Interoperability Drivers and Inhibitors
Bernard BaraniAttacheacute - DG INFSO-D
BernardBaraniceceuint
ETSI Workshop ldquoSOS InteroperabilityrdquoSophia Antipolis 26 May 2005
NB The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the European Commission
Interoperability
There is no ldquoOne Size fits allrdquo definition for Interoperability
Framework Directive service focus
Software Directive focus on portability of codes across various machines and environments
Copyright Directive
EICTA White Paper
DRM High Level Group
rArr Not a new notion but rapidly evolving and acquiring new dimensions
What is changingOnce a notion for ICT industry experts eg ATMMPEGIPDVB co-existence or compatibility But
an exploding number of heterogeneous network infrastructures context dependent (still)
a plethora of (web) services with multiple combinationbundling capabilities
a bombing of (networked) Consumer Electronic devices with most of the functionalities unknown to the user
Threats and vulnerability of IP based systems compared to former TDM based systems
rArr With networked ICT becoming more and more pervasive consumers are becoming intuitively aware of what ldquointeroperabilityrdquo means (eg DVD regional codes fairplay DRM on i_podhellip) This may be the real change ie where the pressure on interoperable solutions may be expected
Interoperability
bull At the NetworkDevice Levelndash WirelessMobileFixedCableISPBroadcasting
networks need to interoperate
bull At the Serviceapplication Levelndash Services need to run across homogeneous or
heterogeneous networks
bull At the MediaContent Levelndash Different media formats must coexist
Interoperability multifaceted
Interoperability is not an end in itself It has to answer policy challenges- Ensuring smooth technological transitions- Creating opportunities for disruption and innovation- Contributing to setting the right collaborative standards and widest market footprint- Optimising for innovation through accrued competition
Media Centre
PDA
Bluetooth andWi-Fi Phones
Game Console
Video walkmanWeb Tablet
Laptop
Users want their devices to work togetherand share content
Printer
IP STB and PVRTeleworkTelework
Voice and video Voice and video conferencingconferencing
Internet Music and Internet Music and TVvideo everywhereTVvideo everywhere
VoDVoD Video Video streaming music streaming music
download storagedownload storage
Home Home automation automation and Controland Control
TelemedicineTelemedicine
Interoperability amp Home Networks
Interoperability challenge in this context include notably Consumer issues Home Gateway control
Interoperability amp ConvergenceDoes convergence push the case for interoperability
In principle Yes butIn addition to the plethora of technologies It introduces novel
elements of complexity m_payments regulation on contents rights holderhellip
Untested and risky business models more opportunities but more risk
Different sectors (CE mobile broadband broadcast) with different logics reducing customer churn and getting increased revenues mastering content distribution keeping control of established customer base starting completely new laquo opportunity driven raquo businesses (eg Skype)
rArr For some players interoperability insofar as it implies large scale convergence with significant levels of substitution may mean risk of disappearing
Interoperability is it a natural trendStill in the context of convergence
Untested business models risks requirement to protect investments may drive proprietary closed solutions eg music download fragmentation of devices and technologies
Some do however believe that market forces are enough to breakthe walls If you were to ask me which mobile device will take top place for listening to music Id bet on the mobile phone for sure As good as Apple may be I dont believe the success of the iPod is sustainable in the long runldquo (Bill Gates to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)
Some other believe that technology may be used as gatekeeper no real incentive to move towards real interoperability and that legislative and regulatory intervention is needed (eg case of Digital content portability and copy right)
rArr But delicate issue to regulate on nascent markets
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Interoperability
There is no ldquoOne Size fits allrdquo definition for Interoperability
Framework Directive service focus
Software Directive focus on portability of codes across various machines and environments
Copyright Directive
EICTA White Paper
DRM High Level Group
rArr Not a new notion but rapidly evolving and acquiring new dimensions
What is changingOnce a notion for ICT industry experts eg ATMMPEGIPDVB co-existence or compatibility But
an exploding number of heterogeneous network infrastructures context dependent (still)
a plethora of (web) services with multiple combinationbundling capabilities
a bombing of (networked) Consumer Electronic devices with most of the functionalities unknown to the user
Threats and vulnerability of IP based systems compared to former TDM based systems
rArr With networked ICT becoming more and more pervasive consumers are becoming intuitively aware of what ldquointeroperabilityrdquo means (eg DVD regional codes fairplay DRM on i_podhellip) This may be the real change ie where the pressure on interoperable solutions may be expected
Interoperability
bull At the NetworkDevice Levelndash WirelessMobileFixedCableISPBroadcasting
networks need to interoperate
bull At the Serviceapplication Levelndash Services need to run across homogeneous or
heterogeneous networks
bull At the MediaContent Levelndash Different media formats must coexist
Interoperability multifaceted
Interoperability is not an end in itself It has to answer policy challenges- Ensuring smooth technological transitions- Creating opportunities for disruption and innovation- Contributing to setting the right collaborative standards and widest market footprint- Optimising for innovation through accrued competition
Media Centre
PDA
Bluetooth andWi-Fi Phones
Game Console
Video walkmanWeb Tablet
Laptop
Users want their devices to work togetherand share content
Printer
IP STB and PVRTeleworkTelework
Voice and video Voice and video conferencingconferencing
Internet Music and Internet Music and TVvideo everywhereTVvideo everywhere
VoDVoD Video Video streaming music streaming music
download storagedownload storage
Home Home automation automation and Controland Control
TelemedicineTelemedicine
Interoperability amp Home Networks
Interoperability challenge in this context include notably Consumer issues Home Gateway control
Interoperability amp ConvergenceDoes convergence push the case for interoperability
In principle Yes butIn addition to the plethora of technologies It introduces novel
elements of complexity m_payments regulation on contents rights holderhellip
Untested and risky business models more opportunities but more risk
Different sectors (CE mobile broadband broadcast) with different logics reducing customer churn and getting increased revenues mastering content distribution keeping control of established customer base starting completely new laquo opportunity driven raquo businesses (eg Skype)
rArr For some players interoperability insofar as it implies large scale convergence with significant levels of substitution may mean risk of disappearing
Interoperability is it a natural trendStill in the context of convergence
Untested business models risks requirement to protect investments may drive proprietary closed solutions eg music download fragmentation of devices and technologies
Some do however believe that market forces are enough to breakthe walls If you were to ask me which mobile device will take top place for listening to music Id bet on the mobile phone for sure As good as Apple may be I dont believe the success of the iPod is sustainable in the long runldquo (Bill Gates to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)
Some other believe that technology may be used as gatekeeper no real incentive to move towards real interoperability and that legislative and regulatory intervention is needed (eg case of Digital content portability and copy right)
rArr But delicate issue to regulate on nascent markets
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
What is changingOnce a notion for ICT industry experts eg ATMMPEGIPDVB co-existence or compatibility But
an exploding number of heterogeneous network infrastructures context dependent (still)
a plethora of (web) services with multiple combinationbundling capabilities
a bombing of (networked) Consumer Electronic devices with most of the functionalities unknown to the user
Threats and vulnerability of IP based systems compared to former TDM based systems
rArr With networked ICT becoming more and more pervasive consumers are becoming intuitively aware of what ldquointeroperabilityrdquo means (eg DVD regional codes fairplay DRM on i_podhellip) This may be the real change ie where the pressure on interoperable solutions may be expected
Interoperability
bull At the NetworkDevice Levelndash WirelessMobileFixedCableISPBroadcasting
networks need to interoperate
bull At the Serviceapplication Levelndash Services need to run across homogeneous or
heterogeneous networks
bull At the MediaContent Levelndash Different media formats must coexist
Interoperability multifaceted
Interoperability is not an end in itself It has to answer policy challenges- Ensuring smooth technological transitions- Creating opportunities for disruption and innovation- Contributing to setting the right collaborative standards and widest market footprint- Optimising for innovation through accrued competition
Media Centre
PDA
Bluetooth andWi-Fi Phones
Game Console
Video walkmanWeb Tablet
Laptop
Users want their devices to work togetherand share content
Printer
IP STB and PVRTeleworkTelework
Voice and video Voice and video conferencingconferencing
Internet Music and Internet Music and TVvideo everywhereTVvideo everywhere
VoDVoD Video Video streaming music streaming music
download storagedownload storage
Home Home automation automation and Controland Control
TelemedicineTelemedicine
Interoperability amp Home Networks
Interoperability challenge in this context include notably Consumer issues Home Gateway control
Interoperability amp ConvergenceDoes convergence push the case for interoperability
In principle Yes butIn addition to the plethora of technologies It introduces novel
elements of complexity m_payments regulation on contents rights holderhellip
Untested and risky business models more opportunities but more risk
Different sectors (CE mobile broadband broadcast) with different logics reducing customer churn and getting increased revenues mastering content distribution keeping control of established customer base starting completely new laquo opportunity driven raquo businesses (eg Skype)
rArr For some players interoperability insofar as it implies large scale convergence with significant levels of substitution may mean risk of disappearing
Interoperability is it a natural trendStill in the context of convergence
Untested business models risks requirement to protect investments may drive proprietary closed solutions eg music download fragmentation of devices and technologies
Some do however believe that market forces are enough to breakthe walls If you were to ask me which mobile device will take top place for listening to music Id bet on the mobile phone for sure As good as Apple may be I dont believe the success of the iPod is sustainable in the long runldquo (Bill Gates to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)
Some other believe that technology may be used as gatekeeper no real incentive to move towards real interoperability and that legislative and regulatory intervention is needed (eg case of Digital content portability and copy right)
rArr But delicate issue to regulate on nascent markets
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
bull At the NetworkDevice Levelndash WirelessMobileFixedCableISPBroadcasting
networks need to interoperate
bull At the Serviceapplication Levelndash Services need to run across homogeneous or
heterogeneous networks
bull At the MediaContent Levelndash Different media formats must coexist
Interoperability multifaceted
Interoperability is not an end in itself It has to answer policy challenges- Ensuring smooth technological transitions- Creating opportunities for disruption and innovation- Contributing to setting the right collaborative standards and widest market footprint- Optimising for innovation through accrued competition
Media Centre
PDA
Bluetooth andWi-Fi Phones
Game Console
Video walkmanWeb Tablet
Laptop
Users want their devices to work togetherand share content
Printer
IP STB and PVRTeleworkTelework
Voice and video Voice and video conferencingconferencing
Internet Music and Internet Music and TVvideo everywhereTVvideo everywhere
VoDVoD Video Video streaming music streaming music
download storagedownload storage
Home Home automation automation and Controland Control
TelemedicineTelemedicine
Interoperability amp Home Networks
Interoperability challenge in this context include notably Consumer issues Home Gateway control
Interoperability amp ConvergenceDoes convergence push the case for interoperability
In principle Yes butIn addition to the plethora of technologies It introduces novel
elements of complexity m_payments regulation on contents rights holderhellip
Untested and risky business models more opportunities but more risk
Different sectors (CE mobile broadband broadcast) with different logics reducing customer churn and getting increased revenues mastering content distribution keeping control of established customer base starting completely new laquo opportunity driven raquo businesses (eg Skype)
rArr For some players interoperability insofar as it implies large scale convergence with significant levels of substitution may mean risk of disappearing
Interoperability is it a natural trendStill in the context of convergence
Untested business models risks requirement to protect investments may drive proprietary closed solutions eg music download fragmentation of devices and technologies
Some do however believe that market forces are enough to breakthe walls If you were to ask me which mobile device will take top place for listening to music Id bet on the mobile phone for sure As good as Apple may be I dont believe the success of the iPod is sustainable in the long runldquo (Bill Gates to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)
Some other believe that technology may be used as gatekeeper no real incentive to move towards real interoperability and that legislative and regulatory intervention is needed (eg case of Digital content portability and copy right)
rArr But delicate issue to regulate on nascent markets
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Media Centre
PDA
Bluetooth andWi-Fi Phones
Game Console
Video walkmanWeb Tablet
Laptop
Users want their devices to work togetherand share content
Printer
IP STB and PVRTeleworkTelework
Voice and video Voice and video conferencingconferencing
Internet Music and Internet Music and TVvideo everywhereTVvideo everywhere
VoDVoD Video Video streaming music streaming music
download storagedownload storage
Home Home automation automation and Controland Control
TelemedicineTelemedicine
Interoperability amp Home Networks
Interoperability challenge in this context include notably Consumer issues Home Gateway control
Interoperability amp ConvergenceDoes convergence push the case for interoperability
In principle Yes butIn addition to the plethora of technologies It introduces novel
elements of complexity m_payments regulation on contents rights holderhellip
Untested and risky business models more opportunities but more risk
Different sectors (CE mobile broadband broadcast) with different logics reducing customer churn and getting increased revenues mastering content distribution keeping control of established customer base starting completely new laquo opportunity driven raquo businesses (eg Skype)
rArr For some players interoperability insofar as it implies large scale convergence with significant levels of substitution may mean risk of disappearing
Interoperability is it a natural trendStill in the context of convergence
Untested business models risks requirement to protect investments may drive proprietary closed solutions eg music download fragmentation of devices and technologies
Some do however believe that market forces are enough to breakthe walls If you were to ask me which mobile device will take top place for listening to music Id bet on the mobile phone for sure As good as Apple may be I dont believe the success of the iPod is sustainable in the long runldquo (Bill Gates to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)
Some other believe that technology may be used as gatekeeper no real incentive to move towards real interoperability and that legislative and regulatory intervention is needed (eg case of Digital content portability and copy right)
rArr But delicate issue to regulate on nascent markets
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Interoperability amp ConvergenceDoes convergence push the case for interoperability
In principle Yes butIn addition to the plethora of technologies It introduces novel
elements of complexity m_payments regulation on contents rights holderhellip
Untested and risky business models more opportunities but more risk
Different sectors (CE mobile broadband broadcast) with different logics reducing customer churn and getting increased revenues mastering content distribution keeping control of established customer base starting completely new laquo opportunity driven raquo businesses (eg Skype)
rArr For some players interoperability insofar as it implies large scale convergence with significant levels of substitution may mean risk of disappearing
Interoperability is it a natural trendStill in the context of convergence
Untested business models risks requirement to protect investments may drive proprietary closed solutions eg music download fragmentation of devices and technologies
Some do however believe that market forces are enough to breakthe walls If you were to ask me which mobile device will take top place for listening to music Id bet on the mobile phone for sure As good as Apple may be I dont believe the success of the iPod is sustainable in the long runldquo (Bill Gates to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)
Some other believe that technology may be used as gatekeeper no real incentive to move towards real interoperability and that legislative and regulatory intervention is needed (eg case of Digital content portability and copy right)
rArr But delicate issue to regulate on nascent markets
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Interoperability is it a natural trendStill in the context of convergence
Untested business models risks requirement to protect investments may drive proprietary closed solutions eg music download fragmentation of devices and technologies
Some do however believe that market forces are enough to breakthe walls If you were to ask me which mobile device will take top place for listening to music Id bet on the mobile phone for sure As good as Apple may be I dont believe the success of the iPod is sustainable in the long runldquo (Bill Gates to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)
Some other believe that technology may be used as gatekeeper no real incentive to move towards real interoperability and that legislative and regulatory intervention is needed (eg case of Digital content portability and copy right)
rArr But delicate issue to regulate on nascent markets
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
The Digital media formats mazeImagingbull BMPbull CLPbull DCXbull DIBbull FPXbull GIFbull IMGbull JIFbull JPEGbull MACbull MSP
Audiobull a2bbull AACbull AC-3bull ADPCMbull AIFFbull ATRAC3+bull AUbull CDDAbull DPCMbull EPACbull MP3
Videobull ASF bull AVIbull DATbull DivX bull DVbull FLCbull FLIbull FLXbull GIF
bull PCTbull PCXbull PNGbull PPMbull PSDbull PSPbull RAWbull RLEbull TIFFbull WPG
bull MP4bull MPEG Audiobull PCMbull QuickTimebull RealAudiobull TACbull TwinVQ (VQF)bull u-law
Compressionbull WAVbull WMA
bull MPEG-1bull MPEG-2bull MPEG-4bull QuickTimebull RMbull UISbull WMV
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Interoperability maze
bull Numerous competing technologies and alliances with assets and drawbacks
bull The home networking market is immature and fragmented
MHPDVB
OSA
OSGIJINIWeb Services
Services Platforms (standards)
Home Plug
Bluetooth
HiperLAN
IEEE80211PhonePNA
Physical Layer (standards)
UPnPJINIOSGi
Interconnect architecture (standards)
PresenceMPEG 721CCPPPersonalisation (standards)
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
InteroperabilityRegulations and possible impacts (examples)
eg content download authorised on an national basis as a function of the rights acquired with the local Collecting society (IP address filtering) Putting restrictions to ldquofixed mobile convergencerdquo on the basis of national market organisations
regulation for Home Gateway interconnection or routing of regulated services provided though laquo foreign raquo IP platforms
example of DVB-H case will probably depend from sectorialregulations It is convergent interoperable (mobile broadcast) May depend from sectorial developed regulation TV wo frontiers e commerce directive regulatory package copyright directive hellip ( broadcast Mobile)
rArr regulation has a potentially high impact on how ldquointeroperable systemsrdquo are deployed
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Media and Home Delivery finding the right equilibrium
ConsumersConsumersrsquorsquoneeds wants needs wants
willingnesswillingnessto payto pay
Technology Technology industryindustry
defining what defining what is possibleis possible
Media Media industryindustry
defining what defining what is is ldquoldquoallowedallowedrdquordquo
Interoperability depends critically on cross industry agreements and on associated regulationcontractual
framework
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Widespread Supply Side Enthusiasm for Interoperability
Interoperability reduces consumer
confusionaids adoption
75
Non-interoperablitywill result in a market
leading format via competition choice13
Industry standard to reduce confusionaid
adoption
8Other
4
Not necessarily what consumer would say
(No DRM)
Question asked Considering the compatibility of audio codecs and DRM technologies and their impact upon consumer adoption of digital music stores and services please select from the following statements that which best describes your opinion
Source JupiterResearch Music Executive Survey 0704 (Western Europe only)
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Interoperability amp Standards
There is a wide spread agreement that interoperability critically depends on standards Yes but
It can not be the only answer
Standards and options
Standardise what Interfaces only or more APIrsquos
Standards are not neutral
Open Source has a role to play but is more an implementation issue Open std is not equiv to Open Source
Standards form a key part of the picture not necessarily the complete answer
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Software the fuel of InteroperabilityM
ob
iles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
MobileMiddleware
NetworkServices
Telecoms Telecoms
NetworkServices
ITMiddleware
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
ITap
pli
cati
on
s
Mo
biles
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Mu
ltim
ed
iaap
pli
cati
on
s
Co
nverg
en
ce
MMMiddleware
Middleware
NetworkServices
Network Services (IP)
Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms Telecoms
Source ITEMS International - 2004
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Turning to Software
Software oriented middleware has implication on standards development process
Previous typical sequence ex ante standard development stable standard development product business development
ldquoSoftwarerdquo standardisation model RampD and product development product launch ex post standardisation further business development
Race for time and being laquo on time to market raquo
Interoperability depends on how easy it is to define ex post interfaces between software modules and components (eg RELODRL trans-coding)
Source ITEMS International - 2004
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
bull Increased connectivity diversity of devices global resource sharing and richer applications increase complexity amplifying the vulnerability of the network and escalating the privacy concerns
- 60 of all e-mail is spamndash 80 of all PCs infested with
malware
Challenges- Pervasive connectivity will increase vulnerability and privacy concerns requiring new
software solutions- Establishment of ldquotrustedrdquo devices servers and gateways will be required to
accommodate dynamic network infrastructure and provide end-to-end security- Containing the damage caused to businesses by malware including the cost of fixing
systems and lost revenueInteroperability vs Security
2000
1995 rsquo96 rsquo97 rsquo98 rsquo99 rsquo00 rsquo01 rsquo02 rsquo03 lsquo04
$20 billion
15
10
5
0
Annual losses
Vulnerability and Privacy
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Global activitiesGlobal activitiesChinabull 3G licenses not yet grantedbull Research on beyond 3G in 863
FuTURE Projectbull Joint Research Center Shanghai
Koreabull Reluctant with wide-spread 3G
deployment
bull HPI WiBro (WiMAX derivative) under
development (35G)
bull Research on systems beyond 3G
Japanbull
3G deploym
ent (cdma2000 W
CD
MA)
bullEnhancem
ents of 3G
bullR
esearch on systems beyond 3G
bullD
oCoM
oproposal Super 3G
CJK ndash China Japan Koreabull Cooperation on government level one
working group on mobile communication
bull Cooperation between SDOs
Dominated by global IT industrybull IEEE activities in
bull IEEE 80211a b g h nbull IEEE 80215bull IEEE 80216 a d ebull IEEE 80220bull IEEE 80221
bull Claims from start-ups and IT companies to provide 4G solutions
bull Flarion (Fast Low Latency Access with Seamless Handoff and OFDM)
bull Arraycomm ndash advanced antenna technology and SDMA
bull Navini Networks ndash Advanced beamformingtechnology for range amp coverage
bull IP Wireless ndash TD-CDMA with IP core networkbull Aperto Networks ndash Fixed Broadband
Wireless Access vendorbull Redline Communications ndash Fixed BWAbull Airspan ndash Fixed BWAbull Alvarion ndash Fixed BWAbull Intel ndash Active in 80216 development and its
promotion in WiMAXbull Many activities are on short-range and WLAN
enhancements
Globallybull ITU-R Framework Recommendationbull WWRF since 2001
North Americabull Research on systems beyond 3G eg
at Motorola Nortel Lucent etc
Europebull UMTSbull UMTS enhancementsbull Research on systems
beyond 3G in FP6
Interoperability has to be addressed Globally
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
mITF- Forum in Japan for 4G amp
Mobile Commerce since 2001
- Commercial introduction target 2010
Field experiments for 4G wireless access
- DoCoMo 100 Mbps transmission with outdoor
1 Gbps with indoor (MIMO)
FuTURE- Chinese National Project- 4 Phases
① Ramp up② Specification (2003 - 2005)③ Implementation (2007 - 2007)④ Standardisation (2008 -)
CJKCollaboration among China Japan and Korea for B3G international Standards
WiBro (Wireless Broadband Portable Internet)- 23 GHz 10 MHz Bandwidth 05 - 50 Mbps
lt 60 kmh
Japan
China
Korea
CJK
Snapshot of Asian Roadmaps - mobile
See also FCC and proactive approach towards global ldquostandardsregulationsrdquo eg UWB
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Rural ldquoWould berdquo ICT users require access to technology
RemoteDSLAM
Agregation
BRAS
AAA
ADSL ADSL2 (gt 100 subs site)
2 Way SAT(lt 20 subssite)
xlt 5 km
WIP WiMax(100gtxgt20 subssite)
x
x
SAT + WLAN CPL (20ltxlt 50 subssite)
WIP+WLAN CPL
lt 5 km
lt 15 km
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
bullSatellite DSL offerbullWireless DSL offerbullADSL offer
For some there is nothing to ldquointeroperaterdquo
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Interoperability amp Availability
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
Infrastructure developmentBroadband for allMore user friendly equipment
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
New applicationsApplications that are useful to all
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
Market dynamisationSolve the standards riddle
Promote and communicate new services
(SourceTelefonica) 3 fronts to address simultaneously Metcalfe law and value of network very close to the i2010 concepts
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
The Report of the Group of
Personalities(2000-2001)
How
SRA
GoP
Vision2020
ACARE
Stakeholders
ResearchProgrammes
ResearchProjects
The Strategic Planning Route
The Strategic Research Agenda
(2001-2002)- Revision every 2 years -
And Private (Industry)
Public (EU National Eurocontrol etc)
The Implementation Route
Technology PlatformIndustrial Initiatives Facilitating global scale interoperability
(Aeronautic ACARE example)
NEMe_Mobility
What
Trying to address issues through their multiple facets including standards and deployment
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Examples of Concrete Interoperability actions supported by DG INFSO
Trough ISTFP6bull DVB-H 3G China and Brazil bull MPEG over DVB-H SVC MPEG 21bull IPv4 IPv6 evolution double stack migration bull DRM MPEG 21 Framework bull DVB CPCM Framework bull Ad Hoc Home Networks OSGI environments bull Enterprise interoperability RFID based integrated
systems bull Digital Business Ecosystems Ad Hoc Entreprise
networksbull helliphellip
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Policy i2010bull An umbrella policy initiative currently in the makingbull In the context of a renewed commitment to the Lisbon Strategybull Commission adoption planned Early June 2005 presentation to
the Council end of June Resolution end of yearbull 3 Pillars deployment innovation inclusionbull Salient features include
ndash ICT as engine for growthndash favourable environment for deployment regs stds targeted actions on
interoperabilityndash researchndash cutting red tape (SMErsquos)ndash in the context of telecom-media convergence
ndash hellip
bull Complemented with Competitiveness and Innovation Programme
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
Conclusions promoting interoperability
∆ Interoperability as targeted Ad Hoc issue rather than through all encompassing definition and approach ∆ Empowering Consumers ∆ Addressing complementary fronts standards but also deployment applications∆ Clarifying applicable regulation to converged amp interoperable environments ∆ Possible careful public intervention where market failure amp market size justify ∆ Importance of international co-operation∆ i2010 FP7 CIP are supporting instruments
