How to design a scalable flipped classroom
A/Professor Carl ReidsemaDr Abelardo Pardo
Workshop Outline
• 1st hour - Whole Systems Design• Break (30 mins)• 2nd hour - Implementation Issues
Opening the conversation …
Your thoughts +Our experiences +
Context considerations=
Next steps/ further conversations
A definition – perhaps too tight?
The flipped classroom describes a reversal of traditional teaching where students gain first exposure to new material outside of class, usually via reading or lecture videos, and then class time is used to do the harder work of assimilating that knowledge through strategies such as problem-solving, discussion or debates.
(Vanderbilt University, Centre for Teaching/TEDI).
Question
Why would YOU want to deploy a Flipped Classroom?
• Correct misconceptions• Increase conceptual depth• Integrate depth with breadth• Improve on-campus engagement in learning• Reallocation of staff to high value tasks?• Taking advantage of online learning resources
Why?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joefruchey/4304930267
Roles and expectations:
– Students MUST take responsibility: Ownership of learning
– Teachers MUST take facilitation roles
And there’s a narrative that evolves out of this – a shared meaning/ relevance
Paradigm changes
Questions
What are the implications of:1. Changing expectations of students2. Changing roles of staff3. Building on the online resources in class
a. Concept explorationb. Demonstration/ Applicationc. Meaning making
CURRICULUMCourse
ContentActivities
AssessmentCommunication
CONTEXT
CURRICULUM
Course
Learning Objectives
FLIP
DRIVERS:• Institution/ Management• Academics/ Students• Industry• Technology• Global trends
EVALUATION
NAR
RATI
VE
People-Spaces-Tools
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Shared understanding
3. Ownership of learning
Flipped Classroom Design Considerations
Design
Measure
Red Hat Conversation
Do you feel daunted/ pressured/ excited at the prospect of flipping your classroom?
Workshop Approach to Engage Staff
So who did the pre-work?
• It takes more time than you think.• Use other people’s stuff.• Expect push-back from students.• Keep your options open.• Have a plan for your extra class time – that’s
the point!
John Sowash: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JPdGlyt6gg
Key Aspects from the Podcasts
Aspects to apply to your context
Key Aspects• Upfront planning/design takes time and thought• Complex systems approach• Ownership of Learning • Importance of Context • Importance of Narrative• Putting content online is only
a small part
Institutional Context
The institutional factors affecting the way that the course is implemented:
• type of institution;• institutional values; and• Reputation
Course Design/ Delivery
The topic focus, resources, and, technology used
How content is delivered (read/ watch – discuss/ create – explore/ evaluate)
Learner granularity (individual, group, team)
Instructor Characteristics
The experience and attitudes of the instructor
Student Characteristics
Experiences, expectations and attitudes of the students
Cohort size and diversity
Level of prior knowledge
Community Expectations
The expectations of evaluators:
• accrediting bodies, • industry, • funding bodies etc.
Learning Objectives
What changes in student knowledge and skills are expected
Instructor Motivation
The support and rewards available to the instructor
Level of ownership
Student Motivation
The kinds and levels of effort and interest that students put into the course
Rewards for doing well
Curriculum Context
Factors affecting the status, purpose and perceptions of the course within its program context
Assessment
Nature and weightings of assessment tasks, and the nature of the criteria (recall – synthesise – create)
Teacher Behaviours
Teacher decisions, attitudes, and interactions (sage on stage – guide on side – co-traveller)
Student support – tutors, email response etc.
Student Behaviours
The nature and amount of student participation in the course including how much they focus on topics, processes, and products
Let’s map your context (10 mins)
Institutional Context• Public funded/research intensive • Ranked 2nd (Australia) and in the
top 100 internationally• 100 years old • Recent edX member• 1200 students enrolled annually in
engineering• Teaching Focused (TF) academic
program • Strong but informal SOTL strength
in engineering and science
Course Design/ Delivery• Engineering Modelling and
Problem Solving through authentic team based major design/build projects
• Flipped Class mode with engineering materials concepts delivered through online videos
• Entirely active learning/no lectures• Balanced individual/team learning
Instructor Characteristics• Professorial leadership with
extensive industry experience• Award winning TF academics• Learner/student focused• Change agents • Project leaders and tutors carefully
selected – enthusiasm, desire to work with first years, ability to challenge students
• Teaching team ~40
Student Characteristics• 100% transfer from ENGG1100
with similar demographics• Multiple engineering disciplines• Mix of engineering statics, thermo,
electrical fundamentals• Mix of 1st year maths ability• Improved social networks• Improved conceptions of degree
major
Community Expectations• Engineers Australia (EA) • Emphasis on theory-practice,
critical thinking, engineering ability • Grow Industry funding through
student project sponsorship (Boeing, ABB, Barnes Foundation etc.);
Learning Objectives• Appreciation of
mathematical/virtual/physical modelling
• Application of engineering materials behaviour in design
• Demonstrated ownership of learning
• Reflective writing for design thinking and planning
• Effective team skills• Use of design process
Instructor Motivation• Largely intrinsic rewards for degree
of effort• High probability of promotion
through change leadership• Opportunity to engage in research
around design learning and transformational change
• High degree of ownership but significant teaching team autonomy
Student Motivation• Still predominantly strategic
learners• Strong desire for authentic learning
and experiences• Seeking relevance • Developing levels of ownership and
identity• Critical team players
Curriculum Context• Course Evaluation results• EA commendation• Academic conceptions of technical
rigour• Industry recognition• National awards received• Balance research intensive image
with real world authentic learning
Assessment• Varied assessment types• Online MCQ/written reflections• Team design reports• Structured activity templates• Demonstration of final designed
product performance• Team peer review
Teacher Behaviours• Emphasis on teaching as
facilitation and coaching• Emphasis on experiential learning• Extensive use of PG/UG tutors• Extensive use of
Facebook/email/LMS communication modes
• Strong emphasis on developing student’s agency
Student Behaviours• Predominantly strongly motivated• Mixed cohort of epistemological
developmental levels (3-4 Perry)• Accepting of challenges• Struggle with teaching vs learning• High degree of participation
ENGG1200 – Engineering Modelling and Problem Solving– Semester 2, Year 1
Black Hat Conversation
What are the immediate obstacles?
What are the long-term problems?
Write on sticky notes and then categorise (make new category if necessary): 5 mins
Let’s take a break
Sustainable FC Implementation
SpacesPeople Technology
ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/93877181@N
00/4905173357/
Gradual Strategy
Sustainable FC Implementation
People
ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/93877181@N
00/4905173357/
http:
//w
ww
.flic
kr.c
om/p
hoto
s/jo
efru
chey
/430
4930
267
People - Students
• Take ownership of their learning• Clearly informed of expectations• Additional scaffolding required• Detailed feedback on progress
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/joefruchey/4304930267
People - Instructors
• Institutional support to active learning• Clear vision of how to deploy FC • Transition from traditional lectures • Suggest gradual approach• Promote best practices (projects, grants)
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/hisgett/6940877193
People - Instructors
Anticipate obstacles• More time• Useful?• Not an improvement
Empower people
Vision
Experts
Project leaders
E-Learning
People
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/90585146@N08/8222922317
People - Instructors
Student - driven
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/nicmcphee/279625345/
People - Instructors
Learning by doing
People - Others
• Admin support• Tech support• Professional development team
What is the #1 action for your “people”?
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/joefruchey/4304930267
Spaces
ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/93877181@N
00/4905173357/
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/pahudson/5514887224/
Spaces to prepare
Spaces to interact
Be creative: Find spaces
Be creative: Find spaces
Spaces to interact
Outdoors?
Old spaces, new activities
What is the #1 action regarding spaces?
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/joefruchey/4304930267
Sustainable FC Implementation
Technology
ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/93877181@N
00/4905173357/
Use technology
To bind together …
… for content …
http://www.ozteacher.com.au/technology/technology-in-schools/cheat-sheet-a-beginners-guide-to-tutorial-videos-and-screencasting/25038
• Createams – purposeful team selection• WebPA – peer assessment• Teamwork in Action – team training
ALL LINKED TO BLACKBOARD – our institutional LMS
and management.
What is the #1 technological action?
http://ww
w.flickr.com
/photos/joefruchey/4304930267
CURRICULUMCourse
ContentActivities
AssessmentCommunication
CONTEXT
CURRICULUM
Course
Learning Objectives
FLIP
DRIVERS:• Institution/ Management• Academics/ Students• Industry• Technology• Global trends
EVALUATION
NAR
RATI
VE
People-Spaces-Tools
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Shared understanding
3. Ownership of learning
So returning to …
Design
Measure
Yellow Hat Conversation
Where to next?What are the opportunities?
How will this all get done?
Thank you!
Concept Mapping of Engineering Materials– What students need to know– What students need to do (to demonstrate attainment)
Example: Designing a new course
Example: a template session
Start with learning outcomes …
Example: a practical session
Example: Owning Learning through reflection
R1: What are your goals?R2: Project ManagementR3: Check your theoryR4: ModellingR5: Goal Check
Example – University of Sydney
• ELEC1601 Fundamentals of Computer Systems• First year, second semester Engineering• Enrollment: 300 students.
Sessions with Previous and in-class activitiesClear statement of that is needed
Videos to supportactivities
MCQ to guarantee engagement
Report engagement to staff