+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations...

Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations...

Date post: 23-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
130
Section 16.2 Line Integrals Section 16.2 Line Integrals Goals: Compute line integrals of multi variable functions. Compute line integrals of vector functions. Interpret the physical implications of a line integral. Multivariable Calculus 1 / 130
Transcript
Page 1: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Section 16.2

Line Integrals

Goals:

Compute line integrals of multi variable functions.

Compute line integrals of vector functions.

Interpret the physical implications of a line integral.

Multivariable Calculus 1 / 130

Page 2: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Types of Integrals

We have integrated a function over

The real number line∫ ba f (x)dx

The plane∫∫D f (x , y)dA

Three space∫∫∫R f (x , y , z)dV

Multivariable Calculus 2 / 130

Page 3: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Line Integrals

In this chapter we will integrate a function over a curve (in either two orthree dimensions, though more are possible).

A two-variable function f (x , y) over a plane curve r(t).

Multivariable Calculus 3 / 130

Page 4: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Parameterizations and the Line Integral

The naive approach to integrating a function f (x , y) over a curver(t) = x(t)i + y(t)j would be to plug in x(t) and y(t). Now we areintegrating a function of t.

But this is dependent on our choice of parameterizations. x(2t)i + y(2t)jdefines the same curve but moves twice as fast. Integrating thiscomposition would give half the ∆t and half the area:

Multivariable Calculus 4 / 130

Page 5: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Integrating Independent of Parameterization

Instead, our variable of integration should measure somethinggeometrically inherent to the curve:

Multivariable Calculus 5 / 130

Page 6: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Arc Length

A more geometrically relevant measure is to integrate with respect todistance traveled. The rectangles approximate the (signed) area betweenC and the graph z = f (x , y).

Multivariable Calculus 6 / 130

Page 7: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Integrating with Respect to Arc Length

Area ≈∑

f (x∗i , y∗i )√

∆x2 + ∆y2

=∑

f (x(t∗i ), y(t∗i ))

√(∆x

∆t

)2

+

(∆y

∆t

)2

∆t

∆t→0−−−−→∫

f (x(t), y(t))

√(dx

dt

)2

+

(dy

dt

)2

dt

Alternately:

∫f (r(t))|r′(t)|dt

Multivariable Calculus 7 / 130

Page 8: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Integrating with Respect to x or y

We can also integrate with respect to change in just x or just y .∑f (x∗i , y

∗i )∆x =

∑f (x(t∗i ), y(t∗i ))

∆x

∆t∆t

∆t→0−−−−→∫

f (x(t), y(t))x ′(t)dt

Multivariable Calculus 8 / 130

Page 9: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Comparison to Integrating a Vector Function

Remark

A plane curve C is defined by a vector function r(t), but we should notconfuse integrating r(t) itself with integrating a function f (x , y) over C .These two types of integrals are almost completely unrelated.

We visualize

∫ b

ar(t)dt as the total displacement achieved by

traveling with velocity r(t) (a vector).

We visualize

∫Cf (x , y)ds as the area between the graph of f and the

curve C (a number).

Multivariable Calculus 9 / 130

Page 10: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Applications

We defined∫C fds as an area. It can also be useful for integrating any

function that is a rate with respect to distance:

Example

Over varied terrain, if p(x , y) gives the price per mile to build railroadtracks at point (x , y), then

∫C p(x , y)ds gives the total cost to construct a

railroad following C .

Example

Over varied terrain, if f (x , y) gives the fuel consumption per mile traveledat the point (x , y), then

∫C f (x , y)ds gives the total fuel consumption to

travel along C .

Multivariable Calculus 10 / 130

Page 11: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Example 1

Let C be the line segment from (0, 0) to (3, 4). Letf (x , y) = x2 + cos(πy). Compute the line integral∫

Cf (x , y)ds.

Multivariable Calculus 11 / 130

Page 12: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Parameterizations to Know

In Chapter 13 we learned parameterizations for the following plane curves:

A line segment from A to B

A circle of radius a

The graph of an explicit function y = f (x)

Multivariable Calculus 12 / 130

Page 13: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Example 2

What does integrating∫C 1ds compute?

Formula∫C

1ds = arc length× height

= arc length

Multivariable Calculus 13 / 130

Page 14: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Example 3

Calculate the arc length of r(t) = (t2 − t)i + 23 (2t)3/2j on the interval

0 ≤ t ≤ 4.

Multivariable Calculus 14 / 130

Page 15: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Summary Questions

Why do we convert to a different differential when setting up a lineintegral?

What does ds mean? What is its differential in terms of dt?

How do we compute arc length?

Multivariable Calculus 15 / 130

Page 16: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Section 16.1

Vector Fields

Goals:

Recognize real world phenomena that are modeled by vector fields.

Determine the geometric behavior of a vector field from its equation.

Compute line integrals of a vector field over a curve.

Multivariable Calculus 16 / 130

Page 17: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

The Definition of a Vector Field

Definition

A vector field in R2 is a function that assigns a two-dimensional vectorF(x , y) to each point in R2.

A vector field in R3 is a function that assigns a three-dimensional vectorF(x , y , z) to each point in R3.

Multivariable Calculus 17 / 130

Page 18: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Drawing a Vector Field

We draw a vector field by attaching the vectors F(x , y) to the points(x , y) by the tail. For obvious reasons, we only draw these vectors from afinite set of points.

Multivariable Calculus 18 / 130

Page 19: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Notation for a Vector Field

A vector field is defined by component functions P and Q (and R inthree dimensions)

F(x , y) = P(x , y)i + Q(x , y)j

or F(x , y) = 〈P(x , y),Q(x , y)〉 .

F(x , y , z) = (0.2x + 0.04y)i + (0.03z − 0.1)j + 0.2 sin(xz)k

Multivariable Calculus 19 / 130

Page 20: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Examples of Vector Fields

Wind speed at each point on the ground.

The force exerted by gravity (or magnetism or charge) at each pointin space.

The gradient of a differentiable function.

Multivariable Calculus 20 / 130

Page 21: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Example 1

Sketch the two dimensional vector field F(x , y) = y2 i− 1

2 j.

Multivariable Calculus 21 / 130

Page 22: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Example 2

How can we visualize the vector field

F(x , y) =x i + y j√x2 + y2

?

Multivariable Calculus 22 / 130

Page 23: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Example 3

How can we visualize the vector field

F(x , y) = −y i + x j?

Multivariable Calculus 23 / 130

Page 24: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.1 Vector Fields

Exercise

Consider the vector field

F =−x i− y j

(x2 + y2)3/2.

1 What direction do the vectors of this field point?

2 How do the lengths depend on the location of (x , y)?

3 Can you sketch the field?

Multivariable Calculus 24 / 130

Page 25: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Dot Products and Work

The dot product measures the angle of two vectors, as well as theirmagnitude.

F · s = |F||s| cos θ

This models the work done by a force F on a displacement s, since onlyFproj contributes to work.

W = Fproj · s = F · s

Multivariable Calculus 25 / 130

Page 26: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Line Integrals of Vector Fields

The formula W = F · s assumes that F is constant, and the displacement sis along a straight line. A vector field introduces the possibility that F isdifferent at different points. To compute the work done by a vector field,we use an integral.

Definition

The line integral of the vector field F(x , y) over the vector function r(t) isdefined: ∫

CF · dr =

∫F(r(t)) · r′(t)dt

This is sometimes called a work integral.

We’ll see later that line integral of a vector field has applications beyondphysics.

Multivariable Calculus 26 / 130

Page 27: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Alternate Notation

If F(x , y) = P(x , y)i + Q(x , y)j we can rewrite this integral without avector operation:

∫C

F(x , y) · dr =

∫C〈P,Q〉 ·

⟨x ′(t), y ′(t)

⟩dt

=

∫CPx ′(t)dt + Qy ′(t)dt

=

∫CPdx + Qdy

Notation

The line integral of a vector field can also be written:∫CP(x , y)dx +

∫CQ(x , y)dy .

Multivariable Calculus 27 / 130

Page 28: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Example 4

Suppose an object travels once anticlockwise around the unit circle and isacted on by a force field F(x , y) = y

2 i− 12 j. Does F do positive or negative

work on the object? Calculate the total work done.

Multivariable Calculus 28 / 130

Page 29: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Independence of Parameterization

Theorem

If C1 and C2 are two parameterizations of the same curve then∫C1

F(x , y)dr =

∫C2

F(x , y)dr

To prove this, let C1 be given by r1(t). Then there is some function u(t)such that C2 is given by r2(t) = r1(u(t)). The proof is a u-substitution.

This makes physical sense, because work does not care about speed, onlydisplacement. Thus traveling more quickly or slowly along a curve will notchange the total work done.

Multivariable Calculus 29 / 130

Page 30: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Summary of Line Integrals

NotationGeometricInterpretation

Calculation∫Cf (x , y) ds Area below the graph

∫ b

a

f (x(t), y(t))√

(x ′(t))2 + (y ′(t))2dt∫Cf (x , y) dx

Area when projectedonto xz plane

∫ b

af (x(t), y(t))x ′(t)dt∫

CF(x , y) · dr Work done by F

∫ b

aF(x(t), y(t)) ·

⟨x ′(t), y ′(t)

⟩dt

or

∫ b

aP(x(t), y(t))x′(t) + Q(x(t), y(t))y′(t) dt∫ b

ar(t) dt

Not a line integral,computes change inposition from velocity

∫ b

ax(t)i + y(t)j dt

Multivariable Calculus 30 / 130

Page 31: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.2 Line Integrals

Summary Questions

How do we represent a vector field, graphically?

What does a line integral of a vector field measure?

How can we see whether a vector field is doing positive or negativework on a path?

What does dr mean? What is its differential in terms of dt?

Multivariable Calculus 31 / 130

Page 32: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Section 16.3

The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Goals:

Use the fundamental theorem to evaluate line integrals ofconservative vector fields.

Determine when a vector field is conservative.

Multivariable Calculus 32 / 130

Page 33: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Choosing a Path

We asserted previously that two parameterizations of the same curve orvector function yield equal line integrals. However, changing the course ofthe curve will usually change the value of the integral, even if the startingand ending points are left the same.

Multivariable Calculus 33 / 130

Page 34: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Example 1/Exercise

Consider the vector field F(x , y) = ∇f (x , y), where f (x , y) =x2 + y2

4. If

A = (−4, 0) and B = (4, 0), what is the work done by F traveling from Ato B along:

1 A line segment?

2 A semicircle of radius 4?

Multivariable Calculus 34 / 130

Page 35: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Line Integrals of Gradient Fields

Gradient fields have the following property.

Theorem (The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals)

If F = ∇f and C travels from point A to point B, then∫C

F · dr = f (B)− f (A)

Multivariable Calculus 35 / 130

Page 36: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Proof of the Fundamental Theorem

F = ∇f =∂f

∂xi +

∂f

∂yj

dr = r′(t)dt =

(dx

dti +

dy

dtj

)dt

∫C

F · dr =

∫ b

a

∂f

∂x

dx

dt+∂f

∂y

dy

dtdt

=

∫ b

a

d

dtf (r(t))dt

= f (r(b))− f (r(a))

= f (B)− f (A)

Multivariable Calculus 36 / 130

Page 37: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Visualizing the Fundamental Theorem

By our previous calculation, F · r′(t) computes the rate of change off (r(t)) with respect to t. This can be realized as the change in height ofthe graph z = f (x , y).

Multivariable Calculus 37 / 130

Page 38: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Conservative Vector Fields

Definition

A vector field is conservative if line integrals depend only the endpointsof the curve.

Theorem

For a vector field F = P i + Qj on a simply connected (no holes) domain,the following are equivalent (if one is true, the others are true).

1 F is conservative.

2 F = ∇f for some function f .

3∫C F · dr = 0 for all closed curves (start and end at same pt).

4 Py = Qx

The function f is sometimes called a potential function for F.

Multivariable Calculus 38 / 130

Page 39: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Proving the Equivalence

Here’s an outline of how we’d prove the theorem.

F conservative F = ∇f

Closed curves integrate to 0 Py = Qx

define f (x , y) =

∫ (x,y)

(0,0)

F · dr

FTLI

compare toconstant curve

combine C1 anda backward C2

fxy = fyxhard

Multivariable Calculus 39 / 130

Page 40: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Examples of Conservative Vector Fields

There are a couple cases of conservative fields that are easy to recognize:

A constant field F(x , y) = ai + bj.

A sum of the form F(x , y) = P(x)i + Q(y)j.

What is the potential function for each of these?

Multivariable Calculus 40 / 130

Page 41: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Example 2

1 Is F = (3x2 − 2xy)i + (cos y − x2)j conservative?

2 What is its potential function?

3 If C is a path from (1, 0) to (3, 0), what is∫C F · dr?

Multivariable Calculus 41 / 130

Page 42: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Exercise

For each vector field, determine whether it is conservative. If it is, find apotential function.

1 F1 = (√xy − y)i + (

√xy − x)j (for x , y ≥ 0)

2 F2 = (ey + 2x)i + (xey − 4y3)j

Multivariable Calculus 42 / 130

Page 43: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.3 The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals

Summary Questions

What does is mean for a vector field to be conservative?

What is the relationship between the gradient and a conservativevector field?

How do we test that a vector field is conservative?

What does the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals say?

Multivariable Calculus 43 / 130

Page 44: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Section 16.4

Green’s Theorem

Goals:

Use Green’s Theorem to replace a line integral with a double integralor vice versa.

Multivariable Calculus 44 / 130

Page 45: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Conclusions from Line Integrals of Closed Curves

Multivariable Calculus 45 / 130

Page 46: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Comparison to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

The fundamental theorem of calculus says that integrating (adding up insmall pieces) a rate of change on the interval [a, b] gives the total changebetween the boundary points a and b.

∫ b

af ′(x)dx = f (b)− f (a)

We will attempt to find a similar correspondence for two-dimensionaldomains.

Multivariable Calculus 46 / 130

Page 47: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Green’s Theorem

Theorem

Suppose D is a simply connected (no holes), bounded region and r(t)defines C , a piecewise smooth curve that traces the boundary of Dcounterclockwise. If F = P i + Qj is a vector field, then∫

CF · dr =

∫∫D

(∂Q

∂x− ∂P

∂y

)dA

Multivariable Calculus 47 / 130

Page 48: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Alternate Line Integral Notation

To avoid mentioning vectors, your textbook uses the notation∫CPdx + Qdy

Thus we can also write Green’s Theorem

Theorem ∫CPdx + Qdy =

∫∫D

(∂Q

∂x− ∂P

∂y

)dA

Multivariable Calculus 48 / 130

Page 49: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Significance of ∂Q∂x −

∂P∂y

If ∂Q∂x > 0, then the upward work on

the right side of C outweighs theupward work on the left side of C .

If ∂P∂y < 0, then the rightward work on

the bottom of C outweighs therightward work on the top of C .

Multivariable Calculus 49 / 130

Page 50: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Proof of Green’s Theorem

We approximate the line integral about C by summing line integralsaround ∆x by ∆y rectangles. Notice that the interior edges cancel eachother out. The remaining outer edges approximate C .

∫C

F·dr = lim∆x ,∆y→0

n∑i=1

∫Ci

F·dri

Multivariable Calculus 50 / 130

Page 51: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Proof of Green’s Theorem

In order to approximate the line integral around a ∆x by ∆y rectangle, welinearize F. We’ll use differential notation. Unless noted otherwise, allfunctions evaluated at (x , y).

L(x + dx , y + dy) =F + dF

=F + Fxdx + Fydy

=[P + Pxdx + Pydy

]i

+[Q + Qxdx + Qydy

]j

Multivariable Calculus 51 / 130

Page 52: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Proof of Green’s Theorem

Let’s parameterize the edges of a ∆x by ∆y rectangle. For each segment,0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

(x + t∆x)i + y j

(x + t∆x)i + (y + ∆y)j

x i + (y + t∆y)j (x + ∆x)i + (y + t∆y)j

(x , y) (x + ∆x , y)

(x + ∆x , y + ∆y)(x , y + ∆y)

Multivariable Calculus 52 / 130

Page 53: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Proof of Green’s Theorem

When we replace F with L and compute the line integral, we getconvenient cancellation. Here are the top and bottom segments.

∫ 1

0L(x + t∆x , y) · (∆x i)dt −

∫ 1

0L(x + t∆x , y + ∆y) · (∆x i)dt

= ∆x

[∫ 1

0P + Px(t∆x)dt −

∫ 1

0P + Px(t∆x) + Py (∆y)dt

]= ∆x

∫ 1

0−Py∆ydt

= −Py∆y∆x

Similarly the left and right segments sum to Qx∆x∆y .

Multivariable Calculus 53 / 130

Page 54: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Proof of Green’s Theorem

Finally we return to our original limit approximation. Note ∆y∆x is thearea of a ∆x by ∆y rectangle, so our expression conforms to the limitdefinition of a double integral.

∫C

F · dr = lim∆x ,∆y→0

n∑i=1

∫Ci

F · dri

= lim∆x ,∆y→0

n∑i=1

(Qx − Py )∆y∆x

= lim∆x ,∆y→0

n∑i=1

(Qx − Py )∆A

=

∫∫D

(Qx − Py )dA

Multivariable Calculus 54 / 130

Page 55: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Example 1

Let F(x , y) = (y2 − 3x)i + xy j. Let C be the path that travels along theline segment from (2, 4) to (−1, 1) and then back to (2, 4) along theparabola y = x2.

Compute∫C F · dr.

Multivariable Calculus 55 / 130

Page 56: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Exercise

Let F(x , y) = (3y − ex)i + (2x − sin y)j. Let C be a circle of radius 3traveling counterclockwise once around the origin.

1 Set up the line integral∫C F · dr as a single-variable integral of t.

2 If F were conservative what would the value of this integral be? Is Fconservative?

3 How would you apply Green’s theorem to the integral? What is itsvalue?

4 What would∫C F · dr be if C traveled clockwise instead?

Multivariable Calculus 56 / 130

Page 57: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Example 2

Let C be a semicircle from (2, 0) to (−2, 0) above the x-axis. Compute∫C

(x2 − y3)dx + (x3 + ey2)dy

Multivariable Calculus 57 / 130

Page 58: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Steps for Line Integrals

First decide whether you’re taking the line integral of a function: f (x , y)or a vector field: F(x , y).

1 Function f

a Parameterize C and set up the integral, replacing dx , dy , ds with theappropriate differential.

b Evaluate the integral.

2 Vector Field Fa Is F conservative? Use FTLI.b Can you draw the curve C? Is it closed? Use Green’s.c If neither works, parameterize C and set up the integral, replacing dr

with r′(t)dt, and evaluate.

Multivariable Calculus 58 / 130

Page 59: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.4 Green’s Theorem

Summary

What kind of integrals can we evaluate with Green’s theorem?

Why would we ever want to replace a single integral with a doubleintegral?

Multivariable Calculus 59 / 130

Page 60: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Section 16.5

Curl and Divergence

Goals:

Compute the curl and divergence of a vector field.

Interpret curl and divergence geometrically.

Multivariable Calculus 60 / 130

Page 61: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Derivatives of Vector Fields

If we compare the fundamental theorem of calculus to the fundamentaltheorem of line integrals,

f (b)− f (a) =

∫ b

af ′(x)dx

f (B)− f (A) =

∫C∇f · dr

we see that ∇f fills the role of a derivative of the multivariable function fin this context. In this section we try to define some derivative-likeoperations of vector fields.

Multivariable Calculus 61 / 130

Page 62: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

The ∇ Operator

Notation

We define the gradient operator ∇ (“del”), which behaves in some wayslike a vector. Depending on our choice of dimension we can have

∇ =

⟨∂

∂x,∂

∂y

⟩∇ =

⟨∂

∂x,∂

∂y,∂

∂z

Multivariable Calculus 62 / 130

Page 63: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

The Gradient of a Function

Given a function f (x , y), we can reexamine ∇f in terms of the gradientoperator:

∇f =

⟨∂

∂x,∂

∂y

⟩f

=

⟨∂

∂xf ,

∂yf

⟩=

⟨∂f

∂x,∂f

∂y

Multivariable Calculus 63 / 130

Page 64: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Divergence of a Vector Field

The ∇ operator is more exciting when we apply it to vector fields.

Definition

The divergence of a vector field F = P i + Qj at a point (x0, y0) measuresthe extent to which F points away from (x0, y0). The divergence functionis

div F = ∇ · F =∂

∂xP +

∂yQ

Divergence is defined analogously for 3-dimensional vector fields.

Notice that ∇ · F(x0, y0) is a number, not a vector.

Multivariable Calculus 64 / 130

Page 65: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Recognizing Divergence Visually

It is easiest to recognize divergence when F(x0, y0) is the zero vector.

∇ · F > 0 ∇ · F < 0 ∇ · F ≈ 0

Multivariable Calculus 65 / 130

Page 66: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Divergence when F(x , y) 6= 0

When F(x0, y0) is not zero, it can be harder to tell whether F is expandingaway from (x0, y0) or accelerating toward it. If F(x0, y0) = v we cansubtract the constant vector v from F .

∇ · F = ∇ · (F− v)

Multivariable Calculus 66 / 130

Page 67: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Exercise

If F = xz i + xyz j− y2k, compute ∇ · F at (−2, 2, 1). What does it mean?

Multivariable Calculus 67 / 130

Page 68: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Green’s Theorem

Recall that ∂Q∂x −

∂P∂y measured the amount that a vector field curled around

a point. Green’s theorem related this to the line integral of a curve aroundthat point. This is a special case of our other “derivative,” the curl of F.

Multivariable Calculus 68 / 130

Page 69: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Curl F

Definition

The curl is defined for a three-dimensional vector field F = 〈P,Q,R〉. It isdenoted ∇× F and computed as follows:

curl F = ∇× F =

∣∣∣∣∣∣i j k∂∂x

∂∂y

∂∂z

P Q R

∣∣∣∣∣∣=

(∂R

∂y− ∂Q

∂z

)i−(∂R

∂x− ∂P

∂z

)j +

(∂Q

∂x− ∂P

∂y

)k

Multivariable Calculus 69 / 130

Page 70: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Geometric Properties of ∇× F

Notice ∇× F(x0, y0, z0) is a vector.

∇× F(x0, y0, z0) is related to the line integrals of F around the point(x0, y0, z0).

The length indicates how large such integrals can be, as a multiple ofthe area they enclose.

The direction is perpendicular to the plane in which these lineintegrals are maximized, or around which F curls most strongly.

Multivariable Calculus 70 / 130

Page 71: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Exercise

If F = xz i + xyz j− y2k, compute ∇×F at (−2, 2, 1). What does it mean?

Multivariable Calculus 71 / 130

Page 72: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Vector Version of Green’s Theorem

Green’s theorem is two dimensional, so we assumeF(x , y , z) = P(x , y)i + Q(x , y)j + 0k. Most of the terms in the curl arezero. Specifically,

∇× F =

(∂Q

∂x− ∂P

∂y

)k.

Theorem (Green’s Theorem)

Suppose D is a simply connected, bounded region in the plane z = 0 andr(t) defines C , a piecewise smooth curve that traces the boundary of Dcounterclockwise. If F = 〈P,Q, 0〉 is a vector field, then∫

CF · dr =

∫∫D

(∇× F) · k dA

Multivariable Calculus 72 / 130

Page 73: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Composing ∇’s

We can also compose ∇ operators together. Here are some examples

Example

∇2f = ∇ · (∇f ) takes the divergence of the gradient vector field.

Example

∇ · (∇× F) computes the divergence of the curl of F.

Theorem

A vector field G on a simply connected 3-dimensional domain is equal to∇× F for some F, if and only if ∇ · G(x , y , z) = 0 for all (x , y , z).

Multivariable Calculus 73 / 130

Page 74: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.5 Curl and Divergence

Summary Questions

How do you compute divergence and curl?

How do you interpret divergence geometrically?

On what vector fields can you compute curl? Divergence?

If someone handed you two functions and tells you one is the curl of avector field and the other is the divergence, how could you tell whichis which?

Multivariable Calculus 74 / 130

Page 75: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Section 16.6

Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Goals:

Parameterize a surface.

Compute tangent vectors to a parametric surface.

Multivariable Calculus 75 / 130

Page 76: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Parametric Surfaces

A parametric surface is the set of points defined by two-variableparametric equations, usually in three-space.

r(u, v) = x(u, v)i + y(u, v)j + z(u, v)k

Where u and v are both parameters. Like with curves, we write this as avector function so we can do calculus, but we visualize it as a set of points.

Multivariable Calculus 76 / 130

Page 77: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Parameterizing the Graph of an Explicit Function

The graph of an explicit function z = f (x , y) can be parameterized bysubstituting

x = u y = v z = f (u, v)

r(u, v) = ui + v j + f (u, v)k

Multivariable Calculus 77 / 130

Page 78: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Parameterizing a Plane

Formula

If a plane p contains the point (x0, y0, z0) and the vectors a and b, then aparametrization of p is

r(u, v) = 〈x0, y0, z0〉+ ua + vb

Multivariable Calculus 78 / 130

Page 79: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Parameterizations from Other Coordinate Systems

Another source of parameterizations comes from coordinate systems we’velearned. Constant multiples and constant terms stretch and shift thesurface.

r(u, v) = (a cos u sin v + x0)i + (b sin u sin v + y0)j + (c cos v + z0)k0 ≤ u ≤ 2π 0 ≤ v ≤ π

Multivariable Calculus 79 / 130

Page 80: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Exercise

Describe the surfaces with the following parametric equations.

1 r(u, v) = 3 cos ui + 3 sin uj + vk 0 ≤ u ≤ 2π, 0 ≤ v ≤ 5

2 r(u, v) = (3− 3u − 3v)i + (6u + 2v)j + (2− 9v)k

3 r(u, v) = u cos π4 sin v i + u sin π4 sin v j + u cos vk

0 ≤ u ≤ 5, 0 ≤ v ≤ π

Multivariable Calculus 80 / 130

Page 81: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Derivatives of a Parametric Surface

Definitions

The partial derivatives ru(u0, v0) and rv (u0, v0) are tangent vectors tothe surface S .

We can use them to produce a linearization of S at r(u0, v0).

L(u, v) = r(u0, v0) + ru(u0, v0)(u − u0) + rv (u0, v0)(v − v0)

Some algebra shows that this is the equation of a tangent plane.

Multivariable Calculus 81 / 130

Page 82: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.6 Parametric Surfaces and Their Areas

Summary Questions

How do we parameterize a plane?

How do we parametrize the graph z = f (x , y)?

How do we parametrize a sphere or a cylinder?

What is the relationship between the tangent vectors and the tangentplane of a surface?

Multivariable Calculus 82 / 130

Page 83: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Section 16.7

Surface Integrals

Goals:

Understand the geometric significance of the different surfaceintegrals.

Set up and evaluate surface integrals.

Multivariable Calculus 83 / 130

Page 84: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Integrating on Parametric Surfaces

Just like with line integrals, we’d like to find ways of integrating a functionf (x , y , z) on a surface S that do not depend on the choice ofparameterization.

Definition

An integral dS is computed with respect to the geometric area on thesurface. We divide S into regions and let

∆Si be the area of the i th region.

(x∗i , y∗i , z∗i ) be a test point in the i th region.

D be the largest diameter of any of the regions (the longest distancebetween two points in the region).

We then define the surface integral:∫∫Sf (x , y , z)dS = lim

D→0

∑i

f (x∗i , y∗i , z∗i )∆Si

Multivariable Calculus 84 / 130

Page 85: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Computing a Surface Integral

It’s easier to choose subregions defined by a change in u and a change inv . Still, we may not know the area of such a region, so we use our oldtrick and linearize r(u, v) at a point and use the area of the parallelogramgiven by ∆u and ∆v . The area is thus

dS = |ru × rv |dudv

Multivariable Calculus 85 / 130

Page 86: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Example 1∫∫S

1dS computes the area of a surface. Compute the surface area of a

sphere of radius R.

Multivariable Calculus 86 / 130

Page 87: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Exercise

Let L be the surface

r(u, v) = 3 cos ui + 3 sin uj + vk 0 ≤ u ≤ 2π, 0 ≤ v ≤ 5.

Set up (but do not evaluate) the surface integral∫∫Lx2zdS .

Multivariable Calculus 87 / 130

Page 88: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Motivational Question

Suppose water, traveling at 3 meters per second is passing through acircular opening of radius 4m.

1 How much water flows through the opening per second?

2 What if the water is not flowing perpendicular to the circle?

Multivariable Calculus 88 / 130

Page 89: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Motivational Question

If the water is flowing with velocity v and n is normal to the opening Swith length equal to the area of S , then the flow rate is v · n.

Multivariable Calculus 89 / 130

Page 90: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Flux Integrals

3 What if the velocity of the water is not constant, but depends on thelocation where it is measured?

4 What if the opening isn’t a flat shape, but a surface in 3 dimensions?

Multivariable Calculus 90 / 130

Page 91: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Flux Integrals

Definition

The flux integral of F through S is denoted∫∫S

F · dS.

For a parameterization r(u, v) we define dS = (ru × rv )dudv . F · dSmeasures the flow of F through the parallelogram dS .

Multivariable Calculus 91 / 130

Page 92: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Example 2

Let F(x , y , z) = x i− y j be a flow of water and let N be a net given byN = {(x , y , z) : z = x2 − y2, x2 + y2 ≤ 1}.

1 Compute

∫∫N

F · dS.

2 What does the sign of your answer mean?

Multivariable Calculus 92 / 130

Page 93: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Exercises

1 Let L be the surface

r(u, v) = 3 cos ui + 3 sin uj + vk 0 ≤ u ≤ 2π, 0 ≤ v ≤ 5.

Let F(x , y , z) = xy i + z j + exk. Set up, but do not evaluate the fluxintegral:

∫S F · dS.

2 An experimental solar car has solar panels in the shape of the graph

z =√x − y2

4 for z ≥ 0 and x ≤ 16. The direction and intensity of thesunlight is given by the constant vector field: F = c(2i + 3j− 2k). Setup a flux integral to compute the energy collected by the car.

Multivariable Calculus 93 / 130

Page 94: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Orientation

Depending on our choice of parameterization, ru × rv could point in one oftwo normal directions. If a surface has two sides, then choosing a normaldirection defines an orientation of the surface.

Note that in general not all surfaces have two sides. Surfaces without twosides are non-orientable.

Multivariable Calculus 94 / 130

Page 95: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

The Unit Normal Vector

We can connect surface integrals to flux integrals via the followingdefinition

Definition

Given a surface S , the unit normal vector n to S at the point P is thenormal vector of length 1 at P whose direction agrees with the orientationof the surface.

Notice that at the point r(u, v), n = ru×rv|ru×rv | so

∫∫S

F·dS =

∫∫F(r)·(ru×rv )dudv =

∫∫F(r)·n|ru×rv |dudv =

∫∫S

F·ndS

This gives us an alternative notation for flux integrals.

Multivariable Calculus 95 / 130

Page 96: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.7 Surface Integrals

Summary Questions

What are the two kinds of surface integrals? What do they compute?

What expression do we substitute for the differentials dS and dS?

How many different orientations can a connected surface have? Doesthis change if the surface consists of two or more disconnected parts?

Multivariable Calculus 96 / 130

Page 97: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Section 16.8

Stokes’ Theorem

Use Stokes’ Theorem to evaluate integrals.

Multivariable Calculus 97 / 130

Page 98: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Line Integrals that Bound a Surface

Green’s Theorem related a line integral around C to a double integral of aregion bounded by C . In three dimensions, a curve C might bound asurface S . We can attempt to apply the method of Green’s to thissituation.

Multivariable Calculus 98 / 130

Page 99: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Subdividing and Linearizing a Surface

Like in two dimensions, given a subdivision of S into smaller pieces withperimeter curves ri , we have∫

CF · dr =

∑i

∫Ci

F · dri

We approximate the Ci with parallelograms from the linearization of S .This lets us write the line integrals in terms of the parameterization of S .

Multivariable Calculus 99 / 130

Page 100: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Line Integrals Around the Parallelograms

Let s(u, v) be a parameterization of S . We will parameterize the edges ofparallelogram that results from a change of ∆u and ∆v in the linearizationof s(u, v). The domains are all 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

r′(t)︷ ︸︸ ︷

s + tsu∆u

s + sv∆v + tsu∆u

r(t) = s + tsv∆v s + su∆u + tsv∆v

F + Fut∆u

F + Fut∆u + Fv∆v

F + Fu∆u + Fv t∆vF(r(t)) = F + Fv t∆v

s s + su∆u

s + su∆u + sv∆vs + sv∆v

We approximate F(ri (t)) by L(u, v) = F + Fudu + Fvdv .Multivariable Calculus 100 / 130

Page 101: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Computations

∫Ci

F · dri

≈∫ 1

0(F + Fut∆u) · (su∆u)dt +

∫ 1

0(F + Fu∆u + Fv t∆v) · (sv∆v)dt

−∫ 1

0(F + Fv∆v + Fut∆u) · (su∆u)dt −

∫ 1

0(F + Fv t∆v) · (sv∆v)dt

=−∫ 1

0Fv∆v · (su∆u)dt +

∫ 1

0Fu∆u · (sv∆v)dt

=

∫ 1

0(Fu∆u) · (sv∆v)− (Fv∆v) · (su∆u)dt

=

∫ 1

0(Fu · sv − Fv · su)∆v∆udt

=(Fu · sv − Fv · su)∆v∆u

Multivariable Calculus 101 / 130

Page 102: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Computations II

(Fu · sv − Fv · su) =

[∂P

∂x

∂x

∂u+∂P

∂y

∂y

∂u+∂P

∂z

∂z

∂u

]∂x

∂v

+

[∂Q

∂x

∂x

∂u+∂Q

∂y

∂y

∂u+∂Q

∂z

∂z

∂u

]∂y

∂v

+

[∂R

∂x

∂x

∂u+∂R

∂y

∂y

∂u+∂R

∂z

∂z

∂u

]∂z

∂v

−[∂P

∂x

∂x

∂v+∂P

∂y

∂y

∂v+∂P

∂z

∂z

∂v

]∂x

∂u

−[∂Q

∂x

∂x

∂v+∂Q

∂y

∂y

∂v+∂Q

∂z

∂z

∂v

]∂y

∂u

−[∂R

∂x

∂x

∂v+∂R

∂y

∂y

∂v+∂R

∂z

∂z

∂v

]∂z

∂u

Multivariable Calculus 102 / 130

Page 103: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Computations III

(Fu · sv − Fv · su) =

(∂R

∂y− ∂Q

∂z

)(∂y

∂u

∂z

∂v− ∂z

∂u

∂y

∂v

)+

(∂P

∂z− ∂R

∂x

)(∂x

∂u

∂z

∂v− ∂z

∂u

∂x

∂v

)+

(∂Q

∂x− ∂P

∂y

)(∂x

∂u

∂y

∂v− ∂y

∂u

∂x

∂v

)= (∇× F) · (su × sv )

Multivariable Calculus 103 / 130

Page 104: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Taking a Limit

Using this computation we can see what happens as we let the size of oursubdivisions approach 0.∫

CF · dr =

∑i

∫Ci

F · dri

= lim∆u,∆v→0

∑i

(Fu · sv − Fv · su)∆v∆u

= lim∆u,∆v→0

∑i

(∇× F) · (su × sv )∆v∆u

=

∫∫S

(∇× F) · dS

Multivariable Calculus 104 / 130

Page 105: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Stokes’ Theorem

Theorem

If S is a smooth surface that is bounded by a simple closed boundarycurve C with positive orientation and F is a vector field with continuouspartial derivatives, then∫

CF · dr =

∫∫S

(∇× F) · dS

Positive orientation means the rotation of C and the direction of dS obeythe right hand rule. If the surface is negatively oriented, introduce a minussign.

Multivariable Calculus 105 / 130

Page 106: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Visualizing Stokes’ Theorem

Much like Green’s theorem, Stokes’ theorem is understood as adding upthe extent to which the vector field curls around each point to get thetotal work around the boundary. The dot product measures the extent towhich the overall curl of F takes place in the surface.

Multivariable Calculus 106 / 130

Page 107: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Example 1

Let C be the curve given by r(t) = cos(t)i + sin(t)j + (cos2(t)− sin2(t))k.Let F(x , y , z) = xyk. How does Stokes’ Theorem apply to∫

CF · dr?

Multivariable Calculus 107 / 130

Page 108: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Exercise

Suppose that F is a conservative vector field on R3 and C is a smoothcurve that bounds a positively-oriented surface S .

1 Can the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals compute∫C F · dr?

What is the value?

2 Use your characterization of F from 1 to compute ∇× F.

Multivariable Calculus 108 / 130

Page 109: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Example 2

Let F(x , y , z) be a smooth vector field on R3. Let S be a sphere. What is∫∫S(∇× F) · dS?

Multivariable Calculus 109 / 130

Page 110: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Physics Application of Stokes’ Theorem

Faraday’s law of induction says that the change in magnetic field througha surface S induces an electromotive force through a wire on its boundaryC . Physicists measure the induced voltage by integrating the change inmagnetic field dS.

Multivariable Calculus 110 / 130

Page 111: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Exercise

Suppose S is part of the paraboloid z = 16− x2 − y2 above the xy -plane,and C is its boundary. Is there an easier way to compute

∫∫S F · dS?

Multivariable Calculus 111 / 130

Page 112: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.8 Stokes’ Theorem

Summary Questions

What two types of integrals does Stokes’ Theorem equate?

What does positive orientation mean?

Multivariable Calculus 112 / 130

Page 113: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Section 16.9

The Divergence Theorem

Use the Divergence Theorem to evaluate integrals.

Multivariable Calculus 113 / 130

Page 114: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Divergence of a Vector Field and Flux Integrals

A vector field with positive divergence expands outward. Let S be aclosed surface. Visually, we expect the flux integral through that surfaceto be related to this divergence.

Multivariable Calculus 114 / 130

Page 115: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

The Divergence Theorem

Theorem

If E is a simple solid region, S is its boundary surface with outwardorientation, and F is a vector field with continuous partial derivatives.Then ∫∫

SF · dS =

∫∫∫E∇ · FdV

Outward orientation means that the normal vectors ru × rv point out of Erather than into E .

Multivariable Calculus 115 / 130

Page 116: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Example 1

Let S be the surface of the cube with vertices (±1,±1,±1), orientedoutward. Let F(x , y , z) = x3i + yz j + exzk. Compute

∫∫S F · dS.

Multivariable Calculus 116 / 130

Page 117: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Example 2

Let F = (2x − sin(y))i + (ez − 4y)j +−zk. Let L be given byr(u, v) = 3 cos(u)i + 3 sin uj + vk for 0 ≤ u ≤ 2π and 0 ≤ v ≤ 4. Compute∫∫

LF · dS.

Multivariable Calculus 117 / 130

Page 118: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Exercise

Let S be a sphere of radius 5 with outward orientation. LetF(x , y , z) = (x + 3y)i + (x sin(z))j− zk. What does the divergencetheorem tell you about the value of∫∫

SF · dS?

Multivariable Calculus 118 / 130

Page 119: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Application: Diffusion

This is a classical situation studied in a partial differential equations course.Suppose a function u(x , y , z , t) gives the density of smoke (or heat) at thepoint (x , y , z) at time t. Suppose F(x , y , z , t) gives the flow of the smoke.Then for any domain D with smooth boundary S we have

d

dt

∫∫∫DudV = −

∫∫S

F · dS

We can reverse the order of differentiation and integration on the left.

We can apply the Divergence Theorem on the right.∫∫∫D

∂u

∂tdV = −

∫∫∫D

(∇ · F) · dV

If this is true for all domains D, the integrands must be equal

∂u

∂t= −∇ · F

Multivariable Calculus 119 / 130

Page 120: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Application: Integration by Parts

The Divergence Theorem allows us to derive a multivariable integration byparts which is also used to solve partial differential equations.

Product Rule

If s is a function and F is a vector field then

∇ · (sF) = (∇s) · F + s(∇ · F)

Theorem (Integration by Parts)

If R is a region with boundary ∂R then∫∫∫R

(∇s) · F +

∫∫∫Rs(∇ · F) =

∫∫∂R

sF

Multivariable Calculus 120 / 130

Page 121: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

The Divergence Theorem in One Dimension

Unlike Green’s and Stokes’ Theorems, the Divergence Theorem can begeneralized to other dimensions

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

For a vector field F(x) = P(x)i on a domain [a, b]. We have∇ · F = P ′(x). The outward normal vectors at a and b are −i and i. Sothe Divergence Theorem is∫

[a,b]P ′(x)dx = F(a) · (−i) + F(b) · i = −P(a) + P(b)

Multivariable Calculus 121 / 130

Page 122: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

The Divergence Theorem in Two Dimension

Two Dimensions

For a closed curve C = (x(t), y(t)) traveling counterclockwise around adomain D, we have the outward normal vector:

n(t) =

∣∣∣∣ i jx ′(t) y ′(t)

∣∣∣∣The Divergence Theorem is

∫∫D∇ · FdA =

∫ b

aF(x(t), y(t)) · n(t)dt.

Multivariable Calculus 122 / 130

Page 123: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.9 The Divergence Theorem

Summary Questions

What two types of integrals does the Divergence Theorem equate?

What needs to be true about the domain for the theorem to work?

Explain why the Divergence Theorem is more likely to be useful incomputation than Stokes’ Theorem.

Multivariable Calculus 123 / 130

Page 124: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.10 Summary of Integration Theorems

Section 16.10

Summary of Integration Theorems

Notice the parallels between the integration theorems we have learned.

Multivariable Calculus 124 / 130

Page 125: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.10 Summary of Integration Theorems

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Given a function f and an interval [a, b], we have

∫ b

af ′(x)dx = f (b)− f (a)

Multivariable Calculus 125 / 130

Page 126: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.10 Summary of Integration Theorems

The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals

Given a function f and a vector function r(t) from A to B, we have

∫ b

a(∇f ) · dr = f (b)− f (a)

Multivariable Calculus 126 / 130

Page 127: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.10 Summary of Integration Theorems

Green’s Theorem

Given a vector field F and a domain D in R2 bounded by a curve C , we

∫∫D

(∂Q

∂x− ∂P

∂y

)dA =

∫C

F · dr

Multivariable Calculus 127 / 130

Page 128: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.10 Summary of Integration Theorems

Stokes’ Theorem

Given a vector field F and a smooth surface S in R3 that is bounded by asimple closed boundary curve C , we have

∫∫S

(∇× F) · dS =

∫C

F · dr

Multivariable Calculus 128 / 130

Page 129: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.10 Summary of Integration Theorems

The Divergence Theorem

Given a vector field F and a region E with (outward oriented) boundarysurface S we have

∫∫∫E∇ · FdV =

∫∫S

F · dS

Multivariable Calculus 129 / 130

Page 130: Section 16.2 Line Integrals - Emory Universitympcarr/math211/print/ch16.pdf · Parameterizations and the Line Integral The naive approach to integrating a function f(x;y) over a curve

Section 16.10 Summary of Integration Theorems

Summary Questions/Exercise

On each side of an integration theorem:

How are the functions related to each other?

How are the domains related to each other?

Multivariable Calculus 130 / 130


Recommended