+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education · PDF fileImpact of Sequestration on Federal...

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education · PDF fileImpact of Sequestration on Federal...

Date post: 08-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: truongkien
View: 219 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
41
Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating educational services as well as eliminating or reducing financial aid for this number of students attending pre-K, elementary, secondary, and postsecondary schools 5.8 7.4 million million 49,365 $38 $40 $42 $44 $46 $48 '04 (billions) F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3 $3 billion FUNDING CUT* STUDENTS AFFECTED* The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number of jobs, which includes preK-12 and postsecondary educators, administrative and support staff, and all other specialists POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES* '13 36% The additional number of students enrolled (public preK-12 and all postsecondary) today than in 2004: The rise in costs in providing public K-12 services since 2004: U.S. Department of Education (plus Head Start) Sequestration would roll back Education Department funding** below the level in 2004 As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year, sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts, was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly applied to almost all federal programs beginning on March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by $24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt, nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year 2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year 2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are enacted for 2013. * Totals include Head Start. ** Total discretionary funding excluding Pell Grants. Source: NEA calculations using federal agency budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.
Transcript

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating educational

services as well as eliminating or reducing financial aid for

this number of students attending pre-K, elementary,

secondary, and postsecondary schools

5.8

7.4

million

million

49,365

$38

$40

$42

$44

$46

$48

'04

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$3billion

FUNDING CUT*

STUDENTS AFFECTED*

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes preK-12 and postsecondary educators,

administrative and support staff, and all other specialists

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES*

'13

36%

The additional number of students enrolled (public preK-12 and all postsecondary)

today than in 2004:

The rise in costs in providing public K-12 services since 2004:

U.S. Department of Education (plus Head Start)

Sequestration would roll back Education Department funding** below the level in

2004

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

* Totals include Head Start. ** Total discretionary funding excluding Pell Grants. Source: NEA calculations using federal agency budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

U.S. Department of Education ProgramsElementary & Secondary Education

Grants to Local Educational Agencies (ESEA Title I, Part A) $740.3 1,181,600 9,910School Improvement State Grants (ESEA section 1003(g)) 27.2 41,600 350State Agency Programs: Migrant (ESEA I-C) and Neglected & Delinquent (ESEA I-D) 22.6 26,600 300Impact Aid Basic Support Payments (ESEA VIII section 8003(b)) 58.8 48,500 810Improving Teacher Quality State Grants (ESEA II, Part A) 125.8 --- 1,63021st Century Community Learning Centers (ESEA IV-B) 58.7 85,500 1,210Education for Homeless Children and Youths (MVHAA Title VII-B) 3.3 45,200 45Rural Education (ESEA VI-B) 9.1 272,100 130English Language Acquisition (ESEA III, Part A) 37.3 209,800 450All Other Elementary & Secondary Education 152.1 141,500 1,910

Subtotal, Elementary & Secondary Education 1,235.4 2,052,400 ** 16,745

Special Education

Special Education Grants to States (IDEA-B-611) 590.5 296,400 7,810Preschool grants (IDEA-B-619) 19.0 38,100 250Grants for infants and families (IDEA-C) 22.6 18,200 300All Other Special Education 12.6 --- 160

Subtotal, Special Education 644.7 352,700 8,520

Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research

Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants (RA Title I-A and Title I-C) 171.2 55,700 1,010All Other Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research 30.9 10,300 390

Subtotal, Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research 202.1 66,000 1,400

Career, Technical, and Adult Education

Career and Technical Education State Grants (Carl D. Perkins CTEA Title I) 57.3 624,400 760Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants (AEFLA and WIA section 503) 30.3 127,900 450All Other Career, Technical, and Adult Education 1.0 --- 15

Subtotal, Career, Technical, and Adult Education 88.6 752,300 1,225

Federal Student Financial Assistance

Federal Pell Grants (HEA IV-A-1) exempt --- ---Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (HEA IV-A-3) 37.5 1,389,900 340Federal Work-Study (HEA IV-C) 49.8 683,000 450Federal Direct Student Loan Program (HEA IV-D) 63.5 --- ---All Other Federal Student Financial Assistance 1.3 48,300 10

Subtotal, Federal Student Financial Assistance 152.0 2,121,200 ** 800

Higher Education

Federal TRIO Programs (HEA IV-A-2, Chapter 1) 42.8 40,900 410All Other Higher Education 88.2 1,928,600 790

Subtotal, Higher Education 131.0 1,969,500 ** 1,200

Institute of Education Sciences 30.3 --- 180Departmental Management 103.8 --- 330

Total, U.S. Department of Education Programs $2,587.9 7,314,100 ** 30,400

Other Federal Education-Related Programs

Head Start (HSA section 639 ) 406.4 48,600 18,965

Total, Federal Education-Related Programs $2,994.3 7,362,700 ** 49,365

*Rounded estimates. ** Totals may include some duplication. Some students may receive services under more than one program.For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Program

Applying CBPP's Estimate

Funding Cut (in millions)*

Students Affected*

Potential Job Losses*

For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

General Notes on "Students Affected"

To derive the number of students affected, NEA first

collected data on the number of students currently

receiving services by state. Since it is not possible to

know precisely how states, districts, and even schools

would implement cuts in federal funding, NEA

calculates an "equivalency" to isolate the number of

students whose services would be eliminated as a result

of sequestration in order to illustrate its impact. From

the number of students currently being served by state,

NEA calculated an average cost per student (per state).

NEA then applied this average cost per student to the

state's reduced funding level, post-sequestration, to

identify the number of students that would remain

unserved due to less funding.

General Notes on "Potential Job Losses"

To derive the number of potential K-12 job losses,

NEA used data by state from the U.S. Census and

NEA Research on current expenditures; salaries,

wages, and benefits; and the number of full-time

equivalent (FTE) employees. NEA calculated the

percentage of current expenditures represented by

salaries, wages, and benefits by state; and, an

average cost per FTE employee by state. NEA

applied the results from both calculations to

determine by state the potential number of jobs that

could be lost from sequestration; and, then

aggregated the losses by state for a national total.

The exception to this approach was for federal student

financial assistance programs. NEA assumed that all

students currently receiving aid would be affected to

varying degrees by any reduction in federal support.

A similar approach was taken for determining the

potential loss of early childhood and postsecondary

jobs, as well as those from other providers, such as

community-based organizations. Sources for the

various data sets include the National Center for

Education Statistics, Office of Head Start, Bureau

of Labor Statistics, and the Government

Accountability Office (GAO). Data for

determining potential job losses at the U.S.

Department of Education was drawn from the

agency's FY 2013 Justifications of Appropriation

Estimates to the Congress. Potential job losses

reflect the mix of jobs specific to each program. For

example, job losses under career and technical

education reflect those at both high schools and

postsecondary schools based on state allocations to

each area.

The impetus for updating the set of tables made available

September 14, 2012 was the "fiscal cliff" deal and

passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act, which

postponed the start of sequestration, or automatic

budget cuts, by two months and reduced the total

amount of the cuts should they occur. As a result, the

NEA has updated its estimates according to an analysis

of the fiscal cliff deal by the Center on Budget and Policy

Priorities. In addition, since the NEA's September 14th

analysis, the U.S. Department of Education has made

available updated state allocation and participation

estimates for selected programs, which the NEA has

incorporated here as well.

Revisions to the Set of Tables Released September 14, 2012

NEA's estimates reflect direct job losses only.

According to Dr. Lawrence Mishel of the Economic

Policy Institute, every 100,000 education jobs lost

translates into roughly 30,000 jobs lost in other

sectors due to reduced spending by schools and

those laid off.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating extra

instructional services for this number of students

who are struggling academically, particularly

students attending high-poverty schools1.2

1.18

million

million

9,900

$10

$11

$12

$13

$14

$15

'08

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$740million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes teachers, classroom aides, reading

specialists, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

12%

The additional number of students receiving Title I services today than in 2008:

The rise in costs, on average, in providing Title I services since 2008:

Grants to Local Educational Agencies (ESEA Title I, Part A)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2008

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut (in millions)

Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $11.9 22,120 193Alaska 1.9 2,240 16Arizona 15.8 17,720 245Arkansas 7.9 13,900 95California 85.0 178,940 848Colorado 7.5 10,340 106Connecticut 5.4 5,500 55Delaware 2.2 3,920 22District of Columbia 2.3 3,340 19Florida 38.2 67,350 666Georgia 25.6 50,330 393Hawaii 2.4 5,480 27Idaho 2.8 4,210 44Illinois 32.8 39,390 321Indiana 13.6 11,850 194Iowa 4.4 5,040 65Kansas 5.4 6,530 101Kentucky 11.3 19,920 203Louisiana 14.7 24,680 230Maine 2.6 1,580 37Maryland 9.9 8,170 96Massachusetts 10.7 15,670 108Michigan 27.3 30,590 303Minnesota 8.1 8,510 98Mississippi 9.5 19,690 145Missouri 11.7 17,140 172Montana 2.3 2,920 35Nebraska 3.6 6,250 58Nevada 5.6 8,570 67New Hampshire 2.0 1,210 27New Jersey 15.5 19,400 136New Mexico 6.2 11,910 88New York 56.4 94,320 500North Carolina 20.8 30,500 348North Dakota 1.8 1,330 28Ohio 30.0 40,050 366Oklahoma 8.3 20,500 129Oregon 7.5 10,280 86Pennsylvania 29.6 31,080 327Rhode Island 2.5 3,070 24South Carolina 10.9 13,730 169South Dakota 2.2 1,950 40Tennessee 14.5 31,160 233Texas 71.0 178,730 1,303Utah 4.9 6,380 76Vermont 1.8 2,620 23Virginia 11.6 11,750 173Washington 10.9 10,450 113West Virginia 4.9 6,480 60Wisconsin 11.9 13,640 131Wyoming 1.7 1,130 22Puerto Rico 23.6 25,460 430Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 7.4 2,600 118Other 0.0 - -

National $740.3 1,181,620 9,913

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Grants to Local Educational Agencies (ESEA Title I, Part A)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to denying targeted,

turnaround services for this number of students

who attend schools that need the most help in

boosting academic achievement

13,528

42thousand

350

$450

$475

$500

$525

$550

'08

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$27million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes teachers, principals, mathematics and

literacy coaches, media specialists, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

5%

The number of schools eligible for School Improvement Grants:

The percentage of eligible schools receiving grants:

School Improvement State Grants (ESEA section 1003(g))

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

2008

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $415 300 7Alaska 77 130 1Arizona 535 210 8Arkansas 275 160 3California 3,154 3,160 31Colorado 269 230 4Connecticut 187 270 2Delaware 76 200 1District of Columbia 79 160 1Florida 1,368 1,300 24Georgia 879 960 13Hawaii 83 270 1Idaho 104 40 2Illinois 1,134 1,010 11Indiana 472 240 7Iowa 155 110 2Kansas 207 50 4Kentucky 395 930 7Louisiana 493 1,470 8Maine 91 130 1Maryland 348 250 3Massachusetts 369 770 4Michigan 908 1,540 10Minnesota 281 630 3Mississippi 316 330 5Missouri 393 1,330 6Montana 78 30 1Nebraska 135 50 2Nevada 195 630 2New Hampshire 69 200 1New Jersey 535 690 5New Mexico 211 610 3New York 1,918 4,440 17North Carolina 734 890 12North Dakota 62 1,140 1Ohio 1,033 1,900 13Oklahoma 285 100 4Oregon 278 230 3Pennsylvania 1,032 1,810 11Rhode Island 85 250 1South Carolina 378 370 6South Dakota 77 310 1Tennessee 504 3,200 8Texas 2,536 3,810 47Utah 174 280 3Vermont 62 1,420 1Virginia 395 740 6Washington 401 380 4West Virginia 171 210 2Wisconsin 414 100 5Wyoming 60 80 1Puerto Rico 726 1,220 13Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 242 340 4Other 1,361 - -

National $27,211 41,610 346

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

School Improvement State Grants (ESEA section 1003(g))

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating services

for this number of students who are migratory,

attending community day programs, or in State-run

institutions and correctional facilities

27thousand

300

$350

$375

$400

'08

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$23million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes teachers, reading specialists,

counselors, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

Migrant (ESEA I-C) and Neglected & Delinquent (ESEA I-D)

Migrant (ESEA I-C)

$40

$44

$48

$52

'02

(millions)

'13

Neglected & Delinquent (ESEA I-D)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2008

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2002

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $161 200 3Alaska 391 310 3Arizona 434 850 7Arkansas 306 390 4California 7,134 9,750 71Colorado 410 340 6Connecticut 138 230 1Delaware 41 70 0District of Columbia 13 60 0Florida 1,313 1,740 23Georgia 489 470 7Hawaii 62 150 1Idaho 222 220 3Illinois 163 220 2Indiana 328 120 5Iowa 114 130 2Kansas 642 290 12Kentucky 450 390 8Louisiana 223 360 3Maine 75 40 1Maryland 110 350 1Massachusetts 223 150 2Michigan 506 400 6Minnesota 125 110 2Mississippi 99 100 2Missouri 154 140 2Montana 60 80 1Nebraska 297 200 5Nevada 36 50 0New Hampshire 33 60 0New Jersey 210 270 2New Mexico 69 60 1New York 688 630 6North Carolina 423 400 7North Dakota 17 70 0Ohio 192 250 2Oklahoma 99 80 2Oregon 592 960 7Pennsylvania 541 510 6Rhode Island 27 70 0South Carolina 107 450 2South Dakota 53 70 1Tennessee 56 130 1Texas 3,304 2,880 61Utah 150 210 2Vermont 66 70 1Virginia 135 490 2Washington 872 770 9West Virginia 55 60 1Wisconsin 69 90 1Wyoming 46 30 1Puerto Rico 32 40 1Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes - - - Other 64 - -

National $22,617 26,560 297

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Migrant (ESEA I-C) and Neglected & Delinquent (ESEA I-D) Programs

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to shifting the costs for

educating this number of students from the federal

government to local school districts

48thousand

800

$1.04

$1.08

$1.12

$1.16

'06

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$59million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes teachers, aides, technology and media

specialists, counselors, nurses, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

22%

Impact Aid Basic Support Payments (ESEA VIII section 8003(b))

The rise in school general operating expenditures

since 2006:

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

2006(billions)

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

$6.1billion

The shortfall in fully funding maximum payments since 2006:

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $138 1,120 2Alaska 7,226 1,010 62Arizona 8,937 2,260 139Arkansas 19 120 0California 3,239 2,830 32Colorado 969 1,000 14Connecticut 218 270 2Delaware 1 20 0District of Columbia 48 200 0Florida 289 2,260 5Georgia 1,110 1,920 17Hawaii 2,344 1,320 27Idaho 298 190 5Illinois 706 700 7Indiana 6 135 0Iowa 9 20 0Kansas 1,362 470 26Kentucky 42 460 1Louisiana 430 360 7Maine 103 95 1Maryland 304 2,150 3Massachusetts 12 80 0Michigan 213 120 2Minnesota 1,017 230 12Mississippi 108 300 2Missouri 1,053 340 15Montana 2,203 490 34Nebraska 905 330 15Nevada 155 560 2New Hampshire 0.3 10 0New Jersey 575 260 5New Mexico 4,864 1,270 70New York 1,741 3,820 15North Carolina 785 2,270 13North Dakota 1,369 255 21Ohio 74 560 1Oklahoma 1,794 1,750 28Oregon 173 95 2Pennsylvania 44 740 0Rhode Island 78 120 1South Carolina 77 750 1South Dakota 2,626 475 47Tennessee 186 765 3Texas 5,134 3,660 94Utah 414 600 7Vermont 0.3 5 0Virginia 1,812 5,570 27Washington 2,177 1,900 23West Virginia 0.5 5 0Wisconsin 669 240 7Wyoming 702 280 9Puerto Rico 63 1,630 1Outlying Areas 7 90 0Other - - -

National $58,831 48,480 807

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Impact Aid Basic Support Payments (ESEA VIII, section 8003(b))

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

95%

1,630

$2.00

$2.25

$2.50

$2.75

$3.00

'02

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$126million

2,630

FUNDING CUT

TEACHERS UNHIRED TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes general and special education teachers,

and professional development coaches

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

45%

The percentage of districts that receive Title II, Part A funds:

The percentage of Title II, Part A funds received by the highest-poverty districts:

Improving Teacher Quality State Grants (ESEA Title II, Part A)

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating the option for

districts to hire this number of teachers to reduce class size,

particularly in grades K to 3 in large, high-poverty urban

schools as well as rural low-income schools

Sequestration would reduce funding to its lowest level

since inception in 2002:

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Teachers Unhired to Reduce Class Size*

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $1,972 38 32Alaska 586 8 5Arizona 1,954 49 30Arkansas 1,193 29 14California 13,783 249 137Colorado 1,383 35 20Connecticut 1,150 19 12Delaware 586 10 6District of Columbia 586 10 5Florida 5,602 120 98Georgia 3,274 75 50Hawaii 586 11 7Idaho 586 15 9Illinois 5,037 97 49Indiana 2,121 43 30Iowa 961 22 14Kansas 984 24 18Kentucky 1,929 41 35Louisiana 2,764 53 43Maine 586 13 8Maryland 1,778 30 17Massachusetts 2,228 37 23Michigan 4,876 95 54Minnesota 1,684 37 21Mississippi 1,821 44 28Missouri 2,124 55 31Montana 586 17 9Nebraska 600 15 10Nevada 634 13 8New Hampshire 586 12 8New Jersey 2,803 42 25New Mexico 977 23 14New York 9,971 157 88North Carolina 2,748 71 46North Dakota 586 15 9Ohio 4,631 103 57Oklahoma 1,426 35 22Oregon 1,202 24 14Pennsylvania 5,006 90 55Rhode Island 586 11 6South Carolina 1,555 38 24South Dakota 586 16 10Tennessee 2,126 49 34Texas 10,209 254 187Utah 823 17 13Vermont 586 13 8Virginia 2,196 45 33Washington 2,026 42 21West Virginia 1,041 19 13Wisconsin 2,034 40 22Wyoming 586 10 8Puerto Rico 3,782 161 69Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 1,252 40 20Other 2,516 - -

National $125,795 2,630 1,628

* Assumes all of the funding cut would have been used for class size reduction.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Improving Teacher Quality State Grants (ESEA Title II, Part A)

Applying CBPP's Estimate

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating before-

and after-school services and summer school programs

for this number of students, most of which attend

high-need, high-poverty schools

125

86

thousand

thousand

1,200

$1.00

$1.05

$1.10

$1.15

$1.20

'08

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$59million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes school-day teachers and other non-

teaching school staff, as well as center administrators and

coordinators, and youth development workers

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

The additional number of students attending afterschool programs

today than in 2008:

The percentage of attendees that qualify for free or reduced-price lunch are nearly:

21st Century Community Learning Centers (ESEA Title IV-B)

66%

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

2008

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $889 845 22Alaska 288 330 4Arizona 1,234 2,390 30Arkansas 608 710 11California 6,328 17,050 98Colorado 598 1,100 13Connecticut 409 870 6Delaware 288 220 4District of Columbia 288 290 4Florida 2,961 3,815 80Georgia 2,058 1,690 49Hawaii 288 540 5Idaho 288 360 7Illinois 2,565 2,370 39Indiana 994 1,295 22Iowa 304 270 7Kansas 441 710 13Kentucky 885 1,495 25Louisiana 1,094 780 27Maine 288 595 6Maryland 727 660 11Massachusetts 841 1,335 13Michigan 2,105 1,520 36Minnesota 634 1,200 12Mississippi 736 1,045 17Missouri 968 1,060 22Montana 288 595 7Nebraska 288 360 7Nevada 390 680 7New Hampshire 288 400 6New Jersey 1,163 790 16New Mexico 445 670 10New York 4,455 7,590 61North Carolina 1,550 1,330 40North Dakota 288 500 7Ohio 2,273 1,690 43Oklahoma 605 800 15Oregon 585 610 10Pennsylvania 2,098 1,765 36Rhode Island 288 410 4South Carolina 876 980 21South Dakota 288 860 8Tennessee 1,080 1,865 27Texas 5,326 7,575 152Utah 321 870 8Vermont 288 680 6Virginia 961 1,300 22Washington 842 1,360 14West Virginia 362 905 7Wisconsin 844 2,035 14Wyoming 288 690 6Puerto Rico 1,977 3,165 56Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 587 510 15Other 587 - -

National $58,735 85,530 1,211

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

21st Century Community Learning Centers (ESEA IV-B)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating a range of

services to facilitate the enrollment, attendance, and success in

school for this number of students who are homeless

500

45

thousand

thousand

45

$60

$61

$62

$63

$64

$65

$66

'06

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$3million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes teachers, classroom aides, reading

specialists, counselors, school nurses, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

130%

The additional number of homeless children receiving services today than in 2006:

The percentage increase in the number of homeless children receiving services since 2006:

Education for Homeless Children & Youths (MVHAA Title VII-B)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2006

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $53 720 1Alaska 8 190 0Arizona 68 450 1Arkansas 34 130 0California 380 17,830 4Colorado 33 850 1Connecticut 24 90 0Delaware 10 100 0District of Columbia 10 160 0Florida 173 2,690 3Georgia 112 1,235 2Hawaii 10 120 0Idaho 13 120 0Illinois 147 1,985 1Indiana 60 350 1Iowa 20 140 0Kansas 25 265 0Kentucky 50 940 1Louisiana 63 660 1Maine 12 20 0Maryland 45 605 0Massachusetts 47 510 0Michigan 116 1,360 1Minnesota 36 345 0Mississippi 41 190 1Missouri 51 315 1Montana 10 70 0Nebraska 17 120 0Nevada 25 480 0New Hampshire 9 90 0New Jersey 69 70 1New Mexico 27 555 0New York 247 2,130 2North Carolina 94 710 2North Dakota 8 30 0Ohio 134 790 2Oklahoma 37 360 1Oregon 34 700 0Pennsylvania 132 975 1Rhode Island 11 20 0South Carolina 49 320 1South Dakota 10 80 0Tennessee 65 380 1Texas 316 2,770 6Utah 22 25 0Vermont 8 10 0Virginia 51 590 1Washington 49 570 1West Virginia 22 190 0Wisconsin 53 430 1Wyoming 8 30 0Puerto Rico 95 245 2Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 37 80 1Other 46 - -

National $3,324 45,190 45

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Education for Homeless Children and Youths (MVHAA Title VII-B)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating a range

of educational services for this number of students

who attend small, rural schools or rural schools with

high concentrations of students in poverty

717

272

thousand

thousand

130

$160

$170

$180

'08

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$9million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of

this number of jobs, which includes teachers,

classroom aides, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

5,992

The additional number of rural students receiving services today than in 2008:

The number of rural districts receiving grants currently:

Rural Education (ESEA VI-B)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2008

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $210 10,420 3Alaska 18 335 0Arizona 202 3,625 3Arkansas 242 8,810 3California 561 6,920 6Colorado 117 2,730 2Connecticut 59 600 1Delaware 3 330 0District of Columbia - - - Florida 129 6,630 2Georgia 365 15,720 6Hawaii - - - Idaho 64 1,695 1Illinois 359 6,590 3Indiana 74 4,290 1Iowa 250 3,805 4Kansas 197 4,095 4Kentucky 298 12,070 5Louisiana 168 8,030 3Maine 130 4,335 2Maryland - - - Massachusetts 73 560 1Michigan 253 8,455 3Minnesota 183 3,380 2Mississippi 355 12,200 5Missouri 442 10,310 6Montana 272 2,710 4Nebraska 222 2,705 4Nevada 6 190 0New Hampshire 127 2,840 2New Jersey 105 980 1New Mexico 125 3,440 2New York 175 5,740 2North Carolina 249 14,920 4North Dakota 47 1,045 1Ohio 201 9,640 2Oklahoma 638 11,960 10Oregon 134 4,550 2Pennsylvania 88 4,830 1Rhode Island 5 85 0South Carolina 141 7,500 2South Dakota 59 1,440 1Tennessee 198 11,920 3Texas 914 26,930 17Utah 43 500 1Vermont - - - Virginia 119 5,080 2Washington 164 3,925 2West Virginia 132 6,720 2Wisconsin 177 4,400 2Wyoming 1 20 0Puerto Rico - - - Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 46 2,120 1Other - - -

National $9,139 272,125 131

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Rural Education (ESEA VI-B)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating

language instruction educational programs

for this number of English learners

210thousand

450

$660

$680

$700

$720

$740

$760

'08

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$37million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this

number of jobs, which includes teachers,

paraprofessionals, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

English Language Acquisition State Grants (ESEA Title III, Part A)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2008

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

56

The number of distinct languages reported by states as one of the

top five languages spoken by English learners in that state:

The number of distinct languages spoken in homes across the

United States:

325

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $199 950 3Alaska 54 760 0Arizona 940 4,690 15Arkansas 160 1,530 2California 8,303 52,970 83Colorado 509 5,660 7Connecticut 296 1,565 3Delaware 63 345 1District of Columbia 40 305 0Florida 2,210 12,125 39Georgia 781 3,965 12Hawaii 180 1,015 2Idaho 100 800 2Illinois 1,458 8,250 14Indiana 427 2,455 6Iowa 165 1,100 2Kansas 210 1,700 4Kentucky 191 810 3Louisiana 157 640 2Maine 37 250 1Maryland 514 2,670 5Massachusetts 670 2,605 7Michigan 543 3,480 6Minnesota 441 3,370 5Mississippi 84 295 1Missouri 260 950 4Montana 11 20 0Nebraska 137 1,050 2Nevada 452 3,935 5New Hampshire 48 190 1New Jersey 1,115 2,820 10New Mexico 208 2,810 3New York 2,853 12,010 25North Carolina 790 5,580 13North Dakota 7 50 0Ohio 493 1,870 6Oklahoma 231 1,810 4Oregon 394 3,030 4Pennsylvania 730 2,280 8Rhode Island 125 375 1South Carolina 230 1,710 4South Dakota 38 200 1Tennessee 291 1,630 5Texas 5,210 38,135 96Utah 247 2,260 4Vermont 4 10 0Virginia 597 4,970 9Washington 893 5,030 9West Virginia 31 90 0Wisconsin 340 2,460 4Wyoming 0 0 0Puerto Rico 174 155 3Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 187 50 3Other 2,427 - -

National $37,257 209,785 450

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

English Language Acquisition State Grants (ESEA Title III, Part A)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to shifting the cost of educating

this number of students with special needs from the federal

government to states and school districts

296thousand

7,800

$9.8

$10.2

$10.6

$11.0

$11.4

$11.8

'08

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$591million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes special education teachers,

instructional aides, speech-language pathologists,

occupational and physical therapists, and school counselors

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

14%

The rise in costs in providing special education services

since 2008:

Special Education Grants to States (IDEA Part B-611)

15%

The federal share of the excess costs of educating students with disabilities in 2013 would fall to

below the 2002 share:

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

2008

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut (in millions)

Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $9.3 3,725 151Alaska 1.9 815 16Arizona 9.6 5,730 149Arkansas 5.7 2,635 69California 62.6 30,970 625Colorado 7.9 3,830 112Connecticut 6.8 3,090 69Delaware 1.8 870 17District of Columbia 0.9 570 7Florida 32.3 16,440 562Georgia 16.8 8,330 257Hawaii 2.0 880 24Idaho 2.8 1,200 44Illinois 25.9 13,095 252Indiana 13.2 7,470 188Iowa 6.2 3,100 92Kansas 5.5 2,825 103Kentucky 8.1 4,160 145Louisiana 9.7 3,640 151Maine 2.8 1,445 39Maryland 10.2 4,630 99Massachusetts 14.5 7,660 147Michigan 20.5 9,665 227Minnesota 9.7 5,525 118Mississippi 6.1 2,755 94Missouri 11.6 5,580 170Montana 1.9 735 29Nebraska 3.8 2,030 61Nevada 3.6 2,125 43New Hampshire 2.4 1,345 33New Jersey 18.5 10,590 162New Mexico 4.7 2,125 66New York 38.8 19,855 343North Carolina 16.7 8,640 279North Dakota 1.4 580 22Ohio 22.3 12,030 273Oklahoma 7.6 4,630 118Oregon 6.6 3,670 75Pennsylvania 21.8 13,410 241Rhode Island 2.2 1,120 21South Carolina 9.0 4,540 140South Dakota 1.7 780 30Tennessee 12.1 5,660 195Texas 50.2 20,400 920Utah 5.6 3,190 88Vermont 1.4 620 18Virginia 14.4 7,390 214Washington 11.3 5,870 118West Virginia 3.9 1,985 47Wisconsin 10.6 5,510 117Wyoming 1.4 615 19Puerto Rico 5.9 5,860 107Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 6.5 440 103Other 0.0 - -

National $590.5 296,380 7,811

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Special Education Grants to States (IDEA Part B-611)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to shifting the costs of educating

this number of preschool children with special needs from the

federal government to states and school districts

223

38

thousand

thousand

250

$300

$325

$350

$375

$400

'95

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$19million

FUNDING CUT

CHILDREN AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes special education teachers, early

childhood education teachers, speech-language pathologists,

and occupational and physical therapists

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

106%

The additional number of children receiving special education services today than in 1995:

The rise in costs in providing special education services

since 1995:

Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Part B-619)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

1995

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Children Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $280 380 5Alaska 63 110 1Arizona 267 780 4Arkansas 268 680 3California 1,921 3,760 19Colorado 247 630 4Connecticut 245 410 2Delaware 63 115 1District of Columbia 12 75 0Florida 923 1,910 16Georgia 489 845 8Hawaii 50 125 1Idaho 109 170 2Illinois 883 1,885 9Indiana 445 930 6Iowa 200 380 3Kansas 217 540 4Kentucky 511 890 9Louisiana 324 570 5Maine 126 200 2Maryland 334 670 3Massachusetts 495 840 5Michigan 628 1,080 7Minnesota 372 785 5Mississippi 211 540 3Missouri 300 820 4Montana 59 90 1Nebraska 113 265 2Nevada 112 390 1New Hampshire 78 160 1New Jersey 569 865 5New Mexico 159 260 2New York 1,688 3,270 15North Carolina 566 960 9North Dakota 40 90 1Ohio 626 1,220 8Oklahoma 182 430 3Oregon 193 510 2Pennsylvania 699 1,670 8Rhode Island 84 150 1South Carolina 357 555 6South Dakota 73 140 1Tennessee 344 680 6Texas 1,139 2,080 21Utah 178 450 3Vermont 43 90 1Virginia 457 850 7Washington 409 745 4West Virginia 174 280 2Wisconsin 474 820 5Wyoming 53 175 1Puerto Rico 156 755 3Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes - - - Other - - -

National $19,005 38,070 247

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Part B-619)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating early

intervention services for this number of infants

and toddlers with disabilities

113

18

thousand

thousand

300

$350

$375

$400

$425

$450

'02

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$23million

FUNDING CUT

CHILDREN AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes special education teachers, child

development specialists, speech-language pathologists, and

occupational and physical therapists

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

49%

The additional number of children receiving special education services today than in 2002:

The rise in costs in providing special education services

since 2002:

Special Education Grants for Infants and Families (IDEA Part C)

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

2002

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Children Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $322 160 5Alaska 111 45 1Arizona 479 260 7Arkansas 207 170 2California 2,669 1,760 27Colorado 361 315 5Connecticut 208 240 2Delaware 111 50 1District of Columbia 111 30 1Florida 1,129 645 20Georgia 720 360 11Hawaii 111 100 1Idaho 128 95 2Illinois 878 1,000 9Indiana 455 485 7Iowa 212 195 3Kansas 218 225 4Kentucky 298 250 5Louisiana 333 280 5Maine 111 55 2Maryland 385 400 4Massachusetts 385 785 4Michigan 621 555 7Minnesota 374 275 5Mississippi 222 115 3Missouri 411 270 6Montana 111 40 2Nebraska 140 80 2Nevada 198 140 2New Hampshire 111 100 1New Jersey 566 570 5New Mexico 153 255 2New York 1,227 1,545 11North Carolina 666 550 11North Dakota 111 50 2Ohio 754 760 9Oklahoma 280 140 4Oregon 250 160 3Pennsylvania 766 1,030 8Rhode Island 111 105 1South Carolina 319 240 5South Dakota 111 60 2Tennessee 429 220 7Texas 2,038 1,275 37Utah 282 185 4Vermont 111 40 1Virginia 537 450 8Washington 467 300 5West Virginia 111 135 1Wisconsin 375 325 4Wyoming 111 65 1Puerto Rico 235 265 4Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 439 20 7 Other - - -

National $22,578 18,225 302

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Special Education Grants for Infants & Families (IDEA Part C)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating services for

this number of individuals with significant disabilities

that prepare them for and engage them in gainful

employment to the extent of their capabilities

9

56

thousand

thousand

1,000

$2.95

$3.05

$3.15

'10

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$171million

FUNDING CUT

INDIVIDUALS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of agency jobs, which includes administrators, counselors,

rehabilitation teachers, support staff, and other staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

5%

The additional number of individuals receiving services

today than in 2010:

The rise in costs in providing services since 2010:

Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants (RA Title I-A and Title I-C)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2010

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Individuals

AffectedPotential

Job LossesAlabama $3,107 1,260 22Alaska 650 145 4Arizona 3,555 555 20Arkansas 2,539 1,060 24California 16,684 3,920 80Colorado 2,294 580 8Connecticut 1,827 450 10Delaware 610 200 4District of Columbia 728 270 3Florida 7,889 2,575 38Georgia 5,589 1,290 46Hawaii 729 270 3Idaho 920 460 8Illinois 6,316 1,360 24Indiana 3,519 795 13Iowa 1,450 500 11Kansas 1,611 550 7Kentucky 2,611 1,070 19Louisiana 2,011 665 11Maine 940 260 6Maryland 2,674 930 20Massachusetts 3,553 1,920 17Michigan 5,914 1,850 27Minnesota 2,730 770 18Mississippi 2,519 880 19Missouri 3,707 1,050 12Montana 763 290 4Nebraska 1,124 410 9Nevada 704 130 3New Hampshire 672 300 4New Jersey 3,245 1,250 15New Mexico 1,356 350 7New York 8,354 3,660 28North Carolina 6,008 2,730 40North Dakota 686 240 3Ohio 5,482 855 25Oklahoma 2,504 1,030 15Oregon 2,227 400 12Pennsylvania 6,878 3,320 49Rhode Island 737 300 4South Carolina 3,169 1,800 33South Dakota 599 185 3Tennessee 3,730 705 23Texas 13,478 3,600 75Utah 2,086 1,345 10Vermont 910 640 5Virginia 4,048 1,250 32Washington 3,071 770 16West Virginia 2,447 990 13Wisconsin 3,149 1,080 12Wyoming 524 175 3Puerto Rico 4,098 1,710 53Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 2,517 525 35Other - - -

National $171,242 55,675 1,007

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants (RA Title I-A and Title I-C)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating career and

technical education programs in high schools, technical

schools, and community colleges for this number of students

2.6

624

million

thousand

760

$0.9

$1.0

$1.1

$1.2

'00

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$57million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes high school teachers, counselors,

faculty at postsecondary institutions, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

60%

The additional number of students enrolled today in

career and technical education programs than in 2000:

The rise in costs in providing career and technical education

programs since 2000:

Career & Technical Education State Grants (Carl D. Perkins CTEA Title I)

2000

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $1,070 13,470 16Alaska 235 1,155 2Arizona 1,009 11,685 15Arkansas 636 6,760 8California 6,037 105,390 57Colorado 748 7,120 11Connecticut 466 6,950 5Delaware 235 1,910 2District of Columbia 235 155 2Florida 2,584 30,250 50Georgia 1,649 24,260 25Hawaii 282 1,920 3Idaho 335 4,910 5Illinois 2,172 26,030 22Indiana 1,322 5,000 18Iowa 668 7,460 9Kansas 572 4,120 9Kentucky 999 10,090 16Louisiana 1,174 10,185 17Maine 282 870 4Maryland 826 9,320 9Massachusetts 967 6,030 11Michigan 1,954 13,825 21Minnesota 931 8,380 11Mississippi 746 7,890 10Missouri 1,168 10,070 17Montana 274 940 4Nebraska 380 7,270 6Nevada 283 4,080 3New Hampshire 282 1,075 4New Jersey 1,173 8,895 12New Mexico 447 4,990 6New York 2,866 17,420 28North Carolina 1,606 34,150 27North Dakota 235 1,560 3Ohio 2,385 13,720 29Oklahoma 842 7,365 13Oregon 692 5,955 7Pennsylvania 2,272 8,330 26Rhode Island 282 1,060 3South Carolina 928 12,575 14South Dakota 235 1,975 4Tennessee 1,197 11,360 19Texas 4,502 66,335 77Utah 641 8,605 10Vermont 235 485 3Virginia 1,297 19,380 19Washington 1,093 26,080 12West Virginia 470 3,365 6Wisconsin 1,129 12,650 13Wyoming 235 1,270 3Puerto Rico 1,030 1,660 20Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes 958 6,640 17Other - - -

National $57,275 624,395 762

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Career & Technical Education State Grants (Carl D. Perkins CTEA Title I)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating programs

that provide adult basic education, English literacy, adult

secondary education, workplace literacy, and family

literacy services for this number of adults

4%

128thousand

450

$500

$550

$600

$650

'08

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$30million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this

number of jobs, which includes adult literacy and GED

teachers in community colleges, community-based

organizations, and public schools

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

72%

The percentage of participants receiving services compared to

those who are eligible:

The percentage of programs with confirmed waiting lists

across all fifty states:

Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants (AEFLA & WIA sec. 503)

2008

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $499 1,270 9Alaska 53 170 1Arizona 607 1,160 11Arkansas 298 1,740 4California 4,640 32,970 52Colorado 355 760 6Connecticut 284 1,485 3Delaware 85 275 1District of Columbia 67 210 1Florida 1,995 13,905 39Georgia 945 4,020 16Hawaii 109 480 1Idaho 121 400 2Illinois 1,105 5,760 12Indiana 514 2,145 8Iowa 188 530 3Kansas 192 480 4Kentucky 463 2,145 9Louisiana 474 1,420 8Maine 94 495 1Maryland 493 1,795 5Massachusetts 524 1,150 6Michigan 711 1,505 9Minnesota 311 2,460 4Mississippi 324 1,090 6Missouri 474 1,930 8Montana 67 170 1Nebraska 124 450 2Nevada 291 460 4New Hampshire 87 310 1New Jersey 809 1,750 8New Mexico 215 1,220 3New York 2,157 7,100 21North Carolina 895 6,490 17North Dakota 52 100 1Ohio 829 2,695 11Oklahoma 315 980 6Oregon 287 1,260 4Pennsylvania 946 2,815 12Rhode Island 118 350 1South Carolina 442 2,910 8South Dakota 62 160 1Tennessee 617 1,975 11Texas 2,849 4,505 59Utah 162 1,385 3Vermont 48 90 1Virginia 700 1,660 12Washington 489 3,465 6West Virginia 198 515 3Wisconsin 351 1,270 4Wyoming 42 155 1Puerto Rico 637 1,815 13Outlying Areas 81 85 1Other 550 - -

National $30,345 127,890 445

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Adult Basic & Literacy Education State Grants (AEFLA & WIA section 503)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut would likely reduce need-based aid

for all current recipients; and, is equivalent to

eliminating aid for 71,000 students

221

1.39

thousand

million

340

$650

$700

$750

$800

'01

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$37million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes faculty and other non-teaching staff, at

both two-year and four-year postsecondary institutions

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

109%

The additional number of students receiving aid today

than in 2001:

The rise in tuition, fees, room, and board (public four-year) since 2001:

Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (HEA IV-A-3)

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

2001

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $618 20,000 5Alaska 41 1,850 0Arizona 924 42,100 9Arkansas 236 7,430 2California 3,922 169,420 26Colorado 523 16,390 5Connecticut 442 13,780 3Delaware 78 3,410 1District of Columbia 366 18,230 4Florida 1,799 80,450 19Georgia 873 32,040 10Hawaii 75 1,960 1Idaho 97 5,740 1Illinois 1,981 49,300 19Indiana 804 39,900 9Iowa 695 32,360 6Kansas 272 13,040 3Kentucky 495 20,190 5Louisiana 359 12,910 3Maine 338 9,840 4Maryland 521 20,200 5Massachusetts 1,426 38,340 14Michigan 1,321 57,480 10Minnesota 857 31,610 8Mississippi 396 12,220 4Missouri 664 21,190 8Montana 83 3,010 1Nebraska 186 6,060 2Nevada 109 3,740 1New Hampshire 242 8,910 3New Jersey 789 26,960 7New Mexico 186 5,800 2New York 2,884 97,420 21North Carolina 851 24,290 9North Dakota 137 3,920 2Ohio 1,541 55,100 14Oklahoma 347 12,380 4Oregon 512 17,810 4Pennsylvania 2,130 68,500 18Rhode Island 297 12,450 3South Carolina 492 12,330 5South Dakota 143 4,630 2Tennessee 642 24,990 7Texas 2,145 71,440 19Utah 204 14,000 1Vermont 263 5,280 2Virginia 748 33,470 7Washington 620 23,540 5West Virginia 240 7,590 3Wisconsin 806 25,630 8Wyoming 53 2,160 1Puerto Rico 672 45,950 8Outlying Areas 19 1,200 0Other - - -

National $37,465 1,389,940 341

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (HEA IV-A-3)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut would likely reduce need-based aid for

all current recipients; and, is equivalent to eliminating

part-time employment for 35,000 students

683thousand

450

$875

$925

$975

$1,025

'00

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$50million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes faculty and other non-teaching staff, at

both two-year and four-year postsecondary institutions

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

7%

The average aid as a share of a student's tuition, fees, room, and board (public four-year) in 2000:

Federal Work-Study (HEA IV-C)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2000

15%

The average aid as a share of a student's tuition, fees, room, and board (public

four-year) in 2013 post-sequester:

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $837 8,220 7Alaska 44 380 0Arizona 596 5,770 6Arkansas 382 5,060 3California 5,126 60,780 34Colorado 647 7,080 7Connecticut 559 9,770 4Delaware 80 1,080 1District of Columbia 556 5,460 6Florida 2,128 20,500 22Georgia 1,196 13,320 14Hawaii 111 1,000 1Idaho 130 1,910 1Illinois 2,674 32,170 25Indiana 1,069 16,280 12Iowa 720 14,500 6Kansas 413 6,000 5Kentucky 722 10,770 7Louisiana 740 8,070 7Maine 398 6,750 4Maryland 778 8,230 8Massachusetts 2,286 38,860 22Michigan 1,576 22,220 12Minnesota 1,000 14,290 9Mississippi 591 6,670 6Missouri 1,032 14,620 12Montana 162 2,160 2Nebraska 280 4,230 3Nevada 121 1,120 1New Hampshire 327 6,890 4New Jersey 979 13,820 9New Mexico 346 3,100 3New York 4,667 70,110 34North Carolina 1,177 18,050 12North Dakota 166 2,300 2Ohio 1,962 27,820 18Oklahoma 511 5,990 5Oregon 682 10,810 5Pennsylvania 2,707 49,300 22Rhode Island 371 7,310 3South Carolina 638 7,830 7South Dakota 209 2,750 2Tennessee 896 12,340 10Texas 2,599 28,260 23Utah 258 2,350 2Vermont 294 5,490 3Virginia 999 14,100 9Washington 793 8,830 7West Virginia 327 5,280 3Wisconsin 919 16,580 9Wyoming 62 770 1Puerto Rico 926 15,080 11Outlying Areas 43 600 1Other - - -

National $49,811 683,030 453

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Federal Work-Study (HEA IV-C)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating outreach and

support services to encourage enrollment in and completion of

postsecondary education for this number of needy individuals,

many who are first-generation college students

41thousand

400

$650

$750

$850

$950

'02

(millions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$43million

FUNDING CUT

STUDENTS AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes coordinators, counselors, tutors,

educators, professional staff, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

15%

Federal TRIO Programs (HEA IV-A-2, Chapter 1)

Sequestration would roll back funding below the level in

2002

164

The percentage increase in the cost per participant today

than in 2002:

The additional number of projects funded today

than in 2002:

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut

(in thousands)Students Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $1,588 1,490 14Alaska 117 130 1Arizona 504 475 5Arkansas 1,114 1,160 10California 4,331 3,810 30Colorado 700 810 7Connecticut 236 325 2Delaware 167 80 1District of Columbia 286 140 3Florida 1,114 1,090 12Georgia 984 1,025 12Hawaii 283 250 2Idaho 335 340 4Illinois 1,754 1,565 17Indiana 581 590 7Iowa 825 840 7Kansas 678 640 8Kentucky 1,044 1,055 10Louisiana 992 910 10Maine 368 345 4Maryland 620 645 6Massachusetts 972 1,050 10Michigan 1,014 740 8Minnesota 1,022 780 10Mississippi 546 525 6Missouri 867 1,125 11Montana 451 455 5Nebraska 444 450 5Nevada 340 250 3New Hampshire 126 100 1New Jersey 587 400 5New Mexico 491 560 4New York 1,793 1,600 13North Carolina 1,197 1,155 13North Dakota 268 260 3Ohio 1,202 1,285 11Oklahoma 1,240 1,295 13Oregon 556 580 4Pennsylvania 1,090 1,150 9Rhode Island 115 230 1South Carolina 909 925 10South Dakota 172 120 2Tennessee 818 930 10Texas 2,994 2,810 29Utah 402 340 3Vermont 238 230 2Virginia 768 750 8Washington 867 770 7West Virginia 421 415 4Wisconsin 1,042 630 10Wyoming 183 230 2Puerto Rico 820 870 11Outlying Areas 260 170 3Other 0 - -

National $42,837 40,895 412

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data and based on an analysis by theCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Federal TRIO Programs (HEA IV-A-2, Chapter 1)

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating funded

enrollment slots that offer comprehensive early

learning and development services for this number

of children from low-income families

49thousand

18,965

$6.6

$7.0

$7.4

$7.8

$8.2

'11

(billions)

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

$406million

FUNDING CUT

CHILDREN AFFECTED

The funding cut could lead to the elimination of this number

of jobs, which includes teachers, assistant teachers,

management staff, and other support staff

POTENTIAL JOB LOSSES

'13

26%

Head Start (HSA section 639)

Sequestration would roll back funding near the level in

2011

Poverty rate of children under age 5:

The number of children under age 5 in poverty:

5.1million

As a result of the "fiscal cliff" deal (American Taxpayer

Relief Act of 2012) reached at the beginning of the year,

sequestration, or automatic, across-the-board budget cuts,

was postponed by two months. Absent any agreement to

replace sequestration, budget cuts will be uniformly

applied to almost all federal programs beginning on

March 1, 2013. Due to the delay, however, the total

amount of the cut in fiscal year 2013 has been lessened by

$24 billion, from $109.3 billion to $85.3 billion. An

analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

(CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense

discretionary programs would be cut by 5.1 percent; and

a cut of 5.3 percent would be applied to nonexempt,

nondefense mandatory programs. Since Congress has

not yet completed work on appropriations for fiscal year

2013, the estimated cuts by education program presented

here assume the same rate of operations as in fiscal year

2012. Actual cuts could differ once appropriations are

enacted for 2013.

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Health and Human Services budget data and based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Here's How the March 1 Sequester Would Work, January 22, 2013. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Impact of Sequestration on Federal Education Programs

StateFunding Cut (in millions)

Children Affected

Potential Job Losses

Alabama $6.4 870 288Alaska 0.74 90 65Arizona 6.2 710 303Arkansas 3.8 545 241California 49.0 5,330 1,778Colorado 4.1 550 266Connecticut 3.0 370 129Delaware 0.79 110 41District of Columbia 1.4 180 96Florida 16.0 1,930 783Georgia 10.2 1,260 403Hawaii 1.3 160 46Idaho 1.4 160 106Illinois 16.1 2,100 658Indiana 5.9 780 237Iowa 3.0 410 143Kansas 3.1 440 176Kentucky 6.4 855 314Louisiana 8.6 1,130 373Maine 1.6 190 98Maryland 4.6 550 164Massachusetts 6.3 685 315Michigan 13.7 1,800 546Minnesota 4.3 570 261Mississippi 9.2 1,380 488Missouri 7.1 930 349Montana 1.2 160 107Nebraska 2.2 275 126Nevada 1.5 160 55New Hampshire 0.80 100 37New Jersey 7.7 805 340New Mexico 3.2 400 180New York 25.3 2,590 1,137North Carolina 8.8 1,050 516North Dakota 1.0 130 72Ohio 14.7 1,970 558Oklahoma 5.0 730 307Oregon 3.6 620 447Pennsylvania 13.4 1,875 609Rhode Island 1.3 150 52South Carolina 5.1 660 221South Dakota 1.1 150 93Tennessee 7.0 870 284Texas 28.6 3,665 1,483Utah 2.3 310 128Vermont 0.78 80 35Virginia 5.9 730 263Washington 6.0 625 407West Virginia 3.0 415 181Wisconsin 5.4 725 324Wyoming 0.69 90 55Puerto Rico 14.2 1,940 738Outlying Areas/Indian Tribes/Migrants 29.0 3,240 1,543Other 13.2 - -

National $406.4 48,600 18,965

Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Health and Human Services budget data and based on ananalysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembarat 202.822.7109 or [email protected]. As of February 5, 2013.

Applying CBPP's Estimate

F I S C A

L Y E A R

2 0 1 3

Head Start (HSA section 639)


Recommended