+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH...

Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH...

Date post: 27-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: nicholas-galloway
View: 217 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
31
Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
Transcript
Page 1: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence

Dan E. KraneWright State University, Dayton, OH 45435

Page 2: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

The business of DNA profiling:

Roughly 900,000 felony convictions per year in US

DNA profiles generated primarily for sexual offenses, murder and assaults.

Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)

Less than 1% of DNA profiles reviewed by defense experts

Page 3: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

DNA profiling approaches:

VNTRs

PCR/reverse dot blots

STRs

Advantages Disadvantagesresolving power, inexpensive

testing time, sensitivity, data comparisons

sensitivity, testing time, data comparisons

resolving power, mixtures

very sensitive, testing time, data comparisons, resolving power

start-up costs

Page 4: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

DNA contents of biological samples:Type of sample Amount of DNA

Hair:

Blood 30,000 ng/mLstain 1 cm in area 200 ngstain 1 mm in area 2 ng

Semen 250,000 ng/mLpostcoital vaginal swab 0 - 3,000 ng

plucked 1 - 750 ng/hairshed 1 - 12 ng/hair

Saliva 5,000 ng/mLUrine 1 - 20 ng/mL

2

2

Page 5: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Allele 2

Allele 7

Allele 12

Allele 13

Allele 17

Primer bindingsite

Tandemly repeated

sequences

Amplified region

Short Tandem Repeats (STRs)

Page 6: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Page 7: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Page 8: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Page 9: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

What you see when you open a CD provided in discovery:

Page 10: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

What you see when you try to open the files on a discovery CD:

Page 11: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Page 12: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

An electropherogram using the software’s default settings:

GenoTyper Graph

Page 13: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

What the testing lab provides is not always the same as the default electropherogram:

Page 14: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Page 15: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Genophiler Zoom

• Genophiler also provides a zoomed graph to 150 RFU’s• Shows smaller peaks more clearly• Here, the peaks that were disregarded by the lab may be evidence of an unknown, minor contributor to the sample

Page 16: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

No mention of a potential, secondary contributor to the sample.

Page 17: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Still no mention of a potential, secondary contributor to the sock sample.

Page 18: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Victim Run:Sample Nickname1:F011542 03P.fsa ALLEGED VICTIM OL (99) 14 (237) 15.2 (309)1:F011542 04A P.fsa SUSPECT STAIN CARD 15 (1120) 17 (1351)1:F011542 02E1P-2.fsa TOWEL CUTTING (Non-sperm Fraction) 15 (1611) 17 (1255)1:F011542 02E2P-2.fsa TOWEL CUTTING (Sperm Fraction) 15 (868) 17 (802)1:F011542 02E2 Pr.fsa TOWEL CUTTING (Non-sperm Fraction) 15 (1740) 17 (1644)1:F011542 01P.fsa SOCK CUTTING OL (125) 14 (2622) 15.2 (2189) 19 (167) OL (140)1:F011542 04 raP-2.fsa 15 (278) 17 (167)

D3

Genophiler output:

Testing lab’s report:

Page 19: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

16 (253) 20 (184) 12 (368) 13 (350) 9 (285) 12 (281) 10 (359)14 (1130) 19 (949) 12 (1626) 13 (1565) 8 (1561) 12 (1148) 10 (895) 11 (944)14 (1495) 19 (1223) 12 (2932) 13 (2703) 8 (2423) 12 (2161) 10 (1267) 11 (1078)14 (1026) 10 (114) 12 (1272) 13 (1052) 8 (1070) 12 (838) 10 (760) 11 (709)14 (1755) 19 (1531) 12 (1874) 13 (1617) 8 (1652) 12 (1328) 10 (1250) 11 (1178)9.2 (73) 16 (628) 20 (483) 12 (2907) 12 (926) 10 (1187)14 (135) 19 (97) 12 (158) 13 (122)

D18 D5 D13 D7

15 (242) 16 (264) 21 (300) 22 (269) X (529) 12 (272) 13 (280) 27 (277) 28 (269)18 (1216) 19 (814) 21 (1352) 22 (1271) X (1347) Y (1288) 15 (2554) 29 (2687)18 (1128) 19 (899) 21 (1906) 22 (1837) X (1907) Y (1756) 15 (3885) 16 (70) 29 (4458)18 (767) 19 (564) 21 (858) 22 (541) X (1191) Y (1187) 13 (81) 15 (2242) 16 (97) 29 (2027)18 (1595) 19 (1166) 21 (1817) 22 (1154) X (1842) Y (1858) 15 (3364) 29 (3355)15 (1290) 16 (1144) 21 (1430) 22 (1394) X (5015) 12 (3418) 13 (2876) 27 (1020) 28 (1032) 30 (72)18 (153) 19 (190) 21 (230) X (196) Y (287) 15 (403) 29 (352)

D21D8vWA FGA Amel

Victim Run:Sample Nickname1:F011542 03P.fsa ALLEGED VICTIM OL (99) 14 (237) 15.2 (309)1:F011542 04A P.fsa SUSPECT STAIN CARD 15 (1120) 17 (1351)1:F011542 02E1P-2.fsa TOWEL CUTTING (Non-sperm Fraction) 15 (1611) 17 (1255)1:F011542 02E2P-2.fsa TOWEL CUTTING (Sperm Fraction) 15 (868) 17 (802)1:F011542 02E2 Pr.fsa TOWEL CUTTING (Non-sperm Fraction) 15 (1740) 17 (1644)1:F011542 01P.fsa SOCK CUTTING OL (125) 14 (2622) 15.2 (2189) 19 (167) OL (140)1:F011542 04 raP-2.fsa 15 (278) 17 (167)

D3

Page 20: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Mix X/Y Deg. R Low (<150) Pull Up Nickname Run:SampleM1 -0.0206 1 0 ALLEGED VICTIM 1:F011542 03P.fsa

1.05 -0.0153 0 0 SUSPECT STAIN CARD 1:F011542 04A P.fsa1.09 -0.0528 1 0 TOWEL CUTTING (Non-sperm Fraction) 1:F011542 02E1P-2.fsa

M2 1.00 -0.0221 3 0 TOWEL CUTTING (Sperm Fraction) 1:F011542 02E2P-2.fsa0.99 -0.0101 0 0 TOWEL CUTTING (Non-sperm Fraction) 1:F011542 02E2 Pr.fsa

M3 -0.0823 4 0 SOCK CUTTING 1:F011542 01P.fsa0.68 -0.0724 3 0 1:F011542 04 raP-2.fsa

Genophiler also flags potential problems for further review:

Page 21: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Page 22: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Project Screen Button

• Screen shot of GeneScan

• Shows exactly what samples were added and what parameter files were used for the analysis

Page 23: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Page 24: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Analysis Parameters Buttons

• See exactly what analysis settings were used

• Parameter files also copied to CD

Page 25: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Finding Problems With Samples: Raw Data

Good raw data begins with a large peak followed by smaller peaks

Page 26: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Finding Problems With Samples: Raw Data

• Bad raw data is indicated by wildly uneven peaks• Indicates lab analysis problems

Page 27: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Finding Problems With Samples: EPT Data

• Shows current, voltage, laser power, and temperature• For good analysis, should be constant (flat)

Page 28: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Finding Problems With Samples: EPT DataFinding Problems With Samples: EPT Data

• Problem EPT data is not flat• Indicates problems with lab analysis

Page 29: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Automation Process

• Select samples and settings in one screen

• Analysis can be performed unattended

• Up to 4 analysis runs can be set up at one time

Page 30: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Forensic BioInformatic Services• Uses Genophiler to generate easily interpreted files

• Objectively applies analysis parameters to all samples

• Fast turn around times

• Efficiently draws attention to problems requiring further review

Page 31: Objective Computer Assisted Review of DNA Evidence Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.

Acknowledgements:

Genophiler programmers: Dr. Travis Doom Dr. Mike Raymer Dr. Oscar Garcia Jason R. Gilder

STR experts: Dr. Bill Thompson Dr. Simon Ford Dr. Dan Krane

Support:Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Forensic BioInformatic Services; Suite 150, 2850 Presidential Drive, Fairborn, OH, 4538x; phone: (937) xxx-xxxx; web site: BioForensics.com


Recommended