Question of Faculty Assessment in Management Education:

A Model for Faculty Accreditation

mm bagali Professor of Management and Human Resources,

Coordinator, Research in Management,

JAIN University, India

mm.bagali@jainuniversity.ac.in

Our Experience

Honored with AIMA-AMT, Accredited Management Teacher in Management Sciences

The paper is based on the experience of having such Professional Accreditation Award for faculty

Our Thinking Surveys and Ranking are done of B-Schools

Parameters

Infrastructure, Knowledge delivery, Corporate interface, Placements, Pedagogy approach

Industrial visits, Corporate guest faculty, Soft skills training, Student - faculty exchange, tie-up- MOU

Canteen, recreational facilities, health care, Wi-Fi, laptops………

Academic Requirements

First Class

NET-SET

M.Phil / PhD

Conference attendance

Paper publication in ISBN / ISSN…. Many more

why not Accreditation or Contribution Assessment?

Accreditation ?

3 Reasons

1.Unquestionable Integrity of Academic Excellence

2. Quality Academic contributions with continuous improvements

3. Foreign University are come(ing), hence match the delivery system

Accreditation: Paradox for Excellence

When we say Accreditation, we mean

Exceeding stated standards of quality performance in academics and related academic activity

Production of Intellectual contributions and Professional Development

The need for maintaining Professional Qualification along with AQ

Upon entering at very senior leadership roles at higher levels in academics (Dean/ Director), an Accredited teacher on the resume will stand out more to employer than one of questionable integrity

PauseYes, Need for Accreditation of

Management Faculty

AssumptionHolistic Achievement and

Contributions to the Academia

by Faculty

Thus,Confirming the ‘PAT’,

Professional Accreditation Teacher award

Question of Faculty Assessment in Management Education:

A Model for Faculty Accreditation

Assessment Parameters

Academic Development

Academic Development

Administration and positions

Administration and positionsIntellectual Contribution

Intellectual Contribution

MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy

MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy International Assignment and Network

International Assignment and Network Social Responsibility towards Nation

Social Responsibility towards Nation

Academic Development 300 points

Teaching Best Practices adopted 150

Course Development/Design 40

Case development 40

Monographs 20

Text books 30

Executive Education20

Administration and positions 50 points

Responsibility held 15

Position held 10

Committees 10

Board Member 10

Support in Instituting a 5

Chair of Excellence

Intellectual Contribution 200 points

Research Publication 50Projects 40PhD guidance 25PhD awarded 30Advisory Board on Journals / Editor 15Reviewer of papers 10Patents and copyrights 20Working papers 10

MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy 100 points

Consultancy 30

Corporate network 10

Training held in academics 20

Training held for corporate 20

Industry based projects 10

International Assignment and Network 150 points

Visiting Assignments 30

Collaboration 20

Post-Doctoral 40

Fellowship 20

Scholarship 10

Conference / Workshops organized 30

Social Responsibility 100 points

Association with NGO’s/ Red Cross 20

Social impact projects 20

Work at School level 20

Economic Development Activity 20

Teach India program 20

Other Academic Excellence areas 100 points

Associates 15

National / State Awards35

Certifications/ Exams 20

Membership to Professional Bodies10

Positions in any Organization/Governing body 10

Cultural/ Sports promotion 10

Selection Methodology

Criteria

PhD

5 years

PG Teaching, Full Time

Management Institutes

Stage 1: Peer Review Process

Considering nominees' accomplishments within Assessment parameters [The total qualifying points 501+ onwards]

orQualify in each area with 50% of total points

or Qualify in each section with 50% of total points

Stage 2: Final Review Process

Presentation

Assigned 100

Interview

Assigned 100

Panels

A. Stakeholders

B. Government Organization/ Institutions

C. Research Organization/ Institutes

D. Industry Bodies

E. Overseas Representatives

F. Corporate University

G. Combination of all

Selection Panel

Stake holdersManagement Education ….. UGC-NAAC, AICTE -NBA, and Local affiliated University, including deemed and autonomous

The National/ State Knowledge Council/

Commission, Council for higher Education, State Innovative Council, IIM, IIT, AIU, National Mission on Education, AIMA

Association - NASCCOM, NHRD, AIMS- Association of Indian Management Schools, University Representatives/ CII, FCCKI, National Skills Development Board

Post Accreditation Utility

1] Member of Board of Studies / Examiners

2]Member, various committees, AICTE/UGC, et al

3]Should be Eligible to…..1 ] Grants and Research funding from University

2] Part of Board/Member - Knowledge commission or other board

3 ] Member, LIC Committee of university, any other ad-hoc committee

4 ] Corporate offerings of MDP, Consultancy, and design of training tools and programs

5 ] Overseas Travel Grants

6] Guide Project work of MBA

4]Research committees in University

5] Guides for PhD work

Grading Scale and Stars

State Level STAR Category Points Final certification

State A Star Best in Class 91-100 High Honors

State A Star Excellent 80-90 A-Distension

State A Star Above Average 60-79 B- Distension

State B Star Average 40-59 A-Merit

State B Star Poor 20-39 B-Merit

State B Star Zero based 00-19 C-Merit

The consolidated points of Presentation and Interview

[PAT]Professional Accreditation

Teacher, Award

The author

is AIMA-A

MT,

Accredited

Managemen

t Teacher

in

Management

Sciences,

and holds

this honor

in HR and

PMIR area

since 1994

. The prop

osal is

based on t

he experie

nce of

having suc

h Accredit

ation

Certificat

ion for As

sessing

Quality an

d Professi

onal Statu

s

to faculty

of Manage

ment

Sciences.

Thanks