Trapped Rydberg ions: a new platform for quantum
information processing
A. Mokhberi1, M. Hennrich2, F. Schmidt-Kaler1,3
1QUANTUM, Institut fur Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz,
Staudingerweg 7, 55128 Mainz, Germany2Department of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden3Helmholtz-Institut Mainz, Staudingerweg 18, 55128 Mainz, Germany
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract. In this chapter, we present an overview of experiments with trapped
Rydberg ions and outline the advantages and challenges of developing applications of
this new platform for quantum computing, sensing and simulation. Trapped Rydberg
ions feature several important properties, unique in their combination: they are tightly
bound in a harmonic potential of a Paul trap, in which their internal and external
degrees of freedom can be controlled in a precise fashion. High fidelity state preparation
of both internal and motional states of the ions has been demonstrated, and the internal
states have been employed to store and manipulate qubit information. Furthermore,
strong dipolar interactions can be realised between ions in Rydberg states and be
explored for investigating correlated many-body systems. By laser coupling to Rydberg
states, the polarisability of the ions can be both enhanced and tuned. This can be used
to control the interactions with the trapping fields in a Paul trap as well as dipolar
interactions between the ions. Thus, trapped Rydberg ions present an attractive
alternative for fast entangling operations as compared to those mediated by normal
modes of trapped ions, which are advantageous for a future quantum computer or a
quantum simulator.
Contents
1 Introduction 3
1.1 Trapped ions for quantum technology experiments and for fundamental
studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 Properties of trapped Rydberg ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2 Experimental approaches 8
2.1 Single-step Rydberg excitation of 40Ca+ ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.2 Two-step Rydberg excitation of 88Sr+ and 40Ca+ ions . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3 Initalization of trapped ion crystals 11
3.1 Trapping ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.2 Normal mode analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
arX
iv:2
003.
0889
1v3
[qu
ant-
ph]
26
Jul 2
020
3.3 Light-ion interaction in the Lamb-Dicke regime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.4 Rydberg ions in the dynamical trapping field of a linear Paul trap . . . . 15
3.5 Loading and laser cooling of ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.6 Initialization of electronic states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.7 Detection and readout schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.8 Controlling electric fields and minimising stray fields . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4 Spectroscopy of Rydberg transitions 25
4.1 Determination of the electric polarisability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
4.2 Resolved Zeeman sublevels of Rydberg states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.3 Rydberg series and determination of the quantum defect . . . . . . . . . 27
4.4 Spectral line effects due to trapping electric fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.4.1 Micromotion sidebands due to the Doppler effect . . . . . . . . . 28
4.4.2 Stark effect on highly polarisable Rydberg ions . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.4.3 Floquet sidebands due to large quadrupole moments of Rydberg
ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.5 Stability of Rydberg ions in the trap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5 Coherent spectroscopy and control of Rydberg ions 32
5.1 Three-level system coupled by two laser fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
5.2 Two-photon Rabi oscillations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.3 Autler-Townes effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
5.4 Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
5.4.1 Rydberg state lifetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
5.4.2 Imprinting a geometric quantum phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
5.5 Two-ion entangling Rydberg interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
6 Future prospects for Rydberg ion crystals 41
6.1 Fast entangling operations using electric field pulses . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2 Mode shaping in linear ion crystals by Rydberg excitations . . . . . . . . 44
6.3 Energy transfer quantum simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
6.4 Planar ion crystals with Rydberg ions for quantum simulation of
frustrated quantum magnets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
6.5 Structural phase transitions controlled by Rydberg excitations . . . . . . 51
7 Outlook 52
2
Trapped Rydberg ions 3
1. Introduction
Cold atoms and ions are currently attracting great interest for applications in
quantum information processing (QIP), quantum simulation and sensing.
Trapped Rydberg ions offer a unique opportunity for combining advantages of precisely
controllable trapped-ion qubits (Haffner et al., 2008) with long-range and tunable
Rydberg interactions (Saffman et al., 2010). One decade after the first theoretical
proposal for exploring Rydberg ions as a new platform for such applications (Muller
et al., 2008), experimental work has succeeded in demonstrating major milestones.
These include the first excitation of trapped Ca+ ions to Rydberg states in a
radiofrequency (RF) ion trap (Feldker et al., 2015), the observation and characterisation
of the trapping fields’ effects on Rydberg ions and spectroscopy of Rydberg transitions
for Sr+ (Higgins et al., 2017a, 2019) and Ca+ ions (Bachor et al., 2016; Mokhberi et al.,
2019). Further progress has been achieved by coherent manipulation of a Rydberg
state of single trapped Sr+ ion (Higgins et al., 2017b, 2019). More recently, sub-
microsecond entangling operations have been demonstrated for two Rydberg ions using
strong dipolar interactions between them (Zhang et al., 2020). Correspondingly, several
theory proposals have been published that take benefit from the spectacular features of
trapped Rydberg ions.
1.1. Trapped ions for quantum technology experiments and for fundamental studies
Today, trapped ions are one of the most promising physical systems for QIP (Bermudez
et al., 2017; Blatt and Wineland, 2008). Following the pioneering ideas of Cirac
and Zoller for quantum computing based on trapped-ion qubits (Cirac and
Zoller, 1995), quantum gates and building blocks of a quantum processor based on
trapped ions have been realised (Bruzewicz et al., 2019; Roos et al., 2008; Schmidt-
Kaler et al., 2003). The fidelity for two-ion logic gate operations at this time is
better than few parts in thousand (Ballance et al., 2016; Gaebler et al., 2016), which
meets one of the requirements for a future quantum computer, according to the
DiVincenzo criteria (DiVincenzo, 2000; Knill, 2005). Multi-ion entanglement (Friis
et al., 2018; Kaufmann et al., 2017a; Monz et al., 2011), the Deutsch Josza quantum
algorithm (Gulde et al., 2003; Olmschenk et al., 2009), teleportation (Riebe et al.,
2004), free-programmable gate sequences (Figgatt et al., 2017) and quantum error
correction (Schindler et al., 2011) have been experimentally demonstrated. Quantum
gate operations are typically implemented using spin-dependent light forces or magnetic
gradients in combination with excitation of collective motional modes of the ion crystal.
The challenge is to scale up this architecture; as the number of ions in the common
confining potential well grows, it becomes increasingly difficult to address a single
vibrational mode without parasitic coupling to other modes, and hence the fidelity of
gates decreases. To address this issue, two approaches are currently pursued. Wineland
proposed scalable QIP using a “quantum-CCD” (Kielpinski et al., 2002). This is a
trapping device in which ions are shuttled around in a large microfabricated array
Trapped Rydberg ions 4
of traps (Blakestad et al., 2009) such that quantum gate operations are excecuted
sequentially, but only on a few ions in a common potential. This approach has
potential for fault-tolerant QIP (Bermudez et al., 2017). An alternative is a modular
architecture of small traps connected via photonic links for establishing the long-range
entanglement (Monroe et al., 2014).
One of the key prerequisites for both approaches is to implement fast logic gates
such that many operations are possible within the memory coherence time of the qubit
register without loss in gate fidelity. In the quantum-CCD approach, additionally the
shuttling time needed for reconfiguration operations has to be in addition taken into
account (Kaufmann et al., 2017b). Gates need to be robust against fluctuations of
experimental parameters including electric fields, magnetic fields, laser field intensities
and laser field frequencies. This is a daunting, but achieveable task as demonstrated
using ultra-fast laser pulses (Wong-Campos et al., 2017), amplitude-modulated high-
intensity laser beams (Schafer et al., 2018) and mixed-frequency laser pulses (Shapira
et al., 2018).
In this context, trapped Rydberg ions offer an exciting alternative for
fast gate operations based on their strong and tunable dipolar interactions. Rydberg
mediated gate operations and collective encoding of multi-qubits have been implemented
in ultracold neutral gases (Gross and Bloch, 2017; Hofstetter et al., 2002; Labuhn
et al., 2016; Saffman et al., 2010). Entangling operations in neutral atomic gases are
preferably performed using the Rydberg blockade mechanism (Jaksch et al., 2000; Lukin
et al., 2001; Saffman and Walker, 2005), as demonstrated in pioneering experiments
for pairs of single atoms individually held in optical tweezers (Isenhower et al., 2010;
Wilk et al., 2010). For trapped ions, the Rydberg blockade mechanism has been
recently demonstrated and employed for implementing a sub-microsecond entangling
operation (Zhang et al., 2020). Theoretical studies propose using Rydberg ions for
shaping the spectrum of motional modes in a linear crystal of trapped ions and for
parallel execution of quantum gates (Li et al., 2013; Li and Lesanovsky, 2014). For
implementing quantum logic operations within a few nanoseconds, a protocol has been
proposed that uses impulsive electric pulses to shuttle ions (Walther et al., 2012) while
Rydberg states undergo a state-dependent force. Because of the large polarisability of
Rydberg states, these kicking forces gives rise to geometric phases that are used for a
controlled phase gate between two ions (Vogel et al., 2019).
In quantum simulation, a well-controlled multi-particle quantum system mimics
the behaviour of complex solid state, high-energy or biological system. Some of the most
advanced experimental demonstrations for quantum simulations have been realised in
trapped ion crystals (Blatt and Roos, 2012) and in cold neutral gases (Bloch et al.,
2012). The former system usually employs the Coulomb interation between ions (Zhang
et al., 2017) whereas the latter takes advantage of dipolar interactions between Rydberg
atoms (Weimer et al., 2010). Rydberg atoms confined in optical lattices in linear
and two-dimensional arrays (Bernien et al., 2017; Gross and Bloch, 2017; Labuhn
et al., 2016) are known as flexible platform for quantum simulation. Experimental
Trapped Rydberg ions 5
advances in neutral atomic gases include the application of defect-free two-dimensional
arrays (Ohl de Mello et al., 2019), arbitrarily-shaped three-dimensional arrays (Barredo
et al., 2018) and the use of a quantum gas microscope that allows for the manipulation
of a large number of spin systems with single-site resolution (Schauß et al., 2015). In
a system of Rydberg ions, the advantages of both systems merge to offer possibilities
for novel experiments (Muller et al., 2008; Nath et al., 2015). The coupling between
electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom of atoms in such optical lattices can be
engineered and used to tailor exotic multibody interactions (Gambetta et al., 2020).
Furthermore, Rydberg dipolar interactions between atoms and ions are powerful
tools for exploring strongly correlated many-body systems, novel quantum
phases (Gambetta et al., 2019; Henkel et al., 2010; Pupillo et al., 2010; Weimer et al.,
2008) and coherent dynamics in such systems (Lesanovsky et al., 2010; Olmos et al.,
2010; Weimer et al., 2008). Symmetry-breaking mechanisms in non-equilibrium systems
transversing a phase transition have been theoretically and experimentally explored
using trapped ions (del Campo et al., 2010; Fishman et al., 2008; Jurcevic et al., 2017;
Pyka et al., 2013; Retzker et al., 2008; Ulm et al., 2013) and cold atoms in optical
lattices (Bernien et al., 2017; Keesling et al., 2019). On the other hand, a symmetry-
protected phase transition has recently been demonstrated using precisely engineered
Rydberg interactions between ultracold neutral atoms in optical tweezers (de Leseleuc
et al., 2019). Rydberg excitation of a single ion in a linear ion array modifies the
ion motional mode spectrum mainly because of the large polarisability of Rydberg
states. This effect can be used to trigger structural phase transitions in a coherent
fashion (Baltrusch et al., 2011; Li and Lesanovsky, 2012) and to observe quantum
signatures like superposition in arrays of cold trapped ions (Baltrusch et al., 2012; Silvi
et al., 2016).
Tuning the interactions between the qubits of trapped Rydberg ions
uses both the Coulomb and the Rydberg dipolar interactions and in addition the inter-
particle distance may be set independently by adjusting the parameters of the Paul trap.
Such a flexibility offers opportunities for simulating many-body systems with coupling
parameters in different ranges. For instance, having the internal dynamics of Rydberg
states of ions mapped to an effective spin model, one can simulate the dynamics of the
spin excitation transfer along a chain of ions (Muller et al., 2008).
Quantum sensing and metrology are applications which are close-to-market
and among the first quantum technologies resulting in commercial prototypes (Bao
et al., 2018; Hinton et al., 2017; Maletinsky et al., 2012). Cold atoms in circular
Rydberg states (Hulet and Kleppner, 1983) are highly susceptible to the electric and
magnetic fields (Gallagher, 2005), and thus are well-suited for precise electromagnetic
field sensing (Brune et al., 1994; Facon et al., 2016; Penasa et al., 2016) and for sensing
photonic fields inside a cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) setup (Brune et al.,
1996; Raimond et al., 2001). For magnetometry, high sensitivity and spatial resolution
were achieved in atomic vapours (Kominis et al., 2003; Wasilewski et al., 2010), ultracold
atomic gases (Koschorreck et al., 2011; Vengalattore et al., 2007) and for single trapped
Trapped Rydberg ions 6
ions (Baumgart et al., 2016; Kotler et al., 2011). Entangled states of two trapped ions
have been used to precisely map an inhomogeneous magnetic field over a distance that
is about 105 times larger than the size of the ions’ motional wavepacket (Ruster et al.,
2017). It would be of great technological impact to combine the sensor capabilities of
Rydberg states with the controllability of trapped ions.
1.2. Properties of trapped Rydberg ions
Rydberg states are highly-excited bound states of a Coulomb potential, whose properties
scale with the principal quantum number n. Significantly enhanced properties
of atoms and ions in Rydberg states, as compared to ground or near-ground states,
are essential for the applications mentioned above. The scaling relations of some key
properties for atomic Rydberg states are given in Table 1. The enhanced orbital size
of Rydberg states implies a high electric polarisability. This boosts the interaction
strength between ions, as the van der Waals and the dipole-dipole interaction coefficients
are enhanced by several orders of magnitude for ions in Rydberg states as compared
to near ground states. The lifetimes of Rydberg states depend on the orbital angular
momentum (Merkt and Zare, 1994), and can reach several milli-seconds for circular
states (Cantat-Moltrecht et al., 2020).
The most prominent aspect for a system of trapped ions in Rydberg states is their
mutual interactions. Here, we consider the interaction potential for two singly-
charged ions, each with a single valence electron in a Rydberg orbital (Fig. 1)
V =e2
4πε0
( 4
|Ri −Rj|− 2
|Ri − (Rj + rj)|− 2
|(Ri + ri)−Rj|+
1
|(Ri + ri)− (Rj + rj)|),
(1)
where e is one unit of elementary positive charge, Ri (Rj) and ri (rj) are the positions of
the i (j)-th ionic cores and of the Rydberg electron bonded to it respectively. In a typical
experiment, the inter-ion distance is about a few micrometres, which is in most cases
much larger than the Rydberg electron orbital size, e.g., about 100 nm for the 53S1/2
state of Sr+ ions (Higgins, 2019), see Table 1 for scaling with the principal quantum
number n. From the multipole expansion of this potential, assuming that the Rydberg
orbital radius is much smaller than the inter-ion distance, i.e., |ri|, |rj| |Ri − Rj|,one obtains
V =e2
4πε0
( 1
Rij
+(Ri −Rj) · (ri − rj)
R3ij
+r2i − 3(nij · ri)2 + r2
j − 3(nij · rj)2
2R3ij
+ri · rj − 3(nij · ri)(nij · rj)
R3ij
),
(2)
where |Ri − Rj| = Rij and nij = (Ri − Rj)/Rij. The first three terms describe the
Coulomb interaction, dipole-charge and quadrupole-charge interactions respectively, and
Trapped Rydberg ions 7
Property n-scaling Z-scaling 50S, 88Sr+
Binding energy En n−2 Z2 3.8× 10−21 J ∼ 5.88 THz
Energy separation En+1 − En n−3 Z2 1.6× 10−22 J ∼ 241 GHz
Fine structure splitting n−3 Z4 2.5× 10−24 J ∼ 3.8 GHz (1)
Orbital size 〈r〉 n2 Z−1 89 nm
Electric quadrupole moment 〈er2〉 n4 Z−2 3.10× 10−34 C m2 (2)
Natural lifetime τnat n3 Z−4 6.7 µs (3)
Blackbody radiation limited lifetime τBBR n2 Z−4 5.6 µs
Transition dipole moment 〈g|er|nLJ〉 n−3/2 Z−1 9.33× 10−32 C m ∼ 0.028 D (4)
Transition dipole moment 〈nL′J ′|er|nLJ〉 n2 Z−1 4.07× 10−27 C m ∼ 1220.04 D (5)
Electric polarisability α n7 Z−4 1.02× 10−30 C2 m2 J−1 ∼ 96.93 MHz/(V/cm)2
Dipole-dipole interaction strength n4 Z−2 2.05× 10−27 J ∼ 3.1 MHz (6)
Van der Waals interaction strength n11 Z−6 5.63× 10−30 J ∼ 8.5 kHz (7)
(1) For splitting between 50P3/2 and 50P1/2.(2) For 50D3/2.(3) For 50P1/2 state of Sr+ τnat ≈ 88 µs, for 50P1/2 state of Ca+ τnat ≈ 192 µs (Glukhov et al., 2013). Longer
lifetimes have been observed for circular states of neutral atoms, e.g., a circular state of Rb with n = 52 in a
4-Kelvin cryostat setup exhibits τnat = 3.7 ms (Cantat-Moltrecht et al., 2020).(4) For 6P1/2 → 50S1/2.(5) For 50S1/2 → 50P1/2.(6) For 50S-50P Microwave-dressed states and 4 µm inter-ion distance.(7) For 50S and 4 µm inter-ion distance.
Table 1. Properties of the Rydberg atoms and ions scaling with the principal quantum
number n and the core charge Z (Higgins, 2019). Z is equal to +1 for neutral Rydberg
atoms and to +2 for singly-charged Rydberg ions, which have overall charge of one
unit of elementary positive charge +e. The last column shows values calculated for
the 50S state of the 88Sr+ ion unless specified in the footnotes (Higgins, 2020).
are absent between interacting Rydberg neutral atoms. The fourth term describes the
dipole-dipole interaction and is common to both neutral and charged atoms in Rydberg
states. Each of these interaction terms as well as inter-ion distances can be engineered
to tune multi-particle interactions. As an interesting example, the charge-dipole term
plays a significant role for designing a fast two-ion gate operation which is performed
by impulsive electric pulses (Sec. 6).
This review is structured as follows. First, we consider the challenges and
approaches for experiments with Rydberg states of trapped ions in Sec. 2. Ion trapping
techniques relevant for control and manipulation of trapped Rydberg ions are discussed
in Sec. 3. Experimental results for spectroscopy of trapped Rydberg ions as well as
effects due to the trapping electric fields are presented in Sec. 4. Coherent manipulation
of Rydberg state of a trapped ion and experimental work for generating entanglement
using Rydberg dipolar interactions between trapped ions are discussed in Sec. 5. We
Trapped Rydberg ions 8
z
ri rj
Ri
Rj
x
y
Figure 1. Schematic of interacting singly-charged trapped Rydberg ions in a single
harmonic potential. Ri (Rj) and ri (rj) are the positions of the i (j)-th ionic cores
(yellow circle) and those of the Rydberg electrons (red circle) respectively. Strong
Coulomb repulsion between the cores is balanced by the trapping force. The dashed
line depicts the harmonic trapping potential that confines the charges.
conclude with prospects and the outlook for this research field in Sec. 6 and Sec. 7.
2. Experimental approaches
Experiments with Rydberg states of trapped ions involve specific challenges in addition
to working with trapped ions in a Paul trap (Sec. 3.1). Currently, two groups pursue
experimental work on trapped Rydberg ions using 40Ca+ ions and 88Sr+ ions. Both
species feature a single valance electron and the isotope with nuclear spin F=0, thus no
Hyperfine structure. Three main requirements are usually considered:
• Rydberg excitation of hydrogen-like alkaline earth ions requires high-energy photons
due to the large binding energy of the electron to the doubly-charged core.
Ionization energies of Be+, Mg+, Ca+, Sr+ and Ba+ ions correspond to energies
of photons at about 68.1, 82.5, 104.4, 112.4 and 123.9 nm respectively (Kramida
et al., 2018). The generation of vacuum ultra-violet (VUV) radiation, beam steering
and its integration into an experimental setup is challenging. For the cases of Ca+,
Sr+ and Ba+ ions, a long-lived metastable D state can be excited before Rydberg
excitation, reducing the remaining excitation energies to wavelengths of 121.9, 134.9
and 133.3 nm respectively (Kramida et al., 2018). Two schemes have been thus
far applied for bridging this energy gap to drive Rydberg transitions of trapped
ions: a single-step approach using VUV laser radiation for the first observation
of Rydberg resonances in trapped Ca+ ions (Feldker et al., 2015) and a two-step
approach using UV lasers for the coherent manipulation of Rydberg levels in
trapped Sr+ ions (Higgins et al., 2017b). Excitation schemes using three or more
steps (e.g. (Lange et al., 1991) for Rydberg ions in free space) involve complications
for coherent manipulation of quantum states, and thus are not of interest for
the applications discussed in this review. In the single-step laser excitation from
metastable D states of alkaline-earth ions, electric dipole transition selection rules
allow transitions to P and F levels. In the two-step approach, the excitation from
Trapped Rydberg ions 9
(a)
52F
66F53F
122.
04 n
m
397
nm
854 nm
866 nm
729 nm
123.22 nm
22F
123.
25 n
m
23P1/2
40Ca+
4P3/24P1/2
3D5/23D3/2
4S1/2
(b)
213 nm
285 - 289 nm
4P3/24P1/2
4S1/2
3D5/23D3/2
5P3/25P1/2
nS1/2nD5/2nD3/2
397
nm
854 nm
866 nm
729 nm
285
- 289
nm
40Ca+ (c)
243 nm
304 - 309 nm
5P3/25P1/2
5S1/2
4D5/24D3/2
6P3/26P1/2
nS1/2nD5/2nD3/2
422
nm
1033 nm
1092 nm
674 nm
304
-309
nm
88Sr+
122.
04 n
m
Figure 2. Energy level diagrams for 40Ca+ (a, b) and for 88Sr+ ions (c) and laser
wavelengths for Rydberg excitation, laser cooling and detection. Rydberg states are
excited from the long-lived metastable D states. (a) Single-step excitation scheme for
P or F levels of Ca+ (purple arrows). (b), (c) Two-step excitation scheme via an
intermediate P state to S or D states of Ca+ and Sr+ (light blue and green arrows).
In (b) and (c), the lasers are detuned from the intermediate, short-lived P3/2 states,
see a detailed example in Fig. 13. Laser beams for a standard trapped ion experiment
in 40Ca+ and 88Sr+ ions (blue and red arrows).
metastable D states is carried out via an intermediate P state, and thus S and D
states can be directly driven (Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 2.2).
• The detection of the population in Rydberg states of single trapped
ions requires the implementation and adaptation of electron shelving techniques.
Observing the state-dependent fluorescence (Sec. 3.7) is a non-destructive efficient
detection method, in contrast to photoionization or electric field ionisation methods
that have been widely used in large samples of cold neutral atomic gases (Gallagher,
2005).
• A key requirement for experiments with Rydberg ions is the ability to precisely
minimise parasitic stray electric fields at the position of ions. Such electric
fields can displace ions from the RF-field nodal line (Sec. 3.1) to new equilibrium
positions at which the amplitude of the oscillating electric field is non-zero (Sec. 3.8).
Various methods have been developed for determining the voltages that are to be
applied on trap electrodes (Berkeland et al., 1998). Minimisation of such stray
fields is essential to avoid energy shifts of Rydberg resonances and coupling effects
due to the trapping electric fields (Sec. 3.8). Coherent excitation of Rydberg levels
requires such control over electric fields at the ion position.
Trapped Rydberg ions 10
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(a)
needle tip866 nm, 854 nm,
729 nm, 397 nm
MgF2
lens
PMT
EMCCD
camera
Figure 3. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup for Rydberg excitation of trapped40Ca+ using a 122 nm laser beam. The ion trap features four gold-coated blade
electrodes and two endcaps with through holes that allow for the 122 nm beam
optical access. The ion fluorescence is imaged on an EMCCD camera, each bright
spot corresponds to the fluorescence of one single ion as the dipole allowed transitions
near 397 nm and 866 nm are driven, see the energy level diagram for 40Ca+ ions in
Fig. 2(a). Adapted from (Feldker et al., 2015). (b) (i-v) False colour fluorescence
images of linear and two-dimensional arrays of cold trapped Ca+ ions in a linear Paul
trap, ion distances are about few micrometres. The central ion in (iv), which is in
the 4S1/2 state (bright state), is optically pumped into the 3D5/2 state (dark state)
in (v) using a tightly focused 729 nm beam. Note that here an anisotropy of the
radial confinement allows for trapping two-dimensional crystals such that single ion
addressability is assured.
2.1. Single-step Rydberg excitation of 40Ca+ ions
The first Rydberg excitation of trapped ions was demonstrated for 40Ca+ ions in a linear
Paul trap (Feldker et al., 2015) (Fig. 3(a)). A continuous-wave, vacuum ultra-violet
(VUV) laser source at 122 nm was used to excite Rydberg F states from metastable
3D3/2 or 3D5/2 states with about one second lifetimes (Fig. 2(a)). This setup was
used to observe 3D3/2 → 52F, 3D3/2 → 53F and 3D5/2 → 66F (Feldker et al., 2015),
3D5/2 → 22F (Bachor et al., 2016) and 3D3/2 → 23P1/2 (Mokhberi et al., 2019)
transitions (Fig. 2(a)). The VUV beam was generated using four-wave frequency mixing
in mercury vapour (Bachor et al., 2016; Eikema et al., 1999; Kolbe et al., 2012; Schmidt-
Kaler et al., 2011). The efficiency of this mixing process is a sensitive function of the
wavelength generated, and thus the output power varies between 0.2 to 10 µW (Schmidt-
Kaler et al., 2011). The Rabi frequency estimated for the 3D3/2 → 53P1/2 transition
using the beam parameters in that setup is about 20 kHz (Feldker, 2016).
Trapped Rydberg ions 11
2.2. Two-step Rydberg excitation of 88Sr+ and 40Ca+ ions
The two-photon Rydberg excitation of trapped ions has been first demonstrated for88Sr+ ions (Higgins et al., 2017a). Rydberg S and D transitions were driven from the
4D5/2 state (or optionally from the 4D3/2 state) via the intermediate 6P3/2 state using
laser light at 243 nm and 305 nm (Fig. 2(c)). A similar approach has been used for
Rydberg excitation of 40Ca+ ions using two UV lasers at 213 nm and 286 nm (Fig. 2(b)).
Laser sources at these wavelengths are commercially available with output powers of
tens to hundreds of milliwatts, which allow for fast coherent manipulation of ions in
Ryberg states (Sec. 5). Another major advantage of this approach is that the Doppler
broadening of resonances can be mitigated using a counter-propagating setup for the
two UV laser beams (Sec. 3.3). Moreover, control of the polarisation of such UV beams
allows for addressing Zeeman sublevels of Rydberg states (Sec. 5).
3. Initalization of trapped ion crystals
3.1. Trapping ions
In this section, the theory for trapping ions in a Paul trap and methods for
manipulating their electronic and motional degrees of freedom are discussed. Paul
traps have been used for a wide-range of applications from quantum optics, quantum
simulation (Blatt and Roos, 2012) and quantum computing (Haffner et al., 2008) to
precision measurements (Asvany et al., 2015), metrology (Huntemann et al., 2016)
and controlled chemistry (Willitsch, 2017). In a Paul trap, three-dimensional
confinement of charged particles is achieved by applying a static electric field
in combination with a time-varying electric field oscillating at radio frequency
(RF) (Major et al., 2005).
In this review, we consider RF traps that generate a nearly quadrupolar electric
potential close to the trap centre, which can be written as:
Φ(R, t) = (γ′xX2 + γ′yY
2 + γ′zZ2) cos(ΩRFt) + (γxX
2 + γyY2 + γzZ
2), (3)
where R ≡ Xx+Y y+Zz is the ion position vector decomposed in Cartesian coordinates
and ΩRF is the RF drive frequency. γi and γ′i, with i ∈ x, y, z, are geometric factors
which depend on the geometry of trap electrodes and voltages applied to them. The
potential given in Eqn. 3 has to fulfil the Laplace equation ∆Φ = 0 at every instant
in time, and thus the geometric factors are constrained by γ′x + γ′y + γ′z = 0 and
γx + γy + γz = 0. For this reason, there is no three-dimensional local minimum in free
space for a charge acted on by only static electric fields (Earnshow’s theorem) (Foot,
2005). Charged particles can be trapped by combination of static electric fields with
either dynamical electric fields (Paul traps) or magnetic fields (Penning traps) (Dehmelt,
1969; Paul, 1990). For positive charges, the common choice for the geometric factors is
γ′x = −γ′y = γ′, γ′z = 0 and −(γx + γy) = γz = 2γ > 0. This configuration is referred
to as the linear Paul trap with translational symmetry along the z axis, also called
Trapped Rydberg ions 12
the trap axis. The confining force along this axis provided by the static electric field is
typically weaker as compared to the dynamical trapping force in any direction in the
x-y plane. In a linear Paul trap, Eqn. 3 is written as
Φ(R, t) = γ′(X2 − Y 2) cos(ΩRFt)− γ((1 + ε)X2 + (1− ε)Y 2 − 2Z2). (4)
Here, ε is a dimensionless parameter that breaks the axial symmetry and removes the
degeneracy of the two radial modes. In most experiments, once the trap geometry is
fixed, γ′ can be varied using a single RF voltage source, whereas γ can be controlled via
different voltages applied to segmented trap electrodes (Hucul et al., 2008).
Stable solutions of the equations of motion can be found from solutions to the
Matthieu equations (Major et al., 2005), for an in-depth discussion see (Leibfried et al.,
2003; Major et al., 2005; Wineland et al., 1998). In most RF traps, the motion of
the ion can be described by two components R = Rsec + Rmm, where Rsec and
Rmm denote the secular slow motion of the ion and the fast driven motion called
“micromotion” respectively. However, one should distinguish unavoidable micromotion
due to secular oscillation of the ion around the RF node from “excess micromotion”
caused by stray static electric fields or by a phase difference between RF voltages
applied to trap electrodes (Berkeland et al., 1998) (Sec. 3.8). The time-dependent
potential in Eqn. 4 is treated within an adiabatic approximation and is time averaged
over one RF period (Major et al., 2005). This approximation corresponds to an
effective and mass-dependent pseudopotential (Dehmelt, 1990), which is given by
Φpseudo(R,M) = Zeγ′2(X2+Y 2)
MΩ2RF
. The frequencies of the ion oscillation along the three
axes (Fig. 3) are thus given by
ωX =
√2e2Z2γ′2
M2Ω2RF
− 2Zeγ(1 + ε)
M, (5)
ωY =
√2e2Z2γ′2
M2Ω2RF
− 2Zeγ(1− ε)M
, (6)
ωZ = 2
√ZeγM
. (7)
Here, M and Z are the mass and the charge of the ion, and e is one elementary positive
charge. Under typical operation conditions, the secular frequencies range between a few
100 kHz and 10 MHz.
3.2. Normal mode analysis
Now we consider N ions in a harmonic potential given in Eqn. 4 and describe a general
approach to calculate their equilibrium positions and vibrational modes. Here,
we assume that the kinetic energy of ions Ekin(∼ kBT ) is reduced by laser cooling
(Sec. 3.5) such that Epot
Ekin= Z2e2
4πε0aWSkBT& 170, where Epot is the potential energy of the
system and aWS is the Wigner-Seitz radius (Pollock and Hansen, 1973; Slattery et al.,
1980). Under this condition, trapped ions undergo a phase transition into translationaly
Trapped Rydberg ions 13
cold and spatially organised structures called “Coulomb crystals” (Bollinger et al.,
1994) (Fig. 3 (b)). In such ion crystals, the amplitude of the ions’ oscillation around
their equilibrium positions are much smaller than the inter-ion separation, which ranges
between 2 µm and 20 µm under typical trapping conditions.
The total energy E of the system is given by (James, 1998)
E =N∑i=1
ZeΦ(Ri,Mi) +1
2
N∑i,ji 6=j
(Ze)2
4πε0|Ri −Rj|+
N∑i=1
Mi
2R2i . (8)
Here, Mi and Ri (Rj) are the mass and coordinate of the i- (j)-th ion and Φ(R,M) is
the trapping potential given in Eqn. 4, where the time-dependent term is approximated
by the mass-dependent pseudopotential. The equilibrium positions of ions R0i are
calculated by solving a set of linear equations ∂Epot
∂Ri= 0, where Epot is given by the
first two terms in Eqn. 8. In a typical linear Paul trap, γ′ is about two orders of
magnitude larger than γ (Eqn. 4), and hence ωX,Y ωZ (Eqns. 5-7). Thus ions form
a chain along the trap axis z (Fig. 3(b-iii)). For a chain of N ions with equal masses
M , the minimum inter-ion distance is given by dmin ≈ ( Z2e2
4πε0Mω2Z
)1/3 2.018N0.559 (James, 1998).
By increasing the number of the ions in the trap, a structural phase transition from a
linear to a two-dimensional structure might occur depending on the anisotropy of the
trapping potential which is given by AX,Y = ( ωZωX,Y
)2 (Dubin, 1993; Kaufmann et al.,
2012), where ωX , ωY and ωZ are the secular trapping frequencies in Eqns. 5-7. Images
of such a two-dimensional Coulomb crystal is shown in Figs. 3(b-iv).
By solving the Lagrangian equations of the motion and computing the Hessian,
one can obtain the normal modes eigenvectors eiα and their corresponding frequencies
ωα (James, 1998). Each normal mode accounts for an independent oscillation, which
can be quantised and given in the form of the momentum and position operators
Pα = i
√Mωα
2(aα − a†α), Xα =
√
2Mωα(aα + a†α), (9)
where aα and a†α are the lowering and raising ladder operators of the normal mode α
at the motional frequency ωα. Using this notation, the quantised form of the i-th ion’s
excursion around its equilibrium position as a function of ion coordinates is given by
Xi =3N∑α=1
(eiα)−1
√
2Mωα(aα + a†α). (10)
The size of the ground state motional wavepacket of the ion in a typical setup is about
5–20 nm, much smaller than its orbit size of about 100 nm in a given Rydberg state.
3.3. Light-ion interaction in the Lamb-Dicke regime
In a trapped-ion qubit, electronic levels can be coherently coupled to motional
degrees of freedom by applying suitable laser pulses (Fig. 4). The transition that
Trapped Rydberg ions 14
2-level system harmonic trap
carrierfirst redsideband
first bluesideband
(a) (b)
|g ⟩
|e ⟩
|g, − 1 ⟩
|e, − 1 ⟩
|g, ⟩
|e, ⟩
|g, + 1 ⟩
|e, + 1 ⟩
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of the electronic two-level system with |g〉 and |e〉 states
coupled by laser light (black arrow). The confinement of the ion in a harmonic well
leads to quantized motional degrees of freedom, also shown is an ion wavepacket in
position space for each phonon state from n = 0 to 3 (grey). (b) Coupling between
internal (electronic) and external (vibrational) degrees of freedom via carrier, first red
and first blue sideband transitions.
couples the |g〉 and |e〉 electronic states with no change in the number of motional
quanta known as phonons, is termed the “carrier transition”. For a tightly confined
ion wavepacket and for suitable tuning of the laser frequency on a narrow optical
transition, the transition from |g, n〉 to |e, n− 1〉 is described by the Jaynes-Cummings
Hamiltonian (Leibfried et al., 2003) referred to as “red sideband” (Fig. 4(b)). In
addition, since the laser field acts as a drain or source of energy, the atom-photon
coupling does not satisfy energy conservation. The |g, n〉 to |e, n + 1〉 transition is
described by the anti-Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian and is coined as “blue sideband”.
For red sidebands and blue sidebands the number of phonons decreases (or increases)
due to the photon recoil momentum kick (Fig. 4(b)). Beyond these cases, there are
many other possibilities for interchanging energy of multiples of the motional quantum.
Including also micromotion effects, a set of transitions can be driven at frequencies of
integer multiples of the RF frequency, the so-called “micromotion sidebands”, and at a
sum over integer multiples of the RF frequency and secular frequencies.
The coupling strength for a given sideband transition depends on the ratio of the
photon recoil energy to one quanta of the ion oscillation, and is given by the Lamb-
Dicke parameter (Haroche and Raimond, 2006)
η =
√
2Mωαk · eα. (11)
Here, k is the wavevector of the laser light that drives the transition and eα is the
unit vector of the normal mode eigenvector at ωα. For strongly confined ions, the
extension of the atomic wavepacket is much smaller than the transition wavelength.
This interaction regime is referred to as the Lamb-Dicke regime that is defined
by η√〈(a+ a†)2〉 ∼ η
√n 1, where n denotes the average phonon number of the
corresponding mode. The excitation strength for the carrier and first red and blue
Trapped Rydberg ions 15
sidebands are respectively given by
Ωn→n = (1− η2n)Ω0, (12)
Ωn→n−1 = η√nΩ0, (13)
Ωn→n+1 = η√n+ 1Ω0, (14)
where Ω0 is the Rabi frequency of the carrier transition. Within the Lamb-Dicke regime,
the transitions that change the motional quantum number by more than one are strongly
suppressed.
In a two-photon process, the effective Lamb-Dicke parameter ηeff is thus identified
by replacing k with ∆k, where the difference wavevector is given by ∆k = k1−k2. Note
that ηeff depends on the alignment of k1 and k2 with respect to the direction of a given
normal mode. The use of short wavelength laser light for driving Rydberg transitions of
trapped ions may potentially give rise to a large Lamb-Dicke parameter. Lowering the
effective Lamb-Dicke parameter by using counter-propagating beams is an advantage of
the two-step excitation setup (Sec. 2.2). In contrast, Rydberg excitation using a single
VUV beam or two co-propagating UV beams lies outside of the Lamb-Dicke regime.
For instance, for 40Ca+ ions confined at an axial trapping frequency of 1 MHz, for the
3D5/2 → 66F transition driven by single photon at 122 nm, one obtains η ≈ 0.58 for an
ion in the motional ground state |n = 0〉, while for the 3D5/2 → 60S transition driven via
the 5P3/2 state using two counter-propagating UV beams at 213 and 285 nm, ηeff ≈ 0.08
can be achieved. In the latter case, even for thermal average quantum numbers up to
nmean ≈ 20, the ion excitation remains within the Lamb-Dicke regime.
3.4. Rydberg ions in the dynamical trapping field of a linear Paul trap
In this section, a detailed account of the dynamics of a single Rydberg ion in a
linear Paul trap is presented. The Hamiltonian of this system is given by
H =P 2
2M+
p2
2m+ V (|r −R|) + Vls(r −R) + 2eΦ(R, t)− eΦ(r, t), (15)
where P (p) and M (m) are the momentum and mass of the ion core (of the electron),
and R (r) is the position vector of the ion core (of the electron). V (|r−R|) is an angular-
momentum-dependent model potential for the Coulomb interaction between the ionic
core and the Rydberg electron, and Vls(r −R) stands for the spin-orbit coupling. The
last two terms in Eqn. 15 account for the coupling of the ionic and the electronic charge
to the trap electric potential given in Eqn. 4.
In the centre-of-mass frame, the Hamiltonian of the system can be written as
H = HI +He +HIe, (16)
Trapped Rydberg ions 16
where
HI =P 2
2M+ eΦ(R, t), (17)
He =p2
2me
+ V (|r|) + Vls(r)− eΦ(r, t), (18)
HIe = − 2eγ′(Xx− Y y) cos(ΩRFt) + 2eγ(Xx+ Y y − 2Zz). (19)
with R ≡ Xx + Y y + Zz and r ≡ xx + yy + zz. Here, corrections due to the finite
nuclear mass are neglected. HI is the free Hamiltonian of the external motion of the
ionic core, which can be approximated by
HeffI =
P 2
2M+M
2
∑ρ=X,Y,Z
ω2ρρ
2, (20)
where ωρ is the secular trapping frequency (Eqns. 5-7).
The Hamiltonian of the Rydberg electron, denoted with He in Eqn. 18, includes the
Coulomb and spin-orbit coupling terms V (|r|) and Vls(r), which can be calculated from
multi-channel quantum defect theory (Aymar et al., 1996). The last term in Eqn. 18
accounts for the interaction between the Rydberg electron and trapping electric fields,
which can be written as
He−Trap = −2
√2π
15eγ′r2(Y 2
2 (θ, φ) + Y −22 (θ, φ)) cos(ΩRFt)− 4
√π
5eγr2Y 0
2 (θ, φ), (21)
where θ and φ are the polar and azimuthal angles with respect to the trap axis z and
Y ml (θ, φ) are Laplace spherical harmonics. The energy shifts due to quadrupole static
and RF electric fields are calculated for a Rydberg state |n, L, J,mJ〉 with n, L and J
the principal, angular and total angular quantum numbers and mJ the projection of J
on the quantization axis. Here, the time t is treated merely as a parameter, since the
dynamics of the Rydberg electron occurs in a much faster time scale as compared with
the period of the RF potential. Note that in this review we discuss only the cases in
which the magnetic field direction, the “quantization” axis, coincides with the trap axis
z. Such a configuration allows for reducing the number of coupling terms arising from
the electron-trap effect.
The first-order energy shifts due to the static trapping potential can be calculated
assuming that the ion is located perfectly at the trap centre, at which the minimum of
the static and the RF quadrupole electric fields overlap. These energy shifts are given
by
∆Est,L,J,mJ = γQL,JJ(J + 1)− 3m2
J
J(2J − 1)(22)
where the corresponding quadrupole moment is given by
QL,J = −e2J − 1
2J + 2〈n, L, J |r2|n, L, J〉. (23)
As an example, for the D3/2 state and principal quantum number n 1, it is
approximated by QD,3/2 ≈ 2ea20n
2/5(4Z + 2)(5n2 + 1 − 3L(L + 1)), with ionic core
Trapped Rydberg ions 17
E
mJ = _3/2 +1/2_1/2 +3/2
nD3/2
nP3/2
Figure 5. First-order energy shifts due to the static quadrupole trapping field (red
arrows) and level couplings due to the RF quadrupole trapping field (blue arrows)
for nD3/2 and nP3/2 states of an alkaline-earth ion. Note that in these cases the
quantization axis, given by the magnetic field direction, is along the trap axis.
charge Z = +2 and Bohr radius a0 (Higgins et al., 2017a). States with J = 1/2 do not
have a permanent quadrupole moment, and therefore do not experience a first order
energy shift, i.e., ∆Est,S1/2= 0 and ∆Est,P1/2
= 0.
The time-dependent terms of the Hamiltonian given in Eqn. 21 lead to the coupling
between Zeeman states with ∆mJ = ±2. For most experiments, it is reasonable to
assume that the fine structure splitting is much larger than the RF drive frequency,
and thus only the coupling to the states of the same Zeeman manifold should be taken
into account. The coupling due to the RF field is characterised by an effective Rabi
frequency defined by C = −2QL,Jγ′/(5√
3) (Higgins et al., 2017a). The above effects
are schematically depicted in Fig. 5. It is important to notice that higher-order terms
due to the electron-trap coupling are not negligible for n > 10. Moreover, these terms
become noticeable when the minima of the static and the RF quadrupolar fields do not
overlap (Sec. 3.8 and Sec. 4.4). Note that only higher-order terms are relevant for nS1/2
and nP1/2 states.
The electron-ion Hamiltonian, HIe in Eqn. 19, is a function of the size of the electron
orbit, which is significantly large for a highly excited state in comparison to a low-lying
state. This gives rise to additional energy shifts proportional to the polarisability of the
Rydberg state excited, which modify the ion oscillation frequencies by (Schmidt-Kaler
et al., 2011)
∆ωX =
√(4e2γ′2 + 8e2γ2(1 + ε)2)ν(2)
M, (24)
∆ωY =
√(4e2γ′2 + 8e2γ2(1− ε)2)ν(2)
M, (25)
∆ωZ =
√8e2γ2ν(2)
M. (26)
Here, ν(2) =∑
m 6=n |〈Ψm|r|Ψn〉|2/(En −Em), which is proportional to the polarisability
Trapped Rydberg ions 18
of the excited state and scales with n7. Note that this frequency shift is about two
orders of magnitude larger for both radial modes as compared to the axial one because
of the larger field gradients of the trapping field in the x-y plane, under typical operation
parameters. Further analysis of these effects is considered in relation with the treatment
of parasitic stray electric fields in Sec. 3.8.
3.5. Loading and laser cooling of ions
In experiments with Rydberg ions, the use of a fast and reliable loading method is
necessary, since the ion loss probability increases by Rydberg excitations (Sec. 4.5).
An atomic beam is produced either by using a resistively heated oven or by laser
ablation from a solid state target (Leibrandt et al., 2007). Ions are generated
inside the trap by photoionization which is effective and can be used for isotope
selective loading (Hendricks et al., 2007; Lucas et al., 2004; Wolf et al., 2018). One
approach for effective loading is to photoionise laser-cooled neutral atoms inside the
trap volume (Bruzewicz et al., 2016; Cetina et al., 2007). Alternatively, in ion traps
with segmented electrodes, a reservoir of ions stored in a separate trapping zone can be
used (Blakestad et al., 2009). In this method, ions are transported from such a loading
zone into the experimental zone at which the laser pulses for qubit control are applied.
Such a “remote loading” has been applied in experiments with Rydberg Ca+ ions in
the Mainz blade trap with segmented electrodes (Mokhberi et al., 2019), see Fig. 3. An
additional advantage of remote loading is that slight contamination of trap electrodes
due to deposition of the atomic beam or the build-up of charges from photoionization
laser beams occur only near the loading zone, and the electrodes near the experimental
zone are not affected. To improve the loading efficiency and to reduce ion heating rates,
appropriate design of the trap electrode geometry and optimisation of applied static
voltages and their time sequences are important (de Clercq et al., 2016; Home and
Stean, 2006).
The likelihood of double ionisation events might increase when using a thermal
oven, which can be inferred to the black-body radiation effect (Higgins, 2019). A good
low-temperature alternative is cryogenic Paul traps (Brandl et al., 2016), in which the
atomic flux is generated by laser ablation (Leibrandt et al., 2007). Ion loading by
laser ablation was reported to improve experiments with Rydberg Sr+ ions (Higgins,
2019) (Sec. 4.5).
After loading, ions are Doppler-cooled on a dipole-allowed transition to an
equivalent temperature of about a few millikelvin (Eschner et al., 2003; Leibfried et al.,
2003; Metcalf and van der Straten, 1999). In this temperature regime, the mean phonon
number in motional eigenstates nmean ≤ 1, and sub-Doppler cooling techniques are
applied for preparing the ground state as a starting point for coherent manipulation of
electronic and motional quantum states (Wineland et al., 1998). Different techniques
have been employed for sub-Doppler cooling, namely, cooling on a dipole-forbidden
quadrupole-allowed transition, cooling on stimulated Raman transitions (Leibfried et al.,
Trapped Rydberg ions 19
2003), cooling using electromagnetically induced transparency (Morigi et al., 2000) and
polarization gradient cooling (Dalibard and Cohen-Tannoudji, 1989).
In this review, we focus on the first cooling method, which is typically implemented
by using an optical transition whose radiative lifetime is narrow as compared to
the period of the ion oscillations in the trap. This method is efficient in the Lamb-Dicke
regime (Sec. 3.3), in which spectrally resolved sidebands of the ion motion occur (so
called strong coupling limit). This technique has enabled nearly perfect motional ground
state cooling (> 99%) (Eschner et al., 2003; Leibfried et al., 2003; Wineland et al., 1998).
As an example, 40Ca+ ions are Doppler cooled on the (4s)2S1/2 → (4p)2P1/2 transition
while pumping on the (3d)2D3/2 → (4p)2P1/2 and (3d)2D5/2 → (4p)2P3/2 transitions
using laser beams at 397, 866 and 854 nm, respectively (Fig. 6(a)). The laser frequency is
“red-detuned” from the cooling transition by approximately Γc/2, where Γc is the natural
linewidth of the transition. Sideband spectroscopy of motional modes is performed using
ultra-stable laser light at 729 nm that drives all different transitions between sublevels
on the (4s)2S1/2 → (3d)2D5/2 quadrupole transition (Γq = 0.14 Hz (Chwalla, 2009)).
The 4S1/2, mJ = −1/2 → 3D5/2, mJ = −5/2 transition is a good choice for sideband
cooling (Roos, 2000), and serves for ion initialisation and state-dependent fluorescence
detection (Sec. 3.6 and Sec. 3.7). Similar schemes and techniques are applicable to Sr+
ions (Figs. 6(b,c)).
Ground state cooling of ions may be required for coherent manipulation of Rydberg
states as the thermal distribution of motional quanta in normal modes can cause
frequency shifts and asymmetrical broadening of Rydberg lines (Higgins et al., 2017a).
In addition, phonon number dependent transitions might be strongly driven and hinder
coherent control of Rydberg states (Higgins et al., 2019). These effects are described in
terms of significant Stark shifts that lead to the modification of trapping frequencies as
given in Eqns. 24-26 in Sec. 3.8.
3.6. Initialization of electronic states
As starting point for driving a Rydberg transition, it is essential to initialise the ion in
a pure state by optical pumping. Here, we describe initialisation techniques for four
cases that are relevant for experiments with Rydberg 40Ca+ ions, noting that there is a
one-to-one similarity to those applied to 88Sr+ ions (Fig. 2). Spectroscopic investigations
rely upon a cycle of consecutive steps of cooling, initialisation, optical pumping, Rydberg
excitation and detection. Such a sequence is performed typically in 5–20 ms on a single
ion or ions in a crystal and is repeated 100 times.
• Initialisation in 4S1/2, mJ = −1/2 state: Any population in metastable 3D3/2 and
3D5/2 states is transferred to the 4S1/2 state using laser light at 866 nm and 854 nm.
Both ground state Zeeman sublevels are populated, but the population in 4S1/2,
mJ = +1/2 state is frequency-selectively excited to 3D5/2, mJ = −3/2, from where
it is quenched again by radiation near 854 nm. After repeating the cycle ten times,
the 4S1/2, mJ = −1/2 state is prepared with better than 97% probability.
Trapped Rydberg ions 20
• Initialisation in metastable 3D5/2, mJ = −5/2 state: Starting with 4S1/2, mJ =
−1/2, the ion is coherently transferred into the 3D5/2, mJ = −5/2 state using a
π-pulse of laser light at 729 nm. The efficiency of this “electron shelving” typically
exceeds 99%, verified by state-dependent fluorescence detection (Sec. 3.7).
• Initialisation in a superposition state of 4S1/2, mJ = −1/2 and 3D5/2, mJ = −5/2:
Applying a π/2-pulse of laser light at 729 nm initialises the ion in an equal
superposition. Controlling the laser phase, frequency and the laser pulse duration
allows for generating arbitrary superposition states of Zeeman sublevels (Ruster
et al., 2016).
• Initialisation in 3D3/2 states: The population is optically pumped to 4S1/2 → 4P1/2
transition followed by a decay with a probability of 6% into the 3D3/2 state (Roos,
2000). Note that in this way an incoherent mixture of Zeeman sublevels is
populated.
To enable population transfer with improved robustness, square laser pulses
at constant frequency and intensity are replaced by optimised laser pulses such as
rapid adiabatic passage (RAP) (Noel et al., 2012; Poschinger et al., 2009, 2012;
Wunderlich et al., 2007; Yamazaki et al., 2008) and stimulated Raman adiabatic
passage (STIRAP) (Gebert et al., 2016; Sørensen et al., 2006). In RAP, the adiabatic
transfer of a population between two atomic states is implemented by a frequency and
amplitude modulated laser pulse as the dynamics of the atomic state dressed by this
light field evolves. In a typical experiment, the laser intensity is shaped with Gaussian
time dependence, whereas the frequency is varied linearly in time across an atomic
resonance. A sequence of initialisation in 4S1/2, mJ = −1/2 state (the first item above)
combined with a RAP pulse allows for initialisation with 99.8% probability, e.g, used
in four-ion entanglement generation demonstarated in (Kaufmann et al., 2017a). In
STIRAP, usually a three-level Λ-system is used such that the adiabatic transfer of the
population from the initial state to the final state occurs with neglible population of a
short-lived intermediate state. The application of STIRAP for manipulation of Rydberg
states driven in a two-step excitation process is discussed in Sec. 5.4.
3.7. Detection and readout schemes
For non-destructive and highly efficient detection of Rydberg excitations of
trapped ions, electron shelving techniques are used. The ion fluorescence from the
electric dipole-allowed transition used for Doppler cooling is detected by an electron-
multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera (see, e.g., the setup in Fig. 3(a))
or a photomultiplier detector (PMT). Relevant states and transitions for such detection
schemes are illustrated for Ca+ Fig. 6(a, b) and Sr+ ions in Fig. 6(c). For Ca+
ions, a typical choice is the 4S1/2 → 4P1/2 transition with 1 ns lifetime of the upper
level and transition wavelength near 397 nm (Fig. 6(a)). The ion scatters millions of
photons per second when this transition is driven, i.e., 4S1/2 state is populated, and
thus this state is counted as a “bright” state. If the ion is initialised in 3D5/2 state,
Trapped Rydberg ions 21
(a)
52F
66F53F
393
nm
122.
04 n
m
397
nm
854 nm
866 nm
729 nm
22F
40Ca+
4P3/24P1/2
3D5/23D3/2
4S1/2
(c)
243 nm
309 nm
5P3/25P1/2
5S1/2
4D5/24D3/2
6P3/26P1/2
25S1/2
422
nm
1033 nm
1092 nm
674 nm
88Sr+(b)
397
nm
854 nm
866 nm
729 nm
123.22 nm
23P1/2
40Ca+
4P3/24P1/2
3D5/23D3/2
4S1/239
3 nm
∆
Figure 6. Successful Rydberg excitations are measured based on electron shelving
and state-dependent fluorescence detection using the 4S1/2, 4P1/2 and 3D5/2 states in
Ca+ ions, and the 5S1/2, 5P1/2 and 4D5/2 states in Sr+ ions. Energy level diagrams
and laser wavelengths relevant for detecting Rydberg states are shown for (a) 52F7/2
and (b) 23P1/2 states of 40Ca+ and (c) for 25S1/2 state of 88Sr+ ions. In the two-step
excitation in (c), the laser at 243 nm: (i) is detuned by ∆ from the intermediate,
short-lived 5P3/2 state for the direct detection scheme and (ii) is on resonance with
the 5P3/2 state for the EIT detection scheme, see text for details.
which does not scatter photons at that frequency, it is counted as a “dark” state.
This state is independently coupled to the S ground state by an electric quadrupole
allowed transition. Such a V-type three-level system allows for electron shelving and
state-dependent fluorescence detection (Fig. 6). Measuring collected photons for few
hundred microseconds allows to distinguish between the bright and dark states with
better than 99.99% efficiency (Myerson et al., 2008).
A successful excitation from a Zeeman sublevel of the 3D5/2 state to a Rydberg state
is revealed by discriminating between the remaining population in the initial state(s),
which needs to be corrected only by the small probability that the Rydberg state decays
back into the initial level (Schmidt-Kaler et al., 2011). Successful events are thus
detected using subsequent state-dependent fluorescence detection in dark and bright
states. For a given Rydberg transition to be investigated spectroscopically, the detection
scheme has to be adapted according to rates for possible decay channels. Excitation
to states with high principal quantum numbers are preferred for taking advantage of
enhanced Rydberg properties (Table 1). To avoid coupling between Rydberg levels
with j ≥ 1/2 due to trapping electric fields (Sec. 3.4), we employ quantum states
with total angular momentum j = 1/2. For coherent manipulation, S transitions are
well suited (Higgins et al., 2017b), whereas for quantum gate operations, P states are
preferred because of longer lifetimes (Vogel et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020). If the decay
rate of a Rydberg level is much faster as compared to the excitation rate, the process
acts similar to optical pumping.
Trapped Rydberg ions 22
Here, we give three examples for detecting Rydberg F and P states in
Ca+ ions and S states in Sr+ ions (Fig. 6). (i) For the 3D3/2 → 52F1/2 transition,
the excited state population decays into 3D5/2 and 3D3/2 states with about 93% and
7% probabilities respectively (Feldker, 2016), where the latter causes a reduction on
the detection efficiency. The successful Rydberg excitation is proven from the ion
fluorescence on the S1/2 → P1/2 transition (bright state). The efficiency of this scheme
can be increased by using Zeeman sublevels of the D5/2 state (Bachor et al., 2016).
(ii) For the 3D3/2 → 23P1/2 transition, one should take into account that P and S
states of the Ca+ and Sr+ ions decay in multiple steps into the S1/2 ground state of
the ion with high probabilities (Glukhov et al., 2013). Thus, shortly after a successful
Rydberg excitation, the ion appears in the bright state, see Fig. 6(b). (iii) For the
4D5/2 → 25S1/2 transition, the Rydberg state decays into the ground state (Fig. 6(c)),
and the excitation probability is deduced from the population of these initial (dark) and
final (bright) states.
In Rydberg excitation using the two-step scheme (Sec. 2), an alternative
detection technique based on the electromagnetically-induced-transparency (EIT)
effect (Harris, 1997) has been developed in experiments with Sr+ ions (Higgins et al.,
2020). EIT is a quantum interference effect that is observed as the absorption reduction
of a weak light field, which is on resonance with an atomic transition, in the presence of
a second light field that near-resonantly couples the upper level to a third level (Boller
et al., 1991). Further examples of such coherent phenomena in a three-level Λ-system
used for two-step Rydberg excitation of ions are discussed in Sec. 5. The three-level
Λ-system for a 40Ca+ ion is represented by the initial 3D5/2 state, the intermediate 5P3/2
state and a certain Rydberg state, which can be any state in the nS1/2, nD3/2 or nD5/2
series. The probe laser at 213 nm is set at the 3D5/2 → 5P3/2 resonance, while the pulse
laser at 287 nm is scanned near the 5P3/2 → nS1/2 transition (Fig. 6). Ions are initialised
in one of the Zeeman levels of the 3D5/2 (dark) state. Since the pump laser is in resonance
with the 5P3/2 state with a lifetime of about 10 ns (Safronova and Safronova, 2011), a
bright signal is counted. Once the probe laser is on resonance with the Rydberg state,
the 5P3/2 state energy level is shifted due to the coupling between this intermediate state
and the Rydberg state. Consequently, the P state becomes transparent to the probe
laser at 213 nm and the population of the 3D5/2 state increases. Such peaks in the dark
state population are used to determine the transition frequencies with the advantage of
avoiding losses or effects from the trapping field. This technique was applied to measure
S-and D-series resonances in Ca+ ions (Fig. 9).
3.8. Controlling electric fields and minimising stray fields
Because of the large polarisability of Rydberg ions, minimising stray electric fields at the
ion position is crucial to avoid significant Stark shifts. For trapped Rydberg ions, the
Stark effect can be treated as a perturbation to the trap potential since only time scales
exceeding the RF period ΩRF and energy shifts much smaller than ΩRF are relevant.
Trapped Rydberg ions 23
For a state with polarisability α, the Stark shift is given by ∆EStark = −12α〈E(R, t)2〉t,
where the electric field near the trap centre is given by
E(R, t) =− 2γ′(Xx− Y y) cos(ΩRFt) + 2γ((1 + ε)Xx+ (1− ε)Y y − 2Zz)
+ E0ϕRF sin(ΩRFt) + Est.(27)
Here, R ≡ Xx+Y y+Zz is the ion position vector, ϕRF is the phase difference between
the RF potentials applied to trap electrodes with amplitude of E0 near the trap centre,
and γ′, γ and ε identify the trapping potential as given in Eqn. 4. Est accounts for
an stray electric field that shifts the ion off the RF centre and causes extra oscillation,
“excess micromotion”. In most experiments, ϕRF is nulled using an appropriate trap
design, and thus the main contribution to excess micromotion is due to stray electric
fields. An additional source of fluctuating electric fields is photo electrons from stray
light of the UV or VUV beams (Sec. 2). The off-centre shift of a singly-charged ion in
a linear RF trap due to Est is given by (Berkeland et al., 1998)
rd =eEst · eαMω2
α
, (28)
where eα is the unit vector of the mode eigenvector at ωα.
Depending on the spatial distance between the minima of the static and
the RF trapping electric fields, two different cases are considered. In case both
minima overlap within the extension of the vibrational ground state wavefunction,
which is typically about 10-50 nm, the stray electric field and the ion displacement
are negligible, i.e., Est = 0 and rd = 0. Assuming the vibrational components of
the wavefunction remain approximately unchanged during the Rydberg transition, the
energy shift can be written as (Higgins et al., 2019)
∆EStark = (nX +1
2)(ω′X(αr)− ω′X(αg)) + (nY +
1
2)(ω′Y (αr)− ω′Y (αg)), (29)
where nX(Y ) is the phonon number in the radial mode of oscillation along the X(Y )
axis and αr (αg) is the polarisability of the |r〉 (or |g〉) state, respectively. The trapping
frequency ω′X(Y ) = ωX(Y ) + ∆ωX(Y ) is given in Eqns. 5-7 and Eqns. 24-26. Note that
the effect arises from a slightly stiffer or shallower harmonic trapping potential as seen
by the ionic core depending on the polarisability of the Rydberg state αr. This effect
may be enhanced by 7 to 9 orders of magnitude as compared to the near-ground state
ion αg (Eqns. 24-26). Electronic wavefunctions of initial and highly-excited states are not
necessarily orthogonal, and thus the phonon conservation is not strictly applied. Such
phonon-number-changing transitions are most likely driven in the case of imperfect
micromotion compensation, in which the minima of the static and RF trapping
electric fields do not overlap, i.e., Est 6= 0 and rd 6= 0. The equilibrium position of the
ion is consequently shifted by
X ′d = Xd(1− 2αγ′2
Mω2X
)−1. (30)
Trapped Rydberg ions 24
E
Ion position
Laser excitation
Xg
|r ⟩
|g ⟩
(a) (b)
Xg
Xr
Laser excitation
ℏ𝜔´x|r ⟩
|g ⟩
ℏ𝜔´x
E
Ion position
1
2ℏ∆𝜔x
3
2ℏ∆𝜔x
5
2ℏ∆𝜔x
Figure 7. Illustration of transition frequency shifts in Rydberg excitation of trapped
ions owing to the Stark effect. (a) Phonon-number-preserving transitions occur in case
of non-zero motional quanta in a given mode. (b) Phonon-number-changing transitions
are driven strongly in the case of ions subjected to stray electric fields. Note that in
this case the equilibrium position of the Rydberg ion Xr is different from that of the
ground-state Xg. For the phonon states shown in (a) and (b), wavepackets of the ion
in a harmonic potential well in the x direction are depicted in grey.
In this case, the Stark shift results in (Higgins et al., 2019)
∆EStark = −1
2α〈E(rd, t)
2〉t = −αγ′2(X2d + Y 2
d ). (31)
In both cases of phonon-number-dependent energy shifts (Fig. 7), the shifts can
be seen as higher-order terms contributing to the ion-trapping field coupling given
in Eqn. 21. This effect is more pronounced when stray electric fields cause excess
micromotion. Micromotion effects alter the shape of the atomic transition resonances,
due to Stark shifts induced by the RF electric field and from second-order Doppler
shifts. Even with nearly perfect minimisation of excess micromotion, asymmetric
broadening of Rydberg resonances may occur if the ion(s) are only Doppler-cooled.
This effect is understood in terms of the broadening of the thermal wavepacket, with
phonon distributions in radial and axial modes, when the Stark shift is taken into
account (Sec. 4.4.2).
On the positive side, such state-dependent modification of trapping frequencies
plays an important role. The effect can be understood as a difference in the effective
mass for the ion in the Rydberg state as compared to an ion in the low-lying or ground
state, which modifies the frequencies of the common modes of vibration as well as the ion
equilibrium positions in a state-depending fashion. This unique property in ion crystals
Trapped Rydberg ions 25
consisting of Rydberg ions has rich applications in quantum simulation (Sec. 6.3),
quantum computation (Sec. 6.1) and structural phase transitions (Sec. 6.5).
4. Spectroscopy of Rydberg transitions
In this section, we discuss experimental results for incoherent Rydberg spectroscopy
of single trapped ions, in which the laser-interaction time exceeds the lifetime of
excited states. These spectroscopy results are important for understanding Rydberg
state properties (Sec. 4.1 and Sec. 4.3), for revealing the effect of trapping fields
on Rydberg spectral line properties (Sec. 4.4) and for applications in sensing and
metrology (Sec. 4.1). Note that in the relatively new experiments with Rydberg ions
only few atomic properties have been thus far measured with required precisions, and
therefore new spectroscopy data are essential.
4.1. Determination of the electric polarisability
Rydberg atoms and ions exhibit exaggerated electric polarisability (Table 1), which can
be deduced from the modification of their line shapes in the presence of an external
electric field. F states of hydrogen-like ions feature large polarisability, see for instance
calculated values in (Kamenski and Ovsiannikov, 2014), and are ideal for such studies.
The trap was operated such that a single Ca+ ion undergoes micromotion along the trap
axis. Ions were initialised in 3D3/2 states and were excited to the 52F state using laser
light at 122 nm. The spectrum is shown at two different oscillating electric field strengths
at the ion position (Feldker et al., 2015), Fig. 8(a). The linewidth of the 52F transition
varies between 60 and 400 MHz full width at half maximum (FWHM), depending on
the trap control parameters, and widens out at higher electric field strengths.
To describe the line shapes quantitatively, the Stark shift due to the oscillating
electric field of the trap and the Doppler effect resulting from the driven motion of the
ion were modelled. The time-dependent resonance frequency of the transition can be
written as (Feldker et al., 2015)
ω(t) = ω0 + k ·RmmΩRFsin(ΩRFt)−αE2
res
2cos2(ΩRFt). (32)
Here, ω0 is the unaffected resonance frequency, and k and Rmm are the wavevector of the
VUV laser and the ion micromotion amplitude. α is the polarisability of the Rydberg
state, and Eres is a residual RF electric field at the ion position. Thus, the modulated
laser field seen by the ion is (Feldker et al., 2015)
Elaser(t) ∝ e−iω0tei2βαΩRFt∑m′
Jm′(βmm)eim′(ΩRFt+π
2)∑m
(−1)mJm(βα)e2im(ΩRFt). (33)
Here, β denotes the modulation index of the Bessel function Jn(β) with βmm = k ·Rmm
and βα = αE2res/8ΩRF, respectively. Micromotion sidebands caused by the Doppler
effect appear at m × ΩRF, whereas micromotion sidebands due to the quadratic Stark
Trapped Rydberg ions 26
Figure 8. Rydberg lines for trapped 40Ca+ ions. (a) The 3D3/2 → 52F transition
measured at |Eres| = 24 V/m (in blue) and 84 V/m (in red) with a laser pulse of
30 ms duration and power of about 0.5 µW with a beam waist of about 15 µm. (b)
and (c) Calculations for 51F and 51P resonances excited form 3D3/2 state at different
residual electric fields respectively, for which cooling to the Doppler limit and the trap
drive frequency ΩRF = 2π× 6.5 MHz is assumed. Adapted from (Feldker et al., 2015).
effect occur at 2m×ΩRF, where m is an integer number (see Figs. 8(b,c) and Fig. 10(b)).
A Floquet analysis of such spectra has been recently computed (Pawlak and Sadeghpour,
2020).
By measuring |Eres| independently, see Sec. 4.4.1 and Fig. 10(c), one can estimate
the polarisability of an excited state from fitting the observed resonances to the model
given in Eqn. 33. Note that such a simple measurement allows for a quick identification
of the angular momentum of an unknown Rydberg state from the sign and magnitude of
α. The result is α52F = 10+7−3×102 MHz/ (V/cm)2 (Feldker et al., 2015) for the 52F state,
a value consistent with the predicted value of α52F = 8×102 MHz/ (V/cm)2 (Kamenski
and Ovsiannikov, 2014) obtained in second-order perturbation theory when spin-orbit
coupling is neglected.
4.2. Resolved Zeeman sublevels of Rydberg states
The coupling terms due to the trapping electric fields (Eqn. 21) are negligible for
nS states up to n < 50 (Muller et al., 2008), and therefore mJ remains a “good”
quantum number for low-lying states as well as for Rydberg S-states. In a two-step
laser excitation of ions, single Zeeman sublevels are driven using circularly polarised UV
beams that drive a given Rydberg transition (Sec. 2). Depending on the polarisation of
the light, each laser beam may drive σ+ transitions, σ− transitions or both transitions.
For instance, see resolved resonances for Zeeman sublevels of Rydberg S levels of Sr+
ions on the 4D3/2 → 25S1/2 transition in (Higgins et al., 2017a).
Trapped Rydberg ions 27
4.3. Rydberg series and determination of the quantum defect
To assign observed Rydberg resonances, measured lines are fitted to a line model, e.g.,
the one described in Sec. 4.1, and resulting level energies are fitted to the Rydberg-Ritz
formula (Ritz, 1908; Rydberg, 1890)
En,l,j = I++ − R∗Z2
(n− µ(E))2+
R∗Z4α2ls
(n− µ(E))3
[ 3
4(n− µ(E))− 1
(j + 1/2)
](34)
Here, αls and R∗ are the fine structure constant and the reduced Rydberg constant and
Z = +2 is the charge of the ionic core. I++, µ(E) and n denote the double ionization
limit, the quantum defect and the principal quantum number respectively. The third
term in Eqn. (34) accounts for the fine-structure splitting. The energy dependence of
the quantum defect µ(E) is approximated up to second order by a Taylor expansion
µ(En,l,j) = µ0l,j(I
++)− ∂µ
∂En,l,j
R∗
(n− µ1l,j)
2+O[(En,l,j − I++)2], (35)
where µ0l,j, µ
1l,j, I
++ and ∂µ/∂En,l,j are treated as fit parameters. The model compiled
from Eqns. (34-35) is usually simplified by replacing µ1 by µ0 which can provide
sufficiently good results, as reported for ns, np, nd series of Rb atoms (Li et al., 2003)
and for ns, nd, nf, ng series of 88Sr+ ions in free space (Lange et al., 1991). However,
this simplification spoils the meaning of the quantum defect as discussed by Drake and
Swainson (Drake and Swainson, 1991) and can ultimately limit the accuracy of the
quantum defect method for precision measurements. The truncation of higher-order
terms in Eqn. 35 must be verified based on the fit results, e.g., see (Deiglmayr et al.,
2016).
Rydberg state spectroscopy in combination with Rydberg-series extrapolation pro-
vides the most precise method for determining the ionization threshold I++ (Deiglmayr
et al., 2016; Peper et al., 2019). For trapped Rydberg ions, S and D Rydberg series of88Sr+ ions (Higgins, 2019) and S, P, D and F series of 40Ca+ ions (Andrijauskas et al.,
2020; Bachor et al., 2016; Feldker et al., 2015; Mokhberi et al., 2019) were used to deter-
mine the quantum defects and their ionization energies. The most precise measurement
has been done for the S states of a single Ca+ ion using the two-step Rydberg excitation
scheme (Sec. 2), in which states with principal quantum number n ranging between 38
and 65 were excited (Andrijauskas et al., 2020), see Fig. 9. Two methods were applied
to detect Rydberg resonances; the direct excitation and the EIT techniques described
in Sec. 3.7. The EIT technique does not yield any population transfer to the Rydberg
state, and therefore has enabled the observation of highly excited states of trapped ions
with n > 50, beyond the theoretical limit for instability of Rydberg ions inside a Paul
trap (Muller et al., 2008), see also Sec. 4.5.
4.4. Spectral line effects due to trapping electric fields
For Rydberg states of ions in the dynamic potential of a linear Paul trap, two classes
of effects due to static and RF quadrupolar electric fields have been observed, arising
Trapped Rydberg ions 28
Figure 9. (a) and (b) S-state level energies of 40Ca+ ions fitted to the Rydberg-Ritz
formula and the corresponding fit residuals. Measurements using a two-step excitation
scheme (blue dots) and using EIT spectroscopy (red diamonds) are plotted versus
the principal quantum number. In both cases, a single ion was initialised from the
3D5/2, mJ = −1/2 state (Chwalla et al., 2009). The red dashed line shows the double
ionization limit I++ deduced from the fit of measured level energies to Eqn. 35 (dashed
red line).
either from high polarisability or from large quadrupole moments of ions in
Rydberg states. The former emerge as a result of the Rydberg electron interaction
with the ionic core, described with He−Trap in Eqn. 21 (Sec. 3.4). The effect is
noticeable for highly-excited states as the polarisability scales with n7 (Sec. 4.4.2). The
second effect is the coupling between states with large electric quadrupole moments in
Rydberg states, which scales with n4. The coupling in this case is driven by the time-
dependent electric quadrupole trapping field, and occurs between Rydberg states with
J > 12
(Sec. 4.4.3). nS1/2 and nP1/2 states (with J = 12) have negligible quadrupole
moments, and therefore are not affected, and are employed for coherent manipulation
and for entangling operations (Sec. 5). Note that also the Zeeman sublevels of the 3D5/2
state of Ca+ ions exhibit a small, quadrupolar differential shift of about 30 Hz, which
was observed using entangled states of a two-ion crystal (Roos et al., 2006). However,
for Rydberg states this effect is significant. For instance, for the 27D3/2 state of Sr+
ion, the coupling is larger by a factor of about 106, corresponding to a calculated shift
of about 30 MHz (Higgins, 2019).
4.4.1. Micromotion sidebands due to the Doppler effect – As discussed in Sec. 3.8,
excess micromotion causes line broadening due to the Doppler effect. This effect is
pronounced when a given transition is driven by a short wavelength as observed for
the 3D3/2 → 23P1/2 transition of trapped Ca+ ions, which is driven by laser light near
123.17 nm (Mokhberi et al., 2019). For this transition and typical laser parameters,
Trapped Rydberg ions 29
Popu
latio
n in
3D
5/2
ν _ν0 (MHz)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
(b)(a)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60ν _ν0 (MHz)
Popu
latio
n in
3D
5/2
Figure 10. Rydberg resonances for the 3D3/2 → 23P1/2 transition in a Ca+ ion
measured at the residual oscillating electric field |Eres|: (a) |Eres| < 10 V/m with the
RF voltage VRF = 120 and ΩRF = 2π × 5.98 MHz, and (b) |Eres| = 160 V/m with
VRF = 280 V and ΩRF = 2π × 14.56 MHz. Error bars stem from quantum projection
noise for 100 measurement repetition for each data point. Calculated line shapes (in
red) are obtained from Eqn. 33. Adapted from (Mokhberi et al., 2019).
Doppler broadening of the resonance shape dominates largely over polarisability effects.
The excitation probabilities for this transition are detected by electron shelving in
the 3D5/2 state (Fig. 10). If excess micromotion is minimised such that the residual
RF electric field at the ion position |Eres| < 10 V/m, the spectrum do not exhibit
additional sidebands. By moving the ion along the trap axis z, ions are subjected
to |Eres| = 160 V/m, and excess micromotion becomes noticeable. Note that for
these sidebands the modulation depth βmm depends on the angle between k and
Rmm as given in Eqn. 33. The amplitude of the oscillating electric field, |Eres|, were
precisely mapped out along the trap axis using resolved sideband spectroscopy on
the 4S1/2,mJ = −1/2 → 3D5/2,mJ = −5/2 transition at 729 nm (Roos, 2000). In
this method, the Rabi frequency on the carrier transition and the first micromotion
sideband are measured, and are used to determine |Eres| and correspondingly βmm
(Eqn. 33) (Roos, 2000).
4.4.2. Stark effect on highly polarisable Rydberg ions – Significant energy shifts in
Rydberg ions owing to the quadratic Stark effect arising from the trapping electric
fields (Sec. 3.8) were observed in Sr+ ions. As the phonon number of motional states
increases, the size of the ion wavepacket becomes larger, and thus the ion experiences
larger interaction with the dynamic electric trapping field. In the experiment, the
4D5/2 → 46S1/2 transition frequency was measured as a function of the phonon
number for a single ion prepared in the number states of the radial modes (x and y
modes) (Fig. 11(a)). These observed Stark shifts are modelled using the mean-squared
RF electric field (Sec. 3.8). We note that calculations in which intrinsic micromotion
has been taken into account showed only 2% deviations from the models given by
Eqn. 29 and 31 (Higgins et al., 2019). Calculations in Fig. 11(a,b) use polarisability
Trapped Rydberg ions 30
of the Rydberg state αr ≡ α46S1/2from theory 5.6×10−31 C2 m2 J−1 (Li, 2017) and that
of the initial state αg ≡ α4D5/2≈ 0 (Jiang et al., 2009).
Pop
ula
tio
n lo
ss f
rom
4D
5/2
Res
on
ance
sh
ift/
2π
[MH
z]
(a)
Number of phonons Laser detuning / 𝜔´x
(b)
Figure 11. Observations of the trap effects on highly polarisable Rydberg ions.
(a) The 4D5/2 → 46S1/2 resonance frequency is measured for a single Sr+ ion as
the phonon number in the x- (blue) and y-modes (green) increases. Note that only
the phonon number of one mode is varied for each data set, while the other radial
mode is cooled to near zero phonon number. The lines are obtained from Eqn. 29
with ∆ωx = ω′x−ωx = −2π×40.1 kHz and ∆ωy = ω′
y−ωy = −2π×41.4 kHz, see the
illustriation in Fig. 7(a). (b) Rydberg excitation spectra for an ion prepared with the
phonon number nx = 20 and ny ' 0. Resonances at integer multiples of ω′X correspond
to phonon-number-changing transitions, illustrated in Fig. 7(b). Measured data (blue
dots) was modelled by Lorentzian absorption lines (green). Adapted from (Higgins
et al., 2019).
In the case of properly minimised stray electric fields at the ion position (Sec. 3.8),
Stark shifts of about few MHz arising from driven phonon-number-preserving transitions
were measured, see Fig. 11(a). In comparison, the quadratic Stark effect leads to more
significant frequency shifts for Rydberg ions subjected to excess micromotion, i.e., when
the minima of the RF and the static fields do not overlap (Sec. 3.8). The reminiscent
is the dependency of the ion equilibrium position on state polarisability (Eqn. 30 and
Fig. 7(b)). Therefore, a change in the ions motional state is observed when driving
electronic states with large polarisabilities (phonon-number-changing transitions). The
measured spectrum, see Fig. 11(b), features resonances at integer multiples of ω′x, where
ω′x = ωx+∆ωx is the modified secular trapping frequency of the normal mode along the
x axis (Eqn. 5 and 24).
This observation might be used to minimise stray electric fields at the ion position,
and hence to mitigate excess micromotion effects with the advantage of being sensitive
to ion micromotion in all three spatial directions (Higgins et al., 2019). Stark shifts
Trapped Rydberg ions 31
in neutral Rydberg atoms were used to precisely measure and minimise stray electric
fields (Osterwalder and Merkt, 1999).
4.4.3. Floquet sidebands due to large quadrupole moments of Rydberg ions – The
coupling between Zeeman sublevels of a nD3/2 state induced by the time-dependent
electric trapping field leads to Floquet sidebands in Rydberg-excitation spectra. This
effect was investigated in the 24D3/2 and the 27D3/2 states of 88Sr+ ions (Higgins, 2019).
As discussed in Sec. 3.4 and 4.4, these sidebands appear only in the excitation spectra
of those states with J > 1/2 (Fig. 5). A manifold of a Rydberg nD3/2 state expanded
in the Floquet basis is shown in Fig. 12(b).
The Floquet theorem is used to describe the effect of the time-dependent potential
in the He−Trap Hamiltonian in Eqn. 21. In this case, the effective Rabi frequency of the
RF field that couples these states is comparable with the RF drive frequency (Sec. 3.4).
For each eigenstate of the time-dependent Hamiltonian, there is a set of eigenstates with
eigenenergies shifted by kΩRF with respect to the uncoupled eigenstates, where k is
an integer number (Fig. 12(b)). The measurements were carried out using the strong
trapping fields gradients γ′ = 8.2× 108 V m−2 and γ = 6.8× 106 V m−2 and the weak
trapping fields gradients γ′ = 3.3 × 108 V m−2 and γ = 5.7 × 106 V m−2 (Fig. 12(a)),
where γ′ and γ are identified by Eqn. 4.
(b)(a) (i)
(ii)
Figure 12. (a) Floquet sidebands observed in the 27D3/2 Zeeman manifold of 88Sr+
ions. The frequency of the RF trapping field is ΩRF = 2π × 18.2 MHz, and thus
first-order sidebands appear around 2π× 18 and second-order ones around 2π× 36 for
both strong (i) and weak trapping fields (ii), see text for parameters. (b) Schematic
of the relevant coupling for a nD3/2 (mJ = 3/2) state in the Floquet basis. First-
order sidebands due to the coupling to the mJ = −1/2 sublevel and second-order ones
resulted from a subsequent coupling to the mJ = −1/2 and the mJ = 3/2 sublevels
are shown. The Floquet eigenstates are labelled with the index k, and states with
∆mJ = 2 and ∆k = 1 are coupled. Adapted from (Higgins, 2019).
Trapped Rydberg ions 32
4.5. Stability of Rydberg ions in the trap
Double ionization might occur in Rydberg excitation of trapped ions and has been
observed in single- and two-step excitation experiments (Feldker, 2016; Higgins, 2019).
This effect has been studied for Ca+ ion crystals excited by laser light at 121.26 nm,
and thus above the ionization limit to generate Ca2+ ions (Feldker et al., 2014). For
this experiment, the trapping parameters were set to allow for stable trapping of both
singly and doubly charged ions. Ca2+ ions do not scatter light at the cooling transition
and appear as dark voids in a linear ion chain, and thus are identified from an increase
of inter ion distances. More importantly, they feature different secular frequencies and
motional modes because of the double charge-to-mass ratio.
Only after several hundred excitations were losses or double ionization events
observed, which require loading new ions. Even excitations to the 65S and 66F states
were observed for Ca+ ions (Andrijauskas et al., 2020; Feldker, 2016). This high stability
of Rydberg states in the trapping field is remarkable, since a calculation suggested a limit
of about n < 50 (Muller et al., 2008). Several additional effects are conjectured to affect
the stability. Blackbody radiation can cause double ionisation particularly for the states
with extremely high principal quantum number. The losses might be expected from the
time-dependent electric trapping field, but the ionization threshold for such events is far
below that of a static electric field. In neutral Rydberg experiments, subsequent Landau-
Zener transitions have been observed that can occur between states with different n-
manifolds. Microwave fields applied to generate Rydberg dressed states (Sec. 5) might
also affect the stability, as MW field ionisation of Ba+ ions in free space (Seng et al.,
1998) and microwave multi-photon transitions between Rydberg states of neutral atoms
have been observed (Stoneman et al., 1988).
5. Coherent spectroscopy and control of Rydberg ions
The previous section describes how the trapping electric fields modify spectral Rydberg
lines, and how these effects may be mitigated to achieve narrow Rydberg resonance
lines, a starting point for implementing coherent dynamics (Higgins et al., 2017b, 2019;
Zhang et al., 2020). The coherent phenomena observed so far include two-photon
Rabi oscillations (Sec. 5.2), the EIT effect (discussed in Sec. 3.7 as employed to
detect Rydberg resonances), the Autler-Townes effect (Sec. 5.3) and stimulated
Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) (Sec. 5.4). Coherent control of Rydberg ions
has enabled measurement of Rydberg state lifetimes (Sec. 5.4.1), a single-qubit gate
(Sec. 5.4.2), and recently a sub-microsecond two-qubit entangling gate (Zhang et al.,
2020) (Sec. 5.5). Some of these phenomena rely on the two-photon excitation scheme,
and thus we begin this section with a theoretical description of three atomic levels
coupled by two laser fields.
Trapped Rydberg ions 33
Ω2306 nm
Ω1243 nm 5P1/2
nS1/2 – |r〉
6P3/2 – |e〉
4D5/2 – |0〉5S1/2 – |1〉
Δ2
Δ1
qubit674 nm
Γe
Γr
fluorescencedetection
88Sr+
Figure 13. Energy level diagram relevant for coherent manipulation of Rydberg
nS1/2 states of 88Sr+ ions. Zeeman sublevels of the 4D5/2, 6P3/2 and nS1/2 states
are coupled using laser fields near 243 nm and 306 nm, with Rabi frequencies Ω1 and
Ω2 and the corresponding laser frequency detuning ∆1 and ∆2 respectively. From the
6P3/2 and the nS1/2 states, the population decays to the ground state 5S1/2. Adapted
from (Higgins et al., 2017b).
5.1. Three-level system coupled by two laser fields
Sr+ ions are excited from the qubit state |0〉 = 4D5/2, mJ = −52
to the Rydberg state
|r〉 = nS1/2, mJ = −12
via the intermediate state |e〉 = 6P3/2, mJ = −32
using laser fields
at 243 nm and 306 nm, as shown in Fig. 13. The coupling strength between |0〉 and
|e〉 is Ω1 and the coupling strength between |e〉 and |r〉 is Ω2, with corresponding laser
frequency detuning which is denoted by ∆1 and ∆2 respectively. Within the rotating
wave approximation, the coupling Hamiltonian Hc for the three levels |0〉, |e〉, |r〉 is
given by
Hc =2
0 Ω1 0
Ω1 2∆1 Ω2eiφ
0 Ω2e−iφ 2∆1 + 2∆2
. (36)
Here, φ is the relative phase between the laser fields within the rotating frame. The
dressed eigenstates are found by diagonalizing Hc.
The population in the |e〉 state decays to the 5S1/2 state with decay rate Γe =
2π× 4.9 MHz by multi-channel decay processes. Population in |r〉 also decays by multi-
channel processes to 5S1/2; the rate Γr at which population leaves |r〉 depends on the
Rydberg state, e.g. Γ46S = 2π × 34 kHz. Typically Γr Γe. Finite laser linewidths
δ1 ≈ δ2 ≈ 2π × 100 kHz cause dephasing.
Rabi oscillations may be observed in a two-level system coupled by a single laser
field. In a three-level system coupled by two laser fields the coherent phenomena that
emerge are richer, as described in the following sections.
Trapped Rydberg ions 34
time [μs]
0.00.40.0 1.61.20.8
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Pop
ulat
ion
loss
from
4D
5/2
Figure 14. Two-photon Rabi oscillations between |0〉 ↔ |r〉 are observed when the
ion is sideband cooled to near the ground state (blue data points). The oscillations
are washed out when only Doppler cooling is employed (green data points). Here
the theory assumes after Doppler cooling nmean ≈ 13, and after sideband cooling
nmean ≈ 0.2, and Ωeff ≈ 2π × 1.2 MHz. The shaded areas represent simulated
results using experimentally-determined parameters, see text for details. Adapted
from (Higgins et al., 2019).
5.2. Two-photon Rabi oscillations
Rabi oscillations between the |0〉 and |r〉 states may be driven, while the coupling to
the lossy intermediate state |e〉 needs to be weak Ω1,Γe, δ1 ∆1 and Ω2,Γe, δ2 ∆2,
such that little population is transferred to |e〉. In such way, the state |e〉 may then be
adiabatically eliminated, and Hc simplifies to
H ′c =2
(− Ω2
1
2∆1−Ω1Ω2
2∆1
−Ω1Ω2
2∆1− Ω2
2
2∆1+ 2∆1 + 2∆2
)(37)
in the |0〉, |r〉 basis. The effective coupling strength between |0〉 and |r〉, i.e. the
two-photon Rabi frequency, is Ωeff = Ω1Ω2
2∆1.
To observe high-contrast Rabi oscillations the off-diagonal coupling elements in
Eqn. 38 should exceed the diagonal decay elements, thus a two-photon detuning from
the |0〉 ↔ |r〉 resonance should satisfy
Ω21 − Ω2
2
4∆1
+ ∆1 + ∆2 Ωeff (38)
The first term on the left accounts for AC Stark shifts, which cancel for Ω1 = Ω2.
High-contrast Rabi oscillations additionally require Ωeff Γr, δ1, δ2.
The importance of mitigating trap effects is illustrated in Fig. 14 in which
the results for a sideband-cooled ion and a Doppler cooled ion are compared. Rabi
oscillations were observed with the sideband-cooled ion, while with the Doppler-cooled
Trapped Rydberg ions 35
ion the linewidth Γr of the |r〉 state was broadened due to the Stark effect (Sec. 3.8),
and Rabi oscillations were smeared out. The experiment used |r〉 = 46S1/2, mJ = −12.
The oscillation contrast was limited by laser linewidths (δ1 ≈ δ2 ≈ 2π × 100 kHz), laser
light intensities and the Rydberg state lifetime.
5.3. Autler-Townes effect
The Autler-Townes effect is observed in spectra when a strong laser field couples |e〉 and
|r〉 with strength Ω2 > Γe,Γr such that the new dressed eigenstates of Hc become
|φ0〉 = |0〉 (39)
|φ±〉 =−∆2 ±
√∆2
2 + Ω22
Ω2
|e〉+ |r〉 (40)
with eigenvalues
E0 = 0 (41)
E± =2
(∆2 ±
√∆2
2 + Ω22
). (42)
This eigenstates may be investigated by spectroscopy using a weak probe laser field
which couples |0〉 ↔ |e〉 with strength Ω1 Γe. In Fig. 15(a) the probe laser detuning
∆1 is scanned while the coupling laser field is resonant ∆2 = 0. The |0〉 ↔ |e〉 resonance
is split into two resonances which correspond to excitation of |φ+〉 = 1√2(|e〉 + |r〉) and
|φ−〉 = 1√2(|e〉 − |r〉). The separation between the resonances is a measure of Ω2, i.e.
the energy difference between the eigenvalues (Eqn. 41); thus we use the Autler-Townes
effect to calibrate Ω2.
By conducting spectroscopy as both ∆1 and ∆2 are scanned the avoided crossing of
|e〉 and |r〉 is mapped out, as shown in Fig. 15(b). When the dressing is weak Ω2 ∆2
the dressed states resemble the bare atomic states |e〉 and |r〉, which are excited when
∆1 ≈ 0 and ∆1 + ∆2 ≈ 0 (the non-equality is due to the AC Stark shiftΩ2
2
4∆2which falls
out of Eqn. 41 when ∆2 Ω2). The avoided crossing arises due to the coupling of |e〉and |r〉 by the coupling laser field. Note that the Autler-Twons effect is distinguished
from the EIT effect (Sec. 3.7) by the coupling scheme applied (Hao et al., 2018).
5.4. Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage
Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) (Bergmann et al., 2015) allows for
coherent transfer of population between |0〉 and |r〉 when Ω1 ∆1 and Ω2 ∆2
– this is a completely different parameter regime as compared to that for driving
two-photon Rabi oscillations as in Sec. 5.2. The STIRAP process relies on smoothly
changing Ω1 and Ω2 such that a dressed state changes its character from |0〉 → −|r〉and population adiabatically follows this evolution. Among the advantages of STIRAP
transfer is its efficiency which may be insensitive to an imperfect setting or fluctuations
of experimental parameters.
Trapped Rydberg ions 36
Probe laser detuning Δ1 / 2π [MHz]
Pop
ulat
ion
loss
from
4D
5/2
0 10 20–10–200.0
0.4
0.2
Prob
e la
ser d
etun
ing
Δ 1 / 2
π [
MH
z]
Coupling laser detuning Δ2 / 2π [MHz]0 10 20–10
0
10
20
–10
–20
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.1
(a) (b)
Pop
ulat
ion
loss
from
4D
5/2
Figure 15. Autler-Townes effect. (a) A single resonance line corresponding to the
|0〉 ↔ |e〉 transition is observed in the absence of the coupling laser field (green
data). With a resonant coupling laser field two resonance lines result, corresponding to
excitation of the dressed states |e〉 ± |r〉, which are separated by the coupling strength
Ω2. The separation between the resonance lines increases with the laser field intensity.
(b) Avoided crossing of two resonance lines. The |0〉 ↔ |e〉 transition gives rise to a
resonance along ∆1 = 0 while the |0〉 ↔ |r〉 transition gives rise to a resonance when
the two-photon detuning is zero ∆2 = −∆1. The coupling laser field couples |e〉 and
|r〉 such that the resonance lines do not cross. Adapted from (Higgins, 2019).
For resonant two-photon condition ∆1 + ∆2 = 0 the dressed state of Hc is
|φdark〉 = Ω2eiφ|0〉 − Ω1|r〉 (43)
Note that this eigenstate has no component of |e〉 and it is dubbed the “dark” eigenstate
because it does not scatter photons (at least on time scales Γ−1r ). Ω1 and Ω2 are
varied according to the counter-intuitive sequences shown in Fig. 16. The sequence in
(a) transfers population from |0〉 → −|r〉 while the sequences in (b) and (c) transfer
population from |0〉 → −|r〉 → e−iφ|0〉.If the sequence is implemented too quickly, non-adiabatic dynamics cause
population to leave the dark eigenstate, decreasing the transfer efficiency. The character
of the dark state is quantified by the mixing angle θ: tan θ = Ω1/Ω2. To reduce losses
due to non-adiabaticity we aim to satisfy the adiabaticity criterion |θ| √
Ω21 + Ω2
2.
The description so far has ignored losses due to Rydberg state decay and finite laser
linewidths. A shorter sequence with a higher |θ| is less sensitive to these losses. Thus a
balance must be struck when choosing the appropriate sequence length.
When the |0〉 → |r〉 transfer is attempted, imperfections and errors cause scattering
off |e〉, which results in population in 5S1/2. After ideal transfer from |0〉 → |r〉population also ends up in 5S1/2, due to Rydberg state decay. Since the experiment
does not have the timing resolution to distinguish the decay processes the STIRAP
transfer efficiency is instead measured by investigating the process |0〉 → −|r〉 → |0〉.After this “double STIRAP” process 0.83+0.05
−0.06 population resided in |0〉 (Higgins et al.,
Trapped Rydberg ions 37
Ω1
|Φdark |0 -|r
|Φdark |0 -|r -|r e-iΦ|0
TimeRab
i fre
quen
cy
wait timeR
abi f
requ
ency
Time
Ω2 Ω1
TimeRab
i fre
quen
cy
|Φdark |0 -|r e-iΦ|0
Ω2eiΦ
Ω2 Ω2eiΦΩ1
(a)
Ω2 Ω1
(b)
(c)
Figure 16. STIRAP pulse sequences used for coherent manipulation. The population
transfer from |0〉 → |r〉, Ω2 is applied before Ω1. The evolution of the dark state is
written below the time axes. The coupling strengths Ω1 and Ω2 are varied sinusoidally
in the experiment. In (b), population which decays from |r〉 during the wait time
cannot be returned to |0〉, thus the Rydberg state lifetime is measured by varying
the wait time and measuring the population returned to |0〉. Adapted from (Higgins,
2019).
2017b), indicating a single STIRAP transfer efficiency of 0.91±0.03. This efficiency is
limited by the laser light intensities, laser linewidths and Rydberg state decay rates.
Recently, with reduced the laser linewidths, a STIRAP transfer efficiency ≈ 0.95 is
achieved for the excitation of 42S1/2 in Sr+ ions (Zhang et al., 2020).
5.4.1. Rydberg state lifetime – We incorporate a waiting time between both STIRAP
pulses such that the population of the Rydberg level |r〉 may decay, and hence reducing
the proportion of population which may be returned to |0〉, see Fig. 16(b). By measuring
the double STIRAP efficiency when varying the wait time a lifetime of (2.3+0.5−0.4)µs was
measured for the 42S1/2 state, see Fig. 17. Theory predicts 3.5µs at room temperature.
5.4.2. Imprinting a geometric quantum phase – If a phase difference φ is introduced
between the 306 nm laser pulses the double STIRAP pulse sequence introduces a
geometric phase |0〉 → −|r〉 → e−iφ|0〉. During the sequence the parameters θ and φ are
varied smoothly. The sequence can be described as following a loop in this parameter
space, as shown in Fig. 18(a). The curvature enclosed by this loop gives rise to the
geometric phase φ, which is detected by implementing the |0〉 → e−iφ|0〉 process inside
Trapped Rydberg ions 38
singleSTIRAPsequence
double STIRAP sequence experimental data fit τ = (2.3–0.4) μs theory τ = 3.5 μs
Popu
latio
n in
4D
5/2
Wait time [μs]
00.05
0.2
0.4
0.58
0 2 4 6
+ 0.5
Figure 17. Measurement of 42S1/2 lifetime. The wait time between the STIRAP
transfers |0〉 → −|r〉 and −|r〉 → |0〉 is varied and the population returned to |0〉 is
measured. As the wait time is increased the returned population falls exponentially,
due to Rydberg state decay. Adapted from (Higgins et al., 2017b).
Figure 18. Introduction of a geometric phase during STIRAP sequence. (a) During
the double STIRAP pulse sequence the dark state traces out a closed path in the
parameter space of the mixing angle θ and the laser phase shift φ, the same space
coincides with the Bloch sphere spanned by |0〉 and |r〉. The curvature enclosed by
the path gives rise to a geometric phase. (b) The geometric phase is detected by
conducting a Ramsey experiment between qubit states |1〉 and |0〉, with introduction of
the geometric phase between the pair of π2 pulses. Simulation (red, dashed), measured
data and fit (blue) are shown. As the laser phase shift is varied the resultant geometric
phase varies and the final population in |0〉 oscillates. (c) Using φ = π the double
STIRAP pulse sequence is a single-qubit phase gate, which was characterised using
process tomography. The process matrix is shown. The gate fidelity was 0.78 ± 0.04.
Adapted from (Higgins et al., 2017b).
Trapped Rydberg ions 39
Figure 19. MW dressing of ionic Rydberg states. (a) Energy level scheme for MW
dressing of Rydberg states of Ca+ ions in the strong MW regime, see text for details.
(b) Van der Waals interaction between two 40Ca+ ions in the 65P1/2(mJ = 1/2) state
as a function of their distance R0. (c) Dipole-dipole interaction between ions in MW-
dressed Rydberg states for the 65P1/2(mJ = 1/2) ↔ 65S1/2(mJ = 1/2) transition.
(d) Dipole-dipole interaction for the electronic pair state | − −〉. There is a complete
overlap between numerical calculations and values obtained from Eqn. 46. Adapted
from (Li and Lesanovsky, 2014).
of a Ramsey experiment between the qubit states |1〉 and |0〉 (Fig. 18(b)).
With φ = π the double STIRAP process behaves as the single-qubit phase gate
α|1〉 + β|0〉 → α|1〉 − β|0〉. The fidelity of the gate operation was characterised using
quantum process tomography, the reconstructed process matrix is shown in Fig. 18(c).
We find a fidelity of 0.78 ± 0.04. Dominant limitations are fluctuations in the laser
intensities and frequency and the finite Rydberg state lifetime.
5.5. Two-ion entangling Rydberg interaction
In this section, we discuss gate operations based on the dipole blockade
mechanism (Comparat and Pillet, 2010; Saffman et al., 2010) between two trapped ions
in MW-dressed Rydberg states. Rydberg ions do not exhibit permanent dipoles and the
van der Waals interaction between a pair of singly-charged ions is 64 times weaker as
compared to that between a pair of neutral Rydberg atoms at the same distance (see
Table 1 and Fig. 19(b-d)). Thus MW fields are used to generate oscillating dipoles
and to enable resonant dipole-dipole interactions. Two MW coupling schemes using a
single-frequency MW field (Li et al., 2013; Li and Lesanovsky, 2014) and a bichromatic
MW field (Muller et al., 2008) (Sec. 6.3) have been proposed. Here, we consider the
former in which the interaction potential for the j-th ion (j ∈ 1, 2) is written as
Trapped Rydberg ions 40
VMW(rj) = −eE1ε1 · rj cos(ω1t), with E1, ε1 and ω1 the amplitude, the polarization
vector and the frequency of the MW electric field. In the strong MW coupling regime
considered here, the dynamics of the MW interaction occurs in time scales significantly
shorter than the ions’ oscillation period and the ion-laser interaction time. Two Rydberg
states with opposite sign of polarisability are considered, e.g., a n′S and a nP level with
αn′S > 0 and αnP < 0 respectively (Fig. 19(a)). The Hamiltonian of the ion at the
position rj is given by
HMW(rj) = ∆S|S〉j〈S|j + ∆P|P〉j〈P|j +ΩMW
2(|S〉j〈P|j + |P〉j〈S|j), (44)
where ΩMW = E1d1 is the Rabi frequency of the MW driven transition with the
nP↔ n′S transition dipole moment d1 = −e〈P|yi|S〉, where yi is the y-coordinate of the
Rydberg electron position for the i-th ion when the MW electric field polarisation aligned
along the y axis. ∆P and ∆S denote the detuning of the MW frequency with respect to
the n′S and the nP energy levels respectively. By diagonalizing this Hamiltonian, one
obtains the MW-dressed states
|±〉j =1√
1 + C2±
(C±|P〉j + |S〉j), (45)
where, C± =∆−±√
Ω2MW+∆2
−ΩMW
is controlled by the MW field parameters and ∆± =
∆P ± ∆S. These dressed states exhibit polarisablility α± = (C2±αnP + αn′S)/(1 + C2
±).
A proper choice of the MW field amplitude allows for tailoring the polarisability of
the dressed state such that the energy shifts due to the large polarisability of Rydberg
states (Eqn. 24-26) are cancelled out. For instance, for n′ = n and |C±| ≈ 0.68, one
obtains α± ≈ 0. Under this condition, the secular trapping frequencies of the excited
ion are identical to those of the ion in low-lying states, i.e., the shifts due to the large
polarisability of Rydberg states given in Eqns. 24- 26 are suppressed.
The resonant dipole-dipole interaction between the two ions can be written as (Li
and Lesanovsky, 2014)
Vdd(±) ≈ e2
4πε0R30
(d2
+Π+ + d2−Π−
d2±
), (46)
where R0 is the inter-ion distance and Π+ = |+〉1 〈+|1 ⊗ |+〉2 〈+|2 and Π− =
|−〉1 〈−|1⊗|−〉2 〈−|2 denote the projection operators. The interaction strength depends
on d± = |d1|C±e(1+C2
±), and thus is tunable by the MW field parameters. Figure 19(b-d) shows
calculated van der Waals and dipole-dipole interactions for two trapped Rydberg Ca+
ions enhanced using the above technique. In these calculations, the MW Rabi frequency
ΩMW = 2π × 400 MHz, ∆S = 2π × 136 MHz and ∆P = 2π × 293 MHz are used, which
give rise to zero polarisability of the dressed Rydberg |−〉 state. Note that the dipole-
dipole interaction does not cause mixing between Rydberg states of different mJ in the
strong MW driving regime described here. The total angular momentum projection of
Trapped Rydberg ions 41
Figure 20. Interactions between two Rydberg ions. (a) and (c) The energy of the
|RR〉 is shifted by the dipole-dipole interaction between Rydberg ions. (b) and (d)
Rabi oscillations between the ground state and the Rydberg state for one ion (green)
and two ions (red and blue) as a function of excitation pulse length. The excitation to
the |RR〉 state is suppressed at certain detuning of the MW field.
the two ions m(1)J + m
(2)J = 1 and the magnetic quantum number is preserved in the
65P1/2(mJ = 1/2)→ 65S1/2(mJ = 1/2) transition.
Such a dipole-dipole interaction has been recently measured between two Sr+
Rydberg ions using microwave radiation, resonant between |S〉 = 46S1/2 ↔ |P 〉 =
46P1/2 (Zhang et al., 2020). In that experiment, the dipole-dipole interaction between
the MW-dressed states |+〉 = 1√2(|S〉 + |P 〉) and |−〉 = 1√
2(|S〉 − |P 〉) caused a
Rydberg blockade effect, which prevented both ions being excited to Rydberg state
|+〉 simultaneously (Fig. 20). With Rydberg excitation by STIRAP, both ions could be
excited to |+〉 and the interaction allowed an entangling two-ion conditional phase gate
to be implemented. This gate was implemented in 700 ns with 78% fidelity characterised
using quantum process tomography.
6. Future prospects for Rydberg ion crystals
The prominence of Rydberg ions as a novel platform for quantum optics experiments
derives from the possibility for precisely controlling strongly correlated many-body
systems. In this section, we give five specific examples of theoretical studies
that explore such collective effects in trapped Rydberg ions. We choose
these examples such that they cover a few application fields within the scope of this
Trapped Rydberg ions 42
review, illustrating how techniques and properties described in the previous sections
are applied. We note that a wide range of theoretical studies for Rydberg physics in
cold atoms and ions can be considered. These include fast gate operations (Sec. 6.1)
and mode shaping techniques (Sec. 6.2) in the realm of quantum computing, quantum
simulators for coherent spin dynamics and excitation transfer (Sec. 6.3) and spin-spin
interactions (Sec. 6.4), and finally investigation of non-equilibrium dynamics using
Rydberg ions (Sec. 6.5).
6.1. Fast entangling operations using electric field pulses
Beyond the experiment mentioned in Sec. 5.5, an alternative protocol has been proposed
to exploit Rydberg ions for fast entangling operations (Vogel et al., 2019). In this scheme,
the state-dependent force is driven by electric pulses that are a few hundred times faster
than the period of ion motional modes. Laser-less gate operations which have been
thus far demonstrated use either static (Khromova et al., 2012) or dynamic magnetic
gradients (Harty et al., 2016; Warring et al., 2013; Weidt et al., 2016) on the spin states
of ions. But the scheme proposed in (Vogel et al., 2019) takes advantage of large electric
field gradients and fast electric pulses as an established technology in Paul traps, as
follows.
Two ions in a Paul trap are acted on by an electric pulse with amplitude f(t) = f0
and pulse duration T . This pulse displaces the ions out of their equilibrium positions
along the trap axis, introduces an induced electric dipole force and excites vibrational
modes of the collective motion (Fig. 21). The electronic basis states for which the phase
is controlled are |αβ〉 = |↓↓〉, |↓↑〉, |↑↓〉, |↑↑〉, with state-dependent collective
frequencies ωαβj with the mode index j ∈ 1, 2, where αβ denotes the internal states
of individual ions, i.e., the ground state or the Rydberg state. Rydberg excitation in the
ion crystal manifests itself in an additional electric potential seen by the adjacent ion,
which causes asymmetric vibration around the centre-of-mass of the crystal due to a
difference of effective masses (Home, 2016; Morigi and Walther, 2001). The large, state-
dependent polarisability of Rydberg states plays a key role by modifying the trapping
frequencies (Eqns. 24-26), and thus the phase acquired by each ion under the act of this
electric kick depends on the ion internal state.
The Hamiltonian of the system is written in terms of the state-dependent creation
a†j ≡ (aαβj )† and annihilation aj ≡ aαβj operators (Vogel et al., 2019)
Hp =∑αβ=↑,↓
(2∑j=1
ωαβj a†j aj + V αβ0
)Παβ. (47)
Here, V αβ0 is a potential term that depends on the equilibrium positions of the ions and
Παβ = |α〉1 〈α|1 ⊗ |β〉2 〈β|2 is the projection operator. The Hamiltonian of the driven
motion due to the electric kick is given by
Hd(t) =∑αβ
[2∑j=1
(Fαβj (t) aj + h.c.) + f(t) Zαβ
c
]Παβ. (48)
Trapped Rydberg ions 43
Figure 21. Schematic of the state-dependent phase accumulation for Rydberg ions
shuttled in a harmonic potential. Time evolution (from left to right) of the ion
wavepacket under the act of a fast electric kick with field-sensitive internal states.
The trapping frequency for the ion in the Rydberg state ω↑ (red) is different from that
for the ground state ω↓ (grey). Colour code: green – fast electric kick that displaces
the ion out of its equilibrium position, dark red – accumulated state-dependent phase
difference between the Rydberg and the ground state, which is π in this case, blue –
coherent motional excitation, which can be suppressed using certain pulse shapes.
Adapted from (Vogel et al., 2019).
In the first term, the state-dependent kick Fαβj (t) acting on the vibrational mode
describes the interaction of the electric pulse with the ion crystal, see also (Cirac
and Zoller, 2000; Garcıa-Ripoll et al., 2003, 2005). Coherent excitations of vibrational
modes is controlled by applying proper pulse amplitude and duration, as experimentally
demonstrated in (Bowler et al., 2012; Kaushal et al., 2020; Walther et al., 2012).
Moreover, impulsive electric pulses of sub-ns resolution have been used in a “bang-
bang” control of single ions with up to 10 000 phonons (Alonso et al., 2016). The second
term in Eqn. 48 is proportional to the crystal centre Zαβc and leads to non-zero phase
evolution only for ion crystals with a single Rydberg excitation.
The total phase accumulated on each of the four basis states is given by φαβ = ϕαβ1 +
ϕαβ2 + Φαβe , where ϕαβ1 and ϕαβ2 denote the contributions of the two vibrational modes
and Φαβe results from the crystal centre displacement. The entangling operation is
controlled only by the shape of the electric pulse (f0 and T ) and the common mode
frequencies (ωαβj ). To realise a two-ion controlled phase gate, the phase difference
φ↑↑ − φ↓↓ = π is required, where φ↓↓ = φ↑↓ = φ↓↑ is satisfied and no residual excitation
in phonon modes generated. The result of these calculations for a two-ion crystal of
Ca+ ions is shown in Fig. 22(a-c). By tuning the experimental parameters γ and the
two collective motional modes, arbitrary phase rotations can be realised.
A remarkable feature of this gate is the possibility for simultaneous improvement
of the gate fidelity and its speed using complex electric pulses. This has been calculated
for a case of “bang-bang” control with three kicks as shown in Fig. 22(c-e). In addition,
optimal control algorithms (Caneva et al., 2011; Furst et al., 2014; Rach et al., 2015)
Trapped Rydberg ions 44
0.05 0.10 0.50 1 5
1
1−F
10−1
10−2
10−3
10−4
10−5
T [µs]
(c)
(d) pz
z
n= 36n= 64
×1.5 · 103
t
f(t)(e)
γ [106 V/m2]
φ↑↑
−φ↑↓
7π
01
5π
3π
π
1−F
10−1
10−2
10−3
10−4
10−5
0 1 2 3 4 5
n=36n=50n=64
(b)
(a) φ↑↑ − φ↓↓
Figure 22. Phase and fidelity calculated for two-ion gate operation using fast electric
pulses. (a) Relative phase between states |↑↑〉 and |↑↓〉. (b) Infidelity as a function of γ,
the gradient of static electric field of the Paul trap, shown for Rydberg states of 40Ca+
with the principal quantum numbers n = 36, 50 and 64. At a given γ, the electric kick
shape can be chosen such that φ↑↑−φ↓↓ = π is satisfied (dashed dark red) and residual
phonon numbers is minimised. (c) Entanglement fidelity (solid curves) and Rydberg
state lifetime-limited fidelity (dashed lines) as a function of gate duration for 36P
(black) and 64P (red) states with 65 µs and 370 µs lifetimes respectively (Glukhov et al.,
2013). The red square (with yellow frame) in (c) indicates a bang-bang control: three
consecutive kicks improve the fidelity to 99.9% for n = 64 at 60 ns operation speed.
(d) and (e) Phase space trajectories and field amplitudes for a constant pulse (green,
scaled by 1.5 × 103) and the waveform composed of three kicks (yellow). Adapted
from (Vogel et al., 2019).
can be used for computing required electric pulses as well as laser pulses for exciting
Rydberg states. It is worth nothing that this scheme uses axial modes and electric kicks
along the trap axis, and the extension of the technique for radial modes or combination
of radial and axial modes requires synchronization of the electric kick with the phase of
the RF drive, as implemented in (Jacob et al., 2016).
6.2. Mode shaping in linear ion crystals by Rydberg excitations
Rydberg excitation of an ion in a chain manifests itself as a drastic change in
the vibrational mode structure of the crystal. Consequently, spatially localised
modes are generated in the sub-crystals isolated by excited ions, see Fig. 23 (Li
et al., 2013). The collective modes are described by the phonon Hamiltonian Hph =∑Nα=1 ωα(a†αaα + 1/2), see Sec. 3.2, where the eigenfrequency ωα is calculated by
Trapped Rydberg ions 45
Figure 23. (a) Schematic for mode shaping in a linear ion crystal in which sub-
crystals of ion pairs in electronically low-lying (blue) states are isolated between ions
in Rydberg (green) states. Using laser-induced spin-dependent forces, quantum gate
operations can be executed on the two sub-crystals in parallel. (b) and (c) Vibrational
modes shown by the modulus of the normal mode eigenvectors j for the m-th ion in
a linear crystal with and without mode shaping respectively. Here, in a crystal of
100 Ca+ ions the 45-th, 48-th and 53-th, 56-th ions are excited to the Rydberg nP1/2
state. The black dashed lines in (c) indicates the part of the spectrum related to the
ion configuration shown in (a). The Rydberg ions significantly reshape the vibrational
mode structure and form localized modes on the two subcrystals as depicted in the
inset of (c). Adapted from (Li et al., 2013).
diagonalising the corresponding Hessian matrix (Li et al., 2013). Thus, sub-crystals
isolated between the Rydberg ions can be employed to perform certain gate
operations in parallel. As a particular example, the fidelity of two two-qubit conditional
phase flip gates that are executed in parallel on different subcrystals in the same ion
chain was explored (Li et al., 2013).
The basic principles of the above technique were studied in a linear, mixed ion
crystal of 40Ca+ and 40Ca2+ ions (Feldker et al., 2014; Kwapien et al., 2007). The
modification of the crystal mode structure owing to different charge-to-mass ratios of
these ions leads to motional modes that are not orthogonal to the centre-of-mass modes
of a pure crystal of 40Ca+ (Fig. 24). In a chain consisting of two 40Ca+ ions and
one 40Ca2+ ion, this has been observed for the radial modes, except for the radial
mode with the 40Ca2+ ion at the centre position (Feldker et al., 2014) (Fig. 24(a)).
More importantly, it has been shown that in a mixed crystal consisting of five 40Ca+
and one 40Ca2+ ion motional modes of sub-crystals of 40Ca+ ions can be excited
separately (Fig. 24(b)).
Trapped Rydberg ions 46
Figure 24. (a) Measured (dots) and calculated (lines) motional frequencies for a 3-ion
crystal with two 40Ca+ ions and one 40Ca+2 ion with corresponding modes depicted
in (i-iii). For comparison, the dashed line shows the simulated frequency of the zigzag
mode in a crystal without 40Ca+2 (iv). (b) Fluorescence images of excited local modes
in a 6-ion crystal of 40Ca+ ions including one 40Ca+2 ion, which is dark. The data
and the simulation demonstrate tailoring of radial modes by the 40Ca+2 ion. Adapted
from (Feldker et al., 2014).
6.3. Energy transfer quantum simulation
Transport of energy excitations using dipole-dipole interactions has an important
role in light-harvesting processes (van Amerongen et al., 2000), in neighbouring
interactions in solid-state quantum dots (Kagan et al., 1996) and in resonant excitation
and de-excitation processes in molecular aggregates (Saikin et al., 2013). In ultracold
Rydberg atoms, energetic disorders and decoherences can be introduced by laser
interaction with a neutral background gas with potential applications in quantum
simulation of energy excitation dynamics (Schonleber et al., 2015). Simulation
of energy transfer along a protein chain in biomolecules in DNA systems has been
proposed (P lodzien et al., 2018) as a specific example of polaron phenomena (Casteels
et al., 2011). The observation of dipole-mediated energy transfer in laser-excited
Rydberg atoms has been used to develop a non-destructive imaging technique (Gunter
et al., 2013).
In a chain of trapped ions excited to Rydberg states, the internal dynamics can
be mapped into an effective spin-1/2 system, which can be engineered using dipolar
interactions between them (Muller et al., 2008). As elaborated in Sec. 5.5, the
resonant dipole-dipole interaction between Rydberg ions is achieved by MW-dressing of
Rydberg states. Here, we consider the MW scheme using a dichromatic MW potential
VMW(rj) = −eE1ε1 · rj cos(ω1t)− eE2ε2 · rj cos(ω2t) to generate an admixture of three
Rydberg states as shown in Fig. 25. In a reference frame which rotates at ω1 and
ω2 and using the rotating-wave approximation, the internal and external dynamics are
Trapped Rydberg ions 47
n’ P
E
Δ1n S
n P
Ω1 , ω1
Ω2 , ω2
Δ2
Ω2 , ω2
Δ’2
S’
n P
Figure 25. Schematic of MW dressing of ionic Rydberg states using a linearly
polarised bichromatic MW field that couples one S with two P levels one of which
is far detuned. After an adiabatic elimination of the latter (depicted by the green
box), one obtains an effective two-level system indicated with S′ and nP states. This
scheme can be used for tailoring the polarisability of Rydberg ions, see also the strong
coupling scheme in Sec. 5.5. Adapted from (Muller et al., 2008).
decoupled, and thus the full Hamiltonian for N interacting ions can be written as
Hions = Hph +N∑i
Hele,i +Hint−ext +Hdd. (49)
Here, Hph =∑
α=x,y,z
∑Nm=1 ωα,ma†α,maα,m denotes the external oscillation dynam-
ics (Sec. 3.2), in which generalised forms of state-dependent creation a†α,m and anni-
hilation aα,m operators are used. The charge-dipole interaction manifests itself in the
position-dependent electric field seen by each ion along the trap axis z. This gives rise
to additional terms in the Hamiltonian of a single ion located at the minimum of the
static electric field (Eqn. 18).
Hele,i =p2
2me
+ V (|r|) + Vls(r)− eγ′ cos(ΩRFt)(x2i − y2
i )
+ e
(γ +
e
8πε0
N∑j 6=i
1
|Z(0)i − Z(0)
j |3
)(x2
i + y2i − 2z2
i )
(50)
The term Hint−ext in Eqn. 49 describes the coupling of external and internal
dynamics, which arises from dipole-charge interactions and the quadrupolar static field
of the Paul trap. The shifts due to state-dependent trapping frequencies that are used
for implementing fast gate operations in Sec. 6.1 are negligible for the total interaction
Hions (Eqn. 49). The dipole-dipole interaction in Eqn. 49 is given by (Muller et al.,
2008)
Hdd =−1
4πε0
N∑j 6=i
d(i)z d
(j)z
|Z(0)i − Z(0)
j |3, (51)
Trapped Rydberg ions 48
with the dipole operator d(j)z for the j-th ion in the set of S′ and nP states given by
dz =1
3
(−Ω1
∆1d1 cos(ω1t) d2e−iω2t
d2eiω2t 0
). (52)
Note that the electric field at the ions’ equilibrium positions denoted by Z(0)j for the
j-th ion is cancelled out by the act of the Coulomb force and the trapping force, but
the position-dependent electronic interactions stem from the couplings described by
Eqns. 50 and 51.
The position-dependent energies of the total Hamiltonian (Eqns. 49-51) represent
inhomogeneity both in the exchange couplings and effective magnetic field in the
spin dynamics language. This feature manifests itself in the position-dependent MW
detuning ∆′2(Z(0)j ) for each ion in the chain (Fig. 26(a)). A linear chain of ions is initially
prepared by a series of π-laser pulses such that the ion located at the most left position
is in the |↑〉 ≡ |n, S〉 state while all others are in the |↓〉 ≡ |n, P 〉 state (Fig. 26(b)).
For simplicity, cases in which only resonant dipole-dipole interactions contribute were
studied. The temporal evolution of the internal states of ions under the Hamiltonian
Hint = Hele,i +Hdd given in Eqn. 50 and 51 leads to the excitation transfer after a given
time (Fig. 26(b)). Numerical calculations for energy transfer dynamics in a chain of ten
ions are shown in Fig. 27.
6.4. Planar ion crystals with Rydberg ions for quantum simulation of frustrated
quantum magnets
Having discussed mode shaping techniques using Rydberg excitations in a linear ion
crystal (Sec. 6.2), we now turn to their extension to two-dimensional ion crystals
for quantum simulation of spin-spin interactions. A particular example of such an
experiment is proposed in (Nath et al., 2015) to emulate topological quantum spin
liquids using the spin-spin iterations between ions in hexagonal plaquettes in a 2D ion
crystal (Fig. 28(a)). The role of a Rydberg ion is to modify the phonon mode spectrum
such that constrained dynamics required for realising the specific Hamiltonian of the
Balents-Fisher-Girvin (BFG) model (Balents et al., 2002) using a Kagome lattice are
reached. This model is described by (Nath et al., 2015)
Hs = Jz
(∑i∈7
Siz
)2
+J⊥2
∑〈ij〉
(Si+S
j− + Si−S
j+
), (53)
where Sjα (α ∈ +,−, z) is the spin operator acting on the site j with one spin-1/2
degree of freedom. The first term accounts for Ising interactions for each hexagonal-
plaquette with Jz(> 0) and the second term denotes the nearest-neighbour spin exchange
interaction. In this model, the source of the frustration is a macroscopic classical ground-
state degeneracy caused by local hexagonal plaquette constraints, i.e.,∑
i∈7 Siz = 0
(Nath et al., 2015).
Trapped Rydberg ions 49
Figure 26. Illustration of the excitation transport along a linear chain of ions. (a)
Schematic level diagrams for a five-ion crystal with position-dependent energy shifts for
each MW-coupled Rydberg ion. The states are labelled as |↓〉 ≡ nP and |↑〉 ≡ nS. The
energy shifts for the state |↓〉 manifest themselves in the inhomogeneous distribution
of the MW-field detuning ∆′2(Z
(0)j ), where Z
(0)j is the equilibrium position of the j-
th ion along the trap axis, see Fig. 25 for the MW coupling scheme. (b) The initial
configuration (orange circles) with the first ion in the state |↑〉 while all the other ions
are in the state |↓〉. After a certain time, the Rydberg excitation has transported to
the right end of the chain (black open circles). k indicates the ions’ position in the
chain. Adapted from (Muller et al., 2008).
To generate such hexagonal-plaquette spin-spin interactions, spin-dependent optical
dipole forces interact with engineered collective vibrational modes of a 2D ion crystal.
The internal level structure of ions is identified by three long-lived states: the state |1〉is coupled to an excited state |e〉, which is used to pin the ion as required for tailoring
phononic modes, the states |2〉 ≡ |↓〉 and |3〉 ≡ |↑〉 encode the spin-1/2 states of the
BFG model. Laser-mediated spin-spin interactions in trapped ions have been extensively
studied, for instance see (Lanyon et al., 2011). A pair of counter-propagating Raman
laser beams with wavevectors k1z and k2z and frequencies ω1 and ω2 are used to generate
spin-spin couplings (Fig. 28(a)) and state-dependent optical shifts in the spin states |↓〉and |↑〉 with an energy separation of ω↓↑.
The schematic of such an experiment is illustrated in Fig. 28. Note that here the
secular trapping frequencies conform ωX,Y ωZ . Ions at sites 1 and 2 are prepared
in the state |1〉 and are superimposed with additional laser fields which either generate
optical lattices or excite the ions to Rydberg states. In either way, the result is the local
modification of ions’ secular trapping frequencies in the direction perpendicular to the
crystal plane. In the former case, the transversal trapping frequency ωZ is modified by
the harmonic frequency of the local potential of the optical lattices applied, whereas in
the latter, the modification is given in terms of the polarisability of the Rydberg state
Trapped Rydberg ions 50
Figure 27. Calculations for a spin excitation transport in a chain of ten trapped ions.
The ion located at the site k = 1 is initially excited to the state |↑〉, while all others
are in the state |↓〉. The excitation is coherently transferred from the first ion to the
last one. The scale of the interaction energy is given by J = −2Mω2Zd
22/9e
2, with the
Rydberg transition dipole matrix element d2. The time evolution of the expectation
values 〈Sz〉 for the first and the last ions after time t = 1.8/J are shown in the inset.
Adapted from (Muller et al., 2008).
excited as given in Eqn. 26.
The effective spin-spin interaction for this hexagonal plaquette is written as (Nath
et al., 2015)
HSS =∑i<j
J ijz Siz ⊗ Sjz +
∑i<j
J ij⊥(Six ⊗ Sjx + Siy ⊗ Sjy
). (54)
Here, the coupling matrix is J ijz =∑N
m=1(4ΩiIΩ
jIηimη
jm)/δm, where Ωi
I = ΩiI(|↓〉)−Ωi
I(|↑〉)and the two photon Rabi frequency for the Raman beams is ΩI = Ω1Ω2/∆ with the
detuning of ∆1 ≈ ∆2 Ω1,2 for each laser, and ηim is the Lamb-Dicke parameter for the
i-th ion for the motional mode m (Eqn. 11). For the phonon mode m, the frequency
difference of the Raman beams ωI is tuned close to the phonon frequencies ωm and is
shown with δm = ωI − ωm in Fig. 28(b). Note that plaquette pattern implies that each
of the six spins occupying the corners of a hexagon interact with every other spin in the
hexagon with the same strength regardless of their separations.
Normalised phonon eigenvectors bm = bim and interaction strengths calculated
for single and two plaquette structures are shown in Fig. 29. The eigenvector bi1 for
the lowest transversal mode (TM) of the ion crystal accounts for the oscillation of the
central ion, where the ions in the outer hexagonal ring oscillate with same amplitude
and are in-phase. Note that in these calculations it has been assumed that the Raman
lasers excite phonons only transiently and the ion-light field interaction remains inside
the Lamb-Dicke regime (Sec. 3.3). The slight imperfections from the BFG plaquette
Trapped Rydberg ions 51
Figure 28. (a) Schematic of the setup for hexagonal-plaquette spin-spin interactions.
Laser beams with wavevectors k1z and k2z and frequencies ω1 and ω2 are used for
driving Raman transitions shown in (b). Ions at sites 1 and 2 are pinned using
far-detuned laser fields (yellow arrow) either by optical lattices OL1 and OL2 or by
Rydberg excitations. (b) Energy level diagram and laser driven transitions. Raman
lasers (blue and red arrows) are detuned by δm with respect to the frequency of the
m-th motional mode, and generate state-dependent optical shifts in the spin states
|2〉 ≡ |↓〉 and |3〉 ≡ |↑〉 with an energy separation of ω↓↑. Adapted from (Nath et al.,
2015).
interactions arise from the off-resonant coupling to higher TMs.
6.5. Structural phase transitions controlled by Rydberg excitations
Transitions from linear to zigzag configurations in an ion crystal are second-order phase
transitions in the thermodynamic limit, and they can be controlled by the trapping
frequencies and the inter-ion distance (Fishman et al., 2008). Experimental observations
were enabled by adiabatically ramping trap parameters (Pyka et al., 2013; Ulm et al.,
2013), and defect formations due to the quenching of the system are well described by
the Kibble-Zurek mechanism (del Campo et al., 2010; Kibble, 1976; Zurek, 1985).
An exciting alternative for such classical control is using Rydberg ions for triggering
structural phase transitions with two advantages: the phase transition dynamics can
be controlled fast and coherently as compared to the ion motion inside the trap. In
addition, the strong coupling between the internal and external dynamics of trapped
Rydberg manifest itself in collective effects. Here, we consider the theory proposal in
which Rydberg excitation of a single ion in a chain of three ions lead to a structural phase
transition from a linear to zigzag configuration (Li and Lesanovsky, 2012). A large kick
due to the Rydberg-induced structural change affects the Franck-Condon factors that
quantify couplings between different vibrational states of the two potential surfaces.
Trapped Rydberg ions 52
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
Figure 29. (a) The eigenvector bi1 for the lowest transversal mode (TM) of the ion
crystal. The inset shows the equilibrium position of 7 ions in a Paul trap with trapping
frequencies ωX = ωY = 2π × 1 MHz and ωZ = 2π × 3 MHz. The central ion, labelled
with 2, experiences an additional force due to the optical lattices or Rydberg excitation
and hence modified trapping frequency ω′Z = 2π × 2.7 MHz. (b) The dimensionless
spin-spin couplings Jij/ω0, where ω0 =(k2
I/8M)
(ωx/ΩI)2, with δ1 = 2π × 10 kHz,
the detuning from the lowest TM. (c) The eigenvector for the lowest transversal mode
in a 19-ion crystal in the presence of a pinning lattice on ion 13. (d) J ijz /ω0 calculated
for trapping frequencies ωX = ωY = 2π × 1 MHz and ωZ = 2π × 3.5 MHz and the
pinned ion experiences an effective shallow trap along the z axis with a frequency of
ω′Z(1) = 2π × 2.1 MHz. (e) The eigenvectors of the two lowest transversal modes
in a trapped 19-ion crystal with trapping frequencies ωX = ωY = 2π × 1 MHz and
ωZ = 2π × 3.5 MHz in the presence of pinning lattices or Rydberg excitations on ions
13 and 14. The modified trapping frequencies of ions 13 and 14 along the z axis are
ω′Z(1) = 2π× 2.1 MHz and ω′
Z(2) = 2π× 2.45 MHz respectively. (f) J ijz /ω0 calculated
for Ω2I/Ω
1I = 1.1 and δ = 2π × 20kHz. Adapted from (Nath et al., 2015).
7. Outlook
Experiments with trapped Rydberg ions have shown potential of this new platform
for quantum computing. At the time of this publication, a two-ion gate using energy
Trapped Rydberg ions 53
(a)
(b)
(c)(i) (ii)
(iii)
𝛾 𝑐𝑛
[107V/m
2]
𝑋𝑟−𝑋𝑔
[nm]
𝛾 [107 V/m2]
phononnumbers
principal quantum number
Figure 30. (a) Structural configurations for a three-ion crystal with and without
central ion excited to Rydberg state as indicated in red. The crystal configuration
depends on the principal quantum number of the excited state and the gradient of the
trapping static electric field γ. Note that γc denotes a critical value at which linear
to zig-zag phase transition occurs. The configurations in (i) and (iii) are identical,
whereas they are state-dependent in (ii). (b) Displacement |Xr − Xg| of the centre-
of-mass potential for a ground state and excited three-ion crystal as shown in (a)
versus the trapping field gradient γ. (c) Franck-Condon factors for transitions from
the vibrational ground state of the ground state potential surface. Adapted from (Li
and Lesanovsky, 2012).
shifts between microwave-dressed Rydberg states was demonstrated with a gate time
of about 0.7 µs and fidelity of 78% (Sec. 5.5), which can in principle be improved by
overcoming some technical issues (Zhang et al., 2020). Such a promising performance
is to be compared with those achievable in trapped ions in their low-lying states
and in neutral cold atomic gases in Rydberg states. In state-of-the-art trapped
ion experiments, two-ion gate fidelities better than 99.9% with gate times of about
10 µs were demonstrated (Ballance et al., 2016), followed by progresses in multipartite
entangling operations (Kaufmann et al., 2017a) and in reducing the gate time (Schafer
et al., 2018; Shapira et al., 2018; Wong-Campos et al., 2017). In cold atomic gases,
the Rydberg blockade effect has enabled two-atom gate fidelities of about 80% for a
few µs gate time (Jau et al., 2016; Maller et al., 2015) with the advantage of qubit
number scalability in optical arrays (Saffman, 2016). These two systems are thus far
more advanced for such an application as compared to Rydberg ions; however, novel
methods in which the interplay between Coulomb and Rydberg interactions are used
will possibly close this gap in the future, e.g., see the proposal in Sec. 6.1.
Preparing trapped Rydberg ions in circular states (Hulet and Kleppner,
1983), which feature significantly longer lifetimes and excessively large magnetic dipole
moments, can be regarded as the next experimental milestone. The long coherence time
of neutral circular Rydberg states in the range of a few ms has enabled fundamental
cavity quantum electrodynamics experiments (Haroche and Raimond, 2006), and
Trapped Rydberg ions 54
has been used to implement quantum sensors for magnetic and electric fields with
unprecedented accuracy (Dietsche et al., 2019; Facon et al., 2016). In such experiments,
suppression of thermal phonon transitions can be achieved by using cryogenic traps,
leading to even longer lifetimes of Rydberg circular states.
One obvious direction to explore is using Rydberg ions as sensitive detectors
for static and RF electric fields as well as MW fields. In addition, using circular
states allows for measurements in which the phase shift due to the interaction of ions
with these external fields can be accumulated for an extremely long time. To improve
signal-to-noise ratios of such sensors, dynamical decoupling pulse sequences or dressing
techniques can be designed for a given measurement using single or an entangled pair
of ions. For instance, a single Rydberg ion inside a segmented micro trap can be used
for mapping out a MW field emitted from a trap-integrated waveguide antenna. Micro-
fabricated ion traps with segmented electrodes will allow for high resolution sensing
by accurately characterising the position of ions. In addition, sensing fields outside
of a trapping apparatus is of technological relevance. For this pupose, a single-ion-
nanoscope can be used (Jacob et al., 2016) to extract ions from a Paul trap, steer them
in the vicinity of a probe surface and focus the ion beam into to a few nm area. Exciting
ions to Rydberg states before this extraction procedure results in enhancement in force
detection, measured by ion-energy-loss spectroscopy.
Hybrid systems of trapped ions immersed in ultracold atomic
gases (Tomza et al., 2019) have led to remarkable advances in collision studies (Hall
et al., 2011; Ratschbacher et al., 2012), controlled chemistry (Sikorsky et al., 2018;
Willitsch, 2017; Wolf et al., 2017) and quantum simulation (Bissbort et al., 2013;
Hempel et al., 2018). In this way, a quantum interface may be built between ultracold
atoms and trapped ions (Secker et al., 2017). It may even be possible to engineer
repulsive interactions between atoms and ions, that prevent Langevin collisions between
the two and thus prevent so-called micromotion induced heating in hybrid atom-ion
systems (Meir et al., 2016; Rouse and Willitsch, 2017; Secker et al., 2016). Recently,
interactions between ultracold Rydberg atoms and trapped ions have been observed
in experiments (Ewald et al., 2019; Haze et al., 2019). A different hybrid ion-atom
system directly produced from an ultracold ensemble of Rb atoms was employed for the
observation of a single-ion-induced Rydberg blockade effect for Rydberg atoms (Engel
et al., 2018). Quantum control at the single-particle level enabled by the Rydberg
excitation of an atom or an ion in a hybrid system (Wang et al., 2020) can be extended
to trapped Rydberg ions superimposed by neutral atomic gases.
Rydberg excitation in cold trapped ions has been experimentally and
theoretically explored over the last decade and opens doors to novel
applications in quantum computing, quantum simulation and sensing.
REFERENCES 55
Acknowledgements
A. M. acknowledges the funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under the Marie Sk lodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 796866
(Rydion). Additional funding from DFG SPP 1929 “Giant interactions in Rydberg
Systems” (GiRyd) and the ERA-Net QuantERA for ERyQSenS project is acknowledged.
We thank G. Higgins for his contributions, R. Gerritsma for helpful comments, and B.
Lekitsch and T. A. Sutherland for careful reading of the manuscript.
References
J. Alonso, F. M. Leupold, Z. U. Soler, M. Fadel, M. Marinelli, B. C. Keitch,
V. Negnevitsky, and J. P. Home. Generation of large coherent states by bang-bang
control of a trapped-ion oscillator. Nat. Comm., 7:11243, 2016.
J. Andrijauskas, J. Vogel, A. Mokhberi, and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Precise determination
of ionisation energy using Rydberg series spectroscopy of cold trapped 40Ca+
ions. in
preparation, 2020.
O. Asvany, K. M. T. Yamada, S. Brunken, A. Potapov, and S. Schlemmer. Experimental
ground-state combination differences of CH+5 . Science, 347:1346, 2015.
M. Aymar, C. H. Greene, and E. Luc-Koenig. Multichannel Rydberg spectroscopy of
complex atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys., 68:1015, 1996.
P. Bachor, T. Feldker, J. Walz, and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Addressing single trapped ions
for Rydberg quantum logic. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 49:154004, 2016.
L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and S. M. Girvin. Fractionalization in an easy-axis Kagome
antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B, 65:224412, 2002.
C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas. High-Fidelity
Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:
060504, 2016.
J. D. Baltrusch, C. Cormick, G. De Chiara, T. Calarco, and G. Morigi. Quantum
superpositions of crystalline structures. Phys. Rev. A, 84:063821, 2011.
J. D. Baltrusch, C. Cormick, and G. Morigi. Quantum quenches of ion Coulomb crystals
across structural instabilities. Phys. Rev. A, 86:032104, 2012.
G. Bao, A. Wickenbrock, S. Rochester, W. Zhang, and D. Budker. Suppression
of the nonlinear Zeeman effect and heading error in earth-field-range alkali-vapor
magnetometers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:033202, 2018.
D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, S. de Leseleuc, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys. Synthetic three-
dimensional atomic structures assembled atom by atom. Nature, 561:79, 2018.
I. Baumgart, J. M. Cai, A. Retzker, M. B. Plenio, and C. Wunderlich. Ultrasensitive
magnetometer using a single atom. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:240801, 2016.
K. Bergmann, N. V. Vitanov, and B. W. Shore. Perspective: Stimulated Raman
adiabatic passage: The status after 25 years. J. Chem. Phys., 142:170901, 2015.
REFERENCES 56
D. J. Berkeland, J. D. Miller, J. C. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland.
minimization of micromotion in a Paul trap. J. Appl. Phys., 83:5025, 1998.
A. Bermudez, X. Xu, R. Nigmatullin, J. O’Gorman, V. Negnevitsky, P. Schindler,
T. Monz, U. G. Poschinger, C. Hempel, J. Home, F. Schmidt-Kaler, M. Biercuk,
R. Blatt, S. Benjamin, and M. Muller. Assessing the progress of trapped-ion processors
towards fault-tolerant quantum computation. Phys. Rev. X, 7:041061, 2017.
H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S.
Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin. Probing many-body
dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature, 551:579, 2017.
U. Bissbort, D. Cocks, A. Negretti, Z. Idziaszek, T. Calarco, F. Schmidt-Kaler,
W. Hofstetter, and R. Gerritsma. Emulating Solid-State Physics with a Hybrid
System of Ultracold Ions and Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:080501, 2013.
R. B. Blakestad, C. Ospelkaus, A. P. VanDevender, J. M. Amini, J. Britton, D. Leibfried,
and D. J. Wineland. High-Fidelity Transport of Trapped-Ion Qubits through an X-
Junction Trap Array. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:153002, 2009.
R. Blatt and C. Roos. Quantum simulations with trapped ions. Nat. Phys., 8:37, 2012.
R. Blatt and D. Wineland. Entangled states of trapped atomic ions. Nature, 453:1008,
2008.
I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbene. Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum
gases. Nat Phys, 8:267, 2012.
K.-J. Boller, A. Imamoglu, and S. E. Harris. Observation of electromagnetically induced
transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett., 66:2593, 1991.
J. J. Bollinger, D. J. Wineland, and D. H. E. Dubin. Nonneutral ion plasmas and
crystals, laser cooling, and atomic clocks. Physics of Plasmas, 1:1403, 1994.
R. Bowler, J. Gaebler, Y. Lin, T. R. Tan, D. Hanneke, J. D. Jost, J. P. Home,
D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland. Coherent Diabatic Ion Transport and Separation
in a Multizone Trap Array. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:080502, 2012.
M. F. Brandl, M. W. van Mourik, L. Postler, A. Nolf, K. Lakhmanskiy, R. R. Paiva,
S. Moller, N. Daniilidis, H. Haffner, V. Kaushal, T. Ruster, C. Warschburger,
H. Kaufmann, U. G. Poschinger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, P. Schindler, T. Monz, and
R. Blatt. Cryogenic setup for trapped ion quantum computing. Rev. Sci. Instrum.,
87:113103, 2016.
M. Brune, P. Nussenzveig, F. Schmidt-Kaler, F. Bernardot, A. Maali, J. M. Raimond,
and S. Haroche. From Lamb shift to light shifts: Vacuum and subphoton cavity fields
measured by atomic phase sensitive detection. Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:3339, 1994.
M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Hagley, J. M. Raimond, and
S. Haroche. Quantum Rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:1800, 1996.
C. D. Bruzewicz, R. McConnell, J. Chiaverini, and J. M. Sage. Scalable loading of a
two-dimensional trapped-ion array. Nat. Commun., 7:13005, 2016.
REFERENCES 57
C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. Sage. Trapped-ion quantum
computing: progress and challenges. Appl. Phys. Rev., 6:021314, 2019.
T. Caneva, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero. Chopped random-basis quantum
optimization. Phys. Rev. A, 84:022326, 2011.
T. Cantat-Moltrecht, R. Cortinas, B. Ravon, P. Mehaignerie, S. Haroche, J. M.
Raimond, M. Favier, M. Brune, and S. Sayrin. Long-lived circular Rydberg states of
laser-cooled Rubidium atoms in a cryostat. arXiv:2002.02893, 2020.
W. Casteels, J. Tempere, and J. T. Devreese. Polaronic properties of an ion in a Bose-
Einstein condensate in the strong-coupling limit. J. Low Temp. Phys., 162:266, 2011.
M. Cetina, A. Grier, J. Campbell, I. Chuang, and V. Vuletic. Bright source of cold ions
for surface-electrode traps. Phys. Rev. A, 76:041401, 2007.
M. Chwalla, J. Benhelm, K. Kim, G. Kirchmair, T. Monz, M. Riebe, P. Schindler, A. S.
Villar, W. Hansel, C. F. Roos, R. Blatt, M. Abgrall, G. Santarelli, G. D. Rovera, and
P. Laurent. Absolute Frequency Measurement of the 40Ca+ 4s2S1/2 − 3d2D5/2 Clock
Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:023002, 2009.
M. M. Chwalla. Precision spectroscopy with 40Ca+ ions in a Paul trap. PhD thesis,
University of Innsbruck, 2009.
J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller. Quantum computation with cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev.
Lett., 74:4091, 1995.
J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller. A scalable quantum computer with ions in an array of
microtraps. Nature, 404:579, 2000.
D. Comparat and P. Pillet. Dipole blockade in a cold Rydberg atomic sample. J. Opt.
Soc. Am. B, 27:A208, 2010.
J. Dalibard and C. Cohen-Tannoudji. Doppler effect; Electric fields; Laser beams; Laser
light; Optical Bloch equations; Optical cooling. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6:2023, 1989.
L. E. de Clercq, H.-Y. Lo, M. Marinelli, D. Nadlinger, R. Oswald, V. Negnevitsky,
D. Kienzler, B. Keitch, and J. P. Home. Parallel Transport Quantum Logic Gates
with Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:080502, 2016.
S. de Leseleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. Buchler,
T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys. Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase
of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms. Science, 365:775, 2019.
H. G. Dehmelt. Radiofrequency spectroscopy of stored ions II. Adv. Atom. Mol. Phys.,
5:109, 1969.
H. G. Dehmelt. Experiments with an isolated subatomic particle at rest. Rev. Mod.
Phys., 62:525, 1990.
J. Deiglmayr, H. Herburger, H. Saßmannshausen, P. Jansen, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt.
Precision measurement of the ionization energy of Cs I. Phys. Rev. A, 93:1, 2016.
A. del Campo, G. De Chiara, G. Morigi, M. B. Plenio, and A. Retzker. Structural defects
in ion chains by quenching the external potential: The inhomogeneous Kibble-Zurek
mechanism. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:075701, 2010.
REFERENCES 58
E. K. Dietsche, A. Larrouy, S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes.
High-sensitivity magnetometry with a single atom in a superposition of two circular
Rydberg states. 15:326, 2019.
D. P. DiVincenzo. The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation. Fortschritte
der Physik, 48:771, 2000.
G. W. F. Drake and R. A. Swainson. Quantum defects and the 1/n dependence of
Rydberg energies: Second-order polarization effects. Phys. Rev. A, 44:5448, 1991.
D. H. E. Dubin. Theory of structural phase transitions in a trapped coulomb crystal.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 71:2753, 1993.
K. S. E. Eikema, J. Walz, and T. W. Hansch. Continuous wave coherent lyman- α
radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83:3828, 1999.
F. Engel, T. Dieterle, T. Schmid, C. Tomschitz, C. Veit, N. Zuber, R. Low, T. Pfau,
and F. Meinert. Observation of Rydberg blockade induced by a single ion. Phys. Rev.
Lett., 121:193401, 2018.
J. Eschner, G. Morigi, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and R. Blatt. Laser cooling of trapped ions.
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 20:1003, 2003.
N. V. Ewald, T. Feldker, H. Hirzler, H. A. Furst, and R. Gerritsma. Observation of
interactions between trapped ions and ultracold Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett.,
122:253401, 2019.
A. Facon, E. K. Dietsche, D. Grosso, S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and
S. Gleyzes. A sensitive electrometer based on a Rydberg atom in a Schrodinger–cat
state. Nature, 535:262, 2016.
T. Feldker. Rydberg excitation of trapped ions. PhD thesis, University of Mainz, 2016.
T. Feldker, L. Pelzer, M. Stappel, P. Bachor, R. Steinborn, D. Kolbe, J. Walz, and
F. Schmidt-Kaler. Mode shaping in mixed ion crystals of 40Ca2+
and 40Ca+
. Appl.
Phys. B, 114:11, 2014.
T. Feldker, P. Bachor, M. Stappel, D. Kolbe, R. Gerritsma, J. Walz, and F. Schmidt-
Kaler. Rydberg excitation of a single trapped ion. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:173001,
2015.
C. Figgatt, D. Maslov, K. A. Landsman, N. M. Linke, S. Debnath, and C. Monroe.
Complete 3-Qubit Grover search on a programmable quantum computer. Nat.
Commun., 8:1918, 2017.
S. Fishman, G. De Chiara, T. Calarco, and G. Morigi. Structural phase transitions in
low-dimensional ion crystals. Phys. Rev. B, 77:064111, 2008.
C. F. Foot. Atomic Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
N. Friis, O. Marty, C. Maier, C. Hempel, M. Holzapfel, P. Jurcevic, M. B. Plenio,
M. Huber, C. F. Roos, R. Blatt, and B. P. Lanyon. Observation of Entangled States
of a Fully Controlled 20-Qubit System. Phys. Rev. X, 8:021012, 2018.
REFERENCES 59
H. Furst, M. Goerz, U. Poschinger, M. Murphy, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, F. Schmidt-
Kaler, K. Singer, and C. Koch. Controlling the transport of an ion: Classical and
quantum mechanical solutions. New J. Phys., 16:075007, 2014.
J. P. Gaebler, T. R. Tan, Y. Lin, Y. Wan, R. Bowler, A. C. Keith, S. Glancy, K. Coakley,
E. Knill, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland. High-Fidelity Universal Gate Set for 9Be+
Ion Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:060505, 2016.
T. F. Gallagher. Rydberg Atoms. New York: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2005.
F. M. Gambetta, I. Lesanovsky, and W. Li. Exploring nonequilibrium phases of the
generalized Dicke model with a trapped Rydberg-ion quantum simulator. Phys. Rev.
A, 100:022513, 2019.
F. M. Gambetta, W. Li, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and I. Lesanovsky. Engineering NonBinary
Rydberg Interactions via Phonons in an Optical Lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:043402,
2020.
J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll, P. Zoller, and J. I. Cirac. Speed Optimized Two-Qubit Gates with
Laser Coherent Control Techniques for Ion Trap Quantum Computing. Phys. Rev.
Lett., 91:157901, 2003.
J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll, P. Zoller, and J. I. Cirac. Coherent control of trapped ions using
off-resonant lasers. Phys. Rev. A, 71:062309, 2005.
F. Gebert, Y. Wan, F. Wolf, J. C. Heip, and P. O. Schmidt. Detection of motional
ground state population of a trapped ion using delayed pulses. New J. Phys., 18:
013037, 2016.
I. L. Glukhov, E. A. Nikitina, and V. D. Ovsiannikov. Lifetimes of Rydberg states in
ions of the group II elements. Opt. Spectrosc., 115:9, 2013.
C. Gross and I. Bloch. Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices.
Science, 357:995, 2017.
S. Gulde, M. Riebe, G. P. T. Lancaster, C. Becher, J. Eschner, H. Haffner, F. Schmidt-
Kaler, I. L. Chuang, and R. Blatt. Implementation of the DeutschJozsa algorithm on
an ion-trap quantum computer. Nature, 421:48, 2003.
G. Gunter, H. Schempp, M. Robert-de Saint-Vincent, V. Gavryusev, S. Helmrich, C. S.
Hofmann, S. Whitlock, and M. Weidemuller. Observing the Dynamics of Dipole-
Mediated Energy Transport by Interaction-Enhanced Imaging. Science, 342:954, 2013.
H. Haffner, C. F. Roos, and R. Blatt. Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys.
Rep., 469:155, 2008.
F. H. J. Hall, M. Aymar, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, and S. Willitsch. Light-assisted
ion-neutral reactive processes in the cold regime: Radiative molecule formation versus
charge exchange. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:243202, 2011.
L. Hao, Y. Jiao, Y. Xue, X. Han, S. Bai, J. Zhao, and G. Raithel. Transition from
electromagnetically induced transparency to Autler–Townes splitting in cold cesium
atoms. New J. Phys., 20:073024, 2018.
REFERENCES 60
S. Haroche and J. M. Raimond. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons.
Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2006. URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/993568.
S. E. Harris. Electromagnetically Induced Transparency. Phys. Today, 50:36, 1997.
T. P. Harty, M. A. Sepiol, D. T. C. Allcock, C. J. Ballance, J. E. Tarlton, and D. M.
Lucas. High-Fidelity Trapped-Ion Quantum Logic Using Near-Field Microwaves.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:140501, 2016.
S. Haze, J. Wolf, L. Deiß, M. Wang, G. Raithel, and J. Hecker Denschlag. Stark
spectroscopy of Rydberg atoms in an atom-ion hybrid trap. arXiv:1901.11069, 2019.
C. Hempel, C. Maier, J. Romero, J. McClean, T. Monz, H. Shen, P. Jurcevic, B. P.
Lanyon, P. Love, R. Babbush, A. Aspuru-Guzik, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos. Quantum
Chemistry Calculations on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator. Phys. Rev. X, 8:
031022, 2018.
R. Hendricks, D. M. Grant, P. F. Herskind, A. Dantan, and M. Drewsen. An all-optical
ion-loading technique for scalable microtrap architectures. Applied Physics B, 88:507,
2007.
N. Henkel, R. Nath, and T. Pohl. Three-Dimensional Roton Excitations and Supersolid
Formation in Rydberg-Excited Bose-Einstein Condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:
195302, 2010.
G. Higgins. A single trapped Rydberg ion. Springer International Publishing, Berlin,
2019.
G. Higgins. Private communication, 2020.
G. Higgins, W. Li, F. Pokorny, C. Zhang, F. Kress, C. Maier, J. Haag, Q. Bodart,
I. Lesanovsky, and M. Hennrich. Single Strontium Rydberg Ion Confined in a Paul
trap. Phys. Rev. X, 7:021038, 2017a.
G. Higgins, F. Pokorny, C. Zhang, Q. Bodart, and M. Hennrich. Coherent control of a
single trapped Rydberg ion. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:220501, 2017b.
G. Higgins, F. Pokorny, C. Zhang, and M. Hennrich. Highly polarizable Rydberg ion in
a Paul trap. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:153602, 2019.
G. Higgins, C. Zhang, F. Pokorny, H. Parke, E. Jansson, S. Salim, and M. Hennrich.
Observation of effects due to an atom’s electric quadrupole polarizability.
arXiv:2005.01957, 2020.
A. Hinton, M. Perea-Ortiz, J. Winch, J. Briggs, S. Freer, D. Moustoukas, S. Powell-Gill,
C. Squire, A. Lamb, C. Rammeloo, B. Stray, G. Voulazeris, L. Zhu, A. Kaushik, Y.-
H. Lien, A. Niggebaum, A. Rodgers, A. Stabrawa, D. Boddice, S. R. Plant, G. W.
Tuckwell, K. Bongs, N. Metje, and M. Holynski. A portable magneto-optical trap
with prospects for atom interferometry in civil engineering. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A,
375:20160238, 2017.
W. Hofstetter, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin. High-Temperature
Superfluidity of Fermionic Atoms in Optical Lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:220407,
2002.
REFERENCES 61
J. P. Home. Quantum science and metrology with mixed-species ion chains. Adv. At.
Mol. Opt. Phys., 62:231, 2016.
J. P. Home and A. M. Stean. Electrode Configurations for Fast Separation of Trapped
Ions. Quantum Inf. Comput., 6(4):289, 2006.
D. Hucul, M. Yeo, S. Olmschenk, C. Monroe, W. K. Hensinger, and J. Rabchuk. On
the transport of atomic ions in linear and multidimensional ion trap arrays. Quantum
Inf. Comput., 8:501, 2008.
R. G. Hulet and D. Kleppner. Rydberg atoms in “Circular” states. Phys. Rev. Lett.,
51:1430, 1983.
N. Huntemann, C. Sanner, B. Lipphardt, C. Tamm, and E. Peik. Single-ion atomic
clock with 3× 10−18 systematic uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:063001, 2016.
L. Isenhower, E. Urban, X. L. Zhang, A. T. Gill, T. Henage, T. A. Johnson, T. G.
Walker, and M. Saffman. Demonstration of a neutral atom controlled-NOT quantum
gate. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:010503, 2010.
G. Jacob, K. Groot-Berning, S. Wolf, S. Ulm, L. Couturier, S. T. Dawkins, U. G.
Poschinger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer. Transmission microscopy with
nanometer resolution using a deterministic single ion source. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:
043001, 2016.
D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cote, and M. D. Lukin. Fast Quantum
Gates for Neutral Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:2208, 2000.
D. F. V. James. Quantum dynamics of cold trapped ions with application to quantum
computation. Appl. Phys. B, 66:181, 1998.
Y. Y. Jau, A. M. Hankin, T. Keating, I. H. Deutsch, and G. W. Biedermann. Entangling
atomic spins with a Rydberg-dressed spin-flip blockade. Nat. Phys., 12:71, 2016.
D. Jiang, B. Arora, M. S. Safronova, and C. W. Clark. Blackbody-radiation shift in
a 88Sr+
ion optical frequency standard. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 42:154020,
2009.
P. Jurcevic, H. Shen, P. Hauke, C. Maier, T. Brydges, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon,
M. Heyl, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos. Direct Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase
Transitions in an Interacting Many-Body System. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:080501, 2017.
C. R. Kagan, C. B. Murray, and M. G. Bawendi. Long-range resonance transfer of
electronic excitations in close-packed CdSe quantum-dot solids. Phys. Rev. B, 54:
8633, 1996.
A. A. Kamenski and V. D. Ovsiannikov. Formal approach to deriving analytically
asymptotic formulas for static polarizabilities of atoms and ions in Rydberg states. J.
Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 47:095002, 2014.
H. Kaufmann, S. Ulm, G. Jacob, U. Poschinger, H. Landa, A. Retzker, M. B. Plenio,
and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Precise Experimental Investigation of Eigenmodes in a Planar
Ion Crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:263003, 2012.
REFERENCES 62
H. Kaufmann, T. Ruster, C. T. Schmiegelow, M. A. Luda, V. Kaushal, J. Schulz, D. von
Lindenfels, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger. Scalable creation of long-lived
multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:150503, 2017a.
H. Kaufmann, T. Ruster, C. T. Schmiegelow, M. A. Luda, V. Kaushal, J. Schulz, D. von
Lindenfels, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger. Fast ion swapping for quantum-
information processing. Phys. Rev. A, 95:052319, 2017b.
V. Kaushal, B. Lekitsch, A. Stahl, J. Hilder, D. Pijn, C. Schmiegelow, A. Bermudez,
M. Muller, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. Poschinger. Shuttling-based trapped-ion
quantum information processing. AVS Quantum Sci., 2:014101, 2020.
A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pichler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar,
S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic,
and M. D. Lukin. Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a
programmable Rydberg simulator. Nature, 568:207, 2019.
A. Khromova, C. Piltz, B. Scharfenberger, T. F. Gloger, M. Johanning, A. F. Varon,
and C. Wunderlich. Designer Spin Pseudomolecule Implemented with Trapped Ions
in a Magnetic Gradient. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:220502, 2012.
T. W. B. Kibble. Topology of cosmic domains and strings. J. Phys. A, 9:1387, 1976.
D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland. Architecture for large-scale ion-trap
quantum computer. Nature, 417:709, 2002.
E. Knill. Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices. Nature, 434:39, 2005.
D. Kolbe, M. Scheid, and J. Walz. Triple resonant four-wave mixing boosts the yield
of continuous coherent vacuum ultraviolet generation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:063901,
2012.
I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis. A subfemtotesla
multichannel atomic magnetometer. Nature, 422:596, 2003.
M. Koschorreck, M. Napolitano, B. Dubost, and M. W. Mitchell. High resolution
magnetic vector-field imaging with cold atomic ensembles. Applied Physics Letters,
98:074101, 2011.
S. Kotler, N. Akerman, Y. Glickman, A. Keselman, and R. Ozeri. Single-ion quantum
lock-in amplifier. Nature, 473:61, 2011.
A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and NIST ASD Team. NIST Atomic
Spectra Database (v. 5.5.6), https://physics.nist.gov/asd. National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD., 2018.
T. Kwapien, U. Eichmann, and W. Sandner. Sympathetic cooling of laser-produced
doubly charged ions in a few-ion crystal. Phys. Rev. A, 75:063418, 2007.
H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de Leseleuc, T. Macrı, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys.
Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising
models. Nature, 534:667, 2016.
V. Lange, M. A. Khan, U. Eichmann, and W. Sandner. Rydberg states of the strontium
ion. Zeitschrift fur Physik D: Atoms, Molecules and Clusters, 18:319, 1991.
REFERENCES 63
B. P. Lanyon, C. Hempel, D. Nigg, M. Muller, R. Gerritsma, F. Zahringer, P. Schindler,
J. T. Barreiro, M. Rambach, G. Kirchmair, M. Hennrich, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and
C. F. Roos. Universal digital quantum simulation with trapped ions. Science, 334:
57, 2011.
D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland. Quantum dynamics of single
trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75:281, 2003.
D. R. Leibrandt, R. J. Clark, J. Labaziewicz, P. Antohi, W. Bakr, K. R. Brown, and
I. L. Chuang. Laser ablation loading of a surface-electrode ion trap. Phys. Rev. A,
76:055403, 2007.
I. Lesanovsky, B. Olmos, and J. P. Garrahan. Thermalization in a Coherently Driven
Ensemble of Two-Level Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:100603, 2010.
W. Li. Private communication, 2017.
W. Li and I. Lesanovsky. Electronically Excited Cold Ion Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett.,
108:023003, 2012.
W. Li and I. Lesanovsky. Entangling quantum gate in trapped ions via Rydberg
blockade. Appl. Phys. B: Lasers and Optics, 114:37, 2014.
W. Li, I. Mourachko, M. W. Noel, and T. F. Gallagher. Millimeter-wave spectroscopy
of cold Rb Rydberg atoms in a magneto-optical trap: Quantum defects of the ns, np,
and nd series. Phys. Rev. A, 67:052502, 2003.
W. Li, A. W. Glaetzle, R. Nath, and I. Lesanovsky. Parallel execution of quantum gates
in a long linear ion chain via Rydberg mode shaping. Phys. Rev. A, 87:052304, 2013.
D. M. Lucas, A. Ramos, J. P. Home, M. J. McDonnel, S. Nakayama, J.-P. Stacey, S. C.
Webster, D. N. Stacey, and A. M. Steane. Photoionization for Ca ion trapping. Phys.
Rev. A, 69:012711, 2004.
M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and
P. Zoller. Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic
Atomic Ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:037901, 2001.
F. G. Major, V. N. Gheorghe, and G. Werth. Charged Particle Traps. Springer, Berlin
and Heidelberg, 2005.
P. Maletinsky, S. Hong, M. S. Grinolds, B. Hausmann, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth,
M. Loncar, and A. Yacoby. A robust scanning diamond sensor for nanoscale imaging
with single Nitrogen-vacancy centres. 7(5):320, 2012.
K. M. Maller, M. T. Lichtman, T. Xia, Y. Sun, M. J. Piotrowicz, A. W. Carr,
L. Isenhower, and M. Saffman. Rydberg-blockade controlled-NOT gate and
entanglement in a two-dimensional array of neutral-atom qubits. Phys. Rev. A, 92:
022336, 2015.
Z. Meir, T. Sikorsky, R. Ben-shlomi, N. Akerman, Y. Dallal, and R. Ozeri. Dynamics
of a Ground-State Cooled Ion Colliding with Ultracold Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:
243401, 2016.
REFERENCES 64
F. Merkt and R. N. Zare. Lifetimes of Rydberg states. J. Chem. Phys., 101:3495, 1994.
H. J. Metcalf and P. van der Straten. Laser Cooling and Trapping. Springer, New York,
1999.
A. Mokhberi, J. Vogel, J. Andrijauskas, P. Bachor, J. Walz, and F. Schmidt-Kaler.
Determination of quantum defect for the Rydberg P series of Ca II. J. Phys. B: At.
Mol. Opt. Phys., 52:214001, 2019.
C. Monroe, R. Raussendorf, A. Ruthven, K. R. Brown, P. Maunz, L.-M. Duan, and
J. Kim. Large-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory
and photonic interconnects. Phys. Rev. A, 89:022317, 2014.
T. Monz, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Chwalla, D. Nigg, W. A. Coish, M. Harlander,
W. Hansel, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt. 14-Qubit Entanglement: Creation and
Coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:130506, 2011.
G. Morigi and H. Walther. Two-species coulomb chains for quantum information. Eur.
Phys. J. D, 13:261, 2001.
G. Morigi, J. Eschner, and C. H. Keitel. Ground State Laser Cooling Using
Electromagnetically Induced Transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:4458, 2000.
M. Muller, L. Liang, I. Lesanovsky, and P. Zoller. Trapped Rydberg ions: From spin
chains to fast quantum gates. New J. Phys., 10:093009, 2008.
A. H. Myerson, D. J. Szwer, S. C. Webster, D. T. C. Allcock, M. J. Curtis, G. Imreh,
J. A. Sherman, D. N. Stacey, A. M. Steane, and D. M. Lucas. High-fidelity readout
of trapped-ion qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:200502, 2008.
R. Nath, M. Dalmonte, A. W. Glaetzle, P. Zoller, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and R. Gerritsma.
Hexagonal plaquette spin–spin interactions and quantum magnetism in a two-
dimensional ion crystal. New J. Phys., 17:065018, 2015.
T. Noel, M. R. Dietrich, N. Kurz, G. Shu, J. Wright, and B. B. Blinov. Adiabatic
passage in the presence of noise. Phys. Rev. A, 85:023401, 2012.
D. Ohl de Mello, D. Schaffner, J. Werkmann, T. Preuschoff, L. Kohfahl, M. Schlosser,
and G. Birkl. Defect-free assembly of 2d clusters of more than 100 single-atom
quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122:203601, 2019.
B. Olmos, M. Muller, and I. Lesanovsky. Thermalization of a strongly interacting 1D
Rydberg lattice gas. New J. Phys., 12:013024, 2010.
S. Olmschenk, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, D. Hayes, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe.
Quantum Teleportation Between Distant Matter Qubits. Science, 323:486, 2009.
A. Osterwalder and F. Merkt. Using high Rydberg states as electric field sensors. Phys.
Rev. Lett., 82:1831, 1999.
W. Paul. Electromagnetic traps for charged and neutral particles. Rev. Mod. Phys., 62:
531, 1990.
M. Pawlak and H. R. Sadeghpour. Rydberg spectrum of a single trapped ca+ ion: A
floquet analysis. Phys. Rev. A, 101:052510, 2020.
REFERENCES 65
M. Penasa, S. Gerlich, T. Rybarczyk, V. Metillon, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, S. Haroche,
L. Davidovich, and I. Dotsenko. Measurement of a microwave field amplitude beyond
the standard quantum limit. Phys. Rev. A, 94:022313, 2016.
M. Peper, F. Helmrich, J. Butscher, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, F. Merkt, and
J. Deiglmayr. Precision measurement of the ionization energy and quantum defects
of 39K i. Phys. Rev. A, 100:012501, 2019.
M. P lodzien, T. Sowinski, and S. Kokkelmans. Simulating polaron biophysics with
Rydberg atoms. Sci. Rep., 8:9247, 2018.
E. L. Pollock and J. P. Hansen. Statistical mechanics of dense ionized matter. II.
equilibrium properties and melting transition of the crystallized one-component
plasma. Phys. Rev. A, 8:3110, 1973.
U. Poschinger, A. Walther, M. Hettrich, F. Ziesel, and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Interaction
of a laser with a qubit in thermal motion and its application to robust and efficient
readout. Appl. Phys. B, 107:1159, 2012.
U. G. Poschinger, G. Huber, F. Ziesel, M. Deiß, M. Hettrich, S. A. Schulz, K. Singer,
G. Poulsen, M. Drewsen, R. J. Hendricks, and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Coherent
manipulation of a 40Ca+
spin qubit in a micro ion trap. Appl. Phys. B: At. Mol.
Opt. Phys., 42:154013, 2009.
G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, M. Boninsegni, I. Lesanovsky, and P. Zoller. Strongly correlated
gases of Rydberg-dressed atoms: Quantum and classical dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.,
104:223002, 2010.
K. Pyka, J. Keller, H. L. Partner, R. Nigmatullin, T. Burgermeister, D. M. Meier,
K. Kuhlmann, A. Retzker, M. B. Plenio, W. H. Zurek, A. del Campo, and T. E.
Mehlstaubler. Topological defect formation and spontaneous symmetry breaking in
ion coulomb crystals. Nat. Commun., 4:2291, 2013.
N. Rach, M. M. Muller, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero. Dressing the chopped-random-
basis optimization: A bandwidth-limited access to the trap-free landscape. Phys. Rev.
A, 92:062343, 2015.
J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche. Manipulating quantum entanglement with
atoms and photons in a cavity. Rev. Mod. Phys., 73:565, 2001.
L. Ratschbacher, C. Zipkes, C. Sias, and M. Kohl. Controlling chemical reactions of a
single particle. Nat. Phys., 8:649, 2012.
A. Retzker, R. C. Thompson, D. M. Segal, and M. B. Plenio. Double Well Potentials
and Quantum Phase Transitions in Ion Traps. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:260504, 2008.
M. Riebe, H. Haffner, C. F. Roos, W. Hansel, J. Benhelm, G. P. T. Lancaster, T. W.
Korber, C. Becher, F. Schmidt-Kaler, D. F. V. James, and R. Blatt. Deterministic
quantum teleportation with atoms. Nature, 429:734, 2004.
W. Ritz. On a new law of series spectra. Astrophys. J., 28:237, 1908.
REFERENCES 66
C. Roos, T. Monz, K. Kim, M. Riebe, H. Haffner, D. James, and R. Blatt. Nonlinear
coupling of continuous variables at the single quantum level. Phys. Rev. A, 77:040302,
2008.
C. F. Roos. Controlling the quantum state of trapped ions. PhD thesis, Leopold-Franzens
University of Innsbruck, 2000.
C. F. Roos, M. Chwalla, K. Kim, M. Riebe, and R. Blatt. Designer atoms for quantum
metrology. Nature, 443:316, 2006.
I. Rouse and S. Willitsch. Superstatistical Energy Distributions of an Ion in an Ultracold
Buffer Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:143401, 2017.
T. Ruster, C. T. Schmiegelow, H. Kaufmann, C. Warschburger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and
U. G. Poschinger. A long-lived Zeeman trapped-ion qubit. Appl. Phys. B, 122:254,
2016.
T. Ruster, H. Kaufmann, M. A. Luda, V. Kaushal, C. T. Schmiegelow, F. Schmidt-
Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger. Entanglement-Based dc Magnetometry with Separated
Ions. Phys. Rev. X, 7:031050, 2017.
J. R. Rydberg. On the structure of the line-spectra of the chemical elements. Philos.
Mag. Series 5, 29:331, 1890.
M. Saffman. Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions:
progress and challenges. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 49:202001, 2016.
M. Saffman and T. G. Walker. Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole
interactions of optically trapped Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. A, 72:022347, 2005.
M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer. Quantum information with Rydberg atoms.
Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:2313, 2010.
M. S. Safronova and U. I. Safronova. Blackbody radiation shift, multipole
polarizabilities, oscillator strengths, lifetimes, hyperfine constants, and excitation
energies in Ca+. Phys. Rev. A, 83:012503, 2011.
S. Saikin, A. Eisfeld, S. Valleau, and A. Aspuru-Guzik. Photonics meets excitonics:
natural and artificial molecular aggregates. Nanophotonics, 2:21, 2013.
V. M. Schafer, C. J. Ballance, K. Thirumalai, L. J. Stephenson, T. G. Ballance, A. M.
Steane, and D. M. Lucas. Fast quantum logic gates with trapped-ion qubits. Nature,
555:75, 2018.
P. Schauß, J. Zeiher, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, M. Cheneau, T. Macrı, T. Pohl, I. Bloch,
and C. Gross. Crystallization in Ising quantum magnets. Science, 347:1455, 2015.
P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, T. Monz, V. Nebendahl, D. Nigg, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich,
and R. Blatt. Experimental Repetitive Quantum Error Correction. Science, 332
(6033):1059, 2011.
F. Schmidt-Kaler, H. Haffner, M. Riebe, S. Gulde, G. P. T. Lancaster, T. Deuschle,
C. Becher, C. F. Roos, J. Eschner, and R. Blatt. Realization of the Cirac–Zoller
controlled-NOT quantum gate. Nature, 422:408, 2003.
REFERENCES 67
F. Schmidt-Kaler, F. Feldker, D. Kolbe, J. Walz, M. Muller, P. Zoller, W. Li, and
I. Lesanovsky. Rydberg excitation of trapped cold ions: a detailed case study. New
J. Phys., 13:075014, 2011.
D. W. Schonleber, A. Eisfeld, M. Genkin, S. Whitlock, and S. Wuster. Quantum
Simulation of Energy Transport with Embedded Rydberg Aggregates. Phys. Rev.
Lett., 114:123005, 2015.
T. Secker, R. Gerritsma, A. W. Glaetzle, and A. Negretti. Controlled long-range
interactions between Rydberg atoms and ions. Phys. Rev. A, 94:013420, 2016.
T. Secker, N. Ewald, J. Joger, H. Furst, T. Feldker, and R. Gerritsma. Trapped Ions in
Rydberg-Dressed Atomic Gases. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:263201, 2017.
M. Seng, U. Eichmann, V. Lange, T. F. Gallagher, and W. Sandner. Microwave
ionization of Rydberg states of the Barium ion. Eur. Phys. J. D, 3:21, 1998.
Y. Shapira, R. Shaniv, T. Manovitz, N. Akerman, and R. Ozeri. Robust Entanglement
Gates for Trapped-Ion Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:180502, 2018.
T. Sikorsky, Z. Meir, R. Ben-shlomi, N. Akerman, and R. Ozeri. Spin-controlled atomion
chemistry. 9:920, 2018.
P. Silvi, G. Morigi, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero. Crossover from Classical to Quantum
Kibble-Zurek Scaling. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:225701, 2016.
W. L. Slattery, G. D. Doolen, and H. E. DeWitt. Improved equation of state for the
classical one-component plasma. Phys. Rev. A, 21:2087, 1980.
J. L. Sørensen, D. Møller, T. Iversen, J. B. Thomsen, F. Jensen, P. Staanum, D. Voigt,
and M. Drewsen. Efficient coherent internal state transfer in trapped ions using
stimulated Raman adiabatic passage. New J. Phys., 8:261, 2006.
R. C. Stoneman, D. S. Thomson, and T. F. Gallagher. Microwave multiphoton
transitions between Rydberg states of potassium. Phys. Rev. A, 37:1527, 1988.
M. Tomza, K. Jachymski, R. Gerritsma, A. Negretti, T. Calarco, Z. Idziaszek, and P. S.
Julienne. Cold hybrid ion-atom systems. Rev. Mod. Phys., 91:035001, 2019.
S. Ulm, J. Roßnagel, G. Jacob, C. Degnther, S. T. Dawkins, U. G. Poschinger,
R. Nigmatullin, A. Retzker, M. B. Plenio, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer.
Observation of the KibbleZurek scaling law for defect formation in ion crystals. Nat.
Commun., 4:2290, 2013.
H. van Amerongen, L. Valkunas, and R. van Grondelle. Photosynthetic Excitons. World
Scientific, Singapore, 2000.
M. Vengalattore, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, L. E. Sadler, and D. M. Stamper-
Kurn. High-Resolution Magnetometry with a Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate. Phys.
Rev. Lett., 98:200801, 2007.
J. Vogel, W. Li, A. Mokhberi, I. Lesanovsky, and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Shuttling of Rydberg
ions for fast entangling operations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:153603, 2019.
REFERENCES 68
A. Walther, F. Ziesel, T. Ruster, S. T. Dawkins, K. Ott, M. Hettrich, K. Singer,
F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. Poschinger. Controlling Fast Transport of Cold Trapped
Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:080501, 2012.
L. Wang, G. Deiß, M. Raithel, and J. Hecker Denschlag. Optical control of atom-ion
collisions using a Rydberg state. accepted to: J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 2020.
U. Warring, C. Ospelkaus, Y. Colombe, K. R. Brown, J. M. Amini, M. Carsjens,
D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland. Techniques for microwave near-field quantum
control of trapped ions. Phys. Rev. A, 87:013437, 2013.
W. Wasilewski, K. Jensen, H. Krauter, J. J. Renema, M. V. Balabas, and E. S. Polzik.
Quantum Noise Limited and Entanglement-Assisted Magnetometry. Phys. Rev. Lett.,
104:133601, 2010.
S. Weidt, J. Randall, S. C. Webster, K. Lake, A. E. Webb, I. Cohen, T. Navickas,
B. Lekitsch, A. Retzker, and W. K. Hensinger. Trapped-Ion Quantum Logic with
Global Radiation Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:220501, 2016.
H. Weimer, R. Low, T. Pfau, and H. P. Buchler. Quantum Critical Behavior in Strongly
Interacting Rydberg Gases. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:250601, 2008.
M. Weimer, H.and Muller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. Buchler. A Rydberg
quantum simulator. Nat. Phys., 6:382, 2010.
T. Wilk, A. Gaetan, C. Evellin, J. Wolters, Y. Miroshnychenko, P. Grangier, and
A. Browaeys. Entanglement of Two Individual Neutral Atoms Using Rydberg
Blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:010502, 2010.
S. Willitsch. Chemistry with controlled ions. Adv. Chem. Phys., 162:307, 2017.
D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof.
Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions.
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan., 103:259, 1998.
J. Wolf, M. Deiß, A. Krukow, E. Tiemann, B. P. Ruzic, Y. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, P. S.
Julienne, and J. H. Denschlag. State-to-state chemistry for three-body recombination
in an ultracold Rubidium gas. Science, 358:921, 2017.
S. Wolf, D. Studer, K. Wendt, and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Efficient and robust photo-
ionization loading of Beryllium ions. Appl. Phys. B, 124:30, 2018.
J. D. Wong-Campos, S. A. Moses, K. G. Johnson, and C. Monroe. Demonstration of
Two-Atom Entanglement with Ultrafast Optical Pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:230501,
2017.
C. Wunderlich, T. Hannemann, T. Krber, H. Hffner, C. Roos, W. Hnsel, R. Blatt,
and F. Schmidt-Kaler. Robust state preparation of a single trapped ion by adiabatic
passage. J. Mod. Opt., 54:1541, 2007.
R. Yamazaki, H. Sawamura, K. Toyoda, and S. Urabe. Stimulated Raman spectroscopy
and the determination of the D-fine-structure level separation in 40Ca+
. Phys. Rev.
A, 77:012508, 2008.
REFERENCES 69
C. Zhang, F. Pokorny, W. Li, G. Higgins, A. Poschl, I. Lesanovsky, and M. Hennrich.
Submicrosecond entangling gate between trapped ions via Rydberg interaction.
Nature, 580:345, 2020.
J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov,
Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe. Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition
with a 53-qubit quantum simulator. Nature, 551:601, 2017.
W. H. Zurek. Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium? Nature, 317:505, 1985.