+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Date post: 05-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: urian
View: 33 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Maximal Extraction of Biological Information from Genetic Interaction Data. Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle). Genetic Interaction. Pairwise perturbation two genes combine to affect phenotype Hereford & Hartwell 1974 Measure a phenotype for 4 strains: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
15
Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle) Maximal Extraction of Biological Information from Genetic Interaction Data
Transcript
Page 1: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Greg Carter

Galitski LabInstitute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Maximal Extraction of Biological Information from

Genetic Interaction Data

Page 2: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Genetic Interaction

Pairwise perturbation

two genes combine to affect phenotype

Hereford & Hartwell 1974

Measure a phenotype for 4 strains:

1. Wild-type reference genotype

2. Perturbation of gene A

3. Perturbation of gene B

4. Double perturbation of A and B

• Loss-of-function, gain-of-function, dominant-negative, etc.

• Interaction depends on phenotype measured.

Page 3: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Example: flo11 and sfl1 for yeast invasion.

WT flo11 sfl1 flo11sfl1

pre-

was

hpo

st-w

ash

Invasion Assay

~2000 interactions measured

(Drees et al, 2005)

Genetic Interaction

Page 4: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

45 possible phenotype inequalities

Classified into 9 rules (Drees, et al. 2005)

Classification of Interactions

WT=A=B=AB, WT=A<B=AB, A=B=WT<AB, A<B<WT=AB, AB<A<WT=B, WT=A=AB<B, WT=A=AB<B, A<B<WT<AB, etc…

Page 5: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Distribution of Rules

2000 interactions among 130 genes

Yeast Invasion Network

Page 6: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Extracting Biological Statements

Statistical associations of a gene interacting with a function

PhenotypeGenetics plug-in for Cytoscape

www.cytoscape.org

Page 7: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

WT=A=B=AB, WT=A<B=AB, A=B<WT<AB, A<B<WT=AB, AB<A<WT=B, WT=A=AB<B, WT=A=AB<B, A<B<WT<AB, etc…

?

Can the 45 interactions be classified in a more informative way?

How many rules?

Distribution of interactions?

Classification Problem

Page 8: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Requirements for a complexity metric :

1. Adding a gene with random interactions adds no information

2. Duplicating a gene adds no information

3. Should depend on

(i) the information content of each gene’s interactions, and

(ii) the information content of all gene-gene relationships.

General requirements for biological information (see poster).

Context-dependent Complexity

Page 9: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

= Ki mij (1 – mij )

Ki is the information of node i,

mij is the mutual information between i and j,

0 ≤ mij ≤ 1and

0 ≤ ≤ 1

Applied to (see poster):

• Sets of bit strings (sequences)• Network architecture• Dynamic Boolean networks• Genetic interaction networks…

pairs ij

Context-dependent Complexity

Page 10: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Genetic Interaction Networks

• Invasion network of Drees, et al. Genome Biology 2005

130 genes, 2000 interactions

• MMS fitness network of St Onge, et al. Nature Genetics 2007

26 genes, 325 interactions

Determined networks of maximum complexity .

Network Classification Scheme

Invasion Data MMS Fitness Data

biological

statements

biological statements

Drees, et al. 0.57 52 0.27 28Segré, et al. 0.52 47 0.32 19St Onge, et al. - - 0.16 10Maximum 0.79 72 0.62 32

Page 11: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Complexity and Biological Information

Number of biological statements is correlated with

115k possible MMS fitness networks, r = 0.80

Page 12: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Genetic Interaction Networks

Maximally complex MMS fitness network

Rule Frequency InequalitiesClassical Interpretation

(Drees et al. 2005)

1 120 PAB = PA < PB < PWTepistatic

2 55 PAB < PA = PB < PWTadditive

3 92 PAB < PA < PB < PWTadditive

4 30PAB = PA = PB < PWT

PAB = PA < PB = PWT

asynthetic

non-interactive

5 26

PAB < PA = PB = PWT

PA < PAB = PB < PWT

PAB = PA = PB = PWT

PAB < PA < PB = PWT

PA < PAB < PB < PWT

synthetic

epistatic

non-interactive

conditional

single-nonmonotonic

Page 13: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

gene interacts via with genes P

SGS1 Rule 5 error-free DNA repair 0.00014

SWC5 Rule 2 error-free DNA repair 0.00056CSM2 Rule 4 error-free DNA repair 0.0026

SHU2 Rule 4 error-free DNA repair 0.0030SHU1 Rule 4 error-free DNA repair 0.0065

Genetic Interaction Networks

Biological statements from the

maximally complex MMS fitness network

gene interacts via with genes P

PSY3 Rule 1 meiotic recombination 0.0011

St Onge, et al. Figure 5d

Page 14: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Conclusion and Future Work

For a given data set, maximizing facilitates unsupervised, maximal information extraction by balancing over-generalized and over-specific classifications schemes.

Need network-based methods to interpret the maximally complex interaction rules. Interpretations will depend on the system, specific to phenotype measured and perturbations performed.

See poster for more details

Page 15: Greg Carter Galitski Lab Institute for Systems Biology (Seattle)

Becky DreesAlex Rives

Marisa RaymondIliana Avila-Campillo

Paul ShannonJames TaylorSusanne Prinz

Vesteinn ThorssonTim Galitski

Matti NykterNathan Price

Ilya ShmulevichDavid Galas

Thanks to


Recommended