Front Matter

Front MatterSource: Harvard Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 1 (Nov., 1914), pp. xxxi-xxxixPublished by: The Harvard Law Review AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1326503 .

Accessed: 21/05/2014 03:32

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

The Harvard Law Review Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toHarvard Law Review.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 195.78.109.38 on Wed, 21 May 2014 03:32:45 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=harvardlaw

http://www.jstor.org/stable/1326503?origin=JSTOR-pdf

http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp


VOL. XXVIII] TABLE OF CASES xxxi

TABLE OF CASES

References in heavy-faced type are to NOTES; all others are to RECENT CASES.

Citations to decisions which were noticed before their appearance in any reg- ular report have been supplied wherever possible.

PAGE

Aalholm v. People . . . . . . I07

Abbott v. Anderson . . . . . 515

Acme White Lead & Color Works, Adams v. . . . . .III

Aczel, United States v. . . . . 8io Adam's Estate, In re . . . . . 529

Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color Works . . . . . . .III

Adams v. Gordon . . . . . 323

AEtna Indemnity Co., Mac- Donald v. . . . . . . . . 522

Allen, London County Coun- cil V.. . . . . . . . . 20I, 2I3

American Art Works v. Chicago Picture Frame Works . . . 43I

American League Baseball Club of Chicago v. Chase . . . . 2I3

American Radiator Co. v. Rogge 524

Andersch, Lamoreaux v. . . . 714

Anderson, Abbott v. . . . . . 5I5

Anderson v. Western Union Tel. Co ........... . 633

Arbitration Agreement between Lazard Freres and L. Vogel- stein & Co., In the Matter of the ..... . . . . . . 407

Arizona & New Mexico Ry. Co. v. Clark .... . . . . . 532

Arlidge, Local Government Board v. . . . . . . . i98, 207

Aronowitz v. Woollard . . . . 8ii Asher, Wichita Falls & W. Ry.

Co. of Texas v. . . . . . . 635 Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.,

De Sedillo . . . . . . 795, 820

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. McCabe v. . . . . . . 417, 425

Atlantic City El. Co., Barnett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 8i8

Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co., Floyd v . . . . . . . . . . 322

Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co., Rogers v. . . . . . . . . . 637

PAGE

Attorney-General v. Bickford . 7I5

Attorney-General, Raich v. 496, 5I9

Aubrey v. O'Byrne . . . . . 325

Bank of Donalsonville, Spooner V ........... . 205

Bank of Midland v. Harris . 422, 427

Barnett v. Atlantic City El. Co. 8i8 Barton, Gulla v. . . . . . . . 427

Battle Creek, City of, v. Goguac Resort Ass'n . . . . . . . io6

Bawden, Lucy v. . . . . . . 329

Baxter Tel. Co. v. Cherokee County Mut. Tel. Ass'n . . 8I5

Beaver v. Mason, Ehrman & Co. 433 Benedict, General Rubber Co.

v. . . . . . . . . . . 409, 427 Bickford, Attorney-General v. . 7I5 Biles, W. S., & Co. v. Elliotte. . 2II

Birmingham, E. & B. R. Co. v. Williams . . . . . . . 5II, 525

Board of Commissioners, State ex rel. Foote v. 523

Board of Public Utilitv Commis- sioners, Public Service Gas Co. V. 50. .50 526

Bond v. Ungerecht . . . . . . II4 Bosley v. McLaughlin . . . . 704

Boston & Maine R. Co. v. Niles 709

Boston Store of Chicago, Hart- nett v. . . . . . . . . . . 435

Bracey v. Darst . . . . . . . 626 Branson, In re . . . . . . . 54

Brantley v. State . . . . . . . 520

Branum, International Travel- er's Ass'n v.. . . . . . . . 209

Breitung, Kleist v . . . . . . 605 British Red Cross Balkan Fund,

In re . . . . . . . . . 193, 2i6

Brown v. Brown . . . . . . . io9

Brown v. Fletcher . . . . 507, 530

Brown, Southern Garage Co. v. ioi Buie, Sutton v. . . . . . . . 634



xxxii HARVARD LAW REVIEW [VOL. XXV:

PAGE

Burdick v. United States . 6og, 642 Burnes v. New Mineral Fertilizer

Co.3. ....... 3

C. Klink Packing Co., People v ........ 496, 5I9

Camp, Martin v. . . . . . . i0o Campbell, Second National Bank

of Vincennes v. .. . . . . 624 Campbell's Creek R. Co., Moss

V ........... . 526 Casper v. Kalt-Zimmers Mfg.

CO. ......... . . 5I9 Central of Georgia Ry. Co.,

Wright v. (236 U. S. 674) . . 703

Central Vermont Ry. Co., Davis V. ........... . 7i6

Charles Schweinler Press, People v. . . . . . . . . . . 790, 8i9

Charles Warner Co. v. Delaware, L.&W.R.Co ...... . 5i6

Chase, American League Base- ball Club of Chicago v. . . . 2I3

Chasm Power Co., McCann v. . 209

Cherokee County Mut. Tel. Ass'n, Baxter Tel. Co. v. . . 8I5

Chester County, etc. Co. v. Se- curities Co ......... 625

Chicago Picture Frame Works, American Art Works v. . . . 43I

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., Farmers' Elevator Co. v. i98, 8o8

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., Neldert v. . . . . . . . . 705

Choctaw, Oklahoma, & Gulf R. Co. v. Harrison .... . . 528

Chotiner, Matter of . . . . . 3i8 Cieloha, Gillihan v. . . . . . 702

City of Battle Creek v. Goguac Resort Ass'n . . . . . . . io6

City of Philadelphia, Harrison v. 428 City of Watervliet, Hildreth

Granite Co. v ....... . 204 City of Wheeling v. Natural Gas

Co. of West Virginia . . . .io Clark, Arizona & New Mexico

Ry. Co. v. .... . . . . 532 Cobb v. Saxby . . . . . . 499, 520

Cohen, Nieberg v. . . . . 5II, 530 Coit v. Owenby-Wofford Co.. . 208 College Township v. Fishburn . 636 Commonwealth v. Karvonen. . 33I Commonwealth, Melton v. . . 426 Commonwealth v. Smith . . . 8i8 Conley, Norfolk & Western Ry.

Co. V. (236 U. S. 605) 683, 7I6

PAGE Connors v. Old Forge Discount

& Deposit Bank . . . . . . 3I9 Consolidated Coal Co., Teti v. . 5i8 Continental Insurance Co.,

Robinson & Co. v. . . . 3I2, 3I7 Continental Tyre & Rubber Co.,

Ltd., v. Daunler Co., Ltd. 629 Cope, Sioux Remedy Co. v. . 43I Coppage v. Kansas . . . 496, 5i8 Corby v. Foster . . . . . . . 330 Corn Products Refining Co.,

Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. 69i, 7I0

Cort, Hart v. . . . . . . . . 639 Cowan v. Ramsey . . . . . . I02

Crane, People v. . . 496, 5i9, 628 Crawford Bros., The, No. 2 200, 203

Crawford's Estate . . . . . . 434 Crosby's Estate, In re . . i96, 207

Crow's Nest Pass Coal Co., Topay v. . . . . . . . 3I2, 3I7

Dallas County, Yost v. . . 6I7, 640 Dana Co., Matter of .437 Dana v. Morgan. 8I2

Danzinger v. Seamen's Bank for Savings . . . . . . . . 430

Darst, Bracey v.. . . . . . . 626 Daunler Co., Ltd., Continental

Tyre & Rubber Co., Ltd., v. . 629

Davisv. Central Vermont Ry. Co. 7i6 Davis, Evers v. . . . . . . . IIi

Davis v. Littlefield . . . . . 9I, I00 Davis, Standard Home Co. v. . 626 Davis, The John, Co. v. Illinois

Surety Co. .... . . . . 528 Dazey v. New York Central &

H. R. R. Co. .... . . . 5I7 Deakin, University Club of Chi-

cago ..... . . . . . . 522

Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., Charles Warner Co. v. . . . 5I6

Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., Jaco- wicz V. . . . . . . . . . 7I3

De Martini, People v. . . . . 53I Denison, Gardner v. . . . . . io6 D'Epinoix's Settlement, In re . 2I6 De Sedillo, Atchison, T. & S. F.

Ry. Co. v. . . . . . . 795, 820 Detroit United Ry., Norris v. 8I4 Dieudonne, Jewison v. . . . 33I Dobson v. Horsley . . . . . . 329 Drew v. Thaw . . . . . . . 430 Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co. . 628 Dueringer v. Klocke . . . . . 2I0

Durand & Co. v. Howard & Co. 328



VOL. XXVIII] TABLE OF CASES xxxiii

PAGE

Eaton v. Shiawassee County. 715

Ehlert, Nunn v. . . . . . . . 2I7 Elder, Gould v. . . . . . 505, 525 Elliotte, W. S. Biles & Co. v. . . 2II

Emanuel v. Misicki , . 424

Epling, Rowe v.. . . . . . . 8I3 Erie R. Co., United States v.

(236 U. S. 259) . . . . . . 635 Evers v. Davis . . . . . . . iii

Fairbanks v. McDonald . . . 529

Fallas, Wolverine Spice Co. v. . 2I3

Farmers' Elevator Co. v. Chi- cago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. . i98, 8o8

Farmers' Elevator Co., Street v. 627 Fawcett v. Smethhurst . . . . 52I

Fayette Liquor Co. v. Jones . . 520

Fiedeer v. Fiedeer . . . . . . i09

First National Bank of Ashton, Soule v. . . . . . . . . . 204

Fischel, Heyne v . .1.... . I07 Fishburn, College Township v. 636 Five Per Cent Case, The . 97, 4I3 Fletcher, Brown v. . . . . 507, 530 Flood v. Pabst Brewing Co. . . 432

Floyd v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co .322

Foote, State ex rel., v. Board of Commissioners ..... . 523

Foster, Corby v. . . . .. . 330 Fourth National Bank of Fay-

etteville v. McArthur . 699, 708 Fox, Estate of . . . . . . . 426 Frank v. Manguvn . . . . 793, 8io Frear, Western Union Telegraph

Co. v. ....... . 304, 320

Gardner v. Denison . . . . io6 Garrick Theatre Co. v. Gimbel

Bros. ......... 436 Garrison, Greenleaf Johnson

Lumber Co. v ..... . 8o6, 8I4 Gaskill, Walker v. . . . . . . 2I8 General Rubber Co. v. Benedict 409,

427 General Stevedoring Co., State

of Maryland v. . . . . .. I00

Georgia, Wadley Southern R. Co. V .527

German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Lewis .84, I I3

Gillihan v. Cieloha . . . . . . 702

Gillis, In re, Ex parte McDonald 415, 425

Gimbel Bros., Garrick Theatre Co. v.436

PAGE

Gleason, Lill v. . . . . . . . I02 Globe Bank & Trust Co. of Pad-

ucah, Ky. v. Martin . ... 703 Glover v. State . . . . . . . 324 Godfree, In re . . . . . . . 333 Godsey, Virginia Railway &

Power Co. v. ..... . . 633 Goguac Resort Ass'n, City of

Battle Creek v. . . . . . . io6 Goldstein v. Pullman Co. .. I04 Goldstein v. Saunders . . . . 7I2 Gordon, Adams v. . . . . . . 323 Gould v. Elder . . . . . 505, 525 Grand Trunk Pacific Ry. Co.,

Haigh v. . . . . . . . . . 638 Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Har-

man.. ..... 638 Greenleaf Johnson Lumber Co.

v. Garrison ...... 8o6, 814 Griffin, St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co.

V. 496, 5I9 Griffiths, James, & Sons, Skinner

V. II4 Groos, In re . . . . . . . . 809 Gulla v. Barton . ... . 427

Haegle, Sassen v . . . . . . . io8 Haigh v. Grand Trunk Pacific

Ry. Co. ..... . . . . 638 Halvorson, Stenson v. . . . . io8 Hamburg-AmericanLine, United

States v. . . . . . . . . . 2 Hamburger, In re . . ... . 63I Hardman, Longyear v. . . . . 705 Harman, Great Northern Ry.

Co. v.. . . . . . . . . . . 638 Harris, Bank of Midland v. 422, 427 Harris, Illinois Central R. Co. v. 7Io Harris, In re . . . . . . . . 325 Harrison v. City of Philadelphia 428 Harrison, Choctaw, Oklahoma,

& Gulf R. Co. v ...... . 528 Hart v. Cort .... . . . 639 Hartnett v. Boston Store of

Chicago . . . . . . . . . 435 Haveron, Priboth v. . . . . . IOO Hays v. Hogan . . . . . 9I, Ioo Hazen, Walter Farrington Til-

ing Co. v......... . 8i6 Heissenbuttel v. Meagher 9I, ioo Henderson, Ray v.. . . . . . 429 Henkel, Henry v. . . . . . . 43 I Henry v. Henkel . . . . . . 431 Henry v. Tacoma Ry. & Power

Co ........... . 822 Hewson v. Shelley . . . . . . 208



xxxiv HARVARD LAW REVIEW [VOL. XXVIII

PAGE

Heyne v. Fischel . . . . . . . I07 Hildreth Granite Co. v. City of

Watervliet .... . . . . 204 Hodges, State ex ret. Kimberlite

Mining & Washing Co. v. 304, 320

Hogan, Hays v. . . . .. 9i, ioo Holte, United States v.. . . . 629 Home, Lambert v . . . . . . 207

Horsley, Dobson v. . . . . . 329

Hough v. Iderhoff . ... .. ioo Houston Belt & Terminal Ry.

Co., State v. . . . 93, II5 Houston, E. & W. T. Ry. Co.

v. United States . . . . . . II3 Howard & Co., Durand & Co. v. 328 Hoyt's Estate, In re . . . 334 Hulton v. Sherrard . . . . . 623 Hunicke v. Meramec Quarry

Co. . . . . . . . . 607, 638

Iderhoff, Hough v . . . . . . 1. ioo Illinois Central R. Co. v. Harris 7IO Illinois Central R. Co. v. Out-

land's Adm'x . . . . . . . 438 Illinois National Bank, Mc-

Bride v. . . . 205 Illinois Surety Co., ihe John

Davis Co. v. .... . . . 528 Intermountain Rate Cases, The iio International Harvester Co. v.

Missouri . . . . . . . . . I05 International Harvester Co.,

United States v. . . . . 87, II4 International Traveler's Ass'n

v. Branum . . . . . . . . 209

Interstate Telephone and Tele- graph Co. v. Public Service Electric Co. . . . . . 307, 333

Jacowicz v. Delaware, L. & W.R.Co ........ . 7I3

James Griffiths & Sons, Skinner V. .4... . . . . . . . . II4

Jewison v. Dieudonne . . . . 33I

John Davis Co., The, v. Illinois Surety Co. . . . . . . . . 528

Johnson v. Northern Trust Co. 313, 330

Jones, Fayette Liquor Co. v. . 520

Jones v. Jones . . . . . . . 7I3 Jones v. State . .. . . . . . . 428 Jones v. Zoological Society of

Philadelphia .... . . . 5I3 Jordan, Slayton v. . . . . 329

Josephine Slosson, Estate of . 332

PAGE Journeymen Bricklayer's Union,

Powers v . . . . . . . . . 630 Juno, The . . . . . . . . . 720

Justices of] Croydon, Mitchell V.. II5

Kalt-Zimmers Mfg. Co., Casper V.. 5I9

Kansas, Coppage v. . . . 496, 5i9 Karvonen, Commonwealth v. . 33I Kemp v. Lewis . . . . . . . 523 Kent, Peabody v. . . . . . . 524 Kerr, MacArthur Bros. Co. v. . 52I

Keystone Watch Case Co., United States v. . . . . . . 7I7

Killifer, Weegham v. . . . . . 2I3 Kimberlite Mining & Washing

Co., State ex rel., v. Hodges 304, 320

Kirkholder's Estate, In re . . 336 Kirkwood, Sligh v. . . . . . . 8i9 Kleist v. Breitung . . . . . . 605 Klinck, C., Packing Co., People

v. 496, 5I9 Klinker, Trenholm v. . . . . 54 Klocke, Dueringer v. . . . . . 2IO Knack, Schiller-Bund v. . . . 7II Knapp, Wright v. . . . . . . 631 Kohler & Chase v. Turner . . 82I Komfort, Schieffelin v. . 309, 327

Lambert v. Horne . . . . . . 207

Lamoreaux v. Andersch . . . 714 Larkin, Long v. . . . . . . . 2I5 Latham v. State . . . .. . . 708 Lauer v. Northern Pacific Ry.

CO. . . . . 712

Law Guarantee Trust and Acci- dent Society, Ltd., In re 302, 327

Lazard Freres and L. Vogelstein & Co., In the Matter of the Arbitration Agreement between ..... . . . . . 407

Le Ray Paper Co., Radley v. . 8I2

Leslie, R. (Ltd.) v. Reliable Ad- vertising and Addressing Agency (Ltd.) . . . . 687, 705

Leslie, Pekas Co. v. . . . 689, 7I5 Lewis, German Alliance Ins.

Co. v. . . . . . . . . 84, I I3 Lewis, Kemp v. . . . . . . . 523 Liberty Bell Gold Mining Co.

v. Moorhead Mining & Mill- ing Co.. . . . . . . . . . 706

iUll v. Gleason . . . . . . . I02



VOL. XXVIII] TABLE OF CASES xxxv

PAGE Linn & Lane Timber Co. v.

United States . . . . . . . 8ii Littlefield, Davis v. . . . 9i, ioo Lloyd v. Powell Duifryn Steam

Coal Co., Ltd. .... 299, 324 Local Government Board v.

Arlidge. . . .i98, 207 London County Council v.

Allen . . 201, 213

Long v. Larkin . . . . . . . 215

Long v. Shafer . . . . . . . 624 Long, State v.. . . . . . . . ii6 Longyear v. Hardman . . . . 705 Lord Ashburton, Nocton v. . . 525 Louisville & Nashville R. Co.,

United States v. (236 U. S. 3i8) . . . . . . . . . . . 636

Lucey v. Matteson . . . . . . 317 Lucy v. Bawden . . . . . . . 329 Lyons, Millbourn v. . . . . . 435

MacArthur Bros. Co. v. Kerr - 52I MacDonald v. YEtna Indemnity

CO .522 MacRorie, State v. 53I Mangum, Frank v. . . . 793, 8io Manhattan Ry. Co., Drucker

v............. 628 Marie Glaeser, The, . . . . . 2I7 Martin v. Camp . . . . . . . ioi Martin, Glove Bank & Trust

Co. of Paducah, Ky. v. . . . 703 Mason, Ehrman & Co., Beaver v. 433 Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.

Co. v. Realty Trust Co. . . 433 Matteson, Lucey v. . . . . . 317 Mayer, United States v. . 412, 434 McArthur, Fourth National

Bank of Fayetteville v. . 699, 708 McBride v. Illinois National

Bank.. .. 205 McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka &

Santa Fe Ry. Co. . . . 417, 425 McCann v. Chasm Power Co. . 209 M'Clement v. Supreme Court,

I. 0. F.797, 8o8 McDonald, Ex parte, In re

Gillis . . . . . . . . 415, 425 McDonald, Fairbanks v. . . . 529 McGuire, James C., & Co. v.

H. G. Vogel Co . . . . . . 332 McIntyre Co., Scott v.. . . . 623 McKee, Matter of . . . . . . 3i8 McLaughlin, Bosley v. . . . . 704 McLurin, Western Union Tel.

Co. v. ..... . . . . . 640

PAGE McNeill v. State . . . . . .. 823 Meagher, Heissenbuttel v. . 9i, Ioo Medlin Milling Co. v. Mims . 817 Melton v. Commonwealth . 426 Menasha W. W. Co., Minne-

apolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . 627

Meramec Quarry Co., Hunicke v. . . . . . . . . . . 607, 638

Michigan Central R. Co. v. Michigan Railroad Commis- sion ...... . 328, 799, 8io

Michigan Central R. Co., Van Auken v. . . . . . . . . . 320

Michigan Railroad Commis- sion, Michigan Central R. Co. v. .... .. 328, 799, 8io

Midwest Oil Co., United States V. (236 U. S. 459) . . . 613, 628

Millbourn v. Lyons . . . . . 435 Miller v. Wilson . . . . . . 704 Mims, Medlin Milling Co. v. . 8I7 Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M.

Ry. Co. v. Menasha W. W. Co ........... . 627

Minnesota, D. & P.*Ry. Co. v. Way ........ 326

Misicki, Emanuel v. . . . . . 424 Missouri, International Har-

vester Co. v ........ I05 Mitchell v. Justices of Croydon . 1 I 5 Modern Pen Co., L. E. Water-

man Co. v. . . . 437 Modern Woodmen of America,

Tolbert v. ... .. 6ii, 634 Moorhead Mining & Milling

Co., Liberty Bell Gold Min- ing Co. v.......... 706

Morgan, Dana v .. . . . . . . 812 Moss v. Campbell's Creek R.

Co ........ 526 Murff v. State . . . . . . . . 632 Murphy, State ex rel., v. Wolfer 322 Murray, White v. . . . . . . 7I9 Musicians' Protective Union

Local, etc., Rhodes Bros. Co. v. . . . . . . . . 696, 7I8

National Dock & Storage Co., Rosenberg v. . . . . . . . 336

Natural Gas Co. of West Vir- ginia, City of Wheeling v. . . i Io

Neagle, People of Porto Rico V. . 95, I05

Neldert v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. . . . . . . . . . . 705



xxxvi HARVARD LAW REVIEW [VOL. XXVIII

PAGE

New Mineral Fertilizer Co., Burnes v. . . . . . . . . . 103

New York Central & H. R. R. Co., Dazey v. . . . . . . . 5I7

New York Herald Co., Wil- liams v. . . . . . . . . . 637

New York, In the Matter of the City of . . . . . . . . . . 323

New York & L. I. Traction Co., Raynor v. . . . . . . . . 206

New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., Robinson v. .. . . . . 620, 626

Nieberg v. Cohen . . . . 511, 530 Niles, Boston & Maine R. Co.

v. 709 Nocton v. Lord Ashburton . . 525 Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v.

Conley (236 U. S. 605) . 683, 7i6 Norris v. Detroit United Ry. . 814 North Coast Fire Ins. Co., Ras-

musson v. . . . . . . . . 707 North Dakota, Northern Pacific

Ry. Co. v. (236 U. S. 585). 683, 7i6 Northern Pacific Ry. Co., Lauer

V. . ... . . ... ... 712

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. North Dakota (236 U. S. 585) . . . . . . . . . 683, 7i6

Northern Trust Co., Johnson v. 313, 330

Nunn v. Ehlert . . . . . . . 217

O'Byrne, Aubrey V . . . . . 325 O'Hara, Stettler v.. . . . 89, 105

Ohio Oil Co., United States v. 84, I04

Old Forge Discount & Deposit Bank, Connors v. . . . . . 3I9

Oleon v. Rosenbloom . . . . . 8o8 Oliver, In re . . . . . . . . 203 Outland's Adm'x, Illinois Cen-

tral Ry. Co. v. . . . . . . 438 Owenby-Wofford Co., Coit v. . 208

Pabst Brewing Co., Flood v. 432 Pacific Express Co., Rosen-

berger v. . . . . . . . . . 432 Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Wright-

Dickinson Hotel Co. . . . . II3 Page Belting Co. v. F. H. Prince

& Co. . . . . . . . . 315, 333 Payette, B. Payn's Sons To-

bacco Co. v. .... . . . 2I5 Payn's, B., Sons Tobacco Co.

v. Payette . . . . . . . . 2I5 Peabody v. Kent . . . . . . 524

PAGE

Pekas Co. v. Leslie . 689, 715

Pelton v. Sheridan . . . . . . 5i6 Pennsylvania Co. v. United

States ........ 799, 8o0 Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Puritan

Mining Co. . . . . . . . . 8i6 Pennsylvania R. Co., Titus v. . 7i6 People, Aalholm v.. . . . . . I07 People v. Charles Schweinler

Press ........ 790, 8I9 People v. C. Klinck Packing Co.

496, 5I9 People v. Crane . . 496, 5i9, 628 People v. De Martini . . . . . 531 People v. Peters . . . . . . . 32I

People v. Risley .... . 693, 708 People v. Schaefer . . . . . . 7I8 People v. Tomlins . . . . . . 527

People of Porto Rico v. Neagle 95, 105

Peters, People v. . . . . . . 32I

Peterson v. Widule . . . . . . ii2

Philadelphia, City of, Harrison V. . . . 428

Piernot, State v.. . . . . . . 429

Pollack, Winder v. . . . . . . 8i5 Powell DufFryn Steam Coal Co.,

Ltd., Lloyd v. . . . . . 299, 324 Powers v. Journeymen Brick-

layer's Union . . . . . . . 630 Priboth v. Haveron . . . . . . i00

Price v. State . . . . . . . . 424

Prince, F. H., & Co., Page Belt- ing Co. v....... . 315, 333

Public Service Electric Co., In- terstate Telephone and Tele- graph Co. v. .... . 307, 333

Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commis- sioners ...... 501, 526

Pullman Co., Goldstein v. . . . i04 Puritan Mining Co., Pennsyl-

vania R. Co. v. . . . . . . 8i6

Quirk v. Thomas . . . . . . 701

R. Leslie (Ltd.) v. Reliable Ad- vertising and Addressing Agency (Ltd.) . . . . 687, 705

R. R. Comm. of Indiana, South- ern Ry. Co. v . . . . . . . 7II

Radley v. Le Ray Paper Co.. . 8I2

Raich v. Attorney-General . 496, 5 I9 Railroad Commission of Cali-

fornia, Wilmington Trans- portation Co. v. . . . . . . 634



VOL. XXVIII] TABLE OF CASES xxxvii

PAGE

Ramsey, Cowan v .. . . . . . I02

Ramsey, Smith v . . . . . . . II4 Rasmusson v. North Coast Fire

Ins. Co. ..... . . . . 707 Ray v. Henderson . . . . . . 429

Raynor v. New York & L. I. Traction Co. .. ... .. 206

Realty Trust Co., Massachu- setts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. . 433

Reliable Advertising and Ad- dressing Agency (Ltd.), R. Leslie (Ltd.) v. . . . . 687, 705

Rhodes Bros. Co. v. Musicians' Protective Union Local, etc.

696, 7i8 Richards, Rowe v. 802, 812

Riera v. Riera . . . . . . . . 425 Risley, People v. . . . . 693, 708 Robinson v. New York, N. H.

& H. R. Co. . . . . . 620, 626 Robinson & Co. v. Continental

Insurance Co . . . . . 3I2, 3I7 Rogers v. Atlantic, Gulf & Pa-

cific Co. . . . . . . . . . 637 Rogge, American Radiator Co.

V. . 524

Rosenberg v. National Dock & Storage Co . . . . . . . . 336

Rosenberger v. Pacific Express CO .432

Rosenbloom, Oleon v. . . . . 8o8 Rothersand, The . . . . . . 335 Rowe v. Epling ...... . 8I3 Rowe v. Richards . . . . 802, 8I2

Rubin, United States v. ... 326 Rumsey v. Sullivan . . . 6i5, 63I

St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. v. Griffin 496, 5I9

Sanford, Schickhaus v. . . . . 2I2

Sassen v. Haegle . . . . . . . io8 Saunders, Goldstein v. . . . . 7I2

Saxby, Cobb v. .... . 499, 520

Schaefer, People v . . . . . . 7I8 Schanz v. Sotscheck . . ... 82I

Schickhaus v. Sanford . . . . 2I2

Schieffelin v. Komfort . . 309, 327 Schiller-Bund v. Knack . . . . 7II Scott v. McIntyre Co. . . . . 623 Seamen's Bank for Savings,

Danzinger v. . . . . . . . 430 Second National Bank of Vin-

cennes v. Campbell . . . . 624 Securities Co., Chester County,

etc. Co. v. . .... . . . 625 Shafer, Long v. .. . 624

PAGE Shauver, United States v. I I2

Shelley, Hewson v.. . . . . . 208

Sheridan, Pelton v. . . . . . 5i6 Sherrard, Hulton v. . . . .. 623

Shiawassee County, Eaton v. . 7I5 Simon v. Southern Ry. Co. . 804, 8i5 Simpson v. Tootle, etc. Co. . 210

Sioux Remedy Co. v. Cope . 431 Skinner v. James Griffiths &

Sons . . . . . . . . . . . II4 Slayton v. Jordan . . . . . . 329

Sligh v. Kirkwood . . . . . . 8i9 Smethhurst, Fawcett v. . . . 521

Smith, Commonwealth v.... 8i8 Smith v. Ramsey . . . . . . II4 Sohmer, Wheeler v. . . . . . I04 Sotscheck, Schanz v. . . . . . 821

Soule v. First National Bank of Ashton . ........ . 204

Southern Garage Co. v. Brown . ioi Southern Lumber Co., Warren

&0. V. Ry. Co. v . . 5I7 Southern Ry. Co. v. R. R. Comm.

of Indiana . . . . . . . . 7I1 Southern Ry. Co., Simon v. 804, 8I5 Spooner v. Bank of Donalson-

ville ........... 205

Standard Home Co. v. Davis . 626 Stanley, Waite v. . . . . . . 64I State, Brantley v ..... . 520

State, ex rel. Foote v. Board of Commissioners ..... . 523

State, Glover v.. . . . . . . 324

State v. Houston Belt & Termi- nal Ry. Co ....... . 93, II5

State, Jones v. . . . . . . . 428 State ex rel. Kimberlite Mining

& Washing Co. v. Hodges 304, 320

State, Latham v. . . . . . . 708 State v. Long . . . . . . . . II6 State v. MacRorie . . . . . . 53I State, McNeill v. . . . . . . 823 State, Murff v. . .. .. . . 632 State ex rel. Murphy v. Wolfer 322 State v. Piernot . . . . . . . 429

State, Price v.. . . . . . . . 424 State v. Superior Court for Spo-

kane County .... . . . 707 State v. Tennessee Coal, Iron, &

R. Co .......... . 2I4 State of Maryland v. General

Stevedoring Co .o.o.... . IOO Stenson v. Halvorson . . . . . io8 Stettler v. O'Hara . . . . . 89, I05 Stockwell v. Supreme Court,

I. 0. F. ....... . 797, 8o8



xxxviii HARVARD LAW REVIEW [VOL. XXVIII

PAGE

Street v. Farmers' Elevator Co. 627 Sullivan, Rumsey v. . . . 6i5, 63I Superior Court for Spokane

County, State v . . . . . . 707 Supreme Court, I. 0. F., M'Cle-

ment v. 77, 8o8 Supreme Court, I. 0. F., Stock-

well v. . . . . . . . . 797, 8o8 Sutherland, In re . . . . . . 325

Sutton v. Buie . . . . . . . 634 Swan, In re . . . . . . . . . 822

Tacoma Ry. & Power Co., Henry v. . . . . . . . . . 822

Tennessee Coal, Iron, & R. Co., State v. . . . . . . . . . 24

Teti v. Consolidated Coal Co. . 518 Thaw, Drew v. . . . . . . . 430 Thomas, Quirk v. . . . . . . 70I Titus v. Pennsylvania R. Co. . 7i6 Tolbert v. Modem Woodmen of

America . . . . . . . 6i I, 634 Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United

States (220 Fed. 458) . . 6o5 Tomlins, People v. . . . . . . 527 Tommi, The . . . . . . . . 335 Tootle, etc. Co., Simpson v. . 2I0

Topay v. Crow's Nest Pass Coal Co. ... .. .... 312, 3I7

Trenholm v. Klinker . . . . . 54 Turner, Kohler & Chase v. . . 82I

Ungerecht, Bond v. . . . . . I14 Union Trust Co. of New York,

In re . . . . . . . . . . . 335 United Rys. Co. of St. Louis,

Voelker Products Co. v. . . 436 United States v. Aczel . . . . 8io United States, Burdick v. . 6og, 642 United States v. Erie R. Co. (236

U. S. 259)- . . . . . . . . 635 United States v. Hamburg-Amer-

ican Line . . . . . . . . . 2II

United States v. Holte . . . . 629

United States, Houston, E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. ..3..... iI3

United States v. International Harvester Co ... .87, II4

United States v. Keystone Watch Case Co. . . . . . . . . . 7I7

United States, Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. 8II

United States v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. (236 U. S.

3i8) . . . . . . ... . . 636 United States v. Mayer. . 412, 434

PAGE

United States v. Midwest Oil Co. (236 U. S. 459) * * 6I3, 628

United States v. Ohio Oil Co. 84, I04

United States, Pennsylvania Co. v. . 799, 8c9

United States v. Rubin . . . . 326 United States v. Shauver . . . II2

United States v. Toledo News- paper Co. (220 Fed. 458) 605

United States Fidelity, etc. Co., Williams v. (236 U. S. 549) . 702

University Club of Chicago v. Deakin ..... . . . . . 522

Van Auken v. Michigan Central R. Co .......... . 320

Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. Godsey ........ . 633

Voelker Products Co. v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis . . . 436

Vogel, H. G., Co., James C. Mc- Guire & Co. . . .. . .. 332

Vogelstein, L., & Co., In the Matter of the Arbitration Agreement between Lazard Freres and . . . . . . . . 407

Wadley Southern R. Co. v. Georgia ..... . . . . 527

Waite v. Stanley .. . . .. 641 Walker v. Gaskill . . . . . . 2i8

Wallach, In re . . . . . . . 530

Walter Farrington Tiling Co. v. Hazen ..... . . . . . 8i6

Warner, Charles, Co. v. Dela- ware, L. & W. R. Co. . . . 5i6

Warren & 0. V. Ry. Co. v. Southern Lumber Co. . . . 5I7

Waterman, L. E., Co. v. Modem Pen Co. . . . . . . . . . 437

Watervliet, City of, Hildreth Granite Co. v ....... . 204

Way, Minnesota, D. & P. Ry. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . 326

Weegham v. Killifer . . . ; . 2I3 Wentworth v. Wentworth . . 639 Wessels, Williams v. . . . . . 7I7 Western Union Tel. Co., Ander-

son v. . . . . . . . . . . 633 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Frear

304, 320 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Mc-

Lurin ..... . . . . . 640 Wetutzke v. Wetutzke . . . . 32I

Wheeler v. Sohmer . . . . . . I04



VOL. XXVIII] TABLE OF CASES xxxix

PAGE

Wheeling, City of, v. Natural Gas Co. of West Virginia . . iio

White v. Murray . . . . . . 7I9 Whiteford, In re . . . . . . 820 Wichita Falls & W. Ry. Co. of

Texas v. Asher . . . . . . 635 Widule, Peterson v. . . . . . II2 Wilder Manufacturing Co. v.

Corn Products Refining Co. 69i, 7IO

Williams, Birmingham, E. & B. R. Co. v ... 5II, 525

Williams v. New York Herald Co ... 637

Williams v. United States Fidel- ity, etc. Co. (236 U. S. 549) . 702

Williams v. Wessels . . . . 7I7

PAGE

Wilmington Transportation Co. v. Railroad Commission of California .... . . . . 634

Wilson, Miller v. . . . . . . 704 Winder v. Pollack . . . . . . 8I5 Wolfer, State ex rel. Murphy v. 322

Wolverine Spice Co. v. Fallas . 2I3

Woollard, Aronowitz v . . . . 8ii Wright v. Central of Georgia Ry.

Co. (236 U. S. 674) . . . . 703 Wright v. Knapp . . . . . . 63I Wright-Dickinson Hotel Co.,

Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v.. . . II3

Yost v. Dallas County . . 6z7, 640 Zo6logical Society of Philadel-

phia, Jones v. . . . . . . . 5I3



Date post:	08-Jan-2017
Category:	Documents
Upload:	dinhduong
View:	213 times
Download:	1 times

Front Matter

Documents