FY2007 - fgacleanup.infofgacleanup.info/Content/Files/AR/AR151_FY2007FortGreelyArmyDefens… ·...

FY2007FORT GREELY

Installation Action Plan

Printed 07 November 2007

Army Defense Environmental Restoration Program

Table of Contents

Statement Of Purpose.....................................................................................................................................

Acronyms........................................................................................................................................................

Acronym Conversion Table.............................................................................................................................

Installation Information....................................................................................................................................

Cleanup Program Summary............................................................................................................................

Installation Restoration Program.....................................................................................................................

Installation Restoration Program Site Descriptions.........................................................................................

Installation Restoration Program Response Complete (No Further Action) Sites Summary..........................

IRP Schedule..................................................................................................................................................

IRP Costs........................................................................................................................................................

Military Munitions Response Program............................................................................................................

IRP Summary..............................................................................................................................................IRP Contamination Assessment..................................................................................................................IRP Previous Studies...................................................................................................................................

FGLY-006 FIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE 85/133.....................................................................................FGLY-007 LANDFILL 1-SITE 31...............................................................................................................FGLY-010 LANDFILLS 4 AND 5-SITE 88 (LOW)......................................................................................FGLY-019 SM1A PIPELINE REMOVAL-SITE 90/132..............................................................................FGLY-027 FORMER ASPHALT & TAR DISPOSAL...................................................................................FGLY-032 BLDG 626 AUTO/CRAFT SHOP/DRUM STORAGE.................................................................FGLY-045 ROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30.......................................................................................FGLY-046 EVERGREEN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 73............................................................................FGLY-050 BLDG 157 LAUNDRY-SITE 103..............................................................................................FGLY-075 BLDG 675 LAUNDRY (54)........................................................................................................FGLY-076 REFUSE BURN PIT-SITE 89...................................................................................................FGLY-100 CANOL pipeline Tank Farm/South Tank...................................................................................

Installation Restoration Program Milestones...............................................................................................IRP Schedule Chart.....................................................................................................................................

IRP Prior Funding/Current Requirements....................................................................................................

MMRP Summary.........................................................................................................................................MMRP Contamination Assessment.............................................................................................................

101213

181920212224252627293032

3538

40

4243

1

2

4

5

7

9

17

33

35

40

41

Table of Contents

Military Munitions Response Program Site Descriptions................................................................................

Military Munitions Response Program Response Complete (No Further Action) Sites Summary..................

Military Munitions Response Program Schedule............................................................................................

MMRP Costs...................................................................................................................................................

Community Involvement..................................................................................................................................

MMRP Previous Studies..............................................................................................................................

FGLY-005-R-01 Site 112..........................................................................................................................

Military Munitions Response Program Milestones.......................................................................................MMRP Schedule Chart................................................................................................................................

MMRP Prior Funding/Current Requirements...............................................................................................

44

46

4849

50

45

47

48

50

51

Final FORT GREELY Installation Action Plan - 1

Statement of Purpose

Engineering & Environment, Inc. for USAECAlaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC)USAECEngineering & Environment, Inc. for USAECUS Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)USAECIMCOM -PacificTeledyne SolutionsEngineering & Environment, Inc. for USAECUS Army Space and Missile Defense Command (USASMDC)

The following persons contributed to the formulation and completion of this Installation Action Plan for FORTGREELY during a planning workshop/book update held on 1 February 2007:

The purpose of the Installation Action Plan (IAP) is to outline the total multi-year Cleanup Program for an installation. The planidentifies environmental cleanup requirements at each site or area of concern, and proposes a comprehensive, installation-wideapproach, with associated costs and schedules, to conduct investigations and necessary remedial actions (RA). In an effort to coordinate planning information between the restoration manager, US Army Environmental Command (USAEC),Fort Greely, Installation Management Command (IMCOM), executing agencies, and regulatory agencies, an IAP wascompleted. The IAP is used to track requirements, schedules and tentative budgets for all Army installation cleanup programs. All site-specific funding and schedule information has been prepared according to projected overall Army funding levels and is,therefore, subject to change.


AcronymsACL

ADEC

AEDB-R

AST

bgs

BRAC

BTEX

CANOL

CERFA

COPC

cy

DD

DPW

DRO

EBS

EM

ft

FY

GMD

GPR

GRO

HRR

IAP

IMCOM

IRP

K

kg

LTM

LUC

MCL

MEC

mg/kg

N/A

PA

PAH

PCB

PID

POL

ppm

RA

RCRA

RI

sf

SVE

SVOC

Alternative Cleanup Level

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation

Army Environmental Database - Restoration

Aboveground Storage Tank

below ground surface

Base Realignment and Closure

Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene

Canadian Oil

Commuinity Environmental Response Facilitation Act

Contaminants of Potential Concern

cubic yards

Decision Document

Directorate of Public Works

Diesel Range Organic

Environmental Baseline Survey

Electromagnetic

feet

Fiscal Year

Ground-based Midcourse Defense

Ground Penetrating Radar

Gasoline Range Organic

Historical Records Review

Installation Action Plan

Installation Management Command

Installation Restoration Program

thousand

kilograms

Long Term Management

Land Use Control

Maximum Contaminant Level

Munitions and Explosives of Concern

milligram/kilogram

Not Applicable

Preliminary Assessment

Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons

Polychlorinated Biphenyl

Photoionization Detector

Petroleum, Oil & Lubricants

parts per million

Remedial Action

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

Remedial Investigation

square feet

Soil Vapor Extraction

Semi-Volatile Organic Compound


AcronymsSWMU

TCE

TEQ

TPH

USACE

USAEC

USARAK

USASMDC

USEPA

UST

UXO

VOC

Solid Waste Management Unit

Trichloroethylene

Toxic Equivalents

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

US Army Corps of Engineers

US Army Environmental Command

US Army Alaska

US Army Missile and Defense Command

US Environmental Protection Agency

Underground Storage Tank

Unexploded Ordnance

Volatile Organic Compound


Acronym Conversion Table

CERCLA RCRA

Preliminary Assessment(PA)Site Inspection(SI)Remedial Investigation/Feasiblity Study(RI/FS)Remedial Design(RD)Remedial Action (Correction)(RA(C))Remedial Action (Operation)(RA(O))Long Term Management(LTM)Interim Remedial Action(IRA)

RCRA Facility Assessment(RFA)Confirmation Sampling(CS)RCRA Facility Investigation/Corrective Measures Study(RFI/CMS)Design(DES)Corrective Measures Implementation (Construction)(CMI(C))Corrective Measures Implementation (Operation)(CMI(O))Long Term Management(LTM)Interim Measure(IM)

========


Installation InformationInstallation Locale

Installation MissionThe installation supports the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) interceptor deployment and the Cold Regions TestCenter. The installation also maintains Allen Army Airfield which is used by GMD and a number of other agencies formiscellaneous activities in the area (US Air Force training, forest fire fighting, etc.).

Lead OrganizationIMCOM - Pacific

Lead Executing Agencies for Installation

Regulator Participation

National Priorities List (NPL) StatusNo NPL Sites have been identified

Installation Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)/Technical Review Committee (TRC)/Technical Assistance for Public Participation(TAPP) Status

Installation Program Summaries

IRPPrimary Contaminants of Concern: Dioxins/Dibenzofurans, Metals, Pesticides, Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants,

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Semi-volatiles, VolatilesGroundwater, Soil

Until recently, under the cognizance of US Army Alaska (USARAK), Fort Greely comprised 267,519 hectares (661,051 acres) ofland, including of the main post, two large training areas (Fort Greely West Training Area and Fort Greely East Training Area) andthree outlying sites in the area. This restructured Fort Greely is much smaller (~2,914 hectares [7,200 acres]) and many facilitieswithin it are now vacant. Responsibility for the remainder of the former Fort Greely was transferred to Fort Wainwright, Alaska,and remains under the control of the USARAK (which is now known as the Donnelly Training Area).

RAB established 199609

Installation Size (Acreage):

State:County:City:

Other Locale Information

7200Delta Junction

N/AAlaska

Current Requirements:Future Requirements:

$30,680.6 K $1,126.1 K

$2,421.0 K

Affected Media of Concern:

FederalState

201309/201309

USASMDC under direction of Fort Greely Directorate of Public Works

Estimated Date for Remedy-In-Place (RIP)/Response Complete (RC):

Prior Funding:

USEPA Region 10ADEC Contaminated Sites Program


Installation Information

MMRPPrimary Contaminants of Concern: Metals, Munitions and explosives of concern

Groundwater, Soil


$354.0 K $30.8 K

$2,960.0 K

Affected Media of Concern:

201709/201709Estimated Date for Remedy-In-Place (RIP)/Response Complete (RC):

Prior Funding:


Cleanup Program SummaryInstallation Historic Activity

Installation Program Cleanup Progress

Fort Greely's entrance is on the Richardson Highway, a paved, two-lane roadway, approximately 100 miles southeast fromFairbanks and approximately five miles south of Delta Junction. One major stream flows through Fort Greely: Jarvis Creek(glacier-fed and silt-laden). Other than Fairbanks, which is home to about 50,000 people, no major population centers exist forseveral hundred miles. Except for transient explorers and hunters, the area near Fort Greely was not inhabited until about 1915, when roadhouses andtrading centers became established with construction of the Richardson Trail (which later became Richardson Highway). DuringWorld War II, the military constructed bases and developed several of the state's major highways, including the Alaska Highwayin 1942. After completing the Alaska Highway, the Army established a base called Station 17, which was used as a staging fieldfor military operations. Few of the original Station 17 buildings remain at Fort Greely. Over the years, the post has gradually expanded, and buildings with antiquated or inadequate facilities have beendecommissioned and demolished. Fort Greely has supported the Cold Regions Test Center, operations at Allen Army Airfield,several hundred thousand acres of ranges, and numerous other activities through the years. Fort Greely has undergone a number of environmental studies and restoration activities dating back to 1978. In 1989, the firststage of the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) initiated a number of investigations. The first significant study was aPreliminary Assessment (PA) conducted in 1992. Most of the sites were studied and several remediation projects werecompleted between 1992 and 1995. In 1995, Fort Greely was selected for realignment under the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Program. The Armysubsequently declared 1,700 acres, including most of the cantonment area, surplus. Fort Greely developed a cleanup plan toremediate the sites so that the surplus property would not pose any environmental liabilities to future occupants. BRAC-drivenremediation continued through 2002, the scheduled implementation date for realignment. Just prior to this date, the Departmentof the Army decided to retain previously identified surplus property at Fort Greely and directed the current footprint be transitionedfrom USARAK to USASMDC. The Ground Based Midcourse Defense Joint Program Office is the current major tenant on Fort Greely. The Missile DefenseAgency has begun fielding of the Ballistic Missile Defense System. Under recent Army initiatives, IMCOM is responsible for baseoperations at Army Installations. The former Fort Greely totaled approximately 600,000 acres in size. The current Fort Greely isapproximately 7,000 acres. The portions of Fort Greely not transferred to USASMDC are now called Donnelly Training Range andare still under the control of USARAK. USASMDC re-started the IRP following the transfer from USARAK. In June of 2003, USASMDC organized a meeting with past and current environmental personnel involved with Gort Greely to listall sites on Fort Greely where there was suspected or confirmed contamination. A list of 132 sites was developed originating fromexamination of all BRAC parcels, USEPA's Solid Waste Management Units (SWMU) list, the ADEC Contaminated Sitesdatabase, and the Army Environmental Database (AEBD-R). An environmental fact sheet was produced for each unique site asa result of the June 2003 meeting and follow-on research. A decision document (DD) was produced to close out 73 of the sitesin 2005. The remaining 59 sites require additional documentation, investigations, and/or RA prior to closeout, either under thecompliance cleanup program or under the IRP.


Cleanup Program Summary

IRP

MMRP

Prior Year Progress:

Prior Year Progress:

FGLY-06 upgradient locations were further investigated and significant Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants(POL) contamination was found in 2006. Remedial Investigation (RI) was conducted at FGLY-06/19/27/32/76/100 in 2006. Bioremediation of 7000 cy of POL contaminated soils at FGLY-100 in2006. FGLY-32 POL contamination was cleaned up and site closure will be sought. FGLY-19 wasinvestigated and no further action is warranted. The RI at FGLY-76 defined the extent of lead anddioxin contamination.

Site Inspection completed in FY07.

Future Plan of Action:

Future Plan of Action:

Soil vapor extraction (SVE) is planned for FGLY-06 in 2007. Phase 2 of Bioremediation will continueat FGLY-100. Approximately 5000 cy will be treated in 2007. FGLY-76 will have excavation and offsite treatment of contaminated soils and the remaining site will be capped in 2008.

None.


FORT GREELY

Installation Restoration ProgramArmy Defense Environmental Restoration Program


SummaryInstallation Total Army Environmental Database-Restoration (AEDB-R) Sites/RC Sites:

IRP50/42

Installation Site Types with Future and/or Underway Phases1

1

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

Burn Area

Disposal Pit/Dry Well

Fire/Crash Training Area

Landfill

Soil Contamination After Tank Removal

Spill Site Area

Storage Area

Surface Disposal Area

Waste Lines

Most Widespread Contaminants of ConcernDioxins/Dibenzofurans, Metals, Pesticides, Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants, Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Semi-volatiles,Volatiles

Media of ConcernGroundwater, Soil

(FGLY-076)

(FGLY-075)

(FGLY-006)

(FGLY-007, FGLY-010)



(FGLY-032)

(FGLY-027)

(FGLY-019)

Completed Remedial Actions (Interim Remedial Actions/ Final Remedial Actions (IRA/FRA))

IRA

IRAIRA

IRAFRAFRAIRA

IRAIRA

IRA

FRAFRAFRA

FRA

IRAIRA

UST'S,BLDG 110

UST'S,BLDG 110UST, BLDG 162

UST, BLDG 162UST, BLDG 210USTS BLDG 602UST'S, BLDG 606

UST'S, BLDG 606TEXAS TOWER BLDGCOMPLEXTEXAS TOWER BLDGCOMPLEXUST'S,BLDG 110UST'S,BLDG 110UST, BLDG 210

USTS BLDG 602

UST BLDG 159UST BLDG 159

1992

19921992

1992199219921992

19921992

1992

199419941994

1994

19941994

TBD

TBDTBD

TBDTBDTBDTBD

TBDTBD

TBD

TBDTBDTBD

TBD

TBDTBD

Site Name Action FY CostRemedy

WASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERSWASTE REMOVAL - SOILSWASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERSWASTE REMOVAL - SOILSWASTE REMOVAL - SOILSWASTE REMOVAL - SOILSWASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERSWASTE REMOVAL - SOILSWASTE REMOVAL - SOILS

WASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERSSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTIONAIR SPARGINGWASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERSWASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERSWASTE REMOVAL - SOILSWASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERS

Site IDFGLY-002

FGLY-002FGLY-033

FGLY-033FGLY-034FGLY-035FGLY-036

FGLY-036FGLY-037

FGLY-037

FGLY-002FGLY-002FGLY-034

FGLY-035

FGLY-043FGLY-043


SummaryIRP


$30,680.6 K $1,126.1 K

$2,421.0 K

Total Environmental Restoration, Army (ER,A) Funding

199008

201509

Date of IRP Inception:

Date of IRP completion including Long Term Management (LTM):201309/201309

Prior Funding:


Completed Remedial Actions (Interim Remedial Actions/ Final Remedial Actions (IRA/FRA))

IRA

FRA

FRAIRA

IRA

FRAIRA

IRA

IRA

FORMER ASPHALT & TARDISPOSALTEXAS TOWER BLDGCOMPLEXUST SOIL PILEFIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE85/133FIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE85/133DELTA TANK FARMROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30SM1A PIPELINE REMOVAL-SITE 90/132FIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE85/133

1995

1995

19961998

1998

19992000

2001

2003

TBD

TBD

TBDTBD

TBD

TBDTBD

TBD

TBD

Site Name Action FY CostRemedy

WASTE REMOVAL - DRUMS, TANKS,BULK CONTAINERSIN-SITU SOIL TREATMENT

INCINERATIONSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION

BIOREMEDITATION - IN SITU

REMOVALTHERMAL DESORPTION

REMOVAL

CAPPING

Site IDFGLY-027

FGLY-037

FGLY-029FGLY-006

FGLY-006

FGLY-049FGLY-045

FGLY-019

FGLY-006

Duration of IRP


Contamination AssessmentIRP

Contamination Assessment Overview

The possible removal actions are at FGLY-006 (SVE and/or soil removal), FGLY-100 (soil bioremediation and SVE) and atFGLY-076 (soil removal). Upon completion of removal/RAs, sites with contamination remaining above ADEC Method 2 cleanuplevels (screening level) will require the development of site specific ADEC Method 3 alternative cleanup levels. Land use controls(LUCs) have been implemented on all known contaminated sites (part of the Garrison's Dig Permit process) and will bemaintained.

Cleanup Exit Strategy

As at most facilities, operations at Fort Greely required the use of many types of potentially hazardous substances. Most of thehazardous waste generated on Fort Greely have historically been spent petroleum products, such as: oil, transmission, brakeand hydraulic fluids, fuel and cleaning solvents. Other less used hazardous substances included leaded paint, battery acid,polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), rodenticides, insecticides, and herbicides. Many investigations and removal actions were undertaken as part of the BRAC efforts to close out a portion of Fort Greely in thelate 1990s. In 2002, USASMDC "reopened" the facility as a ballistic missile defense facility and took over the investigation andremediation activities from USARAK and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Primary focus of recent investigation activitieshas revolved around the discovery of Trichloroethylene (TCE) in the groundwater downgradient of FGLY-006 and benzene inthe groundwater upgradient of FGLY-006. FY05 investigations also revealed significant petroleum contamination at FGLY-100 (South Tank Farm) and a bioremediationeffort of the surface contamination was initiated in late FY06. Additional investigation is required of subsurface petroleumcontamination at this site. Four other sites involve the downgradient groundwater monitoring of landfills or past significant petroleum spill sites. Other sitesinclude dioxin and metals contamination at a former refuse burn pit, two former dry cleaning facilities, a former asphalt/tardisposal area, and two small petroleum spill sites.


1982

1983

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

Internal Notice: Pollution Incident Report 44,000 GallonSpillReport and Memorandums regarding 132,000-GallonFuel Spill

Installation Assessment of the HQ, 172d InfantryBrigade, Ft Greely, For the Commander, Headquarters,172d Infantry Brigade (Alaska), Ft Richardson, AK, andU.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency,(DRXTH - AS - IA - 82328C), Fort GreelyAnalysis of Existing Facilities/EnvironmentalAssessment Report, Ft Greely, AK PreliminaryEvaluation of Solid Waste Disposal Practices, Ft Greely

Waste Site Locations, Ft Greely Cantonment Area,Delta Junction

Installation Restoration Program, Stage 1, JointResources Project, Ft Richardson, Wainwright andGreely, Site 4, Fire Training Pits, Volumes 4, 5, and 6,For Alaskan Air Command HQ ACC/DEP, ElmendorfAFB, and U.S. Army Directorate of Engineering andHousing AFVR - DE, Ft RichardsonFGLY 06 RCRA Facility Assessment PR/VSI Report

FGLY 07 RCRA Facility Assessment (PR/VSI) Report

FGLY 010 RCRA Facility Assessment PR/VSI Report

Groundwater Monitoring Network, Ft Greely

Progress Report for the Confirmation of Fire TrainingPits at Ft Richardson and Greely, Ecology andEnvironment, Inc.FGLY 06 Fire Training Pits Work Plan, Pt 1, FtRichardson & GreelyFGLY 06 Fire Training Pits Work Plan, Part 2,Subsurface Exploration Plan, Ft Richardson and GreelyPreliminary Assessment, Ft Greely

Site Inspection Report for Fire Training Pits at FtRichardson and Greely

Sampling Report for Groundwater Monitoring Networkat Ft Greely, Volume II, Fort 6th Infantry Division (L)

Site Assessment/Corrective Action Plan (FGLY 06),Three Former Fire Training Pits

US Army

USACE

US Army

Unwin, Scheben, Korynta,and Huettl, Inc. (USKH)US Army EnvironmentalHygiene Agency

U.S. Army Toxic andHazardous MaterialsAgencyWoodward-ClydeConsultants

SAIC

SAIC

SAIC

US Army Corps ofEngineers

Ecology and Environment,Inc.

E&E

E&E

CH2M Hill

EEI

Public Works,Environmental ResourcesDepartment, Ft Richardson,ENSR, Consulting andEngineeringUSAED

JAN-1982

DEC-1982

JAN-1983

JAN-1983

JAN-1983

JAN-1990

JAN-1990

JAN-1990

JAN-1990

JAN-1990

AUG-1991

FEB-1992

FEB-1992

FEB-1992

SEP-1992

SEP-1993

JAN-1994

MAR-1994

Previous StudiesIRPTitle Author Date


1994

1995

1997

Environmental Assessment and Finding of NoSignificant Impact (FGLY-06), Remedial Treatment ofPetroleum Contaminated Soils, Fire Training PitsCorrective Action Plan Release Investigation, Ft Greely,Volumes I and IIRemedial Design Investigation, Oil & Tar Burial Site, FtGreely, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-005, DeliveryOrder No. 0001Site Health and Safety Plan, Building 110 RemedialInvestigation and Design, Ft Greely, DACA85-94-D001Chemical Data Report, Spring 1994, GroundwaterMonitoring, Ft GreelyGeotechnical Report, Groundwater Monitoring Networkfor Ft GreelyRemedial Design Investigation, Oil & Tar Burial Site, FtGreely, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-005, DeliveryOrder No. 001Post-wide Site Inspection, Ft Greely, Contract No.DACA85-94-D-005, Delivery Order No. 0008

Final Respiration Test Report: Fire Burn Pits TreatmentSystem, Ft Greely, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-001 1Final Site Inspection Letter Report: Building 110, FtGreely, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-001 1, DeliveryOrder No. 0003Remedial Design Investigation Phase II: Oil & Tar BurialSite, Ft Greely, Contract # DACA85-94-005, DeliveryOrder No. 0001Work Plan Addendum: Ft Greely Postwide SiteInspection, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-005, DeliveryOrder No. 008Final Remedial Design Report (FGLY 06), Contract No.DACA85-94-D-0011, Fire Burn Pits Treatment SystemSchematic Submittal: Repair Bulk Fuel Storage Tanks(Tank 420), DFSP Ft Greely, Contract No. N62472-93-D-1302, For Northern Division Naval FacilitiesEngineering Command, Lester, PennsylvaniaWorkplan: Post-Wide Site Inspection, Ft Greely,Contract No. DACA85-94-D-005, Delivery Order No.0008Ft Greely Post-wide SI, Contract No. DACA5794-D-0012Ft Greely Post-wide SI, Work Order No. 95-0202

Ft Greely Post-wide SI, Work Order No. 950202

Investigation Report: Confirmation Drilling Buildings 162and 606, Ft Greely, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-0011, Delivery Order 5Remedial Design Investigation Report, Building 110, FtGreely, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-0011, DeliveryOrder 3

US Army Base Realignment and Closure 95 Program,

USAED

Harding Lawson Associates

Woodward-ClydeConsultants

AGRA Earth &Environmental, IncCOE



AGRA Earth &Environmental, Inc.AGRA Earth &Environmental, Inc.



AGRA

Enterprise Engineering, Inc.


Sound Analytical Services,Inc.Columbia AnalyticalServicesColumbia AnalyticalServicesAGRA Earth &Environmental, Inc.

AGRA Earth &Environmental, Inc.

Woodward-Clyde

APR-1994

MAY-1994

JUN-1994

SEP-1994

SEP-1994

SEP-1994

NOV-1994

NOV-1994

MAR-1995

MAR-1995

APR-1995

APR-1995

MAY-1995

JUN-1995

JUN-1995

JUL-1995

JUL-1995

AUG-1995

NOV-1995

DEC-1995

JAN-1997



1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Environmental Baseline Survey Report

Oil Discharge Prevention and Contingency (ODPC)Plan (FGLY 045)Final Release Investigation Report, North Delta TankFarm, Delta Junction, Contract # DACA85-94-D-0009,Delivery Order 12, Modification # 0001

Draft Report on Soil Vapor Extraction SystemMonitoring, Remedial Investigation and Design, Bldg110, Ft Greely, Contract No. DACA85-94-D-001 1,Delivery Order No. 003Remedial Design Investigation Report (FGLY 06),Former Fire Burn Pits1997 Site Investigation/Limited Remedial InvestigationReport

Final Report on Confirmation Soil Sampling, RI andDesign, Building 110, Ft Greely1998 Remedial Investigation Report, Final

Summary Report, 1999 Remedial Investigation/RemovalAction

Technical Memorandum, 1997 Analytical Data Review

Limited Risk Evaluation

Summary Report, 2000 Remedial Investigation/RemovalAction

Soil Evaluation and Risk Assessment, Sites: 85 South,85 North, 133, and 112

Cumulative Chemical and Radiological Data Report,1983-2003, Groundwater MonitoringFormer South Tank Farm Soil Investigation Summary

SM-1A 2003 Surveillance Report

Class V Underground Injection Control Inventory Report

Comprehensive Evaluation of Groundwater MonitoringProgramSM-1A Reactor Waste Laydown Yard VerificationSurvey ReportSM-1A Reactor Waste Pipeline Corridor VerificationSurvey ReportGroundwater Sampling and Analysis Report

SM-1A 2004 Environmental Surveillance Report (FGLY

Consultants

USACE

Shannon and Wilson, Inc.

AGRA Earth &Environmental, Inc.

AGRA

Jacobs

AGRA Earth &Environmental, Inc.Jacobs

Radian/ Jacobs

Lockheed AnalyticalServices, JacobsJacobs

Jacobs

USAED

USACE

Artic Slope CombinedGroup

General Health Physics, Inc.

USACE-AK District

Midwest EnvironmentalConsultantsUSACE

USACE

Shannon & Wilson

General Health Physics

JAN-1997

SEP-1997

JUL-1998

JUL-1998

SEP-1998

APR-1999

APR-1999

AUG-2000

APR-2001

NOV-2001

DEC-2001

DEC-2002

JUL-2003

NOV-2003

MAR-2004

APR-2004

JUL-2004

AUG-2004

AUG-2004

OCT-2004

MAR-2005



2005

2006

018)

2004 Field Investigation Report

Groundwater Monitoring and Data Analysis Workplan

2005 Installation Restoration Program Workplan

Environmental Sites Decision Document

South Tank Farm Corrective Action Plan (FGLY 100)

Draft 2005 Remedial Investigation Report

2006 Installation Restoration Program Workplan

Arctic Slope TechnicalServices (ASTS)ASCG

ASCG

TSI

ASCG

ASCG

ASCG

MAY-2005

MAY-2005

MAY-2005

JUN-2005

DEC-2005

FEB-2006

MAY-2006



FORT GREELY

Installation Restoration Program

Site Descriptions


FGLY-006FIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE 85/133

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYPetroleum source removal by SVE and LTM of the TCE plume is likely to be needed. Develop an ADEC Method 3 soil cleanuplevel to show the exceedence of the Method 2 cleanup level does not pose a risk. A soil cap will be placed on Site 133 to limitexposure. A no further RA DD will be completed once the soil cap is complete and the alternate cleanup level is established. LUCshave been implemented and will be maintained.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Pesticides, Semi-volatiles, Volatiles

Media of Concern: Groundwater, Soil

Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............IRA..................RA(C)..............

199206........199206........199306........199410........200805........

199210199210200809200809201309

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 201309

Site 85N is located north of the east end of the west taxiway of Allen Army Airfield. The site is located about 500 feet (ft) south ofthe centerline of the east-west runway. The site was previously a depression with a rectangular pit located near the center. Thesite was used as an apparent storage area for materials/liquids used in fire training. Drums were previously stored on thesouthwestern side of the pit according to 1969 aerial photographs. Investigations of the site revealed contamination do a depth of17 ft. Four soil vapor extraction wells were installed and operated from 1994 and 1997 to remediate deeper soil. The top five feetof soil was remediated using landfarming techniques to accelerate the biodegradation of the contaminants. During summer 2002,soil was placed atop the area of contamination to reduce exposure potential. The biovent system was removed in 2005 aftersitting idle for about eight years. Site sampling occurred in 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1995-1997 (landfarm samples) and 1998. Apassive soil gas survey of the area in 2004 and 2005 was conducted as part of a source investigation after TCE was discovered intwo down gradient groundwater monitoring wells. Results of the survey did not indicate the presence of any source ofcontamination remaining at Site 85N. Site 85S was the location of the actual firefighter training burn area. The site was investigated at the same time and in a similarmanner as Site 85N. The site had numerous soil sampling events and had three biovent wells installed (removed in 2005). Thetop five feet of soil was treated with landfarming. No soil cap exists on this site. The site was further investigated along with Site85N as a possible source for the TCE in the groundwater northeast of Site 85N and Site 85S. Additional samples were taken in2005 after the passive soil gas survey revealed potential Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) and TCE contamination. Site 133 is located south of the aircraft parking apron, and south of 6th Avenue where it parallels the taxiway of Allen ArmyAirfield. The site consisted of several distinct sections early on, including a grassy field, an area containing concrete fill, a forestedarea, a raised circular area approximately six inches high by five feet in diameter, and a pit six feet deep extending approximately20 ft by 30 ft. The site was investigated at the same time as 85N and 85S. Contamination was found to a depth of only 6.5 ft. Thesoil was remediated using landfarming but post remediation samples reveled diesel range organics (DRO) and pesticidesexceeding ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. A well installed in 2003 just upgradient of Site 133 contained benzene. Furtherinvestigation of upgradient areas revealed elevated TPH.

RRSE: LOWRegulatory Driver: CERCLA


FGLY-007LANDFILL 1-SITE 31

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYGroundwater monitoring will continue every other year until closure. Closure documentation will be pursued through ADEC inFY07. LUCs have been implemented and will be maintained.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Metals, Volatiles


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................LTM.................

199206........199906........200110........

199210200003201009

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200003

This site is located within the Northwest Undeveloped Geographic area. Per the Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS), the landfillwas closed prior to 1953. Landfill #1 was identified as SWMU No. 38 in 1990. The types and quantities of waste in the landfill areunknown. The landfill is believed to have accepted sanitary wastes. The size and start date are also unknown; it is believed thatit closed prior to 1953. During 1999, two groundwater monitoring wells were installed downgradient of Site 31 (31/32/112-MW-A and 32-MW-A) andone was installed up-gradient (31-MW-A). Levels below Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) of chlorinated hydrocarbonshave been detected in the groundwater. Since installation, periodic samples from well 31/32/112-MW-A have contained toluene, DRO, and TCE at levels less than MCLs.Each of these analytes has been detected on two of seven sampling events. The groundwater monitoring has found nocontaminants above MCLs since 2001. Groundwater monitoring is now conducted two times a year, every other year. Samplingwill only be collected in even numbered years (i.e. 2006, 2008, etc).



FGLY-010LANDFILLS 4 AND 5-SITE 88 (LOW)

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYGroundwater monitoring will continue until closure. Closure documentation will be pursued through ADEC in FY07. LUCs havebeen implemented and will be maintained.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Metals, Volatiles


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............LTM.................

199206........199708........200403........200410........

199210200009200409201009

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200409

This site is located in the NE Industrial Area. Landfills 4 and 5 were identified as SWMUs No. 42 and 39. They are believed tohave accepted sanitary wastes, metals, and ashes, which were buried in trenches. The landfills operated in the 1960s. Per theEBS, Landfill #4 was closed in 1969 and Landfill #5 was closed prior to 1962. Currently, the area serves as a picnic area and askeet shooting range. The EBS classified this site as Category 7; additional evaluation was needed. Per EBS Table 5-1a andTable 2-1, the site was evaluated by reviewing various hazardous waste management compliance reports dated 1987-1995. Field activities were conducted in 1997. The results of the survey indicated the presence of 15 discrete magnetic anomalies. Tracepesticides were detected, all well below ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. The 1997 report recommended further geophysicalsurvey to delineate anomalies, and additional test pit excavation and sampling. Additional geophysical survey and groundwatersample collection was conducted during 1998. The geophysical survey identified several anomalous areas that appeared to beassociated with discrete metallic objects. A review of former disposal practices determined the landfill features were associatedwith solid waste disposal, and decided further investigation of unexploded ordnance (UXO) was not warranted. In summer 2004, apassive soil gas survey for downgradient areas was completed and no evidence of downgradient contamination was discovered.Bis(2ethylhexyl)phthalate exceeded the MCL. Trichloroethylene, chloroform, and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane have been detected infour sampling events since well installation at levels less than MCLs. Five wells (88MW-A, 88MW-B, 88MW-C, MW-3, and E-2)are sampled semi-annually to monitor the landfills.



FGLY-019SM1A PIPELINE REMOVAL-SITE 90/132

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYNo further investigation is planned. Closeout documentation was started in FY06 and will be completed in FY07.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Semi-volatiles

Media of Concern: Soil

Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............IRA..................

199206........199206........199908........199708........

199210199709200809200109

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200809

The excavation of approximately 1,700 cy of contaminated soil and debris was completed in August 1999. Shipment of the wasteto a disposal facility in Utah was completed in FY00. Maximum soil contamination is 517 picoCuries/l cesium-137 and 290picoCuries/l strontium-90 (1997-1998 Draft Field Report, Removal of SM-1A Radioactive Waste Pipeline, Jan 1999). Finalconfirmation sampling (FY98 funds) of the pipeline corridor was done in FY00. At the end of FY98, the dilution well associatedwith this pipeline was sampled and found to contain 49.9 pCi/l strontium-90, which is more than six times the MCL for thiscontaminant. The source was a slug of contaminated soil in the bottom of the well. In September 1999, the well was cleaned,purged, and sampled. Results show strontium levels are now well below MCLs. Quarterly samples were taken until August 2000(all below MCLs) and the well was abandoned per the workplan. The Final Cleanup Report was submitted to ADEC and USEPAin Fall of 2004. ADEC reviewed the report in 2nd quarter FY05. Comments are being addressed by USACE Omaha District. Station 21+25 has POL contamination that required further characterization prior to closeout. Passive soil gas modules wereplaced along the pipeline corridor surrounding Station 21+25. Three borings were placed along the corridor and results were twoorders of magnitude below ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. No other contaminants of concern were detected.

RRSE: LOWRegulatory Driver:


FGLY-027FORMER ASPHALT & TAR DISPOSAL

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Polynuclear AromaticHydrocarbons, Semi-volatiles


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............IRA..................

199206........199206........199311........199311........

199212199212200809199503

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200809

The former Asphalt Tar Disposal Area is located on the west side of the Allen Army Air Field north of the cantonment area. Thesite contains areas previously used for tar and asphalt disposal. The site is approximately 10 to 20 acres and consists of at least three gravel turnouts that were used as tar and drum disposalareas, and a central unpaved access road that loops off the northeast-southwest runway. At the time of the PA the site containedpools of asphalt tar approximately 20 ft in diameter, three timber cribs filled with tar, narrow gauge rails and pipes stuck in tar,drums, cables, pipes, and a buried pump, and chunks of graveled asphalt debris. The site was probably active in the 1950sduring runway expansion and upgrades. Five potential source areas of contamination are present at the site: four asphalt disposal areas and one drum/asphalt burial area. Woodward-Clyde conducted an investigation of the site in 1994. Test pits were excavated at all four asphalt disposal areas andsoil samples were collected at six in. and four ft below ground surface (bgs). Samples for DRO, gasoline range organics (GRO),volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), pesticides, and PCBs were below ADEC Method2 cleanup levels at all four disposal areas. Geophysical survey was conducted at Asphalt Disposal Area No. 2 and 4, includingElectromagnetics (EM), Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR), magnetometer, and surface resistivity. The study area at Area 2 was 220 ft by 265 ft. A wooden railroad tie system was present in this source area, and asphalt/tarextended 2.5 ft to 3.0 ft deep. Geophysical survey results suggest this area was once a borrow area up to 30 ft deep that wasfilled with soil and debris. Geophysical survey was conducted at Area 4, resulting in identified anomalies. One test pit wasexcavated to investigate an anomaly, and drums were encountered directly beneath the surface. The test pit was terminated andbackfilled without sampling. Six borings were drilled at the Drum/Asphalt Disposal Area, each to 20 ft bgs. Twenty-five samples were collected. Samples forDRO, GRO, VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, and PCBs were below ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. This source area was alsoinvestigated by geophysical survey, including EM, GPR, magnetometer, and surface resistivity. The investigation area was 300 ftby 360 ft. The results suggest the site was used as a borrow area, and then as a landfill after borrow material was removed. Thedepth of the borrow area/landfill was approximately 35 ft. No further action was recommended for Asphalt Disposal Areas No. 1 and 3. Additional investigation was recommended forAsphalt Disposal Areas No. 2 and 4 to better define the limits of impact and buried materials at the source areas. Deeper drillingwas recommended for the Drum/Asphalt Burial Area. Investigations in Areas 2 and 4 were initiated in late FY06 (Summer 2006).The investigation failed to find the reported location of Asphalt Disposal Areas 2 and 4.



FGLY-027FORMER ASPHALT & TAR DISPOSAL

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYCharacterize contamination and prepare no further RA DD (if contamination found above ADEC Method 2 Cleanup levels, prepareADEC Method 3 Alternative Cleanup Level).


FGLY-032BLDG 626 AUTO/CRAFT SHOP/DRUM STORAGE

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYSite closeout documentation will be prepared during FY07.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................

199206........199206........

199212200809

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200809

Building 626 was the automobile and hobby shop. A release from a drum was identified in 1991. Waste solvents werereportedly dumped south of Building 626. An assessment completed by ENSR in 1996 indicates DRO levels to 21,000milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) and TPH to 25,000 mg/kg in soil at the storage yard. In 1997, the EBS investigated the release from adrum and the potential dumping of materials in the waste accumulation area. A total of six borings were completed to a depth ofapproximately 4.5 ft just inside of the fenced area. Samples were collected at the surface (two to four inches), from about 4inches to 2.5 ft, and from 2.5 ft to about 4.5 ft. Samples were analyzed for concentrations of VOCs, DRO, total recoverablepetroleum hydrocarbons, and eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals. No VOCs or metals were detected above regulatory limits. DRO concentrations in excess of the ADEC Method 2 Cleanup Levelof 250 parts per million (ppm) were reported in the surface and near surface samples collected from five borings at concentrationsof 6700, 440, 400, 21000, and 560 ppm. The sample from four inches to 2.5 ft below the surface detection of 21000 ppm had aconcentration of 3800 ppm. All of the DRO results indicate the presence of a product that is heavier than standard diesel fuel.This product is probably a lubricating or other heavy oil and is the source of the high DRO detections. Total recoverablepetroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in excess of ADEC Cleanup Level of 2000 ppm were reported in the samples collected atand near the surface in two borings with a maximum concentration of 25000 ppm. The top six inches of soil was removed fromthe site and confirmatory sampling was conducted in the summer of 2006.



FGLY-045ROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYGroundwater monitoring will continue biannually until closure. Develop an ADEC Method 3 alternative cleanup level to show theexceedence of the Method 2 cleanup level does not pose a risk. A no further RA DD will be completed once the alternate cleanuplevel is established. LUCs are implemented and will be maintained.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS



Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............IRA..................LTM.................

199510........199702........199702........199910........200110........

199610199806200009200009201309

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200009

This site is a former diesel fuel release from an aboveground pipeline. The pipeline was located along a power line right-of-way~0.25 miles west of Robin Road. This site is located within the Northwest Undeveloped Geographic Area. Between 52,000 and133,000 gallons of diesel product were spilled in December 1982. The spill spread 325 ft east of the source and 50 ft west.Borings drilled within a week of the fuel spill indicated fuel contamination had penetrated to at least 50 feet bgs. In January 1983,impacted soil was excavated three to four ft bgs over an area of ~7,500 square feet (sf). The disposal method and location of theexcavated soil is not known. Seven groundwater monitoring wells were installed at and downgradient of the spill. This site wassampled in 1997 and 1998. The report indicated 6,600 sf of impacted surface soil, as well as a larger zone at 40 to 50 ft bgs,resulting from lateral migration above a silt-rich layer. DRO-impacted soil extended to about 70 ft beneath the spill location.Based on corrected results, DRO ranged up to 10,100 mg/kg. GRO and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX)levels were also elevated. Documentation suggests that spilled fuel thawed the frozen soils at the spill site, leached downward through coarse soils untilreaching silt-rich soils at ~40 ft bgs, then spread laterally along the upper interface of the silt-rich layer and soaked into the upperzone of the silt-rich layer. Vertical migration into the silt-rich layer was greatest directly beneath the spill location, extending to~70 ft bgs. Approximately 3,050 cy of soil was excavated from the site in summer 1999. Of this, about 1,070 cy was clean andwas staged adjacent to the excavation, 220 cy was suspected of being impacted and was staged at the excavation, and 1,760 cywas believed to be POL-contaminated and was transported and stockpiled near the active Landfill. Analytical results for much ofthis latter material indicated it was not impacted above cleanup levels; it was later returned to the excavation in summer 2000. During summer 2000, an additional 90 cy of contaminated soil was removed to address xylene detections above ADEC health-based criteria. The excavation was then backfilled. Contaminated soil excavated from the site was thermally processed in 2000by a mobile thermal processor set up at the stockpile area near the landfill. Based on the results of sampling at the site, it metADEC Method 2 health-based cleanup levels (ingestion & inhalation) down to a depth of 15 ft bgs. Leachability modeling wasthen conducted under the LRE to address contaminants remaining at the site that exceeded ADEC Method 2 migration togroundwater cleanup levels. The results of the modeling indicated that contaminant breakthrough at levels exceeding MCLs is notexpected to occur at the site. ADEC has not accepted the LRE conclusions and is not confident the modeling is reflective ofactual site conditions. Work on FGLY-006 will be used to try to validate the SESOIL model. The groundwater monitoring hasfound no contaminants above MCLs since 2001.



FGLY-046EVERGREEN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 73

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYGroundwater monitoring will continue biannually until closure. Develop an ADEC Method 3 alternative cleanup level to show theexceedence of the Method 2 cleanup level does not pose a risk. A no further RA DD will be completed once the alternate cleanuplevel is established. LUCs are implemented and will be maintained.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS



Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............LTM.................

199510........199702........199702........200110........

199510199806200009201309

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200009

This site is a former diesel fuel release located ~300 ft south of the intersection between Evergreen Road and 64th Avenue. Thissite is located within the Old Post Geographic Area. The site is ~64,830 sf. The release occurred in January 1982, when atracked vehicle crossed and broke a 3-inch diesel fuel line. Documents conflict regarding whether the line was above or belowground. Because documentation references removal of diesel contaminated snow, it is assumed the pipe was aboveground. Anestimated 44,000 gallons was released. The pipeline has not been used since 1983. An unknown volume of impacted soil was removed in the spring of 1982 and replaced with Jarvis Creek gravel. The disposallocation of the impacted soil is unknown. The site was investigated in 1997 and 1998. In 1997, DRO levels ranged up to 26,000 mg/kg, GRO up to 7,600 mg/kg, benzeneup to five mg/kg, and xylenes up to 327 mg/kg. Napthalene was detected at 100 mg/kg. In 1998, DRO ranged up to 1,600 mg/kg,GRO up to 2,600, benzene to 6.1 mg/kg, and xylenes to 190 mg/kg. Documentation suggests that spilled fuel thawed the frozen soils at the spill site, leached downward through coarse soils untilreaching silt-rich soils ~30 ft bgs, then spread laterally along the upper interface of the silt-rich layer and soaked into the upperzone of the silt-rich layer. Vertical migration into the silt-rich layer was greatest at a location ~70 ft west of the spill location wherefuel may have puddled. Vertical migration above ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels extended to at least 70 ft bgs. Two groundwater monitoring wells were installed in 1999 associated with Site 73; one well (73-MW-A) very near the spill locationon the downgradient side, and the other (73-MW-B) ~400 ft upgradient (southwest) of the spill site. Data collected during drillingthese wells indicates analyte concentrations did not exceed ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. Leachability modeling was then conducted. None of the site characterization sample results from the upper 15 ft exceeded ADECMethod 2 ingestion and inhalation cleanup levels. The results of the modeling indicated that contaminant breakthrough at levelsexceeding MCLs is not expected to occur at Site 73. Groundwater samples have never had detections above MCLs.



FGLY-050BLDG 157 LAUNDRY-SITE 103

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants,Volatiles


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............

199601........199702........199806........

199701199711200809

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200809

Pursuant to Fort Greely being selected for BRAC, an EBS was conducted to ascertain the environmental condition of property forall surplus parcels on the installation. The EBS listed Parcel 103 as a Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act(CERFA) Category 7 parcel. Category 7 was defined as: Areas that are not evaluated or require additional evaluation. Based on EBS Table 5-1a and Table 2-1, the site was evaluated by reviewing various environmental compliance reports andother available documentation dated between 1987 and 1995. Building 157 had been demolished prior to the 1997 BRAC field investigation. A geophysical survey was conducted in 1997. Fourdistinct anomalies were identified (A1 through A4). One test pit was excavated at anomaly A1. This was found to be buriedconcrete with rebar. Samples were not analyzed. Two test pits were excavated at anomaly A2, which was found to be comprisedof two USTs and associated buried piping. The test pit excavations were stopped upon encountering the tanks. Investigation was continued by then drilling four borings (AP-817 through AP-819 and AP-847) at the tank locations. Sampleswere collected at ten ft bgs and analyzed for DRO, RRO, GRO, BTEX, SVOCs, VOCs, PCBs, and RCRA metals. DRO wasdetected up to 2,700 mg/kg; this exceeds the current ADEC Method 2 migration to groundwater cleanup level. Methylene chloridewas detected above the ADEC Method 2 migration to groundwater cleanup level, but below the screening level in use at the timeof the work. All other analyte concentrations were below ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. The USTs (Tanks #398 and #400) were removed in 1998. POL-impacted soil was observed during the removal. DRO up to 2,700mg/kg was reported in soil beneath UST No. 400 at 12 ft bgs. Three additional soil borings (AP-887, AP-888, and AP-889) were drilled in 1998 to investigate the extent of contaminantmigration. Soil samples were analyzed for DRO, GRO, RRO, BTEX, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). POL concentrationswere detected in samples from 20 to 36 ft bgs; however all detections were well below ADEC Method Two cleanup levels. DROconcentrations at these depths ranged from ND to 160 mg/kg. RRO concentrations ranged from Non-Detect to 150 mg/kg. GROand BTEX were not detected. Two PAH constituents, phenanthrene and 2-methylnapthalene were detected at AP-887 at 20 to22 ft bgs at concentrations below ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. In the summer of 2004 an additional investigation was initiated at this site. Soil gas survey showed no VOC contamination andminor TPH contamination. Additional record search showed the dry well had been removed.



FGLY-050BLDG 157 LAUNDRY-SITE 103

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYA no further RA DD will be completed in FY07. LUCs are implemented and will be maintained.


FGLY-075BLDG 675 LAUNDRY (54)

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYA no further action DD will be completed in FY07.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Volatiles


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............

199708........199806........200501........

199710200009200809

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200809

Pursuant to Fort Greely being selected for BRAC, an EBS was conducted to ascertain the environmental condition of property forall surplus parcels on the installation. The EBS listed Parcel 54 as a CERFA Category 7 parcel. Category 7 was defined asfollows: Areas that are not evaluated or require additional evaluation. Based on EBS Table 5-1a and Table 2-1, the site was evaluated by reviewing various environmental compliance reports andother available documentation dated between 1987 and 1995. As-built drawings were reviewed in 1997 to attempt to find the locations of the dry well and aboveground storage tank (AST) vault. A geophysical survey was also conducted in an attempt to locate the dry well. The dry well location was not definitivelydetermined because of the interference from buried utilities. The AST vault was also not found during the geophysical survey. In 1997, two soil borings were drilled and one test pit was excavated at the approximated AST vault location. The AST vault wasfound when digging the test pits. Samples were analyzed for VOCs and BTEX. Trace concentrations of VOCs were detected,well below ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. The AST vault was not investigated further under BRAC. During 1998, additional investigation was conducted to address the reported dry well. One test pit was excavated to 11 ft bgs verynear the approximated dry well location. The dry well drain line was encountered in the test pit. Power poles and guy wiresprevented digging directly at the dry well location. Samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs. No VOCs were detected.The 1998 report recommended additional investigation of the dry well itself. During 1999, one soil boring was drilled to 37 ft bgs at the dry well location. This was facilitated by the FGA Directorate of PublicWorks (DPW) allowing a power disruption at the nearby power pole. Photoionization detector (PID) field screening resultsappeared to increase with depth. Drilling was stopped because of time constraints implemented by DPW associated with thepower disruption at the nearby pole. Samples were analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs. Toluene, napthalene, and phthalates weredetected at concentrations below ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels. The 1999 BRAC report recommended NFA status for the entiresite, including the dry well and AST vault. In 2004, the regulators requested that additional investigation be completed at this site. Investigation in FY05 (utilizing directionaldrilling to sampled under the dry well) revealed no contamination exceeding ADEC Method 2 cleanup levels.



FGLY-076REFUSE BURN PIT-SITE 89

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Dioxins/Dibenzofurans, Metals


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............RA(C)..............

199601........199708........199810........200805........

199701199809200606200809

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 200809

Three test pits (TP-844, TP-845, and TP-846) were excavated at the site in 1997: one each at the loading areas of twoincinerators, and the third at a depression about 100 ft northeast of the incinerators. Samples were analyzed for DRO, RRO,SVOCs, VOCs, and metals. Samples from the areas of the two incinerators were below ADEC Method Two Cleanup Levels.However, elevated metals concentrations were detected at TP-846 at the northeast depression area. Arsenic (up to 43.3 mg/kg),cadmium (up to 11.8 mg/kg), chromium (up to 95.6 mg/ kg), and lead (up to 15,200 mg/kg) exceeded screening levels in effect atthe time of the work. These concentrations also exceed current ADEC Method Two cleanup levels. The TCLP lead result on thesample containing total lead of 15,200 mg/kg was 17.7 mg/L. Scrap metal was found in TP-846. Four soil borings (AP-880 through AP-883) were drilled and 10 samples collected to further investigate the northeast depressionarea during 1998. Boring AP-880 was drilled immediately adjacent to former test pit TP-846 where lead had been detected at15,200 mg/kg. Lead was detected at only 190 and 270 mg/kg, well less than the 1997 result. Other metal detections were lessthan screening levels. Also at AP-880, dioxins/furans were detected in two samples down to 7 ft bgs. Toxic Equivalents (TEQ) upto 5.51x10-5 mg/kg exceeded the EPA residential PRG of 3.8x10-6 mg/kg. Additional background sampling and evaluation of metals was conducted in 1999. Elevated detections of arsenic, cadmium, andchromium from 1997 were resolved as background and dropped as COPCs. However, lead and dioxin/furan TEQ remained asCOPCs. Lead and dioxin/furan were evaluated further as part of the LRE. The LRE was essentially an ADEC Method Three evaluation forvarious sites at Fort Greely. An ACL for ingestion was calculated for 2,3,7,8-TCDD TEQ at the site using ADEC Method Threeunder the industrial/commercial exposure scenario. The calculated ACL (3.75x10-4 mg/kg) is greater than the maximum detectedconcentration. Additionally, leachability modeling was conducted and the results demonstrated that 2,3,7,8-TCDD would notimpact groundwater at the site. Lead concentrations exceeding the ADEC Method Two residential cleanup level of 400 mg/kg were found in only one test pit (AP-846), and subsequent investigation in the immediate area was unable to reproduce the results. The results demonstrated that thislead contamination is a localized occurrence in the immediate area of the test pit TP-846. In 2004, the regulators requested that additional investigation to look for possible pesticides and PCBs at this site and requestedthat shallow (0-15 feet bgs) dioxin contamination be remediated. FY05 investigations revealed no PCB or pesticidecontamination above ADEC Method 2. Additional dioxin/lead sampling in FY06 defined the amount of contaminated soil that willrequire remediation.



FGLY-076REFUSE BURN PIT-SITE 89

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYSoil removal is needed at this site to remove the metals and dioxin/furans contamination above commercial screening levels at thesurface. A soil cover or other agreed to cap will be added to this site. Following either ACL development or a removal action, a nofurther RA DD will be completed. LUCs are implemented and will be maintained.


FGLY-100CANOL pipeline Tank Farm/South Tank

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYSoil removal/bioremediation of shallow/surface contamination began in FY06. Bioventing may be needed. Point of use treatmentwill be required if drinking water wells are found to be contaminated. Groundwater monitoring is also expected to be required toconfirm petroleum contamination at depth has not migrated to the aquifer. Pending the results of the follow-up investigation during summer 2007 and the interim removal actions, an ADEC Method 3alternate cleanup level will be developed to show any remaining exceedence of the Method 2 cleanup level do not pose a risk.LUCs are implemented and will be maintained.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Metals, Petroleum, Oil andLubricants


Phases Start End PA...................RI/FS...............IRA..................RA(C)..............RA(O)..............LTM.................

200310........200410........200510........201101........201104........201110........

200310201009200909201109201109201509

RIP Date: 201109

RC Date: 201109

This site was opened in AEDB-R in the fall 2004 data call. This site consisted of 4 ASTs and a pump station. It was operational from 1944 to 1945. The ASTs, pump house and pipelineswere removed in 1974. An aerial photograph (1977) shows the northwest AST, documenting that the tank farm existed. The siteis also shown on a 1971 orthopictomap. Documentation of site investigation activities at the site was not found in Fort GreelyDPW or USACE files. In October 2003, ASCG conducted a limited soil investigation. Five borings were done to a depth of 20 ft, 1 in each of the 4bermed areas and the remaining one in the approximate location of multiple piping connections as determined from an aerialphoto. One sample was analyzed at each boring (depth of highest PID reading) for GRO, BTEX, DRO, RRO, and lead. Levelsexceeding cleanup occurred in two locations with DRO of 2,480 mg/kg (10 ft bgs) and 360 mg/kg (5 ft bgs). Laboratory remarksindicate that the DRO samples were characteristic of weathered middle distillate. In FY04, during fenceline installation weathered diesel soil contamination was found. This area is south of the CANOL TankFarm. Some contaminated soil (approximately 100 cy) was removed at the time that it was discovered. A passive soil gas surveyconducted in the summer of 2004 showed TPH contamination in the southern portion of the tank farm. Follow-on investigations inFY05 revealed significant diesel contamination in the former AST berms and subsurface diesel/gasoline contamination at theformer location of a valve pit. A corrective action plan was prepared and bioremediation of the berm soils and shallow subsurfacecontaminated soils was be initiated in FY06. 7000 CY of soil were remediated. An additional 500CY of soil will be treated in Phase2 to be conducted in FY07. Deep contamination was discovered at the site with limited sampling. Monitoring wells were placeddowngradient of the known contamination to determine if water table impacted. Additional investigations of the deeper petroleumcontamination and the water table aquifer are planned for FY07.



Site ID Site Name NFA Date DocumentationFGLY-001

FGLY-002

FGLY-003

FGLY-004

FGLY-005

FGLY-008

FGLY-009

FGLY-011

FGLY-012

FGLY-013

FGLY-014

FGLY-016

FGLY-017

FGLY-018

FGLY-020

FGLY-021

FGLY-022

FGLY-023

FGLY-024

FGLY-025

FGLY-026

FGLY-028

FGLY-029

FGLY-030

FGLY-031

FGLY-033

POL DRUM STG BLD 601

UST'S,BLDG 110

ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS (VARIOUS)

BLDG 605,COLD REG TEST CENTER

BUILDING 601 DUMP SITE -SITE 115

LANDFILL 2-SITE 32

LANDFILL 3

LANDFILL 5

LANDFILL 6

FORMER SEWAGE LAGOON

PESTICIDE STORAGE BUILDING 349

DRUMS OF 2,4,5 - T STD IN PRK BLDG 601

DEACTIVATED NUCLEAR REACTOR

INJECTION WELL FOR NUCLEAR WASTE

PRTC RANGE 13

IMPAC RANGE 3

LANDFILL #7 (1970'S)

ACTIVE LANDFILL #8

SLUDGE DRYING BEDS

INCINERATOR/BURN PIT

ORDNANCE & HAZARDOUS MAT. STORAGE

MIDAS SITE

UST SOIL PILE

BLDG 612 ALLIED TRADES SHOP/DRUM STORAGE

BLDG 615 ROADS AND GROUNDS/DRUM STORAGE

UST, BLDG 162

199410

200009

199511

199709

199709

200306

199210

199210

199210

199511

199511

199212

199410

199410

199210

199210

199511

199511

199212

199212

199212

199511

199609

199410

199410

199604

Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005Not eligible for IRP, transferred to CCProgram2005 Environmental Sites DD

No further remedial action planned. 2005Environmental Sites DD2005 Environmental Sites DD

Combined/Addressed under FGLY-007

Not eligible for ER,A funding. Now MMRP

Combined with FGLY-010

Not eligible for ER,A funding.Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005 Not eligible for ER,A funding, no CERCLAcontaminants.Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005 Site will be reopened under Compliance-Related Cleanup ProgramSite transferred to USACE ReactorProgram for decommissioning.Site transferred to USACE ReactorProgram for decommissioning.This range is part of Fort Wainwright'sDonnelly Training Area and is no longerpart of Fort Greely. This range is part of Fort Wainwright'sDonnelly Training Area and is no longerpart of Fort Greely.Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005 Site active, therefore not eligible for ER,Afunding. Environmental Sites DecisionDocument June 2005Site active, therefore not eligible for ER,Afunding. Environmental Sites DecisionDocument June 2005Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005 Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005 This range is part of Fort Wainwright'sDonnelly Training Area and is no longerpart of Fort Greely.Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005 1997 SI - Study complete. Nocontamination foundRCRA Closure - confirmed throughUSEPA Region 10 by email 7/7/03 Not ER,A eligible (diesel contaminationonly)

Response Complete (No Further Action) Summary


Site ID Site Name NFA Date DocumentationFGLY-034

FGLY-035

FGLY-036

FGLY-037

FGLY-039

FGLY-040

FGLY-041

FGLY-042

FGLY-043

FGLY-049

FGLY-053

FGLY-060

UST, BLDG 210

USTS BLDG 602

UST'S, BLDG 606

TEXAS TOWER BLDG COMPLEX

BLDG 628 BOAT SHOP/DRUM STORAGE

BLDG 658 MOTOR POOL

TEXAS CONDO FACILITY

BLDG 606 POWER PLANT/DRUM STORAGE

UST BLDG 159

DELTA TANK FARM

OLD POWER GENERATION BLDG-SITE 116

FENCED SALVAGE AREA-SITE 112

199410

199410

199604

199511

199410

199410

199410

199410

199604

200009

200009

200306

Not ER,A eligible (diesel contaminationonly)Environmental Sites Decision DocumentJune 2005 Active facility, combined with CCFGLY-004 in Compliance Cleanup ProgramThis range is part of Fort Wainwright'sDonnelly Training Area and is no longerpart of Fort Greely.1999 RI - study complete, nocontaminationNo known contamination

This range is part of Fort Wainwright'sDonnelly Training Area and is no longerpart of Fort Greely. Active facility, combined with CCFGLY-004 in Compliance Cleanup ProgramNot ER,A eligible (diesel contaminationonly)This tank farm is no longer part of FortGreely and is being addressed under theFUDS program.Moved to Compliance Cleanup Program

Being addressed under the MMRP.



ScheduleIRPDate of IRP Inception: 199008

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

PA

SIPA

IRA

RD

PA

INV

IRARFA

CAPISC

SI

CS

RI/FSRDISCINVCAPIMP(C)

(FGLY-049 - DELTA TANK FARM)

(FGLY-029 - UST SOIL PILE)(FGLY-029 - UST SOIL PILE)

(FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110, FGLY-036 - UST'S, BLDG 606, FGLY-037 - TEXAS TOWER BLDGCOMPLEX)(FGLY-029 - UST SOIL PILE)

(FGLY-001 - POL DRUM STG BLD 601, FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110, FGLY-003 - ABOVE GROUNDSTORAGE TANKS (VARIOUS), FGLY-004 - BLDG 605,COLD REG TEST CENTER, FGLY-005 - BUILDING601 DUMP SITE -SITE 115, FGLY-006 - FIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE 85/133, FGLY-007 - LANDFILL 1-SITE 31, FGLY-008 - LANDFILL 2-SITE 32, FGLY-010 - LANDFILLS 4 AND 5-SITE 88 (LOW), FGLY-013 -FORMER SEWAGE LAGOON, FGLY-014 - PESTICIDE STORAGE BUILDING 349, FGLY-016 - DRUMS OF2,4,5 - T STD IN PRK BLDG 601, FGLY-017 - DEACTIVATED NUCLEAR REACTOR, FGLY-018 -INJECTION WELL FOR NUCLEAR WASTE, FGLY-019 - SM1A PIPELINE REMOVAL-SITE 90/132, FGLY-020 - PRTC RANGE 13, FGLY-021 - IMPAC RANGE 3, FGLY-024 - SLUDGE DRYING BEDS, FGLY-025 -INCINERATOR/BURN PIT, FGLY-026 - ORDNANCE & HAZARDOUS MAT. STORAGE, FGLY-027 - FORMERASPHALT & TAR DISPOSAL, FGLY-028 - MIDAS SITE, FGLY-030 - BLDG 612 ALLIED TRADESSHOP/DRUM STORAGE, FGLY-031 - BLDG 615 ROADS AND GROUNDS/DRUM STORAGE, FGLY-032 -BLDG 626 AUTO/CRAFT SHOP/DRUM STORAGE, FGLY-039 - BLDG 628 BOAT SHOP/DRUM STORAGE,FGLY-040 - BLDG 658 MOTOR POOL, FGLY-041 - TEXAS CONDO FACILITY, FGLY-042 - BLDG 606POWER PLANT/DRUM STORAGE)(FGLY-033 - UST, BLDG 162, FGLY-034 - UST, BLDG 210, FGLY-035 - USTS BLDG 602, FGLY-036 -UST'S, BLDG 606, FGLY-037 - TEXAS TOWER BLDG COMPLEX)(FGLY-033 - UST, BLDG 162)(FGLY-009 - LANDFILL 3, FGLY-011 - LANDFILL 5, FGLY-012 - LANDFILL 6, FGLY-022 - LANDFILL #7(1970'S), FGLY-023 - ACTIVE LANDFILL #8)(FGLY-037 - TEXAS TOWER BLDG COMPLEX)(FGLY-033 - UST, BLDG 162, FGLY-034 - UST, BLDG 210, FGLY-035 - USTS BLDG 602, FGLY-036 -UST'S, BLDG 606, FGLY-037 - TEXAS TOWER BLDG COMPLEX)(FGLY-001 - POL DRUM STG BLD 601, FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110, FGLY-003 - ABOVE GROUNDSTORAGE TANKS (VARIOUS), FGLY-006 - FIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE 85/133, FGLY-013 - FORMERSEWAGE LAGOON, FGLY-014 - PESTICIDE STORAGE BUILDING 349, FGLY-016 - DRUMS OF 2,4,5 - TSTD IN PRK BLDG 601, FGLY-017 - DEACTIVATED NUCLEAR REACTOR, FGLY-018 - INJECTION WELLFOR NUCLEAR WASTE, FGLY-020 - PRTC RANGE 13, FGLY-021 - IMPAC RANGE 3, FGLY-024 -SLUDGE DRYING BEDS, FGLY-025 - INCINERATOR/BURN PIT, FGLY-026 - ORDNANCE & HAZARDOUSMAT. STORAGE, FGLY-027 - FORMER ASPHALT & TAR DISPOSAL, FGLY-028 - MIDAS SITE, FGLY-030 -BLDG 612 ALLIED TRADES SHOP/DRUM STORAGE, FGLY-031 - BLDG 615 ROADS AND GROUNDS/DRUMSTORAGE, FGLY-039 - BLDG 628 BOAT SHOP/DRUM STORAGE, FGLY-040 - BLDG 658 MOTOR POOL,FGLY-041 - TEXAS CONDO FACILITY, FGLY-042 - BLDG 606 POWER PLANT/DRUM STORAGE)(FGLY-009 - LANDFILL 3, FGLY-011 - LANDFILL 5, FGLY-012 - LANDFILL 6, FGLY-022 - LANDFILL #7(1970'S), FGLY-023 - ACTIVE LANDFILL #8)

(FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110)(FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110)(FGLY-043 - UST BLDG 159)(FGLY-043 - UST BLDG 159)(FGLY-034 - UST, BLDG 210, FGLY-035 - USTS BLDG 602)(FGLY-034 - UST, BLDG 210, FGLY-035 - USTS BLDG 602)

Past Phase Completion Milestones


ScheduleIRP

1995

1996

1997

1998

2000

2001

2003

2004

2006

RA(C)

IRA

RA(C)PAIMP(C)RI/FS

RFI/CMSCAP

RI/FSSI

PA

RA(O)RDPASI

LTMRA(C)IRASI

RI/FS

IRA

LTM

PARI/FS

RI/FS

(FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110)

(FGLY-027 - FORMER ASPHALT & TAR DISPOSAL, FGLY-043 - UST BLDG 159)

(FGLY-029 - UST SOIL PILE)(FGLY-046 - EVERGREEN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 73)(FGLY-037 - TEXAS TOWER BLDG COMPLEX)(FGLY-003 - ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS (VARIOUS), FGLY-013 - FORMER SEWAGE LAGOON,FGLY-014 - PESTICIDE STORAGE BUILDING 349, FGLY-028 - MIDAS SITE)(FGLY-022 - LANDFILL #7 (1970'S), FGLY-023 - ACTIVE LANDFILL #8)(FGLY-036 - UST'S, BLDG 606, FGLY-043 - UST BLDG 159)

(FGLY-049 - DELTA TANK FARM)(FGLY-004 - BLDG 605,COLD REG TEST CENTER, FGLY-005 - BUILDING 601 DUMP SITE -SITE 115,FGLY-019 - SM1A PIPELINE REMOVAL-SITE 90/132, FGLY-049 - DELTA TANK FARM)(FGLY-045 - ROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30, FGLY-050 - BLDG 157 LAUNDRY-SITE 103, FGLY-053 -OLD POWER GENERATION BLDG-SITE 116, FGLY-060 - FENCED SALVAGE AREA-SITE 112, FGLY-076- REFUSE BURN PIT-SITE 89)

(FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110)(FGLY-049 - DELTA TANK FARM)(FGLY-075 - BLDG 675 LAUNDRY (54))(FGLY-045 - ROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30, FGLY-046 - EVERGREEN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 73,FGLY-050 - BLDG 157 LAUNDRY-SITE 103, FGLY-053 - OLD POWER GENERATION BLDG-SITE 116,FGLY-060 - FENCED SALVAGE AREA-SITE 112, FGLY-076 - REFUSE BURN PIT-SITE 89)

(FGLY-002 - UST'S,BLDG 110)(FGLY-049 - DELTA TANK FARM)(FGLY-045 - ROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30)(FGLY-007 - LANDFILL 1-SITE 31, FGLY-008 - LANDFILL 2-SITE 32, FGLY-010 - LANDFILLS 4 AND 5-SITE 88 (LOW), FGLY-075 - BLDG 675 LAUNDRY (54))(FGLY-045 - ROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30, FGLY-046 - EVERGREEN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 73,FGLY-053 - OLD POWER GENERATION BLDG-SITE 116, FGLY-060 - FENCED SALVAGE AREA-SITE112)

(FGLY-019 - SM1A PIPELINE REMOVAL-SITE 90/132)

(FGLY-008 - LANDFILL 2-SITE 32, FGLY-060 - FENCED SALVAGE AREA-SITE 112)

(FGLY-100 - CANOL pipeline Tank Farm/South Tank)(FGLY-010 - LANDFILLS 4 AND 5-SITE 88 (LOW))

(FGLY-076 - REFUSE BURN PIT-SITE 89)

Projected Phase Completion MilestonesSee attached schedule


ScheduleIRP

Projected Record of Decision (ROD)/Decision Document (DD) Approval Dates

Schedule for Next Five-Year Review: N/A

201509Estimated Completion Date of IRP at Installation (including LTM phase):

Final RA(C) Completion Date: 201309

NPL Deletion Date: N/A

To Be Determined


FORT GREELY IRP Schedule

PA

SI

RI/FS

IRA

RA(C)

PA

SI

LTM

PA

SI

RI/FS

LTM

PA

SI

RI/FS

IRA

PA

SI

RI/FS

IRA

PA

SI

PA

SI

RI/FS

IRA

LTM

PA

SI

RI/FS

LTM

PA

SI

RI/FS

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

FGLY-006

FGLY-007

FGLY-010

FGLY-019

FGLY-027

FGLY-032

FGLY-045

FGLY-046

FGLY-050

FIRE TRAINING AREA - SITE 85/133

LANDFILL 1-SITE 31

LANDFILLS 4 AND 5-SITE 88 (LOW)

SM1A PIPELINE REMOVAL-SITE90/132

FORMER ASPHALT & TAR DISPOSAL

BLDG 626 AUTO/CRAFT SHOP/DRUMSTORAGE

ROBIN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 30

EVERGREEN ROAD FUEL SPILL-SITE 73

BLDG 157 LAUNDRY-SITE 103

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+

= phase underway


FORT GREELY IRP Schedule

PA

SI

RI/FS

PA

SI

RI/FS

RA(C)

PA

RI/FS

IRA

RA(C)

RA(O)

LTM

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

FGLY-075

FGLY-076

FGLY-100

BLDG 675 LAUNDRY (54)

REFUSE BURN PIT-SITE 89

CANOL pipeline Tank Farm/South Tank

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE ID

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NAME

PHASE

PHASE

PHASE

FY08

FY08

FY08

FY09

FY09

FY09

FY10

FY10

FY10

FY11

FY11

FY11

FY12

FY12

FY12

FY13+

FY13+

FY13+


CostsIRP

2005

2006

FY Phase Obligations FY Total

IRALTMRI

IRALTM

RI

SI

FGLY-006FGLY-010FGLY-006FGLY-050FGLY-075FGLY-076FGLY-100FGLY-100FGLY-007FGLY-010FGLY-045FGLY-046FGLY-006FGLY-019FGLY-027FGLY-050FGLY-075FGLY-076FGLY-100FGLY-032

$255.0 K $20.0 K

$275.0 K $100.0 K $50.0 K $50.0 K

$662.6 K $642.0 K $10.0 K $20.0 K $10.0 K $10.0 K

$238.0 K $25.0 K $50.0 K $10.0 K $10.0 K $25.0 K

$223.0 K $40.0 K

$1,412.6 K

$1,313.0 K

2007

FY Phase Requirements FY Total

IRA

LTMRI/FS

SI

FGLY-006FGLY-100FGLY-010FGLY-006FGLY-019FGLY-027FGLY-100FGLY-032

$138.0 K $627.1 K $20.0 K $42.0 K $25.0 K $25.0 K

$224.0 K $25.0 K

$1,126.1 K

TOTAL PRIOR FUNDING: $30,680.6 K

TOTAL CURRENT REQUIREMENTS: $1,126.1 K

TOTAL FUTURE REQUIREMENTS: $2,421.0 K

TOTAL PROGRAM COST: $34,227.7 K

Total Funding through FY 2004: $27,955.0 K

Prior Funding

Current Requirements

Site ID

Site ID


FORT GREELY

Military Munitions Response ProgramArmy Defense Environmental Restoration Program


SummaryInstallation Total Army Environmental Database-Restoration (AEDB-R) Sites/RC Sites:

MMRP5/1

Installation Site Types with Future and/or Underway Phases1 Surface Disposal Area

Most Widespread Contaminants of ConcernMetals, Munitions and explosives of concern

Media of ConcernGroundwater, Soil


$354.0 K $30.8 K

$2,960.0 K

Total Environmental Restoration, Army (ER,A) Funding

200203

204709

Date of MMRP Inception:

Date of MMRP completion including Long Term Management (LTM):

(FGLY-005-R-01)

201709/201709

Prior Funding:


Completed Remedial Actions (Interim Remedial Actions/ Final Remedial Actions (IRA/FRA))Site Name Action FY Cost

N/A

RemedySite ID

Duration of MMRP


Contamination AssessmentMMRP

Contamination Assessment Overview

Munitions and explosives of concern (MEC) investigation planned during RI. Perform removals as needed and closeout sites.Cleanup Exit Strategy

Closed, Transferred and Transferring Range Report for Fort Greely was completed in 2003. This report identified four sites thatrequired further investigation. These sites included possible lead contamination at two rifle ranges and possible buried UXO attwo disposal locations. Fort Greely supported chemical munitions testing at the Gerstle River Test Site and is known to havebeen a staging area for material for Gerstle River Test Site. Buried drums of chemical agent decontamination fluids were foundnear Rifle Range 2, in the borrow pit for the missile field in 2002. The soil contaminated by the caustic fluids was neutralized insitu and some of the material was removed for off-site disposal.


2002

2007

Final US Army Closed, Transferring and TransferredRange/Site Inventory for Fort Greely, Alaska

MMRP Final Site Inspection Report, Fort Greely, Alaska

TechLaw, Inc.

TLI Solutions

SEP-2002

JUL-2007

Previous StudiesMMRPTitle Author Date


FORT GREELY

Military Munitions Response Program

Site Descriptions


FGLY-005-R-01Site 112

CLEANUP/EXIT STRATEGYAdditional MEC investigation is planned during the RI. Cleanup will be based on these findings.

SITE DESCRIPTION

STATUS

Contaminants of Concern: Metals, Munitions and explosives ofconcern


Phases Start End PA...................SI.....................RI/FS...............RD...................RA(C)..............LTM.................

200203........200604........201410........201510........201610........201710........

200305200707201509201609201709204709

RIP Date: N/A

RC Date: 201709

The site was a fenced salvage area; however, the storage practices at this site are unknown. No additional information regardingthe operations conducted at this site was identified during the historic research conducted for the Historical Records Review(HRR). The initial site investigation conducted identified several stained areas and noted abundant metallic debris scattered across thesurface in the southern half of Site 112. Additionally, a large quantity of scrap metal was encountered during UXO andgeophysical surveys conducted at this site, as well as the test pits that were excavated. This munitions debris included expendedsmoke grenades, ground illumination signals (slap flares), 5.56 millimeter (mm) blanks, a 155mm illumination projectile, a 2.75-inch rocket fin, and .50 caliber links. Although UXO was not positively identified during these surveys, a large quantity of UXO-related scrap was encountered at the surface and in subsurface soil. Continuous UXO monitoring was conducted during the testpit and soil boring activities. Additional UXO clearance and monitoring was conducted. A "big pile" of .50 caliber links wasidentified; however, no UXO items were observed.

MRSPP Score: Evaluation pendingRegulatory Driver: CERCLA


Site ID Site Name NFA Date DocumentationFGLY-001-R-01FGLY-002-R-01FGLY-003-R-01FGLY-004-R-01

RIFLE RANGE 1

RIFLE RANGE 2

LANDFILL-SWMU 40

JARVIS CREEK MUNITIONS BURIAL

200707

200305

200707

200707

MMRP Final Site Inspection Report, FortGreely, Alaska, July 2007Site transferred to Fort Wainwright

MMRP Final Site Inspection Report, FortGreely, Alaska, July 2007MMRP Final Site Inspection Report, FortGreely, Alaska, July 2007



ScheduleMMRPDate of MMRP Inception: 200203

2003PA (FGLY-001-R-01 - RIFLE RANGE 1, FGLY-002-R-01 - RIFLE RANGE 2, FGLY-003-R-01 - LANDFILL-

SWMU 40, FGLY-004-R-01 - JARVIS CREEK MUNITIONS BURIAL, FGLY-005-R-01 - Site 112)

Projected Phase Completion MilestonesSee attached schedule

Projected Record of Decision (ROD)/Decision Document (DD) Approval Dates

Schedule for Next Five-Year Review: N/A

204709Estimated Completion Date of MMRP at Installation (including LTM phase):

Final RA(C) Completion Date: 201709

NPL Deletion Date: N/A

Past Phase Completion Milestones

To Be Determined


FORT GREELY MMRP Schedule

PA

SI

RI/FS

RD

RA(C)

LTM

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

FGLY-005-R-01 Site 112SITE ID SITE NAME PHASE FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13+

= phase underway


CostsMMRP

2006

FY Phase Obligations FY Total

SI FGLY-001-R-01FGLY-003-R-01FGLY-004-R-01

$93.0 K $93.0 K $93.0 K

$279.0 K

2007

FY Phase Requirements FY Total

SI FGLY-001-R-01FGLY-002-R-01FGLY-003-R-01FGLY-004-R-01

$9.0 K $3.8 K $9.0 K $9.0 K

$30.8 K

TOTAL PRIOR FUNDING: $354.0 K

TOTAL CURRENT REQUIREMENTS: $30.8 K

TOTAL FUTURE REQUIREMENTS: $2,960.0 K

TOTAL PROGRAM COST: $3,344.8 K

Total Funding through FY 2004: $75.0 K

Prior Funding

Current Requirements

Site ID

Site ID

Community Involvement

Technical Review Committee (TRC):

Restoration Advisory Board (RAB):

None

RAB established 199609

Potential TAPP: NULL

Additional Community Involvement Information The Restoration Advisory Board was formed in September 1996 and meets quarterly. No Technical Assistance for PublicParticipation has been requested. Community Relations Plan was last updated in 1998.

Current Technical Assistance for Public Participation (TAPP): N/ATAPP Title: N/A

RAB Adjournment Date: RAB Adjournment Reason:

N/ANone

Administrative Record is located at Delta Junction Public Library 8.5 Mile Jack Warren Road Delta Junction, AK 99737

Information Repository is located at http://www.smdcen.us/rabfga


Date post:	01-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	buidieu
View:	215 times
Download:	2 times