I,\I]'ED STATES DISl'RIC'I COURT

:::l:.:.:l_".::-:ii:1.9_::::.1.:i:".".."_....._..."-""RO\\ F E\TFRTlI \ \ IE{I ! ET \T. !

Plrintifis.

TIt[ \\'|l-LI,\Nl ]lOltRIs. El AL..

98 Civ 8272(RPP)

\OTICEOF

ltoTto:{

PLEASE TAKE NOTICI tl[rlpon ']re.nnlxcd

atlinlaiion olLcona.d

Ro\re. alirDcd on March 2. l0ll. dnd $c acconpdying Mctxn.ndlm.ft arv in

suppoi ofLhis motion. and rll pleadings h.d herein, plannilTLcdndd Row..r,/1,

i?. $ill o'c dlis Coun. bciitre lhe Ilon. l{obcfi P Pallerson. Uniled States Districr

Coui hdge. fof an orderittrsuant ro Rulc 60. itcl drd. ol lhe Iredehl ltulcs ol

Ci\ilProccdrrc errntilg. in the facc offraDd upon tht court, dcshnction ofiital

e'idlnce! and in the intcrcst ofjusticc: (a) r.licf itorn th.judgnrem in dlis acldr

b) !aca!ns and lenin8 !\ide rhe]udgm.rir (h) resro.rne 'he.ase

k) rcr,le \r.rus:

{c) rcf.ding ihe ncvly discovcred elidcnce to:1he (iiminal Divisior ol ll S.

Auorne' s Olfice. rh.Ii_BI. rhe Conrmiftce on Gricla].es oll]te Bodrd ol Judgcs of

rhe Sou$.mDistricr oINe* York and ihc n".$ York starcAppcllatc Dnirion.

Ftrsr DqramrenL. Dcpdrlflrenral DiscrPlinary Coonlittcc (the '.DlX ): and (d) and

such tunhcr reLief.sthc Honouble Courtdccms troPer

t .l.tlute u,dt peralt^ of pctjtutr thnt.thefottgoihq is truz.4hd 'onecl'

Marcb 2. l0 l2-r ' / .a -: ; l

j ) / t ! : :Li805 Slare Bddgc Road. Sunc lj0Johis Cfcck, Gco.gia 30097enu i I : turee nle rlai n(Llo l..oM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

::_"::T:',:T:":1":'T:____,.ROWE ENTERTAINMENT, E'T AL.,

PlaintilTs,

THE WILLIAM MORRIS, ETAL.,

- .9E.Cin 4272(RPP)

AFT'IRMATIONOF

SERVICE

AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE

I.leonard Rowe. declarc under penalty ofperjury that I have

served a copy of thc aftached:

l. NOTICE OFMOTION|

2, MEMORANDUM OF LAWi Tnd

3. AFFIRMATION OFL'ONARD ROWE

trpon the following pafiies on the attached SeNice List as indicared, lhis dav,

March 2,2012:

x

. JzzMarch 2.2012

5805 State Bidge Road, Suite 350Johns Creek, Georgia 10097end l : tuw e ente aitdeqolcon

SERVICE LISTIlII Charcs lhmprn Vl i l l r r E:q. l .ocb & l - .cb.LLI '>. l ,1 j ParkAvc.N.\r lork. \ \ l0 l i3: l l l$r . r9 l0:udi rumb.. :l2 l{)r-l{X)lr.lnx ll2.1Ol 1+)0:S f:Rv l-: D I I A tlsc ha. f. r@ lNb,..,tL Ckior\ , \ Cldck hnt. . Nl i r in. Phelp!& Phi l l ips l -1P?lnnesSqurre \ .wYorr. .N\ .10016: l : l l r6 l r 4l I I r 16.16) ,1r-8 94ll4fr\ -\'E?lvED Vl \ !.1an.k@.etla,xonl

.1. ! lath.$l .Poppl l l l .Emnc!.Cobb.$i i r \&K.sscnich.Pa. l5 l iR, j_drx!Srr . r .\csOnertrs LA.t0II:r5({ri3l |.10|.(jLr4)53I a 2l)i\ JtR\1ED VIAnlp@)ecwko.coni \ l i rha. lPZ*ci ! t l { l - l ieh& Loeb LLP.:145 P.rk^ve.. \ .RYorl .N\ ' . l0t j .1 2l2. l0r i l9{ '0 t l112 208158: fr\ Sl:RvED l'1:{ tt:*2i!@beh xapar. Morr.r P.uasl iav.crbr Esq..DLA I ' iper RudnickCn' caryLs LLPl2i l6 Alr . \cs rd.L N\.I 00?1) l a)\\' 2 r: 16.1 6300 DL A Piper Mntging I'ohntr P.t.r S. fantuI.oSERf ED I I A p!4L@rl4b!1!l!j4Lie!t!r!!I $?sl . ! R P.qel lL.q. .Hlr ton&Wil l i rn, ! .L l -P.200P.rkAv.nu..Ner\ i t [ .N\.10i( , { ' ) !owNE$ Wll lk, .Fatr&aaLhghLrLl l '>. iSTSerenthA!.r t rc.NcwYoik.N\ ' l ln l96099. l lSA T212 tl3 3264. F I Ll rllJ 9?6,f H utuon ,!. rl illiads LlanagnrE Pt4t Lta J. Sotto 212109 1040,

212 309.11u0...... sER\'I:D v IA: N 'owell@+illkie.con

8 Chnn'E Lrp.m.sNR Det l rn L,s LLPINY). i22l Av.ntr . o i l l reAnen.as \esYork.NY m?0.

.J!af .c)Lt ieJslerF-\qD!N.rBnlLanrrcLLPl io lathavc.\es\ i t rk- \Y. l lx) l9212159r l{150

I L37Gi : l : .dDlGr. . t \ / l { l / t r I r r ' l l in4 r l l l9 . ! lar i rspen!rdo.CnrJ.wi l l ram\.Paren! Fr iney.Lewis. j i l .Manu\ ' r raL.Watersid€ProlrsnonalB trildh s. Stuxn. Fl- .1.199:1 561 287 g160 lLRl LD flA Cary Wilians I'a,1ner ltt@wilieaa^.rM10. NlarkrILemn,t G3.y.williaorr.Par.rii l'mcy. Lr$is. \'lc M inu\. ct r '.NhleaLde Prolessional

Build'i g. S1Mn. IiL l4qq4 561 231 82(o Srlivlir l'I,'t 6a4 lt iUiaB Ponhet Utlltillietafl .onl l Man Roth CoLd.SNR DcnroD US Ll-P(NY)i2l lAleDue of the Anrel i .as N.sYork N\ ' lOO20.(2i2)193 3?01.ll2 r('3 63(lJ lal \;Rl'rlD }7^ nreoldlasoni.0s.!'sr!.!or]]l : wi l lanc campbrLl .Esq 6xry. \ l iL l ixnr- Prrent Fi f t rev.L.wis iv lcMadr(.{al ' . \ \nrer ide

Pruld\ronal A u'ldri!. \!iad. FL .1499,1 56 i 281 3260 vir StrRl/r, WA Adry \ritti'ns Ponntr

!reyillils!4,elttt A N D w i I I i a t 1 t. t 99 6 @n o L t o tfll l Douelas Lambtn.C!ry tilLixJns Parenri F nk! l-dq\ N1'rvlrnus

'r rl \\arc'sde Prolestr'iaL

B trirdrj-g. sban. FL 14994 56 t 23i 32.n) sfRl tD t IA Cz4' rvll iznr t'anns ll9villi!t!!4!!al4 lleler Cara'r. Loeb& rr.b..l45 PsrkAvetrue.New\ork. Nl 101540011 (2lll l4t 1Ildl

SERvED l-IA .vtiq@laeb.cont

SrRVLD I Ia )It\,lrr@ dl..ott

- - ' / r

15. Nladi$. B Nl( le iLan.GaD.Wrl lLaN.PireDrl .Flnncr. lceis.VcMantrs.dr l .$ i reNdeftdesloialB trildi"g. Srten. Ft- .1.1991 561 . 281 8260 J-'tR! tD t'1,,1 6ary \lillianr Partner ll@yiri.eon..o"1l6 SekoriV Oary.Cnrt.$rillirnrs-Parenri I:idner.l-ewis.NlcManur.eral $:id6!de ProtssionalB0 Llding. SlMn- tl, .l.19lt t6 | 231 3261J .SrIlVfD vll C arf lfi iattt PanM lf@Nili.etnronl?. l r i . i rPHol l le ' .Crry. \ ! i l l l {nL.Pnrei t i .F innetLcEis.NIciv lafur.err l . \ \ . ters idcPntt$iotalBnildiRg.Snlan-Fl-.14991561 2al a2gi SERVEI, VIAGaT $illiafls Panttr lf@wiqi.!6.corll8 Jcf i ret 5. Klein. [ t i l .Cohhr]& luar-eer LLPINYc).767 Ff lh Avenue. l5d FIN.R York-\ ] lo l5r2 l2 I l0 30{x) f.r: r 2 | 2) 8:].r'l l,l8 ,SFRr'rn t,1'1 jcfle!.L!c!!!!qdrJ1ljr

l.r Jefiret;\. Fuisz. Llnir€d Star* Atorneys olricc.5outhe.n Dnkict ol N0w \o.k. one sr.A drew\t , laz, .NowYo.\YrO00?2123168tu0212816Gi7fx\SERVEDvIAi I lL&Ley;t fu l l lEl t t20 G.mld Nlaryol is.Manatt .Pheips&trnrpiPhi l l ips. l l . l55we{ol !nrpicBor lovard.L.sAieeles.(Aq\a;, 16,.r. i l0 I r 2 l{XlO DECEI\SED SERVED VIA Ctuit Malzr ea!t!!!!!!t!t@.!!2!!2 l Sanaor Frarkei . Fnnkel& Atrr in 's.210 Park Aretruc. NYC 10169: l l66t 5000S E Rv I: D vtA r:[!s!!t!!9!!!rLe!Lh44]!!422. Srevetr Nl i .haci l tates. l ladl t Conro! BieGre SlenJr i l ldEf&anrp: l layes.LLP I l2Mad60r. \ !cnue.\cwYork. \Yl00l62l2l8+a)1{021?784.6.{20hrJ^CIr t )vtA\hrvennhanlvr .ndv.orn2j Adam Dana Mn2n.rccrstseo.Srvage.Kaplotritz.wiil.& ltL.cus LLP(t x.Av..)6l)0L!\iiatoDA\ nu! \ r$ \orN.\ \ tm : 2 l , l . lo l r i2 l )ob.r ' , i . r \ srRvFDVr{rni / t r" " r" rcn' \ ' er ' '1

21. Brian S FBler. sp.m & lmes LLP.5l ltladron Arerue. \cs YorL. NY 1ml0 212 5l(l l30t)2ll i:10130llr\ SERVED VIA blrasttitrko n.coil

l i . Janr.sACohb.tdmerC.hhwhhs&K.set ich. l i15l 'ovdrasSte. t .str i re1950.NewOrl .ans. l -Ar0llz j01i31 il0l SERV!:D vlAjegClss\!.lo4?6 VikenrArdronjSrnra.KrteScholerLLP.. l25ParkAlentreN.{York.NY100222i23163l{ l )2D 816.8689llr SERI FD VIA _!!4a!a!t!4!9L!!!rrbek!.!9!42? Alan(l (dner.Btrchanar l!!c6ol1 Profesional Corp . ioo Collcgc Ro Ljst. Prnrcetor. NJ 0854)

6@ 981 68A0 sERvIiI) vIA akcsler@tlutfl.mdt-cont

-r0 JamesQ$dker-spers&anrp: lmesLLi .5 l l ladisotrAvenue Nes Yor l .Nt l0010.2l25l0l l l ( r1)212 5r0 r8orhr sF:RvEDvIA jygUllgLLeAzpa.

lL Mod'c,Pera-g| lavccabe.DI-At iperUsl-LP(\Y)125lArenueofthe,\mdri 'as.N' \ rYork Nr

Lan20 212 ]J5,1500 2r2 115.4501 St:tlval] v.r,l 44!!!t!9!!!L!4!.!!a!32. \l.lis\rC Rodnercu.Mor8ar. l-$,s & llockius LLP(Ner \ork).l0i PltrkAveiuc NewYoir'\Y

l0l13212l0!J.61942l2109621:lfax SER\ ED VIA mcrodrieuezc nw-lanLe\r F rom

l l . R.benE!\ ' rdDonnel l r .Lonrnr. f .Ahdo.( . lc . l t rg&Suleb'rg. l l l rv25r l rSreet idf lootNYClOml 2l2 tlJl ll??i SERvED VI;\ bobdonneLivri lomnretr com14 RichardC Priornt.Esq.Ll S.Securnies&ErchangeCommis:ion J {'ttrld FrnatrcialCentcr'lcw

lork.Netr York 10231-loll SCIlt?Ir t?A prinofir@s@.go!

15. carl Rohe( Aron. Esq . 580 Prrk Avetruc. A F l28. NYC ]1INJ5 SERvtl} v IA 'aron@RCC

ctn

^' , [

UNITED STATXS DIS'I RJCT COTRT

::TY"'Ty:-:y"'::__",. '1 . .. 9a Civ.4212

(R"P)

NOTICEOF

APPEARANCE

ROWE ENTXRTATNMENT. ET AI-..

Plrinrlffr,

NOTtCtr] OF APPEARANCE

Pl@se 1ake nolice that i. Leonad Rowc, a plaintiff id this &rion'

blreby afi!€ar pro re and !ha1 all tuiure conespondcnce and papeN in comeclion

wirh rhis acdo! de ro be diteted to me at the addre$ indicarcd below

THD WILLIAM MORRIS, ET AL.,

March2.20125805 Stab Br'dge Road, Suite 350Iohns Crcek, Ceo.gia 10097e na i I : rc p e e n te.t4 i^@o l. co n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

:::r:_Tr lTi:T.:tT:1T_,..____ .ROWI ENTIRTAIN}If,NT, ET AI-.,

Plaintiffs,

-agatnst_THE WILLIAM MORRIS, ETAL.,

98 Ci! 8272(RPP)

AFFIRMATION OF PLATNTIFF LEONARD ROWErJ,,I SUPPORT OF MOTION

l. LeoMrdRo*e. aftim unde. penahy olPerjury ftar:

l. i, Leo.ard Rowe. aft an iadividuall] naned plaintitlin rhe abotc

enlirled aclion, and.especdull) dole this Coudlo issue ar order: (a) lacatints

and se$ing aside drejudgnenq (b) rcstonng the case to acile $aru$ (c) reibning

rbe newly iliscole.ed evidence to:the CiininalDivision of U-S. Artomev's O$ice-

the F 81. ihe Comnitee onCrielances of the Board ofJudgcs oIlhe Sourhern

Di$ricr of New York ard fte New York State Appellare Divisjon. F i.st

Depanmeni, Departmeltal Disciplinary Commiltee (ihe DDC")r md (d) such

fuftherreliefas $e Honorable CoundeemsjNl and Popet:

FRAUD UPON THE COURT

2. In the interest ofjuslice. rhis Honorable Counnusl acl swiily and

poweitull) agdinstl|e oilce.s of the coun who have perpeftated an illegalltaud

againsl lhis tideral coun. and who have diseraced lhe rule oflaw in ihis ereat

nation, and by theirown action$ ha!eidvanced the improper redji.in8 ofConcen

promote6 because offte colof oftheir sknr.

3. When this casc was iDitiau] broughr belbretbis couft.1 lvas nora*are

ofdle depti and ellent ofrhe cor.uplion dd collusion thar m! o$n r onrels werd

r panl to in rhis case.

,1. Specifically. I wns only irforned oD Tuesday, Febru.y 7.2012,

$it my own attorneys trd committed , series ofcrimes.rd gross,ttorrey

etlical liolations in thh case.

5. Aftorney Marlin Roth Gold and members ofhk law tirm had onBoing

'neerinss with delendanri counscl, wi|]1ou ourkro$lede.- and conspned 10

conce.l lilale-nail evidence. which we. as plaintifii paid oler $100.000 lor 'lhis

cruciale!idence comprised ofdocunenls thal conlained thc word lriggef neany

.100 rimes which clearll dc,nonsrakd thc.acial dninls ofrhese defendants ds ii

relaredro rhejr corrmctual dealings with pla;nriffs. Had Anome) Manin Cold and

hjs co-conspir.Io6 nor perpelu.bd this lraud upon the.ourt b) their inlenlional

con.ealnent ol Lbese docuDenrs (fte e-majls) aDd olher viral eviden.e ofsri-|.usr

\iolarions (which was concealed hom bodr lhci.clienls and ihjs court).1 lruly

believe thar this Clourt would hale reached a diilcrcnl outcode on sunm.ry

6. MadinGold didlhese despicable lhings after charging de and olher

plaintiffs hore fia.lwo hurdred tbousad ($200.000) doilare Io'e naild'scove'v

ofthe delendants files.

?- Ai:er Altomey Manin Gold 3nd olhers had taken pmcticallv all o | lhe

mone! .€ceived in panial selremetls tbr the l)laintifii he lhen th'eatened Io

tunlrer sabobge my case by cominglo you, fie jud-qe in fiis cise and nteLe

disldaging .emark ind assenio.s aPolta Martin Gold said he would go directlv

to &e Judge 'ifnol allo$ed ro wltirdmw from the c,se '

8. while I was generally inibrned abou{ one }ea'ago thar m} case mav

have involred "inefecdvc counsel" and/or oiher ceiain utelhical attomev actioDs.

is wasn t unlil lebruary 7. 2012 thal l specificalll leamed $at 1he actions

constiluted violations ol various crimes

DESTRUCTION OFEVIDENCEvital Evidence Secreted From the Courtl

9- Altorneys Madin Oold, ttay Heslin, Richdd Primoff' Christine Lepera

and CarlA.on. after lakin-e over 5100.000 for e'Daildiscotery and cdnpellineus

io uair. palienrly, atrorteys Gold- Hesiin, PrinolTand LePera advised thal nolhing

hadbeenloundasaresul tof theema;lsedch Whenthis was reponed to me' I

could reu th Mr. Gold, Mr. Primotrand Mr. Heslin were no! be;n8 mlhftl bul I

had no 'proof at that l;me,

10. I fien asked lhar they please sendallofrhe enri.e e-mail sea.ch

.esults, *nicb weE Io be included inall tnditrss.n{i documems, to m.. t carefulll

examined cach documenr thatthese attomeys provided lo me and iound no$i'rg

that proved our position against the defendams. Havina sorked in dis indu$ry lb.

over2J yeaN at thal tim€. ud enduring $emcis rhat all Afdcan-Ahedces had

then }nd conti.ue to endure alongwirh the collusion tha!exisrcd rhen ed

conlinues to date, I tbund lhis to be inpossible b believe.

ll. Aboul two (?) weeks late., I w6 calied ro New York Ibr a meeting

withAnonrey Heslin. Whjle I waswaitine outside olhisofiicc I overhedd

Atomey Heslinon the phone discBsing me.tings wjth opposing coun*l in my

case whichhe had nor previously infomed us oi Aier goins into his ofiice.

Anomey Heslin r€ceived ltofter call od he tlmed his back to ne Ib. p.i!acy. I

then glancedon hisdeskand saF a file tlEt w6labeled "Rowe Enterlainment v.

william Moris, D-Mail rcsuhs". Ir was th€n ihal I obse^,ed the wo.d nigger"

was lined on the entire ftst page offe rcpon. Wh€n Anoney Heslin nnished hG

call.l asked h;m "whatwas thatl" pointing to the e-mailrcsulB report onhis desk.

Anom.y Heslin then trmed over the rcpon. in ny tace. dd told me $a. l wd not

supposed !o see that, '

12. I then asked the quesrion -WHy? since it penained ro m) car.

AuomeyHeslin lhe, got very angry and argumenrali!c wirh me. I then calted

Altomel willie Cary and lold his larv tim shar t had seen oo Anomev lleslin\

desk. Abmey Gary lhen asked rhar rhe e-mail rcpon be sent ro rhen for review.

But, imponanlly. I HOSE EMAILS WERE NEVTR SIN1l This is how only $c

rcpon rzs finall! ohained by $e plaint s. ButMr.ColdnorMr lteslinorfteir

frnn. despite my nuDercus requests for the adual documenrs(the stack ol emaih)

that conained the $ord niSAef oedl' 400 times. th€) alwars- ro lhis dale, hove

relused by requesr ro rum over property lhar rig| illy belongs ro me as a plainlitT

and ibrwhich we had paid over $200.000 ro obtain. Mi l{eslin md Mr. coid- and

orhers who had knowledee- .lqar_ failed rc rcpon fiis (thecmaiis) to la$.

en fbr!emedr AND the Coud.

13. I also subrquently leamed thlr A.tomeys ManinGold and Ray

Heslin had a pr!,vious rclationshipwith Dlle Head.lhe ln"House Auoner. ib.

Dcfendanr Clear Channel. Durin-e *clement di$usions with Clear Channel. lhe

Howard RoseAsency aswellas Montercy PeDinsula,I was always pressured by

Atrcme' N.llniD Cold and his iim losettle undet fie conrinualihreat of then

$ ilhdrarval t-rom theca.

l.l. Duringthe deposition ofCAA employcc.lvlr' Rob LighL. which wG

bein8conducted by Anome) CarlAfon. ofMarti' Cold s las fimr. Plainliff, Lee

King. while using ihe r.sr room du.ing a brcak in tne proceedings. overhea.d the

allome\s !tun \Veil Gorchr. reljing Mr Lighr rhar he would nol beasled *an] h&d

queslions iiom Mr Aon. Whcnever Iwoutd ask Auo.ner Aron ro ask deiendants

penrnenr queslrons. such as. e blacks give. the same opponunirt as whites, he

would.efuse to ask the requesred querdon whhour a co.t;onrarion. I k.cw rhe!

ftatour casc s?s being inrentionallv sabomged byAnomey \4ai1in cold and his

15. Ii is reprehensibie rhai rhese anorne)rs. rhar we.e supposed lo be

represennng ny inlcresrs, rerc actuall) engaged in rhe intcnlion.l sabdLagr ofnrr.

case bt sublcditr8 ourpositions and hiding key evjdencc from me and the other

plaintiiis. This ltononble Court,I respectfully $ubnit! MUSTvaclte tne

judgment and restore lhis case to the r.tive calendai

16. I have norv been made lirlly aware lhat $e e!.egious acts were- in

fact. Dot onl) acls ofgioss aliomcy misconduct. fiaud and collusion. bu thdt these

acls speciicauy consilule lhe coDnlission ofserious $imes. A Hf,ARINC ON

THf,SE ISS!T]S IS RIQUIRED, IN'THE INTERI]ST OF.ruSTICI.

Knolriog Crimes By Officers of lhe Coun

17. SpeciilcaU), when Anomeys Mudn Gold, Ray Ileslin. Richard

Primoiiand Chrisline l-epera. with their co-consp;mrors. withheld rhe evidence

(the dannin8emails) f.om theplaintitrs, thisCouG and law enforcemen! rhe!,

kroejngly co,rmined the.rimes ofconsp;ac), obstructioD ofjuslice_ misprison of

a lalon), tlter z//i?. Aid fiese afiorneys grossl] breached e$ical oarhs and.

obviously. vaious attomey di$iplinarv rul€sofconducr rhar mu$be tull!

in\ei igr led oy,Erc and tede,al at tome) erhi(" .ox, ,nkreei .

18. Specilicall). when thes€ sme adomeys destmyed rhe e-mailelid€nce

which Plaintitrs paid over $100,000 roobrain, rhry conmjned the $jDe of

destroying evidence. irrel a/d.

t9. Specjfically. when these same attomeys. !!ilh theconscious inpul

liofr diei. co-conspiFtors o! tbe deten* side otde table, cde into rhis Coun dd

lied. on the record. they commitled the $ime ol peQetraring a "li"ud upon this

Couit- fhey lied d;ectly 10 the Coun, and ftey licd by omission when they did

not produce to the Coun rhe damnins edails lhe} had i, lheir posse$io. and

20. Funher, sp€cilicall), rhe ero6 soughr 1o sway fcus .way lrom lh€

rhe.dgequnuryol e,nJih qhenAnomey Man;nColdand Rj) Hesr in. senr mcd

c$- thar i{ | opposed theirletrer. threareni.8 me riqht before sum

whbdmwal thal rhey would come to you and funher ebolage my cse. This

misconduct is also a crhne of co$cion and extonion, and w4 done while railing to

repon their knowledge ol misdeeds md crimes.

2l- I believe this Coun sbould be ournged b) lhe knowingly jnprope.

a$ions olmy lbrmeraftomeys fiat resulred in a despicable and calculaled fraud

perpemted upon m. dd this coun. k is norhinA shod ofreprehensibte and I

bclieveftalrhe Ll.S. A orners'Office, rlB F.B-l and rh. various atromey

disc;pli.ary mc.hanisds ofthe Stere ofNew york will undenake srd complete a

tull. compleF and impanial invesdgalion ofall who wer. invohed, in anl *q.

True Justice Must Prevail

22. The previous rulingthal was enrcred by this Coun singlc handedly

desroled pracricallyall black businesses thal werc dependenr oD the black concen

promo.ea 'or rherr Ivel \ood 'uch ds lrm(,us.de Lorlndrici. (arering .ompdres.

stagc hands. production cohptnies and orhers whom have -qone tokrupt bdause

ollhcdimjnisled opportunities wroughL by lhe inpennissible del€rmiiation ollhis

case on sunma4 Judgmenr.

wilh the manner in which this case was

23- My etfons in bringing tiis mane.has NEVER b.en ro deslroy the

music enlenainmert ;ndustry but ro r) and slifledenumerors jnstanc.:s of

conrracuai disparities d olher pemicious insleccs ofdisc mination. SADLY

bec.use of hos this est.nd.d, and r. the h.ndsofoneftical !trd illegal

acton, the wid€spre*d rcl3 of

M) tuLher se^cd prouJiJ In

l f . | \ . Ar) ,of I ,4 veJ6. ln I oob he t ldJ,r .Jrd ooqn h, . t : ,c or. , . r han,<, ierd!

oi Viehanr llShting forfiis country so rhat *e allcould ha!e a ch.d.e lo

experience lieeddo and libeny. leavin8 me od n\ mo$e. behind. I wrs 14 yea6

old ar rhe time. W;.eceived ren thousand dolla6 iiom the U.S. Army ibr iris <teaih.

I also rccciled a purple hean and a bronze sra., which I am lery proud ofro $is

day. NIy morherAnd I took our paymetrl liom the Amry ard p.oceeded rc rry and

purchase a bonie in Colunrbus. GA. {hc.e we livcd. Ar.he rnne wc were noL

allowed rc buy a hone in dre neighbo.hood ofou choice becaose ofour race. We

were only allowed to purchase a home in the black neighborhoods. Here we arc

Iodar sir. some lbrtl ti ve yea6 lare. wirh civii righrs laqs tidly 'n

pta.e and rhe

music indu$ry conrinues to operate underthe same discriminlrory policies oiLhc

pasl and ienorirrS the ci!il rights laws of ftis g.eat nation.

24. ln retrospeci, lhc iact lhat ANY purponed panial "selrlenrcnf' was

auowed wilhout$c ending ol the criminal and race-bascd discrim ination is

unthinlGble. Surelr. any aromey wl$ a sp€c ofe$ics $ould hare insured that the

imp perand illegal pracrice would end. The on aoin8 and currcnt st te o|

redlining.ould only resuh liom lhe arog.nce and greedofthose $ho improperiy

acled. kno{ing pe.haps tha! !he} would be proEcted by those similtuly btnr

towdd conuption. ThisCounCANNOl let this condnue. Duringlhis lirigarion.

rhedeLndana. becau* oi rheireogancr', ne\cr made dI a emp.ro*nlc&is

case orro mrct us half$ay on the problcms that surrou.ded $is lnigrtion. hhd!

never been m) inlention to deslrol this 'ndustry

in any \.!. But I thoughr rhlr we

sbould h0ve becn comp.nslted for the nd) ldrctlatourC;vil Righrs had been

viol.Gd. I also l-elt that we should have been giren an €qu.rl opportunh! ll'

contract withoul regard to our mce and to beemploled in ftis induslry on fie same

terms and conditions d allothers. D@snl1his Cou.l. tire leeal p.oilssionand.

indced. allgood people owe it to iuru.e gene.arions lo in$!e ihar equalopponunity

exists tbr allin the United Statcs ofAmerica?

25. lt lhis Coun deni€s u) pan of$is molion.l bcliele thal ii lvould

onl! be condorine rhe u.e(hical dd iUe8,1l behat ior ofth. arbnEys in $is ca*,

b) lpproving ol thcir i-.aud upon ftis coun of lAw and allo$ing fie rcdlining oi

ente.uinmenr p.ornoters based solely on the color oftheir skin to continue.

2o. lhe onEuine ond *nrinlou" hdd"hip lha' ie dnd m) orh(t

colledgues havc endured hss beed su w.enchirg. eDorioidll) d.!inn,g and

economicall)- delastaringand it is verf diliicuh to rhinklhxl itallhas happened

because of traud, collusion, attomq misconduct and $e impermissibie 'weiShing '

ofthe evidence lhal was pre*nled in d'js ca* on sunrm.rvjudgmerr.

27. All th3t I ever wanted was a chalce 10 senle this cae: on rerms rlar

wtre liiif, just and impanjalso that ny litmily ed I. lnd rhose ofthe orher black

concert prcmoreE. couldmakean honest livinaat lhe only cER md prci-ession

thar we havc eaer known. 1

o@nbitu, ,eordlarl ol rh. .al* .f ,hzir s*in.

!8. I kn€w justice was nor s€n ed

asked to ily rc New York for a meding on

of(he injlsdce $as made cl.ar ro ne.

in this cas€ but il wasn\ uniil I was

Tuesdan februa.y 7, ?01? thar the deprh

29. Prcviously. I sal ifl the Honorable Judge Patersoo s counroom and

witnessed iiNr-hand as .justce unfold€d. I winessed lhis Coun $dy Iide and iine

again, that the detbndanls r€eded to rnle this case. I can also rcmember this

Court slating, in open court, lhat lhee was obv;oudy some monkeying around in

lhis indusrry". This Coun als sa;d thal with lhe evidence that had b-<n prcs€nted,

that the Coun did nol sec how they [1he defendmts]could !.evailwift ajury' The

Coun conlinued to plead wilh dle defendanb ro settle- I aho wsted the

deiendants to make som€ sor! ofan€mpi .o settle rhis iegal bante so ihar I. alo.ewrth hy colieaaues, could continue in rhe only professioo tbat we kne*.whicb

wouldailow uslo tal€ care ofou. fanilies and loved ones, dd provide a basis fo.

need chsge so others would nol be similarly discriniEred aSainst.

30. Sittine in Judge Patiesont coun oom thoughout the many yeds of

this leftme feelin8 p.oud ofmy couffry's system oltaw. Bul lhen sobethiry

happened. And ir wasn'1 until February 7. 20 I 2, thal ir was made ctear !o me what

had. in f&t, happened: that there was a se.ies ofknowi.g ittegal acls and arcssattooey nisconduct by inlolved attomeys against me, fte orher plaidtifts, and the

rule oflaw- and s out-lined above-

A Hearing otr These Issues is Required,ln the Interest of Justice

31. I p€X formyselfand all othe6 similarly situaled, thal this Courl took

inlo the deplhs of ils hean and .onscienc€ ed fairly undefiake an impa.tial

elaluation ofthe basis upon which the instanl molion to vacate, set aside and

restore is premised and ftal lhis Court place lhis matter back on iis docket ibr

adjudication, and fo. the other relief.equested.

12. I ask rhis Honorable Courr rc rpstore myfairh in rny

in rhE greor codnrll s dle oflaq. This Coun mdsr

fie inlolved atbmeys onlheirmisdeds- g.oss acts thar leave in place the

disgracefulp.actice ofpromoler redliningbased on $e colorol a person's skin.

34. I rm rnfomed that fiese aturmels have violald \anour anorney

di$iplinsr-v rulesofconduct. I believe this Honorable Coun is obligated to rcport

ilrese atomeys to the staie elhics comminee dd to the U.S. Southern Districr of

New York anomeys eihics commin€e as *ell.

3s. I am infomed thar it is acnme (nisprisof, offelon))A@I1o repon a

crime, and rhal is exactly what herein involved attorneys did when ihey reNaired

silenr when crnicalevidencc was *crcled dd when rhet all chose NOT ro r€port

trhar they knew cxisted (he enrail evidence) to the Civil Righ6 Division of lhe

U.S. Arbme) s OIIicei

36. I am infomed thar il isa.rime to desrcy elidence. and $at is exacrly

whaiManin Gold did. wnh othe6. when he de$royed the maptisl con{aininA the

ll9 emailuses ofthe words nissel'and coon'and orhcr.eferences tothe

redlining ofne ard o&e. black p.omoFrs beause oftle.olor oiour skjn.

37. I belielelhis c()ult has an obligation 10takc allapprupriate action.

includine lbmally rcpon such conducr rc la.iousethics comdiuesand to Law

Enforc.nent, and lad confidenl thal Justce s'illsoon p!e\iil.

18. I am infomed that it is a fiaud upon $e coun shen a person- and in

this cdse it was nufterous attorneysi' tirils to br'ng ro the Court s anentio. the

miscooducl of anothe. anome). thal happenrd in lhis ca$ whe. $e lttoftels

who knewofrhe secredngofrhe email e!idenceand tailed to intbrm the Cou.I ftat

slch rctons had happened in a lbdenl.oun ofldw

Frauds Upotr the Court Murt Be Reported By the Court toAll Appropriate Attorney Ethics Entities

39. The above liauds upon ftis llono.abte Coun MUSTbe tbnnauv

rcpo.ted by this Courr I b€liele this Honomble Coon will iulfill its obligatios ro

.10. I pr.y that lhis Horomble Courtwill stand up to the iueg.l rnd

imprcp€r acriotrs of those *ho would dr.e d€f.lud a cood of kr o.

kooritrgly$offal oursyrlem of hsr I tru.t this Codrt *itljoio tte

courageori m€mbers ofthis nation's federal bench as in:

t.) I)istrid Coud Judg. Michael Mills oi O\lb.d Mi$isippi \ho. in thc MasnJ

Norlin publiccoruplion csc. boldl! depaded lion s.itcncnre guid.lines dd

rcspoDdcdr{' rhe grecdl lbm{public oflicirl h) sa)ii8.

"adlok destroled theloith ofth. people in ,hei. govenrcnt."

(b) t.r.S. Diskicrcoufl Sennrr Judge Neal B i!Ac6. Jr. Nho brrutcd lured artomct

Dic\ir Scrue_ls ,nd said.

-The jBtice sfs/eta no.le lou a .ich nnn, I et !'ou ottnpte.l to conupt it. "

{c, Ihe iloror.ble l.nrsrlvaDj. LI.S. Dk'ricr cdun Jldee litlsin M. KosiiL.

$ho bnvel) r.j{!cd ! plea rSrccmcm in $e i:rbla' c,r, scandal.

IN TIIE INTEREST OF JUSTICE,

A HEARING ON THESE ISSUES IS REQTJIRED

CONCLUS!ON

WHEREFORf,, for the above rcasods and in the inrcer ofjusricc, ptaiiriff

Leonard Rowc rcspectfully rcquests iiar rhe flonomblc Coun mter an ORDER:

nrc undenigned decldes udcr lh. penalty ol perjnry lhar h. is. t'ldintiflin rh..bo!c actiod,$d he has r.ad rhe above dnd rhar rhe info.ndrion contahed hdin ir tue and comcl l3 U.5c. \ l7 l |6 i l3U.S.C I 1621.

Respecrfllly submincd.

M!rch ?.2012

Sening 6ide thcjudgmenr in this cdei

Orderin8 that the case be .eopcn€d and restofed to thc carcndsr asAn active case and ftatjustice be prolerly adminislered undcrthc law:

Referirg th. n€sly dis.ove(\l.viddc€ ro: the Crini.al Divisid ofU.S. Attomey s Ofiice the Comminee on Gnevames ofthc Board ofJudges oflhe Southem DhrictofNew Yofk and to the Ne\r YorkSlate Appellate Division, Firsr DepartNent. Departmcdal DisciplinaryCoonntee (ft . _DDC")i.dd

0ftnting such funher relief as th€ Honorable Coun deems.ju$ and

DECLARAIIO\ UI\I'ER PENALTY Of TEII,'URY

d.

5805 Srare Bridge Road. Sune 350Johns Creek, Gcoryia 30097e ntuil : rcweente oir@tol. con

-.-,J-:,-LL.-o;rd Rowc

UNI'TED S"TAT'DS DISTRICT COTJRTSOUTHERN DISTRICTOF NEW YORK

ROWf, ENTf, RTAINMENT, ['I'AL.,

Plaintiffs,

'againsf_THE \{ILLIAM MORRTS, E]'AL.,

98 Civ. 82?2(RPP)

!N]!OD!Cr!ON

I . i.eonard Rowe. p,, ie and as an indiliduallr namcd plaintifi in thc

abole entitled action. respectfull) subnitsthe hefcin lvlenorandrn oi Law in

Suppo ol I is motion. pursu.nl to Rule 60. itcr a/i4 tbr an orde.r (a) \ acat'ns

and sefii.glside lhe iudgmert; (b) restoring the case toactive status: ic) relering

the newly discolered e!idence ro: the Criminal Dilision 01 U 5 Atbmer's Otn.e.

rhe FBl. rhe Conmiltee on Grie\ances oflhe Board ol Judges of the Soulhem

DisriclofNe$ York and the Nerv York SlaleAppellatc Division. Fnsi

DepanmenL. Depanmenbi Disciplinary Comnitiee 0he DDC- ): and (d) such

lurther.eliel ds the Honorable Coun deemsjusl and prope.

-------x

2. Noe beJbre the Honorablc Coun is a seies ol newlv reveaLed

c\ idence lhattlrongl) cortinues the * idesprcdd pracLicc of the .edlnring oi

Conced Promoters based on the colofofthei. skin

3. PlaidtiffLeonard Rose, appea.ins now in his own indjvidusl

capacity, originally brought ftis acdon with other Aliican-Am$ican Music concen

Promotcrs. The filingagairsl the defendants aileged va.ious cau*sofacrion

ircludinS. bul not limited 10AntiTrusr Violations, CivilRighrs Violations undef

.r2 U-S.C. l98l md orhe. claims for rcli.f.

4. Two )ea6 afle. ol?largument. ad after ext.nsive di$olery and prc-

lrial moton pracdce, this Honorable Coun Srdred sumna.y judgneDr lo $e

d€lbndan$. The Coun s Order lailed to include my m.nlion of the derogalory

utilizador ofrhetenrl "niggers (which $'as found in |lte defendanrs william

Moris Aeency and CAA s €-mail Kords some 3.19 rimes), coons - and odEr

blaunl evidence of racial discrimination by defendants tha! has ben and continues

10 be directed toward plaintiffand others simildly situated. Additionau), the Coun

Ordtr did not nenlion substanrive d@um€ntary elidence. consisling of over 2000

conlmcts which showed fte systemic d;sparities inconracdng between plainlitrs,

who are all Af.ican-Amencan and memb€rs ofaproteted class, le6us 'while"

concen pro'noreG in lens of tlvorable l.ms e{ended lo white" concen

promoters ed said rems and condilions ar. wholty dcnied Afican_Ame.ican

concen prmotes in clea. vjolation of&e temsof l? Ult('/9a,/.

5, Il isofextreme imponance and concem to nore thal white the Coun

weighcd .eflain evidence dunng rhe sunm.ly judgmenr phac of lhe c4, $e

Couri corlld not have conside.ed the actual e-mail records becausc ofthe inproper

actions and misconducr by cerrain involved anom€ys In shon, fte evidenc€ emaik

we.e inprcpedy kept from fie Coun.

6. Plaintifi brings lhjs mo.ion as he hd only Nently teamed tbatrhe

acls ofmi$onduct that.ranspired i. dris case were required by law lo be epo.red

to ftderal ofiicials by inlolved auomeys. Each and €very involvcd indilidual wirh

a law dearee tras aware ofahe egrcgious injustice occasioned by rhe perpe$ation of

&e tiaud upon the coun cdnc€ming$e hund.eds oteDails. and all ofrhose

"ofilc€rs ofthc coun" failed to properly rcpon thes€ matteB according to civil ard

criminal laq and a variety of slale and lideml anomey ethics rul€s -

RILIFFUNDFR RTII f , 60

?. The general purpose ofRule 60 "... is to strike a prupcr baldce

bctwen rheconnicling principles thar litigation muslbe broughl lo an end and

rh:rtJuslice iru51 be done.'Bllsblrr v. 571FJlc. & lllqllffe

F.]d976.977( ldCir . l978). lhe decis ion ro granr or detrr ret ie lpursua ro

Rule 60(b) lies in Lhe $und discarion oflhc rrial coun guided b,- .ccepred

legal principlcs applied in liehl ofallrhe relevant cir.u,nsranccs. - t'trited

!tal9!l!Er44!d92. I j8 F. Supp. ld 188. l9l { D l)el. 1001 ) (quotinA Ross v.

Mragq!. 63 8 l:.ld 64't. 6,18 (ld Cir i 98 I ). Ru le 60 piovidcs . meehen isn lbf

cxlraordinary.iudicial rcljeflrlailablej only il ft. hoving pan) dedonsrrares

exceprionai ctcumslances." Ruorolo i. citv of New York. 514 F..ld I84. l9l

lld Cir.:ooii) (inlernalquotation marks oniLtcd)(sec also Paddioqtop Pannes

v Bouchard- l .+ l . ld l l l l . l l l l i :dCir 199,r)) . b l e l is l l ingoncornore of

Rule 60(b) grounds lorreliel tiom judgnent. \'atr Skiver!: tlnited Srates,952

f.2d l : .11. l : .1.1-,1.1) ( 10" ( ' i r l99l) .

AN TJLTRA VIRf,SACT RESULTS IN A VOID JUDCMENTUNDER ! 'RCP60(8)I

rj. FRCP 60(b)(,1) pennils ! i{ured patu 10 seek rcliel liom ajudgmenr

o. o.de. when the j udgneni is void. Plainriil respecrtu ll) conlends thar rhe

Coun wds de&auded b) inlolved auorneys qhen rhe court'weighed lainted

.vidcncc.lhus resuhing in an ,rra uer ac1.. Gross * Rell. ctal,5E5 I'.ld 72

(l'! Cir :0091e\en rhougn he \ould srill be peBon.lly imnrune corsislenr wirh

tr5 l r S i lo i5b- i? 48 S ar l0 i )o

A Pf,RPf,TRATION OFA FRAUD UPON TlIE COURTREQUIRES REINSTATEMENT O}' THE CASI

tTNDER FRCP60(a),1

9. The l"! Ci.cuir Coun ofAppeals has held thar"lidud upon rhe coun"

consisrs of fiaud pcrpc.E.ed by oiilceB ofthe cdurI so rharjldicial ft"chinery

cannol pe.fo6 in usualDanner its inpanialLast of.iudging..scs presentcd ib.

5i t-.Ed.ld ii I ( 1978). his iudgmen! in $is case. fte order on summar)

judgnent, wolld bc void. Scc senerallx Ctesr_lrjlclldal, 5 85 F.3d 7: (:d

Cir 1009) and ljRCP60(bX.l).

Tnnraero. lnc. u La lu.rz, Ad Bolici!!!. :{ F 1d l< 7, ao I ld

( l inron srrer lood ( ord. . :54 B R. j : l { :000): ( i l t l ron r . IundruLLo. 860 I

i . : lo fRD 7l ( l0ul) . Crtskiu Der€ lnnmenl.

, l8o F. Supp. l l l09l :001).

5 t8. . .n den,ed. 5:o t \ l l . ro. l lq \ Cr. :0: : . l+1. I Fd rd I ' r i . : ' loorr :b- Ie

:d556 (1988). shich held that u.aud upon the .oufl ' s amntins Eliei iio final

judement, as disringuished Fom iiaud upon an adleNe pany. is linned to lnld

\hich se.iousl) rtlbds integrit) olnomalproess ol ddjudicalion Acco.d.

10. This Coun h6 inherenr

thal fraud has been Petttrated uPon

!acdrc lls o$n judEnenL on Foot

ofcrrnel. 20 F. Supp.:d 630 {1998}, Levirip { HonbtrFer,912 F. Supp.508,

am.med. l07t.id3(1996). In independe a.rion ro er asidejudgmcn. based on

Aaud. misconducr, or fraud upon rhe coun, plaintiflmusr oemonsFa.e an absence

of plaintifl's own iault. neglect o. carelessnes. yeld!td1"5.. 8.{5 F. Supp. 72.

st imed 70l. . ld I (1994).

u. I1b6 ben held thar whenananomey misreprcsenK or omiE malerial

lacls roa coun. o.acts on c]ienf!peiuy or distortion of rvidence. his conduct

ha) consuure thud upon the coun. :tr i ,6 l B.R. r00 r .app€al aft€r remo'j, 85 B.R.9?0 (1986). The Fedenl Pro.edures govem rctjct'

iiom judgment due to f.aud, mis.epreseDktion. o. orher misconduct ol adverse

partt applies ro bolh inrentionaland uninrendonal misreprcrentarions. DiPirro !.

!J5., 189 F.R.D.60 (t999).

12. haud upon the coun hd been defined by

that species oft€ud which dcs, or a$empls Io, defile

perpetRted by oRiceB ofthecoun softar thejudicial

th. usualmamd ils iftpanial lask of adj udsine cases

l:deral courts (o embEce

machinery canoot perlbrm in

1115 { loLi Ci i 1985),Ser ltdlos!-LldtsLsts$s, 761 F.ld

K€nnerv. c.I.T-- 187 Fld 689. A fraud upon de coun makes voidfie orders and

judgmen6 ofthar couri.

THE COURT CANNOT "WEIGH" TAINTED EVIDENCEFROM A FRAUD ON THE COURT

PERPETRATED BY INVOLVED ATTORNEYSINASUMMARY PROCEEDTNC

13. Oneofthe principal components ofrhe insra morionrcucalc,set

sideand.estore, is thar rhis Cou.l, unlnowi.gly admiLted "tai ed evidence - d

inpenn issible 'weighing ' of all fte evid€nce in $is case in violarior ofrhe law

&s 'Conclusion ' of Jaiuary 5,2005, Orderon Sur,rmary Judgment.

14. Ona summary judgmenr motion. tbe coun is no1lo weigh lainted

evidence. &e, e.s.. Ards!4r.di!r!!&l&1,jl!.477 U.S. ar l5s. 106 S.Ct.

ar )) ll: lJril3d-Sl!lr!-v.8'rl[. -id f.Id o3J. b41 (:d ( it loolr: D!n3-bllr-!.

\tihdsor h.ks Bord or Fim coFmi.<ione6. El4lJM. 58 {:d Cn.la87}.

llzi-:l (ld C;r1994). The draNitre of inferences and the 6e$ment oflhe

credibilirt offte wimssses remain within the provincc ofthe finders oilacl.

15, tn rulingon amotion for summaryjudgment, the district cou.t is

required to dnw sll fact!,l iniercn es in tulorol and t ke:rll faclual ,ssertions-

judenen'. S((, i s. $ftI

nlt tointel eiden,e- tnrhelight mosl tbvorable ro,lhe parry opposi.g summary

ihertr Lobbr, Inc. . 177 l l 5. :+1. :55,1! ! l

P.aruce pE jh.(r l . ar 50-45 (2d er l la86)

F.id 1051, 1061 (ld Cir 1995). Tbe funclion ofthe disr.ict court in considerinB the

morion lbf sumrnaryjudenent is nor ro resol!e dispuled issues oftaclbuonl) to

dcrem ine wheiher thcre is a genuine issue lo be lded &4. e g , Aldsrsg!-L

S..r :qLr:.i.lj-l4,ol ILo d u ( ru8o): Bpd!ie!s!-!...lcio-dl!q!&4. l:

:177 U.S. at 25t . 106 S.Cr ai 25l l -14: Erstmrn Machire

:5l l l t r t ln i led Starer v. Rem.u I rdjil.

co. { tjpitcd strles. E4l F.2d 1169,173 (2d Cirl988). Asscssmen$ olcredibililv

and choices bcrween confl;cring versions oflhe evenb arc matte6 ibrthejury. nol

for fte cou.! on summary judsmen| See, e.ts.. Fed R Ci! P 56(e) 1963 Adlisorv

477 t .5 rr :55 100 S.Cr dr

6.14 (2d Cirl99,1)1 6 Moore's Federal

16. lt is not thc province ofthe coud itselfro decide whai inttrences

should be dra*\ especialiy $hcn ibc coon had llntled cvidence Presentcd to

(our b),n\ol \ .d atrorners &e- t e :16 l.

1 l F. ld aI lEr i t there is any

.vidence in rhe r.cord iron an) source trom which arcasonable illerence could 6::

drawn in ftvor o i the nonnoving part! sunmary i udgm'm rs nnproPer, see e g l

t t

. l i l F ld rLl l i Bmdr r . To$n of

( . lchesrer.80i t lJ l0 i . ( ld cir ta88l.

17. An] rleighiDg ol ztrd,k/ cvidence isrhe prerogltile olrhe linder of

i ; . , rJr ,n er<.( , 'c ror 'n( .oL r or sumn?rt tuo;neni ( ' .1S. tnr ,"Lar. tnc.

. : js I jd-aE.r0 r l t^ | , ( i r l06r ' -h. -u i+ i , 'gv. Morton l'oods.lnc.,

ui cd elidence in ftis case hy the Coun on sum'har) jud-erncDt constilutes a iiaud

upon ihe Court $hich nust be corected. in the intet€sloijuslice. and as a natter

TqE AITORNf,Y MISCONDUCT COMMITTAD IN THIS CASE WASREQUIRED TO BE REPORTED TO TEDERAL AU'THORTTIES

I8. l8ll.S.C.21: prohibils the deprivaiion. under colof ofla\, oi d righl,

pri!ilese o. immun:ty thrt is protected b), tederal lawand is.rininaliy phish.ble

in a dumber of$ays by ltderal olllcials. I E tj.S.C. 2'll Prchibits lhe conspi.acy

bel}een rwo (l) or nrore persons ro !iolate. indmidare or harass4othc. in the

exc.cise of the,. lidcral .ign6

t9. In. manner in which rhe idsum case preceded, ir was onl] recenll,

revealed to $e hercin movanl, underuco.es the parricipation ol in\olved ditornevs

ro deprive rlainlitlofhis rlghls p.oted€d under federal las.

20. This Court, becaur

prclented liorn Eking necessary

it was defrauded b) membcrs ol the ba! was

action to stop lhe pemicious raciSm thal

pemeates the live concert promolion busidess ofthe entertainment industry in

21. When fte opponunity presented itselftlnough lbe auspices ofrhG

lawsui!. for five (5) yed, dris Court indicated that lhe defe.darrs would i:re

insunnounBble obstacles to survive the scrutiny ofthis Cout dd thejury

Unfortunaiely. the Coun was defmuded, andjustice was denied.

22. The time ha come for th;s Hono.able Court and a jury to see the real

e\ide$e, tfu-utlalzla!fuzidc!!8. Finally, ihis Honorable Coun and ajury has the

oppoltunity to considerthe plethora ofdocumentary evidence of Ecial disparity in

contractual !e.ms a.d conditions, which clearly violate the leuer ed sphit of42

u.s.c. 1981.

23. lt isnowiime ro conecrthis injustice by vacating and setting aside the

smmaiy judgment order that was entered in this matter basd on a iiaud upon rhe

coun by 'nvolved

arbmeys- l!h respectfuuy submitted thatthis case be added to

the docket for adjudication accordins ro law dd !o allow the jury, as the finder of

fact, to make their deteminalion based on ihe fac$, rhe law qnd the !!lbi!]lgl

'Justi.e musr satistv fie appea.ance ofjusrice. Levire '. lJnir.d St ies, 162 t).S.

610.810 s. cr. l0i8 ( t960). orbn- udred stat6. i . t8 u_s I1.75 s. cr. 13,( l95l). As it prcsendy stlnds. the previous order on sumary judgnenldoes nor

have the -le* , the feel or'1he appeearce' ofjusdce ha\ i.g ben p.oq€rl,

sen'ed inthis case. Due process compeis a iln and impaniallribuoalfree from

fraud. bi6 or prcj udice. lts,&lsriuo, 52 I f.:d 842 ( 7rh Cir. I 996). Plaintif was

cleady depriv.d ofduc p@ess in the previous pceedings before this Court when

a lfaud was pui upon lhe Honorable Court by cenain involved attomeys eithe.by

any one adomey s deliberare illegal&6orby d improper silencemd lirilurclo

repon such conducr 4 required.

2.1. I he United States Suprcme Court has reafiimed the princiDal thar

2s. Anomeys Manin Cold. Ray Heslin, Richard Pr;mofi dd Christine

Lepera. wirh rheir co-conspi.ators, witbheld fteevidence (the dmnine emailr)

from $e plaintitTs.Ihis Coun, and law enlbrcernent. they knowi.gly commined thc

crimes ofconspi€cy. obstruction ofjusticc. misp.ison ofa felony. irrer d/ia. And

the involved "officeB offie coun grcssly beacbed anomey cthical oaths,

"Concealmcnt ofcrime has been condemned ftrouShour ourhisrory" ar4,E6r,s c

l/al?s. 408 tr.S.665. 696 (1972).

CONCLUSION

WHEREFORf,, for thc abovc reaens and in the inte.esr ofjusrice, Dlaidriff

Leonard Rowc respftftlly r€quests rhat thc Hono€ble Coun flts s ORDER:

Sc[in8 asidc the Judgnmt in this qsj

Ordcrjrg fiat the case b€ rcopcned aid resror.d 1o rhe calcndr asan eiiw ce ard tbatjusticc be prcperly administcrcd ud€! rh€ law;

Itefening thc ncwly discovorcd ovidenceto: fte C.iminal Division ol

U.S. Anomcy's Ofiicc, thc Co|midee on Cricvanc€s oftlc Board of

Judges ofrhc Southem Districl ofNew York and to the Ne\r York

SrareAppcllalc Divisiotr, Firsl D.panmml D.panmcntal DiscipLinary

Comnirtcc (rhc "DDC ); lnd

CBntins such tunher rclief [J the Honomble Coun dccms just md

I d.clare snder p.nal.r ofpcrj.ry that theloretotna is ttue on t.ar.ct-

March 2,2012' , 1. ,12

L6al;n*-5805 Srat€ Bndge Roa4 Sdile 350Johns Creek, Ceoeia 10097ehai|: tuwent rt i^@oLcon