+ All Categories
Home > Documents > IHP Lec2 Anderson

IHP Lec2 Anderson

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: triana-wahyu-saputri
View: 222 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend

of 62

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    1/62

    Copyright 2008, The J ohns Hopkins University and Gerard Anderson. All rights reserved. Use of these materials

    permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided AS IS; no representations orwarranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independentlyreview all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible forobtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed.

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of thismaterial constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site.

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    2/62

    Assessing Need and Demand for Health Care

    Gerard F. Anderson, PhDJohns Hopkins University

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    3/62

    Section A

    Rational, Incremental, and Garbage Can Models

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    4/62

    4

    Three Perspectives on the Policy Process

    Rational Eightfold Path

    Multiple variants on Eightfold Path

    X Some describe particular policy processes betterthan others

    Incremental

    Garbage can

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    5/62

    5

    Incrementalism

    Not a fundamental re-analysis of policy options Small, marginal adjustments to policy

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    6/626

    Examples of Incrementalism

    Budgetary process

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    7/627

    Rationale for Incrementalism

    Easier to do than rational approach Rational process is time consuming

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    8/628

    Incrementalism Does Not Explain New Initiatives

    Some new ideas expand rapidly Public health preparedness

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    9/629

    Garbage Can Model of Policy Process

    Problematic preferences Unclear technology

    Fluid participation

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    10/6210

    Problematic Preferences

    People seldom have well-reasoned preferences Organizations, especially nonprofit organizations, seldom

    have a single set of objectives

    Politicians rarely state their policy objectives clearly

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    11/6211

    Unclear Technology

    No one controls all aspects of the political process or evenknows all the important participants

    No one controls all aspects of a large organization or knows

    all the participants

    Cannot predict outcomes with certainty

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    12/62

    12

    Fluid Participation

    Decision makers enter and exit the policy process Junior staffers are often frustrated with decision makers lack

    of knowledge about the issue

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    13/62

    13

    Garbage Can

    Problems, solutions, participants are fluid Opportunities to effect changes occur at unexpected

    moments

    Result depends on who is in the room and their priorities atthat particular time

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    14/62

    14

    Limited Agenda

    Only a few items can be on the policy agenda at one time Key is to get your issue on the policy agenda

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    15/62

    15

    Processes That Influence the Garbage Can

    Problem recognitionwhat gets put on the agenda Policy proposalsavailable options; evaluation of

    alternatives

    Political processwho is elected

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    16/62

    Section B

    Need and Demand

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    17/62

    17

    1.

    Need

    2.

    Access

    3. Utilization4. Equality

    5.

    Equity

    6. Disparities

    Six Terms Often Used by Public Health Advocates to

    Promote Change

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    18/62

    18

    Six Terms Often Used by Public Health Advocates to

    Promote Change

    Different people/different disciplines use these terms very

    differently

    Critical for identifying the problem

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    19/62

    19

    When Advocates Argue We Need

    What do they mean by need and how can need be measured? How would you argue that one group is more needy than

    some other group or that fundamental change is needed?

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    20/62

    20

    Health Needs

    Health needs are often measured using the following: Self-report

    Health status indicators

    Biomedical measures of health status Geographic variations

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    21/62

    21

    Self-Reported Need

    Is your health status . . . Excellent

    Good

    Fair Poor One group might have a higher percentage of people withpoor health status

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    22/62

    22

    Common Health Status Indicators

    Physical Health Mental Health Social Health

    Symptoms Symptoms Symptoms

    Mortality Psychological state Social wellbeing

    Morbidity Perceptions

    Disability

    One group may have more symptoms than another group

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    23/62

    23

    Biomedical Measures

    Body mass index Blood pressure

    Cholesterol

    One group may be more obese than another group

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    24/62

    24

    Geographic Measures

    Some geographic regions might have risks associated withspecific health problems

    One state may have higher infant mortality rates than

    another

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    25/62

    25

    Nevada and Utah

    National Cancer Institute.

    Public Domain.

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    26/62

    26

    Discussion

    Would you use need in your statement of the problem? If so, which of these measures of need is most compelling?

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    27/62

    Section C

    Access to Care

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    28/62

    28

    Access

    The level of service which the health care system actuallyoffers to an individual

    Examplenumber of physicians per capita

    Wh I fl A ?

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    29/62

    29

    What Influences Access?

    Availability of services Quality of services

    Cost of services

    Information about services

    A il bili f S i

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    30/62

    30

    Availability of Services

    The number of service providers . . . By region

    By state

    Within states By country

    Within country

    On an Indian reservation

    G hi Di ib i f N F d l Ph i i 2003

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    31/62

    31

    Geographic Distribution of Non-Federal Physicians, 2003

    Less than 220

    220 to 259

    260 to 290

    More than 290

    Source: American Medical Association, 2004

    A i t L l f A

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    32/62

    32

    Appropriate Level of Access

    Does Massachusetts have too much or does Idaho have toolittle access to physician services?

    How would you know? Is the median correct?

    Q lit f S i

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    33/62

    33

    Quality of Services

    Quality may differ despite patients having identical needs What is an acceptable level of quality to say that you have

    access to care

    How do you measure quality? Clinical Perceived

    C i f N i H Q lit i B lti

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    34/62

    34

    Comparison of Nursing Home Quality in Baltimore

    CHARLESTOWN CARE CENTER709 MAIDEN CHOICE LANECATONSVILLE, MD 21228(410) 247-9700

    Mapping/Directions

    Information for 15 ofthe 15 quality

    measures is available

    GLEN MEADOWS RETIREMENT COM.11630 GLEN ARM ROADGLEN ARM, MD 21057(410) 592-5310Mapping/Directions

    Information for 0 ofthe 15 quality

    measures is available

    16 minutesLOCH RAVEN CENTER8720 EMERGE ROADBALTIMORE, MD 21234(410) 668-1961Mapping/Directions

    Information for 14 ofthe 15 quality

    measures is available

    RIDGEWAY MANOR NURSING5743 EDMONDSON AVENUECATONSVILLE, MD 21228(410) 747 5250Mapping/Directions

    Information for 14 ofthe 15 qualitymeasures is available

    5 minutes 15 minutes

    4 Deficiencies

    0 Deficiencies

    7 Deficiencies

    2 Deficiencies

    11 minutes1 hour 2 hours

    Total Number of Residents: 105

    1 hour 2 hours

    Total Number of Residents: 59

    28

    1 hour44 minutes

    2 hours8 minutes

    Total Number of Residents:

    About the Nursing Home Quality Measures Total Number ofHealth Deficiencies

    Nursing Staff

    Hours perResident per

    Day

    CNA Hours perResident per Day

    1 hour1 minute

    2 hours47 minutes

    Total Number of Residents: 218

    Source: www.medicare.gov

    C t

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    35/62

    35

    Cost

    People may be unable to afford all the care that is available inthe community

    Cost may prevent them from seeking care

    Alt ti C t M

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    36/62

    36

    Alternative Cost Measures

    Total direct medical expenditures Out-of-pocket direct medical expenditures

    Out-of-pocket direct medical expenditures as a percent of

    income

    Indirect costs

    Transportation Time from work

    Cost

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    37/62

    37

    Cost

    Choosing the correct cost measure is critical Cost from whose perspective?

    Percentage of Adults Who Could Not Pay Medical Bills in

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    38/62

    38

    41

    9

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    Less than $35,000 $35,000 or more

    Yearly Income

    PercentageWhoCouldNot

    PayMed

    icalBills

    Percentage of Adults Who Could Not Pay Medical Bills in

    the Past Year, by Income

    Percentage of Adults Who Skipped Needed Medical Care in

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    39/62

    39

    37

    13

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    Less than $35,000 $35,000 or more

    Yearly Income

    P

    ercentageW

    hoSkipped

    NeededMedicalCare

    Percentage of Adults Who Skipped Needed Medical Care in

    the Past Year, by Income

    Information

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    40/62

    40

    Information

    Awareness of the availability of a service Clarity of the benefit of health services

    Medical necessity criterion

    Questions

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    41/62

    41

    Questions

    How do you know if the benefit is a covered service? How do you know if you are entitled?

    Whose responsibility is it to tell you that you are entitled to

    care?

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    42/62

    Section D

    Other Measures of Need

    Utilization = Observable Access

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    43/62

    43

    Utilization = Observable Access

    Examples How many doctor/clinic visits do you get?

    How many people were immunized?

    Percentage immunized

    Percentage living in dwellings without lead paint

    Percentage with MD visit

    Number of physician visits per capita

    Equality

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    44/62

    44

    Equality

    Similar inputs to all people Everyone has the same number of MD visits

    But do they have the same need?

    Equity

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    45/62

    45

    Equity

    The absence of systematic and potentially remediabledifferences in one or more aspects of health acrosspopulation groups is defined socially, economically,

    demographically, or geographically

    But how do we determine who should get more?

    Equity

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    46/62

    46

    Equity

    Should we provide additional inputs to disadvantagedgroups?

    Who are disadvantaged groups?

    Native Americans Poor Men

    Equality vs Equity

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    47/62

    47

    Equality vs. Equity

    Which should be the policy objective?

    Disparities

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    48/62

    48

    Disparities

    Racial or ethnic differences in the quality of health care thatare not due to access related factors or clinical needs,preferences, or appropriateness of intervention

    Opposite of equity

    Using the Various Terms

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    49/62

    49

    Using the Various Terms

    Almost half of all Americas have at least one chroniccondition

    25% of Americans have multiple chronic conditions

    For this population, how would you measure the following?

    Need Access Utilization Equality Equity Disparities

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    50/62

    Section E

    Application: The Uninsured

    Application of the Eightfold Path

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    51/62

    51

    Application of the Eightfold Path

    Cover the uninsured

    1 Define the Problem

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    52/62

    52

    1. Define the Problem

    Forty-five million uninsured Uninsured poor health higher spending

    Uninsured have poorer health and shortened lives

    2 Assemble Some Evidence

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    53/62

    53

    2. Assemble Some Evidence

    What information will convince the public, providers, andpolicymakers that universal health insurance coverage isnecessary?

    Percent of adults with no doctor visits in the past year, byinsurance status Site of usual source of care for adults, by insurance status

    Use of services, by insurance status

    Differences in use of preventive services, by insurancestatus

    Stage of cancer at time of diagnosis, by insurance status

    Risk of mortality, by insurance status

    3. Construct the Alternatives

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    54/62

    54

    3. Construct the Alternatives

    Major public program expansion and new tax credit Employer mandate, premium subsidy, and individual

    mandate

    Individual mandate and tax credit

    Single payer

    4. Select the Criterion

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    55/62

    55

    4. Select the Criterion

    Universal Continuous

    Affordable to individuals

    Affordable to society Enhance health

    5. Project the Outcomes

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    56/62

    56

    5. Project the Outcomes

    Status quo

    Public

    program

    expansion

    Employer

    mandate

    Individual

    mandate

    Single

    payer

    Universality 0 + + + + +

    Continuity 0 + + + + +

    Affordability

    to individuals 0 + + +

    Affordability

    to society0 0

    Enhanceshealth

    0 + + + + +

    5. Project the Outcomes

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    57/62

    57

    5. Project the Outcomes

    Status quo

    Public

    program

    expansion

    Employer

    mandate

    Individual

    mandate

    Single

    payer

    Universality 0 + + + + +

    Continuity 0 + + + + +

    Affordability

    to individuals 0 + + +

    Affordability

    to society0 0

    Enhanceshealth

    0 + + + + +

    Bush Plan

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    58/62

    58

    Bus a

    Workers who establish health savings accounts (HSAs) would

    be allowed to deduct premium payments

    Refundable tax credits up to $1,000 for individuals and $3,000

    for families to buy health insurance

    Association health plans will allow small businesses to jointly

    negotiate with health care providers, allowing them to offer

    health insurance to their employees more affordably

    Expanded community health centers to offer medical care touninsured and underinsured Americans

    Kerry Plan

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    59/62

    59

    y

    Tax credits

    25% tax credit for workers 5564 below 300% of poverty 75% tax credit for people out of work and below 300% ofpoverty Up to 50% tax credit for small businesses that cover low- and moderate-income workers

    Federal government pays for children enrolled in Medicaid,and requires states to expand eligibility for children to 300%

    of poverty, for families to 200% of poverty, and for adults to

    100% of poverty

    Drug reimportation, expanding disease management efforts,subsidizing malpractice insurance

    Federal reinsurance

    6. Contrast the Trade-offs

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    60/62

    60

    Bush plan Kerry plan

    Universality 0 + +

    Continuity + +

    Affordability toindividuals

    Affordability to

    society

    Enhance health + + +

    7. Decide

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    61/62

    61

    8. Tell Your Story

  • 7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson

    62/62

    y


Recommended