+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Strategic Partnership Relationship

Strategic Partnership Relationship

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: jontwa-ahombile-mwasimba
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 25

Transcript
  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    1/25

    Strategic Partnering in

    Supply Chain Management

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    2/25

    Points Illustrated in ADS Case

    Pressure for VMI

    Need for POS for VMI

    Pressure for direct shipment (to retailers)

    General increase in ADS shipping costs (no

    coherent shipping strategy)

    Future of audio duplication industry

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    3/25

    Ways to Implement Logistics

    1. Internal activities

    2. Acquisitions

    3. Arms-length transactions (short-term and

    most common)

    4. Strategic alliance (long-term; focus of the

    chapter)

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    4/25

    Which SA Approach is for You?

    Consider the following points

    Does the SA add value to products?

    Does the SA improve your market access?

    Does the SA strengthen your operations?

    Does the SA enhance your technological strength?

    Does the SA enhance your strategic growth?

    Does the SA help build up your financial strength? Will the SA weaken you core competencies

    (strengths)?

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    5/25

    Types of Strategic Alliances

    1. Third-Party Logistics (3PL)

    2. Retailer-Supplier Partnership (RSP)

    3. Distribution Integration (DI)

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    6/25

    3PL Traditional outsourcing characteristics:

    Transaction based relationships

    Single-function providers

    3PL Characteristics: Long-term relationships Multi-function providers

    Mostly prevalent among large firms

    Advantages and disadvantage of 3PL Allows firms to focus on their core competencies

    Provides technological flexibility

    Provides other flexibility

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    7/25

    Advantages & Disadvantages of 3PL

    Advantages:

    Allows firms to focus on their core competencies

    Provides technological flexibility Provides other flexibility

    Disadvantages:

    Loss of control

    Potential conflict with core competencies if logistics is

    one of firms competencies

    Potential new competitor

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    8/25

    3PL Selection Issues

    Know your costs

    Customer orientation of the 3PL (toward the

    hiring firm). This is cited as the most

    important factor

    Specialization of the 3PL

    Asset-Owning vs. Non-Asset Owning 3PL

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    9/25

    Important SP Issues Inventory ownership:

    Supplier owns the goods until they are sold

    Retailer owns the goods

    Performance measures: Fill rate, inventory level,

    inventory turns

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    10/25

    Important SP Issues

    Confidentiality

    Communication and cooperation When First Brands started partnering with Kmart,

    Kmart often claimed that its supplier was not livingup to its agreement to keep two weeks of inventory

    at all times. It turned out that this was due to thefact that the two companies employed differentforecasting methods.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    11/25

    RSP Continuum

    Refer to Page 137, Table 6.1

    Quick Response VMIContinuous

    Replenishment

    Advanced

    Continuous

    Replenishment

    Consignment Information

    Sharing

    Level of trust and cooperationLow High

    Ownership of Inventory

    Firm Supplier

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    12/25

    Main Characteristics of SP

    CriteriaTypes DecisionMaker InventoryOwnership New SkillsEmployed by vendors

    Quick

    Response

    Retailer Retailer Forecasting Skills

    ContinuousReplenishme

    nt

    ContractuallyAgreed to Levels EitherParty Forecasting &Inventory Control

    Advanced

    Continuous

    Replenishme

    nt

    Contractually

    agreed to &

    Continuously

    Improved Levels

    Either

    Party

    Forecasting &

    Inventory Control

    VMI Vendor Either

    Party

    Retail

    Management

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    13/25

    Strategic Partnering

    Quick Response: Vendors receive POS data from retailers,

    and use this information to synchronize production and

    inventory activities at the supplier. In this strategy, the

    retailer still prepares individual orders, but the POS data isused by the supplier to improve forecasting and scheduling.

    Milliken and Company: The lead time from order

    receipt at Millikens textile plants to final clothing

    receipt at several of the department stores involved wasreduced from eighteen weeks down to three weeks.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    14/25

    Strategic Partnering

    Continuous Replenishment: Vendors receive POS data

    and use it prepare shipments at previously agreed upon

    intervals to maintain agreed to levels of inventory.

    Wal-Mart, Kmart

    Advanced Continuous Replenishment: Suppliers may

    gradually decrease inventory levels at the retailers store or

    distribution center as long as service levels are met.

    Inventory levels are thus continuously improved in a

    structured way.

    Kmart

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    15/25

    Strategic Partnering

    Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI):JITD

    VMI Projects at Dillard Department Stores, J.C.

    Penney, and Wal-Mart have shown sales increases

    of 20 to 25 percent, and 30 percent inventory

    turnover improvements.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    16/25

    Requirements of RSP

    Advanced Information Technology (the

    most important)

    Top management commitment

    Trust (Remember Barilla SPA)

    Which is the easiest to acquire?

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    17/25

    Steps in RSP Implementation

    Contractual agreement

    Ownership

    Credit terms

    Ordering responsibilities

    Other

    Establish IT

    Establish effective forecasting techniques Develop coordinating tools for managing

    inventory and transportation

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    18/25

    Steps in SP Implementation

    Contractual negotiations

    Ownership

    Credit terms

    Ordering decisions

    Performance measures

    Develop or integrate information systems

    Develop effective forecasting techniques

    Develop a tactical decision support tool to assist incoordinating inventory management and transportation policies

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    19/25

    Advantages and Disadvantages of SP

    Advantages

    Fully utilize system knowledge

    Consider the partnership between White-Hall

    Robbins (W-R), who makes over-the-counter drugs

    such as Advil, and Kmart. W-R initially disagreed

    with Kmart about forecasts, and in this case, it

    turned out that W-R forecasts were more accuratebecause they have a much more extensive

    knowledge of their products than Kmart does.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    20/25

    Advantages and Disadvantages of SP

    Advantages (continued)

    Decrease required inventory levels

    Improve service levels

    Decrease work duplication

    Improve forecasts

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    21/25

    Advantages and Disadvantages of SP

    Challenges:

    Expensive advanced technology is required

    Supplier/retailer trust must be developed.

    Supplier responsibility increases.

    Expenses at the supplier often increase.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    22/25

    Examples of SP Successes and Failures

    Western Publishing-Golden Books:

    Western Publishing is using VMI for its Golden Books line ofchildrens books at several retailers.

    POS data automatically triggers re-orders when inventory falls

    below a reorder point. This inventory is delivered either to a distribution center, or in

    many cases, directly to the store.

    Ownership of the books shifts to the retailer once deliveries havebeen made.

    In the case of Toys R Us, the company has even managed theentire book section for the retailer, including inventory fromsuppliers other than Western Publishing.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    23/25

    Examples of SP Successes and Failures

    VF Corporations Market Response System:

    The VF Corporation, which has many well known brand names

    (including Wrangler, Lee, Girbaud, and many others), began its

    VMI program in 1989.

    Currently, about 40 percent of its production is handled using some

    type of automatic replenishment scheme.

    This is particularly notable because the program encompasses 350

    different retailers, 40,000 store locations, and more than 15 million

    replenishment levels.

    VFs program is considered one of the most successful in the

    apparel industry.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    24/25

    Examples of SP Successes and Failures

    Spartan Stores

    Spartan Stores, a grocery chain, shut down its VMIeffort about one year after its inception

    One problem was that buyers were not spending anyless time on reorders than they did before

    This was because they didnt trust the suppliersenough to be able to stop carefully monitoring theinventories and deliveries of the VMI items, andintervening at the slightest hint of trouble.

  • 8/2/2019 Strategic Partnership Relationship

    25/25

    Examples of SP Successes and Failures

    Spartan Stores (continued)

    Furthermore, the suppliers didnt do much to allay

    these fears. The problems were not with the suppliers

    forecasts; instead, they were due to the suppliersinability to deal with promotions, which are a key part

    of the grocery business.

    Since they were unable to appropriately account for

    promotions, delivery levels were often unacceptably

    low during these periods of peak demand.


Recommended