+ All Categories
Home > Documents > OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: adityajajodia6221
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 30

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    1/30

    Inventory Control Group 5

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    2/30

    INVENTORY CONTROL

    A short recap..

    Effects of high,low andmediuminventory levels

    EconomicOrder

    Quantity

    Re-orderTime,OrderingCosts,

    Holdingcosts.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    3/30

    ZEBRA SHOES

    A Shoe line at San Francisco, United States. Products: Zebra print shoes, zebra high heel shoes, sandals, pumps,

    sneakers in the lowest price in United States. Services: Overseas shipping at the lowest cost.

    Total weekly production: 6,500 pairs of shoes The company uses a chase strategychase strategyfor purchasing raw materials.

    Raw materials required

    Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)

    Fabric

    Shoelaces

    Iron Holes

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    4/30

    Problem statement

    - No methodology forinventory tracking.As a result many a times large

    quantities of shoes are stuck for an uncertain period of time. Sometimesreducing amount of inventory goes unreported.

    - Production rate andinventory levels are based on intuition, with the

    objective of avoiding stock-outs during the demand period.

    - Purchase and production varies according to the demand.

    - Low efficiency level. In many cases theydont complete the entire

    orders on time.

    - Due to all this, the company is also facing a majorspace optimization

    issue in its inventory storage areas

    .

    PROBLEMSPROBLEMS

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    5/30

    Solution to Inventory Tracking Issues: RFID

    What is RFID?What is RFID?

    RFID = RadioFrequencyIDentification.

    Uses a smallchiporatagthatreads

    radio-frequency waves totransferdata

    betweenareaderanda movableitem

    toidentify,categorize,tracketc.

    Is fastanddoes notrequirephysical

    sight

    or

    contact

    bet

    ween

    reader/

    scannerandthetaggeditem.

    Attempts toprovideunique

    identificationand backendintegration

    thatallows forwiderangeof

    applications.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    6/30

    How does RFID work?

    Tags (or chips) consist of two

    parts:

    1) Antennae

    2) Processor/Storage Receives signal from reader

    and gives a return signal with

    ID number (which is unique

    for every item). Reader sends the unique ID

    number to database or server

    for storage.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    7/30

    RFID today

    Its everywhere!Its everywhere!

    Credit cards

    Car & home keys

    Passports

    Retail Outlets

    Packaged foods

    Clothes

    Asset Tracking in

    airlines etc

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    8/30

    The benefits reaped by Zebra Shoes

    Improved on inventory visibility and accuracy .

    Allowed stores to track the location and count of

    inventories in real time. Bringing about better

    monitoring of demand for certain products and place

    orders to prevent an out-of-stock situation.

    Each item is assigned a unique ID, therefore each

    item has the capability of reporting its own unique

    history of transactions. This allows for quicker

    resolution for missing or forgotten items.

    Increase in efficiency: The system replaced time

    consuming manual typing of inventory data with

    quick scanning of trays of inventory in bulk. Gaps between recorded inventories and physical

    inventories were eliminated.

    Since the system is software enabled, all associated

    risks of human error is completely eradicated.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    9/30

    Production Rate Correction: EPQ Model

    What is EPQ?

    Economic Production Quantity

    model determines the quantity a

    company or retailer should order

    to minimize the total inventorycosts by balancing the inventory

    holding cost and average fixed

    ordering cost.

    The EPQ model was developed

    by E.W. Taft in 1918.

    This method is an extension of

    the Economic Order Quantity

    model.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    10/30

    Implementing EPQ and deciding the

    production rateAssumptions: Constant and uniform demand.

    Objective: EPQ analysis to determine the optimal quantities of shoes that

    Zebra Shoes must produce in order to satisfy the demand.

    Variables Value

    Unitary cost (C) 50 $

    Annual cost for maintaining inventory (i) 15% per year

    Annual cost for maintaining inventoryper unit ( h = ic)

    7.5 $/pair-year

    Preparing production cost (A) 55$/order

    Demand = D 300 000 pairs/year

    Production rate = P 312000 pairs/year

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    11/30

    Hence, ZebraHence, Zebra Shoes must produce 10695 pairs in 13Shoes must produce 10695 pairs in 13

    daysdays approximately to meet customer demands timely.approximately to meet customer demands timely.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    12/30

    Optimizing Inventory Levels: EOQ Model

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    13/30

    Assumptions: Constant and uniform demand

    Objective: EPQ analysis to determine the optimal quantities of shoes that Zebra

    Shoes must produce in order to satisfy the demand.

    Polyvinyl chloride

    Unitary cost = C = 10700 $/ton ; Demand = D = 18 ton/year

    Annual cost for maintaining inventory = i = 5% per yearAnnual cost for maintaining inventory per unit = h = ic = 535 $/ton-yearCost per order = A = 500 $/order

    Optimalquantities ofraw materials toorder

    Hence, Zebra ShoesHence, Zebra Shoes should purchase 5.8 ton of PVCshould purchase 5.8 ton of PVC

    ev

    ery 114ev

    ery 114 days.days.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    14/30

    Fabric

    Unitary cost = C = 30 $/m2Annual cost for maintaining inventory = i = 5% per yearAnnual cost for maintaining inventory per unit = h = ic = 1.5 $/m2-yearCost per order = A = 150 $/orderDemand = D = 19200 m2/year

    Hence, Zebra ShoesHence, Zebra Shoes shouldshould purchase purchase 1959 m2 of fabric1959 m2 of fabric

    every 37every 37 days.days.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    15/30

    Shoelaces boxes

    Unitary cost = C = 37 $/boxAnnual cost for maintaining inventory = i = 1% per yearAnnual cost for maintaining inventory per unit = h = ic = 0.37 $/box-yearCost per order = A = 5 $/orderDemand = D = 1092 box/year

    Hence, Zebra ShoesHence, Zebra Shoes shouldshould purchasepurchase 172 boxes of172 boxes of

    shoelaces every 54 days.shoelaces every 54 days.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    16/30

    Iron holes

    Unitary cost = C = 0.3 $/ pieceAnnual cost for maintaining inventory = i = 1% per yearAnnual cost for maintaining inventory per unit = h = ic = 0.003 $/piece-yearCost per order = A = 5 $/orderDemand = D = 1560 000 pieces/year

    Hence, Zebra ShoesHence, Zebra Shoes shouldshould purchasepurchase 72111 iron holes72111 iron holes

    every 17 days.every 17 days.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    17/30

    Optimizing Inventory Big Problem

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    18/30

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    19/30

    What is a Demand Pull Replenishment

    System?

    This is a system where processes are based on demand, the production

    processes are designed to produce only what is deliverable and the

    business becomes leaner.

    So, the communication of demand is in the form of daily consumer

    purchases and this demand data drives replenishment and production.

    It concentrates on the speed of replenishment and ordering smaller

    batches more frequently.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    20/30

    So how does this system help?

    Improves flexibility to respond tocustomer demand

    Empower employees to produce on

    customer demand

    Improve production scheduling

    Simplify the procurement process

    Eliminate overproduction

    Reduce inventory for finishedgoods, raw material and subassemblies

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    21/30

    Case of VF Corporation

    VF corporation is a leader in branded lifestyle apparel which includes jeanswear, outdoor products, sportswear etc.

    It is a global powerhouse with its presence in more than 150 countries through

    47,000 retailers.

    Sourcing and manufacturing are managed through a global supply chainorganisation

    It has a simple strategy to continuously strengthen brands and products toimprove their competitive position and financial performance.

    VFC had annual sales of 7 billion with billion in annual net profit. Six billionof the annual sales are to Retail Partners and 1 billion comes from Big Brandsown retail stores.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    22/30

    About VFC Manufacturing Strategy

    To remain competitive, manufacturing

    moved to third world countries to take

    advantage of low cost labor.

    Manufacturing lead time is between 2

    and 4 months and transportation lead

    time is between 4 and 6 weeks.

    Today Big Brand orders inventory 5

    to 9 months before the inventory is

    introduced

    to the public.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    23/30

    VF Corporation & associated brands

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    24/30

    Approach to a Better Inventory

    Management

    First Phase Roll Out

    -Got daily point of saledata

    -Monitored inventorybuffers for all SKUs in

    each store every day

    RESULTS

    Many fewer storeshortages

    Less surpluses too

    Sales went up and

    discounting wascurtailed

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    25/30

    Lead Time

    (LT) 7 Days

    Days of Week

    Demand During LT

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    A

    ctualDemand

    Calculation

    Week 1 5 4 2 6 7 1 3 28

    Week 2 5 3 4 7 6 2 4 31

    Week 3 7 11 4 8 4 4 5 43

    Week 4 7 11 5 8 10 6 2 49

    Week 5 6 8 6 7 10 12 5 54

    Average Demand in LT (Average of the Numbers in Weeks 1-5) 41

    Demand Variability (Standard Deviation of Numbers in Weeks 1-5)Note:Assume that the demand is Normally Distributed over the time period 11.24722188

    Calculation of Inventory to Stock

    Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

    Customer Service Level 0.95 0.97 0.99

    Z-Score (Service Level Factor 1.65 1.88 2.33

    Safety Stock (Demand Variability*Z-Score 18.50 21.16 26.16

    Rounding Off 19 21 26

    Total Inventory (Average Demand in LT + Safety Stock 59.50168 62.156024 67.161038

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    26/30

    Second Phase Roll Out

    Picking a central DC for the retail stores

    BENEFITS

    A better picture was seen of what should be replenished from manufacturing. Costs incurred transferring inventory between locations were reduced Replenishment was reduced

    More inventory was held at the DC and less at the store level Overall inventory dropped inventory turns increased Merchandisers had the ability to increase supply to areas that were selling and restrict replenishment where sales were slow or non existent Better availability allowed sales to rise

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    27/30

    Lets see the Real Results

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    28/30

    Results: Facts & Figures

    Same store sales doubled.

    Inventory levels were of what was typical.

    Inventory shortages were reduced to 1.5% which is 20 times less than

    the beginning benchmark.

    The initial rollout alone resulted in a 4 million profit increase.

    Net profits increased to 30% of sales, a level previously regarded as

    impossible.

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    29/30

  • 8/3/2019 OM Final Ppt_Inventory Control

    30/30


Recommended