DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP -...

1

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP

(2010 – 2015)

Micro Watershed & Micro Watershed Code No

: Salaguri MWS

Saidal Turung MWS

Dangdhra Mahimabari MWS

Phulbari Tengajan MWS

IWMP project : JORHAT – 2 (TIPOMIAJAN) IWMP , 2010-11

Block : Titabor Dev. Block

District : Jorhat

Name of the PIA : Divisional Soil Conservation Office, Jorhat

Division, Jorhat, Assam

i

Contents

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-

CHAPTER 1

Introduction and Background

CHAPTER 2

General Description of Project Area

CHAPTER – 3

Base Line Information of Watershed

CHAPTER – 4

Institutional Building and Project Management

CHAPTER – 5

Management/Action Plan

CHAPTER 6

Capacity Building Plan

CHAPTER 7

Phasing of Programme and Budgeting

CHAPTER 8

Consolidation and Completion of Various Works

CHAPTER – 9

Expected Outcomes

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We, M/S Super Engineering Works, Jorhat, Assam express our sincere

gratitude towards State Level Nodal Agency, IWMP, Assam for entrusting with the

responsibility of preparing the Detail Project Report for Tipomiya Watershed Project

under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

We also express our gratitude to Dr. Prem Charan, Chairman, SLNA, IWMP,

Assam for providing his valuable suggestions, guidance for preparing the DPR.

We are also indebted to the CEO, SLNA, IWMP, Assam, Mr. F. Haque

Choudhry, Deputy Secretary, Soil Conservation Department, Govt. of Assam and

other officials of SLNA, IWMP, Assam for their help and support in every stage of

preparing the DPR.

We are expressing our sincere gratitude to the Deputy Commissioner, Jorhat

District and Mr. Dimbeswar Gogoi, Divisional Officer, Soil Conservation Division,

Jorhat, Assam for their help, suggestions and constant inspiration and supervision

for preparing the DPR.

We sincerely acknowledge the help and cooperation extended by all the Goan

Burahs and other community members during the conduction of PRA Exercises and

household survey.

(Er. S. Nazrul Hussain),

Team Leader,

M/S Super Engineering Works,

Jorhat, Assam.

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION:

Name of the State : Assam Name of the District : Jorhat Names of the Blocks : Titabor Dev. Block

Name of the project : Jorhat- 3 (Upper Tuni Watershed)

Financial Year of sanction : 2010-11 Project duration : From2010 to 2015

II). PROFILE OF THE WATERSHED PROJECT:

Table No.1.1 Project at a Glance

1 Name of the State Assam

2 Name of the project JORHAT – 2 (TIPOMIAJAN) IWMP , 2010-11

3 Name of the District Jorhat

4 Names of the Blocks Titabor Dev. Block

5 Names of Gram Panchayats 85 No. Tengajan, 81 No Turung, 87 No. Madhapur

6 Names & Census Code of Villages

covered

Name of Village Census Code

Christian Gaon 01926200

No.2 Madhapur 01926300

Kachari Gaon 01926400

Charaipani Bangali 01926000

Dangdhara 01926100

Mahimabari 01925900

Salaguri 01926600

Lohong Bebejia 01926500

No.1 Madhapur 01927200

Saidal Kachari 01926700

Tipomia 01926800

Turung gaon 01927000

Tipomea Habi 01927100

Bhagyalakhi 01925100

Medeluajan 01925200

Phulbari 01925400

Tangajan 01925500

Charaipani Bosabari

Grant No. 188

Charaipani Grant No.1

7 Four major reasons for selection of

watershed

1. Proper utilization of Natural Resources for

sustenance. 2. Flood is a major concern for the watershed.

2

Floods cause instant devastation of the life and

properties. On the other hand infested thousands of hectares of lands with sands

thereby converting cultivable land into waste

lands. 3. Run-off originating from seasonal rain attain

high velocity due to medium to steep gradient which prevail in the watershed and thereby

causes all types of soil erosion hazards. 4. Lack of sufficient vegetal cover in the project

area is a permanent factor effecting the

infiltration and percolation of surface flow leading to severe moisture stress in the soil

which affects the economy of the people in the long run.

8 Name, Address, Phone No and

Reg.No.. of the PIA(s)

Divisional Officer, Jorhat Soil Conservation Division,

Jorhat, Assam

9 Date of approval of Watershed

Development Plan by the DPC

-

10 Area of the Project (ha.) 4778 Ha

11 Area proposed to be treated (ha.) 3850 Ha

12 Financial Year of sanction 2010-11

13 Project duration From 2010 to 2015

14 Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs) 462.00

15 Date of Sanction by State authority …

16 Date of Release of 1st Installment of

Central Assistance (To be filled by DoLR)

…

17 Any other, please specify ---

3

Project Background:

Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) is a modified

programme of previous Drought Prone Areas Programme (DPAP), Desert

Development Programme (DDP) and Integrated Wastelands Development

Programme (IWDP) of the Department of Land Resources, Government of India. The

scheme was launched during 2009-10. The main objectives of the IWMP are to

restore the ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and developing degraded

natural resources such as soil, vegetative cover and water. The outcomes are

prevention of soil erosion, regeneration of natural vegetation, rain water harvesting

and recharging of the ground water table. This enables multi-cropping and the

introduction of diverse agro-based activities, which help to provide sustainable

livelihoods to the people residing in the watershed area.

Every land area, regardless of its location, is part of a watershed. Some are

hilly and others are relatively flat. Every watershed has a physical landscape a

complex terrain of landforms, water resources, vegetation, animals and their

habitats, human beings and the structures they have built. At the watershed scale,

conflicts over water and land resources are inherently multi-attribute, multi-

stakeholder, and multi-discipline decision problems. Watershed systems from those

with many small tributaries to large-scale lake systems and river basins provide

direct inputs to economic processes, serve as waste sinks for economic output, and

provide ecosystem services that make life possible.

In recent years, the concepts of integrated watershed management have

gained increasing attention as strategies for sustainable resource use within a

complex multi-institutional regulatory context. Watershed is a basic hydrologic unit,

and hydrologic and ecologic processes govern the quality of soil and water resources

within the watershed. Soil degradative processes are accentuated by anthropogenic

factors. It is appropriate; therefore, that issues related to sustainable management

of natural resources (e.g., food security and environment quality) are addressed

within the context of watershed management.

4

Integrated Watershed management implies rational utilization of natural

resources for optimal and sustained production with minimum hazard to

environment. It requires collection and analysis of information from multiple services

to ensure sustainable economic and social progress of a watershed.

Problems :

The Tipomiya Watershed is located in southernmost part of the district Jorhat

and near the foothill of Nagaland. The geographically the project area is located

between 94°7'23.71" to 94°15'9.93"E longitude and 26°29'13.20"N to 26°

33'10.47"N latitude. The watershed area covered 20 numbers of revenue villages

under Titabor Development Block. The total project area of the watershed is about

5077 Ha.

The Tipomiya Watershed is characterized by undulating topography with

numerous streams and wetlands. The major problems of the watershed are – Firstly

degradation and congestion of natural water bodies like wetlands and other natural

drainage secondly, flood is a major concern for the watershed which cause instant

devastation of the life and properties, thirdly, run-off originating from seasonal rain

attain high velocity due to medium to steep gradient which prevail in the watershed

and thereby causes all types of soil erosion hazards. Fourthly, lack of sufficient

vegetal cover in the project area is a permanent factor effecting the infiltration and

percolation of surface flow leading to severe moisture stress in the soil which affects

the economy of the people in the long run. Besides above, the uneven rainfall, river

bank erosion, lack of irrigation facilities, damage caused by pest and diseases in

agricultural production etc are also important problems in the project area.

Need and Scope for Watershed Development

Degradation of soil and water resources is considered not only as an utmost

constraint to sustainable agricultural development but also a threat to the society.

Poor ecosystem management has and will result in the impaired functioning of

watershed and will continue to do so in the future and the need to protect and

preserve the quality of the ecosystem is very essential.

5

Due to rapid growth of population there is an excessive demand for more land both

for agriculture and non-agriculture use. This has created a vast stretches of

wastelands and some are on the verge of becoming wastelands. There is need to

reverse the trend by treating wastelands. Land which is degraded by natural forces

needs improvement by appropriate interventions.

Watershed management is the implementation of management systems that

ensure the preservation, conservation and sustainable use of all land and water

resources. Watershed management also integrates various aspects of forestry,

agriculture, hydrology, ecology, soils etc. for choosing acceptable management

alternative within the specific social and economic context. As mention above, the

major problems of the Tipomiya Watershed are degradation of Natural Resources,

soil erosion, siltation etc. and therefore there is a huge scope for taking up

watershed development activities in the watershed area.

Table No. 1.2 Need and Scope for Watershed Development

Project Name

Project

Type

Weightage

i ii iii iv v vi vii ix x xi xii xiii

Jorhat-2 (Tipomiya) IWMP Plain 5 5 5 5 3 0 5 7.5 10 15 10 5

*As per PPR

Slno. Criteria Max Score

Ranges and Scores

i Poverty index(%of poor to population)

10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20% (2.5)

ii % of SC/ST population

10 More than 40% (10)

20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20% (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80% (10)

50 to 80% (5) Less than 50 (3)

v Ground water status 15 Over exploited (15)

Critical (10) Sub critical (5) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/DDP Block

10 -66.7 & below (10) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (5) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/DDP

6

Block

vii Area under assured irrigation

15 Less than 10% (15)

10 to 20% (10) 20 to 30% (5) Above 30% (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5)

Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20% (15)

Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low – less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

10 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Land with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (0)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity with in the micro watersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (More than one contiguous micro- watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

7

Table no.1.3: Watershed information Sl no

Name of Project

Watershed Code Villages to be Treated Geographical Area(Ha)

Treatable Area(Ha)

Approval Year

1

Jorhat-2

(Tipomiyai)

Salaguri MWS, 3B3C3eII

Salaguri Gaon 514.95

3850 2010-11

2 Lohong Bebejia 343.64

3 Madhapur Grant No.1 181.9

4 Saidal – Turung

MWS, 3B3C3eIII

Saidal Kachari Gaon 562.51

5 Tipomia Gaon 367.68

6 Turung Gaon 262.3

7 Dangdhara –

Mahimabari MWS, 3B3C3eI

Christian Gaon 196

8 Madhapur No.2 95.73

9 Kachari Gaon 35.01

10 Charaipani Bongali Gaon 277.98

11 Dangdhara Grant 182.85

12 Mohima Bari Gaon 216.71

13 Phulbari -Tengajan MWS, 3B3C3eIV

Medeluajan Gaon 34.59

14 Tongajan Gaon 236.55

15 Phulbari Gaon 105.24

16 Tipomia Habi Gaon 315.21

17 Bhagyalakni 298.72

18 Charaipani Bosabari T.E. 278.18

19 Grant No.188 168.45

20 Charaipani Grant No.1 186.81

8

CHAPTER 2

General Description of Project Area

Table 2.1: Location

Longitude 94°7'23.711" to 94°15'9.93"E

Latitude 26°33'10.47"N to 26° 29'13.20"N

State Assam

District Jorhat

Subdivision Titabor

Block Titabor Dev. Block

Panchayat 85 No. Tengajan, 81 No Turung, 87 No. Madhapur

Villages Salaguri Gaon

Lohong Bebejia

Madhapur Grant No.1

Saidal Kachari Gaon

Tipomia Gaon

Turung Gaon

Christian Gaon

Madhapur No.2

Kachari Gaon

Charaipani Bongali Gaon

Dangdhara Grant

Mohima Bari Gaon

Medeluajan Gaon

Tongajan Gaon

Phulbari Gaon

Tipomia Habi Gaon

Bhagyalakni

Charaipani Bosabari T.E.

Grant No.188


9

Location Map

10

Micro Watershed Map

11

Location of Watershed :

The Tipomiya Watershed is located in southernmost part of the district Jorhat

and near the foothill of Naga-Patkai range. The geographically the project area is

located between 94°7'23.71" to 94°15'9.93"E longitude and 26°29'13.20"N to 26°

33'10.47"N latitude. The area is bounded by the foothills of Naga-Patkai Range in

the South-east, Saraipani Jan in the North, River Kakodunga in the west.The

watershed area covered 20 numbers of revenue villages under Titabor Development

Block. The total project area of the watershed is about 4778 Ha.

Physiography:

The physiography of the project area is characterized by undulating hill area

running along the Naga-Patkai range covering the piedmont plain with a dynamic

flow system; the ecology is unique and there is a constant threat of flood and

erosion.

Climate:

The climate of project area is typically ‘tropical monsoon rainfall’ type,

with high levels of humidity and heavy rainfall. People here enjoy a moderate

climate all throughout the year, with warm summers and mild winters. The sub-

tropical climate of the area is characterised by high rainfall and high humidity and is

worked by three dominant seasons, viz. winter (November to February), summer

(March to May) and monsoon (June to October). Most of the rainfall in the state is

received under the influence of the south-west monsoon between June and October.

Rainfall Data of Jorhat District for Last 7 Years (2004-2010)

Year

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

mar

ch

Ap

ril

may

Jun

e

July

augu

st

Sep

tem

ber

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

Dec

emb

er

2004 36.4 37.6 133.5 305.4 307.2 187.2 326.1 204.5 337.7 229.2 5.4 1.8

2005 36.4 24.3 227.9 154.2 219.6 192.1 263.4 281.4 140.9 60.9 14.9 0

2006 5.6 105.7 38.8 140.5 155.4 245.4 332 226.2 157.4 73.3 20.1 11.4

2007 0.1 76.3 29.4 212.8 189 274.6 300.8 318 355.1 28.5 25.3 17.6

2008 27.7 8.3 89.9 181.8 203.3 329.9 357.1 330.5 125 122.5 0 2.1

2009 6.6 21.7 26 154 187.8 225 293.4 286.8 101.5 57.8 18.7 0.7

2010 0 0 108 325 272.4 328 413.8 290.3 187.1 113.9 27.6 8.8 Source: India Meteorological Department, HYDROMET DIVISION.

12

Variation in Rainfall :

YEAR

2010200920082007200620052004

Va

lue

300

200

100

0

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

YEAR

2010200920082007200620052004

Va

lue

400

300

200

100

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

YEAR

2010200920082007200620052004

Va

lue

500

400

300

200

100

0

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBE

YEAR

2010200920082007200620052004

Va

lue

300

200

100

0

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

Annual Rainfall for Last Seven Years

Year Annual Rainfall

2004 2112

2005 1616

2006 1512

2007 1828

2008 1778

2009 1380

2010 2075

Average Annual Rainfall for Last 7 Years 1757

Source: India Meteorological Department, HYDROMET DIVISION.

13

Graph : Variation in Annual Rainfall of Jorhat District, Assam for last 7 Years

Temparature :

Maximum Temparature: (in Degree Celicious)

Years JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1951 22.7 25.0 27.9 27.0 30.0 30.7 31.5 32.3 31.9 28.9 25.5 23.5

1971 22.1 23.3 29.3 28.9 30.1 31.9 32.0 31.4 31.8 29.0 25.4 23.4

1991 22.1 24.4 28.0 27.7 27.9 31.3 32.5 32.3 30.8 29.2 26.3 21.8

2009 24.1 26.7 29.0 28.9 30.9 33.0 33.0 31.8 33.1 30.8 27.0 23.3

Source: Tea Research Association, Tocklai

14

Fig: Variation in Maximum Temparature since 1951

Minimum Temparature: (in Degree Celicious)

Year JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1951 9.0 11.6 15.7 17.5 21.4 23.7 24.3 24.7 23.6 21.1 15.3 10.6

1971 10.3 11.6 15.5 19.8 22.8 24.9 24.9 24.5 24.5 21.9 14.9 10.3

1991 9.7 13.4 17.4 19.6 22.0 25.2 25.9 25.9 24.5 20.6 15.1 8.6

2009 11.7 13.1 16.1 20.6 23.0 25.4 26.0 25.6 25.7 22.6 16.5 12.4 Source: Tea Research Association, Tocklai

Fig: Variation in Minimum Temparature since 1951

15

Relative Humidity (in %)

Year Time/Hour JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1951

Morning (recorded at 06.13 hrs.)

98 96 94 93 95 92 94 96 97 97 98 98

Afternoon (recorded at 13.13 hrs.)

57 49 48 61 67 76 73 74 70 71 68 59

Sunshine Hrs. 6.9 7.3 6.5 5.5 4.9 4.0 6.2 6.6 7.8 5.5 6.4 6.2

1971


94 92 89 90 90 91 91 93 93 95 95 94


55 53 43 59 66 72 72 73 70 73 59 55

Sunshine Hrs. 5.6 6.5 7.7 5.9 6.0 5.0 4.8 5.3 5.8 5.3 6.3 6.9

1991


96 96 92 92 93 92 92 93 95 96 97 98


58 60 51 64 76 76 72 69 77 72 61 65

Sunshine Hrs. 6.8 6.0 7.0 6.1 3.4 3.2 5.4 4.7 3.9 5.5 6.9 5.3

2009


96 94 95 93 91 92 93 95 93 95 97 97


57 49 44 65 69 70 70 74 68 65 61 64

Sunshine Hrs. 4.9 6.1 5.1 5.2 6.4 5.2 5.2 4.3 6.6 5.9 5.9 4.6


Fig: Variation in Relative Humidity since 1951

16

Evaporation (in mm) Year JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1954 43.4 64.4 105.4 102.0 133.3 141.0 99.2 93.0 99.0 68.2 57.2 46.5

1971 36.8 51.2 91.1 91.1 102.3 100.8 112.3 97.4 97.4 69.8 37.5 34.7

1991 36.4 44.8 83.6 75.7 72.6 83.6 105.7 90.2 65.1 62 46.6 32.6

2009 32.8 50.9 73.8 72.1 96.2 93.4 94.6 81.8 94.7 68.4 46.0 31.7


Fig: Variation in Evaporation since 1954

Drainage & Water bodies:

The watershed area is endowed with many perennial streams namely Tipomiya,

Medeluajan, Saraipanijan and Letekajan etc. The Tipomiya Jan originates in the Hills

of Naga-Patkai Range and flows through Phulanibari, Kakatigaon, Tipomiya Habi

gaon,Tipomiya Gaon, and confluence with Cherelijan near Naopeta and then with

Saraipanijan and finally confluence with River Kakodonga. Other Streams are also

originated in the hills of Naga-Patkai Range and flows through the watershed are

and finally confluence with River Kaodona.

17

Drainage Map

18

Soil:

The general and average soil character of cultivable land in the watershed is mainly alluvial and composed of mixture of sand

(course to loamy). From soil resource mapping and taxonomic classification carried by the Natural Bureau of Soil Survey and Land

Use Planning (NBSSLUP) it is observed that there are basically eight types of taxonomic classification of are found with the

watershed namely - Fine Loamy Typic Dystrochrepts (36), Fine Loamy Typic Paleudalfs (38), Fine Loamy Typic Dystrochrepts

associated with clayey, typic hapludults (40), Coarse Loamy Typic Dystrochrepts Fine Silty (42), Fine loamy, Aeric Haplaquepts

(43), Fine Loamy Typic Dystrochrepts associated with fine, typic haplaquepts(44), Fine Loamy Typic Dystrochrepts associated with

fine silty, typic haplaquepts (46), Fine loamy, Aeric Haplaquepts associated with course loamy Typic Dystrochrepts (47).

Characteristics of Dominant Soil:

Pa

rtic

ula

rs

Fin

e L

oam

y

Typic

Dyst

roch

repts

(36)

Fin

e L

oam

y

Typic

Pale

udalfs

(38),

Fin

e L

oam

y

Typic

Dyst

roch

repts

ass

oci

ate

d w

ith

clayey, ty

pic

haplu

dults

(40)

Coars

e L

oam

y

Typic

Dyst

roch

repts

Fin

e S

ilty (

42),

Fin

e loam

y,

Aeric

Hapla

quepts

(43)

Fin

e L

oam

y

Typic

Dyst

roch

repts

ass

oci

ate

d w

ith

fine, ty

pic

hapla

quepts

(44

),

Fin

e L

oam

y

Typic

Dyst

roch

repts

ass

oci

ate

d w

ith

fine s

ilty,

typic

hapla

quepts

(46),

Fin

e loam

y,

Aeric

Hapla

quepts

ass

oci

ate

d w

ith

cours

e loam

y

Typic

Dyst

roch

repts

(47)

Morphology Steep Gently slopping Undulating Undulating Valleys Valleys Valleys Valleys

Surface Texture Steep Gently slopping Undulating Undulating Valleys Valleys Valleys Valleys

Parent Material Sand stone Sand stone Allovium Allovium Alluvium Alluvium Alluvium Alluvium

Soil Depth Deep (>100) Deep (>100) Deep (>100) Deep (>100) Deep (>100) Deep (>100) Deep (>100) Deep (>100)

Particle Size Class Fine loamy Fine loamy Fine loamy Coarse loamy Fine loamy Fine loamy Fine loamy Fine loamy

Mineralogy Mixed Mixed Mixed Mixed Mixed Mixed Mixed Mixed

Soil temperature regime

Highper thermic 220-280 C





Highper thermic 220-

280 C



Reaction (pH) Moderatly acidic 4.5

– 5.5 Moderatly acidic

4.5 – 5.5 Moderatly acidic

4.5 – 5.5 Moderatly acidic

4.5 – 5.5 Neutral 6.5-7.5

Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5

Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5

Slietly acedic 5.5-6.5

Drainage Class Well Excessive Well Well Very poor Well Well Poor

Ground Water Depth

Deep (>5) Deep (>5) Deep (>5) Deep (>5) Moderately

shallow (1-2mtr) Deep (>5)

Moderately deep (2-5 mtr)

Moderately shallow (1-2mtr)

Slope Moderately steep

slopping (15-30%) Gently slopping

3-8% Gently slopping 3-

8% Moderately steep slopping (8-15%)

Level to nearly level 0-1%

Gently slopping 3-8%

Level to nearly level 0-1%

Very gently slopping (1-3%)

19

Soil Map

20

Slope Map

21

Ground Water:

The depth of ground water level in water table zone varies from 0.41 to 3.07 m bgl

in the pre monsoon period and 0.56 to 3.41 m bgl during post monsoon period. As

per Ground Water Information Booklet, Central Ground Water Board, 2008 –the area

is very much suitable for construction of ground water abstraction structures for

discharge ranging from 100-300 M3/hr. Ground water occurs under water table

conditions. In the southern parts of the watershed, the aquifer system fades out due

to mixing of finer particles of sand and clay leading to decrease in thickness of

aquifer system. The southern part of the area, adjacent to the Naga hill range is

covered by surficial blanket of clay, belonging to Younger alluvium and probably has

been derived from the adjacent hills which are composed of the rocks of Tertiary

age.

Economy:

The economy of the project area depends on agriculture. Paddy is the major crop

and it cultivated in kharif and land remains uncultivated for rest of the year. The

farming system is traditional. Low agricultural productivity, lack of irrigation facilities,

damage cause by pest and diseases are the major constraints for the agricultural

development of the region. Further fishing, livestock rearing handloom and weaving

are other important economic activities of the watershed area.

Land Use/ Land Cover:

The following landuse categories are identified through visual interpretation of

remote Sensing Map and supported by field verification. The identified main landuse

categories are –Agricultural land (kharif) constitute about 2928 ha about 57.66% of

total geographicl area of the watershed, Agricultural Land (Double Crop) constitute

about 310 Ha (6.11%), Agricultural Plantation i.e. Tea Garden 734 Ha (14.46%),

Forest (Evergreen/Semi-evergreen) – 46 Ha (0.91%), Wetland – 20 Ha and rural

habitation including homestead plantation constitute about 1039 ha area.

22

Lulc Map

23

Table no: 2.2 Land Details Sl

No

Nam

e of

Vill

age

Geogra

phic

al

Are

a(H

a)

Fore

st A

rea (

ha)

Land u

nder

agricu

ltura

l use

(ha)

Rain

-fed a

rea (

ha)

Irrigate

d A

rea

Perm

anent

past

ure

s

(ha)

Wasteland

Cul

tivab

le

Non

Cul

tivab

le

1 Salaguri Gaon 514.95 0 350.30 311.04 39.26 2.36 0

2 Lohong Bebejia 343.64 0 256.11 256.11 0 0 0

3 Madhapur Grant No.1 181.9 0 74.05 74.05 0 0 0

4 Saidal Kachari Gaon 562.51 0 483.39 215.68 267.71 18.1 0

5 Tipomia Gaon 367.68 0 232.47 229.06 3.41 0 0

6 Turung Gaon 262.3 0 220.68 220.68 0 0 0

7 Christian Gaon 196 0 152.13 152.13 0 0 0

8 Madhapur No.2 95.73 0 40.01 40.01 0 0 0

9 Kachari Gaon 35.01 0 23.89 23.89 0 0 0

10 Charaipani Bongali Gaon 277.98 0 205.07 205.07 0 0 0

11 Dangdhara Grant 182.85 0 124.32 124.32 0 0 0

12 Mohima Bari Gaon 216.71 0 72.12 72.12 0 0 0

13 Medeluajan Gaon 34.59 0.31 32.63 32.63 0 0 0

14 Tongajan Gaon 236.55 6.39 173.71 173.71 0 0 0

15 Phulbari Gaon 105.24 2.1 83.76 83.76 0 0 0

16 Tipomia Habi Gaon 315.21 0 232.47 229.06 3.41 0 0

17 Bhagyalakni 298.72 37.25 209.86 209.86 0 0 0

18 Charaipani Bosabari T.E. 278.18 0 84.98 84.98 0 0 0

19 Grant No.188 168.45 0 19.68 19.68 0 0 0

20 Charaipani Grant No.1 186.81 0 128.36 128.36 0 0 0

TOTAL 4778 46 3342 3029 314 0 20 0

24

Table No. 2.3: Details of the types of areas covered under the project 1 2 3

S.

No.

Names of villages No. of beneficiaries covered

Large

Farmer

Small

Farmer

Marginal

farmer Landless Total

1 Salaguri Gaon 46 72 177 185 479

2 Lohong Bebejia 27 42 104 108 281

3 Madhapur Grant No.1 6 10 24 25 65

4 Saidal Kachari Gaon 13 20 49 51 133

5 Tipomia Gaon 18 29 71 74 193

6 Turung Gaon 17 27 67 70 181

7 Christian Gaon 11 18 44 45 118

8 Madhapur No.2 11 18 44 45 118

9 Kachari Gaon 7 11 27 28 73

10 Charaipani Bongali Gaon 28 45 110 115 298

11 Dangdhara Grant 19 29 72 76 196

12 Mohima Bari Gaon 26 41 101 105 272

13 Medeluajan Gaon 14 22 55 58 150

14 Tongajan Gaon 21 34 83 87 225

15 Phulbari Gaon 13 21 51 53 137

16 Tipomia Habi Gaon 30 47 115 120 312

17 Bhagyalakni 2 4 10 10 26

18 Charaipani Bosabari T.E. 26 41 102 107 277

19 Grant No.188 28 43 107 112 290

20 Charaipani Grant No.1 8 13 32 33 86

TOTAL 371 587 1445 1507 3910

25

Table No. 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition N

am

e o

f th

e A

gro

-

clim

atic

zone

Name of

Village

Major soil types

b)Area(h

a)

Average

rainfall in mm

(precedi

ng 5 years’

average)

Major crops

a)Type

a)Na

me

b)Area

(ha)

Centr

al Bra

hm

aputr

a V

alle

y

Salaguri Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 125.73

1715

Paddy 350.3

Coarse loamy, Aeric Udifluvents 389.07

Lohong

Bebejia Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 343.64 Paddy 256.11

Madhapur Grant No.1 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 181.90 Paddy 74.05

Saidal Kachari

Gaon

Coarse loamy, Aeric Udifluvents 390.64 Paddy 483.39

Fine silty, Typic Haplaquepts 170.30

Tipomia Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 40.60 Paddy 232.47


Turung Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 263.30 Paddy 220.68

Christian Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 158.43 Paddy 152.13


Madhapur

No.2 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 95.73 Paddy 40.01

Kachari Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 35.01 Paddy 23.89

Charaipani Bongali Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 277.11 Paddy 205.07

Dangdhara

Grant Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 181.91 Paddy 124.32

Mohima Bari

Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 215.24 Paddy 72.12

Medeluajan

Gaon

Fine loamy, Typic Dystrochrepts 0.25 Paddy 32.63

Fine loamy, Typic Dystrochrepts 10.89

Tongajan Gaon

Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 83.47 Paddy 173.71


Phulbari Gaon Fine loamy, Typic Dystrochrepts 41.88 Paddy 83.76

Tipomia Habi

Gaon Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 315.20 Paddy 232.47

Bhagyalakni




Charaipani

Bosabari T.E. Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 278.14 Paddy 84.98

Grant No.188 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts 168.45 Paddy 19.68





26

Table No. 2.5 Details of flood and drought in the project area

Sl No

Villages

Periodicity

Annual Occurance

(During 1998-2007)

No. of village : 37

1 Salaguri Gaon High 7-8 Times

2 Lohong Bebejia High 7-8 Times

3 Madhapur Grant No.1 Moderate 5-6 times

4 Saidal Kachari Gaon Very High 9-10 Times

5 Tipomia Gaon Very High 9-10 Times

6 Turung Gaon High 7-8 Times

7 Christian Gaon High 7-8 Times

8 Madhapur No.2 Moderate 5-6 times

9 Kachari Gaon High 7-8 Times

10 Charaipani Bongali Gaon Moderate 5-6 times

11 Dangdhara Grant Moderate 5-6 times

12 Mohima Bari Gaon Low 3-4 Times

13 Medeluajan Gaon Moderate 5-6 times

14 Tongajan Gaon High 7-8 Times

15 Phulbari Gaon Very Low 1- 2 Times

16 Tipomia Habi Gaon High 7-8 Times

17 Bhagyalakni Low 3-4 Times

18 Charaipani Bosabari T.E. Low 3-4 Times

19 Grant No.188 Moderate 5-6 times

20 Charaipani Grant No.1 Moderate 5-6 times

Table No. 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area

Cause Type of erosion

Name of Micro

Watershed

Area affected

(ha)

Run off Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ ha/ year)

(mm/

year)

Water erosion

a Sheet

Dangdhara -

Mohimabari

680.46

1200 0.46 b Rill 39.94

c Gully & Riparain Erosion

-

a Sheet

Salaguri-

936.54

1200 0.46 b Rill 64.34

c Gully & Riparain

Erosion

a Sheet

Saidal - Turung

617.54

1200 0.46 b Rill 48.60

c Gully & Riparain

Erosion

a Sheet

Phulbari -Tengajan

1107.84

1200 0.46 b Rill 98.27

c Gully & Riparain

Erosion 7.46

27

Flood Map

28

Table No. 2.7 Details of the Soil pH sl

No

Name of Village Soil pH Major soil types

1 Salaguri Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

Neutral 6.5-7.5 Coarse loamy, Aeric Udifluvents

2 Lohong Bebejia Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

3 Madhapur Grant No.1 Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

4 Saidal Kachari Gaon Neutral 6.5-7.5 Coarse loamy, Aeric Udifluvents

Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Fine silty, Typic Haplaquepts

5 Tipomia Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts


6 Turung Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

7 Christian Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts


8 Madhapur No.2 Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

9 Kachari Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

10 Charaipani Bongali Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

11 Dangdhara Grant Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

12 Mohima Bari Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

13 Medeluajan Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Fine loamy, Typic Dystrochrepts

Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Fine loamy, Typic Dystrochrepts

14 Tongajan Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts


15 Phulbari Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Fine loamy, Typic Dystrochrepts

16 Tipomia Habi Gaon Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

17 Bhagyalakni

Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts



18 Charaipani Bosabari T.E. Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

19 Grant No.188 Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts

20 Charaipani Grant No.1

Moderatly acidic 4.5 – 5.5 Coarse loamy, Lithic Dystrochrepts



29

Table No.2.7.1 Climatic Condition

Sl No

Year (2009) /month

Monthly Rain fall(in

mm)

Average Annual

rainfall(in mm)preceding 5

years

Temp(0C) (year -2009)

Wind Velocity

Evaporation

(mm per month)(year

2009)

Relative Humidity(RH) (Year 2009)

Average Annual run

off(mm/year) Max Min

Morning

(Recorded at 6.13 hrs

Afternoon (recorded

at 13.13

hrs

Sunshin

e Hrs.

1 January 6.60

1714

24.10 11.7 32.8 96 57 4.9

45.30

2 February 21.70 26.70 13.1 50.9 94 49 6.1

3 March 26.00 29.00 16.1 73.8 95 44 5.1

4 April 154.00 28.90 20.6 72.1 93 65 5.2

5 May 187.80 30.90 23 96.2 91 69 6.4

6 June 225.00 33.00 25.4 93.4 92 70 5.2

7 July 293.40 33.00 26 94.6 93 70 5.2

8 August 286.80 31.80 25.6 81.8 95 74 4.3

9 September 101.50 33.10 25.7 94.7 93 68 6.6

10 October 57.80 30.80 22.6 68.4 95 65 5.9

11 November 18.70 27.00 16.5 46 97 61 5.9

12 December 0.70 23.30 12.4 31.7 97 64 4.6

13 Average Monthly

Rain fall(in mm) 115.00

69.7

30

Table No.-2.8 Physiographic Features

Names of micro watersheds and

Code Nos.

Elevation (metres)

Slope range (%)

Order of

watershed Major streams

Toposequence Average annual

soil loss(Ton / hectare/year)

Sub/micro-watershed

(Soil series)

Salaguri MWS, 3B3C3eII

Maximum - 109 mtr./

Minimum - 90 mtr. Average - 97 Mtr.

Max. Slope

3.5% / Average Slope - 0.6%

Medelua Jan,Tippomia

Jan, Leteka Jan

Coarse loamy,

Lithic Dystrochrepts

0.46

Saidal – Turung MWS, 3B3C3eIII

Maximum - 107mtr./ Minimum - 90mtr.

Average - 97Mtr.

Max. Slope 6.8% / Average

Slope - 0.8%

Tippomia Jan,Medelua Jan, Tenga Jan,Pan Jan

Coarse loamy, Aeric

Udifluvents

0.46

Dangdhara –Mahimabari MWS,

3B3C3eI

Maximum - 126 mtr./ Minimum - 93 mtr.

Average - 106 Mtr.

Max. Slope 4.1% / Average

Slope - 0.9%

Soraipani Jan, Leteka Jan

Coarse loamy, Lithic

Dystrochrepts

0.46

Phulbari -Tengajan

MWS, 3B3C3eIV

Maximum - 132mtr./

Minimum - 102 mtr. Average - 114 Mtr.

Max. Slope 12.8% /

Average Slope -

0.8%

Tenga Jan,Tippomia

Jan, Pan Jan, Soraipani Jan, Medelua Jan

Fine loamy,

Typic Dystrochrepts

0.46

Table No. 2.9 Watershed characteristics

Shape index of the watershed

Length of main stream

Drainage density Average slope Watershed relief Perimeter of the watershed

14.21 Km 0.00128 0.8 - 36357

31

CHAPTER – 3 BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED

Table No. 3.1: Demographic features: 1 2 3 4 5

S.No Feature Male Female Total

1

Population 10927 10475 21402

SC 318 307 625

ST 1771 1880 3651

OBC 6099 5719 11818

Others 2739 2569 5308

2 Children(0-14 years) 3084 2970 6054

3 Sex Ratio 913

4

Literacy 69.02% 54.33% 61.83%

Literates 7543 5691 13234

Illiterates 3385 4783 8168

5

Work Force

Agriculture 3299 2628 5927

Industrial/Business 1117 35 1152

Service 905 248 1153

6 Birth Rate NA NA NA

7 Death Rate NA NA NA

Table No. 3.2: Livestock details:

1 2 3

S.No Feature No./ quantity)

1 Milch Animals

Cows 4101

Buffaloes

Goat, sheep 4832

2 Draft Animals

Ox -

He Buffalo -

3 Others -

Poultry 5217

Piggery 1405

4 Total Milk production from milch animals (ltrs/day) 265

5 Fodder Availability

Dry (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Sufficient

Green (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Sufficient

6 Fuel wood Availability (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce

32

Table No.3.3: Socio- economic status: 1 2 3 4 5 6

SN Type Total HHs

No. of BPL

HHs

Land Holding (Ha) Average Annual Gross Income (Rs.)

Rain fed Irrigated

SC ST Others SC ST Others Total SC ST Others Total

1 Marginal 1494 74 64.09 390.52 217.76 672.37 - 8.19 44.11 52.30 30000 32000 38000

2 Small Farmers 605 - 19.79 160.05 1091.69 1271.53 6.21 13.66 129.06 148.92 50000 50000 52000

3 Big farmers 384 - 10.37 89.63 1512.76 1612.76 46.43 62.73 109.16 90000 100000 100000

4 Landless 1558 1558 - - - - - - - - 19000 19000 19000

Total 4041 1632 94.25 640.20 2822.21 3556.66 6.21 68.28 235.89 310.38 189000 201000 209000

Table No. 3.4: Migration Details:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sl.

No.

No. of persons migrating No. of days

per year of

migration

Major reason(s) for migrating

Distance of

destination of

migration from the

village (km)

Occupation during

migration

Income from

such

occupation

(Rs.) M F Total

1

1480 230 1710 180

Lack in sufficient employment generation,

For Better Opportunity , Lack of irrigation

facility, Mono Crop Area etc.

Various from 20 to

300 Km

Private Job,

Labour, etc. -

33

Table No. 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

S.

N

o.

Type of Group

Total no. of CBOs No. of members No. of ST in

each category

No. of SC in each

category

No. of Others in

each category

No. of BPL in

each category

Bank linkage

With o

nly

Men

With o

nly

Wom

en

With b

oth

Tota

l

M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total

No. of SH

Gs

Bank L

oan

Am

ount

(Rs.

)

1 SHG

(i) Landless

(ii) MF

(iii) SF

(iv) LF

Total

2 UGs

(i) Landless

(ii) MF

(iii) SF

(iv) LF

Total

3 VSS

4 FG/ FC1

5 WUA

6 F-SHG-C

7 F-SHG-B

8 PG

9 PC

10

Other

related Groups

VSS: Van Suraksha Samiti, FG: Farmer’s Group/ Farmer’s Club, WUA: Water User Association, F-SHG: Federation of SHGs (C: at Cluster, B: at Block), PG: Producer’s Group,

PC: Producer’s Cooperative.

34

Table No. 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities:

1 2 3 4 5

S.No Infrastructure type No./Quantity Distance (km) Status (description)

1 Educational Institutions

Anganwadi 31 Within the village Functional

Primary School 25 Within the village Functional

Secondary school 6 - -

Govt. College - - -

Vocational Institutions - - -

2 Service Institutions - -

Bank NA - -

Post office 4 - -

Primary Health Care Center 5 - -

Veterinary Center 2 - -

Markets/ Village Haat 2 - -

3 No. of bore wells/pump sets

(Functional)

NA - -

4 No. of Milk collection centers ( Union/ Society/ Pvt.

Agency/Others)

NA - -

Total Quantity of surplus milk

NA - -

5 Road Connectivity (to main

road by an all-weather road) (Yes/No)

Yes - -

6 Bus facility (Yes/No) No - -

7 No. of HHs provided electricity

2988 - -

8 No. of HHs with access to

drinking water

3900 - -

9 Access to Agro Industries

(Yes/No)

NO - -

10 Any other facilities (specify-------------)

- -

35

Table No.3.7 Land use pattern (in Hectares)

Sl

No

Name of Village

Geogra

phic

al Are

a(H

a)

Fore

st A

rea (

ha)

Com

munity L

and

Land u

nder

agricu

ltura

l

use

(ha)

Perm

anent

past

ure

s (h

a)

Land U

nder

mis

cella

neous

use

Uncultivated

Private land Cultivated area

Net

Sow

n A

rea

Net

Are

a s

ow

n m

ore

than o

nce

Gro

ss C

ropped A

rea

Tem

pora

ry fallo

w

Perm

anent

Fallo

w

Cultiv

ate

d R

ain

fed

Cultiv

ate

d I

rrig

ate

d

1 Salaguri Gaon 514.95 0 0 350.30 0 0.00 2.36 0 311.04 39.26 350.30 39.26 389.56

2 Lohong Bebejia 343.64 0 0 256.11 0 0.00 0 0 256.11 0 256.11 0 256.11

3 Madhapur Grant No.1 181.9 0 0 74.05 0 0.00 0 0 74.05 0 74.05 0 74.05

4 Saidal Kachari Gaon 562.51 0 0 483.39 0 0.00 18.1 0 215.68

267.71 483.39 267.71 751.10

5 Tipomia Gaon 367.68 0 0 232.47 0 0.00 0 0 229.06 3.41 232.47 3.41 235.88

6 Turung Gaon 262.3 0 0 220.68 0 0.00 0 0 220.68 0 220.68 0 220.68

7 Christian Gaon 196 0 0 152.13 0 0.00 0 0 152.13 0 152.13 0 152.13

8 Madhapur No.2 95.73 0 0 40.01 0 0.00 0 0 40.01 0 40.01 0 40.01

9 Kachari Gaon 35.01 0 0 23.89 0 0.00 0 0 23.89 0 23.89 0 23.89

10 Charaipani Bongali Gaon 277.98 0 0 205.07 0 0.00 0 0 205.07 0 205.07 0 205.07

11 Dangdhara Grant 182.85 0 0 124.32 0 0.00 0 0 124.32 0 124.32 0 124.32

12 Mohima Bari Gaon 216.71 0 0 72.12 0 0.00 0 0 72.12 0 72.12 0 72.12

13 Medeluajan Gaon 34.59 0.31 0 32.63 0 0.00 0 0 32.63 0 32.63 0 32.63

14 Tongajan Gaon 236.55 6.39 0 173.71 0 0.00 0 0 173.71 0 173.71 0 173.71

15 Phulbari Gaon 105.24 2.1 0 83.76 0 0.00 0 0 83.76 0 83.76 0 83.76

16 Tipomia Habi Gaon 315.21 0 0 232.47 0 0.00 0 0 229.06 3.41 232.47 3.41 235.88

17 Bhagyalakni 298.72 37.25 0 209.86 0 0.00 0 0 209.86 0 209.86 0 209.86

18 Charaipani Bosabari T.E. 278.18 0 0 84.98 0 0.00 0 0 84.98 0 84.98 0 84.98

19 Grant No.188 168.45 0 0 19.68 0 0.00 0 0 19.68 0 19.68 0 19.68

20 Charaipani Grant No.1 186.81 0 0 128.36 0 0.00 0 0 128.36 0 128.36 0 128.36

TOTAL 4778.45 46.05 0 3199.99 0 0.0 20.46 0 2886.2 313.7 3199.99 313.79 3513.78

36

Table No. 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources: 1 2 3 4

S.No CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(specify dept.) PRI

Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(specify deptt.) PRI

Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1 Wasteland/ degraded land - 160 - - - 461.26 - -

2 Pastures - - - - - - - -

3 Orchards - - - - - - - -

4 Village Forest 320 - - - - - - -

5 Forest - - - - - - - -

6 Village Ponds/ Tanks 1.26 - - - - - - -

7 Community Buildings - - - - - - - -

8 Weekly Markets - 1.55 - ` - - - -

9 Permanent markets - - - - - - - -

10 Temples/ Places of worship - - - 3.5 - - - -

11 Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -

Total - -

Table No. 3.9: Agriculture implements:

1 2 3

S. No. Implements Nos.

1

2

3

Table No. 3.10: Crop Classification 1 2 3

S. No. Crop Classification Area (Hec)

1 Single Crop 3556.66

2 Double Crop 310.38

3 Multiple Crop -

37

Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern: 1 2 3 4 5 6

S. No

Season Crop sown

Rain fed Irrigated Total

Area

(ha)

Producti

on (Ton/yr)

Producti

vity (Kgs/ha)

Cost of

cultivation (Rs. /ha)

Area

(ha)

Productio

n(Ton/yr)

Productivi

ty (Kgs/ha)

Cost of


Area

(ha)

Production

(Ton/yr)

Productivity

(Kgs/ha)

Cost of


1 Kharif Paddy 3556.66 4979 1400 5200 0 0 0 0 3556.66 4979.324 1800 5650

2 Rabi Paddy 0 0 0 0 310.38 682.84 2200 6100 310.38 682.836 225 8500

Lentil 30 39 300 13000 0 0 0 0 30 39 150 6500

Total 3897.04 5701.16 2175 20650

Table No. 3.12: Land capability Classification

* Soil texture (sandy-clay, clayey, loamy-clay, gravel)

1 2 3 4 5 6

La

nd

cla

ss

SN

La

nd

typ

e

To

tal

Are

a

(ha

)

So

il T

ex

ture

*

Based on Depth (cms)- (mention area in ha)

Based on Slope (%) (mention area in ha)

Erosion (mention area in ha)

V. Shallo

w

(0.7

5)

Shallo

w (

7.5

-

22.5

)

Modera

te

deep (

22.5

-

45.0

0)

Deep (

45.0

-

90.0

)

Very

. D

eep

(>90)

Nearly L

evel

(0-2

)

Modera

te

slope (

2-6

)

Str

ong s

lope

(6-1

5)

Ste

ep (

>15)

Water

Win

d

Sh

ee

t

Ril

l

Gu

lly

1 Agricultural Land (Double Crop

310.38 Fine Silty, Coarse-

loamy, Coarse-Silty

- - - 310.38 310.38 - - -

3342.3

8

251.1

5

-

2 Agricultural Land

(Kharif)

3556.66 - - - 3556.66 3556.66 - - -

3 Agricultural Land (Rabi)

- - - - - - - - -

4 Rural Habitation 1039 - - - 1039 1039 - - -

5 Wetland 20 - - - 20 20 - - -

38

Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities:

Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*:

* based on the observation from the field

1 2 3 4

S.No Type of the Source Nos. Command area (in ha)

1 Ponds 16 3.60

2 Open wells - -

3 Bore wells - -

4 Canal irrigation - -

5 Natural spring head -

1 2 3 4 5

S.No Item Units Quantity Source

1 Drinking water requirement Ltrs/day 74907 Well/Tubewell

2 Present availability of drinking water Ltrs/day 69000 Well/Tubewell

3 No. of drinking water sources

available

Nos 3200 Well/Tubewell

a) Functional Nos - -

b) Need Repairing Nos - -

c) Defunct Nos - -

4 Short fall if any Ltrs/day 5907

5 No. of families getting drinking water

from out side the Micro watershed

area

Nos -

6 Requirement of new drinking

water sources (if any)

Nos. -

39

Table No. 3.16: Surface water resources

Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods

1 2 3 4

S. No.

Name of

activity

No. of beneficiaries Pre-project average

income per HH

(Rs.) SC ST Others Total Women

1 Dairy 14 21 231 266 40 3000

2 Goatary 55 160 2868 3083 1700 2500

3 Duckery 62 202 2576 2840 2100 1000

4 Poultry 47 698 1096 1841 1650 1500

5 Piggery 82 14 96 10 3500

6 Weaving 10 5 65 80 80 1000

1 2 3 4 5

S.No Type of water resource

Nos Area irrigated (Ha) Storage capacity (Cu.m)

1 Tank - - -

2 Pond 16 3.6 3200

3 Lake/Wetland 1 10 57000

4 Check dam - - -

5 Percolation tank - - -

6 Drainage

Channel/Canal

1 - -

7 Any others (specify--

------------)

- - -

40

Table No.3.21 PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED

1 2 3 4

S.No Problem area Problem analysis Proposed interventions to overcome

problems

1 Soil Conservation

(slope, erosion, soil

loss, rainfall,

productivity, etc)

1. River Bank Erosion, 2. Soil Erosion, Siltation & high soil loss in

upland area. 3. Sheet erosion is combatively high in many

places.

1. Construction of graded bund, field bund to protect the soil erosion and

siltation problems.

2. Applying Bio-engineering (Vetiver Plantation) to protect the river bank from erosion.

2 Water

conservation

(Water budget,

Ground water norms,

productivity)

1. Degradation of Natural Resource like congestion of natural drainage, degradation of wetland etc.

2. Lack of water storage facility cause scarcity

of water during winter.

3. Run-off originated from seasonal rain

attains high velocity due to medium to steep

prevailed in the watershed and thereby

causes all types of soil erosion hazards.

4. Loss of productivity due to waterlogging

1. Restoration of drainage channel by excavation and reclamation.

2. Reclamation of natural water bodies (beels) by excavating and constructing periphery bund etc. Increase water storage capacity.

3. Construction of Farm Pond for water harvesting/storage. Along with water

distribution channel for irrigation.

4. Construction of Nullabund to check the

water stagnant/waterlogging problem.

41

3 Crop coverage –

{80% of w/s area

should be with

canopy}

1. Rabi crop area is very low because of lack of

irrigation facilities.

2. Mono cropping

3. Inundation problem during summer (kharif)

4. Low vegetative cover

1. Agro-forestry, fuel wood plantation

2. Turmeric & Banana Plantation

4 Agriculture

productivity (crop

wise compare with

dist. average)

1. Low agricultural productivity due to high

flood during summer, lack of irrigation

facility, erratic and uncertain rainfall, low

cropping intensity, lack of location-specific

technologies to match the high ecological

diversity of rainfed area etc.

1. Brick canal and water storage farm pond for irrigation for both Rabi & Kharif crop.

5 Livestock

productivity (Milk

Yield, Meat yield,

Eggs, Wool Yield,

Kidding etc.)

1. Scarcity of fodder during flood period.

2. Lack of secure shelter during flood period

3. Inadequate nutrition due to lack of grazing

land.

4. Diseases which reduce the production

potential of livestock.

1. Promotion of Marketing facilities

through SHG

2. Promotion of Dairy, Piggery, goatery, Duckery and Poultry farming activities.

6 Existing Livelihood

activities for Asset

1. Less income generating activities.

2. Their present occupation is Daily Labour,

1. Promotion of Dairy, Piggery, goaery, Duckery and Poultry farming activities.

42

less persons Rikswa Pullers etc. 2. Promotion of weaving activities for

asset less woman.

7 Community Based

Organizations &

Social capital base

1. Most of the SHG are not functional. 1. Formation of SHG, User groups for promotion of various income generating activities

8 Capacity Building

(participation,

training, awareness

of watershed

community

1. In many villages it is observed that the

Participation in Gram Sabha is very low due

to lack of awareness towards watershed

development activities.

1. Conducting Awareness programmes

among the villagers.

2. Providing training in respect to each activities proposed for watershed development as well as livelihood

generation.

9 Others (specify) 1. Lack of Marketing Facilities 1. Providing Market Promotion Centres along with Low Cost go-down for

storage of various products.

43

CHAPTER – 4

Institutional Building and Project Management

Table No. 4.1 Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. No

.

Type of

Group

Total no. of CBOs No. of members No. of ST in

each

category

No. of SC in each

category

No. of

Others in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

Bank linkage

With

only

Men

With only

Wome

n

Wit

h both

Tota

l M F

Tota

l M F

Tota

l M F

Tota

l M F

Tota

l M F

Tota

l

No. of SHGs

Amount (Rs)

1 SHG

(i)

Landless

(ii) MF

(iii) SF

(iv) LF

Total

2 UGs

(i)

Landless

(ii) MF

(iii) SF

(iv) LF

Total

*Account no. of Watershed Committee, PIA.

44

4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Name of

WCs

Date of

Registration

as a

Society

No. of

members in

WC Designation Name

M/F

SC ST SF MF LF Land-

less UG SHG GP

Any

other Educl

qualifi-

cation

Function/s

assigned# Write “Yes” if applicable

Dangdhra

Mahimabari

Watershed

Committee

10 President Ullium Barlu M

Secretary Nabin Dutta M

Member Md. Mainuddin Ahmed M

Member Mrs. Tanuja Begam F

Member Miss Mayuri Saikia F

Member Miss Juri Saikia F

Member Sri Budheswar Bhumij M

Member Mrs. Purabi Saikia F

Member Sri Surbhajyoti Borah M

Member Mrs. Rinku Moni

Phukan

F

45

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Name of

WCs

Date of

Registration

as a

Society

No. of

members in

WC Designation Name

M/F


less UG SHG GP

Any

other Educl

qualifi-

cation

Function/s


Salaguri

Watershed

Committee

10 President Mrs. Panita Bora F

Secretary Sri Sunil Saikia M

Member Sri Sunil Bora M

Member Mrs. Kalpana Sonowal

Kachari

F

Member Sri Mithen Lagun M

Member Mrs. Rita Saikia F

Member Mr. Lohit Das M

Member Sri Mridul Bora M

Member Sri Babul Bora M

Member Mrs. Sumi Barik F

46

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Name of

WCs

Date of

Registration

as a

Society

No. of

members in

WC Designation Name

M/F


less UG SHG GP

Any

other Educl

qualifi-

cation

Function/s


Sadial

Turung

Watershed

Committee

11 President Sri Singheswar Shym M

Secretary Sri Sanjib Barua M

Member Mrs. Lakhimi Thengal

Gogoi

F

Member Mrs. Joya Kachari F

Member Sri Jekson Bhengra M

Member Sri Prasanta Hazarika M

Member Mrs. Anita Sonowal

Kachari

F

Member Sri Pabitra Saikia M

Member Sri Tileswar Kurmi M

Member Mrs. Daibaki Kachari F

Member Sri Dambaru Saikia M

47

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Name of

WCs

Date of

Registration

as a

Society

No. of

members in

WC Designation Name

M/F


less UG SHG GP

Any

other Educl

qualifi-

cation

Function/s


Phulbari-

Tengajan

Watershed

Committee

11 President Sri Debakumar Kurmi M

Secretary Mrs. Jurijyori Saikia F

Member Sri Anil Gogoi M

Member Sri Mantu Bhakta

Member Deepak Saikia

Member Mrs. Moni Gogoi

Member Mrs. Runu Saikia

Member Sri Jeral Tappa

Member Mrs. Mandira Hazarika

Member Sri Susanta Hazarika

Member Sri Atul Bag

48

Table No 4.3: WDT Particulars:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S.No

Names of WDT

members M/F# Age Qualification / Experience

Description of

professional training Role/ Function*

1 Keshab Baruah M - SCR, Converner, Range

Office, Titabar SC Range,

Titabar

- -

2 Shri Pulin Bora M - ADO, Sub-Divisional Agril.

Office, Titabar

- -

3 Shri Ajit Chetia M - J.E., AEE, Irrigation Sub

Divisional Office, Titabar

- -

4 Smti Juri

Bhattacharya

F - I.C.D.S Project, Titabor - -

5 Dr. Dinesh

Gogoi

M - Tipomiya State Vety.

Dispensary

- -

6 Shri J. R.

Boruah,

M - F.R. Range Office,

Moriyani Forest Range,

Moriyani

- -

7 Miss

Sanghamitra

Shyam

F - WCDC, Jorhat - -

49

Table No. 4.4: PIA particulars 1 2 3

S.No Particulars Details of PIA

1. Type of organization# Govt. Department

2. Name of organization Department of Soil Conservation

3. Designation & Address Divisional Officer, Jorhat Soil Conservation Divison, Jorhat, Assam

4. Telephone +91-9678009880

5. Fax

6. E-mail [email protected]

# In column no. 8.1.6 (1), only the letter assigned to each type, as given below, needs to be typed.

A Line Dept. B Autonomous organization

C Govt. Institute D Research Bodies

E Zila Parishad F Intermediate Panchayat

G Voluntary Organisations H Any other (please specify).

Table No. 4.5 Bank Account Details Name of WC/PIA Name of the Bank/Place Account No. Name of the Signatory Address

50

* Institutional Mechanisms:

Fig. 11 Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level

NLDC National Level Data Centre DoLR Department of Land Resource NRAA National Rainfed Area Authority SLNA State Level Nodal Agency

C.E.O Chief Executive Officer MIS Management Information System GIS Geographical Information System SLDC State Level Data Cell F.O. Financial Officer T.E. Technical Expert

DEO Data Entry Operator DWDU District Water Development Unit DDC District Data Cell WC Watershed Committee PIA Project Implementation Agency PIU Project Implementation Unit

WDT Watershed Development Team SHG Self Help Group WDTM Watershed Development Team Member UG User Group

DoLR, Gol

SLNA - ASSAM

NRAA, GoI

Chairman

MIS

GIS

SLDC

Admn. Officer F.O.

C.E.O. RDD SS, Finance, PCC, Director Soil, DoLR, NREGA, Water, Agril, F&E, DoLR, NGO, Expert, PIA

DWDU

PIA/PIU

WC

SHG UG

T.E. (W/M)

T.E. (Agr.)

T.E. (GIS.)

T.E. (GIS.)

Ac. Astt./ Off. Astt, DEO

NLDC

Chairman Project Manager WCDC T.E. (Agri, W/M, S/M, Mang., F.O

Com. Opp. Off. Astt.

DDC

National Level Institutional

Arrangement

State Level Institutional

Arrangement

WDT MEMBER

District Level Institutional

Arrangement

Project Level Institutional

Arrangement

51

4.6.2 Fund Flow mechanisms – flow chart,

4.6.3 List of Watershed Records to be maintained

A) AT WATERSHED COMMITTEE LEVEL

Registration Certificate

Bylaws

Detail Project Report

Annual Action Plan

Cash Book

DoLR, Gol (90%)

Govt. of Assam (10%)

STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY, ASSAM

(100%)

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AGENCY (PIA)

(TRAINING, OVERHEAD, EPA)

WATERSHED COMMITTEE

DWDU

52

Project Fund Passbook

Watershed Development Fund Pass book

Ledger Book

Asset Register

Vouchers

Land Details

Measurement Book

Audit Report/ Social Audit Report

Photo Documents

Project Completion Report

Common Guidelines

MoU between Watershed Committee and Project Implementing Agency

Revenue Records.

B) AT PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY LEVEL

Cash Book

Computerized Accounting System

Vouchers

4.7 Documents of Agreements:

4.7.1) Watershed Committee Registration certificate - (under Process)

4.7.2 MoU – PIA – DWDU, PIA – WC - (under Process)

4.7.3 Resolution of Gram Sabha ,Aam Sabha, WC approving action plan#

#the resolution should be done village wise and needs to be approved in Gram/Aam Sabha

53

4.8 Project Implementation

Project Implementation involves a number of activities. Among them, the major

activities are- securing community participation, co-ordination of activities and

project management & Controlling, Monitoring.

Co-ordination is the process whereby more people or organizations work together

to deal collectively with a shared objective. The rationale for co-ordination shall be-

1. To take immediate corrective action for problems encountered in

implementation of the project.

2. To promote better relationship among organizations, institution, departments

and individuals connected with the project and to harmonies resources and

activities for the achievements of the project objectives.

3. To establish cordial relationship between the target population of the project

and all the other section of the society.

4. Team building which include recruiting people with appropriate qualification

for positions in the organization, orienting new people to their position to help

them learn about their responsibilities and providing training when necessary

to upgrade people’s skills.

Project Management & Controlling means managing activities to ensure

progress towards the project objectives.

1. Measuring progress of project by comparing the current situation with

established goals and objectives.

2. Submitting reports to account for project activities and finance

3. Monitoring performance to document the way people carry out their

responsibilities.

4. Providing feedback to people on a regular, informal basis including positive

feedback and constructive criticism.

5. Adjusting plans to respond to changes in the internal and external

organizational environment.

54

Monitoring is an important part of project implementation which is a process of

routinely gathering information on all aspects of the project. The monitoring shall

be continuous and it should be in place before start-up.

The first level monitoring shall be done by the project staff. The DWDU and PIA

shall be responsible for monitoring the staff and task under them and Project

Manager shall be responsible for monitoring all aspects of the project. The

second level monitoring shall be done by third party. The monitoring team shall

be collected the report through field visit, progress and measures performance

including financial reporting.

Step for Monitoring Process:

Defining the objectives of the monitoring system;

Designing a programme to systematically monitor achievements;

Selection of indicators/parameters to be monitored, the location,

methods/processes and frequency of observations and the information

processing and reporting procedure are important; and

Organizing, motivating and training people to obtain, convey and use the

information.

Monitoring Tools

Semi-structured interviews;

Community workshops to evaluate the extent of adoption and resulting

achievements from conservation practices.

Observation and measurement of easily quantifiable field indicators.

Farmers’ own records can be prepared which provides vital information to

great details.

Ground photographs taken from the same place depicting before and after

remedial measures, details concerning landscape CPR’s changes in the

status of natural resources.

Community evaluation of certain simple technical, ecological, economical,

social and essential services indicators.

Remote sensing satellite imageries and aerial photographs taken at the

start of the plan are repeated periodically.

55

Geographical Information Systems (GIS)

Video monitoring.

Comparison with demonstration and research plots/ farms.

Comparison with demonstration and research micro-watersheds.

Hydro-meteorological measuring.

Using the information gathered by other institutional and private

enterprises.

Combination of above mentioned tools.

PIS Tasks Responsibility

Project

Co-ordination

Immediate corrective action for

problem encountered

DWDU, Project Manager,

WDT Member

Create Relationship among staff and Institution

Project Manager

Team Building & Capacity Building DWDU/PIA/Project Manager

Co-operation and Network

Development DWDU/PIA/Project Manager

Project Management &

Controlling

Progress of Project Project Manager

Report generating to account project

activities and financial statement PIA/ Project Manager

Performance monitoring PIA/ Project Manager/DWDU

Monitoring

1st Level Monitoring

Staff Performance

Work Performance

Target achievement

DWDU/Project Manager/PIA

2nd Level Monitoring

Work Quality

Deviation Report

Financial statement

DWDU/ Third Party

56

Role & Responsibility of different Institution during Project Implementation

SLNA

Prepare a perspective and strategic plan

Provide technical support to DWDU

Ensure regular and quality on-line monitoring

Identify potential PIAs

Providing professional technical support to Project Implementing

Agencies (PIAs)

Carry out regular monitoring, evaluation and learning.

Ensure smooth flow of funds to watershed development

projects.

Ensure timely submission of required documents to

SLNA / Nodal

Agency of the Department at central level.

DWDU

PIA

Technical guidance to WC

Undertake community organization and training for the

village communities

Undertake community organization and training for the

village communities

Supervise watershed development activities

Monitor and review the overall project implementation

Inspect and authenticate project accounts

Set up institutional arrangements for post-project

operation

57

CHAPTER – 5

Management/Action Plan

Description on methodology of plan adopted

a) Awareness generation interventions :

i. Awareness campaign through Gram Sabha in each villages of watershed

area. Awareness generation programme will be conducted for all project

stakeholders at watershed level with the basic purpose of educating them

and creating more interest regarding various aspects of the IWMP project.

ii. Awareness campaign through distribution of pamphlet and brochures

describing about the IWMP project.

b) Initial Orientation program: For successful completion of the project,

orientation of both project personnel and watershed communities according to

the changing perspective is imperative and it will enhance skills and competence

of project staff to work with the villagers. Various training, awareness

programme and seminar shall be conducted to build necessary skills and

competence among the project officials, PRIs, especially GPs and other

Communities Based Organizations (CBOs) about planning, implementation and

management of various project activities.

c) Formation process UGs & Watershed Committee : The User Group and

Watershed Committee are formed through Gram Sabha and awareness

programme.

d) DPR preparation process:

In consideration of the objective & terms of reference of the programme , the

Methodology adopted for Preparing The DPR are-

A. Survey :

1. Socio-Economic Survey:

a) Collection of data to find out the strength, weakness, opportunity and

threat of the project area and assessment of local resources. It also

58

includes collection of water sample, soil sample and testing shall be

done in laboratory to find out its problem & prospects.

b) Total household enumeration – include collection of household data

related to social as well economic status of the member. It also include

Land use, Agriculture including area, productivity, cropping intensity,

Horticulture, Livestock and Fisheries, Forests and Grass land,

Livelihood Status, Hydrology and Water Resources, Soil and Moisture

Conservation and Efficient use of Water.

2. Physiographic Survey:

a. A Physical survey has conducted using GPS/Total Station in the study

area to identify the location, distribution and availability of the local

resources and to identify the location, morphology and other

physiographic conditions that proposed for any intervention.

b. Collection of satellite imagery, toposheets, weather data, data related

to natural calamities like damage by flood, earthquake etc.

B. PRA:

After collection of baseline data of the study areas PRA has conducted among

the villagers in village level to find out the intervention which are proposed for

implementation. The PRA The process is expected to enhance identification of

the felt needs of the people, bringing forth consensus, the empowerment of

local disadvantaged groups, integration of local knowledge systems into

project design, two‐way learning process between the project and local

people, political commitment and support, accountability in local

governance. The PRA methodology utilizes different tools to seek its goal of a

participatory approach for addressing any issue. The following tools were

used by the research team in the exercise under consideration:

a. Resource mapping: Resource Mapping has done to identify valuable

resource, Ensure that everyone has access to the resources they need,

avoid duplication of services and resource, enhance service, Identify

flexible funding strategies, use data to make informed decision and

cultivate new partnerships and relationship.

59

b. Social mapping: Social mapping is used to present information on village

layout, social infrastructure, demography, language-religion-culture

groups, health, wealth, other, etc. This provides an overview of the socio-

economic aspects.

c. Focus Group Discussion: A focus group discussion (FGD) is a group

discussion of approximately 6 - 12 persons guided by a facilitator, during

which group members talk freely and spontaneously about a certain topic.

A FGD is a qualitative method and its purpose is to obtain in-depth

information on concepts, perceptions and ideas of a group. A FGD aims to

be more than a question-answer interaction. The idea is that group

members discuss the topic among themselves, with guidance from the

facilitator. A FGD also helps to bring out the perceptions of the weaker

stake-holders in an issue, which otherwise will not come up.

d. Transect Walk: A transect walk is a walk taken by participants and

facilitator through the area of interest, observing, asking, listening,

looking, identifying different zones, seeking problems and possible

solutions. The finding are documented and they can be mapped on to a

transect diagram or map. Transects are an ideal point of departure for a

research/planning process in a village, because we establish the villagers

as the experts on living condition of that area.

e. Seasonality: Seasonality analysis has done to identify seasonal

resources. Water availability in different sources at different times,

cropping pattern is clearly recognized through seasonality tool.

f. Trend line: In Trend-line, graphs are created for long-term changes over

time based on the local people’s accounts of the past, of how things close

to them have changed - ecological histories, land use and cropping

patterns, customs and practices, trends in fuel use, etc. Although

secondary data may be available on these, a local perspective facilitates

the design of development initiatives.

g. Time line: Time line has helped us in identifying important past events.

With this information the team is better informed about the area,

community, progress and the problems. The team conducted semi-

60

structured interviews to obtain oral histories of past events. These oral

histories can provide details on local events, how the community perceived

them, and the eventual impact of these events on the local area and the

community.

C. Analysis: Considering the objective of the study analysis has been done -

i. Analysis of Household data (Which shall include socio-economic data)

ii. Analysis of physical data (Weather Data, Soil, water quality, flood etc.)

iii. Analysis of data collected for proposed Intervention and its outcome

etc.

D. Mapping: Mapping and analysis has done in GIS Platform using ARC GIS

and the Satellite Image interpretation shall be done by ERDAS Software. The data

that collected for any intervention has analyzed in GIS Platform using satellite

imagery and Google Earth. The following Maps for the study shall be prepared

using GIS-

a. Location Map

b. Watershed Map

c. Relief Map

d. Drainage Map

e. Slope map

f. Soil Map

g. Land Use / Land cover map

h. Map showing Proposed Intervention in Different Phase

61

Photographic View

Decongestion of Natural Drainage Ipomiya

Congestion of Natural Drainage Site Visit with Villagers

PRA (Village Meeting) Resource Mapping

Present scnerio of Infrasture Wasteland

62

5.2 Details of Natural Resource Management Activities

Table No. 5.2.1 Soil and Moisture Conservation structures & Surface Water Treatment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Sl.

No

.

Na

me

of

the

Acti

vit

ies

(Str

uctu

res)

Na

me

of

the

Ha

mle

t /

Vil

lag

e

Plo

t N

um

be

rs

( in

clu

din

g

Na

me

of

the

loca

l P

atc

h)

Na

me

of

Be

ne

ficia

rie

s

Are

a (

in H

a)/

Dim

en

sio

n (

in M

/ S

q.

M /

Cu

M)

of

Str

uctu

re

Un

it C

ost

To

tal

Co

st

(in

Rs.)

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n

To

tal

Gra

nt

Am

ou

nt

(in

Rs)

Ye

ar

of

Imp

lem

en

ta

tio

n

(1st/

2n

d/3

r

d/4

th/

5 t h )

1 Drainage Channel (RM)

Lohong Bebejia,

Madhapur Grant No.1, Saidal Kachari Gaon,

Tipomia Gaon, Turung Gaon, Christian Gaon,

Tongajan Gaon, Phulbari

Gaon, Bhagyalakni, Charaipani Grant No1

- - 24494 355 8695370 - 8695370 2nd Year, 3rd Year

2 Ipomiya Eradication

Saidal Kachari Gaon - - 60 16540 992400 - 992400 3rd Year

3 Field Bund (RM)

Salaguri Gaon, Lohong

Bebejia, Saidal Kachari Gaon, Tipomia Gaon,

Christian Gaon, Madhapur

No.2, Charaipani Bongali Gaon, Dangdhara Grant,

Tipomia Habi Gaon,

- - 51300 120 6156000 - 6156000 3rd Year & 5th Year

63

Table No. 5.2.2 Water Harvesting Structures

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S

l. N

o.

Na

me

of

the

Acti

vit

ies

(Str

uctu

res)

Na

me

of

the

Ha

mle

t /

Vil

lag

e

Plo

t N

ou

mb

ers

(

inclu

din

g N

am

e o

f

the

lo

ca

l P

atc

h)

Na

me

of

Be

ne

ficia

rie

s

Are

a (

in H

a)/

Dim

en

sio

n (

in

M/ S

q.

M /

Cu

M)

of

Str

uctu

re

Un

it C

ost

To

tal

Co

st

(in

Rs.)

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n

To

tal

Gra

nt

Am

ou

nt

(in

Rs)

Ye

ar

of

Imp

lem

en

tati

on

(1st/

2n

d/3

rd/4

th/5

t

h)

1 Pond

(no)

Salaguri Gaon, Lohong

Bebejia, Saidal Kachari Gaon, Tipomia Gaon,

Madhapur No.2, Tongajan Gaon, Phulbari

Gaon, Bhagyalakni

- - 10 96000 960000 - 960000 3rd Year

&4th Year

2

Sluice

Gate (SQM)

Salaguri gaon, Saidal Kachari Gaon, Turung

Gaon, Christian Gaon, Tengajan Gaon, Phulbari

Gaon,

- - 6 1020000 6120000 - 6120000 4th Year

64

Table No. 5.2.2 Vegetative Covers

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 S

l. N

o.

Na

me

of

the

Acti

vit

ies

Na

me

of

the

Ha

mle

t / V

illa

ge

Plo

t

No

um

be

r

s

Na

me

of

Be

ne

ficia

rie

s

Are

a (

in H

a)

Un

it C

ost

To

tal

Co

st

(in

Rs.)

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n

To

tal

Gra

nt

Am

ou

nt

(in

Rs)

Ye

ar

of

Imp

lem

en

tati

on

(1st/

2n

d/3

rd/4

th/

5th

)

(in

clu

din

g

Na

me

of

the

lo

ca

l

Pa

tch

)

1 Agro Forestry

Salaguri Gaon, Lohong Bebejia, Madhapur

Grant No.1, Saidal Kachari Gaon, Tipomia

Gaon, Turung Gaon,

Christian Gaon, Madhapur No.2, Kachari

Gaon, Charaipani Bongali Gaon,

Dangdhara Grant,

Mohima Bari Gaon, Medeluajan Gaon,

- - 6.9 hec 116000 800400 - 800400

2nd Year, 3rd Year &

4th Year

2 Fuel Wood

Tongajan Gaon, Phulbari Gaon, Tipomia Habi

Gaon, Bhagyalakni

- - 24 Hec 27200 652,800 652,800

3 Road Side

Plantation

273 No 1800 491400 491400

65

5.3: Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures

5.3.2: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting WHS

M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total

1 2 3 4

S. No. Name of structures

Proposed plan

Total units

(No./ cu.m./

rmt)

UNIT COST Estimated cost* Farmers

contribution

(Rs) (Rs. in lakh) (Rs)

M W O T

A2 Common structures

1 Brick Canal 730 680 1.4892 2.9784 0.4964 4.964 -

3 Sluice Gate 6 1020000 18.36 36.72 6.12 61.2

4 Slab Culvert 6 84500 1.521 3.042 0.507 5.07

66

CHAPTER 6 CAPACITY BUILDING PLAN

COST OF CAPACITY BUILDING COMPONENT WISE BREAKUP IN PERCENTAGE (%) (OUT OF 5% OF THE TOTAL FUND ALLOCATION)

(Value in %)

Particulars 1st yr 2nd yr 3rd yr 4th yr 5th Year Total

1 IEC

1.1 Mass Meeting 2.00000 0.00000 1.52000 1.00000 0.000000 4.52000

1.2 Awareness Meeting 1.50000 4.64000 0.00000 0.00000 0.000000 6.14000

1.3 Publicity Materials 2.00000 6.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.000000 8.00000

sub-total 5.50 10.64 1.52 1.00 0.000000 18.66

2 Institutional Building

2.1

WC Formation & Registration, etc. 0.5000 1.5000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 2.0000

2.2 UG Formation 0.0000 0.3000 0.2500 0.1800 0.070000 0.8000

2.3 SHG Formation 0.0000 0.2000 0.6700 0.3000 0.250000 1.4200

sub-total 0.50 2.00 0.92 0.48 0.320000 4.22

3 Capacity Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000

3.1 Training (DWDU) 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.000000 4.0000

3.2 Training ( PIA& WDT) 2.00 3.00 1.80 1.86 0.000000 8.6600

3.3 Training (WC) 0.00 3.50 2.36 0.00 0.000000 5.8600

3.4 Training (UG) 0.00 3.50 3.20 2.20 1.680000 10.5800

3.5 Training (SHG) 0.00 3.50 3.20 2.50 2.160000 11.3600

3.6

Exposure Visit (Farmers/WC Members) 0.00 5.00 2.50 3.00 1.520000 12.0200

3.7

Exposure Visit (Officers/PRI) 0.00 3.00 2.50 4.00 2.860000 12.3600

3.8 Participation in Exhibition 0.00 3.00 2.00 1.66 1.460000 8.1200

3.9 Seminer & Workshop 0.00 0.86 0.00 3.30 0.000000 4.1600

sub-total 4.00 27.36 17.56 18.52 9.680000 77.1200

Total 10.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 10.00000

0 100.000

0

67

COST OF CAPACITY BUILDING COMPONENT WISE BREAKUP IN LAKH RS. (OUT OF 5% OF THE TOTAL FUND ALLOCATION)

(Value in %)

Particulars 1st yr 2nd yr 3rd yr 4th yr 5th Yr Total

1 IEC

1.1 Mass Meeting 0.46 0.00 0.35 0.23 0.00 1.04

1.2 Awareness Meeting 0.35 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42

1.3 Publicity Materials 0.46 1.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85

sub-total 1.27 2.46 0.35 0.23 0.00 4.31

2 Institutional Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.1

WC Formation & Registration, etc. 0.12 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46

2.2 UG Formation 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.18

2.3 SHG Formation 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.07 0.06 0.33

sub-total 0.12 0.46 0.21 0.11 0.07 0.97

3 Capacity Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.1 Training (DWDU) 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92

3.2 Training ( PIA& WDT) 0.46 0.69 0.42 0.43 0.00 2.00

3.3 Training (WC) 0.00 0.81 0.55 0.00 0.00 1.35

3.4 Training (UG) 0.00 0.81 0.74 0.51 0.39 2.44

3.5 Training (SHG) 0.00 0.81 0.74 0.58 0.50 2.62

3.6

Exposure Visit (Farmers/WC Members) 0.00 1.16 0.58 0.69 0.35 2.78

3.7

Exposure Visit (Officers/PRI) 0.00 0.69 0.58 0.92 0.66 2.86

3.8 Participation in Exhibition 0.00 0.69 0.46 0.38 0.34 1.88

3.9 Seminer & Workshop 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.96

sub-total 0.92 6.32 4.06 4.28 2.24 17.81

Total 2.31 9.24 4.62 4.62 2.31 23.10

68

Table No. 6.1 Details of Capacity Building

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Sl. No.

Name of the Training & Exposure ( Knowledge, Skill, etc. at both Being and Doing level)

Number of events

Number of Participants in an event

Total Number of days per event

Total Traineedays (= 3 x 4 x 5)

Cost per Traineeday (in Rs)

Total Cost required for the programme (= 6 x7 ; in Rs.)

Total Grant Amount (in Rs)

Year of Implementation (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)

Monitoring Indicators

TRAINING

1 DWDU 1 60 1 60 1570.00 94200.00 94200.00 1st Year

2 PIA/WDT 3 20 2 120 1666.67 200000.40 200000.40 1st Year, 2nd Year, 4th Year

3 WC/SHG/UG 9 40 2 720 888.89 640000.80 640000.80 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year

Subtotal 13 120 5 900 4125.56 934201.20 934201.20

EXPOSURE VISIT

1 Farmers/ WC Members 3 20 4 240 1156.93 277662.00 277662.00 1st Year, 3rd Year, 4th Year

2 PIA/WDT 3 15 4 180 1586.20 285516.00 285516.00 1st Year, 3rd Year, 4th Year

Subtotal 6 35 8 420 2743.13 563178.00 563178.00

PARTICIPATION IN EXHIBITION

1 SHG/UG 3 10 4 120 1563.10 187572.00 187572.00 2nd Year, 3rd Year, 4th Year

Subtotal 3 10 4 120 1563.10 187572.00 187572.00

SEMINER & WORKSHOP

1 Seminer & Workshop 2 100 1 200 480.48 96096.00 96096.00 2nd Year, 4th Year

Subtotal 2 100 1 200 480.48 96096.00 96096.00

GRAND TOTAL 24 265 18 1640 8912.265 1781047.2 1781047.2

69

CHAPTER 7

PHASING OF PROGRAMME AND BUDGETING

Table No. 7.1: Phasing of the action plan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

S.No

Component

Activities

Unit

Unit Cost

1 year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year Total

(Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No) Fin (Rs.)

1 Entry Point Activities (4%)

i

Construction of Hume Pipe Culvert

No. 6 500000 6 500000

ii

Development of Community Pond

No. 3 510000 3 510000

iii

Ipomiya Eradication

Hec 14.59 240000 14.59 240000

iv

Development of Village Road

No 4 600000 4 600000

v - - 0

Sub Total of Entry Point Activity

1850000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1850000

70

2 Institution & Capacity Building (5%)

i)

Poor HHs in Watersheds to be covered under SHGs

SC No. 50

ST No. 89

BC No. 42

OT No. 72

ii)

Awareness Generation (events) to be conducted

253

Publicity Material No. - - 46200.00 0.00 138600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 184800

Awareness Meeting

No. - - 34650 0 107184 0 0 0 0 0 0 141834

Mass Meeting No. 46200 0 0 0 35112 0 23100 0 0 104412

iv) Formation of UGs No. 0 0 6930 0 5775 0 4158 0 1617 18480

No. of women No. 0

No. of men No. 0

v)

Formation of SHGs

No. - 0 0 4620 0 15477 0 6930 0 5775 32802

No. of women No. 0

No. of men No. 0

vi)

Formation of Watershed Committee

No. - 11550.00 0.00 34650.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 46200

No. of women No. 0

No. of men No. 0

71

vii)

Regular Meetings to be conducted

0

Watershed Committee

No. 0

UGs/LGs No. 0

VO/SHGs No. 0

Gram Panchayat No. 0

viii)

No. of Planning events

No. 0

ix) Registration of WC No. 0

x)

Self Monitoring events (planning, review of activities through tool)

No.

0

xi)

Convergence meetings with LDs/other institutions

No.

0

xii) Social Audit events No. 0

xiii)

Trainings & Exposures

0

a) DWDU No.Trgs - - 46200.00 0.00 46200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 92400

Women No. 0

Men No. 0

b) PIA/WDT No. trgs - - 46200.00 0.00 69300.00 0.00 41580.00 0.00 42966.00 0.00 0.00 200046

Women No. 0

Men No. 0

c) WC/SHG/UG No. trgs - - 0.00 0.00 242550.00 0.00 202356.00 0.00 108570.00 0.00 88704.00 - 642180

Women No. 0

Men No. 0

72

d)

Exposure Visits of Farmers/WC Members

Nos - - 0.00 0.00 115500.00 0.00 57750.00 0.00 69300.00 0.00 35112.00 277662

Women No. 0

Men No. 0

e)

Exposure Visits of PIA/WDT Member

No. trgs 0.00 0.00 69300.00 0.00 57750.00 0.00 92400.00 0.00 66066.00 285516

Women No. 0

Men No. 0

f)

Participation in Exhibition

Nos - - 0 0 69300 0 46200 0 38346 0 33726 187572

Women No. 0

Men No. 0

g) Seminer/Workshop Nos - - 0 0 19866 0 0 0 76230 0 0 96096

Women No. 0

Men No. 0

Sub Total IB & CB {Do not sum Men & Women under CB events

(a to f)}[1]

231000 0 924000 0 462000 0 462000 0 231000 506 2310000

3 Productivity Enhancement (13%)

A) Agriculture

(Improved practices)

i)

Turmeric cultivation

Bigha 19800 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 5.85 115830 3.3 65340 9.15 181170

ii) Ginger Cultivation Bigha 21000 0 0 0 0 7 147000 0 0 0 0 7.00 147000

iii) Vermi Composting No 61675 0 0 0 0 10 616750 0 0 1 61675 11.00 678425

iv)

Horticulture Nursery

Hec 358000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.12 400960 1.12 400960

73

B)

Animal Husbandry

i) Goatery No. 6667 0 0 2 13334 40 266680 0 0 43 286681 85.00 566695

ii) Dairy No. 135000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 810000 0 0 6.00 810000

iii) Piggery No 120000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 360000 0 0 3.00 360000

C) Fisheries

Fisheries No. 88700 0 0 5 443500 4 354800 0 0 2 177400 11.00 975700

D) OTHERS

Weaving Centre No. 50000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 100000 8 400000 10.00 500000

E)

No. of para workers to be positioned

No.

Women No.

Men No.

F) Revolving Fund Rs.

Sub-Total PE 0 456834 1385230 1385830 1392056 4619950

4 Enterprise Promotion (10%)

i) Dairy No 135000 0 0 0 0 10 1350000 0 0 2 270000 12.00 1620000

ii) Weaving Centre No 50000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 150000 0 0 3.00 150000

iii) Goatery No 6667 0 0 35 233345 6 40002 12 80004 36 240012 89.00 593363

iv) Piggery No 120000 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 480000 0 0 4.00 480000

v) Duckery No 12000 0 0 19 228000 0 0 23 276000 0 0 42.00 504000

vi) Poultry No 10000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 250000 25.00 250000

vii)

Bicycle Repairing Unit

No 40000

0 0 0 0 0 0 10 400000 0 0 10.00 400000

viii) Mobile Repairing No 40000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 160000 4.00 160000

74

i)

EP RF to be released

Rs.

ii)

No. of candidates trained under skill development

No.

Women No.

Men No.

Sub-Total EP 0 461345 1390002 1386004 920012 4157363

5 Natural Resource Management (50%)

I) WHS (MI Works)

a Drainage Channel RM 355 0 0 8794 3121870 15700 5573500 0 0 0 0 24494.00 8695370

b

Ipomiya Eradication Hec 16540

0 0 0 0 60 992400 0 0 0 0 60.00 992400

c Pond NO 96000 0 0 3 288000 1 96000 4 384000 2 192000 10.00 960000

II

Soil Moisture Conservation (SMC)

a Field Bund RM 120 0 0 0 0 6700 804000 0 0 44600 5352000 51300.00 6156000

d) Slab Culvert No 84500 0 0 0 0 6 507000 0 0 0 0 6.00 507000

e Brick Canal RM 680 0 0 0 0 730 496400 0 0 0 0 730.00 496400

f) Sluice Gate No 1020000 0 0 0 0 1 1020000 4 4080000 1 1020000 6.00 6120000

III

Vegetative Measures

a Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0 0 0.47 54520 1.03 119480 1.2 139200 4.2 487200 6.90 800400

b

Road Side Plantation No 1800

0 0 0 0 52 93600 138 248400 83 149400 273.00 491400

c Fuel Wood HEC 27200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 652800 24.00 652800

Sub Total NRM: 0 3464390 9702380 4851600 7853400 25871770

Grand Total (sum of all sub-totals 1 to 6) 2081000 5306569 12939612 8085434 10396468 38809083

75

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

S.No

Component

Activities

Unit

Unit Cost

1 year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year Total

(Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.)

6 Administration (10%)

a

WC office expenditure (per office)

Rs. 12000 4 48000 4 48000 4 48000 4 48000 4 48000 4 48000 24 288000

b

WS secretary Salary

Rs 48000 4 192000 4 192000 4 192000 4 192000 4 192000 4 192000 20 1152000

c

Stationary & miscillaneous

Rs. - 222000 - 222000 684000 684000 684000 684000 - 3180000

Sub Total Admin 60000 8 462000 8 462000 8 924000 8 924000 8 924000 8 924000 44 4620000

7 Monitoring Cost (1%)

a Monitoring Rs. - - - 231000 - - 115500 0 0

115500 462000

Sub Total Monitoring 0 0 0 0 231000 0 0 0 115500 0 0 0 115500 0 462000

8 Evaluation (1%)

a Evaluation Rs. - - - 231000 - - 115500 0 0

115500 462000

Sub Total Evaluation 0 0 0 0 231000 0 0 0 115500 0 0 0 115500 0 462000

9 DPR (1%)

a

DPR Preparation

Rs. - - 231000 - 231000 - 0 - 0 - 0 462000

Sub Total DPR 0 0 231000 0 231000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 462000

10 Consolidation (3%)

a Consolidation Rs. - - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1386000 1386000

Sub Total Consolidation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1386000 0 0 0 1386000

SUB Total (sum of all sub-totals6to 10) 693000 1155000 924000 1155000 2310000 1155000 7392000

GRAND TOTAL

2774000 6461569 13863612 9240434 12706468 1155000 46201083

76

VILLAGE & MICRO-WATERSHED WISE BUDGETING FOR WATERSHED WORK PHASE (56%)

Name of Micro Watershed Salaguri MWS

Name of Village Salaguri Gaon

Activities Related to Surface Water Treatment (Rs. In Lakh)

Name of Intervention Unit Rate (in INR) TOTAL

2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

Drainage Channel RM 355 2844 10.10 2844 10.10 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Details of engineering structures in watershed works for Ridge Area, Drainage Line & Land Development

Field Bund RM 120 1700 2.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1700 2.04

Sluice Gate RM 1020000 1 10.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.20 0 0.00

Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works*

Road Side Plantaton NO 1800 15 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 15 0.27

Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0.6 0.70 0 0.00 0.3 0.35 0.3 0.35 0 0.00

Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27


Name of Village Lohong Bebejia


Name of Intervention Unit Rate (in INR) TOTAL 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year



Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 0 0.00 1 0.96 1 0.96 0 0.00

77


Field Bund RM 120 6800 8.16 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 6800 8.16

Brick Canal RM 680 730 4.96 0 0.00 730 4.96 0 0.00 0 0.00



Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0.3 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.3 0.35

Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27


Name of Village Madhapur No.1






Field Bund RM 120 3400 4.08 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3400 4.08




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27

78

Name of Micro Watershed Saidal – Turung MWS

Name of Village Saidal Kachari Gaon





Eradication of Ipomea HEC 16540 60 9.92 0 0.00 60 9.92 0 0.00 0 0.00


Field Bund RM 120 4150 4.98 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4150 4.98

Sluice Gate RM 1020000 1 10.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.20 0 0.00




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 2.0 0.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.54


Name of Village Tipomea Gaon





Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 1.92

79


Field Bund RM 120 4200 5.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4200 5.04



Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0.6 0.70 0 0.00 0.3 0.35 0.3 0.35 0 0.00

Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27


Name of Village Turung Gaon






Field Bund RM 120 4200 5.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4200 5.04

Sluice Gate RM 1020000 1 10.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.20 0 0.00




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27

80

Name of Micro Watershed Dangdhara –Mohimabari MWS

Name of Village Christian Gaon






Field Bund RM 120 3400 4.08 0 0.00 3400 4.08 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sluice Gate RM 1020000 1 10.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.20 0 0.00




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27







Field Bund RM 120 1700 2.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1700 2.04

81



Fuel Wood HEC 27200 2.0 0.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.54


Name of Village Kachari Gaon





Field Bund RM 120 850 1.02 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 850 1.02




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27


Name of Village Charaipani Bongali Gaon





82


Field Bund RM 120 1700 2.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1700 2.04




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27


Name of Village Dangdhara






Field Bund RM 120 3300 3.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3300 3.96



Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27

83


Name of Village Mohimabari Gaon




Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 1 0.96 0 0.00 1 0.96 0 0.00


Field Bund RM 120 3300 3.96 0 0.00 3300 3.96 0 0.00 0 0.00




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27

Name of Micro Watershed Phulbari -Tengajan MWS

Name of Village Medeluajan Gaon





Field Bund RM 120 4200 5.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4200 5.04

84




Fuel Wood HEC 27200 3.0 0.82 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.82


Name of Village Tengajan Gaon





Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 1 0.96 0 0.00 1 0.96 0 0.00


Sluice Gate RM 1020000 1 10.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.20



Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0.3 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.3 0.35 0 0.00

Fuel Wood HEC 27200 1.0 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.27

85


Name of Village Phulbari Gaon





Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 1 0.96 0 0.00 1 0.96 0 0.00


Field Bund RM 120 4200 5.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4200 5.04

Sluice Gate RM 1020000 1 10.20 0 0.00 1 10.20 0 0.00 0 0.00



Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0.3 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.3 0.35 0 0.00

Fuel Wood HEC 27200 2.0 0.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.54


Name of Village Tipomea Habi Gaon





Field Bund RM 120 4200 5.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4200 5.04

Slab Culvert NO 84500 6 5.07 0 0.00 6 5.07 0 0.00 0 0.00

86


Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0.6 0.70 0.17 0.20 0.43 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00

Fuel Wood HEC 27200 2.0 0.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.54


Name of Village Bhagyalakhi gaon







Agro Forestry HEC 116000 0.3 0.35 0.3 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Fuel Wood HEC 27200 2.0 0.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.54


Name of Village Grant No.188






87


Name of Village Charaipani Grant No.1





88

VILLAGE & MICRO-WATERSHED WISE BUDGETING FOR PRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO ENTERPRISE (10%)



Details of allied / other activities (Rs. In Lakh)



Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 5 0.33

Weaving Centre NO 50000 1 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.50

Livelihood Proposed to be Created for Farmers 0

Turmeric Cultivation Bigha 19800 1.15 0.23 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.85 0.17 0.3 0.06

Ginger Cultivation Bigha 21000 1 0.21 0 0.00 1 0.21 0 0.00 0 0.00

Horticulture Nursery Bigha 358000 0.14 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.14 0.50

Vermi Composting No 61675 1 0.62 0 0.00 1 0.62 0 0.00 0 0.00






Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 0 0.00 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 8 0.53 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 6 0.40

Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00

Livelihood Proposed to be Created for Farmers

Turmeric Cultivation Bigha 19800 1 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.20 0 0.00


89


Name of Village Madhapur Grant No.1




Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 5 0.33








Name of Village Saidal Kachari Gaon




Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 0 0.00 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 8 0.53 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 6 0.40

Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00





90


Name of Village Tipomea Gaon




Piggery NO 120000 1 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.20 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 5 0.33











Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.89

Goatery NO 6667 8 0.53 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 6 0.40







91

Name of Micro Watershed Dangdhara –Mahimabari MWS





Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00








Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00









Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 0 0.00 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00




92


Name of Village Charaipani Bongali Gaon




Piggery NO 120000 1 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.20 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00









Goatery NO 6667 4 0.27 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 2 0.13

Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00




Name of Village Mohimabari




Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 8 0.53 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 6 0.40




93


Name of Village Medeluajan




Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.89

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 1 0.07





Name of Village Tengajan Gaon




Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 0 0.00 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00









Piggery NO 120000 1 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.20 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00 1 0.07





94


Name of Village Tipomea Habi Gaon




Goatery NO 6667 4 0.27 2 0.13 2 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00




Name of Village Bhagyalakhmi




Fishery NO 88700 1 0.89 1 0.89 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 0 0.00 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00





95

VILLAGE & MICRO-WATERSHED WISE BUDGETING FOR ASSET LESS PERSONS (9%) Name of Micro Watershed Salaguri MWS


Livelihood Proposed to be Created for Assetless Persons (Rs. In Lakh)

Name of Intervention Unit Rate (in INR) TOTAL 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year


Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35

Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 5 0.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 3 0.36 1 0.12 0 0.00 2 0.24 0 0.00

Mobile Repairing NO 40000 1 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.40






Handloom & Weaving Centre

NO 50000 1 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.50 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 4 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.27

Piggery NO 120000 1 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.20 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Bicycle Repairing NO 40000 1 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.40 0 0.00






Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 4 0.27 4 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 2 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 4 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.40


96


Name of Village Saidal Kachari




Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 0 0.00 3 0.20 2 0.13 2 0.13

Duckery NO 12000 3 0.36 1 0.12 0 0.00 2 0.24 0 0.00



Name of Village Tipomia Gaon




Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 4 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.20

Duckery NO 12000 3 0.36 1 0.12 0 0.00 2 0.24 0 0.00







Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.13 5 0.33

Piggery NO 120000 1 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.20 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 2 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 3 0.30 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.30


97






Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 4 0.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.20

Duckery NO 12000 3 0.36 1 0.12 0 0.00 2 0.24 0 0.00






Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.07 4 0.27

Piggery NO 120000 1 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.20 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00







Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20


98


Name of Village Charaipani Bongali




Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35

Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.33

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20







Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.33

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20


Name of Village Mohimabari Gaon




Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 2 0.13 0 0.00 3 0.20 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20


99


Name of Village Medeluajan




Goatery NO 6667 3 0.20 3 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Piggery NO 120000 1 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.20 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20



Name of Village Tengajan




Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.33

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20







Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 5 0.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00


100


Name of Village Tipomea Habigaon





NO 50000 1 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.50 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 7 0.47 5 0.33 0 0.00 2 0.13 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 6 0.72 1 0.12 0 0.00 5 0.60 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 4 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.40


Name of Village Bhagyalakhmi




Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00


NO 50000 1 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.50 0 0.00

Goatery NO 6667 5 0.33 0 0.00 3 0.20 2 0.13 0 0.00

Duckery NO 12000 2 0.24 1 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.12 0 0.00

Poultry NO 10000 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20


101

Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio

S.No. Name of the activity Total Cost

(Rs.)

Total Benefit expected *

(Rs.) BCR Remarks

1 EPA 1848000 2032800 1.1

2 NRM 25872000 35040000 1.46

3 Productivity Enhancement 4620000 10608000 1.7

4 Livelihood for Asset less 4158000 8640000 1.8

5 Institution and Capacity building 2310000 2772000 1.2

102

Chapter 8 Consolidation and completion of various works

Table No. 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan

Component Implementation Phase

Consolid-

ation/exit Phase

Total

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year

Administrative 11.55 9.24 9.24 9.24 6.93 46.20

Monitoring 0.46 1.39 1.39 1.39 0.00 4.62

Evaluation 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.62

Entry Point Acty 18.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.48

Instituation&CB 9.24 4.62 4.62 4.62 0.00 23.10

DPR 4.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.62

Watershed Development works 46.20 63.29 67.91 81.31 0.00 258.72

livelihood activities (Asset less) 0.00 18.48 13.86 9.24 0.00 41.58

Production system & microenterprise 0.00 23.10 13.86 9.24 0.00 46.20

Consolidation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.8600 13.86

TOTAL 92.40 120.12 110.88 115.04 23.56 462.00

103

Consolidation of Action Plan

Name of MW Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Total for

village Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the

activity (ha)/ (Qnty. In No.)

Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficia-ries

Estimated

contri-bution to WDF (Rs.)

Salaguri

MWS, 3B3C3eII

Salaguri Gaon

Lohong Bebejia Madhapur Grant No.1

Sluice Gate Repair & Maintanance 2.00 122400.00 200 -

Livelihood & Production System

Market Promotion Centre (Alongwidth Low Cost

Godown)

1 239400.00 150 -

SUB TOTAL` 3.00 361800.00 350 0.00

Saidal –

Turung

MWS,

3B3C3eIII

Saidal Kachari Gaon

Tipomia Gaon

Turung Gaon


Livelihood & Production

System

Market Promotion Centre

(Alongwidth Low Cost Godown)

1 239400.00 150 -

SUB TOTAL` 6.00 361800.00 700 0.00

Dangdhara –Mahimabari

MWS, 3B3C3eI

Christian Gaon Madhapur No.2

Kachari Gaon



System


(Alongwidth Low Cost Godown)

1 239400.00 150 -

SUB TOTAL` 1.00 300600.00 150 0.00

Phulbari -Tengajan

MWS,

3B3C3eIV

Medeluajan Gaon Tongajan Gaon

Phulbari Gaon

Tipomia Habi Gaon Bhagyalakni

Charaipani Bosabari T.E.

Grant No.188 Charaipani Grant No.1



System


(Alongwidth Low Cost

Godown)

1 239400.00 150 -

SUB TOTAL` 0.00 361800.00 0 0.00

Total for Project 10.00 1386000.00 1200.00 0.00

104

CHAPTER – 9

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

9.1 Describe in detail the “Expected Outcomes”

Table No. 9.2: Summarize in the table given below (Quantifiable

indicators)

1 2 3 4 5 6

S. No.

Item Unit of measurement

Pre-project Status

Expected

Post-project

Status

Remarks

1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)

Meters 4 3

2 Ground water structures repaired/

rejuvenated

No. NA NA

3 Quality of drinking water Description Iron -

4 Availability of drinking water Description Not Available

for all household

-

5 Increase in irrigation potential Hec. 281.45 2500

6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Description

7 Area under agricultural crop Hec.

I Area under single crop Hec. 3556.66 -

Ii Area under double crop Hec. 310.38 2000

iii Area under multiple crop Hec. - 400

8 Net increase in crop production area Hec. - -

9 Increase in area under

Vegetation/Forest

Hec. - -

10 Increase in area under horticulture Hec. -

11 Increase in area under fuel Hec. -

12 Increase in area under Fodder Hec. -

13 Increase in milk production Litres/day 250

14 Environmental Impact Change in Soil Loss

Perenniality of flow and change in

Run-off Recharge of ground water

14 No. of SHGs Promoted No. 253

15 Increase in no. of livelihoods No. -

16 Increase in income Rs. -

17 Status of Migration No. Decrease

18 SHG Federations formed No. -

19 Credit linkage with banks Rs. -

20 Resource use agreements -

21 WDF collection & management Rs. -

22 Summary of lessons learnt Description

105

Table No.9.3: Backward and Forward Linkages

5 6 7

Type of Marketing Facility Name of the institution

Pre-project (no.)

Expected post project status

(A) Backward linkages

(i) Seed certification

(ii) Seed supply system

(iii) Fertilizer supply system

(iv) Pesticide supply system

(v) Credit institutions

(vi) Water supply

(vii) Extension services

(viii) Nurseries

(ix) Tools/machinery suppliers

(x) Price Support system

(xi) Labour

(xii) Any other (please specify)

(B) Forward linkages

(i) Harvesting/threshing machinery

(ii) Storage (including cold storage)

(iii) Road network

(iv) Transport facilities

(v) Markets / Mandis

(vi) Agro and other Industries

(vii) Milk and other collection centres

(viii) Labour

(ix) Any other (please specify)

Date post:	10-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	duongkiet
View:	260 times
Download:	7 times