PROJECT REPORT IWMP‐5 CHHOTAUDEPUR...

DETAIL PROJECT REPORT ( IWMP‐5 CHHOTAUDEPUR‐ 2P)

Gujarat State Watershed Management AgencyDistrict Watershed Development Unit District Vadodara

District Watershed Development Unit, Vadodara Page 2

Contents Project Background ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Table no.2: Weightage of the project .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Table no.3: Watershed information ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area: ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: .............................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1. Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Table no. 6: PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER – 3 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Geography and Geo‐hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Soil and topography: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Table no.12: Climatic conditions................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Land and Agriculture: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Table no. 14: Land ownership details ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Table no. 15: Agriculture .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Table no. 16: Irrigation ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Table no. 18: Livestock ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Table no. 19:Drinking water ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Socio‐Economic Profile ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Migration Pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Table no. 23: Migration details ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35


Table no. 24: Poverty ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Livelihood pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Table no. 27: Income .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Dependence on Common Property Resource ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 40 CHAPTER – 4 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 WATERSHED ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 46 Scientific Planning: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 47 Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects .................................................................................................................................................. 49 Watershed Committee ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 51 (ii ) Self Help Group ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 55 User Group: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 58 Table no. 33: UG detail ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 58 4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................................................... 65 Table no 36.1 Technical Details of Earthen Bund: .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 71 Table no. 36.2 Technical Details of Farm Pond .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Table no . 36. 3 Technical Details of Feild/Farm Bund ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ...................................................................................................... 73 Sr No. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Name of Village ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Major Activities of the SHGs ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 73 Name of Activity ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 No of SHGs involved ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Average annual income from activity per SHG ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 1. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Mandlva ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 2. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73


Ranikheda ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 3. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Limbani .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 4. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Bandibhit ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 5. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Dholisimel ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 6. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Dungarbhit.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 7. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Dobachapra ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 73 8. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Kevdi ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 9. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Mithibor ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 10. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Kakadkund .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 11. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Marchipani .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 12. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Rinchhvel ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 13. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Gadola ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 14. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Kothara ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 15. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Dhorkuva ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 Table no. 39.1 Soil and water conservation activities of watershed works phase – Proposed Target .......................................................................................... 74 Table no 39.2 Agriculture and Aforestation related activites of watershed works phase – Proposed Target ........................................................................... 74 Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* .......................................................................................................................................................... 75 Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works .................................................................................................................... 79


Table no 40.2.Techincal Specification Graded Bunding ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 Table no 40.3.Techincal Specification Farm Bund ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 Table 40.4.Techincal specification Masonary Checkwall ................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 Table no 40.5.Techincal Specification Masonary Checkdam ............................................................................................................................................................................ 85 Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ................................................................................................................. 87 Table no .41.1 Technical Details of Aforestation Activities/Plantation/Grass seeding: ...................................................................................................................... 92 Table No. 41.1.1 Cost Estimation For Afforestation Activity (For 1000 Plants) ...................................................................................................................................... 92 Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 93 Production System –I ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 101 Production System‐II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 103 Production System‐III: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 106 Production System‐IV ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 108 Production System – V ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 111 Production System: VI .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 112 Production System VII : ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 114 4.4. Capacity Building: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 115 Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116 Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116 Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 117 Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ........................................................................................................................................................ 117 Budgeting .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 119 Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 119 Table no. 48: Village wise‐ component wise budget available under IWMP ........................................................................................................................................... 119 Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ........................................................................................................................................................... 121 CHAPTER – 6 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 124 EXPECTED OUTCOMES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 124 Expected Outcomes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 125 Employment ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 125 Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 125 Migration ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 126 Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ...................................................................................................................................................................... 126


Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ........................................................................................................... 127 Drinking water .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 128 Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 128 Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas .................................................................................................................................................... 129 Table no. 57: Area under horticulture ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 137 Vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 138 Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 138 Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) .. 139 Linkages ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 141 Table no. 60: Backward‐Forward linkages ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 141 CHAPTER ‐7 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 146 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 146 Table no 60. Details of Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP‐5 ...................................................................................................................................... 147 MAPS ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 151


CHAPTER 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND


Project Background Chottaudepur 2‐P project villages of (IWMP‐5) are located in chottaudepur Taluka (N‐220 18’ – 31.25 & E‐ 740 00 – 47.46”) Vadodara District of Gujarat state. IWMP‐5 consists of 15 villages and an area around 3988.60 ha is taken into the project as per the priority for treatment. 15 villages fall under 3 gram panchayats. All the villages are separated by a distance of 25‐55 kms from chottaudepur taluka. 3 Watershed committees are constituted for these 15 villages. This project is expected to cover 9 micro watersheds with codes 5E1B8f1a, 5E1B8f2a, 5E1B8f1k, 5E1B8f1g, 5E1B8c3a, 5E1B8f1h, 5E1B8f1d, 5E1B8f1j, 5E1B8f1e The total project area proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) of the watershed is taken by excluding area covered in DPAP (Drought Prone Area Program) and EAS (Employment Assurance Scheme) project. The nearest town is chottaudepur taluka place which is approximately about 25‐55 Km from almost all the villages and most of the villages are well connected by pucca tar road and few still have kutcha roads and it becomes very difficult in rainy season for transportation. Trasnportation is provided by private transportation facilities as well as State Transport Bus. Most of the land is dry with no land scrub and true example arid region for agriculture. Nayaka, Rathwa, koli and Harijan communities are the major inhabitants of the project area. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, wage labour, depends on local based natural resources, sheep and goat rearing is also prevalent however not in a large scale. The watershed falls under the government designated tribal area. The water level is almost 140 feet deep further, structure of the soil is very shallow with undulated topography, and part of forest land is also encroached by residents of these villages. Land is productive but, acute shortage of irrigation sources and irrigation facilities and least water holding capacity is one of the geographical disadvantages of this project area. Considerably a slope of more than 25‐33 can be seen. Close green forests as well as dence forest can be seen in this area.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sl No.

Name of the project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District Area of the

project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project cost

PIA Name Census code

1 I.W.M.P ‐5

Mandalva 190050139280000Mandalva Gram

Panchayats Chotaudepur Vadodara

764.3 264.3 31.71 DCF Forest

Department,Chhotaudepur 2 Ranikhada 190050139180000 Dholisamal Gram

Panchayats

464.5 264.5 31.74

3 Limbani 190050139170000 380.3 180.3 21.63


4 Bandibhint 190050139300000Mandalva Gram

Panchayats 316.3 316.6 37.99

5 Dholisimel 190050139150000Dholisamal Gram

Panchayats

278.4 78.4 9.4 6 Dungarbhint 190050139160000 649.2 649.2 77.9 7 Dobachapura 190050139140000 394 194 23.28 8 Kevdi 190050139050000 1083.8 583.8 70 9 Mithibor 190050139130000

Mithibor Gram

Panchayats

846.5 446.5 53.58 10 Kakadkund 190050139080000 217.3 97.3 11.67 11 Marchipani 190050139060000 434.5 235.5 28.14 12 Rinchhvel 190050139090000 286 186 22.32 13 Gadola 190050139110000 541.1 241.1 28.93 14 Kothara 190050139120000 127 77 9.24 15 Dhorkuva 190050139100000 375.1 175.1 21.01 Area proposed to be treated 1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Chottaudepur (IWMP5) Watershed project as given in table no. 2. The total number of families under BPL is 2321, which is equal to 83.15 per cent of the total households of the project. Hence a score of 10 is allotted. The percentage of schedule tribe in the project is 90% percent to the total population; hence a score of 10 was allotted. Rainfed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village


majority of the persons. More than 80 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the average land holdings of farmers in around 2‐3 ha and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5, 5 and 5 are allotted respectively. Since this area is prone to frequent drought land is and due to the low moisture index the area is classified under IWMP block. Drinking water is a major problem in this project area. In a broader view the soil of this region is suitable for agriculture crops and cash crops but due to lack of water harvesting structures and irrigation water, agriculture itself has become a constraint and the productivity potential has considerable gone low. The soil is very shallow and hence rate of infiltration is more however production of the land can be significantly brought up with the help of better management practices and availability of timely irrigation and use of organic and inorganic fertilizer. Chottaudepur watershed falls under second priority and it is an individual cluster. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration 11 micro‐watersheds covering a total area of 3988.60 Ha. All the parameters taken together and a cumulative score of 73 are given to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below). Table no.2: Weightage of the project Project name Project type Weight age TOTAL

CHHOTAUDEPUR2

‐G

HILLY/DESERT/OTHER

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

10 10 5 5 3 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 73

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed S. No. Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly

lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block 15 ‐66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block ‐33.3 to ‐66.6 (10)DPAP Block

0 to ‐33.2 (0)Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain‐fed agriculture 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %


(Reject)viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully

covered (0) ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low‐ less than 10 % of

TGA (5) x Productivity potential of the

land 15 Lands with low production &

where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro‐watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro‐watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro‐watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro‐watersheds in cluster (15)

3 to 5 micro watersheds in cluster (10)


Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 Project type: Hilly/desert/Other Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

I.W.M.P ‐5 9

5E1B8f1a, 5E1B8f2a, 5E1B8f1k, 5E1B8f1g, 5E1B8c3a, 5E1B8f1h,

5E1B8f1d, 5E1B8f1j, 5E1B8f1e,

Micro Watershed


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the chottaudepur2P village This village is very back ward in various issues and falls under tribal area, still some of the villages fails to draw the limelight of schemes and developmental projects. Although NREGS (National Rural Employment Scheme) and Indira Awas Yojana (IAY), Sardar Awas Yojana, SGSY, Sakhi Mandal. i. NREGS: Construction of Wells, kutcha Road constructions works, pond depending, check walls, bori bunds and other labour intensive

activity has been taken‐up under NREGA. Construction of boundary trenching, boundary walls, nursery and terrace ponds on hill tops is also taken up through forest department.

ii. Indira Awas Yojana: Total houses constructed in this project are 83 and all the villages of this project have Indra Awas Yojana except for on village Bhindol.

iii. Sardar Awas : houses were built under this shemes and work is still in progess in some of the villages. iv. SGSY: Total groups under this scheme are 32 and are currently active and some of the groups are under grading process. v. Sakhi Mandal: Sakhi Mandal schemes comprise of several groups which are sustainable from long time. vi. TASP: This is a designated as tribal area hence different activities are taken up by for welfare of people these tribal villages. Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area: Sl no

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the programme/scheme

Year of commencement

Villages covered

Estimated number of beneficiaries

1 NREGS Rural Development Dept. Employment 2009 3 598 2 IAY Rural Development Dept. Housing 2005 13 274 3 SGSY Rural Development Dept. Women Welfare 2005 10 180 4 Sakhi Mandal Rural Development Dept. Women Welfare 2006 14 154 5 SHG’s of Haryali Rural Development Dept. Women and Men Welfare 2003 ‐ ‐6 Sadar Awas Yojana Rural Development Dept. Housing 2003 11 169

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: Sl no

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershed codes

Area under

treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion

1 I.W.M.P ‐5

Mandalva 9

5E1B8f1d Govt. DRDA ANA2 Ranikheda 5E1B8f1e 500.15 1200000 1200000 100 1003 Limbani 5E1B8f2a 510 1319000 1319000 100 100


4 Bandibhint 5E1B8f1a 217.565 Dholisimel 5E1B8f2a 109.43 1200000 1200000 100 1006 Dungarbhint 5E1B8c3a7 Dobachapura 5E1B8f1g 146 956000 965302 100 1008 Kevdi 5E1B8f1d 330 832000 843798 100 1009 Mithibor 5E1B8f1j 500 1144000 1166874 100 10010 Kakadkund 5E1B8f1h11 Marchipani 5E1B8f1h 607 600000 615323 100 10012 Rinchhvel 5E1B8f1k 462.14 1107000 1130843 100 10013 Gadola 5E1B8f1k 156.04 850000 867163 100 10014 Kothara 5E1B8f1j 425.13 1275000 1329991 100 10015 Dhorkuva 5E1B8f1k 205.06 1100000 1129296 100 1002.1. Project Implementing Agency The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. In district Vadodara Forest Department is being selected as the Project Implementing Agency. The main office of PIA is located in Chottaudepur taluka place. Deputy conservator of Forest is bestowed the responsibity for all the projects, henceforth he is the PIA of all projects . There are 7 projects in different taluka of Vadodara and each project is assigned to a Nodal officer (Range forest officer). Four different offices are setup in 4 different talukas for smooth functioning and overseasing of project work. About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara The organization and its objectives: The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12 May 2009 in a separate office to oversee the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department), a Technical expert and a multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Vadodara are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines. Programmes/projects of DWDU, Vadodara: At present 7 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Vadodara district. The entry point activities of all the seven IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Vadodara Forest Division is PIA for 7 projects (IWMP‐1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7).


Apart from the 7 IWMP projects, DWDU Vadodara is involved in a total of 303 pre‐Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DPAP & IWMP); 93 projects are completed and 210 projects are still running in the district and are expected to complete within two years of time. The DWDU, Vadodara is also monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dug wells” in the district. SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: Strength: (1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team. (2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency. (3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities and training institutes for capacity building and technical guidance. (4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhi agar, (5) District level advisory committee for monitoring, coordination & Co‐operation. (6) Prior acquaintance of nodal officers with the villagers of selected project area, hence ease in implementation of project. Weakness: (1) No permanent office building at project level. (2) Most of the project area is hilly and distance of project area from DWDU is almost 2‐3 hours. (3) Project area inhabitants mainly composed of schedule tribe class hence, ignorance about developmental projects. Opportunities: (1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of programmes. (2) Better financial provision under IWMP better quality of work can be expected (3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS and MIS integration of the project with the State Level Data Cell for online monitoring and evaluation. (4) Reputed training centres for capacity building at all level of stakeholders viz,, district, block and village level to ensure the proper implementation of the project Threats:

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact. (2) Options in production system are limited due to the lack of sufficient natural resources and due to limited resource base. (3) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning. (4) Lack of awareness of the watershed programme and its objectives. (5) Low literacy rate in the project area.


Table no. 6: PIA: Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 I.W.M.P‐5

(i) Type of organization Project Implementing Agency (ii) Name of organization PIA, Chottaudepur (iii) Designation & Address Nodal Officer, Range Forest Office, Chottaudepur(iv) Telephone 02669‐232302(v) Fax(vi) E‐mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: Sl no Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration 1 P.S.Rathod 51 Male Range Forest Officer M.sc 23 Nodal officer 40498/‐2 Vinodbhai M. Nisarata Male WDT(Agriculture) M.S.W 6 YEAR Agriculture 8000/‐

3 Rekhaben P. Damor 30 FEMALE WDT (Community Mob.) M.S.W. 2 Year Community Mobilizes 8000/‐

4 Vandanaben I. Patel 31 Female WDT(Accountant) M.com, B.ed 5 Year Accountant 7000/‐5 Rathwa suresh .m. 25 Male WDT (Data Entry Operator) B.B.A 2 Year Data Entry Operator 5000/‐6 Bharatkumar K. Bariya 25 Male Messenger 12TH PASS 0 year Messenger 3000/‐


CHAPTER – 3 BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA


Geography and Geohydrology Land use pattern: The net geographical area of Chottaudepur watershed is about 3988.60 ha out of which 29% is forest area. The forest area is nearly covers one third of the project area. Forest areas in this region are dense to moderate. Most of the villages in this area are surrounded by hilly and rocky mountains. About 51% of land is under agriculture which is completely rain‐fed; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 14% of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 41% percent is cultivable and rest is not fit for agriculture. The watershed area consist mostly consist of Mahuda trees, chalori (Buchanania lanzan), teak, Ber, wild blackberry, custard apple, acacia Arabica, kusum trees, ficus and plam tress. These trees are encouraged and grown by the villager since they generated income for the villagers from the produce obtained through these trees. Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr. No. Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village Forest Area Land under

agricultural use Rain fed area

Perm‐anent pastu‐res

Wasteland

Cultivable Non‐cultivable

1 Mandalva 764.30 309.69 268.2 155.80 0.00 177.1 9.30 2 Ranikhada 464.50 308.60 69.4 65.40 0.00 79.10 7.40 3 Limbani 380.30 307.20 57.10 42.10 0.00 16.00 0.00 4 Bandibhint 316.60 98.30 107.6 86.10 0.00 68.90 41.80 5 Dholisimel 278.40 119.10 70.8 34.80 0.00 86.40 2.40 6 Dungarbhint 649.20 388.10 172.10 92.10 0.00 89.00 0.00 7 Dobachapura 394.00 339.00 52.3 46.30 0.00 2.70 0.00 8 Kevdi 1083.80 799.40 212.4 202.40 0.00 47.80 24.209 Mithibor 846.50 384.20 386.40 376.40 0.00 5.5 70.40 10 Kakadkund 217.30 0.00 83.9 68.90 0.00 88.40 45.00 11 Marchipani 434.50 398.7 18.3 18.3 0.00 17.5 7.5 12 Rinchhvel 286.00 185.80 55.70 52.70 0.00 26.00 18.50 13 Gadola 541.10 409.90 61.8 56.80 0.00 21.1 48.30 14 Kothara 127.00 32.90 73.0 70.00 0.00 0.90 20.20 15 Dhorkuva 375.10 226.80 79.5 71.50 0.00 18.1 50.70

Total 7158.6 4307.69 1768.5 1439.6 0.0 744.5 345.7


Soil and topography: Chottaudepur watershed project falls under Middle Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy silt to loamy in some places. The soil is reddish brown to greyish black. The depth of soil is shallow to moderate about 25 to 80 cm. The predominant texture of soil is sandy silty and moderately coarse texture to fine texture in some villages. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. Status of organic carbon is very poor and depleting in this region due to lack of sufficient organic resources and also largely due to the ignorance of the farmers. Due to the low moisture index of this region organic fertilizer efficiency is not noteworthy. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 5‐30% slope with undulating topography and hills surround the most of the project area. There is close similarity between the adjacent project areas. Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No. Name of the Agro‐climatic zone covers project area Area in ha

Names of thevillages

Major soil typesTopo‐graphy a)Type b) Area in ha

1

Central Gujarat 3988.60

Bandibhint

Rocky strata & Sandy loam type

soil 3988.60 Medium to High

Slope

2 Dholisimel3 Dhorkuwa4 Dobachapura5 Dugarbhit6 Gadoal7 Kakadkund8 kevdi9 Kothara10 Limbani11 Mandalva12 Marchipani13 Mithibor14 Ranikheda15 Rinchhvel

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope


Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: Sr. no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 1

Chhotaudepur I.W.MP‐5 NIL Once in three year

11. Edaphic Factors Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off(mm/ year)

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year)

Water erosiona Sheet 827.1603

25‐35% b Rill 937.6260c Gully 1367.3525d Ravenous

Sub‐Total Wind erosion 668.1823 NA

Total 3988.6Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress) Mandalva 32/3 7.5 InherentRanikhada 4,26 7.4 InherentLimbani 18,27 7.8 Inherent

Bandibhint 65,57 6.9 InherentDholisimel 22/2,103 7.6 InherentDungarbhint 126 7.5 InherentDobachapura 19,53 7.1 Inherent

Kevdi 117 7.9 Inherent


Mithibor 8,148 6.8 InherentKakadkund 10 7.3 InherentMarchipani 7,18 7.0 InherentRinchhvel 251,44 7.00,6.6 InherentGadola 8,30 7.4,6.8 InherentKothara 32 7.1 InherentDhorkuva 74,19 6.6,7.2 Inherent

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

IMWP‐5

N/A N/A

Ranikhada Limbani Bandibhint Dholisimel Dungarbhint Dobachapura

Kevdi Mithibor Kakadkund Marchipani Rinchhvel Gadola Kothara Dhorkuva


Table no.12: Climatic conditions

Name of project Average rainfall‐ last 5 years Rainfall (in

mm) Average temperature Highest intensity of

Rainfall (mm in a day)

SummerMax Min

1 2004 1383 42.3 9.9 3142 2005 853 42.3 9.7 3053 2006 1623 42.4 8.1 3014 2007 856 42.9 8.2 3025 2008 364 42.8 7.9 3126 2009 503 42.9 7.9 329

The project area has an optimum to good rainfall over the years however due to various reasons like, changing weather parameters and global climate has changed drastically. The details of the rainfall from 2004‐2009 are given above the of rainfall and temperature trends considerably changed. Hence, rainfall sanctity is growing problem in this area and also due to the low water holding capacity, high infiltration, less land scrub, degrading forests, lack of moisture conservation structure and undulated topography leads to drainage of water. The top fertile soils accounts for major loss. The average rainfall of this area is about 930.3 mm (from past six year data) with a highest intensity of 320 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution of rainfall is leading to surface runoff of soil causing ravine and gully erosion as per the details given in table no 11. The rainfall of this area has considerable gone down from the past three consecutive years and there is decresing trend in rainfall with increasing trend in temperature from past 6 years data. This is glimpse of detoriating conditions of this project area.


Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streamsI.W.M.P‐5 472 Meters 25‐33% NA

Land and Agriculture: Surface water sources and limited ground water table makes farming a difficult task and scarcity of drinking water in this area is among the major problems in almost all the villages of chottaudepur IWMP‐5 project area. The average land holding is about 1.0 ha ranging from 1 to 5 ha. Crop failure is common problem due to insufficient and untimely rains hence, agriculture become a risky. Only kharif season crop is taken in this area. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Maize, cotton, paddy and pulses like Redgram and black gram in this area. 95% of the total agriculture is rainfed and based monsoon of that particular year. Rabi season only 5‐10% of the land is under cultivation in places where the irrigation sources are available. Modern agriculture practise are prevalent in these areas, use of fertilizers and agricultural pesticides for better crop production for increased yields. However, farmers often get cheated in hands of local vendor and obtain second grade products. Table no. 14: Land ownership details Sl no Village Total owned land

Gen OBC SC ST1 Mandalva ‐ ‐ ‐ 265.192 Ranikhada ‐ ‐ ‐ 70.543 Limbani ‐ ‐ ‐ 48.574 Bandibhint ‐ ‐ 0.22 0.225 Dholisimel ‐ ‐ ‐ 77.096 Dungarbhint ‐ ‐ ‐ 196.17 Dobachapura ‐ ‐ ‐ 59.718 Kevdi ‐ ‐ ‐ 168.849 Mithibor ‐ 16.85 ‐ 363.4310 Kakadkund ‐ ‐ ‐ 61.1211 Marchipani ‐ ‐ ‐ 21.4712 Rinchhvel 0.59 ‐ ‐ 51.1613 Gadola ‐ ‐ ‐ 76.3514 Kothara ‐ ‐ ‐ 68.3215 Dhorkuva ‐ ‐ ‐ 78.08


Table no. 15: Agriculture Sl no Village Net sown area (Ha) One time Two times Three times1 Mandalva 164.40 26.99 ‐2 Ranikhada 637.65 2.96 ‐3 Limbani 63.78 12.24 ‐4 Bandibhint 179.77 47.04 ‐5 Dholisimel 449 18.2 ‐6 Dungarbhint 351.24 59.12 ‐7 Dobachapura 58.72 4.88 ‐8 Kevdi 215.38 1.6 ‐9 Mithibor 267.64 7.72 ‐10 Kakadkund 73.25 4.4 ‐11 Marchipani 24.87 0 ‐12 Rinchhvel 67.66 1.2 ‐13 Gadola 134.94 0 ‐14 Kothara 243.05 13.30 ‐15 Dhorkuva 53.40 0.2 ‐

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sl no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : WellAvailability months Net area Gross area Availability

months Net area

Gross area

Availability months Net area Gross area

1 Mandalva ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 14.6 764.3 7 27.25 764.32 Ranikhada ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 464.5 7 17.75 464.53 Limbani ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 380.3 8 14.62 380.34 Bandibhint ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 316.3 8 20.00 316.35 Dholisimel ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 9.5 278.4 7 21.25 278.46 Dungarbhint ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 12.4 649.2 7 18.80 649.27 Dobachapura ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 394.0 8 10.11 394.08 Kevdi ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 15.5 1083.8 8 25.70 1083.89 Mithibor ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 10.00 846.5 7 18.25 846.5


10 Kakadkund ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 3.5 217.3 7 7.60 217.311 Marchipani ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 434.5 6 7.25 434.512 Rinchhvel ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 286.0 7 8.05 286.013 Gadola ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 541.1 6 ‐ 541.114 Kothara ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 127.0 7 ‐ 127.015 Dhorkuva ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 375.1 7 ‐ 375.1Table no. 17: Crop details: Sl no

Village

Kharif (Monsoon) Maize Tur Paddy

Area(ha) Production(Kg) Productivity(kg/ha)

Area(ha) Production(Kg) Productivity(kg/ha) Area(ha) Production(Kg) Productivity(kg/ha)

1 Mandalva 65.42 92896.4 1420 8.20 4920 600 68.80 66736.0 970 2 Ranikhada 110.68 157719.0 1425 90.84 47691 525 365.17 337782.3 925 3 Limbani 16.17 22638.0 1400 13.04 6650.4 510 25.94 24643.0 950 4 Bandibhint 47.91 69469.5 1450 61.48 34121.4 555 52.29 42354.9 810 5 Dholisimel 146.24 215704.0 1475 83.22 46603.2 560 142.52 149646.0 1050 6 Dungarbhint 141.18 202593.3 1435 51.06 26040.6 510 103.74 103740.0 1000 7 Dobachapura 28.92 38319.0 1325 6.42 3338.4 520 17.58 14591.4 830 8 Kevdi 88.48 122544.8 1385 53.76 27686.4 515 52.09 44797.4 860 9 Mithibor 117.28 143081.6 1220 61.82 33073.7 535 34.74 28313.1 815 10 Kakadkund 28.89 34523.6 1195 15.12 6652.8 440 17.48 14368.6 822 11 Marchipani 11.38 13030.1 1145 6.40 3008 470 4.20 3477.6 828 12 Rinchhvel 31.56 40459.9 1282 16.30 7824 480 5.18 4206.2 812 13 Gadola 24.54 28589.1 1165 49.33 22889.1 464 61.08 48253.2 790 14 Kothara 57.36 68832.0 1200 99.19 43842 442 47.40 36877.2 778 15 Dhorkuva 29.04 36590.4 1260 12.40 5952 480 0.20 156.6 783 Sl no

Village

Kharif (Monsoon)Black Gram Cottons(UI)




1 Mandalva 6.90 4312.5 625 17.8 9980 560.72 Ranikhada 70.82 43341.8 612 0 0 03 Limbani 6.96 4468.3 642 4.2 2838.36 675.84 Bandibhint 15.10 10192.5 675 7.5 5907 787.65 Dholisimel 76.80 47692.8 621 0 0 06 Dungarbhint 32.96 21358.1 648 55.8 38496.4 689.97 Dobachapura 5.80 3567.0 615 0 0 08 Kevdi 20.76 13660.1 658 1.0 0 09 Mithibor 53.80 33248.4 618 0 0 010 Kakadkund 9.73 7054.3 725 0 0 011 Marchipani 2.90 2088.0 720 0 0 012 Rinchhvel 14.62 10760.3 736 0 0 013 Gadola 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 014 Kothara 39.10 30576.2 782 0 0 015 Dhorkuva 11.80 6549.0 555 0 0 0

Sr.no Village

Rabi (Winter) Maize Tur Paddy

Area Production(kg) Productivity(Kg per Ha) Area Production(kg) Productivity(Kg

per Ha) Area Production(kg) Productivity(Kg per Ha)

1 Mandalva 26.55 34522.8 1300 0 0 0 0 0 02 Ranikhada 2.16 3240 1500 0 0 0 0 0 03 Limbani 12.11 18537.48 1530 0 0 0 0 0 04 Bandibhint 26.38 41561.1 1575 6.256 6881.6 1100 0 0 05 Dholisimel 16.00 25840 1615 0 0 0 0 0 06 Dungarbhint 57.52 93182.4 1620 0 0 0 0 0 07 Dobachapura 4.4 6314 1435 0 0 0 0 0 08 Kevdi 1.76 2833.6 1610 0 0 0 0 0 09 Mithibor 7.04 9961.60 1415 0 0 0 0 0 010 Kakadkund 4.00 5600 1400 0 0 0 0 0 011 Marchipani ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 012 Rinchhvel 0.8 1053.8 1317 0 0 0 0 0 0


13 Gadola 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 Kothara 1.4 1859.2 1328 0 0 0 0 0 015 Dhorkuva 0.2 270 1350 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sl no Village Zaid (Summer)

Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3

1 Area Production(kg) Productivity(Kg per Ha) Area Production(kg) Productivity(Kg per Ha) Area Production(kg) Productivity(Kg

per Ha) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Livestock: The villages have 1281 cows, 1735 buffaloes, 2250 bullocks, 6242 goats, Hens 6213 and no sheeps. Livestock is owned by all almost all the farmer for drought and agriculture purposes. Partly some people in the community depend on goat rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Mehsani buffalo and Gir cow are common in this area and the survival and production parameters are suitable to this region and climatic condition. Hence there is wider scope for improvement of dairy in this cluster of villages of chottaudepur IWMP‐5. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. Milk production is so low however this can be improved by fodder production in the wasteland in these areas. Although green fodder is only available in kharif season, excess fodder can be dried and stored for use in off season. Country chicken has great demand as it’s a part of daily food and also a source of income. Table no. 18: Livestock Sr. no Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others0

No milk No Milk 0 No Milk1 Mandalva 665 478800 500 210000 688800 950 21375 0 300 720 02 Ranikhada 50 36000 40 16800 52800 250 5625 0 105 314 03 Limbani 25 18000 60 25200 43200 178 4005 0 80 200 04 Bandibhint 150 108000 35 14700 255700 300 6750 0 103 370 05 Dholisimel 200 144000 50 21000 165000 800 18000 0 289 385 06 Dungarbhint 200 144000 63 45360 59760 600 13500 0 358 689 07 Dobachapura 25 18000 30 12600 30600 200 4500 0 89 225 08 Kevdi 80 57600 50 21000 78600 280 6300 0 178 368 0


9 Mithibor 150 108000 200 84000 192000 970 21825 0 377 1150 010 Kakadkund 50 3600 100 42000 45600 300 6750 0 38 290 011 Marchipani 20 14400 18 7560 21960 194 4365 0 19 175 012 Rinchhvel 15 10800 30 12600 23400 300 6750 0 98 317 013 Gadola 30 21600 20 8400 30000 350 7875 0 60 290 014 Kothara 47 33840 60 25200 59040 420 9450 0 80 415 015 Dhorkuva 28 20160 25 10500 30660 150 3375 0 76 305 0

Table no. 19:Drinking water Sr. no Village Ground water table (m) Source of drinking

water Availability in months Quality

1 Mandalva 15 Hand pump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium2 Ranikhada 16.04 Hand pump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium3 Limbani 17.5 Hand pump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium4 Bandibhint 15.4 Hand pump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium5 Dholisimel 20.35 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium6 Dungarbhint 16.42 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium7 Dobachapura 19.02 Hand pump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium8 Kevdi 18.15 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium9 Mithibor 15 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium10 Kakadkund 17.1 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium11 Marchipani 20.15 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium12 Rinchhvel 12.3 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium13 Gadola 14.5 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium14 Kothara 13.4 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium15 Dhorkuva 14 Handpump, Well 8 Month 4 month Medium

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources S. No. Names of

project CPR Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha)

Particulars Area owned/ In possession of Pvt. Govt. PRI Any other Pvt. Govt. PRI Any other


persons (Specify dept.)

(Pl. Specify)

persons (Specify dept.)

(Pl. Specify)

1 Mandalva Wasteland/ degraded land 1.53 123.29 0.8094 1.53 123.29 0.809 ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Forest 309.07 309.07 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐Community Buildings 0.4 ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

2 Ranikheda Wasteland/ degraded land 79.458 0.8 79.45 0.8 ‐Pastures 79.1 ‐Orchards ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 308.06 308.06 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

3 Libani Wasteland/ degraded land ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Forest 307.03 307.03 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐


Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

4 Bandibhit Wasteland/ degraded land 0.2125 98.369 0.2125 98.369 ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 98.32 98.32 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐Community Buildings 1500

squre ft ‐

Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

5 Dholishamel Wasteland/ degraded land 1.13 29.34 1.13 29.34 ‐Pastures ‐Orchards ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 119.01 119.01 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

6 Dugarbhit Wasteland/ degraded land 0.0607 32.01 57.806 0.0607 32.01 57.806 ‐Pastures ‐


Orchards ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 388.02 388.02 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

7 Dobachapara Wasteland/ degraded land 4.0166 4.0166 ‐Pastures ‐Orchards ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 339 339 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

8 Kevadi Wasteland/ degraded land ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 799.04 ‐‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐


Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐9 Mithibor Wasteland/ degraded land 1.3709 32.031 1.3709 32.031 ‐

Pastures ‐Orchards ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks 384.2 384.2 ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐

10 Kakadkund Wasteland/ degraded land 1.01 173.04 1.01 173.04 ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Forest ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

11 Marchipani Wasteland/ degraded land 2.9476 0.4047 2.9476 0.4047 ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 398.7 398.7 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐


Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐

12 Richvel Wasteland/ degraded land 196.28 196.28 ‐Pastures ‐Orchards ‐‐Village Woodlot ‐Forest 185.8 185.8 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

13 Gadola Wasteland/ degraded land 51.102 51.102 ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Forest 409.9 409.9 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

14 Kothara Wasteland/ degraded land 17.655 0.4047 17.655 0.4047 ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐


Village Woodlot ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Forest 32.9 32.9 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

15 Dhorkuwa Wasteland/ degraded land 0.2024 261.62 0.2024 261.62 ‐Pastures ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Orchards ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Village Woodlot ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Forest 226.8 226.8 ‐Village Ponds/ Tanks ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Community Buildings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Weekly Markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Permanent markets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Temples/ Places of worship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Others (Pl. specify) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

SocioEconomic Profile Demographic Status: Chottaudepur watershed project has a total of 1401 households with a population of 11797 (as per baseline survey) out of which 5890 are male and 5907 female .The sex ratio is 1002 female to 1000 male. There are 2321 BPL families. The average family size is 5. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 7.1 percent male literacy rate is 70 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is 30 per cent (of total female population). People in this area are more inclined towards education as it is the best option for finding a employment , as the opportunities in other sectors are limited. The major castes in the village are rathwa, bariya, nayaka and all are Schedule tribe. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.


Table no. 21: Demographic information Sl no Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Total Male Female 1 Mandalva 2416 1195 1221 2416 5 7 12 2404 1185 12192 Ranikhada 526 256 270 526 0 0 0 526 256 2703 Limbani 362 182 180 362 0 0 0 362 182 1804 Bandibhint 906 469 437 906 24 20 44 862 445 4175 Dholisimel 956 477 479 956 1 1 2 954 474 4806 Dungarbhint 1326 671 655 1326 38 38 76 1250 635 6157 Dobachapura 332 177 155 332 0 0 0 332 177 1558 Kevdi 1136 573 563 1136 1 0 1 1115 560 5559 Mithibor 1613 788 825 1613 14 8 22 781 810 159110 Kakadkund 343 165 178 343 0 0 0 162 176 33811 Marchipani 120 59 61 120 0 0 0 59 61 12012 Rinchhvel 332 168 164 332 0 0 0 166 163 32913 Gadola 423 220 203 423 0 0 0 219 203 42214 Kothara 568 278 290 568 0 0 0 276 287 56315 Dhorkuva 438 212 226 438 0 0 0 210 225 435 11797 5890 5907 11797

Table no. 22: Literacy rate Sl no Village Literacy

Total % Male % Female %1 Mandalva 718 29.82 371 15.4 347 14.422 Ranikhada 109 20.76 66 12.05 43 8.263 Limbani 71 19.08 39 10.5 34 9.34 Bandibhint 159 17.52 82 9.1 76 8.425 Dholisimel 269 28.15 118 12.36 151 166 Dungarbhint 224 16.94 120 9.03 101 7.647 Dobachapura 33 10.08 20 6.03 13 4.58 Kevdi 274 24.15 142 12.05 132 11.65


9 Mithibor 626 26.03 336 14 296 12.0310 Kakadkund 92 27.31 48 14.1 45 13.2111 Marchipani 3 3.6 2 2.4 1 1.212 Rinchhvel 90 27.37 50 15.17 40 12.213 Gadola 65 15.35 39 9.25 26 6.114 Kothara 93 16.45 54 9.45 38 6.7215 Dhorkuva 84 19.2 44 10 40 9.2

Total Migration Pattern: Migration is a major problem of these areas. Money is the major motivation and hence people migrate during Rabi and summer season to different parts of the state like Surat, Ahmedabad , Vadodara, bhuj, Ankelshwar and Suarashtra as daily wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. As soon as kharif season ends most of people tend to migrated to different places in search of employment. People with little irrigation souces and livestock stay in the village, futher during drought season most of the villagers choose to migrate. Chottaudepur taluka is also known for its migration. Several studies were taken up from different institution for analysising the reason for migration. Regularly they migrate to same places and work as agriculture labour and wage labour. Childern are most affected as parents migrate, children are taken along them and their education is effected. Table no. 23: Migration details Sl no

Village Total population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for migration Income during migration / month

Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3‐6 months

More than 6 months

1 Mandalva 2416 846 507 339 310 315 221

Low Income, Due to low Crop Production and Lack of Employment

4500/‐2 Ranikhada 526 210 126 84 94 70 46 3500/‐

3 Limbani 362 109 65 44 46 35 28 3200/‐

4 Bandibhint 906 317 190 127 210 67 40 4700/‐

5 Dholisimel 956 315 190 115 140 102 73 2800/‐

6 Dungarbhint

1326 464 278 186 186 189 89 5200/‐


7 Dobachapura

332 100 60 40 45 45 10 3800/‐

8 Kevdi 1136 454 272 181 195 150 109 2500/‐

9 Mithibor 1613 564 338 226 208 186 170 3000/‐

10 Kakadkund

343 102 60 42 45 35 10 4800/‐

11 Marchipani

120 36 26 10 15 14 7 4500/‐

12 Rinchhvel 332 100 60 40 40 30 30 3200/‐

13 Gadola 423 169 100 69 74 64 31 3800/‐

14 Kothara 568 227 127 100 97 76 54 5000/‐

15 Dhorkuva 438 153 103 50 85 46 22 4100/‐

Table no. 24: Poverty Sr.no Village Total Household BPL

0‐16 17‐20 Total1 Mandalva 308 117 228 3452 Ranikhada 107 33 49 823 Limbani 64 103 2 1054 Bandibhint 112 109 59 1685 Dholisimel 178 133 32 1656 Dungarbhint 220 238 68 3067 Dobachapura 95 63 34 978 Kevdi 209 222 26 2489 Mithibor 240 325 2 32710 Kakadkund 60 77 3 8011 Marchipani 23 37 1 38


12 Rinchhvel 51 71 1 7213 Gadola 69 78 24 10214 Kothara 137 79 29 10815 Dhorkuva 57 77 1 78 1930 1762 559 2321

Infrastructure facilities: The village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 79 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Almost all of the villages in this cluster have primary schools. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to chottaudepur a taluka place and a mini town (Zoz) which is about 25‐55 and 10‐25 kilometres respectively from the almost all the villages this particular cluster. However, most of the youngster travel this distance on daily basis to obtain a better education facilities. Most of these do not have any primary health care centre for which villagers have to go to chottaudepur taluka place which is 25 and 55 Kms. Some of the villages come under a Group Panchayat with Panchayat as mentioned in Table no 1 of basic project information. Table no. 25: Village infrastructure Sl no

Village Pucca road to the village (Y/N)

Schools Colleges (Number)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from nearest market yard

Milk collection centre

(Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution LP UP HS

1 Mandalva yes 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 1 02 Ranikhada yes 1 0 0 0 4 0 20 0 0 1 03 Limbani yes 1 0 0 0 7 0 20 0 0 1 0 4 Bandibhint yes 1 0 0 0 4 0 21 0 0 1 05 Dholisimel yes 1 1 0 0 3 0 22 0 1 1 16 Dungarbhint yes 1 0 0 0 5 0 25 0 0 1 07 Dobachapura no 1 0 0 0 4 0 24 0 0 1 18 Kevdi yes 1 0 0 0 6 0 25 0 0 1 0 9 Mithibor yes Yes Yes Yes 0 0 0 38 0 0 2 210 Kakadkund Yes Yes Yes No 0 3 0 33 0 0 1 011 Marchipani No No No No 0 5 0 35 0 0 1 012 Rinchhvel No Yes No No 0 2 0 34 0 0 1 0


13 Gadola Yes Yes No No 0 2 0 41 0 0 1 1 14 Kothara Yes Yes No No 0 3 0 45 0 0 1 1 15 Dhorkuva yes Yes no no 0 2 0 43 0 0 1 0Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets Sl no Village HHs with

electricity HHs with safety latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with TV set

HHs with cooking gas

HHs with Drinking water

HHs with

freedge Land line

Mobile 2‐wheeler

4‐wheeler

1 Mandalva 166 29 3 68 20 1 5 3 6 22 Ranikhada 70 26 4 76 16 3 5 2 0 03 Limbani 40 10 No 15 2 No 1 No 1 14 Bandibhint 115 16 No 60 10 1 No No 0 35 Dholisimel 112 15 No 42 21 5 6 No 5 36 Dungarbhint 160 20 No 38 14 1 2 No 1 27 Dobachapura 33 12 No 15 4 1 1 No 0 08 Kevdi 123 32 No 35 5 3 1 No 2 19 Mithibor 144 4 4 48 15 6 3 2 0 210 Kakadkund 52 No 0 23 2 1 1 0 0 011 Marchipani 3 No 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 012 Rinchhvel 4 No 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 013 Gadola 11 No 1 25 5 2 1 0 0 014 Kothara 41 No 1 8 4 1 4 0 0 115 Dhorkuva 45 No 1 15 3 0 1 0 0 0 Total 1119 164 15 480 124 25 31 7 15 15

Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood from agriculture and animal husbandry and during lean seasons they migrate as daily wage labourers in Surat and surastra and as agriculture labour in other parts of the state. As this area is abundant with local palm trees, in off‐season women tend to sell the extract from these trees locally known as nira a semi alcoholic natural drink consumed by the localities to sustain from the heat waves of summer. This is also one of the subsidiary income sources for the villager especially in summer season. Income is irregular and absolutely no scope for saving for future use. This leads to lending from local sources. Things get wrost when barrowed amount is not paid on time.


Table no. 27: Income Sl no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total1 Mandalva 1201 119 1272 2217 48102 Ranikhada 1452 13 1017 197 26783 Limbani 561 5 898 997 24614 Bandibhint 818 26 375 151 13705 Dholisimel 1764 437 1893 813 49076 Dungarbhint 2891 8 190 163 32517 Dobachapura 1830 0 202 973 30058 Kevdi 1943 124 312 824 32049 Mithibor 1728 85 176 949 293810 Kakadkund 1895 420 1380 58 375411 Marchipani 1305 108 1260 2233 490712 Rinchhvel 1865 0 0 2808 467313 Gadola 1251 0 1557 45 285314 Kothara 446 34 1771 540 279115 Dhorkuva 628 381 1036 508 2554

Dependence on Common Property Resource The majority of the people of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand‐to‐mouth existence. Based upon the rainfall data of past few years the rainfall of this area is increasingly decreasing due to which agriculture is become a major constraint. Availability of little moisture is also insufficient for the development of pasture lands this trend seems to continue year by year making the natural resources in this depleting at a faster rate. Drinking water is also scarce in this region and water table in most of the wells going deeper day by day. One of the prominent features of all these villages in this cluster is dependence on common property resources. Trees of mahuda, medicinal plants, wild herbs and spices are abundant in this area and yearly people tend to year Rs.3000‐3500 per family in summer season. Two main products are mahuda flowers and mahuda (Dodi) seeds. First is Mahuda flowers when fermented releases great amounts of alcohol hence, flowers are sold in the near markets which are exported to different states. Secondly seed cotyledons of mahuda have a good amount of fatty acids which turns into oil after it is allowed from oil extraction process.This extracted oil is used for household purposes which is a good source of nutrition.


Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr. no Village Mahuda Ful Doli Timru Pan

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income1 Mandalva 50.4 616500 45.3 554850 0 02 Ranikhada 9.1 28500 18.4 57750 72.5 2268913 Limbani 52.6 194500 47.4 175050 0 04 Bandibhint 52.6 71000 47.4 63900 0 05 Dholisimel 46.8 490500 42.1 441450 9.3 973506 Dungarbhint 41.5 350500 37.3 315450 21.2 1787507 Dobachapura 11.9 30000 10.8 27000 77.3 1941508 Kevdi 50.0 1291000 45.0 1161900 2.1 534609 Mithibor 47.1 560000 42.4 504000 10.5 12490510 Kakadkund 52.6 120000 47.4 108000 0 011 Marchipani 52.6 82500 47.4 74250 0 012 Rinchhvel 52.6 140500 47.4 126450 0 013 Gadola 52.6 155000 47.4 139500 0 014 Kothara 41.4 150000 37.3 135000 21.3 7711015 Dhorkuva 42.3 133500 38.1 120150 19.6 61710

This shows the livelihood pattern of these particular villagers about 40% are solely engaged in agriculture activities, 37% agriculture plus animal husbandry, 16% causal cum agri labour, 3 % in animal husbandry exclusively, 1% in services,1% in handy crafts works and 1% in others. As shown in this figure it can be understood that primary occupation of this cluster is agriculture and followed by casual labour, which is why most of the people migrate to distant parts of Gujarat in search of labour works during off season. Animal husbandry comes next to casual labour, which is not much improved due to lack of fodder and improved breeds hence, based upon the available resources from locally and from common property resources the livelihood activities were planned keeping


in view the pro and cons this clusters. Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sl no Village Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture + AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Mandalva 1201 119 1082 672 38 ‐ 222 Ranikhada 1452 13 1439 517 8 ‐ 193 Limbani 561 5 556 298 4 ‐ 994 Bandibhint 818 26 792 375 8 ‐ 155 Dholisimel 1764 437 1327 793 16 ‐ 816 Dungarbhint 2891 8 2883 467 9 ‐ 167 Dobachapura 1430 45 1385 202 5 ‐ 638 Kevdi 1943 124 1819 312 5 ‐ 249 Mithibor 1728 85 1643 376 31 ‐ 4910 Kakadkund 1895 420 1475 480 2 ‐ 5811 Marchipani 1305 108 1197 260 0 ‐ 3312 Rinchhvel 1865 45 1820 0 2 ‐ 0813 Gadola 1251 95 1156 1557 2 ‐ 4514 Kothara 446 344 412 1771 3 ‐ 4015 Dhorkuva 20550 1874 18986 8080 133 572Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: “The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.” In order to asses the status of agricultural crops of the project area it is very crucial to have data of that particular geography and its agriculture profile to make a comparative analysis. Hence different sources of data like Baseline survey (for Chottaudepur villages), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (Vadodara) on production and productivity are obtained. Based upon the production and productivity data the gap can be understood in comparision with project villages, taluka place, district, state, country and world. The projections on the graphs is relative comparision of productivity of different places this is in order to understand the gaps in the productivity and to find the plausible solution for increasing the potential to an extend possible.


Crop Details of Project area: Crop 1: Maize Tribal belt of chottaudepur taluka has a good potential for agriculture, the productivity of maize is one among high in chottaudepur taluka in comparsion to entire state and its leading in term of productivity. Maize is one of the major cereals crops grown in this project area and taluka place of chottaudepur. Mazie staple food crop in this region and15 villages of project area are designated as tribal villages and their majority of people depend upon mazie as food crop. Maize crop is also encouraged by many private agribusiness companies like Monsanto, Pineor and dhanuka. NGO’s like shrrof Foudation is also involved in project named “SUNSHINE” which involves distribution of seeds. During migration people tend to carry foods grains from their own field. Fig.1 Comparative data of project, Block, District, State and country of Maize and Redgram

The world productivity of Maize is 4182 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 6290 lakh hectares with a production of 10303 lakh tonnes and productivity of 2024 kg/ha. Gujarat is one of the lowest producing states in India with a 1481 kg/ha productivity, Vadodara district productivity being 1100. Chottaudepur block has very good productivity of 3000 kg/ha. The productivity of the project area is 1318.8 kg/ha which is less in comparsion to the district. Hence, with proper solution the gaps can be minimized through modern agriculture practises.


Crop 2: Redgram: Pigeonpea is grown on an area of about 3.25 million hectares with the production of 2.23 million tonnes in the country.The world productivity of red is 780 kg/ha, India productivity 685 kg/ha. It is second most important crop after chickpea among different pulse crops in the country. Intresting Gujarat state have maximum productivity of with 989 kg/ha and one of the noteworthy facts is chottaudepur has 1500 kg/ha twice the productivity of redgram and even the project area 507.6 kg/ha productivity is higher than the world. However, gap between project area and chottaudepur, can be minimized by modern agricultural practices.

Figure 2 . Comparative data of project, Block, District, State and country of Paddy and Cotton Crop 3: Paddy

In India, rice accounts for 22 per cent of the total cropped area under cereals.The most significant achievement of the post independent era is the transformation from chronic deficit to self‐sufficiency. The per capita net availability of rice (provisional) has increased from about 150 g in 1950 to 225 g in 1990, in spite of growing population.The rice area has shrunk from 2.52 million hectares in 1960 to about 2.20 million hectares in 1998‐99, but the production has increased from 3.5 million tonnes to about 8.2 million tonnes in 1998‐99 and ranked first in national productivity with 2278 kg/ha. World is kg/ha 3033, Gujarat 1699 kg/ha, district Vadodara 1125 kg/ha, chottaudepur 1000 kg/ha and project area is 868 kg/ha respectively. We can see the gap in the productivity of project area. This is mainly due to the lack of irrigation facilities, traditional


varities pest and disease incidence. The differenc can be elimated by different innovative techniques of crop demonstration to create awareness of fertilizer use, pesticides and different tillage practices for increasing productivity of paddy. Crop 4: Cotton Cotton often referred as "White gold" has been in cultivation in India for more than five thousand years. He cotton required for the purpose of manufacturing yarn is cultivated in about 9 million hectares of land in India and thus India ranks first in the world. In India, cotton is grown over an area of about 9 million hectares and provides livelihood for over 4 million farming families. The productivity of cotton is very low in India but still it stands first in production of cotton after china and USA. The productivity of cotton is comparatively good in the project area and chottaudepur block has highest productivity with 1500 kg/ha . . The productivity of cotton is 1103 kg/ha. In this block .Hence this difference has be improved with innovative agricultural practices to an extend. Productivity details of project area of cotton is 685 kg/ha, 950 kg/ha, 534 kg/ha, 774 kg/ha, 488 kg/ha, 690 kg/ha in comparision to taluka, district, state, country and world respectivel It is observed that in recent years their is raise in net cropping area under cotton crop, this is mainly due to the innovate seed technology such as BT cotton (Bacillus turengenises) which has considerable decresed the use of pesticide by 50%. Cotton being a cash crops fetchs more returns and more and more farmers are inclined towards cotton crops. Agriculture department also involved in increasing the yields Black Gram Productivity:

Blackgram is famously known as Udad Dal in India and India is one the major producer of this pulse crop. This is a rich source of protein and greatly used in making of many bakery products. The average productivity of the India is around 450 kg/ha. The project area is good in terms of productivity due to favourable climatic conditions and suitable soils. However the productivity can be still increased by introducing the better management practices and by adopting “Integrated Nutrient Management “and by introducing high yielding varities into the project area.


The productivity of Project area is low due to following reasons: i) Full dependence on monsoon: Project villages village is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate. ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time. iii) Traditional farming methods: This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity. iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery: Even today a large number of farmers in chottaudepur project use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices. v) Lack of finances for farmers: In chottaudepur most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other inputs. vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land productivity. In project, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. But in project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In chottaudepur mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land. vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 5‐10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.


CHAPTER – 4 WATERSHED ACTIVITIES


Watershed Activities Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain‐fed regions of semi‐arid tropics.

These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach , This envisages a broader vision of Geo‐hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro‐watershed. The Chottaudepur

IWMP‐5 Project consists of eleven micro‐ watersheds namely 5E1B8f1a, 5E1B8f2a, 5E1B8f1k, 5E1B8f1g, 5E1B8c3a, 5E1B8f1h, 5E1B8f1d, 5E1B8f1j, 5E1B8f2a, 5E1B8f1e, 5E1B8f1k as their respective codes. Further chottaudepur IWMP‐5 watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely Lunaja, Muthai, Ambakuth, Ghata, Chetapur, Kundal Projects which is taken as IWMP‐3 as third priority area this gives an element of continuation of the programme and suits with features of cluster approach as holistic development. ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household census survey, Biophysical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits. Bio‐physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and post‐ withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA


techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers. Focus Group Discussion with women: Community mobilization expert has carried out the FGD with women in order to understand various issues related to their day to day life. PRA tools such as time line, daily activity chart, details of SHG’s, details of common property resources, seasonal health problems, girl child education, problems of agriculture and seasonal charts were discussed. In this discussion women were encouraged to speak about their problem. The women who drew these charts described the differences between the rainy and dry season patterns. In the dry season, it took longer to get water from the well and collecting firewood to stockpile for the rainy season. When the rains come, things are much busier and the women's days are much longer because of all the work to be done in the fields. Focus Group Discussion with Women


iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System(GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo‐morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. b) Planning A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures. Land parcel number of those particular villages is provided in order to understand the drainage, slope and stream in that area. Selection of site can be marked on the maps with help of survey number of that village map. Hydrological modelling Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was

used

(A) Planning Cluster approach YesWhether technical back‐stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey YesHydro‐geological survey YesContour mapping YesParticipatory Net Planning (PNP) YesRemote sensing data‐especially soil/ crop/ run‐off coverRidge to Valley treatment Online IT connectivity between


(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes (2) DRDA and SLNA Yes (3) SLNA and DoLR Yes Availability of GIS layers 1. Cadastral map Yes2. Village boundaries Yes3. Drainage Yes4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes5. Land use Yes6. Ground water status Yes7. Watershed boundaries Yes8. Activity YesCrop simulation models# NoIntegrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis No

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# NoWeather Station (B) Inputs No1. Bio‐pesticides No2. Organic manures Yes3. Vermicompost Yes4. Bio‐fertilizer No5. Water saving devices Yes6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes7. Bio‐fencing Yes8. Nutrient budgeting No9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers NoAny other (please specify)

#NDVI ‐ Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum


Institution building: The watershed development project has great potential and scope to empower socially disadvantage sections of the community. Considering the needs and priorities of these sections, special activities can be designed to reduce their drudgery. The can be involved in a skills up gradation programme. People's organizations hold the key in ensuring the right integration between sustainable development and social equity. Such organizations must have representations from representations from socially backward communities and women with separate special interest groups. Within group interactions across group interactions and representation in village level institutions provide a platform for the disadvantaged groups to become a part of mainstream development. It is also important to ensure that these groups obtain equal opportunities to access the resources developed at the community level. Watershed Committee It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in all the villages of IWMP‐5chottaudepur 2P project area. The IWMP‐5 Chottaudepur is a cluster of 15 villages with 3 Gram panchayats. Hence 7 main Watershed Committees and 3 sub‐watershed committees are formed at village keeping all parameter of watershed committee keeping the gender sensitive issues intact. Watershed committee member are briefed about the project objectives and a workshop is also conducted a in this regard at every village. The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period. Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society

Name Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless

UG SHG GP Any other

Educational qualification

Function/s assigned#

1 Mandalva 30/7/2010 Rathwa Ramsingbhai Darshanbhai

Presidant M ST M 6th PASS

2 30/7/2010 Rathwa Bachubhai Abhabhai

vice‐Precident M ST L Illiterate

3 30/7/2010 Rathod Pramosinh s.

Member M ST

4 30/7/2010 Rathwa Sanjaybhai Manshukhbhai

Member M ST M 12th PASS

5 30/7/2010 Nayaka Burabhai Khaparbhai

Member M ST S 5th PASS

6 30/7/2010 Rathwa Avsingbhai Chuniyabhai

Member M ST L 10th PASS


7 30/7/2010 Rathwa Savitaben Rajubhai

Member F ST M S Illiterate

8 30/7/2010 Rathwa Soramabhai Maniyabhai

Member M ST L U Illiterate

9 30/7/2010 Rathwa Ditaliben Buchabhai

Member F ST L S Illiterate

10 30/7/2010 Harijanbhai Ravindrabhai Mansingbhai

Member M SC 10th PASS

11 30/7/2010 Vinodbhai M.Nisarata

WDT M ST M.S.W

Sl. No.

Names of WCs


Name Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land‐less

UG SHG GP Any other

Educa‐tional qualifi‐cation


1 Dhorisimel 30/7/2010 Rathwa Mavsingbhai Bhangadabhai

Presidant M ST M 12 th pass

2 30/7/2010 Rathwa Kanubhai Chisalabhai

vice‐Precident M ST S 10 pass

3 30/7/2010 Rathod Pramodsinh S.

Member M ST

4 30/7/2010 Rathwa Shantaben Kanubhai

Member F ST S SY

5 30/7/2010 Rathwa Jetiben Sakabhai

Member F ST S Illiterate

6 30/7/2010 Rathwa Ganpatbhai Chandubhai

Member M ST S 9 TH PASS

7 30/7/2010 Rathwa Ratanbhai Kulsingbhai

Member M ST M Illiterate

8 30/7/2010 Nayaka Dineshbhai Gemabhai


9 30/7/2010 Rathwa Natvarbhai Hamirbhai



10 30/7/2010 Rathwa Sankarbhai Maganbhai

Member M ST M UGS 10 TH PASS

11 30/7/2010 Rathwa Ditiyabhai Jemabhai

Presidant M ST L 10 TH PASS

12 30/7/2010 Rathwa Sankuntalaben Ranjitbhai

vice‐Precident F ST S SHGS 10 TH PASS

13 30/7/2010 Rathwa Geetaben Rajubhai

Member F ST M SHGS 10 TH PASS

14 30/7/2010 Rathwa Pravinbhai Gemabhai

Member M ST S UG 12 TH PASS

15 30/7/2010 Rathwa Sumutraben Rameshbhai

Member F ST S SHG 10 TH PASS

16 30/7/2010 Harijan Bhotubhai Minkabhai

Member M SC LL Illiterate

17 30/7/2010 Nayaka Chimabhai Ditiyabhai

Member M ST LL Illiterate

18 30/7/2010 Vinodbhai M. Nisarata

WDT M ST W.D.T M.S.W


Sl. No.

Names of WCs


Name Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land‐less

UG SHG GP Any other

Educa‐tional qualifi‐cation


1 Mithibor 30/7/2010 Nayaka Dursingbhai Saburbhai

Presidant M ST S 8th Pass

2 30/7/2010 Nayaka Bhanabhai Kanjibhai

vice‐Precident M ST M 10th Pass

3 30/7/2010 Rathwa Keshubhai B.(R.F.O)

Member M ST

4 30/7/2010 shri Nayaka Himatbhai Jangabhai


5 30/7/2010 Nayaka Divabhai Hemabhai

Member M ST S 7th Pass

6 30/7/2010 Vinubhai Dalabhai Member M ST M 6th Pass7 30/7/2010 Vishalbhai

Vechalabhai Member M ST M

8 30/7/2010 Chokhaliben Narsingbhai

Member F ST S Illiterate

9 30/7/2010 Rangaliben Temalabhai

Member F ST L Illiterate

10 30/7/2010 Shri Nadubhai Segalabhai

Member M ST S USG Illiterate

11 30/7/2010 Rathwa Somabhai Ramabhai

Member M ST S USG 10th Pass

12 30/7/2010 Nayaka Galiben Kanubhai

Member F ST L SHG Illiterate

13 30/7/2010 Rathwa Manguben Bhagabhai

Member F ST S SHG 9th Pass

14 30/7/2010 Nayaka Narsingbhai Kagadabhai

Member M ST M USG 4TH

15 30/7/2010 Nayaka Kanubhai Dilabhai


16 30/7/2010 VAnkarHimatbhai Kabhaibhai

Member M SC LL 12th Pass


17 30/7/2010 Nayaka Maliyabhai Devabhai

Member M ST LL Illiterate

18 30/7/2010 Dipak Prajapati WDT M GN WDT

District: Vadodara Taluka: Chhotaudaipur

Sr. No. Name Of Institute Registration

Date AD 1860, Registration Summittee,

Section 21

AD 1950, Mumbai Public Trust, Under Section 29 (Registration

No. Of Public Trust)

1 Mandalva Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee 30/7/2010 Gujarat/2886/Vadodara F/2569/Vadodara

2 Dhorisimel Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee 30/7/2010 Gujarat/2888/Vadodara F/2571/Vadodara

3 Mithibor Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee 30/7/2010 Gujarat/2889/Vadodara F/2572/Vadodara

(ii ) Self Help Group Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. Men can also be member in SHG if it serves the common objective of the group. Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following observations: a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution. b) Schemes like Sakhi mandal and SGSY are already operation at the village level but not to full extend. c) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders d) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people e) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

After a discussion through PRA and other foucus groupd discussion with villagers and local authorities of taluka panchayat and other developmental department, it was known that lack of awareness to villagers regarding such facilities and also due to the lengthy procedure of financial institutions has also become a major constraint.


Table no. 32: SHG details Village Name Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category With

only Men With only Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

RANIKHEDA 0 3 0 3 (i) Landless 1 1 1 1 1 1(ii) SF 12 12 12 12 8 8(iii) MF 17 17 17 17 6 6(iv) LF 4 4 4 4 2 2

Total 0 3 0 3 34 34 34 34 17 17 DHORKUVA 2 2 (i) Landless

(ii) SF 8 8 8 8 6 6(iii) MF 12 12 12 12 10 10(iv) LF 2 2 2 2 2 2

Total 2 2 22 22 22 22 18 18 LIMBANI 1 1 (i) Landless

(ii) SF 6 6 6 6 6 6(iii) MF 5 5 5 5 3 3(iv) LF

Total 1 1 11 11 11 11 9 9 DUNGARBHIT 2 2 (i) Landless 1 1 1 1 1 1

(ii) SF 4 4 4 4 4 4(iii) MF 17 17 17 17 13 13(iv) LF

Total 2 2 22 22 22 22 18 18 KOTHARA 2 2 (i) Landless 2 2 2 2 2 2

(ii) SF 6 6 6 6 6 6(iii) MF 14 14 14 14 11 11(iv) LF

Total 2 2 22 22 22 22 19 19


MANDALVA 2 2 (i) Landless 2 2 2 2 2 2(ii) SF 7 7 7 7 1 1(iii) MF 13 13 13 13 11 11(iv) LF

Total 2 2 22 22 22 22 14 14 MITHIBOR 2 2 (i) Landless 3 3 3 3 3 3

(ii) SF 10 10 10 10 7 7(iii) MF 10 10 10 10 6 6(iv) LF

Total 2 2 23 23 23 23 16 16 DHOLISAMEL 2 2 (i) Landless

(ii) SF(iii) MF 22 22 22 22 15 15(iv) LF

Total 2 2 22 22 22 22 15 15 RICHHAVEL 1 2 3 (i) Landless 1 1 1 1 1 1

(ii) SF 3 9 12 3 9 12 2 6 8(iii) MF 8 9 17 8 9 17 4 7 11(iv) LF 4 4 4 4 4 4

Total 1 2 3 12 22 34 12 22 34 7 17 24 KAKADKUND 2 2 (i) Landless

(ii) SF 7 7 7 7 5 5(iii) MF 15 15 15 15 12 12(iv) LF 1 1 1 1 ‐ ‐

Total 2 2 23 23 23 23 17 17 BANDIBHIT 2 2 (i) Landless

(ii) SF 8 8 8 8 8 8(iii) MF 14 14 14 14 11 11(iv) LF

Total 2 2 22 22 22 22 19 19


DOBACHAPRA 2 2 (i) Landless(ii) SF 4 4 4 4 2 2(iii) MF 19 19 19 19 13 13(iv) LF

Total 2 2 23 23 23 23 15 15 KEVDI 2 2 (i) Landless

(ii) SF 6 6 6 6 4 4(iii) MF 14 14 14 14 9 9(iv) LF 3 3 3 3 2 2

Total 2 2 23 23 23 23 15 15 GADOLA 2 2 (i) Landless 2 2 2 2 2 2

(ii) SF 6 6 6 6 6 6(iii) MF 14 14 14 14 11 11(iv) LF

Total 2 2 22 22 22 22 19 19

User Group: User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. Table no. 33: UG detail Village name Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Mandalva 1 0 2 3 (i)Landless (ii) SF 16 2 18 16 2 18 8 1 9(iii) MF 6 6 6 6 2 2(iv) LF

Total 1 0 2 3 22 2 24 22 2 24 10 1 11Ranikhada 0 0 1 1 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 4 2 6 4 2 6 2 1 3


(iii) MF 2 2 2 2 1 1(iv) LF

Total 0 0 1 1 6 2 8 6 2 8 3 1 4Limbani 1 0 1 2 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 7 2 9 7 2 9 6 1 7(iii) MF 6 6 6 6 3 3(iv) LF

Total 1 0 1 2 13 2 15 13 2 15 9 1 10Bandibhint 1 0 2 1 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 17 1 18 17 1 18 7 1 8(iii) MF 4 1 5 4 1 5 2 1 3(iv) LF

Total 1 0 2 1 21 2 23 21 2 23 9 2 11Dholisimel 2 2 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 5 2 7 5 2 7 2 1 3(iii) MF 2 2 2 2 1 1(iv) LF

Total 0 0 2 2 7 2 9 7 2 9 3 1 4Dungarbhint 2 2 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 20 1 21 20 1 21 8 1 9(iii) MF 11 1 12 11 1 12 4 1 5(iv) LF 10 10 10 10 3 3

Total 0 2 0 2 41 2 43 41 2 43 15 2 17Dobachapura 3 3 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 13 2 15 13 2 15 6 2 8(iii) MF 6 6 6 6 2 2(iv) LF 3 3 3 3 1 1

Total 0 3 0 3 22 2 24 22 2 24 9 2 11Kevdi 2 0 4 6 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 25 1 26 25 1 26 13 1 14


(iii) MF 11 1 12 11 1 12 8 8(iv) LF 7 7 7 7 3 3

Total 2 0 4 6 43 2 45 43 2 45 24 1 25Mithibor 0 2 0 2 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 6 5 11 6 5 11 2 2 4(iii) MF 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1(iv) LF

Total 0 2 0 2 8 6 14 8 6 14 3 2 5Kakadkund (i)Landless

(ii) SF(iii) MF Forest area (iv) LF

Total 0 Marchipani 0 (i)Landless


Total 0 Rinchhvel 1 1 2 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 4 3 7 4 3 7 2 1 3(iii) MF 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1(iv) LF

Total 1 1 2 6 4 10 6 4 10 3 1 4Gadola (i)Landless


Total 0


Kothara 1 (i)Landless (ii) SF 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5(iii) MF 2 2 2 2 2 2(iv) LF

Total 1 5 2 7 5 2 7 5 2 7Dhorkuva 2 0 0 2 (i)Landless

(ii) SF 7 7 7 7 5 5(iii) MF 3 3 3 3 2 2(iv) LF

Total 2 0 0 2 10 10 10 10 7 74.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community to make them to feel the presence at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that a particular amount was allotted for EPA activity for each of their villages, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities. Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sl No

Names of Villages Amount

earmarked (in Lakhs)

Entry Point Activities planned No Estimated cost (in Lakhs)

1 Mandalva 1.268 Water trough for animals( Hawada) 1 0.484Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 3 0.300New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.484

Total 1.268

2 Ranikheda 1.269 Water trough for animals( Hawada) 1 0.505Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 3 0.260New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.504

Total 1.269


3 Limbani 0.865 New hand pump with recharge structure 2 0.865 Total 0.865

4 Bandibhit 1.519

Water trough for animals( Hawada) 1 0.500Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 2 0.200New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.519Repair of community well with recharge recharge structure 1 0.200Water filter in anganwadi /school 1 0.100

Total 1.519

5 Dholisimel 0.376 New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.376 Total 0.376

6 Dungarbhint 3.116

Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 5 0.508Sintex tank for drinking water(25000 Ltr.) 1 1.000Water trough for animals( Hawada) 2 1.000New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.508 Water filter in anganwadi /school 1 0.100

Total 3.116

7 Dobachapura 0.931 Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 4 0.415New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.516

Total 0.931

8 Kevdi 2.802 Water trough for animals( Hawada) 2 1.167New hand pump with recharge structure 2 1.167Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 3 0.468

Total 2.802

9 Mithibor 2.143 Water trough for animals( Hawada) 2 0.981New hand pump with recharge structure 2 0.981Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 2 0.181

Total 2.143

10 Kakadkund 0.467 New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.467 Total 0.467


11 Marchipani 1.125 Water trough for animals( Hawada) 1 0.505 New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.505Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 1 0.115

Total 1.125

12 Rinchhvel 0.892 New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.446Water trough for animals( Hawada) 1 0.446

Total 0.892

13 Gadola 1.157 New hand pump with recharge structure 2 1.038Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 1 0.119

Total 1.157

14 Kothara 0.369 New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.369 Total 0.369

15 Dhorkuva 0.840

New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.520Community well recharge 1 0.210Hand pump repairing with recharge structure 1 0.110

Total 0.840 Grand Total 19.139 19.139

Watershed Development Works: Watershed work phase is the core component of the project. Creating permanent structures as required the slope, geology and topography starting from ridge to valley to conserve rain water at point of its incidence with ground. Trapping the water resources at right place at right time can great increase the effectiveness of this project. The objective being reclamation of natural resources and creating sustainability to assets created under this project. A multi‐tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. Ridge Area Treatment Plans: It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in Chottaudepur IWMP‐5watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Chottaudepur IWMP‐5watersheds following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest and MDT and WDT engineer.

a. Graded Bunding b. Gully Plung


a. Graded Bunding: “Graded bunds or graded terraces or channel terraces are the bunds or terraces laid along a pre‐determined longitudinal grade very near the contour but not exactly along contour”. Suitability: The graded bunds, commonly used are comparable to the narrow base terraces. They are used for the safe, disposal of excess runoff high rainfall areas and rigious where the [Clay] soil is relatively impervious. Farming operations are not done on bunds or bund channels. Function:

1. These terraces act primarily as drainage channel to regulate and conduct runoff at non erosive velocity. 2. To make the runoff water to trickle rather than to rush out. b. Gully Plunge:

The portion where the stream begins, the structure is construted with arraging loose boulder perpendicular to the flow of water is called gully plunge. Benefits: A. Prevents soil erosion of land and reduces the flow of water and further prevents the formation of new strems. B. Very useful in moisture conservation and reduces the scroucing and delsilation of the streams. Land Development The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labour intensive, will involve more of manual labour; so, funds from National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken.Following structures are been proposed in these areas Farm Bunds: Bunding, also called a bund wall, is the area within a structure designed to prevent inundation or breaches of various types. Feild bunding is one of the important structures which check the runoff of water from the Farm level. Often Farm are left without proper bunding, water freely flows out of the Farm and scope for percolation is almost negligible. Hence Farm bunding plays a important role in conservation of moisture at Farm level. As the multi‐tier approach ridge to valley, drainage line treatment and land development Farm bund fall in the third agenda. Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Name Of the Village

Institution & Capacity Building 5% DPR 1%

Institution 0.5%

Capacity 3.0%

IEC 1.5% Base Line Survey 0.50%

HydroGeological Survey 0.25%

Technical Support Agencies

Printing Of DPR & Mapping Of Project Area

0.25%

Estimated Cost (Rs. In Lakh)

Mandlva 15858 95148 47574 15858 7929 ‐ 7929 190296


Bandibhit 18996 113976 56988 18996 9498 ‐ 9498 227952Dhorisimel 4704 28224 14112 4704 2352 ‐ 2352 56448 Limbani 10818 64908 32454 10818 5409 ‐ 5409 129816 Kevdi 35028 210168 105084 35028 17514 ‐ 17514 420336 Dobachapra 11640 69840 34920 11640 5820 ‐ 5820 139680 Ranikheda 15870 95220 47610 15870 7935 ‐ 7935 190440 Dungarbhit 38952 233712 116856 38952 19476 ‐ 19476 467424 Mithibor 26790 160740 80370 26790 13395 ‐ 13395 321480 Kakadkund 5838 35028 17514 5838 2919 ‐ 2919 70056 Dhorkuva 10506 63036 31518 10506 5253 ‐ 5253 126072 Rinchvel 11160 66960 33480 11160 5580 ‐ 5580 133920 Gadola 14466 86796 43398 14466 7233 ‐ 7233 173592Kothara 4620 27720 13860 4620 2310 ‐ 2310 55440 Marchipani 14070 84420 42210 14070 7035 ‐ 7035 168840

239316 1435896 717948 239316 119658 119658 2871792 Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. NO.

Village name

Type of structures

Proposed target Remarks Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 Limbani

Checkdam 2 21.00 1000.00 8.00 21.00 1000.00 8.00 Irrigation departmen

t

Checkwall 3 6.00 2400.00 0.60 6.00 2400.00 0.60 MGNREGA panchayt dep.

well 4 14.00 7.00 14.00 0.00 7.00 MGNREGA Irrigat dep.

Terrece Talavdi 2 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.38 Forest dep.


Checkdam 2 30.00 9250.00 3.98 30.00 9250.00 3.98 Checkwall 7 21.00 7000.00 4.30 21.00 7000.00 4.30

Total 0 0 0 0 20 92.00 19650.0

0 24.26 92.00 19650.0

0 24.26

2 Bandibhit

Checkdam 4 6 900 1.5 6.00 900.00 1.50 Irrigation departmen

t Percolation

Tank 2 5.00 500.00 0.50 5.00 500.00 0.50 Forest dep.




Checkdam 3 45.00 10300.00 5.97 45.00 10300.00 5.97

Checkwall 17 51.00 17000.00 10.68 51.00 17000.00 10.68

Total 4 6 900 1.5 28 118.30 29400.0

0 32.93 124.30 30300.00 34.43

3 Dholisimel

Checkdam 1 2 250 0.4 2.00 250.00 0.40 irrigation departmen

t Percolation

Tank 3 1.50 300.00 0.30 1.50 300.00 0.30 Forest dep.



Terrece Talavdi 3 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 Forest dep. Checkdam 1 9.00 5600.00 1.99 9.00 5600.00 1.99 Checkwall 6 18.00 6000.00 2.48 18.00 6000.00 2.48 Total 1 2 250 0.4 17 35.50 13700.0 11.74 37.50 13950.0 12.14


4 Dungarbhit

Percolation Tank 0 3 5.00 500.00 0.70 5.00 500.00 0.70 Forest dep.




Checkdam 6 48.00 19500.00 11.93 48.00 19500.00 11.93

Checkwall 28 51.80 28000.00 21.62 51.80 28000.00 21.62

Total 0 0 0 0 52 132.80 54100.00

50.62 132.80 54100.00 50.62

5 Dobachapra

Checkdam 0 2 36.00 1200.00 9.50 36.00 1200.00 9.50 Irrigation departmen

t Percolation

Tank 3 5.00 300.00 0.30 5.00 300.00 0.30 Forest dep.



Terrece Talavdi 2 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.38 Forest dep. Checkdam 3 24.00 8600.00 5.93 24.00 8600.00 5.93 Checkwall 5 16.00 5300.00 3.13 16.00 5300.00 3.13

Total 0 0 0 0 25 126.00 18100.0

0 33.44 126.00 18100.0

0 33.44

6 Kevdi

Checkdam 0 5 37.00 1200.00 15.00 37.00 1200.00 15.00 irrigation departmen

t





Checkdam 6 48.00 19500.00 13.93 48.00 19500.00 13.93

Checkwall 20 50.00 15600.00 13.40 50.00 15600.00 13.40

Total 0 0 0 0 42 168.00 39150.0

0 52.69 168.00 39150.00 52.69

7 Kakad Kund

Checkdam 0 1 21.00 700.00 4.00 21.00 700.00 4.00 Irrigation departmen

t Percolation

Tank 6 13.00 600.00 0.60 13.00 600.00 0.60 Forest dep.


well 7 41.00 13.00 41.00 0.00 13.00 MGNREGA irrigat dep.


Total 0 0 0 0 26 107.00 16350.0

0 24.65 107.00 16350.0

0 24.65

8 Marchipani

Checkdam 1 2 250 0.4 2.00 250.00 0.40 Irrigation departmen

t Percolation

Tank 3 1.50 300.00 0.30 1.50 300.00 0.30 Forest dep.





Checkdam 3 36.00 12300.00 5.97 36.00 12300.00 5.97

Checkwall 16 48.00 11200.00 6.00 48.00 11200.00 6.00

Total 1 2 250 0.4 7 8.50 2100.00 6.70 10.50 2350.00 7.10

9 Gadola



well 5 20.00 15.00 20.00 0.00 15.00 MGNREGA irrigat dep.


Checkdam 2 24.00 11200.00 3.98 24.00 11200.00 3.98

Checkwall 8 32.00 6800.00 6.38 32.00 6800.00 6.38

Total 0 0 0 0 23 83.30 20100.0

0 27.02 83.30 20100.0

0 27.02

10 Kothara



well 5 10.00 250.00 9.00 10.00 250.00 9.00 MGNREGA irrigat dep.


Total 0 0 0 0 28 55.50 18950.00

17.95 55.50 18950.00 17.95

11 Mandalva Checkdam 0 1 17.00 1200.00 4.50 17.00 1200.00 4.50

irrigation departmen

t

Well 4 27.00 9.00 27.00 0.00 9.00 MGNREGA irrigat dep.


Checkdam 3 18.00 14800.00 5.02 18.00 14800.00 5.02

Checkwall 8 24.00 6400.00 8.05 24.00 6400.00 8.05

Total 0 0 0 0 16 86.00 22400.0

0 26.57 86.00 22400.0

0 26.57

12 Ranikheda

tank 0 2 5.00 500.00 0.50 5.00 500.00 0.50 Forest dep.

(a) Check wall 2 2.30 1800.00 0.40 2.30 1800.00 0.40 MGNREGA panchayt dep.

(b) well 5 20.00 15.00 20.00 0.00 15.00 MGNREGA irrigat dep.

Checkdam 3 21.00 12900.00 5.97 21.00 12900.00 5.97

Checkwall 8 20.00 7100.00 6.51 20.00 7100.00 6.51

Total 0 0 0 0 20 68.30 22300.0

0 28.38 68.30 22300.0

0 28.38

13 Mithibor

Checkdam 1 2 250 0.4 2.00 250.00 0.40 irrigation departmen

t Percolation

Tank 3 1.50 300.00 0.30 1.50 300.00 0.30 Forest dep.

Checkwall 2 2.00 1600.00 0.40 2.00 1600.00 0.40 NRGA

panchayt dep.

well 2 5.00 6.00 5.00 0.00 6.00 NRGA irrigat dep.

Checkdam 5 15.00 22200.00 9.95 15.00 22200.00 9.95

Checkwall 13 26.00 12100.00 9.20 26.00 12100.00 9.20

Total 1 2 250 0.4 25 49.50 36200.0

0 25.85 51.50 36450.00 26.25

14 Rinchhvel Checkdam 1 13.00 1000.00 4.00 13.00 1000.00 4.00 irrigation departmen

t


Checkwall 3 6.00 2700.00 0.60 6.00 2700.00 0.60 NRGA

panchayt dep.

well 4 14.00 7.00 14.00 0.00 7.00 NRGA irrigat dep.

Checkdam 2 12.00 10200.00 3.98 12.00 10200.00 3.98

Checkwall 5 25.00 4200.00 3.72 25.00 4200.00 3.72

Total 0 0 0 0 15 70.00 18100.0

0 19.30 70.00 18100.0

0 19.30

15 Dhorkuva

(iv)check dam 4 6 900 1.5 6.00 900.00 1.50 irrigation departmen

t tank 2 5.00 500.00 0.50 5.00 500.00 0.50 Forest dep.

(a) Check wall 2 2.30 1700.00 0.40 2.30 1700.00 0.40 NRGA

panchayt dep.

(b) well 5 20.00 15.00 20.00 0.00 15.00 NRGA irrigat dep.

Checkdam 4 24.00 22500.00 7.96 24.00 22500.00 7.96

Checkwall 3 6.80 3100.00 1.72 6.80 3100.00 1.72

Total 4 6 900 1.5 16 58.10 27800.0

0 25.58 64.10 28700.0

0 27.08

Total 4.2

407.647

411.847

Net Convergence = 411.847 ‐ 193.415 = 218.432 Lakhs Table no 36.1 Technical Details of Earthen Bund:

Particulars Value Units Structure Length 680 mt.Structure Height 1 mt. Upstream Slope 02:01 ‐Downstream Slope 01:01 ‐Bund Top Width 1 mt. Structure Base Width 4 mt. Structure Cross Section 2.5 sqm


Table no. 36.2 Technical Details of Farm Pond Particulars Value Unit

Pond Length 10 mt. Pond Width 10 mt.Pond Depth 2.5 mt.Side Slope 02:01Table no . 36. 3 Technical Details of Feild/Farm Bund

Particulars Value Units Bund Length Per Ha. 400 mt.Proposed Area(area of farm) 1 Ha.Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 400 mt.Top Width 0.5 mt.Side Slope 01:01Height 0.5 mt.Base Width 1.5 mt.Cross‐Section of Farm bund 0.5 SqM.


Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas Sr No. Name of Village Major Activities of the SHGs

Name of Activity No of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG

1. Mandlva Fodder Plot 1 Ha. 2 7000Animal helth Camp 4 10000

2. Ranikheda Fodder Plot 1 Ha. 3 7000Animal health Camp 4 10000

3. Limbani Fodder Plot 1 Ha. 2 7000Animal health Camp 4 10000

4. Bandibhit Fodder Plot 1 Ha. 3 7000Animal health Camp 4 10000

5. Dholisimel Animal helth Camp 4 10000Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 2 7000

6. Dungarbhit Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 3 7000Animal helth Camp 6 10000

7. Dobachapra Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 5 7000Animal helth Camp 4 10000

8. Kevdi Animal helth Camp 6 10000Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 8 7000

9. Mithibor Animal helth Camp 6 10000Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 7 7000

10. Kakadkund Animal helth Camp 2 10000Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 3 7000

11. Marchipani Animal helth Camp 4 10000Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 2 7000

12. Rinchhvel Animal helth Camp 6 10000Fodder Plot 1 Ha. 4 7000

13. Gadola Animal helth Camp 4 10000Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 3 7000

14. Kothara Animal helth Camp 2 10000Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 1 7000

15. Dhorkuva Foddar Plote 1 Ha. 2 7000Animal helth Camp 6 10000


Table no. 39.1 Soil and water conservation activities of watershed works phase – Proposed Target

S. No. Name of villages

Gully pluge(R)

contour bund

Masonary check wall(D)

Masonary check dam(D)

Gabian Structure

Afforestation 75%

Live fencing 25% Total

Estimated cost (Rs. In lakhs) (in

Cmt) (in lakh)

(in Cmt)

(in lakh)

No.of units

(in lakh)

No.of units

(in lakh)

No.of units

(in lakh)

Ha Rs. In Lakh

Rmt Rs. In Lakh

1 Mandalva 2000 2.00 0 0.00 8 8.05 3 5.02 0 0.00 3.11 0.59 985.00 0.20 15.8582 Ranikheda 1160 1.16 0 0.00 8 6.51 3 5.97 1200 1.44 3.12 0.59 987.50 0.20 15.8703 Limbani 2000 2.00 0 0.00 7 4.30 2 3.98 0 0.00 2.12 0.40 672.50 0.13 10.8184 Bandibhit 650 0.65 1200 0.75 17 10.68 3 5.97 0 0.00 3.73 0.71 1182.50 0.24 18.9965 Dhorisimal 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 2.48 1 1.99 0 0.00 0.92 0.18 292.50 0.06 4.7046 Dungrabhit 2000 2.00 1200 1.20 28 21.52 6 11.93 300 0.35 7.71 1.46 2440.00 0.49 38.9527 Dobachopra 2000 2.00 0 0.00 5 3.13 3 5.93 0 0.00 2.29 0.44 725.00 0.15 11.6408 Kevadi 3800 3.80 2500 1.70 20 13.40 6 13.93 400 0.45 6.90 1.31 2185.00 0.44 35.0289 Mithibor 2700 2.70 0 0.00 13 9.20 5 9.95 3000 3.60 5.29 1.01 1675.00 0.34 26.79010 Kakadkund 280 0.28 0 0.00 4 1.30 2 3.98 0 0.00 1.14 0.22 360.00 0.07 5.84811 Mirchipani 1400 1.40 0 0.00 16 6.00 3 5.97 0 0.00 2.76 0.53 875.00 0.18 14.07012 Rinchwell 2000 2.00 900 0.90 2 3.72 2 3.98 0 0.00 2.21 0.42 700.00 0.14 11.16013 Gadola 1800 1.80 1200 1.20 8 6.38 2 3.98 300 0.38 2.87 0.54 907.50 0.18 14.46614 Kothara 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 2.40 1 1.99 0 0.00 0.91 0.17 287.50 0.06 4.62015 Dhorkuva 300 0.30 0 0.00 3 1.72 4 7.96 0 0.00 2.08 0.39 657.50 0.13 10.506

Total 22090 22.09 7000 5.75 150 100.79 46 92.53 5200 6.22 47.16 8.96 14932.50 2.99 239.33 Table no 39.2 Agriculture and Aforestation related activites of watershed works phase – Proposed Target

S.No Name of Villages

Nursery Raising

Vegetable Nursery

Crop Demonstation

Plot

Horticulture Plot

Fodder/Pasture Development

Meditation Plot

Total

Ha In

Lakh No

In Lakh

No In

Lakh Ha

In Lakh

Ha In Lakh Ha In

Lakh 1 Mandalva 0 0 1 0.6 7 0.87 4 1.25 2 0.14 0.4 0.370 3.2302 Ranikheda 0 0 1 0.6 10 1.25 4 1.25 3 0.21 0.8 0.750 4.0603 Limbani 0 0 1 0.6 8 1 3.2 1 3 0.21 0.8 0.750 3.560


4 Bandibhit 0 0 1 0.6 5 0.62 2.8 0.87 2 0.14 0 0.000 2.2305 Dhorisimal 0 0 0 0 2 0.25 0.8 0.25 2 0.14 0 0.000 0.6406 Dungrabhit 0.07 1.5 2 1.2 18 2.25 8 2.5 3 0.21 2 1.188 8.8487 Dobachopra 0 0 1 0.6 7 0.87 2.8 0.87 5 0.35 0 0.000 2.6908 Kevadi 0.07 1.5 2 1.2 16 2 8 2.5 8 0.56 1.6 1.500 9.2609 Mithibor 0.07 1.5 2 1.2 14 1.75 6 1.87 7 0.49 0.4 0.375 7.18510 Kakadkund 0 0 0 0 3 0.37 1.6 0.5 3 0.21 0 0.000 1.08011 Mirchipani 0 0 1 0.6 8 1 3.2 1 2 0.14 0 0.000 2.740 12 Rinchwell 0 0 1 0.6 6 0.75 2.4 0.75 4 0.28 0 0.000 2.380 13 Gadola 0 0 1 0.6 8 1 4 1.25 3 0.21 0.4 0.375 3.43514 Kothara 0 0 0 0 4 0.5 1.6 0.5 1 0.07 0 0.000 1.07015 Dhorkuva 0 0 1 0.6 6 0.75 2.4 0.75 2 0.14 0 0.000 2.240

Total 0.21 4.5 15 9 122 15.2 54.8 17.11 50 3.5 6.4 5.308 54.648 Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* S. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line(D)

(iii)Land dev. (L)

(i)Pri‐vate

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG(iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Mandalva Gully plug R P UG, WC, WDT

2000CMT 1.2 0.8 2 2013

check dam D P C UG, WC, WDT

3 3.01 2.01 5.02

check wall D P C UG, WC, WDT

8 4.83 3.22 8.05

Total 9.04 6.03 15.072 Ranikheda Gully plug R P UG, WC,

WDT 1160CMT 0.7 0.46 1.16

Gabion structures R P UG, WC, WDT

1200CMT 0.86 0.58 1.44



3 3.58 2.39 5.97


8 9.91 2.6 6.51

Total 15.05 6.03 15.083 Limbani Gully plug R P UG, WC,

WDT 2000CMT 1.2 0.8 2

check dam D C UG, WC, WDT

2 2.39 1.59 3.98

check wall D P UG, WC, WDT

7 2.58 1.72 4.3

Total 6.17 4.11 10.284 Bandibhit Contour bunding R C UG, WC,

WDT 1200CMT 0.45 0.3 0.75

2013

Gully plug R C UG, WC, WDT

650CMT 0.36 0.29 0.65


3 3.58 2.39 5.97


17 6.4 4.28 10.68

Total 10.79 7.26 18.055 Dholisimel check dam D P UG, WC,

WDT 1 1.19 0.8 1.99


6 1.49 0.99 2.48

Total 2.68 1.79 4.476 Dungarbhit Contour bunding R C UG, WC,

WDT 1200CMT 0.72 0.48 1.2


2000CMT 1.2 0.8 2

Gabion structures R C UG, WC, WDT

300CMT 0.21 0.14 0.35


6 7.16 4.77 11.93



28 12.9 8.62 21.52

Total 22.19 14.81 377 Dobachapra Gully plug R C UG, WC,

WDT 2000CMT 1.2 0.8 2

2013


3 3.56 2.37 5.93


5 1.88 1.25 3.13

Total 6.64 4.42 11.068 K Contour bunding R C UG, WC,

WDT 2500CMT 1.02 0.68 1.7


3800cmt 2.28 1.52 3.8


1 0.27 0.18 0.45


6 8.36 5.57 13.93


20 8.04 5.36 13.4

Total 19.97 13.31 33.289 Mithibor Gully plug R C UG, WC,

WDT 2700CMT 1.62 1.08 2.7

Gabion structures D C UG, WC, WDT

3000cmt 2.16 1.44 3.6


5 5.97 3.98 9.95


13 5.52 3.68 9.2

Total 15.27 10.18 25.4510 Kakadkund Gully plug R P UG, WC,

WDT 280CMT 0.17 0.11 0.28


check dam D P UG, WC, WDT

2 2.39 1.59 3.98


4 0.78 0.52 1.3

Total 3.33 2.22 5.5511 Marchipani Gully plug R P UG, WC,

WDT 1400CMT 0.84 0.56 1.4

check dame D C UG, WC, WDT

3 3.58 2.39 5.97


16 3.6 2.4 6

Total 8.02 5.35 13.3712 Rinchhvel Contour bunding R C 900cmt 0.54 0.36 0.9


2000CMT 1.2 0.8 2

2012


2 2.38 1.6 3.98


5 2.23 1.49 3.72

Total 6.35 4.25 10.613 Gadola Contour bunding R C UG, WC,

WDT 1200cmt 0.72 0.48 1.2


1800cmt 1.08 0.72 1.8


300CMT 0.23 0.15 0.38

check dam D C UG, WC, WDT

2 2.39 1.59 3.98


8 3.83 2.55 6.38

Total 8.25 5.49 13.7414 Kothara check dam D P UG, WC,

WDT 1 1.19 0.8 1.99



5 1.44 0.96 2.4

Total 2.63 1.76 4.3915 Dhorkuva Gully plug R C UG, WC,

WDT 300CMT 0.18 0.12 0.3


4 4.78 3.18 7.96


3 1.03 0.69 1.72

Total 5.99 3.99 9.98 Total 216.3

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG,SHG,WC(Pl.specify

Area (ha)/No.

No. of plants / rmt

Estimated cost in lakhs


completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Mandalva

Afforestation R L F WC 3.11 1943.75 0.591 Jun/13 Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 985 0.197 Jun/13Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 7 0 0.870 Jun/13 Medictional Plot L P UG 0.4 0 0.370 Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 4 0 1.250 Jun/13

Total 3.418

2 Ranikheda

Afforestation R L F WC 3.73 2331.25 0.591 Jun/13Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 1182.5 0.198 Jun/13Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 10 0 1.250 Jun/13Meditation Plot L P UG 0.8 0 0.750 Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 4 0 1.250 Jun/13

Total 4.179


3 Limbani

Afforestation R L F WC 3.12 1950 0.400 Jun/13Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 987.5 250 0.130 Jun/13Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 8 0 1.000 Jun/13Meditation Plot L P 0.8 0 0.750 Jun/13Horticuluture Plant L C F 3.20 0 1.000 Jun/13

Total 3.420

4 Bandibhit

Afforestation R L F WC 2.12 1325 0.710 Jun/13 Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 672.5 0.240 Jun/13 Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 1 0.070 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 5 0.620 Jun/13 Meditation Plot L P UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 2.8 0 0.870 Jun/13

Total 2.510

5 Dholisimel

Afforestation R L F WC 0.92 575 0.176 Jun/13 Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 292.5 0.059 Jun/13Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 2 0.250 Jun/13 Meditation Plot L P UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 0.8 0 0.250 Jun/13

Total 0.734

6 Dungarbhit

Afforestation R L F WC 7.71 4818.75 1.464 Jun/13Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 2440 0.488 Jun/13 Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 3 0.210 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0.07 0 1.500 Jun/13Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 18 0 2.250 Jun/13Meditation Plot L P UG 2 0 1.188 Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 8 0 2.500 Jun/13

Total 9.600

7 Dobachopra

Afforestation R L F WC 2.29 1431.25 0.435 Jun/13 Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 725 0.145 Jun/13 Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 2 0.140 Jun/13


Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 7 0.870 Jun/13Meditation Plot L P UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 2.8 0 0.870 Jun/13

Total 2.460

8 Kevdi


Nursery raising L C SHG 0.07 0 1.500 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 16 2.000 Jun/13 Meditation Plot L P UG 1.6 1.500 Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 8 0 2.500 Jun/13

Total 9.458

9 Mithibor

Afforestation R L F WC 5.29 3306.25 1.005 Jun/13Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 1675 0.335 Jun/13Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0.07 0 1.500 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 14 1.750 Jun/13Meditation Plot L P UG 0.4 0.375 Jun/13Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 6 0 1.870 Jun/13

Total 6.975

10 Kakadkund


Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 3 0.370 Jun/13 Meditation Plot L P UG Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 1.6 0 0.500 Jun/13

Total 1.158

11 Mirchipani

Afforestation R L F WC 2.76 1725 0.525 Jun/13 Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 875 0.175 Jun/13 Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 1 0.070 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 8 1.000 Jun/13 Meditation Plot L P UG 0.4 0.375 Jun/13Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 3.2 0 1.000 Jun/13


Total 3.145

12 Rinchwell

Afforestation R L F WC 2.21 1381.25 0.420 Jun/13Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 700 0.140 Jun/13Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 1 0.070 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 6 0.750 Jun/13Meditation Plot L P UG Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 2.4 0 0.750 Jun/13

Total 2.130

13 Gadola

Afforestation R L F WC 2.87 1793.75 0.545 Jun/13 Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 907.5 0.182 Jun/13 Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 1 0.070 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 8 1.000 Jun/13 Meditation Plot L P UG 0.4 0.375 Jun/13Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 4 0 1.250 Jun/13

Total 3.421

14 Kothara

Afforestation R L F WC 0.91 568.75 0.173 Jun/13Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 287.5 0.058 Jun/13 Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 1 0.070 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 4 0.500 Jun/13Meditation Plot L P UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 1.6 0 0.500 Jun/13

Total 1.300

15 Dhorkuva

Afforestation R L F WC 2.08 1300 0.395 Jun/13 Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 657.5 0.132 Jun/13 Fodder/pasture development L C SHG/UG 1 0.070 Jun/13

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 6 0.750 Jun/13 Meditation Plot L P UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/13 Horticuluture Plant L C F UG 2.4 0 0.750 Jun/13

Total 2.096


Table no 40.2.Techincal Specification Graded Bunding Particulars Value Units

Top width of bund 1 mt.Bottom width of Bund 1 mt.Depth above ground level 1 mt.Depth of Foundation 0.2 mt.Cross section of bund 1 sq. mProposed Area 750 ha.Table no 40.3.Techincal Specification Farm Bund

Particulars Value UnitsBund Length Per Ha. 400 mt.Proposed Area(area of farm) 1 Ha.Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 400 mt.Top Width 0.5 mt.Side Slope 01:01Height 0.5 mt.Base Width 1.5 mt.Cross‐Section of Farm bund 0.5 SqM.Table 40.4.Techincal specification Masonary Checkwall S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount1 Excavation Body wall 1 16 1.5 1 24 Key wall 2 2 0.6 1 2.4 26.4 Cmt. 55.64 1468.9 2 C. C. In Foundation and Plinth (B) 1 16 1.5 0.3 7.2 (K) 2 2 0.6 0.3 0.72 7.92 Cmt. 1586.5 12565.1 3 UCR Masonary in Foundation and

Plinth (B) 1 16 1.5 0.7 16.8

(K) 2 2 0.6 0.7 1.68


Super Structure (B) 1 16 1.5+0.60/2 1 16.8 (K) 2 2 0.6 1 2.4 37.68 Cmt. 1509.9 56893 4 Coping for CC (1:2:4) (B) 1 16 0.6 0.1 0.96 (K) 2 2 0.6 0.1 0.24 1.2 Cmt. 2363.7 2836.44 5 Cement Pointing (B) 1 16 1 16 (K) 2 2 0.6 2.4 18.4 Sq. mt. 41.3 784.7 Total 74548.2 Add 2% W.C. 1490.96 76039.1 Say 76000/‐

40.4.1.Corss –Section of Check wall with its side wall Dimensions:


Table no 40.5.Techincal Specification Masonary Checkdam S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount 1 Excavation Mt. Mt. Mt. Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.9 22.95 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.45 3.51 Bucket 1 17 5 0.45 38.25 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.45 1.08 1 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 66.33 Cmt. 68.4 4536.972 Excavation in Soft rock Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.3 7.65 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.3 2.34 Bucket 1 17 4 0.25 17 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.15 0.36 1 2 0.6 0.15 0.18 27.53 Cmt. 177.2 4878.323 Filling the Foundation Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.15 3.825 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.15 1.17 Bucket 1 17 5 0.15 12.75 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.15 0.36 1 2 0.6 0.15 0.18 18.29 Cmt. 1403.4 25661.24 UCR Masonary in (1) Foundatlion Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.55 14.025 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.55 4.29 Bucket 1 17 5 0.3 25.5 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.6 1.44 1 2 0.6 0.6 0.72 45.98


46 Cmt. 1516 69736 (2) Superstructure Main Body 1 17 1.05 1.4 24.99 Side Wall 2 2 0.6 0.6 1.44 2 5 0.6 1.05 6.3 Key Wall 2 4 0.6 0.6 2.88 2 2 0.6 0.6 1.44 Toe Wall 1 17 0.6 0.6 6.12 43.17 44 Cmt. 1516 66704 5 Coping Top of the main bodywall 1 17 0.6 0.1 1.02 Toe Wall 1 17 0.6 0.1 1.02 Bucket flooring 1 17 4 0.1 6.8 8.84 9 Cmt. 1934.4 17409.6 6 Plaster in (1:3) Main Body 1 17 1.25 21.25 Body wall slop 1 17 1.74 29.58 50.83 51 Sq. mt. 70.2 3580.2 7 Cement Pointing (1:3) Side wall 4 4 1.05 16.8 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 2.4 1 2 0.6 1.2 20.4 21 Sq. mt. 40.5 850.5 8 Name Plate (30cm * 30cm) 1 1 No. 434.9 434.9 Total 193792 3% Conti. 5813.75 199605 199600/‐


Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG,SHG,WC(Pl.specify

Area (ha)/No.

No. of plants / rmt

Estimated cost in lakhs


completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Mandalva

Afforestation R L F WC 3.11 1943.75 0.591 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 985 0.197 Jun/12Fodder/pasture development

L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/12

Nursery raising L C SHG 0 0 0.000 Jun/12Crop Demonstration plot

L P UG 7 0 0.870 Jun/12

Medictional Plot

L P UG 0.4 0 0.370 Jun/12

Horticuluture Plant

L C F UG 4 0 1.250 Jun/12

Total 3.418

2 Ranikheda

Afforestation R L F WC 3.73 2331.25 0.710 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 1182.5 0.237 Jun/12Fodder/pasture development

L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/12


L P UG 10 0 1.250 Jun/12

Meditation Plot L P UG 0.8 0 0.750 Jun/12Horticuluture Plant

L C F UG 4 0 1.250 Jun/12

Total 4.336

3 Limbani Afforestation R L F WC 3.12 1950 0.593 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 987.5 250 0.198 Jun/12


Fodder/pasture development

L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/12


L P UG 8 0 1.000 Jun/12

Meditation Plot L P 0.8 0 0.750 Jun/12Horticuluture Plant

L C F 3.20 0 1.000 Jun/12

Total 3.680

4 Bandibhit

Afforestation R L F WC 2.12 1325 0.404 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 672.5 0.135 Jun/12Fodder/pasture development

L C SHG/UG 1 0.070 Jun/12


L P UG 5 0.620 Jun/12

Meditation Plot L P UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/12Horticuluture Plant

L C F UG 2.8 0 0.870 Jun/12

Total 2.098

5 Dholisimel

Afforestation R L F WC 0.92 575 0.176 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 292.5 0.059 Jun/12Fodder/pasture development

L C SHG/UG 0 0 0.000 Jun/12


L P UG 2 0.250 Jun/12


L C F UG 0.8 0 0.250 Jun/12

Total 0.734

6 Dungarbhit Afforestation R L F WC 7.71 4818.75 1.464 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 2440 0.488 Jun/12




Nursery raising L C SHG 0.07 0 1.500 Jun/12Crop Demonstration plot

L P UG 18 0 2.250 Jun/12


L C F UG 8 0 2.500 Jun/12

Total 9.600

7 Dobachopra




L P UG 7 0.870 Jun/12


L C F UG 2.8 0 0.870 Jun/12

Total 2.460

8 Kevdi




L P UG 16 2.000 Jun/12

Meditation Plot L P UG 1.6 1.500 Jun/12Horticuluture Plant

L C F UG 8 0 2.500 Jun/12

Total 9.458

9 Mithibor Afforestation R L F WC 5.29 3306.25 1.005 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 1675 0.335 Jun/12



L C SHG/UG 2 0 0.140 Jun/12


L P UG 14 1.750 Jun/12


L C F UG 6 0 1.870 Jun/12

Total 6.975

10 Kakadkund




L P UG 3 0.370 Jun/12

Meditation Plot L P UGHorticuluture Plant

L C F UG 1.6 0 0.500 Jun/12

Total 1.158

11 Mirchipani

Afforestation R L F WC 2.76 1725 0.525 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 875 0.175 Jun/12Fodder/pasture development



L P UG 8 1.000 Jun/12


L C F UG 3.2 0 1.000 Jun/12

Total 3.145

12 Rinchwell Afforestation R L F WC 2.21 1381.25 0.420 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 700 0.140 Jun/12





L P UG 6 0.750 Jun/12

Meditation Plot L P UGHorticuluture Plant

L C F UG 2.4 0 0.750 Jun/12

Total 2.130

13 Gadola




L P UG 8 1.000 Jun/12


L C F UG 4 0 1.250 Jun/12

Total 3.421

14 Kothara




L P UG 4 0.500 Jun/12


L C F UG 1.6 0 0.500 Jun/12

Total 1.300

15 Dhorkuva Afforestation R L F WC 2.08 1300 0.395 Jun/12Live Fencing L C F UG, WC 0 657.5 0.132 Jun/12





L P UG 6 0.750 Jun/12


L C F UG 2.4 0 0.750 Jun/12

Total 2.096

Table no .41.1 Technical Details of Aforestation Activities/Plantation/Grass seeding: Particulars Value Unit

Crop Name Plant To Plant Spacing 3 mtRow To Row Spacing 3 mtPit Length 1.5 ftPit Width 1.5 ftPit Depth 1.5 ftNo. of Plants 1111Plantation Area 1 1 HaNo. of Plants Per Ha. 1111 1 HaGap Filling 20% 225Table No. 41.1.1 Cost Estimation For Afforestation Activity (For 1000 Plants) Sr. No.

Description No. Length Width (m.)

Depth (m.)

Unit Quantity Rate Amount

1 Digging of pits for plants in ordinary murum 1000 1.5 ft 1.5 ft 1.5 ft 1000 2.00 2000

2 Plants sampling for plantation In Govt. pasture area, sampling not less than 30cm. Height 1000 2 2000

3 Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site up to 5km 1000 1000 1 10004 Loding and unloding plants 1000 1000

5 Rehandling of plants from camp site up to actual planting site upto 200m. 1000 500


6 Cost of fertiliser & insecticides incl. application 12007 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year) 1000 1000 3 3000

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities S. No.

Name of village

Name of activity Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG(ii)SHG(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated cost(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion (mm/yyyy)

1 Mandalwa

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 1.25Medicinal Plot(Allovera )‐1 acre P UG 0.375Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.52Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 0.875(B) Dairy Development Fodder Plot 1 Ha. P C UG 0.14Animal health Camp P UG 0.40Total 4.160 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicumpost Unit P SHG 2.50Farm implements kits P UG 0.60Total 3.100 Grand Total 7.260

2

Ranikheda

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 1.000Medicinal Plot(Allovera )‐1 acre P UG 0.75Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.26Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 1.00


(B) Dairy Development

Fodder Plot 1 Ha. P C UG 0.21Animal health Camp P UG 0.40Total P 4.220 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 2.250cattle Feed store/stall P SHG 0.50Farm implements kits P UG 0.30Total 3.05 Grand Total 7.270

3

Limbani

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 0.875Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.26Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 0.625 (B) Dairy Development Fodder Plot 1 Ha. P C UG 0.14Animal health Camp P UG 0.40Total P 2.900 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.250cattle Feed store/stall P SHG 0.50Farm implements kits P UG 0.30Total 2.05

Grand Total 4.950

4

Bandibhit

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 1.250Medicinal Plot(Allovera )‐1 acre P UG 0.75Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.52


Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 1.250(B) Dairy Development P Fodder Plot 1 Ha. P C UG 0.21 Animal health Camp P UG 0.40Total 4.98 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 2.00cattle Feed store/stall P SHG 0.50Farm implements kits P UG 0.51floor ‐cum‐ Rice Mill P SHG 0.75Total 3.760 Grand Total 8.740

5

Dholishamel

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 0.25Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.26 Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 0.25(B) Dairy Development Animal helth Camp P UG 0.40Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P UG 0.14Total 1.30 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 0.875Total 0.875 Grand Total 2.175

6 Dugarbhint

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.120Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 2.500Medicinal Plot(Allovera )‐1 acre P UG 1.875Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 1.560Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 2.250(B) Dairy Development


Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.21Animal health Camp P UG 0.60Total 10.19 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Nursery raishing for foresty plant(50000 plants) P SHG 1.50Vermicompost Unit P SHG 3.125Bamboo works(for one SHG) P SHG 0.71 Flour ‐cum‐ rice mill P SHG 0.75Cattle Feed store /stall P SHG 1.00Farm implements kits P UG 0.60

Total 7.685 Grand Total 17.880

7

Dobachapur

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 0.875Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 0.875(B) Dairy Development Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.350 Animal helth Camp P UG 0.40Total P 3.10 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Flour ‐cum‐ rice mill P SHG 0.75Cattle Feed store /stall P SHG 0.50Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.00

Total 2.250 Grand Total 5.350 8 Kevadi Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 1.20Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 2.50Medicinal Plot(Allovera )‐1 acre P UG 1.50Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.78


Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 2.00(B) Dairy Development Animal helth Camp P UG 0.60Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.56Total 9.14 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Mahuda (doli) processing centre P SHG 1.250Nursery raishing for foresty plant(50000 plants) P SHG 1.500Vermicompost Unit P SHG 2.500Flour ‐cum‐ rice mill P SHG 0.75Cattle Feed store /stall P SHG 0.50Farm implements kits P UG 0.45

Total 6.95 Grand Total 16.09 9 Mithibor Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 1.20Medicinal Plot(Allovera )‐1 acre P UG 0.375Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 1.750Drip Irrigation for 1 Vingha Land(Vegetable) P UG 0.78Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 1.875(B) Dairy Development Animal helth Camp P UG 0.60Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.49Total 7.07 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Nursery raishing for foresty plant(50000 plants) P SHG 1.500Vermicompost Unit P SHG 2.500Flour ‐cum‐ rice mill P SHG 0.75Cattle Feed store /stall P SHG 0.500Total SHG 5.250

Grand Total 12.320 2013 10 Kakadkund Production Systems P


(A) AgriHorticulture P Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 0.375Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.26Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 0.50(B) Dairy Development P Animal health Camp P UG 0.20Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.21Total 1.545 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P 1.125

Total SHG 1.125 Grand Total 2.670

11

Marchipani

Production Systems P

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture P Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 1.00Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 1.00Drip irrigation for 1 vigha land(Vegetable) P UG 0.52 (B) Dairy Development Animal health Camp P UG 0.40Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.14Total 3.66 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.250Cattle Feed store /stall P SHG 0.50Farm implements kits P UG 0.30Flour ‐cum‐ rice mill P SHG 0.75


12 Rinchhvel

Production Systems

2013 (A) AgriHorticulture Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 0.75Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60


Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 0.75(B) Dairy Development Animal health Camp P UG 0.60Fodder Plot 1 Ha. P C UG 0.28Total 2.98 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.375Honey collection and Processing P SHG 0.767Total 2.142

Grand Total 5.122

13

Gadola

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Medicinal Plot(Allovera )‐1 acre P UG 0.375Vegetable nursery with net house P UG 0.60Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 1.00Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 1.250(B) Dairy Development Animal health Camp P UG 0.40Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.21Total 3.835 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.750Honey collection and Processing P SHG 0.767Farm implements kits P UG 0.30


14 Kothara

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Crop Demonstration/acre P UG 0.50Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P UG 0.50(B) Dairy Development Animal haelth Camp P UG 0.20Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.07


Total 1.270 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 0.875

Total 8.75 Grand Total 2.145 15

Dhorkuwa

Production Systems

2013

(A) AgriHorticulture Vegetable nursery with net house P SHG 0.60Crop Demonstration/acre P SHG 0.75Horticulture plot (vadi) ‐1 acre P SHG 0.75(B) Dairy Development Foddar Plote 1 Ha. P C UG 0.14Animal heath Camp P UG 0.60Total 2.84 Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.250Honey collection and Processing P SHG 0.767


No. of adult animals No. of calves

TotalNo. of Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank.

236 27 263

Fodder requirement per day (10kg dry fodder for adult and 5 kg for calf). 3540 Kg

Fodder requirement for 180 days. 6372 quintal

Fodder available from lands/farms/pasture land (60%)

3823 quintal


Production System –I Vermicompost Unit: Wastes are nothing but misplaced resources. A large volume of organic matter is generated from agricultural activities, in dairy farms and animal wastes which are usually dumped in corners where it putrefies, usually emanating foul smell. This valuable resource can be utilised by properly composting it into a value‐added end product called manure. The chief objective is to compost organic wastes not for the disposal of solid organic wastes but also to produce superior quality manure to feed our “nutrient/organic matter hungry” soils. Organic wastes can be broken down and fragmented rapidly by earthworms within short period of time. Vermicompost considerable enhances the soil fertility of and N,P,K are totally available to the plants. The water holding capacity of the soil is increased and also help in binding the soil particles together. It should be realized that vermicomposting can be a useful cottage industry for the underprivileged and the economically weak as it can provide them with a supplementary income. If every village can formulate a cooperative society or SHG’s of unemployed youth/women group, it could be a wise venture for them to produce vermicompost and sell it back to the village or firm at a recommended price. The youth will not only earn money, but also aid society by providing excellent quality organic manure for sustainable agro‐practices. This is one of the simplest process where 5 mt.(length) * 1.5 mt (width) beds with 0.5 depth are made on the ground and in the backyard and is filled by 3 month old manure and worms are introduced @ 1/2 kg/ sq.ft. These worms voraciously feed on the manure turning it to granulated compost with 45 day period of time. Hence yearly 8 cycles can be taken within 1 year of time. The proposed model is ideally suitably for the individual beneficiary. Components of Vermicompost Unit: About Worm Species: NonBorrowing Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae is the scientific name of the worms commonly found in Indian soil. They are non‐ borrowing and surface feeders and go maximum up to a depth of 1‐ 1.5 mts. Feeds on decomposing organic matter and well decomposed manure. They are voracious feeders and survive in most of the stressed conditions. Shade Net/ Green Net: A net with 90% shade with steel pipes of 72 running ft for supporting the shade net is recommended and suitable for the construction of a ideal vermicompost unit. The main purpose of shade net is to minimize the sunlight to maximum possible extend and allow only that amount which is essential for keeping worm alive and maintaining a warmer vicinity. Tools and Implements: Some tools and implements are required a crowbar, spade, rose can for watering and sieve for sieving the vermicompost for separating the compost without injury to the earth worms when the compost is ready for packing and storing. VermiComposting Beds:


Customized beds were prepared based upon areas requirement and availability of the manure and raw material. The dimension of bed for this specific area are as follows 5mt length *1.5 width * 0.5 mt depth. These types of beds are feasible and require less space and are good example of the small scale commercial unit for a individual beneficiary at village level Land and worms requirement: Area of 502 meter is need to cover two bed of above mentioned dimensions. The beds are made up of bricks at sides and bottom to maintain the proper structure and depth to ensure viable structure for long period of time. Worms are introduced @ 250 worms for meter 2. This the optimum population for this bed of this dimension to ensure proper multiplication of worms and composting in desired period of time.. Proposed Model of 2 bed Dimension (5mt *1.5mt*0.5mt): A. Intial Investment for Vermicompost Unit: S.no Particulars Units Unit Price Amount1 Vermiculture (Eisenia fetida) 15 kg Rs. 300/kg 45002 Shade net/ Green net of 90 % shade 54 sq.mt Rs. 30/mt 16203 Steel pipes galvanized for supporting the shed 100 ft Rs. 25/sq.ft 25004 Fencing 18 mts Rs. 50/mt 9005 Labour charges of installation of shed and shade net ‐ ‐ 5006 Labour charges for preparation of vermin‐beds ‐ ‐ 4007 Expenditure for the transport of material ‐ ‐ 4008 Expenditure of bricks for construction of vermi‐beds 200 Rs 3.00 6009 Spade and basket ‐ ‐ 20010 Nuts bolts and other accessories for fixing the shed ‐ ‐ 30011 Rose can for water the vermin‐beds ‐ ‐ 25012 Sieve with wooden frame ‐ ‐ 250 Total 12420

B. Returns from Vermicompost Unit: 1. One cycle production per cycle(45 days) is 650 kg * Rs. 3/kg = Rs.1950 8 cycles/Year 156002. Sale of worms 1 kg /cycle * 8 cycle Rs. 50/kg 4003. Gross profit 16000 4. Net profit ( Gross profit 16000 –12420 vermicompost Unit cost) 3580

Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin =12420/


Production SystemII Introduction: Rural economy is mainly based upon the agriculture, agriculture growth on the other hand is decelerated at macro level with un‐ profitable remuneration, crop failure with adverse climatic condition coupled with falling real prices of farm products, and contributing population from agriculture to nonagricultural sector. Added to these problems is the problem of depleting and degrading natural base for farming, threatening the very livelihood security of a majority of subsistence farmers. The farming industry is getting un‐remunerative, the failures of identifying right growth priorities within farming sector, have culminated in farmer’s distress. At this juncture horticultural crops are new hope in providing economic security and further growth. The production and consumption of horticultural products could play a key role in providing nutrition and health security to the people and especially on the income of farmers. Further, given the high degree of agricultural development segmentation with a small percentage of commercial farmers and a great majority of subsistence farmers, horticultural development could provide an opportunity to bring the subsistence and bypass farmers into the development orbit; if the appropriate technologies are identified and implemented. Horticultural crops can augment employment‐income generation to ensure livelihood security of the subsistence farmers without further depleting and degrading the natural resource base for achieving livelihood security and increased economic growth, Production Details of Fruit Crops: Table1 S.no Name of Fruit Crop Plants

per acre Specing Production details every years (plants / kg)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 Kesar Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 15 15 25 40 60 95Rajapuri Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 20 25 35 60 80 120Langdo Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 15 30 35 45 75 100

2 Sapota (Kalipati) 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 20 35 45 75 100 120 1403 Guava 110 6 x 6 MT. ‐ ‐ 10 25 45 80 110 125 135 1504 Custard Apple (Balanagari) 80 5 X 5 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 7 11 13 15 18 205 Ber (Gola / Umaran) 110 6 X 6 MT. ‐ 2 8 35 55 75 100 125 150 1756 Kagadi Lemon 110 6 X 6 MT. ‐ ‐ 10 20 35 45 60 85 120 150


Details of Expenditure for Mango plantation: Table2 Sr No Particulars Expenditure in. Rs. 1 40 pits of 3 x 3 x 5 fect 500 2 Grafted mango plants (40) / 70 Rs. Plants 2800 3 Transportation 1200 4 Thorry fencing 800 5 Fertilizer / Insecticides in pits (40) 1500 6 Plantation & after care expenditure 2200 7 Irrigation to plants 3500

Total 12500 Production Parameters: Kesar variety of mango yields 15kg per plant of 5 years of times and keeps on increasing as growth proceeds.

Particulars Year Increase in production

in Qtl In Rs.

A Initial Investment Rs. 12,000B Production /year(15kg/40 Plants) 6 C Gross income/ Year for 600kg @( Rs.3500/100kg) 6*3500 21000

D

Net Income/ Year* (CA) 5th Year 9000Net Income/ Year* 6th Year =(20*40) 8*3500 28000Net Income/ Year* 7th Year=(25*40) 10*3850 38500Net Income/ Year* 8th Year=(40*40) 16*4235 67760Net Income/ Year* 9th Year=(60*40) 24*4658 111792Net Income/ Year* 10th Year=(95*40) 38*5123 194674


Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total I Fixed Cost a Digging of pits (3*3*5 ft) 40 Rs. 12.50 Rs. 500b Granfted Mango Plants 40 Rs. 70 Rs. 2,800c Transportation cost 40 Rs. 30.00 Rs. 1,200.00d Throny Fencing Rs. 800.00e Fertilizer/ Insecticides in pits Rs. 1,500.00f Plantation & after care expenditure 40 Rs. 55.00 Rs. 2,200.00g Irrigation to plants Rs. 3,500.00 Total: Fixed Cost Rs. 12,500 II Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Labour 2000b Fertilizer/ Insecticides in pits 2000c Transportation cost 1000d Packing 500e Miscellaneous 2500 Total Variable Cost 8000

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity 1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs. 80002 Total Production (Q) Kgs 10003 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 8000/1000 84 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 1 kg 38.55 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 38.5*1000 385006 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 38.5‐8 30.57 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 38500‐8000 30500

Break Even Point = Fixed cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin = 12500/30.5=409.5

Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = Net Benefit/Net cost = 30500/8000 = 3.8 ((should be greater than 1)


Production SystemIII: Raising of Poultry Birds Poultry is one of the fastest growing segments of the agricultural sector in India today. While the production of agricultural crops has been rising at a rate of 1.5 to 2 percent per annum, that of eggs and broilers has been rising at a rate of 8 to 10 percent per annum. As a result, India is now the world's fifth largest egg producer and the eighteenth largest producer of broilers. Driving this expansion are a combination of factors ‐ growth in per capita income, a growing urban population and falling real poultry prices. The poultry sector in India has undergone a paradigm shift in structure and operation. A significant feature of India's poultry industry has been its transformation from a mere backyard activity into a major commercial activity in just about four decades. This transformation has involved sizeable investments in breeding, hatching, rearing and processing. Farmers in India have moved from rearing non‐descript birds to today rearing hybrids such as is Hyaline, lt is Shaver, ll and in Babcock, lt which ensure faster growth, good livability, excellent feed conversion and high profits to the rearers. The industry has grown largely due to the initiative of private enterprise, minimal government intervention, and considerable indigenous poultry genetics capabilities, and considerable support from the complementary veterinary health, poultry feed, poultry equipment, and poultry processing sectors. India is one of the few countries in the world that has put into place a sustained Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) egg production project. Why the term “Home Based Business Opportunity” is the most used term on the Internet today. Because today most people doesn’t want to work for other people anymore, and wanted to have their own home based business instead. Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total I Fixed Cost

a Construction of poultry shed (10mt*10mt) 1 13000 13000b Feeder 2 350 700c Drinker 2 200 400e Sub feeders 2 200 400 Total Fixed Cost 14500


1.8 kg body weight * 2.0 F.C.R. (Feed convertion ratio) 3.6 kg feed require for 1.8 kg body wright at 40 42 day period * 15 Rs feed. Cost 55/ Rs Total Feed Cost Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = Net Benefit/Net cost = 14000/10600 = 1.3 ((should be greater than 1)

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Purchase of birds 100 25 2500b Feed purchase 100 55 5500c Transportation during procurement 700 700d Transportation during selling 1000 1000e Vaccination & Medication (Twice in cycle) 400 400f Electricity charges 500 500 Total Variable Cost 10600

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity 1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs 106002 Total Production (Q) Kgs 1403 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 68.54 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 1 kg 1005 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) (100*140) 140006 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) (100‐68.5) 31.57 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) (14000‐10600) 3400


Production SystemIV Introduction: Jetpurpavi villages of (IWMP‐1) are located in jetpurpavi Taluka Vadodara District of Gujarat state. IWMP‐1 consists of 10 villages and a area around 4353.8 ha is taken into the project as per the priority for treatment. These clusters of village consist of forest area from thin to thick cover. 98% of the population in this area is tribal and hence agriculture, animal husbandry and other allied activities are still carried in very traditional manner. There is huge gap between average and actual yield in this area. Hence, Natural resources based livelihood activities are planned by including modern techniques for enhancing productivity this areas. Selected Activity: Dairy Improvement (Jetpupavi‐1) Livelihood improvement through dairying seems to be a promising option in this area as the livestock population is in optimum number for generating good income and forming potential sub‐sector in these villages. Check list:

1. There is huge number of livestock population in this cluster of villages however; the average productivity potential is very low as per the details given in table 1. Hence after a close study it was decided that by suitable intervention and required support, productivity can be maximized in this area, thereby increasing the average income of the stake holder.

Table: 1 S.No Livestock (Cow, buffalo, etc) No. of cattle No. of productive cattle Milk productivity (liters/cattle/day) 1 Buffalo 2360 486 3.52 Cow 2230 545 2.53 Bullock 2408 275 ‐ 4 Goat 2476 20 0.55 Sheep ‐ 3 06 Hen 1706 ‐ ‐

i. Increasing the productivity:

Due to continuous inbreeding the progeny produced is of same indigenous breed which leads to low milk productivity. However, to counter act this issues a tie‐up with local NGO(JK Trust) and District Milk Union working towards dairy development which provides services such as “Artificial insemination” and animal health care are being linked up to villages of watershed for replacement of indigenous breeds. With the time, improved breeds will ensure the higher productivity of milk in the project area.


ii. Reduce Cost of Production: Cost of production is mainly increased due to fodder and concentrates which are partially available from forest area and farmers own field which is insufficient for entire year. To reduce the cost of production, concentrates along with fodder plots are provided to users group for growing of fodder in their own field which will be sufficient for whole year.

iii. Price realization will be improved by setting up milk collection cum milk grading centre for remuneration as per the fat percentage of milk. Grading centre equipment – 1Computer, 1 Dot‐ Matrix printer, Centrifugal machine for fat testing.

iv. Reducing production Risk: Continuous support for breeding from NGO (JK trust) and District Milk Union/Govt bodies for Artificial Insemination will ensure improved breeds. Feeding risk is being covered by providing fodder plots and concentrates to the user groups ensuring fodder security. Health risk is covered by regular animal health camps‐ de‐worming and preventive health care is provided. Production risk is minimized by above intervention and marketing risk is minimized by linking to District milk collection center. In all the cases agreements are being made between the primary producers and procuring agency.

V. Peoples Institutions Primary level co‐operatives/ Users groups are formed at village level for carrying these activities in collective manner.

Vi. Capacity building requirements Training of farmer/Individual creating awareness regarding preventive health care and animal management through various institutes like KVK, Animal husbandry department and sadguru foundation.

Vii Credit Linkage: Credit linkages with Bank and Gujarat State Tribal Development Corporation through TASP.

Viii Convergence with other programmes: Convergence with District Milk Union, JK trust Program, Animal husbandry department for required technical support and Agriculture department for latest fodder varieties.


S.N. Fodder Name Variety Seed Rate (Kg/Ha.) Torduction (Qtl/Ha.)

1 Jowar S‐1049(Sundhiya), C‐10.2(Chasatiyo), GFS‐3/4/5 For Improved 60 & For Hybrid 30

350‐400

2 Maize Africal Tall, Ganga Safed‐2, Ganga‐5, Vikram Farm Sameri, GM‐1/2/3

60 In Monsoon 300‐400, In Winter & Summer 400‐500

3 Gajraj Grass NB‐21, CO‐1, APBN‐1 27777, 12345, 10000 Cuttings First Year: 1500‐2000, Second Year: 1500, Third Year: 1000

4 Anjan/Dhaman Grass

IGFRI‐1, Pusailo Anjan, Co‐1 2 to 3 In Gauchar 150‐200, In case of Irrigated 400‐500

IX Natural Resource Requirement: Particulars Private Panchayat Government

Land Private Water Private Biomass Private ForestX. Total Beneficiaries under dairy development program.

Sr No. Village Marginal and small Farmer

Total %of marginal Farmers Fodder Plots Health Camps 1 Amabazati 3 75 78 11.62 Bhindol 8 75 83 7.23 Bandli 5 75 80 13.14 Bortha 2 75 77 5.55 Degla 2 80 82 17.86 Naniamrol 10 75 85 13.87 Karsan 20 75 95 4.88 Rajpur(k) 10 90 100 8.59 Saloj 15 75 90 6.910 Zab(Sajva) 15 75 90 7.4

Total 90 770 860 9.7 On an average 9.7 % marginal and small farmers will be covered of the total cluster.

*Note: Beneficiaries % is calculated against total demographic population of each village.


Production System – V Project title: Cultivation of alovera plants in 1 acre of land as part of production system in selected villages. This idea is mainly borrowed from Van Bandhu Kalyan Yojana of Chief Minister’s Ten Point Programme. Objectives: The major objective of the above project is as under.

1. To identify the lands of Tribal/B.P.L Farmer. 2. To prepare a site map of individual plots. 3. To generate and interest among the local population to cultivate herbs of medicinal important in those fileds. 4. To extend necessary technical‐know how for growing medicinal herbs in a cost effective manners. 5. To find out the suitable buyers for the produce and act as a liaison body between the seller and the buyer, protecting interest of the

seller. Criteria for Crop demonstration in production systems: a. Owned land minimum 1 acre. b. Irrigation facility in summer c. Farmer should be progressive and willingness to adapt new technology. d. Self motivated and interested in the field activity. Methodology Each of the individual plots will be assigned a particular WDT agriculture member agro climatic condition of each plot will be recorded and necessary measures will be taken to maintain the optimum level of soil condition suitable for the growth of the herbs. Technical assistance from the expert will be taken to choose the plant species to be grown inn a particular field depending upon the agro climatic condition of that particular field. Arrangement for the supply of seeds/saplings etc will be made and all effort will be made to keep the herbs free from infection. After harvest herbs will be sold at the prevailing market price and hers benefits will be passed on to cultivators. The most important aspect of this project will be that for the growth of the plants no chemical fertilizer will be used rather plants will be grown under the strict principle of “ORGANIC FARMING” so as maintain the best quality of the crude drugs. NOTE: This project is purely based on backward and forward linkages for procurement of raw material till selling and all other technical guidance will be provided through the Navjeevan Trust. This trust is having M.O.U with Nutan Ayurvedic Research Center for purchase all Aloe Vera plants cultivated by trust in Gujarat. (A) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: For one acre of land one type of crop with probable variation of 10 % when The crop is changed. S.no Particulars for one year of cultivation Cost in Rs. 1 Preparation of Land (Ploughing, weeding composting etc.) 10000


2 Seeds/sapling of alovara plants and related. 17500 3 Misc 1000 4 Water 1500 5 Consultation Fee 2500 6 Transportation Expenses 5000 7 Total (Per acre per crop) 37500

(B) PROFIT : (Calculated for one crop per acre) S.no Particulars In Rs.

1 5000 baby plants planted in a acre of land will produce about 20,000 sapling. Each sapling will be sell @ Rs. 1 so the net profit from the sell sapling will be 20000

2 Fully mature plants will be purchased @ Rs. 1/kg. Estimated biomass of Aloe Vera in a acre of land will be 15 kg ( individual wt) X 5000 75000

3 Gross profit 950004 Net profit (AB) 57500

*Note: Good treatment can give one plant weight up to 35 to 40 kgs. Production System: VI Mahua (doli) processing centre: Madhuca longifolia, commonly known as mahwa or mahua, is an Indian tropical tree found largely in the central and north Indian plains and forests. It is a fast‐growing tree that grows to approximately 20 meters in height, possesses evergreen or semi‐evergreen foliage, and belongs to the family Sapotaceae. It is cultivated in warm and humid regions for its oleaginous seeds (producing between 20 and 200 kg of seeds annually per tree, depending on maturity), flowers and wood. The fat (solid at ambient temperature) is used for the care of the skin, to manufacture soap or detergents, and as a vegetable butter. It can also be used as a fuel oil. The seed cakes obtained after extraction of oil constitute very good fertilizer. It is considered holy by many tribal communities because of its usefulness. Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost a Mahuda oil extraction machine 1 60,000 60,000b Machine motor 1 25,000 25,000c Three phase light connection 25,000 Total: Fixed Cost 1,10,000 II Variable Cost (One production cycle)


a Light bill 4 month 10000b Oil expenditure 4 month 2500c Miscellaneous 2,500 Total Variable Cost 15,000

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) 4 month 15,000

2 Total Production (Q) 4 month 40,000 Kg

3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 2.6 rs/kg

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 5 Rs./Kg

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) Rs 20,0000

6 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 2.4

7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 185000

• Break Even Point= 45833.3Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin

• Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 185000/125000= 1.4

– should be greater than 1


Production System VII : Net House Famring: Net Houses cultivation has been experiencing accelerated growth in recent years. Because of the substantial financial investment involved in the building and maintenance of Net Houses’, they are largely used for high added value crops. Net Houses development is particularly suited to the small family farm where there are constraints on available land and water. An average of 300 tons of tomatoes is grown per hectare per season, four times that harvested in open fields. In addition, plastic Net Houses structures have recently come into use for housing livestock, mainly chicken and fish.Net houses are mainly used for growing flowers, vegetables, ornamental plants and spices. Recently experiments have been conducted to investigate the feasibility of Net Houses‐grown fruit trees such as nectarines, peaches, loquats, grapes and bananas for commercial purposes, mainly for export. In our project villages there is vast potential for growing horticulture and floriculture crops which have high commercial value and profit margins are equally with short term returns on investments. A model of capsicum farming in net house is designed in small area to reap the benefits to the best from improvised farming techniques.

S.no Cost Head Unit Unit Quanity Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost i Civil Works Excavation for net‐house coloumn (1:2:4) ordinary Cement

Concrere of curing etc. Size: 9''*9''*1'‐6'' No. 17 225.00 3825.00

ii STRUCTURE WORK 0 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 32 mm Rmt. 102 225.00 22950.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 25 mm Rmt. 54 168.00 9072.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 20 mm Rmt. 30 118.00 3540.00 90 % Shade Agro net Sq. Mt. 300 32.00 9600.00 Ropes Rmt. 200 2.50 500.00iii Fitting Charges L/S 1 6849.3 6849.30 Misting System for net house without Ele. motor Nos. ‐ ‐ 0 Plumbing Materials for connecting motor to irrigation system Nos. ‐ ‐ 0iv Taxes @ 5% L/S 1 2816.82 2816.82 Total 59153.12


II Variable Cost (One production cycle)

Units Unit cost Total

a Seedlings 400.No 5 2000b Land preparation 108.Sqmt 200c Feritlizer & Pesticide 2000d Packing Material 500e Transportation 2500 Total Variable Cost 7200

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity 1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) 72002 Total Production (Q) kgs 10803 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 6.64 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 255 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 270006 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 18.47 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 19800

Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin =59153/18.4=3214.8 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 19800/7200= 2.75 4.4. Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects. Scope of capacity building at ProjectVillage(Chottaudepur 1G)

• Alternative Land Use Plan


• Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation • Improved and Scientific agriculture practices • Fodder development and Management • Afforestation • Organic Farming • Meteorological Information • Dairy Development and Management • Income Generation Activities

o Stiching Machines o Making leaf plates o Flour Mills o Centering material o Tent House o Vermicomposting

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: # Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) $ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/

Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify) Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: S.No Organisation

Training Modules

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, At: Gola Gamadi ,Taluko:Sankheda ,Vadodara Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices2 Anand agriculture University, Anand Training in modern and better agriculture practices3 Sadguru Foundation, Dahod Community Mobilization, Geology and Engg structures details 4 BAIF foundation vadodara SMC works, Livelihood activities and Animal Husbandry development

Programmes, SHG and federation level training and accounting

5 ITI Jambugoda, Microenterprise development activities6 District industrial center, Mechanical training and support training to stakeholders7 Forest research center, vadodara Afforestation and Vermicomposting and agro forestry8 SPIPA, Ahmedabad Participatory approach and Engineering aspects in watershed9 BISAG Space application and Different maps preparation


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of persons

No. of persons to be trained

No. of training programmes Estimated cost

1 Gujarat

PIA 4WDTs 5UGs 232SHGs 308WCs 47

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No.

Particulars Number/Year Cost per unit

Executing agency Estimated expenditure

(Rs.) Outcomes

1 Street play 20 4500

PIA and DWDU, Vadodara

90000 Awareness for the importance of watershed

project

2 Campaigning for community mobilisation 4 2500 10000

3 Pamphlets and posters 20000 3 600004 Banners, Hoardings 20 600 120005 Wall Painting at 3 community places 20 2500 50000


CHAPTER – 5 BUDGETING


Budgeting The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and done accordingly in table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds. Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project Budget component Cost requirement Administrative costs 47.9 Monitoring 4.8 Evaluation 4.8 Entry Point activity 19.1 Institution and Capacity Building 23.9 Detailed Project Report 4.8 Watershed Development Works 239.3 Livelihood activities for asset less 47.9 Production systems and micro‐enterprises 6.2 Consolidation phase 23.9 TOTAL 422.6 Table no. 48: Village wise component wise budget available under IWMP Sr.no Village Activity EPA Institution

and CB DPR Watershed

development Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Mandalva 126864 158580 31716 1585800 9317160 412308 158580 117910082 Ranikhada 126960 158700 31740 1587000 317400 412620 158700 27931203 Limbani 86544 108180 21636 1081800 216360 281268 108180 19039684 Bandibhint 151968 189960 37992 1899600 379920 493896 189960 33432965 Dholisimel 37632 47040 9408 470400 94080 122304 47040 8279046 Dungarbhint 311616 389520 77904 3895200 779040 1012752 389520 68555527 Dobachapura 93120 116400 23280 1164333 232800 302640 116400 20489738 Kevdi 280224 350280 70056 3502800 700560 910728 350280 6164928


9 Mithibor 214320 267900 53580 2679000 535800 696540 267900 471504010 Kakadkund 46704 58380 11676 583800 116760 151788 58380 102748811 Marchipani 112560 140700 28140 1407000 281400 365820 140700 247632012 Rinchhvel 89280 111600 22320 1116000 223200 290160 111600 196416013 Gadola 115728 144660 28932 1446600 289320 376116 144660 254601614 Kothara 36260 46200 9240 462000 92400 120120 46200 81242015 Dhorkuva 84048 105060 21012 1050600 210120 273156 105060 1849056 Total 1914528 2393160 478632 23931600 4786320 6222216 2393160 42119616 Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement S.no Village

Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Mandalva 45.22 31.716 13.52 Ranikhada 47.64 31.74 15.93 Limbani 37.62 21.636 15.984 Bandibhint 55.77 37.992 17.785 Dholisimel 17.08 9.408 7.676 Dungarbhint 94.97 77.904 17.077 Dobachapura 47.66 23.28 24.388 Kevdi 95.42 70.056 25.369 Mithibor 60.68 53.58 7.110 Kakadkund 31.05 11.676 19.3711 Marchipani 35.62 28.14 7.4812 Rinchhvel 33.92 22.32 11.613 Gadola 45.59 28.932 16.6614 Kothara 22.80 9.24 13.5615 Dhorkuva 38.41 21.012 17.4

Total 709.44 478.632 230.81


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to IWMP due to

convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for convergence was

taken

1 Mandalva Checkdam 4.5 Irrigation department Block LevelWell 9 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTotal 13.5

2 Ranikhada

tank 0.5 Forest dep. Block Level(a) Check wall 0.4 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Level(b) well 15 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTotal 15.9

3 Limbani

Checkdam 8 Irrigation department Block LevelCheckwall 0.6 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Levelwell 7 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTerrece Talavdi 0.38 Forest dep. Block LevelTotal 15.98

4 Bandibhint

Checkdam 1.5 Irrigation department Block LevelPercolation Tank 0.5 Forest dep. Block LevelCheckwall 0.4 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Levelwell 15 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTerrece Talavdi 0.38 Forest dep. Block LevelTotal 17.78

5 Dholisimel


6 Dungarbhint Percolation Tank 0.7 Forest dep. Block LevelCheckwall 0.8 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Level


well 15 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTerrece Talavdi 0.57 Forest dep. Block LevelTotal 17.07

7 Dobachapura


8 Kevdi

Checkdam 15 Irrigation department Block LevelCheckwall 0.6 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Levelwell 9 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTerrece Talavdi 0.76 Forest dep. Block LevelTotal 25.36

9 Mithibor

Checkdam 0.4 Irrigation department Block LevelPercolation Tank 0.3 Forest dep. Block LevelCheckwall 0.4 NRGA panchayt dep. Block Levelwell 6 NRGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTotal 7.1

10 Kakadkund

Checkdam 4 Irrigation department Block LevelPercolation Tank 0.6 Forest dep. Block LevelCheckwall 1.2 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Levelwell 13 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTerrece Talavdi 0.57 Forest dep. Block LevelTotal 19.37

11 Marchipani


12 Rinchhvel Checkdam 4 Irrigation department Block LevelCheckwall 0.6 NRGA panchayt dep. Block Level


well 7 NRGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTotal 11.6

13 Gadola

Percolation Tank 0.5 Forest dep. Block LevelCheckwall 0.4 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Levelwell 15 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTerrece Talavdi 0.76 Forest dep. Block LevelTotal 16.66

14 Kothara

Percolation Tank 0.3 Forest dep. Block LevelCheckwall 3.5 MGNREGA panchayt dep. Block Levelwell 9 MGNREGA irrigat dep. Block LevelTerrece Talavdi 0.76 Forest dep. Block LevelTotal 13.56

15 Dhorkuva

(iv)check dam 1.5 Irrigation department Block Leveltank 0.5 Forest dep. Block Level(a) Check wall 0.4 NRGA panchayt dep. Block Level(b) well 15 NRGA irrigat dep. Block Level

Total 17.4


CHAPTER – 6 EXPECTED OUTCOMES


Expected Outcomes Employment One of the prominent features of watershed program is to create self sustainace to stake holder in terms of livelihood and increase in employment opprutunities is one of the benchmark that can unravel the effect of watershed. Watershed creates employment oppurtunites during the work phase for labour intensive activities like construction of gully plug, earthen dam, Farm bund, check dam, check wall and through the assest created under watershed program have a direct impact on agiculuture and natural resource development. Livelihood for self employed, wage lobour and income generating activities where there is a ample scope for employment. As the net employement increases the percapita income of agriculture, animal husbandry and other allied activites are also sure to increase. Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

Sr. NO.

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employmentNo. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 1 Mandalva 892 25467 0 7640 33999 12 2380 0 1221 3613 4 714 0 566 1084 2 Ranikhada 0 5628 0 1688 7316 0 526 0 270 796 0 157 0 81 238 3 Limbani 0 3873 0 1161 5034 0 362 0 180 543 0 108 0 54 162 4 Bandibhint 478 9224 0 2767 12469 44 862 0 437 1343 14 258 0 131 403 5 Dholisimel 66 10090 0 3027 13183 2 943 0 479 1424 2 282 0 143 427 6 Dungarbhint 791 13108 0 3932 17831 74 1225 0 655 1954 22 367 0 196 585 7 Dobachapura 0 3541 0 1062 4603 0 331 0 155 486 0 99 0 46 145 8 Kevdi 100 11931 0 3579 15610 1 1115 0 563 1679 1 334 0 168 503 9 Mithibor 1133 15740 0 4722 21595 22 1471 0 825 2318 7 441 0 247 695 10 Kakadkund 0 3616 0 778 4394 0 338 0 178 516 0 101 0 53 154 11 Marchipani 0 1284 0 385 1669 0 120 0 61 181 0 36 0 19 55 12 Rinchhvel 0 1754 0 526 2280 0 329 0 164 493 0 98 0 49 147 13 Gadola 0 4515 0 1355 5870 0 422 0 203 625 0 126 0 60 186 14 Kothara 0 6024 0 1807 7831 0 563 0 290 853 0 168 0 87 255 15 Dhorkuva 0 4654 0 1396 6050 0 435 0 226 661 0 130 0 67 197


Migration Main reason for migration is in search of employment oppurtunities for generating income for oneself and family. These clusters of villages have employment oppurtunities only during kharif season and which leaves them unemployed for both rabi and summer season. Implementation of watershed activities in these villages will open new avenues for employment in both kharif and Rabi seasons. Water stored in the water harvesting structures will be utilized in the offseason for agriculture purpose and also new technologies like drip irrigation, crop demonstration, animal camps, and farmers meeting for improved crop production practices will alter the farming pattern and create huge employment oppurtunites in the rural areas. Water stored through the structures will give opportunity for cultivation of farm lands which were left barren past years. Hence the overall impact is there will be decrease in the rate of migration Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre‐project Expected post Pre‐project Expected post project

1 Mandalva 846 677 282 2122 Ranikhada 210 168 70 533 Limbani 109 87 36 274 Bandibhint 317 254 106 795 Dholisimel 315 252 105 796 Dungarbhint 464 377 155 1167 Dobachapura 100 80 33 258 Kevdi 454 363 151 1149 Mithibor 564 451 188 14110 Kakadkund 102 82 34 2611 Marchipani 36 29 12 912 Rinchhvel 100 80 33 2513 Gadola 169 135 56 4214 Kothara 227 182 76 5715 Dhorkuva 153 122 51 38

Ground water table: The ground water table of this cluster of villages is appromately 15mt and futher goes down in summer and drought seasons. The single biggest source of groundwater depletion and lowering of the water table is over‐pumping and unchecked ground water utilization. Due to growing


population the demand for water for daily acitivies and agriculute has increased. This posses a major pressure on the water table. The water travels slowly through layers of soil and rock before finally reaching the water table. Several water harvesting structure are created like percolation tanks, roof water harvesting structures, bore well and dug well recharge for recharge of ground water. Hence a strong effort is taken to maintain a balance between usage and recharging of the ground water. Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre‐Project level Expected Increase/decrease(Post‐ Project)

1 Mandalva

Open wells 15.00 13.05 Bore wells 15.00 13.05

Others (specify) ‐ ‐

2 Ranikhada

Open wells 18.04 16.24Bore wells 18.04 16.24


3 Limbani



4 Bandibhint



5 Dholisimel



6 Dungarbhint



7 Dobachapura Open wells 19.02 17.12Bore wells 19.02 17.12


8 Kevdi




9 Mithibor



10 Kakadkund Open wells 17.10 15.39Bore wells 17.10 15.39


11 Marchipani



12 Rinchhvel



13 Gadola Open wells 14.50 13.05Bore wells 14.50 13.05


14 Kothara



15 Dhorkuva Open wells 16.25 14.63Bore wells 16.25 14.63

Others (specify) ‐ ‐Drinking water Drinking water is major problem in these villages. People depend upon hand pump and open well for drinking water and travel at 50 ft distance on average to fetch the water. There is no much problem of inherent or ingress salanity in this area. Drinking water is only available for 8 months and only few well in this village are live. The demand for drinking water changes from season to season gets worse in summer. However through intregration of watershed program with other schemes like WASSMO and Mechnical wing for water supply department Vadodara, has been done under the convergence. Drinkin water problem is likely to slove by this initiative. Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

S. No. Names of Availability of drinking water Quality of drinking water


Villages (no. of months in a year)Pre‐project Expected Post project Pre‐project Expected Post‐project

1 Mandalva 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good2 Ranikhada 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good3 Limbani 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good4 Bandibhint 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good5 Dholisimel 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good6 Dungarbhint 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good7 Dobachapura 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good8 Kevdi 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good9 Mithibor 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good10 Kakadkund 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good11 Marchipani 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good12 Rinchhvel 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good13 Gadola 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good14 Kothara 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good15 Dhorkuva 8 Month 4 month 11 Month 6 month Medium Good

Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas Sr. no Name of Village Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐project

Area(ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area(ha) Average Yield per ha (qtl)

1 Mandalva Kharif Maize 65.42 14.2 71.96 17.04Tur 8.2 6 9.02 10.22

Paddy(UI) 68.8 9.7 75.68 77.62Black gram 6.9 6.25 7.59 8.84Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 17.8 11.86 19.58 21.952Rabi 0 0 0 0Maize 26.55 13 29.2 31.8


Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid 0 0 0 0

2 Ranikheda Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)

per ha. Area(ha) Average Yield per ha

(qtl) Kharif Maize 110.68 14.25 121.75 17.1Tur 90.84 5.25 99.92 6.3

Paddy(UI) 365.17 9.25 401.69 11.1Black gram 70.82 6.12 77.9 7.344Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi 0 0 0 0Maize 0 0 0 0Zaid 0 0 0 0

3 Limbani Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)


(qtl) Kharif Maize 16.17 14 17.79 16.8Tur 13.04 5.1 14.34 6.12

Paddy(UI) 25.94 9.5 28.53 11.4Black gram 6.96 6.42 7.66 7.704Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 4.02 11 4.42 13.2Rabi 0 0 0 0Maize 12.11 15.3 13.32 18.36Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid 0 0 0 0


4 Bandibhit Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)


(qtl) Kharif Maize 47.91 14.2 52.7 17.04Tur 61.48 6 67.63 7.2

Paddy(UI) 52.29 9.7 57.52 11.64Black gram 15.1 6.75 16.61 8.1Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 7.5 10.4 8.25 12.48Rabi 0 0 0 0Maize 26.38 15.75 29.02 18.9Tur 6.26 11 6.88 13.2Zaid 0 0 0 0

5 Dholisamel Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)



Paddy(UI) 142.52 10.5 156.77 12.6Black gram 76.8 6.21 84.48 7.452Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi 0 0 0 0Maize 16 16.15 17.6 19.38Tur 0 0 0 0


Zaid 0 0 0 06 Dungarbhit Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐project



Kharif Maize 141.18 14.35 155.3 17.22Tur 51.06 5.1 51.06 5.1

Paddy(UI) 103.74 10 103.74 10Black gram 32.96 6.48 32.96 6.48Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 55.8 11.5 55.8 11.5Rabi 0 0Maize 57.52 16.2 57.52 16.2Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

7 Dobachapura Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)



Paddy(UI) 17.58 8.3 17.58 8.3Black gram 5.8 6.15 5.8 6.15Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi 0 0 0 0Maize 4.4 14.35 4.4 14.35


Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

8 Kevadi Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)



Paddy(UI) 52.09 8.6 57.3 10.32Black gram 20.76 6.58 22.84 7.896Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 1 10.4 1.1 12.48Rabi 0 0 0 0Maize 1.76 16.1 1.94 19.32Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

9 Mithibor Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)


(qtl) Kharif Maize 117.28 12.2 129.01 14.64Tur 61.82 5.35 68 6.42

Paddy(UI) 34.74 8.15 38.21 9.78Black gram 53.8 6.18 59.18 7.416Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi 0 0Maize 7.04 14.15 7.74 16.98


Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

10 Kakadkund Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)



Paddy(UI) 17.48 8.22 19.23 9.864Black gram 9.73 7.25 10.7 8.7Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi Maize 4 14 4.4 16.8Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

11 Marchipani Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)



Paddy(UI) 4.2 8.28 4.62 9.936Black gram 2.9 7.2 3.19 8.64Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi Maize 0 0 0 0


Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

12 Rinchhvel Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)



Paddy(UI) 5.18 8.12 5.7 9.744Black gram 14.62 7.36 16.08 8.832Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi 0 0Maize 0.8 13.17 0.88 15.804Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

13 Gadola Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐project Area(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)


(qtl) Kharif Maize 24.56 11.65 27.02 13.98 Tur 49.33 4.64 54.26 5.568 Paddy(UI) 61.08 7.9 67.19 9.48 Black gram 0 0 0 0 Ground nut 0 0 0 0 Cotton 0 0 0 0 Rabi Maize 0 0 0 0


Tur 0 0 0 0 Zaid 14 Kothara Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐project



Kharif Maize 57.36 12 63.1 14.4Tur 99.19 4.42 99.19 4.42

Paddy(UI) 47.4 7.78 47.4 7.78Black gram 39.1 7.82 39.1 7.82Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi 0 0Maize 1.4 13.28 1.4 13.28Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

15 Dhorkuwa Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐projectArea(ha) Average Yield (Qtl)



Paddy(UI) 0.2 7.83 0.2 7.83Black gram 11.8 5.55 11.8 5.55Ground nut 0 0 0 0Cotton 0 0 0 0Rabi 0 0


Maize 0.2 13.5 0.2 13.5Tur 0 0 0 0Zaid

Agriculture is being one the most important component and main occupation of the people living in these rural areas. Crop production and agiculture itself is constraint due to lack of irrigation facilities and total dependence of rain has limited the scope for agriculture. Only kharif season crops are taken in one year. However structures created under watershed opens avenue to take up cropping in rabi season by utilizing the water stored through check dam, check wall, farm ponds. Feilds bunds are also created to check the run‐off and to promote percolation of rain water. *Note the present data is taken based upon base‐line survey. The above yield is increased by certain percentage keeping in view the assumption that after the intervention of watershed, production and net area under agriculture will increase. Although the actual condition is subject to change based upon rainfall and climatic condition of that current year. Horticulture Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP

1 Mandalva 10.0 22.52 Ranikhada 3.8 15.03 Limbani 3.0 15.64 Bandibhint 3.5 15.45 Dholisimel 8.0 17.26 Dungarbhint 4.0 16.27 Dobachapura 8.0 20.08 Kevdi 10.5 25.49 Mithibor 11.2 25.010 Kakadkund 2.7 12.311 Marchipani 4.0 16.0 12 Rinchhvel 3.7 15.213 Gadola 2.5 11.014 Kothara 3.6 12.015 Dhorkuva 3.0 10.0


Vegetative cover There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 524ha which consists of only Juliflora Prosopis (ganda babool). Trees like Neem and _Alianthus_are seen just here and there, not concentrated in any area. It is planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation. Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed 1 Mandalva 286.17 1052 Ranikhada 308.77 953 Limbani 345.31 654 Bandibhint 68.60 355 Dholisimel 123.13 706 Dungarbhint 345.31 1157 Dobachapura 322.18 158 Kevdi 848.06 1329 Mithibor 399.87 6210 Kakadkund 90.44 5011 Marchipani 403.23 6812 Rinchhvel 211.75 17013 Gadola 409.93 9014 Kothara 32.88 3015 Dhorkuva 245.33 50

Livestock The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The interventions like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.


Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal Pre‐Project Expected Post‐project

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Mandalwa

Milch‐animals 3165 733800 12726000 3798 880560 15271200Draught Purpose animals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Animals for other purpose ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 3165 733800 12726000 3798 880560 15271200

2

Ranikheda

Milch‐animals 340 58425 972000 408 70110 1166400Draught Purpose animals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Animals for other purpose ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Total 340 58425 972000 408 70110 1166400

3 Libani

Milch‐animals 263 47205 738000 315.4 56646 885600Draught Purpose animals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Animals for other purpose ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 263 47205 738000 315.4 56646 885600

4 Bandibhit


Total 485 262450 2380500 582 314940 2856600

5 Dhodisamel


Total 2250 210000 3195000 2700 252000 3834000

6 Dugarbhit


Total 863 73260 3560400 1035.6 87912 4272480

7 Dobachapara Milch‐animals 255 35100 549000 306 42120 658800Draught Purpose animals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐


Animals for other purpose ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Total 255 35100 549000 306 42120 658800

8 kewadi


Total 210 80400 1467000 252 96480 1760400

9 Mithibor


Total 1850 225750 3420000 2220 2709000 4104000

10 Kakund


450 52350 702000 540 62820 842400

11 Marchipani


Total 232 26325 401400 278.4 31590 481680

12 Richavel


Total 345 30150 405000 414 36180 486000

13 Gadola

Milch‐animals 800 46875 558000 960 56250 669600Draught Purpose animals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Animals for other purpose ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Total 800 46875 558000 960 56250 669600

14 Kothara


Total 1007 79290 1054800 1208.4 95148 1265760


15

Dhorkuwa

Milch‐animals 203 34035 560700 243.6 40842 672840Draught Purpose animals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Animals for other purpose ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Total 203 34035 560700 243.6 40842 672840

G.Total 12718 1995415 32689800 15261.4 4832598 39227760Linkages The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. Table no. 60: BackwardForward linkages S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre‐project (no.) During the project (no.) Post‐project (no.) Backward linkages

Seed certification 1 3Seed supply systemFertilizer supply systemPesticide supply systemCredit institutions Water supply 1 2Extension services 1 2Nurseries 1 2Tools/machinery suppliers 1 1Price Support systemLabour Any other (please specify)Forward linkages Vermicomposting 1 3Paper Plate Making 1 4Road network 1 2Transport facilities Markets / Mandis Agro and other IndustriesMilk and other collection centres 1 4Labour Any other (please specify)


Logical Framework Analysis

PROJECT STRUCTURE EXPECTED RESULT PERFORMANCE VARIABLE

INDICATOR MEANS OF

VERIFICATION RISK/ ASSUMPTIONS

GOAL: IMPACT:

To conserve the soil and moisture and enhance the income of the people of the

project area through watershed activities

* The income of families will increased

*Purchase power of villagers will increase

* Impact assessment study

* Living standard will improve

* Annual expenditure and saving of households. * Evaluation report Natural disaster

(Drought)

* * Household assests * Compare between baseline survey and evaluation report

Political Intervention

Increase of ground water table

* Number of people migrating for employment

opportunity * Physical observation

* Irrigation during off‐season * Cropping pattern * Physical Varification and

FGD with farmers OBJECTIVE1: OUTCOMES:

To minimize the degradation of land and to conserve the natural resources of the project

and area.

* Agriculture income will increase

*Net area under agriculture will increases.


* Total agriculture production will increase * Evaluation report

Soil moisture content will increase

* Presence of vegetation cover in the project area.

* Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

Maintenance of the Structure after the project completion

* Percentage of farmers

cultivating the crops in Rabi. * Trend analysis of crop

cultivation


Activity for Objective1: Outputs:

1. Soil and moisture conservation works

* Completion of soil moisture works.

* Number of watershed physical structure presents

in the project area * Physical verification

*Diversified farming * Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

2. Use of advance water conservation techniques.

* Optimum utilization of available available water

* Number of households having drip irrigation system of their houses

* Physical verification

3. Modern agriculture techniques for enhancing of agriculture productivity

through crop demonstration plot.

*Change in the cultivation pattern and adoption of new techniques in

agriculture to realize the maximum potential of the

land


opportunity * Observations

OBJECTIVE2: OUTCOMES

To increase the per capita income of BPL and marginal farmer through

various livelihood activities.

* Reduction of migrating families from the project

area.


opportunity


* Availbility of employment within the

project area.

* Number of people engaged in poultry farming and other

livelihood activities.

* Physical verification/ Photographs

* Unemployment will decrease

* Number of people involved in self employment activities

* FGDs and PRA


Activity for Objective2: Outputs: 1. Promotion of livelihood

activities like dairy unit,vermicompost,

nursery raising, fodder production, garment stiching and flour mill.

* People will set‐up their micro‐enterprise on

demand based activties.

* Number of people showing their interest to set‐up micro

industry * Observations

2. Capacity building activities for improvement entrepreneurial skill.

* Improved knowledge and enhancement of skills for

self development

* Number of small enterprise set‐up


OBJECTIVE3: OUTCOMES:

To strengthen the local institution

* Presence of strong and dynamic local governance

* Number of meetings initiated by the local leaders.

* Impact assessment study * Interest of the People.

* People participation and representation will

increase

* Number of peoples’ organization present in the

grass root level

* Evaluation report, FGD, Observations

Activity for Objective3: Outputs:

1. Organise training and awareness programme for

Village institutions

* Quality of local leaders will improve and use of more democratic method

of decision making.

* Number of case resolved within the locality. * Observations

2.Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

* Local leaders will take interest to understand the programmes and schemes and utilize for the benefit

of the village.

* Number of schemes utilize for the benefit of the villages. * FGDs and PRA


3. Formation of peoples organization in the grass

root level

* There will be proper management of available resources by the people's

organisation

* Activities of the watershed is implementing smoothly without any hindrance

* There will be proper implementation of the

projects

* Participation of deprived

section will increase

* Number of deprived/ poor people participated in the meeting of Gram Sabha

* Representation of local people will increase

* Number of participants represent in the project

meeting.


CHAPTER 7 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES


Introduction: Chapter‐7 deals with the plan in which the activities of watershed IWMP‐5 Project of Vadodara maintain the quality and renders the project sustainable. In details the chapter describes that the proper and regular monitoring and evaluation of the project can trimming down the improper implementation of activities so that the quality can be controlled at the right time. The chapter extends with the appropriate post‐project techniques for project sustainability and research and documentation for maintaining the records, locate the loop falls in implementing and follow up the project with a new and suitable adaptation for the area development. 7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation:

To control the activities at the stage of implementing proper plans has formed for monitoring and Evaluation. Project monitoring is one of the important components in watershed development programmes. The broad objectives of a watershed project demand good monitoring framework. A monitoring framework is suggested which within the capacity of watershed development teams and watershed committees. No great deal of training, human resources or instruments are expected to be employed. The monitoring should actually assist the project team to provide a guideline for improvement in the activities and output the project. Selection of an appropriate measure for the given area and ensuring the quality of project measures to be given great attention at the time of monitoring. Three Ties of Monitoring: Three tiers of monitoring are planned –

1. First Tire (Monitoring of activities): This is carried out by the head of local PO’s along with part time workers to monitor the implementation of all activities as per the action plan. The monitoring also aims at ensuring that the quality of work is as per the guidelines prescribed for each activity.

2. Second Tire (Monitoring of outputs): To check the outputs of the activities, project coordinators along with the part time workers monitors as per the logical frame work. The indicators are selected considering the broad objectives of the project. One can adopt or modify these as per requirement at the time of implementation. The output level indicators needs to be devised by the project team based on the outcome level indicators on. Outputs need to be monitored frequently, may be once in a quarter/ six months.

3. Third Tire (Monitoring of Outcomes): Project reviewing committee along with the project co‐ordinator will monitor the overall outcomes of the objectives as per the log frame. The outcomes level monitoring may start in the second year and continue on an annual basis. Most of the information can be available from the sets of output level indicators. Participatory methods should be used at the time of monitoring the activities. The methods of collecting samples data for the monitoring activities should be clearly documented in the monitoring report. The detail of

the monitoring system is presented in the table as under. Table no 60. Details of Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP5 Tiers of Monitoring Basis of monitoring Frequency of monitoring Orientation of the Indicator Monitoring by

First tier Immediate result basis

Regular Monthly Monitoring

Activity oriented Local People organizations


Second Tier Monitoring of Outputs Regular monitoring (Quarterly, half yearly and

annually )

Objective oriented Internal project team (WDT, PIA, MDT, Experts and PM)

Third Tier Monitoring of Outcomes

Annually but monitoring start from second year

onwards?

Goal Oriented 1. Specified monitoring team formed by DWDU,

2. External Monitoring team by GSWMA

Apart from the above mentioned monitoring system, there are a Web‐based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land‐use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village‐wise. Furthermore, survey‐number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web‐based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher‐up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude‐longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher‐up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time. Evaluation: The project will be evaluated by the external agency after the project completion to see the impact of the project in the area. The external agency should use the monitoring tool specified in the DPR of the project and should consider the assumptions and risk mentioned in the DPR because these are the factors which may be an obstacle in the implementation of the project. The agency will be decided by the State Nodal Agency (GSWMA) at the time of the evaluation. The evaluation will be evaluate that the goal is achieved or not after the implementation of the project.


7.2 Plans for PostProject Management/Sustainability Approach: Watershed development project can be rendered sustainable through an appropriate combination of environmental balance, community participation and institutionalization of process. So the detail plans for the post project management are described as under: 7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures The measures taken up will be long lasting. Along with engineering measures, efforts will also be made to establish forest cover in the upper catchment areas and on the slopes. The downstream area will have prolonged stream flows. The stream banks should also be vegetated to create a buffer between land and water bodies. Such vegetation helps in stabilizing streams, enhancing recharge and improving the riparian habitat. An including species of trees and grasses will be selected for developing a vegetative cover at the time of implementation of IWMP‐5 project of Vadodara. The diversity of vegetative measures is the key to sustainability. Combination of shallow and deep‐rooted plants, fast and slow growing plants, productive and medical plants and herbs will be encouraged. The vegetation created will ultimately help to recharge the rainwater, use the soil moisture optimally and provide direct and indirect benefits to the community and environment as a whole. Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed. Optimum use of water and increased use of organic fertilizers is the key to conserve the precious land source. Water overuse and excessive fertilization leads to permanent damage of lands and groundwater. It is important to maintain soil quality through crop management. Crop diversity and crop rotation helps in improving the micro flora and fauna present in the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystems relationship. 7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management

During the planning phase the local people’s participation were involved and it is planned that the involvement during implementation and post project maintenance will enhance the impact of project and maintain the structures. However, participation without empowerment does not help in achieving sustainable development. So People will be made aware of different concepts and options for their livelihood and natural resource management. Local wisdom is important in understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human behaviour and its economic / ecological implications. The interests of a community will be created and maintained by adopting the measures in such a manner that they provide immediate, medium term and long term benefits to the community. 7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management

A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation of benefit sharing and maintenance of the resources. This usually includes small user groups for different resources / assets as well as village level organizations. In‐built system and mechanisms will be developed for qualitative growth and dynamisms of the organizations. The community organizations should be linked to other Government and Non Government institutes of interest. The potential people’s organizations were formed in the project area include Watershed level Organization and Users Groups.


Watershed level Committee Watershed level organization is established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, coordination, management and maintenance are possible through this representative body. This clearly implies representation from different sections of the community – landholders and landless, upper reach and lower reach, men and women, lower and upper castes, Gram Panchayat and other existing political or non political organizations User Groups The other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas of interest in the project area named user groups. These include, depending upon necessity, Self Help Groups of women and men, User Groups for common assets, Natural Clubs, etc. The capacities of different groups will be developed time to time for effective functioning of these groups. A mechanism will be developed to ensure continuity, both in learning, functioning and actions that from responsibilities of such groups during the implementation project activities.


MAPS






















Date post:	07-Aug-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	buidung
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

PROJECT REPORT IWMP‐5 CHHOTAUDEPUR...

Documents