+ All Categories
Home > Documents > LTE Radio Fundamental_Enabling

LTE Radio Fundamental_Enabling

Date post: 17-Nov-2015
Category:
Upload: indra-aminudin
View: 156 times
Download: 26 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
LTE
Popular Tags:
45
©2014 Nokia Networks
Transcript

Slide 1

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

Contents LTE Technology Update Why we need to move LTE NSN Solution & Capabilities in delivering LTE NSN Strong points against competitors NSN Radio Network Planning Solution for Smartfren Telecom Bidding

2014 Nokia Networks

LTE Technology Update

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

3GPP UMTS Evolution LTE is the next step in mobile radio communications after HSPA Evolution driven by data rate requirementsWCDMA (R99/R4)2 Mbps DL384 kbps ULCS/PSHSDPA/HSUPA (R5/R6)14.4 Mbps peak DL 5.7 Mbps peak ULPSHSPA + (R7)28 Mbps peak DL 11 Mbps peak ULPSEUTRAN (R8)100 Mbps peak DL 50 Mbps peak ULPS3GPP Rel.99/43GPP Rel. 5/63GPP Rel. 73GPP Rel. 82003/42005/06 HSDPA 2007/08 HSUPA2008/092009/10UTRA Long Term Evolution: up to 20 MHz BWUTRA evolution: WCDMA 5MHz

2014 Nokia Networks

What is new in LTE? New radio transmission schemes:OFDMA in downlinkSC-FDMA in uplinkMIMO Multiple Antenna TechnologyOFDM Modulation Mapper (QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM)

New radio protocol architecture:Complexity reductionFocus on shared channel operation

New network architecture: flat architectureMore functionality in the base station (eNodeB)Focus on packet switched domain

Important for Radio Planning:Frequency Reuse 1No need for Frequency PlanningImportance of interference controlLTE requires Physical Layer Cell Identity (PCI) planning (504 physical layer cell IDs organised into 168 groups of 3)Additional areas need to be planned like PUCCH and PDCCH capacity.Tracking Area Planning needed.

2014 Nokia Networks

LTE will be The Mobile Broadband Radio SolutionAll HSPA and GSM operators deploy LTEHSPA and GSM remain in parallel to LTE for many yearsAll CDMA operator migrate to LTE to get rid of CDMAsoonAll WiMAX operator migrate to LTE to get rid of WiMAX soon

LTE

.

GSM

HSPA.

CDMA

WiMAX

2014 Nokia Networks

LTE Bandwidth ScalabilityScalable bandwidth 1.4 20 MHz using different number of sub-carriersDownlink uses OFDMA and uplink SC-FDMALarge bandwidth provides high data rates while small bandwidth allows simpler re-farming

1.4 MHz3.0 MHz5 MHz10 MHz15 MHz20 MHz

9 Mbps

22 Mbps

37 Mbps

74 Mbps

110 Mbps

150 MbpsPeak data rate ranges from 8 Mbps to 150 Mbps depending on the bandwidth (2x2)

Practical average data rate 25-30% of the peak rate

2014 Nokia Networks

For internal useDocument ID / Version number / Life cycle status / Department / Au3GPP Supported FDD Frequency BandsBandUplink [MHz]Downlink [MHz]Band size [MHz]11920-19802110-21702x60UMTS core21850-19101930-19902x60US PCS31710-17851805-18802x75180041710-17552110-21552x45US AWS5824-849869-8942x258506830-840875-8852x10Japan 80072500-25702620-26902x7026008880-915925-9602x3590091749.9-1784.91844.9-1879.92x35Japan 1700101710-17702110-21702x60Extended AWS111427.9-1447.91475.9-1495.92x20Japan 150012699-716729-7462x17US70013777-787746-7562x10US70014788-798758-7682x10US70017704-716734-7462x12US70018815-830860-8752x15Japan new 80019830-845875-8902x15Japan new 80020832-862791-8212x30EU digital dividend211447.9-1462.91495.9-1510.92x15Extended Japan 1500223410-34903510-35902x803500232000-20202180-22002x20S-band241626.5-1660.51525-15592x34L-band251850-19151930-19952x65Extended 190026814-849859-8942x35Extended 80027807-824852-8692x17Lower 80028703-748758-8032x45Global 70029717-7281x11US 700 downlink only302305-23152350-23602x10AT&T WCS31451-458461-4682x7Telecom Italia 1646.7-1651.71670-16752x5LightSquared 1980-20102170-22002x30Korean Telecom

2014 Nokia Networks

3GPP Supported TDD Frequency BandsThe same technology used both in FDD and in TDD modes in LTETerm TD-LTE also being used for LTE TDDIn 3GPP the active operators on TDD are China Mobile and Softbank / SprintBandUplink [MHz]Downlink [MHz]Band size [MHz]331900-19201900-19201x20UMTS band342010-20252010-20251x15UMTS band351850-19101850-19101x60USA361930-19901930-19901x60USA371910-19301910-19301x20USA382570-26202570-26201x502600 middle391880-19201880-19201x40DECT, UMTS402300-24002300-24001x100China, Asia412496-26902496-26901x1942600 full423400-36003400-36001x2003600433600-38003600-38001x200380044703-803703-8031x100Global 700

2014 Nokia Networks

Why we need to move LTE

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

Trend #1: Mobile Broadband Traffic Doubles per YearCombined data volume for over 100 NSN HSPA and LTE customers

2 year period with growth of nearly 4x

2014 Nokia Networks

2013 Q2:Public campaign about planned network coverageForIinnitteiarnl aTl eulsiae LTE leDaodceumrsehnipt IDlo/sVtersnioonwnusmtrboenr /gLifneetcwycolerkstcatoums /pDeetpitaiortnment / AuthorimprovementsTrend #2: Best Network Competition is Back

ra

TTelia (o4nGe)

3 (3G + 4G)

Tele2/Telenor(4G)

Launch:2009

Everything verywhereE

23G4G G

Vodafone

O2

Launch: 2012

2013 Q2:60% population coverage0.7 million LTE subscribers

LTEquality

CoverageData rateLTE-Advanced

2014 Nokia Networks

For internal useDocument ID / Version number / Life cycle status / Department / AuthorTrend #3: Low Band for Best Broadband CoverageLow frequency is good for coverageExample U900 case: Indoor coverage increased from 75% to over 95%

Increase in 3G data

Dramatic decrease in 2G data

3G data volumes increased by 10% to 15% with U900 indicating that customers were enjoying a better experienceLow band 3G needed also for LTE phones with CSFB. LTE-only low band deployment requires VoLTE

BEFORE(Without U900)AFTERWith U900

2014 Nokia Networks

Trend #4: From Early LTE to Mass Market LTE

>200 million LTE subscribers globally>20x more subscribers since end 2011

VoLTE launched

LTE in smartphones

LumiaiPhone 5

Android

>80% of LTE subs in Korea + Japan +

LTE market penetration

Korea Japan USAEurope (W)60%

40%

20%

0%

2014 Nokia Networks

NSN Solution & Capabilities in delivering LTE

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

Many operators use today feeder-less sites where the RF module is placed close to the antennaFeederless site provide best radio performance since the cable loss can be avoidedSystem

Typical Base Station InstallationFlexy Multiradio

AntennasModuleRF Module

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

NSN Flexi Most Compact RF Solution Real Life Site ExampleNSN Flexi130 kgFlexi RF module6TX 6RX6 x 60W < 25 kg

Dual band3-sector2x2 MIMO6 x (60+60W)

High power + remote RF installation = Best indoor coverage

2014 Nokia Networks

RL 40 Radio Module Variant

2014 Nokia Networks

Flexy Multiradio 10 BTS

2014 Nokia Networks

Circuit Switched Fallback (CSFB) Voice Solution

2G/3G RANMME

E-UTRAN

MSC-SMGW

CSFB is the most common voice solution in LTE smartphones todayCSFB moves LTE terminal from LTE to 2G/3G to make CS callCS voice call not possible in LTE since there is no CS core interface

Paging in LTECS call setup in 2G/3G

2014 Nokia Networks

LTE in Hungary

Current networks use LTE1800 with 20 MHz and can provide up to 150 Mbps peak rateMore coverage with LTE800 later (800 MHz is not yet auctioned) More capacity with LTE2600 later (2600 MHz is not yet auctioned)

LTE1800 by T-MobileLTE1800 by Telenor

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

NSN Strong points against competitors

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

Connect Magazine Tests in Germany, Austria & SwitzerlandPublished December 2013

>Fastest LTE network: A1 Telekom Austria - Mostly provided by NSN (>60%). Average DL data rate: 44 Mbps and UL: 27 Mbps>Best voice success rate: T-Mobile Austria - 100% from NSN. Combined setup failure and call drops: Fastest LTE network: Telkomsel Indonesia (5MHz) - 100% from NSN. Average DL data rate: 30 Mbps>Highest voice quality: Orange Switzerland - 100% NSN network>Similar voice quality also with T-Mobile Germany (100% NSN 3G) and T-Mobile Austria (100% NSN 3G)

2014 Nokia Networks

For internal useDocument ID / Version number / Life cycle status / Department / Author233-Mar-142013 Nokia Solutions and Networks. All rights reserved.

Italian Regulator (AGCOM) Measurements n October 2013

Three best markets NSN

Best NSN area 11.4 Mbps

Best Huawei area 7.9 Mbps

Best Ericsson area 5.1 Mbps

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

Mass Event Performance in Korea in October 2013

Spot A

Spot B

100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%18:00 ~ 19:0019:00 ~ 20:0020:00 ~ 21:0021:00 ~ 21:30VoLTE Success Rate

900800700600500400300200100018:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:1521:30Latency [ms]

051015202518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:1521:30DL Throughput [Mbps]

Service unavailablefrom 20:00 onwards

Service unavailablefrom 20:00 onwards

Service unavailable during entire event >3hr

Service unavailable during entire event >3hr

Service unavailable from 20:00 onwards

2014 Nokia Networks

Carrier Aggregation

100 MHzMIMOCoMPHeterogeneous Networks8x4x

Smooth migrationfrom LTE to LTE-A

Backward compatible to LTE

Mobility

LTE-Advanced Pushes Data Rates Beyond 1 Gbps

2014 Nokia Networks

System Performance Requirements Peak data rate1 Gbps data rate will be achieved by 4-by-4 MIMO and transmission bandwidth wider than approximately 70 MHzPeak spectrum efficiencyDL: Rel. 8 LTE satisfies IMT-Advanced requirementUL: Need to double from Release 8 to satisfy IMT-Advanced requirementRel. 8 LTELTE-AdvancedIMT-AdvancedPeak data rateDL300 Mbps1 Gbps1 Gbps(*)UL75 Mbps500 MbpsPeak spectrum efficiency [bps/Hz]DL153015UL3.75156.75

*100 Mbps for high mobility and 1 Gbps for low mobility

2014 Nokia Networks

Key aspects in 3GPP Rel.10Bandwidth Extension by Carrier Aggregation

Heterogeneous networks

MIMO4x

8x

Coordinated Multipoint

Relaying

Carrier AggregationCarrier1Carrier n

Carrier2..

Mobility

in June 2009

up to 100 MHz Flexible component carrier aggregation different frequency bands asymmetric in UL/DL

Component Carrier (LTE rel. 8 Carrier)

Aggregated BW: 30MHz

Aggregated BW: 5x20MHz = 100MHz

20 MHz

10 MHz

20 MHz

20 MHz

20 MHz

20 MHz

20 MHz300Mbps300Mbps300Mbps300Mbps300Mbps1.5Gbps

2014 Nokia Networks

2010

100 Mbps2012

150 Mbps20 MHz

20 MHz2x2 MIMO150 Mbps

demonstrated already in Korea

201310+10 MHz2x2 MIMOLTE-Advanced Peak Data Rate EvolutionInitial devices 100 Mbps (Cat 3) with contiguous 20MHz150 Mbps (Cat 4) with contiguous 20 MHz150 Mbps with 10 + 10 MHz carrier aggregation 2013300 Mbps with 20 + 20 MHz starting 20143CA and 60 MHz combinations on the way 2014

300 Mbps

2015+

>1 Gbps20+20 MHz2x2 MIMO

40+ MHz4x4 / 8x8 MIMO

2014 Nokia Networks

LTE-A Carrier Aggregation

In order to support bandwidths larger than 20Mhz, two or more component carriers are aggregated together in LTE AdvancedPeak rates (DL 3Gbps / UL 1.5Gbps) achieved by bandwidth extensionFrom 20 Mhz to up to 100 MhzBackwards compatibility with rel-8 by carrier aggregationCombine N Rel-8 carriers together forming N x Rel- 8 bandwidthMaximum 5 carriers can be aggregated (up to 5 x 20 Mhz)Aggregated carriers can be on different frequency bands & different BWLTE-Advanced terminals operate on multiple component carriers45

2014 Nokia Networks

Carrier Aggregation Measurements by Signals Ahead(October 23rd, 2013) Configuration 10 + 10 MHz in Live Networks 850 + 2100 MHzLTE RELEASE 8Primary LTE CarrierLTE RELEASE 8Secondary LTE CarrierLTE ADVANCEDLTE Carrier Aggegation141 Mbps+=71.9 Mbps72.1 MbpsAvg. Data RatePeak Data RateAvg. Data RatePeak Data RateAvg. Data RateAverage RSRP better than -70 dBm, Primary cell at 2100 MHz

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

Spectrum Usage Evolution9001800210035005800Unlicensed bandsLicensed bands700470 700

3.5 GHz spectrum for small cells 700 2600 MHz aggregated together into single poolConvergence of mobile broadband and broadcast2600800

2014 Nokia Networks

1.6 Gbps with Commercial Flexi Multiradio 10 BTS

1.4 Gbps with 100 MHz and 4x4 MIMO in FDD

1.6 Gbps with 60 MHz and 8x8 MIMO in TDD

2014 Nokia Networks

MIMO 4TX4RX Push Data Rates

Larger cell area +3 dB

High cell capacity+20%/70% (DL/UL)

No changes required to terminals all terminals with two antennasCell edge date rate +60%/ 100% (DL / UL)

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

35

2014 Nokia Networks

36

NSN Radio Network Planning Solution for Smartfren Telecom

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks

Radio Network PlanningSmartfren Bidding

R 255 G 211 B 8R 255 G 175 B 0R 127G 16 B 162R 163 G 166 B 173R 104G 113 B 122R 234 G 234 B 234R 175 G 0 B 51R 0 G 0 B 0R 255 G 255 B 255Supporting colors:R 52 G 195 B 51Primary colors:

2014 Nokia Networks

RAN Scope of WorkDeployment Scenarios TDD eNB configuration is 2/2/2@4T4R considering 30 MHz BW (20+10MHz) FDD eNB configuration will be 1/1/1@2T4R considering 5 MHz BW Carrier Aggregation (20+10Mhz) TDD will be Deployed at Day-1 ( Required RL55TD) Inter-Frequency (TDD & FDD) load balancing will be deployed at Day-1 (Required RL55 & RL70) TDD+FDD Carrier Aggregation (20+10M + 5M) will be deployed at End 2015 (Required LTE16) eMBMS will be deployed at Q4 2015 (Required LTE15A)

2014 Nokia Networks

ConfigurationPlanning

Parameter Planning

Area/cell specific

Handover strategies

Site selection & planning

PRE-PLANNINGDETAILEDPLANNINGPropagation measurementsCoverage prediction

Load estimationTraffic distributionPlanned Service & QoS definition

SiteAcquisition or colocation

Post-launch optimization

Measurement surveys

Statistical performance analysis

Quality Efficiency AvailabilityPOST-PLANNING

Coverage & Capacity Planning

System configuration (FDD/TDD,MIMO)

Dimensioning

- Requirements & strategy for coverage, capacity & quality

Parameter Assumption

Ran Dim, Traffic profile.

Pre-launch optimization

Measurements

Planning Approach

Coverage & Capacity Dimensioning

2014 Nokia Networks

Coverage dimensioningCapacity dimensioning

Capacity, CoverageLink budget Coverage & Capacity Planning : - Coverage requirements needs to be met - Capacity requirements

Main inputs :FrequencyClutter type (e.g. dense urban, urban, Sub Urban)Number of Subscriber per area/eNodeBPropagation ModelMain Outputs :Coverage dimensioning Coverage Link Budget Cell Area RangeCapacity dimensioning Capacity Link Budget Traffic Demand

Planning Approach

2014 Nokia Networks

RFPLink Budget Assumptions & RFP to be considered

TD-LTE Link Budget4T4R TD-Config 2 (DSUDD)DownlinkControlDownlinkDataUplink ControlUplinkRandom AccessUplinkDataLTE ChannelPDCCHPDSCHACK/NAKPRACHPUSCHMarginsDense UrbanUrbanSuburbanRuralMIMO Configuration4x24x21x4Loading25%25%25%25%MIMO SchemeCL-SU-MIMOSIMOFast Fade MargindB4.54.54.54.5Channel BandwidthMhz2020Lognormal Fade MargindB9.28.37.36.3Recource Blocks Utilized1001001118Penetration LossdB25201510Effective Edge Data Ratekbps1770128Body LossdB3333TransmitterInterference MargindB1.251.251.251.25# of Transmit Pipes44111IRC offsetdB-0.58-0.58-0.58-0.58Output Power / PipeW20200.20.20.2Output PowerdBm4343232323TotaldB37.8731.9725.9719.97Transmission Line LossdB0.40.4000Tx Diversity GaindB66000Maximum Allowable Path Loss, with marginsdB117.88123.78129.78135.78Antenna GaindBi1818000EIRPdBm6767232323Macro Cell Range (30m - 50m)ReceiverSS Antenna Heightm1.51.51.51.5# of Receive Pipes22444BS Antenna Heightm30304050ModulationQPSKQPSKQPSKQPSKQPSKCarrier FrequencyMhz2300230023002300Modulation Ratebits/symbol22122Propagation Model UsedCost231-HataCost231-HataCost231-HataCost231-HataCoding Rate4.0000.11796.00012.0000.155correction factordB30-5-12MCS Ratebits/symbol0.670.230.010.080.31a(h)dB0.050.050.050.05AWGN Eb/NodB-4.720.470.010.170.621km path lossdB140.03137.03130.30121.96Implementation MargindB22222path loss exponent3.523.523.443.38AWGN SNRdB-4.48-3.83-12.60-8.62-2.46Cell Radiuskm0.240.420.972.57Average BLER Retransmissions%10%10%Average HARQ GaindB0.000.00In-fill Cell Range (17m)Thermal NoisedB/Hz-174.0-174.0-174.0-174.0-174.0SS Antenna Heightm1.51.51.51.5Receiver Noise FiguredB442.22.22.2BS Antenna Heightm17171717Reception Line Loss000.40.40.4Carrier FrequencyMhz2300230023002300Receiver Diversity GaindB33666Propagation Model UsedCost231-HataCost231-HataCost231-HataCost231-HataReceiver Antenna GaindBi00181818correction factordB30-5-12Received Power at Antenna, per sub-carrierdBm-135.70-135.05-166.22-162.24-156.08a(h)dB0.050.050.050.05Received Power at Antenna, compositedBm-104.91-104.25-155.42-151.45-132.741km path lossdB143.44140.44135.44128.44Maximum Allowable Path Loss, without marginsdB171.54170.89178.43174.46155.75path loss exponent3.683.683.683.68Cell Radiuskm0.200.350.701.58In-fill Cell Range (30m)SS Antenna Heightm1.51.51.51.5BS Antenna Heightm30303030Carrier FrequencyMhz2300230023002300Propagation Model UsedCost231-HataCost231-HataCost231-HataCost231-Hatacorrection factordB30-5-12a(h)dB0.050.050.050.051km path lossdB140.03137.03132.03125.03path loss exponent3.523.523.523.52Cell Radiuskm0.240.420.862.02

2014 Nokia Networks

Coverage Plot PDSCH

2014 Nokia Networks

Coverage Plot PUSCH

2014 Nokia Networks

Monte Carlo Simulation Results Display mobiles (Medan)

2014 Nokia Networks

Post Test QuestionsHow Many Channel bandwidth Type in LTE? Please Mentioned all?What difference LTE with other technologies (GSM, UMTS,HSPA), so it can provide high data rates access than others?Please explain about principle of Carrier Aggregation in LTE-Advanced?What differences about CSFB and VoLTE? Why we need CSFB as scenario in LTE deployment?Please mention planning type in LTE (i.e Coverage, Capacity, bla bla bla.)?What Main Input and Output in Planning Process?

Please sent the answer via email to : [email protected] and [email protected] with subject = LTE Fundamental Post Test_22Dec2014

2014 Nokia Networks

2014 Nokia Networks


Recommended