present O.A., as the appeal

preferred by the applicant challenging the impugned

order is pending. Time granted.

4. S.O. to 05.07.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 177 OF 2018 (Shri Gangadhar M. Kulkarni V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri R.K. Ashtekar, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting


affidavit in reply on behalf of respondents.

3. On perusal of the record, it reveals that already

ample opportunities were given to the respondents for

filing affidavit in reply. But they have failed to file

affidavit in reply in time. There is no just ground to

grant further time. However, in the interest of justice

short time is granted to the respondents for filing

affidavit in reply subject to payment of costs of Rs.

5,000/- (Rs. Five Thousand Only). The amount of costs

shall be deposited in the registry of this Tribunal.

4. S.O. to 24.06.2019.

VICE CHAIRMAN Later On

5. Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting Officer has

submitted that during the course of the day affidavit in

//2// O.A. No. 177/2018

reply on behalf of respondent No. 3 would be filed and

he undertakes to serve copy thereof upon learned

Advocate for the applicant. He has also submitted that

presently the affidavit in reply of respondent Nos. 1

and 2 is not necessary. Therefore, he prayed to recall

the order passed by this Tribunal on today i.e. on

19.06.2019 imposing the costs.

6. In view thereof, the order of imposition of costs is

recalled.

7. S.O. to 24.06.2019.



BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 848 OF 2018 (Shri Deepak D. Shinde V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Ms. Rebekah Daniel, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.B. Talekar, learned Advocate for the

applicant, Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting Officer

for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri S.S. Shaikh,

learned Advocate for respondent No. 4. 2. Learned Advocate for respondent No. 4 has

submitted that during the course of the day affidavit in

reply would be filed.

3. Learned Presenting Officer seeks time for filing

affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

4. On perusal of the record, it reveals that already

ample opportunities were given to the respondents for

filing affidavit in reply. But they have failed to file

affidavit in reply in time. There is no just ground to

grant further time. However, in the interest of justice

short time is granted to the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 for

filing affidavit in reply subject to payment of costs of

Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five Thousand Only). The amount of

costs shall be deposited in the registry of this Tribunal.

4. S.O. to 22.07.2019.

VICE CHAIRMAN

//2// O.A. NO. 848/2018

Later On

5. Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting Officer has

filed affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent No. 3.

Same is taken on record. He undertakes to supply

copy thereof to the other side. He has submitted that

presently the affidavit in reply of respondent Nos. 1

and 2 is not necessary. Therefore, he prayed to recall

the order passed by this Tribunal on today i.e. on

19.06.2019 imposing the costs.

6. In view thereof, the order of imposition of costs is

recalled.

7. S.O. to 22.07.2019.


FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.266 OF 2019 (Manohar G. Anawane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE : 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Omprakash D. Mane, learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents has submitted

that he will file affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the

Respondent No.2 during the course of the day.

3. S.O. to 11.07.2019.

VICE CHAIRMAN

SAS ORAL ORDER 19.06.2019 bpp



M.A.NO.504 OF 2018 IN O.A.NO.665 OF 2018 (Zubair Ahmed Abdul Gafoor V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE : 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER : Shri S.K. Chavan, learned Advocate for the

Applicant is absent.

Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. As none appeared for the Applicant, S.O. to

12.07.2019 for passing dismissal order.

VICE CHAIRMAN



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD M.A.NO.450 OF 2018 IN O.A.ST.NO.1887 OF 2018

WITH M.A.NO.495 OF 2018 In O.A.ST.NO.2056 OF 2018






(Shri Sachin G. Shiradkar & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE : 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER :

Heard Smt. Supriya Bhilegaonkar-Bharaswadkar,

learned Advocate holding for Shri M.B. Bharaswadkar,

learned Advocate for the Applicants in all these O.A. and

Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned C.P.O., Smt. Deepali S.

Deshpande, Shri B.S. Deokar, Smt. M.S. Patni and Smt.

Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate, learned Presenting Officers

for the Respondents in respective O.As.

2. Learned C.P.O. for the Respondents has filed

affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 in

M.A.No.17 of 2019 in O.A.St.No.55 of 2019, M.A.No.18 of

2019 in O.A.St.No.57 of 2019, M.A.No.19 of 2019 in

O.A.St.No.59 of 2019 and in M.A.No.20 of 2019 in

O.A.St.No.61 of 2019. The same are taken on record.

3. S.O. to 17.07.2019 for hearing.

VICE CHAIRMAN




M.A.NO.231 OF 2018 IN O.A.ST.NO.1065 OF 2018 (Majid I. Shaikh V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE : 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri K. C. Sonone, learned Advocate

holding for Shri R.P. Bhumkar, learned Advocate for

the Applicant, Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 and Shri

Suresh D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for the

Respondent No.2.

2. No affidavit-in-reply is filed by the Respondents.

3. S.O. to 17.07.2019 for hearing.

VICE CHAIRMAN




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.113 OF 2012 (Bhagwat T. Kadam V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER : Shri Kiran G. Salunke, learned Advocate for the


Heard Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,

learned Present Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents has filed on

record affidavit of Respondent No.3 in compliance of

the interim order dated 30.07.2018 and 03.04.2019

along with the affidavit-in-reply of the Respondent No.1

and some other relevant document. The same are

taken on record.

3. As none appeared for the Applicant, S.O. to

04.07.2019 for passing dismissal order.

VICE CHAIRMAN




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.939 OF 2016 (Rajendra B. Salvi V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER : Shri Jayant B. Choudhary, learned Advocate for

the Applicant has filed leave note.

Heard Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,

learned Present Officer for the Respondents.

2. In view of the leave note of the Advocate for the

Applicant, S.O. to 04.07.2019.

VICE CHAIRMAN




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.585 OF 2017 (Anandidas B. Pane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER : Shri Suhas B. Ghute, learned Advocate for the


Heard Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Present Officer

for the Respondents.

2. This Original Application has been fixed for final

hearing. It seems that the Applicant is not diligent in

prosecuting the matter. Hence, S.O. to 05.07.2019 for

passing dismissal order.

VICE CHAIRMAN




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.263 OF 2018 ( Baban D. Dolzake V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN DATE 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.A. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Present

Officer for the Respondents.

2. Heard both sides. Reserved for order.

VICE CHAIRMAN




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.694 OF 2018 (Speaking to Minutes)

( Somnath S. Reddy V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN (This matter is placed before the Single Bench due to non-availability of Division Bench.)

DATE 19.06.2019

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Avinash S. Deshmukh, learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan,

learned Chief Present Officer for the Respondents.

2. On perusal of the order dated 17.06.2019, it

reveals that in last line of the para no. 6, the word ‘who

has’ has been wrongly typed instead of ‘on the post of’.

The said mistake requires to be corrected.

3. In view of this, the last line of the para no. 6 of

the order dated 17.06.2019 be corrected as ‘on the

post of’ instead of ‘who has’.

4. The Registry of this Tribunal is directed to issue

corrected order to the parties.

VICE CHAIRMAN



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD M.A.NO.226 OF 2019 IN O.A.NO.930 of 2018

( Dnyanoba B. Panchal V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B. P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN (This matter is placed before the Single Bench due to non-availability of Division Bench.)

DATE 19.06.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri G.K. Muneshwar, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned

Present Officer for the Respondents.

2. The Applicant has filed the present Misc. Application

to set aside the order of dismissal dated 04.04.2019 passed

in O.A. No.930/2018 and to restore the same to its original

number.

3. On perusal of record, it reveals that no justifiable

ground for restoration of Original Application No.930/2018

has been mentioned by the applicant in the M.A. However,

considering the valuable rights involved in the O.A., in my

view, it is just and proper to allow the Misc. Application and

to set aside the order of dismissal passed in O.A.

4. In view of above, the Misc. Application is allowed

subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- on or before

28.06.2019. On depositing the costs by the Applicant, the

order of dismissal passed in O.A.No.930/2018 be set aside

and Original Application be restored to its original number.

On failure to deposit the amount of costs, the Misc.

Application stands dismissed automatically. No order as

to cots.

VICE CHAIRMAN SAS ORAL ORDER 19.06.2019 bpp



M.A. NO. 500/2018 IN O.A. ST. NO. 2040/2018 (Valu Waman Deshmukh & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : B.P. PATIL, VICE CHAIRMAN (This matter is placed before the Single Bench due to non-availability of Division Bench.)

DATE : 19.6.2019 ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri A.S. Bayas, learned Advocate for the

applicants and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondents.

2. Learned Advocate for the applicants seeks time

to file misc. application for amendment. Time granted.

3. S.O. to 28.6.2019.

VICE CHAIRMAN ARJ ORAL ORDER 19.6.2019



C.P. 77/2018 IN O.A. NO. 494/2016 (Shri Laxmikant G. Ratnaparkhi V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri S.B. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting

Officer for the respondents.

2. With the consent of both the sides, S.O. to

26.6.2019.




C.P. 8/2019 IN O.A. NO. 893/2016 (Shri Vijay N. Chavan V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri B.G. Deshmukh, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned



3.7.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 39/2018 (Shri Ravi S. Wankhade V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri S.R. Patil, learned Advocate for the




12.7.2019 for hearing on the line of order dtd.

13.3.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 141/2018 (Smt. Nanda P. Bankar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri V.B. Wagh, learned Advocate for the

applicant, Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting Officer

for the respondent no. 1 and Shri A.S. Deshmukh,

learned Advocate for respondent no. 2.

2. Shri Deshmukh, learned Advocate has filed

affidavit in reply of res. no. 2. It is taken on record

and copy thereof has been supplied to other side.

3. At the request of learned Advocate for the

applicant, S.O. 12.7.2019 for filing rejoinder, if any.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 156/2018 (Shri Dnyanoba B. Panchal V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri D.T. Devane, learned Advocate for


learned Presenting Officer for the respondents.

2. At the request of learned Presenting Officer, S.O.

to 12.7.2019 for taking instructions from the

concerned respondents on the line of the order dated

28.1.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 223/2018 (Shri Madhav V. Kale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri G.M. Ghongade, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondent nos. 1 to 3.

None appears for respondent nos. 4 & 6, though duly

served.

2. Shri S.N. Gaikwad, learned Advocate has filed his

V.P. for res. no. 5, which is taken on record. He seeks

time for filing affidavit in reply on behalf of res. no. 5.

Time granted.

3. In the circumstances, S.O. to 2.7.2019 for filing

affidavit in reply of res. no. 5.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 119/2018 (Smt. Jyoti L. Rathod V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri Santosh N. Patne, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned



15.7.2019 for hearing.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 472/2018 (Shri Kishor G. Lalsare V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri K.B. Jadhav, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting



to 15.7.2019 for filing sur-rejoinder.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 474/2018 (Shri Prashant P. Vaidya V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri S.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay S. Deshpande, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned



to 15.7.2019 for filing affidavit in reply of res. nos. 1

&2.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 476/2018 (Smt. Aasha S. Khairnar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri S.R. Patil, learned Advocate for the




applicant, S.O. to 12.7.2019 for filing rejoinder.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 512/2018 (Shri Ashok L. Supekar (Died) through L.Rs. Smt. Lalita w/o Ashok Supekar V/s.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


DATE : 19.6.2019 ORAL ORDER : Shri S.K. Mathpati, learned Advocate for the

applicant (absent). Shri B.S. Deokar, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondents, is present.


to 17.7.2019 for taking instructions from the

concerned respondents regarding sanction of pension

/ family pension as referred in the order dtd.

10.4.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 567/2018 (Smt. Shubhangi M. Sonawane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri Ganesh Jadhav, learned Advocate

holding for Shri A.S. Shelke, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned







ORIGINAL APPLICATION 650/2018 (Shri Shivaji R. Phalgaonkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for the

applicant (leave note). Shri N.U. Yadav, learned


2. In view of leave note of learned Advocate for the

applicant, S.O. to 26.6.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 638/2018 (Shri Rajkumar D. Barwal V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri B.V. Thombre, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting



to 26.6.2019 for filing affidavit in reply of res. no. 1

and 2.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 701/2018 (Dr. Santosh N. Kotule & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri G.M. Ghongade, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, learned Advocate

for the applicant, Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting

Officer for the respondent nos. 1 & 2, Shri V.V. Ingle,

learned Advocate for respondent nos. 5, 8, 19 & 22

and Shri U.P. Giri, learned Advocate for respondent

no. 12. None appears for other respondents.

2. At the request of learned P.O. as well as learned

Advocates for respective respondents, S.O. to 2.7.2019

for filing affidavit in reply of respective respondents.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 732/2018 (Shri Akhtarkhan Shahajadekhan Pathan & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra &

Ors.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


DATE : 19.6.2019 ORAL ORDER : Smt. Suchita A. Dhongde, learned Advocate for

the applicants (absent). Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned



to 26.6.2019 for filing affidavit in reply on behalf of res.

no. 2.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 813/2018 (Shri Robinson R. Masih V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




None appears for the applicant. Shri M.P. Gude,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondents, is

present.

2. In view of absence of applicant and his learned

Advocate, S.O. to 23.7.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 820/2018 (Shri Rohit S. Mhaske & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri U.U. Wagh, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION 871/2018 (Dr. Chandrakant S. Shete V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri Dhiraj S. Gupta, learned Advocate

holding for Shri K.M. Nagarkar, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting







M.A. 509/2017 IN O.A. ST. 1671/2017 AND

M.A. 510/2017 IN O.A. ST. 1672/2017 AND

M.A. 511/2017 IN O.A. ST. 1673/2017 (Sambhaji S. Patil & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 19.6.2019

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Nitin K. Chaudhari, learned Advocate

for the applicants in all these cases and Smt. M.S.

Patni, learned Presenting Officer for the respondents in

all these cases.






M.A. 154/2018 IN O.A. ST. 576/2018 (Smt. Samta R. Lokhande V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Smt. Aparna S. Kulkarni, learned

Advocate holding for Shri Y.P. Deshmukh, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Smt. Priya R.

Bharaswadkar, learned Presenting Officer for the

respondents.






M.A. 221/2019 IN O.A. 84/2019 (Shri Kishor U. Chavan V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri A.S. Londhe, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Anil P. Piratwad, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Sanjivani Deshmukh Ghate,







M.A. 224/2019 IN O.A. 236/2019 (Shri Sanjay B. Udar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri K.B. Jadhav, learned Advocate for



2. Learned P.O. has filed affidavit in reply on behalf

of res. no. 2 in O.A. It is taken on record and copy

thereof has been supplied to the learned Advocate for

the applicant.






ORIGINAL APPLICATION 209/2004 (Shri Shaikh Abdul Khaja Miyah V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri S.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay S. Deshpande, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief



24.6.2019 for final hearing.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION 612/2014 (Smt. Vidya T. Sakhare & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri R.L. Kute, learned Advocate for the

applicants and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief







ORIGINAL APPLICATION 628/2015 (Shri Vijay W. Chahakar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)






the applicant and Smt. Sanjivani Deshmukh Ghate,





Date post:	19-Feb-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	4 times
Download:	0 times

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE MAHARASHTRA … · farad continuation sheet in the maharashtra...

Documents