Date post: | 20-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | arron-oliver |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
SEPTEMBER 2007
Increasing Transparency on Social Performance
Presented by: Gema PerezE-mail: [email protected]
Planet Rating
13 rue Dieumegard 93400 Saint Ouen France
Tél : 33 1 49 21 26 30 – Fax : 33 1 49 21 26 27
[email protected] - www.planetrating.com
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Created in 1999 and became a private independent rating firm in June 2005Created in 1999 and became a private independent rating firm in June 2005
Planet Rating: The Global Microfinance Rating Agency
Planet Rating has the most extensive global coverage:
Paris HQ: covering Eastern Europe & Asia
Lima Office: covering Latin America & the Caribbean
Dakar Office: covering West & Central Africa
Kampala Office: covering East & Southern Africa
Beirut Office: covering North Africa & Middle East
Most diversified rating team in the industry:
Multicultural: American, Canadian, Colombian, Dutch, French, Lebanese, Senegalese, Spanish, Ugandan, Peruvian, Vietnamese citizens
Multilingual: Arabic, Dutch, Italian, English, French, Lugandan, Spanish, Portuguese, Vietnamese, Wolof speakers
Qualified & experienced team:
Planet Rating’s Managing Director is the only head of rating agencies that has operational microfinance experience; he was former General Manager of SPBD – Samoa’s largest MFI
Each senior analyst has conducted at least 12 rating missions on 3 different continents
Analyst backgrounds: investment banking, management consulting, non-profit, microfinance
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Planet Rating is one of the most experienced microfinance rating agencies in Eastern and Central Europe and NISPlanet Rating is one of the most experienced microfinance rating agencies in Eastern and Central Europe and NIS
We have rated MFIs of all sizes, types, legal statuses and stages of development:
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mikrofin, EKI, Partner, Sunrise, LOK micro, MI BOSPO, Benefit, Prizma
Russia: FFECCC, RWMN, VRFSBS
Armenia: Aregak, MDF Kamurj
Mongolia: Khan Bank, Xac Bank
Moldova: MicroInvest
Serbia: AgroInvest
Georgia: Constanta
Kosovo: KEP
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Planet Rating and our reports are recognized by microfinance investors
Many key investors (e.g. FMO, Blue Orchard, responsAbility, Oikocredit, KfW) prefer our detailed and deeply analyzed reports
EBRD and EIB – the leading European microfinance investors – are frequent readers of our rating reports
Wide Report Distribution
Our reports are distributed to and read by all 76 microfinance funds and investors and numerous donors such as development banks and bilateral agencies
Get rated by Planet Rating means instant recognition and credibility with investorsGet rated by Planet Rating means instant recognition and credibility with investors
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
We value what we measure: measure your social performance!
For most MFIs, institutional sustainability is only a means to an end: achieving their social goals.
Transparency on financial performance, with the existence of clear financial performance standards, regular reporting, external evaluations and ratings, has played a significant role in the development of strong microfinance institutions. In order to further strengthen the sector, increased transparency and accountability on the capacity of MFIs to effectively achieve their social goals is needed.
Social Ratings are now available for MFI that wish to complement their institutional and financial rating and provide a comprehensive information to their stakeholders (Boards, Management Team, Fund providers, Supervisory Bodies) for an optimal decision-making.
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Rating: A tool to improve your social performance
Social ratings include an audit of your Social Performance Management systems conducted with a transparent methodology and in an interactive mode to ensure an optimal appropriation of the conclusions of the audit Interviews with management team, board, field staff Verification and validation of social performance information and
indicators Document review (communication documents as well as internal)
For institution where social performance management systems are only incipient, our Social Ratings can be complemented by a one-day training for MFI staff on concepts and best practices currently being developed in the field of social performance management (optional)Social Performance Management is defined as the processes through which you define and formalize your social goals, design the systems to put these
intentions into practice, measure actual outcomes and use these results to refine systems and improve practice
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Rating: A tool to communicate about your social performance
Our Social Rating standardized and comprehensive rating reports are designed to suit the information needs of all MFI stakeholders (Boards, Management Team, Fund providers, Supervisory Bodies)
Socio-economic environment
Outreach and microfinance service offering in the country
Social performance indicators (with benchmarking)
Concise and clear justification of conclusions
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Rating: Reduce risk, create opportunities
Improve your social performance management systems Identify weaknesses and learn about best practices
Reduce reputation risks Demonstrate efforts made towards client satisfaction and client
protection
Build an image of socially responsible institution Differentiate your MFI from competitors to attract skills or funds and
enhance staff motivation
Increase transparency Comply with stakeholders information requests (fund providers,
regulators, clients)
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Ratings: What do we rate?
Intentions clarity and consistency Clarity and visibility of intentions (translation into clear and binding
documents) Relevancy given the MFI context and maturity Consistency of main decisions with stated goals and intentions
Implementation efficiency Efficiency of processes Availability of necessary resources Integration of these processes in the control/ audit / verification cycle
Results comparison with benchmarks Opinion on the reliability of indicators Comparison with national / international microfinance benchmarks Comparison with internationally approved Corporate Social
Responsibility objectives (MDG; ILO; Global Compact; UN Charter)
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Rating Scale
Social Ratings provide an opinion on the capacity of an MFI to achieve its social goals
Rating Definition
5
Advanced: Long-lasting commitment to social goals. Efficient management of social performance and social responsibility risks. Institution very likely to achieve a positive social impact.
4
Convincing: Clear commitment to social goals. Reasonable management of social performance and social responsibility risks. Institution likely to achieve a positive social impact.
3In progress: Clear intent to reach social goals. Social performance management systems being implemented.
2Incipient: Clear intent to reach social goals. Low capacity to manage social performance.
1Intangible: Intention to reach social goals is non tangible. Low level of management of social performance.
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Synergies between Social Rating and GIRAFE Rating
Because the sustainability of an institution is key to its social performance (by allowing it to provide service in a durable way), Social Ratings are only conducted for MFIs that have already undergone an institutional rating (with Planet Rating or another reputable microfinance rating agency)
Social Rating missions can be conducted at the same time as GIRAFE rating missions, but it is not mandatory
Stand alone Social Rating mission, depending on the size of the institution and the type of information available, takes 2-4 days on-site
Combining both processes provides efficiency gains that are reflected in the prices
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Institutionalization of the Social Mission
Social Mission and Strategy Does the institution have a clear social goal, shared by all stakeholders?
How is it defined? Is the social mission integrated in the main decisions of the MFI? Is there a risk that the institution might loose its social focus?
Social Performance Monitoring Has the institution put tools and systems in place to measure and track
its social performance?
Staff Mobilization Are processes in place to involve/motivate staff in/towards the
achievement of social goals?
Social Rating framework ( )
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Rating framework Outreach
Client targeting Has the institution defined its target population? Has the institution put systems in place to know its clientele? Has the institution put systems in place to reach out to its target
clientele?
Outreach to the poor and excluded Is the institution providing financial services to persons usually excluded
from financial services (poor, rural, specifically disadvantaged groups)?
Breadth of Outreach Is the institution reaching out / likely to reach out to a significant
number of poor or excluded people?
Social Rating framework ( )
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Rating framework Service offering
Service design and client satisfaction Does the institution have a good understanding of the financial needs of
its clients and does it have processes to tailor the products to these needs?
Are services adapted to the various financial needs of the target population (diversity of services, amounts, terms, repayment schemes, collection methods, guarantees, operational processes)?
Are client satisfied with the services?
Cost of the services Is the institution actively looking for ways to reduce the cost of the
services for the clients?
Social Rating framework ( )
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Social Rating framework Social responsibility
Customer protection Are there systems in place to guarantee that clients will be treated with
respect and dignity? (transparency, fair treatment, prevention of over indebtedness, respectful collection mechanisms)
Human resources Are all staff recognized equal rights? Are all staff receiving a fair compensation (financial and non financial)
for their work?
Social responsibility to the community Is the institution contributing to the community development with other
means than financial services? (fair and responsible behavior on the market; promotion of fundamental human rights; respect for the local culture)
Social Rating framework ( )
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Planet Rating Social Rating experience
Our social rating methodology has been refined through on-site testing and collection of feedback from actors of the sector (MFIs, investors, donors, social performance specialists) during 2005 and 2006
The draft methodology was used for the social performance evaluations of six MFIs in Mali in 2006
The final methodology has been used for four social ratings in Ethiopia in July 2007
November 16th to16th 2007 Measuring social performance of MFIs
Contacts
Global Headquarters
13 rue Dieumegard
93400 St-Ouen Paris – France
Tel: +33 1 4921 2630
Fax: +33 1 4921 2627
Latin America
Francisco de Paula Ugarriza 813 – Oficina 301
Miraflores, Lima 18 – Peru
Tel: +51 1 472 5988 / 471 9526 / 470 2666
Fax: + 51 1 4716816
West Africa
Boulevard Djily Mbaye
Immeuble FADH, 14th floor
BP 5695 Dakar – Senegal
Tel/Fax: +221 821 79 39
East Africa
Plot 23b Bandali Rise – Bugolobi
PO Box 36179 – Kampala – Uganda
Tel: +256 414 236 745
Middle East & North Africa
42 Mariam Geahchan Street
Ashrafieh, Beirut – Lebanon
Tel: +961 3 11 96 81