Date post: | 06-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | national-press-foundation |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 16
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
1/16
Global health funding:
2001-2011 and beyond
By Mark Harrington
Treatment Action Group27 October 2011
Lille, France
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
2/16
Global health funding has increased in
recent years.
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
3/16
.
McCoy D et al. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24:407-417
The global health funding architecture
has become much more complex
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
4/16
Global health commitments are larger
than disbursements
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
5/16
Health Official Development Assistance (ODA)Commitments by Donor, 2001 & 2008
Total = $7.6 billion Total = $26.4 billion
2001 2008
US$ Billions
Notes: Amounts in gross US$ commitments. Health ODA combines data from four OECD CRS sub-sectors: (1) Health; (2) Population Policies/Programs and Reproductive Health(includes HIV/AIDS & STDs); (3) Water Supply/Sanitation; and (4) Other Social Infrastructure and Services - Social Mitigation of HIV/AIDS. Source: Analysis of data obtained viaonline query of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Database and Creditor Reporting System (CRS), June 22, 2010.
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
6/16
Health Official Development Assistance (ODA)Commitments by Donor, 2001 & 2008
Total = $7.6 billion Total = $26.4 billion
2001 2008
US$ Billions
Notes: Amounts in gross US$ commitments. Health ODA combines data from four OECD CRS sub-sectors: (1) Health; (2) Population Policies/Programs and Reproductive Health(includes HIV/AIDS & STDs); (3) Water Supply/Sanitation; and (4) Other Social Infrastructure and Services - Social Mitigation of HIV/AIDS. Source: Analysis of data obtained viaonline query of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Database and Creditor Reporting System (CRS), June 22, 2010.
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
7/16
U.S. Global Health Initiative (GHI) as a Share ofthe Federal Budget, FY 2012*
Federal Budget$3.7 trillion
*FY 2012 is Presidents Budget Request to Congress.Sources: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data from the Office of Management and Budget, Agency Congressional Budget Justifications, and Congressional Appropriations Bills.
Global HealthInitiative (GHI)
$9.8 billion
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
8/16
Independent Agency
Labor Peace Corps
CDC
HomelandSecurity
Commerce
EPA
The White House
Defense
USDANIH
FDA
HRSAPEPFAR
HHSOGHAOPHS
MCC
PMI
Water forPoor
NTDProgram
Department
Multi-AgencyInitiative
Dept. Operating Unit
CONG
RESS
Notes: GHI: Global Health Initiative; PEPFAR: Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief; PMI: Presidents Malaria Initiative ; NTD: Neglected Tropical Diseases Initiative; MCC:Millennium Challenge Corporation; OGHA: Office of Global Health Affairs; OPHS: Office of Public Health and Science. Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, The U.S. GovernmentsGlobal Health Policy Architecture: Structure, Programs, and Funding; April 2009; White House, Statement by the President on Global Health Initiative, May 5, 2009.
The U.S. Governments Global Health Architecture
USAIDBureaus for: Global Health;
Economic Growth, Agriculture& Trade; Democracy, Conflict,
Humanitarian Assistance.Missions
KEY
Treasury
GHI
StateOGACOES
Ambassadors
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
9/16
$3.3 $3.7$4.5
$5.9$7.5
$8.4$1.1
$1.5
$1.8
$1.4
$2.3$1.9
$1.8 $1.8
$8.9 $8.9
FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
CR
Other Global Health
GHI Programs
U.S. Global Health Initiative (GHI) & Other U.S. GlobalHealth Funding, FY 2004-FY 2011
$4.4$5.2
$6.3
$7.3
$9.8$10.3 $10.8
In Billions
*FY 2011 is currently funded through a Continuing Resolution (CR) that provides funding at FY 2010 enacted levels. Amounts are rounded.Note: The GHI was created as an initiative in FY 2009. All prior years represent the same programs and accounts which were not yet referred to as the GHI.Sources: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data from the Office of Management and Budget, Agency Congressional Budget Justifications prepared by individual agencies,and Congressional Appropriations Bills.
$10.7
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
10/16
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
11/16
Top 10 Countries, U.S. Global Health Initiative (GHI)HIV/AIDS Funding, by Total FY 2010 Funding
* = GHI PlusCountry
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation. The U.S. Global Health Initiative: A Country Analysis;February 2011.
In Thousands
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
12/16
U.S. Global Health Initiative (GHI) Funding: GlobalTuberculosis (TB), FY 2001-FY 2012*
In Millions
*FY 2011 is currently funded through a Continuing Resolution (CR) that provides funding at FY 2010 enacted levels. FY 2012 is Presidents Budget Request to Congress.Note: The GHI was created as an initiative in FY 2009. All prior years represent the same programs and accounts which were not yet referred to as the GHI.Sources: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data from the Office of Management and Budget, Agency Congressional Budget Justifications, and Congressional Appropriations Bills.
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
13/16
U.S. Global Health Initiative (GHI)Tuberculosis (TB) Countries, FY 2010
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation. The U.S. Global Health Initiative: A Country Analysis;February 2011.
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
14/16
Results (HIV)
Global ART programs cost $14-2-$16.6 billion over the past decade.
Over the decade, ART for the 3.5 million patient initial cohort saves18.5 million life-years.
The corresponding gross discounted economic benefits amount to
$34.0 billion. The monetary benefits range from 81 percent to 287 percent of
program costs over the same period. These results suggest that, inaddition to the large health gains generated, the economic benefits oftreatment will substantially offset, and likely exceed, program costswithin 10 years of investment.
- S Resch et al.(2011) Economic Returns to Investment in AIDS Treatmentin Low and Middle Income Countries. PLoS ONE 6(10): e25310.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025310.
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
15/16
Recommendations
Examine not only how much is raised but how it isspent and who benefits.
Create systematic global measurement systems forglobal health investments, disbursements, andimpact.
Strengthen the ability of civil society to serve as awatchdog on how governments, NGOs, the private
sector, and donor programs function to the benefit ofthe end-users and their communities.
8/2/2019 Global Health Funding (Mark Harrington)
16/16
References
McCoy D, Chand S, Sridhar D. Global health funding: how much, where it comesfrom and where it goes. Health Policy & Planning. November 2009: 24 (6): 407-417. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp026. Published online: July 1, 2009.
Kaiser Family Foundation. U.S. Global Health Policy. 2011. globalhealth.kff.org/.
OECD. Measuring aid to health. 2008. www.oecd.org/dac/stats/health.Resch S, Korenromp E, Stover J, Blakley M, Krubiner C, Thorien K, Hecht R, Atun R.
(2011) Economic Returns to Investment in AIDS Treatment in Low and MiddleIncome Countries. PLoS ONE 6(10): e25310.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025310.
http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/healthhttp://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/health