Presented by: Kathy GosaAndrea Hall
Kansas State Department of Education
26th Annual Management Information Systems (MIS) Conference February 14, 2013
Maximizing the Benefits of Common Education
Data Standards
-- The Kansas Story
1
• Background• Current Status• Process• Plans• Challenges
Overview
2
• KSDE has been part of the CEDS initiative from “the beginning.”• Drivers • Facilitate cross-organization collaboration (e.g., early childhood).• Facilitate interstate initiatives (e.g., MEIC IDEX)• Provide a resource for data definitions/codes that could be used by
Requirement Analysts • Provide a resource for database design that could be used by
developers • Provide a solution to our issues with metadata
Background
3
• Kansas was part of the initial 14 states that mapped to the State Core Data with the help of PCG (CCSSO sponsored initiative)• Successes• Jumpstarted data alignment• Provided a model for integrating CEDS in our requirements gathering
process• Identified data most commonly collected and used in other states• Helped business analysts to determine new elements/code sets for
collection and to refine existing definitions
• Challenges• Incorrect alignments• Incomplete
Background
4
• The Kansas student data collection (KIDS Collection) was the first CEDS map Kansas published
• Since then, Kansas has published the following maps• K12 Domain
• Kansas Directory Data• Kansas UID Elements• MEIC IDEX Enrollment History• MEIC IDEX Master Table (DX_Mart)
• Early Learning Domain• Kansas Early Learning
• Postsecondary Domain• Kansas Postsecondary Database Data Dictionary
Current Status
5
• Connect Tool• IDEX (Interstate Data Exchange) Project Connection• Web-based system that allows interstate searching capabilities
Current Status
6
• Researchers• We encourage researchers to use the CEDS website • Review Maps to determine data elements for requests• Creates a common language• Use the Connect Tool• Review Existing Connections• Create New Connections
Current Status
7
• Metadata provides the biggest challenge with aligning and mapping our data to CEDS• Incomplete Metadata Repository • Rapid implementations• Resources
• Difficulty in keeping metadata up to date
Metadata Challenge
8
• Requirements Analysts (RA) • Identify and define data elements• Compare and align the State’s data elements and
definitions with CEDS• Include alignment in requirements documentation
Word is getting out!
Process
9
• Data Stewards• Involve them• Educate them• Encourage them
• Review CEDS website• Review data elements, maps, connections • Use Connect Tool for collaborating with other states and agencies
As stewards of the data, their participation in the CEDS process is imperative to its success!
Process
10
• Program Area Involvement• KSDE Early Childhood Program • CEDS and the School Readiness Data Initiative
School Readiness Data Initiative Vision:“Informed decision making on behalf of young children’s healthy development
and school readiness. Focused on young children from birth to the start of kindergarten, this Initiative will lead to increased availability of valid
and reliable data that can inform effective state and community policy decisions on children’s behalf.”
Process
11
• The School Readiness Data Task Force• K12 Longitudinal Data System• Identify data elements associated with children’s school
readiness
“Create shared data standards, including common data identifiers and collection definitions, so data can be coordinated across programs,
organizations, and agencies.”
Process
12
• Information Technology and Early Childhood Program• Discussed needs• Helped navigate CEDS website• Determined next steps• IT did the initial comparison of elements • Early Childhood Program reviewed the findings
Process
13
• Download CEDS Early Learning Data Elements • Compared CEDS Elements with Elements from the Early
Childhood Applications• Foundations for School Success • Success in Schools
Process
14
• Define Data Elements• Numerous data elements without documented definitions• Metadata repository • Requirements documents• Technical Design documents• Training documents• KSDE program website
Process
15
• IT and Program Staff Meet Again • Reviewed Every Early Childhood Data Element• Updated existing definitions • Defined what was missing or incomplete
Process
16
•CEDS Version 3 Release - September 2012• CEDS Version 3 Draft released for public comment• Information Technology and Early Childhood Program staff
met again • Reviewed each Early Learning data element• Submitted comments in September 2012
Process
17
• Alignment • Alignment Tool in CEDS used to align data elements• Once the alignment was complete• Early Childhood program area review draft• IT Director approval
• Map Publication • The Kansas Early Learning Map was published in December
2012
Process
18
• Challenges• Different Languages• Technical vs. Non-Technical
• Element Names and Definition Discrepancies• Denied vs. Declined• Incorrect analysis of data• Incorrect reporting of data
Cross Team Collaboration
19
• Successes• Everyone had an opportunity to provide input• Everyone was hearing the same thing• Everyone was working toward the same goal
“… increased availability of valid and reliable data that can inform effective state and community policy decisions on children’s behalf.”
Cross Team Collaboration
20
• Expand Stakeholder Involvement• Requirements Analysts• Include CEDS alignment in documentation
• Ensure program involvement • Ensure accurate data• Comprehensive metadata
• Data Stewards• Kansas Individual Data on Students (KIDS)
• Promote the Common Education Data Standards• Master Data Management
What’s Next?
21
• Focus on Alignment and Mapping• Promote the Use of CEDS• Integrate CEDS into our metadata strategy• Capitalize on mapped data
What’s Next?
22
• Connect Tool• Further Exploration of the Tool• Demonstrate its Usefulness • Program Staff• Researchers • Data Analysts
What’s Next?
23
• Data Sharing• Which datasets do we map? • Consideration of which data set is “shared.”• Operational Systems• Data Warehouse• Data Marts
Challenges Moving Forward
24
• Early Childhood• Defining a system that encompasses multiple agencies and
organizations
• Workforce data• KSDE has not yet integrated workforce data into our SLDS
• Maintaining what we’ve built
Challenges Moving Forward
25