Senior Project Administrator - Waste Managementwcec.wm.com/documents/2013 Ambiant Air Monitoring...

This document is intended for the sole use of the party to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately.

® RWDI name and logo are registered trademarks in Canada and the United States of America

Reputation Resources Results Canada | USA | UK | India | China | Hong Kong | Singapore www.rwdi.com

Tel: 519.823.1311 Fax: 519.823.1316 RWDI AIR Inc. 650 Woodlawn Road West Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1K 1B8

Waste Management of Canada Corporation Ottawa, Ontario

Final Report

2013 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program RWDI # 1301745 February 13, 2014

SUBMITTED TO

Rémi Godin Landfill Project Engineer

[email protected]

Waste Management of Canada Corporation 2301 Carp Road

R.R.#3 Carp, Ontario

K0A 1L0

P: (613) 831-5363 F: (613) 831-8928

SUBMITTED BY

John DeYoe, B.A., d.E.T. Project Director/Associate [email protected]

Brad Bergeron, A.Sc.T., d.E.T. Senior Project Manager/Principal

[email protected]

Arjun Tandalam, M.A.Sc. Project Scientist

[email protected]

RWDI AIR Inc. 650 Woodlawn Road West

Guelph, ON N1K 1B8

mailto:[email protected]





Waste Management of Canada Corporation 2013 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program RWDI# 1301745 February 13, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1

2. OVERVIEW OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................... 1

3. SAMPLING METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 2

3.1 Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) .............................................................................................. 2

3.2 VOC Measurements ...................................................................................................................... 2

3.2.1 VOC Sampling and Analytical Methods ............................................................................ 3

3.3 Reduced Sulphur Measurements.................................................................................................. 3

3.4 Meteorological Station ................................................................................................................... 3

3.5 Quality Assurance Measures ........................................................................................................ 4

3.6 Relevant Air Quality Limits ............................................................................................................ 4

4. RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................. 4

5. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................... 6

Tables Tables 1.1 – 1.6: Summary of TSP Results

Tables 2.1 – 2.6: VOC Concentrations – ½ Hour Sampling Results

Table 3.1: TRS Results

Figures Figures 1.1 – 1.25: TSP Sampling Locations

Figures 2.1 – 2.8: Sampling Locations for TRS and ½ Hour VOC

Appendices Appendix A: Notification of Exceedance Reports

Appendix B: Laboratory Reports

Appendix C: Field Notes



Page 1

1. INTRODUCTION RWDI AIR Inc. (RWDI) was retained by Waste Management of Canada Corporation (WM) to conduct the 2013 ambient air quality monitoring program at the Ottawa Landfill facility located in Ottawa, Ontario. This monitoring program was undertaken to fulfill the requirements listed in the Minutes of Settlement, signed on September 27th, 2007 and subsequent documents. The ambient air quality monitoring program was also developed to take into account the results of discussions between community residents, the Ministry of Environment and Waste Management of Canada Corporation.

The ambient monitoring program was approved based on the “Ambient Air Quality Work Plan” dated September 20, 2007 in the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Item 13 in Schedule B1.

2. OVERVIEW OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM

Sampling was conducted from May 2013 to September of 2013, inclusive. The parameters monitored were as follows:

Total suspended particulate (TSP) and metals;

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs); and

Total Reduced Sulphur (TRS).

Monitoring for Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) was conducted at three (3) fixed locations around the landfill footprint. The monitoring locations were near the northeast corner, the southeast corner and the south west corner of the Ottawa Landfill. Samples were taken over a 24 hour period every six (6) days, in concurrence with the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s National Air Pollutant Surveillance program (NAPS).

Monitoring for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) were completed both upwind and downwind of the landfill footprint. Six (6) ½ - hour samples pairs (upwind and downwind) were collected using adsorbent tubes for selected VOC compounds. Sampling locations were selected based on local meteorological conditions at the time of sampling.

For TRS, five (5) pairs of samples (upwind and downwind) were collected for reduced sulphur compounds. Sampling locations were selected based on local meteorological conditions at the time of sampling.

An on-site meteorological station measured wind speed, and wind direction, concurrently with the field measurements.

1 RWDI Air Inc. Ambient Air Quality Work Plan – Ottawa Landfill RWDI Reference Number W07-5258A dated September 20, 2007.



Page 2

In order to best maintain the short-term upwind and downwind positions, the sampling locations for VOC and TRS sampling varied between sample days to adjust to current meteorological conditions. The collected samples were sent for laboratory analysis and the results were compared to the applicable MOE Point of Impingement (POI) Limits.

3. SAMPLING METHODOLOGY A number of quality assurance measures were implemented throughout the program. This section provides details with respect to samplers, media, methods and QA/QC procedures.

3.1 Total Suspended Particulate (TSP)

A total of sixty three (63) samples out of a possible seventy five (75) samples (twenty five sample sets) were collected through the course of the ambient Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) measurement program. These sample sets were taken at three (3) fixed stationary locations along the Ottawa Landfill fence line. The monitoring locations were near the northeast corner, the southeast corner and the south west corner of the landfill. Samples were collected from midnight to midnight (24-hour period), in concurrence with the U.S. EPA NAPS six day sampling schedule.

The monitoring method was in compliance with the methods specified by the MOE’s Operations Manual for Air Quality Monitoring in Ontario and USEPA Method IO-2. The 24-hour samples were taken using standard high-volume (hi-vol) air samplers at a sampling rate of approximately 40 CFM. Suspended particulate matter was collected on an 8”x10” Teflon coated glass fibre filters. The filters were submitted to Caduceon Environmental Laboratories for gravimetric and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis for metals.

The particular metals that were examined on the TSP filters were Lead, Manganese, Chromium, Cadmium, and Nickel.

3.2 VOC Measurements

Monitoring for VOCs was conducted by collecting six (6), ½ - hour sample pairs using adsorbent tubes for select VOC compounds.

Ambient air samples were collected concurrently at locations directly downwind and upwind of the landfill mound. In general, the downwind samples were focused on capturing emissions from the landfill operations. The sampling locations (upwind and downwind) were pre-selected based on forecasts of wind direction provided by Environment Canada and information from the on-site meteorological station.

The sampling methods and analytical techniques used for VOC sampling were developed based on guidance from the MOE’s Operations Manual for Point Source Air Quality Monitoring. The sampling methodology is described in more detail in the following sections.



Page 3

3.2.1 VOC Sampling and Analytical Methods

Sampling for VOC’s was based on the U.S. EPA Ambient Air Method TO-17 using adsorbent tubes. Air samples were collected using a diaphragm pump regulated with rotameters or mass flow controllers. The sample flow rates were nominally 240 ml/minute, resulting in total sample volumes of approximately 7.2 litres, as suggested by the MOE.

Samples were submitted to OSB Laboratories for analysis. The analysis was conducted using a gas chromatograph equipped with a mass spectrometer detector. Vinyl chloride was analyzed using selective ion mode to obtain lower detection limits. The VOC analysis method is comparable to EPA SW846 Method 8260B, NIOSH Method 2549 and equivalent to EPA Compendium Method TO-17.

3.3 Reduced Sulphur Measurements

Reduced sulphur samples were collected in the same location as the VOC samples. The samples were collected roughly over a 10-minute period, downwind and upwind of the landfill mound. The sampling locations were chosen based on meteorological conditions.

Samples were collected in three-litre Tedlar or Teflon bags using a lung sampler. Once collected, the reduced sulphur samples were protected from sunlight until analyzed. The samples were analyzed in-house at RWDI using a thermal oxidizer in conjunction with pulsating ultraviolet light to detect reduced sulphur. The analysis was completed within 24 hours of sample collection.

3.4 Meteorological Station

Continuous wind speed, and wind direction measurements were collected from the on-site weather station installed by RWDI.

Rainfall data was also collected for days when the 24-hour TSP samples were collected. This information was also obtained from the Environment Canada station, Ottawa CDA. The rainfall data is presented in Table 1, below.

Table 1: Rainfall data for each 24-hour TSP Sample Period, (Ottawa International Airport) Date Total Precipitation (mm) Date Total Precipitation (mm)

04-May-13 0.0 21-Jul-13 0.0 10-May-13 10.8 27-Jul-13 5.0 16-May-13 0.0 02-Aug-13 0.6 22-May-13 25.6 08-Aug-13 0.0 28-May-13 0.2 14-Aug-13 2.4 03-Jun-13 Trace 20-Aug-13 0.0 09-Jun-13 Trace 26-Aug-13 1.0 15-Jun-13 0.0 01-Sep-13 0.4 21-Jun-13 0.0 07-Sep-13 4.4 27-Jun-13 0.0 13-Sep-13 Trace 03-Jul-13 0.0 19-Sep-13 0.0 09-Jul-13 Trace 25-Sep-13 0.0 15-Jul-13 0.0



Page 4

3.5 Quality Assurance Measures

A number of common quality assurance measures were implemented during the sampling program to ensure the integrity of the results. These measures included detailed documentation of all field activities, calibration of all samplers and a number of laboratory-related measures including sample handling procedures and instrument calibrations.

All of the samplers were either bench-tested or calibrated in RWDI’s office prior to field deployment or calibrated in the field before use. For example, all of the low flow samplers were calibrated against a certified primary dry cell standard, (i.e., dry cell calibrator) before sampling.

Chain of Custody forms were completed and submitted along with the exposed samples to the laboratory. Where required by the method, exposed samples were packed in coolers before transport.

3.6 Relevant Air Quality Limits

Measured 24-hour TSP concentrations from the ambient air quality monitoring program were compared to the respective Ontario Regulation 419/05 Point of Impingement (POI) Limits.

Measured ½ - hour VOC and 10-minute reduced sulphur compound concentrations from the ambient air quality monitoring program were compared to their respective Ontario Regulation 419/05 POI Limits. Regulation 419/05 sets forth explicit standards for a source’s contribution to the concentration of airborne contaminants at the POI. The term POI is taken to be in the natural environment at the boundaries of the property.

4. RESULTS TSP samples were collected every six (6) days from May 4 to September 25 of 2013. A total of sixty three (63) samples out of a possible seventy five (75) samples were collected. Twelve (12) samples were not collected. The majority of these missed samples were related to electrical power issues. The sample recovery rate was 84% which is well within the MOE’s minimum recovery level of greater than 75%. The results of the TSP analysis are presented in Tables 1.1 to 1.6. Figures 1.1 to 1.25 illustrate the sampling location, the particulate matter concentrations and a wind rose representing the wind conditions at the site during the sampling event. The wind rose shows the frequency and strength of winds blowing from different directions.



Page 5

A total of fourteen (14) measured TSP concentrations were above Schedule 3, 24-hour standard as outlined in O.Reg.419/05. Background particulate concentrations in the vicinity of the landfill are relatively high, due to nearby quarry operations and off-site traffic on Carp Road and Highway 417. Ambient sampling results indicate that off-site sources can produce concentrations of suspended particulate matter as high as or higher than the concentrations produced by landfill operations. This is evidenced by the high particulate measurements recorded when winds were blowing from off-site towards the ambient sampler locations. In addition, there were also a number of events where on-site sources (including movement of vehicles within the landfill) which can be attributed to the elevated concentrations. WM employs a Best Management Practices Plan for fugitive dust control in an effort to reduce the potential for dust to migrate off-site. WM should continue to monitor dust conditions at the site and apply water on all roads as required to reduce the potential for fugitive dust form the site.

For the days on which TSP level exceeded the POI limits, a Notice of Exceedance was sent to Waste Management of Canada Corporation and issued to the MOE. These notices contained details such as the sample location at which the exceedance occurred, sample location relative to the landfill footprint in terms of wind direction, and the potential main contributor to the exceedance. The notices of exceedance are attached in Appendix A.

Six (6) VOC and five (5) reduced sulphur samples were collected and analyzed by the laboratories and methods noted above. The samples were collected on the following days:

June 13 (VOC only);

June 20 (VOC only);

July 16 (VOC only);

July 25;

August 7 (TRS only)

August 14 (TRS only);

September 18; and

September 26.

The results of the VOC samples are presented in Tables 2.1 to 2.6. These tables include the following information:

A summary of all measured data, in terms of upwind and downwind sample tube results in total nanograms (ng) as well as upwind and downwind results in terms of concentration, in micrograms of contaminant per cubic metre of air (ug/m3).

Comparison of upwind and downwind measured concentrations to the applicable air quality limits.

A comparison of the upwind and downwind measured concentrations to determine the net impacts from the landfill facility.



Page 6

The results of the TRS samples are presented in Table 3.1. This table includes:

A summary of all measured data, in terms of upwind and downwind results in parts per billion (ppb) as well as in micrograms of contaminant per cubic metre of air (ug/m3).

Comparison of upwind and downwind measured concentrations to the applicable air quality limits.

A comparison of the upwind and downwind measured concentrations to determine the net impacts from the landfill facility.

Sampling locations for TRS and 30-minute VOC are shown in Figures 2.1 to 2.8. All of the ambient measurements for TRS showed concentrations less than the relevant POI limits.

5. CONCLUSION The ambient sampling program for 2013 was completed on September 26th, 2013.

A total of fourteen (14) measured TSP concentrations were greater than the 24-hour Schedule 3 standard for TSP. For the days the exceedance occurred, notices of exceedance were sent to Waste Management of Canada Corporation for submission to the MOE. These exceedances were mostly attributed to off-site activities. However, some of the exceedances can be attributed to on-site movement of vehicles. Waste Management was applying water to the roadways during the summer season as noted in their on-site dust management strategy in order to minimize the exceedances from the on-site activities. RWDI would recommend that WM review the dust control measures along the south and east roadways on the site and continue to monitor dust conditions at the site. Details of these exceedances are shown in Appendix A. All of the samples for airborne metals were below criteria concentrations.

None of the ambient measurements for VOC or TRS showed concentrations that were greater than the relevant POI Limits.

Employee Job Title

TABLES

Table 1.1: Summary of Total Suspended Particles results

N.E. HI VOL S.E. HI VOL S.W. HI VOL

Sample Date Northeast Southeast Southwest

4-May-13 96 164 84

10-May-13 99 169 52

16-May-13 60 35 42

22-May-13 73 No Sample 23

28-May-13 151 114 58

3-Jun-13 No Sample No Sample 27

9-Jun-13 86 174 54

15-Jun-13 44 74 42

21-Jun-13 45 208 59

27-Jun-13 122 179 52

3-Jul-13 125 163 64

9-Jul-13 96 133 52

15-Jul-13 58 127 33

21-Jul-13 No Sample 43 17

27-Jul-13 67 49 28

2-Aug-13 16 78 13

8-Aug-13 No Sample 100 15




1-Sep-13 No Sample No Sample No Sample

7-Sep-13 20 48 18

13-Sep-13 47 72 No Sample

19-Sep-13 22 293 57

25-Sep-13 54 79 39

N.E. HI VOL S.E. HI VOL S.W. HI VOL28/5/2013: 8 hour sample

26/8/2013: 15 hour sample

25/9/2013: 39 hour sample

Regulatory Limit 120 g/m3

Maximum 293 g/m3

Maximum % of Limit 245%

24-hour Concentration (g/m3)

Note: Days with TSP exceeding MOE limits are shaded red. All samples were collected for approximately 24 hours with the exception of those shaded grey. The sample period for these days are given below:

Table 1.2: Summary of Cadmium (Cd) results

N.E. HI VOL S.E. HI VOL S.W. HI VOLSample Date Northeast Southeast Southwest

4-May-13 ND ND ND

10-May-13 ND ND ND

16-May-13 ND ND ND

22-May-13 ND No Sample ND

28-May-13 ND ND ND

3-Jun-13 No Sample No Sample ND

9-Jun-13 ND ND ND

15-Jun-13 ND ND ND

21-Jun-13 ND ND ND

27-Jun-13 ND ND ND

3-Jul-13 ND ND ND

9-Jul-13 ND ND ND

15-Jul-13 ND ND ND

21-Jul-13 No Sample ND ND

27-Jul-13 ND ND ND

2-Aug-13 ND ND ND

8-Aug-13 No Sample ND ND





7-Sep-13 ND ND ND

13-Sep-13 ND ND No Sample

19-Sep-13 ND ND ND

25-Sep-13 ND ND ND


26/8/2013: 15 hour sample25/9/2013: 39 hour sample

< indicates samples were below detection limits

Regulatory Limit 0.025 mg/m3

Maximum 0.000 mg/m3


24-hour Concentration (mg/m3)

Note: All samples were collected for approximately 24 hours with the exception of those shaded grey. The sample period for these days are given below:

Table 1.3: Summary of Chromium (Cr) results

N.E. HI VOL S.E. HI VOL S.W. HI VOLSample Date Northeast Southeast Southwest

4-May-13 0.017 0.016 0.016

10-May-13 0.018 0.016 0.016

16-May-13 0.019 0.022 0.022

22-May-13 0.025 No Sample 0.023

28-May-13 0.022 0.053 0.022

3-Jun-13 No Sample No Sample 0.017

9-Jun-13 ND ND ND

15-Jun-13 0.003 ND ND

21-Jun-13 ND 0.002 ND

27-Jun-13 0.002 0.003 ND

3-Jul-13 0.002 0.002 ND

9-Jul-13 0.002 ND ND

15-Jul-13 ND 0.002 ND


27-Jul-13 ND 0.003 0.003

2-Aug-13 0.003 ND 0.002

8-Aug-13 No Sample 0.004 0.002

14-Aug-13 No Sample 0.004 0.002

20-Aug-13 No Sample 0.004 0.003

26-Aug-13 No Sample 0.005 0.004


7-Sep-13 0.002 0.002 0.002

13-Sep-13 ND 0.002 No Sample

19-Sep-13 ND 0.004 0.002

25-Sep-13 0.002 0.002 0.001



<indicates samples were below detection limitsRegulatory Limit 1.5 mg/m3

Maximum 0.053 mg/m3


24-hour Concentration (mg/m3)


Note: The 24-hour Schedule 3 Standard for Chromium (0.5 µg/m3) is being phased-in on

July 1, 2016. Until then the Guideline of 1.5 µg/m3 is in effect.

Table 1.4: Summary of Manganese (Mn) results



4-May-13 0.021 0.038 0.014

10-May-13 0.043 0.033 0.008

16-May-13 0.019 0.012 0.015

22-May-13 0.021 No Sample 0.007

28-May-13 0.039 0.024 0.018


9-Jun-13 0.011 0.056 ND

15-Jun-13 0.003 0.011 ND

21-Jun-13 0.012 0.069 0.008

27-Jun-13 0.044 0.038 0.012

3-Jul-13 0.033 0.039 0.011

9-Jul-13 0.029 0.041 0.008

15-Jul-13 0.019 0.043 0.008

21-Jul-13 No Sample 0.013 0.002

27-Jul-13 0.018 0.018 0.011

2-Aug-13 0.006 0.022 0.002

8-Aug-13 No Sample 0.027 0.002

14-Aug-13 No Sample 0.016 0.002

20-Aug-13 No Sample 0.084 0.011

26-Aug-13 No Sample 0.063 0.004


7-Sep-13 0.009 0.016 0.006

13-Sep-13 0.018 0.027 No Sample

19-Sep-13 0.007 0.106 0.013

25-Sep-13 0.021 0.028 0.016




Regulatory Limit 2.50 g/m3

Maximum 0.106 g/m3




Note: The 24‐hour Schedule 3 Standard for Manganese (0.4 µg/m3) is being phased‐in on

July 1, 2016. Until then the Guideline of 2.5 µg/m3 is in effect.

Table 1.5: Summary of Nickel (Ni) results



4-May-13 ND ND ND

10-May-13 ND ND ND

16-May-13 ND ND ND


28-May-13 ND ND ND


9-Jun-13 ND ND ND

15-Jun-13 ND ND ND

21-Jun-13 ND ND ND

27-Jun-13 ND ND ND

3-Jul-13 ND ND ND

9-Jul-13 ND ND ND

15-Jul-13 ND ND ND


27-Jul-13 ND ND ND

2-Aug-13 ND ND ND






7-Sep-13 ND ND ND


19-Sep-13 ND ND ND

25-Sep-13 ND ND ND





Maximum 0.00 g/m3




Table 1.6: Summary of Lead (Pb) results



4-May-13 ND ND ND

10-May-13 ND ND ND

16-May-13 ND ND ND


28-May-13 ND ND ND


9-Jun-13 ND ND ND

15-Jun-13 ND ND ND

21-Jun-13 ND ND ND

27-Jun-13 ND ND ND

3-Jul-13 ND ND ND

9-Jul-13 ND ND ND

15-Jul-13 ND ND ND


27-Jul-13 ND ND ND

2-Aug-13 ND ND ND






7-Sep-13 ND ND ND


19-Sep-13 ND ND ND

25-Sep-13 ND ND ND





Maximum 0.000 g/m3




Table 2.1: Analytical Results for Ambient VOC Sampling at Ottawa Landfill

Upwind and downwind of landfill footprintAnalysis Method - SCAN ATD-GC-MSD Cryogenic Oven Control

Tube: SS37 Tube: SS38Date: June 13, 2013 Date: June 13, 2013

Laboratory Description

CAS # COMPOUNDUpwind

Measured Amount (ng)

Upwind Measured

Concentration(µg/m3)

Upwind Percentage of

POI Limit(%)

Downwind Measured Amount

(ng)

Downwind Measured


Downwind Percentage of

POI Limit(%)

- - Sample Volume (m3) - - - - 0.0080 - - - - 0.0079 - - - -75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,500,000 2.4 0.30 <0.1% 2.4 0.30 <0.1% 0.00

75-45-6 Chlorodifluoromethane 1,050,000 56 7.00 <0.1% 58 7.32 <0.1% 0.31

75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride [1] 3 ND ND ND 0.020 0.0025 <0.1% 0.0025

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 21,240 14.6 1.83 <0.1% 31 3.91 <0.1% 2.08

75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 18,000 3.5 0.44 <0.1% 7.4 0.93 <0.1% 0.50

109-66-0 Pentane 12,600 1.3 0.16 <0.1% 2.7 0.34 <0.1% 0.18

64-17-5 Ethanol 19,000 10.4 1.30 <0.1% 26 3.28 <0.1% 1.98

75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 30 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2,400,000 3 0.38 <0.1% 2.4 0.30 <0.1% background

108-20-3 Isopropyl Ether 220 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

67-64-1 Acetone 35,640 7.3 0.91 <0.1% 19 2.40 <0.1% 1.48

67-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol 22,000 3.2 0.40 <0.1% 8.3 1.05 <0.1% 0.65

107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 12,600 14.6 1.83 <0.1% 32 4.04 <0.1% 2.21

75-09-2 Dichloromethane 660 2.1 0.26 <0.1% 5.8 0.73 0.1% 0.47

96-14-0 3-Methyl Pentane 4,200 0.3 0.04 <0.1% 0.6 0.08 <0.1% 0.04

107-13-1 2-Propenitrile 1.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

156-60-5 1,2-Dichloroethene(trans) 315 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

110-54-3 Hexane 22,500 1.4 0.18 <0.1% 2.9 0.37 <0.1% 0.19

75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

123-72-8 n-Butanal 17 2.1 0.26 2% 6.7 0.85 5% 0.58

156-59-2 1,2-Dichloroethene(cis) 315 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

78-93-3 MEK 3,000 2.5 0.31 <0.1% 7 0.88 <0.1% 0.57

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 19,000 0.9 0.11 <0.1% 1.7 0.21 <0.1% 0.10

67-66-3 Chloroform 3 0.1 0.01 0% 0.4 0.05 2% 0.04

591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 3,684 2.9 0.36 <0.1% 6.5 0.82 <0.1% 0.46

110-82-7 Cyclohexane 18,300 1.2 0.15 <0.1% 4.1 0.52 <0.1% 0.37

71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 350,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 7.2 ND ND ND 0.8 0.10 1% ND

589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane 7,800 4.3 0.54 <0.1% 8.9 1.12 <0.1% 0.58

71-43-2 Benzene [2] 7 0.6 0.08 1% 0.9 0.11 2% 0.04


142-82-5 heptan 33,000 0.9 0.11 <0.1% 1.7 0.21 <0.1% 0.10

79-01-6 Trichloroethene 36 4.1 0.51 1% 4.3 0.54 2% 0.03

78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 2,400 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 19,320 1.6 0.20 <0.1% 4.9 0.62 <0.1% 0.42

108-10-1 MIBK 1,200 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

108-88-3 Toluene 2,000 3.4 0.43 <0.1% 7.5 0.95 <0.1% 0.52

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 1,080 1.2 0.15 <0.1% 1.4 0.18 <0.1% 0.03

123-86-4 Butyl Acetate 735 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 9 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 4,200 ND ND ND 0.3 0.04 <0.1% ND

100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 1,400 0.4 0.05 <0.1% 1.3 0.16 <0.1% 0.11

111-84-2 Nonane 12,600 2.3 0.29 <0.1% 3.4 0.43 <0.1% 0.14

08-38-3/106-42 m/p-Xylene* 2,200 2 0.25 <0.1% 4.7 0.59 <0.1% 0.34

110-12-3 5-Methyl-2-Hexanone 460 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

95-47-6 o-Xylene* 2,200 0.5 0.06 <0.1% 0.9 0.11 <0.1% 0.05

100-42-5 Styrene 400 0.6 0.08 <0.1% 1.1 0.14 <0.1% 0.06

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 60 0.1 0.01 <0.1% 0.5 0.06 0.1% 0.05

20-14-4/622-96 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 0.2 0.03 <0.1% 0.4 0.05 <0.1% 0.03

124-18-5 Decane 60,000 2.8 0.35 <0.1% 5 0.63 <0.1% 0.28

108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 660 0.2 0.03 <0.1% 0.5 0.06 <0.1% 0.04

611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.2 0.03 <0.1% 0.03


535-77-3 m-Cymene - ND ND - Trace Trace - ND

138-86-3 Limonene - ND ND - ND ND - ND

99-87-6 p-Cymene 330 0.5 0.06 <0.1% 1.2 0.15 <0.1% 0.09

106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 285 ND ND ND 0.3 0.04 <0.1% ND


95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 37,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 100 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

91-20-3 Naphthalene 36 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TVOCs (Toluene) 360 45.02 - 870 109.75 - 64.73

TVOCs (Quantified) 156 19.51 - 280 35.32 - 15.81

Molhave-Clausen TVOCs (Toluene) 360 45.02 - 870 109.75 - 64.73

Notes:[1] Vinyl Chloride assessed using SIM analysis, which has a lower detection limit.

[2] The limit for Benzene is 7 ug/m3, based on the Settlment Agreement

[3]

POI = Half Hour Point of Impingement (Ontario Ministry of Environment)

TRACE = Characteristic ions present but too low to be quantified

ND = Characteristic ions are not present therefore Not Detected* & ** = Sum of all isomersBlank = Below integration threshold but presence or absence was not verified by manual search

13070304

Net Landfill Contribution [3]

(ug/m3)

Net Landfill Contribution = Downwind Measured Concentration - Upwind Measured Concentration. Where the net landfill contribution was a negative number, the impacts were deemed to be from background sources.

O. Reg. 419/05 Standards & Guidelines and Jurisdictional

Screening Levels (JSL) (µg/m³)

13070303

Table 2.2 : Analytical Results for Ambient VOC Sampling at Ottawa Landfill


Tube: SS40 Tube: SS41Date: June 20, 2013 Date: June 20, 2013




Upwind Measured



POI Limit(%)


(ng)

Downwind Measured



POI Limit(%)



75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride [1] 3 0.001 0.0002 <0.1% 0.012 0.0015 <0.1% 0.0013

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 21,240 23 2.87 <0.1% 18.9 2.42 <0.1% background


109-66-0 Pentane 12,600 2.4 0.30 <0.1% 1.3 0.17 <0.1% background

64-17-5 Ethanol 19,000 19.9 2.48 <0.1% 8.4 1.08 <0.1% background


76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2,400,000 2.9 0.36 <0.1% 4.3 0.55 <0.1% 0.19


67-64-1 Acetone 35,640 42 5.23 <0.1% 21 2.69 <0.1% background

67-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol 22,000 6.8 0.85 <0.1% 1 0.13 <0.1% background

107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 12,600 27 3.36 <0.1% 22 2.82 <0.1% background

75-09-2 Dichloromethane 660 5.6 0.70 0.1% 5.8 0.74 0.1% background

96-14-0 3-Methyl Pentane 4,200 0.5 0.06 <0.1% 0.3 0.04 <0.1% background

107-13-1 2-Propenitrile 1.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND


110-54-3 Hexane 22,500 2.9 0.36 <0.1% 2.3 0.29 <0.1% background


123-72-8 n-Butanal 17 12.3 1.53 9% 2.5 0.32 2% background


78-93-3 MEK 3,000 7.8 0.97 <0.1% 1.2 0.15 <0.1% background

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 19,000 0.9 0.11 <0.1% 0.9 0.12 <0.1% 0.00

67-66-3 Chloroform 3 0.5 0.06 2% 0.5 0.06 2% 0.00

591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 3,684 4.7 0.59 <0.1% 3.3 0.42 <0.1% background

110-82-7 Cyclohexane 18,300 2.6 0.32 <0.1% 1.6 0.20 <0.1% background


56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 7.2 0.6 0.07 1% 1.4 0.18 2% 0.10


71-43-2 Benzene [2] 7 0.7 0.09 1% 0.5 0.06 1% background


142-82-5 Heptane 33,000 1.7 0.21 <0.1% 1.2 0.15 <0.1% background

79-01-6 Trichloroethene 36 5.4 0.67 2% 4.8 0.61 2% background


108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 19,320 7.1 0.88 <0.1% 2 0.26 <0.1% background


108-88-3 Toluene 2,000 8.4 1.05 <0.1% 6.7 0.86 <0.1% background

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 1,080 1.5 0.19 <0.1% 1.3 0.17 <0.1% background



108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 4,200 0.1 0.01 <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% background

100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 1,400 0.8 0.10 <0.1% 1.1 0.14 <0.1% 0.04

111-84-2 Nonane 12,600 4.1 0.51 <0.1% 2.3 0.29 <0.1% background

08-38-3/106-42 m/p-Xylene* 2,200 9.3 1.16 <0.1% 4.8 0.61 <0.1% background


95-47-6 o-Xylene* 2,200 1 0.12 <0.1% 1.3 0.17 <0.1% 0.04

100-42-5 Styrene 400 1.3 0.16 <0.1% 0.6 0.08 <0.1% background

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 60 0.4 0.05 <0.1% 0.2 0.03 <0.1% background

20-14-4/622-96 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 0.4 0.05 <0.1% 0.2 0.03 <0.1% background

124-18-5 Decane 60,000 4.3 0.54 <0.1% 3.3 0.42 <0.1% background

108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 660 0.3 0.04 <0.1% 0.2 0.03 <0.1% background

611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 Trace Trace <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% background


535-77-3 m-Cymene - ND ND - ND ND - ND


99-87-6 p-Cymene 330 1.5 0.19 <0.1% 0.7 0.09 <0.1% background

106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 285 0.2 0.02 <0.1% ND ND ND background




91-20-3 Naphthalene 36 0.3 0.04 0% ND ND ND background

TVOCs (Toluene) 730 90.97 - 520 66.57 - background

TVOCs (Quantified) 290 36.14 - 220 28.16 - background

Molhave-Clausen TVOCs (Toluene) 730 90.97 - 520 66.57 - background



[3]




13070307


(ug/m3)




13070306



Tube: SS71 Tube: SS70Date: July 16, 2013 Date: July 16, 2013




Upwind Measured



POI Limit(%)


(ng)

Downwind Measured



POI Limit(%)



75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride [1] 3 0.010 0.0014 <0.1% 0.008 0.0010 <0.1% background

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 21,240 74 10.52 <0.1% 42 5.47 <0.1% background

75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 18,000 8.7 1.24 <0.1% 7.2 0.94 <0.1% background

109-66-0 Pentane 12,600 3.7 0.53 <0.1% 5.3 0.69 <0.1% 0.16

64-17-5 Ethanol 19,000 36 5.12 <0.1% 33 4.30 <0.1% background


76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2,400,000 3.5 0.50 <0.1% 5 0.65 <0.1% 0.15


67-64-1 Acetone 35,640 54 7.68 <0.1% 27 3.52 <0.1% background

67-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol 22,000 12.5 1.78 <0.1% 4.2 0.55 <0.1% background

107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 12,600 143 20.34 0% 46 5.99 <0.1% background

75-09-2 Dichloromethane 660 5.5 0.78 0% 4.8 0.62 <0.1% background


107-13-1 2-Propenitrile 1.8 0.3 0.04 2% 0.6 0.08 4% 0.04




123-72-8 n-Butanal 17 10.6 1.51 9% 6.1 0.79 5% background


78-93-3 MEK 3,000 12.6 1.79 <0.1% 23 2.99 <0.1% 1.20

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 19,000 2.6 0.37 <0.1% 2.8 0.36 <0.1% background

67-66-3 Chloroform 3 0.9 0.13 4% 0.5 0.07 2% background

591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 3,684 18 2.56 <0.1% 6.6 0.86 <0.1% background



56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 7.2 1.1 0.16 2% 1.1 0.14 2% background

589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane 7,800 29 4.12 <0.1% 13.3 1.73 <0.1% background




79-01-6 Trichloroethene 36 9.8 1.39 4% 3.7 0.48 1% background


108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 19,320 2.9 0.41 <0.1% 1.8 0.23 <0.1% background


108-88-3 Toluene 2,000 9.3 1.32 <0.1% 6.3 0.82 <0.1% background




108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 4,200 0.4 0.06 <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% background

100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 1,400 0.9 0.13 <0.1% 0.6 0.08 <0.1% background




95-47-6 o-Xylene* 2,200 0.9 0.13 <0.1% 0.6 0.08 <0.1% background

100-42-5 Styrene 400 1.2 0.17 <0.1% 0.5 0.07 <0.1% background

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 60 0.4 0.06 <0.1% 0.3 0.04 <0.1% background




611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 0.1 0.01 <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% background

95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 660 1 0.14 <0.1% 0.7 0.09 <0.1% background

535-77-3 m-Cymene - 0.1 0.01 - ND ND - background



106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 285 0.2 0.03 <0.1% ND ND ND background










[3]







(ug/m3)


13080804 13080805



Tube: SS76 Tube: SS74Date: July 25, 2013 Date: July 25, 2013




Upwind Measured



POI Limit(%)


(ng)

Downwind Measured



POI Limit(%)

- - Sample Volume (m3) - - - - 0.0074 - - - - 0.0079 - - - -75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,500,000 18.7 2.53 <0.1% 3.1 0.39 <0.1% background

75-45-6 Chlorodifluoromethane 1,050,000 49 6.64 <0.1% 42 5.29 <0.1% background

75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride [1] 3 0.019 0.0025 <0.1% 0.029 0.0037 0.1% 0.0011

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 21,240 16.6 2.25 <0.1% 7.5 0.94 <0.1% background



64-17-5 Ethanol 19,000 7.6 1.03 <0.1% 12.5 1.57 <0.1% 0.54


76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2,400,000 4 0.54 <0.1% 3.8 0.48 <0.1% background


67-64-1 Acetone 35,640 8.5 1.15 <0.1% 15.2 1.91 <0.1% 0.76

67-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol 22,000 0.3 0.04 <0.1% ND ND ND background


75-09-2 Dichloromethane 660 2.1 0.28 <0.1% 2 0.25 <0.1% background


107-13-1 2-Propenitrile 1.8 0.1 0.01 1% Trace Trace <0.1% background




123-72-8 n-Butanal 17 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND


78-93-3 MEK 3,000 1.8 0.24 <0.1% 2.3 0.29 <0.1% 0.05

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 19,000 0.7 0.09 <0.1% 1.2 0.15 <0.1% 0.06

67-66-3 Chloroform 3 0.5 0.07 2% 0.6 0.08 3% 0.01




56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 7.2 0.9 0.12 2% 1.3 0.16 2% 0.04

589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane 7,800 7.7 1.04 <0.1% 4 0.50 <0.1% background

71-43-2 Benzene [2] 7 1 0.14 2% 0.9 0.11 2% background





108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 19,320 1.3 0.18 <0.1% 0.5 0.06 <0.1% background


108-88-3 Toluene 2,000 4 0.54 <0.1% 2.7 0.34 <0.1% background

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 1,080 7.6 1.03 <0.1% 5.8 0.73 <0.1% background



108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 4,200 Trace Trace <0.1% ND ND ND 0.00





95-47-6 o-Xylene* 2,200 0.4 0.05 <0.1% 0.4 0.05 <0.1% background

100-42-5 Styrene 400 Trace Trace <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% 0.00

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 60 0.2 0.03 <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% background



108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 660 0.2 0.03 <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% background

611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 Trace Trace <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% 0.00





106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 285 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

526-73-8 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 660 Trace Trace <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% 0.00









[3]







(ug/m3)


13080807 13080808



Tube: SS26 Tube: SS24Date: September 18, 2013 Date: September 18, 2013




Upwind Measured



POI Limit(%)


(ng)

Downwind Measured



POI Limit(%)



75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride [1] 3 0.031 0.0043 0.1% 0.032 0.0047 0.2% 0.0004

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 21,240 143 19.71 <0.1% 101 14.82 <0.1% background

75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 18,000 12.1 1.67 <0.1% 11.1 1.63 <0.1% background


64-17-5 Ethanol 19,000 62 8.55 <0.1% 41 6.02 <0.1% background


76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2,400,000 4.7 0.65 <0.1% 3.9 0.57 <0.1% background


67-64-1 Acetone 35,640 27 3.72 <0.1% 26 3.82 <0.1% 0.09


107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 12,600 350 48.25 0% 240 35.22 0% background

75-09-2 Dichloromethane 660 8.3 1.14 0% 4.4 0.65 <0.1% background


107-13-1 2-Propenitrile 1.8 0.7 0.10 5% 0.4 0.06 3% background




123-72-8 n-Butanal 17 8.3 1.14 7% 9.9 1.45 9% 0.31


78-93-3 MEK 3,000 7.1 0.98 <0.1% 6.9 1.01 <0.1% 0.03

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 19,000 2.9 0.40 <0.1% 2.5 0.37 <0.1% background


591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 3,684 52 7.17 0% 45 6.60 0% background




589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane 7,800 39 5.38 <0.1% 33 4.84 <0.1% background

71-43-2 Benzene [2] 7 1.2 0.17 2% 1 0.15 2% background



79-01-6 Trichloroethene 36 4.7 0.65 2% 6 0.88 2% 0.23


108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 19,320 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND


108-88-3 Toluene 2,000 10.7 1.48 <0.1% 10.6 1.56 <0.1% 0.08




108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 4,200 0.7 0.10 <0.1% 0.5 0.07 <0.1% background


111-84-2 Nonane 12,600 0.5 0.07 <0.1% 1.2 0.18 <0.1% 0.11

08-38-3/106-42 m/p-Xylene* 2,200 3.8 0.52 <0.1% 4.2 0.62 <0.1% 0.09


95-47-6 o-Xylene* 2,200 1.2 0.17 <0.1% 1.2 0.18 <0.1% 0.01

100-42-5 Styrene 400 1.3 0.18 <0.1% 1.4 0.21 <0.1% 0.03

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 60 0.5 0.07 0% 0.7 0.10 0.2% 0.03

20-14-4/622-96 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 0.6 0.08 <0.1% 0.8 0.12 <0.1% 0.03



611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 0.2 0.03 <0.1% 0.2 0.03 <0.1% 0.00


535-77-3 m-Cymene - Trace Trace - 0.5 0.07 - 0.07

138-86-3 Limonene - 0.2 0.03 - ND ND - background

99-87-6 p-Cymene 330 1.7 0.23 <0.1% 6.9 1.01 0% 0.78

106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 285 0.1 0.01 <0.1% 0.2 0.03 <0.1% 0.02










[3]






13091903 13091904


(ug/m3)




Tube: SS51 Tube: SS47Date: September 26, 2013 Date: September 26, 2013




Upwind Measured

Concentration

(µg/m3)


POI Limit(%)


(ng)

Downwind Measured



POI Limit(%)

- - Sample Volume (m3) - - - - 0.0070 - - - - 0.0079 - - - -75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,500,000 7.6 1.08 <0.1% 4.70 0.59 <0.1% background

75-45-6 Chlorodifluoromethane 1,050,000 26 3.71 <0.1% 22.00 2.77 <0.1% background

75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride [1] 3 0.019 0.0027 <0.1% 0.012 0.0015 <0.1% background

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 21,240 13.9 1.98 <0.1% 9.60 1.21 <0.1% background



64-17-5 Ethanol 19,000 24 3.43 <0.1% 15.40 1.94 <0.1% background


76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2,400,000 3.4 0.49 <0.1% 4.80 0.60 <0.1% 0.12


67-64-1 Acetone 35,640 17.2 2.46 <0.1% 11.30 1.42 <0.1% background



75-09-2 Dichloromethane 660 1.6 0.23 <0.1% 1.40 0.18 <0.1% background


107-13-1 2-Propenitrile 1.8 1.3 0.19 10% 0.80 0.10 6% background




123-72-8 n-Butanal 17 1.2 0.17 1% 1.40 0.18 1% 0.01


78-93-3 MEK 3,000 3.2 0.46 <0.1% 3.40 0.43 <0.1% background

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 19,000 4 0.57 <0.1% 4.00 0.50 <0.1% background


591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 3,684 3.8 0.54 <0.1% 4.70 0.59 <0.1% 0.05







142-82-5 Heptane 33,000 0.5 0.07 <0.1% 0.70 0.09 <0.1% 0.02



108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 19,320 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND


108-88-3 Toluene 2,000 2.7 0.39 <0.1% 3.50 0.44 <0.1% 0.06




108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 4,200 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 1,400 0.1 0.01 <0.1% 0.30 0.04 <0.1% 0.02

111-84-2 Nonane 12,600 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.50 0.06 <0.1% 0.06

08-38-3/106-42 m/p-Xylene* 2,200 0.6 0.09 <0.1% 1.20 0.15 <0.1% 0.07


95-47-6 o-Xylene* 2,200 0.2 0.03 <0.1% 0.30 0.04 <0.1% 0.01

100-42-5 Styrene 400 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.40 0.05 <0.1% 0.05

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 60 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.10 0.01 <0.1% 0.01

20-14-4/622-96 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.10 0.01 <0.1% 0.01

124-18-5 Decane 60,000 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.70 0.09 <0.1% 0.09

108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 660 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.10 0.01 <0.1% 0.01

611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene 1,500 Trace Trace <0.1% Trace Trace <0.1% 0.00

95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 660 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.30 0.04 <0.1% 0.04



99-87-6 p-Cymene 330 Trace Trace <0.1% 0.50 0.06 <0.1% 0.06

106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 285 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

526-73-8 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 660 ND ND ND Trace Trace <0.1% ND




TVOCs (Toluene) 250 35.69 - 250.00 31.50 - background

TVOCs (Quantified) 151 21.56 - 128.00 16.13 - background

Molhave-Clausen TVOCs (Toluene) 250 35.69 - 250.00 31.50 - background



[3]






13092703 13092704


(ug/m3)


Table 3.1: Analytical Results for Ambient TRS Sampling at Ottawa Landfill

DateOntario

POI Limit


POI Limit

Downwind Percentage of POI Limit

Net Landfill Impact [1]

(µg/m³) (ppb) (µg/m³) (%) (ppb) (µg/m³) (%) (µg/m³)

25-Jul-13 13.00 8.72 12.12 93% 5.10 7.09 55% background07-Aug-13 13.00 2.43 3.38 26% 2.45 3.41 26% 0.0314-Aug-13 13.00 1.84 2.56 20% 1.73 2.40 18% background18-Sep-13 13.00 1.37 1.90 15% 0.80 1.12 9% background26-Sep-13 13.00 0.60 0.83 6% 4.16 5.79 45% 4.96

Notes:

Downwind Concentration

Upwind Concentration

[1] Net Landfill Contribution = Downwind Measured Concentration - Upwind Measured Concentration. Where the net landfill contribution was a negative number, the impacts were deemed to be from background sources.

Employee Job Title

FIGURES

Reputation Resources Results

Figure 1.1 – TSP Sampling Results – May 4th, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3

NE Hi- Vol 96 µg/m³

SE Hi- Vol 164µg/m³

SW Hi- Vol 84 µg/m³



NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3


SE Hi- Vol 169 µg/m³




NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.4 – TSP Sampling Results – May 22nd, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3


SE Hi- Vol No Sample




NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.6 – TSP Sampling Results – June 3rd, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3

NE Hi- Vol No Sample




Figure 1.7 – TSP Sampling Results – June 9th, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.9 – TSP Sampling Results – June 21st, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.11 – TSP Sampling Results – July 3rd, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.12 – TSP Sampling Results – July 9th, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.14 – TSP Sampling Results – July 21st, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.16 – TSP Sampling Results – August 2nd, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.17 – TSP Sampling Results – August 8th, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 1.21 – TSP Sampling Results – September 1st, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3



SW Hi- Vol No Sample


Figure 1.22 – TSP Sampling Results – September 7th, 2013

NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3



SW Hi- Vol No Sample



NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3






NE Hi-Vol52 µg/m3

SW Hi-Vol58 µg/m3

SE Hi-Vol135 µg/m3





Figure 2.1 – VOC Sampling Locations – June 13th, 2013

Upwind Location

Down Wind Location

Wind rose shows wind speed and direction from 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m.


Figure 2.2 – VOC Sampling Locations – June 20th, 2013

Upwind Location

Down Wind Location

Wind rose shows wind speed and direction from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.


Figure 2.3 – VOC Sampling Locations – July 16th, 2013

Upwind Location Down Wind Location



Figure 2.4 – VOC and TRS Sampling Locations – July 25th, 2013

Upwind Location

Down Wind Location



Figure 2.5 –TRS Sampling Locations – August 7th, 2013

Upwind Location

Down Wind Location



Figure 2.6 –TRS Sampling Locations – August 14th, 2013

Upwind Location

Down Wind Location



Figure 2.7 – VOC and TRS Sampling Locations – September 18th, 2013

Upwind Location

Down Wind Location



Figure 2.8 – VOC and TRS Sampling Locations – September 26th, 2013

Upwind Location

Down Wind Location


Employee Job Title

APPENDIX A



Reputation Resources Results Canada | USA | UK | India | China www.rwdiair.com

Tel: 519.823.1311 Fax: 519.823.1316 RWDI AIR Inc. 650 Woodlawn Road West Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1K 1B8 Email: [email protected]

July 12, 2013

Mr. Remi Godin Waste Management of Canada Corporation Ottawa Landfill 2301 Carp Road Ottawa, ON Re: May 4th to June 3rd, 2013 Sampling Results, Exceedance Notification and Action Plan Ottawa Landfill Site, Ottawa, ON RWDI Reference #1301745

Email: [email protected]

Dear Mr. Godin: RWDI AIR Inc. (RWDI) was retained by Waste Management of Canada Corporation (WM) to complete the Total Suspended Particulate Matter (TSP) and Airborne Metal (Metals) sampling required under the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7 dated March 7, 2008. The sampling program is being completed as approved by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment under Condition 21.3.1 The program was approved based on the “Ambient Air Quality Work Plan” dated September 30, 2007 in the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Item 13 in Schedule B.2 The program consists of TSP and airborne metals at three (3) stationary locations operating on a 6-day cycle from May to September and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) sampling, concurrently upwind and downwind during the months of June, July, and August (and September if required) for a total of five (5) sample sets per year. This letter outlines the results from the sampling completed from May 4th to June 3rd, 2013 for the TSP and airborne metals.

SAMPLING PROGRAM OVERVIEW Each sample location has one (1) High Volume Air samplers (Hi-Vols) which run on a 6 day schedule. Each sample period consisting of a 24-hour (midnight to midnight) sample that operates in concurrence with North American Pollutant Sampling (NAPS) schedule. During the period of May 4th to June 3rd a total of six (6) sample sets were collected. The results of the TSP measurements are presented Table 1, below, respectively from the Northeast, Southeast and Southwest samplers. 1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7, dated March 7, 2008. 2 RWDI Air Inc. Ambient Air Quality Work Plan – Ottawa Landfill RWDI Reference Number W07-5258A dated September 20, 2007.


Mr. Remi Godin Ottawa Landfill Site, Waste Management of Canada Corporation Particulate and Metal Results (May 4th to June 3rd, 2013) RWDI#1301745 July 12, 2013

Page 2

Table 1: Summary of Measured TSP Concentrations from May 4th to June 3rd, 2013

Sample Date Northeast TSP Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southeast TSP Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southwest TSP Concentration

(µg/m³) 04-May-13 96 164 84 10-May-13 99 169 52 16-May-13 60 35 42 22-May-13 73 No Sample 23 28-May-13 151 114 58 03-Jun-13 No Sample No Sample 27

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 120 µg/m³ Three (3) samples were measured in excess of the O.Reg.419/05 Schedule 3 Standard for Suspended Particulate Matter. The exceedances occurred on May 4th, May 10th May 28th. Figures 1, 2 and 3 illustrate the sample locations, measured TSP concentrations, and the windrose depicting the wind conditions on the days the exceedances were measured. The windroses express the frequency of time the wind is blowing from each direction and provide the average wind speed for each direction. As shown in the figures, the elevated levels at the NE Hi-Vol and at the SE Hi-Vol appear to be from a combination of background or non-Ottawa Landfill sources (Highway 417 and the quarry on Carp Road) and movement of vehicles on roads within the landfill facility. A summary of the calculated statistics for measured concentrations of TSP at the Ottawa Landfill Site sampling locations is presented in Table 2. Table 2: Calculated Statistics for Measured 24-hour Averaged TSP Concentrations (µg/m3)

Sample Locations

No. of Samples

Percentiles (%) Maximum Arithmetic

Mean

Number of Measurements Above the MOE’s Schedule 3 Standard

(120 µg/m3) 50 70 90

Northeast 5 96 98 130 151 96 1 Southeast 4 139 164 168 169 121 2 Southwest 6 47 55 71 84 48 0

During this time period, airborne metals were assessed for each filter collected. The list of airborne metals consisted on Lead, Manganese, Chromium, Cadmium and Nickel. All measured concentrations of metals were below their respective air quality standards as outline in Ontario Regulation 419.



Page 3

Tables 3a to 3e outline the results from the metal analysis for each sampling period. Table 3a: Summary of Measured Lead Concentrations from May 4th to June 3rd, 2013

Sample Date Northeast Lead Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southeast Lead Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southwest Lead Concentration

(µg/m³) 04-May-13 ND ND ND 10-May-13 ND ND ND 16-May-13 ND ND ND 22-May-13 ND No Sample ND 28-May-13 ND ND ND 03-Jun-13 No Sample No Sample ND

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.5 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3b: Summary of Measured Manganese Concentrations from May 4th to June 3rd, 2013

Sample Date Northeast Manganese

Concentration (µg/m³)

Southeast Manganese Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southwest Manganese Concentration

(µg/m³) 04-May-13 0.021 0.038 0.014 10-May-13 0.043 0.033 0.008 16-May-13 0.019 0.012 0.015 22-May-13 0.021 No Sample 0.007 28-May-13 0.039 0.024 0.018 03-Jun-13 No Sample No Sample ND

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.4 µg/m³ (future standard for 2016) ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3c: Summary of Measured Chromium Concentrations from May 4th to June 3rd, 2013

Sample Date Northeast Chromium


Southeast Chromium Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southwest Chromium Concentration

(µg/m³) 04-May-13 0.017 0.016 0.016 10-May-13 0.018 0.016 0.016 16-May-13 0.019 0.022 0.022 22-May-13 0.025 No Sample 0.023 28-May-13 0.022 0.053 0.022 03-Jun-13 No Sample No Sample 0.017

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.5 µg/m³ (future standard for 2016) ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit



Page 4

Table 3d: Summary of Measured Cadmium Concentrations from May 4th to June 3rd, 2013

Sample Date Northeast Cadmium


Southeast Cadmium Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southwest Cadmium Concentration


Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.025 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3e: Summary of Measured Nickel Concentrations from May 4th to June 3rd, 2013

Sample Date Northeast Nickel


Southeast Nickel Concentration

(µg/m³)

Southwest Nickel Concentration


Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 2 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit The complete results from all samples, metal analysis and reference filters will be provided in the Annual Report.

CURRENT MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADDITIONAL ACTIONS Currently, particulate emission mitigation measures are in place at the Ottawa Landfill Site and consist of watering of on-site roadways and construction sites. The practices listed above will not occur if precipitation events cause these activities to become redundant or if the ground is sufficiently wet from previous rainfall events. As noted above, there were three (3) exceedances of the 24-hour standard for total suspended particulate matter. As shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3, the wind conditions on the days of exceedance indicate that the particulate measured was likely due to a combination of vehicle movement within the landfill facility and background or non-Ottawa Landfill source(s). Since the source(s) of the dust appear to be related to a combination of on-site and off-site sources, there are no specific action items being noted nor are there any changes to the monitoring plan at this time. Ottawa Landfill site should continue to monitor dust conditions at the site and apply water on all roads as required to reduce the potential for fugitive dust from the site.



Page 5

ADDITIONAL REPORTING As noted in the September 20, 2007 workplan and as indicated in the existing Certificate of Approval, WM is required to provide notification to the Local District Office of the MOE (Ottawa District Office) as soon as practical after receiving the sample results. This notification should be issued to Mr. Greg Davis as soon as practical in order to comply with the existing Certificate of Approval. In addition, WM is also required to identify the potential sources resulting from the exceedance and provide action items for completion if the sources are attributable to the Ottawa Landfill operations. This letter outlines the potential sources of dust based on the meteorological conditions during the elevated sampling event (related to background sources) and therefore no further actions or changes to the monitoring are required at this time for the Ottawa Landfill site.

CLOSING Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments that you may have with respect to this submission. I can be reached at (519) 823-1311 ext. 2428. Yours very truly, RWDI AIR Inc. Brad Bergeron, A.Sc. T., d.E.T. Senior Project Manager / Principal Attach. BCB/mjm

Employee Job Title

FIGUURES


Figure 1 – TSP Sampling Results – May 4th, 2013

NE Hi‐ Vol96 µg/m³

SE Hi‐ Vol164 µg/m³

SW Hi‐ Vol84 µg/m³











PIBS: 5354e Last Revised: November 28 2005 Page 1 of 5

Notification of Exceedence – Regulation 419/05General Information and Instructions

Ministry of the Environment

General Information

Information requested in this notification form is collected under the authority of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990 (EPA) and O. Reg. 419/05 and will be used to collect information relating to a measured or modelled air related exceedence as required by s.25(9), s.28(1) and s.30(3) of O. Reg. 419/05. The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) may also request additional information.

1. Questions regarding completion and submission of this notification form should be directed to your local MOE District Office. A list of these District Offices (including fax numbers) is available on the Ministry of the Environment Internet site at http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/org/op.htm#Reg/Dist. A copy of this form may be acquired through the MOE public web site (www.ene.gov.on.ca) or by contacting any MOE office.

2. For notification under s.25(9) or 28(1), the completed notification form should be faxed, as soon as practicable, to the local Ministry of Environment (MOE) District Office which has jurisdiction over the area in which the facility is located.

3. For notification under s. 30, the completed notification form should be immediately faxed to the local Ministry of Environment (MOE) District Office which has jurisdiction over the area which the facility is located. If the exceedance is determined outside of the business hours of the District Office then the completed notification form should be faxed to the Spills Action Center (1-800-268-6061).

4. Information contained in this notification form may not be considered confidential and may be made available to the public upon request. Information may be claimed as confidential but will be subject to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPPA) and theEBR. If you do not claim confidentiality at the time of submitting the information, the Ministry of the Environment may make the information available to the public without further notice to you.

Instructions

This form should be used to notify the MOE of a measured or modeled air related exceedence as required under O. Reg. 419/05. Failure to notify the MOE as required by regulation constitutes an offence under the O. Reg. 419/05 and the EPA. The generic term "limits" in the context of this form means any numerical Point of Impingement Concentration limit set by the MOE including standards in O. Reg. 419/05 and guidelines provided by the MOE (Ministry POI Limits). For a comprehensive list of MOE POI Limits please refer to the publication titled “Summary of O. Reg. 419/05 Standards, Point of Impingement Guidelines, and Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQC’s)” available on the Ministry of the Environment Internet site at http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/2424e01.htm. Note that contaminants that have guidelines limits or recommended levels for chemicals with no standard or guideline may be considered “contaminants not listed in any of Schedules 1, 2 and 3 and discharges of the contaminant may cause an adverse effect” as this language appears in O. Reg. 419/05. This form may be used for notification of exceedences of more than one contaminant; Table 1 (or equvalent) should be completed for each contaminant. If this notification is made pursuant to s. 30 in combination with ss. 25(9) or 28(1) then this form must be submitted immediately in accordance with s.30.

Regulatory Authority

28. (1) A person who discharges or causes or permits the discharge of a contaminant shall, as soon as practicable, notify a provincial officer in writing if, (a) the person uses an approved dispersion model to predict concentrations of the contaminant that result from the discharges and,

(i) the use of the model indicates that discharges of the contaminant may result in a contravention of section 18, 19 or 20, or(ii) the contaminant is not listed in any of Schedules 1, 2 and 3 and the use of the model indicates that discharges of the

contaminant may cause an adverse effect; (b) measurements of air samples indicate that discharges of the contaminant may result in a contravention of section 18, 19 or 20; or(c) the contaminant is not listed in any of Schedules 1, 2 and 3 and measurements of air samples indicate that discharges of the

contaminant may cause an adverse effect.

25. (9) A person who is required under subsection (8) to complete the update of a report not later than March 31 in a year shall, as soon as practicable after that date, notify a provincial officer in writing if the person has started to use an approved dispersion model with respect to a contaminant for the purpose of completing the update but has not yet complied with section 12, and, (a) the use of the model indicates that discharges of the contaminant may result in a contravention of section 18, 19 or 20; or (b) the contaminant is not listed in any of Schedules 1, 2 and 3 and the use of the model indicates that discharges of the contaminant may

cause an adverse effect.

30. (1) A person who discharges or causes or permits the discharge of a contaminant listed in Schedule 6 into the air shall comply with subsections (3) and (4) if there is reason to believe, based on any relevant information, that discharges of the contaminant may result in the concentration of the contaminant exceeding the half hour upper risk threshold or other time period upper risk threshold set out for that contaminant in Schedule 6 at a point of impingement.

(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the reference in that subsection to relevant information includes relevant information from predictions of a dispersion model, including, (a) an approved dispersion model or other dispersion model; or (b) a dispersion model that is not used in accordance with this Regulation.

(3) If subsection (1) applies to a discharge, the person who discharged or caused or permitted the discharge of the contaminant shall immediately notify the Director in writing.


Notification of Exceedence – Regulation 419/05


1. Ministry of the Environment District Office Information Date Form Submitted (Faxed) Date Exceedednce Determined

District Office Fax Number

Supporting information attached? Yes No

If yes, number of pages:

2. Site Information Name of Person Making the Notification Business Name

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code Business Activity Description (a description of the business endeavour, this may include products sold, services provided, equipment used, etc.)

Site Name MOE District Office

Address Information: Site Address - Street information (address that has civic numbering and street information includes street number, name, type and direction) Unit Identifier (i.e. suite or apartment number)

Survey Address (used for a rural location specified for a subdivided township, an unsubdivided township or unsurveyed territory) Lot and Conc.: used to indicate location within a subdivided township and consists of a lot number and a concession number

Part and Reference: used to indicate location within an unsubdivided township or unsurveyed territory, and consists of a part and a reference plan number indicating the location within that plan. Attach copy of the plan

Lot Conc. Part Reference Plan

Non Address Information (includes any additional information to clarify applicants’ physical location)

Municipality/Unorganized Township County/District Postal Code

Geo Reference

Map Datum Zone Accuracy Estimate Geo Referencing Method UTM Easting UTM Northing

Certificate of Approval Number (s) – attach a separate list if more space is required

3. Type of Notification: Limit Exceedence – Table 1 or Table 2 should be completed and submitted with this notification of exceedence.

This is a notification under Section 28(1) – Notice to Provincial Officer as a result of modelling or measurements relating to an exceedence of: (select all that apply)

Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3 POI Guideline Ambient Air Quality Criteria

Other Limit (explain):

This is a notification under Section 25 (9) – Notice to Provincial Officer as a result an update of an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report (select all that apply)

Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3 Ambient Air Quality Criteria


Date that Refinement is anticipated to be complete (dd/mm/yyyy):

This is a notification under Section 30 (3) – Notice to the Director as a result of an exceedence of Upper Risk Thresholds (Schedule 6)

Yes No

4. Follow-Up Action

Section 28 Notifications

Will an Abatement Plan be submitted to the Ministry within 30 days of this notice as per s.29?

Yes Type of Previously Approved Abatement Plan Date Approved under s.29 of O. Reg. 419/05 (dd/mm/yyyy)

No If No, please provide the following: Section 30 (3) Notifications for URT exceedence

Has an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report been prepared in accordance with s.30(4) and submitted to the Ministry?

Yes

No If No, what is the anticipated submission date for the ESDM* (dd/mm/yyyy)?

* Note: The ESDM must be submitted within three months of the discharge

POI Guideline

May 4, May 10 and May 28, 2013

Ottawa District Office (613) 521-5437

8

Waste Management of Canada Corporation

562210 Waste Disposal Site

Ottawa Landfill Site Ottawa District Office

2301 Carp Road

Carp K0A 1L0


5. Model Based Assessment – please complete this section if notifying of a modelled exceedence (complete Table 1) Was an ESDM Report prepared in accordance with s.26 O. Reg. 419/05?

Yes No

If yes, was the ESDM Report prepared to fulfill (select all that apply):

s.22 of O. Reg. 419/05 - Application for Certificate of Approval under section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act

s.23 of O. Reg. 419/05 - Requirement for Schedule 4 or 5 sector facilities

s.24 of O. Reg. 419/05 - Notice issued by Director

s.25 of O. Reg. 419/05 - Requirement for updating ESDM Report

s.30(4) of O. Reg 419/05 – Required as result of URT exceedence

s.32(13) of O. Reg. 419/05 – Required as part of a Request for Alternative Standard

Other (please specify):

Was the approved dispersion model refined as required by s.12 O. Reg. 419/05 (i.e. operating conditions, emission rates)?

Yes No

Have you modelled for additional receptor locations other than the maximum POI? (please include figure showing maximum POI location)

Yes No

If Yes, specify additional locations (i.e., land use) at which the exceedence may occur (select all that apply – please include figure showing additional modelled locations):

Health Care Seniors Residence / Long Term Care Facility Child Care Facility Educational Facility Dwelling Unknown

Location Specified by The Director (explain):

Other Location (explain):

6. Measurement Based Assessment – please complete this section if notifying of a measured exceedence (Complete Table 2 or equivalent)Type of Monitor / Measurement Type Date of Exceedence (dd/mm/yyyy) Duration of Exceedence

Is the monitoring approved by the Ministry of the Environment?

Yes If yes, please describe the approval:

No Monitoring Reference Number: (if available)

Specify the location (i.e., land use) at which the exceedence did occur (select all that apply):




7. Statement of Company Official

I, the undersigned hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge:

The information contained herein and the information submitted is complete and accurate in every way and I am aware of the penalties against providing false information as per s.184(2) of the Environmental Protection Act.

I have been authorized to act on behalf of the company identified in this form for the purpose of providing this notification of exceedence under O.Reg 419/05 to the Ministry of the Environment

I have used the most recent notification form (as obtained from the Ministry of the Environment Internet site at http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/index.htm#PartAir or from my local Ministry District Office and I have included all necessary information required by O. Reg. 419/05 and identified on this form.

Name of Signing Authority (please print) Title

Civic Address (address that has civic numbering and street information includes street number, name, type and direction) Unit Identifier (i.e. suite or apartment number)

Delivery Designator: If signing authority mailing address is a Rural Route, Suburban Service, Mobile Route or General Delivery (i.e., RR#3)

Municipality Postal Station Province/State Country Postal Code

Telephone Number (including area code & extension) Fax Number (including area code) E-mail Address

Signature Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

TSP Monitors 04/05/2013, 10/05/2013, 28/05/2013 Three 24 hour events

A461002

Property Line of Facility

TSP (SE Sampler, May 4, 2013) 24NA 120Hi-Vol Visibility164 3 136

TSP (SE Sampler, May 10, 2013)

TSP (NE Sampler, May 28 2013)

24

24

NA

NA

120

120

Hi-Vol

Hi-Vol

Visibility

Visibility

169

151

3

3

141

126





October 21, 2013

Mr. Remi Godin Waste Management of Canada Corporation Ottawa Landfill 2301 Carp Road Ottawa, ON Re: June 9th to July 15th, 2013 Sampling Results, Exceedance Notification and Action Plan Ottawa Landfill Site, Ottawa, ON RWDI Reference #1301745


Dear Mr. Godin: RWDI AIR Inc. (RWDI) was retained by Waste Management of Canada Corporation (WM) to complete the Total Suspended Particulate Matter (TSP) and Airborne Metal (Metals) sampling required under the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7 dated March 7, 2008. The sampling program is being completed as approved by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment under Condition 21.3.1 The program was approved based on the “Ambient Air Quality Work Plan” dated September 30, 2007 in the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Item 13 in Schedule B.2 The program consists of TSP and airborne metals at three (3) stationary locations operating on a 6-day cycle from May to September and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) sampling, concurrently upwind and downwind during the months of June, July, and August (and September if required) for a total of five (5) sample sets per year. This letter outlines the results from the sampling completed from June 9th to July 15th, 2013 for the TSP and airborne metals.

SAMPLING PROGRAM OVERVIEW Each sample location has one (1) High Volume Air samplers (Hi-Vols) which run on a 6 day schedule. Each sample period consisting of a 24-hour (midnight to midnight) sample that operates in concurrence with North American Pollutant Sampling (NAPS) schedule. During the period of June 9th to July 15th, 2013 a total of seven (7) sample sets were collected. The results of the TSP measurements are presented Table 1, below, respectively from the Northeast, Southeast and Southwest samplers. 1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7, dated March 7, 2008. 2 RWDI Air Inc. Ambient Air Quality Work Plan – Ottawa Landfill RWDI Reference Number W07-5258A dated September 20, 2007.


Mr. Remi Godin Ottawa Landfill Site, Waste Management of Canada Corporation Particulate and Metal Results (June 9th to July 15th, 2013) RWDI#1301745 October 22, 2013

Page 2

Table 1: Summary of Measured TSP Concentrations from June 9th to July 15th, 2013.


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 09-Jun-13 86 174 54 15-Jun-13 44 74 42 21-Jun-13 45 208 59 27-Jun-13 122 179 52 03-Jul-13 125 163 64 09-Jul-13 96 133 52 15-Jul-13 58 127 33

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 120 µg/m³ Eight (8) samples were measured in excess of the O.Reg.419/05 Schedule 3 Standard for Suspended Particulate Matter. The exceedances occurred on June 9th, June 21st, June 27th, July 3rd, July 9th and July 15th. Figures 1 to 6 illustrate the sample locations, measured TSP concentrations, and the windrose depicting the wind conditions on the days the exceedances were measured. The windroses express the frequency of time the wind is blowing from each direction and provide the average wind speed for each direction. As shown in the figures, the elevated levels at the NE Hi-Vol and at the SE Hi-Vol appear to be from a combination of background or non-Ottawa Landfill sources (Highway 417) and movement of vehicles on roads within the landfill facility. It should be noted that the measured wind speeds on June 27th and July 3rd were below 1 m/s and have been recorded as calm periods. A summary of the calculated statistics for measured concentrations of TSP at the Ottawa Landfill Site sampling locations is presented in Table 2. Table 2: Calculated Statistics for Measured 24-hour Averaged TSP Concentrations (µg/m3)

Sample Locations

No. of Samples

Percentiles (µg/m3) Maximum

(µg/m3)

Arithmetic Mean

(µg/m3)


(120 µg/m3) 50 70 90


During this time period, airborne metals were assessed for each filter collected. The list of airborne metals consisted on Lead, Manganese, Chromium, Cadmium and Nickel. All measured concentrations of metals were below their respective air quality standards as outline in Ontario Regulation 419. Tables 3a to 3e outline the results from the metal analysis for each sampling period.



Page 3

Table 3a: Summary of Measured Lead Concentrations from June 9th to July 15th, 2013.


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 09-Jun-13 ND ND ND 15-Jun-13 ND ND ND 21-Jun-13 ND ND ND 27-Jun-13 ND ND ND 03-Jul-13 ND ND ND 09-Jul-13 ND ND ND 15-Jul-13 ND ND ND

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.5 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3b: Summary of Measured Manganese Concentrations from June 9th to July 15th, 2013.




(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 09-Jun-13 0.011 0.056 ND 15-Jun-13 0.003 0.011 ND 21-Jun-13 0.012 0.069 0.008 27-Jun-13 0.044 0.038 0.012 03-Jul-13 0.033 0.039 0.011 09-Jul-13 0.029 0.041 0.008 15-Jul-13 0.019 0.043 0.008

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.4 µg/m³ (future standard for 2016) ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3c: Summary of Measured Chromium Concentrations from June 9th to July 15th, 2013.




(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 09-Jun-13 ND ND ND 15-Jun-13 0.003 ND ND 21-Jun-13 ND 0.002 ND 27-Jun-13 0.002 0.003 ND 03-Jul-13 0.002 0.002 ND 09-Jul-13 0.002 0.0002 ND 15-Jul-13 0.0002 0.002 ND




Page 4

Table 3d: Summary of Measured Cadmium Concentrations from June 9th to July 15th, 2013.




(µg/m³)



Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.025 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3e: Summary of Measured Nickel Concentrations from June 9th to July 15th, 2013.

Sample Date Northeast Nickel Concentration

(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)




CURRENT MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADDITIONAL ACTIONS Currently, particulate emission mitigation measures are in place at the Ottawa Landfill Site and consist of watering of on-site roadways and construction sites. The practices listed above will not occur if precipitation events cause these activities to become redundant or if the ground is sufficiently wet from previous rainfall events. As noted above, there were eight (8) exceedances of the 24-hour standard for total suspended particulate matter. As shown in Figures 1 to 6, the wind conditions on the days of exceedance indicate that the particulate measured was likely due to a combination of vehicle movement within the landfill facility and background or non-Ottawa Landfill source(s). Since the source(s) of the dust appear to be related to a combination of on-site and off-site sources, there are no specific action items being noted nor are there any changes to the monitoring plan at this time. Ottawa Landfill site should continue to monitor dust conditions at the site and apply water on all roads as required to reduce the potential for fugitive dust from the site.



Page 5


CLOSING Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments that you may have with respect to this submission. I can be reached at (519) 823-1311 ext. 2428. Yours very truly, RWDI AIR Inc. Brad Bergeron, A.Sc. T., d.E.T. Senior Project Manager / Principal Attach. BCB/mjm


Figure 1 – TSP Sampling Results – June 9th, 2013





Figure 2 – TSP Sampling Results – June 21st, 2013





Figure 3 – TSP Sampling Results – June 27th, 2013





Figure 4 – TSP Sampling Results – July 3rd, 2013





Figure 5 – TSP Sampling Results – July 9th, 2013





Figure 6 – TSP Sampling Results – July 15th, 2013







General Information






Instructions




























Geo Reference












Yes No

4. Follow-Up Action






Yes



POI Guideline

June 9, 21, 27 and July 3, 9 and 15, 2013


11




2301 Carp Road

Carp K0A 1L0



Yes No










Yes No


Yes No
























TSP Monitors June 9, 21, 27 and July 3, 9 and 15, 2013 Eight 24 hour events

A461002


TSP (SE Sampler, June 9) 24NA 120Hi-Vol Visibility174 3 145

TSP (SE Sampler, June 21)

TSP (NE Sampler, June 27)

TSP (SE Sampler, June 27)

TSP (NE Sampler, July 3)

TSP (SE Sampler, July 3)



24

24

24

24

24

24

24

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

Hi-Vol

Hi-Vol

Hi-Vol

Hi-Vol

Hi-Vol

Hi-Vol

Hi-Vol

Visibility

Visibility

Visibility

Visibility

Visibility

Visibility

Visibility

208

122

179

125

163

133

127

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

173

102

149

104

135

111

105





October 22 2013

Mr. Remi Godin Waste Management of Canada Corporation Ottawa Landfill 2301 Carp Road Ottawa, ON Re: July 21st to August 26th, 2013 Sampling Results, Exceedance Notification and Action Plan Ottawa Landfill Site, Ottawa, ON RWDI Reference #1301745


Dear Mr. Godin: RWDI AIR Inc. (RWDI) was retained by Waste Management of Canada Corporation (WM) to complete the Total Suspended Particulate Matter (TSP) and Airborne Metal (Metals) sampling required under the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7 dated March 7, 2008. The sampling program is being completed as approved by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment under Condition 21.3.1 The program was approved based on the “Ambient Air Quality Work Plan” dated September 30, 2007 in the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Item 13 in Schedule B.2 The program consists of TSP and airborne metals at three (3) stationary locations operating on a 6-day cycle from May to September and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) sampling, concurrently upwind and downwind during the months of June, July, and August (and September if required) for a total of five (5) sample sets per year. This letter outlines the results from the sampling completed from July 21st to August 26th, 2013 for the TSP and airborne metals.

SAMPLING PROGRAM OVERVIEW Each sample location has one (1) High Volume Air samplers (Hi-Vols) which run on a 6 day schedule. Each sample period consisting of a 24-hour (midnight to midnight) sample that operates in concurrence with North American Pollutant Sampling (NAPS) schedule. During the period of July 21st to August 26th, 2013 a total of sixteen (16) out of a possible twenty one (21) samples were collected. Some of the samples were not collected due to equipment malfunction. The results of the TSP measurements are presented Table 1, below, respectively from the Northeast, Southeast and Southwest samplers. 1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7, dated March 7, 2008. 2 RWDI Air Inc. Ambient Air Quality Work Plan – Ottawa Landfill RWDI Reference Number W07-5258A dated September 20, 2007.


Mr. Remi Godin Ottawa Landfill Site, Waste Management of Canada Corporation Particulate and Metal Results (July 21st to August 26th, 2013) RWDI#1301745 October 22, 2013

Page 2

Table 1: Summary of Measured TSP Concentrations from July 21st to August 26th, 2013.


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 21-Jul-13 No Sample 43 17 27-Jul-13 67 49 28 02-Aug-13 16 78 13 08-Aug-13 No Sample 100 15 14-Aug-13 No Sample 43 11 20-Aug-13 No Sample 234 42 26-Aug-13 No Sample 168 31

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 120 µg/m³ Two (2) samples were measured in excess of the O.Reg.419/05 Schedule 3 Standard for Suspended Particulate Matter. The exceedances occurred on August 20th and August 26th. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the sample locations, measured TSP concentrations, and the windrose depicting the wind conditions on the days the exceedances were measured. The windroses express the frequency of time the wind is blowing from each direction and provide the average wind speed for each direction. As shown in the figures, the elevated levels at the SE Hi-Vol appear to be from a combination of background or non-Ottawa Landfill sources (Highway 417) and movement of vehicles on roads within the landfill facility. A summary of the calculated statistics for measured concentrations of TSP at the Ottawa Landfill Site sampling locations is presented in Table 2. Table 2: Calculated Statistics for Measured 24-hour Averaged TSP Concentrations (µg/m3)

Sample Locations

No. of Samples


(µg/m3)

Arithmetic Mean

(µg/m3)


(120 µg/m3) 50 70 90


During this time period, airborne metals were assessed for each filter collected. The list of airborne metals consisted on Lead, Manganese, Chromium, Cadmium and Nickel. All measured concentrations of metals were below their respective air quality standards as outline in Ontario Regulation 419. Tables 3a to 3e outline the results from the metal analysis for each sampling period.



Page 3

Table 3a: Summary of Measured Lead Concentrations from July 21st to August 26th, 2013.


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 21-Jul-13 No Sample ND ND 27-Jul-13 ND ND ND 02-Aug-13 ND ND ND 08-Aug-13 No Sample ND ND 14-Aug-13 No Sample ND ND 20-Aug-13 No Sample ND ND 26-Aug-13 No Sample ND ND

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.5 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3b: Summary of Measured Manganese Concentrations from July 21st to August 26th, 2013.




(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 21-Jul-13 No Sample 0.013 0.002 27-Jul-13 0.018 0.018 0.011 02-Aug-13 0.006 0.022 0.002 08-Aug-13 No Sample 0.027 0.002 14-Aug-13 No Sample 0.016 0.002 20-Aug-13 No Sample 0.084 0.011 26-Aug-13 No Sample 0.063 0.004

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.4 µg/m³ (future standard for 2016) ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3c: Summary of Measured Chromium Concentrations from July 21st to August 26th, 2013.




(µg/m³)


(µg/m³) 21-Jul-13 No Sample ND ND 27-Jul-13 ND 0.003 0.003 02-Aug-13 0.003 ND 0.002 08-Aug-13 No Sample 0.004 0.002 14-Aug-13 No Sample 0.004 0.002 20-Aug-13 No Sample 0.004 0.003 26-Aug-13 No Sample 0.005 0.004




Page 4

Table 3d: Summary of Measured Cadmium Concentrations from July 21st to August 26th, 2013.




(µg/m³)



Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.025 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3e: Summary of Measured Nickel Concentrations from July 21st to August 26th, 2013.

Sample Date Northeast Nickel Concentration

(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)




CURRENT MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADDITIONAL ACTIONS Currently, particulate emission mitigation measures are in place at the Ottawa Landfill Site and consist of watering of on-site roadways and construction sites. The practices listed above will not occur if precipitation events cause these activities to become redundant or if the ground is sufficiently wet from previous rainfall events. As noted above, there were two (2) exceedances of the 24-hour standard for total suspended particulate matter. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, the wind conditions on the days of exceedance indicate that the particulate measured was likely due to a combination of vehicle movement within the landfill facility and background or non-Ottawa Landfill source(s). Since the source(s) of the dust appear to be related to a combination of on-site and off-site sources, there are no specific action items being noted nor are there any changes to the monitoring plan at this time. Ottawa Landfill site should continue to monitor dust conditions at the site and apply water on all roads as required to reduce the potential for fugitive dust from the site.



Page 5


CLOSING Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments that you may have with respect to this submission. I can be reached at (519) 823-1311 ext. 2428. Yours very truly, RWDI AIR Inc. Brad Bergeron, A.Sc. T., d.E.T. Senior Project Manager / Principal Attach. BCB/jo


Figure 1 – TSP Sampling Results – Aug 20th, 2013

NE Hi‐ VolNo Sample




Figure 2 – TSP Sampling Results – Aug 26th, 2013

NE Hi‐ VolNo Sample






General Information






Instructions




























Geo Reference












Yes No

4. Follow-Up Action






Yes



POI Guideline

August 20th and 26th, 2013


7




2301 Carp Road

Carp K0A 1L0



Yes No










Yes No


Yes No
























TSP Monitors 20/08/2013, 26/08/2013 Two 24 hour events

A461002


TSP (SE Sampler, August 20) 24NA 120Hi-Vol Visibility234 3 195

TSP (SE Sampler, August 26) 24NA 120Hi-Vol Visibility168 3 140





November 20 2013

Mr. Remi Godin Waste Management of Canada Corporation Ottawa Landfill 2301 Carp Road Ottawa, ON Re: Sep. 1st to Sep. 25th, 2013 Sampling Results, Exceedance Notification and Action Plan Ottawa Landfill Site, Ottawa, ON RWDI Reference #1301745


Dear Mr. Godin:

RWDI AIR Inc. (RWDI) was retained by Waste Management of Canada Corporation (WM) to complete

the Total Suspended Particulate Matter (TSP) and Airborne Metal (Metals) sampling required under the

Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7 dated March 7, 2008. The sampling

program is being completed as approved by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment under Condition

21.3.1 The program was approved based on the “Ambient Air Quality Work Plan” dated September 30,

2007 in the Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval A461002 Item 13 in Schedule B.2 The program

consists of TSP and airborne metals at three (3) stationary locations operating on a 6-day cycle from May

to September and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) sampling,

concurrently upwind and downwind during the months of June, July, and August (and September if

required) for a total of five (5) sample sets per year. This letter outlines the results from the sampling

completed from September 1st to September 25th, 2013 for the TSP and airborne metals.

SAMPLING PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Each sample location has one (1) High Volume Air samplers (Hi-Vols) which run on a 6 day schedule.

Each sample period consisting of a 24-hour (midnight to midnight) sample that operates in concurrence

with North American Pollutant Sampling (NAPS) schedule. During the period of September 1st to

September 25th, 2013 a total of eleven (11) out of a possible fifteen (15) samples were collected. Some

of the samples were not collected due to equipment malfunction.

The results of the TSP measurements are presented Table 1, below, respectively from the Northeast,

Southeast and Southwest samplers. 1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment Certificate of Approval A461002 Notice 7, dated March 7, 2008. 2 RWDI Air Inc. Ambient Air Quality Work Plan – Ottawa Landfill RWDI Reference Number W07-5258A dated September 20, 2007.


Mr. Remi Godin Ottawa Landfill Site, Waste Management of Canada Corporation Particulate and Metal Results (September 1st to September 25th, 2013) RWDI#1301745 November 20, 2013

Page 2

Table 1: Summary of Measured TSP Concentrations from September 1st to September 25th, 2013.


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)

01-Sep-13 No Sample No Sample No Sample 07-Sep-13 20 48 18 13-Sep-13 47 72 No Sample 19-Sep-13 22 293 57 25-Sep-13 54 79 39

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 120 µg/m³ One (1) sample was measured in excess of the O.Reg.419/05 Schedule 3 Standard for Suspended

Particulate Matter. The exceedance occurred on September 19th. Figure 1 illustrates the sample

locations, measured TSP concentrations, and the windrose depicting the wind conditions on the days the

exceedances were measured. The windroses express the frequency of time the wind is blowing from

each direction and provide the average wind speed for each direction. As shown in the figures, the

elevated levels at the SE Hi-Vol appear to be from a combination of background or non-Ottawa Landfill

sources (Carp Road and quarry across Carp Road) and movement of vehicles on roads within the landfill

facility.

A summary of the calculated statistics for measured concentrations of TSP at the Ottawa Landfill Site

sampling locations is presented in Table 2.

Table 2: Calculated Statistics for Measured 24-hour Averaged TSP Concentrations (µg/m3)

Sample Locations

No. of Samples


(µg/m3)

Arithmetic Mean

(µg/m3)


(120 µg/m3) 50 70 90


During this time period, airborne metals were assessed for each filter collected. The list of airborne

metals consisted on Lead, Manganese, Chromium, Cadmium and Nickel. All measured concentrations of

metals were below their respective air quality standards as outline in Ontario Regulation 419. Tables 3a

to 3e outline the results from the metal analysis for each sampling period.

Table 3a: Summary of Measured Lead Concentrations from September 1st to September 25th, 2013.



Page 3


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)

01-Sep-13 No Sample No Sample No Sample 07-Sep-13 ND ND ND 13-Sep-13 ND ND No Sample 19-Sep-13 ND ND ND 25-Sep-13 ND ND ND

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.5 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit

Table 3b: Summary of Measured Manganese Concentrations from September 1st to September 25th,

2013.




(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)

01-Sep-13 No Sample No Sample No Sample 07-Sep-13 0.009 0.016 0.006 13-Sep-13 0.018 0.027 No Sample 19-Sep-13 0.007 0.106 0.013 25-Sep-13 0.021 0.028 0.016

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.4 µg/m³ (future standard for 2016) ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3c: Summary of Measured Chromium Concentrations from September 1st to September 25th, 2013.




(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)

01-Sep-13 No Sample No Sample No Sample 07-Sep-13 0.002 0.002 0.002 13-Sep-13 ND 0.002 No Sample 19-Sep-13 ND 0.004 0.002 25-Sep-13 0.002 0.002 0.001

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.5 µg/m³ (future standard for 2016) ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit Table 3d: Summary of Measured Cadmium Concentrations from September 1st to September 25th, 2013.




(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)

01-Sep-13 No Sample No Sample No Sample 07-Sep-13 <0.014 <0.012 <0.013 13-Sep-13 <0.016 <0.012 No Sample 19-Sep-13 <0.01 <0.01 <0.013 25-Sep-13 <0.013 <0.012 <0.008

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 0.025 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit



Page 4

Table 3e: Summary of Measured Nickel Concentrations from September 1st to September 25th, 2013.

Sample Date Northeast Nickel



(µg/m³)


(µg/m³)

01-Sep-13 No Sample No Sample No Sample 07-Sep-13 ND ND ND 13-Sep-13 ND ND No Sample 19-Sep-13 ND ND ND 25-Sep-13 ND ND ND

Notes: Bold – Values that are above the O.Reg.419 Schedule 3 Standard of 2 µg/m³ ND – Indicates that the sample concentration was less than the method detection limit The complete results from all samples, metal analysis and reference filters will be provided in the Annual

Report.

CURRENT MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADDITIONAL ACTIONS

Currently, particulate emission mitigation measures are in place at the Ottawa Landfill Site and consist of

watering of on-site roadways and construction sites. The practices listed above will not occur if

precipitation events cause these activities to become redundant or if the ground is sufficiently wet from

previous rainfall events.

As noted above, there was one (1) exceedance of the 24-hour standard for total suspended particulate

matter. As shown in Figure 1, the wind conditions on the days of exceedance indicate that the particulate

measured was likely due to a combination of vehicle movement within the landfill facility and background

or non-Ottawa Landfill source(s). Since the source(s) of the dust appear to be related to a combination of

on-site and off-site sources, there are no specific action items being noted nor are there any changes to

the monitoring plan at this time. Ottawa Landfill site should continue to monitor dust conditions at the site

and apply water on all roads as required to reduce the potential for fugitive dust from the site.

ADDITIONAL REPORTING

As noted in the September 20, 2007 workplan and as indicated in the existing Certificate of Approval, WM

is required to provide notification to the Local District Office of the MOE (Ottawa District Office) as soon

as practical after receiving the sample results. This notification should be issued to Mr. Greg Davis as

soon as practical in order to comply with the existing Certificate of Approval.

In addition, WM is also required to identify the potential sources resulting from the exceedance and

provide action items for completion if the sources are attributable to the Ottawa Landfill operations. This

letter outlines the potential sources of dust based on the meteorological conditions during the elevated

sampling event (related to background sources) and therefore no further actions or changes to the

monitoring are required at this time for the Ottawa Landfill site.

CLOSING



Page 5

Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments that you may have with respect to this

submission. I can be reached at (519) 823-1311 ext. 2428.

Yours very truly, RWDI AIR Inc. Brad Bergeron, A.Sc. T., d.E.T. Senior Project Manager / Principal Attach. BCB/jo


Figure 1 – TSP Sampling Results – Sep 19th, 2013







General Information






Instructions




























Geo Reference












Yes No

4. Follow-Up Action






Yes



POI Guideline

September 19, 2013


6




2301 Carp Road

Carp K0A 1L0



Yes No










Yes No


Yes No
























TSP Monitors 19/09/2013 One 24 hour event

A461002


TSP (SE Sampler, Sep 19) 24NA 120Hi-Vol Visibility293 3 245

Employee Job Title

APPENDIX B

Certificate of AnalysisFinal Report

C.O.C.: G 35016 REPORT No. B13-14480

Report To: Caduceon Environmental LaboratoriesRWDI 2378 Holly Lane 190-210 Somerset St. West Ottawa, Ontario, K1V 7P1Ottawa, ON Tel: 613-526-0123K2P 0J4 Fax: 613-526-1244Attention: Brad Bergeron

DATE SUBMITTED: JOB/PROJECT NO.: WM Ottawa

DATE REPORTED: P.O. NUMBER::

SAMPLE MATRIX: Hi-Vol Filters

Sample ID / Date TSP Cd Cr Mn Ni Pb

Units mg/filter mg/filter mg/filter mg/filter mg/filter mg/filter

Detection Limit 1 0.02 0.003 0.003 0.03 0.06

NE 4-May-13 143 <0.02 0.025 0.031 <0.03 <0.06

SE 4-May-13 264 <0.02 0.026 0.061 <0.03 <0.06

SW 4-May-13 133 <0.02 0.025 0.022 <0.03 <0.06 Smudge

NE 10-May-13 161 <0.02 0.030 0.070 <0.03 <0.06 Rain spots

SE 10-May-13 273 <0.02 0.026 0.053 <0.03 <0.06 Uneven

SW 10-May-13 85 <0.02 0.026 0.014 <0.03 <0.06 Smudge

NE 16-May-13 98 <0.02 0.032 0.031 <0.03 <0.06 Mounted off centre

SE 16-May-13 53 <0.02 0.033 0.018 <0.03 <0.06 Mounted off centre / Smudges

SW 16-May-13 66 <0.02 0.035 0.023 <0.03 <0.06 Uneven

NE 22-May-13 115 <0.02 0.040 0.032 <0.03 <0.06

SW 22-May-13 36 <0.02 0.036 0.011 <0.03 <0.06

NE 28-May-13 245 <0.02 0.035 0.063 <0.03 <0.06

SE 28-May-13 61 <0.02 0.028 0.013 <0.03 <0.06 Smudges

SW 28-May-13 93 <0.02 0.036 0.030 <0.03 <0.06

SW 3-Jun-13 42 <0.02 0.027 <0.003 <0.03 <0.06 Smudges

Krystyna PipinLab Supervisor

The analytical results reported herein refer to the samples as received. Reproduction ofthis analytical report in full or in part is prohibited without prior consent from Caduceon Environmental Laboratories

June 13, 2013

July 4, 2013 1301745

Remarks


C.O.C.: - REPORT No. B13-19205







Detection Limit 1 0.02 0.003 0.003 0.03 0.06

NE 9-Jun-13 139 <0.02 <0.003 0.018 <0.03 <0.06 Dark spot

SE 9-Jun-13 281 <0.02 <0.003 0.091 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SW 9-Jun-13 87 <0.02 <0.003 <0.003 <0.03 <0.06

NE 15-Jun-13 70 <0.02 0.005 0.004 <0.03 <0.06

SE 15-Jun-13 116 <0.02 <0.003 0.017 <0.03 <0.06

SW 15-Jun-13 64 <0.02 <0.003 <0.003 <0.03 <0.06

NE 21-Jun-13 71 <0.02 <0.003 0.018 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SE 21-Jun-13 325 <0.02 0.004 0.108 <0.03 <0.06

SW 21-Jun-13 94 <0.02 <0.003 0.012 <0.03 <0.06

NE 27-Jun-13 197 <0.02 0.004 0.070 <0.03 <0.06 Uneven

SE 27-Jun-13 289 <0.02 0.005 0.061 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SW 27-Jun-13 84 <0.02 <0.003 0.020 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

NE 3-Jul-13 199 <0.02 0.003 0.053 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SE 3-Jul-13 260 <0.02 0.004 0.062 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SW 3-Jul-13 104 <0.02 <0.003 0.018 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

NE 9-Jul-13 152 <0.02 0.003 0.046 <0.03 <0.06

SE 9-Jul-13 219 <0.02 0.000 0.067 <0.03 <0.06

SW 9-Jul-13 82 <0.02 <0.003 0.013 <0.03 <0.06

NE 15-Jul-13 93 <0.02 0.000 0.030 <0.03 <0.06

SE 15-Jul-13 202 <0.02 0.004 0.069 <0.03 <0.06 Uneven

SW 15-Jul-13 51 <0.02 <0.003 0.012 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

Gord MurphyLab Supervisor

The analytical results reported herein refer to the samples as received. Reproduction of this analytical report in full or in part is prohibited without prior written consent from Caduceon Environmental Laboratories.

1301745

July 26, 2013

August 27, 2013

Remarks


C.O.C.: G26866 REPORT No. B13-24034







Detection Limit 1 0.02 0.003 0.003 0.03 0.06

SE 21-Jul-13 69 <0.02 <0.003 0.021 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SW 21-Jul-13 27 <0.02 <0.003 0.003 <0.03 <0.06

NE 27-Jul-13 106 <0.02 <0.003 0.028 <0.03 <0.06

SE 27-Jul-13 73 <0.02 0.005 0.027 <0.03 <0.06 Black specks

SW 27-Jul-13 43 <0.02 0.005 0.017 <0.03 <0.06 Black specks

NE 2-Aug-13 26 <0.02 0.005 0.010 <0.03 <0.06

SE 2-Aug-13 126 <0.02 <0.003 0.036 <0.03 <0.06 Uneven

SW 2-Aug-13 23 <0.02 0.003 0.003 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SE 8-Aug-13 161 <0.02 0.006 0.044 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SW 8-Aug-13 24 <0.02 0.003 0.003 <0.03 <0.06

SE 14-Aug-13 69 <0.02 0.007 0.026 <0.03 <0.06

SW 14-Aug-13 18 <0.02 0.004 0.003 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SE 20-Aug-13 390 <0.02 0.007 0.139 <0.03 <0.06 Uneven

SW 20-Aug-13 65 <0.02 0.005 0.017 <0.03 <0.06 Rain spots

SE 26-Aug-13 271 <0.02 0.009 0.102 <0.03 <0.06 Black specks

SW 26-Aug-13 31 <0.02 0.004 0.004 <0.03 <0.06 Rain spots



1301745

September 12, 2013

October 2, 2013

Remarks


C.O.C.: - REPORT No. B13-27325

Report To: Caduceon Environmental LaboratoriesRWDI 2378 Holly Lane 190-210 Somerset St. West Ottawa, Ontario, K1V 7P1Ottawa, ON Tel: 613-526-0123K2P 0J4 Fax: 613-526-1244Attention: Arjun Tandalam






Detection Limit 1 0.02 0.003 0.003 0.03 0.06

NE 7-Sep-13 29 <0.02 0.003 0.014 <0.03 <0.06

SE 7-Sep-13 79 <0.02 0.003 0.027 <0.03 <0.06 Black specks / Rain spots

SW 7-Sep-13 28 <0.02 0.003 0.009 <0.03 <0.06

NE 13-Sep-13 60 <0.02 <0.003 0.024 <0.03 <0.06

SE 13-Sep-13 115 <0.02 0.003 0.043 <0.03 <0.06

NE 19-Sep-13 43 <0.02 <0.003 0.013 <0.03 <0.06

SE 19-Sep-13 585 <0.02 0.007 0.212 <0.03 <0.06 Uneven

SW 19-Sep-13 90 <0.02 0.003 0.020 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

NE 25-Sep-13 85 <0.02 0.003 0.033 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SE 25-Sep-13 128 <0.02 0.003 0.045 <0.03 <0.06 Bugs

SW 25-Sep-13 99 <0.02 0.003 0.041 <0.03 <0.06



1301745

October 16, 2013

November 18, 2013

Remarks

REPORT OF ANALYSIS: Target Compounds in ng Compounds in ng

REPORT: 13029a (Method - SCAN ATD-GC-MSD Cryogenic Oven Control) SCAN ATD-GC-MSD Cryogenic Oven Control)

DESCRIPTION 13070302 13070303 13070304 13070305 13070306 13070307

CAS # COMPOUND

SS35 Blank

Jun13/13 SFT=2.026

V=NA

SS37 Upwind

Jun13/13 SFT=2.004

V=NA

SS38 Downwind Jun13/13

SFT=2.011 V=NA

SS43 Blank

Jun20/13 SFT=2.008

V=NA

SS40 Upwind

Jun20/13 SFT=2.020

V=NA

SS41 Downwind Jun20/13

SFT=2.028 V=NA

POI (Ontario) (ug/m³)

MDL

Target Compounds

75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane Trace 2.4 2.4 2.4 3.3 14.1 1500000 3

75-45-6 Chlorodifluoromethane 37 56 58 37 53 61 1050000 3

75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 3 3

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 7.6 14.6 31 35 23 18.9 - 1

75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane Trace 3.5 7.4 0.3 9.1 13.1 18000 3

109-66-0 Pentane 0.4 1.3 2.7 1.7 2.4 1.3 - 1

64-17-5 Ethanol 10.0 10.4 26 15.7 19.9 8.4 19000 3

75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 30 3

76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 3.1 3.0 2.4 ND 2.9 4.3 2400000 3

108-20-3 Isopropyl Ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 220 2

67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 7.3 19.0 17.0 42 21 48000 1

67-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol 2.3 3.2 8.3 10.1 6.8 1.0 24000 3

107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 7.2 14.6 32 48 27 22 - 1

75-09-2 Dichloromethane 1.9 2.1 5.8 4.1 5.6 5.8 5300 3

96-14-0 3-Methyl Pentane Trace 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 - 1

107-13-1 2-Propenitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND 180 3

156-60-5 1,2-Dichloroethene(trans) ND ND ND ND ND ND 315 2

110-54-3 Hexane 0.7 1.4 2.9 3.9 2.9 2.3 35000 3

75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 600 3

123-72-8 n-Butanal 2.9 2.1 6.7 8.1 12.3 2.5 - 3

156-59-2 1,2-Dichloroethene(cis) ND ND ND ND ND ND 315 1

78-93-3 MEK 1.8 2.5 7.0 3.2 7.8 1.2 30000 1

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.5 0.9 0.9 19000 1

67-66-3 Chloroform ND 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.5 300 3

591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 1.6 2.9 6.5 5.6 4.7 3.3 - 1

110-82-7 Cyclohexane 1.2 1.2 4.1 3.3 2.6 1.6 300000 3

71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 350000 3

56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND ND 0.8 ND 0.6 1.4 7.2 6

589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane ND 4.3 8.9 10 9.1 6.6 - 1

71-43-2 Benzene 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.7 0.5 1 1

107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND - 1

142-82-5 Heptane 0.4 0.9 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.2 33000 3

79-01-6 Trichloroethene 3.4 4.1 4.3 3.0 5.4 4.8 3500 3

78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND - 10

108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 1.5 1.6 4.9 3.0 7.1 2.0 - 1

108-10-1 MIBK ND ND ND ND ND ND 1200 1

108-88-3 Toluene 3.3 3.4 7.5 5.8 8.4 6.7 2000 1

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.3 10000 2

123-86-4 Butyl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND 735 1

106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 9 2

108-90-7 Chlorobenzene ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.1 Trace - 3

100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.6 0.8 1.1 3000 1

111-84-2 Nonane 1.2 2.3 3.4 2.0 4.1 2.3 - 1

108-38-3/106-42-3 m/p-Xylene 2.0 2.0 4.7 2.5 9.3 4.8 2300* 1

110-12-3 5-Methyl-2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 460 10

95-47-6 o-Xylene 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.6 1.0 1.3 2300* 1

100-42-5 Styrene 0.9 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.3 0.6 400 1

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 - 1

620-14-4/622-96-8 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.2 - 1

124-18-5 Decane 2.2 2.8 5.0 3.0 4.3 3.3 - 1

108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 - 1

611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene Trace Trace 0.2 Trace Trace Trace - 1

95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.6 0.6 1.3 0.8 1.2 0.7 500 5

535-77-3 m-Cymene ND ND Trace Trace ND ND - 1

138-86-3 Limonene ND ND ND ND ND ND - 2

99-87-6 p-Cymene 0.6 0.5 1.2 0.8 1.5 0.7 - 1

106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND 0.3 0.2 0.2 ND 285 2

526-73-8 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 - 1

95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 37000 2

120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100 2

91-20-3 Naphthalene ND ND ND ND 0.3 ND 36 2

TVOCs (Toluene) 400 360 870 1540 730 520

TVOCs (Quantified) 103.0 156.0 280 240 290 220

Molhave-Clausen TVOCs (Toluene) 400 360 870 1540 730 520

POI = Half Hour Point of Impingement (Ontario Ministry of Environment) = Half Hour Point of Impingement (Ontario Ministry of Environmen

MDL = Method Detection Limit (estimate : volume and split dependent) = Method Detection Limit (estimate : volume and split dependent)

< (TRACE) = Characteristic ions present but too low to be quantified = Characteristic ions present but too low to be quantified

< (ND) = Characteristic ions are not present therefore Not Detected = Characteristic ions are not present therefore Not Detected

* & ** = Sum of all isomers = Sum of all isomers

SFT = Split dilution factor = Split dilution factor

V = Volume of air sampled = Volume of air sampled

REPORT OF ANALYSIS: Target Compounds in ng Compounds in ng

REPORT: 13029b (Method - SCAN ATD-GC-MSD Cryogenic Oven Control) SCAN ATD-GC-MSD Cryogenic Oven Control)

DESCRIPTION 13080803 13080804 13080805 13080806 13080807 13080808

CAS # COMPOUND

SS67Blank

Jul16/13SFT=2.089

V=NA

SS71UpwindJul16/13

SFT=2.008V=NA

SS70Downwind

Jul16/13SFT=2.001

V=NA

SS77Blank

Jul25/13SFT=2.002

V=NA

SS76UpwindJul25/13

SFT=2.017V=NA

SS74Downwind

Jul25/13SFT=2.013

V=NA

POI(Ontario)(ug/m³)

MDL

Target Compounds

75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.8 3.8 7.5 Trace 18.7 3.1 1500000 3

75-45-6 Chlorodifluoromethane 15.5 42 47 49 49 42 1050000 3

75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 3 3

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 400 74 42 17.4 16.6 7.5 - 1

75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 2.6 8.7 7.2 ND 9.3 10.6 18000 3

109-66-0 Pentane 14.5 3.7 5.3 0.7 2.4 1.5 - 1

64-17-5 Ethanol 120 36 33 15.8 7.6 12.5 19000 3

75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 30 3

76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2.8 3.5 5.0 Trace 4.0 3.8 2400000 3

108-20-3 Isopropyl Ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 220 2

67-64-1 Acetone 167 54 27 15.8 8.5 15.2 48000 1

67-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol 65 12.5 4.2 3.3 0.3 ND 24000 3

107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 260 143 46 30 12.8 1.7 - 1

75-09-2 Dichloromethane 15.5 5.5 4.8 1.6 2.1 2.0 5300 3

96-14-0 3-Methyl Pentane 6.4 1.3 1.1 0.2 0.7 0.2 - 1

107-13-1 2-Propenitrile ND 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.1 Trace 180 3

156-60-5 1,2-Dichloroethene(trans) ND ND ND ND ND ND 315 2

110-54-3 Hexane 45 9.8 4.4 2.2 2.2 0.9 35000 3

75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 600 3

123-72-8 n-Butanal 45 10.6 6.1 1.5 ND ND - 3

156-59-2 1,2-Dichloroethene(cis) ND ND ND ND ND ND 315 1

78-93-3 MEK 63 12.6 23 2.3 1.8 2.3 30000 1

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 18.1 2.6 2.8 0.8 0.7 1.2 19000 1

67-66-3 Chloroform 2.3 0.9 0.5 ND 0.5 0.6 300 3

591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 62 18.0 6.6 4.2 5.3 2.3 - 1

110-82-7 Cyclohexane 14.9 2.4 1.4 0.7 0.6 0.2 300000 3

71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 350000 3

56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 0.4 1.1 1.1 ND 0.9 1.3 7.2 6

589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane 100 29 13.3 7.4 7.7 4.0 - 1

71-43-2 Benzene 2.0 1.1 1.3 0.3 1.0 0.9 1 1

107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND - 1

142-82-5 Heptane 9.3 3.1 1.6 0.7 1.2 0.7 33000 3

79-01-6 Trichloroethene 3.9 9.8 3.7 2.7 2.6 2.9 3500 3

78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND - 10

108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane 14.0 2.9 1.8 0.8 1.3 0.5 - 1

108-10-1 MIBK ND ND ND ND ND ND 1200 1

108-88-3 Toluene 33 9.3 6.3 2.2 4.0 2.7 2000 1

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 2.3 1.3 1.6 2.3 7.6 5.8 10000 2

123-86-4 Butyl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND 735 1

106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 9 2

108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 2.2 0.4 Trace Trace Trace ND - 3

100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 2.3 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 3000 1

111-84-2 Nonane 6.5 3.3 2.2 1.2 2.4 1.7 - 1

108-38-3/106-42-3 m/p-Xylene 6.3 3.9 2.7 1.0 1.8 1.6 2300* 1

110-12-3 5-Methyl-2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 460 10

95-47-6 o-Xylene 1.9 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 2300* 1

100-42-5 Styrene 3.0 1.2 0.5 0.1 Trace Trace 400 1

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene 0.6 0.4 0.3 Trace 0.2 Trace - 1

620-14-4/622-96-8 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 0.7 0.4 0.3 Trace 0.2 0.1 - 1

124-18-5 Decane 8.4 5.4 2.7 1.7 1.3 1.3 - 1

108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 0.3 0.2 Trace 0.2 Trace - 1

611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene 0.2 0.1 Trace Trace Trace Trace - 1

95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.7 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.3 500 5

535-77-3 m-Cymene 0.4 0.1 ND ND ND ND - 1

138-86-3 Limonene Trace ND ND ND ND ND - 2

99-87-6 p-Cymene 4.3 1.7 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.3 - 1

106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.4 0.2 ND ND ND ND 285 2

526-73-8 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 0.2 0.1 ND Trace Trace - 1

95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 37000 2

120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100 2

91-20-3 Naphthalene ND ND ND ND ND ND 36 2

TVOCs (Toluene) 8900 2800 1120 670 390 197

TVOCs (Quantified) 1520 520 320 168 178 133

Molhave-Clausen TVOCs (Toluene) 8900 2800 1120 670 390 197

POI = Half Hour Point of Impingement (Ontario Ministry of Environment) = Half Hour Point of Impingement (Ontario Ministry of Environme

MDL = Method Detection Limit (estimate : volume and split dependent) = Method Detection Limit (estimate : volume and split dependen

< (TRACE) = Characteristic ions present but too low to be quantified = Characteristic ions present but too low to be quantified

< (ND) = Characteristic ions are not present therefore Not Detected = Characteristic ions are not present therefore Not Detected

* & ** = Sum of all isomers = Sum of all isomers

SFT = Split dilution factor = Split dilution factor

V = Volume of air sampled = Volume of air sampled

REPORT OF ANALYSIS: Target Compounds in ng

REPORT: 13029c (Method - SCAN ATD-GC-MSD Cryogenic Oven Control)

DESCRIPTION 13091902 13091903 13091904

CAS # COMPOUND

SS25 Blank

Sep18/13 SFT=2.004

V=NA

SS26 Upwind

Sep18/13 SFT=2.026

V=NA

SS26 Downwind Sep18/13

SFT=2.020 V=NA


TLV (ACGIH) (ug/m³)

TWAEV (Ontario) (ug/m³)

MDL

Target Compounds75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 2.8 13.6 1500000 4047900 4940000 375-45-6 Chlorodifluoromethane 52 43 52 1050000 3536600 3535000 375-01-4 Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND 3 2600 2600 378-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 0.3 143 101 - - - 175-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 12.1 11.1 18000 - - 3109-66-0 Pentane 0.1 4.6 3.8 - 1770000 1770000 164-17-5 Ethanol 34 62 41 19000 1884000 1900000 375-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND 30 19800 20000 376-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 2.7 4.7 3.9 2400000 7664600 7650000 3108-20-3 Isopropyl Ether ND ND ND 220 1044700 - 267-64-1 Acetone 8.3 27 26 48000 1187100 1780000 167-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol ND 11.8 7.9 24000 983000 980000 3107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 0.7 350 240 - - - 175-09-2 Dichloromethane ND 8.3 4.4 5300 173700 175000 396-14-0 3-Methyl Pentane ND 2.3 1.7 - - - 1107-13-1 2-Propenitrile ND 0.7 0.4 180 - - 3156-60-5 1,2-Dichloroethene(trans) ND ND ND 315 793000 790000 2110-54-3 Hexane Trace 15.3 12.6 35000 176000 176000 375-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND 600 404800 405000 3123-72-8 n-Butanal ND 8.3 9.9 - - - 3156-59-2 1,2-Dichloroethene(cis) ND ND ND 315 793000 790000 178-93-3 MEK ND 7.1 6.9 30000 590000 590000 1141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate ND 2.9 2.5 19000 1440000 1440000 167-66-3 Chloroform ND 1.8 1.3 300 48800 49000 3591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 0.8 52 45 - - - 1110-82-7 Cyclohexane Trace 2.3 1.8 300000 688400 1030000 371-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND 350000 1910000 1910000 356-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1.8 1.3 7.2 31000 31000 6589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane ND 39 33 - - - 171-43-2 Benzene 0.5 1.2 1 1 1600 3200 1107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND - 40500 40000 1142-82-5 Heptane ND 3.9 3.6 33000 1640000 1635000 379-01-6 Trichloroethene 5.1 4.7 6 3500 268700 268000 378-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND - 346600 350000 10108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane ND ND ND - 1606000 1600000 1108-10-1 MIBK ND ND ND 1200 204800 205000 1108-88-3 Toluene 1.1 10.7 10.6 2000 188400 188000 1127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 1.4 4.1 4.2 10000 170000 170000 2123-86-4 Butyl Acetate ND ND ND 735 713000 710000 1106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ND ND 9 - - 2108-90-7 Chlorobenzene ND 0.7 0.5 - 46000 46000 3100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 0.1 1.2 1.1 3000 434200 435000 1111-84-2 Nonane 0.1 0.5 1.2 - 1049000 1050000 1

108-38-3/106-42-3 m/p-Xylene 0.7 3.8 4.2 2300* 434000* 435000* 1110-12-3 5-Methyl-2-Hexanone ND ND ND 460 234000 233000 1095-47-6 o-Xylene 0.2 1.2 1.2 2300* 434000* 435000* 1100-42-5 Styrene ND 1.3 1.4 400 85200 213000 1103-65-1 Propyl Benzene Trace 0.5 0.7 - - - 1

620-14-4/622-96-8 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 0.1 0.6 0.8 - - - 1124-18-5 Decane 0.4 2.5 1.6 - - - 1108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.1 0.7 0.7 - 123000** 123000** 1611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene Trace 0.2 0.2 - - - 195-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Trace 1.1 1.5 500 123000** 123000** 5535-77-3 m-Cymene ND Trace 0.5 - - - 1138-86-3 Limonene ND 0.2 ND - - - 299-87-6 p-Cymene Trace 1.7 6.9 - - - 1106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.1 0.2 285 60100 60000 2526-73-8 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.3 0.3 - 123000** 123000** 195-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND 37000 150300 150000 2120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND 100 - - 291-20-3 Naphthalene ND ND ND 36 52400 52000 2

TVOCs (Toluene) 35 4900 4000TVOCs (Quantified) 109 840 670Molhave-Clausen TVOCs (Toluene) 35 4900 4000

POI = Half Hour Point of Impingement (Ontario Ministry of Environment)TLV = Threshold Limit ValueTWAEV = Time Weighted Average Exposure Value (Ontario Ministry of Labour)MDL = Method Detection Limit (estimate : volume and split dependent) E = Semiquantitative versus TolueneU = Unresolved due to co-elutionBlank = Below integration threshold but presence or absence was not verified by manual search< = Manual search for compound verified as below MDL< (TRACE) = Characteristic ions present but too low to be quantified< (ND) = Characteristic ions are not present therefore Not Detected> = Saturated peak outside of quantitative calibration range* & ** = Sum of all isomersSFT = Split dilution factorV = Volume of air sampled I = Solvent extract injectedEV = Extract volume

REPORT OF ANALYSIS: Target Compounds in ng

REPORT: 13029d (Method - SCAN ATD-GC-MSD Cryogenic Oven Control)

DESCRIPTION 13092702 13092703 13092704

CAS # COMPOUND

SS50 Blank

Sep26/13 SFT=2.001

V=NA

SS51 Upwind

Sep26/13 SFT=2.035

V=NA

SS47 Downwind Sep26/13

SFT=2.006 V=NA


MDL

Target Compounds

75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 7.6 4.7 1500000 3

75-45-6 Chlorodifluoromethane 24 26 22 1050000 3

75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND 3 3

78-78-4 2-Methyl Butane 7.0 13.9 9.6 - 1

75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 9.4 11.6 18000 3

109-66-0 Pentane 0.4 1.4 1.1 - 1

64-17-5 Ethanol 9.0 24 15.4 19000 3

75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND 30 3

76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 0.6 3.4 4.8 2400000 3

108-20-3 Isopropyl Ether ND ND ND 220 2

67-64-1 Acetone 6.6 17.2 11.3 48000 1

67-63-0 Isopropyl Alcohol 3.2 2.9 1.8 24000 3

107-83-5 2-Methyl Pentane 9.2 11.7 7.7 - 1

75-09-2 Dichloromethane 1.0 1.6 1.4 5300 3

96-14-0 3-Methyl Pentane Trace 0.5 0.3 - 1

107-13-1 2-Propenitrile 2.9 1.3 0.8 180 3

156-60-5 1,2-Dichloroethene(trans) ND ND ND 315 2

110-54-3 Hexane 0.8 1.6 1.2 35000 3

75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND 600 3

123-72-8 n-Butanal 2.4 1.2 1.4 - 3

156-59-2 1,2-Dichloroethene(cis) ND ND ND 315 1

78-93-3 MEK 1.9 3.2 3.4 30000 1

141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate 1.9 4.0 4.0 19000 1

67-66-3 Chloroform ND 0.7 0.7 300 3

591-76-4 2-Methyl Hexane 3.1 3.8 4.7 - 1

110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.4 0.5 0.5 300000 3

71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND 350000 3

56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1.1 1.2 7.2 6

589-34-4 3-Methyl Hexane 2.6 4.1 4.1 - 1

71-43-2 Benzene 0.4 0.9 0.7 1 1

107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND - 1

142-82-5 Heptane 0.3 0.5 0.7 33000 3

79-01-6 Trichloroethene 3.8 3.3 3.9 3500 3

78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND - 10

108-87-2 Methyl Cyclohexane ND ND ND - 1

108-10-1 MIBK ND ND ND 1200 1

108-88-3 Toluene 2.6 2.7 3.5 2000 1

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 1.3 1.1 1.3 10000 2

123-86-4 Butyl Acetate ND ND ND 735 1

106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ND ND 9 2

108-90-7 Chlorobenzene ND ND ND - 3

100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene 0.2 0.1 0.3 3000 1

111-84-2 Nonane 0.2 Trace 0.5 - 1

108-38-3/106-42-3 m/p-Xylene 0.8 0.6 1.2 2300* 1

110-12-3 5-Methyl-2-Hexanone ND ND ND 460 10

95-47-6 o-Xylene 0.2 0.2 0.3 2300* 1

100-42-5 Styrene 0.6 Trace 0.4 400 1

103-65-1 Propyl Benzene Trace Trace 0.1 - 1

620-14-4/622-96-8 m/p-Ethyl Toluene 0.1 Trace 0.1 - 1

124-18-5 Decane 0.6 Trace 0.7 - 1

108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.1 Trace 0.1 - 1

611-14-3 o-Ethyl Toluene Trace Trace Trace - 1

95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.2 Trace 0.3 500 5

535-77-3 m-Cymene ND ND ND - 1

138-86-3 Limonene ND ND ND - 2

99-87-6 p-Cymene 0.3 Trace 0.5 - 1

106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND 285 2

526-73-8 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene Trace ND Trace - 1

95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND 37000 2

120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND 100 2

91-20-3 Naphthalene ND ND ND 36 2

TVOCs (Toluene) 300 250 250

TVOCs (Quantified) 89 151 128

Molhave-Clausen TVOCs (Toluene) 300 250 250


MDL = Method Detection Limit (estimate : volume and split dependent)

< (TRACE) = Characteristic ions present but too low to be quantified

< (ND) = Characteristic ions are not present therefore Not Detected

* & ** = Sum of all isomers

SFT = Split dilution factor

V = Volume of air sampled

Employee Job Title

APPENDIX C

Date post:	12-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Senior Project Administrator - Waste Managementwcec.wm.com/documents/2013 Ambiant Air Monitoring...

Documents