N C D P R IWMP-10 ETAILED ROJECT EPORTgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2010-11/NARMADA/IWMP-10.pdfNani...

District Watershed Development Unit | Narmada

NANI CHIKLI

IWMP-10 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

District Watershed Development unit Narmada Page 2

1.1 Project Background ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................9

Table no.1: Basic project information ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................9

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme ......................................................................................................................................................................................................9

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed .................................................................................................................................................................... 11

Table no.3: Watershed information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Project area ........................................................................................................................................................ 13

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ........................................................................................................................................................ 13

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ............................................................................................................................................................... 13

2.1. Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16

2.2 About Project Implementing Agency, Rajpipla (Narmada) ........................................................................................................................................................ 16

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

2.2 SWOT Analysis of the PIA: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

Table no. 6: PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18

3.1.1 Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 20

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

3.1.2 Soil and topography: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21


Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

Table no.12: Climatic conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23

Table no. 16: Irrigation .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 17: Crop details: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 24

3.1.4 Livestock: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 18: Livestock .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 19: Drinking water ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 26

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28

3.2.1 Demographic Status: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28

Table no. 21: Demographic information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28

Migration Pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29


Table no. 24: Poverty ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Infrastructure facilities: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31

3.3. Livelihood pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 32

Table no. 27: Per capita Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

Dependence on Common Property Resource ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 32

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 33

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: .................................................................. 33

The Nani Chikali project area........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38

Watershed Activities ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42

4.1. Scientific Planning: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................................... 50

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area .......................................................................................................................................... 52

Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55

4.2. Institution building ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55

Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details of Gadit ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 55

Table no. 32.2: Watershed Committee details of Moti banvari ....................................................................................................................................................................... 56


Table no. 32.3: Watershed Committee details of Boridra .................................................................................................................................................................................. 57

Table no. 33: SHG details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59

Table no. 33: SHG details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 60

User Group: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62

Table no. 34: UG detail ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 62

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP 10 (Nani Chikali) ........................................................................................................................................................ 64

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................................................... 64

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works* ................................................................................................... 67

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................................................... 71

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................ 76

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises .................................................................................. 76

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) the project areas ............................................................................................................ 81

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ....................................................................................................... 83

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas .................................................................................................................................................. 84

4.4. Capacity Building: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 85

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 86


Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: .......................................................................................................................................................... 86

Budgeting ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 88

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 88

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP .......................................................................................................................................................... 88

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 89

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes .............................................................................................................................................................. 89

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ..................................................................................................................................................... 94

6.1 Expected Outcomes........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 96

6.1.1 Employment ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 97

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 97

6.1.2Migration ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ........................................................................................................................................................................ 98

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) .............................................................................................................. 99

6.1.4 Drinking water ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 99

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 99

6.1.5 Crops ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................... 100

6.1.6 Horticulture ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100


Table no. 57: Area under horticulture .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100

1.7 Vegetative cover ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 101

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 101

6.1.8 Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 101

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ...... 102

Logical Framework Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 103

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110

7.2 Plans for Project management: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 111

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 111

7.4 User Charges:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 111


CHAPTER -1

PROJECT BACKGROUND


1.1 Project Background

Nani Chikli (IWMP-10) project is located in Nanod Taluka, Narmada District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of ten micro-watersheds

with 5d1b1a2e, a21, a2f, a2g, a1j, a1b, a1c, a1b, a1d, a1e being their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is about

5626.20 Ha, of which 5554.5 Ha has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2010-

11.

The nearest town is Rajpipla which is about 23 Km from Nani Chikali project and is well connected by pucca road. The watershed includes ten

village of Nani Chikli, Boridra, Moti banvari, Gadit, Ambli, Gagar, Khutaamba,Moti chikhali,Palci,Bitada. Vasava, Tadvi, Padvi and ST communities are

the primary inhabitants of the village. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, goat

and poultry rearing. Majority of housed made up of soil and bamboo.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sl No.

Name of the project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of the project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project cost

PIA Name

Census code

1

IWMP-10 Nani Chikli Project in

Nandod Block

Nani chikli 01513800 Boridra

Nandod

Narmada

484.60 484.60 58,15,200

District Development

Unit, Narmada

2 Boridra 01513900 Boridra 618.10 618.10 74,17,200

3 Moti chikli 01515000 Boridra 548.00 548.00 65,76,000

4 Gadit 01515700 Gadit 569.90 650 78,00,000

5 Amli 01515600 Gadit 613.20 600 72,00,000 6 Gagar 01515500 Gadit 779.90 750 90,00,000 7 Khutaamba 01515900 Moti Bhamari 948.10 839.4 1,00,72,800 8 Moti

Bhamri 01516100 Moti Bhamari 329.10 329.10 39,49,200

9 Palci 01516200 Moti Bhamari 403.40 403.40 48,40,800 10 Bitada 01516300 Moti Bhamari 331.90 331.90 39,82,800

Total 5626.20 5554.50 6,66,54,000

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme


Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual

wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the

area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster

approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Nani Chikhali Watershed project as given

in table no. 2.

The total number of families under BPL is 1251 (69%), which is less than 88.47 per cent of the total households of the village. Hence a score of

7.5 is allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 100 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 10 was allotted. More

than 70 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a

composite rank of 5, 3 and 5 are allotted respectively.

The soil type is black cotton and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Cluster approach

was followed taking into consideration four micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5554.5 Ha. All the parameters taken together give a cumulative

score of 113 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).

Table no. 2: Weightage of the project

Project name

Project type

Weightage

IWMP 1 other i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii

7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 7.5 10 10 15 15 NA


Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S.

No. Criteria

Maximum score

Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (0)


xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order IWMP-10

Nani Chikli 2

5d1b1a2e ,a21, a2f, a2g, a1j, a1b, a1b, a1c, a1b, a1d, a1e

Mini Watershed


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Project area

This Nani Chikhali project has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are Mahatma Gandhi National Rural

Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS),Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY), Indira Awas Yojana

(IAY) and Sardar Awas Yojana (SAY),Mission mangalam.

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

Sl no

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the

programme/scheme Year of commencement Villages covered

Estimated number of

beneficiaries 1. Indira Avas Yojana DRDA House 2001-02 10 375 2. Sardar Avas Yojana DRDA House 2001-02 10 74 3. MGNREGA DRDA Employer 2008-09 10 627

4. WASMO Irrigation Department Water Tank, Hand Pump, Pipe

Line Etc., 2001-02 10 -

5. National Agriculture

Development Department Cattle Guard 2007-08 07 142

6. Watershed INRECA, NGO Check Dam, Nala Repairing, 1995-96 03 65

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

In project area IWMP is the first watershed programme.

Sl no

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershed codes

Area under

treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of

IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion

1 Batch-8 2003

Khutaamba

1 a21 500 Gov. DRDA

Hajarpura Seva

Sansthan, Hajarpura

30.00 100 100 100

2 EAS

BATCH-1

- Palci Nil

3 EAS

BATCH--

Bitada


1


CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY


2.1. Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the

State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation

of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments,

Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for Nani Chikhli watershed Project is

District Watershed Development Unit Rajpipla (Narmada).

2.2 About Project Implementing Agency, Rajpipla (Narmada)

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

PIA of the Nani Chikhali project is District Watershed Development (DWDU), Narmada. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the Chairman of

DWDU. PIA has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one MDT-Civil (Nodal officer) and a watershed development team of civil

engineer, agriculture expert and community mobiliser, Data Entry Operator, surveyor, and accountant. The objective of the PIA is supervising,

planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities at project level as

per guidelines. This also submits the documents at the district level. The DWDU, Narmada is working as a PIA for four IWMP projects.

2.2 SWOT Analysis of the PIA:

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, South Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity building and

technical guidance

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar,

(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee


Weakness:

(1) Lack of permanent staff.

(2) Total project area is Tribal

Opportunities:

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of

programmes

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS

Threats:

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people

(4) Low literacy rate in the project are

Table no. 6: PIA:

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

(i) Type of organization District Watershed Development Unit

(ii) Name of organization District Watershed Development Unit

(iii) Designation & Address

MDT, Civil, District Watershed Development Unit,

Old Jilla Panchayat Bhavan, Opp. Bharat Petrol Pump, Narmada. (Rajpipla).

Ta. Nandod. Dist. Narmada.

(iv) Telephone 02640-220365

(v) Fax 02640-220365

(vi) E-mail [email protected]


Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sl no

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration 1. Vasava Parvatiben R. 34 F MDT, Civil D.E. in Civil 3 Years 15,000/- 2. Baxi Hiteshbhai 44 M WDT Civil Eng. Diploma Civil 20 Year 12000/-

3. Vasava Hemantbhai P. 29 M WDT Community

Mobilizer M.R.S 4 Year 8,000/-

4. Chaudhari Trupati M. 26 F WDT Agri. Expert M.R.S 3 Year 8,000/- 5. Machhi Bhavinbhai L. 29 M WDT Surveyor I.T.I. Surveyor, 1 Year 6,000/- 6. Raulaji Jaydiksinh. F 25 M WDT Accountant B.Com. 3 Year 7000/- 7. Vasava Kalpeshbhai. P. 30 M WDT Messanger B.A. 3 Year 3,000/-


CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology


3.1.1 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Nani Chikhali watershed is about 5626.20 ha out of which 45% is forest area. About 48% of land is under

agriculture which is rain-fed and irrigated; mainly Rabi and kharib crops are taken. About 5.5% of the total land is classified under wasteland of which

32 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No. Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village

Forest Area Land under

agricultural use Rainfed area

Perm-anent pastu-res

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-cultivable

1 Nani chikli 484.60 382.50 102.10 102.10 0 55.00 45.00

2 Boridra 618.10 303.90 214.40 214.40 0 45.00 62.30 3 Moti chikli 548.00 359.40 81.30 81.30 0 0 102.60 4 Gadit 569.90 139.10 430.80 430.80 0 0 0 5 Amli 613.20 333.70 279.60 279.60 0 0 0

6 Gagar 779.90 270.60 509.30 509.30 0 0 0

7 Khutaamba 948.10 548.60 399.40 399.40 0 0 0 8 Moti Bhamri 329.10 117.60 211.60 211.60 0 0 0 9 Palci 403.40 56.00 347.40 347.40 0 0 0

10 Bitada 331.90 36.60 136.00 136.00 0 0 0

5626.20 2548.00 2711.90 2711.90 0 100 209.90

3.1.2 Soil and topography:

Nani Chikali watershed project (NWP) falls under South Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly deep black and clay. The soil is brown to black

in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm.The annual rainfall is 1100 mm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy

and clay. The soil fertility is average with low contain of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-

20% slope.


Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No. Name of the Agro-climatic zone

covers project area Area in ha

Names of the villages

Major soil types Topo-graphy

a)Type b) Area in ha

1 Nani Chikli Project In Nandod

Block

484.60 Nani chikli

Black Cotton Latteric rocky

5626.20 Moderate Slope

618.10 Boridra 548.00 Moti chikli 569.90 Gadit 613.20 Amli 779.90 Gagar 948.10 Khutaamba 329.10 Moti Bhamri 403.40 Palci 331.90 Bitada

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 1. Nani chikli Nil Once in 5 Year 2. Boridra Nil Once in 5 Year 3. Moti chikli Nil Once in 5 Year 4. Gadit Nil Once in 5 Year 5. Amli Nil Once in 5 Year 6. Gagar Nil Once in 5 Year 7. Khutaamba Nil Once in 5 Year 8. Moti Bhamri Nil Once in 5 Year 9. Palci Nil Once in 5 Year 10. Bitada Nil Once in 5 Year


Table no. 11: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off

(mm/ year) Average soil loss (Tonnes/

ha/ year) Water erosion

a Sheet 2134 350 - b Rill 948 460 30% c Gully 500 320 22%

Sub-Total 3582 Wind erosion 1950 NA 22%

Total

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the project Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress) Nani Chikali 43 7.8 Inherent

Table no.12: Climatic conditions

Name of Project

Year Rainfall (in mm) Temperature (˚C) Highest intensity of Rainfall (mm

in a day) Max. Min.

Nani Chikali

2004 1130.25 42 27 200 2005 1178.00 42.5 27 190 2006 1604.00 43 28 210 2007 1389.50 44 27.5 200 2008 1146.25 43 28 180 2009 822.25 44 27 210

The average rainfall of this area is about 1100 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 200 mm within span of a day. This

uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year.


Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation(MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams Nani Chikali (IWMP10) 171.42 meters 0-20 % Karjan,Narmada

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture:

The average land holding is about 0.4 ha ranging from 0.171 to 0.629 ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to migrate

to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Rice (paddy),

Groundnut, Cotton, Pigonpea and Wheat. Farmers take crops according to mansoon. The land conservation measures such as Check dams and farm

bunds in the area will help them to increase cropping intensity of project area.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sl no Village Total owned land HHs giving land

on lease HHs taking land

on lease Gen OBC SC ST 1 Nani chikli 0 0 0 50 0 0

2 Boridra 0 0 0 99 0 0

3 Moti chikli 0 0 0 13 0 0

4 Gadit 0 0 0 34 0 0

5 Amli 0 0 0 70 0 0

6 Gagar 0 0 0 77 0 0

7 Khutaamba 0 0 0 98 0 0

8 Moti Bhamri 0 0 0 106 0 0

9 Palci 0 0 0 75 0 0

10 Bitada 0 0 0 95 0 0

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sl no Village Net sown area

One time (%) Two times(%) Three times(%) 1 Nani chikli 17.64 5.7 0


2 Boridra 31.48 8.9 0 3 Moti chikli 13.71 2.56 0 4 Gadit 36.96 9.81 0 5 Amli 16.16 3.24 0 6 Gagar 30.87 3.01 0 7 Khutaamba 20.57 2.86 0 8 Moti Bhamri 81.44 23.52. 0 9 Palci 37.68 10.21 0

10 Bitada 43.97 12.2 0

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sl no

Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability months

Net area Gross area Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability months

Net area Gross area

1 Nani chikli 0 0 0 4 25 Ha 71 Ha 4 18 Ha 68 Ha 2 Boridra 0 0 0 5 22 ha 63 Ha 5 21 Ha 65 Ha 3 Moti chikli 0 0 0 4 32 ha 78 Ha 6 16 Ha 42 Ha 4 Gadit 0 0 0 5 27 ha 73 Ha 5 15 Ha 38 Ha 5 Amli 0 0 0 6 20 ha 58 Ha 4 19 Ha 51 Ha 6 Gagar 0 0 0 5 19 ha 45 Ha 4 25 Ha 65 Hs 7 Khutaamba 0 0 0 5 21 ha 51 Ha 3 20 Ha 58 Ha 8 Moti Bhamri 0 0 0 7 26 Ha 48 Ha 4 35 Ha 71 Ha 9 Palci 0 0 0 6 15 Ha 60 Ha 3 30 Ha 75 Ha

10 Bitada 0 0 0 4 16 Ha 35 Ha 5 28 Ha 67 Ha

Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sl no

Village Kharif (Monsoon)

Cotton Urad Toor Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Nani chikli 35.88 6517 181.63 22.16 2381 107.45 27.44 5620 204.81


2 Boridra 81.66 17850 218.59 50.44 6520 129.26 62.45 13520 216.49

3 Moti chikli 31.54 6720 213.06 19.48 2155 110.63 24.12 4850 201.08

4 Gadit 100.83 20222 200.56 62.27 6607 106.10 77.11 15650 202.96

5 Amli 257.39 48995 190.35 158.97 18545 116.66 196.84 38960 197.93

6 Gagar 97.19 18765 193.08 60.03 7541 125.62 74.33 15650 210.55

7 Khutaamba 72.22 12998 179.98 44.6 4885 109.53 55.23 12456 225.53

8 Moti Bhamri 112.58 22545 200.26 69.53 7352 105.74 86.1 15756 183.00

9 Palci 77 15001 194.82 47.56 5120 107.65 58.89 11586 196.74

10 Bitada 61.25 12152 198.40 37.83 4025 106.40 46.85 9952 212.42

3.1.4 Livestock:

The Nani Chikali project area has 762 cows, 128 buffaloes, 960 bullocks, 430 goats and 90 sheep. Majority of Vasava,Tadvicommunity depends on

Buffalo and cow rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture

availability for their animals.

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sl no

Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo+Cow) Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No Milk/day

(Litre) No

Milk/day (Litre)

Milk/day (Litre) No Milk/day

(Litre) No No No No

1 Nani chikli 17 37 62 125 187 24 12 - 60 3 40 2 Boridra 27 50 111 220 331 80 41 - 119 5 71 3 Moti chikli 3 5 43 80 123 5 3 80 0 - 38 4 Gadit 3 6 19 30 49 5 2.5 1 34 1 8 5 Amli 5 8 99 170 269 36 16 - 108 1 60 6 Gagar 8 14 123 230 353 98 45 1 139 0 77


7 Khutaamba 26 51 104 190 294 65 30 0 130 0 65 8 Moti Bhamri 15 29 112 210 322 35 14 0 169 0 73 9 Palci 3 5 13 21 34 34 15 0 38 0 7

10 Bitada 21 40 76 130 206 48 20 8 163 0 59

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sl no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality 1 Nani chikli 8 Hand Pump, Well 12 Good 2 Boridra 9 Hand Pump, Well 11 Good 3 Moti chikli 8 Hand Pump, Well 12 Good 4 Gadit 11 Hand Pump, Well 12 Good 5 Amli 8 Hand Pump, Well 11 Good 6 Gagar 7 Hand Pump, Well 12 Good 7 Khutaamba 11 Hand Pump, Well 11 Good 8 Moti Bhamri 9 Hand Pump, Well 11 Good 9 Palci 8 Hand Pump, Well 11 Good

10 Bitada 8 Hand Pump, Well 11 Good

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons Govt.

(specify deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify) Pvt.

persons

Govt. (specify deptt.)

PRI Any other (Pl.

Specify)

Wasteland/ degraded land - - - - - 1147.1 - - Pastures - - - - - - - - Orchards - - - - - - - - Village Woodlot - - - - - - - - Forest - - - - - 1561.13 - - Village Ponds/ Tanks - 59 - - - - - - Community Buildings - 20 - - - - - - Weekly Markets - 0 - - - - - - Permanent markets - 0 - - - - - -


Temples/ Places of worship - 10 - - - - - - Others (Pl. specify) - 1147.1 - - - - - -


3.2. Socio-Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status:

Nani Chikali watershed project has a total of 1414 households with a population of 6911 (as per base-line survey) out of which 3551 are male

and 3360 female. Nani Chikali project 100% ST population. The sex ratio is 945 female to 1000 male. There are 1251 BPL families. The average family

size is 5. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 65.89 per cent; male literacy rate is 67.98 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low

as 54.64 per cent (of total female population). Thirty one people are graduate in project area. The major castes in the project area are vasava and tadvi

(ST). Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sl no

Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 1. Nani chikli 383 203 180 0 0 0 0 383 203 180 100 2. Boridra 741 387 354 0 0 0 0 741 387 354 100

3. Moti chikli 219 105 114 0 0 0 0 219 105 114 100

4. Gadit 702 359 343 0 0 0 0 702 359 343 100 5. Amli 542 284 258 0 0 0 0 542 284 258 100

6. Gagar 856 432 424 0 0 0 0 856 432 424 100

7. Khutaamba 884 431 453 0 0 0 0 884 431 453 100 8. Moti Bhamri 1291 672 619 0 0 0 0 672 619 1391 100 9. Palci 253 121 132 0 0 0 0 253 121 132 100

10. Bitada 1040 557 483 0 0 0 0 557 483 1040 100

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sl no Village Literacy Literacy % above

age 14 Literacy % below

age 14 Total % Male % Female % 1. Nani chikli 270 70.49 148 54.81 122 45.19 72.40 65.39 2. Boridra 443 59.78 251 56.66 192 43.44 59.26 60.96 3. Moti chikli 129 58.90 80 62.02 49 37.98 75.96 25.04


4. Gadit 404 54.56 224 58.49 159 41.51 46.98 89.50

5. Amli 317 58.49 176 55.52 144 45.43 54.42 67.54

6. Gagar 474 55.37 271 57.17 203 42.83 50.52 65.69 7. Khutaamba 528 59.73 281 65.20 247 54.53 60.80 45.83 8. Moti Bhamri 757 58.63 441 58.26 316 41.74 45 55

9. Palci 687 58.37 208 51.87 193 48.13 66.50 33.50

10. Bitada 545 52.40 334 59.96 211 43.69 46.20 64.04

Migration Pattern:

People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Surat, Baroda, and Ahamdabad as daily wagers, agricultural labours and

construction workers.

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sl no Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for migration

Income during

migration / month

Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months More than 6

months

1. Nani chikli 383 20 9 11 12 4 4 Low Labour Rs. 3,000/- Month

2. Boridra 741 28 24 4 17 5 2 Low Labour Rs. 3,500/- Month

3. Moti chikli 219 18 11 7 18 - - Low Labour Rs. 4,000/- Month

4. Gadit 702 38 31 7 22 10 6 Low Labour Rs. 4,000/- Month

5. Amli 542 21 19 2 21 0 0 Low Labour Rs. 3,500/- Month

6. Gagar 856 52 34 18 32 4 16 Low Labour Rs. 3,000/- Month

7. Khutaamba 884 41 36 5 5 0 0 Low Labour Rs. 3,500/- Month

8. Moti Bhamri 1291 77 57 20 53 13 11 Low Labour Rs. 3,000/- Month

9. Palci 687 72 51 21 57 15 2 Low Labour Rs. 4,000/-


Month

10. Bitada 1040 102 95 7 75 25 2 Low Labour Rs. 3,000/- Month

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total Household BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Nani chikli 72 63 3 66 91.67 22 33.33% 2 Boridra 144 65 54 119 82.63 45 37.82%

3 Moti chikli 44 41 1 42 95.45 31 29.54% 4 Gadit 125 21 68 89 71.20 91 72.80 5 Amli 111 93 18 111 88.80 41 40.59

6 Gagar 156 58 51 109 70.73 79 50.97

7 Khutaamba 160 9 113 122 76.25 62 38.75

8 Moti Bhamri 269 223 46 269 100* 163 66.80 9 Palci 142 101 41 142 100* 67 48.91

10 Bitada 191 162 20 182 94.79 96 50%

Infrastructure facilities:

Nani Chikali watershed is well connected with Nanod Taluka with pucca roads. The mostly villages have electricity connectivity. Nearly 52 (738) per

cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. All villages have a primary school with all facilities like computers. For middle

and higher secondary education, the students have to go to Nanod Taluka which is about 23 kilometres away. This also contributes to lower education

level of the people.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sl no

Village

Pucca road to

the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Number)

Post Office (Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market

yard

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution LP UP HS

1 Nani chikli Yes Yes No No No 16 No 25 No No No Anganwadi


2 Boridra Yes Yes No No No 10 No 17 No No No Anganwadi 3 Moti chikli Yes Yes No No No 16 No 25 No No No Anganwadi 4 Gadit Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 27 No No No Anganwadi 5 Amli Yes Yes No No No 5 No 25 No No No Anganwadi 6 Gagar Yes Yes No No No 6 No 26 No No No Anganwadi 7 Khutaamba Yes Yes No No No 6 No 30 No No No Anganwadi 8 Moti

Bhamri Yes

Yes Yes No No 14 No 35 No No No Anganwadi

9 Palci Yes Yes No No No 12 No 32 No No No Anganwadi 10 Bitada Yes Yes No No No 10 No 34 No No No Anganwadi

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sl no

Village HHs with electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set HHs with

cooking gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with

freedge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Nani chikli 67 0 0 5 2 0 6 N 3 1 2 Boridra 124 0 0 15 5 1 18 N 2 1

3 Moti chikli 35 0 0 7 4 0 3 N 4 0

4 Gadit 116 0 0 3 0 0 5 N 4 0 5 Amli 88 0 0 5 4 0 4 N 3 0 6 Gagar 129 0 0 7 1 0 5 N 6 1

7 Khutaamba 140 2 0 16 7 0 16 N 6 2

8 Moti Bhamri 229 1 1 19 9 0 15 N 4 N

9 Palci 129 0 0 7 1 0 7 N 5 1

10 Bitada 171 0 0 9 7 1 7 N 4 0


3.3. Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in

Rajpipla, Baroda, and Baruch and as agriculture labour in other parts of the state. Another major occupation of the people is Basket making and leaf

plates making using the raw material which they collect from the community land or forest.

Table no. 27: Per capita Income

Sl no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Agriculture Labour Casual labour Others Total

1 Nani chikli 6700 1350 2450 1200 1565 13265

2 Boridra 7800 1300 3100 1280 2664 16144

3 Moti chikli 6450 1850 2600 1130 3893 15923

4 Gadit 6560 2250 2750 1290 1985 14835

5 Amli 6740 1900 2850 1350 2296 15136

6 Gagar 4890 2150 2800 1030 2313 13183

7 Khutaamba 5850 2450 2700 980 2605 14585

8 Moti Bhamri 4550 2120 2100 1229 2777 12776

9 Palci 5150 1020 2250 3587 7921 19928

10 Bitada 4890 1440 2350 1147 4178 14005

Dependence on Common Property Resource

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sl no Village Mahua Oil Making Other (Fuel Wood / Fodder )

Total income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Nani chikli 10.5 5700 11.5 1280 6980

2 Boridra 11 6000 10.5 1200 7200

3 Moti chikli 10.3 5600 12.2 1400 7000

4 Gadit 9.6 5200 8.21 900 6100


5 Amli 9.3 5000 8.52 900 5900

6 Gagar 10.1 5500 9.21 1000 6500

7 Khutaamba 10.25 5600 7.25 800 6400

8 Moti Bhamri 9.1 4900 13.22 1500 6400

9 Palci 9.4 5100 11.51 1300 6400

10 Bitada 9.2 5000 10.69 1200 6200

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sl no

Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Nani chikli 114 44 50 32 70 0 5 10 2 Boridra 144 101 44 55 45 4 6 1 3 Moti chikli 44 31 5 21 13 0 0 0 4 Gadit 110 34 25 23 106 0 2 2 5 Amli 100 60 23 41 44 0 3 1 6 Gagar 155 75 45 32 79 0 7 5 7 Khutaamba 254 98 35 65 150 4 3 3 8 Moti Bhamri 362 81 45 72 269 5 3 7 9 Palci 134 82 23 45 49 0 0 3

10 Bitada 173 96 12 65 68 2 3 9

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World:

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of

land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for Nani Chikali project), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and

India), and Dept. of Agriculture (for Narmada). The results indicate that Nani Chikali project has low productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat


and Narmada. The productivity is low not only because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due

lack to of source of irrigation and scarcity of rain.

Farmers mainly grow cotton, Black gram, Rice, Pigeonpea. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall.

The world productivity of Pigeon pea is 2800 kg/ha. In India productivity of 675 kg/ha. Gujarat productivity of about 906 kg/ha. Narmada district has

productivity 508kg /ha. The Nani Chikali project area has only 215 kg/ha productivity. It is low compare to district, State, India and world.


The world and India productivity of cotton are 526 kg,764 kg per hectare respectively.Gujarat is a major cotton producing state in India with

the productivity of 627kg/ha.cotton productivity of Narmada is 451 kg/ha and Nani Chikali village has very poor productivity with 225 Kg/ha.



The world and India productivity of Urad are 500 kg,469 kg per hectare respectively.Gujarat is a major Black gram producing state in India

with the productivity of 450kg/ha.Wheat productivity of Narmada is 350 kg/ha and Nani Chikali project has very poor productivity with 175 Kg/ha.


The Nani Chikali project area has low productivity because of the following reason

i) Full dependence on monsoon:

Nani Chikali Project is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,80% of

the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure

of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times

they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods:

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple

cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low

productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers in Nani Chikali use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill. So,

old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers:

In Nani Chikali project most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and

other inputs.


vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land

productivity. In Nani Chikali project, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated

condition. But in Nani Chikhali project 99 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Nani Chikali mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers

especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders

at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage

facilities.


Problem analysis of the project area:

1. Treatment of waste land and development of degraded land are important activities and the activities to be taken in project.

2. To make available the quality saplings for horticulture crops, so we have taken horticultural nursery in the project.

3. Most of land comes under undulating land so in project land levelling taken with border plantation.

4. Fodder production, making available high milk yielding cattle in SHG mode and production of vermin compost are the main areas taken

up in Animal Husbandry. The provisions for cattle health, too, have been taken care of.

5. Popularization of micro-irrigation system is another area which has been given due attention in the plan.

6. Marketing is another area to be looked into. So we have linked with ATMA and KVK for effective marketing.

7. Introduced improve breed of animals.

8. Propose animal health camp and demonstration of mineral mixture to remove diseases and improve the milk productivity.

9. Demonstration of drip irrigation and new and improved agricultural intervention for effective extension.

10. Introducing vermicompost for landless it will create employment as well as improve the soil condition.

11. Many microenterprises have been taken under project for women empowerment.


CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES


Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of

migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The

common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.


4.1. Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Nani Chikali Project

consists of ten- watersheds namely5d1b1a2e,a21,a2f,a2g,a1j,a1b,a1b,a1c,a1b,a1d,a1e as their respective codes. Further Nani

Chikali watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely Navagam panuda, Narvadi, Kolvan, Dhamdara Projects this

gives an element of continuation of the programme.

ii) Base line Survey


To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark

for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which

involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey

includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the

demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption

rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the

area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

Fig i. Base line Survey


iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal

activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season

calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the

villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local

vegetations (apt for afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers


Figure: 2 Resource mapping


Figure: 3 Village meeting


iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning


iv: Biophysical survey


Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological,

Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage

according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil

Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to

identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical

interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid

over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which

generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was

used

(A) Planning Cluster approach Yes Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes


Hydro-geological survey Yes Contour mapping Yes Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes Ridge to Valley treatment Yes Online IT connectivity between Yes

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers Yes

1. Cadastral map Yes 2. Village boundaries Yes 3. Drainage Yes 4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 5. Land use Yes 6. Ground water status Yes 7. Watershed boundaries Yes 8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# No Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

No

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No Weather Station

(B) Inputs No 1. Bio-pesticides No 2. Organic manures Yes 3. Vermicompost Yes 4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 5. Water saving devices Yes 6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 7. Bio-fencing Yes 8. Nutrient budgeting No 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No


Any other (please specify)

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr. No. Name of the PRA

Activity / FGD Date

Number of

people

present

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

Specific problems of different villages to be narrated

1 Social map 11-8-2011 32 100 % ST population, Migration (40%), distribution of landless or homeless families (35%), small and marginal farmers (80%), other occupations (rural artisans), local resource people, widows, etc.

2. Resources map 11-8-2011 35

vegetation (forests, trees(Teak,Mahua,Bamboo,Neem,Nilgiri,Mango), land use (cultivated, uncultivated waste, grazing land, forest land, irrigated land), land ownership patterns, land productivity, cropping patterns etc.Topography, terrain and slopes, drainage etc.Need demonstration plot with good quality seed distribution, land levelling with border plantation, Grass and bamboo plantation.

3. Tree matrix

ranking 12-8-2011 35

Identify importance of trees, and ranked trees according to use.According to tree matrix ,teak, Mango, sitafal have been taken under plantation.

4. Wealth ranking 12-8-2011 90 The relations between village institutions and outside forces, such as government services or development agencies. They made large circle for Primary school,Gram panchayat

5. Seasonal diagram 13-8-2011 55

Seasonal diagram helped to identify heavy workload periods, food and fodder security, wage availability, migration period etc.In Project area peoples migrate in summer (March to Jun) due to scarcity of fodder and month of July is very heavy workload month because they do sowing and tillage practice.

6. Transect walk 13-8-2011 65

Used this tool as a verification of issues raised during other PRA exercises particularly during social mapping, natural resource mapping etc.Identify suitable activities for EPA like repair of check dam,Desilting of check dam.Well recharge,Fencing and plantation in community land etc.

7. FGD 16-8-2011 78 Identify needs of community and proposed livelihood activities according to need like vermin compost and Nursery raising for landless people. It will reduce migration.




Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details

4.2. Institution building

i) Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This

committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with

the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in Nani Chikali project villagewise. Capacity building

training to the watershed committee is given by WDT.

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.

Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details of Boridra

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name

Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s assigned#

1

Boridra Watershed Committee

Under Process

Vasava Jesalbhai Movasibhai

President M Y Y 7

2 Vasava

Kalidasbhai Manasukhbhai

Secretary M Y Y 12

3 Vasava

Bhupendrabhai Mahendrabhai

Member M Y Y 11

4 Vasava

Harilalbhai Maniyabhai

Member M Y Y 9

5 Vasava

Bharatbhai Member M Y Y 12


Laxmanbhai

6 Vasava

Jitendrakumar Khalapabhai

Member M Y Y BA

7 Vasava

Sarangabem Kanubhai

Member F Y Y BA

8 Vasava

Chetanbhai Rameshbhai

Member M Y Y 11

9 Vasava

Vijaybhai Kashibhai

Member M Y Y 9

10 Vasava

Rajeshbhai Shanubhai

Member M Y Y 12

Table no. 32.2: Watershed Committee details of Moti bhamri

Sl. No.

Names of WCs


yyyy)

Name


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation


1

Moti Bhamari

Watershed Committee

Under Process

Vasava Bandulalbhai

President M Y Y 8

2 Vasava

Jethabhai Mulajibhai

Secretary M Y Y 7

3 Vasava

Manubhai Mohanbhai

Member M Y Y 7

4 Vasava

Zaverbhai Sengabhai

Member M Y Y 10

5 Vasava Member M Y Y 7


Mahendrabhai Gurajibhai

6 Vasava

Ganeshbhai Shankarbhai

Member M Y Y 10

7 Vasava

Sureshbhai Member M Y Y 10

8 Vasava

Manilalbhai Bamaniya

Member M Y Y 10

9 Vasava

Natvarbhai Dadubhai

Member M Y Y 12

10 Vasava

Babubhai Chandubhai

Member M Y Y 12

11 Vasava

Jayendrabhai Shankarbhai

Member M Y Y 10

12 Vasava

Zumaliben Ramjibhai

Member F Y Y 10

Table no. 32.3: Watershed Committee details of Gadit

Sl. No.

Names of WCs


yyyy)

Name


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation


1 Gadit

Watershed Committee

Under Process

Vasava Hasmukhbhai

Shantilal President M Y Y 12

2 Vasava

Gulabsing Sengabhai

Secretary M Y Y B.Ed.


3 Vasava

Mahendrabhai Rasalbhai

Member M Y Y B.A.

4 Vasava

Babubhai Manilal

Member M Y Y Un-

educated

5 Vasava

Jetarbhai Manilalbhai

Member M Y Y Y 8

6 Vasava

Kesurbhai Bhangadbhai

Member M Y Y Y 10

7 Vasava

Chandubhai Kikariyabhai

Member M Y Y 9

8 Vasava

Amrutbhai Abhesingbhai

Member M Y Y 10

9 Vasava

Sureshbhai Bhikhajibhai

Member M Y Y 9

10 Vasava

Rameshbhai Rupajibhai

Member M Y Y 5

\


Table no. 33: SHG details

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially

for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the

following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like AKRSP, it was planned to have some capacity building training

regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment.


Table no. 33: SHG details

S. No. Name of village

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only

Women

With both

Total Member

Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Nani

Chikhali 0 1 0 10

(i) Landless

0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2

(ii) SF 0 8 8 0 8 8 0 8 8

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Boridra 0 1 0 12

(i) Landless

0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2

(ii) SF 0 10 10 0 10 10 10 0 10

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Moti

Chikhali 0 0 0 0

(i) Landless

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Gadit 0 1 0 10

(i) Landless

0 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3

(ii) SF 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Amli 0 1 0 10

(i) Landless

0 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3

(ii) SF 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7


(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Gagar 0 1 0 9

(i) Landless

0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2

(ii) SF 0 7 7 0 7 7 7 0 7

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Khuta Amba

0 4 0 45

(i) Landless

0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10

(ii) SF 0 35 35 0 35 35 0 26 26

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 Moti

Bhamari 0 1 0 10

(i) Landless

0 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3

(ii) SF 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 Palsi 0 1 0 11

(i) Landless

0 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 4

(ii) SF 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 Bitada 0 1 0 10

(i) Landless

0 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3

(ii) SF 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 6 6

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total

12 0 127 0 0 127 127 0 127 127 17 100 117


User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user

charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

S. No.

Name of village Total no. of UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1

Nani Chikhali

4 20

(i) Landless 5 5 5 5 5 5

(ii) SF 15 15 15 15 15 15

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

2

Boridra

6 32

(i) Landless 4 4 4 4 4 4

(ii) SF 28 28 28 28 24 24

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

3

Moti Chikhali

6 38

(i) Landless 9 9 9 9 9 9

(ii) SF 29 29 29 29 29 29

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

4

Gadit

6 45 (i)

Landless 16 16 16 16 11 11


(ii) SF 29 29 29 29 19 19

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

5

Amli

6 60

(i) Landless 9 9 9 9 9 9

(ii) SF 51 51 51 51 51 51

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

6

Gagar

5 25

(i) Landless 5 5 5 5 5 5

(ii) SF 20 20 20 20 20 20

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

7

Khuta Amba

4 30

(i) Landless 6 6 6 6

(ii) SF 24 24 24 24 12 12

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

8

Moti Bhamari

5 25

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 25 25 25 25 25 25

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

9

Palsi

3 21

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 21 21 21 21 21 21

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

10

Bitada

5 0 0 35 (i)

Landless 6 6 6 6 6 6


(ii) SF 29 29 29 29 23 23

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 50 0 0 331 0 331 0 331 311 20 331 288 0 288

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP 10 (Nani Chikali)

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain

important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development

Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 26.66 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent

of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them

that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument

of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Names of Villages Amount earmarked for EPA Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost

Expected outcome

1

Nani Chikli 2.33

Handpump Repairing. 0.40

2 Causeway Repairing 0.80

3 Drainage Line 0.39

4 Animal Trough Repairing 0.27

5 New Electric Motor 0.42

6 Animal Health Camp 0.12

7 Vegitalale Kit 0.10

8 New Animal Trough 0.50

1

Boridra 2.97

Handpump Repairing 0.50

2 Protection Wall 1.17


4 Check Dam Desilting 0.35




1

Moti Chikli 2.63

New Animal Trough 0.50




5 Causeway Repairing 0.68

6 Hand Pump Repairing- 0.20

1

Gadit 3.12

Handpump Repairing 0.30


3 Check Dam Desilting & Repairing 0.82


1

Amli 2.88

Check Dam Desilting & Repairing 0.80


3 Hand Pump Repairing 0.55

4 Animal Health Camp & Mineral Mixture 0.27


6 Anganwadi Repairing 0.36

1

Gagar 3.6

Well Desilting & Repairing 0.38


3 Motor Repairing 0.30





8 Vegitalale Kit 0.16


1

Khutaamba 4.03

Well De silting & Repairing 0.39

2 Check Dam De silting & Repairing 0.83

3 Check Dam De silting & Repairing 0.61

4 Sintex Tank 0.19






9 Pipe Line for Drinking Water 0.20


1

Moti Bhamari 1.58

Hand Pump Repairing 0.50




1

Palsi 1.94







1

Bitada 1.59



3 Fencing & Plantation 0.71

4 Animal Health Camp 0.24

5 Nala Repairing 0.40

6 Well De silting & Repairing 0.20

Project Total 26.67

30.67

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be

approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allotted for this work.

Ridge Area Treatment Plans:


It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in Nani Chikali

watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Nani Chikali watershed following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the watershed

committee, and other field staff of DWDU.

1. Stone Banding 2. Continuous Contour Trenches (CCT) 3. Check dam 4. Gabion structure 5. Nala banding 6. Percolation tank

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*

S. No

. Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (iii) (i)

(ii) Commu

nity (iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion (mm/yyyy) (D)

Land dev. (L)

Pri-vate M W O T

1

Nani Chikha

li

Contour Trenching (CCT) Yes Forest 3000 3.00

Plantetion Yes

Forest 1500

1.5 Graded bunding

(Stone Bund) Yes Yes 1500 10.5 Earthern bunding Yes Yes Forest 350 1.07

Gully plug


Gabion structures Yes

Forest 105 4.00

Chek Wall Yes

Any others (Please specify)

Total 4964 18.57

2 Boridr

a

Contour Trenching (CCT) Yes Forest 1000 1.00

Graded bunding (Stone Bund) Yes Yes 1750 13

Earthern bunding Yes Yes 500 0.75 Gabion structures Yes Yes 60 2


Total 3310 16.75

3

Moti Chikha

li

Contour Trenching (CCT) Yes

Forest/Forest 1500 1.50

Graded bunding (Stone Bund) Yes Yes 950 6.8

Bench terracing

Earthern bunding Yes Yes 200 0.3

Gabion structures Yes Yes 71 2.5


Total 2721 11.1

4 Gadit Contour Trenching Yes Forest 2000 2


(CCT)





Total 4377 20

5 Amli

Contour Trenching (CCT) Yes Forest 2000 2


Gabion structures Yes Yes 25 1


Total 3125 11

6 Gagar


Forest/Forest 1000 1





Total 3565 25.4

7 Khuta Amba





Total 2074 22.5

8

Moti Bhama

ri






Total 2220 7.3

9 Palsi




Total 291 3.6

10 Bitada






Total 1892 6.75


(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name Type of

structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y LacsLtr

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y In Lacs Ltr

Estimated cost

1 Nani Chikhali

(i) Tank

(ii) Pond 0 0 0 0 1 15 3.00 3 15 12.00 3

(iii ) Lake

(iv) Check dam

1 10 3.6 1.5 6 40 15.00 16 50 18.60 17.5

(v) Percolation tank

(vi) Check Wall

5 12 6.8 7.5 12 6.80 7.50

(vii) Any others (Please specify)

Total 1 10 3.6 1.5 12 67 24.8 26.5 77 37.4 28

2 Boridra

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0 0 2 20 24 7 20 24 7

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

1 7 3 2 5 35 12 13 42 15 15


0 0 0


(vi) Check Wall

0 0 0 0 10 21 12 14 21 12 14


0 0 0

Total 0 1 7 3 2 17 76 48 34 83 51 36

3 Moti Chikhali

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

2 10 5 3 5 35 9.6 10.7 45 14.6 13.7


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

0 0 0 0 14 23 12.5 16.5 23 12.5 16.5


0 0 0

Total 2 10 5 3 19 58 22.1 27.2 68 27.1 30.2

4 Gadit

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 2 20 24 6 0 0 0 0 20 24 6

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

7 25 11 7 1 5 3.5 2.6 30 14.5 9.6


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

4 6 3.25 6 6 3.25 6



0 0 0

Total 9 45 35 13 5 11 6.75 8.6 56 41.75 21.6

5 Gagar

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

1 5 3 1 6 45 26 21.5 50 29 22.5


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

7 10.8 13.2 13 10.8 13.2 13


0 0 0

Total 1 5 3 1 13 55.8 39.2 34.5 60.8 42.2 35.5

6 Amli

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

0 0 0 0 5 24 10 13 24 10 13


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

11 18.5 9.85 18 18.5 9.85 18

(vii) Any others (Please

0 0 0


specify)

Total 0 0 0 0 16 42.5 19.85 31 42.5 19.85 31

7 Khuta Amba

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

4 22 16 8 5 24 12 14.91 46 28 22.91


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

5 11 5.48 8 11 5.48 8


0 0 0

Total 4 22 16 8 10 35 17.48 22.91 57 33.48 30.91

8 Moti Bhamri

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

0 0 0 0 2 15 6 4.5 15 6 4.5


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

5 12 8.26 7.32 12 8.26 7.32


0 0 0


Total 0 0 0 0 7 27 14.26 11.82 27 14.26 11.82

9 Palsi

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

0 0 0 0 3 12 6.5 7.2 12 6.5 7.2


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

10 15 9.52 12.5 15 9.52 12.5


0 0 0

Total 0 0 0 0 13 27 16.02 19.7 27 16.02 19.7

10 Bitada

(i) Tank 0 0 0

(ii) Pond 0 0 0

(iii ) Lake 0 0 0

(iv) Check dam

2 12 7 3 5 32 22 15 44 29 18


0 0 0

(vi) Check Wall

8 12 8.21 12 12 8.21 12


0 0 0

Total 2 12 7 3 13 44 30.21 27 56 37.21 30

Total For the Project 20 111 72.6 31.5 120 431.3 230.41 235.91 542.3 312.01 267.41


Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

recharging structures Construction of new recharging

structures Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated

cost No.

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

1 Boridra

(i)Open wells 2 5 1 0 0 0 5 1

(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 (iii)Any others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0

Total for the village 2 5 1 0 0 0 5 1

2 Khuta Amba

(i)Open wells 7 20 3 0 20 3

(ii)Bore wells (iii)Any others (Pl. specify)

Total for the village 7 20 3 0 0 0 20 3

3 Moti Bhamari

(i)Open wells 1 3 0.5 0 0 0 3 0.50

(ii)Bore wells (iii)Any others (Pl. specify)

Total for the village 1 3 0.5 0 0 0 3 0.50

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S. No. Name Of Village Name Of Activity

Type Of Land Executing

Agency Target

Private (Ii)

Community

(Iii) Others

(Pl. Specify)

(I) Ug Estimated

Cost Expected

Month & Year Of Completion

(Mm/Yyyy) (Ii)Shg (Rs. In Lakh)


(Iii) Others (Pl. Specify)

1 Nani Chikhali

Wadi (Mango, Custard Apple ,Ber) Private 1.20 Ha Ug 1

Crop Demonstration With Drip Private 1.50 Ha Ug 2

Low Cost Poly House Private 3 Unit Ug 0.6

Agriculture Tools Community 2 No 1

Green Manuring Demonstration Private 1 Unit Ug 0.1

Nursery Raising Private 2 Unit Ug 1

Chaff Cutter Community 1 No. 0.3

Ai& Cattle Feeds Community 1 Unit 1

Vermi Compost Private 1unit Shg 0.45

Oil Extraction Unit 1 Unit Ug 2

Rice Threshing Machine 1 Unit Ug 3

Village Total 12.45

2 Boridra

Vegetable Creeper Production Private 1 Ha Ug 2.5

Wadi & Drip Irrigation Private 2 Ha Ug 4

Low Cost Poly House Private 5 Unit Ug 1

Agro Centre (Agriculture Input Supply (Hybrid Seeds/Organic Fertilizers) 1 Unit Ug 1.09

Nursery Raising Private 1 Ha Ug 0.5

Animal Health Camp &Ai Mineral Mixture Community 1 Unit 0.5

Dairy Development Through Ai 1 Unit 0.5

Chaff Cutter Community 1 No. 0.3

Demonstration Of Silage Production Community 2 Unit 1

Vermi Compost Unit Private 3 Unit Shg 1.5

Fishery Development Production - 3 Unit Ug 1.5

Village Total 15.89

3 Moti Chikhali Wadi ( Mango/Saragva/Custard Apple ) Private 2 Ha Ug 1.5


Vegetative Nursery Raising (Brinjal, Tomato,Mango,Bamboo) Private 2 Unit Ug 3

Agro Centre (Improved Seeds/Organic Fertilizer) Private 1 Unit Ug 0.99

Demonstration Of Ipm Plot Private 1 Unit Ug 1.5

Vegetable Creeper With Drip Private 1ha Ug 1.5

Grading & Packaging Of Pigeon Pea 1 Unit Shg 1.5

Chaff Cutter Community 1 No 0.3

Artificial Insemination 1 Unit Ug 0.5

Rice Mill 1 Unit Ug 3


Oil Extraction Mill 1 Unit Ug 2

Village Total 16.29

4 Gadit

Demonstration Of Flower Production With Drip Private 1ha Ug 1

Wadi (Mango/Saragva/Custard Apple) Private 2 Ha Ug 1.5


Demonstration For Green Manuring Private 20 Ha Ug 1.5

Agro Center (Organic Fertilizer, Improved Seed ) Private 1 Unit Ug 0.82

Daal Mill 1 Unit Ug 3

Urad Grading & Packaging Unit 2 Unit Shg 3

Ai & Animal Camp Community 1 Unit 1

Chaff Cutter Community 1 Unit 0.3

Demonstration Of Silage Private 1 Unit Ug 0.5

Vermi Compost Unit Private 2 Unit Shg 1



Village Total 19.62

5 Amli Demonstration Of Flower Production With Drip Private 1ha Ug 2.5

Wadi (Mango/Sargava/Custard Apple) Private 2ha Ug 1.5


Demonstration Of Vegetative Creeper Private 2ha Ug 2

Vegetative Nursery Raising Production Private 2 Unit Ug 2

Demonstration Of Drip Irrigation System Private 2ha Ug 2.18

Demonstration Of Inm Plot Private 1 Unit 1.5

Flour Mill 1 Unit Ug 0.5

Nursery Raising For Bamboo/Nilgiri/Mango Private 2 Unit Ug 2


Dairy Development Through Ai & Animal Camp Community 1 Unit 1.5

Vermi Compost Private 2 Unit Shg 1

Village Total 16.98

6 Gagar

Wadi ( Mango/ Sargava/ Sag/Custard Apple) Private 2 Ha Ug 2.5

Kitchen Garden Private 4 Unit Ug 1

Demonstration Of Drip Irrigation Private 2 Ha Ug 2.7

Green Manuring Private 1 Ha Ug 0.3


Nursery Raising (Nilgiri, Bamboo, Custard Apple) Private 4 Unit Shg/Ug 4


Animal Health Camp Unit Ai Community 1 Unit 1



Mahua Oil Extraction Unit 1 Unit Ug 2

Village Total 20.4

7 Khuta Amba

Demonstration Of Floriculture 1 Acre With Drip Private 3 Ha Ug 4.5

Vegetative Nursery Raising Private 1 Unit Ug 1

Demonstration Of Kitchen Garden Private 1 Unit Ug 1

Wadi ( Mango/Sitafal/Sag) With Drip Private 2 Ha Ug 3

Agro Centre(Improved Seed/Fertilizer) Private 1 Unit Ug 1.64


Demonstration Of Organic Farming Private 2 Unit Ug 2


Dairy Development Through Ai & Animal Camp Community 5 Unit 1.5

Nursery Raising For Bamboo & Mango Private 2 Unit Shg 2

Tuar/Urad Grading & Packaging 1 Unit Ug 4


Village Total 22.94

8 Moti Bhamri

Wadi (Mango Plantation/ Saragava) Private 1 Ha Ug 1

Demonstration Of Drip Irrigation Wadi Private 3 Ha Ug 5

Nursery Raising ( Nilgiri/Bamboo,Mango) Private 1 Unit Ug 1

Tuar/ Urad Grading & Packaging Unit 1 Unit Ug 2


Dairy Development Ai & Animal Camp Community 5 Unit 1

Vermi Compost Private 1 Unit Shg 0.5

Fish Production 1 Unit Ug 1


Mahua Oil Extraction Mill 1 Unit Ug 2

Village Total 16.8

9 Palsi

Wadi (Mango/Sag/Custard Apple) Private 1.20 Ha Ug 1.5

Green Manuring Private 10 Ha Ug 1.2

Nursery Raising For Nilgiri, Bamboo, Mango Private 1 Unit Ug 1


Ai & Animal Health Camp Community 5 Unit 1

Demonstration Of Silage Private 5 Unit Ug 1




Village Total 11.5


10 Bitada

Wadi (Mango/Custard Apple) With Drip Private 2 Ha Ug 3

Agro Centre (Improved Seed And Fertilizer) 1 Unit 1.07

Low Cost Poly House Private 10 Unit Ug 2.5

Nursery Raising For Bamboo, Mango, Custard Apple Private 2 Unit Ug 2


Ai & Animal Health Camp Community 5 Unit 1

Vermi Compost Private 3 Unit Shg 1.5


Village Total 14.37

Project Total 167.24 Note: 1. Please provide the list of works and names beneficiaries in the annexure 2. Ensure that 10% of the total project funds go to the assetless- give separate list in the annexure

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) the project areas

S. No. Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per

SHG 1 Nani Chikhali Vermi Compost Unit 1 0.45 2 Boridra Vermi Compost Unit 3 1.50 3 Moti Chikhali Vermi Compost Unit 1 0.50

4 Gadit Urad Grading & Packaging

Unit 2

3.00

Vermi Compost Unit 2 1.00 5 Amli Vermi Compost Unit 2 1.00 6 Gagar Vermi Compost Unit 2 1.00 Nursery Raising (Nilgiri) 4 4.00

7 Khuta Amba Vermi Compost Unit 4 2.00

Nursery Raising for Bamboo

& Mango 2

2.00


8 Moti Bhamari Vermi Compost Unit 1 0.50 9 Palsi Vermi Compost Unit 1 0.50

10 Bitada Vermi Compost Unit 3 1.50

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr. No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome

1 Nani chikali project

Vermi composting

Forward: Use in vegetable and horticulture plantation Backward: Raw material at village level

Farmers group Improve soil health and increase productivity

Vegetable production with drip

Forward: Good quality vegetable production Backward: Vermicompost Unit

Surat sardar market ,APMC ankleshwar

Income and Standard of living will be increased

Nursery raising

Forward: Vegetable production Backward: Vermicompost

Unit

Farmers (User) group High quality seedling will

be available

Horticulture plantation(Mango,sitafal,ber)

Forward: Pickle making Unit Backward: Vermicompost Unit

ATMA,KVK Income will increase with food processing

Fish production unit Forward: Backward:

Kevdi fish market

Vegetable production criper

Forward: Sale in surat market Backward: Vermicompost Unit

Surat sardar market ,APMC ankleshwar

Income and Standard of living will be increased

Oil extraction unit (Mahua) Forward: Oil and cake Backward: Raw material (Mahua seed )

Local consumption Income generating activity with the use of local resource .

Teak and bamboo nursery Forward: Teak& bamboo Farmers (User) group High quality seedling will


production Backward: Vermicompost

Unit

be available

Nursery for horticulture plants with drip

Forward: High quality seedling Backward: Vermicompost

Unit

Farmers (User) group High quality seedling will

be available

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village Name of

structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion (mm/ yyyy)

1. Nani Chikhali Afforestation Yes Gauchar UG 1.28 1500 1.50

2. Boridra Afforestation Yes Gauchar UG 1 1200 1.40

3. Moti Chikhali Afforestation Yes Gaucher UG 2.4 3400 3.00

4. Amli Afforestation Yes Gauchar/Forest UG 3 4500 3.50

5. Gadit Afforestation Yes Gauchar/Forest UG 3 3000 3.00

6. Gagar Afforestation Yes Gauchar/Forest UG 1.4 1600 1.50

7. Moti Bhamri Afforestation Yes Gauchar/Forest UG 1.8 1800 3.00

8. Palsi Afforestation Yes Forest UG 2 3000 3.81

9. BItada Afforestation Yes Gauchar/Forest UG 6 7500 8.00

Total 20.88 27500 28.71


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

Nani Chikhali Waste Land

Mango, Vegetable Production

3 1.50 75

Total for village

Boridra

Total for village

4.4. Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and

experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the

conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to

human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve

participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building at Nani Chikali project area

Alternative Land Use Plan

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices


Vegetable production and Management

Afforestation

Meteorological Information

Dairy Development and Management

Rural Craft

Income Generation Activities

o Stiching

o Food Processing

o Post Harvest management practices

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S. No. Name of the

Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website

& e-mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of speciali-zation$

Accreditation details

Trainings

Reference Year No. of

trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be trained

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra

Dediyapada,Narmada Research Institutes

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

GoI 2012-2014 12 200

2 Navsari Agril. University

Navsari University

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

GoI 2012-2014 3 15

3 AKRSP Baruch NGO Capacity Building

Society Reg. Act

2011-2012 16 400

4 BISAG Gandhinagar Space

application Remote Sensing

GoG 2010-2015 3 10


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. Project Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons

No. of persons

to be trained

No. of training programmes Estimated cost(in lakh)

1 Nani Chikali

PIA 4 3 8 0.24

WDTs 6 6 16 5.0

UGs 200 200 2 2.5

SHGs 250 250 3 11.0

WCs 48 48 6 5.0

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible) Street plays Local Drama Groups 1.5

Awareness for the importance of watershed projecta

Video shows DWDU-Narmada 15000 Pamphlets and posters DWDU-Narmada 10000 Banners, Hoardings DWDU-Narmada 15000


CHAPTER – 5

BUDGETING


Budgeting

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and done accordingly in

table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds.

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance

Sl no Budget component Cost requirement 1. Administrative costs 66.654

2. Monitoring 66.6654

3. Evaluation .6654

4. Entry Point activity 26.6616

5. Institution and Capacity Building 33.327

6. Detailed Project Report 6.6654

7. Watershed Development Works 373.2624

8. Livelihood activities for asset less 59.9886

9. Production systems and micro-enterprises 66.654

10. Consolidation phase 19.9962

TOTAL 666.54

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP

Sl no

Village Activity

EPA Institution and CB

DPR Watershed development Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Nani chikli 232608 290760 58152 3256512 523368 581520 174456 5117376


2 Boridra 296688 370860 74172 4153632 667548 741720 222516 6527136

3 Moti chikli 263040 328800 65760 3682560 591840 657600 197280 5786880

4 Gadit 312000 390000 78000 4368000 702000 780000 234000 6864000

5 Amli 288000 360000 72000 4032000 648000 720000 216000 6336000

6 Gagar 360000 450000 90000 5040000 810000 900000 270000 7920000

7 Khutaamba 402912 503640 100728 5640768 906552 1007280 302184 8864064

8 Moti Bhamri 157968 197460 39492 2211552 355428 394920 118476 3475296

9 Palci 193632 242040 48408 2710848 435672 484080 145224 4259904

10 Bitada 159312 199140 39828 2230368 358452 398280 119484 3504864

Total 2666160 3332700 666540 37326240 5998860 6665400 1999620 58655520

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Nani chikli 63.35 45.95 17.4 2 Boridra 74.72 58.61 16.11 3 Moti chikli 64.43 51.96 12.47 4 Gadit 67.34 61.62 5.72 5 Amli 65.36 56.88 8.48 6 Gagar 87.4 71.1 16.3 7 Khutaamba 83.38 79.58 3.8 8 Moti Bhamri 41 31.2 9.8 9 Palci 40.55 38.25 2.3

10 Bitada 61.32 31.45 29.87

Total 648.85 526.6 122.25

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

50.1 EPA


S. No. Village

Phase/ Type of work* Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to

IWMP due to convergence (Rs.

in lakh)

Scheme with which

convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/

task/ structure in

DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Nani Chikhali EPA New Animal Trough 0.5 WASMO District

2 Boridra EPA Protection Wall 0.7 NREGA District

3 Moti Chikli EPA New Animal Trough 0.5 WASMO District

4 EPA Hand Pump Repairing- 0.2 WASMO District

5 Gagar EPA Protection Wall 1 NREGA District

6 Moti Bhamari EPA Hand Pump Repairing 0.5 WASMO District

7

Bitada

EPA Nala Repairing 0.4 NREGA District

8 EPA Well De silting & Repairing 0.2 NREGA District

Total 4

50.2 Watershed Works


S. No. Village Phase/ Type of work* Activity to be carried out


IWMP due to convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which


Reference no. of

activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for convergence

was taken

1 Nani

Chikhali

Ridge Area treatment Graded bunding (Stone Bund) 4.50 MGNREGA

District

2 Surface Water Pond development 3.00 MGNREGA

District

3 Surface Water Check dam 8.00 MGNREGA

District

4

Boridra

Ridge Area treatment Graded bunding (Stone Bund) 3.61 MGNREGA

District

5 Surface Water Check Wall 6.00 MGNREGA

District


District

7 Moti

Chikhali

Ridge Area treatment Contour Trenching (CCT) 0.50 Forest

District

8 Surface Water Check Wall 7.47 MGNREGA

District

9 Gadit Ridge Area treatment Graded bunding (Stone Bund) 0.92 MGNREGA

District

10 Amali Surface Water Check Wall 5.18 MGNREGA

District

11

Gagar

Surface Water Check Wall 5.00 MGNREGA

District


District

13 Bitada Surface Water

Check Wall 12.00 MGNREGA

District

Check Dam 10.47 MGNREGA

District


Total 77.65

50.3 Livelihood

S. No. Village Phase/ Type

of work* Activity to be carried out


IWMP due to convergence (Rs.

in lakh)

Scheme with which


Reference no. of activity/

task/ structure in

DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Nani Chikhali

Livelihood Agriculture Tools 1 Agri. Dept.

District

Livelihood Green Manuring Demonstration 0.1 Agri. Dept. District

Livelihood Chaff Cutter 0.3 AH Dept District

2 Boridra

Livelihood Animal Health Camp &AI Mineral Mixture 0.5 Animal

Husbandry District


Livelihood Demonstration of Silage Production 1 KVK District

3 Moti Chikhali

Livelihood Demonstration of IPM Plot 1.5 Agri. Dept. KVK District

Livelihood Vegetable Creeper with Drip 1.5 Agri. Dept. KVK District


Livelihood Artificial Insemination 0.5 AH dept. District

4 Gadit

Livelihood Daal Mill 3 Agri culture

District

Livelihood AI & Animal Camp 1 AH dept District


Livelihood Demonstration of Silage 0.5 AH dept District


5 Amali

Livelihood Demonstration of INM Plot 1.5 KVK District


Livelihood Dairy Development Through AI & Animal Camp 1.5

Animal Husbandry District

6 Gagar

Livelihood Low Cost Poly House 2 KVK District


Livelihood Animal Health Camp Unit AI 1 Animal

Husbandry District

7 Khuta Amba

Livelihood Demonstration of Organic Farming 2 Agri. Dept. District


Livelihood Dairy Development Through AI & Animal Camp 1.5

Animal Husbandry District

8 Moti Bhamati

Livelihood Demonstration of Drip Irrigation Wadi 5 BRGF District

Livelihood Tuar/ Urad Grading & Packaging Unit 2 BRGF District


Livelihood Dairy Development AI & Animal Camp 1 Animal

Husbandry District

Livelihood Fish Production 1 BRGF District

9 Palsi


Livelihood AI & Animal Health Camp 1 AH dept. District

Livelihood Demonstration of Silage 1 Agri. Dept. District

10 Bitada

Livelihood Low Cost Poly House 2.5 Agri. Dept. District


Livelihood AI & Animal Health Camp 1 AH dept. District


Livelihood Rice Mill 3 BRGF District

Total 40.6

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No. Name of Private Sector Partner

Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes

Comments a)MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

- - - - - - - -


CHAPTER - 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES


6.1 Expected Outcomes


6.1.1 Employment

Employment has always been a problem in the Project area. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal husbandry and

casual labour work. However, rain fall being average and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, which keeps them

partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full

time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging people

in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment would be created by

providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development.

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area

S. NO. Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 1 Nani chikli 0 355 4 145 359 0 355 0 134 355 0 250 0 98 250 2 Boridra 3 790 0 320 793 0 690 0 312 690 0 675 0 220 675 3 Moti chikli 0 251 0 120 251 0 234 0 112 234 0 190 0 98 190 6 Gadit 0 928 0 430 928 3 750 0 354 753 3 650 0 143 653 7 Ambli 0 896 21 439 917 0 670 0 450 670 0 878 0 320 878 8 Gagar 0 744 9 243 753 0 543 0 165 543 0 145 0 85 145 9 Khutaamba 0 789 39 160 828 0 450 2 130 452 0 240 0 134 240

10 Moti bamri 0 895 0 220 895 0 320 0 259 320 0 312 0 120 312 11 Palci 0 785 5 265 790 0 386 0 187 386 0 265 0 156 265 12 Bitada 0 456 4 157 460 0 170 1 170 171 0 198 0 98 198


6.1.2Migration

On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of

the year for wage labour. In project area more than 60 percent area comes under forest and people collect grass and fodder from forest but it is not

sufficient. So people migrate in Surat,Baruch,Baroda Etc

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons

migrating No. of days per year

of migration Major reason(s) for migrating

Expected reduction in no. of persons migrating

1 Nani chikli 150

100-150 Better Employment, low productivity of

land, only one crop in an year, low wages

95

2 Boridra 120 70

3 Moti chikli 50 40

4 Gadit 90 60

5 Ambli 150 85

6 Gagar 140 60

7 Khutaamba 125 80

8 Moti bamri 100 60

9 Palci 250 90

10 Bitada 90 60

6.1.3 Ground water table

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over the years.

Presently it stands at 12 m.


Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table depth from 28 m in the pre-project level to 25

m in the post project period.

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Project Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1 Nani Chikhali Open wells 12 Meter - 5 Meter

Bore wells 22 eter -4 Meter Others (specify)

6.1.4 Drinking water

There is not a big problem of drinking water in project area. But quality of drinking water is not satisfactory.

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve.

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

S. No. Names of the villages Availability of drinking water (no. of months

in a year) Quality of drinking water Comments

Pre-project Expected Post-project Pre-project Expected Post-project

portable

1 Nani chikli

4-5 months , water sources are very few in

number

12 months portable portable

2 Boridra

3 Moti chikli

4 Gadit

5 Ambli

6 Gagar

7 Khutaamba

8 Moti bamri

9 Palci


10 Bitada

6.1.5 Crops

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. Soil moisture will be increased and rain water also

help percolate sweet water underground. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can

take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area

S.no Name of Project Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area (ha)

Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha)

Average Yield per ha (qtl)

1

IWMP-10 Nani Chikhali Project in

Nandod Block.

Kharif

Tuar 706.36 2.8 1050 5

Cotton 927.54 2.0 1250 4.5 Urad 572.87 2.5 840 4.5 Rabi 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 Zaid 0 0 00 0

0 0 0 0 Total

6.1.6 Horticulture

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered

through IWMP 1 Nani chikli 0 3.20 Ha 2 Boridra 0 2.00 Ha


3 Moti chikli 0 2.00 Ha 4 Gadit 0 2.00 Ha 5 Amli 0 2.00 Ha 6 Gagar 0 2.00 Ha 7 Khutaamba 0 2.00 Ha 8 Moti bamri 0 1.00 Ha 9 Palci 0 1.20 Ha

10 Bitada 0 1.50 Ha

1.7 Vegetative cover

The project has less than 40 percent forest area. Trees like Teak and eucalyptus are seen just here and there. It is planned that more than 100 ha land

to be covered under new plantation.

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed 1 Nani chikli 2.50 1.28 Ha 2 Boridra 2.74 1.00 Ha 3 Moti chikli 462.10 2.40 Ha 4 Gadit 250.26 2.00 Ha 5 Amli 3.14 3.00 Ha 6 Gagar 507.28 1.40 Ha 7 Khutaamba 284.74 0 8 Moti bamri 3.20 1.80 Ha 9 Palsi 56.04 2.00 Ha

10 Bitada 36.61 6.00 Ha

6.1.8 Livestock

The Project has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats. The interventions like provision of good quality

cows and buffaloes, the establishment of fodder bank (Agro forestry) and other such related activities would spur up the dairy development in the

Project. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.


Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of project

Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1

IWMP – 10 Nani Chikhali

In Nandod Block

Milch-animals Cow(per animal/day) 762 2.1 20 Rs/lit 950 6 25Rs/lit

Buffalo(per animal/day) 128 2.50 24Rs/lit 350 6.5 30 Rs/Lit Draught Purpose animals

Camel 00 - Animals for other purpose 1458

Goat (Meat: Rs/kg) 600 110 100 1000 100 Sheep (Meat: Rs/kg)) 90

Linkages The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the

desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

Backward linkages Seed certification Seed supply system Fertilizer supply system Pesticide supply system Credit institutions 0 2 5 Water supply Extension services Nurseries 1 10 15 Tools/machinery suppliers 0 5 5 Price Support system Labour Any other (please specify) Forward linkages


Harvesting/threshing machinery Storage (including cold storage) Road network Transport facilities Markets / Mandis Agro and other Industries Milk and other collection centres 0 2 - Labour Any other (please specify)

Logical Framework Analysis

Objectives Expected outputs Proposed activities

Development Objective Improved and sustained management of natural resources in the watershed project

Immediate Objectives 1. District capable of appropriate management, monitoring and facilitation of community based natural resources management

Overall land use zones for the watershed delineated into conservation, buffer and development zones based on village land use zones

Sub-sector plans developed according to analysis and agreement on use of natural resources

District staff trained in planning, management, monitoring and technical subjects

District extension service functioning IWMP plan updated

1.1.1 Review and delineate the catchment area into three overall zones through discussions with relevant villages and district staff. 1.2.1 Sub-sectors develop their annual plan, which supports the village development plans in line with the natural resources analysis. 1.2.2 Sub-sectors implement their annual work plans. 1.2.3 Follow-up on request from the district on designating the district protected area. 1.3.1 Identify training needs and conduct the training 1.4.1 Set-up the extension systems and assign adequate numbers of farming systems


extension workers. 1.4.2Update IWM plan.

Village land and forest allocation (LFA) completed for all villages

Village action plans developed with prioritised activities

Village requests submitted to district for assistance

Intra-village networks established to develop a sub-catchment plan

2.1.1 Update LFA in villages and complete the LFA in the remaining villages 2.2.1 Conduct participatory rural appraisal (PRA) in all villages and draw-up village action plans 2.3.1 Assist villages in developing proposals for village development activities 2.4.1 Assist villages in networking with each other

3. Improved enforcement and implementation of natural resources and environmental (NRE) legislation

District staff trained in relevant NRE legislation

3.1.1 Access the legislation and conduct training workshops

4. Co-ordination and information exchange of NR activities among relevant stakeholders

4.1Coordination meetings held between relevant stakeholders 4.2MAF at the central level provides appropriate NR maps and information to the district level

4.1.1 District organizes regular meetings among the different stakeholders in relation to natural resources management 4.1.2Identify and discuss possible land use options that are agreeable to all partners 4.1.3Identify alternative income generating activities 4.2.1 District send request to MAF for maps and other NR information as appropriate.

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact

Village Institution Formation

§ Formation of Watershed Committee, User Group

§ One Watershed Committee each village

§ Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and

§ Unity and prosperity in the village management.


§ Number of User group depending on the coverage of particular intervention

participatory way ensuring equity.

§ People's Participation and positive perception towards the programme

Strengthening Village Institutions

§ Organise training and awareness programme for Village institutions

§ awareness camps to be organised.

§ Quality of management of common resources improved.

§ Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

§ trainings and exposure visits UGs and WCs to be held

§ Quality of distribution of benefits between people improved.

§ Failitating and monitoring the functioning of UGs and WCs

§ Capacity building workshops to be organised

§ Increased awareness amongst women about village resources.

§ Strengthen linkages between UGs and WCs and Panchayat Institutions.

§ 1 Federations of UGs and WC to be formed.

§ Women participation enhanced in decision-making of GVCs.

§ Gender sensitisation of UGs and WCs to increase inclusiveness of samuh decision-making.

§ Involvement of youth and children in village development increased.

§ Sensitise village communities to involve children and youth in development.

Fund Management

§ Improve management and utilisation of UGs and WCs.

§ UGs and WCs operating bank account and managing resources on their own

§ Purpose, frequency and volume of use of the fund enhanced.

§ Prepare communities to explore other sources of income for UGs and WCs.

§ Volume of funds generated for UGs and WCs from other sources of income increased.


Ecological Restoration

§ Protection, treatment and regeneration of common and private lands

§ Common and private lands to be brought under new plantations and agro-horti-forestry like Neem, Adusa, prosopis, Banyan and Peepul

§ Fodder availability from common and private lands increased.

§ Better Ecological order in the area

§ Protection, treatment and regeneration of forest lands

§ Forest lands to be brought under new plantations and protection

§ Accessibility to common and forest lands increased with removal of encroachments and resolution of conflicts.

§ Increase in the proportion of households having more security of fodder

§ Plantation of fruits and forest species § Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organised for communities, village volunteers and staff

§ Reduction in drudgery of fodder and fuel collection, especially women

§ Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organise exposure visits for communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

§ Income generation intervention promoted

§ Identification and promotion of non-timber forest produce based income generation activities

Rainfed Area Development

§ Treatment of land through improved soil and moisture conservation practices on watershed basis

§ Land to be brought under improved soil moisture conservation practices

§ Improved productivity of treated land

§ Increase in proportion of households having more security of food

§ Promotion of good agricultural practices- horticulture, improved crop and vegetable

§ Good agricultural practices to be promoted

§ Increased availability of water in wells


§ Organic farming to be promoted

§ Increase in annual agriculture production

§ Increase in contribution of agricultural income to the household income

§ Fodder banksto be established

§ Farmers adopt organic farming practices

§ Promotion of organic farming practices

§ Agriculture based livelihood income generation activities to be promoted

§ Fodder security of farmers enhanced.

§ Formation of Fodder banks to increase fodder security and promote dairy development among communities

§ Water harvesting structures to be constructed

§ Increase availability of water for 9 to 12 months

§ Identification and promotion of agri-produce based income generation activities like grading, processing and packaging.

§ Drip Irrigation facilities to be distributed among farmers

§ Increased availability of water for livestock

§ Promotion of better Irrigation practices like drip irrigation

§ Approx 15000 person days of employment to be generated

§ Availability of irrigation water established

§ Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organise exposure visits of communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

§ Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff

§ Farmers take two crops in a year

§ Increase in agricultural productivity of land

§ Availability of drinking water enhanced


Women’s Socio-political and economic empowerment

§ Formation & Strengthening of women’s SHG groups

§ Women’s SHG groups to be formed

§ Enhanced capacities of leaders of women's group in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

§ Position of women in household, community, society (politically, socially and economically) as perceived by women and community at large

§ Capacity building of womenfolk § Federation of Women’s SHGs to be formed

§ Performance enhancement of SHGs in terms of participation, decision-making, leadership and fund management.

§ Capacity building of SHG leaders and accountants

§ Trainings to be conducted for preparation of woollen products from sheep and goats

§ Improved access to credit for livelihood purposes.

§ Equality & Equity in gender relations at home (decision making, expenditure, children’s education, health)

§ Linking SHGs with external financial institutions

§ Increased household income.


CHAPTER -7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES


7 Quality and Sustainability Issues

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system

would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all

of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use

classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield

etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the

DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical

works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various

years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan

corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the

project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias

WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the

project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The

WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are

then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by

the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent

periods of time.


7.2 Plans for Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village

level institutes.In Nani Chikali, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of

assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A

proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during

post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes mainly fund the following:

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the

formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC)

shall maintain the records of the following.


CHAPTER -8

MAPS

Date post:	02-Apr-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

N C D P R IWMP-10 ETAILED ROJECT EPORTgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2010-11/NARMADA/IWMP-10.pdfNani...

Documents