Date post: | 17-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | naveen-kumar |
View: | 282 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Information Technology Project Management – Fourth Edition
By Jack T. MarchewkaNorthern Illinois University
Power Point Slides by Gerald DeHondtGrand Valley State University
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-1
The Project Team
Chapter 4
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-2
Learning Objectives Describe the three major types of formal
organizational structures: functional, pure project, and matrix.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the functional, pure project, and matrix organizational structures.
Describe the informal organization. Develop a stakeholder analysis. Describe the difference between a work
group and a team. Describe and apply the concept of learning
cycles and lessons learned as a basis for knowledge management.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-3
PMBOK® Area – Project Human Resources Management Develop Human Resource Plan
Creating a staff management plan that identifies and documents the reporting relationships as well as each team member’s role, responsibility, and required skills
Acquire Project Team Confirms that specific human resources will be available to
work on the project Develop Project Team
The processes to improve the competencies of the project team, their interactions, and the overall team environment
Manage the Project Team The tracking of the project team’s performance, providing
feedback, resolving interpersonal issues, and managing organizational change
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-4
The Formal Organization
Formal groupings & specializations Published Lines of
Authority Responsibilities Reporting Relationships Communication Decision-Making
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-5
Organization and Project Planning Organizational Structure
Figure 4.1
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-6
The Functional OrganizationThe Functional Organization
Figure 4.2
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-7
The Functional Organization
Advantages Increased
Flexibility Breadth & Depth of
Knowledge & Experience
Less Duplication
Disadvantages Determining
Authority & Responsibility
Poor Response Time
Poor Integration
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-8
The Project The Project OrganizatioOrganizationn
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-9
The Project-Based Organization
Advantages Clear Authority &
Responsibility Improved
Communication High Level of
Integration
Disadvantages Project Isolation Duplication of
Effort “Projectitis”
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-10
The Matrix Organization The Matrix Organization Figure 4.4
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-11
The Matrix Organization
Advantages High Level of
Integration Improved
Communication Increased Project
Focus
Disadvantages Potential for
conflict Unity of Command
can be violated Poor Response
Time
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-12
While the formal organizational structure tells us how individualsor groups within an organizationshould relate to one another, it does not tell us how they actuallyrelate.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-13
The Informal Organization Bypasses formal lines of communication &
authority Power is determined by how well one is
connected in the informal network – i.e., the “grapevine”
Can be more complex than the formal organization because relationships are established from positive and negative relationships over time
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-14
Stakeholders
Individuals, groups, or evenorganizations that have a “stake”or claim in the project’s (successfulor unsuccessful) outcome
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-15
Stakeholder Analysis Process
1. Develop a list of stakeholders who have an interest in the successful or unsuccessful outcome of the project
2. Identify the stakeholder’s interest in the project
“+1” for positive interest “0” for neutral “-1” for negative interest
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-16
Stakeholder Analysis1. Determine the degree of influence each
stakeholder has on a scale of 0 (no influence) to 10 (can terminate the project)
2. Define a role for each stakeholder – e.g., champion, consultant, decision maker, ally, rival, foe, etc.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-17
Stakeholder Analysis1. Identify an objective for each stakeholder
– e.g., provide resources, guidance, expertise, acceptance, approval, etc.
2. Identify a strategy for each stakeholder – e.g., build, maintain, improve, re-establish the relationship
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-18
Stakeholder Interest Influence PotentialConflicts
Role Objective Strategy
Hirem N. Firem +1 5 Competition for resources with other functional managers
Project Sponsor and Champion
Provide resources, approvals, and public support for the project
To maintain open communication so that political landmines can be avoided
Dee Manitger +1 3 Resources not made available as promised by functional managers
Project Manager Lead and manage the project so that it achieves its MOV
Work closely with project stakeholders and project team
Project Team +1 2 This project will change a number business processes. Affected users may resist change by withholding information
Steve Turner – Network AdministratorShedelle Bivits – Systems AnalystCorean Jenkins – Programmer/DBAMyra Dickens – Inventory Analyst
Provide expertise to complete the project work
Support project team with adequate resources while minimizing distractions
I. Will Sellit -1 4 As the marketing manager, Sellit is not pleased that this project was chosen over his proposed project. May withhold promised resources
Foe Build and maintain best possible relationship to minimize attempts to divert resources
Maintain open communication. Use project sponsor’s influence as necessary
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-19
The Project Team The Roles of the Project Manager
Managerial role Leadership role
Attributes of a successful project manager ability to communicate with people ability to deal with people ability to create and sustain relationships ability to organize
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-20
The Wisdom of Teams - Jon R. KatzenbachDouglas K. Smith
Work Groups Pseudo Teams Potential Teams Real Teams High Performance Teams
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-21
Work Groups
Members interact to share information, best practices, or ideas
No shared performance goals (individual performance)
No joint work-products No mutual accountability Viable in many situations
E.g., study group
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-22
Teams Bring complementary skills & experience Jointly defined clear goals & approaches
improve communication Improve decision-making Have more fun
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-23
Real Teams1. Small number of people2. Complementary skills3. Committed to a common purpose4. Common goals5. Common approach6. Hold themselves accountable
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-24
Pseudo Teams Weakest of all groups Not focused on collective performance (&
not trying to achieve it) No interest in shaping a common purpose Confusion & dysfunctional behaviours
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-25
Potential Teams Significant performance potential Requires more clarity about purpose,
goals, work-products, and common approach
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-26
High Performance Teams Meet all the conditions of a real team PLUS:
Members are deeply committed Perform above all reasonable expectations
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-27
Vital Signs for Evaluation
6 Project Team Basics Themes & Identity Enthusiasm & Energy Level Event-Driven Histories Personal Commitment Earned Membership
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-28
Team Leader (Project Manager) Acts To:
Clarify purpose & goals Build commitment & self
confidence Strengthen team’s collective skills Remove external obstacles Create opportunities for others
Creates the Project Environment Work space Team culture and values Project administration Ethical Conduct
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-29
A Learning Cycle Approach to Project Management
An Agile Project Management Approach
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-30
Learning Cycles
Derived from educator/philosopher John Dewey (1938)
Used to describe how people learn (Kolb, 1984; Honey & Mumford, 1994)
Can be applied to project teams (Jeris, 1997; Redding, 2000).
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.4-31
Traditional Teams Accept background information at “face-
value” Approach projects in logical, linear fashion Provide run-of-the-mill solutions Solutions remain within the original “frame” or
how the problem was originally presented to them
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-32
Radical Teams Do not accept issues & tasks at their “face
value” The way the problem is defined may very well
be the problem Unquestioned assumptions are surfaced &
challenged Only by digging below the surface can we get
to the “root” so that a meaningful solution can emerge
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-33
A Learning Cycle
Figure 4.6
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-34
What we know(Facts)
What we think we know
(Assumptions)
What we don’t know(Questions to be
Answered)Company has too much inventory on hand
It may be an efficiency problem
Why are inventory levels so high?
Cost of maintaining current inventory is becoming prohibitive
Management believes an new information system will improve efficiency and therefore lower inventory levels
What are the current levels of inventory?
Inventory turnover needs to be increased
What is the desired level of inventory?
Figure 4.7
Example of a Team Learning Record
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-35
Who? Does What? By When?Shedelle and Steve Interview sales team to
understand past, current, and future trends for the company’s product.
Tuesday
Myra Provide a detailed count of the current physical inventory on hand.
Thursday
Corean Research potential inventory management system commercial packages
Thursday
Steve Research average inventory levels for the industry
Wednesday
Figure 4.8
An Example of an Action Plan for Team Learning
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-36
Team Learning Cycles over the Project Life Cycle
Figure 4.9
Each cycle providesthe opportunity to challenge framing assumptions,create new understanding &find radical solutions
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-37
Assessing Team LearningSpeed
Depth Breadth(Impact)
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-38
The Project Environment A place to call home Technology Office supplies Culture
What is expected from each team member?
What role will each team member play?
How will conflicts be resolved?
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-39
Example of a Project Team Charter
Figure 4.10
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-40
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without
express permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no
responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information herein.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-41