Date post: | 17-May-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | sherry-lake |
View: | 190 times |
Download: | 2 times |
UPDATE ON DATA MANAGEMENT (AND SHARING) POLICES
Sherry LakeUniversity of Virginia
iConference 2013February 12, 2013
US AND CANADA
Outline
• U.S. Funders• Canadian Funders• Other Policies
– Domain specific professional groups– Journals
• Organizational Support– Institutions
US Funding Agencies Requirement
• The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 provides the federal administrative requirements for grants and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals and other non-profit organizations.
• In1999, revised to provide public access under some circumstances to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
• Funding agencies have implemented the OMB requirement in various ways.
US Funding Agencies
• Require a Data Management Plan (DMP)– National Science Foundation– National Institutes of Health– National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Research (NOAA)– Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS)– National Endowment of Humanities – office of digital
humanities (NEH)
• Require Sharing of Results– NASA– NEH – Preservation & Access
This list is not inclusive.
Research Data Polices in Canada
• Canada Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)– Policy on Access to Research Outputs
• Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)– Research Data Archiving Policy
• Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)– Implementing some policies through specific
projects
Research Data Canada
• Working group to address problems on access & preservation of data from Canadian Research
• Challenges to be addressed collectively from a national perspective with the participation of all parts of the research community, including researchers themselves who create and use this data.
• Supported by National Research Council Canada
Other Data Policies (Examples)
US• American Psychology Association (APA)
Canada• McGill University• Fisheries & Oceans Canada (one example of a
government department data policy)Journals
• Nature Publishing Group
Library Organizations
US– Association of Research Libraries (ARL)– ASERL (Association of Southeastern Research
Libraries)– Council on Library and Information Resources
(CLIR)
Canada– Canadian Association of Research Libraries
(CARL)
ARL/DLF E-Science Institute
Goal: to help academic and research libraries develop a strategic agenda for e-research support, with a particular focus on the sciences• Initial cohort July 2011: 70 institutions• Sept-Dec. 2012 offered in partnership with
DuraSpace• additional 22 institutions• http://duraspace.org/esi-course-description
ASERL/SURAAssociation of Southeastern Research Libraries Southeastern Universities Research Association
Developed model language for their member universities to consider when drafting policy to support data management policies at their institutions
http://www.aserl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ASERL-SURA_Model_Language_RDM_Policy_Language_FINAL.pdf
Institutions
• UW-Madison (Policy on Data Stewardship, Access, and retention – Feb 2011)
CLIR: Digital Library Federation
• Data Curation Post Doctoral Program Creating a professional career path for data specialists aligned with the discipline but grounded with data curation community. – Science and Social Sciences
• Purdue - Scientific Data Management
– Medieval Studies• Funded by Mellon Foundation• http://www.clir.org/fellowships/postdoc/applicants/d
c-medieval