+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 , Shuji …yofukutani.com/pdf/2018_AGU_poster.pdfRegion 1 Mw:...

Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 , Shuji …yofukutani.com/pdf/2018_AGU_poster.pdfRegion 1 Mw:...

Date post: 14-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 36 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
2 3 4 5 6 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 2 3 4 5 6 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 1000 2000 0 1000 2000 In this research, we target the Sagami trough earthquake tsunami that could have a big influence around the Japanese capital region and propose a method for simultaneous damage assessment using copulas that can take into consideration correlation of tsunami depths and building damages between two sites. First, we simulated the tsunami inundation depths at two sites by using a nonlinear long wave equation. We simulated the tsunami heights by varying the slip amount (5 cases) and the depths (5 cases) for each 10 source of the Sagami Trough. Then, we constructed the response surfaces that can explain tsunami heights. Then, we conducted the Monte-Carlo simulation using copulas in order to consider correlation of tsunami heights between two sites. In this study, we used Survival Gumbel copula for the region 8 as the results of maximum likelihood estimation of bivariate copula based on the tsunami numerical simulation results. We can properly evaluate the correlation of tsunami heights by using the copula. Considering the correlation of the tsunami inundation depth at the two sites, the expected value hardly changed compared with the case of no correlation, but it was calculated largely that the damage rate of 99th percentile value was about 2 % and the maximum value was about 6 % in case of using the copulas. Assessment using copulas of simultaneous damage to multiple buildings as a result of tsunamis Yo Fukutani 1 , Shuji Moriguchi 2 , Takuma Kotani 2 , Kenjiro Terada 2 1 Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Science, Kanto Gakuin University (E-mail: [email protected]) 2 Regional Safety Engineering, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University 2018American Geophysical Union Poster Session Target sources and target points Tsunami risk assessment using Monte-Carlo simulations and copulas Yo FUKUTANI, Shuji MORIGUCHI, Takuma KOTANI, Kenjiro TERADA (2018), PROBABILISTIC TSUNAMI LOSS ESTIMATION USING RESPONSE-SURFACE METHOD -APPLICATION TO SAGAMI TROUGH EARTHQUAKE-, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering), Vol. 74(2), pp.I-463-I-468. (in Japanese) Summary Abstract We used the Sagami trough earthquakes as a tsunami source, which was published by the study meeting for the Tokyo Inland Earthquakes of the Cabinet Office (2013) (see Fig.1). The target points for the tsunami risk assessment are located in the Sagami Bay and the entrance of the Tokyo Bay (see Fig.2). x1: Slip rate of the earthquake, x2: Depth of the earthquake We conducted Monte-Carlo simulation (N=10,000) using the response surface considering uncertainty of slip and depth of the earthquake (see Table.1). Variables Average Standard deviation P.D.F Reason for the variation Slip rate 1.00 0.10 Normal Distribution The Nuclear Civil Engineering Committee, Japan Society of Civil Engineers (2016) indicated that there can be a variability of ±0.1 Mw considering same fault area. In this case, a variation range of slip is from 0.7 times to 1.4 times. Fault depth [km] 0.12 (log average) 0.65 (log standard deviation) Log normal Distribution This variability was calculated based on the observation errors of fault depths, which are listed in the seismic source list of JMA (Data period: 2016/10- 2017/10) We proposed tsunami risk evaluation using response-surface method and monte- Carlo simulation technique considering correlation of tsunami depth using copulas. The proposed method is a useful and simple way to evaluate tsunami risk without conducting many tsunami numerical simulations. Y (x1,x2) = a*x1 + b*x2 + c*x1*x2 + d*x1*x1 + e Tsunami numerical simulation results Region 1 Mw: 7.9 Mw: 8.2 Mw: 8.0 Mw: 8.3 Mw: 8.4 Mw: 8.5 Mw: 8.5 Mw: 8.6 Mw: 7.9 Mw: 8.2 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 Region 9 Region 10 The Sagami Bay The Tokyo Bay Figure.1 The target sources of this study (The Sagami trough earthquake in Japan) Figure.2 The two target points of this study A Target point (The Hiratsuka port) A Target point (Miura City) Using the fault parameters of the Sagami trough earthquake, we calculated the initial displacement of tsunami by Okada’s equation and simulated tsunami wave by non-linear long wave equation (TUNAMI-N2 model by Tohoku University). In order to consider uncertainties of tsunami wave, the tsunami simulations were conducted with changing slip rate and fault depth. The slip were changed from 0.7 times to 1.4 times (5 cases). The fault depth were changed from -1.0 km to +2.0 km (5 cases). Then, we conducted regression analyses using below equation and developed a response surface for tsunami inundation depth. Constructing response surfaces for the target points Slip rate Slip rate Tsunami inundation depth (m) Tsunami inundation depth (m) a= 0.66, b=0.05, c=0.00, d=0.52, e=0.51 P1 P2 P1 P2 a= 11.11, b=0.00, c=0.00, d=-4.02, e=-3.13 Figure.3 The constructed response surfaces at each point (P1, P2) for the region 8 2 3 4 5 6 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 2 3 4 5 6 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 1000 2000 0 1000 2000 Figure.4 (a) is the Monte-Carlo simulation results (Black points) of the region 8 without considering correlation of tsunami height between two sites. The red points are the tsunami simulation results. The black points cannot not be considered the correlation. Based on the tsunami numerical simulation results (25 cases), we conducted maximum likelihood estimation of bivariate copula, then selected Survival Gumbel copula because AIC is minimum (AIC = -49.54). Figure.4 (b) is the results of Monte-Carlo simulation results considering the correlation using Survival Gumbel copula. P1 P2 (a) (b) Figure.4 Monte-Carlo simulation results (a)without and (b) with Survival Gumbel copula Tsunami height (m) (Miura City) Tsunami height (m) (Hiratsuka City) Frequency Frequency Frequency N = 10,000 N = 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulation results Tsunami numerical simulation results Monte-Carlo simulation results Tsunami numerical simulation results For all regions of the Sagami trough, we conducted same statistical simulations using above method. Then, we converted the tsunami heights to the damage probability of steel building at two points using fragility curve. Compared with the case of no correlation, the expected value of the damage probability hardly changed, but it was calculated largely that the damage rate of 99th percentile value was about 2 % and the maximum value was about 6 % in case of using the copulas (see Fig.5). Reference Table.1 Uncertainty of slip rate and fault depth Figure.5 Damage probability in case of using each copula 10% 20% 30% 40% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 50% 0% No correlation Gaussian copula Survival Gumbel copula Frequency Damage probability of two buildings P2 Tsunami height (m) (Miura City)
Transcript
Page 1: Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 , Shuji …yofukutani.com/pdf/2018_AGU_poster.pdfRegion 1 Mw: 7.9 Mw: 8.2 Mw: 8.0 Mw: 8.3 Mw: 8.4 Mw: 8.5 Mw: 8.5 Mw: 8.6 Mw: 7.9 Mw: 8.2 Region

2 3 4 5 6

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Hirats

uka

2 3 4 5 6

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

sim

8_hirats

uka

01000

2000

0 1000 2000

In this research, we target the Sagami trough earthquake tsunami that could have a big influence around the Japanese capital region and propose a method for

simultaneous damage assessment using copulas that can take into consideration correlation of tsunami depths and building damages between two sites.

First, we simulated the tsunami inundation depths at two sites by using a nonlinear long wave equation. We simulated the tsunami heights by varying the slip amount

(5 cases) and the depths (5 cases) for each 10 source of the Sagami Trough. Then, we constructed the response surfaces that can explain tsunami heights. Then, we

conducted the Monte-Carlo simulation using copulas in order to consider correlation of tsunami heights between two sites. In this study, we used Survival Gumbel

copula for the region 8 as the results of maximum likelihood estimation of bivariate copula based on the tsunami numerical simulation results. We can properly

evaluate the correlation of tsunami heights by using the copula. Considering the correlation of the tsunami inundation depth at the two sites, the expected value hardly

changed compared with the case of no correlation, but it was calculated largely that the damage rate of 99th percentile value was about 2 % and the maximum value

was about 6 % in case of using the copulas.

Assessment using copulas of simultaneous damage to multiple buildings as a result of tsunamis

Yo Fukutani1, Shuji Moriguchi2, Takuma Kotani2, Kenjiro Terada2

1 Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Science, Kanto Gakuin University (E-mail: [email protected])2 Regional Safety Engineering, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University

2018American Geophysical Union Poster Session

① Target sources and target points ③ Tsunami risk assessment using Monte-Carlo simulations and copulas

Yo FUKUTANI, Shuji MORIGUCHI, Takuma KOTANI, Kenjiro TERADA (2018),

PROBABILISTIC TSUNAMI LOSS ESTIMATION USING RESPONSE-SURFACE METHOD

-APPLICATION TO SAGAMI TROUGH EARTHQUAKE-, Journal of Japan Society of Civil

Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering), Vol. 74(2), pp.I-463-I-468. (in Japanese)

④ Summary

Abstract

We used the Sagami trough earthquakes as a tsunami source, which was

published by the study meeting for the Tokyo Inland Earthquakes of the Cabinet

Office (2013) (see Fig.1). The target points for the tsunami risk assessment are

located in the Sagami Bay and the entrance of the Tokyo Bay (see Fig.2).

x1: Slip rate of the earthquake, x2: Depth of the earthquake

We conducted Monte-Carlo simulation (N=10,000) using the response surface

considering uncertainty of slip and depth of the earthquake (see Table.1).

Variables Average Standard deviation P.D.F Reason for the variation

Slip rate 1.00 0.10Normal

Distribution

The Nuclear Civil EngineeringCommittee, Japan Society of CivilEngineers (2016) indicated that therecan be a variability of ±0.1 Mwconsidering same fault area. In thiscase, a variation range of slip is from0.7 times to 1.4 times.

Fault depth [km]

0.12(log average)

0.65(log standard

deviation)

Log normalDistribution

This variability was calculated based onthe observation errors of fault depths,which are listed in the seismic sourcelist of JMA (Data period: 2016/10-2017/10)

We proposed tsunami risk evaluation using response-surface method and monte-

Carlo simulation technique considering correlation of tsunami depth using copulas.

The proposed method is a useful and simple way to evaluate tsunami risk without

conducting many tsunami numerical simulations.

Y (x1,x2) = a*x1 + b*x2 + c*x1*x2 + d*x1*x1 + e

Tsunami numerical simulation results

Region 1

Mw: 7.9 Mw: 8.2 Mw: 8.0 Mw: 8.3

Mw: 8.4 Mw: 8.5 Mw: 8.5 Mw: 8.6

Mw: 7.9 Mw: 8.2

Region 2 Region 3 Region 4

Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8

Region 9 Region 10

The Sagami Bay

The Tokyo Bay

Figure.1 The target sources of this study

(The Sagami trough earthquake

in Japan)

Figure.2 The two target points of this study

A Target point (The Hiratsuka port)

A Target point (Miura City)

Using the fault parameters of the Sagami trough earthquake, we calculated the

initial displacement of tsunami by Okada’s equation and simulated tsunami wave

by non-linear long wave equation (TUNAMI-N2 model by Tohoku University).

In order to consider uncertainties of tsunami wave, the tsunami simulations were

conducted with changing slip rate and fault depth. The slip were changed from

0.7 times to 1.4 times (5 cases). The fault depth were changed from -1.0 km to

+2.0 km (5 cases). Then, we conducted regression analyses using below equation

and developed a response surface for tsunami inundation depth.

② Constructing response surfaces for the target points

Slip rateSlip rate

Tsu

nam

i in

undat

ion d

epth

(m

)

Tsu

nam

i in

undat

ion d

epth

(m

)

a= 0.66, b=0.05, c=0.00, d=0.52, e=0.51

P1

P2

P1 P2

a= 11.11, b=0.00, c=0.00, d=-4.02, e=-3.13

Figure.3 The constructed response surfaces at each point (P1, P2) for the region 8

2 3 4 5 6

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Hirats

uka

2 3 4 5 6

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

sim

8_hirats

uka

01000

2000

0 1000 2000

Figure.4 (a) is the Monte-Carlo simulation results (Black points) of the region 8

without considering correlation of tsunami height between two sites. The red

points are the tsunami simulation results. The black points cannot not be

considered the correlation. Based on the tsunami numerical simulation results (25

cases), we conducted maximum likelihood estimation of bivariate copula, then

selected Survival Gumbel copula because AIC is minimum (AIC = -49.54).

Figure.4 (b) is the results of Monte-Carlo simulation results considering the

correlation using Survival Gumbel copula.

P1

P2

(a) (b)

Figure.4 Monte-Carlo simulation results (a)without and (b) with Survival Gumbel copula

Tsunami height (m)

(Miura City)

Tsu

nam

i hei

ght

(m)

(Hir

atsu

ka

Cit

y)

Frequency

Fre

quen

cy

Fre

quen

cy

N = 10,000 N = 10,000

Monte-Carlo simulation resultsTsunami numerical simulation results

Monte-Carlo simulation resultsTsunami numerical simulation results

For all regions of the Sagami trough, we conducted same statistical simulations

using above method. Then, we converted the tsunami heights to the damage

probability of steel building at two points using fragility curve. Compared with the

case of no correlation, the expected value of the damage probability hardly changed,

but it was calculated largely that

the damage rate of 99th percentile

value was about 2 % and the

maximum value was about 6 % in

case of using the copulas (see

Fig.5).

Reference

Table.1 Uncertainty of slip rate and fault depth

Figure.5 Damage probability in case of using each copula

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%100%

50%

0%

No correlation

Gaussian

copula

Survival

Gumbel

copula

Frequency

Dam

age

pro

bab

ilit

y

of

two

bu

ild

ing

s

P2Tsunami height (m)

(Miura City)

Recommended