Date post: | 14-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | triana-wahyu-saputri |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 3 times |
of 62
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
1/62
Copyright 2008, The J ohns Hopkins University and Gerard Anderson. All rights reserved. Use of these materials
permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided AS IS; no representations orwarranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independentlyreview all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible forobtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of thismaterial constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
2/62
Assessing Need and Demand for Health Care
Gerard F. Anderson, PhDJohns Hopkins University
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
3/62
Section A
Rational, Incremental, and Garbage Can Models
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
4/62
4
Three Perspectives on the Policy Process
Rational Eightfold Path
Multiple variants on Eightfold Path
X Some describe particular policy processes betterthan others
Incremental
Garbage can
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
5/62
5
Incrementalism
Not a fundamental re-analysis of policy options Small, marginal adjustments to policy
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
6/626
Examples of Incrementalism
Budgetary process
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
7/627
Rationale for Incrementalism
Easier to do than rational approach Rational process is time consuming
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
8/628
Incrementalism Does Not Explain New Initiatives
Some new ideas expand rapidly Public health preparedness
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
9/629
Garbage Can Model of Policy Process
Problematic preferences Unclear technology
Fluid participation
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
10/6210
Problematic Preferences
People seldom have well-reasoned preferences Organizations, especially nonprofit organizations, seldom
have a single set of objectives
Politicians rarely state their policy objectives clearly
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
11/6211
Unclear Technology
No one controls all aspects of the political process or evenknows all the important participants
No one controls all aspects of a large organization or knows
all the participants
Cannot predict outcomes with certainty
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
12/62
12
Fluid Participation
Decision makers enter and exit the policy process Junior staffers are often frustrated with decision makers lack
of knowledge about the issue
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
13/62
13
Garbage Can
Problems, solutions, participants are fluid Opportunities to effect changes occur at unexpected
moments
Result depends on who is in the room and their priorities atthat particular time
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
14/62
14
Limited Agenda
Only a few items can be on the policy agenda at one time Key is to get your issue on the policy agenda
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
15/62
15
Processes That Influence the Garbage Can
Problem recognitionwhat gets put on the agenda Policy proposalsavailable options; evaluation of
alternatives
Political processwho is elected
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
16/62
Section B
Need and Demand
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
17/62
17
1.
Need
2.
Access
3. Utilization4. Equality
5.
Equity
6. Disparities
Six Terms Often Used by Public Health Advocates to
Promote Change
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
18/62
18
Six Terms Often Used by Public Health Advocates to
Promote Change
Different people/different disciplines use these terms very
differently
Critical for identifying the problem
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
19/62
19
When Advocates Argue We Need
What do they mean by need and how can need be measured? How would you argue that one group is more needy than
some other group or that fundamental change is needed?
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
20/62
20
Health Needs
Health needs are often measured using the following: Self-report
Health status indicators
Biomedical measures of health status Geographic variations
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
21/62
21
Self-Reported Need
Is your health status . . . Excellent
Good
Fair Poor One group might have a higher percentage of people withpoor health status
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
22/62
22
Common Health Status Indicators
Physical Health Mental Health Social Health
Symptoms Symptoms Symptoms
Mortality Psychological state Social wellbeing
Morbidity Perceptions
Disability
One group may have more symptoms than another group
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
23/62
23
Biomedical Measures
Body mass index Blood pressure
Cholesterol
One group may be more obese than another group
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
24/62
24
Geographic Measures
Some geographic regions might have risks associated withspecific health problems
One state may have higher infant mortality rates than
another
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
25/62
25
Nevada and Utah
National Cancer Institute.
Public Domain.
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
26/62
26
Discussion
Would you use need in your statement of the problem? If so, which of these measures of need is most compelling?
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
27/62
Section C
Access to Care
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
28/62
28
Access
The level of service which the health care system actuallyoffers to an individual
Examplenumber of physicians per capita
Wh I fl A ?
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
29/62
29
What Influences Access?
Availability of services Quality of services
Cost of services
Information about services
A il bili f S i
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
30/62
30
Availability of Services
The number of service providers . . . By region
By state
Within states By country
Within country
On an Indian reservation
G hi Di ib i f N F d l Ph i i 2003
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
31/62
31
Geographic Distribution of Non-Federal Physicians, 2003
Less than 220
220 to 259
260 to 290
More than 290
Source: American Medical Association, 2004
A i t L l f A
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
32/62
32
Appropriate Level of Access
Does Massachusetts have too much or does Idaho have toolittle access to physician services?
How would you know? Is the median correct?
Q lit f S i
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
33/62
33
Quality of Services
Quality may differ despite patients having identical needs What is an acceptable level of quality to say that you have
access to care
How do you measure quality? Clinical Perceived
C i f N i H Q lit i B lti
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
34/62
34
Comparison of Nursing Home Quality in Baltimore
CHARLESTOWN CARE CENTER709 MAIDEN CHOICE LANECATONSVILLE, MD 21228(410) 247-9700
Mapping/Directions
Information for 15 ofthe 15 quality
measures is available
GLEN MEADOWS RETIREMENT COM.11630 GLEN ARM ROADGLEN ARM, MD 21057(410) 592-5310Mapping/Directions
Information for 0 ofthe 15 quality
measures is available
16 minutesLOCH RAVEN CENTER8720 EMERGE ROADBALTIMORE, MD 21234(410) 668-1961Mapping/Directions
Information for 14 ofthe 15 quality
measures is available
RIDGEWAY MANOR NURSING5743 EDMONDSON AVENUECATONSVILLE, MD 21228(410) 747 5250Mapping/Directions
Information for 14 ofthe 15 qualitymeasures is available
5 minutes 15 minutes
4 Deficiencies
0 Deficiencies
7 Deficiencies
2 Deficiencies
11 minutes1 hour 2 hours
Total Number of Residents: 105
1 hour 2 hours
Total Number of Residents: 59
28
1 hour44 minutes
2 hours8 minutes
Total Number of Residents:
About the Nursing Home Quality Measures Total Number ofHealth Deficiencies
Nursing Staff
Hours perResident per
Day
CNA Hours perResident per Day
1 hour1 minute
2 hours47 minutes
Total Number of Residents: 218
Source: www.medicare.gov
C t
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
35/62
35
Cost
People may be unable to afford all the care that is available inthe community
Cost may prevent them from seeking care
Alt ti C t M
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
36/62
36
Alternative Cost Measures
Total direct medical expenditures Out-of-pocket direct medical expenditures
Out-of-pocket direct medical expenditures as a percent of
income
Indirect costs
Transportation Time from work
Cost
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
37/62
37
Cost
Choosing the correct cost measure is critical Cost from whose perspective?
Percentage of Adults Who Could Not Pay Medical Bills in
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
38/62
38
41
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Less than $35,000 $35,000 or more
Yearly Income
PercentageWhoCouldNot
PayMed
icalBills
Percentage of Adults Who Could Not Pay Medical Bills in
the Past Year, by Income
Percentage of Adults Who Skipped Needed Medical Care in
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
39/62
39
37
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Less than $35,000 $35,000 or more
Yearly Income
P
ercentageW
hoSkipped
NeededMedicalCare
Percentage of Adults Who Skipped Needed Medical Care in
the Past Year, by Income
Information
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
40/62
40
Information
Awareness of the availability of a service Clarity of the benefit of health services
Medical necessity criterion
Questions
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
41/62
41
Questions
How do you know if the benefit is a covered service? How do you know if you are entitled?
Whose responsibility is it to tell you that you are entitled to
care?
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
42/62
Section D
Other Measures of Need
Utilization = Observable Access
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
43/62
43
Utilization = Observable Access
Examples How many doctor/clinic visits do you get?
How many people were immunized?
Percentage immunized
Percentage living in dwellings without lead paint
Percentage with MD visit
Number of physician visits per capita
Equality
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
44/62
44
Equality
Similar inputs to all people Everyone has the same number of MD visits
But do they have the same need?
Equity
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
45/62
45
Equity
The absence of systematic and potentially remediabledifferences in one or more aspects of health acrosspopulation groups is defined socially, economically,
demographically, or geographically
But how do we determine who should get more?
Equity
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
46/62
46
Equity
Should we provide additional inputs to disadvantagedgroups?
Who are disadvantaged groups?
Native Americans Poor Men
Equality vs Equity
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
47/62
47
Equality vs. Equity
Which should be the policy objective?
Disparities
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
48/62
48
Disparities
Racial or ethnic differences in the quality of health care thatare not due to access related factors or clinical needs,preferences, or appropriateness of intervention
Opposite of equity
Using the Various Terms
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
49/62
49
Using the Various Terms
Almost half of all Americas have at least one chroniccondition
25% of Americans have multiple chronic conditions
For this population, how would you measure the following?
Need Access Utilization Equality Equity Disparities
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
50/62
Section E
Application: The Uninsured
Application of the Eightfold Path
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
51/62
51
Application of the Eightfold Path
Cover the uninsured
1 Define the Problem
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
52/62
52
1. Define the Problem
Forty-five million uninsured Uninsured poor health higher spending
Uninsured have poorer health and shortened lives
2 Assemble Some Evidence
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
53/62
53
2. Assemble Some Evidence
What information will convince the public, providers, andpolicymakers that universal health insurance coverage isnecessary?
Percent of adults with no doctor visits in the past year, byinsurance status Site of usual source of care for adults, by insurance status
Use of services, by insurance status
Differences in use of preventive services, by insurancestatus
Stage of cancer at time of diagnosis, by insurance status
Risk of mortality, by insurance status
3. Construct the Alternatives
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
54/62
54
3. Construct the Alternatives
Major public program expansion and new tax credit Employer mandate, premium subsidy, and individual
mandate
Individual mandate and tax credit
Single payer
4. Select the Criterion
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
55/62
55
4. Select the Criterion
Universal Continuous
Affordable to individuals
Affordable to society Enhance health
5. Project the Outcomes
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
56/62
56
5. Project the Outcomes
Status quo
Public
program
expansion
Employer
mandate
Individual
mandate
Single
payer
Universality 0 + + + + +
Continuity 0 + + + + +
Affordability
to individuals 0 + + +
Affordability
to society0 0
Enhanceshealth
0 + + + + +
5. Project the Outcomes
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
57/62
57
5. Project the Outcomes
Status quo
Public
program
expansion
Employer
mandate
Individual
mandate
Single
payer
Universality 0 + + + + +
Continuity 0 + + + + +
Affordability
to individuals 0 + + +
Affordability
to society0 0
Enhanceshealth
0 + + + + +
Bush Plan
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
58/62
58
Bus a
Workers who establish health savings accounts (HSAs) would
be allowed to deduct premium payments
Refundable tax credits up to $1,000 for individuals and $3,000
for families to buy health insurance
Association health plans will allow small businesses to jointly
negotiate with health care providers, allowing them to offer
health insurance to their employees more affordably
Expanded community health centers to offer medical care touninsured and underinsured Americans
Kerry Plan
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
59/62
59
y
Tax credits
25% tax credit for workers 5564 below 300% of poverty 75% tax credit for people out of work and below 300% ofpoverty Up to 50% tax credit for small businesses that cover low- and moderate-income workers
Federal government pays for children enrolled in Medicaid,and requires states to expand eligibility for children to 300%
of poverty, for families to 200% of poverty, and for adults to
100% of poverty
Drug reimportation, expanding disease management efforts,subsidizing malpractice insurance
Federal reinsurance
6. Contrast the Trade-offs
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
60/62
60
Bush plan Kerry plan
Universality 0 + +
Continuity + +
Affordability toindividuals
Affordability to
society
Enhance health + + +
7. Decide
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
61/62
61
8. Tell Your Story
7/30/2019 IHP Lec2 Anderson
62/62
y