+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright...

Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright...

Date post: 19-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: jeremy-robertson
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
23
Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com) Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling Video Series
Transcript
Page 1: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles

Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com)

Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Forensic DNA Profiling Video Series

Page 2: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

DNA statistics

• Coincidental 13 locus DNA profile matches are exceedingly rare

• Several factors can make statistics less impressive– Mixtures– Incomplete information– Relatives

Page 3: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

DNA profile

Page 4: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Comparing electropherograms

Evidence sample Suspect #1’s reference

EXCLUDEEXCLUDE

Page 5: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Comparing electropherograms

Evidence sample Suspect #2’s reference

CANNOT EXCLUDECANNOT EXCLUDE

Page 6: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

What weight should be given to DNA evidence?

Statistics do not lie.

But, you have to pay close attention to the questions they are addressing.

Page 7: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

What weight should be given to DNA evidence?

Statistics do not lie.

But, you have to pay close attention to the questions they are addressing.

RMP: The chance that a randomly chosen, unrelated individual from a given population would have the same DNA profile observed in a sample.

Page 8: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Single source samples

Formulae for RMP:

At a locus:Heterozygotes:Homozygotes:

Multiply across all loci

p2

Statistical estimates: the product rule2pq 2pq 2pq 2pq

2pq 2pq 2pq 2pq

2pq 2pq

2pq 2pq

2pqp2 p2

p2

x x x x

x x x x

x x x x

x

x

Page 9: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

0.1454 x 0.1097 x 2

Statistical estimates: the product rule

Page 10: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

3.2% 6.0% 4.6% 1.2%

9.8% 9.5% 6.3% 2.2% 1.0%

2.9% 5.1% 29.9% 4.0%

1.1% 6.6%

X X X X

XXXXX

X X X X

X

Statistical estimates: the product rule

1 in 609,000,000,000,000,000,000

1 in 609 quintillion

= 0.0320.1454 0.1097 2x x

Page 11: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Two underlying assumptions of the product rule:

• The events being evaluated are independent– In this context, the events are the

observation of specific alleles

• The frequencies of the events are known– In this context, at what frequency does

each allele occur?

Page 12: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Population genetics: testing for independence

• Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)– A test of the independence of alleles

within a locus

• Linkage equilibrium– A test of the independence of alleles

between loci

Page 13: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

DNA profile

Page 14: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

DNA statistics

• Coincidental 13 locus DNA profile matches are exceedingly rare

• Corrections can be made for population substructure

• RMP statistics described in terms of quintillions are common

Page 15: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Two underlying assumptions of the product rule:

• The events being evaluated are independent– In this context, the events are the

observation of specific alleles

• The frequencies of the events are known– In this context, at what frequency does

each allele occur?

Page 16: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

What weight should be given to DNA evidence?

Statistics do not lie.

But, you have to pay close attention to the questions they are addressing.

RMP: The chance that a randomly chosen, unrelated individual from a given population would have the same DNA profile observed in a sample.

Page 17: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

What is the relevant population?

1 in 609 quintillion

Page 18: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Popular vote in 2008 by county. McCain won red counties, Obama won blue counties.

How would you determine the frequency of Obama supporters in North Carolina?

Obama

N.C. 50.2%

Page 19: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Popular vote in 2008 by county. McCain won red counties, Obama won blue counties.

How would you determine the frequency of Obama supporters in North Carolina?

Obama

N.C. 50.2%

Region 59.6%

Page 20: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Popular vote in 2008 by county. McCain won red counties, Obama won blue counties.

How would you determine the frequency of Obama supporters in North Carolina?

Obama

N.C. 50.2%

Region 59.6%

U.S. 52.9%

Page 21: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Popular vote in 2008 by county. McCain won red counties, Obama won blue counties.

How would you determine the frequency of Obama supporters in North Carolina?

Obama

N.C. 50.2%

Region 59.6%

U.S. 52.9%

Utah? 35.5%

?

Page 22: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

DNA statistics

• Coincidental 13 locus DNA profile matches are exceedingly rare

• Several factors can make statistics less impressive– Mixtures– Incomplete information– Relatives

Page 23: Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.

Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles

Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com)

Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Forensic DNA Profiling Video Series


Recommended