+ All Categories
Home > Documents > III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections...

III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections...

Date post: 03-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
124
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-1 III. CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR DRAFT EIR I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY In response to Comment No. 2.1 on the Draft EIR, the following mitigation measure is added to Table I- 1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-15): (D-4) Prior to demolition of the existing East Building, environmental concerns related to organochlorine pesticides from termiticides shall be investigated and, if necessary, mitigated, in accordance with Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) Interim Guidance, Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Soil Contamination as a Result of Lead From Lead-Based Paint, Organochlorine Pesticides from Termiticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Electrical Transformers , dated June 9, 2006. The addition of this mitigation measure to Section I corresponds with the addition of this mitigation measure to Section IV.D of the Draft EIR. Incorporation of this added mitigation measure does not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR. In response to Comment Nos. 5.17 and 31.4 on the Draft EIR, the following revisions are made to Mitigation Measure G-4 in Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-20): (G-4) Two weeks prior to the commencement of demolition and construction at the Bundy Campus, notification shall be provided to the Santa Monica Airport administration, off-site residential uses located along to the southern boundary of the Bundy Campus, the Mar Vista Community Council, as well as on-site posting within the Bundy Campus, disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period. The revisions to this mitigation measure reflect the revisions to this mitigation measure in Section IV.G of the Draft EIR and do not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR. The following inadvertent error was identified in the “Level of Significance after Mitigation” for the Transportation and Traffic mitigation measures in Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-25) and is corrected as follows: “The Master Plan’s impacts would be less-than-significant with respect to the regional transportation system, parking, impacts at 21 of the 27 intersections studied, and impacts at 20 of the 23 22 street segments studied.”
Transcript
Page 1: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-1

III. CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR

DRAFT EIR

I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY

In response to Comment No. 2.1 on the Draft EIR, the following mitigation measure is added to Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-15):

(D-4) Prior to demolition of the existing East Building, environmental concerns related to organochlorine pesticides from termiticides shall be investigated and, if necessary, mitigated, in accordance with Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) Interim Guidance, Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Soil Contamination as a Result of Lead From Lead-Based Paint, Organochlorine Pesticides from Termiticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Electrical Transformers, dated June 9, 2006.

The addition of this mitigation measure to Section I corresponds with the addition of this mitigation measure to Section IV.D of the Draft EIR. Incorporation of this added mitigation measure does not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

In response to Comment Nos. 5.17 and 31.4 on the Draft EIR, the following revisions are made to Mitigation Measure G-4 in Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-20):

(G-4) Two weeks prior to the commencement of demolition and construction at the Bundy Campus, notification shall be provided to the Santa Monica Airport administration, off-site residential uses located alongto the southern boundary of the Bundy Campus, the Mar Vista Community Council, as well as on-site posting within the Bundy Campus, disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period.

The revisions to this mitigation measure reflect the revisions to this mitigation measure in Section IV.G of the Draft EIR and do not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

The following inadvertent error was identified in the “Level of Significance after Mitigation” for the Transportation and Traffic mitigation measures in Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-25) and is corrected as follows:

“The Master Plan’s impacts would be less-than-significant with respect to the regional transportation system, parking, impacts at 21 of the 27 intersections studied, and impacts at 20 of the 23 22 street segments studied.”

Page 2: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-2

The correction to this text in Table I-1 does not materially change any findings or conclusions in the Draft EIR.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

In response to Comment No. 5.2 on the Draft EIR, Figure II-2 has been revised to reflect the correct location of Santa Monica Boulevard and the Emeritus College. The revised Figure II-2 is included on page III-3 of this Section.

In response to Comment No. 5.3, the text “via Donald Douglas Loop South” on pages II-8, II-9, and II-10 has been corrected to read “at Donald Douglas Loop South,” as shown below:

1. Spitfire Grill Driveway. Once access is secured to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South, this historical access point to Airport Avenue, located at the Bundy Campus’ northern edge between the Spitfire Grill and the 3200 Airport Avenue Building, would not be used on a regular basis.

2. 3400 Airport Avenue Building Driveway. Once access is secured to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South, this historical access point to Airport Avenue, located at the Bundy Campus’ northern edge between the 3400 Airport Avenue Building and Bundy Drive, would not be used on a regular basis.

5. Donald Douglas Loop South. SMC intends to secure access from the Bundy Campus to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South, located along the Bundy Campus’ northern edge, west of the 3200 Airport Avenue Building. Beginning in January 2006, right-turn egress-only from the Bundy Campus has been provided via a newly resurfaced and re-striped driveway at this location.

In addition, the same text in the third sentence on page II-10 has been corrected as follows:

“As discussed above, the Spitfire Grill Driveway (access point 1) and the 3400 Airport Avenue Building Driveway (access point 2) would not be used on a regular basis once access is secured to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South.”

These corrections do not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

In response to Comment No. 5.3, the text in the last sentence of the second full paragraph on page III-13 has been corrected as shown below:

“In January 2006, with the opening of the driveway to Airport Avenue by way of at Donald Douglas Loop South, parking on the Bundy Campus was made available to all students and staff.”

Page 3: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Wilshire

Boulev

ard

22

1

34

5

7

6

8

Source: (Image) Sandborn copywrite 2005 , TeleAtlas copywrite 2005, and GoogleEarth copywrite 2005; (Figure) Christopher A. Joseph & Associates, January 2006; amended January 2007.

1010405405

1. Emeritus College2. Madison Campus

3. Santa Monica College Main Campus4. Vacant Lot at 14th & Pico Boulevard

5. Academy of Entertainment and Technology6. Administration

7. Airport Arts Campus8. Bundy Campus (Project Site)

Approximate Scale (Miles)

0.5 0.750.25 1.00.0

Legend: SMC Campus Facilities

1

Bundy Campus(Project Site)

Figure II-2Project Location Map

Page 4: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-4

In response to Comment Nos. 7.12, 8.4, 23.3, 26.1, 26.14, 26.17, and 28.1, the fifth page of Table III-1 (i.e., page III-20 of the Draft EIR) has been edited to delete the words “removal of shuttle lot N/A” under the description for Related Project No. 113.

In addition, in response to Comment Nos. 5.25 and 5.37, two new related projects, Related Project Nos. 118 and 119, have been added to Table III-1.

As edited, the referenced portions of Table III-1 read as follows:

city park (acre) 4 dog park (acre) 1

recreation field (acre) 1 113 Airport Park Expansion

removal of shuttle lot NA

Donald Douglas Loop to north, Airport Avenue to south,

Bundy Drive to east

Santa Monica

118 Madison Campus New theater (sf) 32,000 11th Street and Arizona Avenue Santa Monica

119 Big Blue Bus – New Bus Line public transit bus line N/A

Westwood/Pico to 1900 Pico Boulevard via

Palms and Mar Vista Santa Monica

In addition, Figure III-9 has been revised to reflect the addition of Related Project Nos. 118 and 119. The revised Figure III-9 is included on the following page of this Section.

The correction to the description of Related Project No. 113 and the addition of Related Project Nos. 118 and 119 do not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. Impacts Found to be Less Than Significant

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

B. Aesthetics

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

C. Air Quality

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

Page 5: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Related Project Location

565857 59

8862

605348

4643

39

444240

71212219

1718

11

95 116

96 105

2332337024

256927

30

54

64

66

11449 77

8575

76475051

87 78

107

106104 84

109979998 86

108 10010 129

11

115

16 89

68

2041

8131 8283

112

343536

743773

2629

28

45

103

52 55 6165

63 9380

110

79

67

14

8

38

9294

117

907291

7

13

101102

15 12 34

56

San Vice

nte Blvd

Wilshire

BlvdSanta Monica Blvd

Lincoln Blvd

Pico Blvd

Ocean Park Blvd

Rose Ave

Venice Blvd

Centinela AveBundy Dr

Olympic Blvd

National Blvd

Jefferson Blvd

Culve

r Blvd

Neilson Way

Washington Blvd

Montana Ave

118

119

Figure III-9Related Projects Location Map

Source: Kaku Associates and Christopher A. Joseph & Associates, June 2006; amended January 2007.

Feet

0 5,6002,800 4,2001,400

Legend

#

PROJECT SITE

Related Project Location

113

Pacific Ocean

Airport Ave

Page 6: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-6

D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials

In response to Comment No. 2.1 on the Draft EIR, the following mitigation measure is added to the Draft EIR:

(D-4) Prior to demolition of the existing East Building, environmental concerns related to organochlorine pesticides from termiticides shall be investigated and, if necessary, mitigated, in accordance with Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) Interim Guidance, Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Soil Contamination as a Result of Lead From Lead-Based Paint, Organochlorine Pesticides from Termiticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Electrical Transformers, dated June 9, 2006.

The addition of this mitigation measure provides further assurance that the construction activities will be conducted in a manner that protects the health and safety of the public. Incorporation of this added mitigation measure does not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

E. Hydrology and Water Quality

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

F. Land Use and Zoning

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

G. Noise

In response to Comment Nos. 5.17 and 31.4 on the Draft EIR, the following revisions are made to Mitigation Measure G-4 in the Draft EIR:

(G-4) Two weeks prior to the commencement of demolition and construction at the Bundy Campus, notification shall be provided to the Santa Monica Airport administration, off-site residential uses located alongto the southern boundary of the Bundy Campus, the Mar Vista Community Council, as well as on-site posting within the Bundy Campus, disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period.

The revisions to this mitigation measure expand the scope of notice and do not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

H. Public Utilities

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

Page 7: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-7

I. Public Services

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

J. Traffic/Transportation/Parking

In response to Comment No. 5.3, the text “Airport Avenue via Donald Douglas Loop South” in Table IV.J-13, Master Plan Access Alternatives, has been corrected to read “Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South” (page IV.J-23). The following addition is also made to the third sentence in Mitigation Measure J-2 (page IV.J-46):

(J-2) 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue and Airport Avenue (Study Intersection 15) – The most constrained movement at this intersection is the westbound right-turn (operating at Level of Service (LOS) F in the a.m. peak hour and LOS C in the p.m. peak hour). The impact at this location is significant only in the a.m. peak hour, when the addition of Master Plan traffic there would result in a significant increase in delay. Therefore the mitigation measure that has been identified to address the impact at this location is to prohibit left turns out from the Bundy Campus at Donald Douglas Loop South onto Airport Avenue during the a.m. peak period (between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m.). This operational measure would reduce the amount of Master Plan traffic to this movement and would effectively mitigate the Master Plan impact that would occur under Access Alternatives A1, A5, A6, A9, A10, B1, B2, B4, and C2.

In response to Comment No. 26.11, 26.16, and 28.3, the first sentence on page IV.J-41 of the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:

“The segment of Airport Avenue westeast of Centinela Avenue is treated as a collector street in this study, which is consistent with previous studies for other projects in the area.”

In response to Comment No. 28.3, the following paragraph on page IV.J-47 of the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:

“23rd Street North of Airport Avenue (Street Segment 13) — The significant street segment impact identified for 23rd Street north of Airport Avenue occurs on a street that is part of a travel corridor that provides the only channel for north-south through traffic between Centinela Avenue and Lincoln Boulevard. As such, this segment of 23rd Street, while classified as a collector street, carries in excess of 25,000 vehicles per day. That traffic volume, as well as the physical characteristics of the street itself (i.e., its grade), is such that typical neighborhood traffic calming measures — such as those applied on Rose Avenue westeast of Bundy Drive and on 23rd Street north of Ocean Park Boulevard (stop signs and speed humps) — are not considered appropriate. The alternative that might be used on collector streets with relatively high volumes would be “speed tables,” essentially raised areas that are lower, longer and wider than speed humps. However, the installation of speed tables is not considered feasible on this segment of 23rd Street, given the grade of 23rd Street at this location, the fact that the City of Santa Monica Residential Traffic Management policy discourages measures that reroute trips from one local

Page 8: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-8

street to another, and the City of Santa Monica’s policy to keep streets designated by the Fire Department as “Emergency Response Routes” free from design features that would slow fire trucks.”

These corrections do not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

K. Neighborhood Effects

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

V. GENERAL IMPACT CATEGORIES

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

VI. ALTERNATIVES TO THE MASTER PLAN

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

VII. PREPARERS OF THE EIR AND PERSONS CONSULTED

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

VIII. REFERENCES AND ACRONYMS

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.

TECHNICAL APPENDICES TO THE DRAFT EIR

APPENDIX A: NOP AND INITIAL STUDY

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.

APPENDIX B: RESPONSES TO THE NOP

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.

APPENDIX C: AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.

APPENDIX D: PHASE I/II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENTS, AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.

Page 9: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-9

APPENDIX E: NOISE WORKSHEETS

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.

APPENDIX F: LETTERS FROM PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITY AGENCIES AND CUMULATIVE UTILITY GENERATION TABLES

No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.

APPENDIX G: TRAFFIC STUDY

In response to Comment No. 6.12, the “Cumulative Plus Project (Year 2010) City of Los Angeles Methodology with Mitigation” tables from the Traffic Study (pages 1077 through 1133 of Appendix G to the Draft EIR) have been re-included on the following pages of this Section.

This does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

Page 10: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-10

Page 11: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-11

Page 12: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-12

Page 13: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-13

Page 14: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-14

Page 15: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-15

Page 16: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-16

Page 17: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-17

Page 18: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-18

Page 19: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-19

Page 20: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-20

Page 21: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-21

Page 22: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-22

Page 23: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-23

Page 24: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-24

Page 25: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-25

Page 26: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-26

Page 27: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-27

Page 28: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-28

Page 29: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-29

Page 30: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-30

Page 31: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-31

Page 32: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-32

Page 33: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-33

Page 34: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-34

Page 35: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-35

Page 36: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-36

Page 37: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-37

Page 38: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-38

Page 39: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-39

Page 40: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-40

Page 41: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-41

Page 42: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-42

Page 43: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-43

Page 44: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-44

Page 45: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-45

Page 46: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-46

Page 47: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-47

Page 48: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-48

Page 49: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-49

Page 50: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-50

Page 51: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-51

Page 52: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-52

Page 53: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-53

Page 54: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-54

Page 55: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-55

Page 56: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-56

Page 57: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-57

Page 58: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-58

Page 59: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-59

Page 60: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-60

Page 61: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-61

Page 62: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-62

Page 63: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-63

Page 64: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-64

Page 65: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-65

Page 66: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Page III-66

Page 67: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-67

In response to Comment No. 6.13 regarding planned improvements to the intersection of Inglewood Boulevard and Venice Boulevard, projected future levels of service for this intersection were recalculated with the identified improvements in place. The results of this recalculation are included on the following pages of this Section.

This recalculation does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

Page 68: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.012 No C -0.036 No

Airport Avenue PM D D 0.037 Yes D 0.030 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D 0.007 No C -0.066 No

signalized PM E 0.041 Yes D -0.105 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.380 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.300 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.777 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.792 A 1 No 4 0.762 A 0 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 11

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A1

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+ Project with

Mitigations

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.950 0.991

1.376 1.381

**

0.826 0.833

17

0.823 0.835

0.855 0.892

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.400

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.948

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.302 1.333

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367 1.372

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

Delay or V/C

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

0.787

0.885

1.210

1.298

0.760

0.845

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-68

Page 69: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.009 No

PM -0.002 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.014 No C -0.036 No

Airport Avenue PM D D 0.039 Yes D 0.032 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D 0.008 No C -0.063 No

signalized PM E 0.045 Yes D -0.084 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.040 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.353 F -0.021 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.380 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.300 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.778 A 0 No 4 0.719 A -2 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.792 A 1 No 4 0.762 A 0 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

Delay or V/C

0.861

0.861 0.883

0.861

1.367 1.376

1.021

1.108

1.302 1.333

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.963

0.9490.926

1.400

1.100

0.459

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.543

0.459

0.575

1.090

1.034 1.035

1.090

0.508

**

17

0.823 0.837

17

**

0.855 0.894

1.201 1.210

1.297 1.295

**

0.826 0.834

**

0.950 0.995

1.376 1.381

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.051

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

0.787

0.887

0.763

0.866

TABLE 12

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A2

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-69

Page 70: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.001 No

PM -0.002 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.014 No C -0.031 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.065 Yes E 0.061 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D 0.009 No C -0.073 No

signalized PM F 0.072 Yes D -0.105 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.322 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 8 0.285 A 0 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.779 A 0 No 4 0.722 A -2 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.814 A 1 No 4 0.784 A 0 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 13

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A3

No Feasible Mitigation

1.376

1.021

0.883

1.337

1.404

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

1.108

0.949

0.964

1.075

0.459

0.544

Cumulative plus

Project

1.090

17

**

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

17

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/CDelay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.302

1.100

1.073

0.861

0.926

0.459

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.823 0.837

0.855 0.920

1.201 1.202

1.297 1.295

**

0.826 0.835

0.950 1.022

1.376 1.381

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

0.897 0.898

Delay or V/C

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.792

0.916

0.753

0.845

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

Page III-70

Page 71: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.001 No

PM -0.002 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.010 No C -0.031 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.057 Yes E 0.057 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D 0.018 No C -0.063 No

signalized PM F 0.091 Yes D -0.081 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.318 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 8 0.280 A 0 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.773 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.800 A 1 No 4 0.777 A 0 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

1.201 1.202

1.297 1.295

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

1.091

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

TABLE 14

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A4

No Feasible Mitigation

17

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

0.544

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

0.964

1.404

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.949

1.021

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.321 1.321

1.091

1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

1.100

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.950 1.041

1.376 1.381

**

0.826 0.844

0.823 0.833

0.855 0.912

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.861 0.883

1.302 1.337

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367 1.376

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

0.792

0.912

0.763

0.869

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-71

Page 72: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.012 No C -0.037 No

Airport Avenue PM D D 0.032 Yes D 0.024 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D 0.007 No C -0.073 No

signalized PM E 0.035 Yes D -0.105 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.323 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.296 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.777 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.787 A 1 No 4 0.757 A 0 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 15

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A5

No Feasible Mitigation

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/CDelay or V/C

0.861

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

0.861

1.367

0.926 0.948

0.964

1.019

1.361

0.963

1.302 1.333

1.400

1.100 1.108

1.372

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.075

0.459 0.459

0.5440.543

1.073

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

1.090

17

0.823 0.835

0.855 0.887

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

17

**

0.826 0.833

**

0.950 0.985

1.376 1.381

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

0.897 0.898

Delay or V/C

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.786

1.210

1.298

0.879

0.753

0.845

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-72

Page 73: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.032 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.080 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM C -0.027 No

signalized PM E 0.001 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.334 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.317 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.791 A 2 No 5 0.725 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 4 No 5 0.806 A 1 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 16

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A6

No Feasible Mitigation

17

1.090

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

1.034 1.035

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

1.091

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908

1.321 1.321

1.091

0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.950 0.951

1.376 1.381

**

0.826 0.799

0.823 0.847

0.855 0.957

** **

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.400

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.948

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.302 1.333

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367 1.372

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

0.791

1.210

1.298

0.935

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-73

Page 74: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.001 No

PM -0.004 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.025 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.109 Yes E 0.094 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM C -0.027 No C -0.027 No

signalized PM E 0.014 Yes D -0.071 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.006 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.007 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.002 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F -0.049 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.333 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.306 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.793 A 2 No 5 0.727 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.862 A 4 No 6 0.813 A 2 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 17

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A7

No Feasible Mitigation

17

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

0.544

1.201 1.202

1.297 1.293

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.272

1.091 1.091

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.930

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.403

0.788 0.787

0.950 0.964

1.376 1.382

**

0.826 0.799

0.823 0.849

0.855 0.964

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.404

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.949

1.021

0.861 0.883

1.302 1.337

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367 1.376

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

0.798

0.949

0.799

0.879

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-74

Page 75: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.001 No

PM -0.004 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.034 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.109 Yes E 0.079 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D -0.015 No D -0.015 No

signalized PM E 0.029 Yes D -0.053 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.000 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C 0.002 No

Rose Avenue PM E E 0.002 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.328 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.287 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.793 A 2 No 5 0.724 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.862 A 4 No 5 0.809 A 1 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 18

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A8

No Feasible Mitigation

1.376

1.021

0.861

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

0.883

1.302 1.337

1.404

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.949

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

17

0.823 0.849

0.855 0.964

1.201 1.202

1.297 1.293

**

0.826 0.811

0.950 0.979

1.376 1.376

1.396 1.396

0.788 0.790

0.932 0.934

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

0.897 0.898

Delay or V/C

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.789

0.934

0.811

0.897

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-75

Page 76: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.036 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.102 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F F

Project Driveway [a] PM F F

AM -0.017 No D -0.017 No

PM 0.012 Yes D -0.061 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.330 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.310 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 7 0.791 A 1 No 5 0.723 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 7 0.855 A 3 No 5 0.803 A 1 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 19

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A9

No Feasible Mitigation

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/CDelay or V/C

0.861

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

0.861

1.367

0.926 0.948

0.964

1.019

1.361

0.963

1.302 1.333

1.400

1.100 1.108

1.372

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.075

0.459 0.459

0.5440.543

1.073

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

1.090

17

0.823 0.847

0.855 0.957

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

17

**

** **

0.826 0.809

**

0.950 0.962

1.376 1.381

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

0.897 0.898

Delay or V/C

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.787

1.210

1.298

0.957

0.809

0.889

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-76

Page 77: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.036 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.072 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F C

Project Driveway [a] PM F D

AM D -0.018 No D -0.018 No

PM E 0.011 Yes D -0.063 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.323 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.296 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.791 A 2 No 5 0.723 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 4 No 5 0.803 A 1 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 20

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A10

No Feasible Mitigation

17

1.090

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

1.034 1.035

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

1.091

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908

1.321 1.321

1.091

0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.950 0.961

1.376 1.381

21

** 31

0.826 0.808

0.823 0.847

0.855 0.957

** **

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.400

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.948

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.302 1.333

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367 1.372

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

0.787

1.210

1.298

0.927

0.808

0.887

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-77

Page 78: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.012 No C -0.038 No

Airport Avenue PM D D 0.037 Yes D 0.028 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D 0.008 No C -0.073 No

signalized PM E 0.042 Yes D -0.107 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.379 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.300 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.777 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.792 A 1 No 4 0.762 A 0 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 21

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B1

No Feasible Mitigation

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/CDelay or V/C

0.861

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

0.861

1.367

0.926 0.948

0.964

1.019

1.361

0.963

1.302 1.333

1.400

1.100 1.108

1.372

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.075

0.459 0.459

0.5440.543

1.073

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

1.090

17

0.823 0.835

0.855 0.892

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

17

**

0.826 0.834

**

0.950 0.992

1.376 1.381

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

0.897 0.898

Delay or V/C

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.785

1.210

1.298

0.883

0.753

0.843

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-78

Page 79: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.032 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.080 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM C -0.027 No

signalized PM E 0.001 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.334 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.317 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.791 A 2 No 5 0.725 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 4 No 5 0.806 A 1 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 22

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B2

No Feasible Mitigation

17

1.090

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

1.034 1.035

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

1.091

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908

1.321 1.321

1.091

0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.950 0.951

1.376 1.381

**

0.826 0.799

0.823 0.847

0.855 0.957

** **

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.400

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.948

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.302 1.333

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367 1.372

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

0.791

1.210

1.298

0.935

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-79

Page 80: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.001 No

PM -0.004 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.034 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.109 Yes E 0.079 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D -0.015 No D -0.015 No

signalized PM E 0.029 Yes D -0.053 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.000 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C 0.002 No

Rose Avenue PM E E 0.002 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D -1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.328 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.287 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 D 8 0.793 A 12 Yes 5 0.724 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.862 A 5 No 5 0.809 A 1 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

0.897

0.934

0.811

0.789

0.897 0.898

Delay or V/C

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.934

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.396

0.788 0.790

0.950 0.979

1.376 1.376

**

0.826 0.811

17

0.823 0.849

0.855 0.964

1.201 1.202

1.297 1.293

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.949

0.883

1.302 1.337

1.404

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367

TABLE 23

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B3

No Feasible Mitigation

1.376

1.021

0.861

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-80

Page 81: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes F 0.001 No

PM 0.001 No F 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.034 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.081 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway PM F

signalized AM D -0.015 No D -0.015 No

signalized PM E 0.024 Yes D -0.061 No

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 15 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 18 0.644 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.428 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.703 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D -1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.004 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.329 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.315 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 D 8 0.791 E 12 Yes 5 0.726 D -2 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 5 No 5 0.806 A 2 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 24

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B4

No Feasible Mitigation

1.372

1.020

0.861

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

0.883

1.302 1.333

1.400

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.948

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

17

0.823 0.847

0.855 0.957

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

**

0.826 0.811

0.950 0.974

1.376 1.381

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

0.897 0.898

Delay or V/C

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.789

1.202

1.298

0.936

0.811

0.889

No Feasible Mitigation

No Feasible Mitigation

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-81

Page 82: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.009 No

PM -0.002 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.046 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.080 Yes D 0.034 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway [a] PM F

AM

PM

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM F F -0.002 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C 0.002 No

Rose Avenue PM E E 0.001 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.353 F -0.021 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.318 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 8 0.280 A 0 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.832 A 2 No 5 0.724 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 14 1.194 B 10 No 11 1.143 B 7 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 25

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE C1

No Feasible Mitigation

17

1.090

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

1.034 1.035

1.201 1.210

1.297 1.295

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

1.091

1.229 1.227

0.717 0.716

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908

1.321 1.321

1.091

0.911

0.926 0.929

0.897 0.898

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

0.932 0.933

0.592 0.595

1.396 1.394

0.788 0.790

0.950

1.376 1.375

This intersection is consolidated with intersection #17**

0.826

0.823 0.849

0.855 0.935

** **

0.544

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

0.964

1.073 1.075

0.459 0.459

1.400

1.100 1.108

0.926 0.949

1.021

0.861 0.883

1.302 1.333

Delay or V/C

0.861 0.861

1.367 1.376

Delay or V/C

1.019

1.361

0.963

0.543

1.090

17

**

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

0.777

0.889

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-82

Page 83: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

City of Los Angeles Methodology

Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual

Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?

*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No

Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No

I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes

*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes

Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes

*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No

National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes

*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No

*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No

*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No

National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No

*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No

National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F

Airport Avenue [a] PM C C

AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No

PM 0.001 No 0.001 No

*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.046 No

Airport Avenue PM D E 0.071 Yes D 0.028 Yes

18 Bundy Drive & AM F

Project Driveway [a] PM F

AM

PM

*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No

Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No

*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No

Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No

*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No

Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No

*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No

*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No

Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No

*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No

Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No

*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No

*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No

*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No

Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No

City of Santa Monica Methodology

Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual

Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?

1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No

2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No

3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No

Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No

6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No

7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No

8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No

Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No

15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No

Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No

16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.323 A 0 No

Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.296 A 1 No

17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.804 A 2 No 5 0.725 A -1 No

Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 12 1.107 B 8 No 9 1.075 A 5 No

Notes:

* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.

** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.

[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the

operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA

methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.

[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.

[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.

TABLE 26

FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE C2

No Feasible Mitigation

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cum+Project with

Mitigations

Delay or V/CDelay or V/C

0.861

Cumulative Base

Cumulative plus

Project

Cumulative plus

Project

0.861

1.367

0.926 0.948

0.964

1.019

1.361

0.963

1.302 1.333

1.400

1.100 1.108

1.372

1.020

0.861 0.883

1.075

0.459 0.459

0.5440.543

1.073

0.527 0.615

0.508 0.575

1.090

1.034 1.035

** **

1.090

17

0.823 0.847

0.855 0.926

1.201 1.212

1.297 1.298

17

**

0.826This intersection is consolidated with intersection #17

0.950

**

1.376 1.381

1.396 1.401

0.788 0.787

0.932 0.929

0.592 0.595

0.744 0.747

1.033 1.040

1.079 1.084

1.099 1.100

1.229 1.227

1.100 1.103

0.775 0.776

0.908 0.911

0.926 0.929

0.717 0.716

1.321 1.321

1.091 1.091

0.897 0.898

No Feasible Mitigation

Delay or V/C

No Feasible Mitigation

0.777

1.210

1.298

0.883

0.867 0.866

1.229 1.227

Page III-83

Page 84: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

2010 CBAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

573A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.717 =

+

+

+++ 455431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

455

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1690 30 63 1274 90

199 301690421383685431 90127463

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:06:49 PMCalcaDB

CB_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-84

Page 85: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

2010 CBPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

695

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.229 =

+

+

+++ 695944 88124

*1425

465A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2032 54 88 1293 103

227 542032134676134110384 103129388

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:07:19 PMCalcaDB

CB_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-85

Page 86: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A1 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:07:41 PMCalcaDB

A1_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-86

Page 87: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A1 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:07:59 PMCalcaDB

A1_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-87

Page 88: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A2 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:13 PMCalcaDB

A2_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-88

Page 89: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A2 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:25 PMCalcaDB

A2_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-89

Page 90: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A3 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:37 PMCalcaDB

A3_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-90

Page 91: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A3 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:51 PMCalcaDB

A3_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-91

Page 92: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A4 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:03 PMCalcaDB

A4_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-92

Page 93: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A4 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:15 PMCalcaDB

A4_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-93

Page 94: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A5 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:30 PMCalcaDB

A5_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-94

Page 95: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A5 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:44 PMCalcaDB

A5_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-95

Page 96: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A6 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:55 PMCalcaDB

A6_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-96

Page 97: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A6 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:06 PMCalcaDB

A6_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-97

Page 98: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A7 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:17 PMCalcaDB

A7_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-98

Page 99: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A7 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:28 PMCalcaDB

A7_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-99

Page 100: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A8 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:40 PMCalcaDB

A8_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-100

Page 101: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A8 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:55 PMCalcaDB

A8_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-101

Page 102: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A9 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:08 PMCalcaDB

A9_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-102

Page 103: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A9 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:24 PMCalcaDB

A9_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-103

Page 104: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A10 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:36 PMCalcaDB

A10_10~1

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-104

Page 105: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative A10 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:47 PMCalcaDB

A10_10~2

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-105

Page 106: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative B1 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:01 PMCalcaDB

B1_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-106

Page 107: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative B1 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:15 PMCalcaDB

B1_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-107

Page 108: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative B2 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:29 PMCalcaDB

B2_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-108

Page 109: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative B2 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:41 PMCalcaDB

B2_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-109

Page 110: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative B4 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:53 PMCalcaDB

B4_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-110

Page 111: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative B4 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:13:09 PMCalcaDB

B4_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-111

Page 112: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative C1 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:13:21 PMCalcaDB

C1_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-112

Page 113: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative C1 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:14:58 PMCalcaDB

C1_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-113

Page 114: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative C2 2010 CPAM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

570A:

B: 199

216A:

B: 36

129

A:

B:

431

0.716 =

+

+

+++ 454431 19936

*1425

63

A:

B:

454

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

B(W/B)

A(N/B)

A(E/B)

B(S/B)

CLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

129

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 129

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90

199 301681421383685431 90127263

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:15:16 PMCalcaDB

C2_10_AM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-114

Page 115: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Alternative C2 2010 CPPM

Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:

AM/PM: Comments:

COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:

227

A:

B:

692

134

A:

B:

944

384A:

B: 124

1.227 =

+

+

+++ 692944 88124

*1425

464A:

B: 88

V/C =

West/East Critical Movements =

North/South Critical Movements =

SouthBound

WestBoundEastBound

NorthBound

A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit

Results

V/C RATIO LOS

0.00 - 0.60 A

0.61 - 0.70 B

0.71 - 0.80 C

0.81 - 0.90 D

0.91 - 1.00 E

A(W/B)

B(N/B)

B(E/B)

A(S/B)

FLOS =

Critical Movements Diagram

TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT

Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

EXISTING

RTOR

RT

124

AMBIENT

RELATED

PROJECT

TOTAL 124

LANE

SIGNAL Perm

1

Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0

LT

384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103

227 542023134676134110384 103128988

Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations

Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94

December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:15:31 PMCalcaDB

C2_10_PM

INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET

Page III-115

Page 116: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-116

In response to Comment Nos. 7.12, 8.4, 23.3, 26.1, 26.14, 26.17, and 28.1, Table 8 of the Traffic Study (Appendix G to the Draft EIR) has been corrected to no longer indicate that the trip generation estimates shown for Airport Park include the removal of the former SMC shuttle lot as no such adjustment was made in the traffic analysis. This does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

In response to Comment No. 5.25, Table 8 has also been amended to include the Madison Campus. It should be noted that because the traffic impact analysis for the Madison Campus estimated that it would generate only nominal traffic during the typical peak periods (six trips in the a.m. peak hour and 13 trips in the p.m. peak hour) and its location is approximately four miles from the site of the Bundy Campus, the addition of the Madison Campus to Table 8 of the Traffic Study does not change any of the findings or conclusions of the Draft EIR.

The revised Table 8 of the Traffic Study has been included on the following pages of this Section.

Page 117: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

TAB

LE 8

TRIP

GEN

ERA

TIO

N E

STIM

ATE

S FO

R R

ELA

TED

PR

OJE

CTS

IN T

HE

CIT

Y O

F SA

NTA

MO

NIC

A

SPIRT

YA

DKEE

WPI

RTETI LAN

DD

ISC

OU

NT

AVE

RA

GE

USE

FAC

TOR

DA

ILY

A.M

. PEA

K H

OU

RP.

M. P

EAK

HO

UR

ED

OC

EZISES

UN

OITA

COL

TCEJ

ORP

[b]

TRIP

SIN

OU

TTO

TAL

INO

UT

TOTA

L

Cur

rent

Cum

ulat

ive

Proj

ects

with

in S

anta

Mon

ica

(per

12/

16/2

005

City

Lis

t)

Fast

Foo

d/R

etai

l/Offi

ce15

402n

d S

treet

mix

ed u

se re

plac

emen

t of

exi

stin

g M

cDon

alds

731801

9299

3168

059)ten(

RIE

morfF

SK

16

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1032

3rd

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1048

-50

3rd

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

947

4th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

75-U

nit M

ixed

-use

Bui

ldin

g15

394t

h S

treet

resi

dent

ial

75D

U22

01

504

830

3831

1647

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

914

5th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

944

5th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

Ret

ail/R

esid

entia

l12

415t

h S

treet

resi

dent

ial

49D

U22

01

325

421

2520

1030 01

55

31

2021

1028

FS

K3

liater

Ret

ail/R

esid

entia

l13

215t

h S

treet

resi

dent

ial

16D

U22

01

106

17

87

310 3

21

10

193

1028

FS

K1

liater

Ret

ail/R

esid

entia

l13

245t

h S

treet

resi

dent

ial

48D

U22

01

318

420

2420

1030

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1410

5th

Stre

etap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

56D

U22

01

371

524

2923

1235 01

55

31

2901

5.0028

FS

K5

l iater

Page

III-

117

Page 118: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

TAB

LE 8

TRIP

GEN

ERA

TIO

N E

STIM

ATE

S FO

R R

ELA

TED

PR

OJE

CTS

IN T

HE

CIT

Y O

F SA

NTA

MO

NIC

AM

ulti

Fam

ily R

esid

entia

l14

205t

h S

treet

apar

tmen

t bui

ldin

g50

DU

220

133

24

2226

2110

31 53

21

01

165.0

028F

SK

3l iater

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1437

5th

Stre

etap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

26D

U22

01

172

211

1311

516

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1442

5th

Stre

etap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

50D

U22

01

332

422

2621

1031 5

32

10

116

5.0028

FS

K3

liater

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1450

5th

Stre

etap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

56D

U22

01

371

524

2923

1235 7

43

21

138

5.0028

FS

K4

liater

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1548

5th

Stre

etap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

46D

U22

01

305

419

2319

1029

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1234

6th

Stre

etap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

48D

U22

01

318

420

2420

1030 3

21

10

153

5.0028

FS

K2

liater

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1244

6th

Stre

etap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

50D

U22

01

332

422

2621

1031

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1411

7th

Stre

etap

artm

ents

52D

U22

01

345

423

2721

1132 4

22

10

124

5.0028

FS

K2

l iater

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1418

7th

Stre

etap

artm

ent

48D

U22

01

318

420

2420

1030 3

21

10

153

5.0028

FS

K2

liater

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1427

7th

Stre

etap

artm

ent

50D

U22

01

332

422

2621

1031

17-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1544

7th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m17

DU

from

CE

(net

)1

00

00

00

0

8-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

2510

7th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m8

DU

230

147

14

53

14

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

839

9th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1027

10th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

Page

III-

118

Page 119: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

TAB

LE 8

TRIP

GEN

ERA

TIO

N E

STIM

ATE

S FO

R R

ELA

TED

PR

OJE

CTS

IN T

HE

CIT

Y O

F SA

NTA

MO

NIC

A5-

Uni

t Con

dom

iniu

m17

5010

th S

treet

cond

omin

ium

5D

U23

01

290

22

21

3

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1038

11th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

911

12th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

15-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1211

12th

Stre

etap

artm

ents

15D

U22

01

991

78

63

9 013

78

71

6011

0 22U

D61

s tnemtrapa

teertS

ht212561

la itnediseR 5-

Uni

t Con

dom

iniu

m91

414

th S

treet

cond

omin

ium

5D

U23

01

290

22

21

330

-Uni

t Apa

rtmen

t15

1115

th S

treet

apar

tmen

t30

DU

220

119

92

1315

136

19

10-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

838

16th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m10

DU

230

159

13

43

25

6-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1415

16th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m6

DU

230

135

12

32

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1520

16th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1537

16th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

11-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1803

16th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m11

DU

230

164

14

54

26 5

23

43

135

1022

UD

8laitnedise r

teer tS

ht71809

noisividbuStin

U-8 5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1105

18th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13 4

13

33

004

1022

UD

6laitnediser

teertS

ht817291

noisividbuStin

U-6 5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

811

19th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

838

19th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13 3

12

33

033

1032

UD

5la itn edise r

teer tS

h t91158

nois ivid buStin

U-5 8-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

917

19th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m8

DU

230

147

13

43

14 3

12

33

033

1022

UD

5laitn ediser

teer tS

ht915301

nois ividbuStin

U-5

31

23

30

331

022U

D5

lai tnediserteert

Sht91

8102nois ividbu

Sti nU-5 5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

923

20th

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

101-

Uni

t Res

iden

tial

1671

20th

Stre

etre

side

ntia

l10

1D

U22

01

670

844

5242

2163

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1120

21st

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

Page

III-

119

Page 120: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

TAB

LE 8

TRIP

GEN

ERA

TIO

N E

STIM

ATE

S FO

R R

ELA

TED

PR

OJE

CTS

IN T

HE

CIT

Y O

F SA

NTA

MO

NIC

A5-

Uni

t Con

dom

iniu

m20

1321

st S

treet

cond

omin

ium

5D

U23

01

290

22

21

3

74 3,1798

0541 91,1

35 3838

A/N

1RI

Emo rf

)R I

Emorf(

teertS

dn228231

N/A

(70)

(38)

(108

)(3

1)(6

8)(9

9)N

/A83

835

41,

192

450

898

1,34

810

-Uni

t Con

dom

iniu

m25

1228

th S

treet

cond

omin

ium

10D

Ufro

m C

E (n

et)

10

00

00

00

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1751

App

ian

Way

apar

tmen

t14

DU

220

193

16

76

39

Ret

ail/R

esid

entia

l43

0A

rizon

a A

ve.

resi

dent

ial

39D

U22

01

259

317

2016

824 41

77

42

2651

5.0028

FS

K7

liater

0301

0252

124

5231

022U

D94

lai tnediser. ev

Aano zi r

A505

la itnediseR

919

0111

38

4511

026U

D56

sdeB

56.ev

Aanozi r

A1311

ytilicaFs're

miehzlA 7-

Uni

t Con

dom

iniu

m21

7B

ickn

ell

cond

omin

ium

7D

U23

01

411

23

31

4

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

606

Bro

adw

ayre

side

ntia

l50

DU

220

133

24

2226

2110

31co

mm

erci

al6

KS

F82

00.

512

72

13

56

11 0301

0242

024

8131

022U

D84

s tnemt rapa

yawdao r

B626

laitnediseR ap

artm

ent/o

ffice

1424

Bro

adw

ayap

artm

ent/o

ffice

7D

U22

01

461

34

31

4

32-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1502

Bro

adw

ayco

ndom

iniu

m32

DU

230

118

82

1214

116

17

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

1906

Bro

adw

ayre

side

ntia

l32

DU

230

118

82

1214

116

17 21

10

00

911

028F

SK

0liater ex

istin

g si

gn s

hop

3K

SF

140

-1(1

0)(2

)0

(2)

(1)

(1)

(2)

8-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1311

Cen

tinel

a A

ve.

cond

omin

ium

8D

Ufro

m C

E (n

et)

10

01

10

00

lano it iddafo.f.s004,13

dv lB

dleif revolC

7071ega rot

Sse

lf-st

orag

e8

44

52

30

1F

SK

13

16-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1940

Clo

verfi

eld

Blv

dco

ndom

iniu

m16

DU

230

194

16

76

39

bus

mai

nten

ance

bld

g.40

KS

F ne

tfro

m E

IR1

342

75

123

710 51

312

612

41.cni

58 .0R I

Emor f

FS

K8

eci ffo

5-st

ory

Mix

ed-u

se B

uild

ing

525

Col

orad

oap

artm

ent

38D

U22

01

252

316

1916

824

St.

John

s M

edic

al C

ente

r &

Mas

ter P

lan

Tran

spor

tatio

n Fa

cilit

y M

aste

r Pla

nC

olor

ado

to n

orth

, 7th

to e

ast,

5th

to

wes

t, O

lym

pic

to s

outh

Page

III-

120

Page 121: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

TAB

LE 8

TRIP

GEN

ERA

TIO

N E

STIM

ATE

S FO

R R

ELA

TED

PR

OJE

CTS

IN T

HE

CIT

Y O

F SA

NTA

MO

NIC

Anoisnapx

Esup

maC

odaro loC

2 16su

Beul

Bg i

B 26-U

nit A

fford

able

H

ousi

ng71

1C

olor

ado

Ave

.ap

artm

ents

26D

U22

01

172

211

1311

516

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

2834

Col

orad

oap

artm

ent

145

DU

220

196

112

6274

6030

90 618

88

44

502RI

Emorf

erca4

krapyt ic

noisnapxE

k raPtropri

A04

0103

5351

02522

RIE

morferca

1krap

god66

8382

00

0891

RIE

morferca

1dleif

noitaercer rem

ove

exis

ting

San

ta

Mon

ica

Col

lege

shu

ttle

lot

-310

spac

es(9

46)

(66)

(6)

(72)

(32)

(57)

(89)

Euc

lid P

ark

Nea

r 152

5E

uclid

15 K

SF

park

0.34

acre

San

DA

G1

171

01

10

1

Lant

ana

Sou

th31

31E

xpos

ition

ente

rtain

men

t pos

t pr

oduc

tion

99K

SF

from

EIR

(net

)1

1,45

418

826

214

2914

217

1

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1243

Fran

klin

cond

omin

ium

5D

U23

01

290

22

21

3

6-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

2015

Idah

o A

venu

eco

ndom

iniu

m6

DU

230

135

12

32

13 704

22358

106021

184A/

NRI

Emorf

secaps588

secapsgnikrap

wen.t

Snia

M5861

)704()223 (

)58()106(

)021 ()18 4(

A/N

R IE

mor fsecaps

588-gni tsixe

morft fihs32

2111

62

4862

5 .0028

FS

K5 .21

liat er

2012

-202

4M

ain

St.

apar

tmen

t10

7D

U22

01

709

946

5544

2266

2012

-202

4M

ain

St.

spec

ialty

reta

il12

KS

F81

40.

525

00

00

79

1620

21-2

029

Mai

n S

t.ap

artm

ents

26D

U22

01

172

211

1311

516

2021

-202

9M

ain

St.

spec

ialty

reta

il7

KS

F81

40.

513

30

00

35

8

44-U

nit A

partm

ents

, 100

%

Affo

rdab

le22

09M

ain

Stre

etaf

ford

able

apa

rtmen

ts44

DU

220

129

24

1822

189

27

212

Mar

ine

Stre

etm

ulti-

fam

ily re

side

ntia

l24

DU

from

EIR

114

12

911

94

13co

mm

erci

al9

KS

F82

00.

519

33

25

89

17

Priv

ate

Hig

h S

choo

l22

30M

ichi

gan

Ave

high

sch

ool

15K

SF

530

118

731

1344

86

14

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1719

Oce

an F

ront

Wal

kco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

Mira

mar

Dev

elop

men

t A

gree

men

t11

33O

cean

Ave

nue

Hot

el 2

00 R

oom

s20

0R

oom

s31

081 1

5536

21144

861

Spe

cial

ty R

etai

l12

KS

F81

40.

526

78

513

2019

39Q

ualit

y R

esta

uran

t7

KS

F93

10.

525

21

12

147

21312

3120

3120

3121

FS

K01

eca lP

gn ite eM

Don

ald

Dou

glas

Loo

p to

nor

th,

Airp

ort A

v. to

sou

th, B

undy

Dr.

to

east

San

ta M

onic

a C

ivic

Cen

ter

Par

king

Stru

ctur

e

Nor

th M

ain

(Pio

neer

B

aker

y S

ite)

24-U

nit M

ixed

Use

Pro

ject

Page

III-

121

Page 122: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

TAB

LE 8

TRIP

GEN

ERA

TIO

N E

STIM

ATE

S FO

R R

ELA

TED

PR

OJE

CTS

IN T

HE

CIT

Y O

F SA

NTA

MO

NIC

AH

ill S

treet

Par

tnrs

D

evel

opm

ent A

gree

men

t13

27-1

337

Oce

an A

venu

eH

otel

75

Roo

ms

75R

oom

s31

01

613

2616

4223

2144

Res

taur

ant

3K

SF

932

140

519

1837

2114

35

3025

Oly

mpi

c B

lvd.

apar

tmen

t18

6D

U22

01

1,23

315

8095

7738

115

cond

omin

ium

54D

U23

01

316

420

2419

1029

spec

ialty

reta

il5

KS

F81

40.

510

20

00

33

6

Lant

ana

Eas

t30

30O

lym

pic

Blv

d.en

terta

inm

ent p

ost

prod

uctio

n64

KS

Ffro

m E

IR (n

et)

151

368

1078

1260

72

791001

79844

181762

939,1)ten(

RIE

morfF

SK

511loo hcs

e tavirp.dvl

Bc ip

mylO

1313sdao

Rwe

N Aut

o D

eale

rshi

p E

xpan

sion

3300

Oly

mpi

c B

lvd.

auto

dea

lers

hip

9.6

KS

F84

10.

518

08

311

58

13

9-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

125

Pac

ific

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m9

DU

230

153

13

43

25

5-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

126

Pac

ific

Stre

etco

ndom

iniu

m5

DU

230

129

02

22

13

18-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

1112

Pic

o B

lvd

cond

omin

ium

18D

U23

01

105

17

87

310

8-un

it C

ondo

min

ium

1528

-30

Prin

ceto

nco

ndom

iniu

m8

DU

230

147

13

43

14

May

fair

Thea

ter

212

San

ta M

onic

a B

lvd

apar

tmen

t38

DU

220

125

23

1619

168

24 819

95

23

8025.0

028F

SK

01lia ter

Affo

rdab

le H

ousi

ng26

01S

anta

Mon

ica

Blv

dap

artm

ent b

uild

ing

44D

U22

01

292

418

2218

927

Mix

ed-U

se B

uild

ing

3107

San

ta M

onic

a B

lvd

apar

tmen

t bui

ldin

g10

DU

220

166

14

54

26 32

2111

62

4462

5.0028

FS

K21

liater

Pro

duct

ion/

Live

Wor

k B

ldg.

1818

Sta

nfor

d S

treet

com

mer

cial

bui

ldin

g34

KS

F71

00.

8531

840

545

736

43

1630

Ste

war

tpr

oduc

tion

offic

e9

KS

F71

00.

8588

112

132

1012

resi

dent

ial

10K

SF

220

163

14

54

26

12-U

nit C

ondo

min

ium

2121

Virg

inia

Ave

cond

omin

ium

12D

U23

01

701

45

42

6

Mul

ti-Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

507

Wils

hire

50 re

side

ntia

l50

DU

230

129

34

1822

189

27 6442

2231

58

5.0F

SK

5laicre

mmocfs

153,5

Mix

ed-u

se B

uild

ing

Pro

duct

ion

Offi

ce/R

esid

entia

l

Page

III-

122

Page 123: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

TAB

LE 8

TRIP

GEN

ERA

TIO

N E

STIM

ATE

S FO

R R

ELA

TED

PR

OJE

CTS

IN T

HE

CIT

Y O

F SA

NTA

MO

NIC

A

7524

5108

2285

6951

RIE

morf)

RIE

morf(3

21

51

433

1RI

Emorf

)RI

Emorf(

32

15

14

331

RIE

morf)

RIE

morf(

San

ta M

onic

a P

ier B

ridge

&

Pie

r Ram

pS

anta

Mon

ica

Pie

r/Col

orad

o A

v.w

iden

pie

r brid

ge &

co

nstru

ct ra

mp

to

PC

H14

40/1

550

Lot

(n

ote:

pro

ject

wou

ld n

ot g

ener

ate

new

trip

s bu

t wou

ld c

hang

e ex

istin

g ac

cess

pat

tern

s to

the

1550

PC

H p

arki

ng lo

t)

630,1216

424224

07253

c/nsecaps

217,1tcartn oc

dna rotisivgnikr a

Pn

wot nwo

DM

Spa

rkin

g

894461

433804

44346

503,5022

UD

008laitnedise

Rot

ociP,htron

otodarolo

Ccificep

SretneC

civiC

931511

42541

71821

420,1017

FS

K39

eciffO

tsew

otnaec

O,tsaeot

ht4,htuosnal

P021

6546

9431

63903,1

0 28/138F

SK

52l ia te

R /tnarua tseR

071431

63452

15302

337,2RI

Emorf

FS

K00 1

gnidliuB

eciv reS

y tiC

6161

042

042

143RI

Emorf

FS

K02

noisnapxE

muirotiduA

56178

87951

5748

199565

FS

K5.21

retn eC

doohdl ihC

ylraE

7 572

033 8

1424

046RI

Emorf

ecrA

8.21kra

P33

9141

10

166

RIE

morfdleiF

1dleiF recco

S Inte

rnal

& N

on-A

uto

Adj

.(5

24)

(19)

(6)

(24)

(21)

(31)

(51)

SM

C M

adis

on T

heat

er13

1011

th S

treet

live

thea

ter

314

96

15

097RI

Emorf

staes005

TOTA

L: C

UR

RE

NT

SA

NTA

MO

NIC

A P

RO

JEC

TS38

,284

3,89

12,

613

6,50

53,

301

4,43

37,

735

Sou

rces

: C

ity o

f San

ta M

onic

a, D

ecem

ber 1

6, 2

005

and

"Dra

ft E

nviro

nmen

tal I

mpa

ct R

epor

t for

the

Mad

ison

The

ater

Pro

ject

" (C

hris

toph

er A

. Jos

eph

& A

ssoc

iate

s, M

arch

7, 2

003)

.

Wils

hire

to n

orth

, Col

orad

o to

so

uth,

5th

to e

ast,

2nd

to w

est

San

ta M

onic

a/U

CLA

H

ospi

tal

Wils

hire

to n

orth

, Ariz

ona

to s

outh

, 16

th to

eas

t, 15

th to

wes

t

Page

III-

123

Page 124: III.a. Corrections and Additions · 2020. 8. 19. · SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007

SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-124

In response to Comment No. 26.11, the first sentence of the second paragraph on page 27 of Appendix G (Traffic Study) to the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:

“The segment of Airport Avenue westeast of Centinela Avenue is treated as a collector street in this study, which is consistent with previous studies of projects in the area.”

This correction does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.

In response to Comment No. 28.3, the fourth sentence of the last paragraph on page 27 of Appendix G (Traffic Study) to the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:

“That traffic volume, as well as the physical characteristics of the street itself (i.e., its grade), is such that typical neighborhood traffic calming measures — such as those applied on Rose Avenue westeast of Bundy Drive and on 23rd Street north of Ocean Park Boulevard (stop signs and speed humps) — are not considered appropriate.”

This correction does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.


Recommended