+ All Categories
Home > Documents > HPI Complete GROUP 2

HPI Complete GROUP 2

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: mazi1772
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 40

Transcript
  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    1/40

    HUMAN PERFORMANCE

    IMPROVEMENT

    Group 2

    1

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    2/40

    Measuring performance is an exercise in measuring the past. It is the

    use of that data to plan an improved future that is all important.(Peter Brophy, 2006)

    PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

    2

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    3/40

    PRESENTATION OUTLINE1. Concept of Performance Measurement

    2. Definitions of Human Performance

    Improvement (HPI)

    3. Importance of HPI

    4. Models of HPI

    5. Example of HPI6. Conclusions

    3

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    4/40

    Vision statements provide a broad guideline of future

    organizational goals, mission statements define the scope of

    the organization, differentiate it from competitors and give a

    summary of why the organization exists Bowen (2005)

    INTRODUCTION

    4

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    5/40

    Definition

    systematicapproach to

    improveproductivity and

    competence

    a set of methodsand procedures -and a strategy forsolving problems

    realizingopportunitiesrelated to the

    performance ofpeople.

    5

    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2006)

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    6/40

    HPI

    Systematic

    systemic

    Grounded inscientifically

    derivedtheories

    Open to allmeans,

    method andmedia

    Focused onachievementthat human

    performers andthe system

    value

    HUMAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

    CHARACTERISTICS

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    7/40

    PROCESS MODEL

    PerformanceAnalysis

    CauseAnalysis

    Intervention Implementation ChangeManagement

    Evaluationand

    Measurement

    Design / Develop

    Need Analysis Impliment

    Evaluation

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    8/40

    NEEDS ANALYSISTraining Needs Analysis

    Human Performance Improvement

    Focuses on gaps in knowledge and skills Focuses on organizations, processes and the individual

    Not as systematic as HPI Very systematic, looking at all aspects of performance

    gaps in organizations, processes, and individuals

    Does not typically recommend interventions beyond a

    training program

    Recommends interventions in all areas of the

    organizations, processes, and individuals.

    Training usually conducted at the individual level Training may be only one element of an HPI

    intervention

    May or may not be linked to goals or incentives Goals and incentives are keys to an HPI intervention

    Not as results focused. Typically other elements need

    to be included to ensure appropriate results. These are

    outside a training analysis

    Always results based including all aspects of an

    organizations, a process, or an individuals performance

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    9/40

    RUMMLERS MODEL

    Do the work processes

    impede performance?

    Do performers have what they need(time, tools, staff, information)?

    1. Barriers 2. Performance Expectations

    Have performance expectationsbeen established?

    Communicated?

    6. Individual Abilities

    5. Knowledge/Skill

    Do the performers have the necessary skill

    and knowledge to perform?

    Do the performers know why desired

    performance is important?

    Are they capable physically, mentally, and

    emotionally to perform?

    4. Feedback

    Do performers receive feedback about

    their performance?

    Is the information they receive

    relevant?

    accurate?

    timely?

    specific?

    constructive?Easy to understand?

    3. Consequences

    Are there negative consequences to

    nonperformance?

    Are there positive consequences for

    good performance?

    Are the consequences timely?

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    10/40

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    11/40

    11

    Individualsand

    Organization

    performanceanalysis

    causeanalysis

    interventionselection

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    12/40

    1.1 GOOD STAFF CRITERIA

    TRADITIONAL MEASUREMENT

    Revenues and expenditures

    Community size/registered borrowers

    Staff size and salariesNEW MEASUREMENT

    Positive impact and outcomes

    for customers

    Value to customers and

    stakeholders

    *Tell us the value to the user

    (Hiller & Kyrillidou, 2008)

    12

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    13/40

    1.5 THE CHALLENGES

    Traditional statistics dont define the 21st Century

    Can no longer tell the staff performance

    May not be aligned with organizational goals and plans

    Dont define and measure service quality

    Need metrics describing outcomes: success and valuefrom the users perspective

    Provide the organizational culture, structure, tools, &

    skill sets needed for oragnization to acquire & use this

    information(Hiller & Kyrillidou, 2008)

    13

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    14/40

    1.2 DEFINITION OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

    Performance measurement is the ongoing

    monitoring and reporting of program

    accomplishments, particularly progress

    towards pre-established goals(United States General Accounting Office ,1998)

    14

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    15/40

    1.3 THE ASPECTS OF EVALUATION

    eedback

    inputs processes outputs outcomesresources performance customers

    (human/

    financial etc)measures

    service

    qualitysatisfaction

    Evaluation

    Source: Cullen (1998) 15

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    16/40

    5.PERFORMANCEMEASUREMENTS

    MODELS

    16

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    17/40

    5.1 Performance Measurement Model

    Figure 1Source : Boekhorst (1995)

    17

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    18/40

    5.1 Performance Measurement Model

    Performance is the degree to which a library is

    achieving its objectives, particularly in term of users

    needs

    Performance indicators (measures) are quantified

    statements used to evaluate the performance of the

    library in achieving its objectives

    18

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    19/40

    HPI EXAMPLE IN THE

    ORGANIZATIONS

    19

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    20/40

    (1) AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF

    MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN SRI LANKA

    TYPES OF

    ORGANIZATION

    TYPES OF MEASURES RESULTS

    The Department of Census

    and Statistics of Sri Lanka

    Classifies industrialestablishments into 3 main

    divisions:

    a) Mining and Quarrying

    b) Manufacturing

    c) Production &distribution of

    Electricity, Gas & Water

    five-point Likert response

    scale ranging from 1 (strongly

    disagree) to 5 (strongly

    agree)

    Team work,

    communication,

    performance

    evaluation,empowerment,

    rewards and

    recognition, and skill

    development

    practices significantly

    positively correlatewith quality results

    20

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    21/40

    21

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    22/40

    (2)

    New Paradigm

    Individual

    +Organization & Processes

    =

    Performance

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    23/40

    SAFER Dialogue

    Product

    Results

    OrganizationalProcesses

    & Values

    Anticipate Error

    Traps

    Evaluate

    Defenses

    Summarize

    Critical

    Steps

    Post-Job

    Briefing

    PLAN PREPARE PERFORM

    SAFER STAR

    Worker

    BehaviorITH

    LEARNMGT System

    Feedback

    Job-SiteConditions

    Review

    Experience

    PURSUE EXCELLENCE

    Stop

    Think

    Act

    Review

    Look Critically, Engage to Improve, Avoid Recurrence,

    Report Honestly, and Nurture Learning in Others

    TaskDemands

    Work

    Environment

    Human

    Nature

    Individual

    Capabilities Foresee

    Potential

    Consequences

    Pre-job

    BriefingA Dialogue

    Task

    PreviewBefore & During

    Pre-job

    Briefing

    Proactive Mental Framework

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    24/40

    Limited short-term memory Personality conflicts

    Mental shortcuts (biases) Lack of alternative indication

    Inaccurate risk perception (Pollyanna) Unexpected equipment conditions

    Mindset (tuned to see) Hidden system response Complacency / Overconfidence Workarounds / OOS instruments

    Assumptions (inaccurate mental picture) Confusing displays or controls

    Habit patterns Changes / Departures from routine

    Stress (limits attention) Distractions / Interruptions

    Human NatureWork Environment Illness / Fatigue Lack of or unclear standardsHazardous attitude for critical task Unclear goals, roles, & responsibilities

    Indistinct problem-solving skills Interpretation requirements

    Lack of proficiency / Inexperience Irrecoverable acts

    Imprecise communication habits Repetitive actions, monotonous

    New technique not used before Simultaneous, multiple tasks

    Lack of knowledge (mental model) High Workload (memory requirements) Unfamiliarity w/ task / First time Time pressure (in a hurry)

    IndividualCapabilitiesTask Demands

    Error Precursors -- Short List

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    25/40

    SummarizeCriticalSteps

    Anticipate Error

    Traps

    Foresee

    Potential

    Consequences

    Evaluate

    Defenses

    Review

    Experience

    Task

    Preview

    Before & DuringPre-job

    Pre-job

    Briefing

    A Dialogue

    SAFER Dialogue

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    26/40

    80% Human Error30%

    Individual

    20% Equipment

    Failures

    Human Errors

    Occurrences

    70% Latent

    Organization

    Weaknesses*

    (Slips, trips, lapses)

    * Latent Organization Weakness Hidden deficiencies in managementcontrol process or values creating workplace conditions that can provoke

    an error and/or degrade the integrity of defenses

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    27/40

    (3)

    MODEL OF HUMAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    28/40

    The Human Performance Improvement model

    developed and evolved from work in systems

    engineering, behavioural and cognitive

    psychology, instructional systems design, andstudy of analytical systems. The use of the

    model allows for a streamlined approach for

    analyzing performance problems and findingthe solution that best fits the problem.

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    29/40

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    30/40

    (4)

    CASE STUDY :

    The Relationship Between

    Knowledge Sharing, Employee

    Performance And Service Delivery InPublic Sector

    Organisations: A Theoretical

    FrameworkRUZAINI BIN KAMARUDIN

    FACULTY OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES

    GS30053

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    31/40

    INTRODUCTION

    Public sector efficiency and effectiveness have alwaysbeen important issues for many countries, includingMalaysia.

    Suggested by Wiig, knowledge management couldplay an important role in improving the efficiency ofpublic administration

    For non-profit oriented organizations like the publicsector, knowledge sharing can help to increasecontinuous performance, service delivery, and alsocustomer and staff satisfaction.

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    32/40

    THEORY

    According to Rao performance is what isexpected to be delivered by an individual or a setof individuals within a time frame, and it hasmany dimensions. These include: output

    dimensions, input dimensions, time dimensions,focus dimensions, quality dimensions and costdimensions. Due to the various dimensions ofperformance, there is no universally accepted

    model or a single best measure for performance[20]. However, in general, performance can bemeasured at two levels: employee or individualperformance and organizational performance.

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    33/40

    EMPERICAL EVIDENTS

    Recommendations - 9th Malaysia Plan is the creation of aknowledge-based public service through encouraging knowledgesharing among and within government agencies.

    Previous works assert that it is the lack of information andknowledge sharing that leads to poor public sector service delivery

    as evinced by the number of grievances received by the PublicComplaints Bureau. The government of Malaysia seeks to ensurethat public complaints are managed effectively.

    The theory is considered relevant to the study as to render betterservice, employees should have knowledge about what they areproviding to the people.

    It is impossible for employees to deliver good service withouthaving relevant knowledge.

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    34/40

    (5)Strategy and Structure Follow People:

    Improving Organizational Performance

    Through Effective Executive Search

    By Mark S. Van Clieaf

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    35/40

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    36/40

    7. CONCLUSION Measures, & standard are essential forthe enhancement & transformation

    towards excellence.

    HPI can help libraries to distinguish the

    factors that will create VALUE

    In order to increase the understanding

    about HPI among staffs, more efforts

    are needed to ensure all of them will

    go hand-in-hand in contributing to the

    process of achieving the HPI.36

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    37/40

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    38/40

    38

  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    39/40

    REFERENCESAdvanced Performance Institute. (2011). Key performance indicators (KPIs) - explained: Examples, reporting &

    case studies... Retrieved 5/1/2011, 2011, from http://www.ap-institute.com/Key Performance

    Indicators.htmlBourne, M., & Bourne, P. (2002). Balanced scorecard in a week. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Brophy, P. (2006). Measuring library performance: Principles and techniques. London: Facet.

    Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, A. P. L. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.

    Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2), 203-221.

    Cullen, R. (1998). Measure for measure: A post modern critique of performance measurement in libraries and

    information services. Iatul Conference Proceedings,

    Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1990). Performance indicators. Clevedon, Avon, England; Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

    Human performance improvement in organizations: Potential application for the nuclear industry. IAEA in

    Austria November 2005

    International standard ISO 11620. (2005). International standard. ISO 11620, information and documentation

    = information et documentation. library performance indicators = indicateurs de performance des

    bibliothques. Geneva: ISO Copyright Office.

    John Reh, F. (1997). Key performance indicators what are key performance indicators or KPIS. Retrieved

    3/19/2011, 2011, from http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/keyperfindic.htm

    Krishnapillai, A. (2009). Understanding key performance indicators through driver measures. (M.Sc., University

    of Ottawa (Canada)). , 115.

    Parmenter, D. (2009). Key performance indicators (KPIS) developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs.

    Pekeliling Kemajuan Pentadbiran Awam Bilangan 2 Tahun 2005.

    Garis Panduan Bagi Mewujudkan Petunjuk-Petunjuk Prestasi Utama Atau Key Performance Indicators

    (KPIS) Dan Melaksanakan Pengukuran Prestasi Di Agensi Kerajaan, (2005). Retrieved fromhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.my 39

    http://www.ap-institute.com/Keyhttp://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/keyperfindic.htmhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0hbDCtU8Qw4J:e-maik.myhttp://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/keyperfindic.htmhttp://www.ap-institute.com/Keyhttp://www.ap-institute.com/Keyhttp://www.ap-institute.com/Key
  • 8/2/2019 HPI Complete GROUP 2

    40/40

    REFERENCES

    Performance measurement in libraries. Retrieved 10/9/2011, 2011, fromhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=my

    Ministry of Higher Education. (2011). University act. Retrieved 5/1/2011, 2011, fromhttp://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/University Act

    Mohd Najib, T. R. (2009a).

    KPIS nasional diperkenal hujung bulan. Retrieved 3/19/2011, 2011, fromhttp://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=newslist&news_id=239&news_cat=13&page=1731&sort_year=&sort_month=

    Mohd Najib, T. R. (2009b). Najib: KPIS for all government matters. Retrieved 4/30/2011, 2011, fromhttp://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/20/nation/4162443&sec=nation

    Murley, P. (1997). Gower handbook of customer service. Aldershot, Hampshire, England; Brookfield,Vt.: Gower.

    Rothwell, W. J., Hohne, C.K., King, S. B. (2007). Human performance improvement: Building

    practitioner performance. (2nd Edition). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Sanchez, H., & Robert, B. (2010). Measuring portfolio strategic performance using key performanceindicators. Project Management Journal, 41(5), 64-73.

    Toor, S., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). Beyond the iron triangle: Stakeholder perception of keyperformance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. InternationalJournal of Project Management, 28(3), 228-236.

    40

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=myhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=myhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=myhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=myhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=myhttp://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/Universityhttp://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/Universityhttp://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/Universityhttp://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/Universityhttp://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/Universityhttp://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=newslist&news_id=239&news_cat=13&page=1731&sort_year=&sort_month=http://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=newslist&news_id=239&news_cat=13&page=1731&sort_year=&sort_month=http://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=newslist&news_id=239&news_cat=13&page=1731&sort_year=&sort_month=http://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=newslist&news_id=239&news_cat=13&page=1731&sort_year=&sort_month=http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/20/nation/4162443&sec=nationhttp://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/20/nation/4162443&sec=nationhttp://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/20/nation/4162443&sec=nationhttp://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/20/nation/4162443&sec=nationhttp://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/20/nation/4162443&sec=nationhttp://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=newslist&news_id=239&news_cat=13&page=1731&sort_year=&sort_month=http://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=newslist&news_id=239&news_cat=13&page=1731&sort_year=&sort_month=http://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/Universityhttp://www.portal.mohe.gov.my/portal/page/portal/ExtPortal/MOHE_MAIN_PAGE/Information/Universityhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=myhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=myhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EekY2NzOgZcJ:old.libqual.org/documents/admin/TelAviv_Hiller&Kyrillidou.ppt+performance+measurement+in+libraries+Steve+Hiller&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=my

Recommended