LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION · 2021. 4. 2. · GRIVAS Director General ACR Wilhelm WOHLFAHRT...

2020Level 1 - Implementation Overview

LSSIP 2020 - SWEDENLOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Sweden

Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/88

Date of Edition 23/03/2021

LSSIP Focal Point Susann LANDQVIST - [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person Igor MARCETIC [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS

LSSIP Support Team [email protected]

Status Released

Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders

Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation-monitoring

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation-monitoring

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2020

https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan-implementation-plan-level-3

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2020

https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan-implementation-report-level-3

European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

National AIP https://aro.lfv.se/Editorial/View/IAIP

FAB Performance Plan https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/luftfart/flygplatser-flygtrafiktjanst-och-luftrum/Flygtrafiktjanst/Prestationsplan/

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation-monitoring






https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

https://aro.lfv.se/Editorial/View/IAIP

https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/luftfart/flygplatser-flygtrafiktjanst-och-luftrum/Flygtrafiktjanst/Prestationsplan/

https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/luftfart/flygplatser-flygtrafiktjanst-och-luftrum/Flygtrafiktjanst/Prestationsplan/


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020.

Stakeholder / Organisation

Name Position Signature

Transportstyrelsen Swedish Transport Agency

Gunnar LIUNGBERG Civil Aviation and Maritime Director

LFV Ann PERSSON GRIVAS Director General

ACR Wilhelm WOHLFAHRT CEO

Military Authorities Anders JANSON Inspector of Military Aviation Safety

Swedavia -Stockholm Arlanda Airport Peder GRUNDITZ Managing Director


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1

Introduction ..................................................................................................... 12

1. National ATM Environment .......................................................... 13 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................. 13 National Stakeholders .......................................................................................... 15

2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 22 Evolution of traffic in Sweden ............................................................................. 22 MALMÖ ACC ......................................................................................................... 23 STOCKHOLM ACC .................................................................................................. 30

3. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 35 National projects .................................................................................................. 35 FAB projects .......................................................................................................... 36 Multinational projects .......................................................................................... 37

4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 40 FAB Co-ordination ................................................................................................ 40 Multinational cooperation initiatives.................................................................. 40

5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 43 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress .................................. 43 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes.......................... 44 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress ................................................................. 50 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................... 54

6. Annexes ........................................................................................ 79 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Sweden .......... 79 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ......................................................... 80 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ........................................... 85 D. Glossary of abbreviations .................................................................................... 90

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context Member State of:

Main national stakeholders:

- Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency; - Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; - Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider; - Swedavia – Swedish airport company; - The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); - The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK).

Main airport covered by LSSIP: There are four airports covered in this LSSIP: Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Göteborg Landvetter Airport, Malmö Airport and Umeå Airport

Main national stakeholders:

- Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency; - Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; - Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider; - Swedavia – Swedish airport company; - The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); - The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK).


Traffic and Capacity

Traffic growth in 2019 vs 2020 and Summer Forecast (May to October inclusive) for Sweden. The average en-route delay per flight (minutes per flight) decreased to 0.0.

The average en-route delay per flight (minutes per flight)

Malmo ACC Stockholm ACC

Sweden is part of:

The DK-SE Functional Airspace Block

Number of national projects: 9 Number of FAB projects: 3 Number of multinational projects: 4

-57% 2020

2019 2020 0.16T

0.00

10% & 32%

2021-2025

0.00

2019 2020 0.11T

0.00


Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non-PCP) and the PCP elements.

It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status.

The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP14, AOP15, AOP16, AOP18, ATC02.9, ATC18, ATC20, COM11.2 and NAV12.

Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030

95%

SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2013 2025

41%

SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030

48%


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (non-PCP) SESAR 1 (PCP only)

Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

ATM Interconnected Network

99 % 17 %

Airport and TMA performance

98 % 0 % 31 %

CNS Infrastructure and Services

90 % 40 % 63 %

Digital AIM and MET Services

82 %

Fully Dynamic and Optimised Airspace

95 % 100 % 60 %

Multimodal Mobility and integration of all Airspace Users

N/A

Trajectory Based Operations

81 % 50 %

Virtualisation of Service Provision

100 %


ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress.

Block 0 2000 2030

95%

Block 1 2009 2030

53%

Block 2 2013 2030

Block 3 2018 2025

2%


ATM Deployment Outlook

State Objectives

Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) COM12 - 100 % progress

- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route COM11.1 - 63 % progress - Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) INF07 - 85 % progress - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal COM11.2 - 40 % progress - Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information ITY-ADQ - 78 % progress - Aircraft Identification ITY-ACID - 72 % progress - Collaborative Flight Planning FCM03 - 98 % progress - Surveillance Performance and Interoperability ITY-SPI - 87 % progress - Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 - 85 % progress - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 ITY-AGVCS2 - 90 % progress - Traffic Complexity Assessment FCM06 - 00 % progress - Ground-Based Safety Nets ATC02.8 - 81 % progress

- Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes ITY-COTR - 97 % progress

- RNP 1 in TMA Operations NAV03.2 - 42 % progress

- RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY NAV10 - 91 % progress - Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile INF08.1 - 02 % progress

By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+


Deployed in 2019 - 2020 None

- Initial Airport Operations Plan AOP11 - 00 % progress - Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 - 50 % progress - Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 - 55 % progress

Airport Objectives - Stockholm Arlanda Airport

By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+


Overall situation of Implementation Objectives

Main Objectives Topic Progress

at the end of 2020

Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling

100% Completed

AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) 0% Not Applicable

*

AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data 0% Not yet planned

*

AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing

0% Not yet planned

*

AOM19.4 Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations 0% Not Applicable

*

AOM21.1 Direct Routing 100% Completed AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace 100% Completed *

AOP04.1(ESSA) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1)

100% Completed *

AOP04.2(ESSA) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict

Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2)

55% Late *

AOP05(ESSA) Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) 100% Completed * AOP10(ESSA) Time-Based Separation 0% Not

Applicable *

AOP11(ESSA) Initial Airport Operations Plan 0% Late * AOP12(ESSA) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting

ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC)

50% Late *

AOP13(ESSA) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing

0% Not yet planned

*

AOP14(ESNN) Remote Tower Services 100% Completed 2030 AOP14(ESNO) Remote Tower Services 100% Completed 2030 AOP15(ESSA) Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport 0% Not yet 2030



at the end of 2020

Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025

safety nets for the vehicle drivers planned AOP16(ESSA) Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting 0% Not yet

planned 2030

AOP17(ESSA) Provision/integration of departure planning information to NMOC

0% Not Applicable

2030

AOP18(ESSA) Runway Status Lights (RWSL) 0% Not yet planned

2030

ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations

100% Completed

ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 81% Ongoing * ATC02.9 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs 100% Completed *

ATC07.1(ESSA) AMAN Tools and Procedures 100% Completed * ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution

Support Information and Conformance Monitoring 100% Completed *

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN

100% Completed

ATC15.2 Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace 100% Completed * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 100% Completed ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to

Controller during Coordination and Transfer 85% Ongoing *

ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T 100% Completed 2030 ATC19 Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration 0% Not yet

planned 2030

ATC20 Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via Mode S EHS

0% Not yet planned

2030

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100% Completed COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route 63% Ongoing * COM11.2 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in

Airport/Terminal 40% Ongoing *

COM12 New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) 100% Completed * ENV01(ESGG) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed * ENV01(ESMS) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed * ENV01(ESNU) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed *



at the end of 2020

Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025

ENV01(ESSA) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed * ENV02(ESSA) Airport Collaborative Environmental Management 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESDF) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESGG) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESMK) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESMS) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESMT) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNN) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNO) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNQ) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNU) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNZ) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESPA) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSA) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSB) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSL) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSV) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services

100% Completed

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 98% Ongoing * FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 0% Not yet

planned *

FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP 0% Not yet planned

*

FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 0% Planned * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 85% Late

INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile

2% Ongoing *

ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 72% Late * ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical

Information 78% Late

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100% Completed *



at the end of 2020

Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025

ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195

90% Late *

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes

97% Late

ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) 100% Completed ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 87% Late *

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100% Completed 2030 NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations 42% Ongoing * NAV10 RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY 91% Ongoing * NAV12 ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations 0% Not

Applicable 2030

SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions

100% Completed

LEGEND: * Full Operational Capability (FOC) date

The Planned Implementation Date as reported in the LSSIP DB for each objective


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3)/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2020, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, it gives an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units and the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It also presents the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity, taking into account the current aviation situation caused by the COVID19 crisis;

Chapter 3 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and multinational level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The Level 1 document covers a high-level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in the Level 2 document; Chapter 4 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation, as well as all other multinational initiatives, which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 5 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Essential Operational Change and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition, it provides the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

The Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders (REG, ASP, MIL and APO) to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2020. In addition, it covers a detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP DataBase.

The information contained in Chapter 5 – Implementation Objectives Progress is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


1. National ATM Environment

Geographical Scope

International Membership

Sweden is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 1955

EUROCONTROL 1995

European Union 1995

EASA 2002

ICAO 1946

NATO - NO

ITU 1866

EDA 2008

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses Sweden FIR.

Sweden FIR is surrounded by FIR(s) of 9 States, namely Norway FIR/UIR, Kobenhavn FIR/UIR (Denmark), Rhein UIR (Germany), Warszawa FIR/UIR (Poland), Kaliningrad FIR/UIR (Russia – non-ECAC), Vilnius FIR/UIR (Lithuania), Riga FIR/UIR (Latvia), Tallinn FIR/UIR (Estonia) and Finland FIR/UIR.

The Division Flight Level (DFL) is not applied in Sweden.


Airspace Classification and Organisation

The classification of the airspace in Sweden is shown in the following picture:

Lower limit of SUECIA CTA is FL 125 in NW part of Sweden FIR over mountainous terrain (upland area).


ATC Units

The ATC units in the Swedish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

Malmö 10 2 Sweden FIR En-route call sign are the same for both Malmö and Stockholm – “Sweden Control”.

Stockholm 11 3 Sweden FIR

There are two Areas of Responsibility (AoR) in Sweden FIR served by Malmö ATCC and Stockholm ACC.

In Stockholm TMA the three sectors are served by one or two additional op. positions (ARR/DEP/DIR) in order to handle the traffic in an efficient and safe manner. There is also one coordinator position to support the controllers in the TMA sectors.

In general, Controlled Airspace in Sweden comprises all airspace between FL 95 and FL 660, including the airspace within TMAs and CTRs. The exception is the NW part of Sweden FIR over mountainous terrain (upland area) where the CTA lower limit is FL125.

National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Sweden are the following:

- Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency;

- Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider;

- Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider;

- Swedavia – Swedish airport company;

- The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces);

- The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK).

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.


Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in Sweden is the responsibility of the Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The Swedish Transport Agency is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis

Rule-making The Swedish Transport Agency

Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act

Safety Oversight The Swedish Transport Agency

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

The Swedish Transport Agency

Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen ( 2010:770) - Civil Aviation Ordinance Brottsbalken (1962:700) - Penal code

Airspace The Swedish Transport Agency

Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) - Civil Aviation Ordinance

Economic The Swedish Transport Agency

Commission Regulation (EU) No 391/2013

Environment The Swedish Transport Agency

Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) - Civil Aviation Ordinance

Security The Swedish Transport Agency and the National Police Board

Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) - Civil Aviation Ordinance Lag om luftfartsskydd (2004:1100) - Civil Aviation Security Act


Accident investigation Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK)

Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Accident Investigation Act (1990:712)

Accident Investigation Ordinance (1990:717)

Ordinance providing Instructions for Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (2007:860)

Swedish Transport Agency Accidents and incidents not covered by EU No. 996/2010 may be investigated by the Swedish Transport Agency.

Civil Aviation Authority - Swedish Transport Agency

The Swedish Transport Agency is a government agency operating under the Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. The core activities within Swedish Transport Agency are: Railway, Civil Aviation, Maritime, Traffic Registry and Road Traffic.

The agency is institutionally separated from the ANSPs.

The current organisation chart is given in Annexes.

Swedish Transport Agency website: www.transportstyrelsen.se

Annual Report published:

Y Transportstyrelsen Årsredovisning 2020 Transportstyrelsen årsredovisning 2020

Air Navigation Service Provider(s)

LFV

Name of the ANSP: LFV

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% State-owned

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y LFV is the only provider of ATC en-route in Sweden for both civil and military users.

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET Y Partly (MET OBS and MET briefing).

ATCO training Y Certified (not for Initial training)

Others

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

N

Annual Report published: Y

LFV Annual Report 2019 LFV Årsredovisning 2019 (e-magin.se)

LFV’s organisation chart is given in Annexes.

LFV website: www.lfv.se

http://www.transportstyrelsen.se/

https://transportstyrelsen.se/492c5b/globalassets/global/om_oss/finansiering/arsredovisning/transportstyrelsens-arsredovisning-2020.pdf

https://www.e-magin.se/paper/bvr9b9n3/paper/1#/paper/bvr9b9n3/1

http://www.lfv.se/


ACR

Name of the ANSP: Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR)

Governance: Private company Ownership: Private owned

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route N

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS N

CNS N

MET Y MET OBS at aerodromes

ATCO training Y Certified (not for Initial training)

Others N

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

N

Annual Report published: Y

ACR Annual Report 2019 available through Scanned Document (squarespace.com)

ACR’s organisation chart is given in Annexes.

ACR website: www.acr-sweden.se

ATC Systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 Y COOPANS

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Upgrades are deployed twice a year as part of COOPANS development and deployment concept.

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No Plan

ATC Unit

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Upgrades are deployed twice a year as part of COOPANS development and deployment concept.

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No Plan

ATC Unit

1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/594a26a2ccf210b0481c1405/t/5ece708395844040ae306203/1590587541293/A%CC%8Arsredovisning+2019+_+556656-1204+.pdf

http://www.acr-sweden.se/


Airports

General information

There are 46 instrument airports in Sweden, of which 10 airports are operated by Swedavia. The other airports are in general owned and operated by the municipality where they are located (e.g. Norrköping and Kalmar Airports). Two military aerodromes are also used for regular civil traffic.

Generally, Swedish airports own the main part of the ATM related equipment and the ATS Provider is the contractor for the service.

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2020 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives

There are four airports covered in this LSSIP: Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Göteborg Landvetter Airport, Malmö Airport and Umeå Airport. The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): Stockholm Arlanda: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/ESSA

https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/ESSA


Military Authorities

The Military Authorities in Sweden (Swedish Armed Forces) is an authority governed by the Swedish Parliament and the Swedish Government and is headed by the Supreme Commander. The leadership is located at the Armed Forces Headquarters in Stockholm. The Military Authorities play, during peacetime, a limited role in managing the airspace. The civil air navigation service provides service for military air traffic – hence there is no military service provider in Sweden. The legal basis for these provisions is the Swedish Civil Aviation Act (SFS 2010:500).

Co-ordination between civil air navigation service providers and the military authorities is ensured through Letters of Agreements (LoAs).

Besides the LoA there is an agreement between Swedish Armed Forces and Swedish Transport Agency concerning military demands for ATC.

Military authorities are responsible for the certification of military aircraft and equipment, but have no other ATM regulatory or ATM provision responsibilities. This is reflected in the tables below, as well as in the LSSIP Database, in which only SLoAs for Military that address the limited regulatory power and the airspace user role are kept.

The Swedish Armed Forces website: www.forsvarsmakten.se

Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule making

Oversight

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

N/A Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N/A

Level of such legal provision: N/A Level of such legal provision: N/A

Authority signing such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: N/A

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Organisation of military ATS for GAT

OAT/GAT Co-ordination OAT/GAT Co-ordination

ATCO Training ATCO Training

ATCO Licensing ATCO Licensing

ANSP Certification ANSP Certification

ANSP Supervision ANSP Supervision

Aircrew Training

Aircrew Licensing

Additional Information: see explanation under the 'Military Authorities' heading

Additional Information: See OAT comment

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP N National AIP N

National Military AIP N National Military AIP N

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N

Other: N Other: N

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: N/A NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A

Additional information: No OAT services provided by the military.

Additional information: No GAT services provided by the military.

http://www.forsvarsmakten.se/


Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: - Duration of the Certificate:

-

Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

-

Additional Information: See above

User role

Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route N Provided by LFV En-Route N

Approach/TMA N Provided by LFV/ACR Approach/TMA N

Airfield/TWR/GND N Provided by LFV/ACR Airfield/TWR/GND N

AIS N Provided by LFV AIS N

MET Y Provided by Swedish Armed Forces

MET N

SAR Y Provided by Swedish Maritime Administration

SAR N

TSA/TRA monitoring Y Provided by Swedish Armed Forces.

FIS N

Other: Provided by LFV Other: N

Additional Information: LFV and ACR are the ATS service providers, LFV also provides AIS service.

Additional Information: See OAT comment

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control

Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF

CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS

Others: These measures are applicable only for flying in Swedish airspace

Military applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




2. Traffic and Capacity

Evolution of traffic in Sweden

2020

Traffic in Sweden decreased by 57% in 2020 compared to 2019.

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

800000

900000

2016 A 2017 A 2018 A 2019 A 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F

IFR

fligh

ts

Sweden - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Scenario 2



International Dep/Arr 34%

Domestic flights 15%

Overflights51%

Sweden - Distribution (Ref. year 2019)

IFR flights yearly growth 2017 A 2018 A 2019 A 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F

Sc1 -57.6% 66.7% 20.7% 8.2% 6.4%Sc2 5.4% 2.8% -0.9% -58.3% 16.2% 43.1% 14.2% 12.4%Sc3 -58.4% 13.6% 17.3% 15.2% 12.0%Sc1 -55.1% 61.9% 21.9% 8.9% 6.8%Sc2 4.0% 3.8% 0.8% -56.4% 16.6% 41.9% 14.1% 12.2%Sc3 -56.6% 14.5% 17.5% 14.8% 11.6%

EUROCONTROL Five-Year Forecast 2020-2024

Sweden

ECAC

A = Actual

F = Forecast


MALMÖ ACC

Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2016-2024

2020 performance

Malmö ACC

Traffic evolution (2020 vs 2019) En-route Delay (min. per flight)

Actual Traffic All reasons

Year -58% 0.01

Summer -70% 0.00

Summer 2020 performance assessment

The average delay per flight was zero in Summer 2020.

Operational actions Achieved Comments

Optimising the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes

Improved ATFCM techniques Yes

Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation

Yes

Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Yes Staff available but 11 sectors not required due to reduced traffic levels from COVID-19 crisis

Minor updates of ATM system Yes

Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes


Planning Period – Summer 2021

2021 Summer Capacity Plan

Free Route Airspace

Airspace Management Advanced FUA Optimising the use of FRA when military areas are active

Airport & TMA Network Integration SWEA (Swedish Airspace Project) Phase I

Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM techniques

Airspace Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation

Procedures

Staffing Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors

Technical Minor updates of ATM system

Capacity Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand

Significant Events

Additional information

The charts below are valid for the following reference periods:

- May: 17 to 23 May 2021

- June: 14 to 20 June 2021

- July: 19 to 25 July 2021

- August: 16 to 22 August 2021

- September: 13 to 19 September 2021

- October: 18 to 24 October 2021







STOCKHOLM ACC

Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2016-2024

2020 performance

Stockholm ACC

Traffic evolution (2020 vs 2019) En-route Delay (min. per flight)

Actual Traffic All reasons

Year -59% 0.00

Summer -73% 0.00

Summer 2020 performance assessment

The average delay per flight was zero in Summer 2020.

Operational actions Achieved Comments

Optimising the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes

Improved ATFCM techniques Yes

Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation

Yes

Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Yes Staff available but 11 sectors not required due to reduced traffic levels from COVID-19 crisis

Minor updates of ATM system Yes

Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes

Summer 2021 Outlook

No capacity issues are foreseen for Malmö ACC in Summer 2021.


Planning Period – Summer 2021

2021 Summer Capacity Plan

Free Route Airspace

Airspace Management Advanced FUA Optimising the use of FRA when military areas are active

Airport & TMA Network Integration SWEA (Swedish Airspace Project) Phase I

Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM techniques

Airspace Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation

Procedures

Staffing Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors

Technical Minor updates of ATM system

Capacity Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand

Significant Events

Additional information

The charts below are valid for the following reference periods:

- May: 17 to 23 May 2021

- June: 14 to 20 June 2021

- July: 19 to 25 July 2021

- August: 16 to 22 August 2021

- September: 13 to 19 September 2021

- October: 18 to 24 October 2021




Summer 2021 Outlook

No capacity issues are foreseen for Stockholm ACC in Summer 2021.


3. Implementation Projects

The tables below presents the high-level information about the main projects currently ongoing in Sweden. The details of each project are available in Chapter 2 of the Level 2 - Detailed Implementation Status document.

National projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Progress Description: Links:

A-SMGCS Level 2 implementation (2015_291_AF2)

SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/01/2017 - 31/12/2019 Ongoing L3: AOP04.2 DP: Project 2015_291_AF2; Family 2.2.1

ADQ LFV (SE) 2012-2020 The project started in 2012 with the initial planning phase. During 2013-2015: - ADQ awareness campaigns has been performed - AIS internal processes and routines have been adapted to meet the ADQ requirements - minor system modifications have been implemented - Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with data originators (such as airports and other parties according to chapter 2.2 in the ADQ Implementing Rule) have been signed by a majority of the stakeholders. In 2015, a procurement for an ADQ compliant AIM production system was initiated. The procurement process continued during 2016. Tender evaluation late 2016 and early 2017. Implementation late 2017-2020. Operational late 2020.

L3: ITY-ADQ

ADQ implementation Stockholm Arlanda (2015_288_AF5)

SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/03/2016 - 31/12/2020 - L3: ITY-ADQ DP: Project 2015_288_AF5; Family 5.3.1

DMAN Stockholm Arlanda Airport (2015_292_AF2)

SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/04/2016 - 30/06/2019 - L3: AOP13 DP: Project 2015_292_AF2; Family 2.1.4



Enhancement of Airport Safety Nets at Stockholm Arlanda Airport

SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/08/2015 - 31/12/2019 - L3: AOP12 DP: Project 137AF2a; Family 2.2.1

Implementation of VoIP (2015_320_AF3)

LFV (SE) 01/01/2016 - 31/05/2021 Ongoing. Upgrade of VCS and Backup VCCS in progress. Network updates also in progress

L3: COM11.1 DP: Project 2015_320_AF3; Family 3.1.4

Implementing redundant WAN (2015_098_AF5)

LFV (SE) 01/01/2016 - 31/12/2020 Ready. Network services for 2nd WAN implemented. Implementation Network services for 3rd WAN installed and commissioned.

DP: Project 2015_098_AF5; Family 5.2.1

Initial AOP (2015_290_AF2) SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/10/2016 - 31/12/2021 - L3: AOP11 DP: Project 2015_290_AF2; Family 2.1.4

MUS LFV (SE) 2015-2020 Procurement done. Installation and commission started. The last station (Östersund MSSR) will be comissioned in February 2021

L3: ITY-SPI

FAB projects


ADQ Components in the SWIM Infrastructure - upstream data inclusion in the full data chain solution - ANSP and Airport (2017_060_AF5)

LFV (SE), Naviair (DK), SWEDAVIA (SE)

12/04/2018 - 31/12/2021 On-going DP: 2017_060_AF5

DK-SE FAB Aeronautical Data Quality (ADQ) (2015_099_AF5)

LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) 01/03/2016 - 31/12/2021 On-going, this project is continued into 2017_060_AF5 (= ADQ Components in the SWIM Infrastructure - upstream data inclusion in the full data chain solution - ANSP and Airport)

L3: ITY-ADQ DP: Project 2015_099_AF5; Family 5.3.1

Joint Programme Office (JPO) LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) 01/03/2016 - 31/12/2020 The project is completed and will be reported at the beginning of 2021.

-


Multinational projects


Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) (2015_227_AF3_A; 2015_227_AF3_B)

ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)

15/02/2016 - 31/12/2020

From an LFV Point of view, this Project is completed. L3: AOM21.2 DP: 2015_227_AF3_A and 2015_227_AF3_B; Family 3.2.4



Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSP including support of free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3 , B3.4 and B4.1) (2015_207_AF3_A; 2015_207_AF3_B)

Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), Naviair (DK)

01/01/2016 - 31/12/2020

Contract with INEA changed during 2019, B4.1 replaced by B3.5. Project finalised according to plan Build implemented with following operational completion dates Build 3.3 - 14.03.2019; Build 3.4 - 29.01.2019; Build 3.5 - 06.02.2020 Project Achievements - Obsolescent hardware replaced with modern, supported and high-performance upgrades which enables support for higher system loads and capacities, ready for traffic growth - Enhanced support for FRA operations and proper processing of FRA flight plans - Improved NM compliance developed based on NM feedback - Significant reduction of queued flight plans - Implementation of „gate” concept for conditional management of FRA flights as a complement to coordination point linked conditions, resulting in increased flight profile calculation, improved coordination and general better handling of FRA flights - Reduced workload and improved situational awareness - Architectural harmonization and product (MAESTRO) version update across COOPANS - Implementation of AMA message transmission support - Enables the extension of Arrival Management to upstream airspace by sharing of time-to-lose / time-to-gain and other AMAN information - Benefits: improved approach trajectory, optimized sequencing and runway delivery - Capacity improvements for high load airport scenarios - System Capacity Upgrades including FDP re-engineered so support multithreaded operation, significantly increasing flight plan processing capacity and overall system scalability - Architectural upgrade of AMAN in remote sites, increasing capacity.

DP: 2015_207_AF3_A and 2015_207_AF3_B; Family 3.2.1



NewPENS Stakeholders contribution for the procurement and deployment of NewPENS (Part A: General Call; Part B: Cohesion Call) (2015_174_AF5_A; 2015_174_AF5_B)

LFV (SE) 15/02/2016 - 31/12/2020

End equipment installed at both ATCC Stockholm and ATCC Malmö. Planning for integration and commissioning of data flows during end of 2019. Finalized in beginning of 2020

DP: 2015_174_AF5_A and 2015_174_AF5_B; Family 5.1.2

Sub-regional SWIM MET deployment to support NEFRA (A & B) (2015_025_AF5_A)

Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE)

01/11/2016 - 30/06/2019

On-going. DP: 2015_025_AF5_A and 2015_025_AF5_B; Family 5.4.1


4. Cooperation activities

FAB Co-ordination

DK-SE FAB - general:

In accordance with the reply to the Commission in 2014 and the ministry declaration 2013 enhanced cooperation between DK-SE FAB and NEFAB has been established in intra FAB arrangements at all levels. Since May 2017, full seamless FRA is in place in the entire airspace of DK-SE FAB and NEFAB.

The MET consortium NAMCon has continued their cooperation in accordance to agreed plans.

FAB Board:

DK-SE FAB Board had 2 meetings in 2020 on skype due to Covid - 19. The military authorities in Sweden and Denmark have participated as well as the national en-route providers. The main focus has been to monitor the development of the FAB and the work performed by the FAB sub groups.

Airspace:

In 2020 no meetings was held by the airspace group as no proposals from airspace users or ANSPs regarding the need for airspace changes from a FAB perspective were received.

Civil military cooperation

One meeting held due to Covid - 19 Main issue was complete agreement concerning ES D138/139.

Rule Harmonisation Group:

No activity during 2020.

Safety Oversight Group

Two Skype meetings have been held in 2020 due to Covid - 19. As NUAC HB has ceased as organisation the need of common oversight has changed to exchange of information.

Multinational cooperation initiatives

EPN – Entry Point North

Entry Point North (EPN), jointly owned by LFV, Naviair and IAA was established in 2006 and was the first transnational supplier of ATM education and training.

Today EPN operates as a Group with headquarters in Sturup, Sweden and training subsidiaries based in Hungary (EPC), Ireland (EPNI), Belgium (EPNB) and a training branch in Spain (EPNS).

EPN was created with the prime purpose to deliver standardised education of ab initios and controllers in accordance with best practices and regulations from ICAO and EC. EPN offers initial training for ATCOs and FISOs and Instructor and assessor training authorised by the Swedish authorities. EPN also delivers training and services such as ATSEP training, language training and recruitment selection.


In addition to training of the owners own personnel, EPN offers education on a commercial basis to clients throughout Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. The academy provides courses based on EPN’s training programme and methods.

The COOPANS alliance

The COOPANS (Co-operation between ANSPs) alliance is established between the five ANSPs IAA (Ireland), LFV (Sweden), Naviair (Denmark), Austro Control (Austria) and Croatia Control (Croatia) with Thales as supplier and partner.

The overarching purpose of the alliance is to reduce costs and reduce risks related to investments and operation for each of the five ANSPs through common training, maintenance contracts etc. This is achieved through a harmonised approach where the ATM systems are upgraded to a common COOPANS ATM system. The system utilises joint software and harmonised technical and operational procedures in order to limit specific national functionalities.

The organisation within COOPANS Alliance has been adapted to cover all the activities the Alliance is involved in. It will now cover the activities from SESAR to Realisation, including strategic planning.

A6 Alliance

The “A6 Alliance” was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership, i.e.:

• ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP;

• DFS, the German ANSP;

• DSNA, the French ANSP;

• ENAV, the Italian ANSP;

• NATS, the British ANSP;

• NORACON, (the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium).

After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalize the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation which was concluded in June 2011.

The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonized strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase.

The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organize co-operation at expert level.

The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015).

PANSA became then a full member of the A6 Alliance, which also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS[1] ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December, 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment.


This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities in 2015 and, strengthened by its wide membership, the A6 Alliance members has been able since then to provide significant support either in logistics or in human resources to the SESAR Deployment Manager.

The A6 Alliance leads European-wide technical activities validated and co-funded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Through the EC Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) financial program, successive proposals and actions driven by the SESAR Deployment Manager allowed significant contributions to ATM industry implementation projects within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project – PCP).

Moreover, in the context of SESAR2020, the B4[2] Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and, after having been associated through an agreement established with A6 Alliance in order to authorize exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D, Skyguide became by the end 2017 a full member of A6 through an ad-hoc consortium agreement with DSNA.

Finally, the A6, associated for the purpose to ROMATSA (Romanian ANSP) and Hungaro Control (Hungarian ANSP) and in cooperation with its A4 and SDAG partners, prepared in 2017 the establishment of SDA consortium into an AISBL[3] that became effective on 01/01/2018, for the benefit of the whole ATM industry and their end customers.

NORACON – North European and Austrian consortium

NORACON, the North European and Austrian Consortium is led by LFV and consists of Swedavia (former LFV airports) and eight European ANSPs: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). The NORACON consortium is a formal member of the SJU during SESAR1.

The purpose of the NORACON consortium is to ensure influence on the technical development in Europe, including protecting the partners’ long-term strategic investments in the perspective of SESAR. Within the SJU, NORACON is in lead of WP8, Information Management, and is making significant contributions to both operational and technical areas.

The Borealis alliance

The members of Borealis alliance are AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden), LGS (Latvia), NATS (UK) and Naviair (Denmark).

The alliance is based on an Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) signed on the 20th of June 2012. The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. By the establishment of the Borealis alliance the co-operation agreement known as NEAP (North European ANS Providers) was formally ended.

Borealis has two objectives, the first relates to delivering value through business co-operation between the Members, the second to being collectively more influential by developing and expressing a joint position on common issues. These objectives will be achieved by developing and delivering a joint Borealis business plan.


5. Implementation Objectives Progress

State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress

The graph below shows progress for all Implementation Objectives (applicable and not applicable to the State).

42; [56%]

8; [11%]1; [1%]

9; [12%]

10; [13%]

5; [7%]

Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

Not yet planned

Not Applicable


Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes

Legend:

100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (to FOC date)

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100 %

COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route

63 %

COM11.2 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal

40 %

ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 72 %

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100 %

ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195

90 %

ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability

87 %

NAV10 RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY

91 %


<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling

100 %

AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport 0 %

COM12 New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS)

100 %

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 98 %

FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2

0 %

FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP 0 %

FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 0 %

INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile

2 %

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 85 %

ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information

78 %


<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOP14 Remote Tower Services

ESNN - SUNDSVALL-HARNOSAND 100 %

ESNO - ORNSKOLDSVIK 100 %

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1)


AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2)


AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM)


AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC)


AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


AOP15 Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the vehicle drivers


AOP16 Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting


AOP18 Runway Status Lights (RWSL)



ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures


ATC19 Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration 0 %

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)

ESGG - Göteborg Landvetter Airport 100 %

ESMS - Malmö Airport 100 %

ESNU - Umeå Airport 100 %


ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management


ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO)

ESDF - RONNEBY 100 %

ESGG - Göteborg Landvetter Airport 100 %

ESMK - KRISTIANSTAD 100 %

ESMS - Malmö Airport 100 %

ESMT - HALMSTAD 100 %

ESNN - SUNDSVALL-HARNOSAND 100 %

ESNO - ORNSKOLDSVIK 100 %

ESNQ - KIRUNA 100 %

ESNU - Umeå Airport 100 %

ESNZ - ARE OSTERSUND 100 %

ESPA - LULEA/KALLAX 100 %


ESSB - Stockholm Bromma Airport 100 %

ESSL - LINKOPING/SAAB 100 %

ESSV - VISBY 100 %

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%

NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations 42 %

SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions

100 %


<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data

0 %

AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing

0 %

AOM21.1 Direct Routing 100 %

ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring

100 %

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN

100 %

ATC15.2 Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace

100 %

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

85 %

ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T 100 %

ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP)

100 %


<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 81 %

ATC02.9 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs 100 %

ATC20 Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via Mode S EHS

0 %

This EOC Chart is not applicable for Sweden since the Objective NAV12 is not applicable


ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress

The following tables show, for each of the ASBU Elements belonging to a particular ASBU Thread and Block, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2020 declared statuses and progress of the relevant implementation objectives in accordance with the initial mapping between ATM Master Plan Level 3 and new ICAO GANP 6th Edition (2019), as reflected in the Implementation Plan 2020. A comprehensive analysis performed as part of the ongoing ICAO EURGANT Project Team activity may result in updating the mapping following EASPG approval.

Legend:

= Completed (during 2020 or before) = Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2020 = Not applicable

ACAS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ACAS-B1/1 ACAS Improvements 100 %

ACDM

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ACDM-B0/2 Integration with ATM Network function 100 %

AMET

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AMET-B2/4 Meteorological information service in SWIM 100 %

APTA

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

APTA-B0/1 PBN Approaches (with basic capabilities) 100 %

APTA-B0/2 PBN SID and STAR procedures (with basic capabilities)

100 %

APTA-B0/4 CDO (Basic) 100 %

APTA-B0/5 CCO (Basic) 100 %

APTA-B1/1 PBN Approaches (with advanced capabilities)

100 %

APTA-B1/2 PBN SID and STAR procedures (with advanced capabilities)

100 %

2.0 %

91.0 %

91.0 %

42.0 %


ASUR

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ASUR-B0/1 Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B)

100 %

ASUR-B0/3 Cooperative Surveillance Radar Downlink of Aircraft Parameters (SSR-DAPS)

100 %

COMI

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

COMI-B0/4 VHF Data Link (VDL) Mode 2 Basic 100 %

COMI-B0/7 ATS Message Handling System (AMHS) 100 %

COMI-B1/1 Ground-Ground Aeronautical Telecommunication Network/Internet Protocol Suite (ATN/IPS)

100 %

COMI-B1/2 VHF Data Link (VDL) Mode 2 Multi-Frequency

100 %

COMI-B2/1 Air-Ground ATN/IPS 100 %

DAIM

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

DAIM-B1/3 Provision of digital terrain data sets 100 %

DAIM-B1/4 Provision of digital obstacle data sets 100 %

DAIM-B2/1 Dissemination of aeronautical information in a SWIM environment

100 %

FICE

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

FICE-B0/1 Automated basic inter facility data exchange (AIDC)

100 %

FRTO

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

FRTO-B0/1 Direct routing (DCT) 100 %

FRTO-B1/1 Free Route Airspace (FRA) 100 %

FRTO-B1/3 Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) and management of real time airspace data

No Plan

FRTO-B1/5 Enhanced Conflict Detection Tools and Conformance Monitoring

100 %

FRTO-B1/6 Multi-Sector Planning 100 %

87.0 %

87.0 %

51.5 %

85.0 %

85.0 %

2.0 %

97.0 %


NAVS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

NAVS-B0/2 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS)

100 %

NOPS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

NOPS-B0/2 Collaborative Network Flight Updates 100 %

NOPS-B0/4 Initial Airport/ATFM slots and A-CDM Network Interface

100 %

NOPS-B1/1 Short Term ATFM measures No Plan

NOPS-B1/2 Enhanced Network Operations Planning No Plan

NOPS-B1/3 Enhanced integration of Airport operations planning with network operations planning

100 %

NOPS-B1/4 Dynamic Traffic Complexity Management 100 %

NOPS-B1/5 Full integration of airspace management with air traffic flow management

No Plan

NOPS-B1/8 Extended Arrival Management supported by the ATM Network function

100 %

RATS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

RATS-B1/1 Remotely Operated Aerodrome Air Traffic Services

100 %

RSEQ

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

RSEQ-B0/1 Arrival Management 100 %

RSEQ-B0/2 Departure Management 100 %

RSEQ-B1/1 Extended arrival metering 100 %

RSEQ-B2/1 Integration of arrival and departure management

No Plan

91.0 %

99.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %


SNET

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

SNET-B0/1 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) 100 %

SNET-B0/2 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) 100 %

SNET-B0/3 Area Proximity Warning (APW) 100 %

SNET-B0/4 Approach Path Monitoring (APM) 100 %

SNET-B1/1 Enhanced STCA with aircraft parameters No Plan

SNET-B1/2 Enhanced STCA in complex TMAs 100 %

SURF

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

SURF-B0/2 Comprehensive situational awareness of surface operations

100 %

SURF-B0/3 Initial ATCO alerting service for surface operations

100 %

SURF-B1/1 Advanced features using visual aids to support traffic management during ground operations

No Plan

SURF-B1/3 Enhanced ATCO alerting service for surface operations

100 %

SURF-B1/4 Routing service to support ATCO surface operations management

No Plan

SURF-B2/2 Comprehensive vehicle driver situational awareness on the airport surface

No Plan

SURF-B2/3 Conflict alerting for pilots for runway operations

No Plan

SWIM

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

SWIM-B3/1 Air/Ground SWIM for safety critical information

100 %

90.5 %

81.0 %

81.0 %

81.0 %

55.0 %

50.0 %

2.0 %


Detailed Objectives Implementation progress

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

Completed Not yet planned

Ongoing Not Applicable

Planned Missing Data

Late

Main Objectives

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

- Handling of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is harmonised. 30/11/2012

REG (By:12/2018)

Mil. Authority - - 0%

Not Applicable

- SWE Transport Agency

National legislation is published and updated in accordance with EUROAT.

100% Completed

31/03/2012

ASP (By:12/2018)

ACR Comply to common principles rules and procedures for OAT handling and OAT/GAT interface according to national legislation.

100% Completed 30/11/2012

LFV Common principles for EUROAT according to Swedish regulation are applied.

100% Completed 30/11/2012

MIL (By:12/2018)

Mil. Authority

Military aeronautical information is migrated to EAD. Mil. Authority has no ATM Service Provision role and no ATM Regulatory power, so the ASP and REG SLoAs are 'Not Applicable'.

100% Completed

31/12/2010

AOM19.1

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA)

(Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -

0% Not Applicable

- LFV Advanced Airspace management is implemented, however without an automated ASM Support System, because no operational need found for it. For the military, flight plans have been amended according to notified dynamic airspace changes, but will not adapt to use ADR.

-

ASP (By:01/2022)

ACR ACR provides only TWR/APP-services, without advanced airspace management.

0% Not

Applicable -

LFV - 0% Not

Applicable -


AOM19.2

ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

0% Not yet planned

- No plan yet -

ASP (By:01/2022)

LFV - 0% Not yet planned

-

AOM19.3

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

0% Not yet planned

- No plan yet B2B is available in the LARA system but we are not there yet and there is no operational need at the moment. -

ASP (By:01/2022)

LFV - 0% Not

Applicable -

AOM19.4

Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -

0% Not Applicable

- . -

ASP (By:01/2022)

LFV - 0% Not

Applicable -

AOM21.2

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

100% Completed

- Free Route Airspace implemented. 31/10/2013

ASP (By:01/2022)

ACR ACR provides only TWR/APP-services, without advanced airspace management.

0%

Not Applicable

-

LFV Free Route Airspace implemented and final acceptance received from Swedish Transport Agency.

Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) /

Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1) / NEFRA

100%

Completed

31/10/2013

AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021

100% Completed

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Introduction of MLAT system including equipage of transponders is completed. 31/12/2011


REG (By:12/2010)

SWE Transport Agency

Regulation is updated and requires all aircraft operating into airports equipped with A-SMGCS Level 1 having equipment in accordance with the requirements of ICAO. Airport Manager is mandated to issue Local Safety Regulation applicable to the aerodrome operation.

100%

Completed

31/07/2011

ASP (By:01/2021)

LFV Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level I implemented.

100% Completed 30/04/2010

APO (By:01/2021)

SWEDAVIA Introduction of MLAT system including equipage of transponders to support existing SMR is completed. Training and installation of equipment are completed.

100% Completed

31/12/2011

AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021

55% Late

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport A-SMGS level 2 is installed and is under testing/evaluation. Planned to be fully operational 2020-06-30. LFV Proposal: A-SMGS level 2 software installed and testing/evaluation is 80% completed. Integration of new MLAT sensor system delayed due to COVID-19 restrictions for the NL and US suppliers to visit on site. New date now planned to be operational 2021-05-31.

31/05/2021

ASP (By:01/2021)

LFV

Training and operational procedures planning activities completed and ready for implementation. Information received from Swedavia Airports is that technical implementation delayed further until March/April 2021 due to COVID-19 restrictions for visits on-site.

40%

Late

31/05/2021

APO (By:01/2021)

SWEDAVIA A-SMGS level 2 is installed and is under testing/evaluation. Planned to be fully operational 2020-06-30.

A-SMGCS Level 2

implementation

100%

Completed

31/12/2019

AOP05

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021

100% Completed

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Validation of CDM at Stockholm Arlanda is completed, will be operational from February 2017. 20/02/2017

ASP (By:01/2021)

LFV

This Stockholm CDM project is in collaboration between EEC and Stockholm-Arlanda aeronautical platform represented by LFV, Swedavia, Aircraft Operators SAS, Britannia, Skyways and a number of Handling Agents.

100%

Completed

31/12/2016

APO (By:01/2021)

SWEDAVIA Implementation of CDM at Stockholm Arlanda is partly, final operational test are conducted.

A-CDM Optimization

100% Completed 20/02/2017


AOP10 Time-Based Separation Timescales: - not applicable -

0% Not Applicable

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

Stockholm Arlanda Airport is not in the applicability area of this objective - REG (By:01/2024) SWE Transport Agency

- - 0% Not

Applicable -

ASP (By:01/2024)

LFV

The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective was related to the Pilot Common Project but was taken out from latest version of CP. COOPANS has planned an implementation of TBS, but for the moment not decided when and to wish extent

0%

Not yet planned

-

AOP11

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 01/01/2021

0% Late

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Stockholm Arlanda Airport is planning to establish an Initial Airport Operational Plan according to SESAR deployment programme 2015.The planning phase of this project is on-going. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2021)

LFV - 0% Late 31/12/2021

APO (By:01/2021)

SWEDAVIA

Stockholm Arlanda Airport is planning to establish an Initial Airport Operational Plan according to SESAR deployment programme 2015.The planning phase of this project is on-going.

Initial AOP 0%

Late

31/12/2021

AOP12

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021

50% Late

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport - 31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2021)

LFV - 0% Not

Applicable -

APO (By:01/2021)

SWEDAVIA Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring, according to IR 716/2014, will be planned in the near future.

Enhancement of Airport Safety Nets at

Stockholm Arlanda Airport

0%

Late

31/12/2021


AOP13

Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 01/01/2024

0% Not yet planned

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport No plan yet. -

REG (By:01/2024) SWE Transport Agency

No plan yet. - 0% Not yet planned

- ASP (By:01/2024)

LFV No plan yet. 0% Not

Applicable -

ATC02.8

Ground-Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

81% Ongoing

- APW is already implemented in Topsky and will be compared to EUROCONTROL Specification on APW. MSAW is already implemented, but is not operationally used. The existing MSAW function will be compared to the approved EUROCONTROL Specification on MSAW. Waiting approved Eurocontrol specification on APM as the basis for implementation of APM.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2022)

LFV APW and MSAW are already implemented in Topsky. APM is planned to be commissioned during Q4 2021.

81% Ongoing 31/12/2021

ACR The initiative to implement safety nets at the airports rests with AOP. ACR will support and participate when/if the functionality is implemented.

0% Not

Applicable -

ATC02.9

Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

100% Completed

- LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. STCA is using the Multi-Hypothesis STCA Algorithm functionality All is completed.

30/11/2012

ASP (By:12/2020)

ACR LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E.

100% Completed

30/11/2012

LFV

LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. STCA is using the Multi-Hypothesis STCA Algorithm functionality All is completed.

100%

Completed

30/11/2012


ATC07.1

AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2020

100% Completed

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Basic AMAN functionality is already in place through the MAESTRO sequencing function, which is integrated in the EUROCAT2000E. 31/03/2005

ASP (By:01/2020)

ACR Basic AMAN functionality is ATCC-related. - 0% Not

Applicable -

LFV Basic AMAN functionality is already in place through the MAESTRO sequencing function which is integrated in the TopSky system

- 100% Completed

31/03/2005

ATC12.1

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

100% Completed

- Sweden has implemented a Resolution Support Function and a Conformance Monitoring function (MTCD). MTCD has been in full operational use in both Malmö (ESMM) and Stockholm (ESOS) ACCs since the S2K system where commissioned in 2005.

31/03/2005

ASP (By:01/2022)

ACR - - 0% Not

Applicable -

LFV - - 100% Completed 31/03/2005

ATC15.1

Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019

100% Completed

- AMAN is implemented and approved as a part of Eurocat. 31/12/2008

ASP (By:12/2019)

LFV AMAN is implemented and in operational use in Stockholm and Malmö ACC. - 100% Completed

31/12/2008

ACR Basic AMAN functionality is ATCC-related, ACR performs only TWR/APP services. - 0%

Not Applicable

-

ATC15.2

Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2024

100% Completed

- - 31/12/2019

ASP (By:01/2024)

LFV The implementation of AMA OLDI messages to support extended AMAN operations has been completed in the TopSky system.

Lower Airspace

optimization 100%

Completed

31/12/2019


ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

85% Ongoing

- Automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer will be implemented according to plan. NSA has accepted and communicated proposed changes to ANSP. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2022)

ACR The functionality is ATCC-related and therefore outside the scope of ACR services.

0% Not

Applicable -

LFV

Automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer is implemented. It is now only system bugs preventing the operational use of RAP, RRV, CDN, ACP, RJC, and SBY.

85%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

- AMHS capability (Basic ATSMHS & Extended ATSMHS) and gateway facilities to AFTN are implemented. -

ASP (By:12/2018)

ACR Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services. 0% Not

Applicable -

LFV AMHS capability (Basic ATSMHS & Extended ATSMHS) and gateway facilities to AFTN are implemented.

100% Completed -

COM11.1

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

63% Ongoing

- LFV plan to replace obsolete technologies (analogue and TDM-based) with VoIP solutions both for G/G telephony and the ground part of A/G voice communication. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2022)

LFV LFV plan to replace obsolete technologies (analogue and TDM-based) with VoIP solutions both for G/G telephony and the ground part of A/G voice communication.

Implementation of VoIP

63% Ongoing

31/12/2021

ACR Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services. 0% Not

Applicable -


COM11.2

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

40% Ongoing

- - 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2023)

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute - 0% Not

Applicable -

LFV

LFV plan to replace, where suitable, obsolete technologies (analogue and TDM-based) with VoIP solutions both for G/G telephony and the ground part of A/G voice communication. LFV will implement according to same plan as for OI

40%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

ACR - - 0% Not yet planned

COM12

New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 01/01/2025

100% Completed

- LFV has implemented NewPENS mid 2020. 30/05/2020

ASP (By:01/2025)

ACR - - 0% Not Applicable

LFV LFV has implemented NewPENS. mid 2020 - 100% Completed 30/05/2020

APO (By:01/2025)

SWEDAVIA No current plan. - 0% Not Applicable

ENV01

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

100% Completed

ESGG - Göteborg Landvetter Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Göteborg. 31/10/2010

ASP (By:12/2023)

LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Göteborg.

100% Completed 31/10/2010

APO (By:12/2023)

SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Göteborg.

100% Completed 31/10/2010

ENV01


100% Completed

ESMS - Malmö Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Malmö-Sturup. 31/10/2010

ASP (By:12/2023)

LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Malmö-Sturup. 100% Completed 31/10/2010

APO (By:12/2023)

SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Malmö-Sturup. 100% Completed 31/10/2010


ENV01


100% Completed

ESNU - Umeå Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 31/10/2010

ASP (By:12/2023)

LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 100% Completed 31/10/2010

APO (By:12/2023)

SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 100% Completed 31/10/2010

ENV01


100% Completed

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Stockholm-Arlanda. 30/09/2009

ASP (By:12/2023)

LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Stockholm-Arlanda.

100% Completed 30/09/2009

APO (By:12/2023)

SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Stockholm-Arlanda. The availability of CDA is reduced during peak hours.

100% Completed 30/09/2009

FCM03

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

98% Ongoing

- Sweden has fulfilled all actions required to support the collaborative flight planning to the extent that it is possible. All remaining not done actions require NM to first upgrade their systems to handle IAFP messages for cross border FRA operations, so while LFV is now ready for these steps to be completed we await the required NM changes as a pre-requisite.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2022)

ACR ACR will support the collaborative flight planning in the interface with COOPANS.

0% Not

Applicable -

LFV

Sweden has fulfilled all actions required to support the collaborative flight planning to the extent that it is possible. All remaining not done actions require NM to first upgrade their systems to handle IAFP messages for cross border FRA operations, so while LFV is now ready for these steps to be completed we await the required NM changes as a pre-requisite.

NEFRA 98%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

FCM04.2

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

0% Not yet planned

- No plan yet. -

ASP (By:01/2022)

LFV - 0% Not yet planned

-


FCM05

Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

0% Not yet planned

- No plan yet. -

ASP (By:01/2022)

LFV - - 0% Not yet planned

- APO (By:01/2022)

SWEDAVIA - - 0% Not

Applicable -

FCM06

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022

0% Planned

- Analysis is on-going. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2022)

ACR ACR Comply only to local (ATS-unit) ATFM management and has no data exchange with NM. - 0%

Not Applicable

-

LFV - - 0% Planned 31/12/2021

INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 01/01/2019

85% Late

- Sweden has notified differences to ICAO concerning date of compliance for Area 1, 2 and 4, which has been postponed to 31 December 2020. 31/12/2021

REG (By:01/2019)


Sweden has notified differences to ICAO concerning date of compliance for Area 1, 2 and 4 which has been postponed to 31 December 2020. National TOD policy and implementation programme is established.

- 85%

Late

31/12/2021


ASP (By:01/2019)

LFV

A national TOD policy from the regulator did not become available until 2nd of November 2017. It has not been possible to plan according to the plan before. The current version of the national TOD policy only includes Area 1. A number of open questions remain regarding how to fulfil the requirements concerning Area 2, 3 and 4, mainly concerning responsibilities. Some initiatives have however started and are ongoing, as mentioned here: LFV has notified the regulator that the LFV part/responsibility when it comes to interfaces between the AIS and a TOD solution will be established as a part of the overall ADQ compliant AIM system implementation. Contract is signed with a system provider in August 2017; the system will according to plan be put in operation during 20201. During 2019, the quality assessment of the existing obstacle data base has been initiated, in collaboration with the National Survey (Lantmäteriet). This will continue until 2025. Terrain data for Area 1 will be published from 2021-

70%

Late

31/12/2021

ACR - - 0% Not

Applicable -

APO (By:01/2019)

SWEDAVIA - - 100% Completed 31/12/2017

INF08.1

Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 01/01/2025

2% Ongoing

- - 31/12/2024

ASP (By:01/2025) Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute

.Upstarted. SMHI will have their Message Swich up and running in November 2019 and will be able to provide TAF, METAR and SIGMET in IWXXM during q1 2020.

10%

Ongoing

31/12/2024

ACR - - 0% Not yet planned

-

LFV - - 0% Not yet planned

- MIL (By:01/2025)


Not yet planned

- APO (By:01/2025)

SWEDAVIA - - 0% Not yet planned

-


ITY-ACID

Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

72% Late

- On going investments related to Surveillance infrastructure that has Mode S capability. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:01/2020)

LFV WAM and MSSR-stations with mode-S capability are now covering 90% of Sweden FIR with at least two independent sources. LFV two major ATCC are using mode-S Aircraft Id for identification and correlation.

80% Late

31/12/2021

ACR

The initiative to implement ACID at the airports rests with AOP. ACR will support and participate when/if the functionality is implemented. Update 2019-11-22: Updates of the SD to Mode-S capabilities has started and training is conducted on some of ACRs units.

50%

Late

31/12/2021

ITY-ADQ

Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

78% Late

- Planning and implementation in progress. 31/12/2021


Verification of compliance will be done according to established routines when application is submitted or through ongoing oversight when applicable.

70% Late

31/12/2021

ASP (By:06/2017)

LFV Planning and implementation is in progress. ADQ / DK-SE FAB Aeronautical Data

Quality (ADQ) 66%

Late

31/12/2021

ACR LoA exist between LFV and ACR concerning lowest available vectoring altitudes

100% Completed 31/12/2015

APO (By:06/2017)

SWEDAVIA Swedavia is in a preparatory phase which includes cost and workload estimates. Planning will be coordinated with LFV (ANSP).

ADQ implementation Stockholm Arlanda

85% Late

31/12/2021

ITY-AGDL

Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

100% Completed

- Swedish Transport Agency ensures that safety is assessed before any change to the existing system and that relevant information is published in AIP. LFV plans to support CPDLC over ATN/VDL Mode 2 in accordance with EC Regulation No 29/2009. Transport-type State aircraft will be equipped to comply with Commission Regulation (EC) 29/2009.

16/04/2015

REG (By:02/2018)


Swedish Transport Agency ensures that safety is assessed before any change to the existing system where availability of ATN/VDL2, Security Policy and address management will be assessed. It is dependent on the safety case presented by the effected ANSP.

100%

Completed

16/04/2015


ASP (By:02/2018)

LFV LFV plan to support CPDLC over ATN/VDL Mode 2 in accordance with EC Regulation No 29/2009.

100% Completed 16/04/2015

ACR ACR has no service above FL 95. - 0% Not

Applicable -

MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Authority

Transport-type aircraft entering into service from 1January 2014 have been equipped with data link capabilities.

100% Completed 01/01/2014

ITY-AGVCS2

8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

90% Late

- Compliance will be ensured with the requirements on 8,33 kHz frequency conversions. 31/12/2021


Compliance will be ensured with the requirements on 8,33 kHz frequency conversions.

43% Late

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2018)

ACR

Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services, communication system is responsibility of the airports. ACR is monitoring airport implementation. All concerned (ACR) personnel has been trained.

100%

Completed

31/12/2018

LFV - VHF 100% Completed 31/12/2016

MIL (By:12/2020)

Mil. Authority

All aircraft are equipped for 8,33 kHz channel spacing 12-2013. All radios (in all aircraft) will be modified for 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability by 12-2018. Mil. Authority has no ATM Service Provision role and no ATM Regulatory power, so the ASP and REG SLoAs are 'Not Applicable'.

100%

Completed

31/12/2020

APO (By:12/2018)

SWEDAVIA Swedavia is comply to existing legislation meaning full compliant by 31st of December 2018.

100% Completed 31/12/2018

ITY-FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

100% Completed

- FMTP compliant to (EC) Regulation No. 633/2007 was implemented technically in Topsky systems 01/2013. Transition for each adjacent ACC is completed. 31/12/2018


ASP (By:12/2014)

ACR This objective is not for the time being relevant for the small airports. Initiative rests with AOP. ACR will support and participate in the activities when/if needed.

0% Not

Applicable -

LFV

FMTP compliant to (EC) Regulation No. 633/2007 was implemented technically in Topsky systems 01/2013. All adjacent ACCs except Tampere are now completed. Coordination of tests with Tampere is on-going.

100%

Completed

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2014)


Not Applicable

-

ITY-SPI

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS-B Out in transport-type State aircraft : 07/12/2020 ELS in transport-type State aircraft : 07/12/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/12/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/12/2020

87% Late

- Safety assessment is conducted and reviewed by regulator, interoperability is ensured and training is performed when needed. 30/06/2021


Safety assessments reports will be reviewed when received. 100% Completed

30/11/2012

ASP (By:02/2015)

LFV Safety assessment is conducted, interoperability is ensured and training is performed when needed. MUS / SUPS 100% Completed

30/11/2012

ACR Safety assessment is conducted and training is performed when needed.

100% Completed 03/02/2015

MIL (By:12/2020)

Mil. Authority

The State aircraft operating as GAT in accordance with IFR rules will be equipped with Mode S enhanced surveillance 01/2019 and ADS-B out 12/2017. Military Authority has no ATM Service Provision role, so the ASP SLoAs are Not Applicable.

55%

Late

30/06/2021

NAV03.1

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030

100% Completed

- P-RNAV is implemented in accordance with Swedish regulations for following aerodromes: Stockholm-Arlanda, Halmstad, Göteborg Landvetter, Umeå, Åre-Östersund and Stockholm-Skavsta 2011/2012. RNAV for en-route based on DME/DME is implemented.

16/12/2015


- - 100% Completed

-


ASP (By:06/2030)

LFV RNAV for en-route based on GNSS and DME/DME is implemented, carriage required FL95 and above. Initiative for PBN at aerodromes rests with AOP.

Lower Airspace

optimization 100%

Completed

30/04/2005

ACR Initiative for PBN at aerodromes rests with AOP. - 100% Completed 16/12/2015

NAV03.2

RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Start: 07/08/2018 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024 One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030

42% Ongoing

- - 31/12/2023


- - 100% Completed

31/12/2020

ASP (By:06/2030)

ACR - - 30% Ongoing 31/12/2023

LFV TMA operations is AOP responsibility. - 0%

Not Applicable

-

NAV10

RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at Non-PCP airports: 03/12/2020 Instrument RWY ends served by precision approach (including PCP airports): 25/01/2024 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024

91% Ongoing

- Procedures for APV/Baro VNAV are published in Swedish AIP. National regulation implemented for APV procedures based on EASA material. This objective contains detailed information about RNP approach procedures implementation at four aerodromes that participate in LSSIP reporting, i.e. Stockholm ESSA, Goteborg ESGG, Malmo ESMS and Umea ESNU. LNAV and LNAV/VNAV have already been implemented at all four aerodromes. LPV(APV1) is expected to be implemented at ESGG, ESMS and ESNU by 25.01.2024. LPV(CAT1) is expected to be implemented at ESSA by 31.12.2020

25/01/2024


National regulation implemented for APV procedures based on EASA material. - 100%

Completed

30/09/2010

ASP (By:01/2024)

LFV Implementation is depending on the aerodrome owners initiative and PBN-plan. Procedures for APV/Baro VNAV are published in Swedish AIP.

- 85% Ongoing

25/01/2024

ACR - - 100% Completed 30/04/2015

SWEDAVIA - - 55% Ongoing 25/01/2024


NAV12

ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -

0% Not Applicable

- No current plans to implement this functionality. -

REG (By:06/2030) ASP (By:06/2030)

LFV - - 0% Not

Applicable -

SAF11

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

100% Completed

- The Swedish Transport Agency has published a national action plan, based on EAPPRE, with recommendations to Aerodrome Operator, Air Navigation Service Provider, Aircraft Operator and National Authority. Actions taken by the different actors are reviewed during oversight.

31/12/2018

REG (By:01/2018)


The Swedish Transport Agency has published a national action plan, based on EAPPRE, with recommendations to Aerodrome Operator, Air Navigation Service Provider, Aircraft Operator and National Authority. Actions taken by the different actors are reviewed during oversight.

- 100%

Completed

30/11/2013

ASP (By:12/2014)

LFV Participating in Runway Safety Teams according to LoA between LFV and AOPs. - 100% Completed

20/11/2014

ACR The applicable measures of the Action plan have been implemented. - 100% Completed

20/11/2014 APO (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority - - 100% Completed

30/11/2013

SWEDAVIA

All recommendations according 3.1 & 3.2 have been reviewed, evaluated and implemented as far as practible possible. Appropriate recommendations according 3.3 with Aerodrome Operators responsibility (3.3.4; 3.3.5 and 3.3.6) have been considered and implemented.

- 100%

Completed

31/12/2018


Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

AOM21.1

Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

- Free route airspace implemented 31/10/2013. 31/10/2013

ASP (By:12/2017)

LFV Free route airspace implemented 31/10/2013. - 100% Completed

31/10/2013

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

100% Completed

- LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. All is completed. National regulations for the use of STCA are in force since 1 January 2005 but the choice of the version and specifications is left to ANSP.

30/11/2012

ASP (By:01/2013)

ACR LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E.

- 100% Completed

30/11/2012

LFV LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E.

- 100% Completed

30/11/2012

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

- Approved operators are registered in authority registry-system after approved application. LFV has a monitoring system in place and all concerned personnel have been trained. All transport A/C are equipped with TCAS 7.1.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)


Aircraft operators informed via published authority documents and information channels. Information containing applicable regulations and how to make complete airworthiness and operational/training updating and application for ACAS 7.1 Approved operators are registered in authority registry-system after approved application.

- 100%

Completed

31/10/2013

ASP (By:03/2012)

ACR The functionality is ATCC-related and therefore outside the scope of ACR services. - 0%

Not Applicable

-

LFV Monitoring system is in place and all concerned personnel have been trained. - 100% Completed

31/12/2011 MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority All transport A/C are equipped with TCAS 7.1. - 100% Completed

31/12/2015


FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

- Enhanced tactical flow management service (ETFMS) is implemented except DPI pending decision at Stockholm Arlanda Airport regarding CDM implementation 31/10/2009

ASP (By:07/2014)

ACR ACR Comply only to local (ATS-unit) ATFM management. - 0% Not

Applicable -

LFV Enhanced tactical flow management service (ETFMS) is implemented except DPI pending decision at Stockholm Arlanda Airport regarding CDM implementation

- 100% Completed

31/10/2009

ITY-COTR

Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

97% Late

- FDP and exchange system are in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 Annex I (Part A). ABI, ACT, REV, MAC, BFD, and CFD messages completed. Training on additional functionality is always an integral part of implementation.

31/12/2022

ASP (By:12/2012)

ACR

This objective is not for the time being relevant for the small airports. Initiative rests with AOP. ACR will support and participate in the activities when/if needed. 2020-12-10 update: Development is actually going in the opposite direction after LFV decision as En-route monopolist provider to withdraw Topsky components from ACR towers. Will generate higher workload for both ACC and TWR.

0%

Not Applicable

-

LFV

FDP and exchange system are in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 Annex I (Part A). ABI, ACT, REV, MAC, BFD, and CFD messages completed. Training on additional functionality is always an integral part of implementation. COOPANS TopSky system supports MAC messages but they are temporarily disabled due to operational safety concerns with their use. The Eurocontrol OLDI Task Force has been notified that there is a problem with the specification and they have produced guidance material to cover the concerns. Now a TopSky software change is needed before MAC messages can be used - this is on-going.

97%

Late

31/12/2022

MIL (By:12/2012)

Mil. Authority

Mil. Authority has not ATM Service Provision role, so the ASP SLoAs is 'Not Applicable'.

0% Not

Applicable -


Local Objectives

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local 100% Completed

ESNN - SUNDSVALL-HARNOSAND The ATS- and MET-services at Örnsköldsvik airport, ESNO and Sundsvall airport, ESNN is provided from a (remote ATS) center located in Sundsvall. 04/10/2017

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local 100% Completed

ESNO - ORNSKOLDSVIK The ATS- and MET-services at Örnsköldsvik airport, ESNO and Sundsvall airport, ESNN is provided from a (remote ATS) center located in Sundsvall. 21/04/2015

AOP15 Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the vehicle drivers Applicability and timescale: Local

0% Not yet planned

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport No ongoing activity in this objective yet. -

AOP16 Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting Applicability and timescale: Local 0% Not yet

planned ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport

No ongoing activity in this objective yet. -

AOP17 Provision/integration of departure planning information to NMOC Applicability and timescale: Local % Not

Applicable ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport

Due to AOP 05. -

AOP18 Runway Status Lights (RWSL) Applicability and timescale: Local 0% Not yet

planned ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport

No activity in this objective yet, -

ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local 100% Completed

- - In which ACCs has the MSP (1P2T configuration) been implemented;¨ ATCC Malmö - How many sectors are operated with MSP (1P2T configuration); Two - Are these sectors continuously operated as 1P2T, or for specific periods of time. Specific periods of time Sweden has no further plans to implement MSP in other ACCs

-

ATC19 Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration Applicability and timescale: Local % Not yet

planned -

No plans yet in this year report. -


ATC20 Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via Mode S EHS Applicability and timescale: Local 0% Not yet

planned -

We do not have significant data in for enhanced Mode-S (no updated and accepted requirements for data quality). -

ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Applicability and timescale: Local 100% Completed

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport A number of projects and activities are ongoing taking care of mutual interests in reducing environmental impact on neighbouring communities. 31/10/2010

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 100% Completed

ESDF - RONNEBY The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESGG - Göteborg Landvetter Airport The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows for example that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017



ESMK - KRISTIANSTAD The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESMS - Malmö Airport The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESMT - HALMSTAD The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017



ESNN - SUNDSVALL-HARNOSAND The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESNO - ORNSKOLDSVIK The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESNQ - KIRUNA The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017



ESNU - Umeå Airport The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC)

20/12/2017


ESNZ - ARE OSTERSUND The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESPA - LULEA/KALLAX The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017



ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports. This shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285. LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESSB - Stockholm Bromma Airport The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows for example that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). Stockholm Bromma (ESSB) stand out a bit. Departing aircrafts from ESSB must often level off after departure in order to avoid traffic from Stockholm Arlanda (ESSA) especially when aircrafts departures from RWY 30 at ESSB. LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition, LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


ESSL - LINKOPING/SAAB The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition, LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017



ESSV - VISBY The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285). LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). In addition, LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO. For example in January and February 2017 LFV performed training for over 100 area-controllers at ESOS (Stockholm ATCC).

20/12/2017


6. Annexes

A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Sweden

LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP National Focal Point Swedish Transport Agency Susann LANDQVIST

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA LFV Bo Johansson

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP ACR Carl Hansson

LSSIP Focal Point for Military Swedish Armed Forces Göran Andersson

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Swedavia Torstein Grönmo

Other Focal Points Organisation Name

Focal Point for NETSYS Luftfartsverket Adam Brown

Focal Point for SUR LFV Anders ANDERSSON

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS Igor Marcetic


B. National stakeholders organisation charts

Swedish Transport Agency Organisation

The Swedish Transport Agency is working to achieve good accessibility, high quality, secure and environmentally aware rail, air, sea and road transport. We have overall responsibility for drawing up regulations and ensuring that authorities, companies, organisations and citizens abide by them.

The Swedish Transport Agency has overall responsibility for civil aviation and is responsible for the authority tasks relating to air navigation services for civil and military aviation.


Swedish Transport Agency Civil Aviation and Maritime Department Organisation

The Civil Aviation and Maritime Department formulates regulations, examines and grants permits, as well as assessing civil aviation with particular regard to safety and security. And we monitor developments in the aviation market. We also formulate regulations, examine and grants permits, as well as exercising supervision principally of Swedish and foreign vessels sailing in Swedish waters. We work to improve maritime safety and environmental influence for recreational boating. We also analyse accidents and near-misses.


LFV

LFV’s primary mission is to provide safe, efficient and environmentally friendly air navigation services for civil and military aviation. LFV shall work to achieved the transport policy objectives

LFV is a State Enterprise 100% state owned.

LFV is the only provider of ATC En-route in Sweden and handle both civil and military users in an integrated system since 1978.

LFV is organised in four departments (see above) and employs approximately 1.100 people.

LFV Head office is in Norrköping.

LFV provides ATC services in:

• 18 ATC towers

• 1 RTC (no airports connected 2020)

• 2 Air Navigation centres located in Malmö and Stockholm.

LFV’s subsidiaries and associated companies:

• LFV Aviation Consulting AB a wholly owned subsidiary whose role is to develop, produce and export aviation competence and represent the organisation in international commercial situations.

• EPN AB, the Nordic ATS Academy EPN. This is a subsidiary equally owned by LFV, Naviair Avinor and IAA.

• Norway A/S, a wholly owned subsidiary whose role is to develop, produce and export aviation competence and represent the organisation in Norway specifically.

• SAAB Digital Air Traffic Solutions AB, a jointly owned company with SAAB as majority owner. The company commenced operations on 1 September 2016 and will sell, develop and operate products and services for digital remote air traffic control. SAAB Digital Air Traffic Solutions AB operates 1 RTC for 4 airports.

• AVISEQ Critical Communication AB, a wholly owned subsidiary whose role is to provide monitoring, operation, maintenance and support for technical system within aviation (LFV, Swedavia, local airports).


ACR Aviation Capacity Resources AB

ACR Aviation Capacity Resources AB is a privately owned company and are providing air traffic services at fourteen airports in Sweden. ACR is designated as a provider at these airports and provides integrated air traffic services for both civil and military aviation. ACR conducts aerodrome- and approach control services and has approximately 100 employees in 15 different locations. ACR is headquartered in Stockholm and has resources for operations, finance, security, management and staff.


Swedavia

Swedavia owns, operates and develops ten airports across Sweden, and the company is wholly owned by the Swedish state. The business is run as airport operations and real estate operations. Our role is to create the access Sweden needs to facilitate travel, business and meetings – in Sweden, elsewhere in Europe and around the world. A focus on customers, sustainable development, and safety and security are the basis of everything Sweden does, both in our own operations and in society in general. Swedavia is a world leader in developing airports with the least possible environmental impact. In 2013, Swedavia had revenue of about 5.2 billion Swedish kronor and some 2,400 employees. A total of 33.5 million passengers flew via our airports in 2013, which is an increase of 3.5 per cent.


C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans

The table below (extracted from the MPL3 Progress Plan 2020) shows for each implementation objective, the mapping of the L3 implementation Objectives to the corresponding SESAR Essential Operational Changes, the SESAR Solutions, the Deployment Program families, the ICAO ASBU, the EASA EPAS, the Network Strategy Plan, the Airspace Architecture Study Transition Plan (AAS TP) Milestones and the SESAR Key Features.

EOC Level 3 Implementation Objectives SESAR Sol. DP family ICAO ASBUs EPAS NSP AAS TP KF

ATC21-Composite surveillance ADS-B/WAM #114 - ASUR-B0/1

ASUR-B0/2 RMT.0679 RMT.0519

SO8/3 SO8/4 - EAI

COM10 - Migration from AFTN to AMHS - - COMI B0/7 - - - EAI

COM11.1 - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route - 3.1.4

3.2.1 COMI B2/1 - SO8/4 AM-1.3 EAI

COM11.2 - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal - - COMI B2/1 - SO8/4 - EAI

ITY-ACID - Aircraft identification - - - - SO8/2 - EAI

ITY-AGDL - Initial ATC air-ground data link services -

6.1.1 6.1.3 6.1.4

COMI B0/4 COMI B1/2 RMT.0524 SO4/1

SO8/3 AM-1.1 EAI

ITY-AGVCS2 – 8.33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 - - - - SO8/1 - EAI

ITY-SPI - Surveillance performance and interoperability - - ASUR B0/1

ASUR B0/3 RMT.0679 RMT.0519

SO8/3 SO8/4 - EAI

NAV10 - RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY #103 1.2.1

1.2.2

APTA B0/1 APTA B1/1

NAVS B0/2

RMT.0639 RMT.0445 SO6/5 - AATS

NAV11 - Precision Approach using GBAS CAT II/III based on GPS L1 #55 - NAVS B1/1 - - - HPO

AOM13.1 - Harmonise OAT and GAT handling - - - - SO6/2 - OANS


AOP11 - Initial Airport Operations Plan #21 2.1.4 NOPS B1/3 - SO6/2 - HPAO

AOP17 – Provision/integration of DPI to NMOC #61 - NOPS B0/4 - - - HPAO

COM12 - NewPENS - 5.1.2 5.2.1 COMI B1/1 -

SO2/3 SO2/4 SO8/3 SO8/4

- EAI

FCM03 - Collaborative flight planning - 4.2.3 NOPS B0/2 - SO4/2 SO5/1 SO5/6

AM-1.14 OANS

FCM04.2 - STAM phase 2 #17 4.1.2 NOPS B1/1 - SO4/3 SO5/4 AM-1.11 OANS

FCM05 - Interactive rolling NOP #20, #21 4.2.2 4.2.4 NOPS B1/2 -

SO2/1 SO2/2 SO2/3 SO2/4

AM-1.12 OANS

FCM06 - Traffic Complexity Assessment #19 4.4.2 NOPS B1/4 - SO4/3 SO5/4 AM-1.13 OANS

FCM09 - Enhanced ATFM Slot swapping #56 - NOPS B1/7 - SO6/1 - OANS

INF08.1 - Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile #35, #46

5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1,

5.6.1

AMET B2/4 DAIM B2/1 SWIM B3/1

-

SO2/4 SO2/5 SO5/2 SO5/5

AM-1.5 EAI

INF08.2 - Information Exchanges using the SWIM Blue TI Profile

#28, #46

5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.6.2

SWIM B3/1, TBO B3/1 - SO5/2SO5

/5 AM-9.1 EAI

INF07 - Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (e-TOD) - 1.2.2 DAIM B1/4

DAIM B1/4 RMT.0703 RMT.0722 SO2/5 - EAI

INF09 - Digital Integrated Briefing #34 DAIM B1/7, AMET B1/4 - SO2/5 - EAI

ITY-ADQ - Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information - 1.2.2 - RMT.0722

RMT.0477 SO2/5 - EAI


- - - - - - - -

AOP14 – Remote Tower Services #12, #71,

#52, #13 - RATS B1/1 RMT.0624 - - HPAO

AOP04.1 - A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) #70 2.2.1 SURF B0/2 MST.029 SO6/6 - HPAO

AOP04.2 - A-SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) - 2.2.1 SURF B0/3 MST.029 SO6/6 - HPAO

AOP05 - Airport CDM #106 2.1.1 2.1.3

ACDM B0/2 NOPS B0/4 RSEQ B0/2

- SO6/4 - HPAO

AOP10 - Time Based Separation #64 2.3.1 WAKE B2/7 - SO6/5 - HPAO

AOP12 - Improve RWY and Airfield safety with CATC detection and CMAC #02 2.1.2

2.5.1 SURF B1/3 MST.029 SP6/6 - HPAO

AOP13 - Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement planning and routing

#22 #53 2.4.1 SURF B1/4 MST.029 SO6/6 - HPAO

AOP15 - Safety Nets for vehicle drivers #04 - SURF B2/2 MST.029 - - HPAO

AOP16 - Guidance assistance through airfield lighting #47 - SURF B1/1 MST.029 - - HPAO

AOP18 - Runway Status Lights #01 - SURF B2/2 MST.029 - - HPAO

ATC07.1 - Arrival management tools - 1.1.1 RSEQ B0/1 - SO4/1 - AATS

ATC19 - Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration #54 - RSEQ B2/1 - SO6/5

SO4/1 - AATS

ENV01 – Continuous Descent Operations - - APTA B0/4 - SO6/5 - AATS

ENV02 – Airport Collaborative Environmental Management - - - - - - HPAO

ENV03 – Continuous Climb Operations - - APTA B0/5 - SO6/5 - AATS


NAV03.1 – RNAV1 in TMA Operations #62 - APTA B0/2 RMT.0639 RMT.0445 SO6/5 - AATS

NAV03.2 – RNP1 in TMA Operations #09, #51 1.2.3 1.2.4 APTA B1/2 RMT.0639

RMT.0445 SO6/5 - AATS

SAF11 - Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions - - -

MST.007 RMT.0570 RMT.0703

- - HPAO

AOM19.1 - ASM tools to support A-FUA #31 3.1.1 FRTO B0/2 - SO3/2 SO3/3 AM-1.8 OANS

AOM19.2 - ASM management of real-time airspace data #31 3.1.2 FRTO B1/3

NOPS B1/5 - SO3/2 SO3/3 AM-1.8 OANS

AOM19.3 - Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing #31 3.1.3 NOPS B1/5

FRTO B1/3 - SO3/2 SO3/3 AM-1.8 OANS

AOM19.4 – Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations #31 3.1.4 NOPS B1/6

FRTO B1/4 - SO3/2 SO3/3 - OANS

AOM21.2 - Free Route Airspace #33, #66 3.2.1 3.2.4 FRTO B1/1 - SO3/1

SO3/4

AM-1.6 AM-1.10 AM-5.1

AATS

ATC12.1 - MONA, TCT and MTCD #27, #104 3.2.1 FRTO B1/5 - SO3/1 SO4/1

AM-1.15 AM-5.1 AATS

ATC15.1 - Initial extension of AMAN to En-route - 1.1.2 - - SO4/1 - AATS

ATC15.2 - Extension of AMAN to En-route #05 1.1.2 RSEQ B1/1

NOPS B1/8 - SO4/1 AM-1.3 AATS

ATC17 - Electronic Dialog supporting COTR - 3.2.1 - - SO3/1

SO4/1 AM-1.3 AATS

ATC18 - Multi Sector Planning En-route – 1P2T #63 - FRTO B1/6 - SO4/1 AM-4.3

AM-5.1 AATS

ITY-FMTP - Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) - - - - SO8/3 AM-1.3 EAI

ATC02.8 - Ground based safety nets - 3.2.1

SNET B0/1 SNET B0/2 SNET B0/3 SNET B0/4

- SO4/1 - AATS


ATC02.9 - Enhanced STCA for TMAs #60 - SNET B1/2 MST.030 SO4/1 - AATS

ATC20 – Enhanced STCA with DAP via Mode S EHS #60 - SNET B1/1 - SO7/2 - AATS

NAV12 – ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations #113 - APTA B0/6 MST.031 SO6/5 - AATS


D. Glossary of abbreviations

This Annex mainly shows the abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Document for Sweden.

Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in:

https://www.eurocontrol.int/airial/

Term Description

ACR Aviation Capacity Resources AB

AFA Alliance Framework Agreement AF ATM Functionality

COOPANS Co-operation between ANSPs

DK-SE FAB Danish-Swedish Functional Airspace Block

EPC Entry Point Central

EPN Entry Point North

ESSA ICAO Code for Stockholm – Arlanda Airport

FT Fast Track

JPO Joint Programme Office

LFV Luftfartsverket

NAMCon Northern Europe Aviation Meteorology Consortium

NEFAB North European Functional Airspace Block

NEFRA Northern Europe Free Route Airspace

NUAC Nordic Unified Air traffic Control PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

RHG Rule Harmonisation Group for DK-SE FAB

RTC Remote Tower Centre S-AF Sub ATM Functionality

SEK Swedish Kronor

SHK Swedish Accident Investigation Authority

SUPS Surveillance Upgrade Program Sweden

Swedavia Swedish airport company

https://www.eurocontrol.int/airial/definitionListInit.do?skipLogon=true&glossaryUid=AIRIAL

Date post:	10-May-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times