+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation...

Date post: 16-Jan-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
32
Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 1.6 ] TITLE OF NEW CONTENT Type your content here ... 1.7 Pressure Measurement. All pressures expressed in this document are gauge pressures unless specifically noted otherwise. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6. Related Item First Revision No. 11-NFPA 37-2015 [New Section after 5.5] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:30:13 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Action: Rejected but see related SR Resolution: SR-13-NFPA 37-2016 Statement: This revision is made to coordinate with the revisions to section 5.6 (see SR-14) and to clarify the units of pressure measurement. National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... 1 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 1 of 32
Transcript
Page 1: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 1.6 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

1.7 Pressure Measurement. All pressures expressed in this document are gauge pressuresunless specifically noted otherwise.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6.

Related Item

First Revision No. 11-NFPA 37-2015 [New Section after 5.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:30:13 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-13-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This revision is made to coordinate with the revisions to section 5.6 (see SR-14) andto clarify the units of pressure measurement.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 1 of 32

Page 2: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.7 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Inlet Gas Pressure: The pressure at the outlet of the equipment isolation valve.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6

Related Item

First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:37:38 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-2-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This definition is added to explain terminology used in section 5.6 (see SR-14).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

2 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 2 of 32

Page 3: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.7 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Line Pressure Regulator: A pressure regulator placed in a gas line between the serviceregulator and the appliance regulator [ 54 , 2015]

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6

Related Item

First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:33:20 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-3-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This definition is added to explain terminology used in section 5.6 (see SR-14).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

3 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 3 of 32

Page 4: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 9-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.9 ]

Rated Pressure. The maximum internal and external pressures that the materials, devices, orcomponents are designed to contain or control.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6

Related Item

First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:36:08 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted

Resolution: SR-4-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This definition is added to explain terminology used in section 5.6 (see SR-14).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

4 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 4 of 32

Page 5: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 7-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.9 ]

3.3.9 Protected Pressure.

The set pressure of the nearest upstream overpressure protection device or the inlet pressureto the service regulator, whichever is lower.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6

Related Item

First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:32:33 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-5-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This revision is made to coordinate with the revisions to section 5.6 (see SR-14). Theterm "protected pressure" is no longer used in the document.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

5 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 5 of 32

Page 6: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.3 ]

4.1.3 Engines Located on Roofs, Platforms, and Other Supporting Structures .

4.1.3.1

Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, that are installed on roofs of structures ,on platforms, or on other supporting structures shall be located at least 1.5 m (5 ft) fromopenings in walls and at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from

structures having combustible walls. A minimum separation shall not be required where thefollowing conditions exist: The adjacent wall of the structure hascombustible structures except as provided in 4.1.3.1.1 or 4.1.3.1.2

4.1.3.1.1

A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where all portions of the structure that arecloser than 1.5 m (5 ft) from the engine enclosure have a fire resistance rating of at least 1

hour. The weatherproof enclosure is constructed of noncombustible materials and it hasbeen demonstratedhr.

4.1.3.1.2

A clearance less than 1.5m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated throughtesting by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory acceptable to the authority havingjurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignite combustible

materials outside the enclosurestructures .

4.1.3.2

An oil A liquid containment system consisting of a curb or dike having a capacity at least equalto the total capacity of the lubricating oil system or , the liquid fuel system, whichever isgreater and the engine coolant system , shall be provided. This system shall also comply withapplicable requirements of Chapter 6 except as provided in 4 .1.3.2.1.

4.1.3.

3 *

2.1

Where engines are connected to a Chapter 5 fuel supply system, a liquid containment systemshall not be required where engines provided with weatherproof housings have the availablecapacity to contain the total capacity of the oil lubricating system and engine coolant systemwithin the weatherproof enclosure.

*

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

6 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 6 of 32

Page 7: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

4.1.3.3

The surface beneath the engine and beyond the engine and the oil liquid containment dikeshall be noncombustible to a minimum distance of 300 mm (12 in.), except as provided in4 .1.3.3.1.

4.1.3.3.1

The surface beneath the engine and beyond the engine and the liquid containment dike, ifprovided, shall not be required to be noncombustible where it has be demonstrated throughtesting by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory acceptable to the authority havingjurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignite the roofs of structures, platformsconstructed of combustible materials, or other supporting structures.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name

20_kw_residential_generac_on_a_raised_platform_serviced_by_NNG_automatic_standby_generators-540x272.jpg

Generac_air-cooled.gif

kohler-generator-on-a-platform-installed-by-NNG-in_Richmond_county.jpg

Kolher_.jpg

27_kw_kilowatt_generac_generator_on_a_custom_built_platform_by_northern_neck_generator_in_middlesex.jpg

generac-48kW-generator-on-raised-platform-and-200-amp-transfer-switch-installed-by-northern-neck-generator-in-kilmarnock.jpg

generac-70-kilowatt-generator-installed-on-a-raised-platform-by-nng-standby-generators.jpg

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

7 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 7 of 32

Page 8: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Bad_Core_Power.JPG

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply to 4.1.3 as an engine located on top of a structure (roof) is also an engine located outdoors. The language should be identical for enforcement purposes.

With the expansion of the installation of permanently installed residential generators throughout the country, there have been concerns with the placement of these units on combustible supporting structures. NFPA 37, 4.1.3 covered the placement of large scale commercial and industrial generator on roofs, but did not address requirements for residential applications. Areas of the country that are in FEMA flood zones require equipment to be installed above the flood level. A common practice to raise the generator above these FEMA flood levels, has been the placement of the generator on a platform constructed of combustible materials, or on an existing wood deck, porch or other structure suitable for supporting the generator. These small residential generators are then connected to a fixed fuel piping system, either natural gas or LP vapor. The generators installed on platforms in the attached pictures do not have a noncombustible separation installed between the generator and the supporting structure. If the generator were to have a fire within the enclosure, the fire could spread to the combustible platform and the platform could collapse. When this occurs the generator connection to the fixed fuel piping system can be compromised, and now a fuel gas is discharging into atmosphere next to an open flame. The public comment would add clarity to the code that any combustible structure that is utilized to support any generator would be required to be fully protected from a fire within the generator enclosure.

The change to liquid containment dike would add clarity that the engine coolant is as important to contain as the engine oil and fuel, and if all systems are compromised the total capacity of all systems shall be contained. Although the concept of a water-based fluid being flammable may be difficult for installers to comprehend, one must recognize that coolant is actually glycol based and only mixed with water. Raised to a high enough temperature, the glycol is still flammable even in the presence of water vapor. The exception to the requirement for the containment dike would allow the weatherproof enclosure of small air-cooled and liquid-cooled generators that are connected to a Chapter 5 fuel supply system to serve this purpose as long as the enclosure has the available capacity. Small air-generator cooled engine generators contain on average 2 quarts of oil or less.

SwRI, and OSHA NRTL, has performed enclosure testing on engine enclosures for generator manufacturers. These tests were performed for generators installed at grade level, however if additional testing can demonstrate that the engine enclosure will not ignite a combustible supporting structure, consideration should be given to the listed engine enclosure serving as the required noncombustible separation and additional noncombustible separations should not be required.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.1.4]

Related Item

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 37-2014 [Section No. 5.4.3 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

8 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 8 of 32

Page 9: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Brian Baughman

Organization: Generac Power Systems

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 16:57:11 EST 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-15-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: These revisions clarify the requirements for the reader. Annex material was also addedto clarify that it might be possible for the weatherproof housing to act as the oilcontainment system. With respect to the proposed changes in PC-1, the committeeagrees that platforms and other structures are better addressed in section 4.2 (SeeSR-10) . The flammability of engine coolant is considered negligible, and although itmay need to be addressed from an environmental standpoint, it does not need to beaddressed from a fire standpoint.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

9 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 9 of 32

Page 10: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.4 ]

4.1.4 Engines Located Outdoors.

4.1.4.1

Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, that are installed outdoors shall belocated at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from openings in walls and at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from combustiblestructures except as provided in 4.1.4.1.1 or 4.1.4.1.2

4.1.4.1.1

A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where all portions of structures that arecloser than 1.5 m (5 ft) from the engine enclosure have a fire resistance rating of at least 1 hour.

4.1.4.1.2

A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated by one ofthe following methods through testing by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratoryacceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignitestructures: Where a full-scale fire test has shown that the complete consumption of thecombustibles within the enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine

structure.

Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, shall be permitted to be placed at adistance no less than that specified during the fire test from a wall constructed of the samematerial.

combustible materials.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The first draft language does not bring clarity to the code. SwRI, an OSHA NRTL, has performed full scale engine enclosure testing for generator manufacturers and has certified through listing and labeling which generator manufacturer enclosures are approved as meeting the requirement in Clause 1 of 4.1.4.1.2.

Clause 2 of 4.1.4.1.2 does not state what approved calculations are acceptable and who is deemed qualified to perform these calculations. The States are required to participate in the OSHA safety programs or substitute their own safety programs. The State is the authority having jurisdiction and the State can approve their own recognized testing laboratory.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.1.3]

Related Item

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4]

Submitter Information Verification

*

* Where calculations have shown that a fire within the engine enclosure will not ignitestructures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than that specifiedin the calculations.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

10 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 10 of 32

Page 11: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Submitter Full Name: Brian Baughman

Organization: Generac Power Systems

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 17:33:47 EST 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-16-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This section was revised to be consistent with section 4.1.3. If a calculation procedureis used, it must be acceptable to the AHJ, so these do not need to be specified here.Although calculations may have some limitations, they provide an alternative toperforming full scale fire tests.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

11 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 11 of 32

Page 12: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 13-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.4.1 ]

4.1.4.1

Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, that are installed outdoors shall belocated at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from openings in walls and at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from combustiblestructures except as provided in 4.1.4.1.1 or 4.1.4.1.2

4.1.4.1.1

A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where all portions of structures that arecloser than 1.5 m (5 ft) from the engine enclosure have a fire resistance rating of at least 1hour.

4.1.4.1.2

A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated by one ofthe following methods acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within theenclosure will not ignite structures:

(1)

(2)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I fully support the proposed language.

Related Item

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 11 19:31:29 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected

Resolution: There were no actionable recommendations.

* Where a full-scale fire test has shown that the complete consumption of thecombustibles within the enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine shall be permittedto be placed at a distance no less than that specified during the fire test from a wall of thesame material.

* Where calculations have shown that a fire within the engine enclosure will not ignitestructures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than thatspecified in the calculations.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

12 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 12 of 32

Page 13: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.4.1.2 ]

4.1.4.1.2

A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated by one ofthe following methods acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within theenclosure will not ignite structures:

(1)

(2)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Calculations to predict the results of a fire inside the enclosure of an engine generator are limited in scope.Limited in scope, to the effect of the combustible materials that are a part of the engine generator construction.However, the combustibles that are a part of the engine generator construction are not the only combustibles that can burn inside the enclosure once ignited. In particular, there is a fuel source attached to the engine generator that is routed into the enclosure as well. The most common types of fuel sources are propane (liquid or vapor), natural gas, or diesel fuel. If the fuel source is natural gas the supply is unlimited. Propane and diesel fuel as a fuel source are limited by the size of the supply tank but usually have an adequate supply to flow for many hours.

Depending on whether the unit is running or not, the Automatic Safety Shutoff Valves (ASSVs) will be open (engine running) or closed (engine not running).If the engine is running, the ASSVs are open, when the fuel lines and other fuel containing parts are consumed the fuel will enter the compartment and be available to burn. The fuel burning will add a significant amount of energy to the enclosure and heat load that is to be contained within the enclosure. Normally the engine will stop when the fuel lines are consumed due to the lack of fuel to power the engine. The ASSVs will close if they can. The ability of the ASSVs to close is dependent on if the fire has damaged the internal sealing components. The ASSVs sealing components are usually made from rubber or a similar material and melt at a relatively low temperature.Regardless of whether the engine is running or not the fire inside the enclosure can potentially comprise the gas shutoff valve and allow the fuel supply to enter the enclosure and fuel the fire.It would be very difficult to calculate the effect of this additional fuel source, rate of burn, path of burn and the overall effect on the ability of the engine generator enclosure to contain the fire.

This is why the calculations to predict the results of a fire inside the enclosure of an engine generator are limited in scope. Since this approach is limited in scope, section 4.1.4.1.2 (2) should be eliminated from the 2018 version of NFPA 37.

Related Item

* Where a full-scale fire test has shown that the complete consumption of thecombustibles within the enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine shall be permitted tobe placed at a distance no less than that specified during the fire test from a wall of thesame material.

* Where calculations have shown that a fire within the engine enclosure will not ignitestructures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than thatspecified in the calculations.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

13 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 13 of 32

Page 14: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeff Jonas

Organization: Generac Power Systems

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 18 15:57:48 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-16-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This section was revised to be consistent with section 4.1.3. If a calculation procedureis used, it must be acceptable to the AHJ, so these do not need to be specified here.Although calculations may have some limitations, they provide an alternative toperforming full scale fire tests.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

14 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 14 of 32

Page 15: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.3 ]

4.3* Hazardous Locations.

In hazardous locations, engines that neither compress a flammable gas nor pump a flammableliquid shall meet the following three criteria:

(1) They shall be installed in a an enclosure or room of fire-resistive construction.

(2) They shall be ventilated from a nonhazardous outside area.

(3) They shall have outside access only defined emergency egress path(s) .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Larger gensets and turbines today are being provided with large, purpose designed free standing “enclosures” that are not an “engine room” as used in NFPA 37. “Engine room” as used in NFPA 37 implies a portion of a building that is walled off to provide a separate space in which an engine / turbine is placed; much like we wall off Office or Bathroom spaces in a building. The task group has provided an expanded discussion of “enclosures” at Annex section A.3.3.2 that considers and distinguishes between the close fitting weather covers that are provided for small gensets and microturbines; and the large, purpose designed, free standing enclosures, purpose designed “packages” and “containerized” assemblies that are provided with larger genset and industrial turbine installations. Recognizing that the free standing purpose designed enclosures, packages and containers for gensets and turbines are being placed as an assembly within a larger building, it is usually not practical (nor is it being provided!) for personnel working within those structures to have a direct exit to outdoors; rather they exit to the larger building from which an exit path to the outdoors must be provided This change recognizes the evolution in installation configurations.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.5.1]

Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.5.2]

Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. A.3.3.2]

Related Item

First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner

Organization: GE Power & Water

Street Address:

City:

State:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

15 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 15 of 32

Page 16: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:08:58 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-6-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: The committee determined that the emergency egress path should be acceptable to theAHJ so as not to lead to a more hazardous area. The term enclosure was addedbecause larger gensets and turbines today are being provided with large, purpose-designed, free-standing “enclosures” that are not an “engine room” as used in NFPA 37.“Engine room” as used in NFPA 37 implies a portion of a building that is walled off to

provide a separate space in which an engine/turbine is placed.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

16 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 16 of 32

Page 17: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.5.1 ]

4.5.1

Electrical installations in rooms, or enclosures containing engines shall comply with NFPA 70.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

“enclosures” added here for consistency with the changes made to 4.3 and the expanded discussion of enclosures provided in Annex A.3.3.2.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No.4.3]

Change for Consistency betweenclauses

Related Item

First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner

Organization: GE Power & Water

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:22:10 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-8-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This revision clarifies that, regardless of location, the electrical installation isrequired to meet the provisions of NFPA 70.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

17 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 17 of 32

Page 18: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.5.2 ]

4.5.2

Engine rooms, enclosures, or other locations shall not be classified as hazardous locations asdefined in Article 500 of NFPA 70, solely by reason of the engine fuel, lubricating oil, orhydraulic fluid.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

“enclosures” added here for consistency with the changes made to 4.3 and the expanded discussion of enclosures provided at Annex section A..3.3.2.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016 [SectionNo. 4.3]

Provide consistency with PublicComment 15

Related Item

First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner

Organization: GE Power & Water

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:26:23 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-9-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: The term “enclosures” is added to be consistent with the changes made to 4.3 (seeSR-6) and the expanded discussion of enclosures provided in A.3.3.2 (see SR-7).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

18 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 18 of 32

Page 19: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 4-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 5.1 ]

5.1* Gas Piping Gas Train Materials and Fittings and Gas Piping Systems .

5.1.1

Gas piping system from the point of delivery to the equipment isolation valve shall beinstalled in accordance with the following methods:

(1) All fuel gas piping systems at service pressures equal to or less than a gauge pressure of860 kPa (gauge pressure of 125 psi) shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 54.

(2) All fuel gas p iping systems at service pressures in excess of a gauge pressure of 860kPa (gauge pressure of 125 psi), other than LP-Gas systems, shall be installed inaccordance with ANSI/ASME B31.3, Process Piping.

(3) LP-Gas p iping systems, whether liquid or vapor phase, shall be installed in accordancewith the provisions of NFPA 58.

5.1.2*

Plastic pipe on the gas train or within the gas piping system shall not be used to carry fuelwithin a room housing an engine(s).

5.1.3

Approved metallic flexible connectors on a gas train or within the gas piping system shall bepermitted for protection against damage caused by settlement, vibration, expansion,contraction, or corrosion.

5.1.4

Approved nonmetallic connectors on a gas train or within the gas piping system shall bepermitted for protection against damage caused by settlement, vibration, expansion,contraction, or corrosion except for LP-Gas in the liquid phase.

5.1.5*

Connectors used on the gas train for vibration dampening shall be properly anchored andinstalled according to manufacturer's instructions.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The term fuel gas piping system in NFPA 54 is all piping upstream of the equipment isolation valve. NPFA 54 defines “piping system” as “All pipe, tubing, valves, and fittings from the point of delivery to the outlets of the appliance shutoff valve” (aka equipment isolation valve). All piping that is downstream of the equipment isolation valve is part of the “fuel gas train”, which is part of the engine and is not considered “fuel gas piping”.

2) The NFPA 54 reference is circuitous; NPFA 86 references a standard, whose scope does not cover and should not be applied to a fuel gas train of the oven. Thus, unintentional conflicts can occur. For example, NPFA 54 (2015), 5.6 “Acceptable Piping Materials and Joining Methods” required that non-ferrous flanged (i.e. aluminum flanged connections) comply with ANSI/ASME B16.24, Cast Copper Alloy Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings: Classes 150, 300, 600. 900, 1500, and 2500 (see NFPA 54, paragraph 5.6.10.1.3). This standard only permits flat face flanges.

For design of gas trains, the use of Aluminum valves with raised face flanges has been standard since

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

19 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 19 of 32

Page 20: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

the 1930’s. Such valves are permitted in NPFA 86, NFPA 85, CDS-1, UJL 795, UL 2200, and a whole host of ANSI standards, and the intent of the NFPA 54 reference is not to prohibit the use of aluminum valves with raised face flanges.

Related Item

Committee Input No. 10-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 5.1.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 16 17:23:27 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-12-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This revision was made to eliminate unintended conflicts between NFPA 54 andNFPA 37.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

20 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 20 of 32

Page 21: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 5.6 ]

5.6 Overpressure Protection.

5.6.1 Overpressure protection shall be required for any fuel gas train subject to either of thefollowing conditions :

LP-Gas piping systems, whether liquid or vapor phase, in accordance with the provisions ofNFPA 58.

Fuel gas piping systems at service pressures in excess of a gauge pressure of 860 kPa((gauge pressure of 125 psi), other than LP-Gas systems, in accordance with ANSI/ASMEB31.3, Process Piping.

Fuel gas piping systems and fuel gas trains, handling pressures equal to or less than a gaugepressure of 860 kPa (gauge pressure of 125 psi), when the supply pressure exceeds a gaugepressure of 14 kPa (gauge pressure of

:

(1) The inlet gas pressure exceeds both 14 kPa ( 2 psi) and the

protected pressure already provided to the fuel gas train is greater than the maximumallowable operating pressure rating of any fuel gas train component.

5.6.1.1

When an overpressure protection device is required in 5.6.1(3) , the overpressure protectiondevice shall be set to provide a protected pressure so that the following pressures are notexceeded:

(1) If the component’s maximum allowable operating pressure rating is a gauge pressureless than 83 kPa (gauge pressure less than 12 psi), the allowable overpressure is 50percent over the maximum allowable operating pressure rating of the component.

(2) If the component’s maximum allowable operating pressure rating is a gauge pressureequal to or greater than 83 kPa but less than 414 kPa (gauge pressure equal to or greaterthan 12 but less than 60 psi), the allowable overpressure is a gauge pressure of 41 kPa(gauge pressure of 6 psi) over the maximum allowable operating pressure rating of thecomponent.

(3) If the component’s maximum allowable operating pressure rating is a gauge pressureequal to or greater than 414 kPa but less than or equal to 860 kPa (gauge pressure equalto or greater than 60 psi), but less than or equal to 125 psi), the allowable overpressure is10 percent over the maximum allowable operating pressure rating of the component.

(1) rated pressure of any downstream component

(2) The failure of a single upstream line pressure regulator results in an inlet gas pressureexceeding the rated pressure of any downstream component

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

21 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 21 of 32

Page 22: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

5.6.1.2 1

The overpressure protection device required in 5.6.1.1(3) shall also comply with the following:

(1) The overpressure protection device shall be any one device permitted in Section 5.9 ofNFPA 54.

The gas piping system or fuel gas train shall be designed and installed such that the

(1) * There shall be an active or passive means by which the activation of the overpressureprotection device is

in a continuous pressure protection mode, and the overpressure condition is

(2) detectable.

Pressure relief valves, where

(1) Where a pressure relief valve(s) is used as the overpressure protection device, the reliefvalve and all connected vent piping shall be sized to

fully relieve the required volume of gas in order to provide a protected pressure inaccordance with

(2) accommodate the maximum anticipated flow due to the failure of the nearest upstream linepressure regulator.

Add annex

A. 5.6.1.1

under the following conditions:

The upstream pressure regulator in the gas piping system has failed in the wide openposition.

The required relieving pressure of the relief valve is based on the protected pressure to theupstream pressure regulator in the gas piping system. The pressure limits in this section are consistent with 49 CFR Part 192.201, RequiredCapacity of Pressure Relieving and Limiting Stations

A.5.6.1.1.1(2) An example of active means is an alarm or light notification. An example ofpassive means is a manual reset.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

NFPA_37_Section_5_6_-_Revisions_FINAL_TASK_GROUP.docx

This is the work of the task group

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

New definitions needed in order to know how to apply the requirement, and this resulted in changes to the wording. Also, scope was limited to the gas train since NFPA 37 does not cover gas piping. Therefore, task group feels that failure of a service regulator need not be needed to drive the requirement of an OPD since the issue is really about failure of line regulator within the upstream gas piping system

Related Item

First Revision No. 11-NFPA 37-2015 [New Section after 5.5]

Submitter Information Verification

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

22 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 22 of 32

Page 23: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

New 1.7 1.7 Pressure Measurement. All pressures expressed in this document are gauge pressures unless specifically noted otherwise. Removed Definitions Remove definition of Protected Pressure that was added in the First Draft New Definitions Inlet Gas Pressure: The pressure at the outlet of the equipment isolation valve. Line Pressure Regulator: A pressure regulator placed in a gas line between the service regulator and the appliance regulator [54, 2015] Rated Pressure. The maximum internal and external pressures that the materials, devices, or components are designed to contain or control. Revised Definitions Service Regulator. A pressure regulator installed by the serving gas supplier to reduce and limit the service line gas pressure to delivery pressure. [54, 2015]  Revise Section 5.6 5.6 Overpressure Protection. 5.6.1 Overpressure protection shall be required for any fuel gas train subject to either of the following conditions:

(a) The inlet gas pressure exceeds both 14 kPa (2 psi) and the rated pressure of any downstream component

(b) The failure of a single upstream line pressure regulator results in an inlet gas pressure exceeding the rated pressure of any downstream component

5.6.1.1* When an overpressure protection device is required in 5.6.1(2), it shall be set so that the following pressures are not exceeded:

(1) When the rated pressure of any component is less than 83 kPa (12 psi), the set point of the overpressure protection device shall not exceed 150 percent of the rated pressure of the lowest rated component.

(2) When the rated pressure of any component is equal to or greater than 83 kPa (12 psi) but less than 414 kPa (60 psi), the set point of the overpressure protection device shall not exceed 41 kPa (6 psi) above the rated pressure of the lowest rated component.

(3) When the rated pressure of any component is equal to or greater than 414 kPa (60 psi), the set

point of the overpressure protection device shall not exceed 110 percent of the rated pressure of the lowest rated component.

 5.6.1.1.1 The overpressure protection device required in 5.6.1.1(3) shall also comply with the following:

(1) The overpressure protection device shall be any one device permitted in Section 5.9 of NFPA 54.

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 23 of 32

Page 24: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

(2) * There shall be an active or passive means by which the activation of the overpressure protection device is detectable.

(3) Where a pressure relief valve(s) is used as the overpressure protection device, the relief valve and all connected vent piping shall be sized to accommodate the maximum anticipated flow due to the failure of the nearest upstream line pressure regulator.

A.5.6.1.1 The pressure limits in this section are consistent with 49 CFR Part 192.201, Required Capacity of Pressure Relieving and Limiting Stations A.5.6.1.1.1(2) An example of active means is an alarm or light notification. An example of passive means is a manual reset.

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 24 of 32

Page 25: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:42:38 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-14-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This revision addresses the gap in the requirements of NFPA 54 (2015) foroverpressure protection between 2 psi and 125 psi.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

23 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 25 of 32

Page 26: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.2 ]

A.3.3.2 Enclosure.

An enclosure is not considered to be a room. An enclosure can be a simple weather protectioncover (as typically provided for a small outdoor genset) that cannot be entered by a person,UL2200 is often applied for the design of these enclosures. An enclosure can also be apurpose designed structure provided with an engine or a room. turbine by the manufacturer,which may have provisions for personnel entry to facilitate inspection or maintenance. Somegensets and turbines are provided in a fully self-contained “package” that may be in the form ofa purpose designed structure or a standard shipping container. Although purpose designedstructures and packages may be placed within a building, they remain independent structuresthat are not an integral part of the building and, therefore, do not constitute an “engine room” asused in NFPA 37. These purpose designed structures / packages may provide any of, but arenot limited to, the following functions:

(1) Environmental protection

(2) Noise containment

(3) Fire protection

(4) Heat rejection / ventilation

(5) Human protection

(6) Hazardous area classification

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This expanded discussion for the term “enclosure” a) recognizes and details the current variety of installations for gensets and turbines, and b) provides clarity on the subject to users of NFPA 37.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016[Section No. 4.3]

Provides an updated discussion of "enclosur" asused in Public Comment 15

Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 37-2016[Section No. B.1.2.9]

Related Item

First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner

Organization: GE Power & Water

Street Address:

City:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

24 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 26 of 32

Page 27: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:31:28 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-7-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: The revised definition and expanded discussion for the term “enclosure” recognizesand details the current variety of installations for gensets and

turbines, and provides clarity on the subject to users of NFPA 37.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

25 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 27 of 32

Page 28: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 12-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. A.4.1.4.1.2(2) ]

A.4.1.4.1.2(2)

The calculation procedure procedures in Chapter 10 of NFPA 555 is contain a proceduresimilar to the “Radiant Ignition of a Near Fuel” algorithm in NIST’s Fire Protection EngineeringTools for Hazard Estimation (FPETool) for calculating ignition from a nearby fire. It is a sound,engineering-based method of predicting the risk radiative ignition of ignition from a fire amaterial not in direct contact with a flame .

The values in 4.1.4 and the reference to the NFPA 555 calculation method are the result of thecalculations presented to the technical committee in 1996. The calculations treated an enginefire as a vertical cylinder. The values in 4.1.4 changed somewhat in the 1998 edition of NFPA37 based on those calculations. They are reasonably consistent with the requirements of theBuilding Officials and Code Administrators (BOCA) National Building Code, which was in effectat the time. The committee wanted to include a performance alternative in NFPA 37. Thereference in this annex section to the NFPA 555 method provides guidance on how to evaluateproposed alternatives.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I fully support the concept in this annex note. The proposed change is basically editorial. Chapter 10 of NFPA 555 contains more than one procedure for evaluating radiative ignition. The procedures do not address risk but hazard, which is the potential for harm. The charging paragraph of Chapter 10 of NFPA 555 is shown below.

10.1 Methods/Tools. A set of analytical methods or tools is needed to provide a means for performing the evaluations embodied by the definitions in Section 8.3. In particular, methods are needed to predict the heating to ignition of materials contained within a fuel package as well as the radiative heat transfer to the material from other fuel packages or the hot gas layer. This chapter focuses on the radiative ignition of a material not in direct contact with a flame.

Related Item

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4]

First Revision No. 23-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. A.4.1.4(2)]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 11 19:22:21 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

26 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 28 of 32

Page 29: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-16-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: This section was revised to be consistent with section 4.1.3. If a calculation procedureis used, it must be acceptable to the AHJ, so these do not need to be specified here.Although calculations may have some limitations, they provide an alternative toperforming full scale fire tests.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

27 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 29 of 32

Page 30: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. A.5.1 ]

A.5.1

Gaseous-fueled engines are those engines in which the fuel supply is delivered to the engine invapor form, including, but not limited to, the following:

(1) Natural gas

(2) Compressed natural gas (CNG)

(3) Propane

(4) LP-Gas

(5) Mixed gas

(6) Manufactured gas and syngas

(7) Biogas (e.g., landfill and digester gas) (for biogas applications, see CSA B149.6-15, Codefor Digester Gas and Landfill Gas Installations for Piping Materials and Practices)

Liquefied natural gas (LNG), for the purpose of Chapter 5, can be considered a gaseous fuelfor engines.

Piping systems supplying gaseous fuels should be designed to minimize piping failure. Severalexamples of methods for minimizing piping failure are as follows:

(1) Welded pipe joints should be used where practical. Threaded couplings and bolted flangesshould be assembled in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements.

(2) If rigid metal piping is used, it should be designed to deflect with the engine in anydirection. Properly designed flexible connectors are an alternative in high-vibration areas,such as between rigid pipe supply lines and manifolds or other points of connection to theengine.

(3) Rigid piping connected directly to the engine should be supported so that failures will notoccur due to the natural frequency of the piping coinciding with the rotational speed of theengine. Care should be taken in the design of pipe supports to avoid vibrations.

For guidance on the evacuation/purging, charging, and commissioning of the combustible gassupply in the piping upstream of the equipment isolation valve, refer to NFPA 56.

During commissioning, the gas train should be inspected for leaks . Typically, inspection andleak tests of a gas train is performed at a pressure not less than their normal operatingpressure using the test method detailed in NFPA 54.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Leak testing of a gas piping system is detailed in NFPA 54. I suggest we have some recommendation in the Annex about using NFPA 54 as the method to test a gas train for external tightness.

Related Item

Public Input No. 23-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 5.1.1]

Submitter Information Verification

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

28 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 30 of 32

Page 31: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle

Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Apr 08 16:56:22 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The committee recognizes that additional clarity might be needed with respect tocommissioning of gas trains. However, this is new material and the committee willaddress this in the next revision cycle.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

29 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 31 of 32

Page 32: Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment...Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply

Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. B.1.2.9 ]

B.1.2.9 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

UL 2080, Fire Resistant Tanks for Flammable and Combustible Liquids, 2000.

UL 2085, Protected Aboveground Tanks for Flammable and Combustible Liquids, 1997, revised2010.

UL2200, Standard for Safety, Stationary Engine Generator Assemblies, 2012, revised 2015

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Added UL 2200 since this document was referenced in the expanded Annex A.3.3.2 discussion.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 37-2016 [SectionNo. A.3.3.2]

Reference made to UL 2200 in PublicComment 18

Related Item

First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner

Organization: GE Power & Water

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:40:08 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-11-NFPA 37-2016

Statement: The reference to UL 2200 is added because this document is referenced in theexpanded Annex A.3.3.2 discussion.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

30 of 30 11/4/2016 3:05 PM

NFPA 37 Public Comment Responses Page 32 of 32


Recommended