Final Ppt CSR

8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR

1/40

CSR IGNORED

Group Members:

Vigyat Bhardwaj 03

Vanita Kundapur 25 Sampada Modey 30

Sanket Nayak 32

Prerna Tuli 55


2/40

OVERVIEW

In the year 2000 Coca-Cola Company set up a bottling plant in

Plachimada, Palakkad district , Kerala

The Company occupied an area of around 34 acres of land for

the bottling plant

The land was classified arable by Govt.

About Palakkad district:

80% of population depends upon agriculture for their

livelihood

Lies in rain shadow area of the Western Ghats and is a

drought-prone area

Depends heavily on canal irrigation and groundwater

Hence, it is most likely that, the location of an industrial

plant itself can be seen as the beginning of the problem


3/40

PROBLEMS FACED

People of Plachimada started to suffer adversities within six

months

Salinity and hardness of the water had risen

Water from some open wells and shallow bore wells nearby

allegedly had strong bitter taste

The people complained of a variety of illnesses such as a

burning sensation in the skin of the face; greasy, sticky hair;

stomach disorders and skin deformities

Also reported that a few wells in the nearby area had becomedry due to the over extraction of groundwater

The insufficiency of water had also resulted in the decline of

agricultural production

Local economy and life in the area was ruined


4/40

This was due to over extraction of groundwater both in quality

and quantity by the Company

It involved the question of right to life, the right to livelihood

and the emerging jurisprudence of environmental law Due to this hue and cry the Perumatty Grama Panchayat

passed a resolution on 7 April 2003 refusing to renew the

license given to the Company

The matter came before the High Court of Kerala on twooccasions and is now pending before the Supreme Court of

India


5/40

THE LEGAL BATTLE

Single Bench Decision

The Court rejected allegations of the Panchayat on the ground

that: the Panchayat is not competent to go into the quality of

the beverages produced.

Strongly relied upon the public trust doctrine

It was decided that:

The Company should be restrained from excessive extraction

of groundwater from its land

Should be permitted to extract the groundwater, which must be

equivalent to the water normally used for irrigating the cropsin 34 acres of plot

Panchayat was given the power to monitor and inspect the

groundwater consumption of the Company


6/40

DIVISION BENCH DECISION

Disapproved the reasoning of the single bench based on publictrust doctrine

Discredited the powers of the Panchayat under the Kerala

Panchayat Raj Act

Recognized groundwater as a private water resource andaccepted the proposition of law that the landowner has

proprietary right over it.

Rejected the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) report on

the purity of the cola on the ground that the JPC report had not

referred to any samples collected from the factory in

Plachimada


7/40

Not satisfied with the Division Bench Decision,the village folk of

Plachimada complained to state authorities which forced them

to pass a legislation in favour of the village folk.


8/40

FINAL JUDGMENT

The State Legislature of Kerala passed a legislation that theCompany should give compensation of Rs.216 cr.to theaffected individuals

This decision was passed by a tribunal(3-member body)formed by the State Legislature

The Committee came to the conclusion that the Company isresponsible for these damages and it is obligatory that they paythe compensation to the affected people for the agriculturallosses, health problems, loss of wages, loss of educationalopportunities, and the pollution caused to the water resources

Coca-Colas bottling plant in Plachimada has been shutdown since March 2004

The case is currently pending in the Supreme Court ofIndia


9/40

GROUND-WATER ACT

After this problem, the Kerala State Legislature passed a

Ground-Water Act 2002

Ground Water Act:

The Act focuses on the conservation, regulation and control of

extraction and use of Ground Water by Private Individuals and

Companies


10/40

CASE STUDY-

GULF OF MEXICO OIL SPILLAGE


11/40

CONTENTS

About Deepwater Horizon RIG and Explosion.

Actions taken by BP to stem the oil leakage.

Spill Management by BP, the effects of the oil spill.


12/40

PETROLEUM OIL SPILL

An oil spill is a release of a liquid petroleum hydrocarbon intothe environment due to human activity, and is a form of

pollution.

The term oil spill often refers to marine oil spills, where oil is

released into the ocean or coastal waters.

Oil spills include releases of crude oil from- Oil Tankers

- Offshore platforms/pipelines

- Drilling rigs and wells


13/40

GULF OF MEXICO

It is the 11th largest body of water in the world.

It is an ocean basin largely surrounded by the US states of

Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas


14/40

DEEPWATERHORIZON RIG

Dynamically positioned, Semi-Submersible offshore oil drilling rig.

Owned by

Leased to British Petroleum .

Cost of the RIG was US$560 million.

Located in the Gulf of Mexico at thedepth of water 5,000 feet

(1524 m).


15/40

FEATURES OF DWH (RIG)

Built by Hyundai Heavy Industries, Completed on 2001.

Commissioned by R&B Falcon.

Length -> 112 m , Height 97.4 m.

In 2002,the RIG was upgraded with e-drill (A drillmonitoring system whereby Received real-time drilling datafrom the RIG and transmitted maintenance andTroubleshooting information).


16/40

ACHIEVEMENTS OF DWH (RIG)

The SEP 2009,The RIG drilled the worlds

deepest oil well in history at a vertical depthof 35,055 ft in the Tiber field at Keatheley

Canyon.


17/40

REASON FOR DISASTER

Absence of certain safety documentation and emergencyprocedure documentation

Monthly inspection for first 40 months

But 25% of inspections were omitted

Bureau of Ocean Energy (BOE) is the regulatory andinspection body for offshore oil drilling and RIG in USA.


18/40

DEEPWATERHORIZON OIL SPILL

Location-Gulf of Mexico

Spill Date-20th April 2010

Well officially sealed-19th September 2010

Spilled volume-4900000 barrels.

Spill area-6500 to 180000 km2.


19/40

THE DISASTER OIL SPILL IN GULF OF

MEXICO


20/40

On 20-Apr-10, 23:00 EST the Deepwater Horizon oil rig of

British Petroleum (BP), located in the Mississippi Canyon

about 52 miles off the Louisiana coast, suffered a catastrophicexplosion, 11 crew members were killed of the total 126

workers aboard the rig at the time of the blast.

On29-Apr-10

the U.S. government revealed that

approximately 5,000 barrels of oil per day (210,000 gallons)

was being leaked into the ocean.

On 01-May-10, the oil spill cleanup efforts are underway.

On 27-May-10, USGS had revised the estimate of the leak

from 5,000 barrels a day to 12,000-19,000 barrels a day.


21/40

On 20-June-10, the leak was almost 100,000 barrels a day

As of30-June-10, Deepwater Horizon has spilled 73 million

to 126 million gallons of oil into sea.

On 15-July-10, BP said the leak had been stopped by capping

the gushing oil wellhead.


22/40

Explosion and Leakage

CAUSES

Failure of cement for thetemporary capping.

Failure of Blind shearrams of Blow OutPreventer.


23/40

Q4000 managed to collect about 10,000 barrels per day.

The damaged equipment were improved

STEPS BY BP


24/40

Relief WellsBP after anticipating the extent of leakage started digging two

relief wells such that they will intersect at the oil well on

completion.


25/40

Oil Recovery


26/40

Finally BP stopped the oil

flow for the first time since

20th April.

Tests were also conducted

for further possible leaks.

The results tests werepositive.


27/40

Efforts to protect the coastline & marine

equipments

CONTAINMENT

EFFORTS DISPERSAL

REMOVAL


28/40

Containment

o Oil containment boom

BP installed $4.5million worthboom, for 2500miles.

Convenient, Foldable and

Lightweight

Uses are Collection and

Protection.

o Barrier island plan

Building sand berms off the

coast, to catch the oil before itreached the wetlands..


29/40

Dispersal

Spilled oil disperses, naturally. Chemical Dispersants accelerate that process.

Dispersants can cause Genetic mutations and

Cancer.


30/40

Removal Burning the oil (In-situ burning).

25% of the oil had been removedfrom gulf, as per NOAA.

92000-tones of oily solids wereremoved from the Gulf coast

beach.

BP had spent $16 billion onrestoration and cleanup.

Oil-eating bacteria were used toclean the oil

CategoryCategory EstimateEstimate

Direct recovery fromDirect recovery from

wellheadwellhead17%17%

Burned at the surfaceBurned at the surface 5%5%

Skimmed from theSkimmed from the

surfacesurface3%3%

Chemically dispersedChemically dispersed 8%8%

Naturally dispersedNaturally dispersed16%16%

Evaporated or dissolvedEvaporated or dissolved25%25%

Residual remainingResidual remaining26%26%


31/40

Impact on Marine Community

Oil+Water=Mousse (sticky substance). Damage the airways of Birds and Animals.

Chemicals that are inhaled may damage liver, immune

systems, brain function lead to death.

Fish larvae, turtle eggs also damage. Sea grass and coral also affect.

Oil or Dispersants on the sea can cause skin irritation,

chemical burns and infections.


32/40

IMPACTON ENVIRONMENT

Oil on the water surface can catch fire and pollute the air.

Oil can react with oxygen in the air to form acids that are carried by wind

and eventually fall back to the ground as acid rain.

Oil washes up on beaches and marshes resulting in life threatening habitatsfor wildlife species.


33/40

POLITICAL IMPACT

Public expectations about the President's image-

based actions conflicted with the practicalities of

understanding and responding to an unprecedented and

intellectually incomprehensible disaster

This spill has badly affected President Obama's decision to

open up new regions to offshore drilling.

Lawmakers called for an enquiry into safety regulations.


34/40

CONSEQUENCES

o Ecology As of Nov-10, 6814-Dead animals

collected.

Birds like pelicans,herons and Sea

Turtles.

Fishes, Dolphins and other

mammals.

Shrimps, Crabs, Pyrosomes and

Coral reefs also affected.

Four Bird rehabilitation centers,

seven marine mammal and Sea

turtle rehabilitation centers wereopened.


35/40

Economic

Between Apr-20 and Jul-15,2010, almost 5-million barrels of oilwere released into the gulf.

From that, 800000-barrels captured.

Fisheries and Tourism were affected directly.

As per NOAA, 20% of U.S Oyster production, 75% of U.SShrimp production depends the Gulf coast which was affected

The stakeholders were affected as the share prices collapsed

Contd..


36/40

OTHER CONSEQUENCES

Many people cancelled their vacations

due to the spill. Fall in real estate prices.


37/40

Recent Developments

Oct,2011

State and Federal Agencies of US have accused BP for

violating Clean Water Act and Natural Resource Damage Act

BP is accused by Justice Dept. of United States for criminal

activity and civil liability and has to pay respective fines


38/40


39/40

References

http://www.nwf.org.

http:// www.oceana.org

http:// www.//bbc.co.uk//news.

http://www.nasdaq.com.

http://www.doi.gov//news.

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7393211n#ixzz1kHFQ7yYt


40/40

Date post:	06-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	sanket-nayak
View:	246 times
Download:	2 times

Final Ppt CSR

Documents