NONTRADITIONAL STUDENTS: THE IMPACT OF ROLE STRAIN … · students’ is generally used to describe...

NONTRADITIONAL STUDENTS:

THE IMPACT OF ROLE STRAIN ON THEIR IDENTITY

by

Sherri L. Rowlands

A.A.S., Business & Accounting, Mohawk Valley Community College, 1997 B.S., Workforce Education & Development, Southern Illinois University, 1998

B.S. Business & Administration, Southern Illinois University, 1998

A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the

Master of Science in Education Degree

Department of Workforce Education and Development in the Graduate School

Southern Illinois University Carbondale May, 2010

i

DEDICATION

I would like to dedicate this paper to my five children: James, Brendan,

Gwendolyn, Zachary, and Michael. These wonderful children may not realize it but

while I was going to school as a nontraditional student and single parent, they taught me

what role strain was really all about and inspired my interest in the topic. Thanks, kids!

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to gratefully acknowledge the support, help, and encouragement of

the following terrific people:

Dr. Marcia Anderson—Professor Emerita and Workforce Education and

Development Graduate Coordinator and my advisor for this final paper. She provided

tons of support, encouragement, humor, and guidance. I could not have finished it

without her.

Dr. Beth Freeburg—WED Interim Chair and instructor of my WED 561 –

Research Methods course. She helped me get a good start on this paper.

Karla Rankin—co-worker and friend who encouraged me and let me review her

work for Workforce Education and Development.

Brooke Thibeault—Associate Director, Foreign Language and International Trade

and friend. She graciously agreed to be my outside reader for my oral defense of this

paper.

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... ii

CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1

Need for the Study ................................................................................................. 1

Purpose of the Study .............................................................................................. 2

Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................... 2

Research Questions ................................................................................................ 2

Definition of Terms................................................................................................ 3

CHAPTER 2—RESEARCH METHOD AND REVIEW OF

RELATED LITERATURE ............................................................................................ 5

Overview ................................................................................................................ 5

Methods and Procedures ........................................................................................ 5

Review of Related Literature ................................................................................. 6

Nontraditional Students ............................................................................. 6

Student Identity ........................................................................................ 12

Role Strain ............................................................................................... 15

Student Supports and Accommodations .................................................. 20

CHAPTER 3—SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......... 26

Summary of Findings ........................................................................................... 26

Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 27

Nontraditional Students ........................................................................... 27

Student Identity ........................................................................................ 27

iv

Role Strain ............................................................................................... 28

Student Supports and Accommodations .................................................. 28

Recommendations ................................................................................................ 28

Recommendations for Practice ................................................................ 28

Recommendations for Further Study ....................................................... 30

Final Recommendation ............................................................................ 30

REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 32

VITA .............................................................................................................................. 43

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Need for the Study

Nontraditional or adult students are part of one of the fastest growing populations

at postsecondary institutions (Fairchild, 2003). Nontraditional students are typically

older and have multiple life roles. These life roles may include work and business

responsibilities, parenting, spousal, and/or other familial roles, and, possibly, community

and social roles and responsibilities. Entering or re-entering school adds yet another role,

that of student.

The student identity has been the subject of much research in traditional students

but limited research has been done involving nontraditional students. The National

Center for Educational Statistics identified nontraditional students as having one or more

of the following characteristics: delayed enrollment in college, part-time attendance,

financial independence, full-time employment, dependents other than a spouse, single

parenthood, or failed to graduate from high school (Choy, 2002; Horn, 1996). These

traits are also indicators of multiple roles the students must fill in addition to the student

role. Adding the student role may increase the probability of role strain and affect the

development of the student identity (Fairchild, 2003).

Role strain has been researched as it applies to work-family roles, but the student

role involves positional and relational identities in nontraditional or adult learners

(Kasworm, 2005). How role strain affects the development of the student identity is a

question that needs more research. An understanding of how the development of the

2

student identity is influenced by role strain may help in designing better support systems

for the nontraditional student.

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of the

development of student identity in nontraditional students. More specifically, the study

attempted to define the influence of role conflict, role overload, and role contagion in the

development of student identity in nontraditional students as an aid in designing better

support systems for nontraditional students. Nontraditional students are the “fastest

growing” population (Fairchild, 2003, p. 11) in higher education but the attrition rate for

these students is around 32% (Allen, 1993). Support systems and accommodations for

these students need to be developed by colleges and universities in order to attract and

retain nontraditional students.

Statement of the Problem

The problem addressed in this study was: To what extent does role strain

(composed of role conflict, role overload, and role contagion) affect the development of

the student identity in nontraditional students, and what accommodations should be

available to the students to provide the support needed to succeed?

Research Questions

1. Who is the nontraditional student?

3

2. How is the development of student identity in nontraditional students affected

by role strain?

3. Which variable of role strain – role conflict, role overload, or role contagion –

has the greatest influence on the development of student identity in

nontraditional students?

4. What supports do nontraditional students need, and what accommodations

should faculty, staff, and institutions offer to eliminate or to mitigate the

effects of role strain in nontraditional students?

Definition of Terms

Nontraditional student: Defined as having one or more of the following

characteristics: delayed enrollment in college, part-time attendance, financial

independence, full-time employment, dependents other than a spouse, single parenthood,

or failed to obtain a high school diploma (Choy, 2002; Horn, 1996). They can be defined

further as “minimally nontraditional (one characteristic), moderately nontraditional (2 or

3 characteristics), or highly nontraditional (4 or more characteristics)” (Horn, 1996, p. i).

Role conflict: Defined as simultaneous, incompatible demands from two or more

sources (Home, 1998).

Role contagion: Defined as a preoccupation with one role while performing

another (Home, 1998).

Role overload: Defined as insufficient time to meet all demands (Home, 1998).

4

Role strain: Defined as a “felt difficulty in fulfilling role obligations” (Goode,

1960, p. 483). Additionally, role strain is composed of the variables of role conflict, role

contagion, and role overload (Home, 1997).

Student identity: Defined as a social construct within an educational setting with

three primary dimensions: self-concept (the felt identity), the presented self (how one

presents self to others), and the attributed self (the identity attributed to one by others)

(Kaufmann & Feldman, 2004).

5

CHAPTER 2

RESEARCH METHOD AND REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Overview

The problem researched in this study was: To what extent does role strain

(composed of role conflict, role overload, and role contagion) affect the development of

the student identity in nontraditional students, and what accommodations should be

available to the students to provide the support needed to succeed? A review of literature

was conducted to answer the research questions stated. The scope of the study required

research in four areas: (a) Nontraditional Students; (b) Student Identity; (c) Role Strain,

and (d) Student Supports and Accommodations Available or Recommended for

Nontraditional Students.

Methods and Procedures

The type of research used in this study was descriptive research. Best and Kahn

(2006) defined descriptive research as “…concerned with conditions or relationships that

exist, opinions that are held, processes that are going on, effects that are evident or trends

that are developing” (p. 118). A variety of literature was available for review including

research studies in several scholarly journals. Material was reviewed from those journals,

government brochures, books, monographs, and several presented papers from different

educational, psychological, sociological, and other organizations. Much of the material

was located from several databases on the Internet. Google Scholar was used primarily

in locating relevant literature. The Morris Library at Southern Illinois University

6

Carbondale has an extensive e-journal library from which many journal articles and

research studies were retrieved. Key words used to locate relevant literature included

“nontraditional students”, “student identity”, “role strain”, and “adult learners”. All of the

literature retrieved was printed and studied extensively for information that could be used

to answer the research questions. Some of the retrieved data, while interesting, did not

apply to this study and was set aside. The data that did apply to this study was reviewed,

analyzed, and, finally, synthesized to make conclusions and recommendations for further

study.

Review of Related Literature

Nontraditional Students

Who is the nontraditional student? Cross (1980) stated, “The term ‘nontraditional

students’ is generally used to describe adult part-time learners who carry full-time adult

responsibilities in addition to their study” (p. 627). In a comprehensive review of

literature across the ERIC database, Kim (2002) identified three criteria researchers use

to define nontraditional students. The first, and most common, was age. Students that

were older than 25 years were typically classified as nontraditional (Allen, 1993;

Benshoff, 1993; Bishop-Clark & Lynch, 1992; Bowl, 2001; Countryman, 2006; Darab,

2004; Donaldson & Graham, 1999; Johnson & Watson, 2004; Kasworm, 1990;

Kasworm, 2003c; Kim, 2002; Richardson & King, 1998). The other two criteria

identified by Kim (2002) were background characteristics and at-risk behaviors.

Background characteristics included ethnicity and socioeconomic status. At-risk

behaviors included part-time enrollment, full-time employment, single parenthood, or

7

high school drop-out. All of the at-risk behaviors listed by Kim were included in the list

of defining characteristics used by the National Center for Education Statistics.

The National Center for Education Statistics (Choy, 2002; Horn, 1996) defined

the nontraditional student as a student having one or more of the following

characteristics:

• Delays enrollment (does not enroll directly after high school).

• Attends part-time for at least part of the school year.

• Works full-time (35 or more hours per week).

• Financially independent for financial aid eligibility.

• Has dependents other than a spouse.

• Is a single parent.

• Does not have a high school diploma.

They can be defined further as “minimally nontraditional (one characteristic), moderately

nontraditional (2 or 3 characteristics), or highly nontraditional (4 or more

characteristics)” (Horn, 1996, p. i). Using these criteria, Choy (2002) reported 73% of all

enrolled college students were nontraditional.

Background characteristics and at-risk behaviors could be barriers to higher

education (Bowl, 2001). Low income and socially disadvantaged students, single

parents, and high school dropouts were highly likely to drop out of a program in the first

year. Some institutions would not admit students with these characteristics (Bowl, 2001;

Richardson & King, 1998: Schuetze & Slowey, 2002).

Additional characteristics are described by other researchers. Some students are

classified as nontraditional because English was not their first language (Tyler, 1993).

8

Fairchild (2003) reported on other common traits shared by nontraditional students,

“Typically, adults are on campus only for classes or administrative requirements, as

opposed to social or athletic activities (O’Connor, 1994), and they navigate college

independently, without an age cohort (Benshoff and Lewis, 1992)” (p. 11).

Nontraditional students attended school for various reasons. According to Benshoff

(1993), these included: changing job requirements, family life transitions, changes in

leisure patterns, and self-fulfillment. Additionally, Kasworm (2003c) reported some

students enrolled for “education in life areas of health, religion, and citizenship” (p. 5).

As a population, nontraditional students usually chose community colleges as a

provider of higher education because they were more accessible (Choy, 2002; Ely, 1997:

Kasworm, 2003c; Kasworm, 2003d; Kim, 2002). Kasworm (2003c) explained the choice

of an institution:

Adult undergraduate students typically enroll in a college that is readily

accessible, relevant to current life needs, cost-effective, flexible in course

scheduling, and supportive of adult lifestyle commitments. However,

some adults also are committed to pursuing colleges that are prestigious

(and perhaps not adult-student friendly) or that offer specialized academic

programs with requirements for full-time attendance (such as

architecture). Enrollment in such programs is a significant financial and

life commitment for adult students. (p. 7)

In other research, Kasworm (2003d) concluded, “The majority of adult students are part-

timers; they do not live on campus or participate in most collegiate activities nor rarely

spend time out of class with faculty and other students” (p. 5). Polson (1993) concurred

9

saying, “most [adult] students are off-campus directed” (Other Characteristics section,

para. 1).

Nontraditional students also had more life roles, experiences, and responsibilities

than traditional college students (Cross, 1980; Ely, 1997; Fairchild, 2003; Kasworm,

2003c, 2003d; Kim, 2002). This was both detrimental and beneficial to nontraditional

students. Competing life roles and responsibilities demanded time and attention and

detracted from the student role. The resulting role strain affected student performance

and was often a factor in student attrition (Polson, 1993; Scott, Burns, & Cooney, 1996;

Tyler, 1993). Role strain was a major source of stress in adult students (Dill & Henley,

1998; Giancola, Grawitch, & Borchert, 2009; Ross, Niebling, & Heckert, 1999). Life

experiences were beneficial in some cases as they helped students understand and apply

some classroom knowledge.

Nontraditional students were often classified as a group with poor study skills,

poor time management, deficits in basic general education skills, age-related deficits in

cognition, and poor academic performance (Ely, 1997; Kasworm, 1990; Richardson &

King, 1998). Richardson and King (1998) stated, as a result of their research,

It is clear that adult students are consistently stigmatized in terms of their

capacity to benefit from higher education and that these negative

stereotypes are shared by at least some educators, both as individuals and

also corporately through organizations such as the APA. (p. 69)

Richardson and King further maintained,

These stereotypes are ageist in their content and in their implications,

because they obstruct legitimate opportunities for older people to achieve

10

personal development, financial status, and political power. They are also

indirectly (although somewhat less obviously) sexist, in that the majority

of adult students are female. (p. 91)

Richardson and King’s research was focused on disputing the negative images

attributed to nontraditional students. They found, through a comprehensive review of

literature related to adult students, that most of these negative stereotypes were untrue.

Deficits in study skills were dismissed as “meaningless, because there is no one specific

set of skills that constitutes effective studying in higher education” (p. 81). As far as time

management, they concluded, “…adult students seem to make more use of time-

management strategies than younger students” (p. 81). Age-related deficits in cognition

were usually demonstrated by students age 60 or older and were “often linked with poor

physical health or physical disablement” (p. 75). Richardson and King reported most

nontraditional students perform academically as well or better than younger more

traditional students. Other researchers agreed with this finding (Carney-Crompton &

Tan, 2002; Donaldson & Graham, 1999). Donaldson and Graham (1999) stated:

Despite a lack of certain types of campus involvement and recent

academic experience, adult students apparently learn and grow as much or

more than younger students during their undergraduate collegiate

experiences. This implies that adults may be using different skills,

techniques, settings, or interactions with faculty, fellow students, and

others to achieve their desired results. (p. 26)

Finally, deficits in basic general education were usually in math and composition

and could be explained by the time away from an educational setting. Most students did

11

well in introductory courses designed to improve these skills but disliked the courses

being labeled “remedial.” (Ely, 1997).

Nontraditional students tended to take longer than five years to complete a degree

program and were far more likely to drop out than traditional students (Horn, 1996). This

was primarily due to part-time attendance but also due to breaks in education as other life

roles interfered. Horn (1996) reported

Nontraditional students were more than twice as likely to leave school in

their first year than were traditional students (38 percent versus 16

percent). However, for students who persisted to their second year,

nontraditional rates of attrition were much closer to the rates of traditional

students. (p. ii)

Allen (1993) reported commuting students were at higher risk for attrition and most

nontraditional students are commuters.

Nontraditional students had different classroom experiences than traditional

students. Some researchers observed nontraditional students experienced a feeling of

discomfort in the classroom and they attributed this to “a lack of self-confidence among

nontraditional students about their ability to succeed” (Bishop-Clark & Lynch, 1992, p.

115; see also Kasworm, 2005). Younger students in the classroom were observed to

defer to the older students and expected them to be authorities equal to the instructor.

They further observed hostility between younger students and older students when the

older students failed to live up to the supposed image. Faculty expectations of

nontraditional students are mixed. Bishop-Clark and Lynch (1992) observed, in many

classes, older students treated faculty as peers and often expected reciprocation from the

12

faculty. Some nontraditional students reported, however, they felt the faculty was

uninterested in them and that the faculty would have preferred only traditional students in

class. Kasworm (2005) also reported adult students complained faculty expected more

from them due to their life experience and graded them a little more harshly.

Student Identity

How is the development of student identity in nontraditional students affected by

role strain? In order to answer that research question, it was important to study the

development of student identity in general.

Research on identity led to one definition of identity as the “self-meanings that

are formed in particular situations” (Burke & Reitzes, 1981, p. 84). The performance of a

role leads to the development of the identity in that role. Burke and Reitzes (1981) noted

In order to be (some identity), one must act like (some identity). In order

not to be (some other identity), one must not act like (that other identity.)

If being feminine, for example, means being tender and one defines

oneself as being feminine, then one must act in ways that will be

interpreted by oneself as well as by others as acting “tender” and not

acting “tough.” In our case with the student roles and identities, if one has

a student identity that is high in Academic Responsibility, then one should

act in ways that have the same meaning. (pp. 90-91)

Identity, then, was linked to role performance and the meanings attributed to the

role by oneself and others.

13

Much of the research on the development of student identity was focused on

traditional college students. A few researchers studied adult or nontraditional students

(Bron, 2002; Kasworm, 2005; Shields, 1995). The research on nontraditional student

identity focused, for the most part, on academic performance and motivation rather than

the student identity as a whole.

Student identity was defined as a social construct within an educational setting

with three primary dimensions: self-concept (the felt identity), the presented self (how

one presents self to others), and the attributed self (the identity attributed to one by

others) (Kaufmann & Feldman, 2004). The most important dimension in mature student

identity is the self-concept or the felt identity (Johnson & Watson, 2004; Kasworm,

2003a; Kasworm, 2005; Kaufmann & Feldman, 2004). The felt student identity is often

based on perceptions of what a student should be or the “ideal student image” (Kasworm,

2005, p. 10).

Adult or nontraditional students’ perceptions of what a student should be were

colored by their age and life experiences. Through interviews with adult students,

Kasworm (2005) and Johnson and Watson (2004) determined adults formulate a student

identity using age-appropriate standards of behavior and life experiences. A five-stage

process for developing a mature student identity was defined by Johnson and Watson

(2004) and involved:

• Retrospecting—looking back on past experiences to define the present

• Lacking fit—being uneasy in an alien group or environment

• Changing views—focusing on abilities and needs rather than deficits

14

• Student success—positive experiences foster feelings of success and

accomplishment

• Perceived success—being seen as successful by other students and peers.

The process was influenced by beliefs about appropriate student involvement,

relationships with faculty, peers, and younger students, and by the reason for going to

school. Curiously, adult students who returned to school for career advancement often

had weaker student identities than students who returned for other reasons (Shields,

1995).

Nontraditional students formed a student identity based on participation,

involvement, and acceptance in the classroom (Kasworm, 2003d; O’Donnell & Tobbell,

2007). A program designed to help nontraditional students transition to higher education

was examined and discussed by O’Donnell and Tobbell (2007). They reported that the

peripheral program provided limited access to services available to matriculated students

and its courses in study skills, essay writing, and note taking were disdained by the

students. The student identity was weak or nonexistent as students complained they did

not feel like “proper students” (p. 325). Kasworm (2005) found nontraditional students

formed student identities based on relationships with faculty, peers, and younger students

in the classroom. Classroom involvement was based on students’ “constructed image of

the ideal college student” (p. 17).

Multiple role students struggled with the student identity. Van Meter and

Agronow (1992) researched whether choosing the student role as the salient role would

reduce role strain. They found it increased role strain unless perceptions of spousal and

family support were high. Several researchers reported multiple role students dropped

15

the student role first as a coping mechanism to role strain (Adebayo, 2006; Allen, 1993;

Benshoff, 1993, Berkove, 1979; Blaxter & Tight, 1994; Carney-Crompton & Tan, 2002;

Clouder, 1997; Darab, 2004; Eagan, 2004; Fairchild, 2002; Feldman & Marinez-Ponz,

1995; Home, 1992, 1997, 1998; Home & Hinds, 2004; Home, Hinds, Malenfant, &

Boisjoll, 1995; Scott, Burns, & Cooney, 1996; Tyler, 1993; Van Meter & Agronow,

1982).

Role Strain

Which variable of role strain—role conflict, role overload, or role contagion—

have the greatest influence on the development of student identity in nontraditional

students? Multiple identities or roles are a part of everyday existence for most people.

Each role has its own demands and obligations. The student role becomes one role among

many for nontraditional students and comes with a number of demands which may be

difficult to fulfill and increases role strain. Adebayo (2006) commented:

Students generally are faced with a number of stressors. These include

continuous evaluation, pressure to earn good grades, time pressures,

unclear assignments, heavy workload, uncomfortable classrooms, and

relationships with family and friends (Ross, Niebling, & Heckert, 1999).

In addition to these, nontraditional students are faced with employment

demands and social and family responsibilities. No, doubt, combining

work commitment, family responsibilities, and school obligations may be

very complex and tasking. Ultimately, the struggling and juggling

16

inherent in this may create tension and health-related problems for the

individuals concerned. (p. 126)

Several studies have been conducted on multiple roles and role strain and most of it

focused on women as subjects (Adebayo, 2006; Berkove, 1979; Carney-Crompton &

Tan, 2002; Clouder, 1997; Darab, 2004; Eagan, 2004; Home, 1998, 1997, 1992; Home &

Hinds, 2000; Quimby & O’Brien, 2006). This may be because women often were the

primary caregivers in the home, thus they have higher demands from the family role.

Researchers identified two perspectives of multiples roles and role strain—role

scarcity and role expansion (Eagan, 2004). The role scarcity perspective implies multiple

roles with different demands and obligations lead to role strain. Individuals did not have

the strength or energy to effectively meet all those demands and, therefore, suffer from

stress and other problems. To reduce role strain, decisions are made to continue or leave

role relationships or to bargain with other stakeholders to meet role demands (Goode,

1960).

Role expansion, on the other hand, implied additional roles are a benefit and can

be a source of greater self-esteem and purpose (Eagan, 2004). Successes in one role

could lessen feelings of failure or loss in another role. Multiple roles provided multiple

opportunities for accomplishments and rewards. Family activities might produce more

energy to cope with all other roles (Marks, 1977). One caveat to the expansion theory—

multiple roles might be beneficial but they were less beneficial for women than men

(Eagan, 2004).

The scarcity theory was the most common view of multiple roles and role strain.

In 1960, Goode defined role strain as a “felt difficulty in fulfilling role obligations” (p.

17

483). The author theorized “an individual’s total role obligations are over-demanding”

(p. 485) and described five ways an individual attempts to reduce role strain which he

called compartmentalization, delegation, elimination, extension, and barriers to intrusion.

Compartmentalization involved setting aside other role demands to deal with a

different role. This was dependent on the location and context of the role such as being a

student while in the classroom. Situational urgency or crisis might also force other roles

to the background. This coping mechanism could be similar to identity centrality in

which group identification was used to define a role (Settles, 2004).

Delegation reduced role strain by passing some role demands to someone else.

Childcare, for example, could be delegated to a spouse, family member, or childcare

provider. This coping mechanism was dependent having others available to take on some

of the role demands. It was constrained by role demands which could not be delegated,

for example, a student taking an exam.

Elimination of role relationships and demands reduced role strain. If demands

from a work role were causing role strain an individual might try to find a different job or

student demands might cause an individual to quit school. Blaxter and Tight (1994)

suggested students might use this to reduce strain:

Where their responsibilities extended to two or more major roles, there

were usually major doubts about their capacities to cope. They were

struggling, rather than juggling, with time, and withdrawal from study or

one of their other roles seemed a probable consequence. (p. 162)

It was important to note some roles were not easily eliminated and other roles might

involve loss of status or recognition if curtailed or terminated.

18

Extension of one role might allow an individual to plead commitments to avoid

demands of another role (Goode, 1960). Expansion of a role could facilitate other role

demands such as joining a club or group to increase networking possibilities. Indefinite

expansion was impossible as the initial decrease in role strain was soon lost as the

number of roles grew increasing role strain.

Barriers to intrusion were a common coping mechanism to reduce role strain

(Goode, 1960). Simple barriers such as turning off a cell phone or shutting an office door

might keep role demands down. Administrators used secretaries through whom

appointments must be made to control role demands.

Marks (1977) did not reject or embrace the theories of role scarcity and role

expansion but theorized that commitment to a role influenced whether an individual felt

role strain. He suggested people have an abundance of energy and time for roles to

which they are highly committed. Lesser commitment to roles with high demands could

bring about role strain.

Three dimensions of role strain were role conflict, role overload, and role

contagion (Home, 1998). Role conflict (simultaneous, incompatible demands from two

or more roles) was usually the greatest factor in role strain. In some literature, the terms

“role conflict” and “role overload” were used interchangeably (Coverman, 1989).

Coverman stressed role overload existed “when persons (usually women) simultaneously

fulfill multiple roles, such as spouse, parent, and paid worker” (p. 967). Role contagion

is described as a preoccupation with one role while fulfilling another, such as worrying

about a school assignment while at work or home preparing dinner (Coverman, 1989;

Home, 1998).

19

Home (1992) found that role conflict was most pronounced between student and

parenting roles. This was confirmed in a later study. The perception was that family and

student work “just never ends” (Home, 1998). Giancola et al., (2009), in a more recent

study, found students reported the greatest stressors were school-family conflict. Low

incomes, course work (rather than internships or thesis), and children under age 13 were

all factors in role strain in female students (Home, 1992, 1997, 1998; Home & Hinds,

2000).

The best predictor of role strain, however, was an individual’s own perceptions of

role demands. Feldman and Martinez-Ponz (1995) conducted a study which examined an

individual’s perceptions of role strain using the variables of self-efficacy and self-esteem.

Students reported lower perceptions of role strain when perceptions of self-efficacy and

self-esteem were high. Clouder (1997) found most women accept all role demands as

legitimate and try to fulfill then. Darab (2004) agreed saying “the degree of difficulty is

exacerbated because they [female students] continue to accept primary responsibility for

family work” (Role Strain and Stress section, para. 1). Once perception of role demands

was factored out, low income became the most significant variable in role strain. Time

and energy spent to cover expenses on a limited budget could stress even dedicated

students (Fairchild, 2003).

Role strain from increased roles and their demands and from time conflicts was

associated with high stress, depression, and anxiety in women students (Carney-Compton

& Tan, 2002; Darab, 2004). Carney-Compton and Tan also found nontraditional students

performed at a higher academic level than traditional students even though they had more

stressors and fewer sources of instrumental and emotional support. High academic

20

achievement led to greater satisfaction, self-esteem, role gratification, and ego

enhancement. The exception to this may be work-school conflict. Lundberg (2004)

reported students working more than 30 hours a week performed less well and had lower

grades on course work. Work-school conflicts were less common but when they

occurred, the student role suffered and, occasionally, was eliminated.

Student Supports and Accommodations

What supports do nontraditional students need, and what accommodations should

faculty, staff, and institutions offer to eliminate or to mitigate the effects of role strain in

nontraditional students? Three areas of support have been identified as family,

workplace, and educational institutions.

The best support for nontraditional students was perceived support from their

families (Berkove, 1979; Clouder, 1997; Home, 1992, 1997, 1998; Kirby, Biever,

Martinez, & Gomez, 2003; Quimby & O’Brien, 2006; Van Meter & Agronow, 1982).

Berkove (1979) identified four areas of husbandly support for adult female students –

attitudinal, emotional, financial, and behavioral. Women reported less stress from

husbands purporting more liberal views regarding women’s roles and abilities. Van Meter

and Agronow (1982) found that

Women who place the family role first were more likely to perceive their

husband’s agreement with that role choice and also his emotional support

for her school endeavors outside the family regardless of whether there are

children present or not. . . . Furthermore, the data suggest that for the

21

woman who puts another role first, her partner’s agreement with that

choice is vitally important in alleviating role strain. (p. 136)

Quimby and O’Brien (2006) suggested a secure family attachment predicted well-being

in female students along with parenting and student self-efficacy, self-confidence, and

perceived social supports. Family support was so important some researchers

recommended orientation programs and social events involving the whole family

(Berkove, 1979; Carney-Crompton & Tan, 2002; Home, 1992; Kirby et al., 2003;

Quimby & O’Brien, 2006).

Workplace demands were less likely to cause role strain due to fixed hours and

fixed tasks but paid study leave was a significant source of support to students where it

was available (Home & Hinds, 2000). Other workplace supports included use of

equipment and resources, job sharing, and flexible scheduling. Co-workers and superiors

can provide information about workplace education polices and support students in their

efforts (Home & Hinds, 2000; Home et al., 1995).

Institutional supports might help with role strain but most educational institutions

still had traditional student mindset. Blaxter and Tight (1994) researched how adults

managed life-long education and had this to say about institutions’ perceptions of adult

students:

Lifelong education is clearly becoming a reality in societies like ours, but

at an individual rather than a societal level. Adults are increasingly

expected, and often required, to engage in serious study if they are to

maintain or improve their employment positions and make the best use of

their life chances. But this reality is coming about without much planning

22

and it is being achieved by placing a disproportionate element of the

responsibility and burden upon the individual adults themselves. They are

being expected to take on the role of student in institutions where the

perception of the student role is of someone with no other major

commitments, and with little or no reduction in their other responsibilities.

(p. 162)

Because of this perception of adult students the supports offered by institutions were

rarely what the students truly needed. Ely (1997) reported

Nontraditional students have made the additional following suggestions:

(a) Separate registration, advising, and orientation; (b) improved access

and availability to parking; (c) special assistance with financial aid and

housing (easy to understand, simplified paperwork); (d) improved

information services and communication networks; (e) increased social

networking and support; (f) increased and convenient counseling services

for adults; (g) increased availability of weekend, evening, and off-campus

classes; (h) better preparation of faculty and staff to meet the needs of

nontraditional students; (i) availability of childcare; and (j) credit

consideration for life and work experience. Other services considered

important, but are often unavailable to nontraditional students, include

health services and publications for adults (Benshoff, 1993, p. 12-13). (p.

4)

Countryman (2006) found nontraditional students requested more tutorials and labs,

optional class offerings such as night, weekend, and afternoon courses, childcare

23

services, accessible parking, and additional campus safety. Allen (1993) suggested

institutions provide more financial aid specifically for nontraditional students, flexible

advisement and counseling with “well-trained staff who are alert to the special problems

of nontraditional students who are at risk of dropping out of school” (Academic Advising

and Counseling section, para. 1). Tyler (1993) suggested institutions and individual

faculty members needed to quickly identify “at-risk” nontraditional students by having

students complete an index card answering simple questions about how long they had

been away from school and how many social roles they had. The answers to these

questions could “red-flag” at-risk students.

Accelerated degree programs are available in some areas and are designed to

allow students to complete a degree program in two years or less. This involves, usually,

in taking one course, or possibly two, a month on nights and/or weekends. Kasworm

(2003b) reported adult students in these programs “believed that they were in a

supportive world defined for adult learners” (p. 18). Students found the programs

convenient, well-structured, and focused. Students had to develop a new set of learning

strategies to cope with the accelerated pace of the courses. Kasworm (2003b) reported

Successful adult students created a mental life space to do the course work

and attend the class sessions, create a new time schedule to keep up with

the pace, and rethink their other role commitments in relation to this new

and important commitment to the degree program. If adult participants

could not adjust to the demands of the course work and could not keep up

the pace of learning through the accelerated learning classroom, they

dropped out by the end of the second course. (p. 21)

24

Accelerated degree programs were available at few accredited universities at the time of

the research but they seemed to be a viable choice for multiple role students looking for a

supportive learning environment.

Distance education, another educational choice, was becoming more wide spread

and allowed students more control over when, where, and speed of learning, but in many

institutions it was offered only to geographically challenged students (Carney-Crompton

& Tan, 2002; Home, 1998, 1997; Home & Hinds, 2000). This option required students to

be self-directed and motivated; there was a high drop-out rate and it rarely attracted low

income students (Home, 1998).

Another institutional support was flexible scheduling of courses and adult

services. Research at a Weekend College program found the program substantially

reduced the impact of returning to school on the family, work, and social life of students

(Kirby et al., 2003). They noted a lower number of childcare problems possibly due to

the availability of other family members, more support from families, and increased

status at work. Other scheduling options, such as night courses, varied in actual support

based on other life situation variables.

Students who were also parents faced a unique challenge in returning to school.

Whether they were single parents or had a partner, the age of the children could be a

significant factor in role strain. Children younger than 13 years old required more

attention and role conflicts involving school and parenting demands were common.

Medved and Heider (2002) suggested faculty and staff should be aware of student-parents

in the classroom. Faculty-student interactions were important for student persistence and

achievement. Institutions could also offer low-cost childcare for student-parents.

25

Several other support suggestions were offered by different researchers. Financial

aid was a mixed support for nontraditional students. It helped with the costs of education

but, if in the form of loans, added stress about an increasing debt load. Renegotiating

financial aid availability and regulations was a topic for further examination. Flexible

assignment deadlines actually increased role strain in many students because

uncompleted work still demanded attention (Home, 1998). Fairchild (2003) suggested

educators focus on learning skills and knowledge applicable to life circumstances.

Targeted orientation sessions for the student and family might be beneficial for adult

students especially if they involve fellow students that had already been coping with

multiple role demands. Individual and group counseling with peers, faculty, staff, and

professionals could provide a valuable tool for students trying to cope with role strain

(Berkove, 1979; Home, 1998; Home et al., 1995). The biggest institutional support might

be, however, educator awareness of multiple role adult students. Perhaps Bron (2002)

said it best:

It is possible to have different identities, or several, at the same time, can

cope with them accordingly in different social situations, family, work,

being with friends. Because of changes in life, like in emigration or

changing the career, where new culture, new language, and symbols as

well as meanings are involved we can enrich and shape our lives again and

again. To capture such processes is essential for understanding human

conduct and becoming, but most of all, for adult educators, to capture the

intersubjectivity of human learning. (p. 16)

26

CHAPTER 3

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of Findings

Nontraditional students are a diverse population with many traits and

characteristics that set them apart from the traditional student body at higher education

institutions. They are typically more than 25 years old and often have other roles and

responsibilities. These multiple roles might make it difficult to develop a strong student

identity.

Student identity is a felt self-concept based on perceptions of what a student

should be. Adults adjust that perception by age and life experiences as they strive to fit in

with the group. A weaker student identity may lead to poor performance or attrition in

nontraditional students.

Multiple roles can cause role strain in nontraditional students. Role conflict,

overload, and contagion can impact the development of the student identify and affect

student persistence and achievement. To be successful, these students may use several

coping mechanisms and supports.

Family provide the best support for multiple role nontraditional students.

Workplace supports, where available, also help students cope with multiple roles.

Institutional supports and accommodations vary in their effectiveness and, often, fail to

meet student needs adequately. Several suggestions were made by various researchers on

how institutions can help nontraditional students. These included family events and

orientations to improve family support, flexible course and assignment scheduling,

27

flexible hours for registration and administrative duties, increased information on and

availability of financial aid, and training for faculty and staff to increase awareness of

nontraditional students’ needs.

Conclusions

Nontraditional Students

Who is the nontraditional student? It was clear that a large number of students

attending higher education institutions were nontraditional in the sense they were not

young students just out of high school. They were usually more than 25 years old and

had other various traits described by these researchers that included multiple roles, part-

time attendance, and working full time among other at-risk behaviors. They usually

performed as well or better than younger students but they may have taken longer to

complete a degree program due to part-time attendance and breaks in education. They

had a high attrition rate, and they needed various supports and accommodations to be

successful.

Student Identify

How is the development of student identity in nontraditional students affected by

role strain? Role strain did have an impact on the development of student identity. Role

strain created stress and anxiety in students. If the role strain was difficult for students to

handle, the student role was frequently eliminated. Students who successfully coped with

role strain often had family support. The choice of the student identity as a salient role

28

helped strengthen the student identity but increased role strain when family support was

not present or limited.

Role Strain

Which variable of role strain—role conflict, role overload, or role contagion—has

the greatest influence on the development of student identity in nontraditional students?

Role conflict appeared to have the greatest influence on the development of student

identity. Role conflict was defined as simultaneous, incompatible demands from two or

more sources. It required an either/or choice. Students had to choose which role demand

to fulfill. Family demands often took precedence over the student role. Role overload

and role contagion had some influence on the development of student identity but to a

lesser degree than role conflict.

Student Supports and Accommodations

What supports do nontraditional students need, and what accommodations should

faculty, staff, and institutions offer to eliminate or to mitigate the effects of role strain?

Family support appeared to be the most important factor in succeeding as a student.

Family events and orientations were suggested by a number of researchers as a way to

bolster family support. Institutional supports such as flexible scheduling of courses,

flexible hours for registration and other administrative duties, and improved financial aid

were the most commonly requested by adult students.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Practice

29

1. Nearly three-quarters of all enrolled college students have at least one trait

defining them as nontraditional, so the term “nontraditional student” needs to

be dropped in favor of a more appropriate label for this body of students.

Some researchers suggested using “adult students” or “adult learners” as

labels for this group but in most countries, students 18 years old or older are

adults, so the adult students/learners labels are not quite accurate either. Other

labels suggested were “reentry students”, “returning students”, “educationally

disadvantaged students”, “first generation students”, and “minority students”

Perhaps the best label should be “mature” or “older students.”

2. Faculty and staff awareness of the needs of nontraditional students could be

improved by training seminars and further research. Early identification of at-

risk mature students is extremely important. Supportive faculty and staff can

make a difference in persistence and success of nontraditional students. Some

consideration should be given to alternate scheduling of assignments, exams,

and presentations to help students resolve role conflict.

3. Increased resources of and information about financial aid should be a priority

of any higher education institution that wants to attract and keep

nontraditional students. Financial aid is extremely important to most students,

but nontraditional students may have other financial responsibilities that could

be impacted by the demands of going to school.

4. Institutions should consider offering low-cost childcare, counseling, social

networking services to nontraditional students. All of these services could

mitigate role strain. In addition, nontraditional students have requested

30

improved parking and campus safety. These things may seem trivial but they

could make a difference in student retention.

5. Finally, institutions should investigate the possibilities of offering more

accelerated degree programs, distance learning courses, off-campus courses,

and night, evening, and weekend courses. Flexible scheduling of required

courses is necessary to increase student retention.

Recommendations for Further Study

1. Role strain in male students is a topic that requires further study. Most of the

role strain research involves women. More men are taking the primary

caregiver role so research on role strain in male nontraditional students could

provide further insights into what these students require to be successful.

2. Further studies into how technology can improve or offer different, preferably

low-cost, options for course delivery should be conducted. Courses on

interactive CD or DVD or other technologies may provide an opportunity for

nontraditional students to obtain a degree at their own pace with less stress

and role strain.

3. Finally, further studies into how to improve faculty and staff awareness of

nontraditional students and their needs are highly recommended. Supportive

faculty and staff can improve student retention and successful degree

completion in nontraditional students.

Final Recommendation

31

Nontraditional students have been called the “fastest growing segments”

(Fairchild, 2003, p. 11) in higher education today. Ely (1997) stated

Brace yourself. Enrollment growth is predicted to “skyrocket in the next

few years under the welfare reform package passed by the last Congress.

When welfare recipients are required to find employment, they will turn to

open-access community colleges for training”(Cuancara, 1997, p. 11). In

our rapidly changing society, “global competition and rapid advances in

technology” (“Not Just for Kids”, 1997, p. 16) are placing increased

demands on the community colleges for quick, efficient, and up-to-date

training and retraining. Many of the individuals in these programs will be

today’s and tomorrow’s nontraditional students. (p. 5)

Today’s institutions need to be ready for some of the best students they may ever see.

32

REFERENCES

Adebayo, D. O. (2006). Workload, social support, and work-school conflict among

Nigerian nontraditional students. Journal of Career Development, 33(2), 125-141.

doi:10.1177/0894845306289674

Allen, B. (1993). The student in higher education: Nontraditional student retention. The

Community Services Catalyst, 23(2). Retrieved from

http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/CATALYST/V23N3/allen.html.

Benshoff, J. M. (1993, November). Educational opportunities, developmental challenges:

Understanding nontraditional college students. Paper presented at the First

Annual Conference of the Association for Adult Development and Aging, New

Orleans, LA. Retrieved from

http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/

13/2e/33.pdf

Berkove, G. F. (1979). Perceptions of husband support by returning women students. The

Family Coordinator, 28(4), 451-457. Retrieved from

http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/583504.pdf

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in Education (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn and

Bacon

Bishop-Clark, C., & Lynch, J. (1992). The mixed-age college classroom. College

Teaching, 40(3), 114. Retrieved from

http://proxy.lib.siu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=t

rue&db=tfh&AN=9707062561&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

33

Blaxter, L., & Tight, M. (1994). Juggling with time: How adults manage their time for

lifelong education. Studies in the Education of Adults, 26(2), 162. Retrieved from


rue&db=tfh&AN=9502226095&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Bowl, M. (2001, June). Experiencing the barriers: Non-traditional students entering

higher education. Research Papers in Education, 16(2), 141-160.

doi:10.1080/02671520110037410

Bron, A. (2002, March). Construction and reconstruction of identity through

biographical learning. The role of language and culture. Paper presented at

“European Perspectives on Life History Research: Theory and Practice of

Biographical Narratives.” European Society for Research on the Education of

Adults (ESREA) Life History and Biographical Research Network Conference,

7th, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from


1a/12/03.pdf

Burke, P., & Reitzes, D. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social

Psychology Quarterly, 44(2), 83-92. Retrieved from

http://www.jstor.org/sici?origin=sfx%3Asfx&sici=0190-

2725(1981)44%3A2%3C83%3ATLBIAR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W

Carney-Crompton, S., & Tan, J. (2002). Support systems, psychological functioning, and

academic performance of nontraditional female students. Adult Education

Quarterly, 52(2), 140-154 doi:10.1177/0741713602052002005

34

Choy, S. (2002). Findings from the condition of education 2002: Nontraditional

undergraduates [Brochure]. U. S. Department of Education, National Center for

Education Statistics, NCES 2002-012 . Retrieved from

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002012.pdf

Clouder, L. (1997). Women’s ways of coping with continuing education. Adults Learning

(England), 8(6), 146. Retrieved from



Countryman, K. C. (2006). A comparison of adult learners’ academic, social, and

environmental needs as perceived by adult learners and faculty. (Doctoral

dissertation, Auburn University). Retrieved from

http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1147184721&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=150

9&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Coverman, S. (1989).Role overload, role conflict, and stress: Addressing consequences of

multiple role demands. Social Forces, 67(4), 965-982. Retrieved from

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2579710

Cross, K. P. (1980, May). Our changing students and their impact on colleges: Prospects

for a true learning society. The Phi Delta Kappan, 61(9), 627-630. Retrieved from


35

Darab, S. (2004). Time and study: Open foundation female students’ integration of study

with family, work and social obligations. Unpublished manuscript, School of

Social Sciences, Southern Cross University, Australia. Retrieved from

http://www.pco.com.au/Foundations04/presentations%20for%20website/Sandra%

20Darab_Newcastle_paper.pdf.

Dill, P. & Henley, T. (1998). Stressors of college: A comparison of traditional and

nontraditional students. The Journal of Psychology, 132(1), 25-32. Retrieved from


rue&db=aph&AN=253723&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Donaldson, J. & Graham, S. (1999). A model of college outcomes for adults. Adult

Education Quarterly, 50(1), 24-40. doi:10.1177/074171369905000103 1999

Egan, S. B. (2004). Role strain in female students in graduate social work education:

Culturally competent institutional responses. (Doctoral dissertation. Fordham

University). Retrieved from

http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=765813901&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=1509

&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Ely, E. (1997, April). The non-traditional student. Paper presented at the American

Association of Community Colleges 77th Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA.

Retrieved from


14/fa/be.pdf

Fairchild, E. E. (2003). Multiple roles of adult learners. New Directions for Student

Services, 102, 11-16. doi:10.1002/ss.84

36

Feldman, S. & Martinez-Ponz, M. (1995, October). Multiple role conflict and graduate

students’ performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the New

England Psychological Association, 1995, Wenham, MA. Retrieved from

http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019

b/80/14/4e/cf.pdf

Giancola, J., Grawitch, M., & Borchert, D. (2009). Dealing with the stress of college: A

model for adult students. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 246-263. doi:

10.1177/0741713609331479

Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25(4), 483-

496. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/sici?origin=sfx%3Asfx&sici=0003-

1224(1960)25%3A4%3C483%3AATORS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4

Home, A. (1992, July). Women facing the multiple role challenge. Adult women studying

social work and adult education in Canada: A study of their multiple role

experiences and of supports available to them. Ottawa, Canada: Social Sciences

and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Ottawa (Ontario). Retrieved from


b/80/15/8d/e7.pdf

Home, A. (1997). Learning the hard way: Role strain, stress, role demands, and support

in multiple role women students. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 335–347.

Retrieved from



37

Home, A. (1998). Predicting role conflict, overload, and contagion in adult women

university students with families and jobs. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(2), 85-

97. doi:10.1177/074171369804800204

Home, A., & Hinds, C. (2000). Life situations and institutional supports of women

university students with family and job responsibilities. Unpublished manuscript,

Department of Educational Studies, University of British Columbia, Vacouver,

Canada. Retrieved from http://www.edst.educ.ubc.ca/aerc/2000/homea&hindsc-

final.pdf

Home, A., Hinds, C., Malenfant, B., & Boisjoll, D. (1995). Managing a job, a family, and

studies. A guide for educational institutions and the workplace = Coordonner

employ, famille, et etudes. Un guide destine’ aux institutions d’enseignement et au

milieu du travail. [Brochure]. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved

from


b/80/14/01/84.pdf

Horn, L. (1996). Nontraditional undergraduates: Trends in enrollment from 1986 to 1992

and persistence and attainment among 1989-1990 beginning postsecondary

students (NCES 97-578). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for

Education Statistics. Retrieved from


14/d7/f9.pdf

38

Johnson, G. C., & Watson, G. (2004). ‘Oh gawd, how am I going to fit into this?’:

Producing (mature) first-year student identity. Language and Education, 18(6),

474-487. Retrieved from

http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=2&hid=6&sid=58f2a83f-0e3d-47cb-

8c1a-83ff64bbbee8%40sessionmgr10

Kasworm, C. (1990). Adult undergraduates in higher education: A review of past

research perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 60(5), 345-372. DOI:

10.3102/00346543060003345

Kasworm, C. (2003a). Adult meaning making in the undergraduate classroom. Adult

Education Quarterly, 53(2), 81-98. DOI: 10.1177/0741713602238905

Kasworm, C. (2003b). From the adult student’s perspective: Accelerated degree

programs. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Educations, 97, 17-27.

Retrieved from

http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=2&hid=6&sid=53a232ca-08be-45cc-

ba22-2dd62e8433a4%40sessionmgr10

Kasworm, C. (2003c). Setting the stage: Adults in higher education. New Directions for

Student Services, 102, 3-10. Retrieved from

http://www.inpathways.net/SettingtheStage.pdf

39

Kasworm, C. (2003d, April). What is collegiate involvement for adult undergraduates? In

C. Kasworm (Chair), What does research suggestion [sic] about effective college

involvement of adult undergraduate students? Symposium conducted at the

annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Retrieved from


b/80/1b/72/a6.pdf

Kasworm, C. (2005). Adult student identity in an intergenerational community college

classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(1), 3-20.

doi:10.1177/0741713605280148

Kaufman, P., & Feldman, K. A. (2004). Forming identities in college: A sociological

approach. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 463-496. Retrieved from

http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=2&hid=6&sid=c8d3adcf-46b7-4645-

97a2-d8e039d816d2%40sessionmgr10

Kim, K. (2002). ERIC review: Exploring the meaning of “nontraditional” at the

community college. Community College Review, 30(1), 74-89.

doi:10.1177/009155210203000104

Kirby, P. G., Biever, J. L., Martinez, I., & Gomez, J. P. (2003). Nontraditional students:

A qualitative study of the impact of returning to school on family, work, and

social life. Unpublished manuscript, Our Lady of the Lake University, San

Antonio, TX. Retrieved from

http://www.nssa.us/nssajrnl/NSSJ2003%2021_1/pdf/07Kirby_Peter.pdf

40

Lundberg, C. (2004). Working and learning: The role of involvement for employed

students. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 41(2), 201-215.

Retrieved from http://journals.naspa.org/jsarp/vol41/iss2/art1/

Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time,

and commitment. American Sociological Review, 4(6), 921-936. Retrieved from


Medved, C. E., & Heisler, J. (2002). A negotiated order exploration of critical student-

faculty interactions: Student-parents manage multiple roles. Communication

Education, 51(2), 105-120. doi:10.1080/03634520216510

O’Donnell, V. L., & Tobbell, J. (2007). The transition of adult students to higher

education: Legitimate peripheral participation in a community of practice? Adult

Education Quarterly, 57(4), 312-328. doi:10.1177/0741713607302686

Polson, C. (1993, September). Teaching adult students. IDEA Paper No. 29. Manhattan,

KS: Center for Faculty Education & Development, Kansas State University.

Retrieved from


b/80/14/83/73.pdf

Quimby, J. L., & O’Brien, K. M. (2006). Predictors of well-being among nontraditional

female students with children. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 451-

460. Retrieved from

http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=2&hid=6&sid=563d70c8-492c-4143-

9375-0c2dcc53852b%40sessionmgr10

41

Richardson, J. & King, E. (1998). Adult students in higher education: Burden or boon?

The Journal of Higher Education, 69(1) 65-88. Retrieved from


Ross, S. E., Niebling, B. C., & Heckert, T. M. (1999, June). Sources of stress among

college students. College Student Journal, 33(2), 312-317. Retrieved from

http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=2&hid=6&sid=24317db0-c29d-4742-

bbe4-

2ef797126ef1%40sessionmgr12&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZ

T1zaXRl#db=tfh&AN=1984378

Schuetze, H., & Slowey, M. (2002). Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis

of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education. Higher

Education, 44(1), 309-327. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3447490

Scott, C., Burns, A., & Cooney, G. (1996, March). Reasons for discontinuing study: The

case of mature age female students with children. Higher Education, 31(2), 233-

253. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3447886

Settles, I. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487-500. Retrieved from

https://www.msu.edu/user/settles/papers/Settles%20When%20multiple%20identit

ies%20interfere.pdf

Shields, N. (1995). The link between student identity, attributions, and self-esteem among

adult, returning students. Sociological Perspectives, 38(2), 261-272. Retrieved

from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1389293

42

Tyler, D. (1993, May). At risk non-traditional community college students. Paper

presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Institute for

Staff and Organizational Development on Teaching Excellence and Conference of

Administrators, 15th, Austin, TX. Retrieved from


b/80/13/0c/4f.pdf

Van Meter, M. S. & Agronow, S. J. (1982, January). The stress of multiple roles: The

case for role strain among married college women. Family Relations, 31(1), 131-

138. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/584211.pdf

43

VITA

Graduate School Southern Illinois University

Sherri L. Rowlands Date of Birth: March 4, 1957 111 E. Knauer St., Ava, Illinois 62907 PO Box 310, Ava, Illinois 62907 [email protected] Mohawk Valley Community College Associate in Applied Science, Business & Accounting, May 1997 Southern Illinois University Carbondale Bachelor of Science, Workforce Education & Development, May 1998 Southern Illinois University Carbondale Bachelor of Science, Business & Administration, May 1998 Special Honors and Awards: Summa Cum Laude, Bachelor of Science, May 1998 Summa Cum Laude, Bachelor of Science, May 1998 Research Paper Title: Nontraditional Students: The Impact of Role Strain on Their Identities Major Professor: Marcia A. Anderson, Ph.D.

Date post:	08-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

NONTRADITIONAL STUDENTS: THE IMPACT OF ROLE STRAIN … · students’ is generally used to describe...

Documents