+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White...

Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White...

Date post: 02-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 7 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
8
Figure 1.1 Married Men Ages Twenty to Forty-Nine, with Children Under Age Eighteen, Who Were Employed in Manufacturing, Construction, or Transportation, by Race, 1880–2010 Source: Ruggles et al. (2010). Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 White 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1880 Year Manufacturing Construction Transit/Utilities Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 African American 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1880 Year Manufacturing Construction Transit/Utilities
Transcript
Page 1: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

8 Labor’s Love Lost

Figure 1.1 married men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with Children Under age eighteen, who were employed in manufacturing, Construction, or transportation, by race, 1880–2010

Source: Ruggles et al. (2010).

Perc

enta

ge

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2010

White

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

1880

Year

ManufacturingConstructionTransit/Utilities

Perc

enta

ge

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2010

African American

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

1880

Year

ManufacturingConstructionTransit/Utilities

Page 2: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

Source: Ruggles et al. (2010).

Perc

enta

ge

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2010

Whites

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

1880

Year

High andRising

Inequality,1880–1910

NarrowingInequality,1910–1950

Low andStable

Inequality,1950–1979 W

iden

ing

Ineq

ualit

y High andRising

Inequality,1987–2010

Perc

enta

ge

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2010

African Americans

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

1880

Year

Service WorkersCraftsmen andOperatives

Professional, Technical, andManagerial Occupations

High andRising

Inequality,1880–1910

NarrowingInequality,1910–1950

Low andStable

Inequality,1950–1979 W

iden

ing

Ineq

ualit

y RisingIncome

Inequality,1987–2010

Figure 1.2 married, U.s.- Born men ages twenty to Forty- nine, by (nonfarm) occupational group, 1880–2010 (whites) and 1900–2010 (african americans)

Page 3: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

40 Labor’s Love Lost

Perc

enta

ge

20

15

10

5

0

Whites

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 19501880

Year

ServiceWorkers andLaborers

Clerical andSales Workers

Professional,Technical, andManagerialOccupations

CraftsmenOperatives

Perc

enta

ge

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

African Americans

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 19501880

Year

Service Workers and LaborersCraftsmen Operatives

Figure 2.1 Children ages ten to Fifteen who were in the Labor Force, by (nonfarm) occupation of household head, 1880–1950

Source: Ruggles et al. (2010).

Page 4: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

good times and hard times 65

of family life that had first emerged among native- born Protestants in the early 1800s.9

The idea of a wife who was solely involved with domestic activities was beyond the reach of most working- class families. Nevertheless, it was an influential model. And about 1890 a new word appeared in the English language that had the connotation of a wife who was fully immersed in domestic activities and who earned no income either outside or inside the home: “homemaker.” We can see the emergence of the term “homemaker” with the aid of a massive data set of published words. In 2004 Google be-gan a project to scan every word of millions of books, including more than 5 million published from 1810 to the late 2000s—about 4 percent of the books ever published. The resulting database can be searched for words or short phrases by year of publication. Figure 3.1 shows the frequency of the words “homemaker” and “housewife” per million words in books pub-

Num

ber

of A

ppea

ranc

es(p

er 1

Mill

ion

Wor

ds)

4

3.5

3

2.5

2

1.5

1

0.5

0

1810

–181

9

1820

–182

9

1830

–183

9

1840

–184

9

1850

–185

9

1860

–186

9

1870

–187

9

1890

–189

9

1880

–188

9

1900

–190

9

1910

–191

9

1920

–192

9

1930

–193

9

1940

–194

9

1950

–195

9

1960

–196

9

1970

–197

9

1980

–198

9

1990

–199

9

2000

–200

7

Decade

HomemakerHousewife

Source: Davies (2011) and Michel et al. (2011).

Figure 3.1 number of times the words “homemaker” and “housewife” appear per 1 million words in Books published in the United states, by decade, 1810–1819 to 2000–2007

Page 5: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

110 Labor’s Love Lost

of life. It provided a label for a range of behaviors that went beyond whether or not a person was doing industrial labor. This usage reached a high point in the 1970s, just as the growth of industrial employment was slowing, and then it declined. The fact that the usage of “white collar” also grew through the 1970s and then declined suggests that the two meta-phors had become linked. The distinction between blue- collar work and white- collar work had become part of the language and the culture.32

The “blue collar” metaphor had both positive and negative connota-tions. On the positive side, Americans thought of blue- collar workers as embodying virtues such as hard work and personal responsibility. Of course, working with one’s hands had long been celebrated in America—think of the legend of John Henry the steel driver, building the railroads during the nineteenth century, or of Paul Bunyan, the giant lumberjack. And farm families had long been seen as hardworking: up before sunrise to feed the animals, working until dark to harvest the crops. But as the urban population soared and industrial employment grew as well, the

Num

ber

of A

ppea

ranc

es(p

er 1

Mill

ion

Wor

ds)

21.81.61.41.2

10.80.60.40.2

0

1810

–181

9

1820

–182

9

1830

–183

9

1840

–184

9

1850

–185

9

1860

–186

9

1870

–187

9

1890

–189

9

1880

–188

9

1900

–190

9

1910

–191

9

1920

–192

9

1930

–193

9

1940

–194

9

1950

–195

9

1960

–196

9

1970

–197

9

1980

–198

9

1990

–199

9

2000

–200

7

Decade

Blue CollarWhite Collar

Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar” appear per 1 million words in Books published in the United states, by decade, 1810–1819 to 2000–2007

Source: Davies (2011) and Michel et al. (2011).

Page 6: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

126 Labor’s Love Lost

they could contribute a good income, therefore increasing their likelihood of marrying. We could call this an income effect: the more income women have, the more they marry. Second, women’s increased earnings could have reduced their desire to marry by providing them with an indepen-dent source of income. We could call this an independence effect: the more income women have, the less they marry. In practice, among women with-out bachelor’s degrees, the independence effect seems to have been stron-ger: between 1980 and 2010 these women became less likely to have ever been married. Perhaps the independence effect won out because so few young men had good earnings prospects that an acceptable marriage part-ner was hard to find and remaining single seemed the better option. The availability of cash assistance to low- income mothers from government social welfare programs may also have strengthened the independence effect. For instance, spending on the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which assists low- income parents with children, rose sharply after 1985. In any event, an increasing number of young women without bachelor’s de-grees never married. They did not, however, forgo childbearing as much, leading to a rise in the proportion of children who were born to cohabiting couples or single mothers.9

Figure 5.1 Changes in real hourly earnings, by education, 1979–2007

Source: Autor (2010). Reprinted with permission.

Perc

enta

ge

40

30

20

10

0

–10

–20

MenWomen

No HighSchoolDegree

HighSchoolDegree

SomeCollege

CollegeDegree

PostcollegeEducation

Page 7: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

136 Labor’s Love Lost

rangements of children whose mothers had bachelor’s degrees or more, the group that I have called the college- educated middle class. You can see how short the black bars are compared to the gray and white bars, and you can see that the height of the black bars does not change much over time. This means that only a small proportion of children were living with

Figure 5.2 Children Living with an Unmarried mother, by the mother’s education, 1980–2010

Source: My tabulations, pursuant to Stykes and Williams (2013), from the IPUMS data.

Perc

enta

ge

30

25

20

15

10

5

01980 1990 2000 2010

Year

Whites

College Degree High School Degree/Some College

No High School Degree

Perc

enta

ge

50

40

30

20

10

0

1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

Nonwhites

College Degree High School Degree/Some College

No High School Degree

Page 8: Figure 1.1 m arried men ages twenty to Forty-nine, with ... and Figures.pdf · Blue Collar White Collar Figure 4.1 number of times the phrases “Blue Collar” and “white Collar”

156 Labor’s Love Lost

second most important increased over time, especially in the more recent surveys. In contrast, the percentage who rated the characteristic “work important and gives a feeling of accomplishment” as most important or second most important decreased over time. The trends were very similar for women—this was not just a shift in values among men. As with high school seniors, American adults seem to have shifted toward valuing less- demanding work and away from the intrinsic rewards of work.6

Yet what is notable is that the shift in preferences shown by the GSS oc-curred not only among the less- educated adults whom some have labeled as not industrious enough, but also among highly educated adults. Figure 6.1 shows the percentage of twenty- five- to forty- four- year- old men who rated “working hours are short, lots of free time” as the most important or second most important job characteristic, by educational group. The line marked with squares shows the overall trend: an increase from 13 percent

Perc

enta

ge

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

1973–1984 1985–1994 2006–2012

Year

All Educational LevelsLess Than a High School DegreeHigh School Degree to One toThree Years of CollegeFour-Year College Degree or More

Source: General Social Survey.

Figure 6.1 employed men ages twenty-Five to Forty-Four who rated “working hours are short, Lots of Free time,” as most Important or second most Important of Five Job Characteristics


Recommended