Sydney Light Rail Projectdata.sydneylightrail.transport.nsw.gov.au/s3fs-public/CONSTRUCTIO… ·...

Sydney Light Rail Project

Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statement Works

Rozelle Stabling Yard

Report Number 610.14954 CNVIS R5

23 June 2016

Acciona Infrastructure Australia Pty Ltd

Level 7, 280 Elizabeth Street

SURRY HILLS NSW 2010

Version: Revision 0



Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statement Works Rozelle Stabling Yard


23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 2

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd


Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statement Works

Rozelle Stabling Yard

PREPARED BY:

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd ABN 29 001 584 612

2 Lincoln Street

Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia

(PO Box 176 Lane Cove NSW 1595 Australia)

T: +61 2 9427 8100 F: +61 2 9427 8200

[email protected] www.slrconsulting.com

This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the

timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with the Client.

Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected,

which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid.

This report is for the exclusive use of Acciona Infrastructure Australia Pty Ltd.

No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties.

This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from SLR.

SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work.

DOCUMENT CONTROL

Reference Status Date Prepared Checked Authorised

610.14954 CNVIS R5 Revision 0 23 June 2016 Ryan Wakeling Mark Blake Mark Blake





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 3

Table of Contents


1 INTRODUCTION 5

2 CONSTRUCTION WORKS 6

2.1 Conditions of Approval 11

2.2 Construction Hours 12

3 NOISE AND VIBRATION CRITERIA 13

3.1 Construction Noise 13

3.1.1 Noise Management Levels 13

3.1.2 Other Sensitive Land Uses 14

3.1.3 Sleep Disturbance 14

3.1.4 Standard Mitigation Measures - Construction Noise Strategy 15

3.1.5 Additional Mitigation Measures 15

3.2 Construction Vibration 16

3.3 Construction Traffic Noise Assessment 18

4 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ASSESSMENT 18

4.1 Equipment Sound Power Levels 18

4.2 Correction Factors 19

4.3 Construction Noise Assessment 19

4.3.1 Discussion 20

4.3.2 Cumulative Noise Impacts 21

4.3.3 Highly Noise Affected Receivers 21

5 MITIGATION MEASURES AND WORK PRACTICES 21

5.1 Restricting Works 23

5.1.1 Respite Periods 23

5.1.2 Alternative Construction Methodology 23

5.2 On-Site Noise Controls 23

5.3 Noise Auditing and Reporting 23

5.4 Offsite Noise Mitigation Measures 24

5.4.1 Permanent Offsite Mitigation 24

5.4.2 Temporary Offsite Mitigation 24

5.5 Vibration Management and Monitoring 24

6 CONCLUSION 25

6.1 Noise Assessment 26

6.2 Vibration Assessment 26

6.3 Noise and Vibration Management 26





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 4

Table of Contents


TABLES

Table 1 Construction Tasks 8 Table 2 Noise Management Levels for Residential Receptors 14 Table 3 Noise Management Levels for Other Sensitive Receptors 14 Table 4 Site Control Vibration Criteria 16 Table 5 Recommended Safe Working Distances for Vibration Intensive Plant 16 Table 6 Summary of Worst-case Construction Noise Predictions per Task (dBA) 20 Table 7 Mitigation Measures Matrix - Airborne Construction Noise 22 Table 8 Additional Mitigation Measures Matrix - Ground-borne Vibration 25

FIGURES

Figure 1 Construction Site Area 5 Figure 2 Construction Program Outline 7 Figure 3 Noise Catchment Areas 13 Figure 4 Sound Pressure Level vs Distance 20

APPENDICES

Appendix A Acoustic Terminology Appendix B Sound Power Level Data Appendix C Worst-Case Noise Level Predictions Appendix D Predicted Noise Level Map Appendix E Noise Management Map





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 5


1 INTRODUCTION

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (SLR Consulting) has been tasked by Acciona Infrastructure Australia Pty Ltd (ACCIONA) to assess the potential noise and vibration impacts from construction works which are proposed to be undertaken as part of the CBD and South East Light Rail project (‘the CSELR’).

The CSELR proposal will comprise the construction and operation of a light rail service from Circular Quay to Kingsford and Randwick. The key features of the proposal include approximately 12 km of new light rail track from Circular Quay to Central and Kingsford and Randwick via Surry Hills and Moore Park.

This report assesses potential noise impacts of the proposed construction works to be undertaken at the Rozelle Stabling Yard.

Figure 1 shows the site area of the Rozelle Stabling Yard.

A detailed description of the acoustic terminology used within this report is presented within Appendix A.

Figure 1 Construction Site Area





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 6


2 CONSTRUCTION WORKS

Proposed construction works associated with the CSELR Rozelle Stabling Yard consists of 10 primary tasks. The proposed construction tasks are as follows:

Site establishment

Tree and vegetation removal

Demolition of buildings and yard slabs

Utilities works

Site remediation and bulk earthworks

Piling

Civil construction of retaining walls, pit and pipe service installations, stormwater, landscaping, culverts, hardstands

Track works

Building works

Roads and carpark

Figure 2 illustrates the timing of each task to be undertaken, while Table 1 contains the details of the

various tasks which are required to complete the proposed construction works. Sound Power Level (SWL) data for individual plant and equipment items is contained in Appendix B.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 7


Figure 2 Construction Program Outline





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 8


Table 1 Construction Tasks

Task Ref.

Task Equipment

1 Site establishment Franna - 25t

Generator 20 kVa

Diesel Air compressor 250-600cfm (w/blower)

Gerni

Manitou

Light vehicle

Hiab truck

Tilt tray truck

Road saw

Vac truck

Semi trailer

Water truck

Fork lift

Sweeper truck

Rattle-guns

2 Tree and vegetation removal Excavator - 14t with grabs

Chainsaws

Truck and chipper

Positrak with mulcher

3 Demolition of buildings and yard slabs

Excavator - 30t with grabs

Trucks

Excavator - 20t with grabs

30t Excavator with hammer

Concrete crusher

4 Utilities works Vac Trucks

Excavator - 20t with bucket

Concrete trucks

Mini-roller

5 Site remediation and Bulk earthworks Front end loader

20 t Excavator

Semi trucks

Truck & Dogs

Dozer D6

Forklift

30t Excavator

Bogies

Grinders /welding gear/ oxy

6 Piling 30t Piling Rig (Bored piles with casing)

20t Excavator

Grinders & welding gear

Semi trucks





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 9


Task Ref.

Task Equipment

Concrete Trucks

7 Civil construction of retaining walls, pit and pipe service installations, stormwater, landscaping, culverts, hardstands

Franna - 25t

Generator 20 kVa

Manitou

Light vehicles

Hiab truck

Tilt tray

Vac Truck

Semi trailer

Water truck

Fork lift

Concrete boom pump 30m

Concrete trucks

Dump trucks

Bogies

Mini-roller

smooth drum roller

Vibe-plate

Concrete vibrators

Excavator - 20t

Excavator - 30t


Rattle-guns

80t all terrain crane

Gerni

8 Track works Float truck

Truck and trailer

20t hi-rail diggers

Loader

Hiab truck

Semi trailer


Loaders

Hi-rail excavator 20t

LPG Burners

Large Generator (350kVa)

Rail Grinder (5hp)

Power Saws

Concrete trucks

Concrete pump - medium size (30m boom)

Vibro-screeds

Concrete Vibrators





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 10


Task Ref.

Task Equipment

20kVa Generators

Asphalt Paver - 3m wide

Smooth Drum Roller

Slipform Concrete Paver

Water truck

Vac truck

Sweeper truck


Daymaker - Light tower

Gerni

9 Building works Light vehicles

Sweeper truck

Water truck

Vac truck

Scissorlifts / Boom Lifts (up to 20m)

Knuckle boom

Franna - 25t

Manitou

Fork lift

Tilt tray truck

Semi trailer with formwork

Hiab truck

Mini-Excavator - 5t with bucket

Mini-Excavator - 8t with hammer

20t Excavator - with auger

Bogie truck

Road saw/concrete saw

20 kVa generators

Concrete trucks


Concrete vibrators


Mini-roller

rattle gun

Vibe-plate

10 Roads and carpark Light vehicles

Sweeper truck

Water truck

Vac truck

Diesel Air compressor 250-600cfm (w/ blower attachment)

Gerni





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 11


Task Ref.

Task Equipment

Franna - 25t

Manitou

Fork lift

Tilt tray truck

Semi trailer

Hiab truck

Mini-Excavator - 5t with bucket

Mini-Excavator - 8t with hammer

20t Excavator - with auger

Bogie truck

Road saw/concrete saw

20 kVa generators

Concrete trucks


Concrete vibrators


Mini-roller

Vibe-plate

Scissorlifts / Boom Lifts (up to 20m)

Daymaker - Light tower

Grout mixer

Asphalt Paver - 3m wide

Smooth Drum Roller

Line marking truck

When referencing the above methodology it should be noted that this indicative set of construction scenarios represents one option of a number of alternatives in which the works sequence may proceed.

2.1 Conditions of Approval

The conditions in the Infrastructure Approval (under Section 1152B of the Environmental Planning Act 1979, Application No: SSI-6042) relevant to this CNVIS state:

B2. With the exception of the CBD precinct, the Applicant shall only undertake construction works associated with the SSI during the following hours: (a) 6.00am to 6.00pm, Mondays to Fridays inclusive; (b) 8.00am to 5.00pm on Saturdays; and (c) at no time on Sundays or public holidays.

B4. Notwithstanding conditions B2 and B3, construction works associated with the SSI may be undertaken outside the hours specified under that condition in the following circumstances: (a) Construction that causes LAeq(minute) noise levels that are:

(i) no more than 5 dB above rating background level at any residence in accordance with the lnterim Construction Noise Guideline (DECC, 2009); and

(ii) no more than the noise management levels specified in Table 3 of the Interim Construction Noise Guideline (DECC, 2009) at other sensitive land uses.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 12


(b) For the delivery of materials required by the police or other authorities for safety reasons; or

(c) When directed by the Transport Management Centre. ln these circumstances, mitigation and management measures detailed in the OOHW protocol shall apply; or

(d) Where it is required in an emergency to avoid the loss of lives, property and/or to prevent environmental harm; or

(e) Works approved through an out-of-hours work protocol prepared as part of the Construction Noise Management Plan required by condition B89, provided the relevant Council, local residents and other affected stakeholders and sensitive receivers are informed of the timing and duration at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of the work; or

(f) Works approved through an Environment Protection Licence, including for works identified in an out of hours works protocol.

B5. The Proponent shall prepare specific Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statements in consultation with relevant government agencies, and the Community and Business Reference Groups for specific stages of construction consistent with the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan required by condition B89. Each Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statement shall specifically address each of the major construction sites and shall include but not be limited to: (a) A description of the proposed activities; (b) Predicted noise and vibration levels; (c) Examination of alternative methods of construction that would potentially reduce

noise and vibration if it the potential noise and vibration exceeds the relevant criteria;

(d) Description and commitment to work practices which limit noise and vibration; (e) Description of specific noise and vibration mitigation treatments and time restrictions,

including respite periods, duration, and frequency (where possible, programming of night works over consecutive nights that impact sensitive receivers in the same locality shall be avoided);

(f) Justification for any activities to be undertaken outside the specified construction hours specified in condition B2, B3, and B7;

(g) Internal noise audit systems including recording of daily hours of construction, progressive impact assessments as work proceeds, conducting informal checks by the Environmental Representative, providing active and communication links to relevant Councils and surrounding residents and sensitive receivers;

(h) Assessment of potential noise from the proposed construction methods including noise from construction vehicles and noise impacts from required traffic diversions;

(i) Community consultation and notification; (j) All reasonable and feasible measures including adopting the least noisy available

construction methods, systems and equipment; (k) Assessment and examination of reasonable and feasible offsite mitigation; and (l) Additional noise and vibration mitigation measures as negotiated with affected

residents and other sensitive receivers.

2.2 Construction Hours

As per Construction Condition B2, the approved construction hours for works undertaken within the Rozelle Stabling Yard are:

6.00 am to 6.00 pm, Mondays to Fridays inclusive;

8.00 am to 5.00 pm on Saturdays; and

at no time on Sundays or public holidays.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 13


Construction noise and vibration has been assessed in accordance with the procedures determined in the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP) for daytime and night-time periods. As such, the daytime, evening and night-time periods as they apply to the approved construction hours are as follows:

Night-time - 6.00 am to 7.00 am

Daytime - 7.00 am to 6.00 pm

Evening - Not Applicable

At this stage, all noise and vibration intensive works would be undertaken during the daytime period (7.00 am to 6.00 pm).

Construction works which are required to be undertake outside of the approved construction hours will be assessed within the respective Out of Hours Works CNVIS (OoHW CNVIS) and have therefore not been assessed within this CNVIS. It is currently anticipated that some sewer connection works would be required to be undertaken outside of the approved construction hours due to lower flow rates during the night-time period. In addition, dewatering maybe required on site occasionally, including the use of a dewatering pump and generator during out of hours periods.

3 NOISE AND VIBRATION CRITERIA

3.1 Construction Noise

3.1.1 Noise Management Levels

The LAeq(15minute) Noise Management Levels (NMLs) for the project area have been determined in the CNVMP for daytime, and night-time periods at the relevant sensitive receivers for these works.

The NMLs which are relevant to the Noise Catchment Areas (NCAs, refer to Figure 3) for the proposed works are detailed in Table 2. The CNVMP also nominates sleep disturbance screening criteria which are also presented in Table 2.

Figure 3 Noise Catchment Areas

Note 1: Source - CBD and South East Light Rail Project Environmental Impact Statement Technical Paper 11.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 14


Table 2 Noise Management Levels for Residential Receptors

Precinct NCA NML LAeq(15minute) (dBA) Sleep Disturbance Screening Criteria LA1 (1 minute)

Daytime Night

Rozelle Stabling

NCA06.1 66 52 62

NCA06.2 59 47 57

3.1.2 Other Sensitive Land Uses

The project specific LAeq(15minute) NMLs for other non-residential noise sensitive receptors from the CNVMP are provided in Table 3.

Table 3 Noise Management Levels for Other Sensitive Receptors

Land Use Area NML LAeq(15minute) Noise Levels

External Internal

Hotel Bars and Lounges 70 dBA 50 (Daytime & Evening)

Sleeping Areas: - Hotels near major roads

As per Table 2

for residential

40 (Night-time)

Café Coffee bar 70 dBA

50 (when in use)

Bar/Restaurant Bars and Lounges / Restaurant

70 dBA

50(when in use)

Library Reading Areas 70 dBA 45(when in use)

Recording Studio Music Recording Studios 70 dBA 25(when in use)

Theatre/ Auditorium Drama Theatres 70 dBA 30(when in use)

Childcare Centres Internal Play Area 65 dBA 55 dBA

Sleeping Area 50 dBA (when in use) 40 dBA (when in use)

Classrooms at schools and other education institutions 55 dBA 45 dBA (when in use)

Hospital wards and operating theatres 70 dBA 45 dBA

Places of Worship 70 dBA 45 dBA

Active recreation areas 65 dBA

Passive recreation areas 60 dBA

Community centres Depends on the intended use of the centre. Refer to the recommended ‘maximum’ internal levels in AS 2107 for specific uses.

Commercial premises offices, retail outlets and small commercial premises

70 dBA (when in use)

Industrial premises 75 dBA (when in use)

3.1.3 Sleep Disturbance

The most recent guidance in relation to sleep disturbance is contained in the EPA’s Application Notes - NSW Industrial Noise Policy, 2000. The pertinent section of the Application Notes states the following:

“DECC[W] reviewed research on sleep disturbance in the NSW Environmental Criteria for Road Traffic Noise (ECRTN) (EPA, 1999). This review concluded that the range of results is sufficiently diverse that it was not reasonable to issue new noise criteria for sleep disturbance.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 15


From the research, DECC[W] recognised that current sleep disturbance criterion of an LA1, (1 minute) not exceeding the LA90, (15 minute) by more than 15 dBA is not ideal. Nevertheless, as there is insufficient evidence to determine what should replace it, DECC[W] will continue to use it as a guide to identify the likelihood of sleep disturbance. This means that where the criterion is met, sleep disturbance is not likely, but where it is not met, a more detailed analysis is required.

The detailed analysis should cover the maximum noise level or LA1, (1 minute), that is, the extent to which the maximum noise level exceeds the background level and the number of times this happens during the night-time period. Some guidance on possible impact is contained in the review of research results in the appendices to the ECRTN. Other factors that may be important in assessing the extent of impacts on sleep include:

How often high noise events will occur.

Time of day (normally between 10pm and 7am).

Whether there are times of day when there is a clear change in the noise environment (such as during early morning shoulder periods).

The LA1, (1 minute) descriptor is meant to represent a maximum noise level measured under “fast” time response. DECC[W] will accept analysis based on either LA1, (1 minute) or LAmax”

For the purposes of this assessment, the following night-time sleep disturbance noise goal has been used:

Night-time LA1 (1 minute) RBL +15 dB “screening criterion”

The term “screening criterion” indicates a noise level that is intended as a guide to identify the likelihood of sleep disturbance. It is not a firm criteria to be met, however where the criterion is met sleep disturbance is not likely. When the screening criterion is not met, a more detailed analysis is required.

The detailed analysis should assess the maximum noise level or LA1(1minute), the extent that the maximum noise level exceeds the background noise level and the number of times any exceedance occurs during the night-time period.

3.1.4 Standard Mitigation Measures - Construction Noise Strategy

Section 5.6 of the CNVMP identifies standard mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction of the project based on guidance provided in TfNSW’s Construction Noise Strategy (Transport Projects) (CNS) practical guidance on how to minimise the potential construction noise impacts on the community during the construction of the project.

Examples of standard mitigation measures include community consultation, site inductions, monitoring, appropriate equipment selection, non-tonal reversing alarms and respite periods.

3.1.5 Additional Mitigation Measures

If exceedances of the objectives occur after implementation of all standard mitigation measures, then additional noise mitigation measures are to be investigated and applied.

Where appropriate, additional mitigation measures are presented in Section 5.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 16


3.2 Construction Vibration

Section 8 of the CNVMP nominates relevant vibration criteria in relation to both Structural Damage

and Human Response. Medical and educational facilities, which may operate potentially vibration sensitive equipment, will be sent a letter providing them with the opportunity to identify their equipment. All responses would be assessed on a case-by-case basis, and appropriate vibration criteria nominated. Correspondence with the relevant stakeholders would take place in accordance with the Stakeholder and Community Engagement Plan.

Based on information presented in the CNVMP, relevant site control vibration criteria have been recommended are reproduced in Table 4.

Table 4 Site Control Vibration Criteria

Receiver Type Operator Warning Level Operator Halt Level

Reinforced Structures including Commercial, Industrial and Apartment Towers

1

15 mm/s PPV 20 mm/s PPV

Light-Framed/Unreinforced Structures including Dwellings and Buildings of Similar Design

1

4 mm/s PPV 5 mm/s PPV

Heritage Structures1 2 mm/s PPV 3 mm/s PPV

Human Response2 0.2 m/s

1.75 VDV

0.4 m/s

1.75 VDV

Vibration Sensitive Equipment3 0.013 mm/s PPV 0.018 mm/s PPV

Note 1: Based on information presented in DIN 4150.3 - 1999.

Note 2: Based on information presented in DECCW’s Assessing Vibration: a technical guideline.

Note 3: Based on equipment specifications provided by the Prince of Wales Hospital NCCC and AATC and Generic

Vibration Criteria for Vibration-Sensitive Equipment (SPIE 1991).

Whilst vibration may be generated during scenarios which require the use of a vibratory roller or hydraulic hammer, the separation distance from those activities to the nearest receivers is likely to be sufficient to mitigate potential impacts. Care should however be taken when vibratory rolling or hydraulic hammering is required to be used in close proximity to potentially sensitive buildings. Table 5 presents the recommended safe working distances for the proposed construction plant and equipment presented in Table 1. Provided that each item of plant and equipment is operated outside

of the minimum working distances presented for each structure type, it is predicted that compliance with the relevant vibration goals presented in Section 8 of the CNVMP will be achieved.

Table 5 Recommended Safe Working Distances for Vibration Intensive Plant

Plant Item Safe Working Distance (m)


1


1

Heritage Structures

1

Human Response

2

20 kVa generators 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

20t Excavator - with auger 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

20t hi-rail diggers 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

30t Excavator 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

30t Excavator with hammer 1.0 5.0 8.0 5.0

30t Piling Rig (Bored piles with casing) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

80t all terrain crane 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

Asphalt Paver - 3m wide 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 17




1


1

Heritage Structures

1

Human Response

2

Bogie truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Chainsaw 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Concrete crusher 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Concrete pump - medium size (30m boom) 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

Concrete Trucks 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Concrete vibrators 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Daymaker - Light tower 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

Diesel Air compressor 250-600cfm (w/blower) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Dozer D6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Dump trucks 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Excavator - 14t with grabs 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Excavator - 20t with bucket 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1



Float truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Forklift 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Franna - 25t 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Front end loader 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Gerni 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

Grinders & welding gear 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Grout mixer 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

Hiab truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Knuckle boom 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Large Generator (350kVa) 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

Light vehicle 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Line marking truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

LPG Burners 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Manitou 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Mini-Excavator - 5t with bucket 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Mini-Excavator - 8t with hammer 0.3 0.5 1.5 0.5

Mini-roller 0.5 1.0 4.0 1.0

Positrak with mulcher 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0

Power Saws 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Rail Grinder (5hp) 0.1 0.5 2.0 0.5

Rattle-guns 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.3

Road saw/concrete saw 0.1 0.5 2.0 0.5





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 18




1


1

Heritage Structures

1

Human Response

2

Scissorlifts / Boom Lifts (up to 20m) 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Semi trailer 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Slipform Concrete Paver 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

smooth drum roller 1.0 10.0 20.0 10.0

Sweeper truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Tilt tray truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Truck & Dogs 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Truck and chipper 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Vac Trucks 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Vibe-plate 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Vibro-screeds 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Water truck 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.3

Note 1: Based on information presented in DIN 4150.3 - 1999.

Note 2: Based on information presented in DECCW’s Assessing Vibration: a technical guideline.

3.3 Construction Traffic Noise Assessment

It is understood that the additional heavy construction vehicle movements on public roads will be predominantly required during daytime hours, although some heavy vehicle movements at night will be required to support night-time construction works (when these are required for safety reasons or to minimise disruption to the road network).

In assessing feasible and reasonable mitigation measures, an increase of up to 2 dB represents a minor impact that is considered barely perceptible to the average person. On this basis, traffic NMLs set at 2 dB above the existing road traffic noise levels during the daytime and night-time periods are considered appropriate to identify the onset of potential traffic noise impacts. This 2 dB allowance corresponds to an increase in existing traffic flows of approximately 60%.

While details regarding specific traffic diversion routes are yet to be confirmed, it is understood that diversion routes will primarily be via arterial roads whereby increased traffic flows are not likely to exceed existing traffic flows by 60%. It is therefore expected that increased traffic noise due to traffic diversions is likely to be less than the 2 dB allowance at all locations.

4 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ASSESSMENT

4.1 Equipment Sound Power Levels

The proposed works comprise the various construction scenarios detailed in Table 1. Sound Power Level data for individual items of plant and equipment are provided in Appendix B.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 19


4.2 Correction Factors

The CNVMP requires that construction activities which have been proven to be “annoying” have a 5 dB penalty applied to them. The CNVMP identifies the following activities as being particularly annoying and as such, a 5 dB correction has been incorporated into the noise modelling process for them.

Use of power saws, such as used for cutting road pavement

Jackhammers/rock breakers

4.3 Construction Noise Assessment

Construction noise levels have been predicted at all receiver locations in the vicinity of the proposed works. The resultant range of worst-case LAeq(15minute) noise level predictions are presented in Table 6 for the daytime period together with the predicted worst-case range of noise exceedances

above the nominated NMLs. The full set of predicted worst-case noise levels for each receiver location is presented in Appendix C, while Appendix D presents a graphical representation of these noise levels. Appendix E presents a graphical representation of the predicted worst-case range of

noise exceedances above the nominated NMLs. Where exceedances of the nominated NMLs have been predicted, mitigation measures and work practices as described in Section 5 would be

implemented in order to manage construction noise emissions.

The calculated noise levels will inevitably depend on the number of plant items operating at any one time and their precise location relative to the receiver of interest. In practice, the noise levels are likely to vary due to the fact that plant would move about the worksites and would not all be operating concurrently at all times. As such, noise levels are likely to be lower than the worst-case noise levels presented in Table 6 for substantial periods of time during the works.

When referencing the predicted noise levels, it should be noted that the work scenarios as assessed represent one way of a number of alternatives in which the works may proceed. The contractor completing the works may choose to implement a methodology that differs from that which is assessed in this report. The noise levels as assessed are however considered to represent a worst-case scenario. Figure 4 presents the sound pressure levels (SPLs) associated with various sound

power levels (SWLs) with respect to distance in order to provide guidance to the contractor in the case of implementing methodology which differs from that assessed in this report.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 20


Figure 4 Sound Pressure Level vs Distance

Table 6 Summary of Worst-case Construction Noise Predictions per Task (dBA)

Task Predicted Worst Case Daytime LAeq Noise Level

Worst Case NML Exceedance

Residential Commercial

Site Establishment 76 dBA 10 dB 6 dB

Tree & vegetation Removal 85 dBA 18 dB 15 dB

Demolition of buildings & yard slabs 76 dBA 13 dB 5 dB

Utilities Works 72 dBA 6 dB 2 dB

Site Remediation 71 dBA 4 dB 1 dB

Piling 71 dBA 5 dB 1 dB

Civil construction 69 dBA 3 dB -

Track Works 69 dBA 4 dB -

Building works 69 dBA 3 dB -

Roads and carpark 72 dBA 6 dB -

4.3.1 Discussion

Given the particularly small offset distance in some instances, a number of the proposed works are predicted to result in high noise impacts with correspondingly high exceedances of the Noise Management Levels at the nearest receivers.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 21


The highest noise impacts are predicted to occur during tree and vegetation removal, with predicted noise levels of up to 85 dBA during the daytime period. It should be noted that the presented noise predictions represent a worst-case scenario whereby the noisiest items of plant and equipment are located immediately adjacent to each individual receiver. These items would be immediately adjacent to each individual receiver for a relatively short duration (typically less than one week) and as the items move further away, the noise and vibration levels would be significantly lower. This relationship of sound pressure level vs distance is illustrated in Figure 4.

4.3.2 Cumulative Noise Impacts

Given the strategic programming of the staged construction works, cumulative noise impacts are expected to be minimal. In scenarios where a number of tasks are scheduled to be undertaken at the same time (for instance, during track and track slab works and the construction of access roads between March and June 2017), a worst-case increase of 3 dB in the predicted noise levels may be observed at the nearest affected receiver. Notwithstanding, this situation would only occur if the noisiest plant/equipment associated with the tasks were to be used concurrently and in very close proximity to each other. In reality, it is likely that equipment will be spread out across the full area of the site and that the operational timing of equipment use will differ between each task. Accordingly, cumulative noise impacts are expected to be minimal, typically being less than 1 dB.

4.3.3 Highly Noise Affected Receivers

Any individual receiver which is predicted to experience noise levels greater than 75 dBA is considered ‘highly noise affected’ as defined in the CNVMP. Table 6 shows that site establishment,

tree and vegetation removal and the demolition of buildings and yard slabs have the potential to expose the nearest receivers to such noise levels.

5 MITIGATION MEASURES AND WORK PRACTICES

The expected exceedances may be concerning for surrounding residents and particular effort should be directed towards the implementation of all feasible and reasonable noise mitigation and management strategies.

The exceedances are also sufficient to require consideration of mitigation measures. A summary of the requirement for noise mitigation is provided in Table 7.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 22


Table 7 Mitigation Measures Matrix - Airborne Construction Noise

Time Period Mitigation Measure

LAeq(15minute) Noise Level above NML

0 to 5 dBA

Noticeable

5 to 15 dBA

Clearly Audible

15 to 25 dBA

Moderately Intrusive

>25 dBA

Highly Intrusive

Standard Mon-Fri (6:00 am - 6:00 pm) - - B, LB, M B, LB, M

Sat (8:00 am - 5:00 pm)

Sun/Pub Hol (Nil)

OOHW Period 1

Mon-Fri (6:00 pm - 10:00 pm) - LB B, M, LB B, M, IB, LB, RO, PC, SN

Sat (7:00 am - 8:00 am) & (5:00 pm - 10:00 pm)

Sun/Pub Hol (8:00 am - 6:00 pm)

OOHW Period 2

Mon-Fri (10:00 pm - 7:00 am) LB M, LB B, M, IB, LB, PC, SN

B, M, IB, LB, PC, SN

Sat (10:00 pm - 8:00 am)

Sun/Pub Hol (6:00 pm - 7:00 am)

Note: The following abbreviations are used: Noise Barrier (B), Monitoring (M), Individual briefings (IB), Letter box drops

(LB), Project specific respite offer (RO), Phone calls (PC), Specific notifications (SN).

The applicable mitigation measures for the various construction scenarios should be determined from the noise levels presented in Table 6 in conjunction with the mitigation measures assessment matrix presented in Table 7 for each receiver.

Where reasonable and feasible, additional best practice noise mitigation measures would also be implemented, including:

Maximising the offset distance between noisy plant items and nearby noise sensitive receivers.

Avoiding the coincidence of noisy plant working simultaneously close together and adjacent to sensitive receivers.

Minimising consecutive works in the same locality.

Orienting equipment away from noise sensitive areas.

Carrying out loading and unloading away from noise sensitive areas.

Where possible, using plant and equipment which have been designed to include noise controls such as efficient silencers and low noise mufflers.

In addition, consultation should be undertaken on a site-by-site basis through the Community Reference Group and Business Reference Group in order to identify additional periods of heightened sensitivity to noise, such as school examination periods. These periods would be treated as “OOHW Period 2” works as presented in Table 7 and the applicable mitigation measures determined

accordingly.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 23


5.1 Restricting Works

5.1.1 Respite Periods

High noise and vibration generating activities, including the use of rockbreakers and road-saws would be scheduled between the following hours:

8.00 am and 12.00 pm Monday to Friday;

2.00 pm and 5.00 pm Monday to Friday; and

8.00 am and 12.00 pm Saturdays.

In addition, these activities would only be carried out in continuous blocks, not exceeding 3 hours each, with a minimum respite period of one hour between each block.

5.1.2 Alternative Construction Methodology

Given the nature of the proposed works and the type of receivers adjacent to the work zones (in some cases multi-story unit buildings), a combination of various mitigation measures would be applied, including but not limited to the use of relocatable noise barriers.

Correctly designed and constructed barriers (of solid construction using appropriate materials, such as 16 mm form plywood, 25 mm timber without gaps, or other proprietary products such as noise blankets) have been credibly demonstrated on other construction projects to achieve noise reduction of up to 15 dB. Relocatable barriers of such construction would be used in close proximity to noise intensive plant and equipment (including rockhammers and road saws) and fixed plant (such a diesel generators and pumps) where feasible, and considering the access and ventilation requirements of the equipment.

5.2 On-Site Noise Controls

5.3 Noise Auditing and Reporting

In order to document and manage site noise emissions, a daily log of construction activities would be kept onsite by the site manager. In addition, informal noise audits would be conducted as follows:

On a weekly basis during the noisiest proposed task to be undertaken during that week.

Whenever an item of “noise intensive” plant or equipment is brought onto site for the first time. For the purpose of internal noise audits, any item of plant or equipment with Sound Power Level (SWL) greater than 110 dBA as presented in Appendix B would be considered to be potentially

“noise intensive”.

In response to any complaint.

The internal noise audits would record the following information as a minimum:

All noise audits:

Name of auditor and site manager.

Details of the instrument used for the measurement including make, model, serial number and last calibration date.

Date and time of test.

Weather condition during test, including air temperature, wind speed, wind direction and details of rain/wet conditions if applicable.

Plant and equipment operating at the time of measurement.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 24


Weekly noise audits:

Measured 15 minute noise level at both the site boundary and nearest affected receiver, including LAeq, LAmax and LA90 statistical parameters.

In response to complaints:

The name and contact details of the person making the complaint.

Time of the complaint.

Any other specific details relating to the complaint.

Measured 15 minute noise level at the boundary of the affected receiver including LAeq, LAmax and LA90 statistical parameters.

Plant and equipment noise audits:

LAmax noise level measured at a distance of 7 metres from the item of plant or equipment during normal operation.

The results of all informal noise audits would be submitted to the Environmental Representative who would compile progressive impact assessments as work proceeds.

Site noise emissions required to be monitored on the property of an affected stakeholder (in the instance of a complaint for example), would be undertaken in accordance with the Stakeholder and Community Engagement Plan.

5.4 Offsite Noise Mitigation Measures

5.4.1 Permanent Offsite Mitigation

Condition of Approval C11 requires an Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan (ONVMP) to be produced which will identify receivers considered to be highly noise affected due to the operation of the CSELR. At the time of writing this CNVIS the ONVMP is yet to be complete, however it is anticipated that a number of receivers will be identified as requiring permanent offsite mitigation, including upgrading existing glazing specifications.

5.4.2 Temporary Offsite Mitigation

The additional noise mitigation measures presented in Table 7 includes the option of Project Specific Respite Offers (RO). The purpose of such an offer is to provide residents with respite during to lengthy periods of noise or vibration. An example of a respite offer might be pre-purchased movie tickets. The provision of this measure would be determined on a case-by-case basis through consultation and negotiation with the relevant stakeholders.

Other temporary offsite mitigation options, such as temporary facade treatments and at-receiver noise barriers have been investigated, however are not considered feasible due to the obstruction of adequate natural ventilation and lighting, and compromising the visual amenity of the treated properties.

5.5 Vibration Management and Monitoring

Additional vibration mitigation measures are described in the CNVMP. These include the time period in which vibration exceedances occur which triggers consideration of each additional mitigation measure (reproduced in Table 8).





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 25


All vibration intensive plant and equipment would, where feasible, be operated at a distance greater than the recommended safe working distance presented in Table 5. Where vibration intensive plant

or equipment is required to be operated within their relevant safe working distance and where alternative plant, equipment or construction methods are not considered feasible, the additional mitigation measures detailed in Table 8 would be implemented.

Table 8 Additional Mitigation Measures Matrix - Ground-borne Vibration

Time Period Mitigation Measures

Predicted Vibration Levels Exceed Maximum Levels

Standard Mon-Fri (6:00 am - 6:00 pm) M, LB

Sat (8:00 am - 5:00 pm)

Sun/Pub Hol (Nil)

OOHW Period 1 Mon-Fri (6:00 pm - 10:00 pm) M, IB, LB, RO, PC, SN

Sat (7:00 am - 8:00 am) & (5:00 pm - 10:00 pm)

Sun/Pub Hol (8:00 am - 6:00 pm)

OOHW Period 2 Mon-Fri (10:00 pm - 7:00 am) M, IB, LB, PC, SN

Sat (10:00 pm - 8:00 am)

Sun/Pub Hol (6:00 pm - 7:00 am)

Note: The following abbreviations are used: Monitoring (M), Individual briefings (IB), Letter box drops (LB), Project

specific respite offer (RO), Phone calls (PC), Specific notifications (SN).

Where it has been determined that vibration monitoring is required, the vibration monitors would include an audible and visual alarm system which would provide instantaneous feedback to equipment operators and site personnel when measured vibration levels approach or exceed the relevant vibration criteria as determined in the CNVMP. Where it is not feasible to include an audible/visual alarm, due to site access restrictions for example, an alternative SMS based alarm system would be adopted.

An “operator warning” alarm would be triggered when measured vibration levels reach 75% of the nominated vibration criteria, while an “operator halt” alarm would be triggered when the measured vibration level exceeds the nominated vibration criteria. In the case of the latter, the equipment operator would be required to stop work immediately and alternative construction techniques, including the use of smaller plant and equipment, be adopted. If it is not considered feasible or reasonable to adopt alternative construction methods, operator-attended vibration monitoring would be conducted by a suitable qualified acoustic consultant and works may proceed with caution under their strict instruction.

Noise management measures described in Section 5.1, in particular the scheduling of works and placement of plant and equipment would also provide benefits with reference to human response to vibration.

It is currently anticipated that vibration monitoring would be required during vibratory rolling, impact rolling and sheet piling works as a minimum.

6 CONCLUSION

Noise and vibration predictions for the construction works associated with the CSELR Project have been undertaken on a worst case basis. The presented noise and vibration levels correspond to operation of the plant and equipment associated with the main construction activities operating at the nearest expected point to each respective receiver.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 26


6.1 Noise Assessment

Due the close proximity of adjacent receivers to the works, the majority of the proposed works are predicted to result in high noise impacts with correspondingly high exceedances of the Noise Management Levels (NMLs) at the nearest receivers.

The predictions indicate that the proposed tasks have potential to exceed the construction NMLs causing a potentially highly intrusive impact at some locations on occasion where sensitive receivers are immediately adjacent to the works locations and would therefore be managed in accordance with mitigation measures as detailed within this report. The noisiest items of plant and equipment are primarily the positrak with mulcher, truck and chipper, 30t excavator with hammer and the road saw/concrete saw. These items typically would be in immediate vicinity to each individual receiver for a relatively short duration and as the items move further away, the noise (and vibration) levels would be significantly lower.

Where exceedances of the NMLs are anticipated or measured, appropriate noise mitigation and management measures would be implemented.

6.2 Vibration Assessment

The vibration predictions indicate that some of the proposed construction plant and equipment have potential to exceed both cosmetic damage and human response vibration criteria.

The use of the smooth drum roller and hydraulic hammer have the greatest potential to generate vibration emissions during the construction of the stabling yard, however, the separation distance from the associated activities to the nearest receivers is likely to be sufficient to mitigate potential impacts in most areas. Care should however be taken when these equipment are required to be used in close proximity to potentially sensitive buildings. The recommended safe working distances for the proposed construction plant and equipment presented are presented in this report. Provided each item of plant and equipment is operated further than the minimum working distances presented for each structure type, it is predicted that compliance with the relevant vibration goals will be achieved.

Where works are required within the safe working distance, alternative methods or equipment would be investigated, together confirmation via vibration monitoring and implementation of appropriate mitigation and management measures.

6.3 Noise and Vibration Management

The expected exceedances may be concerning for surrounding receivers and particular effort would be directed towards the implementation of all feasible and reasonable noise mitigation and management strategies.

Where reasonable, best practice noise mitigation and management measures would be implemented, including:

Standard construction hours would be limited to the less sensitive daytime period.

Maximising the offset distance between noisy plant items and nearby noise sensitive receivers.

Avoiding the coincidence of noisy plant working simultaneously close together and adjacent to sensitive receivers.

Minimising consecutive works in the same locality.

Orienting equipment away from noise sensitive areas.

Carrying out loading and unloading and have stockpiles away from noise sensitive areas.

Where possible, using plant and equipment which have been designed to include noise controls such as efficient silencers and low noise mufflers.





23 June 2016

Revision 0 Page 27


Having assessed the best practice noise measures, noise exceedances are still anticipated. Accordingly, addition noise management measures would also be implemented to engage, inform and provide Project-specific messages to the community, recognising that advanced warning of potential disruptions can assist in reducing the impact. Further, consultation would be undertaken on a site-by-site basis through the Community Reference Group and Business Reference Group in order to identify additional periods of heightened sensitivity to noise, such as school examination periods, and the applicable mitigation measures determined accordingly.

Appendix A Report 610.14954

Page 1 of 2

Acoustic Terminology

(Appendix A.docm) SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

1 Sound Level or Noise Level

The terms ‘sound’ and ‘noise’ are almost interchangeable, except that in common usage ‘noise’ is often used to refer to unwanted sound.

Sound (or noise) consists of minute fluctuations in atmospheric pressure capable of evoking the sense of hearing. The human ear responds to changes in sound pressure over a very wide range. The loudest sound pressure to which the human ear responds is ten million times greater than the softest. The decibel (abbreviated as dB) scale reduces this ratio to a more manageable size by the use of logarithms.

The symbols SPL, L or LP are commonly used to represent Sound Pressure Level. The symbol LA represents A-weighted Sound Pressure Level. The standard reference unit for Sound Pressure Levels expressed in decibels is 2 x 10-5 Pa.

2 ‘A’ Weighted Sound Pressure Level

The overall level of a sound is usually expressed in terms of dBA, which is measured using a sound level meter with an ‘A-weighting’ filter. This is an electronic filter having a frequency response corresponding approximately to that of human hearing.

People’s hearing is most sensitive to sounds at mid frequencies (500 Hz to 4000 Hz), and less sensitive at lower and higher frequencies. Thus, the level of a sound in dBA is a good measure of the loudness of that sound. Different sources having the same dBA level generally sound about equally loud.

A change of 1 dBA or 2 dBA in the level of a sound is difficult for most people to detect, whilst a 3 dBA to 5 dBA change corresponds to a small but noticeable change in loudness. A 10 dBA change corresponds to an approximate doubling or halving in loudness. The table below lists examples of typical noise levels

Sound Pressure Level (dBA)

Typical Source

Subjective Evaluation

130 Threshold of pain Intolerable

120 Heavy rock concert Extremely noisy

110 Grinding on steel

100 Loud car horn at 3 m Very noisy

90 Construction site with pneumatic hammering

80 Kerbside of busy street Loud

70 Loud radio or television

60 Department store Moderate to quiet

50 General Office

40 Inside private office Quiet to very quiet

30 Inside bedroom

20 Recording studio Almost silent

Other weightings (eg B, C and D) are less commonly used than A-weighting. Sound Levels measured without any weighting are referred to as ‘linear’, and the units are expressed as dB(lin) or dB.

3 Sound Power Level

The Sound Power of a source is the rate at which it emits acoustic energy. As with Sound Pressure Levels, Sound Power Levels are expressed in decibel units (dB or dBA), but may be identified by the symbols SWL or LW, or by the reference unit 10-12 W.

The relationship between Sound Power and Sound Pressure may be likened to an electric radiator, which is characterised by a power rating, but has an effect on the surrounding environment that can be measured in terms of a different parameter, temperature.

4 Statistical Noise Levels

Sounds that vary in level over time, such as transportation noise and most community noise, are commonly described in terms of the statistical exceedance levels LAN, where LAN is the A-weighted sound pressure level exceeded for N% of a given measurement period. For example, the LA1 is the noise level exceeded for 1% of the time, LA10 the noise exceeded for 10% of the time, and so on.

The following figure presents a hypothetical 15 minute noise survey, illustrating various common statistical indices of interest.

LA1

LA10

LA90

LAeq

LAmax

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

00:00 05:00 10:00 15:00

Monitoring or Survey Period (minutes)

So

un

d P

ressu

re L

evel

(d

BA

)

Of particular relevance, are:

LA1 The noise level exceeded for 1% of the 15 minute interval.

LA10 The noise level exceed for 10% of the 15 minute interval. This is commonly referred to as the average maximum noise level.

LA90 The noise level exceeded for 90% of the sample period. This noise level is described as the average minimum background sound level (in the absence of the source under consideration), or simply the background level.

LAeq The A-weighted equivalent noise level (basically the average noise level). It is defined as the steady sound level that contains the same amount of acoustical energy as the corresponding time-varying sound.

When dealing with numerous days of statistical noise data, it is sometimes necessary to define the typical noise levels at a given monitoring location for a particular time of day. A standardised method is available for determining these representative levels.

This method produces a level representing the ‘repeatable minimum’ LA90 noise level over the daytime and night-time measurement periods, as required by the EPA. In addition the method produces mean or ‘average’ levels representative of the other descriptors (LAeq, LA10, etc).

5 Tonality

Tonal noise contains one or more prominent tones (ie distinct frequency components), and is normally regarded as more offensive than ‘broad band’ noise.

6 Impulsiveness

Appendix A Report 610.14954

Page 2 of 2

Acoustic Terminology

(Appendix A.docm) SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

An impulsive noise is characterised by one or more short sharp peaks in the time domain, such as occurs during hammering.

7 Frequency Analysis

Frequency analysis is the process used to examine the tones (or frequency components) which make up the overall noise or vibration signal. This analysis was traditionally carried out using analogue electronic filters, but is now normally carried out using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysers.

The units for frequency are Hertz (Hz), which represent the number of cycles per second.

Frequency analysis can be in:

Octave bands (where the centre frequency and width of each band is double the previous band)

1/3 octave bands (3 bands in each octave band)

Narrow band (where the spectrum is divided into 400 or more bands of equal width)

The following figure shows a 1/3 octave band frequency analysis where the noise is dominated by the 200 Hz band. Note that the indicated level of each individual band is less than the overall level, which is the logarithmic sum of the bands.

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

125

160

200

250

315

400

500

630

800

100

0

1250

160

0

2000

250

0

3150

Overa

ll

1/3 Octave Band Centre Frequency (Hz)

So

un

d P

ressu

re L

evel

(dB

A)

8 Vibration

Vibration may be defined as cyclic or transient motion. This motion can be measured in terms of its displacement, velocity or acceleration. Most assessments of human response to vibration or the risk of damage to buildings use measurements of vibration velocity. These may be expressed in terms of ‘peak’ velocity or ‘rms’ velocity.

The former is the maximum instantaneous velocity, without any averaging, and is sometimes referred to as ‘peak particle velocity’, or PPV. The latter incorporates ‘root mean squared’ averaging over some defined time period.

Vibration measurements may be carried out in a single axis or alternatively as triaxial measurements. Where triaxial measurements are used, the axes are commonly designated vertical, longitudinal (aligned toward the source) and transverse.

The common units for velocity are millimetres per second (mm/s). As with noise, decibel units can also be used, in which case the reference level should always be stated. A vibration level V, expressed in mm/s can be converted to decibels by the formula 20 log (V/Vo), where Vo is the reference level (10-9 m/s). Care is required in this regard, as other reference levels may be used by some organizations.

9 Human Perception of Vibration

People are able to ‘feel’ vibration at levels lower than those required to cause even superficial damage to the most susceptible classes of building (even though they may not be disturbed by the motion). An individual's perception of motion or response to vibration depends very strongly on previous experience and expectations, and on other connotations associated with the perceived source of the vibration. For example, the vibration that a person responds to as ‘normal’ in a car, bus or train is considerably higher than what is perceived as ‘normal’ in a shop, office or dwelling.

10 Ground-borne Noise, Structure-borne Noise and Regenerated Noise

Noise that propagates through a structure as vibration and is radiated by vibrating wall and floor surfaces is termed ‘structure-borne noise’, ‘ground-borne noise’ or ‘regenerated noise’. This noise originates as vibration and propagates between the source and receiver through the ground and/or building structural elements, rather than through the air.

Typical sources of ground-borne or structure-borne noise include tunnelling works, underground railways, excavation plant (eg rockbreakers), and building services plant (eg fans, compressors and generators).

The following figure presents the various paths by which vibration and ground-borne noise may be transmitted between a source and receiver for construction activities occurring within a tunnel.

The term ‘regenerated noise’ is also used in other instances where energy is converted to noise away from the primary source. One example would be a fan blowing air through a discharge grill. The fan is the energy source and primary noise source. Additional noise may be created by the aerodynamic effect of the discharge grill in the airstream. This secondary noise is referred to as regenerated noise.

Appendix B 610.14954 CNVIS – Rozelle Stabling Yard

Equipment Sound Power Levels


Plant/Equipment

Sound Power Level

(SWL dBA)

LAeq(15 minute)

Sound Pressure Level

(SPL dBA) at 7 m

LAeq(15 minute)

20 kVa generators 92 67

20t Excavator - with auger 99 74

20t hi-rail diggers 99 74

30t Excavator 104 79

30t Excavator with hammer 119 94

30t Piling Rig (Bored piles with casing) 99 74

80t all terrain crane 101 76

Asphalt Paver - 3m wide 104 79

Bogie truck 97 72

Chainsaw 108 83

Concrete crusher 111 86

Concrete pump - medium size (30m boom) 106 81

Concrete Trucks 106 81

Concrete vibrators 102 77

Daymaker - Light tower 83 58

Diesel Air compressor 250-600cfm (w/blower) 98 73

Dozer D6 108 83

Dump trucks 96 71

Excavator - 14t with grabs 95 70

Excavator - 20t with bucket 99 74



Float truck 100 75

Forklift 101 76

Franna - 25t 93 68

Front end loader 104 79

Gerni 110 85

Grinders & welding gear 80 55

Grout mixer 106 81

Hiab truck 98 73

Knuckle boom 92 67

Large Generator (350kVa) 110 85

Light vehicle 90 65

Line marking truck 106 81

LPG Burners 94 69

Manitou 96 71

Mini-Excavator - 5t with bucket 89 64

Mini-Excavator - 8t with hammer 115 90

Mini-roller 104 79

Positrak with mulcher 120 95

Power Saws 113 88

Rail Grinder (5hp) 116 91

Rattle-guns 99 74

Road saw/concrete saw 119 94

Scissorlifts / Boom Lifts (up to 20m) 92 67

Semi trailer 106 81

Slipform Concrete Paver 97 72

smooth drum roller 100 75

Sweeper truck 98 73

Tilt tray truck 103 78

Truck 103 78

Truck & Dogs 106 81

Truck and chipper 120 95

Vac Trucks 110 85

Vibe-plate 108 83

Vibro-screeds 96 71

Water truck 103 78

Appendix C 610.14954 CNVIS – Rozelle Stabling Yard

Predicted Noise Levels


Name NCA Usage Day Evening Night Sleep Dist Site Establishment

Tree &

vegetation

Removal

Demolition of

buildings

& yard slabs Utilities Works Site Remediation Piling Civil construction Track Works Building works

Roads and

carpark

44 HALLORAN STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 COM 70 70 70 - 76 85 75 72 71 71 67 68 65 70

36-40 HALLORAN STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 COM 70 70 70 - 70 79 72 66 64 65 60 63 63 63



73-75 LILYFIELD ROAD ROZELLE NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 53 62 58 49 48 48 43 51 50 46

142 CECILY STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 55 63 60 51 49 50 46 52 52 49




134A CECILY STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 48 57 58 44 43 43 41 45 51 44







96 RYAN STREET LILYFIEL NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 59 68 64 55 53 54 54 55 56 57






81 RYAN STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 61 70 67 57 56 56 55 57 59 58




77-79 LILYFIELD ROAD LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 67 75 70 62 61 62 65 60 62 68

82 LAMB STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 65 74 68 61 59 60 59 59 61 62

80A LAMB STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 65 73 68 60 59 60 60 59 60 63




81 LILYFIELD ROAD LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 75 83 76 71 69 70 69 65 69 72

81A LILYFIELD ROAD LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 74 82 75 69 68 69 68 65 67 71






62-84 JUSTIN STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 74 83 75 70 69 69 68 68 67 71

79 JUSTIN STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 76 84 74 72 70 71 67 69 66 70












35 HALLORAN STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 75 84 73 71 70 70 64 65 62 67









26 GARNET AVENUE LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 66 75 69 62 61 61 57 59 59 60










73-79 RYAN STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 60 69 65 56 55 55 52 56 57 55









101-103 CECILY STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 53 61 60 49 47 48 36 48 53 39





















24 TREVOR STREET LILYFIELD NCA06.2 RES 66 60 52 62 60 68 65 56 54 55 53 56 52 57





NML

Predicted LAeq (15 minute) Noise Level - Daytime

\\AU405L\C:\Users\rwakeling\Desktop\610.14954 Light Rail CNVIS\Appendix C\Appendix C Randwick 20150812.xlsm

Rozelle Printed 21-04-2016 2:35 PMSLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Appendix D 610.14954 CNVIS – Rozelle Stabling Yard

Predicted Noise Level Maps


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_S

iteEs

t_02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m

Projec t No.:Date:Draw n by:Scale:Sheet Size:Projec tion:

03/05/2016

GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56

610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250

Ac c iona Infras tru c tu re Au s tralia Pty LtdConstruction Noise Mapping

2 LINCOLN STREETLANE COVE

NEW SOUTH WALES 2066AUSTRALIA

T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200

www.slrconsulting.comThe content contained within this document may be based on third party data.SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not guarantee theaccuracy of such information.

LEGENDDaytime LAeq (15min)

≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I

Note: Indicated noise level relates to the maximum overall construction noise level predicted on any level or façade for each building.

Representative Noise LevelsSite EstablishmentLilyfield Stabling Yard

Sources: Esri, HERE , DeLorme, USGS, In termap,increment P Corp., NRCA N, Esri Japan, METI, E sriChina (Hong Kong), Esri (Tha iland), MapmyIndia, ©OpenS treetMap contribu tors, and the GIS User

JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_V

eg_0

2.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsTree & Vegetation RemovalLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_D

emoli

tion_

02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsDemolitionLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_U

tilitie

sWork

s_02

.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsUtilities WorksLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_R

emed

iation

_02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsSite RemediationLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_P

iling_

02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsPilingLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_C

ivilC

onstr

uctio

n_02

.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsCivil ConstructionLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_T

rack_

02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsTrack WorksLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_B

uildin

g_02

.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsBuilding WorksLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldNo

ise_R

oadC

arpark

_02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 7070 - 75

75 - 8080 - 8585 - 90

90 - 95> 95

I


Representative Noise LevelsRoads and CarparkLilyfield Stabling Yard


Appendix E 610.14954 CNVIS – Rozelle Stabling Yard

Predicted NML Exceedance Maps


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Site

Est_0

2.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m

Project No.:Date:Draw n by:Scale:Sheet Size:Projection:

03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250

Acciona Infrastructure Australia Pty LtdConstruction Noise Mapping



T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200


LEGENDDay Exceedence dBA

≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceSite EstablishmentLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Veg

_02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceTree and Vegetation RemovalLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Dem

olitio

n_02

.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceDemolitionLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Utili

tiesW

orks_

02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceUtilities WorksLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Rem

ediat

ion_0

2.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceSite RemediationLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Pilin

g_02

.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedancePilingLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Civi

lCon

struc

tion_

02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceCivil ConstructionLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Trac

k_02

.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceTrack WorksLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Buil

ding_

02.m

xd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceBuilding WorksLilyfield Stabling Yard


JOSEPH ST

HALLORAN ST

GLAD

STON

E ST

PERC

IVAL S

T

LONS

DALE

ST

CATH

ERIN

E ST

TREVOR ST

BEAMES ST

PRET

ORIA

ST

PIPER ST

POINT ST

GARNET AVE

STAR

LING

ST

RUSS

ELL S

TAIN

SWOR

TH ST

BRENAN ST

WHITE

ST

EDWARD ST

HELENA STERIC ST

BALMAIN RD

LILYFIELD RD

ALBERT STCASHMAN ST

HUTCHESON ST

GROVE LANE

JUSTIN ST

FOUCART LANE

CECILY ST

MARY ST

LAMB ST

MAIDA ST

GROVE ST

DENISON ST

MAY ST

WHARF RD

O'NEILL LANE

RYAN ST

O'NEILL ST

THE BOULEVARDE

ORANGE GROVE PLZA

CARRINGTON ST

ALICE ST

FOUCART ST

ANNA

NDAL

E ST

GRAY ST

BREIL

LAT S

T

W EYN TO N L ANE

PRITC

HARD

ST

BREIL

LAT L

ANE

ROSE ST

BAYVIEW CR

PRITC

HARD

LANE

HU TC H IN SO N ST

YOUN

G ST

RAILWAY PDE

PIPER

LANE

F:\02

. Proj

ect D

ata\Sy

dLigh

tRail

\2016

0503

\SLR6

1014

954_

Lilyfi

eldEx

_Roa

dCarp

ark_0

2.mxd

0 20 40 60 80 100m


03/05/2016


610.14954.00500

NT

A31:3,250




T: 61 2 9427 8100F: 61 2 9427 8200



≤ 01 - 5

5 - 1515 - 25> 25

I


Representative ExceedanceRoads and CarparkLilyfield Stabling Yard


Date post:	14-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	lamnhan
View:	218 times
Download:	1 times

Sydney Light Rail Projectdata.sydneylightrail.transport.nsw.gov.au/s3fs-public/CONSTRUCTIO… ·...

Documents